1United States Fleet ForcesUnited States Fleet Forces Operational Readiness, Effectiveness, PrimacyOperational Readiness, Effectiveness, PrimacyUnited States Fleet ForcesUnited States Fleet Forces Operational Readiness, Effectiveness, PrimacyOperational Readiness, Effectiveness, Primacy
Ship MaintenanceShip Maintenance
RADM Jeff BrooksRADM Jeff BrooksFFC N43FFC N43
Ver: VSRA Final 15 Feb 07
2United States Fleet ForcesUnited States Fleet Forces Operational Readiness, Effectiveness, PrimacyOperational Readiness, Effectiveness, PrimacyUnited States Fleet ForcesUnited States Fleet Forces Operational Readiness, Effectiveness, PrimacyOperational Readiness, Effectiveness, Primacy
Required Focus Required Focus
A + A oFRP oLife Cycle A = Fleeto
3United States Fleet ForcesUnited States Fleet Forces Operational Readiness, Effectiveness, PrimacyOperational Readiness, Effectiveness, PrimacyUnited States Fleet ForcesUnited States Fleet Forces Operational Readiness, Effectiveness, PrimacyOperational Readiness, Effectiveness, Primacy
Desired OutcomesDesired Outcomes
• CNO understanding of:– Maintenance governance
– Maintenance requirements process approach validity
– Maintenance communication thresholds
– FY07 execution plan
• Supporting Information:– Maintenance process changes underway across Fleet
Readiness Enterprise (FRE)
– Maintenance process/performance metrics in use/development to identify and drive change
– Future maintenance risk items with threshold potential
4United States Fleet ForcesUnited States Fleet Forces Operational Readiness, Effectiveness, PrimacyOperational Readiness, Effectiveness, PrimacyUnited States Fleet ForcesUnited States Fleet Forces Operational Readiness, Effectiveness, PrimacyOperational Readiness, Effectiveness, Primacy
AgendaAgenda
• Where we are today
• Discussion of Alignment, Governance and Thresholds
• Vision of where we are heading:– Maintenance process improvements– Aligning warfare enterprises around
common processes – Potential out-year domain challenges
Deliver efficiency & effectiveness aligned with FRP
5United States Fleet ForcesUnited States Fleet Forces Operational Readiness, Effectiveness, PrimacyOperational Readiness, Effectiveness, PrimacyUnited States Fleet ForcesUnited States Fleet Forces Operational Readiness, Effectiveness, PrimacyOperational Readiness, Effectiveness, Primacy
Navy Ship Maintenance ActivitiesNavy Ship Maintenance Activities
AS-39 USS EMORY S LAND @ La Maddalena
AS-40 USS FRANK CABLE @ Guam
MARMC Det. Naples
MARMC Det. Bahrain
Puget Sound Naval Shipyard & Intermediate
Maintenance Facility(PSNS & IMF)
(RMC)
Norfolk Naval Shipyard
SouthwestRegional
MaintenanceCenter (RMC)
San DiegoSouth CentralRMC Ingleside
Mid-Atlantic RMC Norfolk
Trident Refit Facility Kings Bay Southeast RMC Mayport
Pearl Harbor Naval Shipyard & IMF
(RMC)
Ship RepairFacility
Yokosuka(RMC)
Nuclear Submarine Support Facility New London
SUPSHIP Groton
SUPSHIP Newport News
Portsmouth Naval Shipyard
Mission funded & aligned through “One Shipyard” construct.
6United States Fleet ForcesUnited States Fleet Forces Operational Readiness, Effectiveness, PrimacyOperational Readiness, Effectiveness, PrimacyUnited States Fleet ForcesUnited States Fleet Forces Operational Readiness, Effectiveness, PrimacyOperational Readiness, Effectiveness, Primacy
POM/BudgetProcess
Today’s StrategyToday’s Strategy
Ship Maintenance & Modernization Domain
(SYSCOMs)
ENGINEEREDMAINT. PLANS (Platform Sponsors/PEOs)
MODERNIZATION
Requirements Generation
Fleet Readiness Enterprise$
CONDITIONBASED MAINT.
(Fleets) InputsM
aterialR
eadiness
Units Ready
For Tasking
Dem
and
Sig
nal
COCOMs
NCCsFRP Readiness + Life Cycle Readiness
Cost
7United States Fleet ForcesUnited States Fleet Forces Operational Readiness, Effectiveness, PrimacyOperational Readiness, Effectiveness, PrimacyUnited States Fleet ForcesUnited States Fleet Forces Operational Readiness, Effectiveness, PrimacyOperational Readiness, Effectiveness, Primacy
Maintenance Supports OpsMaintenance Supports Ops
Notional CVN FRTP:
Continuous Maint. (CM) Periods
• PIAs & DPIAs are “Hard” Scheduling Targets• Dry-dock Constraints• FY $$’s• Industrial Base Loading
• CM Schedules More Flexible• Max Interface w/ TYCOM and Fleet N3’s
INTEGRATEDTRAINING
BASICTRAINING
6 Mo Planned Incremental
Availability (PIA) or 10 ½ Mo
Docking PIA
DEPLOYMENTREDEPLOYMENT(SUSTAINMENT)
MAINTENANCEPHASE
Ao FRTP + Ao Life Cycle = Ao Total
8United States Fleet ForcesUnited States Fleet Forces Operational Readiness, Effectiveness, PrimacyOperational Readiness, Effectiveness, PrimacyUnited States Fleet ForcesUnited States Fleet Forces Operational Readiness, Effectiveness, PrimacyOperational Readiness, Effectiveness, Primacy
Maintenance Program ContentMaintenance Program Content
Modernization
Corrective Maintenance (CSMP)
Class Maint Plan (CMP)
Engineered Requirements
0%
25%
50%
75%
100%
FY05FY98 FY05FY98 FY98 FY05
Exe
cute
d M
aint
enan
ce M
an-
days
41
43
16
70
20
10
82
8
1021
64
23
13
21
58
21
21
21
21
43
36
SurfaceCarrierSubmarine
9United States Fleet ForcesUnited States Fleet Forces Operational Readiness, Effectiveness, PrimacyOperational Readiness, Effectiveness, PrimacyUnited States Fleet ForcesUnited States Fleet Forces Operational Readiness, Effectiveness, PrimacyOperational Readiness, Effectiveness, Primacy
Should Maintenance Content be the Same?Should Maintenance Content be the Same?
• Class Maintenance Plan content differs because of:
– System certifications (nuclear, subsafe, flight deck)
– Aging Effects
– Hull life expectancy
– Maintenance scheduling intervals
10United States Fleet ForcesUnited States Fleet Forces Operational Readiness, Effectiveness, PrimacyOperational Readiness, Effectiveness, PrimacyUnited States Fleet ForcesUnited States Fleet Forces Operational Readiness, Effectiveness, PrimacyOperational Readiness, Effectiveness, Primacy
How Do We Determine the Right CMP Content?How Do We Determine the Right CMP Content?
MaintenanceExecution
Ship Configuration
Integration
Maint History& Feedback
Continuous Improvement
Class Maint Plans•Maintenance Requirements
•Assessment Procedures•Maintenance Strategies
Work Package Development
Requirements Deferral Review
ModernizationCSMP
0%
25%
50%
75%
100%
CarrierSubmarine Surface
Modernization
Corrective Maintenance (CSMP)
Class Maint Plan (CMP)
Engineered Requirements
Exe
cute
d M
aint
enan
ce M
an-
days
Cycles of Learning Drive CMP improvements.
41
43
16
70
10
82
8
10
21
64
23
13
21
58
21
21
21
21
43
36
20
11United States Fleet ForcesUnited States Fleet Forces Operational Readiness, Effectiveness, PrimacyOperational Readiness, Effectiveness, PrimacyUnited States Fleet ForcesUnited States Fleet Forces Operational Readiness, Effectiveness, PrimacyOperational Readiness, Effectiveness, Primacy
• Corrosion control
• Planning/Support services
• Maintenance intensive components/systems
• Modernization
What are the Big Cost Drivers?What are the Big Cost Drivers?
0%
25%
50%
75%
100%
Surface
Habitability/Upgrades
Program Alterations
Fleet Alterations
Corrective Maintenance
Class Maint Plan (CMP)
Corrective, contingency
CMP Scheduled Rqmts
CMP Corrosion, contingency
Corrosion Control
CarrierSubmarine
Exe
cute
d M
ain
tena
nce
Man
-day
s
Targets for Maintenance Improvement
1
27
30
7
16
7
5
7
1
42
16
18
1
12
82
1
58
11
7
13
8
1
1
1
29
24
13
13
6
6
6
3
41
24
9
18
7
21
21
26
15
16
1
12United States Fleet ForcesUnited States Fleet Forces Operational Readiness, Effectiveness, PrimacyOperational Readiness, Effectiveness, PrimacyUnited States Fleet ForcesUnited States Fleet Forces Operational Readiness, Effectiveness, PrimacyOperational Readiness, Effectiveness, Primacy
Maintenance Cost Improvement InitiativesMaintenance Cost Improvement Initiatives
• Fleet-wide LEAN/Six-Sigma Implementation (ECD: Jan 07)
• Hull-specific Maintenance & Modernization Business Plans (ECD: Jun 07)
• Joint-Fleet/ASN/NAVSEA National Contracting Strategy (Implement: Oct 06)
• Paint/Preservation Task Force (ECD: Jan 07)
• Single Fleet Modernization Process (ECD: Sep 07)
• Ship Material Condition Metrics [MFOM 2.0] (Deploy:
Oct 06)
13United States Fleet ForcesUnited States Fleet Forces Operational Readiness, Effectiveness, PrimacyOperational Readiness, Effectiveness, PrimacyUnited States Fleet ForcesUnited States Fleet Forces Operational Readiness, Effectiveness, PrimacyOperational Readiness, Effectiveness, Primacy
Program Life
% o
f O
rig
ina
l
100
Present
CVN 68
SSN 688
Trends Over Time?Trends Over Time?
CLASS DEPOT LIFECYCLE MANDAYS
CRU/DES
Beginning of Life
50
Adherence to Class Maint
Plans Atrophied
Integrated Class Maint Plan &
Maint Requirement
System
SHIPMAIN
Results
14United States Fleet ForcesUnited States Fleet Forces Operational Readiness, Effectiveness, PrimacyOperational Readiness, Effectiveness, PrimacyUnited States Fleet ForcesUnited States Fleet Forces Operational Readiness, Effectiveness, PrimacyOperational Readiness, Effectiveness, Primacy
0
Ship Maintenance Funding TrendsShip Maintenance Funding Trends
Maint Funding With Supp PB07 POM08 Requirement Battle Force Ships
0
1,000
2,000
3,000
4,000
5,000
6,000
7,000
8,000
9,000
1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013
Co
ns
tan
t F
Y0
6 D
oll
ars
(M
)
40
80
120
160
200
240
280
# S
hip
s
FY
320
360
The FREChallenge!
15United States Fleet ForcesUnited States Fleet Forces Operational Readiness, Effectiveness, PrimacyOperational Readiness, Effectiveness, PrimacyUnited States Fleet ForcesUnited States Fleet Forces Operational Readiness, Effectiveness, PrimacyOperational Readiness, Effectiveness, Primacy
Enterprise RelationshipsEnterprise Relationships
Navy Enterprise
FleetReadiness Enterprise
Warfare Enterprises
CNO
N8/ FMB
TYCOMs OPNAV N8/6/4/1
Providers ResourceSponsors
RDAVCNO
CFFC/CPF
Thre
shol
d re
ports
FMBOD
16United States Fleet ForcesUnited States Fleet Forces Operational Readiness, Effectiveness, PrimacyOperational Readiness, Effectiveness, PrimacyUnited States Fleet ForcesUnited States Fleet Forces Operational Readiness, Effectiveness, PrimacyOperational Readiness, Effectiveness, Primacy
AlignmentAlignment
NAVSEA
CSF CNAFCNSF
FREFRP
Alignment
CPFCFFC
WarfareEnterprises
FMBOD
Ship Repair• Technical Authority• Contract Authority• Life Cycle Mgmt.• Class Maint Plans• Shipyard Operation
Shipbuilding&
Modernization
PEOs/Platform Sponsor
Units Ready
For Tasking
17United States Fleet ForcesUnited States Fleet Forces Operational Readiness, Effectiveness, PrimacyOperational Readiness, Effectiveness, PrimacyUnited States Fleet ForcesUnited States Fleet Forces Operational Readiness, Effectiveness, PrimacyOperational Readiness, Effectiveness, Primacy
Governance StructureGovernance Structure
Local Boards Of Directors (LBODs)
Members• RMC Cdr. (chair)• Customer TYCOMs• PHIBGRUs• DESRONs• SUBRONs• Ship ISICs• FMO (Reps)
Purpose Manage port
workload Align:
• Priorities• Funds• Resources
Fleet Maintenance Board Of Directors
(FMBOD)
Members• FMOs (chair)• SEA 04/08• OPNAV N43• TYCOM N43s
Purpose Ship maint.
enterprise issues Cross enterprise
maint issues Major policy
changes Major avail changes Budgetary impacts/
options Drives Productivity
Navy Ship Maintenance Oversight Board
(NSMOB)
Members• SEA 00 (co-chair)• OPNAV N4 (co-chair)• DASN (Ships)• DASN (Log)• CFFC (FMO)• CPF (FMO)• PEO (Ships/Carriers/Subs)
• OPNAV N8
Purpose Execution issues w/
significant impact on shipbuilding and repair industrial base
PPBE issues w/ potential impact on shipbuilding and ship repair industrial base
18United States Fleet ForcesUnited States Fleet Forces Operational Readiness, Effectiveness, PrimacyOperational Readiness, Effectiveness, PrimacyUnited States Fleet ForcesUnited States Fleet Forces Operational Readiness, Effectiveness, PrimacyOperational Readiness, Effectiveness, Primacy
FMBOD ResponsibilitiesFMBOD Responsibilities
• Chartered by CFFC/CPF to:
– Establish overarching Fleet Maintenance Policy
– Determine ship maintenance resource requirements
– Adjudicate cross-enterprise ship maintenance issues
– Implement best practices and lessons learned across the
Fleet Readiness Enterprise to enhance productivity
– Oversee standardization of maintenance processes across
all platforms
– Develop meaningful ship maintenance metrics
– Maintain awareness of national ship repair industrial base
– Oversee availability assignment process
– Ensure stakeholders advised of threshold issues
19United States Fleet ForcesUnited States Fleet Forces Operational Readiness, Effectiveness, PrimacyOperational Readiness, Effectiveness, PrimacyUnited States Fleet ForcesUnited States Fleet Forces Operational Readiness, Effectiveness, PrimacyOperational Readiness, Effectiveness, Primacy
ProviderCurrent Comments
CNSF G
CNAF G Expeditionary
CSF Y Peak in units unavailable
NECC G FRP is green; 1NCD,
NNWC GMSC G
RFT GroupsCur-rent
Next
6 mo Comments
CSG
Presence
G G Meet CCDR demand
Surge(6 + 1) Y Y 6+0 surge 6+0
Tempo Y YCNO approval for Enterprise
ESG
Presence
G G Meet CCDR demand
Surge Y Y Reduced LPD availability Tempo G G All metrics within red line
Account YTDReadines
s Impact
Comments
Air Ops G G
Air Maint. [from CNAF]
Ship Ops G G
Ship Maint. Y GCarrier overlap at Norfolk Naval Shipyard
Combat Ops Y G
Contracts committed, but not obligated. Close EOY on plan.
Support Comments
Personnel G FIT, IA notification time
Training TBD Live training/ranges, synthetic training
Ordnance G Weapon stations
Supply G Average Customer Wait TimeInstallations G
Environment
Y USWTR, sonar, exercise concerns
Health Svcs G Individual health status data
Con. Develop. & Experiment
G
(1) Strike Group Readiness: FRP, O-Plan
(2) Unit Readiness: FRP, O-Plan (4) Readiness Support
(3) YTD Financial Execution Readiness Impact
UNCLAS VERSION FOR BRIEF PURPOSES.
Fleet Readiness Status IndicatorsFleet Readiness Status Indicators
GY
20United States Fleet ForcesUnited States Fleet Forces Operational Readiness, Effectiveness, PrimacyOperational Readiness, Effectiveness, PrimacyUnited States Fleet ForcesUnited States Fleet Forces Operational Readiness, Effectiveness, PrimacyOperational Readiness, Effectiveness, Primacy
Maintenance Maintenance [N43][N43]
GREEN: No impact on Fleet readiness and or maintenance
YELLOWYELLOW: Potentially impacts Fleet readiness and or maintenance
RED: Significantly impacts Fleet readiness and or maintenance (cost and/or schedule)
GREEN: No impact on Fleet readiness and or maintenance
YELLOWYELLOW: Potentially impacts Fleet readiness and or maintenance
RED: Significantly impacts Fleet readiness and or maintenance (cost and/or schedule)
Status indicators
Previous slide
• Ability to Meet COCOM Tasking–Nothing to report
• CNO Avail Planning and Execution–Growth and New work issues; shipyard performance
Funding–Program execution; funds timing
Industrial Base Issues– Availability assignments out of home port; “One Shipyard”
performance
Congressional Issues– Balancing public shipyard workload
G
G
G
G
G
21United States Fleet ForcesUnited States Fleet Forces Operational Readiness, Effectiveness, PrimacyOperational Readiness, Effectiveness, PrimacyUnited States Fleet ForcesUnited States Fleet Forces Operational Readiness, Effectiveness, PrimacyOperational Readiness, Effectiveness, Primacy
ThresholdsThresholds
• Advise CNO/Stakeholders if/when:– Maintenance impacts major Navy metric and/or
Combatant Commander event(s) (e.g., 6+0 vice 6+1; CVN
deployment date slip)
– Noteworthy maintenance discovery (e.g., FFG hull thinning)
– Funds beyond normal appropriation guidelines required
– Public/Political interest is likely (e.g., public shipyard work loading)
– Decisions affecting out-year programming (e.g., CVN tanks)
– Industrial base capacity & critical skills issues (e.g., CVN
overlap solution)
22United States Fleet ForcesUnited States Fleet Forces Operational Readiness, Effectiveness, PrimacyOperational Readiness, Effectiveness, PrimacyUnited States Fleet ForcesUnited States Fleet Forces Operational Readiness, Effectiveness, PrimacyOperational Readiness, Effectiveness, Primacy
Informed Decision Making Informed Decision Making
Software indicates which items should be repaired to support selected mission.
23United States Fleet ForcesUnited States Fleet Forces Operational Readiness, Effectiveness, PrimacyOperational Readiness, Effectiveness, PrimacyUnited States Fleet ForcesUnited States Fleet Forces Operational Readiness, Effectiveness, PrimacyOperational Readiness, Effectiveness, Primacy
Feeding Other Metric SystemsFeeding Other Metric Systems
MFOM
NTAs
P E S T O
12
Defense Readiness Reporting System-
Navy
DRRS-N ScreenTotal Force Integrated
Readiness Model (TFIRM)
PersonnelEquipmentSupplyTrainingOrdnance
DRRS Screen
Connecting Cost via TFIRM
24United States Fleet ForcesUnited States Fleet Forces Operational Readiness, Effectiveness, PrimacyOperational Readiness, Effectiveness, PrimacyUnited States Fleet ForcesUnited States Fleet Forces Operational Readiness, Effectiveness, PrimacyOperational Readiness, Effectiveness, Primacy
Maintenance Domain Risk ItemsMaintenance Domain Risk Items
• One Shipyard execution of Norfolk Naval Shipyard carrier overlap workload
• USS ENTERPRISE FY08 availability
• Congressional Hot Points
• Potential shipyard downsizing impacts
25United States Fleet ForcesUnited States Fleet Forces Operational Readiness, Effectiveness, PrimacyOperational Readiness, Effectiveness, PrimacyUnited States Fleet ForcesUnited States Fleet Forces Operational Readiness, Effectiveness, PrimacyOperational Readiness, Effectiveness, Primacy
Naval Shipyard Workload ForecastNaval Shipyard Workload Forecast
• The CNO brief contained a workload forecast graph that was classified “For Official Use Only-Business Sensitive”. To avoid classifying this version of the brief in that manner, the graph was removed for purposes of general distribution and key points noted below.
• Graph key points:• Submarine workload begins significant decline in
FY09• BRAC retention of all four SYs exacerbated capacity
overload• High overtime the norm thru FY08 due to projected
requirement reduction starting in FY09• Manning reduction glide slope feasible without
adverse personnel actions
26United States Fleet ForcesUnited States Fleet Forces Operational Readiness, Effectiveness, PrimacyOperational Readiness, Effectiveness, PrimacyUnited States Fleet ForcesUnited States Fleet Forces Operational Readiness, Effectiveness, PrimacyOperational Readiness, Effectiveness, Primacy
FY 07 Execution PlanFY 07 Execution Plan
5% Challenge is in Addition to Previous Marks and Mitigations
CNO was provided a synopsis of the FY07 ship maintenance execution plan that
included the challenge noted in the banner below for all ship maintenance domain
members to execute all requirements using only 95% of projected funding. Specific
briefing numbers included in the version of this brief presented to the CNO have been
removed as they are no longer current.
27United States Fleet ForcesUnited States Fleet Forces Operational Readiness, Effectiveness, PrimacyOperational Readiness, Effectiveness, PrimacyUnited States Fleet ForcesUnited States Fleet Forces Operational Readiness, Effectiveness, PrimacyOperational Readiness, Effectiveness, Primacy
–Maintenance governance is correctly aligned
–Maintenance requirements process approach is valid
Take-AwaysTake-Aways
–FY07 execution strategy
–Maintenance communication thresholds
28United States Fleet ForcesUnited States Fleet Forces Operational Readiness, Effectiveness, PrimacyOperational Readiness, Effectiveness, PrimacyUnited States Fleet ForcesUnited States Fleet Forces Operational Readiness, Effectiveness, PrimacyOperational Readiness, Effectiveness, Primacy
A + A oFRP oLife Cycle A = Fleeto
29United States Fleet ForcesUnited States Fleet Forces Operational Readiness, Effectiveness, PrimacyOperational Readiness, Effectiveness, PrimacyUnited States Fleet ForcesUnited States Fleet Forces Operational Readiness, Effectiveness, PrimacyOperational Readiness, Effectiveness, Primacy
Top 5 Cost Drivers by Ship ClassTop 5 Cost Drivers by Ship Class
Slide 10 backup.
Class System System System System System
CVN 68Aircraft Launching Systems
Steam Heating Systems
Discharge Storage Systems Aircraft Elevators
Firemain and Flushing Piping
CG 47Waste Heat Systems
Propulsion Shafting Fuel Oil Tanks
Helo Handl/Spt Facilities
Propellers/ Propulsors
DDG 51Prop. Reduction Gear
Propulsion Shafting
Comb Msl/Rkt Lnch/Stow/Handl
Propellers/ Propulsors
SS Gas Turb Gen Spt Systems
FFG 7SS Diesel Generator Sewage System
Helo Handl/Spt Facilities HP Air System Steering System
LHA 1 Propulsion Boiler Ballast TanksData Display Group Main Feed Pumps Aircraft Elevators
LHD 1 Propulsion BoilerCargo Ammo Elevator
Self-Contained Guns
Comms Antenna Systems
CW Cooling Distrib System
LPD 4 Propulsion BoilerSelf-Contained Guns
SS Turbine Generator
Main Cond./Air Ejectors Ballast Tanks
LSD 41Propulsion Diesel Engines Ballast Tanks
SS Diesel Generator
Boat Handling/Stowage Auxiliary Boilers
MCM 1Propulsion Diesel Engines
Propulsion Shafting Sea Valves
Minesweeping Systems Rudder
MHC 51Propellers/ Propulsors
Auto Prop. Control System MP/LP Air System
Minehunting Systems Fuel Oil Tanks
PC 1Propulsion Shafting Stabilizing Fins
Propulsion Diesel Engines
Prop. Shaft Bearings Rudder
SSN 688Air Conditioning Plants
Steam Reducing Valves Periscopes Sound Vibration Lube Oil Purifiers