+ All Categories
Home > Documents > SEM Summit ‘09 Framing Our Discussions: Partnering to Harmonize Enrolment Management Susan...

SEM Summit ‘09 Framing Our Discussions: Partnering to Harmonize Enrolment Management Susan...

Date post: 02-Jan-2016
Category:
Upload: teresa-lewis
View: 218 times
Download: 5 times
Share this document with a friend
39
SEM Summit ‘09 SEM Summit ‘09 Framing Our Discussions: Partnering to Harmonize Enrolment Management Susan Gottheil, Mount Royal College Clayton Smith, University of Windsor 1 © Gottheil/Smith
Transcript

SEM Summit ‘09SEM Summit ‘09SEM Summit ‘09SEM Summit ‘09

Framing Our Discussions:Partnering to Harmonize Enrolment Management

Susan Gottheil, Mount Royal CollegeClayton Smith, University of Windsor

1© Gottheil/Smith

SEM Summit ‘09SEM Summit ‘09SEM Summit ‘09SEM Summit ‘09

2© Gottheil/Smith

TopicsTopics WelcomeWelcome

IntroductionsIntroductions

Setting the toneSetting the tone

A bit about SEMA bit about SEM

Importance of partneringImportance of partnering

SEM Summit ‘09SEM Summit ‘09SEM Summit ‘09SEM Summit ‘09

Setting the Tone Our unique discussion style

• The discussion leader will take 10-20 minutes or so to frame the issue

• This will be followed by a facilitated discussion of the topic

Notes will be taken, with a summary placed to our web site (www.uwindsor.ca/sem) at the conclusion of the Summit

3© Gottheil/Smith

SEM Summit ‘09SEM Summit ‘09SEM Summit ‘09SEM Summit ‘09

Setting the Tone (Cont’d) A written compilation of our thoughts will

be developed, which will create a jumping off place for further Canadian SEM discussions

Lots of great discussion, opportunities for networking: The SEM Summit Way!

4© Gottheil/Smith

SEM Summit ‘09SEM Summit ‘09SEM Summit ‘09SEM Summit ‘09

First, A bit About SEM…

5© Gottheil/Smith

SEM Summit ‘09SEM Summit ‘09SEM Summit ‘09SEM Summit ‘09

Definition of SEM

Strategic enrollment management (SEM) is a concept and process that enables the fulfillment of institutional mission and students’ educational goals.

-Bontrager, 2009

6© Gottheil/Smith

SEM Summit ‘09SEM Summit ‘09SEM Summit ‘09SEM Summit ‘09

7© Gottheil/Smith

The Purposes of SEM are Achieved by…

Establishing clear goals for the number and types of students needed to fulfill the institutional mission

Promoting students’ academic success by improving access, transition, persistence, and graduation

Promoting institutional success by enabling effective strategic and financial planning

SEM Summit ‘09SEM Summit ‘09SEM Summit ‘09SEM Summit ‘09

8© Gottheil/Smith

The Purposes of SEM are Achieved by… Creating a data-rich environment to inform

decisions and evaluate strategies

Improving process, organizational and financial efficiency and outcomes

Strengthening communications and marketing with internal and external stakeholders

Increasing collaboration among departments across the campus to support the enrolment program

SEM Summit ‘09SEM Summit ‘09SEM Summit ‘09SEM Summit ‘09

Some Core SEM Concepts…

9© Gottheil/Smith

SEM Summit ‘09SEM Summit ‘09SEM Summit ‘09SEM Summit ‘09

10© Gottheil/Smith

The Concept of Optimum The Concept of Optimum EnrolmentEnrolment

Physical Capacity

Undergrad/Grad

International

Program Capacity

Special Skills

AcademicProfiles

Majors

Ethnicity

InstitutionalMission

SEM Summit ‘09SEM Summit ‘09SEM Summit ‘09SEM Summit ‘09

11© Gottheil/Smith

SEM Summit ‘09SEM Summit ‘09SEM Summit ‘09SEM Summit ‘09

12© Gottheil/Smith

Institutional Mission &Institutional Mission &Enrolment Goals Are Determined By:Enrolment Goals Are Determined By:

Programs Programs offeredoffered

Historical Historical status status

NicheNicheWeaknessesWeaknesses

StrengthsStrengths

Range of Range of influenceinfluence

Aspirational Aspirational statusstatus

Current Current competitive competitive

statusstatus

…with consideration to institutional differentiation!

SEM Summit ‘09SEM Summit ‘09SEM Summit ‘09SEM Summit ‘09

13© Gottheil/Smith

Traditional Enrollment Perspective

Recruitment/ Marketing

Admission

OrientationCo-curricular

Support

Academic Support

RetentionFinancial Support

Classroom Experience

The Student Success Continuum

Student’s College CareerAttain

Degree/Goal

SEM Summit ‘09SEM Summit ‘09SEM Summit ‘09SEM Summit ‘09

14© Gottheil/Smith

The SEM Perspective

Recruitment/ Marketing

Admission

OrientationCo-curricular

Support

Academic Support

RetentionFinancial Support

Classroom Experience

The Student Success Continuum

Student’s College Career AttainDegree/Goal

SEM Summit ‘09SEM Summit ‘09SEM Summit ‘09SEM Summit ‘09

15© Gottheil/Smith

Starting point for long term

success

SEM Planning Model

Typical starting point

MeetingGoals

Tactics

Strategies

DATA

Clear Mission and Goals

Enrollment InfrastructureStructure, Staffing, Skills, Systems,

Service

SEM Summit ‘09SEM Summit ‘09SEM Summit ‘09SEM Summit ‘09

16© Gottheil/Smith

The Enrolment Funnel is Different for Different StudentsStudent Type:•New Immigrants•International Students•First Generation Students•Rural Students•Francophone Students•Students with Disabilities•Dislocated Workers•Sole Support Mothers•Low-income Students•Minority Students•High-Achieving Students

SEM Summit ‘09SEM Summit ‘09SEM Summit ‘09SEM Summit ‘09

17© Gottheil/Smith

A Few Ways to Look at SEM

SEM Summit ‘09SEM Summit ‘09SEM Summit ‘09SEM Summit ‘09

18© Gottheil/Smith

Gov’t Grants& ExternalFunding

“Capacity Development Loop” “Delivery Loop”

Demand forPrograms &

Courses

+

+

StudentRetention +

Programs & Courses

Completed

+

-

ReasonsFor Not

Continuing+

+

Students Graduated, Transferred, Hired

++Gov’t Approval For

Credit Programs

=

Programs & Courses Offered

+

=

+Tuition &

Other Sources Of Revenue

+

+

CoursesEnrolled

Student Attrition

+=

Programs & Courses Developed &

Approved

+

+

+

=

CoursesTaught

+ or -

-Seto, 2008

SEM Summit ‘09SEM Summit ‘09SEM Summit ‘09SEM Summit ‘09

19© Gottheil/Smith

Enrolment Management System

InstitutionalGoals

Environmental Factors

StudentCharacteristics

Institutional Objectives

InstitutionalStrategies

Desired Outcomes

Enduring Effect

Enduring Behaviour

Member ofunderservedstudent group

Beliefs & values

Academic preparation

Motivation to learn

Educationalaspirations

Self-discipline

Adaptability

Interpersonal skills

Peer involvement

Ability to pay

Study habits

Family & peerSupport

Studentenrolmentbehaviour

Demographictrends

Competition

PublicAccountability(loan default rate,graduation,Accessibility,retention)

Studentgeographic draw

EconomicTrends

Off-campusemploymentavailability

Federal &provincial polices

QuantitativeGoals

QualitativeGoals

Diversity Goals

PersistenceGoals

CapacityGoals

Net RevenueGoals

Student headcount

Admission averageTransfer GPA

Visible minorities,Aboriginal, international

Retention rates,StudentSatisfaction,graduation rates

Classroom capacity,adequate sections,Class size

Financial aid discount rate,internationalenrolment

•Marketing•Recruitment•Admission•Financial aid/pricing•Orientation•Residence•Athletics•First Year•Experience•Advising•Supplemental instruction•Service learning•Learning communities•Academic support•Peer support•Teaching & learning approaches•Student engagement•SEM organization•Data mining

Awareness

Interest

Commitment

Enrolment

Persistence

Satisfaction

Education

Relationship

InstitutionalLoyalty

Institutional Image

Adapted from: Kuh et al , 2007; Black, 2003

SEM Summit ‘09SEM Summit ‘09SEM Summit ‘09SEM Summit ‘09

20© Gottheil/Smith

SEM Summit ‘09SEM Summit ‘09SEM Summit ‘09SEM Summit ‘09

21© Gottheil/Smith

Major SEM Components

Accessibility

Accountability

Admission Policies

Financial Aid

Geographic Draw

Enrolment Marketing

Organization

Planning

Recruitment

Retention

SEM Summit ‘09SEM Summit ‘09SEM Summit ‘09SEM Summit ‘09

22© Gottheil/Smith

SEM Started in the U.S. Started in the late 1970’s at Boston College

• As a result of declining traditional student enrolments

Early focus on attracting new students (e.g., returning adults, women, minorities, low-income)

Expanded to all types of PSE institutions (e.g., public, private, 2-year, 4-year, grad)

SEM Summit ‘09SEM Summit ‘09SEM Summit ‘09SEM Summit ‘09

23© Gottheil/Smith

SEM Started in the U.S. (Cont’d) Grew to include student success

• First-Year Experience programs

• Increased levels of student engagement

Increasing emphasis on connecting with institutional financial management

Now the concern of the senior leadership team – presidents, provost, deans

SEM Summit ‘09SEM Summit ‘09SEM Summit ‘09SEM Summit ‘09

24© Gottheil/Smith

Emergence of SEM in Canada

Slower emergence of SEM in Canada

Driven by funding cuts, lack of revenue, heavier reliance on tuition, changing demographics

Many Canadian institutions have now adopted SEM in name, practice or both

• We’re attending webinars, workshops & conferences

• Some of us are working with consultants

SEM Summit ‘09SEM Summit ‘09SEM Summit ‘09SEM Summit ‘09

Importance of Partnering…

25

SEM Summit ‘09SEM Summit ‘09SEM Summit ‘09SEM Summit ‘09

What SEM factors are most associated with institutions successfully reaching their enrolment goals?

26© Gottheil/Smith

SEM Summit ‘09SEM Summit ‘09SEM Summit ‘09SEM Summit ‘09

SEM Summit ‘09SEM Summit ‘09SEM Summit ‘09SEM Summit ‘09

Methodology Mail survey sent to enrolment managers at 500 two- and four-year

(public and private) undergraduate institutions, with the following response rates:

• 4-year public: 53%

• 4-year private: 53%

• 2-year public: 55%

• 2-year private: 49%

Multiple regression techniques were used to determine the relationship between the 12 individual enrolment management factors (identified by Dolence) and enrolment manager perceptions of enrolment performance (recruitment/retention)

An analysis was conducted for each of the 4 institutional stratifications

28© Gottheil/Smith

SEM Summit ‘09SEM Summit ‘09SEM Summit ‘09SEM Summit ‘09

Variable Change in R Squared

Significant at the 0.05 level

Assessment 0.011 *

Comprehensiveness 0.003

Definitions/Classifications 0.029

Documentation 0.000

Evaluation 0.004 *

Key Performance Indicators 0.019

Leadership 0.007

Participation & Integration 0.417 *

Resources 0.009

Strategies 0.093 *

Systems 0.003

Timing 0.058 * 29

© Gottheil/Smith

Four-Year Public Institutions

SEM Summit ‘09SEM Summit ‘09SEM Summit ‘09SEM Summit ‘09

Variable Change in R Squared

Significant at the 0.05 level

Assessment 0.064

Comprehensiveness 0.011

Definitions/Classifications 0.004 *

Documentation 0.006

Evaluation 0.013

Key Performance Indicators 0.029 *

Leadership 0.005

Participation & Integration 0.312 *

Resources 0.061

Strategies 0.025

Systems 0.115 *

Timing 0.04931

© Gottheil/Smith

Two-Year Public Institutions

SEM Summit ‘09SEM Summit ‘09SEM Summit ‘09SEM Summit ‘09

33© Gottheil/Smith

Participation & integration is the most important factor at both 4-year and 2-year public institutions in sustaining long-term SEM success.

-Smith, 1997

SEM Summit ‘09SEM Summit ‘09SEM Summit ‘09SEM Summit ‘09

34© Gottheil/Smith

What is Participation & Integration?

Participation of senior administration, academic governance, academic administration, faculty and the persons responsible for strategy and tactic implementation

In short, both vertical and horizontal involvement in SEM

SEM Summit ‘09SEM Summit ‘09SEM Summit ‘09SEM Summit ‘09

Some Collaboration is Common

High levels of collaboration generally exist between academic and student affairs activities related to counselling, first-year experience programs, orientation and recruitment

-Kezaar, Hirsh & Burak (2002)

41© Gottheil/Smith

SEM Summit ‘09SEM Summit ‘09SEM Summit ‘09SEM Summit ‘09

However…

Many institutions mistake a series of joint events for true collaboration

To truly be competitive and to meet the rigors of accountability, institutions must go beyond activities and embrace

collaborative dialogue

42© Gottheil/Smith

SEM Summit ‘09SEM Summit ‘09SEM Summit ‘09SEM Summit ‘09

It is time for academic and student affairs professionals alike to realize that it is only through the breaking down of current barriers—real and perceived—that institutions will achieve the outcomes they seek. Through strategic collaboration, both segments…can develop and implement programs and processes that add value and benefit students

43© Gottheil/Smith

-Newton & Smith, 2009

SEM Summit ‘09SEM Summit ‘09SEM Summit ‘09SEM Summit ‘09

Collaborative Dialogue Requires Partnerships with…

Senior Management

Deans, Associate Deans, Dept Heads

Student Affairs

Institutional Research/Analysis

Finance/Budget

Marketing/PR/Communication

44© Gottheil/Smith

SEM Summit ‘09SEM Summit ‘09SEM Summit ‘09SEM Summit ‘09

“What is needed is an adjustment in the lens with which enrollment professionals view (S)EM as a quintessentially academic enterprise.”

45© Gottheil/Smith

-Henderson, 2005

SEM Summit ‘09SEM Summit ‘09SEM Summit ‘09SEM Summit ‘09

Guiding Principles – SEM Ethos A shared responsibility

Integrated institutional planning

A focus on service

Accountability

Research & evaluation

For the long haul

46© Gottheil/Smith

SEM Summit ‘09SEM Summit ‘09SEM Summit ‘09SEM Summit ‘09

Questions & Comments

47


Recommended