+ All Categories

Setup

Date post: 30-Dec-2015
Category:
Upload: lance-weiss
View: 24 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
Description:
Setup. China/US Joint Winter School & 3 rd China/US Workshop on Novel Superconductors. 19 – 27 January 2013. University of Hong Kong. A Density-Functional Study of the Electronic and Magnetic Properties of Tetragonal Copper Monoxide as a Proxy for High Temperature Superconductivity. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Popular Tags:
41
Setup
Transcript
Page 1: Setup

Setup

Page 2: Setup

China/US Joint Winter School &3rd China/US Workshop on Novel Superconductors

19 – 27 January 2013

University of Hong Kong

A Density-Functional Study of the Electronic and Magnetic Properties of Tetragonal Copper Monoxide as

a Proxy for High Temperature Superconductivity

Paul M. GrantW2AGZ Technologies

www.w2agz.com

Page 3: Setup

“China/US Joint...”~ 10,000 years ~ 1,000 years

Page 4: Setup
Page 5: Setup

Zhu Jingwu

Page 6: Setup

Yao Ming

Page 7: Setup

Now Let’s Get Started!

Tools

Page 8: Setup

Bob Laughlin’s “Theory of Everything” (that matters)

Where’s spin, Pauli and Darwin? Ya screwed up,

Bob!Oh yeah, how about

Maxwell, Boltzmann, Gibbs, Fermi,…and finally,

Newton’s Apple.

The crunch comes when I with i >= 3 -> “thermodynamic limit.” “Van Vleck Catastrophe (1936)”

“Size Matters !”B-

Page 9: Setup

Extended Hubbard Hamiltonian

, , ,2ij i j i jsi iij i ij s

VH t c c U n n n n

Qualitative Description of the Physical Properties of Antiferromagnetic Insulators

One-electron “band” term

On-site “Hubbard” double occupation coulomb repulsion

Off-site repulsion

2 24 /NkT t S UMore Later!

Page 10: Setup

Charge Transfer Insulator

After Imada, et al, RMP 70, 1039 (1998)

Page 11: Setup

Density Functional TheoryHohenberg – Kohn (NP Chemistry, 1998)

Kohn-Sham Equations (~1965)

Now minimize self-consistently:

obtaining:

where:

W. Kohn

Page 12: Setup

DFT & (LDA + U)

Implemented in LMTO by Anisimov, et al, JPCM 2, 3973 (1990)o Applied to rock salt NiO, MnO, FeO, CoO

Plane-Wave Pseudopotential Implementation by Cococcioni and de Gironcoli, PRB 71, 035105 (2005)o Applied to rock salt FeO and NiO

But where is rock salt copper monoxide, CuO?

Page 13: Setup

Copper Monoxide

Page 14: Setup

Néel Temperature vs. TMO Atomic Number

“Tenorite”~225 K

Page 15: Setup

Tenorite (Monoclinic CuO)

Cu

O

What God wants…just ask her!

Page 16: Setup

Comparison of Tenorite (111) to CuO – MgO Proxy (100)

(111) Tenorite (100) MgO

O

Cu

O

Cu

Cu

O

Page 17: Setup

Anthologies (CuO rs/tet fsc)• Experimental

– Siemons:• “Tetragonal CuO: End Member of the 3d Transition Monoxides,” Siemons, et al., PRB 79,

195122 (2009).

• Computational– Grant:

• “Electronic Properties of Rocksalt Copper Monoxide: A Proxy Structure for High Temperature Superconductivity,” Grant, JOP:CS 129, 012042 (2008).

– Franchini:• “Hybrid Density-Functional Calculations of the Electronic and Magnetic Structure of Tetragonal

CuO,” Chen, et al., PRB 80, 094527 (2009).• “Thickness Dependent Structural and Electronic Properties of CuO Grown on SrTiO3(100): A

Hybrid Density Functional Theory Study,” Francini, et al., JOP:CM 23, 045004 (2011).

– Cococcioni:• “First Principles Study of Electronic and Structural Properties of CuO,” Himmetoglu, et al.,

arXiv:1107:4399v1 (2011).(This is a great paper...see Acknowledgements...and estimate of TN)

• What’s Next?:– Geballe:

• “Optimal TC of Cuprates: The Role of Screening and Reservoir Layers,” Raghu, et al., PRB 86, 094506 (2012).

(I suspect this model/assertion may be “DFT testable”)

Page 18: Setup

3d9

Cu2+ Ion Cubic Tetragonal

t2g

eg

Cu2+ 3d Multiplet Splitting (Tetra)

Page 19: Setup

Tetragonal CuO

c/a = 1.36

3.9053.905

5.320

Measurements(Wolter Siemons)

• 2-4 ML epi on STO

• No Fermi Edge

• No Exchange Bias on ferro-SRO (Tc ~ 100-150 K)

Page 20: Setup

Proto-TMO AF-II Rocksalt Unit Cell

[111]

Applies to:•MnO•FeO •CoO •NiO •CuO ?

Page 21: Setup

Proto-TMO AF-II Rocksalt

[-1-1-1]

Page 22: Setup

“Zone-ology” of “nm_Tet-CuO”

Actually, “Tet-CuO” is really “Ortho-fcc CuO” with a = b

oh...btw...the red balls are O

Page 23: Setup

So...

Let’s “Shut up and start calculating.”- David Mermin, Cornell, as quoted by yours truly,

(Nature 4 August 2011)

Page 24: Setup

Tools

QUANTUM-ESPRESSO Suite of CodesDFT (LDA+U) plus electron-phononGraphics by Tone Kolalj (XCrysDen)www.quantum-espresso.org

“Dial-in” Parameters G2 = 40 Ry ρ = 320 RyConvergence ≤ 10-6 Ry“Smearing” = Methfessel-PaxtonPsuedopotentials: Ultrasoft, XC = Perdew-Zunger

Cu: 3d94s2 O: 2s22p4

Hardware 3.33 GHz Intel Core i7 – 12 GB+

Page 25: Setup
Page 26: Setup

First EffortsTMO Asymmetric Type II

af-CuO Cell

LDA+U Calcs

Grant, IOP-CS 129 (2008) 102042(Click Here)

Tetragonal Distortion

Siemons, et al, PRB 79 (2009)

195122(Click Here)

Page 27: Setup

Néel Temperature vs. TMO Atomic Number

“Tenorite”~225 K

“Face-Centered, Rock

Salt CuO”~850 K (wow!)

See Francini, Cococcioni Papers

jiij

BN J

k

SST

3

)1(2

Page 28: Setup

n

U

0

3

6

0.00 +0.15 -0.15

Page 29: Setup

“Real Metal”“Fermi Liquid”

“Fu

nn

y Metal”

“Pseu

do

gap

“Fo

nd

AF

Mem

ories”

Superconductivity

“SDW”“NEEL”“A-F”

T

gg*“Insulator” “Conductor”“F

un

ny M

etal”

“Pseu

do

gap

“Fo

nd

AF

Mem

ories”

The Colossal Quantum Conundrum

U~U0 {1 - (g/g*)2}1/2

Somewhere in here there has to be “BCS-like” pairing!

U = 6 U = 0

U = 3

Page 30: Setup

Shakes or Spins or Both?Are They Copacetic, Competitive…or…

…just another Conundrum?

What formalism is the HTSC analogy to Migdal-Eliashberg-McMillan?

• Original Strong Coupling, Eliashberg (JETP, 1960), McMillan (PR, 1968)

• Generalized Linhard Response Function (RPA + fluctuations) Hu and O’Connell (PRB 1989)

• Dielectric Response Function Kirznits, Maximov, Khomskii (JLTP 1972)

(In other words, how do I calculate the value of the BCS gap?)

Page 31: Setup

McMillan Strong Coupling(Computationally implemented by Wierzbowska, et al., cond-mat/0504077, 2006)

What’s the HTSC

equivalent?

Well!What do I “move?”

Page 32: Setup

Phonons?(Ask Alex M.)

Page 33: Setup

Bednorz-Mueller Nobel Lecture

After Chakravarty, (1979)

Page 34: Setup

Macfarlane, Rosen, Seki, SSC 63, 831 (1987)

Raman Spectroscopy of YBCO

Indeed, they’re there!

Page 35: Setup

Pyka, et al., PRL 70, 1457, (1993)

Harashima, et al., Physica C263, 257 (1996)

More Evidence

Page 36: Setup
Page 37: Setup

Ledbetter, Physica C 235, 1325 (1994)

Finally, TC scales (roughly) with D

Nota Bene!

Page 38: Setup

The Grand(t) Summary: (EM, D ≈ 440 K, * ≈ 0.05)

Note Differences in Tc Scale

(“double-delta) smoothing (“double-delta) smoothing

(“double-delta) smoothing

Tc (K)Tc (K)

Tc (K)

“Tet c/a = 1.36”q = 0.15 holes per CuO

“Cubic”q = 0

“Tet c/a = 1.36”q = 0.15 electrons per CuO

Page 39: Setup

Doping per CuO (units of (e)

Tc (K)

Conclusions

• Phonons can yield “credible” values of Tc in the cuprates

• Holes are better than electrons

• Can’t account for higher Tc’s in “1-2-3 +” layered compounds (Yet...check out Raghu, et al.)

Computers and the Study of Proxy Structures may finally resolve the mystery of High-Tc...a Future NP for

someone in the audience...much younger than me!

Page 40: Setup

The End

Well...almost...

Page 41: Setup

PBCO CNT-5,0

“Ba Channel”“RE Channel”

Come See Mein Baltimore!

Possibilities for Observation of Quantum Transport in

(RE)Ba2Cu3O7-y Perovskites

R43.000032:54 PM, Wednesday, 3/20/2013

Hilton Ballroom 2


Recommended