+ All Categories
Home > Documents > September 2008AFGE Field Services and Education Department 1 AFGE Meeting NSPS HEAD-ON.

September 2008AFGE Field Services and Education Department 1 AFGE Meeting NSPS HEAD-ON.

Date post: 18-Jan-2016
Category:
Upload: alison-sylvia-reed
View: 217 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
Popular Tags:
22
September 2008 AFGE Field Services and E ducation Department 1 AFGE Meeting NSPS HEAD-ON
Transcript
Page 1: September 2008AFGE Field Services and Education Department 1 AFGE Meeting NSPS HEAD-ON.

September 2008 AFGE Field Services and Education Department

1

AFGEMeeting NSPS

HEAD-ON

Page 2: September 2008AFGE Field Services and Education Department 1 AFGE Meeting NSPS HEAD-ON.

September 2008 AFGE Field Services and Education Department

2

AFGEThrough lawsuits and lobbying, we saved:

• The right to a union voice.

• Collective bargaining rights.

• The Government-wide RIF rules.

• The critical merit principles of fairness and due process instead of fire “at will.”

Page 3: September 2008AFGE Field Services and Education Department 1 AFGE Meeting NSPS HEAD-ON.

September 2008 AFGE Field Services and Education Department

3

AFGEWe saved:

• The principle of national pay raises tied to the General Pay Increase instead of DoD’s budget.

• Locality pay under FEPCA.

• A merit-based Civil Service System for America.

Page 4: September 2008AFGE Field Services and Education Department 1 AFGE Meeting NSPS HEAD-ON.

September 2008 AFGE Field Services and Education Department

4

AFGE• BUT we could not get rid of NSPS altogether.

WGIs and Grades are out – pay bands are in. Congress could not overcome a veto threat by the President.

• Congress let DoD continue with NSPS, but with bargaining under Chapter 71.

• Although we got back important rights, NSPS remains a flawed system!

Page 5: September 2008AFGE Field Services and Education Department 1 AFGE Meeting NSPS HEAD-ON.

September 2008 AFGE Field Services and Education Department

5

AFGE• DoD double-crosses Congress again!!!

• Under a loophole in the new law, DoD published proposed regulations, which could severely limit the bargaining Congress intended to help make the process fairer and more honest.

Page 6: September 2008AFGE Field Services and Education Department 1 AFGE Meeting NSPS HEAD-ON.

September 2008 AFGE Field Services and Education Department

6

GS Pay System

• Very Simple and Transparent• People treated fairly.• Pay raises by law maintain living standard.• Does have performance components:

– To move up career ladders– To move to next step– To receive promotions– Recognition and Awards

Page 7: September 2008AFGE Field Services and Education Department 1 AFGE Meeting NSPS HEAD-ON.

September 2008 AFGE Field Services and Education Department

7

NSPS Pay System

• Very Complicated – Not simple!• Done in the dark – Not Transparent!!• Not based on Performance!!!• Violates Merit Principles!!!!• Designed to Suppress Pay and Pensions!!!!!

Page 8: September 2008AFGE Field Services and Education Department 1 AFGE Meeting NSPS HEAD-ON.

September 2008 AFGE Field Services and Education Department

8

NDAA 2008The new law requires DoD to include a performance management

system with the following elements:

A. Adherence to merit principles,B. A fair, credible, and transparent employee performance system,C. A link to the agency’s strategic plan,D. Employee involvement in the design and implementation,E. Adequate training and retraining for managers and employees in

the performance management system,F. Ongoing performance feedback and dialogue,G. Effective safeguards to ensure the system is fair and equitable,H. Adequate agency resources for the design, implementation and

administration of the performance management system,I. A pay-for-performance system to better link individual pay to

performance.

Page 9: September 2008AFGE Field Services and Education Department 1 AFGE Meeting NSPS HEAD-ON.

September 2008 AFGE Field Services and Education Department

9

Pay bands and employees do not automatically go up by 100% of GS raise, but only by 60%—and that only because Congress ordered it.

Will fall behind GS counterparts in other agencies.Privately purchased labor market studies will be used to slot jobs

within pay bands and control performance raises.Illusion of greater pay potential in banding, but really “mini-bands

and control points” will limit pay potential below the top of the band—this is lying to the workforce!

Unfair allocations to pay pools.Some pools and employees receive more, others less.

All aimed at COST-CONTAINMENT!Will result in pay and pension suppression.

Key Bad NSPS Elements

Page 10: September 2008AFGE Field Services and Education Department 1 AFGE Meeting NSPS HEAD-ON.

September 2008 AFGE Field Services and Education Department

10

Ratings and payouts may be based on who writes better self assessments and job objectives rather than actual performance.

Who determines your final performance rating and payout is an unsolved mystery.

Performance ratings will be determined by bureaucratic layers of managers who may not have any direct knowledge of your performance.

Forced distribution of performance ratings instead of true evaluations of performance.

Key Bad NSPS Elements

Page 11: September 2008AFGE Field Services and Education Department 1 AFGE Meeting NSPS HEAD-ON.

September 2008 AFGE Field Services and Education Department

11

Unfair delay --You don’t know how your performance was rated until 3 months into the next performance cycle, depriving you and your supervisor of valuable information needed to develop a better performance plan for next year’s raise.

Arbitrary pay adjustment – could be cash bonuses or salary raise based on a number of factors, most outside of your control and not based on your performance.

Competitive Merit Promotion process is gone for most jobs – Non-competitive promotions are standard and are now called reassignments. Managers can select anyone for a new job without posting or competition!

Key Bad NSPS Elements

Page 12: September 2008AFGE Field Services and Education Department 1 AFGE Meeting NSPS HEAD-ON.

September 2008 AFGE Field Services and Education Department

12

Page 13: September 2008AFGE Field Services and Education Department 1 AFGE Meeting NSPS HEAD-ON.

September 2008 AFGE Field Services and Education Department

13

PAY POOL PANELRATES EMPLOYEES

Supervisor recommends your rating to the pay pool panel, but must not tell you, the

employee, your rating!!!!

Pay pool panel changes and “reconciles”ratings among different supervisors.

Your rating is determined by other managerswho did not supervise your performance!

Page 14: September 2008AFGE Field Services and Education Department 1 AFGE Meeting NSPS HEAD-ON.

September 2008 AFGE Field Services and Education Department

14

Page 15: September 2008AFGE Field Services and Education Department 1 AFGE Meeting NSPS HEAD-ON.

September 2008 AFGE Field Services and Education Department

15

Page 16: September 2008AFGE Field Services and Education Department 1 AFGE Meeting NSPS HEAD-ON.

September 2008 AFGE Field Services and Education Department

16

PAY FORPERFORMANCE PROBLEMS

• FAA Problems - Discrimination Lawsuits:– 2,000 Outstanding employees had not received salary

increases in 3 years (only cash)– One employee calculated a loss of $300,000 in retirement income over 25 years– Top management said employees should understand

the tight budgets of the agency – Budgets are always tight - if you can’t afford pay-for-

performance, you shouldn’t do it!

Page 17: September 2008AFGE Field Services and Education Department 1 AFGE Meeting NSPS HEAD-ON.

September 2008 AFGE Field Services and Education Department

17

Securities & Exchange Comm.

• Pay system like NSPS for 3 years.

• Pay system was determined to illegally discriminate against employees on the basis of race and age by an Arbitrator in late 2007.

Page 18: September 2008AFGE Field Services and Education Department 1 AFGE Meeting NSPS HEAD-ON.

September 2008 AFGE Field Services and Education Department

18

Government Accountability Office

• Pay for Performance System for many years.

• GAO has been a major proponent of pay-for-performance.

• Many employees found themselves losing money compared to co-workers.

• Employees organized and for the first time in history, GAO is union!

Page 19: September 2008AFGE Field Services and Education Department 1 AFGE Meeting NSPS HEAD-ON.

September 2008 AFGE Field Services and Education Department

19

NSPS DISCRIMINATES!

The first large-scale NSPS payout shows: White employees received higher ratings

and payouts than other employees. Employees over 40 received higher

payouts than younger employees with the same ratings.

Defense Agency employees got higher ratings and payouts than employees of the Services.

Page 20: September 2008AFGE Field Services and Education Department 1 AFGE Meeting NSPS HEAD-ON.

September 2008 AFGE Field Services and Education Department

20

If your salary is 10%-15% lower under NSPS than GS, in 15 years when you retire:

Your pension will be about 10% - 15% lower. Imagine 25 years of retirement @ $3,000 less per year = $75,000 less retirement income.

What would that mean for you?

REFORMING NSPS MATTERS!

Possible impact on Retirement

Page 21: September 2008AFGE Field Services and Education Department 1 AFGE Meeting NSPS HEAD-ON.

September 2008 AFGE Field Services and Education Department

21

CURRENT STATUS OF NSPS

DoD has indicated that no current employees represented by AFGE will be placed under NSPS before 2009.

New regulations are expected to take effect early in 2009.

DoD is likely to begin to move represented employees into NSPS in 2009.

Page 22: September 2008AFGE Field Services and Education Department 1 AFGE Meeting NSPS HEAD-ON.

September 2008 AFGE Field Services and Education Department

22

Solution???

WHAT-- We need to press the Congress and the next Administration to end NSPS altogether.

WHY—NSPS is very bad and DoD has proven to be untrustworthy once again!

HOW—Organize and mobilize employees to join and get active to work for the changes needed to save their future standard of living!!


Recommended