+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Session 3 (i)

Session 3 (i)

Date post: 03-Jun-2018
Category:
Upload: anjnakandari
View: 213 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend

of 34

Transcript
  • 8/12/2019 Session 3 (i)

    1/34

    Governments and

    Trade

  • 8/12/2019 Session 3 (i)

    2/34

    McGraw-Hill/Irwin 2003 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., All Rights Reserved.

    5-2

    Session FocusThe political reality offree tradeis that while nationsare nominally committed to it, they intervene and takeactions to protect the interests of politically important

    groups.This session explores the political and economicreasons for intervention; to restrict imports andexpand exports, but, more recently, for socialreasons.

    The session describes the range of interventioninstruments used by governments and considers thecase for free trade in light of government actions.

  • 8/12/2019 Session 3 (i)

    3/34

    McGraw-Hill/Irwin 2003 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., All Rights Reserved.

    5-3

    The 7 Instruments of Trade Policy

    AntidumpingDuties

    Local

    ContentRequirements

    Tariffs

    VoluntaryExports

    Restraints

    Subsidies

    AdministrativePolicies

    ImportQuotas

  • 8/12/2019 Session 3 (i)

    4/34

  • 8/12/2019 Session 3 (i)

    5/34

    McGraw-Hill/Irwin 2003 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., All Rights Reserved.

    5-5

    Subsidies

    Governmentpayment to a

    domestic producerCash Grants

    Tax Breaks

    Low InterestLoans

    GovernmentEquity

    Participation

  • 8/12/2019 Session 3 (i)

    6/34

    McGraw-Hill/Irwin 2003 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., All Rights Reserved.

    5-6

    Subsidies

    Agriculture

    1.Keeps inefficientfarmers in business.

    2.Encourages productionof subsidized products.

    3.Produce products grownmore cheaply elsewhere.

    4.Reduces agriculturetrade.

    Helps domestic

    producers tocompete internationally.

    Paid by taxingindividuals

  • 8/12/2019 Session 3 (i)

    7/34McGraw-Hill/Irwin 2003 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., All Rights Reserved.

    5-7

    Import Quotas and Voluntary ExportRestraints

    Direct restrictionon the quantity of a

    good that canbe imported intoa country.

    Import Quotas

    Quota on trade imposed

    by the exportingcountry at the request

    of the importingcountrys government.

    VERs

    Helps

    producers

    Quotarent

  • 8/12/2019 Session 3 (i)

    8/34McGraw-Hill/Irwin 2003 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., All Rights Reserved.

    5-8

    Local Content Requirements

    A specificfraction of a

    good must bedomestically

    produced.

    A specific

    fraction of agood must bedomestically

    produced.

    Physicalamount

    Value

    Widely usedby developingcountries to

    develop theirmanufacturing

    base.

    Used by developedcountries to

    protect local jobsand industry from

    foreign competition.

  • 8/12/2019 Session 3 (i)

    9/34McGraw-Hill/Irwin 2003 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., All Rights Reserved.

    5-9

    Administrative PoliciesBureaucratic rules designed to make it difficult for importsto enter a country.

    Japanese masters in imposing rules.

    Tulip bulbs.

    Federal Express.

  • 8/12/2019 Session 3 (i)

    10/34McGraw-Hill/Irwin 2003 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., All Rights Reserved.

    5-10

    Antidumping Policies

    Selling goods into a foreign market below productioncosts, or

    Selling below fair market value.

    Used to unload excess production.Or, predatory pricing.

    Antidumping policies are used to punish foreign firms.Protect local industry from unfair practices.

    Impose countervailing duties.

  • 8/12/2019 Session 3 (i)

    11/34McGraw-Hill/Irwin 2003 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., All Rights Reserved.

    5-11

    Political Arguments for Intervention

    FurtherForeign Policy

    Objectives

    ProtectIndustryand Jobs.

    NationalSecurity

    Retaliation

    ProtectConsumers

    ProtectHumanRights

  • 8/12/2019 Session 3 (i)

    12/34McGraw-Hill/Irwin 2003 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., All Rights Reserved.

    5-12

    ProtectIndustryand Jobs.

    Most common political argument.

  • 8/12/2019 Session 3 (i)

    13/34McGraw-Hill/Irwin 2003 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., All Rights Reserved.

    5-13

    Retaliation

    Risky strategy. If governmentfails to heed warnings and

    imposes its own higher tariffs,the result is higher tariffs allaround and a correspondingeconomic loss.

  • 8/12/2019 Session 3 (i)

    14/34McGraw-Hill/Irwin 2003 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., All Rights Reserved.

    5-14

    RetaliationUS Trade Sanctions

    0

    5

    10

    15

    20

    25

    1993 95 97 99

    New

    Sanctions

    Afghanistan Italy

    Burma Libya

    Canada Nigeria

    China N. Korea

    Cuba Pakistan

    India Saudi Arabia

    Iran SudanIraq Syria

    Yugoslavia

    Partial List

    5 15

  • 8/12/2019 Session 3 (i)

    15/34McGraw-Hill/Irwin 2003 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., All Rights Reserved.

    5-15

    ProtectConsumers

    Battleground for biotechnologysuch as hormone-treatedbeef and genetically altered crops.

    5 16

  • 8/12/2019 Session 3 (i)

    16/34McGraw-Hill/Irwin 2003 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., All Rights Reserved.

    5-16

    FurtherForeign PolicyObjectives

    Used to build relations with

    another country or punish it(so-called rogue states). Policyis unilateral and easily defeatedby other countries ignoring it.

    5 17

  • 8/12/2019 Session 3 (i)

    17/34McGraw-Hill/Irwin 2003 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., All Rights Reserved.

    5-17

    ProtectHumanRights

    Basis for the use of MostFavored Nation status topersuade China to change itspositions on human rights.

    5 18

  • 8/12/2019 Session 3 (i)

    18/34

    McGraw-Hill/Irwin 2003 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., All Rights Reserved.

    5-18

    Economic Arguments for Intervention

    InfantIndustry

    StrategicTradePolicy

    Infant industry is the oldest economicargument for government intervention,dating to 1792 and Alexander Hamilton.

    Protect developing countrys new industryfrom developed countries betterestablished industries. Recognized byGATT.

    Strategic trade policy can help a

    firm gain first mover advantagesor overcome barriers created by adifferent (foreign) first mover.

    5 19

  • 8/12/2019 Session 3 (i)

    19/34

    McGraw-Hill/Irwin 2003 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., All Rights Reserved.

    5-19

    Revised Case for Free Trade

    Paul Krugman, MIT economist, argues that strategictrade policies can lead to trade wars. The best way tohandle disputes is to work to establish rules that minimizetrade-distorting subsidies - a function of the World

    Trade Organization.

    He also argues that government intervention usually favorsspecial interest groups that distort the subsidy to theirown ends.

    Therefore, a blanket policy of free trade, with exceptionsgranted only under extreme pressure may be the bestpolicy that the country is likely to get.

    5 20

  • 8/12/2019 Session 3 (i)

    20/34

    McGraw-Hill/Irwin 2003 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., All Rights Reserved.

    5-20

    Development of the World Trading

    System

    Intellectual arguments for free trade:

    Adam Smithand David Ricardo.Free trade as government policy:

    Britains (1846) repeal of the Corn Laws.

    Britain continued free trade policy.Fear of trade war.

    5 21

  • 8/12/2019 Session 3 (i)

    21/34

    McGraw-Hill/Irwin 2003 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., All Rights Reserved.

    5-21

    World War I to World War II

    1918 - 1939

    Great Depression

    US stock market collapseSmoot-Hawley Act (1930)

    US had positive trade balance with world

    Act imposes tariffs to protect U.S. firms.

    Foreign response was to impose own barriersUS exports tumbled

    5 22

  • 8/12/2019 Session 3 (i)

    22/34

    McGraw-Hill/Irwin 2003 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., All Rights Reserved.

    5-22

    General Agreement on Tariffs and

    Trade

    WWII allies wanted international organization in trade arenasimilar to UN in political arena.

    GATT proposed by US in 1947 as step toward ITO.1948: Havana Conference.

    Failed charter for the International Trade Organization.

    GATT

    19 original members grew to 120 nations by the time it wassuperceded by the WTO.

    GATT members agreed not to raise tariffs above negotiatedrates.

    5-23

  • 8/12/2019 Session 3 (i)

    23/34

    McGraw-Hill/Irwin 2003 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., All Rights Reserved.

    5-23

    GATT Negotiating Rounds

    Geneva 1947 23

    Annecy 1949 13

    Torquay 1950-51 38

    Geneva 1956 26Dillon 1960-62 45

    Kennedy 1964-67 62

    Tokyo 1973-79 99

    Uruguay 1986-94 117

    9.08.58.07.5

    7.06.56.05.55.0

    4.54.0

    World Trade

    World Income

    1953-63 1963-73

    Annual Growth UnderGATT

    %

    5-24

  • 8/12/2019 Session 3 (i)

    24/34

    McGraw-Hill/Irwin 2003 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., All Rights Reserved.

    5-24

    Average Reduction in US Tariff Rates1947 - 85

    0

    20

    40

    60

    80

    100

    120

    Pre-G

    eneva

    Geneva

    Anne

    cy

    Torquay

    Geneva

    Dillo

    n

    Kennedy

    Toky

    o

    IndexPre-GenevaTariff = 100

    GATT Negotiating Rounds

    5-25

  • 8/12/2019 Session 3 (i)

    25/34

    McGraw-Hill/Irwin 2003 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., All Rights Reserved.

    5 25

    1980-1993: Disturbing Trends

    Pressures for greater protectionism:

    Japans economic success.Worlds second largest economy.

    Worlds largest exporter.

    The U.S.s persistent trade deficit.

    Many countries had found ways to avoid GATTrestrictions.

    5-26

  • 8/12/2019 Session 3 (i)

    26/34

    McGraw-Hill/Irwin 2003 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., All Rights Reserved.

    5 26

    Most comprehensive trade agreement in history.Created the World Trade Organization.

    Impacted:

    Agriculture subsidies (stumbling block:US/EU).

    Applied GATT rules to services andintellectual property.

    Strengthened GATT monitoring andenforcement.

    Uruguay Round

    5-27

  • 8/12/2019 Session 3 (i)

    27/34

    McGraw-Hill/Irwin 2003 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., All Rights Reserved.

    5 27

    Umbrella organization for:

    GATT

    ServicesIntellectual property

    Responsibility for trade arbitration:

    Reports adopted unless specifically rejected.

    After appeal, fail to comply can result in compensation toinjured country or trade sanctions.

    World Trade Organization

    5-28

  • 8/12/2019 Session 3 (i)

    28/34

    McGraw-Hill/Irwin 2003 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., All Rights Reserved.

    5 28

    WTO

    145 members.Between 1995 and 2000, 213 disputes brought beforethe WTO.Significant victories:

    Telecommunications

    68 countries (90%) of worldtelecommunications revenuesPledged to open their marketsto fair competition

    Financial Services

    95% of financial services market102 countries will open, to varyingdegrees, their markets.

    5-29

  • 8/12/2019 Session 3 (i)

    29/34

    McGraw-Hill/Irwin 2003 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., All Rights Reserved.

    WTO Cancun

    Failure of Countries to Agree on Goals

    Private Groups & Unions Oppose faceless Organization

    5-30

  • 8/12/2019 Session 3 (i)

    30/34

    McGraw-Hill/Irwin 2003 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., All Rights Reserved.

    STRUCTURE OF WTOThe MinisterialConference

    The General CouncilThe DisputeSettlement BodyThe Trade Policy

    Review BodyCouncils for Trade inGoods,Services &TRIPS

    Subsidiary Bodies

    Committees on

    Trade andDevelopment, BOPrestrictions,Budge

    t, Finance &Administration

    5-31

  • 8/12/2019 Session 3 (i)

    31/34

    McGraw-Hill/Irwin 2003 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., All Rights Reserved.

    THE SECRETARIATHeaded by Director General

    D-G to be appointed by Ministerial Conference

    Other appointments by D-G in accordance withrules framed by Ministerial Conference

    Responsibility of the Secretariat to beInternational in character.No authority external

    to WTO to direct the activities of the staffincluding Governments of the nations they arecitizens of.

    5-32

  • 8/12/2019 Session 3 (i)

    32/34

    McGraw-Hill/Irwin 2003 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., All Rights Reserved.

    Salient Features of Uruguay RoundFormation of WTO

    IndustrialProducts(Market access)

    Agricultural ProductsServices

    Textiles & Clothing

    Intellectual Property

    SubsidiesTechnical Barriers

    Anti-Dumping rules

    Trade Related InvestmentMeasures

    Government Procurement

    Safeguard ActionsBalance of PaymentsProvisions

    Dispute Settlement

    Coherence in Global PolicyMaking

    5-33

  • 8/12/2019 Session 3 (i)

    33/34

    McGraw-Hill/Irwin 2003 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., All Rights Reserved.

    SubsidiesProhibited-Contingent upon export performance

    Actionable-Adverse effect on other countries

    Non actionable-Industrial research, Pre-competitive development

    5-34

  • 8/12/2019 Session 3 (i)

    34/34

    Intellectual PropertyTo grant national treatment

    To provide certain minimum standards of

    protectionInstitute procedures and remedies under nationallaws


Recommended