Date post: | 26-Dec-2015 |
Category: |
Documents |
Upload: | aileen-thornton |
View: | 218 times |
Download: | 2 times |
Shared Prosperity Work Group 1
Shared Prosperity Workgroup
March 6, 201410:00 – 11:30AM
GREATER MSP
Shared Prosperity Work Group 2
Agenda
10:00 – 10:05: Introductions10:05 – 10:20: Today’s objectives & moving forward10:20 – 10:50: Break out groups
i. Stakeholder engagement (Peter)ii. Audience (Julia)iii. Indicator categories (Mary Kay & Val)
10:50 – 11:20: Full group discussion11:20 – 11:30: Wrap up
Shared Prosperity Work Group 3
Meeting Objectives
• Get feedback on outreach process and audiences
• Gather your input and direction on indicator categories
Regional Success Measures: Project Recap
We have the opportunity to draw upon all of our work to date and establish a shared set of key metrics. WE ARE NOT STARTING FROM SCRATCH!
A dashboard where we all look to answer the most basic question: How are we doing?
Help leaders converge around a set of metrics that are:• Objective • Comprehensive (economic, social, environmental)• Compact (20-25 key measures in 5-6 categories)• Benchmarked against peer regions • Clearly and consistently communicated • Place equity measures on the same plane as other metrics such as economic
growth.• Endorsed and used by organizations region-wide
MEASURE
REVIEW
ACT
Last M
odified
2/4/20
14 11:4
3 A
M C
entral S
tanda
rd T
ime
Prin
ted
Like most best practice regional indicators, San Diego’s are organized into categories
▪ San Diego’s indicators are prominently displayed on the homepage of the regional economic development organization
▪ Oriented to tell story of region’s talent, e.g., talent has its own category, above economy
▪ Engaging, at-a-glance display both simplifies message and invites viewer to explore
PRELIMINARY
SOURCE: SanDiegoBusiness.org/Research; Io.inc, McKinsey Cities Initiative
Last M
odified
2/4/20
14 11:4
3 A
M C
entral S
tanda
rd T
ime
Prin
ted
6
London’s set of indicators is focused on sustainable development, which it defines broadly
SOURCE: London Sustainable Development Commission
Regional Success Measures: Project Recap
Consensus accelerator The benefits of a shared dashboard for leaders in the public, private and nonprofit sectors would be immediate and significant. The new consensus around key metrics will help us manage growth, focus investment, set strategic priorities and act more quickly in areas requiring cross-sector collaboration.
Regional Economic Development Strategy Establishing regional indicators is one of the six action items identified in the region’s 3-5 year competitiveness strategy. The new indicators will provide a data-driven, comprehensive answer to the fundamental question “how are we doing” and enable a new range of collaborative endeavors central to execution of the strategy.
Global best practiceHigh-performing regions around the globe use indicators to develop and maintain a common understanding of what’s critical to their success. In our region, the indicators will be used to benchmark against national and international peers and, over time, produce valuable trend data on our region’s performance.
Shared Prosperity Work Group 8
Choose 1 of the small groups
30 minutes gathering your feedback to:1. Refine the stakeholder engagement process2. Identify potential audiences and how they would
use the indicators3. Develop indicator categories
Bring discussion back to the larger group.
How do we get there?
Shared Prosperity Work Group 9
Why Is Stakeholder Engagement Important to this Project?
Establishing regional consensus on a high-level, shared set of indicators is a primary deliverable of this project.
LEADERSHIP
TECHNICAL
LEADERSHIP
CONSENSUS BUILDING • Regional Priorities• Process, Goals, Outcomes
METRIC IDENTIFICATION & SELECTION
COMMUNICATIONADOPTION & UTILIZATION
Engaging regional leaders is a priority because who uses the new dashboard and how are as important than how it looks and what it measures.
10Shared Prosperity Work Group
Why Is Stakeholder Engagement Important to this Project?
CoordinatedMEASUREMENT
SharedPRIORITIES
CollectiveACTION
VALUE
Strategic Change
The shared dashboard is a critical step toward regional product improvement
Greater regional competitiveness
&
Shared Prosperity Work Group 11
Who will be engaged?
1 Confirmed users of the shared dashboard
Groups that may utilize the indicators
Groups with existing regional indicators
Groups with an interest in some, but not all areas of the dashboard (economic; environmental; social)
2
3
PRIORITY
PRIORITY
PRIORITY
12Shared Prosperity Work Group
How Will Groups Be Engaged?
CONVERGE DESIGN COMMUNICATE
MARCH JULY DECEMBER
Evaluate&
Share
Evaluate&
Share
What is the “market” for this “product”
What are the 5-6 categories all leaders in our region should track?
What models from outside the region resonate most?
What 3-4 metrics will we use to measure each category?
How should our dashboard look and function?
How should we communicate the roll-out of the product?
What are your reactions to draft dashboard?
Who will be involved in the roll-out of the dashboard & how?
Shared Prosperity Work Group 13
Who’s on the Project Team?
Val VannettGREATER MSP
Mary Kay BaileyPartnership for Regional Opportunity
Julia SilvisItasca Project
Todd GrahamMet Council
Todd KlingelMinneapolis Regional Chamber of Commerce
Peter FroschGREATER MSP
POTENTIAL ADDITIONS
Wilder Foundation - MN Compass DEED
University of MinnesotaGreat Plains Institute for Sustainable Development
Minneapolis Federal Reserve
Shared Prosperity Work Group 14
Small Group Worksheet
Why don’t we have a shared
dashboard today?
How can we strengthen the
process?
What other groups may want
to utilize the dashboard?
• GREATER MSP Board• Itasca Project Members• Partner Advisory Council• Regional Chamber Boards
• Reg. Council of Mayors• Metropolitan Council• Metro Cities
• Wilder Foundation• UofMN• Private Colleges
Private Public 3rd Sector
Add to this initial list
Shared Prosperity Work Group 15
Audience: Who
• Our goal is to create a set of indicators that a broad variety of leaders and stakeholders from around the region will find relevant to them:– Business leaders/CEOs– Residents– Public officials (elected and staff)– Philanthropy/non-profits
Shared Prosperity Work Group 16
Audience: Examples from other regions
• Philadelphia – an academically-led coalition– Housed in Temple University– Advisory members include academics, local non-profits, and a few
business leaders
• Boston – – In their own words: “Non-profit organizations, program officers at
foundations, city agencies, students, and practitioners all use our data to tell important stories that will inform future policies and development in Boston”
• Sacramento – land use focus– Public officials, particularly those who touch
land use and transportation decisions– General public– Developers, real estate professionals
Shared Prosperity Work Group 17
Audience: How• We envision the audience will use these indicators to help them make
decisions regarding their own programs and priorities, e.g., – Three non-profits form a partnership to move a sub-group of indicators
important to all of them– A CEO bolsters testimony he is giving to the legislature using facts from the
indicators– A program director at a non-profit alters their RFP focus to address an issue of
concern– A family is prompted to changing their volunteering by a sobering indicator
• May not directly seek to impact metrics, i.e., may or may not use the indicators as a progress metric for their own efforts
• Many organizations, we imagine, will continue to collect goal-specific, actionable indicators of unique relevance to them and their stakeholders – this set of indicators is not meant to replace existing efforts
Shared Prosperity Work Group 18
Audience: Examples of how other regions use indicators
• Seoul uses competitive indicators to increase pride in the region, market itself to businesses, tourists and potential new residents (all their indicators are externally-created rankings)
• San Diego uses metrics to define and also market itself as a great place for high-tech talent
• Philadelphia uses its indicators to illuminate differences between regional geographies. They issue reports, policy briefs, and provide interactive mapping software for partners to access indicators to support their own causes
• Seattle uses its indicators both to create a common understanding of who and what the region is, and to measure performance of the government on specific metrics
• Atlanta uses indicators to track progress towards shared regional goals
Shared Prosperity Work Group 19
Audience: Discussion Questions
• What is your reaction to the audience we describe?– Should it be more broad? More narrow? How can we speak about the
indicators in a way to draw in desired audience members?– Whom else would you like to see included in the audience description?
• How do you envision the audience using indicators? E.g., – Increasing public awareness/urgency– Building consensus among regional leaders on challenges, assets and
solutions– Supporting more effective management of their projects or programs
• What implications do you see in the audience and their use of indicators for – Categories– Specific metrics: Actionable, informative, surprising?– Communications: Frequency, reach, level?
Shared Prosperity Work Group 20
Indicator Category Development
CRITERIA• In aggregate, broad view
of regional success (e.g. economic, social, environment)
• Relevant to every part of the region (e.g. urban, suburban, ex-urban)
• 5 – 7 categories which “bucket” 20 – 25 indicators total.
Indicator categories in use by other US regions
Shared Prosperity Work Group 21
San Diego Charlotte Atlanta Boston Philadelphia Seattle Total regions using
Economy 6Environment 5Demography/ People 4
Mobility/ Transport 4
Civic Vitality “Government” “public engagement”
4
Health 4Public Safety 4Cultural life/Arts 3Housing 3Education 3Talent “quality
workforce”2
Other/Notes Quality of life Community Technology Gov’t & Taxes; Terrorism, Land
use Regs
Financial stability; Service
excellence
NA
MSP Indicator categories
Shared Prosperity Work Group 22
COMPASS MN Dashboard MRCC BVI CURA/U Metro Consortium (Gauto)
Initiatives using
NOTES:
Economy Biz Climate 4
Education Human Capital 4
Environment Quality of Life 4
Mobility (transp & internet)
Transportation Quality of Life
Governance 4
Workforce Econ/education Human Capital 4 Mix of education, labor force charc.
Government/ Civic Engmnt Governance 3 Voting, volunteerism, gvt
efficiency
Community Housing& economy Social 3 Poverty, homelessness,
wage inequality
Public Safety Quality of Life
3
Health 2
Housing Quality of Life
2 Homelessness, ppl pay more than 30%
Quality of Life Social 2 Cultural institutions hospital beds
People/specific groups
Aging, Children/Yout
Early childhood, immigrants
1 Does not include basic demographics
OTHER: Thrive MSP 2040 indicator categories will be under the 5 outcomes: stewardship, prosperity, equity, livability, sustainability
Shared Prosperity Work Group 23
Economy A thriving economy that encourages business growth & employment opportunities. A strong economy that encourages business investment and promotes opportunities for a competitive workforce.
Education Minnesotans have the education and skills they need to achieve their goals. All Minnesota students graduate from high school and are prepared for postsecondary education
Environment A clean, healthy environment with sustainable uses of natural resources.A clean and healthy environment that contributes to our state's well-being now and into the future. Improve energy efficiency while preserving the region’s environment.
Mobility (transp & internet)
Sustainable options to safely move people, goods, services, and informationMinnesota will have safe, economic, energy-efficient alternatives to move people and goods throughout the state.
Workforce Everyone has skills and opportunities to obtain well-paying jobs
Government/ Civic Engmnt
Efficient and accountable government services.Our state will foster a climate of inclusion that encourages active participation from everyone living in our community.
Community Strong and stable families and communities. Promote places to live with easy access to jobs and services
Public Safety People in MN are safe. People living in Minnesota or visiting our state will feel safe.
Health Minnesotans are healthy.All people living in Minnesota will have optimum physical and mental health.
Housing People at all income levels have housing opportunities throughout the state.
Quality of Life The region has low crime rates, ample access to outdoor recreation and a variety of entertainment options.
People/specific groups
All young children throughout Minnesota enter school ready to learn. All children and youth will have caring relationships, enrichment activities, and the investment from their communities to grow into a successful adulthood.
SOURCES: Minnesota Dashboard. Minnesota Compass. Business Vitality Index. Atlanta Plan 2040
Describing the “goals” of each category
Shared Prosperity Work Group 24
Sample indicators by categoryEconomy Annual change in Gross Regional Product; median HH income, UE rate, # of MN start ups that survive 5 years
Education % of 3rd graders proficient in reading, % of 8th graders proficient in math, % students graduate HS on time
Environment Days air quality rated good (or bad); lakes and streams meet water quality standards,
Mobility (transp & internet)
Transportation expenses as a share of income, share of workers who could commute to work with a 30-min or less transit trip, % of region’s population that has access to high-speed internet
Workforce Labor force participation rates; Adults (age 25+) with bachelor’s degree/associates degree;
Government/ Civic Engmnt
% of eligible Minnesotans voted, bond ratings,
Community Share of region’s residents living in concentrated areas of poverty
Public Safety # Serious crimes per 1,000 people
Health % of region’s residents who are obese
Housing % of households paying more than 30% of income for housing (or 50% of income for combined housing and transportation costs)
Quality of Life Share of population that resides within ½ mile of a local park
People/specific groups
% of low birth weights
SOURCES: Compass, Business Vitality Index, Minnesota Dashboard, Metropolitan Council Discussion Draft 2012,
Shared Prosperity Work Group 25
Small group assignment
1) Individually select 5 – 7 categories and what goal it is driving toward. (10 minutes)
2) In group synthesize categories & category “goal statements” (15 minutes)
3) What works & doesn’t work with this approach (5 minutes)