K A T H R Y N P I C A N C O , E D . D .D I R E C T O R , C E N T E R F O R G I F T E D E D U C A T I O N
W H I T W O R T H U N I V E R S I T Y
SERVING HIGHLY CAPABLE STUDENTS IN RURAL
DISTRICTS
WASHINGTON STATE
28A.185.020 RCW (2009)The legislature finds that, for highly capable students, access to accelerated learning and enhanced instruction is access to a basic education.
There are multiple definitions of highly capable, from intellectual to academic to artistic. The research literature strongly supports using multiple criteria to identify highly capable students, and therefore, the legislature does not intend to prescribe a single method.
SHIFT IN THINKING
3
FROM Program Centered TO Student Centered
SHIFT IN THINKING
4
FROM considered a separate program not integrated into the regular classroom
TO an integrated range of services as a part of the student’s basic education K-12
GIFTED KIDS ARE GIFTED EVERY DAY, ALL DAY.
5
PSYCHOSOCIAL SKILLS THAT SUPPORT TALENT DEVELOPMENT
PAULA OLSZEWSKI-KUBILIUS (ND)TALENT DEVELOPMENT AS AN EMERGING FRAMEWORK IN GIFTED EDUCATION.
• Openness to new experience
• Self-efficacy• Self-confidence• Grit• Growth mindset• Emotional regulation• Coping skills for
failure and disappointment
• Resiliency• Comfort with
intellectual tension• Ability to handle
competition and critique
• Psychological independence from parents and teachers
Some social-emotional attributes seen as enduring characteristics of all gifted individuals and defining of and inherent within giftedness
• Not inherent in being gifted• Needs result from interaction
between gifted individual & environment, influenced by culture and opportunity
• Psychosocial skills are critical to talent development and these change with domain of talent and stage of developed talent
• Emphasizes deliberate cultivation of psychosocial skills to support giftedness and high achievement within domains
Gifted children have unique social, psychological and emotional needs
Psychosocial Development
Traditional View of
Giftedness
Talent Development
Paula Olszewski-Kubilius (ND)Talent development as an emerging framework in gifted education.
OUTCOMES OF GIFTED EDUCATION PROGRAMS
• The anticipated social roles that people of high potential will play should be the main rationale for both supporting special programs and designing learning experiences that will prepare today’s students for responsible leadership roles in the future. (Renzulli, 2012)
College and Career
Ready Student
Growth Opportunities and Supports
High Quality Instruction and Leadership
Educator and System Accountability
K-12 continuum of services built on a foundation of standards in the 3 areas.
College/Career training communication and support
CCSSO
MAJOR CHANGES IN WA
• All districts need to submit a school board approved program plan by July 1, 2014
• A K-12 continuum of services needs to be in place for identified gifted students
• All educators require ongoing professional development about the nature and needs of the gifted learner and instructional strategies to challenge them, not just the teacher for the gifted program
• Program evaluation linked to goals
Chapter 392-170 WAC. Retrieved from http://apps.leg.wa.gov/wac/default.aspx?cite=392-170.
KEY QUESTIONS TO ADDRESS
• Who are “highly capable” students and what are their learning needs?
• What is accelerated learning and what does it look like in a school setting?
• What is enhanced instruction and what does it look like in a school setting?
• What can a K-12 continuum of services include and look like?
11
WHO ARE “HIGHLY CAPABLE” STUDENTS AND WHAT ARE THEIR LEARNING NEEDS?
12
WAC 392-170-036 DEFINITION OF LEARNING CHARACTERISTICS
As used in this chapter, the term learning characteristics means that students who are highly capable may possess, but are not limited to, these learning characteristics:
1) Capacity to learn with unusual depth of understanding, to retain what has been learned, and to transfer learning to new situations.
13
WAC 392-170-036 DEFINITION OF LEARNING CHARACTERISTICS
2) Capacity and willingness to deal with increasing levels of abstraction and complexity earlier than their chronological peers.
3) Creative ability to make unusual connections among ideas and concepts.
4) Ability to learn quickly in their area(s) of intellectual strength.
5) Capacity for intense concentration and/or focus.
14
LESSONS LEARNED ABOUT EDUCATING THE GIFTED AND TALENTED: A SYNTHESIS OF THE RESEARCH
ROGERS, K. (2007). LESSONS LEARNED ABOUT EDUCATING THE GIFTED AND TALENTED: A SYNTHESIS OF THE RESEARCH. GIFTED CHILD QUARTERLY, 51(4), 382-396.
• Gifted learners need daily challenge in their specific area of talent
• Opportunities should be provided on a regular basis for gifted learners to be unique and to work independently in their areas of passion and talent
• Provide various forms of subject-based and grade-based acceleration to gifted learners as their educational needs require
• Provide opportunities for gifted learners to socialize and to learn with like-ability peers
• For specific curriculum areas, instructional delivery must be differentiated in pace, amount of review and practice, and organization of content presentation
15
WHAT’S NEXT?
Callahan, C. (September, 2010). Lessons learned from evaluating programs for the gifted. Presented at the Highly Capable Program Technical Working Group Meeting. 17
SERVICE DELIVERY MODELS
• Integrated classroom support• Cluster grouping• Pull-out program• Special classes• Special schools
Schroth, St. (2013). Service delivery models. In Plucker, J. and Callahan, C. (Ed.s), Critical issues and practices in gifted education: What the research says (p 577-591). Waco, TX: Prufrock Press.
18
DIFFERENTIATION
A teaching philosophy where
teachers strive to meet the needs of their students by intentionally planning the curriculum and/or instruction based on student interests, learning profile, readiness levels and/or affect.
-Tomlinson
19
DIFFERENTIATION FOR HIGHLY CAPABLE STUDENTS
Acceleration
Novelty
Complexity
Depth
20
Kaplan
WHAT IS ACCELERATED LEARNING?
“Progress through an educational program at rates faster or at ages younger than conventional.”
Pressey in Colangelo, N., Assouline, S. and Gross, M. (2004). A Nation Deceived: How Schools Hold Back America’s Brightest Students, Vol. 2. The Connie Belin & Jacqueline N. Blank International Center for Gifted Education and Talent Development.
21
A NATION DECEIVED
• Institute for Research and Policy on Acceleration, The Ohio State University
• http://www.accelerationinstitute.org/Nation_Deceived/Get_Report.aspxhttp://www.accelerationinstitute.org/Nation_Deceived/Get_Report.aspx
22
TYPES OF ACCELERATION• Early Admission to
Kindergarten• Early Admission to
First Grade• Grade-Skipping• Continuous Progress• Self-Paced
Instruction• Subject-Matter
Acceleration/Partial acceleration
• Combined Classes• Curriculum
Compacting• Telescoping the
Curriculum
• Mentoring• Extracurricular
Programs• Correspondence
Courses• Early Graduation• Concurrent/Dual
Enrollment• Advanced Placement• Credit by Examination• Acceleration in College• Early Entrance into
Middle School, High School
Colangelo, N., Assouline, S. and Gross, M. (2004). A Nation Deceived: How Schools Hold Back America’s Brightest Students, Vol. 2. The Connie Belin & Jacqueline N. Blank International Center for Gifted Education and Talent Development.
23
WHAT IS ENHANCED INSTRUCTION?
24
Enhanced Instructio
n
Depth
Complexity
Novelty
25
Differentiated Quality Curriculum for Highly Capable Students
• Higher level of abstractness (3.1.4)
• Greater depth and complexity of content, process, and orproduct (3.1.4)
• More rapid pace of learning or task completion (5.1.1)• Problems with many facets; products or outcomes from
ill-formed and open-ended problems (3.3.3; 3.4.1; 3.4.2;3.4.3))
• Mastery of content that requires greater leaps of insight or more indirect applications or transfer of learning (3.4.4)
• Use of more advanced and sophisticated resources
• Match to each student‟s developmental level and culture- based learning needs (1.2.1)
Callahan, C. (September, 2010). Lessons learned from evaluating programs for the gifted. Presented at the Highly Capable Program Technical Working Group Meeting.
26
KEY POINTS
• Curriculum is developmentally appropriate
• Creativity and problem solving are integrated into the disciplines rather than taught as isolated skills or only as part of competitionsCallahan, C. (September, 2010). Lessons learned from evaluating programs for the gifted. Presented at the Highly Capable Program Technical Working Group Meeting. 27
ENHANCED INSTRUCTION IN RURAL COMMUNITIES
Traditional Values in Rural Communities• Importance of family and
community• Strong work ethic• Deep ties to the land• Stewardship
Lawrence, B. (2009). Rural gifted education: A comprehensive literature review. Journal for the Education of the Gifted. 32(4), 461-494.
Enhanced Instructional Strategies that Align• Service-Learning• Place-based
Learning• Problem-based
Learning
POSITIVE EFFECTS OF GROUPING FOR GIFTED STUDENTS
Approach Effect Size Growth beyond the regular academic year
E = Elementary and S=Secondary
Full time ability grouping .49 ( E ) and .33 ( S )
Within class ability grouping .34 ( E and S )
Regrouping for specific instruction
.34 ( E ) and .79 ( S )
Cluster grouping .59 ( E ) and .44 ( S )
Multiage classroom .49 ( E ) and .46 ( S )
Like ability cooperative groups
.28 ( E and S )
Mixed ability grouping 0
29Rogers, K (October 2011). Presentation at the Washington Association for Educators of the Talented and Gifted conference.
WHAT DOES A K-12 CONTINUUM OF SERVICES INCLUDE?
30
GENERAL CLUSTER GROUPING
Common gifted education practice that places a group of high achieving, gifted, or high ability students in a classroom with other students and with a teacher who has received training or who is willing to differentiate curriculum and instruction for the identified cluster students.
Gentry, M. and Mann, R. (nd). Total school cluster grouping and differentiation: A comprehensive, research-based plan for raising student achievement and improving teacher practices. Powerpoint companion to the book.
32
EXAMPLE OF A CLASSROOM COMPOSITION FOR THE TOTAL SCHOOL CLUSTER GROUPING MODEL
30 students in two classrooms
Group 1: High Achieving
Group 2: Above Average Achieving
Group 3: Average
Group 4: Low Average
Group 5: Low
Class A 6 0 12 12 0
Class B 0 6 12 6 6
33
GETTING STARTED: WHAT ARE YOU ALREADY DOING?
ElementaryWaKIDs readiness
assessmentMAP Tests
Math grant- Developmental approach,
flexible grouping
MiddleHonors courses
Flexible grouping through blended learning
environments in math, transferable to other
content areas
High School
Honors and specialized courses
College in the High School
Advanced Placement
Program goals could focus on academic specific domainsProgram evaluation tied to student growth in the identified areas
35
K-8
K-8 Gates Grant focused on algebraic readiness• Examining materials that will develop algebraic reasoning
and differentiate math instruction• Flipped and blended learning environments
• WaKIDS - Washington Kindergarten Inventory of Developing Skills
SECONDARY
• Technology grant for high school to create online courses to share specialized instructors across districts• Collaborative with Eastern Washington University for the
platform and training
• College in the School and Advanced Placement• Piloting AP Capstone program in 2014-2015
TRANSITIONING SERVICE IDEAS
Current Considering
Instructional Coach
Flexible grouping in classrooms
Guided reading
Professional development focused on struggling students
Differentiation Specialist
Cluster grouping if numbers demonstrate need
Walk to read/math across grade levels
Professional development focused on differentiation strategies that will encourage the growth of all students
New: Project/Place/Problem based learning enrichment for identified gifted students based on local values
38
EXAMPLE
Philosophy: All students require the opportunity to achieve their full potential. Students identified as highly capable are to receive a qualitatively different and differentiated educational experience.Goals: 1. Highly capable students will receive accelerated and enhanced learning opportunities to advance academic achievement and growth 2. Enrichment opportunities will be provided to foster gifted behaviors.Identification:• CogAT Screener, MAP tests, Rezulli Scales in specific
areas, parent/teacher/peer nomination
39
EXAMPLE: SMALL DISTRICT
Elementary Middle School High School
Accelerate
and Enhance
Site based services including differentiated and enhanced instruction
Site based services including differentiated and enhanced instruction
Site based services including differentiated and enhanced instruction
Flexible grouping across subject areas
Honors and accelerated courses
Honors and accelerated courses (AP, College in the High School)
Early entrance/dual enrollment and/or grade skipping
Dual enrollment and/or grade skipping
Dual enrollment/Running Start
Enrich
Extracurricular activities/groups
Extracurricular activities/groups
Extracurricular activities/groups
Academic competitions
Academic competitions
Academic competitions40
FLEXIBLE GROUPING ACROSS CONTENT AREAS
• Group by readiness flexibly in the classroom to target instruction• Pre-assess• Group by ability/readiness• Teach in small groups
• Group by readiness across grade levels • Pre-assess• Group by ability/readiness• Teach in small groups or whole class of similar readiness
• Multiage classrooms• Grades 1-3, 4-6, 7-9• Rotate core curriculum on a three year cycle, not one• Students move progressively through and meet
standards/benchmarks by end of three year period 41
SITE BASED SERVICES: DIFFERENTIATION FOR HIGHLY CAPABLE STUDENTS
Curriculum: Add depth and complexity to tasks when appropriate, inquiryInstruction: • Compact the curriculum and replace with either
accelerated or enriched curriculum. • Independent, interest-based projects available
and facilitated by the teacher• Project-based learning• Place-based learning
42
ACCELERATION POLICIES
• District policies for:• Early entrance to Kindergarten• Grade skipping when deemed most appropriate option
for the student• Dual enrollment • Ability to take advanced coursework out of grade level
43
DUAL ENROLLMENT
• Can occur at any time during a child’s K-12 education
• A child that is significantly advanced in a particular content area may require instruction at then next level of schooling• Example: A fourth grader advanced in math may need to
take Algebra at the middle school to be appropriately challenged.
44
EXTRACURRICULAR
• Academic competition preparation• Optional interest based experiences run by
community members to share expertise• Creative writing• Dance• Biology• Chess club
45
PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT
Universal Options
Options provided to all students through core curriculum,
differentiated instruction, progress
monitoring.
Enhance success and
reduce barriers for vast majority
of students.
Selected Options
Supplemental options provided for small groups
who meet benchmarks
early or quickly to increase
likelihood of continued progress.
Targeted Options
Individually designed
interventions for students who have a
high likelihood of academic
failure.
Selected Options
Supplemental options
provided for small groups who have not
met benchmarks to
reduce the potential of long term
failure.
Targeted Options
Individually designed
interventions for students who
exceed expectations
and need extensions or acceleration
0 +1-1 +2-2 +3-3
Mean = 0 Deviations + or -
1-2% of Students:
10-15% of Students:
10-15% of Students:
1-2% of Students:
70-80% of Students:
Amy Miller – Oregon, WI
RtI Response to Intervention
TEACHER/PRINCIPAL EVALUATION PROGRAM
8 Criteria, 26 Standards
Instructional Frameworks• CEL 5D+ Teacher Evaluation Rubric 2.0• Danielson’s Framework for Teaching (2011)• Marzano’s Teacher Evaluation Model
Washington State Teacher/Principal Evaluation Project (2013). Criteria and definitions. Retrieved from http://tpep-wa.org/the-model/criteria-and-definitions/.
• Criterion 1 : The teacher sets high expectations and challenges each student by asking questions of all students with the same frequency and depth by probing incorrect answers of all students in the same manner.
• Criterion 2: The teacher helps students effectively interact with practice and deepen their understanding of, and generate and test hypotheses about new knowledge, through various methods to engage students.
• Criterion 3: The teacher has knowledge to design instruction for individual student learning needs and provides interventions to meet those needs.
• Criterion 4: The teacher has a comprehensive understanding of the subject(s) and standards taught, and skillfully uses the adopted curriculum while developing and communicating clear learning targets (daily) and clear learning goals (longer term) to students.
• Criterion 5: The teacher fosters and manages a safe, positive learning environment by managing physical space, creating clear and consistent expectations, monitoring and responding to student behavior, and building positive relationships.
• Criteria 6: The teacher uses multiple data elements to guide students in self-reflection and goal setting, to modify instruction, and to design and modify appropriate student assessments. In addition, the teacher shows that students have made growth and/or met course or grade-level standards using multiple measures.
• Criteria 7: The teacher communicates and collaborates with the school/community and families in a timely and professional manner.
• Criteria 8: The teacher collaborates with colleagues about student learning and instructional practices, displays dependability through active participation, and pursues professional development.
PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT
Ongoing Professional Development
.Observation of peer classrooms, peer coachingBook study, planning groups
Sample formal evaluations
Initial Professional DevelopmentReview initiatives and background
information
Staff presentation on the analysis of student work and planning for
differentiation
Grade level teams/bands work together to analyze student work and create differentiated lessons
School Initiatives: Criterion 3 of TPEP, RTI, CCSS Identify individual student learning needs through
the use of formative assessment.Develop effective curriculum/instruction based on
identified needs.
RURAL AND SMALL SCHOOLS STUDY
• The purpose of the study was to determine:• The resources districts need in
order to develop or expand their highly capable programs
• Examples of existing programs for districts around the state to learn from one another
Professional Developmen
t
• Program development
• Teacher Training
Collaboration
• Share funds and resources
• Network
Streamline Process and Requirement
s
• Modified process
• Flexibility
Recommendations
Professional Development
• Program development: OSPI, ESD and university institutes
• Teacher Training: WAETAG/ESD Cadre
Collaboration
• Class Two districts may pool funds and share resources
• Regional network meetings to discuss program development are being formed
Streamline Process and
Requirements
• After the first plan is created, Class Two districts only need to submit a plan when changes are made (not necessarily annually)
• Adjusted administrative requirements
Progress So Far
CONCLUDING THOUGHTS
• Rural communities are unique in their composition and structure. The program of services developed should reflect the shared values of the community.
• Creating a continuum of services for students with identification starting in Kindergarten will result in more students being served appropriately.
• Early intervention for all exceptionalities is essential for students to reach their potential and remain engaged in the learning process through school.
ENDLESS POSSIBILITIES AND PROMISE!
REFERENCES AND RESOURCES
• Baum, S. M., Reis, S. M., & Maxfield, L. R. (Eds.). (1998). Nurturing the gifts and talents of primary grade students. Mansfield Center, CT: Creative Learning Press.
• Coleman, M. (2003). The identification of students who are gifted. ERIC Digest.• Cooper, D. (nd). Professional development: An effective research-based model. Houghton Mifflin
Harcourt.• Gentry, M. Peters, S. and Pereira, N (2010) Gifted and talented student identification using behavior
checklists, nominations, and rating forms: What’s out there? Presentation at the 57th NAGC Convention, Atlanta, GA.
• Johnsen, S. (2009). Best practices for identifying gifted students. Principal. Retrieved from http://www.roe11.k12.il.us/GES%20Stuff/Day%203/Best%20Practices%20for%20Id%20Gifted%20Students.pdf
• Lawrence, B. (2009). Rural gifted education: A comprehensive literature review. Journal for the Education of the Gifted. 32(4), 461-494.
• Purcell, J. and Eckert, R.(2005). Designing programs and services for high ability learners: A guidebook for gifted education. Corwin Press.
• Rogers, K. (2007). Lessons Learned About Educating the Gifted and Talented: A Synthesis of the Research. Gifted Child Quarterly, 51(4), 382-396. Rural Education Resource Center http://www.ed.gov/rural-education
• Washington Administrative Code (2013). Chapter 392-170 WAC: Special service program – highly capable students. Retrieved from http://apps.leg.wa.gov/wac/default.aspx?cite=392-170.
• Washington State Teacher/Principal Evaluation Project (2013). Criteria and definitions. Retrieved from http://tpep-wa.org/the-model/criteria-and-definitions/.