Session 17: Episode 5(2) —
Genomics, our African genesis and family tree
William P. Hall President Kororoit Institute Proponents and Supporters Assoc., Inc. - http://kororoit.org [email protected] http://www.orgs-evolution-knowledge.net
Access my research papers from Google Citations
Tonight
Now that our ancient ancestors and close relatives have been introduced we will consider the historical facts so far as they can be determined.
– From comparing fossils and genomic information we can construct a more-or-less detailed family tree going back a million years or so
– From fossils and toolkits we can reconstruct geographic distributions
Fossils, tools, genomics and human migrations Oldowan origins in the crucible of the Rift valley “Out of Africa 1 (and 2?)” – what hominins from Dmanisi and Flores tell us Origin and spread of the Acheulean toolkit through Africa and Asia Fossil hominins in Europe prior to Homo sapiens Proliferation and genomics of the heidelbergensis species complex Triumph of anatomically modern Homo sapiens out of Africa to the world
Fossils & toolkits (“hardware”)
Earliest stone tools associated with hominin fossils found in East African & Ethiopian Rifts
Australopithecine tool making? – 3.4 mya, cut marked (i.e.
butchered) bones found at Dikika (McPherron Et Al 2010) – Ethiopian Rift
– 3.3 mya, oldest stone tools like Oldowan but larger, found in West Turkana area (Harmand et al. 2015) – East African Rift
Prior to above discoveries, oldest tools plausibly associated with Homo were found around
– Gona (2.6 mya) & Hadar (2.36 mya) – Ethiopian Rift
– Omo (2.34)– referenced in Harmand et al., and Lokalalei 2C between Omo and West Turkana (2.34 mya) in the East African Rift (Roche et al. 2009)
4
Species IDed from the fossil record
5
naledi newly discovered, small brained, mosaic of primitive and modern features from South Africa
Dmanisi Georgia - Variation in Dmanisi specimens show erectus, ergaster, & probably also rudolfensis and habilis might form one chronospecies persisting through time
floresiensis (Hobbit) lived up to a few thousand years ago on Flores (Indonesia) probably derived from Dmanisi erectus (Kubo et al. 2013) or possibly even Australopithecus (Stringer 2014)
erectus longest lived Homo, spread widely through Africa and (via Dmanisi?) Eurasia
antecessor fossils from N central Spain associated with Mode 1 tools – pre heidelbergensis ?
(rhodesiensis ) name sometimes applied to African branch of heidelbergensis probably ancestral to “out of Africa” sapiens
heidelbergensis Eurasian stock probably ancestral to neanderthalensis and Denisovans, probably derived from erectus – via antecessor ?
sapiens, neanderthalensis & Denisovans (Prüfer et al 2014) modern sibling species deriving from heidelbergensis - all using Denisova cave ad different times
After Wood, B. 2012.
H. naledi
?
?
H. erectus/rhodesiensis
Geographic spread of Homo away from E Africa based on fossil sites
Shows distribution of fossil sites attributed to Homo
– Bräuer is a “lumper”, does not recognize H. heidelbergensis as different from “primitive homo”
– ⓢ speciation events Brauer recognizes
Early exits from Africa – Dmanisi, Georgia –
possibly via Strait of Hormuz
– Sangiran, Indonesia – possibly along Indian Ocean coast
– Atapuerca, Spain – possibly two separate times via Strait of Gibralter 6 Bräuer (2008, 2012)
i.e., Indonesia
How do we know they are made tools?
“Refits” of pieces show clear evidence of intentional flaking.
7
Increasingly complex/sophisticated tools help map spread of humans out of Africa
Mode 1 = Oldovan sharp edged pebbles & stones (on core)
Mode 2 = Acheulean bi-facial hand axes & cutting tools shows planned manufacturing (on flake)
Mode 3 = Mousterian industry (primarily used by Neanderthals)
Mode 4 = Arignacian industry – Variety of sophisticated stone &
bone tools (scrapers, bladelets) Mode 5 = Microlithic industries
making blades, points, etc. for use as parts of compound tools (arrows, sickles, awls, etc.)
8
Temporal distribution of stone tools by putative species
9 Brooks 2000; Shea 2011, 2011a
Foley & Lahr 1997
Ocean currents affecting floresiensis colonization of Flores
10
H. erectus
Biogeography: out of Africa
Alternative hypotheses for early exits from Africa (after Rightmire & Lordkipanidze 2010).
– Top: one species (H. erectus) evolved in Africa and spread through Eurasia. floresensis was an early
offshoot of erectus – Bottom: an early African Homo
spread to Eurasia, giving rise to erectus in Asia, that then returned to Africa. floresiensis ancestors may
have exited Africa prior to erectus
Common ancestor to sapiens, neanderthalensis, & denisovans may be erectus or another independent exit from Africa 11
After Rightmire & Lordkipanidze 2010
In this our direct ancestors’ first landfall in Eurasia?
Dating early human occupation of Eurasia (Dennell 2010) by fossils and/or tools
– Black bars = no evidence – Bold type = widely accepted – Light ? = controversial
Did erectus spread from Asia
Minor (Dennell 2010a) ? – Version 2
12
Possible paths for early Homo to reach Western Europe
13 (Sirakov et al. 2010)
Most detailed record of fossils from early Homo out of Africa is from Europe
Earliest tools from western Europe (no hominin fossils found) – Biostratigraphically dated to 1.6-1.3 mya from Pirro Nord in
southern Italy (Arzarello & Peretto 2010; Pavia et al. 2012) – Radiometrically dated dated to 1.57 mya from Lezignan-la-Cebe,
France (Crochet et al. 2009). No hominin fossils have been found with these tools.
Earliest fossils are from Spain, H. antecessor (Bermudez de Castro et al. 1997, 2013),
– Dated from 1.22 mya and around 800 kya (Carbonell et al. 2008; Manzi 2011, 2012; MacDonald et al. 2012).
– Both dates ssociated with Mode 1 (Oldowan) tools. Few fossils are available between ~ 800 kya and ~ 700 kya
– most earlier and later specimens are fragmentary – difficult to define clear boundaries and infer genealogical
relationships among the various species based solely on morphological traits preserved by the fragments.
14
Temporal and geographic distribution of homo in the strict sense based more or less on fossils & tools
15
Genomics (“software”)
- Allows much more
precise reconstruction of relations & migrations of
H. sapiens and our closest relatives
What does genomics tell us
Data universe vastly larger than provided by fossils – Nuclear genomes: ~3 x 109 potential base-pair differences – Y-chromosome DNA: ~ 9 M male-specific base-pairs – Mitochondrial genome: matrilineally inherited 16,600 base-pairs
Analytical tools – Phyletic genealogies
Each mutation is a potential point of bifurcation – Genetic distances (i.e., % different) x estimated mutation rates
Accuracy improves with increasing numbers of data points – Linkage & genetic disequilibrium
Gene loci close together on a chromosome stay together longer and thus tend to be inherited as a package
Mitochondrial & Y-chromosome genes do not recombine – Measures of heterozygosity
Variability lost in small populations Reduced adaptability
– Comparative analysis 17
Latest genomics gives accurate genealogy for heidelbergensis siblings, splits and interspecific hybridization
High quality whole genomic DNA (Prüfer, K., et al. 2014)
mDNA from 300-400 kya fossil Homo (Meyer, et al. 2014) Nuclear DNA dates sapiens/Neanderthal separation to 700 kya and Neanderthal/ Denisovan to 500 kya (Gibbons 2015. Science 349, p. 1270)
Red arrows show inter-specific hybridization with introgression of genes and proportion of genome introgressed
4500 kya
Mitochondrial DNA shows stepwise genealogical derivation based on sequence of single nucleotide mutations 18
Genes not found in Neanderthal genomes H. erectus ?
700 kya
500 kya
Genetic distances from 2.3 M SNPs
19 Schlebusch et al. 2012, Lombard et al. 2013
Phyletics of 24,402 autosomal markers
20
Southern African pops. show greatest diversity & variability
Variability reduced as distance increases from s. Africa
Probable consequence of selection & small population sizes of pops. on the leading edge of expansion
(Petersen et al. 2013)
mitochondrial DNA phylogeny of the “L” branchs in Africa
21 Behar et al. 2008
Time scale 200 kya+ years; LSA = Lower Stone Age
The “L” branch includes the most primitive mDNA sequences in human pops
Turquois shade comprise speakers of the Khoisan dialect
Lavender comprises all other Africans
Pink comprises most branches in the rest of the world mostly deriving from M & N – 7 major bifurcations down from the common ancestor with L0
Human migrations as mapped by mitochondrial DNA mutations
22 Wikipedia
Dating Y-chromosomal DNA lineage branches from 200 kya common ancestor Eurasian stocks down 5 branches
23 Scozzari et al. 2014
B2, E, C, & F found outside of Africa
Detailed Y-chromosome phylogeny
24 Hallast et al. 2015
Oldest known patrilineal bifurcation between any humans (A00 and A0, with 75 derived mutational differences in 180 kb) is estimated to be 239,000 years ago with a 95% CI of 188,000–296,000 years ago, not too different from that of 170,000–180,000 years ago for mitochondrial DNA (Helgason et al. 2015)
Human migrations based on uniparental DNA
25 Oppenheimer 2012
The spread of heidelbergensis derivatives as recorded in Neanderthal, Denisovan & sapiens’ nuclear genomes
“heidelbergensis” spreads across Africa & Eurasia. Mid Pleistocene split of Eurasian branch into Neanderthal & Denisovan. Denisovan lineage hybridizes with surviving “erectus”. Denisovan hybridizes with Neanderthal. African heidelbergensis directly ancestral to sapiens (Eurasians trace genetic ancestry to S. African lines). First sapiens crossing(s) into Levant ~190 kya(?) and 133-80 kya didn’t survive. Next crossing 70-60 kya hybridized with Neanderthals in Levant & spread across Eurasia. Early southern migrants to Australian shelf & Pacific islands hybridized with Denisovans but were replaced by more modern sapiens in Eurasia. Later dispersal of sapiens into Asia hybridized a second time with Neanderthals. H. sapiens remaining in Africa mix around ~35 kya with surviving separate Homo species that had diverged around 700 kya. 26
Veeramah & Hammer 2014
Next session begins to explore our first five million years “How did we become who we are now?”
27
To this point I have summarized a vast array of evidence about the physical evidence for reconstructing hominin history leading to domination of the world by Homo sapiens (ourselves).
In the next session I begin to reconstruct the evolutionary circumstances that led humans to diverge from their close primate relatives to become something so completely new that our capacity to dominate our physical and biological environment has grown to the point where we are on the way to consuming the entire planetary biosphere.
– How and why did the divergence begin? – How has this shaped who we are today and are likely to become?
An Evolutionary Hypothesis: - Our First Five Million Years or “How Did We Get Here?” Life in the primeval forest The end of Eden and adapting to a hard life in a drier world with fewer trees What Can We Learn About Early Hominins from Chimpanzees and Capuchin Monkeys Cultural versus hereditary transmission of technological knowledge Where hominins have gone beyond chimpanzees and capuchins.
Next session starts in the Garden of Eden
28