+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Sentimental Journey: the long, winding road to a renewable ...Sentimental Journey: the long, winding...

Sentimental Journey: the long, winding road to a renewable ...Sentimental Journey: the long, winding...

Date post: 22-Jan-2020
Category:
Upload: others
View: 11 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
5
1 Sentimental Journey: the long, winding road to a renewable energy future June 2016 The journey to a renewable energy future is taking longer than many analysts and agencies expected. How so? The solid line in the first chart shows the percentage of US primary energy 1 derived from renewable sources, alongside some over-optimistic prior forecasts 2 . Similarly, most forecasts for electric vehicles (EVs and plug-in hybrid vehicles) have been too high as well, as shown in the 2 nd chart. Now that learning curves have contributed to declines in solar and wind capital costs 3 , renewable energy is finally showing up on the global electricity radar screen. In 2015, global investment in renewable energy reached a new all-time high at $286 billion, despite sharp falls in oil, coal and gas prices. Almost all of the recent growth is wind and solar, with the largest regional increases in China/Asia. Renewables ex-hydro made up 54% of all capacity installed around the world in 2015 (the first time they represented a majority), and accounted for 7% of global electricity generation in 2015. Wind has been growing steadily, while solar remains at just 1% of total generation. 1 US primary energy use by sector: electricity 39%, transportation 28%, industrial 22%, residential/commercial 11%. 2 Rather than focusing just on the US, Jacobson and Delucchi (2009) proposed a global plan for 2030 in which 100% of world energy would come from renewables. Parts list: 3.8 million 5 MW wind turbines; 40,000 300 MW PV plants; 1.7 billion 3 kW rooftop solar installations; 5,350 100 MW geothermal plants; 270 1.3 GW hydropower stations; 720,000 wave devices; 490,000 1 MW tidal turbines; and unprecedented extensions of high-voltage transmission. Assembly required. 3 Since 1976, solar module costs have declined steadily from $100 per watt to $1 per watt as production volumes increased. Wind costs also declined from 1984 to 2004, after which prices stopped falling due to rising component and labor costs. For more information, see our learning curve exhibit from last year’s energy paper. 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 2020 2030 Source: EIA, listed authors, Vaclav Smil, JPMAM. 2015. Renewables include wind, solar, hydropower, geothermal, biomass, wood and waste. The share of US primary energy coming from renewable sources, and some notable forecasts Actual renewable share of primary energy Amory Lovins (RMI) Carter Admin (solar only) Physicist Bent Sorensen Nat'l Renew. Energy Lab Google 2030 Clean Energy Plan 0% 2% 4% 6% 8% 10% 12% '09 '10 '11 '12 '13 '14 '15 '16 '17 '18 '19 '20 Source: DOE, BEA and listed organizations. 2015. Note: global EV+PHEV sales in 2015 were also around 0.6%. Another generation of electric car projections out of sync with reality, EV+PHEV sales as % of total car sales Deutsche Bank PwC Frost & Sullivan Bloomberg NEF IEA Roland Berger BCG Deloitte Actual US EV+PHEV sales US Global $0 $50 $100 $150 $200 $250 $300 '04 '05 '06 '07 '08 '09 '10 '11 '12 '13 '14 '15 Source: UNEP, Bloomberg New Energy Finance. 2015. Annual global investment in renewable energy USD billions Asia ex. China China Europe US Americas ex. US Middle East & Africa 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% '85 '87 '89 '91 '93 '95 '97 '99 '01 '03 '05 '07 '09 '11 '13 '15 Source: BP Statistical Review of World Energy. 2015 Global renewable electricity generation: still mostly a hydro-electric story, but wind rising, % of total generation Hydro Geothermal, biomass, & other Solar Wind
Transcript

1

Sentimental Journey: the long, winding road to a renewable energy future June 2016

The journey to a renewable energy future is taking longer than many analysts and agencies expected. How so? The solid line in the first chart shows the percentage of US primary energy1 derived from renewable sources, alongside some over-optimistic prior forecasts2. Similarly, most forecasts for electric vehicles (EVs and plug-in hybrid vehicles) have been too high as well, as shown in the 2nd chart.

Now that learning curves have contributed to declines in solar and wind capital costs3, renewable energy is finally showing up on the global electricity radar screen. In 2015, global investment in renewable energy reached a new all-time high at $286 billion, despite sharp falls in oil, coal and gas prices. Almost all of the recent growth is wind and solar, with the largest regional increases in China/Asia. Renewables ex-hydro made up 54% of all capacity installed around the world in 2015 (the first time they represented a majority), and accounted for 7% of global electricity generation in 2015. Wind has been growing steadily, while solar remains at just 1% of total generation.

1 US primary energy use by sector: electricity 39%, transportation 28%, industrial 22%, residential/commercial 11%.

2 Rather than focusing just on the US, Jacobson and Delucchi (2009) proposed a global plan for 2030 in which 100% of world energy would come from renewables. Parts list: 3.8 million 5 MW wind turbines; 40,000 300 MW PV plants; 1.7 billion 3 kW rooftop solar installations; 5,350 100 MW geothermal plants; 270 1.3 GW hydropower stations; 720,000 wave devices; 490,000 1 MW tidal turbines; and unprecedented extensions of high-voltage transmission. Assembly required.

3 Since 1976, solar module costs have declined steadily from $100 per watt to $1 per watt as production volumes increased. Wind costs also declined from 1984 to 2004, after which prices stopped falling due to rising component and labor costs. For more information, see our learning curve exhibit from last year’s energy paper.

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 2020 2030Source: EIA, listed authors, Vaclav Smil, JPMAM. 2015. Renewables include wind, solar, hydropower, geothermal, biomass, wood and waste.

The share of US primary energy coming from renewable sources, and some notable forecasts

Actual renewable share of primary energy

Amory Lovins (RMI)

Carter Admin (solar only)

Physicist Bent Sorensen

Nat'l Renew. Energy

Lab

Google 2030 Clean Energy Plan

0%

2%

4%

6%

8%

10%

12%

'09 '10 '11 '12 '13 '14 '15 '16 '17 '18 '19 '20Source: DOE, BEA and listed organizations. 2015. Note: global EV+PHEV sales in 2015 were also around 0.6%.

Another generation of electric car projections out of sync with reality, EV+PHEV sales as % of total car sales

Deutsche BankPwCFrost & SullivanBloomberg NEFIEARoland Berger

BCG

Deloitte

Actual US EV+PHEV sales

● US● Global

$0

$50

$100

$150

$200

$250

$300

'04 '05 '06 '07 '08 '09 '10 '11 '12 '13 '14 '15Source: UNEP, Bloomberg New Energy Finance. 2015.

Annual global investment in renewable energyUSD billions

Asia ex. China

China

Europe

USAmericas ex. US

Middle East & Africa

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

'85 '87 '89 '91 '93 '95 '97 '99 '01 '03 '05 '07 '09 '11 '13 '15Source: BP Statistical Review of World Energy. 2015

Global renewable electricity generation: still mostly a hydro-electric story, but wind rising, % of total generation

Hydro

Geothermal, biomass, & otherSolar

Wind

2

Will renewable energy continue its recent rapid expansion? If so, wind and solar intermittency costs will have to be absorbed or eliminated. In last year’s energy paper, we analyzed Germany’s Energiewende plan to meet 80% of electricity demand from renewable sources by 2050. One notable finding about Energiewende: Germany’s thermal (coal and natural gas) capacity needs would be almost unchanged from current levels, given the need to meet electricity demand in winter months when German wind and solar irradiance levels are low. As an indication that our estimates may be on the right track, consider the next chart. Despite a lot of renewable capacity added since 2001, Germany’s coal and natural gas capacity has not declined at all. In other words, grids with high wind and solar penetration can still be heavily reliant on backup thermal capacity. This dynamic is not incorporated into levelized costs per kWh for renewable energy, and may also explain why Germany’s electricity costs are the highest in Europe. We get into more details in the New York section on pages 14-15.

For investors, the journey to a more renewable and cleaner energy future has translated into substantial risk. Since 2003 and 2009, two notable renewable and alternative energy indices have trailed both the S&P energy sector (comprised mostly of oil & gas stocks), and the broad equity market as well4.

4 The Wilderhill Clean Energy Index includes US-listed companies focused on renewable energy production, energy conversion (DC-AC, fuel cells, LED screen manufacturers), pollution prevention, conservation and power delivery. The FTSE Environmental Opportunities Renewable and Alternative Energy Index, launched in 2008, includes global companies involved in renewable & alternative energy, energy efficiency and waste and pollution control.

525

550

575

600

625

0

20

40

60

80

100

'91 '93 '95 '97 '99 '01 '03 '05 '07 '09 '11 '13

Source: German Federal Ministry for Economic Affairs and Energy. 2014.

Despite a large renewable energy build-out in Germany, almost no reduction in natural gas and coal capacity

Solar and wind capacity, GW

Thermal capacity (coal & gas), GW

Electricity consumption, TWh

Wild

erhi

ll C

lean

Ene

rgy

S&

P S

mal

l Cap

Ene

rgy

S&

P M

id C

ap E

nerg

y

S&

P L

arge

Cap

Ene

rgy

S&

P S

mal

l Cap

S&

P M

id C

ap

S&

P 5

00

-50%

0%

50%

100%

150%

200%

250%

300%

350%

Source: Bloomberg. Date range: December 31, 2002 to June 14, 2016.

Renewable/clean energy stocks, traditional energy stocks and the broad market: 2003-2016, Cumulative return

Wild

erhi

ll C

lean

Ene

rgy

FTS

E E

O R

enew

able

an

d A

ltern

ativ

e E

nerg

y

S&

P S

mal

l Cap

Ene

rgy

S&

P M

id C

ap E

nerg

y

S&

P L

arge

Cap

Ene

rgy

S&

P S

mal

l Cap

S&

P M

id C

ap

S&

P 5

00

-50%

0%

50%

100%

150%

200%

250%

Source: Bloomberg. Date range: December 31, 2008 to June 14, 2016.

Renewable/clean energy stocks, traditional energy stocks and the broad market: 2009-2016, Cumulative return

3

Renewable and clean tech investments have been made by venture capital and private equity investors as well. Private investment is by definition harder to track, but there are sources to look at. Cambridge Associates compiles data on venture capital and private equity investments in clean tech companies5. As with publicly tradable equities, the Cambridge private investment renewable energy and clean tech universe has generated substantial risk and low returns to-date:

• Through September 2015, the gross internal rate of return (before fees) on the Cambridge renewable/clean tech universe of private companies is 3.4%

• US companies which comprise around ¾ of the universe generated a gross internal rate of return before fees of 1.7%

• Cambridge notes that when measured across their entire dataset, such company-level returns are typically 4.4% higher than net fund-level returns earned by limited partner investors

Bankruptcies and 70%+ stock price declines in the renewable, alternative and clean energy sectors

5 The Cambridge Clean Tech universe includes renewable power manufacturing and development, energy optimization and conservation, energy storage, recycling and pollution control. As of Q3 2015, the universe was comprised of 810 companies in which 480 venture capital and private equity funds invested. Over 90% of the investments were made after 2005. Cambridge estimates that their sample represents 20%-40% of all clean tech private investment. I consider the returns to be informative since 45% of the investments have been realized.

A closer look at renewable energy and clean tech bankruptcies and large stock price declines

The following companies are reminders of the risks and exaggerated hype often associated with renewable energy and clean tech stocks. Each stock shown went bankrupt, or suffered a price decline of 70%+ from its peak. The list is primarily drawn from our analysis of concentrated stock risk in the history of the Russell 3000 Index (“The Agony & The Ecstasy”). The list includes public companies only, and excludes failed private companies such as Solyndra (solar panels); Better Place (electric car charging stations); Range Fuels, Qteros, Coskata and Terrabon (biofuels); etc.

Biofuels Fuel Cells, Engines Geothermal Solar Wind

Amyris and Batteries Alternative Earth Resources Akeena Solar Broadwind Energy

Aventine A123 Systems Geothermal Resources Intl American Solar King China Ming Yang Wind

Bioamber Advanced Battery Technologies Applied Solar Energy Cleantech Solutions

Gevo Aura Systems Pollution control Ascent Solar Technologies

KiOR Azure Dynamics Earthshell Corp AstroPower

TerraVia Ballard Power Systems Environmental Elements Energy Conversion Devices Misc. services

VeraSun ECOtality Fuel Tech Enphase Energy Intermolecular

Ener1 Wahlco Systems Equinox Lime Energy

Energy conservation FuelCell Energy Evergreen Solar

Blue Earth H Power Power generation, conversion First Solar

Comverge Impco/Fuel Systems Sol. and storage Hoku Scientific

Magnetek Medis Technologies Aixtron Real Goods Solar

Orion Energy Systems Millennium Cell American Superconductor Sky Solar Group

SemiLEDs Plug Power Amtech STR Holdings

Power Solutions Int. Beacon Power SunEdison

Rare earth minerals Quantum Fuel Systems Capstone Turbine SunPower

5N Plus Sonex Research Proton Energy Suntech Power

Daqo New Energy Unique Mobility/UQM Satcon Technology Trendsetter Solar Products

Molycorp Valence Technology TerraForm Yingli Green Energy

Rare Element Resources Westport Innovations

Source: JPMAM, Bloomberg. May 31, 2016. The companies above are shown for illustrative purposes only. Their inclusion should not be interpreted as a recommendation to buy or sell. The use of the above company logos is in no way an endorsement for JPMIM investment management services.

4

This year’s paper continues our research into the promise, potential and constraints of renewable energy, after a brief section on the commodity super-cycle and oil. Click on the page links for each section.

[I] How far along in the commodity super-cycle, and is the oil bounce sustainable? Pages 5-6 Prior super-cycles have taken 15-30 years to play out. However, given price declines that have already taken place, we are probably much closer to the end of the current one. And on oil, by mid-2017, the world may be looking at a deficit of supply relative to demand.

[II] The tortoise, the hare and the electric car: the quiet progress of hybrids over EVs Pages 7-9 Electric cars generate excitement, but EV projections have been too high for generations. The more impactful energy-reducing trends are taking place in the hybrid market.

[III] A New York State of Mind: Thoughts on an ambitious new energy plan Pages 10-15 By 2030, New York aims to generate 50% of electricity from renewable energy, and decrease energy consumption in buildings by 23%. Parts of the plan are achievable while others are aspirational, particularly since New York is not a very sunny or windy place.

[IV] The Utility Empire Strikes Back: Distributed solar power and billing changes Pages 16-18 US utilities are changing their approach to customer billing, which could slow the future growth of distributed residential and commercial solar power.

[V] Dam it: A look at the modest potential for more hydropower in the US Pages 19-20 Despite its large stock of streams and rivers, the US gets a lot less electricity from hydropower than Norway, Switzerland, Canada, Austria and Brazil where its share of generation is over 50%. We take a closer look at US hydropower potential.

Sources and acronyms Page 21 As always, our energy piece is overseen by Vaclav Smil, Distinguished Professor Emeritus in the Faculty of Environment at the University of Manitoba and a Fellow of the Royal Society of Canada. His inter-disciplinary research includes studies of energy systems (resources, conversions, and impacts), environ-mental change (particularly global biogeochemical cycles), and the history of technical advances and interactions among energy, environment, food, economy, and population. He is the author of 39 books and more than 400 papers on these subjects and has lectured widely in North America, Europe, and Asia. In 2010, Foreign Policy magazine listed him among the 100 most influential global thinkers. In 2015, he received the biennial OPEC award for research, and is described by Bill Gates as his favorite author.

Michael Cembalest J.P. Morgan Asset Management

This year’s cover. The picture of Jinshui Road in Taiwan at night shows light trails and light bursts which seem to be happening in real time, but which are actually the result of changes to the camera’s shutter speed and aperture settings. With its mixture of the real and the unreal, it captures some of the themes of this year’s energy piece. On a sentimental journey, some of the images you recall seeing were real, while others existed only in the realm of your imagination.

Credit: ©katoh123/dreamstime.com

22

IMPORTANT INFORMATION

Purpose of This Material: This material is for information purposes only.

The views, opinions, estimates and strategies expressed herein constitutes Michael Cembalest’s judgment based on current market conditions and are subject to change without notice, and may differ from those expressed by other areas of J.P. Morgan. This information in no way constitutes J.P. Morgan Research and should not be treated as such. Any projected results and risks are based solely on hypothetical examples cited, and actual results and risks will vary depending on specific circumstances. We believe certain information contained in this material to be reliable but do not warrant its accuracy or completeness. We do not make any representation or warranty with regard to any computations, graphs, tables, diagrams or commentary in this material which are provided for illustration/reference purposes only. Investors may get back less than they invested, and past performance is not a reliable indicator of future results. It is not possible to invest directly in an index. Forward looking statements should not be considered as guarantees or predictions of future events.

Confidentiality: This material is confidential and intended for your personal use. It should not be circulated to or used by any other person, or duplicated for non-personal use, without our permission.

Regulatory Status: In the United States, Bank products and services, including certain discretionary investment management products and services, are offered by JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. and its affiliates. Securities products and services are offered in the U.S. by J.P. Morgan Securities LLC, an affiliate of JPMCB, and outside of the U.S. by other global affiliates. J.P. Morgan Securities LLC, member FINRA and SIPC.

In the United Kingdom, this material is issued by J.P. Morgan International Bank Limited (JPMIB) with the registered office located at 25 Bank Street, Canary Wharf, London E14 5JP, registered in England No. 03838766. JPMIB is authorised by the Prudential Regulation Authority and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority and the Prudential Regulation Authority. In addition, this material may be distributed by: JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. (“JPMCB”), Paris branch, which is regulated by the French banking authorities Autorité de Contrôle Prudentiel et de Résolution and Autorité des Marchés Financiers; J.P. Morgan (Suisse) SA, regulated by the Swiss Financial Market Supervisory Authority; JPMCB Dubai branch, regulated by the Dubai Financial Services Authority; JPMCB Bahrain branch, licensed as a conventional wholesale bank by the Central Bank of Bahrain (for professional clients only).

In Hong Kong, this material is distributed by JPMCB, Hong Kong branch. JPMCB, Hong Kong branch is regulated by the Hong Kong Monetary Authority and the Securities and Futures Commission of Hong Kong. In Hong Kong, we will cease to use your personal data for our marketing purposes without charge if you so request. In Singapore, this material is distributed by JPMCB, Singapore branch. JPMCB, Singapore branch is regulated by the Monetary Authority of Singapore. Dealing and advisory services and discretionary investment management services are provided to you by JPMCB, Hong Kong/Singapore branch (as notified to you). Banking and custody services are provided to you by JPMIB. The contents of this document have not been reviewed by any regulatory authority in Hong Kong, Singapore or any other jurisdictions. You are advised to exercise caution in relation to this document. If you are in any doubt about any of the contents of this document, you should obtain independent professional advice.

With respect to countries in Latin America, the distribution of this material may be restricted in certain jurisdictions. Receipt of this material does not constitute an offer or solicitation to any person in any jurisdiction in which such offer or solicitation is not authorized or to any person to whom it would be unlawful to make such offer or solicitation.

Risks, Considerations and Additional information: There may be different or additional factors which are not reflected in this material, but which may impact on a client’s portfolio or investment decision. The information contained in this material is intended as general market commentary and should not be relied upon in isolation for the purpose of making an investment decision. Nothing in this document shall be construed as giving rise to any duty of care owed to, or advisory relationship with, you or any third party. Nothing in this document is intended to constitute a representation that any investment strategy or product is suitable for you. You should consider carefully whether any products and strategies discussed are suitable for your needs, and to obtain additional information prior to making an investment decision. Nothing in this document shall be regarded as an offer, solicitation, recommendation or advice (whether financial, accounting, legal, tax or other) given by J.P. Morgan and/or its officers or employees, irrespective of whether or not such communication was given at your request.

J.P. Morgan and its affiliates and employees do not provide tax, legal or accounting advice. You should consult your own tax, legal and accounting advisors before engaging in any financial transactions. Contact your J.P. Morgan representative for additional information concerning your personal investment goals. You should be aware of the general and specific risks relevant to the matters discussed in the material. You will independently, without any reliance on J.P. Morgan, make your own judgment and decision with respect to any investment referenced in this material.

J.P. Morgan may hold a position for itself or our other clients which may not be consistent with the information, opinions, estimates, investment strategies or views expressed in this document.

JPMorgan Chase & Co. or its affiliates may hold a position or act as market maker in the financial instruments of any issuer discussed herein or act as an underwriter, placement agent, advisor or lender to such issuer.

References in this report to “J.P. Morgan” are to JPMorgan Chase & Co., its subsidiaries and affiliates worldwide. “J.P. Morgan Private Bank” is the marketing name for the private banking business conducted by J.P. Morgan.

If you have any questions or no longer wish to receive these communications, please contact your usual J.P. Morgan representative.

© 2016 JPMorgan Chase & Co. All rights reserved.

Investment products: Not FDIC insured • No bank guarantee • May lose value


Recommended