Date post: | 14-Dec-2015 |
Category: |
Documents |
Upload: | nyla-bowlby |
View: | 223 times |
Download: | 7 times |
Shrimp Improvement Systems
The Importance of shrimpbroodstock and PL quality forsuccessful and sustainable
shrimp farming
Dean M AkiyamaDavid A Leong
Shrimp Improvement Systems, India
What is the major constraintfor commercial shrimpfarming sustainability?
- Environment?
- Production system?- Feed & Feed Resources?
- Disease?
- Market demand?- Other?
2
What is the major constraintfor commercial shrimpfarming sustainability?
Shrimp farmer profitability is criticalfor continued growth of the shrimp
culture industry.
3
What are the basic foundationtechnologies for commercial
shrimp farming?
- Hatchery: Production of consistent quality seed- Production: Consistent & predictable harvests
- Feed: Production of consistent quality feed- Genetics: Production of consistent quality broodstockand the improvement of commercially important traits
- Disease: Solutions for hatchery and farming- Market: Access and demand
4
The chicken industry is agood model for shrimp. It is
the most advanced andsophisticated of all animal
production industries.
6
Broiler Production Predictability
• 25 C with 85% humidity??- Cooling panel (water fall) to lower temperature
- Fan to pull air past water assisted cooling paneland through house. Also remove excess nitrogen.
Replace litter after every cycle to remove feces andbacteria
Broiler Production Predictability
• 75% of all chickens can feed at the same time
• 40 broilers per feeder
• 8 broilers per water nipple
• 20 kg per m, not number of birds
Broiler Production Predictability
“Guaranteed” production by BreederCompany and Local Distributor
• Cycle period: 35 days
• Final size: 2.2 kg
• FCR: 1.5
• Survival Rate: 96%
• Dressing weight: 67%
Controlled Production Systems
PL10 stocked in raceways with minimum 6 ppm DO,stabile temperature and pH, will reach 35 g in 100
days.
Siblings stocked in pond vs perimeter cagesADG 0.18 vs 0.25 (39%)
We must always strive toimprove technicalefficiencies and thereduce the cost of
production. This is anever ending process.
12
Alternative Species
Vannamei : Chicken : Lowest costMonodon : Turkey : Largest
Stylirostris : Duck : Sweetest
SIS has 4 Production Facilities
• SIS Florida; 1998- Nucleus Breeding Center for Penaeus vannamei, the Pacific
white shrimp. All of SIS P. vannamei stocks originate fromFlorida.
- Broodstock multiplication with capacity to produce and shipabout 120,000 commercial broodstock annually.
• SIS Singapore; 2005- Broodstock multiplication with capacity to produce and ship
about 150,000 commercial broodstock annually.• SIS Hawaii; 2006
- Nucleus Breeding Center for Penaeus monodon, the blacktiger prawn and Penaeus stylirostris, the blue shrimp.
- Broodstock multiplication with capacity to produce and shipabout 250,000 commercial broodstock annually.
• SIS India; 2012- Shrimp hatchery for P Vannamei.
Shrimp Improvement SystemsGenetic Program
Major genetic discoveries based on tracking of genetic lineperformance from strategic alliances with integrated farms,
hatcheries and processing plants
Shrimp Improvement SystemsBreeding Program
• 15 years of commercial genetic improvement and research.• Pure lines selected for specific traits over 20 generations.
• Inter- and intra-familiar selection for growth, disease resistance,reproductive capacity and general hardiness.
• 12 breeding sessions per year, each one with 40 families. 480 full-pedigree families created and evaluated each year.
• Genetic advantage is calculated from the results of field and labperformance tests and pedigree information.
• The best families from each breeding session are used to generatefamilies for the next generation.
• Working on lines that exhibit resistance to multiple pathogens; i.e.TSV and IMNV.
Genetic Family Selection
Original familiesin each breeding session
Families divided intotwo groups
Siblings for disease challenges& field evaluations
Data fromfield evaluations
Disease challenge(off-site)
Discard survivors(never return to NBC)
SPF siblings maintained atNucleus Breeding Center (NBC)
Top performing families
Top families fast-trackedto broodstock
Genetically Improved StocksTo Customers
Phases of SIS Breeding Program
I. MATURATION II. HATCHERY III. NURSERY IV. GROWOUT
~2 Months 1 Month 2 Months 4 to 7 Months
40 g + 0 to PL-20 PL-20 to 8 g 5 to 40 g +
Family selection for Intra and Inter-family Performance testing Inter and intra-familymating rate and selection for for Growth, Disease selection for Growthfecundity hardiness resistance and
general hardiness
Commercial Farm MicrocosmTesting Facilities
Water from commercial production ponds are pumped throughMicrocosm tank system.
Broodstock Quality
Quality factors for broodstock quality are not
clearly defined but rapidly improving.- Genetic pedigree most critical
- Virus free (SPF plus)
- Stabile production conditions from PL to harvest
- Age and size
- Minimum 38g female and 35g male- Acclimation : 4 weeks for 40hr transport stress
2 weeks for 10hr transport stress
Definition of SPF
• Specific Pathogen Free Stock refers to thehealth status of a stock and not a genetic
characteristic. To be SPF a shrimp must befree of all “known” shrimp virus.
• Specific Pathogen Resistant Shrimp refers toa Genetic characteristic- being resistant to aspecific pathogen (not general disease).
• All commercial broodstock are SPR to somedegree but all may not be SPF.
Specific Pathogen Resistance (SPR)
• Resistance comes in the genes, it is NOT developed byexposure to pathogens. Resistance genes are alreadypresent in the genome of the species.
• Selection for disease resistance aims to find andconcentrate these genes in the animal.
• Challenge tests are run on siblings or progeny in orderto gather information. Never on the animals that areused commercial or breeding broodstock.
• By applying these principles, SIS has broodstock whichare virus free, SPF and SPR.
Routine Disease Monitoring
• INDIA, for every shipment , samples are taken and sent toUniversity of Arizona.
• Routinely every 3 months, shrimp samples are collectedfrom SIS facilities.
• Samples are submitted to independent and Governmentrecognized pathology laboratories.
- Dr Don Lightner, University Arizona; Florida, Hawaii, Singapore
- US Federal Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS); Florida- Hawaii State Aquatic Veterinarian Service; Hawaii
- Agri Food and Veterinary Authority Of Singapore; Singapore
• Samples are analyzed for all the diseases and viruses asspecified by USMSFP and OIE.
SIS “Virus Free” Status
• Documented 15 year history of certified SPF status.• Authorized supplier of broodstock and PLs into India,
Indonesia, Thailand, China, Vietnam, Malaysia,Philippines, South Africa, Brazil, Ecuador, Venezuela,Belize, Honduras, Panama, Surinam, Jamaica, Puerto
Rico, Cuba and USA.• Authorized to supply SPF PLs and broodstock to US
growers in Texas, Alabama, and South Carolina.• Annually certified by State of Florida as compliant with
Best Management Practices.
SIS Critical Performance Criteria
SIS Values2006 2014
• Maturation
- Nauplii/female/month 350,000 700-800,000
• Hatchery
- Survival rate 45% 55-75%
• Pond Production
- Growth rate 0.14 g/d 0.18-0.25 g/d
– Survival rate 70-80% 75-85%
– CV size 18% > 12%
Biosecurity is Critical• Biosecurity is all of the procedures used to
protect living organisms from contracting,carrying, and spreading diseases.
• These include Isolation of site, Traffic controlof vehicle and people, Sanitation and Disease
surveillance procedures.• A proven history is the only evidence ofcommitment and dedication to biosecurity.
Biosecurity Protocols at NucleusBreeding Center
• All shrimp reared indoors, protected from birds, crabs and feralanimals.
• Restrict visitors and then everyone entering facility must changeto SIS clothing and foot ware.
• Vehicle tire bath, footbaths and hand washing stations at entryinto each separate culture area.
• Entire facility encircled by chain link fence and crab barriers.
• Water source is a fossil seawater well. Water is aseptic, exceptfor some anaerobic sulfur bacteria.
• All effluents are chlorinated and diverted to dispersion wells. Noeffluent is released into the environment.
INDIA produced broodstocks: F2
• Are local produced broodstocks from a biosecurefacility from maturation to broodstock harvest?
• Without a reliable genetic selection program, what isthe animal performance loss in pond production per
generation? 10%?
• The cost savings of broodstock for the hatchery isinsignificant relative to the risk of farm failure.
• The fastest way to spread and transmit a disease isthrough infected broodstock and PLs. Essential tosecure reliable and consistent source of virus free
broodstock and PLs.
Quality Post Larvae
Quality factors for shrimp post larvae are
routine and common industry knowledge.
- Necrosis
- Deformities
- Luminescent bacteria
- Ectoparasites
- Muscle Clarity
- Size variation
- Activity level
- Gut-muscle ratio
- Chromatophores
- Stress tests
However, there are other factors which also
affect PL quality.
Post Larvae Required Age forGill Development
PL6 gill development not complete. Depends ongrowth rate but between PL8-10.
Gill development required for DO andosmoregulation : minimize stress.
Survival
PL6 78%
PL10 85%
Effect of PL age for salinity stress test:30 ppt to 5 ppt for 2 hours
PL Age Harvested Survival RateTanks
6 5 52
8 3 77
10 7 94
PL quality parameters to PondPerformance
• 2011 - 2013 pond performance data from 18,000harvested ponds (2,500-5,000 m per pond)
• Only ponds which were from one broodstock familyand harvested from one hatchery tank were being
analyzed (9,500 ponds)• Hatchery tanks harvested, 8,500 tanks producing
5-8 million PL10 per tank (55 billion PLs)• PL length and SD/CV adjusted to PL10 parameters
• Growth rate in hatchery (PL ADG) was the PLlength divided by total time
• Harvested biomass adjusted to 100 days in 1 hapond area
Segmentation of HatcheryParameters
• Low category fall approximately about 25% of the lowest data• Medium take approximately 50% of the mid range data High
• High categories were the top 25% of the data
Hatchery Parameter Low (25%) Medium (50%) High (25%)
Hatchery SR (%) SR < 57.7 57.7 ≤ SR < 81 81 ≤ SR < 100
PL Length (mm) Lgth < 8.95 8.95 ≤ Lgth < 9.52 9.52 ≤ Lgth < 11.35
ADG (mm/day) ADG < 0.5688 0.5688 ≤ DG < 0.6175 0.6175 ≤ DG < 0.7129
CV (%) CV < 4.5 4.5 ≤ CV < 6.68 6.68 ≤ CV < 12.45
Pond performance based on survivalrate in hatchery (2010-13)
Hatchery Parameter <58% 58-81% 82-100%
Number of ponds 2,018 4,042 2,012
Biomass (MT/ha) 12.40b 12.53b 12.60a
MBW (g) 18.37b 18.51a 18.59a
ADG 0.184b 0.185a 0.186a
Survival (%) 79.4a 79.4a 79.0a
High hatchery SR produces better biomass, MBW and ADG inponds but not affect survival rate.
Pond performance based on PL10length in hatchery (2010-13)
Hatchery Parameter <8.95 8.95-9.52 9.53-11.35
Number of ponds 2,012 4,431 2,083
Biomass (MT/ha) 12.44b 12.47b 12.74a
MBW (g) 18.33b 18.39b 18.86a
ADG 0.183b 0.184b 0.189a
Survival (%) 79.1a 79.4a 79.4a
PL10 Length does have positive correlation with pond performance butno affect on survival.
Pond performance based on growth(ADG) in hatchery (2010-13)
Hatchery Parameter <0.57 0.57-0.62 0.63-0.71
Number of ponds 2,063 4,310 2,153
Biomass (MT/ha) 12.24c 12.49b 12.85a
MBW (g) 18.28c 18.43b 18.82a
ADG 0.183c 0.184b 0.188a
Survival (%) 78.8b 79.4a 79.5a
Better animal growth rate in hatchery had positive correlation withpond performance. This correlation was better than PL lengthalone.
Pond performance based on CV inhatchery (2010-13)
Hatchery Parameter <4.5 4.5-6.7 6.8-12.5
Number of ponds 2,146 4,185 2,140
Biomass (MT/ha) 12.69a 12.66a 12.08b
MBW (g) 18.60a 18.54a 18.31b
ADG 0.186a 0.185a 0.183b
Survival (%) 79.5a 79.2a 79.2a
Better animal CV size in the hatchery had positive correlation topond performance but no affect on survival.
Luminescent bacteria affect onhatchery performance (2010-11)
Hatchery Parameter Lumbac No Lumbac
Number of tanks 614 605
Flushed tanks (%) 14.4% 6.0%
Survival (%) 63.19a 62.25a
PL10 length (mm) 9.14b 9.25a
ADG PL10 0.54b 0.55a
CV size PL10 5.38a 5.50a
Compared hatchery tanks were stocked with same family.
Luminescent bacteria affect on pondperformance (2010-11)
Hatchery Parameter Lumbac No Lumbac
Number of ponds 2,305 5,933
Harvested biomass (MT/ha) 10.97b 11.44a
MBW (g) 17.7b 18.2a
ADG 0.177b 0.182a
FCR 1.87b 1.82a
Survival (%) 72.3b 74.6a
Conclusion PL Quality Trials
• Hatchery tank survival rate, PL10 length, PL10 ADG,CV size and luminescent bacteria all affected pond
performance but not pond survival rate.• Pond survival rate is not a reliable pond performance
parameter because difficult to know exactly how PLshave been stocked.
• PLs has been estimated to have 10-20% influence onpond production. Success is highly dependant on
farm management.• All other parameters such as stress tests, necrosis,
gut muscle ratio, etc…. had no correlation to pondperformance.
• All tested PLs were virus free.
Quality Post Larvae
The production of consistent quality post larvaerequires a “Commitment to Quality” and
discipline to implement a quality assuranceprogram.
- Virus free: nauplii, PL3, PL8
- Minimum tank survival rate: 30%
- CV size less than 7
- Minimum ADG: 9 mm PL10
- Luminescent bacteria free
Must reject or flush tank if less than standard.
SIS STRENGTHS & VALUES
• Fast growth• Uniform harvest size
• Resistance to diseases: TSVand increasingly IMNV
• High fecundity• Virus free broodstocks for
15 years