+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Shortened in vivo bioconcentration factor testing in ...

Shortened in vivo bioconcentration factor testing in ...

Date post: 15-Jan-2022
Category:
Upload: others
View: 5 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
85
APPROVED: Duane Huggett, Major Professor Ed Dzialowski, Committee Member Mark Burleson, Committee Member Sam Atkinson, Professor, Interim Chair of the Department of Biological Sciences and Director of the Institute of Applied Science Mark Wardell, Dean of the Toulouse Graduate School SHORTENED IN VIVO BIOCONCENTRATION FACTOR TESTING IN Cyprinus carpio Mark C antu Thesis Prepared for the Degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE UNIVERSITY OF NORTH TEXAS December 2013
Transcript
Page 1: Shortened in vivo bioconcentration factor testing in ...

APPROVED:

Duane Huggett, Major Professor Ed Dzialowski, Committee Member Mark Burleson, Committee Member Sam Atkinson, Professor, Interim Chair of the

Department of Biological Sciences and Director of the Institute of Applied Science

Mark Wardell, Dean of the Toulouse Graduate School

SHORTENED IN VIVO BIOCONCENTRATION FACTOR

TESTING IN Cyprinus carpio

Mark C antu

Thesis Prepared for the Degree of

MASTER OF SCIENCE

UNIVERSITY OF NORTH TEXAS

December 2013

Page 2: Shortened in vivo bioconcentration factor testing in ...

Cantu, Mark. Shortened in vivo bioconcentration factor testing in Cyprinus carpio.

Master of Science (Biology), December 2013, 78 pp., 9 tables, 12 figures, chapter references.

Bioconcentration factor testing serves as the most valuable surrogate for the

assessment of bioaccumulation. The assessment of potentially harmful chemicals is crucial to

not only the health of aquatic environments, but to humans as well. Chemicals that possess the

ability to persist in the environment or that have the potential to bioaccumulate, pose a greater

risk to organisms that are exposed to these chemicals. The Organization for Economic

Cooperation and Development Guideline 305 outlines specific protocols to run an accurate and

reliable aquatic flow-through test. However, since its adoption in 1996, very few changes have

been made to accommodate the endeavor to lowering the amount of test species to run one of

these said tests. Running an aquatic flow-through test, according to 305, takes much time and

money as well as numerous amounts of fish. Such burdens can be eliminated through simple

modifications to the standard protocols. In this study, we propose an abbreviated study design

for aquatic bioconcentration testing which effectively alleviates the burdens of running a flow-

through test. Four chemicals were used individually to evaluate the usefulness of the proposed

shortened design; 4-Nonyphenol, Chlorpyrifos, Musk Xylene, and DDT. The study consisted of

exposing Cyprinus carpio for 7 days followed by 7 days of depuration, for a total of a 14-day

study. Our results for each of the four compounds are consistent with literature values, thus,

demonstrating that BCFk can be accurately predicted in an abbreviated in vivo test.

Page 3: Shortened in vivo bioconcentration factor testing in ...

Copyright 2013

by

Mark Cantu

ii

Page 4: Shortened in vivo bioconcentration factor testing in ...

iii

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Page

LIST OF TABLES ................................................................................................................................. v LIST OF FIGURES .............................................................................................................................. vi CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................... 1

1.1 Background ............................................................................................................. 1

1.1.1 Fish Bioconcentration Factor Testing ......................................................... 1

1.1.2 OECD 305: Bioconcentration Assessment: Flow-Through Fish Test ........... 4

1.2 Environmental Relevance ....................................................................................... 6

1.2.1 Chemical Interaction ................................................................................... 6

1.2.2 Future Testing Procedures .......................................................................... 6

1.2.3 Xenobiotic Biotransformation .................................................................... 7

1.3 Experimental Design ............................................................................................... 9

1.3.1 Test Materials ............................................................................................. 9

1.3.2 Test Organism ........................................................................................... 19

1.4 Specific Aims ......................................................................................................... 20

1.5 Objectives and Hypothesis .................................................................................... 20

1.6 Chapter References............................................................................................... 21 CHAPTER 2. DEVELOPMENT OF AN ABBREVIATED IN VIVO BIOCONCENTRATION FACTOR TEST IN COMMON CARP ........................................................................................................................ 30

2.1 Introduction .......................................................................................................... 30

2.2 Materials and Methods ......................................................................................... 31

2.2.1 Chemicals .................................................................................................. 31

2.2.2 Animals and Housing ................................................................................ 32

2.2.3 Fish Exposure ............................................................................................ 32

2.2.4 Analytical Chemistry ................................................................................. 35

2.2.5 Data Analysis ............................................................................................. 37

2.3 Results ................................................................................................................... 37

2.3.1 Single Compound Study ............................................................................ 37

Page 5: Shortened in vivo bioconcentration factor testing in ...

iv

2.3.2 Mixture Study Results ............................................................................... 39

2.3.3 Whole-Body Homogenate Results ............................................................ 40

2.4 Discussion.............................................................................................................. 41

2.5 Chapter References............................................................................................... 43 CHAPTER 3. IN VITRO METABOLISM OF FOUR COMPOUNDS AND THEIR EFFECTS THEY HAVE ON EACH OTHERS METABOLISM ........................................................................................................ 46

3.1 Introduction .......................................................................................................... 46

3.2 Materials and Methods ......................................................................................... 48

3.2.1 Chemicals and Reagents ........................................................................... 48

3.2.2 Fish Culture ............................................................................................... 48

3.2.3 Liver S9 Preparation .................................................................................. 48

3.2.4 Microsomal Preparations .......................................................................... 49

3.2.5 In Vitro Assay ............................................................................................ 49

3.2.6 Control Groups .......................................................................................... 50

3.2.7 CYP-Specific Inhibition .............................................................................. 51

3.2.8 Data Analysis ............................................................................................. 51

3.3 Results ................................................................................................................... 51

3.4 Discussion.............................................................................................................. 54

3.5 Chapter References............................................................................................... 56 CHAPTER 4. CONCLUSION ............................................................................................................. 62

4.1 Introduction .......................................................................................................... 62

4.2 BCF Testing ............................................................................................................ 62

4.3 S9 In Vitro Assay .................................................................................................... 64

4.4 Conclusions ........................................................................................................... 65

4.5 Chapter References............................................................................................... 66 APPENDIX A. BCF GRAPHS FROM SINGLE EXPOSURE .................................................................. 72 APPENDIX B. BCF GRAPHS FROM MIXTURE EXPOSURE: CONCENTRATION OF MULTIPLE COMPOUNDS IN WHOLE BODY HOMOGENATE OVER A 14-DAY PERIOD .................................... 77

Page 6: Shortened in vivo bioconcentration factor testing in ...

v

LIST OF TABLES

Page

Table 1.1. Chlorpyrifos properties. (NIH 2012) ............................................................................. 11

Table 1.2. Nonylphenol properties. (NIH 2012) ............................................................................ 14

Table 1.3. DDT properties. (NIH 2012) .......................................................................................... 17

Table 1.4. Musk Xylene properties. (NIH 2012) ............................................................................ 19

Table 2.1: Table of BCFk values from single exposure study in carp muscle tissue. ..................... 38

Table 2.2: Table of BCFk values from single exposure study in carp liver tissue. ......................... 38

Table 2.3: Table of BCFk values from mixture study exposure in carp muscle tissue. ................. 40

Table 2.4: Table of BCFk values from mixture study exposure in carp liver tissue. ...................... 40

Table 2.5: Summary of BCFk values calculated from whole body homogenate in carp from single and mixture studies. ..................................................................................................................... 41

Page 7: Shortened in vivo bioconcentration factor testing in ...

vi

LIST OF FIGURES

Page

Figure 1.1. Molecular structure of chlorpyrifos (Cole et al., 2012). ............................................... 9

Figure 1.2. Biotransformation pathway of chlorpyrifos as adapted from Smith et al., 2011. ..... 11

Figure 1.3. Molecular structure of nonylphenol (Eriksson et al., 2003). ...................................... 12

Figure 1.4. Degredation of nonylphenol polyethyoxylates in wastewater treatment microorganisms as adapted from Giger et al., 1984 and Di Corcia et al., 1998. .......................... 12

Figure 1.5. Proposed metabolic pathway of nonylphenol as adapted from Thibaut et al., 1998.14

Figure 1.6. Biotransformation of DDT to form DDD (by reductive dechlorination, right) and DDE (by elimination of HCl, left). .......................................................................................................... 15

Figure 1.7. Proposed metabolic pathway of DDT as adapted from van den Berg et al., 2003. ... 16

Figure 1.8. Molecular structure of Musk Xylene (Sari and Itoh, 2012). ....................................... 17

Figure 1.9. Biotransformation of musk xylene in humans as adapted from Riedel and Dekant 1998. ............................................................................................................................................. 18

Figure 3.1: Biotransformation of 4-NP in trout S9 fractions over a 60 min period. ..................... 52

Figure 3.2: Biotransformation of NP in trout S9 fractions. Data here showing different reaction vessels with MX added. ................................................................................................................ 52

Figure 3.3: Biotransformation of CPS in trout S9 fractions. ......................................................... 53

Page 8: Shortened in vivo bioconcentration factor testing in ...

1

CHAPTER 1

INTRODUCTION

1.1 Background

1.1.1 Fish Bioconcentration Factor Testing

Fish bioconcentration factor (BCF) testing serves as the most valuable source for

determining a chemical’s ability to bioaccumulate in the environment. Guidelines have been set

to standardize and validate testing protocols to increase repeatability and reliability among

results. To obtain a reliable and valid assessment of a compounds bioaccumulative property

four key criteria must be met: 1) clear specification of the test compound and fish being tested,

2) chemical analysis in the fish as well as analysis of the exposure medium, 3) no toxicological

effects from the chemical should be observed in the test, and 4) steady-state conditions must

be met (Parkerton et al., 2008). Information from BCF studies can be obtained from both

environmental and laboratory settings, however most testing procedures take place within

laboratory settings due to lack of protocol guidelines for field studies and increased variability

factors among testing results. Additionally, BCF values can be used to formulate quantitative

structure-activity relationships (QSARs), which can be used to help predict certain compounds

potential to bioaccumulate within the environment (Arnot et al., 2009).

Regulation of chemicals in the environment is crucial to help reduce exposure to not

only wildlife but humans as well. Chemicals that persist in the environment have the potential

to accumulate to higher-tropic level organisms, most notably humans. Environmental

organizations look at three characteristics to assess if a chemical should or should not be placed

under certain restrictions to eliminate potential over-exposure within the environment and

Page 9: Shortened in vivo bioconcentration factor testing in ...

2

potentially to humans. Agencies assess the compounds persistence (P), bioaccumulative

potential (B), and environmental toxicity (T) to determine if a compound should be subjected to

tighter regulations as well as determining if a chemical is environmentally safe and should be

placed on the market for commercial use (Weisbrod et al., 2008).

Chemicals that have the ability to persist in the environment for longer periods of time,

will pose a greater risk for organisms that are indigenous to the area of exposure. In other

words, the longer the chemical can persist in a marine environment; the greater the chances of

an organism to come into contact with that chemical. When evaluating the persistence of a

substance, actual half-life data under desired marine conditions should be used to determine

the substances persistence. Substances with a half-life of >60 days in marine water or >40 days

in freshwater will fulfill the persistence criterion. Also, a substance with a half-life that is >180

days in marine sediment or >120 days in freshwater sediment would be considered persistent.

In more extreme cases, some substances have the potential to be very persistent. Substances

that have a half-life >60 days in both marine and freshwater or >180 days in both marine and

freshwater sediment would be considered very persistent (vP) (European Chemicals Bureau

2003).

Aquatic organisms have the potential to become exposed to substance directly from the

water (bioconcentration), or uptake through the foodchain (biomagnification). Actual measured

data on bioconcentration in aquatic species should be used to assess a substances

bioaccumulative property. When measured data is not available, log Kow or BCF based on

mathematical models can be used to predict bioaccumulative potential. Substances with a BCF

value exceeding of 2,000 will fulfill the B criterion, and any substance that exceeds a value of

Page 10: Shortened in vivo bioconcentration factor testing in ...

3

5,000 would be considered very bioaccumulative (vB). When actual measured data is not

available, a log Kow value exceeding 4.5 will fulfill this criterion (European Chemicals Bureau

2003). Requirement to fulfill this criterion varies from country to country. For example, the

United States, Japan, Canada, and Australia use criterion that follows the Stockholm Convention

that states a chemical may be considered bioaccumulative if its BCF value is greater than 5,000.

Toxicity data should ideally assess long-term effects to fulfill the toxic criterion.

However, data available for most chemicals are acute effects and used to drive initial selection.

A substance would meet this criterion if chronic long-term no observed effect concentration

(NOEC) for marine or freshwater organisms is < 0.01 ml/l, or when a substance has been

classified as carcinogenic, mutagenic or toxic for reproduction. Also, if there is evidence of long-

term toxicity, such as endocrine disruption, a substance would be considered to fulfill this

criterion (European Chemicals Bureau 2003).

Regulatory agencies look at PBT characteristics in a chemical to determine if tighter

regulations should be put in place. For example, the European Registration, Evaluation,

Authorization, and Restriction of Chemical substances (REACH) program places greater

responsibility on industries to provide information on chemicals for safer and smarter handling

of the distribution of substances. Regulation of chemicals has been a milestone in reducing the

amount of potentially harmful chemicals to the environment. Not only has regulation been

pivotal for protecting our environment, but it has reduced exposure to humans as well.

Although some protocols for environmental assessment are in need to be updated, newer and

cheaper methods for environmental assessment have proven to be effective at predicting

bioaccumulation potential of a compound.

Page 11: Shortened in vivo bioconcentration factor testing in ...

4

1.1.2 OECD 305: Bioconcentration Assessment: Flow-Through Fish Test

The Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development Guideline 305 outlines

the protocols used in the United States that are needed for an accurate and reliable aquatic

flow-through test to be administered (OECD, 1996). The testing consists of two phases:

exposure (uptake) and post-exposure (depuration) phases. The protocol calls for a 28 day

uptake phase, however if steady-state is not reached (BCFss) by day 28 then the uptake phase

should be lengthened until BCFss is met or up to 60 days. BCFss can be derived from taking the

concentration in the fish (Cf) and dividing that by the concentration in the water (Cw) (OECD,

1996).

(BCF = Cf/Cw) (1)

Along with the length of the test, two different concentrations should be used to

conduct each study. Sampling of the fish should take place at least five different time points

during the uptake phase and at least four different time points for the depuration phase. Water

should be sampled prior to the addition of the fish being studied to determine if nominal

concentrations have been reached. Guideline 305 calls for at least four fish per concentration at

each of the time points to be sampled for accurate analysis of BCF.

Standard fish BCF analysis can be derived from two first order kinetic processes that can

accurately describe uptake and depuration (OECD, 1996).

Rate of uptake = k1 x Cw (2)

Overall loss rate = (k2+kg+km)xCf (3)

Page 12: Shortened in vivo bioconcentration factor testing in ...

5

By combining the rate of uptake and overall loss rate equations we can derive kinetic

BCF (BCFk).

(BCFk = k1/k2) (4)

BCFk is a ratio between k1 and k2 and should be equal to steady-state BCF (BCFss) that is

obtained from the concentration in fish to the concentration in water. Once BCFss has been

reached, or 60 days have passed, whichever comes first, the exposure phase has come to an

end and the aquatic organisms should be moved to a clean tank to begin the depuration phase.

With this procedure an experiment could run as long as three months and fish used for the

experiment could range from 70 to 90 fish, or more depending on when BCFss is reached.

The length of the test, the required amount of fish to be tested, and the amount of

chemical needed for that length of time in a flow-through system can be very taxing on any

budget for labs performing these tests. Development for a shortened and applicable BCF testing

protocol would alleviate many monetary concerns that are often a burden for laboratories. A

reduction in the amount of time would also reduce the amount of fish and chemical needed for

a BCF test. Alleviating these burdens will open opportunities for more chemical screening as

many chemicals have already been screened but there are still thousands more that can be

found in the environment that need to be tested.

The organism often used for BCF assessments is the common carp. The use of this

organism is efficient in that it develops and grows very slowly, allowing for a more accurate

assessment for the potential to bioaccumulate. Using an organism that develops rapidly could

skew the results as the organism’s ability to metabolize and excise chemicals could increase.

Page 13: Shortened in vivo bioconcentration factor testing in ...

6

1.2 Environmental Relevance

1.2.1 Chemical Interaction

Chemicals that are found in the environment are not found alone, but in a complex of

chemicals that aquatic organisms can potentially be exposed to. Many BCF tests have focused

on one particular chemical at a time and how an organism will uptake and depurate that

specific chemical. As stated, chemicals are found as a complex; therefore it has been proposed

that mixture studies are needed to validate many of these findings. Interactions between these

chemicals within the environment or the organism can alter the BCF values that we see during

the test. For example, it has been shown that musk xylene induces CYP2B enzymes in mice;

however activity of this enzyme was not observed (Chou and Dietrich, 1999; Hawkins et al.,

2002; Lehman-McKeeman et al., 1995). These findings suggest that musk xylene, while inducing

certain enzymes; will inhibit metabolic proteins as well. CYP2B is a major liver enzyme that is

required to break down many chemicals within the liver and inhibition of this enzyme could

very well prevent the metabolism of other chemicals present within the organism.

1.2.2 Future Testing Procedures

Certain steps are being made to better screen chemicals in order to reduce the amount

of testing and to filter out any chemicals that could potentially be a higher risk to humans and

the environment. Quantitative structure-activity relationships (QSARs) are mathematical

models that can potentially predict complex relationships between complex chemical reactions

and biological systems they may occupy. The predictability of these QSARs is limited and based

on homogeneity of the compound throughout the investigation of the chemical. Limits can be

Page 14: Shortened in vivo bioconcentration factor testing in ...

7

widened if the biological activity is unspecific or narrowed if the biological endpoints involve

specific mechanisms of action (Suter-Eichenberger et al., 1998).

Metabolism studies with S9 or microsomal fractions have increased in popularity in

regards to relating these data to BCF work. In vitro metabolism assays can accurately show how

well an organism may or may not break a chemical down (Cowan-Ellsberry et al., 2008). In

addition to showing relevant metabolism data, in vitro tests can be performed much faster and

cheaper. Mixture studies can also be performed to determine if there are any reactions taking

place that may skew the results of how well an organism can break down multiple compounds.

1.2.3 Xenobiotic Biotransformation

1.2.3.1 Liver Metabolism

Metabolism of compounds that are foreign to an internal environment has been well

studied and documented for many years. Studies that look at different modifications of

xenobiotic compounds range from pharmaceuticals that are found in waste water treatment to

pesticides that leach into different ecosystems. Although many different cell types possess the

appropriate enzymes to metabolize xenobiotics, the liver is the main site for most

biotransformation. Biotransformation of foreign substances can be subdivided into two phases:

modification and conjugation. The objective for phase I (modification) reactions are to

introduce reactive and polar groups to substrates that have been introduced into a system

(Guengerich, 2001). The most common reactions are oxidation, reduction, and hydrolysis

(Goeptar et al., 1995). Phase I reactions, more often than not, involve the enzyme cytochrome

P450, which is a large superfamily of enzymes that catalyze reactions (Guengerich, 2008). If the

newly formed metabolites have become sufficiently polar, they can be excreted out of the

Page 15: Shortened in vivo bioconcentration factor testing in ...

8

system. However, metabolites that have not acquired the polarity needed for excretion, the

metabolites will undergo Phase II reactions, conjugation. In Phase II reactions, metabolites are

conjugated with different species such as glutathione, sulfate, glycine, or glucuronic acid (Ritter,

2000; Buckley and Klaassen, 2007). Conjugation can occur on carboxyl, hydroxyl, amino, or

sulfhydryl groups of the metabolite, depending on the chemical structure of the metabolite

(Parkinson and Oglivie, 2007). The end product of conjugation is a more polar metabolite;

therefore, it cannot diffuse across membranes and can be actively transported.

Phase I and II reactions are vital for the detoxification of potentially poisonous foreign

substances. However, this is not always the case. Some metabolites that are formed during

biotransformation are more detrimental than their parent compound. The biotransformation of

chlorpyrifos is a good example of how a metabolite can be more toxic than the parent molecule

itself. Chloropyrifos-oxon, a metabolite of chlorpyrifos, has been well studied and has shown to

inhibit acetylcholinesterase activity in neurons. Although biotransformation is essential for

detoxifying xenobiotics, there are a few instances where biotransformation can be toxic in

itself.

1.2.3.2 Subcellular Fractions

In vitro work has increased in popularity over the past two decades, due to the

constraints of cost and time. Approximately 70-80% of the liver is composed of hepatocyte

cells, where many different biological processes occur. Homogenized liver tissue can be

centrifuged for a certain amount of time to isolate cytosol and microsomes. Cytosol contains

the necessary transferases for phase II metabolism, while microsomes contain cytochrome

P450 isoforms necessary for phase I metabolism. Both cytosol and microsomes form what is

Page 16: Shortened in vivo bioconcentration factor testing in ...

9

called S9 fractions, where the ‘S’ stands for supernatant and the ‘9’ represents a 9,000g 20

minute centrifuge spin to isolate the fraction from cellular debris. In vitro metabolism data,

using S9 fractions, can accurately assess and determine xenobiotic biotransformation from

multiple species. One strong point of in vitro work is the ability to show biotransformation

differences among different species. Along with variation among species, in vitro has also

helped reduce the number of animals needed for experimentation.

1.3 Experimental Design

1.3.1 Test Materials

The proposed testing materials include nonylphenol, dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane,

chlorpyrifos, and musk xylene.

1.3.1.1 Chlorpyrifos

Figure 1.1. Molecular structure of chlorpyrifos (Cole et al., 2012).

Chlorpyrifos (O,O-diethyl O-3,5,6-trichloropyridin-2-yl phosphorothioate) was first

synthesized by Dow Chemical Company in 1965 as an organophosphate (OP) insecticide (Fig.

1.1), under the trade names include Dursban and Lorsban. The OP works at the neurological

level by blocking acetylcholinesterase, which is an enzyme that is vital for acetylcholine (ACh) to

be broken down and enables the pre-synaptic cleft to re-uptake the chemical (Cole et al., 2012).

Blockage of acetylcholinesterase leads to an increase in ACh levels in neuronal tissues and can

cause a wide range of effects, depending on the level of exposure. Severe intoxications can

Page 17: Shortened in vivo bioconcentration factor testing in ...

10

eventually result in death, usually from respiratory failure. Metabolism of chlorpyrifos is

dependent on P450 enzymes found in hepatic cell lines. CYP3A4/5 has showed the highest

activity for metabolism but due to lack of specificity CYP2B6 and CYP2C19 have shown high

activity as well (Robert et al., 2007). Specifically, CYP2B6 enzyme is responsible for

desulfuration, CYP2C19 for dearylation, and CYP3A4/5 for both pathways (Smith et al., 2011).

P450 enzymes may either detoxify the chemical (dearylation), or it may activate oxon

metabolites (desulfuration) (Cole et al., 2012). During desulfuration, the sulfur group is

removed and a double bonded oxygen molecule is put in its place (CPS-oxon). CPS-oxon

metabolite demonstrates a much higher affinity for the ∂ and ß subunits esterases that causes

unwanted side effects (Bicker et al., 2005). Oxon binds irreversibly to the ß-esterase and

reversibly to the ∂-esterase through hydrolyzing the oxon metabolite. As mentioned earlier,

inactivation of these results in an increase in ACh and overstimulation of cholinergic nerves.

Elimination of chlorpyrifos and its metabolites is mainly achieved via the kidneys (Nolan

et al., 1984; Griffin et al., 1999; Timchalk et al., 2002). Urinary excretion data in acute

chlorpyrifos exposures in humans is available for DETP, DEP, and TCPγ, all primary metabolites

for chlorpyrifos. Elimination, however, is highly dependent on the mode of absorption. Dermal

absorption of chlorpyrifos has an apparent half-life that is twice as long as an oral dose of

chlorpyrifos, this is also true for the elimination phase of chlorpyrifos (Griffin et al., 1999). The

processes of absorption, distribution, metabolism and excretion are highly dependent on route

and vehicle of administration. These processes can vary greatly and this variety can cause

discrepancies among various amounts of exposure (Smith et al., 2009). Specifically for CPS-

oxon, metabolism can occur by hepatic and extrahepatic esterases, such as paraoxonase (PON-

Page 18: Shortened in vivo bioconcentration factor testing in ...

11

1) (Pond et al., 1998), and tissue β-esterases to form two intermediates TCPγ and

diethylphosphate (DEP) (Chanda et al., 1997). Excretion of chlorpyrifos is facilitated through

passage of urine as DEP, DETP, TCPγ, or a glucuronide, sulfate, or other conjugates of TCPγ

(Bakke et al., 1976; Nolan et al., 1987).

Figure 1.2. Biotransformation pathway of chlorpyrifos as adapted from Smith et al., 2011.

Table 1.1. Chlorpyrifos properties. (NIH 2012)

Chemical Name O,O-diethyl O-3,5,6-trichloropyridin-2-yl phosphorothioate Water Solubility 1.4 mg L (25 °C)

Kow 4.7 BCF 100-4,667

Molecular Weight 350.59 g/mol Formula C9H11Cl3NO3PS

Page 19: Shortened in vivo bioconcentration factor testing in ...

12

1.3.1.2 Nonylphenol

Figure 1.3. Molecular structure of nonylphenol (Eriksson et al., 2003).

Nonylphenol (4-(2,4-dimethylheptan-3-yl)phenole) is another compound that is

commonly found in the environment, Fig. 1.3. Microbial organisms are known to breakdown

alkylphenol polythoxylates (APEs) in wastewater treatment, as seen in Fig 1.4. One product that

is created during the shortening of APEs is nonylphenol.

Figure 1.4. Degredation of nonylphenol polyethyoxylates in wastewater treatment microorganisms as adapted from Giger et al., 1984 and Di Corcia et al., 1998.

Industrial and agricultural use of nonylphenol is also apparent as it is used as a

surfactant in many different processes that include detergents, emulsifiers, and wetting agents

(Eriksson et al., 2003; Arukwe et al., 2003). The USEPA considers nonylphenol toxic to aquatic

organisms due to its estrogenic mimicry effects that are shown in laboratory testing. In rainbow

Page 20: Shortened in vivo bioconcentration factor testing in ...

13

trout, it has also been suggested that nonylphenol directly induces the expression of the

estrogen receptor and vitellogenin gene (Arukwe et al., 2003; Lalah, et al., 2003). That being

said, nonylphenol is considered to be an endocrine-disrupting chemical (EDC) as it feminizes

male fish and increases vitellogenin expression, a gene that is only expressed in female fish

(Ren and Lech, 1997). In regards to human health, nonylphenol has been shown to proliferate

MCF-7 breast tumor cells (Lee and Lech 1998). Jensen et al. presented a correlation in the

increased number of cases involving testicular cancer, decreased in semen quality and

hypospadia.

In rainbow trout, studies have shown that the highest concentrations of residues were

seen in bile and intestinal contents/feces (Coldham et al., 1998; Kleinow et al., 1992; Cravedi et

al., 1985). This finding leads to the indication that the primary route of excretion is biliary or

fecal (Thibaut et al., 1998). In rats, biotransformation of nonylphenol is achieved by UDP-

glucuronosyltransferase (UGT) 2B1 (Daidoji et al., 2003). Likewise, in trout, treatment of

hepatocytes with β-glucuronidase demonstrated that conjugation with glucuronic acid is the

primary biotransformation pathway (Cravedi et al., 2001). However, some studies have

indicated that a few phase I enzymes are responsible for biotransformation in rats (Lee er al.,

1998). Although phase II liver enzymes effectively metabolize nonylphenol, the more polar

glucuronide conjugate can still persist for long periods of time (Daidoji et al., 2003). As in trout

studies, orally administered nonylphenol in rats is absorbed by the gastrointestinal tract and

persist in intestinal tissues for long periods of time (Daidoji et al., 2005).

Page 21: Shortened in vivo bioconcentration factor testing in ...

14

Figure 1.5. Proposed metabolic pathway of nonylphenol as adapted from Thibaut et al., 1998. Table 1.2. Nonylphenol properties. (NIH 2012)

Nonylphenol 4-(2,4-dimethylheptan-3-yl)phenole Water Solubility 6 mg L -1 (20°C)

Kow 5.71 BCF 2-350

Molecular Weight 220.35 g/mol Formula C15H24O

1.3.1.3 DDT

Dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane (1,1,1-trichloro-2,2-di(4-chlorophenyl)ethane) is

different than most organochlorine insecticides in that it works by opening voltage-gated Na+

channels causing them to open spontaneously leading to repetitive discharging of axonal action

potentials. It was first synthesized in the late 1800’s but was not used as an insecticide until the

Page 22: Shortened in vivo bioconcentration factor testing in ...

15

latter part of World War II to control malaria and typhus. It wasn’t until 1962 when Rachel

Carson published Silent Springs that the dangers of DDT were made apparent to the public. The

book outlined the dangers of indiscriminately spraying DDT without knowledge of the impact it

could have on the environment or to human health. DDT is a class II organochlorine that is no

longer in use in the United States. Low acute exposure to DDT can lead to symptoms like

headaches, nausea, vomiting, confusion, and can even produce tremors and lower

coordination. At higher doses exposure can produce convulsions, or spasms, which are caused

by Na+ channels spontaneously opening in neuronal tissue causing action potentials to fire

abruptly and can eventually lead to death. The metabolism of DDT causes the formation of its

two metabolites DDD and DDE, seen in Fig. 1.6.

Figure 1.6. Biotransformation of DDT to form DDD (by reductive dechlorination, right) and DDE (by elimination of HCl, left).

Since legislation passed banning DDT from commercial and agricultural use,

concentrations of the compound have decreased significantly within the environment.

However, even with this decrease in concentration there still persist some levels of DDT in

certain organisms and environments. Even still, the discontinued use of the organophosphate

was a major contributor to the bald eagle population making a turn around. DDT, and its

Page 23: Shortened in vivo bioconcentration factor testing in ...

16

metabolites, is highly lipophilic which gives the compounds the ability to accumulate in

sediment, soils, and in adipose tissue of animals. Because of its lipophilic nature, DDT has a very

high potential to bioaccumulate and biomagnify up the food chain, which is the cause for the

decline of the birds of prey population.

Figure 1.7. Proposed metabolic pathway of DDT as adapted from van den Berg et al., 2003.

Increased levels of CYP3A4 mRNA levels suggest that this enzyme plays an important

role in the xenobiotic metabolism of DDT (Litvak et al., 1968).

Page 24: Shortened in vivo bioconcentration factor testing in ...

17

Table 1.3. DDT properties. (NIH 2012) DDT 1,1,1-trichloro-2,2-di(4-chlorophenyl)ethane

Water Solubility 5.50x10-3 mg/L @ 25°C Kow 6.91 BCF 600-84,500

Molecular Weight 354.49 g/mol Formula C14H9Cl5

1.3.1.4 Musk Xylene

Figure 1.8. Molecular structure of Musk Xylene (Sari and Itoh, 2012).

Musk xylene (1-tert-Butyl-3,5-dimethyl-2,4,6-trinitrobenzene) is a nitro musk that is very

persistent and very bioacculmulative within the environment (Fig. 1.8). Since the mid-1980s, its

use has declined greatly due to safety concerns regarding human and environmental health.

Commercially, musk xylene was used as a synthetic fragrance to mimic natural musks (Della

Tore et al., 2011). Such applications included perfumes and some cosmetics. Musk xylene is an

analogue of trinitrotoluene (TNT), and for all intents and purposes nitro musks were first

discovered and studied to produce new high explosives. The nitro musks decline in use was, in

part, due to the residues obtained in the environment. Under the REACH regulation program

the European Chemicals Agency labeled musk xylene as a substance of very high concern

(SVHC), saying that the chemical has very persistent and very bioaccumulative (vPvB)

properties; however the musk does meet the criteria to be considered toxic to humans or for

the environment. Musk xylene is not only persistent in aquatic environments but in human

Page 25: Shortened in vivo bioconcentration factor testing in ...

18

adipose and breast tissue as well. In rats and mice, musk xylene has been shown to increase

transcriptional mRNA levels of CYP2B enzymes in hepatic fractions. However, the increase of

expression is not followed by an increase in activity (Hawkins et al., 2002; Lehman-McKeeman

et al., 1995; Lehman-McKeeman et al.,1999). This suggests that inhibition of the CYP2B enzyme

may be caused by musk xylene or its metabolites (Lehman-McKeeman et al., 1995).

In human volunteer studies, Riedel and Dekant (1998) demonstrated the toxicokinetics

of musk xylene via oral and dermal administration. What they found was that musk xylene was

rapidly absorbed in the gastrointestinal tract and penetration through the skin was very slow,

stating that the concentration of musk xylene was 40-fold lower than that of the orally

administered volunteers (Riedel and Dekant, 1998). The previously described study also showed

that plasma concentrations demonstrate a rapid initial decrease of musk xylene from blood to a

second compartment (body fat), with a half-life of elimination of 70 days.

Figure 1.9. Biotransformation of musk xylene in humans as adapted from Riedel and Dekant 1998. Lehman-McKeeman et al. (1999) showed hepatic effects of musk xylene in rats,

increasing total liver weight as well as increasing total microsomal P450 content in a dose-

Page 26: Shortened in vivo bioconcentration factor testing in ...

19

dependent manner. Interestingly, the increase in P450 activity was coupled with a decrease, or

inhibition of specific activity. Specifically, CYP2B mRNA expression increases while the

compound and its metabolites inhibit the proteins activity. CYP1A and CYP3A showed increased

mRNA expression as well, however, this is not followed by a decrease in enzymatic activity, as

seen with CYP2B.

Table 1.4. Musk Xylene properties. (NIH 2012) Musk Xylene 1-tert-Butyl-3,5-dimethyl-2,4,6-trinitrobenzene

Water Solubility 0.472 mg/L @ 25°C Kow 4.369 BCF 1,400-6,740

Molecular Weight 297.264 g/mol Formula C12H15N5O6

1.3.2 Test Organism

The organism commonly used for BCF assessments is the common carp. The use of this

organism is efficient in that it develops and grows very slowly, allowing for a more accurate

assessment for the potential to bioaccumulate. As an organism grows and develops its ability to

metabolize and excise chemicals increases, as the enzymes become more refined. Since

common carp develop very slowly, this reduces any variability while running a test with the

organism. Along with the advantage of slow growth, carp are very resilient and viable in many

different environments. Resilience is especially important when the organism is placed under

conditions that could increase the stress levels of the organism. Tolerant of many different

environmental conditions, carp can live in water with a pH ranging from 6.5-9.0 and

temperatures ranging from 3 to 35°C. These characteristics of the common carp make it an

ideal test organism for flow-through BCF studies.

Page 27: Shortened in vivo bioconcentration factor testing in ...

20

1.4 Specific Aims

In order to assess the potential of a shortened BCF protocol to accurately predict 28-day

BCF values specific days during the study were selected for sampling. Days 1, 3, and 7 will be

used as testing time points to accurately assess the uptake of the chemical. To accurately assess

the depuration of a chemical, Day 7, 10, and 14 were used as sampling time-points. Shortening

the exposure time and consequently the amount of fish used for BCF assessments could

significantly reduce the cost for laboratories to perform these tests. This could ultimately lead

to a large reduction in cost that would allow more chemicals being tested in the future.

1.5 Objectives and Hypothesis

Objective 1: Determine the difference in BCFk values between whole body and tissue specific samples.

• Hypothesis 1: HO: Tissue specific BCF values will not be different than the whole body BCF values

Objective 2: Determine if the proposed shortened BCF protocol is sufficient to screen for bioconcentration potential.

• Hypothesis 2: HO: 14-day BCF value will not be different than 28-day BCF values.

Objective 3: Determine if there is difference in the in vivo BCF of individual chemicals vs. BCF values when fish are exposed to a mixture of all chemicals.

• Hypothesis 3: HO: Individual BCF values will not be different than mixture BCF values.

Objective 4: Determine if there is difference in the in vitro metabolic activity of individual chemicals vs. in vitro metabolic activity with a mixture of three different chemicals.

• Hypothesis 4: HO: Individual in vitro values will not be different than mixture in vitro values.

Page 28: Shortened in vivo bioconcentration factor testing in ...

21

1.6 Chapter References

Alegría-Torres, J. A., Díaz-Barriga, F., Gandolfi, A. J., & Pérez-Maldonado, I. N. (2009). Mechanisms of p,p′-DDE-induced apoptosis in human peripheral blood mononuclear cells. Toxicology in Vitro, 23(6), 1000-1006. doi:10.1016/j.tiv.2009.06.021

Arnot, J. A., Mackay, D., Parkerton, T. F., & Bonnell, M. (2008). A database of fish biotransformation rates for organic chemicals. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 27(11), 2263-2270. doi: 10.1897/08-058.1

Arnot, J. A., Meylan, W., Tunkel, J., Howard, P. H., Mackay, D., Bonnell, M., & Boethling, R. S. (2009). A quantitative structure-activity relationship for predicting metabolic biotransformation rates for organic chemicals in fish. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 28(6), 1168-1177. doi: 10.1897/08-289.1

Arukwe, A., Goksøyr, A., Thibaut, R., & Cravedi, J. P. (2000). Metabolism and organ distribution of nonylphenol in atlantic salmon (salmo salar). Marine Environmental Research, 50(1–5), 141-145. doi:10.1016/S0141-1136(00)00081-7

Arukwe, A., Thibaut, R., Ingebrigtsen, K., Celius, T., Goksøyr, A., & Cravedi, J. (2000). In vivo and in vitro metabolism and organ distribution of nonylphenol in atlantic salmon (salmo salar). Aquatic Toxicology, 49(4), 289-304. doi:10.1016/S0166-445X(99)00084-3

Bakke, J.E., Feil, V.J., Price, C.E., 1976. Rat urinary metabolites from O,O-diethyl-O-(3,5,6-trichloro-2-pyridyl) phosphorothioate. J. Environ. Sci. Health B 11, 225–230

Baldwin, W. S., Roling, J. A., Peterson, S., & Chapman, L. M. (2005). Effects of nonylphenol on hepatic testosterone metabolism and the expression of acute phase proteins in winter flounder (pleuronectes americanus): Comparison to the effects of Saint John's wort. Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology Part C: Toxicology & Pharmacology, 140(1), 87-96. doi:10.1016/j.cca.2005.01.007

Behechti, A., Schramm, K. -., Attar, A., Niederfellner, J., & Kettrup, A. (1998). Acute aquatic toxicities of four musk xylene derivatives on daphnia magna. Water Research, 32(5), 1704-1707. doi:10.1016/S0043-1354(97)00361-8

Bicker, W., Lämmerhofer, M., Genser, D., Kiss, H., & Lindner, W. (2005). A case study of acute human chlorpyrifos poisoning: Novel aspects on metabolism and toxicokinetics derived from liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry analysis of urine samples. Toxicology Letters, 159(3), 235-251. doi:10.1016/j.toxlet.2005.05.013

Bonin, A. M., Stupans, I., Baker, R. S. U., Ryan, A. J., & Holder, G. M. (1985). Effect of induction by DDT on metabolism and mutagenicity of benzo[a]pyrene. Mutation Research/Genetic Toxicology, 158(3), 111-117. doi:10.1016/0165-1218(85)90072-2

Page 29: Shortened in vivo bioconcentration factor testing in ...

22

Buckley, D., Klaassen, C., 2007. Tissue- and gender-specific mRNA expression of UDP-Glucuronosyltransferases (UGTs) in mice. Drug Metab. Dispos. 35, 121-127.

Buhler, D. R., & Wang-Buhler, J. (1998). Rainbow trout cytochrome P450s: Purification, molecular aspects, metabolic activity, induction and role in environmental monitoring. Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology Part C: Pharmacology, Toxicology and Endocrinology, 121(1–3), 107-137. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0742-8413(98)10033-6

Cárdenas-González, M., Gaspar-Ramírez, O., Pérez-Vázquez, F. J., Alegría-Torres, J. A., González-Amaro, R., & Pérez-Maldonado, I. N., 2012 p,p′-DDE, a DDT metabolite, induces proinflammatory molecules in human peripheral blood mononuclear cells in vitro. Experimental and Toxicologic Pathology, doi:10.1016/j.etp.2012.07.006

Chanda, S.M., Mortensen, S.R., Moser, V.C., Padilla, S., 1997. Tissue-specific effects of chlorpyrifos on carboxylesterase and cholinesterase activity in adult rats: An in vitro and in vivo comparison. Fundam. Appl. Toxicol. 38, 148–157

Choi, K., Joo, H., Rose, R. L., & Hodgso, E. (2006). Metabolism of chlorpyrifos and chlorpyrifos oxon by human hepatocytes*. Journal of Biochemical and Molecular Toxicology, 20(6), 279-291. doi:10.1002/jbt.20145

Chou, Y., & Dietrich, D. R. (1999). Interactions of nitromusk parent compounds and their amino-metabolites with the estrogen receptors of rainbow trout (oncorhynchus mykiss) and the south african clawed frog (xenopus laevis). Toxicology Letters, 111(1–2), 27-36. doi:10.1016/S0378-4274(99)00168-X

Coldham, N. G., Sivapathasundaram, S., Dave, M., Ashfield, L. A., Pottinger, T. G., Goodall, C., et al. (1998). Biotransformation, tissue distribution, and persistence of 4-nonylphenol residues in juvenile rainbow trout (oncorhynchus mykiss). Drug Metabolism and Disposition, 26(4), 347-354.

Cole, T. B., Fisher, J. C., Burbacher, T. M., Costa, L. G., & Furlong, C. E. (2012). Neurobehavioral assessment of mice following repeated postnatal exposure to chlorpyrifos-oxon. Neurotoxicology and Teratology, 34(3), 311-322. doi:10.1016/j.ntt.2012.02.003

Cowan-Ellsberry, C. E., Dyer, S. D., Erhardt, S., Bernhard, M. J., Roe, A. L., Dowty, M. E., & Weisbrod, A. V. (2008). Approach for extrapolating in vitro metabolism data to refine bioconcentration factor estimates. Chemosphere, 70(10), 1804-1817. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2007.08.030

Cravedi, J. P., Boudry, G., Baradat, M., Rao, D., & Debrauwer, L. (2001). Metabolic fate of 2,4-dichloroaniline, prochloraz and nonylphenol diethoxylate in rainbow trout: A comparative in vivo/in vitro approach. Aquatic Toxicology, 53(3–4), 159-172. doi:10.1016/S0166-445X(01)00163-1

Page 30: Shortened in vivo bioconcentration factor testing in ...

23

Dai, D., Tang, J., Rose, R., Hodgson, E., Bienstock, R. J., Mohrenweiser, H. W., et al. (2001). Identification of variants of CYP3A4 and characterization of their abilities to metabolize testosterone and chlorpyrifos. Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics, 299(3), 825-831.

Daidoji, T., Ozawa, M., Sakamoto, H., Sako, T., Inoue, H., Kurihara, R., et al. (2006). Slow elimination of nonylphenol from rat intestine. Drug Metabolism and Disposition, 34(1), 184-190. doi:10.1124/dmd.105.007229

Della Torre, C., Monti, M., Focardi, S., & Corsi, I. (2011). Time-dependent modulation of cyp1a gene transcription and EROD activity by musk xylene in PLHC-1 and RTG-2 fish cell lines. Toxicology in Vitro, 25(8), 1575-1580. doi:10.1016/j.tiv.2011.05.025

Di Corcia A, Costantino A, Crescenzi C, Marinoni E, Samperi R (1998) Characterization of recalcitrant intermediates of the branched alkyl side chain of nonylphenol ethoxylate surfactants. Environ Sci Technol 32:2401-2409

Doerge, D. R., Twaddle, N. C., Churchwell, M. I., Chang, H. C., Newbold, R. R., & Delclos, K. B. (2002). Mass spectrometric determination of p-nonylphenol metabolism and disposition following oral administration to sprague-dawley rats. Reproductive Toxicology, 16(1), 45-56. doi:10.1016/S0890-6238(01)00198-8

Dutta, R., Mondal, A. M., Arora, V., Nag, T. C., & Das, N. (2008). Immunomodulatory effect of DDT (bis[4-chlorophenyl]-1,1,1-trichloroethane) on complement system and macrophages. Toxicology, 252(1–3), 78-85. doi:10.1016/j.tox.2008.07.063

Eriksson L, Jaworska J, Worth AP, Cronin MTD, McDowell RM, Gramatica P. Methods for reliability and uncertainty assessment and for applicability evaluations of classification and regression-based QSARs. Environ Health Perspect. 2003;111:1361–1375.

Foxenberg, R. J., McGarrigle, B. P., Knaak, J. B., Kostyniak, P. J., & Olson, J. R. (2007). Human hepatic cytochrome P450-specific metabolism of parathion and chlorpyrifos. Drug Metabolism and Disposition, 35(2), 189-193. doi:10.1124/dmd.106.012427

Farag, A. T., El Okazy, A. M., & El-Aswed, A. F. (2003). Developmental toxicity study of chlorpyrifos in rats. Reproductive Toxicology, 17(2), 203-208. doi: 10.1016/S0890-6238(02)00121-1

Gatermann, R., Hühnerfuss, H., Rimkus, G., Attar, A., & Kettrup, A. (1998). Occurrence of musk xylene and musk ketone metabolites in the aquatic environment. Chemosphere, 36(11), 2535-2547. doi:10.1016/S0045-6535(97)10208-9

Giger W, Brunner PH, Schaffner C, (1984) 4-nonylphenol in sewage sludge-accumulation of toxic metabolites from nonionic surfactants. Science 225:623-625

Page 31: Shortened in vivo bioconcentration factor testing in ...

24

Goeptar, A., Scheerens, H., Vermeulen, N., 1995. Oxygen reductase and substrate reductase activity of cytochrome P450. Crit. Rev. Toxicol. 25, 25-65

Gomez, C. F., Constantine, L., & Huggett, D. B. (2010). The influence of gill and liver metabolism on the predicted bioconcentration of three pharmaceuticals in fish. Chemosphere, 81(10), 1189-1195. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2010.09.043

Griffin, P., Mason, H., Heywood, K., Cocker, K., 1999. Oral and dermal absorption of chlorpyrifos: a human volunteer study. Occup. Environ. Med. 56, 10-13

Guengerich FP (June 2001). “Common and uncommon cytochrome P450 reactions related to metabolism and chemical toxicity”. Chem. Res. Toxicol. 14 (6): 611-50

Guengerich FP (January 2008). "Cytochrome p450 and chemical toxicology". Chem. Res. Toxicol.21 (1): 70–83.

Hawkins, D. R., & Ford, R. A. (1999). Dermal absorption and disposition of musk ambrette, musk ketone and musk xylene in rats. Toxicology Letters, 111(1–2), 95-103. doi:10.1016/S0378-4274(99)00171-X

Hawkins, D. R., Elsom, L. F., Kirkpatrick, D., Ford, R. A., & Api, A. M. (2002). Dermal absorption and disposition of musk ambrette, musk ketone and musk xylene in human subjects. Toxicology Letters, 131(3), 147-151. doi:10.1016/S0378-4274(01)00548-3

Hemmer, M. J., Hemmer, B. L., Bowman, C. J., Kroll, K. J., Folmar, L. C., Marcovich, D., et al. (2001). Effects of p-nonylphenol, methoxychlor, and endosulfan on vitellogenin induction and expression in sheepshead minnow (cyprinodon variegatus). Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 20(2), 336-343. doi:10.1002/etc.5620200214

Herren, D., & Berset, J. D. (2000). Nitro musks, nitro musk amino metabolites and polycyclic musks in sewage sludges: Quantitative determination by HRGC-ion-trap-MS/MS and mass spectral characterization of the amino metabolites. Chemosphere, 40(5), 565-574. doi:10.1016/S0045-6535(99)00325-2

Hodgson, E. (2001). In vitro human phase I metabolism of xenobiotics I: Pesticides and related chemicals used in agriculture and public health, september 2001. Journal of Biochemical and Molecular Toxicology, 15(6), 296-299. doi:10.1002/jbt.10011

John, D. M., House, W. A., & White, G. F. (2000). Environmental fate of nonylphenol ethoxylates: Differential adsorption of homologs to components of river sediment. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 19(2), 293-300. doi:10.1002/etc.5620190207

J. Tang, Y. Cao, R. L. Rose, A. A. Brimfield, D. Dai, J. A. Goldstein, E. Hodgson. Metabolism of chlorpyrifos by human cytochrome P450 isoforms and human, mouse, and rat liver microsomes. Drug Metab Dispos. 2001 September; 29(9): 1201–1204.

Page 32: Shortened in vivo bioconcentration factor testing in ...

25

Kirman, C. R., Aylward, L. L., Hays, S. M., Krishnan, K., & Nong, A. (2011). Biomonitoring equivalents for DDT/DDE. Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology, 60(2), 172-180. doi:10.1016/j.yrtph.2011.03.012

Kosatsky, T., & Weber, J. (2002). Using biomarkers to characterise contaminant exposure among eaters of great lakes and St. Lawrence river fish. Environmental Toxicology and Pharmacology, 12(2), 69-74. doi:10.1016/S1382-6689(02)00024-8

Kupfer, D., & Bulger, W. H. (1976). Studies on the mechanism of estrogenic actions of o,p′DDT: Interactions with the estrogen receptor. Pesticide Biochemistry and Physiology, 6(6), 561-570. doi:10.1016/0048-3575(76)90081-X

L’Abbée, J., Tu, Y., Barriault, D., & Sylvestre, M. (2011). Insight into the metabolism of 1,1,1-trichloro-2,2-bis(4-chlorophenyl)ethane (DDT) by biphenyl dioxygenases. Archives of Biochemistry and Biophysics, 516(1), 35-44. doi:10.1016/j.abb.2011.09.016

Lalah, J. O., Schramm, K. -., Severin, G. F., Lenoir, D., Henkelmann, B., Behechti, A., et al. (2003). In vivo metabolism and organ distribution of a branched 14C-nonylphenol isomer in pond snails, lymnaea stagnalis L. Aquatic Toxicology, 62(4), 305-319. doi:10.1016/S0166-445X(02)00106-6

Laurenzana, E. M., Weis, C. C., Bryant, C. W., Newbold, R., & Delclos, K. B. (2002). Effect of dietary administration of genistein, nonylphenol or ethinyl estradiol on hepatic testosterone metabolism, cytochrome P-450 enzymes, and estrogen receptor alpha expression. Food and Chemical Toxicology, 40(1), 53-63. doi:10.1016/S0278-6915(01)00095-3

Lavado, R., & Schlenk, D. (2011). Microsomal biotransformation of chlorpyrifos, parathion and fenthion in rainbow trout (oncorhynchus mykiss) and coho salmon (oncorhynchus kisutch): Mechanistic insights into interspecific differences in toxicity. Aquatic Toxicology, 101(1), 57-63. doi: 10.1016/j.aquatox.2010.09.002

Leaños-Castañeda, O., Van Der Kraak, G., Rodríguez-Canul, R., & Gold, G. (2007). Endocrine disruption mechanism of o,p′-DDT in mature male tilapia (oreochromis niloticus). Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology, 221(2), 158-167. doi:10.1016/j.taap.2007.03.011

Lee, P. C., Marquardt, M., & Lech, J. J. (1998). Metabolism of nonylphenol by rat and human microsomes. Toxicology Letters, 99(2), 117-126. doi:10.1016/S0378-4274(98)00153-2

Lehman-Mckeeman, L. D., Caudill, D., Young, J. A., & Dierckman, T. A. (1995). Musk xylene induces and inhibits mouse hepatic cytochrome P450 2B enzymes. Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, 206(3), 975-980. doi:10.1006/bbrc.1995.1138

Lehman-McKeeman, L. D., Caudill, D., Vassallo, J. D., Pearce, R. E., Madan, A., & Parkinson, A. (1999). Effects of musk xylene and musk ketone on rat hepatic cytochrome P450 enzymes. Toxicology Letters, 111(1–2), 105-115. doi:10.1016/S0378-4274(99)00172-1

Page 33: Shortened in vivo bioconcentration factor testing in ...

26

Li, D., Kim, M., Oh, J., & Park, J. (2004). Distribution characteristics of nonylphenols in the artificial lake shihwa, and surrounding creeks in Korea. Chemosphere, 56(8), 783-790. doi:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2004.01.008

Litvak, S., Tarragó-Litvak, L., Poblete, P., & Agosin, M. (1968). Evidence for the DDT-induced synthesis of messenger ribonucleic acid in triatoma infestans. Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology, 26(1), 45-56. doi:10.1016/0010-406X(68)90311-3

Medina-Díaz, I. M., & Elizondo, G. (2005). Transcriptional induction of CYP3A4 by o,p′-DDT in HepG2 cells. Toxicology Letters, 157(1), 41-47. doi:10.1016/j.toxlet.2005.01.003

Miracle, A. L., & Ankley, G. T. (2005). Ecotoxicogenomics: Linkages between exposure and effects in assessing risks of aquatic contaminants to fish. Reproductive Toxicology, 19(3), 321-326. doi: 10.1016/j.reprotox.2004.06.007

Mottaleb, M. A., Brumley, W. C., Pyle, S. M., & Sovocool, G. W. (2004). Determination of a bound musk xylene metabolite in carp hemoglobin as a biomarker of exposure by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry using selected ion monitoring. Journal of Analytical Toxicology, 28(7), 581-586. doi:10.1093/jat/28.7.581

Nichols, J. W., Bonnell, M., Dimitrov, S. D., Escher, B. I., Han, X., & Kramer, N. I. (2009). Bioaccumulation assessment using predictive approaches. Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management, 5(4), 577-597. doi: 10.1897/IEAM_2008-088.1

Nolan, R.J., Rick, D.L., Freshour, N.L., Saunders, J.H., 1984. Chlorpyrifos: pharmacokinetics in human volunteers. Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. 73, 8-15.

OECD. OECD guidelines for test chemicals. 305. Bioconcentration: Flow-through fish test. Paris (FR) : Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, 1996.

O'Reilly, K. C., Shumake, J., Bailey, S. J., Gonzalez-Lima, F., & Lane, M. A. (2009). Chronic 13-cis-retinoic acid administration disrupts network interactions between the raphe nuclei and the hippocampal system in young adult mice. European Journal of Pharmacology, 605(1-3), 68-77. doi:10.1016/j.ejphar.2008.12.037

Parkerton, T. F., Arnot, J. A., Weisbrod, A. V., Russom, C., Hoke, R. A., Woodburn, K., Lampi, M. A. (2008). Guidance for evaluating in vivo fish bioaccumulation data. Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management, 4(2), 139-155. doi: 10.1897/IEAM_2007-057.1

Parkinson, A., Oglivie, B. 2007 Biotransfromation of Xenobiotics. In Casarett, L., Klaassen, C., Doull, J. (Eds.), Casarett and Doull’s toxicology: the basic science of poisons, 7th ed. McGraw-Hill Professional, New York, pp. 161-304

Page 34: Shortened in vivo bioconcentration factor testing in ...

27

Pelkonen, O., Turpeinen, M., Uusitalo, J., Rautio, A., & Raunio, H. (2005). Prediction of drug metabolism and interactions on the basis of in vitro investigations. Basic & Clinical Pharmacology & Toxicology, 96(3), 167-175. doi:10.1111/j.1742-7843.2005.pto960305.x

Pérez-Maldonado, I. N., Herrera, C., Batres, L. E., González-Amaro, R., Díaz-Barriga, F., & Yáñez, L. (2005). DDT-induced oxidative damage in human blood mononuclear cells. Environmental Research, 98(2), 177-184. doi:10.1016/j.envres.2004.11.001

Pond, A.L., Chambers, H.W., Coyne, C.P., Chambers, J.E., 1998. Purification of two rat hepatic proteins with A-esterase activity toward chlorpyrifos-oxon and paraoxon. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 286, 1404–1411

Ren, L., Marquardt, M. A., & Lech, J. J. (1997). Estrogenic effects of nonylphenol on pS2, ER and MUC1 gene expression in human breast cancer cells-MCF-7. Chemico-Biological Interactions, 104(1), 55-64. doi:10.1016/S0009-2797(97)03767-8

Riedel, J., & Dekant, W. (1999). Biotransformation and toxicokinetics of musk xylene in humans. Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology, 157(2), 145-155. doi:10.1006/taap.1999.8665

Ritter, J., 2000. Roles of glucuronidation and UDP-glucuronosyltransferases in xenobiotic bioactivation reactions. Chem. Biol. Interact. 129, 171-193.

Rimkus, G. G., Gatermann, R., & Hühnerfuss, H. (1999). Musk xylene and musk ketone amino metabolites in the aquatic environment. Toxicology Letters, 111(1–2), 5-15. doi:10.1016/S0378-4274(99)00190-3

Robert J. Foxenberg, Barbara P. McGarrigle, James B. Knaak, Paul J. Kostyniak, James R. Olson. Human hepatic cytochrome p450-specific metabolism of parathion and chlorpyrifos. Drug Metab Dispos. 2007 February; 35(2): 189–193. Published online 2006 November 1. doi: 10.1124/dmd.106.012427

Sari, A. A., Tachibana, S., & Itoh, K. (2012). Determination of co-metabolism for 1,1,1-trichloro-2,2-bis(4-chlorophenyl) ethane (DDT) degradation with enzymes from trametes versicolor U97. Journal of Bioscience and Bioengineering, 114(2), 176-181. doi:10.1016/j.jbiosc.2012.03.006

Scott H. Jackson, Christina E. Cowan-Ellsberry, and Gareth Thomas. Use of Quantitative Structural Analysis To Predict Fish Bioconcentration Factors for Pesticides. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 2009 57 (3), 958-967

Smith, J. N., Campbell, J. A., Busby-Hjerpe, A. L., Lee, S., Poet, T. S., Barr, D. B., et al. (2009). Comparative chlorpyrifos pharmacokinetics via multiple routes of exposure and vehicles of administration in the adult rat. Toxicology, 261(1–2), 47-58. doi:10.1016/j.tox.2009.04.041

Page 35: Shortened in vivo bioconcentration factor testing in ...

28

Smith, J. N., Timchalk, C., Bartels, M. J., & Poet, T. S. (2011). In vitro age-dependent enzymatic metabolism of chlorpyrifos and chlorpyrifos-oxon in human hepatic microsomes and chlorpyrifos-oxon in plasma. Drug Metabolism and Disposition, 39(8), 1353-1362. doi:10.1124/dmd.111.038745

Steevens, J. A., & Benson, W. H. (2001). Toxicokinetic interactions and survival of hyalella azteca exposed to binary mixtures of chlorpyrifos, dieldrin, and methyl mercury. Aquatic Toxicology, 51(4), 377-388. doi: 10.1016/S0166-445X(00)00127-2

Suter-Eichenberger, R., Altorfer, H., Lichtensteiger, W., & Schlumpf, M. (1998). Bioaccumulation of musk xylene (MX) in developing and adult rats of both sexes. Chemosphere, 36(13), 2747-2762. doi:10.1016/S0045-6535(97)10234-X

Tang, J., Cao, Y., Rose, R. L., Brimfield, A. A., Dai, D., Goldstein, J. A., et al. (2001). Metabolism of chlorpyrifos by human cytochrome P450 isoforms and human, mouse, and rat liver microsomes. Drug Metabolism and Disposition, 29(9), 1201-1204.

Thibaut, R., Debrauwer, L., Rao, D., & Cravedi, J. P. (1998). Disposition and metabolism of [3H]-4-n-nonylphenol in rainbow trout. Marine Environmental Research, 46(1–5), 521-524. doi:10.1016/S0141-1136(97)00089-5

Tilton, F. A., Tilton, S. C., Bammler, T. K., Beyer, R. P., Stapleton, P. L., Scholz, N. L., & Gallagher, E. P. (2011). Transcriptional impact of organophosphate and metal mixtures on olfaction: Copper dominates the chlorpyrifos-induced response in adult zebrafish. Aquatic Toxicology, 102(3–4), 205-215. doi: 10.1016/j.aquatox.2011.01.012

Timchalk, C., Nolan, R. J., Mendrala, A. L., Dittenber, D. A., Brzak, K. A., & Mattsson, J. L. (2002). A physiologically based pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic (PBPK/PD) model for the organophosphate insecticide chlorpyrifos in rats and humans. Toxicological Sciences, 66(1), 34-53. doi:10.1093/toxsci/66.1.34

Timchalk, C., Busby, A., Campbell, J. A., Needham, L. L., & Barr, D. B. (2007). Comparative pharmacokinetics of the organophosphorus insecticide chlorpyrifos and its major metabolites diethylphosphate, diethylthiophosphate and 3,5,6-trichloro-2-pyridinol in the rat. Toxicology, 237(1–3), 145-157. doi:10.1016/j.tox.2007.05.007

Wang, X., & Wang, W. (2005). Uptake, absorption efficiency and elimination of DDT in marine phytoplankton, copepods and fish. Environmental Pollution, 136(3), 453-464. doi:10.1016/j.envpol.2005.01.004

Weisbrod A.V., Burkhard LP, Arnot J, Mekenyan O, Howard PH, Russom C, et al. Workgroup report: review of fish bioaccumulation databases used to identify persistent, bio-accumulative, toxic substances. Environ Health Perspect. 2007;115:255–261.

Page 36: Shortened in vivo bioconcentration factor testing in ...

29

Weisbrod, A.V., Sahi, J., Segner, H., James, M. O., Nichols, J., Schultz, I., Hoeger, B. (2009). The state of in vitro science for use in bioaccumulation assessments for fish. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 28(1), 86-96. doi: 10.1897/08-015.1

Zhang, X., Liang, G., Zeng, X., Zhou, J., Sheng, G., & Fu, J. (2011). Levels of synthetic musk fragrances in human milk from three cities in the yangtze river delta in eastern china. Journal of Environmental Sciences, 23(6), 983-990. doi:10.1016/S1001-0742(10)60506-2

Zhao, Q., Dourson, M., & Gadagbui, B. (2006). A review of the reference dose for chlorpyrifos. Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology, 44(2), 111-124. doi: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2005.10.003

Page 37: Shortened in vivo bioconcentration factor testing in ...

30

CHAPTER 2

DEVELOPMENT OF AN ABBREVIATED IN VIVO BIOCONCENTRATION FACTOR TEST

IN COMMON CARP

2.1 Introduction

Bioconcentration factor testing serves as the most valuable surrogate for the

assessment of bioaccumulation (Parkerton et al., 2008). The assessment of potentially harmful

chemicals is crucial to not only the health of aquatic environments, but to humans as well.

Chemicals that possess the ability to persist in the environment or that have the potential to

bioaccumulate, pose a greater risk to organisms that are exposed to these chemicals (European

Commissions Bureau, 2003). The Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development

Guideline 305 outlines specific protocols to run an accurate and reliable aquatic flow-through

test (OECD, 1996). However, since its adoption in 1996, very few changes have been made to

accommodate the endeavor to lowering the amount of test species to run one of these said

tests. Running an aquatic flow-through test, according to OECD guideline 305, takes much time

and money as well as numerous amounts of fish. Such burdens can be eliminated through

simple modifications to the standard protocols.

When performing environmental assessments, regulatory agencies look at different

criteria in a compound to determine if they pose any danger to human or environmental

health. In 2007, the REACH program (the European Union regulation on the Registration,

Evaluation and Authorization of Chemicals) was set in force. Under this program, chemicals that

are imported into the EU at quantities of one tonne or more per year are required to register

with European Chemicals Agency. The REACH program was a novel stepping-stone for the

Page 38: Shortened in vivo bioconcentration factor testing in ...

31

regulation of chemicals and for the companies that are making these chemicals to be held

responsible for making sure the compound is safe for human and environmental health.

Regulatory agencies look at three criteria: persistence (P), bioaccumulation (B), and

toxicity (T) (Weisbrod et al., 2008). BCF tests are the most common studies performed to assess

bioaccumulation of a compound. OECD guideline 305 outlines the protocol to accurately and

reliably run a BCF test for aquatic organisms. Along with the few changes that have been made

since 1996, the guideline only outlines testing procedures for one compound at a time.

However, in the environment compounds are not found individually, rather in a cocktail of

multiple compounds. This could pose a potential problem for the normal absorption,

distribution, metabolism and excretion (ADME) characteristics of a compound in an organism.

Different compounds have different effects within a biological system that could alter the

ADME properties of a compound and, in turn, alter BCFk values that are generated in a single

compound BCF study. Thus, it is important to study the effects that chemicals have within a

biological system with mixture studies to determine if there are increased risks for chemicals to

bioaccumulate.

2.2 Materials and Methods

2.2.1 Chemicals

Chlorpyrifos (O,O-diethyl O-3,5,6-trichloropyridin-2-yl phosphate, CAS# 2921-88-2)

methyl-chlorpyrifos (CAS# 5598-13-0), 4-Nonylphenol (4-(2,4-dimethylheptan-3-yl)phenole ,

CAS# 104-40-5), D4-Nonylphenol (CAS# 1173019-62-9), DDT (1,1,1-Trichloro-2,2-bis(4-

chlorophenyl)ethane, CAS# 50-29-3), DMF (N,N-dimethylformamide CAS# 68-12-2) and DCBP

(4,4’-Bis(9-carbazolyl)1-1’-biphenyl, CAS# 583828-31-7), were all obtained from Sigma Aldrich

Page 39: Shortened in vivo bioconcentration factor testing in ...

32

Corp (St. Louis, MO). Musk Xylene (1-tert-Butyl-3,5-dimethyl-2,4,6-trinitrobenzene CAS# 81-15-

2) was obtained from City Chemical LLC (West Haven, CT). HPLC grade methanol,

dichloromethane, ethyl acetate, and n-hexane were obtained from Fisher Scientific (Houston,

TX). Milli-Q water was obtained from in house Milli-Q water system (Millipore, Billerica, MA).

2.2.2 Animals and Housing

Animals were stored in appropriate conditions for common carp, 18°C in a living stream

and fed every other day. Carp were obtained from Osage Catfisheries (MO) and transported to

the University of North Texas. Housing took place in a separate room from where the fish were

exposed to prevent any contamination of fish stocks. Fish were allowed to acclimate for a week

before conducting BCF tests, which were conducted according to OECD 305 guideline (OECD

1996). Fluorescent lights were kept at a constant light and dark cycle of 16 h light/ 8 h dark.

Water quality was checked every 3 days and measurements of (mean ± SD) temperature, pH,

DO, alkalinity, and water hardness for the 14 d BCF were 25 ± 2°C, 8.0 ± 2.2, 7.8 ± 0.6 mg/L, 90 ±

16 mg/L, respectively. Carp were fed ad libitum twice a day during the experiment.

2.2.3 Fish Exposure

For the 14 d BCF test, carp (n=60) were randomly chosen and distributed into two

solvent control tanks and two exposure tanks, with all aquaria having a 20 L capacity. The

exposure tanks received a continuous flow of 2.5 μg/L test compound solution using

dimethylformamide (DMF) as a carrier solvent (<0.01 %). Carp were exposed for 7 d and then

moved into clean tanks containing only dilution water for the remaining 7 d depuration period.

2.2.3.1 Chemical Stocks

Once chemicals arrived, a 10,000 mg/L master stock of each of the chemicals was made

Page 40: Shortened in vivo bioconcentration factor testing in ...

33

with the appropriate solvent. The master stock was made by measuring out 10 mg of the

compound and then adding 1 mL of solvent. For DDT, musk xylene, and DCBP stocks were made

up in DCM, and for rest of the compounds stocks were made up in methanol. From the 10,000

mg/L master stocks, diluted stocks were made from 10,000 down to 1 mg/L. Dilutions went as

follows: from 10,000 mg/L to 1,000 mg/L (1 in 10 dilution) 100 μL aliquot of 10,000 mg/L into

900 μL of solvent, the 1,000 mg/L stock was vortexed and another 100 μL aliquot was taken out

of the 1,000 mg/L solution into 900 μL of solvent producing a 100 mg/L stock solution (another

1 in 10 dilution). This was repeated down to 1 mg/L stock solution.

For the syringe pumps a 60 mg/L solution needed to be prepared. From the 10,000 mg/L

master stock 60 μL was aliquoted out into a 100 mL volumetric. The carrier solvent (DMF) was

then added to the volumetric to fill up to the 100 mL line.

2.2.3.2 Flow-Through System

A flow-through system was set up to deliver solvent (DMF) and compound at a steady

rate. This was to ensure a constant uptake of chemical was being delivered during the initial

phase of the experiment. The peristaltic pump (Masterflex® L/S®, Cole Palmer®, Veron Hills, IL)

pumped water at a constant rate of 120 ml/min into a 5 L mixing chamber that would deliver

the water and chemical to the aquaria. The 5 L mixing chamber was placed on top of a stir plate

with a stir bar in the mixing chamber to distribute the compound throughout the water. A

syringe pump was used to transfer the compound from 30 mL polycarbonate syringes (Becton

Dickinson, Franklin Lakes, NJ) to the mixing chambers at 5 µm/min, both flows were checked

once every other day during the experiment. Plastic tubing transported the mixed water-

compound/solvent into the 20 L aquaria that housed the testing species. The 20 L aquaria were

Page 41: Shortened in vivo bioconcentration factor testing in ...

34

placed into a large tub to allow the out-flowing water to drain into a single outlet. At the end of

the outlet, carbon traps were set in place to absorb any chemical from leaching out into any

water systems.

The 30 mL polycarbonate syringes were loaded with the compound and DMF with a

concentration of 60 mg/L. The compound was slowly pumped into the 5 L mixing chambers and

then finally drained into 20 L aquaria, making the final concentration that the fish were exposed

to 2.5 μg/L. From the syringes to the 20 L aquaria results in a 26,000-dilution factor that results

in a 2.5 μg/L final concentration from 60 mg/L. Water concentrations were checked before

placing the fish in the exposure tanks to determine nominal concentrations had been met.

2.2.3.3 Test Organism and Sample Prep

Cyprinus carpio (obtained from Osage Catfisheries) was used in the experiment to test

bioaccumulative properties of each of the testing compounds. For each of the four test

chemicals, fish were exposed to a nominal concentration of 2.5 μg/L. A solvent control

delivering only DMF to the aquaria was included to account for any possible side effects. Water

concentrations were verified on each of the fish sampling days and 10 mL of water was taken

from both the dosed tanks and solvent control tanks. The samples were then dried down by

lightly applying nitrogen gas. Once dried down the test materials were transferred to 2 mL

amber vials using the same solvent and then analyzed.

Fish were anesthetized with up to 100 mg/L MS222 prior to taking muscle and liver

samples as well as whole body analysis. Samples were placed into vials with solvent (1:1 hexane

ethyl-acetate) and spiked with the appropriate internal standard then homogenized. After

homogenization, samples were transferred into centrifuge glass vials. 0.5 mL of MQ and 0.5 mL

Page 42: Shortened in vivo bioconcentration factor testing in ...

35

of solvent were added to the vials for better separation between solvent and tissue debris. Vials

containing samples were mixed with a vortex and then centrifuged for 20 minutes at 2000 rpm.

Once separation was achieved, the solvent layer was then extracted (i.e. top layer for 1:1

hexane ethyl-acetate and bottom layer for DCM). Using pasteur pipettes, the appropriate

solvent layer was extracted into a scintillation vial, this was repeated once more to collect a

total amount of solvent and lipid of about 1 mL. The solvent was lightly dried down with

nitrogen gas and the final lipid weight was taken to use for lipid normalization. With 1 mL of 1:1

hexane ethyl-acetate lipid material was transferred to 2 mL amber vials. The sample was dried

down using a zephyr of nitrogen gas. 100 µL aliquots of acetonitrile was used to wash down the

sides of the dried sample and transferred to a glass insert and frozen in a -20˚C freezer for

approximately 1 hour to allow any lipid debris to settle. After an hour, 60 µL of the sample was

transferred to a new amber vial for further processing (i.e. 4-NP derivatization) or

reconstitution with appropriate solvent for analysis with ESI+ LCMSMS or GC-MS.

2.2.4 Analytical Chemistry

2.2.4.1 4-Nonylphenol Analysis

Derivatizing the hydroxyl group of the phenol ring with danzyl chloride was necessary to

analyze 4-nonylphenol using ESI+ LC-MSMS. The process involved nitrogen dry-down of the 60

µL aliquots taken after the freezing step of the processed sample (see Sample Prep). Once dry,

50 µL of 10 M sodium bicarbonate (pH 10) and 50 µL of 1 g/L dansyl chloride (in acetone) were

added to sample vials and derivatized in an oven at 60˚C for 3 minutes. Once the samples were

derivatized they were liquid/liquid back-extracted into 500 µL of ethyl acetate (2x). The pooled

layers of ethyl acetate (1000 µL total volume) were gently dried under nitrogen and residue

Page 43: Shortened in vivo bioconcentration factor testing in ...

36

reconstituted to glass spring inserts with a final volume of 50 µL methanol (containing 0.1%

formic acid) to fix the final concentration. Deuterated (D4) 4-nonylphenol was used as the

analytical internal standard (at 250ppb final concentration). Analytes were analyzed using

multiple reaction monitoring (MRM) with parent to daughter mass transitions of 453.9>171.0

for 4-nonylphenol and 457.9>170.6 for D4-4-nonylphenol monitored.

2.2.4.2 Chlorpyrifos Analysis

Chlorpyrifos did not require derivatization for accurate analysis by the ESI+ LC-MSMS.

The 50 µL aliquot taken after freezing the reconstituted samples (see Sample Prep) were gently

dried down with nitrogen and re-suspended in an equivalent volume (50 µL) of methanol

(containing 0.1% formic acid). As with 4-nonylphenol, samples were placed in a glass spring-

loaded insert due to the small volume. Parent to daughter mass transition (MRM) of 350>198

were analyzed for chlorpyrifos. Methyl-chlorpyrifos was used as the internal standard (at

250ppb final concentration).

2.2.4.3 DDT and Musk Xylene Analysis

DDT and musk xylene were analyzed by GC-MS using GC 6890N (Agilent, Palo Alto, CA)

fitted with a 30 m x 0.25 mm x 0.25 µm EC™- 5 capillary column (Alltech, Deerfield, IL).

Ultrapure Helium (Air Liquide, Houston, TX) was used as the carrier gas and the instrument was

operated in constant pressure (9.5 psi) mode with an initial flow of 1.2 mL/min and an average

velocity of 40 cm/sec. Samples were auto-injected (2.0 µL) in pulsed splitless mode at 260˚C

and the separation was achieved using the following temperature program for the GC oven:

initial temperature at 40˚C for 3 minutes, increased to 200˚C at 10˚C/min with no hold time

followed by the final ramp to 300˚C at 15˚C/min and held at this temperature for 5 minutes for

Page 44: Shortened in vivo bioconcentration factor testing in ...

37

baking the column in preparation for the next injection. After the separation in the GC column,

DDT and musk xylene were identified from the mass spectra obtained by electronic impact

ionization (70eV; positive ion polarity) in a Mass Selective Detector, MSD 5973 (Agilent) that

was operated under Selection Ion Monitoring (SIM) with dwell time of 50 ms and at transfer

line temp of 280˚C.

2.2.5 Data Analysis

Data analysis was prepared using GraphPad Prism® (version 5.02, La Jolla, CA) and SAS®

(version 9.1, SAS institute Inc, Cary, NC). K1 and K2 values were obtained from SAS® statistical

analysis program, where BCFk estimates were calculated. Standard error of the mean (SEM) was

calculated in Graphpad for each of the BCF tests that were run.

2.3 Results

2.3.1 Single Compound Study

For the single exposure studies, our BCFk values show to be in range of known literature

values (Tables 2.1 & 2.2). Reported ranges for all chemicals seem to coincide with the results

shown here. According to the MITI (Ministry of International Trade and Industry) database

reported BCF values for 4-nonylphenol range from 90-330. For chlorpyrifos, reported BCF

values range from 49-2880 and both of our studies fall within this range of values. DDT and

musk xylene also fall within the reported range with DDT ranging from 5100-25900 and musk

xylene ranging from 1440-6740. Using the benchmark tool, in this case musk xylene seems to

be helpful in analysis data points in regards to BCF calculations. The benchmark values can be

determined by dividing the calculated BCFk value by the calculated BCFk value of the benchmark

compound. Musk xylene is a useful compound to use as a benchmark because of its known

Page 45: Shortened in vivo bioconcentration factor testing in ...

38

bioaccumulation properties in aquatic environments. Muscle data shown in tables 5 & 6 appear

to be good representation of whole body homogenate data, while increases liver values

suggests this is a major site for accumulation.

Even with the shortened exposure time, steady-state was met in the muscle tissue

during the single compound exposures. For DDT, not surprisingly steady-state was never met;

however DDT has been notorious for its ability to not reach steady-state. In the whole body

homogenate we saw a different trend in regards to steady-state being met. BCFss can be

defined as sampling tissue on two different days without the test compound increasing in

concentration within the organism. Data in Appendix A shows that steady-state criteria was

met, thus indicating that a shortened approach to BCF tests can be effective and accurate.

Table 2.1: Table of BCFk values from single exposure study in carp muscle tissue. Muscle

Study Compound Uptake (K1) Depuration (K2) BCFk MX

Benchmark

Single Compound exposure

4-Nonylphenol 107.70 0.48 220.93 0.12 Chlorpyrifos 62.57 0.13 999.68 0.55 Musk Xylene 1155.10 0.64 1814.36 1.00

DDT 765.55 0.04 20077.70 11.07

Table 2.2: Table of BCFk values from single exposure study in carp liver tissue. Liver

Study Compound Uptake (K1) Depuration (K2) BCFk MX

Benchmark

Single Compound exposure

4-Nonylphenol 372.65 0.39 808.93 0.15 Chlorpyrifos 180.40 0.29 829.18 0.16 Musk Xylene 2340.00 0.43 5396.52 1.00

DDT 7296.30 0.16 124369.57 23.05

With the exception of chlorpyrifos, increased BCFk values can be seen in the liver

indicating that this may be the primary site for metabolism for each of these compounds. Also

Page 46: Shortened in vivo bioconcentration factor testing in ...

39

due to the increased lipid content within the liver, as compared to the muscle, may explain why

there is such a large increase in BCFk values.

2.3.2 Mixture Study Results

Results from this study show that mixture studies could prove to be valuable tools in

environmental data analysis. The mixture study we performed came out with different and

surprising results, however. While BCFk results for muscle tissue remained equivalent to the

single exposure study results, in the liver we saw a dramatic increase in BCFk of nonylphenol

and musk xylene. These findings indicate that in the presence of certain compounds,

metabolism and/or accumulation can be affected in certain organisms. As stated earlier, musk

xylene is a known inhibitor of CYP enzymes in rat/mice livers; this may be the cause of why we

see such a dramatic increase of BCFk in carp liver samples. Tables 7 & 8 show the results from

the mixture exposure experiment. These findings also indicate the importance for mixture BCF

tests to represent real world bioaccumulation.

When running an aquatic BCF flow-through study, agencies and laboratories only look at

one compound at a time; the results of the mixture study indicate the importance of running

mixture studies on a regular basis to represent real-world bioaccumulation. Certain legislations

were set in place to not only protect environmental exposures, but human exposure as well so

it is important to assess chemicals in conditions that can represent environmental conditions,

as results can vary in laboratories while running only one compound.

Page 47: Shortened in vivo bioconcentration factor testing in ...

40

Table 2.3: Table of BCFk values from mixture study exposure in carp muscle tissue. Muscle

Study Compound Uptake (K1) Depuration (K2) BCFk MX

Benchmark

Mixture Compound exposure

4-Nonylphenol 85.58 0.28 306.55 0.04 Chlorpyrifos 30.34 0.11 286.21 0.03 Musk Xylene 828.20 0.10 8457.69 1.00

DDT 1239.60 0.03 46495.83 10.99

Table 2.4: Table of BCFk values from mixture study exposure in carp liver tissue. Liver

Study Compound Uptake (K1) Depuration (K2) BCFk MX

Banchmark

Mixture Compound exposure

4-Nonylphenol 68.58 0.005 13864.91 1.17 Chlorpyrifos 59.53 0.05 1119.54 0.09 Musk Xylene 2411.10 0.20 11826.60 1.00

DDT 4721.00 0.21 22964.88 1.94

2.3.3 Whole-Body Homogenate Results

In a separate experiment, we ran both single and mixture exposures in carp, however,

instead of just taking specifically muscle and/or liver tissue we sampled whole body

homogenate and compared them to our tissue-specific sample analysis. Especially in a species

like carp, where liver tissue is disperse and hard to gather, taking whole body homogenate

tissue could help regulatory agencies improve the efficiency of BCF tests as this whole body

homogenate approach could further streamline the process of data analysis.

Muscle data would indicate that our muscle data more closely represents single

compound whole body BCFk values than the liver does. By extracting out specific tissues we can

pinpoint exact sites for bioaccumulation within an organism, however, this does not completely

represent whole body bioaccumulation as the whole body homogenate does. In the mixture

study, criterion for BCFss was met for nonylphenol and chlorpyrifos; however, these criteria

Page 48: Shortened in vivo bioconcentration factor testing in ...

41

were not met for DDT and musk xylene during the time allotted for the experiment. Such would

be expect for DDT due to its extreme lipophilic nature and increased bioaccumulation results

even during an extended BCF flow-through test.

Table 2.5: Summary of BCFk values calculated from whole body homogenate in carp from single and mixture studies. Whole Body Homogenate

Single Compound Uptake (K1) Depuration (K2) BCFk

MX Benchmark

Compound Musk Xylene 764.70 0.38 1997.34 1.00 Exposure 4-Nonylphenol 253.30 0.44 575.68 0.29 Chlorpyrifos 213.30 0.23 927.14 0.46 Whole Body Homogenate Mixture Musk Xylene 522.90 0.01 53588.29 1.00 Exposure 4-Nonylphenol 304.00 0.41 738.72 0.01 Chlorpyrifos 630.00 0.26 2398.42 0.05 DDT 6415.70 0.03 213689.82 3.99

2.4 Discussion

In this study, we propose an abbreviated study design for aquatic bioconcentration

testing which effectively alleviates the burdens of running a flow-through test. Four chemicals

were used individually to evaluate the usefulness of the proposed shortened design; 4-

Nonyphenol, Chlorpyrifos, Musk Xylene, and DDT. The study consisted of exposing Cyprinus

carpio for 7 days followed by 7 days of depuration, for a total of a 14-day study. Our results for

each of the four compounds are consistent with literature values, thus, demonstrating that

BCFk can be accurately predicted in an abbreviated in vivo test. A shortened approach could

increase productivity for both regulatory agencies and industries. Alleviating monetary and

time burdens would help move environmental assessment forward a little faster and allow for

more chemicals to be screened. Only a small percentage of chemicals that are being produced

Page 49: Shortened in vivo bioconcentration factor testing in ...

42

in high quantities and that are found in the environment have published BCF or BAF values, and

even fewer with published BMF values. BCFss was met in the short amount of time the

organisms were exposed to the chemicals, thus, demonstrating that a shortened approach

could be accurate and reliable for further aquatic BCF testing. Chemical exposure to aquatic

organisms to test bioaccumulation has been used for many years, but ever since, little has been

done to refine, reduce, and replace animal testing in the laboratory. To further the expansion of

a growing line of work, efficiency and improvement must be taken into account. Using this

method for bioaccumulation will aid regulatory agencies and private labs to further streamline

the process of chemical BCF testing, which will allow for more chemicals in question to be

tested.

Also, it is important to note the BCF values that we found with the mixture study. BCFk

for 4-nonylphenol and DDT increased tremendously in the mixture exposure indicating that

there are chemical interactions that may be taking place within the organism that are affecting

the ADME characteristics of these chemicals. It is interesting to note that the most dramatic

changes were seen in the liver tissue, a site where metabolism of xenobiotic chemicals occur

the most. Most BCF tests are ran with only one compound being tested at a time. However, we

show here that in the presence of multiple chemicals, BCF values have the potential to be

dramatically altered.

There can be many reasons for skewed BCF results; one possibility is that one of the

compounds, musk xylene, is a known CYP2B inhibitor in rat and mouse hepatocyte cell lines.

This inhibition, in turn, could affect the metabolism of the other compounds where CYP2B is

Page 50: Shortened in vivo bioconcentration factor testing in ...

43

important for metabolism. Further experiments would need to be done to verify the results we

see here, and to better determine why exactly we saw these results.

Our whole body homogenate results indicate that it may be possible to use this

approach when running an aquatic BCF flow-through test. However, since our results in the

mixture differ so greatly, this approach may only be prudent in single exposure studies. This

variation in results could be due to adsorption in the presence of high lipid content, or in the

case of nonylphenol adsorption to vessels used to extract it out for chemical analysis. The

whole body homogenate results indicated that it could be used as a replacement for muscle-

specific BCFk data. However, in the mixture studies the results varied, meaning, more testing

would need to be completed to verify the data shown here.

2.5 Chapter References

Arnot, J. A., Mackay, D., Parkerton, T. F., & Bonnell, M. (2008). A database of fish biotransformation rates for organic chemicals. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 27(11), 2263-2270. doi: 10.1897/08-058.1

Arnot, J. A., Meylan, W., Tunkel, J., Howard, P. H., Mackay, D., Bonnell, M., & Boethling, R. S. (2009). A quantitative structure-activity relationship for predicting metabolic biotransformation rates for organic chemicals in fish. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 28(6), 1168-1177. doi: 10.1897/08-289.1

Behechti, A., Schramm, K. -., Attar, A., Niederfellner, J., & Kettrup, A. (1998). Acute aquatic toxicities of four musk xylene derivatives on daphnia magna. Water Research, 32(5), 1704-1707. doi:10.1016/S0043-1354(97)00361-8

Chanda, S.M., Mortensen, S.R., Moser, V.C., Padilla, S., 1997. Tissue-specific effects of chlorpyrifos on carboxylesterase and cholinesterase activity in adult rats: an in vitro and in vivo comparison. Fundam. Appl. Toxicol. 38, 148–157

Coldham, N. G., Sivapathasundaram, S., Dave, M., Ashfield, L. A., Pottinger, T. G., Goodall, C., et al. (1998). Biotransformation, tissue distribution, and persistence of 4-nonylphenol residues in juvenile rainbow trout (oncorhynchus mykiss). Drug Metabolism and Disposition, 26(4), 347-354.

Page 51: Shortened in vivo bioconcentration factor testing in ...

44

Cowan-Ellsberry, C. E., Dyer, S. D., Erhardt, S., Bernhard, M. J., Roe, A. L., Dowty, M. E., & Weisbrod, A. V. (2008). Approach for extrapolating in vitro metabolism data to refine bioconcentration factor estimates. Chemosphere, 70(10), 1804-1817. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2007.08.030

Cravedi, J. P., Boudry, G., Baradat, M., Rao, D., & Debrauwer, L. (2001). Metabolic fate of 2,4-dichloroaniline, prochloraz and nonylphenol diethoxylate in rainbow trout: A comparative in vivo/in vitro approach. Aquatic Toxicology, 53(3–4), 159-172. doi:10.1016/S0166-445X(01)00163-1

Eriksson L, Jaworska J, Worth AP, Cronin MTD, McDowell RM, Gramatica P. Methods for reliability and uncertainty assessment and for applicability evaluations of classification and regression-based QSARs. Environ Health Perspect. 2003;111:1361–1375.

Gatermann, R., Hühnerfuss, H., Rimkus, G., Attar, A., & Kettrup, A. (1998). Occurrence of musk xylene and musk ketone metabolites in the aquatic environment. Chemosphere, 36(11), 2535-2547. doi:10.1016/S0045-6535(97)10208-9

Giger W, Brunner PH, Schaffner C, (1984) 4-nonylphenol in sewage sludge-accumulation of toxic metabolites from nonionic surfactants. Science 225:623-625

Gomez, C. F., Constantine, L., & Huggett, D. B. (2010). The influence of gill and liver metabolism on the predicted bioconcentration of three pharmaceuticals in fish. Chemosphere, 81(10), 1189-1195. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2010.09.043

John J., D. (1998). Retinoid chemoprevention in the high-risk patient. Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology, 39(2, Supplement 2), S82-S85. doi:10.1016/S0190-9622(98)70451-7

Kirman, C. R., Aylward, L. L., Hays, S. M., Krishnan, K., & Nong, A. (2011). Biomonitoring equivalents for DDT/DDE. Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology, 60(2), 172-180. doi:10.1016/j.yrtph.2011.03.012

Miracle, A. L., & Ankley, G. T. (2005). Ecotoxicogenomics: Linkages between exposure and effects in assessing risks of aquatic contaminants to fish. Reproductive Toxicology, 19(3), 321-326. doi: 10.1016/j.reprotox.2004.06.007

Nichols, J. W., Bonnell, M., Dimitrov, S. D., Escher, B. I., Han, X., & Kramer, N. I. (2009). Bioaccumulation assessment using predictive approaches. Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management, 5(4), 577-597. doi: 10.1897/IEAM_2008-088.1

OECD. OECD guidelines for test chemicals. 305. Bioconcentration: Flow-through fish test. Paris (FR) : Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, 1996.

Page 52: Shortened in vivo bioconcentration factor testing in ...

45

Scott H. Jackson, Christina E. Cowan-Ellsberry, and Gareth Thomas. Use of Quantitative Structural Analysis To Predict Fish Bioconcentration Factors for Pesticides. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 2009 57 (3), 958-967

Suter-Eichenberger, R., Altorfer, H., Lichtensteiger, W., & Schlumpf, M. (1998). Bioaccumulation of musk xylene (MX) in developing and adult rats of both sexes. Chemosphere, 36(13), 2747-2762. doi:10.1016/S0045-6535(97)10234-X

Weisbrod A.V., Burkhard LP, Arnot J, Mekenyan O, Howard PH, Russom C, et al. Workgroup report: review of fish bioaccumulation databases used to identify persistent, bio-accumulative, toxic substances. Environ Health Perspect. 2007;115:255–261.

Weisbrod, A.V., Sahi, J., Segner, H., James, M. O., Nichols, J., Schultz, I., Hoeger, B. (2009). The state of in vitro science for use in bioaccumulation assessments for fish. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 28(1), 86-96. doi: 10.1897/08-015.1

Page 53: Shortened in vivo bioconcentration factor testing in ...

46

CHAPTER 3

IN VITRO METABOLISM OF FOUR COMPOUNDS AND THEIR EFFECTS THEY HAVE ON EACH

OTHERS METABOLISM

3.1 Introduction

Sub-cellular in vitro metabolism assays have increased in popularity and usage in the

past decade and have been extremely helpful in screening for metabolic properties of

xenobiotics (Plant, 2004). Not only have in vitro assays been crucial for drug companies in their

decision-making process of which chemicals to discard and which to progress further for

development, but they have also been novel in helping environmental regulatory agencies and

laboratories around the world screen for potentially harmful chemicals in the environment

(Lipscomb and Poet 2008; Cowan-Ellsberry et al., 2007). With respect to environmental impact

assessment, sub-cellular in vitro metabolism assays offer a quick and cost-effective way to

determine metabolism potential of certain compounds (Cowan-Ellsberry et al., 2007).

Humans and different environments are constantly exposed to xenobiotic chemicals and

to assess if there are any harmful impacts, regulatory agencies look at the persistence (P),

bioaccumulation (B), and toxicity (T) characteristics of thousands of chemicals European

Commission, 2003). However, with as many chemicals that have been screen, it has been

estimated that reliable BCF data only exists for <4% of commercial organic compounds (Arnot

and Gobas, 2006). Fish BCF can be measured using the OECD guideline 305 (OECD, 1996).

Guideline 305 can become a very long and expensive test, thus lengthening to time it takes to

acquire BCF data. Computer models, such as quantitative structure-activity relationships

(QSARs), have also been novel in assisting with BCF prediction of certain compounds. However,

Page 54: Shortened in vivo bioconcentration factor testing in ...

47

these models can provide inaccurate estimates of bioaccumulation potential (Dimitrov et al.,

2003; Weisbrod et al., 2007). Model inaccuracies can be attributed to the lack of reliable and

accepted methods for estimating biotransformation in fish (Cowan-Ellsberry et al., 2007).

Furthermore, chemicals are found in the environment as a complex of chemicals not just

a single compound. Along with BCF tests, in vitro assays are normally conducted with one

chemical at a time. Due to the complex nature of chemical interactions, inside or out of an

organism, it is important to note the metabolic changes a compound exerts in an organism in

the presence of other chemicals. To clarify, musk xylene is a known inhibitor of the CYP2B

enzyme in rat and mouse liver fractions (Hawkins et al., 2002; Lehmanmckeeman et al., 1995;

Lehman-McKeeman et al.,1999). If present, musk xylene could potentially inhibit the

biotransformation of a compound where CYP2B is the primary pathway taken by that

compound. Chemical interaction should be considered important not only for

biotransformation data, but for BCF testing data as well.

In a BCF flow-through experiment, a mixture of chemicals was used at once to see if

there were any differences in BCFk values. Because of the dramatic increase of values in the

mixture study, as compared to the single compound study, it is necessary to find out exactly

why this increase was seen in the aquatic organisms. The previous chapter of this work outlines

data found in both experiments, and as the liver showed the largest increase in BCF values it

would thought that this difference could be explained by running in vitro S9 assays to assess

any inhibitory effects chemicals may have on the liver. Because the liver is the primary site for

most compounds to be metabolized, it seems beneficial to run these experiments to assess any

correlation between liver metabolism and BCF results we saw in the previous chapter.

Page 55: Shortened in vivo bioconcentration factor testing in ...

48

3.2 Materials and Methods

3.2.1 Chemicals and Reagents

Chlorpyrifos (O,O-diethyl O-3,5,6-trichloropyridin-2-yl phosphate, CAS# 2921-88-2)

methyl-chlorpyrifos (CAS# 5998-13-0), 4-Nonylphenol (CAS# 104-40-5), D4-Nonylphenol (CAS#

1173019-62-9), DDT (1,1,1-Trichloro-2,2-bis(4-chlorophenyl)ethane, CAS# 50-29-3), DCBP (4,4’-

Bis(9-carbazolyl)1-1’-biphenyl, CAS# 583828-31-7), B-Nictotinamide adenine dinucleotide

phosphate (NADPH, CAS# 100929-71-3), isocitric dehydrogenase (NADP, CAS# 9028-48-2) and

DL-isocitric acid trisodium salt hydrate (ISO, CAS# 1637-73-6) were all obtained from Sigma

Aldrich Corp (St. Louis, MO). Musk Xylene (1-tert-Butyl-3,5-dimethyl-2,4,6-trinitrobenzene,

CAS# 75-05-8) was obtained from City Chemical LLC (West Haven, CT). HPLC grade methanol,

DCM, ethyl acetate, and n-hexane were obtained from Fisher Scientific (Houston, TX). Milli-Q

water was obtained from in house Milli-Q water system (Millipore, Billerica, MA). Resuspension

buffer (0.02M KH2PO4, 0.08M K2HPO4, 0.1M KCl, 1mM EDTA, and glycerol) materials were

obtained from Fisher Scientific (Houston, TX).

3.2.2 Fish Culture

Both male and female trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) weighing approximately 1 kg were

used in the study. Fish were obtained from Pond King (Gainesville, TX) and transported to the

University of North Texas. The fish were kept in a living stream at approximately 15°C, fed daily

with commercial trout chow, and placed under fluorescent lights with a 16 h light/ 8 h dark

photoperiod.

3.2.3 Liver S9 Preparation

Fish were anesthetized with up to 100 mg/L MS222 until immobile prior to sacrificing.

Page 56: Shortened in vivo bioconcentration factor testing in ...

49

The liver was then perfused with a saline solution in order to remove hemoglobin from the

organ. Livers were pooled from 3 different trout, weighed and then homogenized on ice in PBS

buffer solution in a 2:1 ratio of buffer to liver. The PBS buffer (pH 7.4) was composed of 50mM

potassium phosphate, 0.15 M potassium chloride, and 0.2 M sucrose. The homogenate was

placed into chilled centrifuge tubes and centrifuges at 9,000g for 20 min at 4°C. The S9

(supernatant) was pulled off from the tissue debris with careful pipetting and 1 mL was

transferred to chilled 1.5 mL microfuge tube then stored in a -80°C freezer for later use. 300 μL

of S9 was set aside to analyze CYP activity using spectrophotometer as described in (Paper

David found) and total protein content was measured by conducting a Bradford assay.

3.2.4 Microsomal Preparations

For specific phase I metabolism analysis, microsomal fractions were prepared from trout

S9 fractions. S9 was placed in chilled ultracentrifuge tubes and centrifuged at 100,000g for 1 h

at 4°C. The supernatant was removed from the tubes and 500 μL resuspension buffer (0.02 M

KH2PO4; 0.08 M K2HPO4; 0.1 M KCl; 1 mM EDTA; 1mM DTT; 20% glycerol or 20 g in 100 mls)

was added to remove the bottom pellet. Using a thin brush, the microsomes were gently

removed from the bottom of the tube and mixed in with the resuspension buffer. The resulting

solution was then placed in a -80°C freezer for storage, and as with the S9 300 μL was set aside

for protein and CYP analysis.

3.2.5 In Vitro Assay

Trout S9 and microsomes were diluted to 1 mg/mL protein content in PBS (pH7.4)

containing 50mM potassium phosphate and 0.15 M potassium chloride. A NADPH regeneration

system was used and composed of isocitric (7 mM), isocitric dehydrogenase (0.5 units of

Page 57: Shortened in vivo bioconcentration factor testing in ...

50

activity ml-1) and β-NADPH (600 mM) (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO). All reagents were made in

PBS (pH7.4) on the day of the assay. The regeneration system was aliquoted into 20 mL vials

that contained the diluted S9 or microsomal fractions, and the reaction mix was placed in a

25°C shaking water bath and allowed to equilibrate for several minutes before adding the

testing compound. To initiate biotransformation, an ethanol (<1% solvent) stock containing the

compound (10 μM) was added to each of the reaction mixes. Over a period of 1 h, 0.5 mL

aliquots of the solution were removed and placed in 4 mL vial containing 0.5 mL 1:1 hexane-

ethyl acetate solution to stop the reaction. Time points to assess biotransformation were 0 min,

15 min, 30 min, 45 min and 60 min. The vial was then vortexed and centrifuged to remove the

supernatant for analysis on either a LC-MS/MS or a GS-MS.

3.2.6 Control Groups

Three different controls were used while running each of the S9 or microsomal assays: a

buffer control, which contained only buffer and compound (10 μM); a no NADPH control, PBS

(pH7.4) was added into the reaction mix to fill the missing volume; and a heat inactivated

control, diluted protein was placed in an oven at 100°C until protein was visibly coagulated and

clumped. The controls were only taken at time points 0 min and 60 min to assess any

inaccuracies that may have arisen. Buffer controls are used to assess loss of parent due to

volatility or adsorption onto surfaces, no NADPH controls are used to assess whether or not the

reaction is phase I as CYP enzymes require the donated hydrogen from the NADPH, and the

heat inactivated controls denatures the proteins and can be used to assess to the loss of parent

due to adsorption to the reaction vessel, volatilization, or abiotic degradation.

Page 58: Shortened in vivo bioconcentration factor testing in ...

51

3.2.7 CYP-Specific Inhibition

To show that the presence of certain compounds can alter the metabolism profile of

other compounds, musk xylene was added and run in separate assays. A solution of musk

xylene (10 μM) was added to the standard NADPH regeneration solution with the diluted

protein in two different ways: 1) at the same time that the test compound was added, and 2) 30

min before the test compound solution was added. By doing adding musk xylene at different

times we can assess whether or not the parent compound is responsible for the inhibition of

metabolism, or its metabolites.

3.2.8 Data Analysis

Data analysis was prepared using GraphPad Prism® (version 5.02, La Jolla, CA). A One-

way ANOVA was performed to determine statistical significance in all experiments, a P value

less than 0.05 was considered significant. Within the reaction mix vessels, levels of all

compounds were expressed as Means ± SEM.

3.3 Results

The results of the following assays were representative of literature findings in regards

to nonylphenol (NP) metabolism in trout. Two assays were used to assess metabolism: S9 and

microsomal fractions. The results show that with phase I assays (microsomes) NP is not readily

metabolized or degraded (data not shown); however, with S9 fractions we see a 50% loss in

parent compound (Fig. 3.1). Also, in the S9 assay there is an almost equivalent loss of parent in

the buffer control. In a separate assay, we ran a reaction mix with a buffer control and at time

point 60 min we washed the sides of the reaction vessel with hexane ethyl-acetate and

transferred residue to a 4 mL vial. By doing this we were able to recover 100% of NP in the

Page 59: Shortened in vivo bioconcentration factor testing in ...

52

buffer controls (data not shown). In the no NADPH control with the S9 assay the loss of parent

was almost equivalent to the loss in the reaction mix, this alongside with the microsomal results

indicates that NP is metabolized mainly by phase II enzymes.

Figure 3.1: Biotransformation of 4-NP in trout S9 fractions over a 60 min period.

Figure 3.2: Biotransformation of NP in trout S9 fractions. Data here showing different reaction vessels with MX added. Chloropyrifos (CPS) results differed than that of the nonylphenol results. We saw no

significant loss in parent for the CPS assay, indicating that trout may not be able to metabolize

Page 60: Shortened in vivo bioconcentration factor testing in ...

53

CPS as well as mammals can. Surprisingly, the results from the musk xylene (MX) treated and

MX + CPS assays were somewhat counterintuitive. In the reaction vessel that was treated with

10 µM MX 30 mins prior to adding CPS, we see a significant drop in parent compound by time

point 60 min. In the reaction vessel where CPS was added simultaneously with MX (10 µM

each) we see a steady decline in the parent compound as the reaction takes place, indicating

that perhaps a metabolite of MX (rather than MX itself) is responsible for the increased loss of

parent. In multiple rat and mice studies, results have shown that while inducing CYP2B

expression, MX simultaneously inhibits CYP2B activity (Hawkins et al., 2002; Lehman-

McKeeman et al., 1995; Lehman-McKeeman et al.,1999). Being that a CYP2B enzyme is

important in mammalian metabolism of CPS, it would seem that MX would inhibit the

metabolism of CPS however, this is not the case.

Figure 3.3: Biotransformation of CPS in trout S9 fractions.

Page 61: Shortened in vivo bioconcentration factor testing in ...

54

3.4 Discussion

The results of this study show that in the presence of musk xylene some type of

interaction is taking place within the reaction mix to alter the metabolic characteristics of trout

S9 fractions. Musk xylene is a known CYP2B inhibitor in rats and mice but little is known about

its effects in trout. Chemical inhibition is especially important for regulatory agencies that run

BCF tests according to protocol OECD 305. In the presence of multiple chemicals, interactions

may be altering certain ADME characteristics of an organism, either by certain interactions that

are affecting metabolic enzymes of the organism or if there is some sort of chemical-to-

chemical interaction taking place. We show here that in the presence of musk xylene, results of

loss-of-parent metabolism assays are altered. These results, however, differ between

chlorpyrifos and 4-nonylphenol.

For 4-nonylphenol, in the presence of musk xylene, metabolism seems to be inhibited to

a certain point, preventing the S9 fraction from breaking the parent molecule down. Being that

the duality of musk xylene is that it not only induces transcription of certain CYP enzymes in rat

livers but it also inhibits the activity of these enzymes, therefore, the results of the 4-

nonylphenol assays are not surprising. Two reaction mixes were ran with musk xylene and 4-

nonylphenol; 1) a reaction mix with the S9 and all co-factors treated with musk xylene for 30

mins before aliquoting in 4-nonylphenol, and 2) a reaction mix where musk xylene and 4-

nonylphenol were aliquoted in the reaction mix vial simultaneously. In the reaction mix that

was treated with musk xylene, no metabolism was seen in 4-nonylphenol over a period of 1 hr.

Indicating that musk xylene had successfully inhibited or prevented 4-nonylphenol from being

broken down. In the second reaction mix, when 4-nonylphenol was added simultaneously with

Page 62: Shortened in vivo bioconcentration factor testing in ...

55

musk xylene, we observed a gradual decrease in metabolic activity over a period of 1 hr. Within

30 mins we observed a 30% loss of parent in 4-nonylphenol, however, over the next 30 mins we

observed >5% loss of parent in the parent compound. These data suggests that a metabolite of

musk xylene may be more responsible for inhibiting metabolic activity rather than musk xylene

itself.

For chlorpyrifos, the results were somewhat counterintuitive as compared to our 4-

nonylphenol results. For the chlorpyrifos assay we ran the same reaction mixes with one

reaction mix treated with musk xylene 30 mins before adding chlorpyrifos and another where

we added them simultaneously. What we observed was the exact opposite of what we saw in

4-nonylphenol. For the 30 mins treated reaction mix we saw the most metabolism after 1 hr,

and for the second reaction mix we observed an increase in loss-of-parent over the period of 1

hr. In the second reaction mix, we saw little loss of parent in the first 30 mins and over the next

30 mins we see that loss almost double in scale. These data suggests that musk xylene may

have had the opposite effect as originally hypothesized. We also ran a reaction mix that was

included only S9, co-factors, and chlorpyrifos, where we saw little to no significant loss of

parent in the results. Along with these results and the results from the previously mentioned

reaction mixes, it would seem that musk xylene (or one of its metabolites) actually increases

the rate or ability for trout S9 to metabolize chlorpyrifos.

The reactions that we observed taking place are not well understood, however, what is

apparent is that in the presence of musk xylene other compounds metabolic properties change

– and not in the same way. The results of this experiment show that it is important for us to try

and understand these interactions better, as they may affect how certain regulatory agencies

Page 63: Shortened in vivo bioconcentration factor testing in ...

56

handle chemical impact assessment. Most notably, for aquatic BCF tests results may vary in the

presence of multiple chemicals. Environmental impact assessment protocols were set in place

to help protect not only the environment but humans as well, as it is possible for us to be

exposed to these chemicals. Realistic environmental conditions do not comprise of only one

chemical but a mixture of chemicals and it is important for us to understand these interactions

as they may alter BCF test results, which would not represent real-world interaction within the

environment.

3.5 Chapter References

Ekins, S., Ring, B. J., Grace, J., McRobie-Belle, D. J., & Wrighton, S. A. (2000). Present and future in vitro approaches for drug metabolism. Journal of Pharmacological and Toxicological Methods, 44(1), 313-324. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1056-8719(00)00110-6

Gómez-Lechón, M. J., Castell, J. V., & Donato, M. T. (2007). Hepatocytes—the choice to investigate drug metabolism and toxicity in man: In vitro variability as a reflection of in vivo. Chemico-Biological Interactions, 168(1), 30-50. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cbi.2006.10.013

Houston, J. B., & Carlile, D. J. (1997). Incorporation of in vitro drug metabolism data into physiologically-based pharmacokinetic models. Toxicology in Vitro, 11(5), 473-478. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0887-2333(97)00056-8

Lipscomb, J. C., & Poet, T. S. (2008). In vitro measurements of metabolism for application in pharmacokinetic modeling. Pharmacology & Therapeutics, 118(1), 82-103. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pharmthera.2008.01.006

Pelkonen, O., Turpeinen, M., Hakkola, J., Abass, K., Pasanen, M., Raunio, H., et al. (2013). Preservation, induction or incorporation of metabolism into the in vitro cellular system − views to current opportunities and limitations. Toxicology in Vitro, 27(5), 1578-1583. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tiv.2012.06.002

Petkam, R., Renaud, R. L., & Leatherland, J. F. (2003). The role of CYP 1A1 in the in vitro metabolism of pregnenolone by the liver of rainbow trout embryos. Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology Part C: Toxicology & Pharmacology, 135(3), 277-284. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1532-0456(03)00113-3

Plant, N. (2004). Strategies for using in vitro screens in drug metabolism. Drug Discovery Today, 9(7), 328-336. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1359-6446(03)03019-8

Page 64: Shortened in vivo bioconcentration factor testing in ...

57

Ponsoda, X., Pareja, E., Gómez-Lechón, M., Fabra, R., Carrasco, E., Trullenque, R., et al. (2001). Drug biotransformation by human hepatocytes. in vitro/in vivo metabolism by cells from the same donor. Journal of Hepatology, 34(1), 19-25. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0168-8278(00)00085-4

Tingle, M. D., & Helsby, N. A. (2006). Can in vitro drug metabolism studies with human tissue replace in vivo animal studies? Environmental Toxicology and Pharmacology, 21(2), 184-190. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.etap.2005.07.008

Arukwe, A., Goksøyr, A., Thibaut, R., & Cravedi, J. P. (2000). Metabolism and organ distribution of nonylphenol in atlantic salmon (salmo salar). Marine Environmental Research, 50(1–5), 141-145. doi:10.1016/S0141-1136(00)00081-7

Arukwe, A., Thibaut, R., Ingebrigtsen, K., Celius, T., Goksøyr, A., & Cravedi, J. (2000). In vivo and in vitro metabolism and organ distribution of nonylphenol in atlantic salmon (salmo salar). Aquatic Toxicology, 49(4), 289-304. doi:10.1016/S0166-445X(99)00084-3

Bakke, J.E., Feil, V.J., Price, C.E., 1976. Rat urinary metabolites from O,O-diethyl-O-(3,5,6-trichloro-2-pyridyl) phosphorothioate. J. Environ. Sci. Health B 11, 225–230.

Baldwin, W. S., Roling, J. A., Peterson, S., & Chapman, L. M. (2005). Effects of nonylphenol on hepatic testosterone metabolism and the expression of acute phase proteins in winter flounder (pleuronectes americanus): Comparison to the effects of saint john's wort. Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology Part C: Toxicology & Pharmacology, 140(1), 87-96. doi:10.1016/j.cca.2005.01.007

Bicker, W., Lämmerhofer, M., Genser, D., Kiss, H., & Lindner, W. (2005). A case study of acute human chlorpyrifos poisoning: Novel aspects on metabolism and toxicokinetics derived from liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry analysis of urine samples. Toxicology Letters, 159(3), 235-251. doi:10.1016/j.toxlet.2005.05.013

Bonin, A. M., Stupans, I., Baker, R. S. U., Ryan, A. J., & Holder, G. M. (1985). Effect of induction by DDT on metabolism and mutagenicity of benzo[a]pyrene. Mutation Research/Genetic Toxicology, 158(3), 111-117. doi:10.1016/0165-1218(85)90072-2

Buhler, D. R., & Wang-Buhler, J. (1998). Rainbow trout cytochrome P450s: Purification, molecular aspects, metabolic activity, induction and role in environmental monitoring. Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology Part C: Pharmacology, Toxicology and Endocrinology, 121(1–3), 107-137. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0742-8413(98)10033-6

Chanda, S.M., Mortensen, S.R., Moser, V.C., Padilla, S., 1997. Tissue-specific effects of chlorpyrifos on carboxylesterase and cholinesterase activity in adult rats: an in vitro and in vivo comparison. Fundam. Appl. Toxicol. 38, 148–157

Page 65: Shortened in vivo bioconcentration factor testing in ...

58

Choi, K., Joo, H., Rose, R. L., & Hodgso, E. (2006). Metabolism of chlorpyrifos and chlorpyrifos oxon by human hepatocytes*. Journal of Biochemical and Molecular Toxicology, 20(6), 279-291. doi:10.1002/jbt.20145

Coldham, N. G., Sivapathasundaram, S., Dave, M., Ashfield, L. A., Pottinger, T. G., Goodall, C., et al. (1998). Biotransformation, tissue distribution, and persistence of 4-nonylphenol residues in juvenile rainbow trout (oncorhynchus mykiss). Drug Metabolism and Disposition, 26(4), 347-354.

Cravedi, J. P., Boudry, G., Baradat, M., Rao, D., & Debrauwer, L. (2001). Metabolic fate of 2,4-dichloroaniline, prochloraz and nonylphenol diethoxylate in rainbow trout: A comparative in vivo/in vitro approach. Aquatic Toxicology, 53(3–4), 159-172. doi:10.1016/S0166-445X(01)00163-1

Dai, D., Tang, J., Rose, R., Hodgson, E., Bienstock, R. J., Mohrenweiser, H. W., et al. (2001). Identification of variants of CYP3A4 and characterization of their abilities to metabolize testosterone and chlorpyrifos. Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics, 299(3), 825-831.

Doerge, D. R., Twaddle, N. C., Churchwell, M. I., Chang, H. C., Newbold, R. R., & Delclos, K. B. (2002). Mass spectrometric determination of p-nonylphenol metabolism and disposition following oral administration to sprague-dawley rats. Reproductive Toxicology, 16(1), 45-56. doi:10.1016/S0890-6238(01)00198-8

Foxenberg, R. J., McGarrigle, B. P., Knaak, J. B., Kostyniak, P. J., & Olson, J. R. (2007). Human hepatic cytochrome P450-specific metabolism of parathion and chlorpyrifos. Drug Metabolism and Disposition, 35(2), 189-193. doi:10.1124/dmd.106.012427

Goeptar, A., Scheerens, H., Vermeulen, N., 1995. Oxygen reductase and substrate reductase activity of cytochrome P450. Crit. Rev. Toxicol. 25, 25-65

Guengerich FP (June 2001). “Common and uncommon cytochrome P450 reactions related to metabolism and chemical toxicity”. Chem. Res. Toxicol. 14 (6): 611-50

Guengerich FP (January 2008). "Cytochrome p450 and chemical toxicology". Chem. Res. Toxicol.21 (1): 70–83.

Hawkins, D. R., & Ford, R. A. (1999). Dermal absorption and disposition of musk ambrette, musk ketone and musk xylene in rats. Toxicology Letters, 111(1–2), 95-103. doi:10.1016/S0378-4274(99)00171-X

Hawkins, D. R., Elsom, L. F., Kirkpatrick, D., Ford, R. A., & Api, A. M. (2002). Dermal absorption and disposition of musk ambrette, musk ketone and musk xylene in human subjects. Toxicology Letters, 131(3), 147-151. doi:10.1016/S0378-4274(01)00548-3

Page 66: Shortened in vivo bioconcentration factor testing in ...

59

Hodgson, E. (2001). In vitro human phase I metabolism of xenobiotics I: Pesticides and related chemicals used in agriculture and public health, september 2001. Journal of Biochemical and Molecular Toxicology, 15(6), 296-299. doi:10.1002/jbt.10011

J. Tang, Y. Cao, R. L. Rose, A. A. Brimfield, D. Dai, J. A. Goldstein, E. Hodgson. Metabolism of chlorpyrifos by human cytochrome P450 isoforms and human, mouse, and rat liver microsomes. Drug Metab Dispos. 2001 September; 29(9): 1201–1204.

L’Abbée, J., Tu, Y., Barriault, D., & Sylvestre, M. (2011). Insight into the metabolism of 1,1,1-trichloro-2,2-bis(4-chlorophenyl)ethane (DDT) by biphenyl dioxygenases. Archives of Biochemistry and Biophysics, 516(1), 35-44. doi:10.1016/j.abb.2011.09.016

Lalah, J. O., Schramm, K. -., Severin, G. F., Lenoir, D., Henkelmann, B., Behechti, A., et al. (2003). In vivo metabolism and organ distribution of a branched 14C-nonylphenol isomer in pond snails, lymnaea stagnalis L. Aquatic Toxicology, 62(4), 305-319. doi:10.1016/S0166-445X(02)00106-6

Laurenzana, E. M., Weis, C. C., Bryant, C. W., Newbold, R., & Delclos, K. B. (2002). Effect of dietary administration of genistein, nonylphenol or ethinyl estradiol on hepatic testosterone metabolism, cytochrome P-450 enzymes, and estrogen receptor alpha expression. Food and Chemical Toxicology, 40(1), 53-63. doi:10.1016/S0278-6915(01)00095-3

Lavado, R., & Schlenk, D. (2011). Microsomal biotransformation of chlorpyrifos, parathion and fenthion in rainbow trout (oncorhynchus mykiss) and coho salmon (oncorhynchus kisutch): Mechanistic insights into interspecific differences in toxicity. Aquatic Toxicology, 101(1), 57-63. doi: 10.1016/j.aquatox.2010.09.002

Lee, P. C., Marquardt, M., & Lech, J. J. (1998). Metabolism of nonylphenol by rat and human microsomes. Toxicology Letters, 99(2), 117-126. doi:10.1016/S0378-4274(98)00153-2

Lehman-Mckeeman, L. D., Caudill, D., Young, J. A., & Dierckman, T. A. (1995). Musk xylene induces and inhibits mouse hepatic cytochrome P450 2B enzymes. Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, 206(3), 975-980. doi:10.1006/bbrc.1995.1138

Lehman-McKeeman, L. D., Caudill, D., Vassallo, J. D., Pearce, R. E., Madan, A., & Parkinson, A. (1999). Effects of musk xylene and musk ketone on rat hepatic cytochrome P450 enzymes. Toxicology Letters, 111(1–2), 105-115. doi:10.1016/S0378-4274(99)00172-1

Mottaleb, M. A., Brumley, W. C., Pyle, S. M., & Sovocool, G. W. (2004). Determination of a bound musk xylene metabolite in carp hemoglobin as a biomarker of exposure by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry using selected ion monitoring. Journal of Analytical Toxicology, 28(7), 581-586. doi:10.1093/jat/28.7.581

Nolan, R.J., Rick, D.L., Freshour, N.L., Saunders, J.H., 1984. Chlorpyrifos: pharmacokinetics in human volunteers. Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. 73, 8-15.

Page 67: Shortened in vivo bioconcentration factor testing in ...

60

Parkinson, A., Oglivie, B. 2007 Biotransfromation of Xenobiotics. In Casarett, L., Klaassen, C., Doull, J. (Eds.), Casarett and Doull’s toxicology: the basic science of poisons, 7th ed. McGraw-Hill Professional, New York, pp. 161-304

Pelkonen, O., Turpeinen, M., Uusitalo, J., Rautio, A., & Raunio, H. (2005). Prediction of drug metabolism and interactions on the basis of in vitro investigations. Basic & Clinical Pharmacology & Toxicology, 96(3), 167-175. doi:10.1111/j.1742-7843.2005.pto960305.x

Pond, A.L., Chambers, H.W., Coyne, C.P., Chambers, J.E., 1998. Purification of two rat hepatic proteins with A-esterase activity toward chlorpyrifos-oxon and paraoxon. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 286, 1404–1411

Riedel, J., & Dekant, W. (1999). Biotransformation and toxicokinetics of musk xylene in humans. Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology, 157(2), 145-155. doi:10.1006/taap.1999.8665

Ritter, J., 2000. Roles of glucuronidation and UDP-glucuronosyltransferases in xenobiotic bioactivation reactions. Chem. Biol. Interact. 129, 171-193.

Rimkus, G. G., Gatermann, R., & Hühnerfuss, H. (1999). Musk xylene and musk ketone amino metabolites in the aquatic environment. Toxicology Letters, 111(1–2), 5-15. doi:10.1016/S0378-4274(99)00190-3

Robert J. Foxenberg, Barbara P. McGarrigle, James B. Knaak, Paul J. Kostyniak, James R. Olson. Human hepatic cytochrome p450-specific metabolism of parathion and chlorpyrifos. Drug Metab Dispos. 2007 February; 35(2): 189–193. Published online 2006 November 1. doi: 10.1124/dmd.106.012427

Sari, A. A., Tachibana, S., & Itoh, K. (2012). Determination of co-metabolism for 1,1,1-trichloro-2,2-bis(4-chlorophenyl) ethane (DDT) degradation with enzymes from trametes versicolor U97. Journal of Bioscience and Bioengineering, 114(2), 176-181. doi:10.1016/j.jbiosc.2012.03.006

Scott H. Jackson, Christina E. Cowan-Ellsberry, and Gareth Thomas. Use of Quantitative Structural Analysis To Predict Fish Bioconcentration Factors for Pesticides. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 2009 57 (3), 958-967

Smith, J. N., Campbell, J. A., Busby-Hjerpe, A. L., Lee, S., Poet, T. S., Barr, D. B., et al. (2009). Comparative chlorpyrifos pharmacokinetics via multiple routes of exposure and vehicles of administration in the adult rat. Toxicology, 261(1–2), 47-58. doi:10.1016/j.tox.2009.04.041

Smith, J. N., Timchalk, C., Bartels, M. J., & Poet, T. S. (2011). In vitro age-dependent enzymatic metabolism of chlorpyrifos and chlorpyrifos-oxon in human hepatic microsomes and chlorpyrifos-oxon in plasma. Drug Metabolism and Disposition, 39(8), 1353-1362. doi:10.1124/dmd.111.038745

Page 68: Shortened in vivo bioconcentration factor testing in ...

61

Suter-Eichenberger, R., Altorfer, H., Lichtensteiger, W., & Schlumpf, M. (1998). Bioaccumulation of musk xylene (MX) in developing and adult rats of both sexes. Chemosphere, 36(13), 2747-2762. doi:10.1016/S0045-6535(97)10234-X

Tang, J., Cao, Y., Rose, R. L., Brimfield, A. A., Dai, D., Goldstein, J. A., et al. (2001). Metabolism of chlorpyrifos by human cytochrome P450 isoforms and human, mouse, and rat liver microsomes. Drug Metabolism and Disposition, 29(9), 1201-1204.

Thibaut, R., Debrauwer, L., Rao, D., & Cravedi, J. P. (1998). Disposition and metabolism of [3H]-4-n-nonylphenol in rainbow trout. Marine Environmental Research, 46(1–5), 521-524. doi:10.1016/S0141-1136(97)00089-5

Timchalk, C., Nolan, R. J., Mendrala, A. L., Dittenber, D. A., Brzak, K. A., & Mattsson, J. L. (2002). A physiologically based pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic (PBPK/PD) model for the organophosphate insecticide chlorpyrifos in rats and humans. Toxicological Sciences, 66(1), 34-53. doi:10.1093/toxsci/66.1.34

Timchalk, C., Busby, A., Campbell, J. A., Needham, L. L., & Barr, D. B. (2007). Comparative pharmacokinetics of the organophosphorus insecticide chlorpyrifos and its major metabolites diethylphosphate, diethylthiophosphate and 3,5,6-trichloro-2-pyridinol in the rat. Toxicology, 237(1–3), 145-157. doi:10.1016/j.tox.2007.05.007

Wang, X., & Wang, W. (2005). Uptake, absorption efficiency and elimination of DDT in marine phytoplankton, copepods and fish. Environmental Pollution, 136(3), 453-464. doi:10.1016/j.envpol.2005.01.004

Weisbrod, A.V., Sahi, J., Segner, H., James, M. O., Nichols, J., Schultz, I., Hoeger, B. (2009). The state of in vitro science for use in bioaccumulation assessments for fish. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 28(1), 86-96. doi: 10.1897/08-015.1

Zhao, Q., Dourson, M., & Gadagbui, B. (2006). A review of the reference dose for chlorpyrifos. Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology, 44(2), 111-124. doi: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2005.10.003

Page 69: Shortened in vivo bioconcentration factor testing in ...

62

CHAPTER 4

CONCLUSION

4.1 Introduction

Environmental impact assessment has grown and developed since Rachel Carson wrote

her eye-opening book ‘Silent springs’, however, over the past decade little has been done to

improve how we go about testing compounds that are of concern. One goal for researchers is

to apply the 3Rs whenever possible; refine, replace and reduce. Referring specifically to the

number of animals required to run a BCF test, we can apply these ‘3Rs’ to aquatic BCF testing.

Current protocols (OECD 305) outline specific guidelines to run a reliable and reproducible

aquatic flow-through test, however there are some limitations that hinder the process from

testing more chemicals in a timely manner. Being that there is very little reliable data for the

amount of chemicals that are present in the environment, it is becoming increasingly important

to alleviate certain constraints that are present in current testing protocols.

4.2 BCF Testing

OECD guideline 305 outlines how to run an aquatic flow-through test, however the

protocol can be a burden on a laboratory. The time the protocol requires to run an aquatic

flow-through and the amount of fish needed can become costly. If steady-state has not been

reached within 28 days, the protocol states that one should keep running the test until steady-

state has been met, or up to 60 days. After the uptake phase in completed, the depuration

phase initiates. The length of these two phases combined with the number of sampling days

demonstrates how much of a burden running one of these tests can be. Therefore, in these

Page 70: Shortened in vivo bioconcentration factor testing in ...

63

experiments we demonstrate a shortened testing design that could alleviate not only a

monetary burden, but time as well.

The results of the 14-day BCF tests show that accurate and reliable BCFk can be

calculated in only 14 days, rather than a 42-day study as proposed by OECD 305. Our results

here are comparable to literature BCF results and accurately represent compound BCFk in

juvenile common carp. By shortening the time it takes to run an aquatic BCF test, we could

effectively alleviate the burdens of current protocols, which would ultimately allow for more

compounds to be screened. As previously stated, there are many chemicals present in the

environment that still need to be assessed, and BCF results of many chemicals that have been

tested may not be as reliable as others. By using the proposed shortened procedure here, more

chemicals could be pushed through evaluation.

We also evaluated the differences between using tissue-specific samples and whole-

body homogenate samples for the BCF tests. What we found was that there are little

differences between using tissue-specific sampling and whole-body homogenate. While we

observed differences in BCFk between specific tissues (e.g. liver and muscle), the BCFk values of

the whole-body homogenate fell in between the values for muscle and liver (in the single

compound studies). Especially with species such as juvenile carp, it can become very time

consuming to extract out specific tissues such as liver or muscle, therefore using whole-body

homogenate can shorten some of the time for sample preparations. Also, being that the BCFk

results between muscle and liver differ so greatly, using whole-body homogenate can provide a

more accurate BCFk that is present throughout the whole fish.

Page 71: Shortened in vivo bioconcentration factor testing in ...

64

Along with shortening current protocols, we ran shortened flow-through tests with only

one compound as well as a mixture of compounds. While most aquatic BCF tests are ran with

only one test chemical in question, it is important to note that within the environment certain

chemical interactions could take place that will affect the BCF in certain organisms. Our data

suggests the importance of real-world environmental exposures in aquatic organisms as certain

properties of chemicals may change in the presence of multiple chemicals. Our mixture

exposure included the compounds 4-nonylphenol, chlorpyrifos, DDT, and musk xylene. In our

results for the mixture studies we observed a dramatic increase in BCFk for 4-nonylphenol and

musk xylene. Musk xylene is a known CYP2B inhibitor in mammalian livers, however, little is

known about its affect in the common carp. And while musk xylene is only one example of this

alteration, there are many compounds present in the environment that could skew BCF results.

4.3 S9 In Vitro Assay

Due to the results of our mixture studies, we found it prudent to run in vitro S9 assays to

see if there were any differences in metabolism in the presence of multiple chemicals. Using

trout S9 fractions we were able to detect any affects that may be occurring within the organism

that would alter its ability to excise chemicals. What we found was quite surprising in that the

results varied between specific compounds. In the presence of musk xylene, the trout S9 was

unable to reduce the parent compound, as it normally should without musk xylene present. We

also observed a decrease in the loss of parent of time when musk xylene and 4-nonylphenol

were simultaneously added to the reaction mix, indicating that a metabolite of musk xylene

may be responsible for this inhibition rather than musk xylene itself. The exact opposite was

observed in the chlorpyrifos assay. The trout S9 was unable to metabolize the parent

Page 72: Shortened in vivo bioconcentration factor testing in ...

65

compound without musk xylene present in the reaction mix. However, when musk xylene was

added 30 mins prior to adding chlorpyrifos, we observed a significant loss in parent

chlorpyrifos. Along with these results, when musk xylene was added with chlorpyrifos

simultaneously we observed a gradual increase in loss-of-parent over time, indicating again that

a metabolite of musk xylene may be responsible to this induction of metabolism rather than

musk xylene itself. The results observed in the in vitro assays correlate with the results that we

see in our single and mixture BCF tests. BCFk for 4-nonylphenol dramatically increased in the

mixture study, indicating that the organism was unable to excise the compound properly as it

did in the single study exposure. BCFk for chlorpyrifos remained unchanged in the mixture study

design when compared to the single compound study. Results from the in vitro assays could

help explain why our BCF results dramatically differed between our single and mixture studies.

However, more testing should be done to clarify the differences in BCF results.

4.4 Conclusions

In any case, the results from both the BCF tests and in vitro assays indicate that further

studies should be done to better understand how chemicals behave within certain organisms.

The work done for this thesis showed the following:

• 14-day BCF tests can accurately and reliably represent BCF results from a 42-day study.

• Whole-body homogenate sampling for BCF tests can be used to represent BCFk of the entire fish and not just specific tissues.

• Mixture BCF studies should become regular in practice to represent real-world interactions in the environment.

• In the presence of certain chemicals, in vitro clearance can change, further indication the importance of mixture studies.

Page 73: Shortened in vivo bioconcentration factor testing in ...

66

Environmental impact assessment is absolutely essential to the health of our

environment and to humans; so it should be equally important to continually question and

update current protocols that are set in place for assessment. There is much work that could be

done to help move environmental assessment forward, and the work done here shows that

certain steps could be taken to help move impact assessment forward to allow for more

chemicals to be tested and to help obtain better and more accurate ‘real-world’ BCF values.

4.5 Chapter References

Ekins, S., Ring, B. J., Grace, J., McRobie-Belle, D. J., & Wrighton, S. A. (2000). Present and future in vitro approaches for drug metabolism. Journal of Pharmacological and Toxicological Methods, 44(1), 313-324. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1056-8719(00)00110-6

Gómez-Lechón, M. J., Castell, J. V., & Donato, M. T. (2007). Hepatocytes—the choice to investigate drug metabolism and toxicity in man: In vitro variability as a reflection of in vivo. Chemico-Biological Interactions, 168(1), 30-50. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cbi.2006.10.013

Houston, J. B., & Carlile, D. J. (1997). Incorporation of in vitro drug metabolism data into physiologically-based pharmacokinetic models. Toxicology in Vitro, 11(5), 473-478. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0887-2333(97)00056-8

Lipscomb, J. C., & Poet, T. S. (2008). In vitro measurements of metabolism for application in pharmacokinetic modeling. Pharmacology & Therapeutics, 118(1), 82-103. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pharmthera.2008.01.006

Pelkonen, O., Turpeinen, M., Hakkola, J., Abass, K., Pasanen, M., Raunio, H., et al. (2013). Preservation, induction or incorporation of metabolism into the in vitro cellular system − views to current opportunities and limitations. Toxicology in Vitro, 27(5), 1578-1583. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tiv.2012.06.002

Petkam, R., Renaud, R. L., & Leatherland, J. F. (2003). The role of CYP 1A1 in the in vitro metabolism of pregnenolone by the liver of rainbow trout embryos. Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology Part C: Toxicology & Pharmacology, 135(3), 277-284. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1532-0456(03)00113-3

Plant, N. (2004). Strategies for using in vitro screens in drug metabolism. Drug Discovery Today, 9(7), 328-336. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1359-6446(03)03019-8

Page 74: Shortened in vivo bioconcentration factor testing in ...

67

Ponsoda, X., Pareja, E., Gómez-Lechón, M., Fabra, R., Carrasco, E., Trullenque, R., et al. (2001). Drug biotransformation by human hepatocytes. in vitro/in vivo metabolism by cells from the same donor. Journal of Hepatology, 34(1), 19-25. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0168-8278(00)00085-4

Tingle, M. D., & Helsby, N. A. (2006). Can in vitro drug metabolism studies with human tissue replace in vivo animal studies? Environmental Toxicology and Pharmacology, 21(2), 184-190. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.etap.2005.07.008

Arukwe, A., Goksøyr, A., Thibaut, R., & Cravedi, J. P. (2000). Metabolism and organ distribution of nonylphenol in atlantic salmon (salmo salar). Marine Environmental Research, 50(1–5), 141-145. doi:10.1016/S0141-1136(00)00081-7

Arukwe, A., Thibaut, R., Ingebrigtsen, K., Celius, T., Goksøyr, A., & Cravedi, J. (2000). In vivo and in vitro metabolism and organ distribution of nonylphenol in atlantic salmon (salmo salar). Aquatic Toxicology, 49(4), 289-304. doi:10.1016/S0166-445X(99)00084-3

Bakke, J.E., Feil, V.J., Price, C.E., 1976. Rat urinary metabolites from O,O-diethyl-O-(3,5,6-trichloro-2-pyridyl) phosphorothioate. J. Environ. Sci. Health B 11, 225–230

Baldwin, W. S., Roling, J. A., Peterson, S., & Chapman, L. M. (2005). Effects of nonylphenol on hepatic testosterone metabolism and the expression of acute phase proteins in winter flounder (pleuronectes americanus): Comparison to the effects of saint john's wort. Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology Part C: Toxicology & Pharmacology, 140(1), 87-96. doi:10.1016/j.cca.2005.01.007

Bicker, W., Lämmerhofer, M., Genser, D., Kiss, H., & Lindner, W. (2005). A case study of acute human chlorpyrifos poisoning: Novel aspects on metabolism and toxicokinetics derived from liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry analysis of urine samples. Toxicology Letters, 159(3), 235-251. doi:10.1016/j.toxlet.2005.05.013

Bonin, A. M., Stupans, I., Baker, R. S. U., Ryan, A. J., & Holder, G. M. (1985). Effect of induction by DDT on metabolism and mutagenicity of benzo[a]pyrene. Mutation Research/Genetic Toxicology, 158(3), 111-117. doi:10.1016/0165-1218(85)90072-2

Buhler, D. R., & Wang-Buhler, J. (1998). Rainbow trout cytochrome P450s: Purification, molecular aspects, metabolic activity, induction and role in environmental monitoring. Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology Part C: Pharmacology, Toxicology and Endocrinology, 121(1–3), 107-137. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0742-8413(98)10033-6

Chanda, S.M., Mortensen, S.R., Moser, V.C., Padilla, S., 1997. Tissue-specific effects of chlorpyrifos on carboxylesterase and cholinesterase activity in adult rats: an in vitro and in vivo comparison. Fundam. Appl. Toxicol. 38, 148–157

Page 75: Shortened in vivo bioconcentration factor testing in ...

68

Choi, K., Joo, H., Rose, R. L., & Hodgso, E. (2006). Metabolism of chlorpyrifos and chlorpyrifos oxon by human hepatocytes*. Journal of Biochemical and Molecular Toxicology, 20(6), 279-291. doi:10.1002/jbt.20145

Coldham, N. G., Sivapathasundaram, S., Dave, M., Ashfield, L. A., Pottinger, T. G., Goodall, C., et al. (1998). Biotransformation, tissue distribution, and persistence of 4-nonylphenol residues in juvenile rainbow trout (oncorhynchus mykiss). Drug Metabolism and Disposition, 26(4), 347-354.

Cravedi, J. P., Boudry, G., Baradat, M., Rao, D., & Debrauwer, L. (2001). Metabolic fate of 2,4-dichloroaniline, prochloraz and nonylphenol diethoxylate in rainbow trout: A comparative in vivo/in vitro approach. Aquatic Toxicology, 53(3–4), 159-172. doi:10.1016/S0166-445X(01)00163-1

Dai, D., Tang, J., Rose, R., Hodgson, E., Bienstock, R. J., Mohrenweiser, H. W., et al. (2001). Identification of variants of CYP3A4 and characterization of their abilities to metabolize testosterone and chlorpyrifos. Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics, 299(3), 825-831.

Doerge, D. R., Twaddle, N. C., Churchwell, M. I., Chang, H. C., Newbold, R. R., & Delclos, K. B. (2002). Mass spectrometric determination of p-nonylphenol metabolism and disposition following oral administration to sprague-dawley rats. Reproductive Toxicology, 16(1), 45-56. doi:10.1016/S0890-6238(01)00198-8

Foxenberg, R. J., McGarrigle, B. P., Knaak, J. B., Kostyniak, P. J., & Olson, J. R. (2007). Human hepatic cytochrome P450-specific metabolism of parathion and chlorpyrifos. Drug Metabolism and Disposition, 35(2), 189-193. doi:10.1124/dmd.106.012427

Goeptar, A., Scheerens, H., Vermeulen, N., 1995. Oxygen reductase and substrate reductase activity of cytochrome P450. Crit. Rev. Toxicol. 25, 25-65

Guengerich FP (June 2001). “Common and uncommon cytochrome P450 reactions related to metabolism and chemical toxicity”. Chem. Res. Toxicol. 14 (6): 611-50

Guengerich FP (January 2008). "Cytochrome p450 and chemical toxicology". Chem. Res. Toxicol.21 (1): 70–83.

Hawkins, D. R., & Ford, R. A. (1999). Dermal absorption and disposition of musk ambrette, musk ketone and musk xylene in rats. Toxicology Letters, 111(1–2), 95-103. doi:10.1016/S0378-4274(99)00171-X

Hawkins, D. R., Elsom, L. F., Kirkpatrick, D., Ford, R. A., & Api, A. M. (2002). Dermal absorption and disposition of musk ambrette, musk ketone and musk xylene in human subjects. Toxicology Letters, 131(3), 147-151. doi:10.1016/S0378-4274(01)00548-3

Page 76: Shortened in vivo bioconcentration factor testing in ...

69

Hodgson, E. (2001). In vitro human phase I metabolism of xenobiotics I: Pesticides and related chemicals used in agriculture and public health, september 2001. Journal of Biochemical and Molecular Toxicology, 15(6), 296-299. doi:10.1002/jbt.10011

J. Tang, Y. Cao, R. L. Rose, A. A. Brimfield, D. Dai, J. A. Goldstein, E. Hodgson. Metabolism of chlorpyrifos by human cytochrome P450 isoforms and human, mouse, and rat liver microsomes. Drug Metab Dispos. 2001 September; 29(9): 1201–1204.

L’Abbée, J., Tu, Y., Barriault, D., & Sylvestre, M. (2011). Insight into the metabolism of 1,1,1-trichloro-2,2-bis(4-chlorophenyl)ethane (DDT) by biphenyl dioxygenases. Archives of Biochemistry and Biophysics, 516(1), 35-44. doi:10.1016/j.abb.2011.09.016

Lalah, J. O., Schramm, K. -., Severin, G. F., Lenoir, D., Henkelmann, B., Behechti, A., et al. (2003). In vivo metabolism and organ distribution of a branched 14C-nonylphenol isomer in pond snails, lymnaea stagnalis L. Aquatic Toxicology, 62(4), 305-319. doi:10.1016/S0166-445X(02)00106-6

Laurenzana, E. M., Weis, C. C., Bryant, C. W., Newbold, R., & Delclos, K. B. (2002). Effect of dietary administration of genistein, nonylphenol or ethinyl estradiol on hepatic testosterone metabolism, cytochrome P-450 enzymes, and estrogen receptor alpha expression. Food and Chemical Toxicology, 40(1), 53-63. doi:10.1016/S0278-6915(01)00095-3

Lavado, R., & Schlenk, D. (2011). Microsomal biotransformation of chlorpyrifos, parathion and fenthion in rainbow trout (oncorhynchus mykiss) and coho salmon (oncorhynchus kisutch): Mechanistic insights into interspecific differences in toxicity. Aquatic Toxicology, 101(1), 57-63. doi: 10.1016/j.aquatox.2010.09.002

Lee, P. C., Marquardt, M., & Lech, J. J. (1998). Metabolism of nonylphenol by rat and human microsomes. Toxicology Letters, 99(2), 117-126. doi:10.1016/S0378-4274(98)00153-2

Lehman-Mckeeman, L. D., Caudill, D., Young, J. A., & Dierckman, T. A. (1995). Musk xylene induces and inhibits mouse hepatic cytochrome P450 2B enzymes. Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, 206(3), 975-980. doi:10.1006/bbrc.1995.1138

Lehman-McKeeman, L. D., Caudill, D., Vassallo, J. D., Pearce, R. E., Madan, A., & Parkinson, A. (1999). Effects of musk xylene and musk ketone on rat hepatic cytochrome P450 enzymes. Toxicology Letters, 111(1–2), 105-115. doi:10.1016/S0378-4274(99)00172-1

Mottaleb, M. A., Brumley, W. C., Pyle, S. M., & Sovocool, G. W. (2004). Determination of a bound musk xylene metabolite in carp hemoglobin as a biomarker of exposure by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry using selected ion monitoring. Journal of Analytical Toxicology, 28(7), 581-586. doi:10.1093/jat/28.7.581

Nolan, R.J., Rick, D.L., Freshour, N.L., Saunders, J.H., 1984. Chlorpyrifos: pharmacokinetics in human volunteers. Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. 73, 8-15.

Page 77: Shortened in vivo bioconcentration factor testing in ...

70

Parkinson, A., Oglivie, B. 2007 Biotransfromation of Xenobiotics. In Casarett, L., Klaassen, C., Doull, J. (Eds.), Casarett and Doull’s toxicology: the basic science of poisons, 7th ed. McGraw-Hill Professional, New York, pp. 161-304

Pelkonen, O., Turpeinen, M., Uusitalo, J., Rautio, A., & Raunio, H. (2005). Prediction of drug metabolism and interactions on the basis of in vitro investigations. Basic & Clinical Pharmacology & Toxicology, 96(3), 167-175. doi:10.1111/j.1742-7843.2005.pto960305.x

Pond, A.L., Chambers, H.W., Coyne, C.P., Chambers, J.E., 1998. Purification of two rat hepatic proteins with A-esterase activity toward chlorpyrifos-oxon and paraoxon. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 286, 1404–1411

Riedel, J., & Dekant, W. (1999). Biotransformation and toxicokinetics of musk xylene in humans. Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology, 157(2), 145-155. doi:10.1006/taap.1999.8665

Ritter, J., 2000. Roles of glucuronidation and UDP-glucuronosyltransferases in xenobiotic bioactivation reactions. Chem. Biol. Interact. 129, 171-193.

Rimkus, G. G., Gatermann, R., & Hühnerfuss, H. (1999). Musk xylene and musk ketone amino metabolites in the aquatic environment. Toxicology Letters, 111(1–2), 5-15. doi:10.1016/S0378-4274(99)00190-3

Robert J. Foxenberg, Barbara P. McGarrigle, James B. Knaak, Paul J. Kostyniak, James R. Olson. Human hepatic cytochrome p450-specific metabolism of parathion and chlorpyrifos. Drug Metab Dispos. 2007 February; 35(2): 189–193. Published online 2006 November 1. doi: 10.1124/dmd.106.012427

Sari, A. A., Tachibana, S., & Itoh, K. (2012). Determination of co-metabolism for 1,1,1-trichloro-2,2-bis(4-chlorophenyl) ethane (DDT) degradation with enzymes from trametes versicolor U97. Journal of Bioscience and Bioengineering, 114(2), 176-181. doi:10.1016/j.jbiosc.2012.03.006

Scott H. Jackson, Christina E. Cowan-Ellsberry, and Gareth Thomas. Use of Quantitative Structural Analysis To Predict Fish Bioconcentration Factors for Pesticides. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 2009 57 (3), 958-967

Smith, J. N., Campbell, J. A., Busby-Hjerpe, A. L., Lee, S., Poet, T. S., Barr, D. B., et al. (2009). Comparative chlorpyrifos pharmacokinetics via multiple routes of exposure and vehicles of administration in the adult rat. Toxicology, 261(1–2), 47-58. doi:10.1016/j.tox.2009.04.041

Smith, J. N., Timchalk, C., Bartels, M. J., & Poet, T. S. (2011). In vitro age-dependent enzymatic metabolism of chlorpyrifos and chlorpyrifos-oxon in human hepatic microsomes and chlorpyrifos-oxon in plasma. Drug Metabolism and Disposition, 39(8), 1353-1362. doi:10.1124/dmd.111.038745

Page 78: Shortened in vivo bioconcentration factor testing in ...

71

Suter-Eichenberger, R., Altorfer, H., Lichtensteiger, W., & Schlumpf, M. (1998). Bioaccumulation of musk xylene (MX) in developing and adult rats of both sexes. Chemosphere, 36(13), 2747-2762. doi:10.1016/S0045-6535(97)10234-X

Tang, J., Cao, Y., Rose, R. L., Brimfield, A. A., Dai, D., Goldstein, J. A., et al. (2001). Metabolism of chlorpyrifos by human cytochrome P450 isoforms and human, mouse, and rat liver microsomes. Drug Metabolism and Disposition, 29(9), 1201-1204.

Thibaut, R., Debrauwer, L., Rao, D., & Cravedi, J. P. (1998). Disposition and metabolism of [3H]-4-n-nonylphenol in rainbow trout. Marine Environmental Research, 46(1–5), 521-524. doi:10.1016/S0141-1136(97)00089-5

Timchalk, C., Nolan, R. J., Mendrala, A. L., Dittenber, D. A., Brzak, K. A., & Mattsson, J. L. (2002). A physiologically based pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic (PBPK/PD) model for the organophosphate insecticide chlorpyrifos in rats and humans. Toxicological Sciences, 66(1), 34-53. doi:10.1093/toxsci/66.1.34

Timchalk, C., Busby, A., Campbell, J. A., Needham, L. L., & Barr, D. B. (2007). Comparative pharmacokinetics of the organophosphorus insecticide chlorpyrifos and its major metabolites diethylphosphate, diethylthiophosphate and 3,5,6-trichloro-2-pyridinol in the rat. Toxicology, 237(1–3), 145-157. doi:10.1016/j.tox.2007.05.007

Wang, X., & Wang, W. (2005). Uptake, absorption efficiency and elimination of DDT in marine phytoplankton, copepods and fish. Environmental Pollution, 136(3), 453-464. doi:10.1016/j.envpol.2005.01.004

Weisbrod, A.V., Sahi, J., Segner, H., James, M. O., Nichols, J., Schultz, I., Hoeger, B. (2009). The state of in vitro science for use in bioaccumulation assessments for fish. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 28(1), 86-96. doi: 10.1897/08-015.1

Zhao, Q., Dourson, M., & Gadagbui, B. (2006). A review of the reference dose for chlorpyrifos. Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology, 44(2), 111-124. doi: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2005.10.003

Page 79: Shortened in vivo bioconcentration factor testing in ...

72

APPENDIX A

BCF GRAPHS FROM SINGLE EXPOSURE

Page 80: Shortened in vivo bioconcentration factor testing in ...

73

Figure A.1: Concentration of DDT in muscle tissue over 14 days with a nominal concentration of 2.5 ppb.

Figure A.2: Concentration of DDT in liver tissue over 14 days with a nominal concentration of 2.5 ppb.

0

2000

4000

6000

8000

10000

12000

14000

1 3 7 10 14

Conc

entr

atio

n in

Mus

cle

(ng/

grm

tiss

ue

wet

wt.)

Time (Days)

0

10000

20000

30000

40000

50000

60000

70000

80000

90000

1 3 7 10 14

Conc

entr

atio

n in

Liv

er (n

g/gr

m ti

ssue

w

et w

t.)

Time (Days)

Page 81: Shortened in vivo bioconcentration factor testing in ...

74

Figure A.3: Concentration of 4-NP in muscle tissue over 14 days with a nominal concentration of 2.5 ppb.

Figure A.4: Concentration of 4-NP in liver tissue over 14 days with a nominal concentration of 2.5 ppb.

0102030405060708090

100

1 3 7 10 14

Conc

entr

atio

n in

Mus

cle

(ng/

grm

tis

sue

wet

wt.)

Time (Days)

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

450

500

1 3 7 10 14

Conc

entr

atio

n in

Liv

er (n

g/gr

m ti

ssue

wet

w

t.)

Time (Days)

Page 82: Shortened in vivo bioconcentration factor testing in ...

75

Figure A.5: Concentration of MX in muscle tissue over 14 days with a nominal concentration of 3.2 ppb.

Figure A.6: Concentration of MX in liver tissue over 14 days with a nominal concentration of 3.2 ppb.

0

2000

4000

6000

8000

10000

12000

14000

1 3 7 10 14

Conc

entr

atio

n in

Mus

cle

(ng/

grm

tiss

ue

wet

wt.)

Time (Days)

0

5000

10000

15000

20000

25000

30000

1 3 7 10 14

Conc

entr

atio

n in

Liv

er (n

g/gr

m ti

ssue

w

et w

t.)

Time (Days)

Page 83: Shortened in vivo bioconcentration factor testing in ...

76

Figure A.7: Concentration of CPS in muscle tissue over 14 days with a nominal concentration of 2.5 ppb.

Figure A.8: Concentration of CPS in liver tissue over 14 days with a nominal concentration of 2.5 ppb.

0

200

400

600

800

1000

1200

1400

1600

1800

1 3 7 10 14

Conc

entr

atio

n in

Mus

cle

(ng/

grm

tiss

ue

wet

wt.)

Time (Days)

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

3000

3500

1 3 7 10 14

Conc

entr

atio

n in

Liv

er (n

g/gr

m ti

ssue

w

et w

t.)

Time (Days)

Page 84: Shortened in vivo bioconcentration factor testing in ...

77

APPENDIX B

BCF GRAPHS FROM MIXTURE EXPOSURE: CONCENTRATION OF MULTIPLE COMPOUNDS IN

WHOLE BODY HOMOGENATE OVER A 14-DAY PERIOD

Page 85: Shortened in vivo bioconcentration factor testing in ...

78

0.00

5000.00

10000.00

15000.00

20000.00

25000.00

30000.00

35000.00

40000.00

45000.00

1 3 7 10 14

Who

le B

ody

Conc

entr

atio

n (n

g/gr

am)

Time (Days)

Whole Body BCF Values for Mixtures Study

ChlorpyrifosMusk Xylene4-NPDDT

Uptake Depuration


Recommended