Date post: | 20-Feb-2017 |
Category: |
Environment |
Upload: | center-for-energy-and-environment |
View: | 209 times |
Download: | 1 times |
Shaping the Tradability of US Energy Efficiency Outreach to Minnesota Stakeholders on the
National Energy Efficiency Registry (NEER)
August 11, 2016
Energy Cast Webinar
Pg. 2 Research
Financing Policy
Programs
Discover + Deploy the most effective solutions for a healthy, low-carbon economy
Planning
Pg. 5
Shaping the Tradability of US Energy
Efficiency Moderated by CEE:
Megan Hoye | Engagement Manager
Today’s Expert Panelists
Jessica Burdette
MN Depart. of Commerce
Jenna Jorns
The Climate Registry
Pat Stanton
E4TheFuture
National Energy Efficiency Registry:
Minnesota’s Role
Jessica Burdette
State Energy Office Manager, Efficiency & Operations
Minnesota Department of Commerce, Division of Energy Resources
• Project Origins
–US Department of Energy Competitive Award
– Lead by Tennessee & five other states
–Supporting organizations include The Climate
Registry & NASEO
–Partner states include Minnesota, Oregon,
Pennsylvania, Michigan, Georgia
Introduction: National Energy Efficiency Registry
Introduction: National Energy Efficiency Registry
• Registry Purpose
–Central repository of EE projects
–Allow for EE program and initiative tracking
–Future compliance with the Clean Power Plan
–Voluntary market for tradeable credits
• Minnesota’s Role
–Provide input into operating rules
–Engage interested stakeholders
– Inform implementation roadmap
Introduction: National Energy Efficiency Registry
Pg. 10
Poll Question #1
Are you familiar with the National Energy
Efficiency Registry (NEER) Project?
• No, not at all
• No, but I have heard of it
• Yes, but only a little bit
• Yes, very familiar
Pg. 11
Audience Expertise & Interests
29%
35% 12%
24%
Draft principles& operatingrules
Examples of howstakeholders willuse
Developmenttimeline
35%
20%
14%
11%
8%
5%
5%
EfficiencyProgram…
Other
Utility
Clean EnergyAdvocate
Policymaker
Energy ServiceCo.
RatepayerAdvocate
Poll Question #1
Are you familiar with the National Energy
Efficiency Registry (NEER) Project?
No, not at all
Yes, but only a little bit
Yes, very familiar
About the NEER
A central repository that will allow the public and
private sectors to transparently track attributes
associated with energy efficiency initiatives
Policy neutral
Built on best practice
Registry design
EE accounting and reporting protocols
Will help states demonstrate progress towards
energy goals and potential compliance with
existing and future regulation
Will be able to track energy conservation and
other types of reduction efforts
NEER Objectives
Provide a consistent framework for EE to be
included as an “eligible resource” in federal
and state plans
Demonstrate verification of EE projects
according to the appropriate eligibility
standards
Facilitate the opportunity for inter- and
intrastate trading
Potential NEER Applications
Electric
EE
Fossil
Fuel EE
CEIP
(CPP) Non-
electric
carbon
regulation CPP
Compliance: other
Environmental or
Energy Policies
Performance-based
EE procurement
Supports multi-state EE
collaboration
Tracking for State
EE Programs
Poll Question #2
What potential NEER role are you most
interested in learning about?
Energy efficiency provider
State
Instrument buyer
Accredited Independent Verifier (AIV)
Others
NEER Support of State Efforts
Lowers the cost associated with
administering energy efficiency programs
and policies
Streamlines energy efficiency project EM&V
Supports state energy and environmental
planning efforts
Avoids double counting of energy savings
Creates greater transparency of energy
efficiency programs and impacts
Benefits of a NEER
The NEER will:
Not prescribe EM&V but will outline consistent
requirements for data
Aggregate rate payer and non-rate payer
programs
Support the development of financial
instruments representing verified EE savings
Be flexible to support a range of EE projects
and program types
States Initiative on Principles and Governance
Policy & Integration Working Groups
Committee to Draft Functional
Requirements
Development and Implementation
NEER
NEER Development Elements
State Initiative on Principles
and Governance
Two-year initiative to define:
NEER Principles and Operating Rules
• Steering/Advisory Committee to develop and finalize
• Multi-stakeholder Working Group ensures Principles and
Operating Rules meet the needs of all stakeholders
Roadmap for state adoption and implementation
Key functional platform components
Funded though U.S. DOE 2015 State Energy
Program Award to Tennessee
State Initiative on Principles
and Governance
Supporting project partners:
Additional project support provided by:
State Initiative on Principles
and Governance Timeline
Timeframe Task
March – April 2016 Formation of Multi-stakeholder Working Group
& Steering/Advisory Committee
April 2016 – February 2017 Multi-stakeholder Working Group to draft
NEER Principles and Operating Rules
April – May 2017 Public comment period for draft NEER
Principles and Operating Rules
September 2017 Final roadmap for state adoption and
implementation
October 2017 Key functional platform requirements
Composed of ~125 members
Ensures draft Principles and Operating Rules
meet the needs of all stakeholders
Makes recommendations to steering committee
Ongoing membership pending ability to
accommodate additional participants
Email [email protected] if you are
interested in joining
Multi-stakeholder Working
Group
Working Group Timeline
Timeframe Activity
March 2016 Formation of Multi-stakeholder Working Group
April 14, 2016 Kickoff stakeholder webinar
June 15, 2016 Initial draft rules circulated to working group
July 14, 2016 Stakeholder webinar
August 1, 2016 Multi-stakeholder Working Group comments
due on initial draft rules
August 2016 Issue-specific sub-group calls
September 15, 2016 Stakeholder webinar; in-person option at
NASEO annual conference (Providence, RI)
October 2016 Stakeholder webinar (TBD)
November 2016 Stakeholder webinar (TBD)
February 2017 Final stakeholder webinar; in-person option at
NASEO meeting (Washington, DC) (TBD)
About Attribute Registries
Track the non-energy attributes of generation
Come in all shapes and sizes
Registry
Single Purpose
Compliance
Voluntary
General Purpose
Compliance & Voluntary
Existing Registries and
Experience
Single Purpose Compliance Instrument Registries
Acid Rain Program Registry
RGGI Allowance Registry
Voluntary Registries
Green-e
Verified Carbon Standard Registry
General Purpose ‘all non-energy attribute’
certificate registries
M-RETS
PJM Generation Attributes Tracking System (GATS)
Basic Registry Elements
Basic elements are found in most attribute
registries supporting various policies
Accounts Assets Asset Output
Commoditized Instruments
Instruments Transactions
Instruments Retirement
Sample Scenario
Private Lighting Contractor is EE Provider -- in a
contract with the site owner who has ownership
of EE Credits (EEC).
Assume there is a voluntary market for EECs
similar to green power market for renewables --
Buyers generally require NEER Enhanced QA/QC.
No ratepayer funding used
EE Provider sells EECs to Buyer who in
turn uses them as basis for making
sustainability claims
Sample Scenario
Accounts Assets Asset Output
Commoditized Instruments
Instruments Transactions
Instruments Retirement
NEER Draft Rules Sections
Sec. 8: Instrument Transactions
Accounts Assets Asset Output
Commoditized Instruments
Instrument Transactions
Instrument Retirement
EE Provider
Information
Static data
Step 1: Register an Account
Accounts Assets Asset Output
Commoditized Instruments
Instrument Transactions
Instrument Retirement
Step 2: Register an Asset
A: EE Project
Information
Accounts Assets Asset Output
Commoditized Instruments
Instrument Transactions
Instrument Retirement
Step 2: Register an Asset
A: EE Project
Information
B: EE Provider
Selects NEER
Enhanced
QA/QC Option
Accounts Assets Asset Output
Commoditized Instruments
Instrument Transactions
Instrument Retirement
C: Attest to
Ownership
&
Exclusivity
Step 2: Register an Asset
A: EE Project
Information
B: EE Provider
Selects NEER
Enhanced
QA/QC Option
Accounts Assets Asset Output
Commoditized Instruments
Instrument Transactions
Instrument Retirement
Step 3: Asset Output
Reporting
A: EE Provider
Submits Asset
Output Report
Accounts Assets Asset Output
Commoditized Instruments
Instrument Transactions
Instrument Retirement
A: EE Provider
Submits Asset
Output Report
B: QA/QC
Protocol
Completed w/
AIV Certification
Step 3: Asset Output
Reporting
Accounts Assets Asset Output
Commoditized Instruments
Instrument Transactions
Instrument Retirement
C: NEER-
Admin Loads
Verified Asset
Output Into
Log
A: EE Provider
Submits Asset
Output Report
B: QA/QC
Protocol
Completed w/
AIV Certification
Step 3: Asset Output
Reporting
Accounts Assets Asset Output
Commoditized Instruments
Instrument Transactions
Instrument Retirement
Step 4: Creation of Instrument
A: NEER-Admin
Deposits EECs Based
on Verified Asset output
into EE Provider’s Asset
Account
Accounts Assets Asset Output
Commoditized Instruments
Instrument Transactions
Instrument Retirement
Step 4: Creation of Instrument
A: NEER-Admin
Deposits EECs Based
on Verified Asset output
into EE Provider’s Asset
Account
B: EE Provider
Executes a
Bilateral
Contract to
Sell EECs to a
Buyer
Accounts Assets Asset Output
Commoditized Instruments
Instrument Transactions
Instrument Retirement
Step 5: Transfer of Instruments
A: EE Provider
Directs NEER-
Admin to Transfer
EECs to Buyer’s
Asset Account
Accounts Assets Asset Output
Commoditized Instruments
Instrument Transactions
Instrument Retirement
A: EE Provider
Directs NEER-
Admin to Transfer
EECs to Buyer’s
Asset Account B: NEER-
Admin
Transfers EECs
Contingent on
Buyer
Acceptance
Step 5: Transfer of Instruments
Accounts Assets Asset Output
Commoditized Instruments
Instrument Transactions
Instrument Retirement
B: NEER-Admin
Confirmation of
EEC Retirement
For Buyers
Sustainability
Documentation
Step 6: Instrument Retirement
A: Buyer Retires
EECs
NEER Basic Self-reported data
No M&V report or third-
party verification of
Dynamic Data
Full disclosure that EE
data is self-reported
No Instruments created
NEER Enhanced Self-reported data
Requires M&V report
Accredited Independent
Verification of Static
and Dynamic Data
EM&V standard
comparable to CPP MTR
Instruments created
Proposed QA/QC Options
NEER Basic Self-reported data
No M&V report or third-
party verification of
Dynamic Data
Full disclosure that EE
data is self-reported
No Instruments created
NEER Enhanced Self-reported data
Requires M&V report
Accredited Independent
Verification of Static
and Dynamic Data
EM&V standard
comparable to CPP MTR
Instruments created
Proposed QA/QC Options
NEER Basic Self-reported data
No M&V report or third-
party verification of
Dynamic Data
Full disclosure that EE
data is self-reported
No Instruments created
NEER Enhanced Self-reported data
Requires M&V report
Accredited Independent
Verification of Static
and Dynamic Data
EM&V standard
comparable to CPP MTR
Instruments created
Proposed QA/QC Options
Poll Question #3
Instruments should NOT be issued to Assets
using the NEER Basic QA/QC Protocol?
Agree
Disagree
Don’t have an opinion
Need more information
Poll Question #4
The NEER Enhanced QA/QC Protocols should
be comparable to the Clean Power Plan
Model Trading Rule (EM&V, etc.)?
Agree
Disagree
Don’t have an opinion
Need more information
For more information, please contact:
Thank you!
Acknowledgement: This material is based upon work supported by the Department of Energy, Office of Energy
Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE), under Award Number DE-EE0007219, CFDA No. 81.119.
Jenna Jorns
Policy Associate
The Climate Registry
(213) 784-4165
Pat Stanton
Director
E4TheFuture
(508) 740-2836
Audrey Starkebaum
Policy Analyst
E4TheFuture
(774) 777-5121 ext. 106
Peggy Kellen
Director of Policy
The Climate Registry
(213) 542-0291
Pg. 13
Shaping the Tradability of US Energy
Efficiency Moderated by CEE:
Megan Hoye | Engagement Manager
Today’s Expert Panelists
Jessica Burdette
MN Depart. of Commerce
Jenna Jorns
The Climate Registry
Pat Stanton
E4TheFuture
Audience Question & Answer 15 minutes
Webinar Archive Link:
https://www.mncee.org/resources/resource-center/