Date post: | 07-Apr-2018 |
Category: |
Documents |
Upload: | csisa-project |
View: | 217 times |
Download: | 0 times |
of 21
8/3/2019 SEP-Lecture for CA Training- Ludhina 7 July
1/21
Farmer perceptions, Economic benefitsand risk- Effects on technology adoption
Socio- EconomicsProgram
CIMMYT
8/3/2019 SEP-Lecture for CA Training- Ludhina 7 July
2/21
The Concern
Low yieldgrowth, inspite
of newtechnologies
being introduced
Farmers facethreat ofeconomic
viability andsustainability incrop production
Poor
technologyadoption
Decline ininvestment
Inefficiency
invalue/supplychain
8/3/2019 SEP-Lecture for CA Training- Ludhina 7 July
3/21
Technology Adoption
Answers are sought for
Why some technologies are popular among farmers?
Which of the technologies are widely adopted? Where
and Why? How effectively is the technology adopted and
diffused?
This information guides us on
How research has impacted productivity, incomes andpoverty?
What should be the future priorities?
Where are the gaps in research and adoption?
8/3/2019 SEP-Lecture for CA Training- Ludhina 7 July
4/21
Technology adoption is effectedby
Knowledge toadopt
Technicalknow how
OtherInformation
Ability toadopt
Credit
Infrastructure
Markets
SupplyChain
Incentive toadopt
Input prices
OutputPrices
Profitability
8/3/2019 SEP-Lecture for CA Training- Ludhina 7 July
5/21
Zero-Tillage Wheat in Haryana:Diffusion and Impacts
Study conducted by
Vijesh Krishna
CIMMYT (New Delhi)
&
Mukesh MeenaUniversity of Agricultural Sciences (Bangalore)
8/3/2019 SEP-Lecture for CA Training- Ludhina 7 July
6/21
Background of the study
Objectives - Examination of the ZT diffusionpattern (including the reasons for non- and dis-adoption and constraints in adoption of thetechnology)
A list of 100 villages of Haryana, where ZT wheatis widely adopted was obtained from Dr. ML Jat
Data was collected through (a) Focus groupdiscussions (b) Farm-household surveys
FGDs and surveys were conducted duringJanuary-February 2011 in 15 villages selectedrandomly
Random selection of 180 wheat farmers wasdone from these villages (12 households/village)
8/3/2019 SEP-Lecture for CA Training- Ludhina 7 July
7/21
ZT adoption in sample villages
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
8090
100
Seg
ha
Kherilama
Bag
hal
Ka
layat
Kau
lekhan
Sonta
Ma
lor
Niharirsi
Do
dhpur
Sha
hpur
Hathira
Thal
San
dha
li
Basna
Basantpur
Kaithal Ambala Kurukshetra
ZTa
doption
(%househ
olds
)insamp
levi
llages
Districts and villages
8/3/2019 SEP-Lecture for CA Training- Ludhina 7 July
8/21
ZT adoption among wheat growing households
16%
21%63%
Non adoption Discountinous adoption Continuous adoption
8/3/2019 SEP-Lecture for CA Training- Ludhina 7 July
9/21
Reasons for non-, and discontinuous-adoption
and constraints in adoption of ZT wheat
Reasons behind
Constraints
in adoption
(N = 112)
Non-adoption
(N=
28)
Discontinuous
adoption
(N=
38)
Field/plot
characteristic
Excess moisture in field 0 14 2
Soil structure/undulation
unsuitable for ZT
14 5 4
Lack of moisture during
sowing
4 5 1
Small land-holding 11 3 1Cropping pattern Difficulty to manage
kharif crop (pearl millet,
cotton, rice) residues
54 8 9
Early harvesting of kharif
crop
0 0 2
Figures show % of farmers in each group expressing the particular concern
8/3/2019 SEP-Lecture for CA Training- Ludhina 7 July
10/21
Reasons for non-, dis- and discontinuous-adoption
and constraints in adoption of ZT wheat (Contd.)
Reasons behind
Constraints
in adoption
(N = 112)
Non-adoption
(N=
28)
Discontinuous
adoption
(N=
38)
Undesirableimpacts of
the
technology
High aphid infestation 0 19 4Negative impact on soil
quality/structure
4 5 0
High fertilizer requirement 0 0 2
High weed infestation 4 3 0
High irrigation requirement 4 5 2
Low yield 7 22 3Low germination of seed 7 0 0
Scarcity of the drill 14 8 1
Other reasons/constraints 0 3 2
No specific reason/constraint 0 3 69
Figures show % of farmers in each group expressing the particular concern
8/3/2019 SEP-Lecture for CA Training- Ludhina 7 July
11/21
Farmers perception
Traditional technology vs modern/ new technology
Farmers perception are not adequately analyzed inadoption studies
An econometric model that includes farmers
perception variables can explain adoptionbehaviour better than the ones that include only theusual farm and farmer related variables
An important area of research is to understand the
process through which farmers revise theirperceptions regarding technologies and whyperceptions differ across individuals.
8/3/2019 SEP-Lecture for CA Training- Ludhina 7 July
12/21
Farmers perception (cont.)
Differential access to information anddifferences in information processing capacitymay lead to variations in perceptions andfarmers ability to update their initial
perceptions. Knowledge about the specific characteristics
of the new technology play an important rolein adoption and changing farmers perception
Programs and extension strategies help tounderstand farmers perspectives and help torevise framers perceptions- usually lead toimproved adoption rate.
8/3/2019 SEP-Lecture for CA Training- Ludhina 7 July
13/21
Farmers associations withtraits
Yield performance
Income
Low cost ofproduction
Pest resistance
Highpriority
Relative Tolerance
Drought tolerance
Environmentaleffects
LowPriority
8/3/2019 SEP-Lecture for CA Training- Ludhina 7 July
14/21
Socio-Economic variable impactingtechnology adoption
Internal factors- Characteristics of thedecision maker
Age and Gender
Education and Experience
Farm size
Risk taking attitude
8/3/2019 SEP-Lecture for CA Training- Ludhina 7 July
15/21
Socio-Economic variable impactingtechnology adoption (cont.)
External factors-
Closer contacts to source of information
Exposure to experimental trials
Adoption by peers
Ease of access to inputs and machineries
Infrastructure and Governance
Availability of finance
Readability of new technology Market value of new varieties- taste and
preferences
8/3/2019 SEP-Lecture for CA Training- Ludhina 7 July
16/21
Economic Benefits
Cost
Machinery and fuelcost
Pesticides/Herbicides/ andWeedicides cost
Invested time tounderstand the newtechnology-management cost
Benefit
Less water utilization
Improved soil health
Reduced labor cost Reduced yield
variability
Shorter cropping
cycle in CA
Perceived economic returns and risk associated with a new technology
impacts the technology adoption.
8/3/2019 SEP-Lecture for CA Training- Ludhina 7 July
17/21
Socio Economic Surveys
Location and cropping patter, characteristics, of householdand farmer
Sampling Procedures-
Stratified Random Sampling
Farmers perception - Types of measurement- Qualitative andquantitative
quantitative (e.g., crop yields, quantity of seed and otherinputs used)
qualitative (e.g., farmer opinions of new technologies)
Quantitative measurements are necessary for analyses andinterpretations.
Qualitative data can often add insights and explanations thatare hard to capture in numbers. e.g., farmer reasons for nonadoption) can be quantified after coding,
8/3/2019 SEP-Lecture for CA Training- Ludhina 7 July
18/21
Socio Economic Surveyscont. Farmers Perception- Focus Group
discussion
Economic Benefits and Risks-
Household surveys Comparison b/w baselines and
adoption surveys
Control Group to be created
8/3/2019 SEP-Lecture for CA Training- Ludhina 7 July
19/21
Technology Adoption- role ofliteracy, social networks and ICT
Formal education may not contribute directly, but influencesefficient allocation of resources.
Literacy has a positive and significant relationship with farmmodernization and agricultural productivity.
Social networks has role in building the trust to influence theadoption of new mindsets and actions by small farmers.
ICT acts as a revolutionising mode to disseminateinformation.- through Internet based information system andmobile phone based information systems
8/3/2019 SEP-Lecture for CA Training- Ludhina 7 July
20/21
Improve technology adoption
Understandingfarmersperceptio
n
Do the costbenefit
analysis ofnewtechnology
Connectwithfarmers todisseminate the
knowledgeaboutbenefits
Demonstrate withexperimental trials
8/3/2019 SEP-Lecture for CA Training- Ludhina 7 July
21/21
Thank you!!