Date post: | 21-Oct-2018 |
Category: |
Documents |
Upload: | hoangthuan |
View: | 213 times |
Download: | 0 times |
1
Short title: Movement of tobacco PEBP mRNA 1
2
Corresponding author: 3
Tien-Shin Yu 4
Institute of Plant and Microbial Biology, Academia Sinica, Taipei, 11529, Taiwan 5
Phone: 886-2-27871159 6
Fax: 886-2-27827954 7
Email: [email protected] 8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
Plant Physiology Preview. Published on August 27, 2018, as DOI:10.1104/pp.18.00725
Copyright 2018 by the American Society of Plant Biologists
www.plantphysiol.orgon October 20, 2018 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2018 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
2
Mobility of antiflorigen and PEBP mRNAs in tomato-tobacco heterografts 24
Nien-Chen Huang, Kai-Ren Luo, and Tien-Shin Yu* 25
Institute of Plant and Microbial Biology, Academia Sinica, Taipei, 11529, Taiwan 26
27
28
One-sentence summary 29
Long-distance movement of tobacco NsCET1 and PEBP mRNAs suggests that 30
acquisition of RNA mobility is an early evolutionary event. 31
32
33
Funding information 34
This work was supported by grants from the National Science Council, Taiwan. 35
36
*For correspondence: E-mail: [email protected] 37
38
39
40
41
Author contributions 42
NCH performed most of the experiments; TSY and KRL provided technical assistance to 43
NCH; TSY and NCH conceived and designed the experiments; TSY wrote the article 44
with contributions of NCH and KRL. 45
46
www.plantphysiol.orgon October 20, 2018 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2018 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
3
Abstract 47
Photoperiodic floral induction is controlled by the leaf-derived and 48
antagonistic mobile signals florigen and antiflorigen. In response to photoperiodic 49
variations, florigen and antiflorigen are produced in leaves and translocated through 50
phloem to the apex, where they counteract floral initiation. Florigen and antiflorigen are 51
encoded by a pair of homologues belonging to FLOWERING LOCUS T (FT)- or 52
TERMINAL FLOWER1 (TFL1)-like clades in the phosphatidylethanolamine binding-53
domain protein (PEBP) family. The PEBP gene family contains FT-, TFL1-, and 54
MOTHER OF FT AND TFL1 (MFT)-like clades. Evolutionary analysis suggests that FT- 55
and TFL1-like clades arose from an ancient MFT-like clade. Protein movement of PEBP 56
family is an evolutionarily conserved mechanism in many plants; however, mRNA 57
movement of PEBP family remains controversial. Here, we examined the mRNA 58
movement of PEBP genes in different plant species. We identified a tobacco (Nicotiana 59
sylvestris) CENTRORADIALIS-like 1 gene, denoted NsCET1, and showed that NsCET1 is 60
an ortholog of Arabidopsis antiflorigen ATC. In tobacco, NsCET1 acts as a mobile 61
molecule that non-cell-autonomously inhibits flowering. Grafting experiments showed 62
that endogenous and ectopically expressed NsCET1 mRNAs move long distances in 63
tobacco and Arabidopsis thaliana. Heterografts of tobacco and tomato (Lycopersicon 64
esculentum) showed that in addition to NsCET1, multiple members of the FT-, TFL1-, 65
and MFT-like clades of tobacco and tomato PEBP gene families are mobile mRNAs. Our 66
results suggest that the mRNA mobility is a common feature of the three clades of PEBP-67
like genes among different plant species. 68
69
www.plantphysiol.orgon October 20, 2018 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2018 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
4
70
Introduction 71
Cell-to-cell and inter-organ communication are crucial in synchronizing plant 72
developmental programs with external cues. To integrate environmental stimuli perceived 73
in distal tissues, plants have evolved many elegant systems to sense and convert the 74
stimuli into mobile molecules. These mobile molecules are translocated through phloem 75
to the target tissues to exert their non-cell-autonomous functions (Ham and Lucas, 2017; 76
Lacombe and Achard, 2016). In addition to hormones, proteins, and metabolites, many 77
plants recruit mRNAs as mobile molecules for long-distance communication (Kim et al., 78
2001; Haywood et al., 2005; Banerjee et al., 2006; Lu et al., 2012; Huang et al., 2012). 79
Upon translocating to target tissues, the mobile mRNAs are believed to serve as a 80
template to translate into many proteins. Thus, this mRNA-based regulatory network 81
provides an efficient and specific communication system to transmit environmental 82
stimuli perceived in distal tissues. It has been demonstrated that many mobile mRNAs are 83
trafficked through phloem, probably by forming an RNA-protein complex to allow the 84
stable translocation of mRNA molecules (Lucas et al., 2001; Ham and Lucas, 2017). 85
Transcriptome profiling of phloem sap or heterografting experiments identified several 86
thousand mobile mRNAs (Ruiz-Medrano et al., 1999; Guo et al., 2013; Thieme et al., 87
2015; Yang et al., 2015; Xia et al., 2018), suggesting that the use of mobile mRNAs as 88
systemic signals may be a prevalent mechanism in plants to cope with environmental 89
dynamics. 90
91
www.plantphysiol.orgon October 20, 2018 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2018 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
5
Photoperiodic floral regulation is mediated by two counteracting mobile 92
molecules, namely florigen and antiflorigen, which are encoded by a pair of functionally 93
opposite homologues belonging to different clades in the phosphatidylethanolamine 94
binding-domain protein (PEBP) gene family (Zeevaart, 1976; Lang et al., 1977; 95
Corbesier et al., 2007; Tamaki et al., 2007; Zeevaart, 2008; Huang et al., 2012; 96
Matsoukas et al., 2012; Higuchi et al., 2013). In Arabidopsis thaliana, florigen and 97
antiflorigen are encoded by FLOWERING LOCUS T (FT) and ARABIDOPSIS 98
THALIANA CENTRORADIALIS homolog (ATC), respectively. The expression of FT or 99
ATC is induced under long-day (LD) or short-day (SD) conditions, respectively 100
(Kardailsky et al., 1999; Kobayashi et al., 1999; Huang et al., 2012). FT and ATC both 101
regulate the expression of the same downstream meristem identity gene, APETALA1, by 102
interacting with the transcription factor, FD (Abe et al., 2005; Wigge et al., 2005; Huang 103
et al., 2012). The antagonistic function of FT and ATC may be attributed to competition 104
between FT and ATC for the same binding site on FD, because the deletion of 40 amino 105
acids at the C-terminus of FD abolished the binding of FD with FT and ATC (Huang et 106
al., 2012). The expression of FT and ATC is mainly in vascular tissues and is absent in 107
the apex (Takada and Goto, 2003; Huang et al., 2012), whereas the expression of FD is 108
exclusively in shoot and root apices (Abe et al., 2005; Wigge et al., 2005), which 109
suggests that the movement of FT and ATC from the vasculature to the apex is required 110
for their functions. Through grafting experiments and tissue-specific expression, the 111
protein and mRNA movement of FT and ATC has been demonstrated (Corbesier et al., 112
2007; Jaeger and Wigge, 2007; Mathieu et al., 2007; Lu et al., 2012; Huang et al., 2012). 113
The movement of FT protein from companion cells (CCs) to sieve elements (SEs) is 114
www.plantphysiol.orgon October 20, 2018 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2018 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
6
mediated through the endoplasmic reticulum-localized protein FT-INTERACTING 115
PROTEIN 1 (FTIP1) and the heavy-metal-associated domain-containing protein 116
SODIUM POTASSIUM ROOT DEFECTIVE 1 (NaKR1) (Liu et al., 2012; Zhu et al., 117
2016). However, deletion analysis of Cucurbita moschata FT protein suggested that the 118
transport of FT protein in CCs-SEs is also governed by a diffusion-based system (Yoo et 119
al., 2013). Although ATC protein is detected in grafted scions, direct evidence to support 120
the long-distance movement of ATC protein is lacking (Huang et al., 2012). In addition 121
to protein movement, it has been reported that Arabidopsis FT and ATC are phloem-122
mobile mRNAs (Li et al., 2009; Lu et al., 2012; Huang et al., 2012). After transcription in 123
leaves, FT and ATC mRNA is selectively targeted to plasmodesmata (PD) for cell-to-cell 124
movement (Luo et al., 2018). However, the mRNA movement of florigen and 125
antiflorigen has only been observed in Arabidopsis, because previous tomato 126
(Lycopersicon esculentum) grafting experiments failed to support long-distance 127
trafficking of SINGLE FLOWER TRUSS (SFT) mRNA, a tomato FT ortholog (Lifschitz 128
et al., 2006). Thus, whether the mRNA of florigen and antiflorigen are mobile in different 129
plant species remains to be elucidated. 130
131
The PEBP gene family is an evolutionarily conserved gene family across 132
different kingdoms. In angiosperms, PEBP genes are grouped into three clades, namely 133
FT-, TERMINAL FLOWER1 (TFL1)-, and MOTHER OF FT AND TFL1 (MFT)-like 134
clades (Chardon and Damerval, 2005). However, in gymnosperms, phylogenetic analysis 135
revealed that only MFT- and FT/TFL1-like genes are present, with only MFT-like genes 136
in bryophytes and lycopods, which suggests the MFT-like clade is the ancestor of all 137
www.plantphysiol.orgon October 20, 2018 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2018 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
7
PEBP genes (Hedman et al., 2009; Karlgren et al., 2011). Evolutionary analysis of the 138
PEBP family indicated that two ancient PEBP duplication events occurred in the common 139
ancestor after the angiosperms split from gymnosperms. The first duplication event gave 140
rise to the MFT-like clade and the ancient lineage of the TFL1/FT-like clade, which was 141
subsequently confronted with a second duplication event forming the TFL1-like and FT-142
like clades (Hedman et al., 2009; Karlgren et al., 2011; Wang et al., 2015). The analysis 143
of florigen movement in different plants indicates that the protein movement of PEBP 144
genes is evolutionarily conserved in many plants (Conti and Bradley, 2007; Zeevaart, 145
2008; Turnbull, 2011); however, little is known about the mRNA movement of PEBP 146
genes in different plant species. In addition, how florigen and antiflorigen have evolved 147
to acquire mobility remains to be investigated. 148
149
In tobacco (Nicotiana sp.), many PEBP genes belonging to FT- or TFL1-like 150
clades have been identified (Amaya et al., 1999; Harig et al., 2012). Unlike Arabidopsis, 151
in which all FT-like genes are floral activators, functional analysis of Nicotiana tabacum 152
FT-like genes showed that three FT-like genes (NtFT1, NtFT2, and NtFT3) act as floral 153
inhibitors, whereas NtFT4 is a tobacco florigen homolog (Harig et al., 2012). NtFT1, 154
NtFT2, and NtFT3 are expressed in leaves under SD conditions, probably in phloem 155
companion cells (Harig et al., 2012). However, whether these FT-like genes and the 156
members of TFL1- or MFT-like genes are mobile mRNAs remains unknown. In this 157
study, we investigated the mRNA movement of PEBP genes in tobacco. We identified 158
three Nicotiana sylvestris TFL1-like genes, NsCET1, NsCET2, and NsCET10, which act 159
non-cell-autonomously to inhibit floral initiation. Functional analysis suggested that 160
www.plantphysiol.orgon October 20, 2018 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2018 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
8
NsCET1 is an ortholog of Arabidopsis antiflorigen ATC. Analysis of heterografts showed 161
that NsCET1 mRNA is mobile in Arabidopsis and tobacco, which suggests that mRNA 162
movement of antiflorigen is a conserved mechanism across different plant species. 163
Further heterografting experiments showed that the mRNA of multiple PEBP genes, 164
including the members of FT-, TFL1-, and MFT-like genes, is mobile in tobacco and 165
tomato. Thus, the movement of PEBP genes mRNA may be a conserved mechanism 166
across different plant species. 167
168
169
www.plantphysiol.orgon October 20, 2018 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2018 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
9
Results 170
Tobacco NsCET genes act non-cell-autonomously to inhibit flowering in Arabidopsis 171
and tobacco 172
To explore mRNA movement of antiflorigen in different plant species, we 173
identified tobacco ATC orthologues to examine their mRNA movement. By combining 174
database searches and RT-PCR analysis, we identified five TFL1-like genes, namely 175
NsCET1, NsCET2, NsCET5, NsCET9, and NsCET10, from an obligate LD tobacco 176
variety (Nicotiana sylvestris). Phylogenetic analysis showed that NsCET5 and NsCET9 177
were grouped with Arabidopsis TFL1 (Supplemental Fig. S1A), which is consistent with 178
previous results that NsCET5 is an ortholog of TFL1 (Amaya et al., 1999). Because our 179
previous experiments revealed that ectopic expression of Arabidopsis TFL1 in companion 180
cells is not sufficient to affect flowering (Huang et al., 2012), we investigated the 181
remaining CET genes, specifically NsCET1, NsCET2, and NsCET10. Sequence 182
comparison revealed that NsCET1, NsCET2 and NsCET10 contain the key amino acids 183
required for the activity of floral inhibitors (His 88 and Asp 144, Ahn et al., 2006). The 184
flowering time of Arabidopsis transformants harboring these CET transgenes was delayed 185
as compared to that of wild-type plants (Table I), which indicates that NsCET1, NsCET2, 186
and NsCET10 are floral inhibitors. In addition, expression of NsCET1, NsCET2, and 187
NsCET10 by the SUCROSE TRANSPORTER 2 (SUC2) promoter, a companion cell-188
specific promoter, showed that these CETs acted non-cell-autonomously to inhibit 189
flowering in Arabidopsis (Table I). Among CET transformants, ectopic expression of 190
NsCET1 exhibited the most severe late-flowering phenotype (Supplemental Fig. S1, B–E). 191
The flowers of NsCET1 transformants produced leafy-like bracts, which resembled the 192
www.plantphysiol.orgon October 20, 2018 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2018 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
10
phenotypes of Arabidopsis ATC-overexpression lines (Supplemental Fig. S1, C–E; 193
Huang et al., 2012). Similarly, Arabidopsis transformants harboring NsCET2 or NsCET10 194
transgenes showed moderate late-flowering and leafy-like bracts phenotypes (Table I, 195
Supplemental Fig. S1, F–I), which suggests that the functions of NsCET1, NsCET2, and 196
NsCET10 are partially redundant, but NsCET1 functions similar to Arabidopsis ATC. 197
198
To further examine the function of NsCET1 in tobacco, we introduced P35S-199
NsCET1 or PSUC2-NsCET1 into tobacco. The obligate LD variety (N. sylvestris) or day-200
neutral variety tobacco (N. tabacum) harboring P35S-NsCET1 or PSUC2-NsCET1 201
transgenes showed a late-flowering phenotype (Fig. 1), which suggests that NsCET1 acts 202
as a non-cell-autonomous floral inhibitor in tobacco. Tobacco transformants with extreme 203
late-flowering phenotypes produced a substantial number of leaves. A number of 204
transformants did not flower at 5 months after transfer to soil from rooting medium (Fig. 205
1, A and B, black circles). In addition to exhibiting a late-flowering phenotype, these 206
tobacco transformants had a short-internode phenotype, which was easily recognized in N. 207
tabacum transformants (Supplemental Fig. S2, A and B). However, unlike Arabidopsis 208
P35S-NsCET1 or PSUC2-NsCET1 transformants, the floral organs of tobacco P35S-209
NsCET1 transformants were similar to those of wild-type plants (Supplemental Fig. S2, C 210
and D), which indicates functional specificity for tobacco NsCET1. 211
212
In N. sylvestris leaves, the mRNA accumulation of NsCET1, NsCET2, and 213
NsCET10 was significantly induced under SD conditions (Fig. 2A; Supplemental Fig. S3), 214
which is consistent with the production of antiflorigen under SD conditions (Lang et al., 215
www.plantphysiol.orgon October 20, 2018 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2018 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
11
1977; Huang et al., 2012). To examine the expression pattern of NsCET1 in tobacco, the 216
NsCET1 promoter were PCR-amplified and fused with a GUS reporter gene. 217
Histochemical analysis showed that in N. sylvestris and Arabidopsis transformants, GUS 218
activity was mainly detected in leaves and in root vascular tissue (Fig. 2, B and C, E–F, 219
www.plantphysiol.orgon October 20, 2018 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2018 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
12
Supplemental Fig. S4), but not in the shoot apex (Fig. 2C; Supplemental Fig. S4B), 220
suggesting that the regulatory mechanism of NsCET1 expression is conserved in 221
Arabidopsis and tobacco. In agreement with the non-cell-autonomous function of 222
NsCET1, our bimolecular fluorescence complementation (BiFC) analysis revealed that 223
www.plantphysiol.orgon October 20, 2018 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2018 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
13
NsCET1 interacted with FD (Fig. 2D), which is a bZIP transcription factor specifically 224
expressed in the apex (Abe et al., 2005; Wigge et al., 2005). Thus, NsCET1 may 225
translocate from the leaf to the shoot apex to inhibit flowering. 226
227
Knockdown of NsCET expression promotes flowering in tobacco 228
To investigate the contribution of CET genes to floral initiation in tobacco, 229
we knocked down the expression of NsCET1, NsCET2, and NsCET10 using an artificial 230
microRNA (amiR-CETs). Because the sequences of NtCET1, NtCET2, and NtCET10 in N. 231
tabacum were identical to those of respective CETs in N. sylvestris, the same amiR-CETs 232
construct with expression driven by a CaMV35S promoter was introduced into either N. 233
tabacum or N. sylvestris. Similar to the Arabidopsis antiflorigen atc-2 mutant (Huang et 234
al., 2012), the N. tabacum transformants harboring amiR-CETs displayed an early 235
flowering phenotype under SD but not under LD conditions (Supplemental Fig. S5, A 236
and B), which indicates a conserved function of antiflorigen in day-neutral tobacco and 237
Arabidopsis. In LD-grown N. sylvestris, the amiR-CET transformants flowered slightly 238
earlier than wild-type N. sylvestris (Fig 3A). RT-qPCR analysis revealed a reduced level 239
of NsCET1, NsCET2, and NsCET10 mRNA in N. sylvestris 35S-amiR-CET transformants 240
(Fig. 3, B–D). When these transformants were grown under SD conditions, floral 241
induction was not observed in N. sylvestris 35S-amiR-CET transformants or wild-type N. 242
sylvestris (Fig. 3E), suggesting that knocking down the expression of CET genes in 243
obligate LD tobacco is not sufficient to induce flowering under non-floral induction 244
conditions. However, when N. sylvestris 35S-amiR-CET transformants were grown under 245
SD conditions with dim light during the dark period to induce a low-level expression of 246
www.plantphysiol.orgon October 20, 2018 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2018 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
14
NsFT4 (Supplemental Fig. S5, C and D), the N. sylvestris 35S-amiR-CET transformants 247
flowered earlier than wild-type N. sylvestris plants (Fig. 3F), which is consistent with the 248
notion that the function of CETs is to modulate flowering by antagonizing the activity of 249
florigen. 250
www.plantphysiol.orgon October 20, 2018 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2018 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
15
251
NsCET1 mRNA is mobile in Arabidopsis and tobacco heterografts 252
Given that the SUC2 promoter is a strong promoter expressed in most CCs, 253
including CCs near the shoot apex, to further verify that the late-flowering phenotype in 254
PSUC2-NsCET1 transformants is caused by long-distance signals associated with 255
NsCET1, we grafted wild-type tobacco scions onto PSUC2-NsCET1 transformant stocks. 256
Because N. sylvestris is a rosette-type plant, we used N. tabacum plants for grafting 257
experiments. In control experiments, with wild-type N. tabacum scions grafted onto wild-258
type stocks, floral initiation occurred after a mean of 28.4±3.8 leaves was produced on 259
scions (Fig. 4, A and B). However, when wild-type scions were grafted onto PSUC2-260
NsCET1 transformant stocks, floral initiation occurred after a mean of 45.6±3.7 leaves 261
was produced (Fig. 4, A and B). In addition, the internodes of wild-type scions were 262
shorter after grafting onto PSUC2-NsCET1 transformant stocks (Fig. 4, C and D). 263
Therefore, the late-flowering and short-internode phenotypes observed in PSUC2-264
NsCET1 transformants were graft-transmissible. 265
266
To examine whether tobacco NsCET1 mRNA is a mobile mRNA, we first 267
used the Arabidopsis pin-fasten grafting method (Huang and Yu, 2015) to graft 10-day-268
old Arabidopsis wild-type scions onto Arabidopsis P35S-NsCET1 or PSUC2-NsCET1 269
transformant stocks. At 2 weeks after grafting, RT-qPCR analysis detected NsCET1 270
mRNA in wild-type scions grafted onto P35S-NsCET1 or PSUC2-NsCET1 transformant 271
stocks but not onto wild-type controls (Fig. 5, A and B), which indicates that 272
overexpressed NsCET1 mRNA was mobile in Arabidopsis. To investigate the long-273
www.plantphysiol.orgon October 20, 2018 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2018 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
16
distance movement of NsCET1 mRNA in tobacco, we grafted tobacco wild-type scions 274
onto tobacco PSUC2-NsCET1 transformant stocks or control wild-type stocks. At 3 275
weeks after grafting, RT-PCR with NsCET1 transgene-specific primers resulted in PCR 276
products from wild-type scions grafted onto PSUC2-NsCET1 stocks but not from controls 277
www.plantphysiol.orgon October 20, 2018 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2018 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
17
of wild-type scions grafted onto wild-type stocks. Further sequencing of amplified DNA 278
fragments confirmed the identity of PCR products (Supplemental Fig. S6), which 279
indicates that overexpressed NsCET1 mRNA is also mobile in tobacco. 280
281
www.plantphysiol.orgon October 20, 2018 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2018 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
18
To further determine whether endogenous NsCET1 mRNA is a mobile 282
mRNA in tobacco, we performed hetero-species grafting experiments. The sequences of 283
the PEBP genes of tomato and tobacco exhibit significant variations, which allows for 284
differentiation of species-specific PEBP mRNA by RT-PCR and sequencing analysis. We 285
grafted wild-type tomato scions with N. sylvestris stocks (Fig. 6A). At 3 weeks after 286
grafting, RT-PCR with NsCET1 gene-specific primers resulted in PCR products from 5 287
independent tomato scions grafted onto N. sylvestris stocks but not from wild-type 288
tomato plants (Fig. 6B). The PCR products from tomato scions verified by sequencing 289
analysis showed that these products were indeed derived from tobacco NsCET1 mRNA 290
(Supplemental Fig. S7). In contrast, control RT-PCR experiments with primers for 291
tobacco PHLOEM PROTEIN 2A (PP2A), a previously shown non-mobile mRNA (Huang 292
and Yu, 2009), revealed no tobacco PP2A mRNA in wild-type tomato plants and tomato 293
scions grafted onto N. sylvestris stocks (Fig. 6B). These results indicate that endogenous 294
NsCET1 mRNA can move from tobacco stocks to tomato scions. 295
296
The mRNA of MFT-like genes is mobile in tomato-tobacco heterografts 297
In angiosperms, phylogenetic analysis shows that FT- and TFL1-like genes 298
may arise from the ancestor in the MFT-like clade (Hedman et al., 2009; Karlgren et al., 299
2011). To investigate whether the mRNA movement of FT- and TFL1-like genes evolved 300
from mobile MFT-like genes, we examined the mRNA movement of the leaf-expressed 301
MFT-like genes in tomato-tobacco heterografting experiments. The literature and 302
database search identified two tobacco MFT-like genes, namely NsMFTL1 and NsMFTL2, 303
and two tomato MFT-like genes, namely SELF-PRUNING 2G (SP2G) and SELF-304
www.plantphysiol.orgon October 20, 2018 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2018 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
19
PRUNING 3A (SP3A) (Supplemental Fig. S1A; Carmel-Goren et al., 2003). RT-PCR 305
analysis showed weak expression of NsMFTL1 and NsMFTL2 in leaves of N. sylvestris, 306
whereas SP2G but not SP3A was highly expressed in leaves of tomato (Supplemental Fig. 307
S8). To examine the movement of NsMFTL1 and NsMFTL2 mRNA, RT-PCR analysis 308
www.plantphysiol.orgon October 20, 2018 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2018 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
20
was conducted to analyze tomato scions grafted onto N. sylvestris stocks and revealed 309
that NsMFTL2 but not NsMFTL1 mRNA was present in 1 of 5 independent tomato scions 310
grafted onto N. sylvestris stocks (Fig. 6C). In addition, RT-PCR with primers for different 311
tobacco PEBP genes detected NsFT2 and NsFT3 mRNA, which are two tobacco floral 312
inhibitors belonging to the FT-like clade (Harig et al., 2012), in tomato scions grafted 313
onto N. sylvestris stocks (Fig. 6C). These results suggest that in tobacco, a number of 314
members in FT-, TFL1- and MFT-like clades are mobile mRNAs. 315
316
To further verify mRNA movement of tomato PEBP genes, we grafted wild-317
type N. tabacum scions onto tomato stocks (Fig. 7A). At 3 weeks after heterografting, 318
RT-PCR analysis detected SP2G mRNA in tobacco scions grafted onto tomato stocks 319
(Fig. 7B), which suggests that the mRNA movement of MFT-like genes is conserved in 320
tomato and tobacco. In addition, RT-PCR with the primers for different tomato PEBP 321
genes detected SP3D, SP5G (FT-like clade), and SP9D (TFL1-like clade) mRNA in 322
tobacco scions (Fig. 7B). However, RT-PCR with primers for SP11A (FT-like clade) 323
detected SP11A mRNA in tomato stocks but not in tomato scions grafted onto tobacco 324
stocks (Fig. 7B), which suggests that the mRNA movement of PEBP genes is transcript-325
specific. Taken together, our results indicate that in tobacco and tomato, multiple FT-, 326
TFL1-, and MFT-like genes are mobile mRNAs. 327
328
329
www.plantphysiol.orgon October 20, 2018 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2018 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
21
Discussion 330
The PEBP gene family is an evolutionarily conserved gene family. In many 331
plant species, the long-distance or cell-to-cell movement of different PEBP proteins in 332
FT- and TFL1-like clades has been well established (Conti and Bradley, 2007; Zeevaart, 333
www.plantphysiol.orgon October 20, 2018 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2018 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
22
2008; Turnbull, 2011). However, whether the mRNA of PEBP genes is mobile remained 334
controversial. Although previous Arabidopsis grafting experiments showed that the 335
mRNA of FT and ATC can move long distance from stocks to scions (Huang et al., 2012; 336
Lu et al., 2012), grafting experiments in tomato failed to detected the transport of 337
SINGLE FLOWER TRUSS (SFT) mRNA, which is a tomato FT ortholog (Lifschitz et al., 338
2006). Thus, questions remaining are whether the mRNA movement of PEBP genes 339
occurs in other plant species and how florigen and antiflorigen evolved to acquire RNA 340
mobility. In Arabidopsis, MFT is not directly involved in flowering control but rather is 341
involved in seed development (Xi et al., 2010). A specific expression pattern of MFT in 342
germinating seeds is inappropriate for examining the RNA long-distance movement. In 343
this study, we identified a tobacco antiflorigen NsCET1 and showed that NsCET1 mRNA 344
is mobile in Arabidopsis and tobacco (Fig. 5 and 6). Through the use of tobacco-tomato 345
heterografts, we showed that many PEBP genes, including the genes in FT-, TFL-, and 346
MFT-like clades, are mobile in tomato and tobacco (Fig. 6 and 7). The simplest 347
explanation for these findings is that RNA mobility in the PEBP gene family has the 348
same evolutionary lineage: the acquisition of mRNA mobility in FT- and TFL1-like 349
genes may have evolved before the split of FT/TFL1-like clades from the more ancient 350
MFT-like clade. Alternatively, individual PEBP genes in different clades may have 351
independently evolved to access the RNA mobility. Our recent RNA live-imaging 352
analysis showed that Arabidopsis FT and ATC mRNAs are selectively targeted to 353
plasmodesmata for cell-to-cell movement (Luo et al., 2018), suggesting that the same 354
mechanism may be used to direct the cell-to-cell movement of FT and ATC mRNA. This 355
result is consistent with the hypothesis that the RNA mobility in the PEBP gene family 356
www.plantphysiol.orgon October 20, 2018 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2018 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
23
may have evolved before the divergence of the FT/TFL1-like clade from the MFT-like 357
clade. However, more experiments are required to verify whether the RNA movement of 358
different PEBP genes is controlled by the same mechanism. 359
360
Whether the movement of mobile mRNAs is governed by specific or non-361
specific mechanisms is uncertain (Kehr and Kragler, 2018; Morris, 2018). The detection 362
of a significant number of mobile mRNAs in grafted plants (Thieme et al., 2015; Yang et 363
al., 2015) and phloem exudates (Guo et al., 2013) indicates weak selection in regulating 364
mRNA transport (Morris, 2018). A computational simulation indicated that the 365
movement of mobile mRNAs is nonspecific and correlated with transcript abundance 366
(Calderwood et al., 2016). In contrast, in Arabidopsis, grafting experiments with ectopic 367
expression of non-mobile mRNA such as GFP, Arabidopsis dual-affinity nitrate 368
transporter (CHL1), or Arabidopsis ammonium transporter (AMT1;2) showed that high 369
mRNA abundance in companion cells is not sufficient to trigger long-distance movement 370
of these mRNAs (Huang and Yu, 2009; Xia et al., 2018). In addition, the RNA sequences 371
involved in long-distance movement of Arabidopsis GA-INSENITIVE and FT have been 372
located (Huang and Yu, 2009; Lu et al., 2012). Recently, tRNA-like structures (TLSs) in 373
some phloem-mobile mRNAs were found necessary and sufficient to trigger RNA 374
movement (Zhang et al., 2016), which is consistent with the notion that the movement of 375
mobile mRNAs operates by specific mobile RNA motifs. In our grafting experiments, 376
tobacco NsCET1 mRNA could move long-distance in both tobacco and Arabidopsis (Fig. 377
5 and 6). In addition, endogenous NsCET1 mRNA could move across the graft union 378
from tobacco stocks to tomato scions (Fig. 6). These results suggest that the mechanism 379
www.plantphysiol.orgon October 20, 2018 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2018 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
24
by which NsCET1 mRNA moves long distance is likely conserved in these plants. Our 380
heterografting experiments failed to detect the translocated tomato SP11A mRNA in 381
tobacco scions grafted onto tomato stocks (Fig. 7), which suggests that the movement of 382
mobile mRNA is transcript-specific. Thus, the transport of mobile mRNA may be 383
controlled by a regulatory mechanism rather than non-specific diffusion. The cis-acting 384
elements required for Arabidopsis FT RNA movement were localized to nucleotides 1–385
102 on the FT coding sequence (Li et al., 2009; Lu et al., 2012). Given that the sequences 386
of NsCET1 and FT or other PEBP genes exhibit significant similarity, sequence 387
comparison and deletion analysis may provide information to understand whether 388
NsCET1 and FT or other PEBP genes share similar mobile RNA motifs. 389
390
Systemic spreading of many plant RNA viruses is mediated by movement 391
proteins (MPs). These virus-encoded RNA-binding proteins (RBPs) have been shown to 392
bind viral RNA for cell-to-cell movement through PD (Heinlein, 2015). To elucidate the 393
mechanisms underlying the long-distance transport of mobile mRNAs, the movement of 394
plant mobile mRNAs was proposed to be mediated by the interaction of systemic RBPs 395
and mobile RNA motifs (Lucas et al., 2001). The involvement of systemic RBPs in 396
delivery of plant phloem-mobile mRNAs was revealed by the identification of RBPs 397
from phloem exudates. The analysis of pumpkin phloem proteins that cross-react with 398
antiserum against the MP of red clover necrotic mosaic virus identified Cucurbita 399
maxima PHLOEM PROTEIN 16 (CmPP16), which acts as a paralog of viral MP in long-400
distance movement of phloem-mobile mRNA (Xoconostle-Cazares et al., 1999). In 401
pumpkin phloem sap, CmPP16 interacts with Cucurbita maxima PHLOEM RNA 402
www.plantphysiol.orgon October 20, 2018 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2018 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
25
BINDING PROTEIN 50 (CmRBP50), encoding a polypyrimidine track-binding (PTB) 403
protein, and other phloem proteins to form a protein complex that selectively binds with 404
PTB motifs containing phloem-mobile mRNAs (Ham et al., 2009; Li et al., 2011). In 405
agreement with these results, potato StPTB1 and StPTB6, two potato homologs of 406
CmRBP50, mediate tuber development by regulating long-distance movement of mobile 407
StBEL5 mRNA (Cho et al., 2015). Thus, the delivery of various mobile mRNAs may be 408
regulated by the interaction of systemic RBPs with distinct mobile RNA motifs, such as 409
PTB or TLS motifs (Zhang et al., 2016). The identification of the RBPs that involved in 410
long-distance trafficking of NsCETs or other mobile PEBP mRNAs may provide insights 411
into the mechanism of mRNA movement. 412
413
Several lines of evidence demonstrate that plant mobile mRNAs play 414
important roles in many developmental programs. This phloem-mediated RNA regulatory 415
network is involved in leaf development, tuber formation, flowering, and many other 416
developmental processes (Lucas et al., 1995; Kim et al., 2001; Haywood et al., 2005; 417
Banerjee et al., 2006; Lu et al., 2012; Huang et al., 2012). Grafting experiments of 418
tobacco (Lang et al., 1977), cucumber, squash (Satoh, 1996), and soybean (Cober and 419
Curtis, 2003) support the production of antiflorigen when plants are grown under non-420
floral induction conditions. Although previous grafting experiments with early- or late-421
flowering mutants also suggested the presence of graft-transmissible floral inhibitors in 422
pea (Paton and Barber, 1955), the effect is now more likely attributed to the lack of 423
florigen in these mutants (Weller et al., 2009). Recently, an analysis of Arabidopsis and 424
Chrysanthemum revealed that TFL1-like genes act non-cell-autonomously to inhibit 425
www.plantphysiol.orgon October 20, 2018 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2018 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
26
flowering (Huang et al., 2012; Higuchi et al., 2013), which agrees with our finding that 426
NsCET1 is an antiflorigen in tobacco. In tobacco, the PEBP genes in both FT- and TFL-427
like clades may act as floral inhibitors. At least three FT-like floral inhibitors, specifically 428
NtFT1, NtFT2, and NtFT3, are expressed in CCs (Harig et al., 2012). In addition, our 429
heterografting experiments indicated that NsFT2 and NsFT3 are mobile mRNA (Fig. 6C), 430
which suggests that NtFT1, NtFT2, and NtFT3 are probably also mobile in tobacco. Thus, 431
multiple members in both FT- and TFL-like clades of the tobacco PEBP gene family may 432
act redundantly to contribute to antiflorigen activity. 433
434
Floral inhibition of antiflorigen is mediated by antagonizing florigen activity 435
(Huang et al., 2012). In rice, florigen Hd3a may recruit 14-3-3 proteins and FD to form 436
florigen activation complexes and induce the expression of downstream floral identity 437
genes (Taoka et al., 2011). Analysis of Arabidopsis antiflorigen demonstrated that ATC 438
can physically interact with FD to downregulate similar floral identity genes (Huang et al., 439
2012). Similar to ATC, tobacco CET1 also interacted with FD in our BiFC assays (Fig. 440
2D). Therefore, antiflorigen may function to interfere in the binding of FD with florigen 441
to form a florigen activation complex. However, in addition to displaying a late-flowering 442
phenotype, CET1-overexpressed transformants also displayed other developmental 443
alterations, including abnormal floral organs with leafy-like bracts (Supplemental Fig. S1) 444
and shortened internodes (Supplemental Fig. S2). These phenotypes may not be simply 445
attributed to the defective functions of FT or FD. Thus, in addition to antagonizing the 446
activity of florigen, antiflorigen may also act independently of florigen to participate in 447
other developmental regulation. In agreement with this notion, the interaction between 448
www.plantphysiol.orgon October 20, 2018 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2018 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
27
Arabidopsis FT and BRANCHED1 is independent of FD (Niwa et al., 2013). Whether 449
antiflorigen can interact with other factors remains to be investigated. 450
451
Material and Methods 452
Plant growth condition 453
A. thaliana seeds were obtained from the Arabidopsis Biological Resource Center 454
(ABRC, Ohio, USA) and grown in growth chambers under LD (16 h light/8 h dark) or 455
SD (8 h light/16 h dark) conditions, with a 22°C/20°C day/night cycle and white 456
fluorescent light (light intensity 100 μmol m-2 s-1). Tomato, Nicotiana tabacum cv 457
Turkish, and N. sylvestris were grown in a growth chamber with a 25°C/22°C day/night 458
cycle and light intensity 200 μmol m-2 s-1. To induce low-level expression of the tobacco 459
florigen NsFT4, tobacco plants were grown under SD conditions but with dim light (10 460
μmole m-2 s-1) during the dark period. 461
462
Plasmid construction 463
Full-length cDNA of tobacco NsCET1, NsCET2, or NsCET10 was amplified by RACE 464
RT-PCR with gene-specific primers (Sequences are in Supplemental Table S1). The 465
cDNA was driven by a CaMV35S or Arabidopsis SUC2 promoter and transferred into 466
Agrobacterium tumefaciens strain AGL1. The amiR-CETs were designed by using 467
WMD3 Web MicroRNA Designer (http://wmd3.weigelworld.org/cgi-bin/webapp.cgi; 468
Schwab et al., 2006) and confirmed by sequencing. The resulting amiR-CETs constructs 469
were driven by a CaMV35S promoter and transferred into A. tumefaciens strain AGL1 for 470
plant transformation. 471
www.plantphysiol.orgon October 20, 2018 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2018 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
28
Tobacco NsCET1 5.5K promoter was amplified by PCR with forward (5′-472
AAGTGAAGTCGACTAATTCTTTTATATG-3′) and reverse primers (5′-473
CTTCACCCTTTTGTTTCTTCTTCTTTTTGG-3′). The 5.5K promoter was fused with a 474
β-glucuronidase (GUS) reporter gene in pCAMBIA1390 for plant transformation. 475
476
Arabidopsis and tobacco transformation 477
Arabidopsis transformation was performed by the floral dip method. The T1 478
transformants were selected on MS medium containing 40 μg ml-1 hygromycin. At 10 479
days after selection, resulting transformants were selected and transferred to soil for 480
further analysis. For transformation of tobacco (N. tabacum cv. Turkish), tobacco seeds 481
were surface-sterilized and germinated on MS30 medium (MS medium containing 30 g/L 482
sucrose) in growth chambers with 25°C LD conditions for 1 month until plants produced 483
5–6 fully expanded leaves. The midrib of developed leaves was removed, and the 484
remaining blades were cut into 1.0-cm2 pieces and placed on plates with shooting 485
medium I (SM I; MS30 medium containing 1 mg/L BAP and 0.1 mg/L NAA) at 25°C for 486
2 days. Explants were then co-cultured with overnight agrobacterium cultures (diluted to 487
OD600= 0.8–1.0 in SM I solution) for 20 min and blotted dry on sterilized 3M filter paper, 488
then transferred to SM I agar plates at 25°C under dark conditions for 2 days. The 489
explants were transferred to shooting medium II (SM II; MS30 medium containing 1 490
mg/L BAP, 0.1 mg/L NAA, 200 mg/L cefotaxime, and 30 mg/L hygromycin) and 491
incubated in growth chambers under LD conditions to produce callus. Every 2 weeks, 492
calli were subcultured on a new SM II agar plate until new shoots developed. The well-493
developed shoots were transferred to rooting medium (MS30 medium containing 200 494
www.plantphysiol.orgon October 20, 2018 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2018 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
29
mg/L cefotaxime and 30 mg/L hygromycin) until roots were well developed. The 495
successful transformants were transferred to soil. N. sylvestris transformation followed 496
the N. tabacum transformation procedures, except the hormone concentration in SM II 497
medium was reduced to 0.5 mg/L BAP and 0.05 mg/L NAA. 498
499
Bimolecular Fluorescence Complementation (BiFC) Analyses 500
The cDNA of NsCET1 or NsCET2 was cloned into VenusN binary vector HygII-501
VYNE(R), and FD was cloned into the SCFP3AC vector KanII-SCYCE(R), under control 502
of a CaMV35S promoter (Waadt et al., 2008). The successful constructs were introduced 503
into A. tumefaciens strain AGL1. For BiFC analysis, Agrobacterium strains carrying 504
individual BiFC constructs were cultured in LB media containing 50 μg ml-1 kanamycin, 505
10 mM MES, pH 5.7, and 20 μM acetosyringone at 28°C overnight. The bacteria were 506
pelleted and diluted in infiltration solution (10 mM MgCl2, 10 mM MES, pH 5.7, 200 μM 507
acetosyringone) to OD600 = 1.0. The bacteria solution was incubated at room temperature 508
for 1 h. Co-infiltration was conducted with a 1:1 mix of HygII-VYNE(R)-CET and 509
KanII-SCYCE(R)-FD strains. The mixed solution was infiltrated into the leaves of 3-510
week-old Nicotiana benthamiana using syringes. Three days after infiltration, tissue was 511
visualized under a confocal laser-scanning microscope (Zeiss LSM 510 Meta). 512
513
Histochemical analysis 514
The 40-day-old Nicotiana sylvestris transformants carrying NsCET1pro-GUS were 515
incubated with GUS staining solution (50 mM sodium phosphate pH 7.0, 10 mM EDTA, 516
0.5 mM potassium ferricyanide, 0.5 mM potassium ferrocyanide, 1 mM X-Gluc, 0.01% 517
www.plantphysiol.orgon October 20, 2018 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2018 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
30
Triton X-100) at 37°C for 16 hrs. Plants were treated with 95% ethanol to remove 518
chlorophyll and photographed under a Leica Z16 Apo microscope. 519
520
Grafting experiments 521
Arabidopsis grafting was performed by pin-fasten grafting as previously described 522
(Huang and Yu, 2015). At 2 weeks after grafting, the mature leaves of the stocks and the 523
tissues from 0.2 cm above the graft union of the scions were collected for RNA extraction. 524
For tobacco grafting experiments, we used a simple cleft grafting approach. The 525
wild-type or PSUC2-NsCET1 transformant of N. tabacum cv. Turkish were grown in a 526
growth chamber for 2 months. At this stage, plants usually produced 10–15 leaves. The 527
wild-type scions were cut from 10–12 cm below the apex. Mature leaves on the scions 528
were removed and the base of scions was cut into a wedge shape to insert into the slit 529
made by a vertical cut on apex-removed stocks. The graft junctions were secured with 530
parafilm and sealed in a Ziploc bag to retain humidity for 1 week. The mature leaves of 531
the scions on successfully grafted plants were regularly removed to ensure sink strength. 532
For tomato and N. sylvestris heterografting, 1-month-old wild-type tomato were 533
used as scions to graft with wild-type N. sylvestris tobacco plants stocks. The N. 534
sylvestris plants with 4–5 expanding leaves were cut from the base of hypocotyls and 535
shaped into a wedge cut, then inserted into slits made on the stem of tomato plants. The 536
mature leaves of tomato were removed to ensure phloem transport from N. sylvestris to 537
tomato. The graft junctions were secured with parafilm and sealed in a Ziploc bag. 538
Successfully grafted plants were grown in growth chambers with regular removal of 539
mature leaves of tomato scions to ensure sink strength. At 3 weeks after grafting, the 540
www.plantphysiol.orgon October 20, 2018 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2018 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
31
mature leaves of N. sylvestris stocks and the apex of tomato scions, which contains shoot 541
meristem and young primordia, were collected for RNA extraction. 542
N. tabacum and tomato heterografting was made by the simple cleft grafting 543
method conducted with 1-month-old wild-type N. tabacum cv. Turkish scions and tomato 544
stocks. The N. tabacum scions were cut from 6 cm below the apex and shaped into a 545
wedge to insert into the vertical cut of the apex-removed tomato stocks. The graft 546
junctions were secured with parafilm and sealed in a Ziploc bag to retain humidity for 1 547
week. The mature leaves of the scions on successfully grafted plants were regularly 548
removed to ensure sink strength. 549
550
RNA extraction and RT-PCR or RT-qPCR analysis 551
Total RNA was extracted by using Trizol reagent according to user’s manual with 552
modifications (Invitrogen, CA). In brief, 0.4 g of ground tissues were mixed with 1 ml 553
Trizol reagent and centrifuged at 4°C for 10 min at full speed to remove cell debrides. 554
The solution was extracted with chloroform and phenol/chloroform and subjected to 555
ethanol precipitation. RNA was vacuum dried and dissolved in DEPC-treated dH2O. 556
For RT-PCR analysis, 5 μg of total RNA was used in reverse transcription reactions 557
performed with oligo(dT)20 and SuperScript III reverse transcriptase (Invitrogen). One 558
microliter of cDNA was used for the PCR reaction with the following conditions: 1 min 559
at 94°C for 1 cycle; 30 sec at 94°C, 30 sec at 60°C, 1min at 68°C for 35 cycles, and 10 560
min at 68°C for 1 cycle. An aliquot (5 μl) of PCR products was separated on agarose gels. 561
For nested PCR, the PCR products were diluted 1:50 and subjected to a second round of 562
PCR with nested primers. 563
www.plantphysiol.orgon October 20, 2018 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2018 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
32
For RT-qPCR analysis, RNA was treated with DNase I to remove potential DNA 564
contamination. An amount of 5 μg total RNA was used to synthesize first-strand cDNA 565
using Superscript III reverse transcriptase (Invitrogen, CA) in a reaction volume of 20 μl. 566
cDNA was diluted to 10 ng/μl with RNase-free water. An aliquot of 5 μl diluted cDNA 567
and 200-nM gene-specific primers were used for real-time PCR with the Applied 568
Biosystems StepOnePlus Real-Time PCR System (Applied Biosystems). PCR was run at 569
95°C for 10 min, then 40 cycles of 95°C for 15 sec, and 60°C for 1 min, with triplicates 570
technical replicates included for each sample. The expression of β-tubulin (TUB) was a 571
normalization control. The sequences of primers are in Supplemental Tables S1 and S2. 572
573
Accession Numbers 574
Sequence data from this article can be found in the GenBank/EMBL data libraries under 575
accession numbers: NsCET1 (LOC104248269), NsCET2 (LOC104226905), NsCET5 576
(LOC104217580), NsCET9 (LOC104239376), NsCET10 (LOC104229471), NsFTL5 577
(LOC104234573), NsFTL6 (LOC104235396), NsFTL7 (LOC104225910), NsMFTL1 578
(LOC104210644), NsMFTL1 (LOC104210681), NsFT2 (XM_009770669), NsFT3 579
(XM_009773706), SP2G (AY186734), SP3D (AY186735), SP5G (XM_004239797), 580
SP9D (AY186738), SP11A (XM_004250027). 581
582
Supplemental Data 583
The following supplemental materials are available. 584
Supplemental Figure S1. Tobacco NsCET1, NsCET2, and NsCET10 act as floral 585
inhibitors in Arabidopsis. 586
www.plantphysiol.orgon October 20, 2018 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2018 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
33
Supplemental Figure S2. N. tabacum cv. Turkish PSUC2-NsCET1 transformants 587
displayed phenotypes of short internodes and wild-type floral organs. 588
Supplemental Figure S3. Gene expression of N. sylvestris NsCET2 and NsCET10 under 589
LD or SD conditions. 590
Supplemental Figure S4. GUS activity of NsCET1 promoters in tobacco and 591
Arabidopsis. 592
Supplemental Figure S5. Suppression of CETs expression in day-neutral tobacco 593
promotes flowering under SD conditions. 594
Supplemental Figure S6. Long-distance movement of tobacco NsCET1 RNA in tobacco 595
PSUC2-NsCET1 transformants. 596
Supplemental Figure S7. Sequencing analysis of mobile tobacco NsCET1 mRNA in 597
tobacco-tomato heterografts. 598
Supplemental Figure S8. Expression pattern of MFT-like genes in tomato and tobacco. 599
Supplemental Table S1. Primers used in identification of tobacco CET genes and RT-600
qPCR analysis. 601
Supplemental Table S2. Primers used in RT-PCR analysis. 602
603
Acknowledgements 604
We thank the Arabidopsis Biological Resource Stock Center (ABRC) for providing 605
Arabidopsis seeds and Dr. Jörg Kudla for providing the BiFC vectors. This work was 606
supported by grants from the Academia Sinica, Taiwan. 607
608
www.plantphysiol.orgon October 20, 2018 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2018 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
34
Table I. Flowering time of Arabidopsis transformants expressing tobacco 609
CENTRORADIALIS-like (CET) transgenes 610
Plant line Flowering time (no. of rosette leaves)
Col 8.6±0.7
35S-NsCET1 16.8±1.7
SUC2-NsCET1 22.4±2.9
35S-NsCET2 11.9±1.0
SUC2-NsCET2 14.0±1.7
35S-NsCET10 11.3±0.9
SUC2-NsCET10 11.1±0.7
Data are means±SD. 611
612
Figure Legends 613
Figure 1. Tobacco NsCET1 acts act non-cell-autonomously to inhibit flowering 614
A, Flowering time of wild-type Nicotiana sylvestris plant and Nicotiana sylvestris 615
transformants harboring P35S-NsCET1 or PSUC2-NsCET1 transgenes under LD 616
conditions. The black circles represent the leaf number of 3 transformants that did not 617
flower at 5 months after transfer from rooting medium. Flowering time is represented by 618
the number of leaves during flowering (*=p<0.05; **=p<0.01, unpaired Student’s t-test). 619
B, Flowering time of wild-type N. tabacum cv. Turkish and N. tabacum transformants 620
harboring P35S-NsCET1 or PSUC2-NsCET1 transgenes under LD conditions. The black 621
circles represent the leaf number of 2 transformants that did not flower at 5 months after 622
transfer from rooting medium. (*=p<0.05, unpaired Student’s t-test). C, Wild-type N. 623
www.plantphysiol.orgon October 20, 2018 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2018 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
35
sylvestris (left) and N. sylvestris P35S-NsCET1 transformants (right) under LD conditions. 624
D, Wild-type N. tabacum cv. Turkish (left) and N. tabacum PSUC2-NsCET1 625
transformants (right) under LD conditions. 626
627
Figure 2. Expression pattern of NsCET1 in N. sylvestris 628
A, RT-qPCR analysis of NsCET1 mRNA level in N. sylvestris under long-day (LD) or 629
short-day (SD) conditions. The relative expression of NsCET1 was normalized to β-630
tubulin expression. B and C, Histochemical staining of leaf (B) and apex (C, indicated by 631
an arrow) tissue of N. sylvestris transformants carrying a 5.5-kb fragment of NsCET1 632
promoter fused with a GUS reporter gene. Scale bars=0.5 mm. D, Bimolecular 633
fluorescence complementation (BiFC) assay of interaction between NsCET1 and FD. 634
VYNE(R)-CET1 and SCYCE(R)-FD were co-infiltrated in leaves of Nicotiana 635
benthamiana by agro-infiltration. Scale bars=50 μm. E and F, Histochemical staining of 636
roots of root (E) and root tip (F) tissue of N. sylvestris CET1pro-GUS transformants. 637
Scale bars=0.2 mm. 638
639
Figure 3. Knockdown of NsCET expression promotes flowering in tobacco 640
A, Flowering time of wild-type N. sylvestris (Syl, white circle) and N. sylvestris P35S-641
amiR-CET transformants (amiR, black circle) under LD conditions. Each spot represents 642
the leaf number of individual wild-type or transformants during flowering (**=p<0.01, 643
unpaired Student’s t-test). B–D, RT-qPCR analysis of NsCET1 (B), NsCET2 (C), and 644
NsCET10 (D) mRNA level in mature leaves of wild-type N. sylvestris (Syl) and 3 645
representative N. sylvestris P35S-amiR-CET T2 plants (T1-4. T1-5, and T1-9). The 646
www.plantphysiol.orgon October 20, 2018 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2018 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
36
relative expression of CETs was normalized to β-tubulin expression. E, Representative 647
images of wild-type N. sylvestris (Syl, left) and P35S-amiR-CET transformants (amiR, 648
right) grown under SD conditions for 6 months. F, Representative images of wild-type N. 649
sylvestris (Syl, left) and P35S-amiR-CET transformant (amiR, right) grown under SD 650
conditions but with dim light (10 μmole m-2 s-1) during the dark period. 651
652
Figure 4. Phenotypes of tobacco PSUC2-NsCET1 transformants are graft-653
transmissible 654
A, Wild-type N. tabacum cv Turkish scions grafted onto wild-type Turkish stocks 655
(WT/WT; left two plants) or onto PSUC2-NsCET1 transformant stocks (WT/CET1ox; 656
right two plants). The mature leaves were regularly removed from scions to enhance sink 657
strength. Note that the flowering time of the scions grafted onto PSUC2-NsCET1 658
transformant stocks (WT/CET1ox) was significantly delayed. B, Box whisker plot of 659
flowering time of wild-type scions grafted onto wild-type stocks (WT*/WT; yellow, n=7) 660
or PSUC2-NsCET1 transformant stocks (WT*/CET1ox; green, n=10). Flowering time 661
was presented as number of leaves of scions, which was calculated from the grafted 662
junction to the first floral bud. WT* indicates that samples were calculated from wild-663
type scions (****=p<0.0001, unpaired Student’s t-test). C, Internodes of wild-type scions 664
grafted onto wild-type stock (WT*/WT) or PSUC2-NsCET1 transformant stock 665
(WT*/CET1ox). The nodes are indicated by red asterisks. Scale bar=1 cm. D, Box-666
whisker plots of internode length of 5 representative scions grafted onto wild-type stocks 667
(WT*/WT; yellow, 1–5) or PSUC2-NsCET1 transformant stocks (WT*/CET1ox; green, 668
www.plantphysiol.orgon October 20, 2018 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2018 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
37
6–10). Horizontal lines are median; box edges are Q1–Q3; whiskers are highest and 669
lowest values (****=p<0.0001, unpaired Student’s t-test). 670
671
Figure 5. Long-distance movement of NsCET1 mRNA in Arabidopsis 672
A and B, RT-qPCR analysis of NsCET1 mRNA level in wild-type Arabidopsis scions 673
grafted onto Arabidopsis P35S-NsCET1 (A) or PSUC2-NsCET1 (B) transformant stocks. 674
RNA was extracted from mature leaves of wild-type (Col), P35S-NsCET1, or PSUC2-675
NsCET1 stocks or wild-type scions grafted onto P35S-NsCET1 or PSUC2-NsCET1 676
transformant stocks (SC1 and SC2). The relative mRNA level of NsCET1 was 677
normalized to ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme (UBC) expression. 678
679
Figure 6. Long-distance movement of tobacco NsCET1 mRNA in tomato-tobacco 680
heterografts 681
A, Representative images of tomato-tobacco heterografting experiments, depicting a 682
wild-type tomato scion grafted with a wild-type N. sylvestris stock. The grafting union 683
was secured by grafting clips (white arrow). Mature leaves of tomato recipient were 684
removed to enhance the sink strength. B and C, RT-PCR analysis of various mRNA in 685
mature leaves of wild-type N. sylvestris (Tob), wild-type tomato (Tom), or tomato scions 686
(indicated by stars) grafted onto tobacco stocks (Tom*/Tob, 1–5). PCR (B) was 687
performed with gene-specific primers for tobacco NsCET1 (upper panel), tobacco 688
NsPP2A (middle panel) and loading controls of tobacco ACTIN2 (NsACT2, the first lane 689
in lower panel), or tomato IMPORTINα (SIKAPα, lanes 2–6 in lower panel). Nested RT-690
PCR (C) was performed for tobacco NsMFTL2 (upper panel), tobacco NsFT2 (middle 691
www.plantphysiol.orgon October 20, 2018 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2018 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
38
panel), and tobacco NsFT3 (lower panel). The position of the 0.25- and 1-kb DNA 692
marker (lower and upper black lines, respectively) is indicated in each panel. 693
694
Figure 7. Long-distance movement of tomato PEBP genes mRNA in tobacco-tomato 695
heterografting experiments 696
A, Representative images of tobacco-tomato heterografting experiments, depicting a 697
wild-type tobacco scion grafted with a wild-type tomato stock. The grafting union was 698
secured by parafilm (white arrow). Mature leaves of tobacco scions were removed to 699
enhance the sink strength. B, RT-PCR analysis of mRNA from wild-type tomato (Tom), 700
wild-type tobacco (Tob), or tobacco scions (indicated by stars) grafted onto tomato stocks 701
(Tob*/Tom). PCR was performed with gene-specific primers for tomato SP2G (MFT-like 702
clade); SP3D, SP5G and SP11A (FT-like clade); SP9D (TFL-like clade); and loading 703
controls of tomato, IMPORTINα (SIKAPα, the first lane), or tobacco ACTIN2 (NtACT2, 704
lane 2 and 3). 705
706
707
www.plantphysiol.orgon October 20, 2018 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2018 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
Parsed CitationsAbe M, Kobayashi Y, Yamamoto S, Daimon Y, Yamaguchi A, Ikeda Y, Ichinoki H, Notaguchi M, Goto K, Araki T (2005) FD, a bZIP proteinmediating signals from the floral pathway integrator FT at the shoot apex. Science 309: 1052-1056.
Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Ahn JH, Miller D, Winter VJ, Banfield MJ, Lee JH, Yoo SY, Henz SR, Brady RL, Weigel D (2006) A divergent external loop confersantagonistic activity on floral regulators FT and TFL1. EMBO J 25: 605-14.
Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Amaya I, Ratcliffe OJ, Bradley DJ (1999) Expression of CENTRORADIALIS (CEN) and CEN-like Genes in Tobacco reveals a conservedmechanism controlling phase change in diverse species. Plant Cell 11: 1405-1417.
Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Banerjee AK, Chatterjee M, Yu Y, Suh SG, Miller WA, Hannapel DJ (2006) Dynamics of a mobile RNA of potato involved in a long-distance signaling pathway. Plant Cell 18: 3443-3457.
Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Calderwood A, Kopriva S, Morris RJ (2016) Transcript abundance explains mRNA mobility data in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Cell 28:610-615.
Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Carmel-Goren L, Liu YS, Lifschitz E, Zamir D (2003) The SELF-PRUNING gene family in tomato. Plant Mol Biol 52: 1215-1222.Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Chardon F, Damerval C (2005) Phylogenomic analysis of the PEBP gene family in cereals. J Mol Evol 61: 579-590.Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Cho SK, Sharma P, Butler NM, Kang IH, Shah S, Rao AG, Hannapel DJ (2015) Polypyrimidine tract-binding proteins of potato mediatetuberization through an interaction with StBEL5 RNA. J Exp Bot 66: 6835-6847.
Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Conti L, Bradley D (2007) TERMINAL FLOWER1 is a mobile signal controlling Arabidopsis architecture. Plant Cell 19: 767-778.Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Corber ER, Curtis DF (2003) Both promoters and inhibitors affected flowering time in grafted soybean flowering-time isolines. Crop Sci43: 886-891.
Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Corbesier L, Vincent C, Jang S, Fornara F, Fan Q, Searle I, Giakountis A, Farrona S, Gissot L, Trunbull C, Coupland G (2007) FT proteinmovement contributes to long-distance signaling in floral induction of Arabidopsis. Science 316: 1030-1033.
Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Guo S, Zhang J, Sun H, Salse J, Lucas WJ, Zhang H, Zheng Y, Mao L, Ren Y, Wang Z, Min J, Guo X, Murat F, Ham BK, Zhang Z, Gao S,Huang M, Xu Y, Zhong S, Bombarely A, Mueller LA, Zhao H, He H, Zhang Y, Zhang Z, Huang S, Tan T, Pang E, Lin K, Hu Q, Kuang H, NiP, Wang B, Liu J, Kuo Q, Hou W, Zou X, Jiang J, Gong G, Klee K, Schoof H, Huang Y, Hu X, Dong S, Liang D, Wang J, Wu K, Xia Y, ZhaoX, Zheng Z, Xing M, Liang X, Huang B, Lv T, Wang J, Yin Y, Yi H, Li R, Wu M, Levi A, Zhang X, Giovannoni JJ, Wang J, Li Y, Fei Z, Xu Y(2013). The draft genome of watermelon (Citrullus lanatus) and resequencing of 20 diverse accessions. Nat Genet 45: 51-58.
Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Ham BK, Brandom JL, Xoconostle-Cazares B, Ringgold V, Lough TJ, Lucas WJ (2009) A polypyrimidine tract binding protein, pumpkinRBP50, forms the basis of a phloem-mobile ribonucleoprotein complex. Plant Cell 21: 197-215.
Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Ham B-K, Lucas WJ (2017) Phloem-mobile RNAs as systemic signaling agents. Annu Rev Plant Biol 68: 173-195.Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Harig L, Beinecke FA, Oltmanns J, Müth J, Muller O, Rüping B, Twyman RM, Fischer R, Prüfer D, Noll GA (2012) Proteins from theFLOWERING LOCUS T-like subclade of the PEBP family act antagonistically to regulate floral initiation in tobacco. Plant J 72: 908-921.
Pubmed: Author and Title www.plantphysiol.orgon October 20, 2018 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2018 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
Google Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Haywood V, Yu T-S, Huang N-C, Lucas WJ (2005) Phloem long-distance trafficking of GIBBERELLIC ACID-INSENSITIVE RNA regulatesleaf development. Plant J 42: 49-68.
Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Hedman H, Källman T, Lagercrantz U (2009) Early evolution of the MFT-like gene family in plants. Plant Mol Biol 70: 359-369.Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Heinlein M (2015) Plasmodesmata: channels for viruses on the move. Methods in Mol Biol 1217: 25-52.Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Higuchi Y, Narumi T, Oda A, Nakano Y, Sumitomo K, Fukai S, Hisamatsu T (2013) The gated induction system of a systemic floralinhibitor, antiflorigen, determines obligate short-day flowering in chrysanthemums. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 110: 17137-17142.
Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Huang N-C, Yu T-S (2009) The sequences of Arabidopsis GA-insensitive RNA constitute the motifs that are necessary and sufficient forRNA long-distance trafficking. Plant J 59: 921-929.
Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Huang N-C, Jane W-N, Chen J, Yu T-S (2012) Arabidopsis thaliana CENTRORADIALIS homologue (ATC) acts systemically to inhibit floralinitiation in Arabidopsis. Plant J 72: 175-184.
Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Huang N-C, Yu T-S (2015) A pin‑fasten grafting method provides a non‑sterile and highly efficient method for grafting Arabidopsis atdiverse developmental stages. Plant methods 11: 38-48.
Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Jaeger KE, Wigge PA (2007) FT protein acts as a long-range signal in Arabidopsis. Curr Biol 17: 1050-1054.Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Kardailsky I, Shukla VK, Ahn JH, Dagenais N, Christensen SK, Nguyen JT, Chory J, Harrison M, Weigel D (1999) Activation tagging ofthe floral inducer FT. Science 286: 1962-1965.
Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Karlgren A, Gyllenstrand N, Kallman T, Sundstrom JF, Moore D, Lascoux M, Lagercrantz U (2011) Evolution of the PEBP gene family inplants: functional diversification in seed plant evolution. Plant Physiol 156: 1967-1977.
Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Kehr J, Kragler F (2018) Long-distance RNA movement. New Phytol 218: 29-40.Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Kim M, Canio W, Kessler S, Sinha N (2001) Developmental changes due to long-distance movement of a homeobox fusion transcript intomato. Science 293: 287-289.
Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Kobayashi Y, Kaya H, Goto K, Iwabuchi M, Araki T (1999) A pair of related genes with antagonistic roles in mediating flowering signals.Science 286: 1960-1962.
Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Lacombe B, Achard P (2016) Long-distance transport of phytohormones through the plant vascular system. Curr Opin Plant Biol 34: 1-8.Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Lang A, Chailakhyan MK, Frolova IA (1977) Promotion and inhibition of flower formation in a dayneutral plant in grafts with a short-dayplant and a long-day plant. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 74: 2412-2416.
Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Li C, Zhang K, Zeng X, Jackson S, Zhou Y, Hong Y (2009) A cis-element within FLOWERING LOCUS T mRNA determines its mobility andfacilitates trafficking of heterologous viral RNA. J Virol 83: 3540-3548.
Pubmed: Author and Title www.plantphysiol.orgon October 20, 2018 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2018 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
Google Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Li P, Ham BK, Lucas WJ (2011) CmRBP50 protein phosphorylation is essential for assembly of a stable phloem-mobile high-affinityribonucleoprotein complex. J Biol Chem 286: 23142-23149.
Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Lifschitz E, Eviatar T, Rozman A, Shalit A, Goldshmidt A, Amsellem Z, Alvarez JP, Eshed Y (2006) The tomato FT ortholog triggerssystemic signals that regulate growth and flowering and subsitute for diverse environmental stimuli. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103: 6398-6403.
Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Liu L, Liu C, Hou X, Xi W, Shen L, Tao Z, Wang Y, Yu H (2012) FTIP1 is an essential regulator required for florigen transport. PLoS Biol10: e1001313.
Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Lu K-J, Huang N-C, Liu Y-S, Lu C-A, Yu T-S (2012) Long-distance movement of Arabidopsis FLOWERING LOCUS T RNA participates insystemic floral regulation. RNA Biol 9: 653-662.
Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Lucas WJ, Bouché-Pillon S, Jackson DP, Nguyen L, Baker L, Ding B, Hake S (1995) Selective trafficking of KNOTTED1 homeodomainprotein and its mRNA through plasmodesmata. Science 270: 1980-1983.
Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Lucas WJ, Yoo BC, Kragler F (2001) RNA as a long-distance information macromolecule in plants. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2: 849-857.Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Luo K-R, Huang N-C, Yu T-S (2018) Selective targeting of mobile RNAs to plasmodesmata for cell-to-cell movement in plants. PlantPhysiol 177: 604-614.
Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Matsoukas IG, Massiah AJ, Thomas B (2012) Florigenic and antiflorigenic signaling in plants. Plant Cell Physiol 53: 1827-1842.Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Mathieu J, Warthmann N, Küttner F, Schmid M (2007) Export of FT protein from phloem companion cells is sufficient for floral inductionin Arabidopsis. Curr Biol 17: 1055-1060.
Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Morris RJ (2018) On the selectivity, specificity and signaling potential of the long-distance movement of messenger RNA. Curr OpinPlant Biol 43: 1-7.
Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Niwa M, Daimon Y, Kurotani K, Higo A, Pruneda-Paz JL, Breton G, Mitsuda N, Kay SA, Ohme-Takagi M, Endo M, Araki T (2013)BRANCHED1 interacts with FLOWERING LOCUS T to repress the floral transition of the axillary meristems in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell25: 1228-1242.
Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Paton DM, Barber HN (1955) Physiological genetics of Pisum I Grafting experiments between early & late varieties. Austral J Biol Sci 8:231-240.
Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Pin PA, Benlloch R, Bonnet D, Wremerth-Weich E, Kraft T, Gielen JJL, Nilsson O (2010) An antagonistic pair of FT homologs mediatedthe control of flowering time in sugar beet. Science 330: 1397-1400.
Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Porri A, Torti S, Romera-Branchat M, Coupland G (2012) Spatially distinct regulatory roles for gibberellins in the promotion of floweringof Arabidopsis under long photoperiods. Development 139: 2198-2209.
Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Ruiz-Medrano R, Xoconostle-Cázares B, Lucas WJ (1999) Phloem long-distance transport of CmNACP mRNA: implications forsupracellular regulation in plants. Development 126: 4405-4419.
Pubmed: Author and Title www.plantphysiol.orgon October 20, 2018 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2018 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
Google Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Satoh S (1996) Inhibition of flowering of cucumber grafted on tooted squash stock. Physiol Plant 97: 440-444.Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Schwab R, Ossowski S, Riester M, Warthmann N, Weigel D (2006) Highly specific gene silencing by artificial microRNAs in Arabidopsis.Plant Cell 18: 1121-1133.
Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Takada S, Goto K (2003) TERMINAL FLOWER2, an Arabidopsis homolog of HETEROCHROMATIN PROTEIN1, counteracts theactivation of FLOWERING LOCUS T by CONSTANS in the vascular tissues of leaves to regulate flowering time. Plant Cell 15: 2856-2865.
Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Tamaki S, Shoichi M, Wong HL, Yokoi S, Shimamoto K (2007) Hd3a protein is a mobile flowering signal in rice. Science 316: 1033-1036.Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Taoka K, Ohki I, Tsuji H, Furuita K, Hayashi K, Yanase T, Yamaguchi M, Nakashima C, Purwestri YA, Tamaki S, Ogaki Y, Shimada C,Nakagawa A, Kojima C, Shimamoto K. (2011) 14-3-3 proteins act as intracellular receptors for rice Hd3a florigen. Nature 476: 332-335.
Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Thieme CJ, Rojas-Triana M, Stecyk E, Schudoma C, Zhang W, Yang L, Miñambres M, Walther D, Schulze WX, Paz-Ares J, Scheible W-R,Krager F (2015) Endogenous Arabidopsis messenger RNAs transported to distant tissues. Nature Plants 1: 15025.
Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Turnbull C (2011) Long-distance regulation of flowering time. J Exp Bot 62: 4399-4413.Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Waadt R, Schmidt LK, Lohse M, Hashomota K, Bock R, Kudla J (2008) Multicolor bimolecular fluorescence complementation revealssimultaneous formation of alternative CBL/CIPK complexes in planta. Plant J 56: 505-516.
Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Wang Z, Zhou Z, Liu Y, Liu T, Li Q, Ji Y, Li C, Fang C, Wang M, Wu M, Shen Y, Tang T, Ma J, Tian Z (2015) Functional evolution ofphosphatidylethanolamine binding proteins in soybean and Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 27: 323-336.
Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Weller JL, Hecht V, Liew LC, Sussmilch FC, Wenden B, Knowles CL, Vander Schoor JK (2009) Update on the genetic control offlowering in garden pea. J Exp Bot 60: 2493-2499.
Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Wigge PA, Kim MC, Jaeger KE, Busch W, Schmid M, Lohmann JU, Weigel D (2005) Integration of spatial and temporal informationduring floral induction in Arabidopsis. Science 309: 1056-1059.
Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Xi W, Liu C, Hou X, Yu H (2010) MOTHER OF FT AND TFL1 regulates seed germination through a negative feedback loop modulatingABA signaling in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 22: 1733-1748.
Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Xia C, Zheng Y, Huang J, Zhou X, Li R, Zha M, Wang S, Huang Z, Lan H, Turgeon R, Fei Z, Zhang C (2018) Elucidation of the mechanismsof long-distance movement in a Nicotiana benthamiana/tomato heterograft system. Plant Physiol 177: 745-758.
Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Xoconostle-Cázares B, Xiang Y, Ruiz-Medrano R, Wang H-L, Monzer J, Yoo B-C, McFarland KC, Franceschi VR, Lucas WJ (1999) Plantparalog to viral movement protein that peteniates transport of mRNA into the phloem. Science 283: 94-98.
Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Yang Y, Mao L, Jittayasothorn Y, Kang Y, Jiao C, Fei Z, Zhog GY (2015) Messenger RNA exchange between scions and rootstocks ingrafted grapevines. BMC Plant Biol 15: 251.
Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
www.plantphysiol.orgon October 20, 2018 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2018 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
Yoo S-C, Chen C, Rojas M, Daimon Y, Ham B-K, Araki T, Lucas WJ (2013) Phloem long-distance delivery of FLOWERING LOCUS T tothe apex. Plant J 75: 456-468.
Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Zeevaart JAD (1976) Physiology of flower formation. Annu Rev Plant Physiol 27: 321-348.Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Zeevaart JAD (2008) Leaf-produced floral signals. Curr Opin Plant Biol 11: 541-547.Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Zhang W, Thieme CJ, Kollwig G, Apelt F, Yamg L, Winter N, Andresen N, Walther D, Kragler F (2016) tRNA-related sequences triggersystemic mRNA transport in plants. Plant Cell 28: 1237-1249.
Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Zhu Y, Liu L, Shen L, Yu H (2016) NaKR1 regulates long-distance movement of FLOWERING LOCUS T in Arabidopsis. Nature Plant 2:16075.
Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
www.plantphysiol.orgon October 20, 2018 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2018 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.