+ All Categories
Home > Health & Medicine > Seminar Powerpoint

Seminar Powerpoint

Date post: 12-Jul-2015
Category:
Upload: jbennett1919
View: 522 times
Download: 2 times
Share this document with a friend
Popular Tags:
49
CLINICALLY SEVERE OBESITY TIMOTHY CUSTER M.D., F.A.C.S
Transcript
Page 1: Seminar Powerpoint

CLINICALLY SEVERE

OBESITY

TIMOTHY CUSTER M.D., F.A.C.S

Page 2: Seminar Powerpoint

WHAT IS MORBID

OBESITY?

Page 3: Seminar Powerpoint

BMI CHART

Do You Know Your Own BMI?

5'4"5'4"

He

igh

tH

eig

ht

Weight (lbs)Weight (lbs)

5'25'2""

5'0"5'0"

5'10"5'10"

5'8"5'8"

5'6"5'6"

6'0"6'0"

6'2"6'2"

120120 130130 150150 160160 170170 180180 190190 200200 210210 220220 230230 240240 250250140140 260260 270270 2828

002929

00300300

6'4"6'4"

Page 4: Seminar Powerpoint
Page 5: Seminar Powerpoint

Definitions

Category BMI lbs overweight % US pop

Normal 25 0 30%

Overweight >25 0-35 30%

Obese >30 >35 35%

Morbidly Obese >40 >80 - 100 5% (15 million)

Page 6: Seminar Powerpoint

Morbid Obesity – a “disease”

• Clinically severe obesity = a point at which obesity becomes an independentdisease process and medical conditions occur as a result

this occures at about 100 lbs

over ideal body weight or BMI 40

Page 7: Seminar Powerpoint

OBESITY IS A WORLDWIDE EPIDEMIC

Page 8: Seminar Powerpoint

Consequences of Obesity

Page 9: Seminar Powerpoint
Page 10: Seminar Powerpoint

Consequences of Obesity

• Type II Diabetes 30%

• Hypertension 50%

• CAD/ CHF 20%

• Hyperlipidemia 50%

• Respiratory Insuff. 70%

- Sleep Apnea

- Obesity Hypovent Synd

- Asthma

• Intra-abdominal HTN

- GERD

- Stress Incontinence

- Venous Insufficiency

- DVT / PE

- Hernias

Page 11: Seminar Powerpoint

Consequences of Obesity

• Gallstones

• Arthritis 90%

• Infertility

• Hepatosteatosis

• Chronic Skin

Infections

• Pseudotumor Cerebri

• Cancer - 2-3x higher

- Breast

- Endometrial/Cervical

- Colon

- Prostate

• Depression

• Social Rejection

Page 12: Seminar Powerpoint

Clinically severe obesity

Risk of not Having Surgery

0

1

2

3

4

20 25 30 35 40

Mo

rta

lity

Ra

tio

0

1

2

3

4

20 25 30 35 40

Mo

rta

lity

Ra

tio

Increasing BMI

Page 13: Seminar Powerpoint

Mortality of Obesity

• Shortens life by 8 yrs for women and 15 years for men

• Only one in seven with severe obesity reach a normal life span (77y)

• Carries a higher mortality than most cancers

• Current generation is the first to have shorter life expectancy than their parents in 100 yrs

Page 14: Seminar Powerpoint

OBESITY EPIDEMIC

• Obesity responsible for >$100 billion in

medical costs per yr

• US was first in life span in 1900, now

LAST among developed nations

• Current generation predicted to have 1/3

chance of developing DM

Page 15: Seminar Powerpoint

Consequences - Mortality

“Taken together, the diseases associated

with morbid obesity markedly reduce the

odds of attaining an average life span and

raise annual mortality tenfold or more.”

American College of Surgeons, Recommendations for facilities

performing bariatric surgery, ST-34, Bull Am Col Surg, 2000;85:

Page 16: Seminar Powerpoint

Consequences - Mortality

>300,000 people die each year secondary to

complications of obesity, making it our

2nd leading cause of preventable death

Page 17: Seminar Powerpoint

IV. Treatment of Obesity

Page 18: Seminar Powerpoint

Medical Options for Weight

Loss

• Dietary therapy

• Behavioral modification

• Exercise

• Medications

Page 19: Seminar Powerpoint

Medical Treatment

The bottom Line:

All Non-surgical weight loss attempts achieve at best modest and short termsuccess in the morbidly obese population, with about 10% wt loss, and regain in about 95% within two years

“ANYTHING LESS THAN A RADICAL AND PERMANENT TRANSFORMATION WILL RESULT IN FAILURE TO TREAT MORBID OBESITY”

Page 20: Seminar Powerpoint

Medical Weight Loss

Page 21: Seminar Powerpoint

1991 Concensus Conference on

Obesity

• Medical Therapy is Rarely successful

• Those who fail medical therapy should be treated surgically

• Criteria for surgical therapy:

- BMI > 40

- BMI > 35 with significant comorbidities

- failed attempts at medical wt loss

Procedures recommended = VBG and GBP

Page 22: Seminar Powerpoint

Surgical Options

• Gastric Band

• Sleeve Gastrectomy

• Gastric Bypass

• Biliopancreatic Diversion with Duodenal

Switch

Page 23: Seminar Powerpoint

How does surgery work?

Depending on the procedure:

1. Restriction (less volume in)

2. Malabsorbtion (less calories absorbed)

3. Hormonal Changes (less hunger, “cures”

several disease processes)

4. Dumping (less processed sugar in)

Page 24: Seminar Powerpoint

Ruox en Y Gastric Bypass

• First developed in the

1970s

• Procedure of choice in

the United States

• Best wt loss with the

lowest side effects

• 60 - 80% EWL in 12 - 18

mo (90% lose 70%)

• Maintained up to 15 yrs

post op

Page 25: Seminar Powerpoint

Gastric Bypass

Q : How does the GBP effect wt loss?

A : Four mechanisms

1. Restriction

2. Malabsorption

3. Dumping Syndrome

4. Hormonal Changes

Page 26: Seminar Powerpoint

The Roux-en-Y Procedure

• In the Roux-en-Y

Bypass procedure, a

small pouch

is formed along the

lesser curve, excluding

the fundus

• The fundus is the part

that can stretch out

Page 27: Seminar Powerpoint

The Roux-en-Y Procedure

• The small intestine is

divided about 20-50

cm beyond the lig of

trietz (beginning pt of

the jejunum)

Page 28: Seminar Powerpoint

The Roux-en-Y Procedure

• The small intestine (B), is brought up to the gastric pouch and these are attached

• The bilio-pancreatic limb (A) is hooked up to the Roux limb (B) 100 to 150 cm from the pouch

• The biliopancreatic limb delivers the bile and enzymes, so food in the roux limb is poorly digested

Page 29: Seminar Powerpoint

Dumping

The Roux limb does

not handle sugar well

and therefore eating

sweets will cause

nausea, cramping

and diarrhea

Page 30: Seminar Powerpoint

Decreased Hunger

• Ghrelin is a hormone that stimulates appetite

• Ghrelin levels are seen to drop within 24 hrs of surgery

and stay depressed

• Result = “I’m just not hungry”

• Not clear why this occurs

Page 31: Seminar Powerpoint

Benefits of GBP

• 90% of Patients lose 70% Excess Weight

• 90% of medical problems resolve or improve

• Longer Life (up to 89% reduced mortality)

• Improved energy

• Improved self-esteem, confidence, and relationships

Page 32: Seminar Powerpoint

Roux-en-Y

Open Procedure

• More pain

• Longer hosp stay

• Longer return to work

• Wound complications

- seroma (15%)

- infection (<5%)

- dehicsence (1%)

- hernia (20%)

• Technically much

easier

Page 33: Seminar Powerpoint

Laparoscopic Roux-en Y

• Less pain

• Shorter stay

• Less blood loss

• Faster return to

work

• Technically more

challenging

• More internal

hernias

Page 34: Seminar Powerpoint

“Restrictive” Surgery

Page 35: Seminar Powerpoint

LAP BAND

• Mechanism purely restrictive (no decreased appetite, dumping, or malabsorbtion)

• Injecting saline tightens the opening, decreasing flow out of the pouch

• Adjustments made based on symptoms, wt loss, about every 4 weeks for first several months

Page 36: Seminar Powerpoint

ADJUST, ADJUST, ADJUST!

• First adjustment at 6 wks post op

• Continues every 3 wks thereafter until in “green zone”

• Too tight = food gets stuck, nausea/ vomiting, GERD

• Too Loose = poor wt loss, hungry, tolleratebread / red meat, “large” meals

• Average adjustments - 5-6 first year and ever 6 - 12 months thereafter

Page 37: Seminar Powerpoint

LAP BAND

• Weight loss , generally , and

than with GBP

- Best studies = 30% 1 yr, 40% 2y, 50% 3y

- Some studies 20 -30% wt loss

- Some up to 60% wt loss

- overall about 50% pts lose 50% excess

weight

Page 38: Seminar Powerpoint

Lap Band Advantages

• Stomach and intestines not cut

• May have shorter recovery time

• Band is adjustable (going on a cruise is

not a reason to empty it!!)

• Surgery is “reversible” ( usually for

complications)

Page 39: Seminar Powerpoint

Lap Band Disadvantages

• Wt loss slower, less and more variable

• Persistently high rates of reoperation and

band removal (15 – 25%)

• Less Resolution medical problems

• Easier to “cheat”

• Requires Maintenance adjustments

forever (every 6 - 12 months)

Page 40: Seminar Powerpoint

Who should get a band?

Page 41: Seminar Powerpoint

Sleeve Gastrectomy

• BPD developed 1976

• BPD with DS 1998

• LS BPD w/ DS 2000

• Some restriction

• Mostly malabsorbtion

• Hormonal effect

• More complications,

higher risk

Page 42: Seminar Powerpoint

Sleeve Gastrectomy

“Two stage” LS BPD w/

DS proposed 2000

-LS Sleeve first

-Intestinal bypass after

initial wt loss

-FOUND THAT SOME

DID NOT NEED 2ND

SURGERY

Page 43: Seminar Powerpoint

Sleeve Gastrectomy

• 2005 – 2 studies of LS Sleeve as primary

procedure showing 53% and 83% EWL at

1 yr

• 2006 first large study (357pts) showing

62% EWL 12m and 67% EWL 2 yrs

• To date 36 studies (2,570 pts) showing

33 – 85% EWL at 5 yrs, AVERAGE 60%

Page 44: Seminar Powerpoint

Sleeve Gastrectomy

MECHANISM:

1.Restriction – 100 to 150 cc vs 30cc pouch

2.Hormonal Effect

- decreased grehlen 70%

- decreased hunger 75%

- significant effect on diabetes

3. No dumping, no malabsorbtion

Page 45: Seminar Powerpoint

COMPLICATIONS

LAP BAND GASTRIC BYPASS GASTRIC SLEEVE

Gastric Prolapse (slip) Anastomotic Leak Staple line Leak

Band Erosion Bowel Obstruction Bleeding

Esophageal Dialation Pulm Embolism Stricture

Port Problems Stricture/Marginal Ulcer Conversion to GBP

Death .1 - .5% Death .2 - .3% Death .2%

Page 46: Seminar Powerpoint

Is it worth it?

• Mortality - Cholecystectomy .2 - .5 %

- Hip Replacement .1 - .3 %

- Colon Resection 3 – 5 %

- LS Incisional Hernia 1 – 3%

- Hysterectomy .1 - .6%

Page 47: Seminar Powerpoint

Bariatric Surgery

• Major Life Changing event

• Not a “cure” for Morbid Obesity, but . . .

• Currently the best (and only) tool available

to manage the disease of Morbid obesity

• Will only be successful when

accompanied by of and

lifestyle changes

Page 48: Seminar Powerpoint
Page 49: Seminar Powerpoint

Recommended