+ All Categories
Home > Documents > SEP-Lecture for CA Training- Ludhina 7 July

SEP-Lecture for CA Training- Ludhina 7 July

Date post: 07-Apr-2018
Category:
Upload: csisa-project
View: 217 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend

of 21

Transcript
  • 8/3/2019 SEP-Lecture for CA Training- Ludhina 7 July

    1/21

    Farmer perceptions, Economic benefitsand risk- Effects on technology adoption

    Socio- EconomicsProgram

    CIMMYT

  • 8/3/2019 SEP-Lecture for CA Training- Ludhina 7 July

    2/21

    The Concern

    Low yieldgrowth, inspite

    of newtechnologies

    being introduced

    Farmers facethreat ofeconomic

    viability andsustainability incrop production

    Poor

    technologyadoption

    Decline ininvestment

    Inefficiency

    invalue/supplychain

  • 8/3/2019 SEP-Lecture for CA Training- Ludhina 7 July

    3/21

    Technology Adoption

    Answers are sought for

    Why some technologies are popular among farmers?

    Which of the technologies are widely adopted? Where

    and Why? How effectively is the technology adopted and

    diffused?

    This information guides us on

    How research has impacted productivity, incomes andpoverty?

    What should be the future priorities?

    Where are the gaps in research and adoption?

  • 8/3/2019 SEP-Lecture for CA Training- Ludhina 7 July

    4/21

    Technology adoption is effectedby

    Knowledge toadopt

    Technicalknow how

    OtherInformation

    Ability toadopt

    Credit

    Infrastructure

    Markets

    SupplyChain

    Incentive toadopt

    Input prices

    OutputPrices

    Profitability

  • 8/3/2019 SEP-Lecture for CA Training- Ludhina 7 July

    5/21

    Zero-Tillage Wheat in Haryana:Diffusion and Impacts

    Study conducted by

    Vijesh Krishna

    CIMMYT (New Delhi)

    &

    Mukesh MeenaUniversity of Agricultural Sciences (Bangalore)

  • 8/3/2019 SEP-Lecture for CA Training- Ludhina 7 July

    6/21

    Background of the study

    Objectives - Examination of the ZT diffusionpattern (including the reasons for non- and dis-adoption and constraints in adoption of thetechnology)

    A list of 100 villages of Haryana, where ZT wheatis widely adopted was obtained from Dr. ML Jat

    Data was collected through (a) Focus groupdiscussions (b) Farm-household surveys

    FGDs and surveys were conducted duringJanuary-February 2011 in 15 villages selectedrandomly

    Random selection of 180 wheat farmers wasdone from these villages (12 households/village)

  • 8/3/2019 SEP-Lecture for CA Training- Ludhina 7 July

    7/21

    ZT adoption in sample villages

    0

    10

    20

    30

    40

    50

    60

    70

    8090

    100

    Seg

    ha

    Kherilama

    Bag

    hal

    Ka

    layat

    Kau

    lekhan

    Sonta

    Ma

    lor

    Niharirsi

    Do

    dhpur

    Sha

    hpur

    Hathira

    Thal

    San

    dha

    li

    Basna

    Basantpur

    Kaithal Ambala Kurukshetra

    ZTa

    doption

    (%househ

    olds

    )insamp

    levi

    llages

    Districts and villages

  • 8/3/2019 SEP-Lecture for CA Training- Ludhina 7 July

    8/21

    ZT adoption among wheat growing households

    16%

    21%63%

    Non adoption Discountinous adoption Continuous adoption

  • 8/3/2019 SEP-Lecture for CA Training- Ludhina 7 July

    9/21

    Reasons for non-, and discontinuous-adoption

    and constraints in adoption of ZT wheat

    Reasons behind

    Constraints

    in adoption

    (N = 112)

    Non-adoption

    (N=

    28)

    Discontinuous

    adoption

    (N=

    38)

    Field/plot

    characteristic

    Excess moisture in field 0 14 2

    Soil structure/undulation

    unsuitable for ZT

    14 5 4

    Lack of moisture during

    sowing

    4 5 1

    Small land-holding 11 3 1Cropping pattern Difficulty to manage

    kharif crop (pearl millet,

    cotton, rice) residues

    54 8 9

    Early harvesting of kharif

    crop

    0 0 2

    Figures show % of farmers in each group expressing the particular concern

  • 8/3/2019 SEP-Lecture for CA Training- Ludhina 7 July

    10/21

    Reasons for non-, dis- and discontinuous-adoption

    and constraints in adoption of ZT wheat (Contd.)

    Reasons behind

    Constraints

    in adoption

    (N = 112)

    Non-adoption

    (N=

    28)

    Discontinuous

    adoption

    (N=

    38)

    Undesirableimpacts of

    the

    technology

    High aphid infestation 0 19 4Negative impact on soil

    quality/structure

    4 5 0

    High fertilizer requirement 0 0 2

    High weed infestation 4 3 0

    High irrigation requirement 4 5 2

    Low yield 7 22 3Low germination of seed 7 0 0

    Scarcity of the drill 14 8 1

    Other reasons/constraints 0 3 2

    No specific reason/constraint 0 3 69

    Figures show % of farmers in each group expressing the particular concern

  • 8/3/2019 SEP-Lecture for CA Training- Ludhina 7 July

    11/21

    Farmers perception

    Traditional technology vs modern/ new technology

    Farmers perception are not adequately analyzed inadoption studies

    An econometric model that includes farmers

    perception variables can explain adoptionbehaviour better than the ones that include only theusual farm and farmer related variables

    An important area of research is to understand the

    process through which farmers revise theirperceptions regarding technologies and whyperceptions differ across individuals.

  • 8/3/2019 SEP-Lecture for CA Training- Ludhina 7 July

    12/21

    Farmers perception (cont.)

    Differential access to information anddifferences in information processing capacitymay lead to variations in perceptions andfarmers ability to update their initial

    perceptions. Knowledge about the specific characteristics

    of the new technology play an important rolein adoption and changing farmers perception

    Programs and extension strategies help tounderstand farmers perspectives and help torevise framers perceptions- usually lead toimproved adoption rate.

  • 8/3/2019 SEP-Lecture for CA Training- Ludhina 7 July

    13/21

    Farmers associations withtraits

    Yield performance

    Income

    Low cost ofproduction

    Pest resistance

    Highpriority

    Relative Tolerance

    Drought tolerance

    Environmentaleffects

    LowPriority

  • 8/3/2019 SEP-Lecture for CA Training- Ludhina 7 July

    14/21

    Socio-Economic variable impactingtechnology adoption

    Internal factors- Characteristics of thedecision maker

    Age and Gender

    Education and Experience

    Farm size

    Risk taking attitude

  • 8/3/2019 SEP-Lecture for CA Training- Ludhina 7 July

    15/21

    Socio-Economic variable impactingtechnology adoption (cont.)

    External factors-

    Closer contacts to source of information

    Exposure to experimental trials

    Adoption by peers

    Ease of access to inputs and machineries

    Infrastructure and Governance

    Availability of finance

    Readability of new technology Market value of new varieties- taste and

    preferences

  • 8/3/2019 SEP-Lecture for CA Training- Ludhina 7 July

    16/21

    Economic Benefits

    Cost

    Machinery and fuelcost

    Pesticides/Herbicides/ andWeedicides cost

    Invested time tounderstand the newtechnology-management cost

    Benefit

    Less water utilization

    Improved soil health

    Reduced labor cost Reduced yield

    variability

    Shorter cropping

    cycle in CA

    Perceived economic returns and risk associated with a new technology

    impacts the technology adoption.

  • 8/3/2019 SEP-Lecture for CA Training- Ludhina 7 July

    17/21

    Socio Economic Surveys

    Location and cropping patter, characteristics, of householdand farmer

    Sampling Procedures-

    Stratified Random Sampling

    Farmers perception - Types of measurement- Qualitative andquantitative

    quantitative (e.g., crop yields, quantity of seed and otherinputs used)

    qualitative (e.g., farmer opinions of new technologies)

    Quantitative measurements are necessary for analyses andinterpretations.

    Qualitative data can often add insights and explanations thatare hard to capture in numbers. e.g., farmer reasons for nonadoption) can be quantified after coding,

  • 8/3/2019 SEP-Lecture for CA Training- Ludhina 7 July

    18/21

    Socio Economic Surveyscont. Farmers Perception- Focus Group

    discussion

    Economic Benefits and Risks-

    Household surveys Comparison b/w baselines and

    adoption surveys

    Control Group to be created

  • 8/3/2019 SEP-Lecture for CA Training- Ludhina 7 July

    19/21

    Technology Adoption- role ofliteracy, social networks and ICT

    Formal education may not contribute directly, but influencesefficient allocation of resources.

    Literacy has a positive and significant relationship with farmmodernization and agricultural productivity.

    Social networks has role in building the trust to influence theadoption of new mindsets and actions by small farmers.

    ICT acts as a revolutionising mode to disseminateinformation.- through Internet based information system andmobile phone based information systems

  • 8/3/2019 SEP-Lecture for CA Training- Ludhina 7 July

    20/21

    Improve technology adoption

    Understandingfarmersperceptio

    n

    Do the costbenefit

    analysis ofnewtechnology

    Connectwithfarmers todisseminate the

    knowledgeaboutbenefits

    Demonstrate withexperimental trials

  • 8/3/2019 SEP-Lecture for CA Training- Ludhina 7 July

    21/21

    Thank you!!


Recommended