+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Shrine of Faqeerullah Shah Alvi, Shikarpur€¦ · Fayyaz Ali Khan, Craig Von Hagen and Mehdi...

Shrine of Faqeerullah Shah Alvi, Shikarpur€¦ · Fayyaz Ali Khan, Craig Von Hagen and Mehdi...

Date post: 15-Jun-2020
Category:
Upload: others
View: 2 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
55
Transcript
Page 1: Shrine of Faqeerullah Shah Alvi, Shikarpur€¦ · Fayyaz Ali Khan, Craig Von Hagen and Mehdi Bokhari Desktop Publishing: Noman Ali and Sarfaraz Ayub GIS Analyses and Mapping: Imra
Page 2: Shrine of Faqeerullah Shah Alvi, Shikarpur€¦ · Fayyaz Ali Khan, Craig Von Hagen and Mehdi Bokhari Desktop Publishing: Noman Ali and Sarfaraz Ayub GIS Analyses and Mapping: Imra

Shrine of Faqeerullah Shah Alvi, Shikarpur

Page 3: Shrine of Faqeerullah Shah Alvi, Shikarpur€¦ · Fayyaz Ali Khan, Craig Von Hagen and Mehdi Bokhari Desktop Publishing: Noman Ali and Sarfaraz Ayub GIS Analyses and Mapping: Imra

PAKISTAN EMERGENCY SITUATIONAL ANALYSIS

September 2012

“Disaster risk reduction has been a part of USAID’s work for decades. ……..we strive to do so in ways that better assess the threat of hazards, reduce losses, and ultimately protect and save

more people during the next disaster.” Kasey Channell,

Acting Director of the Disaster Response and Mitigation Division of USAID’s Office of U.S. Foreign Disaster Assistance (OFDA)

District Shikarpur

“Disasters can be seen as often as predictable events, requiring forward planning which is integrated in to broader development programs.”

Helen Clark, UNDP Administrator, Bureau of Crisis Preven on and Recovery. Annual Report 2011

Page 4: Shrine of Faqeerullah Shah Alvi, Shikarpur€¦ · Fayyaz Ali Khan, Craig Von Hagen and Mehdi Bokhari Desktop Publishing: Noman Ali and Sarfaraz Ayub GIS Analyses and Mapping: Imra

Credits

Authors:

Naeem Ahmad, Zohaib Omer, Mutee Ul Rehman, Salman Mulk, Sumbal Kazmi, Anne Qureshi, Omer Younus, Zeeshan Nabi Bukhsh, Shazia Kanwal, and Farooq Laghari

Contributors:

Hadya Ali, Dr. Ahmad Ali Malik, Hussain Mughal, Zohaib Fazal, Sadia Ishrat, Pervaiz Ahmed, Khurram Shahid, Shakeel Ahmed and Raheeb Muzaffar

Editorial Reviews:

Fayyaz Ali Khan, Craig Von Hagen and Mehdi Bokhari

Desktop Publishing:

Noman Ali and Sarfaraz Ayub

GIS Analyses and Mapping:

Imra Shaheen, Naveed Alam, Qasim Jan, Jarjaish Hussain, Mubashir Hassan, and Fayyaz Ahmad

Administrative Support:

Wajid Ali

Page 5: Shrine of Faqeerullah Shah Alvi, Shikarpur€¦ · Fayyaz Ali Khan, Craig Von Hagen and Mehdi Bokhari Desktop Publishing: Noman Ali and Sarfaraz Ayub GIS Analyses and Mapping: Imra
Page 6: Shrine of Faqeerullah Shah Alvi, Shikarpur€¦ · Fayyaz Ali Khan, Craig Von Hagen and Mehdi Bokhari Desktop Publishing: Noman Ali and Sarfaraz Ayub GIS Analyses and Mapping: Imra

Disclaimer

iMMAP Pakistan is pleased to publish this district profile. The purpose of this profile is to promote public awareness, welfare, and safety while providing community and other related stakeholders, access to vital information for enhancing their disaster mitigation and response efforts.

While iMMAP team has tried its best to provide proper source of information and ensure consistency in analyses within the given time limits; iMMAP shall not be held responsible for any inaccuracies that may be encountered. In any situation where the Official Public Records differs from the information provided in this district profile, the Official Public Records should take as precedence.

iMMAP disclaims any responsibility and makes no representations or warranties as to the quality, accuracy, content, or completeness of any information contained in this report. Final assessment of accuracy and reliability of information is the responsibility of the user.

iMMAP shall not be liable for damages of any nature whatsoever resulting from the use or misuse of information contained in this report. The user agrees to indemnify and hold harmless iMMAP and anyone involved in storing, retrieving, or displaying this information for any damage of any type that may be caused by using this information.

The terms used and the maps presented in this profile do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of iMMAP and USAID concerning the legal status and the area of any administrative unit or its authorities.

NOTE:

This district profile is a live document and it will continue to improve based on its users feedback and upon availability of more accurate and authenticated sources as and when they become available. It’s not always possible to publish these profiles in hardcopy format; however iMMAP will ensure that these updates are made available on DRR Pakistan Information Management Portal. For updated version of following profile, please visit www.drrpakistan.pk/pesa.

Any questions/ comments concerning information presented in this report can be addressed to:

iMMAP Pakistan Services Desk

H.# 25, College Road, F-7/2, Islamabad, Pakistan Tel: +92.51.835.0755

eMail: [email protected]

Page 7: Shrine of Faqeerullah Shah Alvi, Shikarpur€¦ · Fayyaz Ali Khan, Craig Von Hagen and Mehdi Bokhari Desktop Publishing: Noman Ali and Sarfaraz Ayub GIS Analyses and Mapping: Imra

Foreword

Timely response to a disaster may save precious human lives and reduce economic costs. However, natural disasters, typically, occur unexpectedly. Consequently, in most cases, the afflicted population lacks the necessary tools and capacity to handle such tragic occurrences and the devastation is manifold more than it should be. “Before the next disaster hits, now is the time to recommit to making smart investments that save lives, property, and money. Whether at home or abroad, measures to improve response, increase disaster management capacity, plan and prepare, can have dramatic dividends.” (Kasey Channell: Acting Director of the Disaster Response Team for USAID’s Office of U.S. Foreign Disaster Assistance.) It is so true, as preparation for unexpected calamities is a tough task. However, if certain precautions are taken, they might lessen the overall damage. This series of district profiles, prepared by iMMAP and funded by USAID, is one such effort to enhance Government of Pakistan, humanitarian organizations and all other stakeholders’ efforts towards rapid needs assessment, disaster response and mitigation. These profiles are divided into four sections namely background information, disaster history and its impact, hazard vulnerability and capacity assessment (HVCA) and coordination and support services. Background information provides an overview of history, geography, culture, and communication infrastructure. It also provides detailed analyses of demography, livelihood, food security, health and education. The second section provides detailed history of disasters in the district; information about losses and damages; and gap analyses of above mentioned sectors. HVCA section provides detailed analyses of district hazards, vulnerabilities and capacities that exist in the local community. Coordination and support services section gives information on whom to contact in emergency/disaster situations. The motivation stems from the idea that at the time of disaster all the stakeholders in general and the donors and disaster managers in particular can have a fair idea of what to expect and how to prepare for. It is expected that this contribution of USAID and iMMAP would lead to a well-coordinated and coherent response by different humanitarian organization on managing similar disasters. Having stated the above, it is very candidly admitted that these profiles are by no means exhaustive and in fact require a lot more input to qualify these as good enough documents for disaster preparedness. However, these are live documents and would be improved upon as and when required. There appears to be an element of repetition, which is owed to the fact that while these documents depict the district profiles in normal circumstances, the same then provide a detail account of the impact of the 2010/2011 floods, the assistance provided by the government and the humanitarian organizations and the remaining gaps. While selecting districts, priority has been given to National Disaster Management Authority (NDMA) identified disaster prone districts for 2012. Due to time and resources constraints, the information provided in these profiles is mainly based on secondary source data. Depending on the end users’ response and funding availability, this exercise would be extended to other districts of the country.

Major (Rtd.) Tahir Iqbal Chairman

iMMAP Pakistan

Page 8: Shrine of Faqeerullah Shah Alvi, Shikarpur€¦ · Fayyaz Ali Khan, Craig Von Hagen and Mehdi Bokhari Desktop Publishing: Noman Ali and Sarfaraz Ayub GIS Analyses and Mapping: Imra

Table of Contents District at a Glance ........................................................................................................................... i

Shikarpur Reference Map ................................................................................................................ii

Acronyms ........................................................................................................................................ iii

1 Background Information ................................................................ ................................ 1

1.1 Introduction...................................................................................................................... 1

1.1.1 History ....................................................................................................................... 1

1.1.2 Geography ................................................................................................................. 1

1.1.3 Culture (Ethnicity, Religion and Politics) ................................................................... 2

1.1.4 Administrative Division ............................................................................................. 2

1.1.5 Road Network Infrastructure .................................................................................... 3

1.1.6 Irrigation.................................................................................................................... 3

1.1.7 Solid Waste Management ......................................................................................... 4

1.2 Demography ..................................................................................................................... 5

1.2.1 Population Characteristics ........................................................................................ 5

1.2.2 Population Growth Pattern ....................................................................................... 6

1.2.3 Population Distribution by Age and Gender ............................................................. 6

1.2.4 Dependent Population .............................................................................................. 6

Population Reference Map ..................................................................................................... 8

1.3 Livelihood ......................................................................................................................... 9

1.3.1 Main Sources of Livelihood/Income ......................................................................... 9

1.3.2 Agriculture .............................................................................................................. 10

1.3.3 Industry ................................................................................................................... 11

1.3.4 Livestock .................................................................................................................. 12

1.4 Food Security .................................................................................................................. 13

1.4.1 Availability ............................................................................................................... 13

1.4.2 Access ...................................................................................................................... 14

1.4.3 Utilization ................................................................................................................ 15

1.5 Health ............................................................................................................................. 16

1.5.1 Details of Health Facilities ....................................................................................... 16

Shikarpur Health Facility Map ............................................................................................... 17

1.6 Education ........................................................................................................................ 18

Page 9: Shrine of Faqeerullah Shah Alvi, Shikarpur€¦ · Fayyaz Ali Khan, Craig Von Hagen and Mehdi Bokhari Desktop Publishing: Noman Ali and Sarfaraz Ayub GIS Analyses and Mapping: Imra

1.6.1 Some Highlights ...................................................................................................... 18

1.6.2 District School Enrolment Ratio .............................................................................. 18

1.6.3 Gender and Level Wise Details ............................................................................... 19

2 Disaster History and Its Impact ............................................................................................. 22

2.1 Disaster in Shikarpur ...................................................................................................... 22

2.1.1 Disaster History ....................................................................................................... 22

Shikarpur Risk Analysis Map ................................................................................................. 23

Shikarpur Possible Safe Locations Map ................................................................................ 24

2.2 Disaster Impact............................................................................................................... 25

2.2.1 Demography ............................................................................................................ 25

Affected Population Density Map ......................................................................................... 27

2.2.2 Livelihood ................................................................................................................ 28

2.2.3 Damage to Agriculture: ........................................................................................... 28

2.2.4 Analysis of Food Security Situation ......................................................................... 31

2.2.5 Health ...................................................................................................................... 31

2.2.6 Education ................................................................................................................ 32

3 Hazard Vulnerability and Capacity Analysis .......................................................................... 33

3.1 Hazard ............................................................................................................................ 33

3.1.1 Natural hazard ........................................................................................................ 33

3.1.2 Man-made hazard ................................................................................................... 33

3.2 Vulnerability ................................................................................................................... 34

3.2.1 Physical/material vulnerability: .............................................................................. 34

3.2.2 Social/organizational vulnerability: ........................................................................ 34

3.2.3 Attitudinal/motivational vulnerability: ................................................................... 34

3.3 Capacity .......................................................................................................................... 36

3.3.1 Physical/material capacity: ..................................................................................... 36

3.3.2 Social /organizational capacity: .............................................................................. 36

3.3.3 Attitudinal/motivational capacity: .......................................................................... 36

Hazard Analysis Map ............................................................................................................. 39

4 Coordination and Support Services ...................................................................................... 40

4.1 Important Contacts ........................................................................................................ 40

4.1.1 Departmental Focal Points ..................................................................................... 40

4.1.2 List of Taluka Nazims with Address......................................................................... 40

Page 10: Shrine of Faqeerullah Shah Alvi, Shikarpur€¦ · Fayyaz Ali Khan, Craig Von Hagen and Mehdi Bokhari Desktop Publishing: Noman Ali and Sarfaraz Ayub GIS Analyses and Mapping: Imra

4.1.3 List of NGOs Working in Shikarpur ......................................................................... 40

4.2 Health Facilities .............................................................................................................. 41

4.2.1 List of BHUs ............................................................................................................. 41

4.2.2 List of RHCs.............................................................................................................. 42

4.2.3 List of Dispensaries ................................................................................................. 42

4.2.4 List of Hospitals ....................................................................................................... 42

4.2.5 List of Maternal and Child Health Centres .............................................................. 42

Page 11: Shrine of Faqeerullah Shah Alvi, Shikarpur€¦ · Fayyaz Ali Khan, Craig Von Hagen and Mehdi Bokhari Desktop Publishing: Noman Ali and Sarfaraz Ayub GIS Analyses and Mapping: Imra

List of Tables and Maps List of Tables

SR # Name Page 1.1.1 Administrative Division of District Shikarpur 3 1.1.2 Road Network Infrastructure of District Shikarpur 3 1.1.3 Mouzas Reporting Sources of Irrigation 4 1.2.1 Estimated Population of District Shikarpur for 2010 5 1.2.2 Population Details by Taluka 7 1.3.1 Number of Mouzas Reporting Sources of Employment 9 1.3.2 Food and cash crops cultivated in district Shikarpur 10 1.4.1 Number of Mouza Reporting Major Crops 13

1.4.2 Distance of Mouzas from Wholesale Markets 14

1.4.3 Percentage Distribution of HH by Source of Drinking Water 15

1.4.4 Percentage Distribution of HH by Type of Toilet 15

1.5.1 Number of Health Facilities by Type 16 1.6.1 Gross and Net Enrolment Rates by Gender and Locality at Different levels 18 1.6.2 Enrolment and Educational Facilities by level and Gender 20 2.2.1 Summary of Losses and Damages 25 2.2.2 Summary of Losses and Damages by Taluka for 2010 25 2.2.3 Crop Area Affected in District Shikarpur 28

List of Maps 1 Shikarpur Reference Map ii 2 Population Reference Map 8 3 Shikarpur Health Facility Map 17 4 Shikarpur Risk Analysis Map 22 5 Shikarpur Possible Safe Location Map 23 6 Affected Population Density Map 26 7 Hazard Analysis Map 38

Page 12: Shrine of Faqeerullah Shah Alvi, Shikarpur€¦ · Fayyaz Ali Khan, Craig Von Hagen and Mehdi Bokhari Desktop Publishing: Noman Ali and Sarfaraz Ayub GIS Analyses and Mapping: Imra

i

District at a Glance Area 2,5121 Sq.Kms. Population - 1998 880,438 persons

Male 456,589 (51.86 %) Female 423,849 (48.14 %)

Sex Ratio (males per 100 females) 107.7 Population Density 350.5 per Sq. Km

Urban Population 211,979 (24.08 %) Rural Population 668,459 (75.42 %)

Average Household Size 5.9 Literacy Ratio (10 +) 31.9 %

Male 44.95 % Female 18.04 %

Population - 1981 596,409 persons Average Annual Growth Rate (1981 - 98) 2.32 % Total Housing Units 149,758

Pacca Housing Units 20,849 (13.92 %) Housing Units having Electricity 104,794 (69.97 %)

Housing Units having Piped Water 30,389 (20.29 %) Housing Units using Gas for Cooking 20,368 (13.60 %)

Administrative Units Talukas 04

Union Councils 47 Mauzas 2401

Municipal Committee 01 Town Committees 06

Registered Voters2 487,227 Male 257,456

Female 229,771

1 Current Area according to UN is 2,589 Km2 and total revenue villages are 222 2 http://www.ecp.gov.pk/VoterStats/Sindh.aspx

Page 13: Shrine of Faqeerullah Shah Alvi, Shikarpur€¦ · Fayyaz Ali Khan, Craig Von Hagen and Mehdi Bokhari Desktop Publishing: Noman Ali and Sarfaraz Ayub GIS Analyses and Mapping: Imra

ii

Map

dat

a so

urce

(s):

PCO

(Pop

ulai

on C

ensu

s O

rgan

izat

ion)

: Bou

ndar

ies

WFP

(Wor

ld F

ood

Prog

ram

me)

: Roa

ds, R

ailw

ays

WH

O (W

orld

Hea

lth O

rgan

izat

ion)

: Hea

lth F

acili

ties

ESR

I: R

iver

sG

eorg

ia U

nive

rsity

: Shi

karp

ur S

ettle

men

ts

Dis

clai

mer

s:Th

e de

sign

atio

ns

empl

oyed

an

d th

e pr

esen

tatio

n of

mat

eria

l on

this

map

do

not

impl

y th

e ex

pres

sion

of

any

opin

ion

wha

tsoe

ver

on t

he p

art

of

iMM

AP o

r th

e U

SAID

conc

erni

ng th

e le

gal s

tatu

s of

any

cou

ntry

, ter

ritor

y, c

ity o

rar

ea o

r of

its

auth

oriti

es, o

r co

ncer

ning

the

delim

itatio

n of

its fr

ontie

rs o

r bou

ndar

ies.

Map

Doc

Nam

e:

Cre

atio

n D

ate:

Proj

ectio

n/D

atum

:W

eb R

esou

rces

:N

omin

al S

cale

at A

4:1:

30,0

00,0

00

iM

MAP

_Shi

karp

ur_R

efer

ence

_Map

A4L

_v1_

01

Sept

embe

r,16

, 201

2W

GS8

4ht

tp://

ww

w.im

map

.org

Jaco

baba

d

Jaffa

raba

d

Gar

hiYa

sin

Kha

npur

Lakh

i

Shik

arpu

r

Amro

te

Bham

bhir

Dak

han

Gah

ejaG

arhi

Yasi

n

Jind

oD

ero

Mad

eji

Mirz

apur

Nau

shah

roAb

ro

Nim

Shha

toM

angi

War

yaso

Gar

hiTe

gho

Gha

riD

hako

Meh

moo

daBa

gh

Mia

nSa

hib

Pir B

uxSh

ujra

hR

ahim

abad

Shab

iraAb

adTh

anhr

io

Zark

hel Ab

doo

Bhirk

an

Cha

kJe

han

Khan

Lakh

i

Ruk

Rus

tam

Sehw

ani

Taib

Waz

iraba

d

Ham

ayun

Jaga

nJa

hanw

ah

Jano

Kara

n

Lodr

a

Sulta

nKo

t

Indi

a

Paki

stan

Iran

Afgh

anis

tan

Uzb

ekis

tan

Turk

men

ista

n

Arab

ian

Sea

Tajik

ista

n

Dis

pute

d Te

rrito

ry

Punj

ab

Balo

chis

tan

Sind

h

Fata

Chi

na

Gilg

it Ba

ltist

anKP

K Azad

Kas

hmir

Map

Loc

ator

Dis

tric

t Shi

karp

ur R

efer

ence

Map

Sept

embe

r, 20

12

Lege

nd Dis

trict

Bou

ndar

y

Uni

on C

ounc

ils B

ound

ary

Talu

ka B

ound

ary

Rai

lway

Lin

e

Riv

ers

Roa

ds

Settl

emen

ts

Hea

lth F

acilit

ies

! CBA

SIC

HEA

LTH

UN

IT! C

DIS

PEN

SAR

Y! C

HO

SPIT

AL! <

MAT

ER

NAL

& C

HIL

D H

EAL

TH C

ENTR

E! C

RU

RAL

HEA

LTH

CEN

TRE

! ASU

B H

EALT

H C

ENTR

E! A

TB C

LIN

IC

Page 14: Shrine of Faqeerullah Shah Alvi, Shikarpur€¦ · Fayyaz Ali Khan, Craig Von Hagen and Mehdi Bokhari Desktop Publishing: Noman Ali and Sarfaraz Ayub GIS Analyses and Mapping: Imra

Acronymsiii

ACO Agriculture Census Organization BHU Basic Health Unit CFW Cash For Work DCR District Census Report DDRMP District Disaster Risk Management Plan ECP Election Commission of Pakistan FAO Food and Agricultural Organization GER Gross Enrolment Rate GOS Government of Sindh GoS Government of Sindh HH Household NADRA National Database and Registration Authority NDMA National Disaster Management Authority NDP National Drainage Programme NER Net Enrolment Rate NFIs Non-Food Items NGO Non-Governmental Organization NHA National Highway Authority PBS Pakistan Bureau of Statistics PCO Population Census Organization PDMA Provincial Disaster Management Authority PLW Pregnant and Lactating Women PSLM Pakistan Social and Living Standard Measurement Survey RHC Rural Health Centre RSU Reform Support Unit SDPI Sustainable Development Policy Institute SMCs School Member Committees SUPARCO Space and Upper Atmosphere Research Commission UC Union Council UNICEF United Nations Children's Fund UNOCHA United Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs WFP World Food Programme WHO World Health Organization

Page 15: Shrine of Faqeerullah Shah Alvi, Shikarpur€¦ · Fayyaz Ali Khan, Craig Von Hagen and Mehdi Bokhari Desktop Publishing: Noman Ali and Sarfaraz Ayub GIS Analyses and Mapping: Imra

DISTRICT SHIKARPUR1

1 Background Information 1.1 Introduction

1.1.1 History Around 400 years ago, the area of district Shikarpur used to be a forests near Indus River, inundated with waters. Mehr and Jatoi Tribes used to visit this area for hunting purposes. Since this region was used for hunting (shikar), so it was named accordingly as Shikarpur . Two Abbasi families, Kalhoro and Daudpota, ruled Sindh for long time. Abbasi are of Arabic origin and descent from Abbas ibn Abd al-Muttalib (566 – 662) a paternal uncle and Sahabi (companion) of Prophet Muhammad (PBUH) as well as a progenitor of the Abbasi Khalifa of Baghdad and Qahira. Sultan Ahmad II, son of Shah Muzammil of Egypt left that country and arrived in Sindh with a large following of Arabs ca. 1370. He married the daughter of Raja Rai Dhorang Sahta and received a third of the country in dowry. Amir Fathu'llah Khan Abbasi, is the recognized ancestor of the dynasty. Afterwards, the leadership of the tribe was contested between two branches of the family, the Daudpota and the Kalhoro. Amir Bahadur Khan Abbasi abandoned Tarai and settled near Bhakkar, founding the town of Shikarpur in 1690.

Shikarpur is historically significant district and used to be the main hub of cultural and business venture for the passengers coming from Asia Minor, Kabul, Qandhaar, Tashkent, and Bukhara. The city of Shikarpur also had trade contacts with Baghdad, Bombay, Kolkatta and China. Before the British rule, Sindh has three major districts - Hyderabad, Shikarpur, and Karachi. Shikarpur was announced as a district in 1843. During this period Reserve Bank of India was also established in Shikarpur city. This building still exists in the city.

People of this district participated significantly in the Independence Movement, Tehreek-e-Khilafat and also Raishmi Romaal Tehreek . When Sindh was given the status of separate province in 1937; Sir Ghulam Hussain Hayatullah from Shikarpur was appointed as the first Chief Minister of the province. Later he was also appointed as first Governor of Sindh on Aug. 14, 1947.

1.1.2 Geography Shikarpur district is bounded on the north by Talukas Jacobabad, Thuland and Kandhkot of district Jacobabad, on the south by river Indus and Khairpur, on the west by district Larkana and on the east by Indus River and Sukher district. The district lies from 27o-38' to 28o-10' north latitudes and 68o-16' to 69o-05' east longitudes.

Shikarpur district is a plain formed by the river Indus. There are no mountains or hills formations in Shikarpur district. The land gently slopes from north-west to south east. The general elevation of the land surface varies from about 50 to 100 meters above sea level.

Page 16: Shrine of Faqeerullah Shah Alvi, Shikarpur€¦ · Fayyaz Ali Khan, Craig Von Hagen and Mehdi Bokhari Desktop Publishing: Noman Ali and Sarfaraz Ayub GIS Analyses and Mapping: Imra

BACKGROUND INFORMATION2

The district witnesses extremes of climate. The summer season commences from April and continues till October. May, June and July are the hottest months. The mean maximum and minimum temperatures during this period are about 42c and 28c respectively. The months of August and September become stuffy and suffocating. The mean maximum and minimum temperature during the winter months of December, January and February is about 24c and 9c respectively.

1.1.3 Culture (Ethnicity, Religion and Politics) Shikarpur has been the seat of civilisation, culture, trade and commerce. It acquired political and economic importance because of its strategic location on the map of Sindh, being directly accessible to those who came from Central and West Asia through the Bolan Pass. As per the 1998 census of the country, Shikarpur district had a population of 0.880 Million out of which 0.212 million (24%) was urban. Majority of the population is Muslim i.e. 98.03%, following the minorities of Hindus 1.8% and Christians 0.09%. Hindus form 6.14% of the urban population of the district. Sindhi is the most commonly spoken language in the district as it is spoken by 95.7% of the population. Other languages like Urdu, Balochi, Punjabi, Serayki and Pashto are also spoken3.

Shikarpur is famous for its Aachar (pickle) and sweets from Mola Bukhsh Memon. It has a large market and manufactures of cotton, cloth and pottery. The city has rich history and cultural heritage. Shikarpur used to be called "Paris of East" because of its modern buildings built on the pattern of Shanzelize and its Perfume (Ittar) industry4.

Pakistan People Party Parliamentarians (PPPP), Pakistan Muslim League (Q), National People Party and nationalist parties are prominent in the political arena of this district. However, PPPP is the most influential in this district and have won majority of the seats in national and provincial assemblies in the last elections5.

1.1.4 Administrative Division District Shikarpur consists of four talukas namely, Shikarpur, Garhi Yasin, Lakhi and Khan Pur. These 4 talukas spread over 245 Dehs. Thirteen (13) Dehs house of more than five thousand population and 86 Dehs house between one to two thousand populations each, and remaining 146 dehs have less than one thousand populations in each. There are seven urban localities (one municipal committee and six town committees) and 33 Union Coun cils in the district.

3 http://visitorsheaven.com/Shikarpur.php 4 http://www.shikarpurcitizensclub.com/urdu-articles/about-shikarpur-urdu.html 5 http://www2.ecp.gov.pk/vsite/ElectionResult/Search.aspx?constituency=PA&constituencyid=PS-11

Page 17: Shrine of Faqeerullah Shah Alvi, Shikarpur€¦ · Fayyaz Ali Khan, Craig Von Hagen and Mehdi Bokhari Desktop Publishing: Noman Ali and Sarfaraz Ayub GIS Analyses and Mapping: Imra

DISTRICT SHIKARPUR3

Table 1.1.1: Administrative Division of District Shikarpur

Shikarpur

Knungo Circles/

Supervisory Tapas

Patwar Circles/

Tapas

Number of Mouzas

Total Rural Urban Partly urban Forest Un-

populated SHIKARPUR TALUKA 3 13 49 45 2 2 - KHANPUR TALUKA 3 13 52 48 2 1 1 - GARHI YASIN TALUKA 4 25 93 88 2 3 - LAKHI TALUKA 3 13 51 44 2 4 1 - TOTAL 13 64 245 225 6 9 5 -

Source: Mouza Statistics of Sindh 2008, Agriculture Census Organization

1.1.5 Road Network Infrastructure District Shikarpur, with an area of 2640 square kilometres, has a population of 880,000. It is divided in four "talukas": Shikarpur, Lakhi, Garhi Yasin and Khanpur. Its borders meet with districts of Larkana, Jacobabad, Khairpur, and Sukkur. Two National Highways (N-65 & N-55) intersect in the city of Shikarpur, so it can well be termed as, one of the junction points of the four provinces.

The existing road network in Shikarpur district is fairly good. The district headquarter of Shikarpur is connected with its taluka headquarters of Khanpur, Garhi Yasin and Lakhi through metalled roads. Shikarpur is connected through railway line with Jacobabad in the North Larkana in the south west and Sukkur in the south east.

The district has a total road length of 920.0 kilometres, including 125 kilometres of National Highways and 195 kilometres of Provincial Highways. It is, thus, deficient in road density6 (0.35 km/Km2) compared with recognized international parameters of development (1 km/Km2). During the last few years, creeping development activity has taken pace and 71 kilometres of road, 94 schools and a number of schemes in drainage, health and other sectors have been completed, under various programs.

Table 1.1.2: Road Network Infrastructure of District Shikarpur District

Route via

Distance from Shikarpur

Shikarpur to Hyderabad Indus Highway N55 66 km Shikarpur to Karachi Hyderabad Motorway N05 519 km Shikarpur to DG Khan Indus Highway N55 341 km Shikarpur to Quetta N65 355 Km

Source: Sindh Development Institute

1.1.6 Irrigation Agriculture, in Shikarpur, mainly depends upon canal irrigation. However, other modes of land irrigation like pumps and tube wells are also used. Table 1.1.6.1, given below, shows the total 6 Number of kilometers of road in 1 km2

Page 18: Shrine of Faqeerullah Shah Alvi, Shikarpur€¦ · Fayyaz Ali Khan, Craig Von Hagen and Mehdi Bokhari Desktop Publishing: Noman Ali and Sarfaraz Ayub GIS Analyses and Mapping: Imra

BACKGROUND INFORMATION4

irrigated area of district Shikarpur by different modes of irrigation. Out of 234 rural mouzas, 211 (90%) are irrigated with the help of canals. Tube well Irrigation is also common in 94 mouzas which constitutes 40% of the total rural mouzas. Most of the area is being irrigated by Canals and Tube Wells. However, the rest is irrigated by mixed mode i.e. however, rive irrigation and arid lands are also prevalent in this district.

Table1.1.3: Mouzas Reporting Sources of Irrigation

1.1.7 Solid Waste Management According to World Health Organization, waste is defined as any substance or object arising from human or animal activities that has to be discarded as ‘unwanted’ (Economopoulos, 1993). Solid waste consists of the discarded portion of household material, dead animal remains, trade, commercial, agriculture & industrial waste and other large waste like debris from construction site, furniture etc.

All urban localities are covered with Drainage, sewerage or open pacca drain system in district Shikarpur. Twelve (12) schemes have been completed up to June 1997 and 2 schemes with estimated cost of Rs. 24.261 million are under implementation. Since enough water is available according to local requirements due to the availability of ground water in large area of district, it will necessary to provide more drainage schemes when compared to water supply schemes.

ADMINISTRATIVE UNIT RURAL

POPULATED MOUZAS

NUMBERS OF MOUZAS REPORTING SOURCE OF IRRIGATION

CANAL RIVER TUBEWELL

/WELL RAVI

NE

SPRING/STREAM/K

AREZ

ARID(BARANI)

FLOODING/TOR

RENT SHIKARPUR DISTRICT

NUMBER 234 211 22 94 0 0 6 1 PERCENT 100 90% 9% 40% 0% 0% 3% 0%

SHUKIKARPUR TALUKA

NUMBER 47 47 1 26 0 0 0 PERCENT 100 100% 100% 2% 55% 0% 0% 0%

KHANPUR TALUKA

NUMBER 49 41 13 44 0 0 0 0 PERCENT 100 84% 27% 90% 0% 0% 0% 0%

GARHI YASIN TALUKA

NUMBER 90 90 0 5 0 0 0 1 PERCENT 100 100% 0% 6% 0% 0% 0% 1%

LAKHI TALUKA NUMBER 48 33 8 19 0 0 6 0 PERCENT 100 69% 17% 40% 0% 0% 13% 0%

Source: Mouza Statistics of Sindh 2008, Agriculture Census Organization

Page 19: Shrine of Faqeerullah Shah Alvi, Shikarpur€¦ · Fayyaz Ali Khan, Craig Von Hagen and Mehdi Bokhari Desktop Publishing: Noman Ali and Sarfaraz Ayub GIS Analyses and Mapping: Imra

5DISTRICT SHIKARPUR

1.2 Demography

1.2.1 Population Characteristics Pakistan is among those countries where the male population is more than female population. One probable reason of this ratio could be underreporting of females during national surveys. Pakistan is among those four countries where life expectancy for female at birth is less than that of males7. Sex ratio in Shikarpur is 108 male per 100 females; this is more than the ratio at National level which is 1068. Though there could be other possible reasons for such a difference in male to female ratio, such as very high maternal mortality rate9 (0.5 for Sindh; second highest at national level) is likely to be instrumental for a great fall in number of women and poor health care at district and province level10. District Shikarpur is rural by its characteristics like majority of districts in Sindh. Seventy six (76) percent of the population resides in rural area and only 24% of the population resides in urban areas.

Table 1.2.1: Estimated Population of District Shikarpur for 2010 AGE GROUP

(IN YEARS) TOTAL RURAL URBAN

BOTH SEXES MALE FEMALE BOTH SEXES MALE FEMALE BOTH SEXES MALE FEMALE ALL AGES 1,182,407 613,188 569,219 897,724 466,150 431,575 284,683 147,038 137,644 00 -- 04 201,493 101,701 99,793 159,959 80,834 79,125 41,534 20,867 20,667 05 -- 09 204,781 110,734 94,047 159,723 87,448 72,275 45,058 23,286 21,772 10 -- 14 136,065 77,893 58,172 99,536 58,317 41,219 36,529 19,575 16,954 15 -- 19 119,725 59,839 59,886 87,843 43,565 44,278 31,882 16,274 15,608 20 -- 24 104,663 49,678 54,985 78,751 36,873 41,878 25,913 12,805 13,107 25 -- 29 88,395 44,123 44,271 67,352 33,302 34,050 21,043 10,822 10,221 30 -- 34 70,971 36,412 34,559 53,281 27,001 26,281 17,690 9,412 8,278 35 -- 39 57,180 29,402 27,778 43,097 21,916 21,181 14,082 7,486 6,597 40 -- 44 50,211 24,787 25,424 37,336 18,286 19,050 12,875 6,501 6,374 45 -- 49 38,482 19,657 18,824 28,639 14,520 14,119 9,843 5,137 4,706 50 -- 54 34,853 18,651 16,202 26,157 14,100 12,057 8,696 4,551 4,144 55 -- 59 20,940 10,889 10,051 15,090 7,741 7,349 5,850 3,148 2,702 60 -- 64 22,933 12,554 10,379 17,257 9,524 7,733 5,675 3,030 2,646 65 -- 69 11,199 5,776 5,423 8,120 4,161 3,959 3,079 1,616 1,464 70 -- 74 11,070 6,127 4,943 8,467 4,793 3,674 2,603 1,334 1,269 75 & ABOVE 9,446 4,965 4,482 7,116 3,770 3,347 2,330 1,195 1,135

Source: Estimated on the basis of table 4, Census Report 1998

7 A profile for District Badin, 2009. South-Asia Partnership Pakistan 8 Labour Force Survey 2010-11: Pakistan Bureau of Statistics 9 Pakistan Demographic and Health Survey, 2006-07: National Institute of Population Studies, Pakistan. pp. 179 10 Mean distance from hospital/dispensary is 12 km for Sindh: Pakistan Mouza Statistics, Table 15

Page 20: Shrine of Faqeerullah Shah Alvi, Shikarpur€¦ · Fayyaz Ali Khan, Craig Von Hagen and Mehdi Bokhari Desktop Publishing: Noman Ali and Sarfaraz Ayub GIS Analyses and Mapping: Imra

DEMOGRAPHY6

880

,438

901

,787

923

,759

946

,373

969

,651

993

,612

1,0

18,2

79

1,0

43,6

74

1,0

69,8

20

1,0

96,7

41

1,1

24,4

62

1,1

53,0

08

1,1

82,4

07

1,2

12,6

85

1,2

43,8

70

-

200,000

400,000

600,000

800,000

1,000,000

1,200,000

1,400,000

1998

1999

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011

2012

Population Growth Pattern

8.6% 9.4%

6.6% 5.1%

4.2% 3.7%

3.1% 2.5%

2.1% 1.7% 1.6%

0.9% 1.1%

0.5% 0.5% 0.4%

8.4% 8.0%

4.9% 5.1%

4.7% 3.7%

2.9% 2.3%

2.2% 1.6%

1.4% 0.9% 0.9%

0.5% 0.4% 0.4%

1-45-9

10-1415-1920-2425-2930-3435-3940-4445-4950-5455-5960-6465-6970-74

75+

FEMALE MALE

Dependent 48.55%

Labor Force 51.45%

Dependent Population percent

1.2.2 Population Growth Pattern

Total population in 1998 was 880,438. Population of District Shikarpur is categorized by a high growth rate of 2.32% per annum which simply means that population will double itself in next 30.17 years11 from 1998. 45.87 % of the population is below 15 years and 2.68 % is 65 years or above. The estimated population for 2010 is 1,182,407 showing a 31% in 12 years from 1998.

1.2.3 Population Distribution by Age and Gender

Out of the total population, 52 % are males and 48 % are females. Largest cohort of population is 5-9 years which decreases with 5 years interval. Except age groups 15-19, 20-24, 25-29 and 40-44 in all rest of the age groups, male population out numbers female population.

1.2.4 Dependent Population The economically dependent population is considered to be the population less than 15 years and more than 65 years. In addition to them widowed, and/or divorced women are also considered dependent population. Dependent population in case of Shikarpur District is 48.55 % of the total population whereas the working 11 Rule of 70 http://controlgrowth.org/double.htm

Page 21: Shrine of Faqeerullah Shah Alvi, Shikarpur€¦ · Fayyaz Ali Khan, Craig Von Hagen and Mehdi Bokhari Desktop Publishing: Noman Ali and Sarfaraz Ayub GIS Analyses and Mapping: Imra

7DISTRICT SHIKARPUR

population is 51.45 % only. Which shows that dependency ratio in the district is 94 %.

Table 1.2.3: Population Details by Taluka

Taluka Population Male Female Pop

Density Sex Ratio

Average HH Size

Estimated HHs

GARHI YASIN TALUKA 312,747 161,824 150,923 322 107 5.2 55,848 KHANPUR TALUKA 303,015 158,284 144,731 482 109 4.7 58,272 LAKHI TALUKA 202,312 104,093 98,218 576 106 4.9 34,881 SHIKARPUR TALUKA 364,333 189,355 174,978 649 108 4.7 53,578 Total 1,182,407 613,556 568,851 471 108 5.9 202,580

Source: Estimated on the Basis of Table 01 District Census Report Shikarpur 1998

Page 22: Shrine of Faqeerullah Shah Alvi, Shikarpur€¦ · Fayyaz Ali Khan, Craig Von Hagen and Mehdi Bokhari Desktop Publishing: Noman Ali and Sarfaraz Ayub GIS Analyses and Mapping: Imra

DEMOGRAPHY8

Map

dat

a so

urce

(s):

PCO

(Pop

ulai

on C

ensu

s O

rgan

izat

ion)

: Bou

ndar

ies

Popu

latio

n C

ensu

s 19

98: T

aluk

a-w

ise

popu

latio

n D

ensi

ty(E

stim

ated

)

Dis

clai

mer

s:Th

e de

sign

atio

ns

empl

oyed

an

d th

e pr

esen

tatio

n of

mat

eria

l on

this

map

do

not

impl

y th

e ex

pres

sion

of

any

opin

ion

wha

tsoe

ver

on t

he p

art o

f iM

MA

P or

the

USA

IDco

ncer

ning

the

lega

l sta

tus

of a

ny c

ount

ry, t

errit

ory,

city

or

area

or

of it

s au

thor

ities

, or

conc

erni

ng th

e de

limita

tion

ofits

fron

tiers

or b

ound

arie

s.

Map

Doc

Nam

e:

Cre

atio

n D

ate:

Proj

ectio

n/D

atum

:W

eb R

esou

rces

:N

omin

al S

cale

at A

4:1:

30,0

00,0

00

iM

MAP

_Shi

karp

ur_P

opul

atio

n D

ensi

tyA4

L_v1

_01

Sept

embe

r,16

, 201

2W

GS8

4ht

tp://

ww

w.im

map

.org

Jaco

baba

d

Kas

hmor

e

Kha

irpur

Lark

ana

Shik

arpu

r

Sukk

ur

Gar

hiYa

sin

Kha

npur

Lakh

i

Shik

arpu

r

322

482

576

649

Indi

a

Paki

stan

Iran

Afgh

anis

tan

Uzb

ekis

tan

Turk

men

ista

n

Arab

ian

Sea

Tajik

ista

n

Dis

pute

d Te

rrito

ry

Punj

ab

Balo

chis

tan

Sind

hFata

Chi

na

Gilg

it Ba

ltist

anKP

K Azad

Kas

hmir

Map

Loc

ator

Dis

tric

t Shi

karp

ur P

opul

atio

n D

ensi

tySe

ptem

ber,

2012

Lege

nd Dis

trict

Bou

ndar

y

Talu

ka B

ound

ary

Popu

latio

n D

ensi

ty

07.

515

3.75

Kilo

met

ers

Talu

kaPo

pul

Mal

eFe

mal

ePo

pD

esi

tySe

xR

Ave

rage

HH

Size

Eat

edH

Hs

GA

RH

IYA

SIN

TALU

KA31

2,74

716

1,82

415

0,92

332

210

75.

255

,848

KHA

NPU

RTA

LUKA

303,

015

158,

284

144,

731

482

109

4.7

58,2

72LA

KHIT

ALU

KA20

2,31

210

4,09

398

,218

576

106

4.9

34,8

81SH

IKA

RPU

RTA

LUKA

364,

333

189,

355

174,

978

649

108

4.7

53,5

78To

tal

1,18

2,40

761

3,55

656

8,85

147

110

85.

920

2,58

0So

urce

: 201

0 Es

timat

ed B

ased

on

1998

Cen

sus

Pers

ons/

Squa

re k

ilom

eter

323

- 482

483

- 576

577

- 649

Upt

o - 3

22

Page 23: Shrine of Faqeerullah Shah Alvi, Shikarpur€¦ · Fayyaz Ali Khan, Craig Von Hagen and Mehdi Bokhari Desktop Publishing: Noman Ali and Sarfaraz Ayub GIS Analyses and Mapping: Imra

9DISTRICT SHIKARPUR

9

1.3 Livelihood

1.3.1 Main Sources of Livelihood/Income Like other districts of Pakistan, Shikarpur is also an agro-based district with majority of the people earning their livelihood through farming (56%) while the second largest group, 28.3%, depends upon casual labour. Only 5.5% of the people are associated with services sector, 0.89% of the people are associated with business while 7.69% are not doing any type of work. In case of poor households, a larger percentage (35.26%) is dependent on casual labour as compared to in non-poor households (21.4%). The per capita income in Shikarpur is Rs. 1,473/month which is lower than the nationally defined per capita income of Rs. 1,504. The average monthly per capita income for rural Sindh is Rs. 1,49412.

Crop cultivation is the single largest source of income followed by labour. These two have a combined share of more than two-thirds (79.5%), the rest being shared amongst various sources such as services, business, pension, rent and remittances. Major contributors to off -farm income are business activities (2.25%) and cash/gifts (1.06%)13.

Table 1.3.1: Number of Mouzas Reporting Sources of Employment

GENDER QUANTIFICATION SERVICE AGRICULTURE TRADE INDUSTRY PERSONAL BUSINESS

OVERSEAS EMPLOYEMENT LABOUR

MALE MOSTLY 2 182 - - 1 - 7

SOME 170 51 70 4 109 4 180 NONE 62 1 164 230 124 230 47

FEMALE MOSTLY 1 114 - - - - 11

SOME 43 104 1 3 91 3 141 NONE 190 16 233 231 143 231 82

Source: Mouza Statistics of Sindh: 2008, Agriculture Census Organization

The categories under which these mouzas have reported their population against different livelihood sources are: • Mostly: population of 50 percent and above • Some: population between 1 percent and 50 percent • None: less than or equal to 1 percent

The above mentioned table reveals the sources of employment for the people of district Shikarpur. Out of the 234 rural mouzas, 182 (78%) reported agriculture as the source of employment. The table also reveals that casual labour is frequent in this district. Services and personal business are also major source of employment for some of the population. The below graph show this trends in percentages. It can be ascertained that, in the category of mostly and some, for both male and female population; agriculture, labour, services and personal business are the major sources of employment for the people of this district.

12 Socio-Economic Baseline Survey of Shikarpur District (2010), Rural Support Programme Network (RSPN) Islamabad 13 ibid

Page 24: Shrine of Faqeerullah Shah Alvi, Shikarpur€¦ · Fayyaz Ali Khan, Craig Von Hagen and Mehdi Bokhari Desktop Publishing: Noman Ali and Sarfaraz Ayub GIS Analyses and Mapping: Imra

LIVELIHOOD10

10

0

20

40

60

80

100

MOSTLY SOME NONE MOSTLY SOME NONE

MALE FEMALE

Percentage of Mouzas Reporting Sources of Employment

SERVICE AGRICULTURE TRADE INDUSTRY PROFESSIONAL BUSSINESS OVERSEAS EMPLOYEMENT LABOUR

1.3.2 Agriculture The land distribution is highly skewed in this district as 79% of the households (HH) do not own any land. The majority of land ownership is in the 2 to 5 acres category, with the average size of landholding being 2.5 acres per household. 4.1% of the HH own up to 1% of the lands, 6.8% of the HH own 2 to 5 acres, 2.9% own 5 to 12.5 acres and only 0.7% of the HH own 12.5 to 25 acres of land14. Resultantly, share cropping and tenant farming is common in this district. Although the literature suggests the mixed effect (positive and negative) of tenant farming and share cropping on agriculture productivity, but in developing countries like Pakistan, given the weak agriculture credit institutions and amenities, such types of farming lowers the agriculture productivity.

The major crops of the district are wheat and rice. The annual production of wheat and rice over the period 2008-09 was 88.2(000 Tonnes) and 348.9(000 Tonnes) respectively. Other crops, maize, cotton and sugarcane are also cultivated in the district but at a very minute level.

Area sown and production of food and cash crops in 2008-09 are reported in the Table 1.3.2.

Table 1.3.2: Food and cash crops cultivated in district Shikarpur

Type Crop Area Sown in 2008-09 (000 Hectares)

Production in 2008-09 (000 Tonnes)

Area Sown in 2010-11 (Hectares) FAO

Food

Wheat 31.3 88.2 N/A Rice 96.1 348.9 102,000

Maize 0.1 0 N/A

Cash

Sugarcane 0 0 29 Cotton 0.1 0.5 bales 33

Source: Crop Area and Production by Districts for 28 Years; 2008-09 Pakistan Bureau of Statistics (PBS)

14 Socio-Economic Baseline Survey of Shikarpur District (2010), Rural Support Programme Network (RSPN) Islamabad

Page 25: Shrine of Faqeerullah Shah Alvi, Shikarpur€¦ · Fayyaz Ali Khan, Craig Von Hagen and Mehdi Bokhari Desktop Publishing: Noman Ali and Sarfaraz Ayub GIS Analyses and Mapping: Imra

11DISTRICT SHIKARPUR

11

0

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

1981

-82

1982

-83

1983

-84

1984

-85

1985

-86

1986

-87

1987

-88

1988

-89

1989

-90

1990

-91

1991

-92

1992

-93

1993

-94

1994

-95

1995

-96

1996

-97

1997

-98

1998

-99

1999

-00

2000

-01

2001

-02

2002

-03

2003

-04

2004

-05

2005

-06

2006

-07

2007

-08

2008

-09

Index of the Area & Production of Rice

Area Production

00.5

11.5

22.5

33.5

44.5

5

1981

-82

1982

-83

1983

-84

1984

-85

1985

-86

1986

-87

1987

-88

1988

-89

1989

-90

1990

-91

1991

-92

1992

-93

1993

-94

1994

-95

1995

-96

1996

-97

1997

-98

1998

-99

1999

-00

2000

-01

2001

-02

2002

-03

2003

-04

2004

-05

2005

-06

2006

-07

2007

-08

2008

-09

Index of the Area & Production of Wheat

Area Production

Note: It is to be noted that the production of cotton is shown in bales instead of tonnes and the numbers reported are rounded off to nearest decimal places.

Over the last 28 years15, total area sown for food crops has shown a drastic change.

� Wheat The available data on area and production shows that over the last 28 years, area sown is the same with a slight increase in it and production with relatively increasing trends. From 1980’s area sown is more consistent than production, area showed same tendency but it decreased in the period of 2001 to 2004 but after that there is the same score which was before declining. Production showed increasing trends and relatively higher than area. Production increased over the time period but decrease in 1985 and in 2000. � Rice Rice is also an important food crop of the district. The data shows that there is an increasing trend in both rice production and area sown. But from 1980’s increase in production is significantly higher than the area cultivated for the production of rice. In 1984-85 and 1999 to 2002 production area decreased but over all there is an increase in area sown till 2008-09. The trend in production of rice is same as area but production is meaningfully higher than area.

1.3.3 Industry The manufacturing establishments in district Shikarpur are reported as 35 units during the latest census of manufacturing Industries (CMI) 1997. By comparing with the previous census that took place in 1990-91, under which 27 units were reported, it shows that 8 units have been

15 Area and Production by District for 28 Years, Pakistan Bureau of Statistics 2010

Page 26: Shrine of Faqeerullah Shah Alvi, Shikarpur€¦ · Fayyaz Ali Khan, Craig Von Hagen and Mehdi Bokhari Desktop Publishing: Noman Ali and Sarfaraz Ayub GIS Analyses and Mapping: Imra

LIVELIHOOD12

closed. There are 12 textiles units, 323 rice mills, 14 beverages industries and one oil industry is working in this district16.

1.3.4 Livestock Livestock is one of the major sub-sector of Agriculture and back bone of Pakistan’s economy. Its main by-products including hides and skins have substantial potential as semi-finished products. A substantial growth in Livestock products such as milk, meat, beef, mutton, poultry and eggs have been noticed over the past few years. It has been estimated that over three - fourths of the farm power comes from animals, and they are used for most of the farm operations. Bullocks provide the draft power on farm and in transport around the villages.

Most farmers traditionally keep a few heads of livestock, 2.13 livestock/HH, ranging from bullocks for draft to buffaloes or cattle for milk and poultry for eggs & meat 17. As per livestock census 1996, the population of cattle, buffaloes, sheep and goats in Shikarpur district were recorded at 221,841, 279,676, 142,154 and 168,243 respectively. The population of livestock grew by 4.4% cattle, 5.5% buffaloes, 10.8% sheep and 2.2% goats over the l ast livestock census enumerated in 1986.

Meat, hair, hides, skins and wool are the other major products of livestock. Beef is the most important source of meat in the district. Mutton comes next in the market place, and it is provided by a variety of goats and sheep.

In order to meet the requirements of meat and milk, livestock farming seems to be necessarily in a joint venture of public/private sector or helping private sector in importing the livestock for establishing livestock farms through loans on easy terms & conditions. The Shikarpur district has a vast potential for establishing livestock farming in the district.

16 http://sindhdevelopmentinstitute.blogspot.com/2005/03/shikarpur-economic-profile.html 17 Socio-Economic Baseline Survey of Shikarpur District (2010), Rural Support Programme Network (RSPN) Islamabad

Page 27: Shrine of Faqeerullah Shah Alvi, Shikarpur€¦ · Fayyaz Ali Khan, Craig Von Hagen and Mehdi Bokhari Desktop Publishing: Noman Ali and Sarfaraz Ayub GIS Analyses and Mapping: Imra

13DISTRICT RAJANPUR

1.4 Food Security Food security can be broadly divided into four components:

� Availability of food in terms of sufficient quantity available through domestic production or imports

� Access to adequate resources given the socio-political and economic arrangements of the community

� Utilization Refers to the body’s ability to make use of the nutrients provided. This requires clean water sanitation and health care

� Stability includes an all-time access and utilization of food without any fear of losing it due to any shock (natural calamity, economic shock). This component points out to the sustainability of food in an area.

1.4.1 Availability In Shikarpur district, wheat and rice is being produced for meeting food requirement as major crops along with other cash crops such as maize, pulses and vegetables. Maize, pulses and vegetables are relatively less produced in the district.

Below table shows, wheat and rice are cropped in 98% and 88% of the mouzas respectively. So overall crop based food availability is sufficient in the Shikarpur district18.

Table 1.4.1: Number of Mouza Reporting Major Crops

ADMINISTRATIVE UNIT NUMBERS OF MOUZAS REPORTING MAJOR CROPS

WHEAT RICE COTTON SUGARCANE MAIZE PULSES ORCHARDS VEGETABLES SHIKARPUR DISTRICT 230 207 - - 1 5 - 7 SHUKIKARPUR TALUKA 47 47 - - - - - - KHANPUR TALUKA 48 40 - - 1 3 - 1 GARHI YASIN TALUKA 88 79 - - - - 4 LAKHI TALUKA 47 41 - - - 2 - 2

Source: Mouza Statistics of Sindh: 2008, Agriculture Census Organization

Food availability not only depends on the wheat only but also rests on availability of other cereals like rice, maize etc. Rice is produced in surplus quantity whereas maize production falls short of the requirement in this district. Animal based food availability (meat, milk, milk products) is also important for total food availability. On average, livestock constitutes 24% of the productive assets of each HH. According to a survey, people invest 24% of their loans on the livestock19. Such attention towards livestock rearing depicts the abundant availability of meat

18 Food Insecurity in Pakistan (2009), Sustainable Development Policy Institute (SDPI), Islamabad 19 Socio-Economic Baseline Survey of Shikarpur District (2010), Rural Support Programme Network (RSPN) Islamabad

Page 28: Shrine of Faqeerullah Shah Alvi, Shikarpur€¦ · Fayyaz Ali Khan, Craig Von Hagen and Mehdi Bokhari Desktop Publishing: Noman Ali and Sarfaraz Ayub GIS Analyses and Mapping: Imra

FOOD SECURITY14

and other livestock products. Combining both, crop based and animal based food self-sufficiency, Shikarpur is in surplus for food availability20.

1.4.2 Access Despite the fact that the food is in surplus in Shikarpur district, it is not the only indicator of food security. If the available food is not socio-economically accessible to the masses, availability alone cannot make a society food secure. Household income, inflation, child dependency and monthly food expenditures are some of the indicators that define access to food.

The per capita income in Shikarpur is Rs. 1,473/month which is lower than the nationally defined per capita income of Rs. 1,504. The average monthly per capita income for rural Sindh is Rs. 1,49421. Child dependency (ratio between children and household members in economically active age group) is high in district Shikarpur which constitutes as one of the limiting factors in meeting the daily needs of households. The increased dependency ratio enhances the spending of the household on child care and food which results in a per capita reduction of socio-economic access to food in the district. The share of household expenditures on food is 61.8% of the total income in Sindh. So the low level of income, high food expenditures and high inflation (particularly food inflation) hinders access to food in the district Shikarpur.

The table below shows physical access of food in the district Shikarpur depicting the distance of mouzas from the wholesale markets. Average distance from the fruit and vegetable market of a Mouza is 25 and 24 kilometres respectively, whereas the distance from the grain market is 23 kilometres. Such long distances impede access to food.

Table 1.4.2: Distance of Mouzas from Wholesale Markets

Type of facility Rural

Populated Mouzas

Overall Mean

Distance (KM)

Mouzas by Distance (in Kilometres) by Facility

Less Than 1 1 - 10 11 – 25 26 – 50 51 &

Above

Livestock Market Number 234 25 30 106 88 10 Percent 100 13 45 38 4

Grains Market Number 234 23 2 37 113 72 10 Percent 100 1 16 48 31 4

Fruit Market Number 234 25 30 102 91 11 Percent 100 13 44 39 5

Vegetable Market Number 234 24 1 37 101 84 11 Percent 100 16 43 36 5

Govt. Procurement Centre

Number 234 23 36 112 74 10 Percent 100 15 48 32 4

20 ibid 21 Socio-Economic Baseline Survey of Shikarpur District (2010), Rural Support Programme Network (RSPN) Islamabad

Source: Mouza Statistics of Sindh: 2008, Agriculture Census Organization

Page 29: Shrine of Faqeerullah Shah Alvi, Shikarpur€¦ · Fayyaz Ali Khan, Craig Von Hagen and Mehdi Bokhari Desktop Publishing: Noman Ali and Sarfaraz Ayub GIS Analyses and Mapping: Imra

DISTRICT SHIKARPUR15

1.4.3 Utilization In addition to food availability and access, proper assimilation of food in the body is essential. Food utilization and stability depicts this absorption of food and its sustainability. Improved sanitation facilities, clean drinking water, health infrastructure and individual health status along with the female literacy plays vital role in food absorption. According to Food Security Analysis (FSA) 2009, access to improved drinking water is reasonable in this district. Seventy nine (79%) of the HH use hand pumps and 17% use motor pumps as source of drinking water22. Female literacy rate is 29% in this district which is considered as very low.

Table 1.4.3: Percentage Distribution of HH by Source of Drinking Water

SHIKARPUR Water Delivery System

Tap Water Hand Pump Motor Pump Dug Well Other Total 4 79 17 0 0 Urban 1 37 62 0 1 Rural 5 91 4 0 0

Source: PSLM 2010-11

Also, the sanitation conditions are relatively better in the district Shikarpur where 44% of the households has flush toilets and 54% has the non-flush toilets. Only 2% of the households have no toilet facility.

Table 1.4.4: Percentage Distribution of HH by Type of Toilet Flush Non-Flush No Toilet

Urban Rural Total Urban Rural Total Urban Rural Total 96 30 44 4 67 54 0 3 2

Source: PSLM 2010-11

Moreover, in the district Shikarpur, 64% of the population is poor and the poverty gap ratio is 31% which is alarmingly high23. Such high poverty and the high inflationary pressures, particularly food inflation, low level of HH income push the households towards food insecurity. Combining all the indicators of food security i.e, availability, access, utilization and stability; it can be concluded safely that district Shikarpur is a food insecure district of Pakistan.

22 Food Insecurity in Pakistan (2009), Sustainable Development Policy Institute (SDPI), Islamabad 23 Poverty Gap Ratio is defined as average of the ratio of the poverty gap to the poverty line. It is expressed as a percentage of the poverty line for a country or a region. Poverty gap index is a percentage between 0 and 100%. A theoretical value of zero implies that all the extremely poor people are exactly at the poverty line.

Page 30: Shrine of Faqeerullah Shah Alvi, Shikarpur€¦ · Fayyaz Ali Khan, Craig Von Hagen and Mehdi Bokhari Desktop Publishing: Noman Ali and Sarfaraz Ayub GIS Analyses and Mapping: Imra

DISTRICT SHIKARPUR16

1.5 Health

1.5.1 Details of Health Facilities According to Population Welfare Department Sindh24 there are 3 Taluka hospitals, 7 rural health centres and 33 basic health units. Total fertility rate is 5.4 which is quite higher. Contraceptive prevalence rate is 66.7. In the whole district there are 40 Hakims (quakes), 5 homeopaths and 100 registered medical practitioners are currently working in the district.

According to World Health Organization (WHO) there are total 64 health facilities including 4 maternal and child health centres. Table 1.5.1 shows the details of health facilities in the district.

Table 1.5.1: Number of Health Facilities by Type Facility Type Number BASIC HEALTH UNIT 35 DISPENSARY 13 HOSPITAL 5 MATERNAL & CHILD HEALTH CENTRE 4 RURAL HEALTH CENTRE 7 Grand Total 64

World Health Organization (WHO) 2010

Immunization In district Shikarpur around 48% pregnant women have received tetanus toxoid injections. In urban areas this percentage is 64% and in rural areas it is 45%25. Record based26 immunization data of district Shikarpur shows that 10% (Male 7%: Female 14%) of the children aged 12-23 months have received full immunization. In urban areas this percentage is 19 percent (Male 9%: Female 28%) and in rural areas it is 9% (Male 7%: Female 11%). The graph shows the percentage of children of 12-23 months that have been immunized by the type of Antigen based on records27.

24 http://www.sindh.gov.pk/dpt/PopulationDev/shikarpur.htm 25 Table 3.11, Pakistan Social and Living Standards Measurement Survey (PSLM)2010-2011 26 Table 3.4 (b) Based on record: Children who reported having received full immunization who also have an immunization card, expressed as a percentage of all children aged 12-23 months. Also immunizations to be classed as fully immunized a child must have received: ‘BCG’, ‘DPT1’, ‘DPT2’, ‘DPT3’, ‘Polio1’, ‘Polio2’ 27 Table 3.5: Pakistan Social and Living Standards Measurement Survey (PSLM)2010-2011

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

BCG

DPT1

DPT2

DPT3

POLI

O1

POLI

O2

POLI

O3

MEA

SLES

Urban

Rural

Total

Page 31: Shrine of Faqeerullah Shah Alvi, Shikarpur€¦ · Fayyaz Ali Khan, Craig Von Hagen and Mehdi Bokhari Desktop Publishing: Noman Ali and Sarfaraz Ayub GIS Analyses and Mapping: Imra

HEALTH AND NUTRITION17

Map

dat

a so

urce

(s):

PCO

(Pop

ulai

on C

ensu

s O

rgan

izat

ion)

: Bou

ndar

ies

WH

O (W

orld

Hea

lth O

rgan

izat

ion)

: Hea

lth F

acili

ties

Geo

rgia

Uni

vers

ity: S

hika

rpur

Set

tlem

ents

Dis

clai

mer

s:Th

e de

sign

atio

ns

empl

oyed

an

d th

e pr

esen

tatio

n of

mat

eria

l on

this

map

do

not

impl

y th

e ex

pres

sion

of

any

opin

ion

wha

tsoe

ver

on t

he p

art

of

iMM

AP o

r th

e U

SAID

conc

erni

ng th

e le

gal s

tatu

s of

any

cou

ntry

, ter

ritor

y, c

ity o

rar

ea o

r of

i ts

auth

oriti

es, o

r co

ncer

ning

the

delim

itatio

n of

its fr

ontie

rs o

r bou

ndar

ies.

Map

Doc

Nam

e:

Cre

atio

n D

ate:

Proj

ectio

n/D

atum

:W

eb R

esou

rces

:N

omin

al S

cale

at A

4:1:

30,0

00,0

00

iM

MAP

_Shi

karp

ur_H

ealth

_Fac

ilitie

s_M

apA4

L_v1

_01

Sept

embe

r,16

, 201

2W

GS8

4ht

tp://

ww

w.im

map

.org

Gar

hiYa

sin

Kha

npur

Lakh

i

Shik

arpu

r

Amro

te

Bham

bhir

Dak

han

Gah

ejaG

arhi

Yasi

n

Jind

oD

ero

Mad

eji

Mirz

apur

Nau

shah

roAb

ro

Nim

Shha

toM

angi

War

yaso

Gar

hiTe

gho

Gha

riD

hako

Meh

moo

daBa

gh

Mia

nSa

hib

Pir B

uxSh

ujra

h

Rah

imab

ad Shab

iraAb

adTh

anhr

io

Zark

hel

Abdo

oBhirk

an

Cha

kJe

han

Khan

Lakh

i

Ruk

Rus

tam

Sehw

ani

Taib

Waz

iraba

d

Ham

ayun

Jaga

nJa

hanw

ah

Jano

Kara

n

Lodr

a

Sulta

nKo

t

Indi

a

Paki

stan

Iran

Afgh

anis

tan

Uzb

ekis

tan

Turk

men

ista

n

Arab

ian

Sea

Tajik

ista

n

Dis

pute

d Te

rrito

ry

Punj

ab

Balo

chis

tan

Sind

h

Fata

Chi

na

Gilg

it Ba

ltist

anKP

K Azad

Kas

hmir

Map

Loc

ator

Dis

tric

t Shi

karp

ur H

ealth

Fac

ilitie

sSe

ptem

ber,

2012

Lege

nd Dis

trict

Bou

ndar

y

Talu

ka B

ound

ary

Settl

emen

ts

Hea

lth F

acilit

ies

! CBA

SIC

HEA

LTH

UN

IT! C

DIS

PEN

SAR

Y! C

HO

SPIT

AL! <

MAT

ER

NAL

& C

HIL

D H

EAL

TH C

ENTR

E! C

RU

RAL

HEA

LTH

CEN

TRE

! ASU

B H

EALT

H C

ENTR

E! A

TB C

LIN

IC

Uni

on C

ounc

ils

Jaco

baba

d

Kas

hmor

e

Sukk

ur

Lark

ana

Kha

irpur

07

143.

5Ki

lom

eter

s

Page 32: Shrine of Faqeerullah Shah Alvi, Shikarpur€¦ · Fayyaz Ali Khan, Craig Von Hagen and Mehdi Bokhari Desktop Publishing: Noman Ali and Sarfaraz Ayub GIS Analyses and Mapping: Imra

1.6 Education

1.6.1 Some Highlights Literacy Rate (10 years and above) 50% Adult Literacy Rate (15 years and above) 47%

GPI Primary 0.59 GPI Middle 1.62

GPI Secondary 0.47 GPI Higher Secondary 0.24

Population that has ever attended School 36 Male 50

Female 19 Population that has completed primary level or higher 28

Male 39 Female 14

Student Teacher Ratio 29 Primary 30 Middle 20

Secondary 21 Higher Secondary 36

Source: Reform Support Unit Sindh 2010-11 and Pakistan Social and Living Standard Measurement Survey 2010-11

1.6.2 District School Enrolment Ratio The education status is quite poor in Shikarpur. The overall literacy rate (for the population of 10 years and above) for the district is 50%, for male it is 68% and for female it is 29%. For the urban rural comparison, urban literacy rate is higher than the rural, which is 71%. Among urban community, literacy rate for male is 87 % and for female it is 55%; whereas the rural literacy rate is 43%, and in rural community, literacy rate for male is 63% and for female it is 20%. Adult literacy rate (for the population of 15 years and above) is 47 %. Gross Enrolment Ratio28 (GER) for primary level in Shikarpur is 75% (Male: 88%, Female: 59%), in urban community it is 98% (Male: 103%, Female: 92%) and in rural community it is 69% (Male: 84%, Female: 52%). Net Enrolment Ratio29 (NER) for primary in Shikarpur is 49% (Male: 54%, Female: 43%), in urban community it is 69% (Male: 72%, Female: 64%) and in rural community it is 45 (Male: 50%, Female: 39%). Table 1.6.1 shows details of Gross and Net Enrolment Rates by Rural and Urban Gender at different levels

28 Total enrolment in a specific level of education, regardless of age, expressed as a percentage of the eligible official school-age population corresponding to the same level of education in a given school year. 29 Enrolment of the official age group for a given level of education expressed as a percentage of the corresponding population

DISTRICT SHIKARPUR18

Page 33: Shrine of Faqeerullah Shah Alvi, Shikarpur€¦ · Fayyaz Ali Khan, Craig Von Hagen and Mehdi Bokhari Desktop Publishing: Noman Ali and Sarfaraz Ayub GIS Analyses and Mapping: Imra

EDUCATION19

Table 1.6.1: Gross and Net Enrolment Rates by Gender and Locality at Different levels

Urban/ Rural/ District

Gender Gross Enrolment Rates Net Enrolment Rates

Primary Group (5-9) Middle

Group (10-12) Matric

Group (13-14) Primary

Group (5-9) Middle

Group (10-12) Matric

Group (13-14)

Urban Male 103% 68% 73% 72% 25% 11% Female 92% 77% 41% 64% 24% 12% Total 98% 72% 53% 69% 24% 12%

Rural Male 84% 33% 43% 50% 12% 4% Female 52% 17% 12% 39% 7% 3% Total 69% 27% 29% 45% 10% 3%

Total Male 88% 40% 48% 54% 14% 5% Female 59% 30% 21% 43% 11% 6% Total 75% 35% 35% 49% 13% 5%

Source: Pakistan Social and Living Standard Measurement Survey 2010-11

1.6.3 Gender and Level Wise Details The total male enrolment of District Shikarpur is 83,775 while the total female enrolment is 46,580, whereas the total enrolment is 130,355. Out of total 4,432 teachers 3,517 are male and 915 are female teachers. This illustrates that one teacher is teaching averagely 29 students. The total boys’ schools of District Shikarpur are 563, while the total female schools are 255 and mixed gender schools are 529. Thus, the total number of schools is 1,380. This means that averagely every school has teaching staff of around 230.

1.6.3.1 Primary Total numbers of primary level schools that are reported are 1,256. The total enrolment at primary level is 96,228. Gender wise 60,578 are boys and 35,650 are girls. Total numbers of teachers at primary level, are 3,096 out of which 2,484 are male and 611 are female teachers. Thus on an average each primary school has enrolment of 77 students with teaching staff of 2. However the student class ratio is 33 and each school has averagely around 2 class rooms.

1.6.3.2 Middle There are total 68 middle schools reported. The total enrolment at middle level is 3,895 of which 1,484 are boys’ enrolment, whereas, the girls enrolment is 3,411. The total teachers at middle level are 223 out of which 127 are male teachers, while, 96 are female teachers. Thus on an average each middle school has average enrolment of 57 students with teaching staff of 3. However the student class ratio is 15 and each school has averagely around 4 class rooms.

1.6.3.3 Matric There are total 47 secondary schools. The total enrolment at secondary level is 21,022 of which 14,305 are boys’ enrolment whereas 6,717 are girls’ enrolment. The total no. of teachers at secondary level is 824 out of which male teachers are 651 and female teachers are 173. Thus on an average each secondary school has average enrolment of 447 students with teaching staff of 18. However the student class ratio is 52 and each school has averagely around 9 class rooms.

30 Statistical Education Bulletin, Reform Support Unit, Sindh Government.

Page 34: Shrine of Faqeerullah Shah Alvi, Shikarpur€¦ · Fayyaz Ali Khan, Craig Von Hagen and Mehdi Bokhari Desktop Publishing: Noman Ali and Sarfaraz Ayub GIS Analyses and Mapping: Imra

DISTRICT SHIKARPUR20

1.6.3.4 Higher Secondary There are total 9 higher secondary schools. The total enrolment at higher secondary level is 9,210 out of which 7,408 are boys’ enrolment and 1,802 are girls’ total enrolment in higher secondary level. The total no. of teachers at higher secondary level is 285 out of which 255 are male teachers and 30 are female teachers. Thus on an average each higher secondary school has average enrolment of 1,023 students with teaching staff of 32. However the student class ratio is 71 and each school has averagely around 14 class rooms.

Table 1.6.2: Enrolment and Educational Facilities by level and Gender31

Level Enrolment School Facilities Teachers

Boys Girls Mixed Total Boys Girls Mixed Total Male Female Total Primary 28,633 18,804 48,791 96,228 510 217 529 1,256 2,484 612 3,096 Middle 870 1,739 1,286 3,895 24 26 18 68 127 100 227 Secondary 11,627 5,722 3,673 21,022 24 10 13 47 651 173 824 Higher Secondary 5,709 1,294 2,207 9,210 5 2 2 9 255 30 285 Total 46,839 27,559 55,957 130,355 563 255 562 1,380 3,517 915 4,432

31 Sindh School List 2010-11 RSU

Page 35: Shrine of Faqeerullah Shah Alvi, Shikarpur€¦ · Fayyaz Ali Khan, Craig Von Hagen and Mehdi Bokhari Desktop Publishing: Noman Ali and Sarfaraz Ayub GIS Analyses and Mapping: Imra

DISASTER HISTORY AND ITS IMPACT21

2 Disaster History and Its Impact 2.1 Disaster in Shikarpur

2.1.1 Disaster History Although there is not much information available (except for the previous decade) on the history of disasters in District Shikarpur and this district is not disaster free area. Disasters of different kinds are reported in the previous decade. Earthquake was reported in 2001. Heavy rains and seasonal monsoon were reported in 2003, 2010 and 2011. Riverine and flash floods are reported in 2003, 2005, and 2010 2011. According to Board of Revenue Sindh 2010, the relative severity of floods in Shikarpur is given a rank 2 which means low floods32.

River Indus after receiving water from 5 rivers system causes floods in the northern and southern parts of the Sindh province. The upper regions of the Sindh Province constitute the districts of Kashmore, Shikarpur, Jacobabad, Larkana and Kambar Shahdadkot on the right bank of River Indus and Ghotki, Sukkur, Khairpur, Naushahroferoze and Shaheed Benazirabad on the left bank of River Indus. These districts on the right and left of River Indus pose a severe threat owing to passing of River Indus. Heavy rains are also a major cause flooding in the district. Vulnerable points of Shikarpur are Hamayoon Jaggan, Sultan Kot, Jahanwah, Lodra, Karan, Jano, Khanpur except town, Garhi Dakho, Rahim Abad, Mian Sahib, Zarkhail, Thanhrio, Shabirabad, Garhi Tegho, Pir Bux Shujra, Mahmood-A-Bag, Taib, Wazirabad, Rustam, Sehwani, Chak, Bhirkan, Mungrani, Bhanbhihar, Nim Sharif, Jindo Dero, Mirzapur, Amrote Sharifam33.

Along with the aforementioned disasters epidemics, casualties from accidents and environmental degradation occur on yearly basis. The district is highly vulnerable to the floods. In 2010 District Shikarpur was severely hit by floods and a population of 778,000 persons was affected.

Hazard history of District Shikarpur can be seen in the table below34

Hazard Frequency Area a�ected/union councils Severity/Force Year

Floods Monsoon Entire district High (2012,2011,2010,2005,2003)

Heavy rains Seasonal /monsoon Whole district High 2003,2010,2011

Earthquake Entire district Low 2001 Epidemics Seasonal Entire district Low Every year Transport accidents Often Entire district Low Every year Environmental degradation Through out Entire district Low Every year

32 Flood Facts 2010. 33 Sindh Contingency Plan 2012. 34 Ibid

Page 36: Shrine of Faqeerullah Shah Alvi, Shikarpur€¦ · Fayyaz Ali Khan, Craig Von Hagen and Mehdi Bokhari Desktop Publishing: Noman Ali and Sarfaraz Ayub GIS Analyses and Mapping: Imra

DISTRICT SHIKARPUR22

Map

dat

a so

urce

(s):

PCO

(Pop

ulai

on C

ensu

s O

rgan

izat

ion)

: Bou

ndar

ies

WFP

(Wor

ld F

ood

Prog

ram

me)

: Roa

ds, R

ailw

ays

WH

O (W

orld

Hea

lth O

rgan

izat

ion)

: Hea

lth F

acilit

ies

ESR

I: R

iver

sG

eorg

ia U

nive

rsity

: Shi

karp

ur S

ettle

men

tsM

OD

IS: F

lood

Ext

ents

Dis

clai

mer

s:Th

e de

sign

atio

ns

empl

oyed

an

d th

e pr

esen

tatio

n of

mat

eria

l on

this

map

do

not

impl

y th

e ex

pres

sion

of

any

opin

ion

wha

tsoe

ver

on t

he p

art o

f iM

MA

P or

the

USA

IDco

ncer

ning

the

lega

l sta

tus

of a

ny c

ount

ry, t

errit

ory,

city

or

area

or o

f its

aut

horit

ies,

or c

once

rnin

g th

e de

limita

tion

of

Map

Doc

Nam

e:

Cre

atio

n D

ate:

Proj

ectio

n/D

atum

:W

eb R

esou

rces

:N

omin

al S

cale

at A

4:1:

30,0

00,0

00

iM

MAP

_Shi

karp

ur_F

lood

Ris

k An

alys

is_M

apA4

L_v1

_01

Sept

embe

r,16

, 201

2W

GS8

4ht

tp://

ww

w.im

map

.org

Gar

hiYa

sin

Kha

npur

Lakh

i

Shik

arpu

r

Am

rote

Bha

mbh

ir

Dak

han

Gah

ejaG

arhi

Yasi

n

Jind

oD

ero

Mad

eji

Mirz

apur

Nau

shah

roA

bro

Nim

Shha

toM

angi

War

yaso

Gar

hiTe

gho

Gha

riD

hako

Meh

moo

daB

agh

Mia

nSa

hib

Pir B

uxSh

ujra

h

Rah

imab

ad

Shab

iraA

bad

Than

hrio

Zark

hel

Abd

ooB

hirk

an

Cha

k

Jeha

nK

han

Lakh

i

Ruk

Rus

tam

Sehw

ani

Taib

Waz

iraba

d

Ham

ayun

Jaga

n

Jaha

nwah

Jano

Kar

an

Lodr

a

Sulta

nK

ot

Indi

a

Paki

stan

Iran

Afgh

anis

tan

Uzb

ekis

tan

Turk

men

ista

n

Arab

ian

Sea

Tajik

ista

n

Dis

pute

d Te

rrito

ry

Punj

ab

Balo

chis

tan

Sind

hFata

Chi

na

Gilg

it Ba

ltist

anKP

K Azad

Kas

hmir

Map

Loc

ator

Dis

tric

t Shi

karp

ur F

lood

Ris

k An

alys

isSe

ptem

ber,

2012

Lege

nd

! A

Dis

trict

Bou

ndar

y

Talu

ka B

ound

ary

Rai

lway

Lin

e

Riv

ers

Roa

ds

Settl

emen

ts

Uni

on C

ounc

ils B

ound

ary

Floo

d 20

12

Floo

d 20

11

Floo

d 20

10

Hea

lth F

acilit

ies

!CBA

SIC

HEA

LTH

UN

IT!C

DIS

PEN

SAR

Y!C

HO

SPIT

AL!<

MAT

ERN

AL &

CH

ILD

HEA

LTH

CEN

TRE

!CR

UR

AL H

EALT

H C

ENTR

E! A

SUB

HEA

LTH

CEN

TRE

TB C

LIN

IC

Kas

hmor

e

Sukk

ur

Kha

irpur

Lark

ana

Jaco

baba

d

07

143.

5Ki

lom

eter

s

On

12th

Sep

tem

ber,

201

2 th

ere

wer

e 10

2 vi

llage

s ou

t of

tot

al 2

59 u

nder

oo

ded

wat

er d

ue t

o he

avy

mon

soon

rain

s.

Dur

ing

2011

oo

ds, 1

4 vi

llage

s w

ere

dire

ctly

inun

date

d be

side

s th

e a

ecte

d un

ion

coun

cils

.

Out

of 2

59 v

illag

es 1

36 v

illag

es w

ere

lyin

g in

oo

d 20

10 d

ecla

red

aec

ted

unio

n co

unci

ls

79 o

ut o

f 259

vill

ages

wer

e un

der w

ater

in

ood

2010

.

145

villa

ges

of 2

59 v

illag

es a

re w

ithin

the

rang

e of

10

kilo

met

er fr

om ri

vers

.

*Res

ults

ha

ve

been

ex

trac

ted

from

M

odis

sa

telli

te

Imag

erie

s an

d sp

aal

an

alys

is

usin

g U

nive

rsity

of

Geo

rgia

Vill

ages

dat

abas

e. R

esul

ts a

re n

ot

eld

veri

ed,

so i

t m

ay n

ot d

epic

t th

e ac

tual

situ

aon

in th

e el

d.

Page 37: Shrine of Faqeerullah Shah Alvi, Shikarpur€¦ · Fayyaz Ali Khan, Craig Von Hagen and Mehdi Bokhari Desktop Publishing: Noman Ali and Sarfaraz Ayub GIS Analyses and Mapping: Imra

DISTRICT SHIKARPUR23

Map

dat

a so

urce

(s):

PCO

(Pop

ulai

on C

ensu

s O

rgan

izat

ion)

: Bou

ndar

ies

WFP

(Wor

ld F

ood

Prog

ram

me)

: Roa

ds, R

ailw

ays

WH

O (W

orld

Hea

lth O

rgan

izat

ion)

: Hea

lth F

acili

ties

ESR

I: R

iver

sG

eorg

ia U

nive

rsity

: Shi

karp

ur S

ettle

men

tsM

OD

IS: F

lood

Ext

ents

Dis

clai

mer

s:Th

e de

sign

atio

ns

empl

oyed

an

d th

e pr

esen

tatio

n of

mat

eria

l on

this

map

do

not

impl

y th

e ex

pres

sion

of

any

opin

ion

wha

tsoe

ver

on t

he p

art

of

iMM

AP o

r th

e U

SAI D

conc

erni

ng th

e le

gal s

tatu

s of

any

cou

ntry

, ter

ritor

y, c

ity o

rar

ea o

r of i

ts a

utho

ritie

s, o

r con

cern

ing

the

delim

itatio

n of

Map

Doc

Nam

e:

Cre

atio

n D

ate:

Proj

ectio

n/D

atum

:W

eb R

esou

rces

:N

omin

al S

cale

at A

4:1:

30,0

00,0

00

iM

MAP

_Shi

karp

ur_S

afe

Loca

tions

_Map

A4L_

v1_0

1

Sept

embe

r,16

, 201

2W

GS8

4ht

tp://

ww

w.im

map

.org

Gar

hiYa

sin

Kha

npur

Lakh

i

Shik

arpu

r

Am

rote

Bha

mbh

ir

Dak

han

Gah

ejaG

arhi

Yasi

n

Jind

oD

ero

Mad

eji

Mirz

apur

Nau

shah

roA

bro

Nim

Shha

toM

angi

War

yaso

Gar

hiTe

gho

Gha

riD

hako

Meh

moo

daB

agh

Mia

nSa

hib

Pir B

uxSh

ujra

hR

ahim

abad

Shab

iraA

bad

Than

hrio

Zark

hel

Abd

ooB

hirk

an

Cha

k

Jeha

nK

han

Lakh

i

Ruk

Rus

tam

Sehw

ani

Taib

Waz

iraba

d

Ham

ayun

Jaga

n

Jaha

nwah

Jano

Kar

an

Lodr

a

Sulta

nK

ot

Indi

a

Paki

stan

Iran

Afgh

anis

tan

Uzb

ekis

tan

Turk

men

ista

n

Arab

ian

Sea

Tajik

ista

n

Dis

pute

d Te

rrito

ry

Punj

ab

Balo

chis

tan

Sind

h

Fata

Chi

na

Gilg

it Ba

ltist

anKP

K Azad

Kas

hmir

Map

Loc

ator

Dis

tric

t Shi

karp

ur P

ossi

ble

Safe

Loc

atio

ns D

urin

g Fl

ood

Sept

embe

r, 20

12

Lege

nd

! A

Rai

lway

Lin

e

Riv

ers

Roa

ds

Settl

emen

ts

Floo

ded

Innu

ndat

ed A

reas

201

0-20

12

Poss

ible

Saf

e Lo

catio

ns D

urin

g Fl

ood

Hea

lth F

acili

ties

!CBA

SIC

HE

ALTH

UN

IT!C

DIS

PE

NSA

RY

!CH

OSP

ITAL

!<M

ATER

NAL

& C

HIL

D H

EAL

TH C

ENTR

E!C

RU

RA

L H

EA

LTH

CE

NTR

E! A

SUB

HE

ALTH

CE

NTR

ETB

CLI

NIC

Kas

hmor

e

Sukk

ur

Kha

irpur

Lark

ana

Jaco

baba

d

Com

bine

Max

imum

Flo

od E

xten

t of R

ecen

t 3 y

ears

floo

ds

Dis

trict

Bou

ndar

y

Talu

ka B

ound

ary

Uni

on C

ounc

ils B

ound

ary

07

143.

5Ki

lom

eter

s

Page 38: Shrine of Faqeerullah Shah Alvi, Shikarpur€¦ · Fayyaz Ali Khan, Craig Von Hagen and Mehdi Bokhari Desktop Publishing: Noman Ali and Sarfaraz Ayub GIS Analyses and Mapping: Imra

DISASTER HISTORY AND ITS IMPACT24

2.2 Disaster Impact

2.2.1 Demography Shikarpur district is unfortunate in the sense that it was consecutively hit by heavy floods both in 2010, 2011, and now in 2012. In 2010 floods35 all 1,359 villages were affected and in total 401,831 acre of land were inundated. 110,189 acres of crop area were inundated. A population of 778,000 persons was affected and there were 13 casualties and 77 injuries. 838 cattle head perished. Total 117,879 houses were affected out of which 94,303 were kacha houses and 23,756 were pakka houses. In the year 2011 floods have affected Shikarpur district to a lesser extent and as compared to 2010 only 4 UCs were affected36. Total 3 casualties and 4 injuries were reported during floods 2011. Population of 75 people was affected and 30 houses were destroyed. 28 cattle head perished and 20,218 acres of crop area were damaged. Table 2.2.1 shows the losses and damages summary.

Table 2.2.1: Summary of Losses and Damages37 Attribute Figure 2011 Figure 2010 Source Total Households 2010 202,580

Estimated Affected Households 12 67,850 Total UCs 47 PDMA UC Affected 4 31 NDMA/OCHA Total Revenue Villages 240 DCR 1998 Villages Affected 7 1,359 NDMA Total Houses Affected 30 117,879

NDMA Partially Damaged 0 n/a Destroyed 30 n/a Kacha n/a 94,303 Pakka n/a 23,756 Total Population 1,182,407 Estimated Affected Population 75 400,317 UNOCHA

UNOCHA

Death 3 13 NDMA

Injuries 4 77 Total Area 620,728.72 Calculated Total Affected Area 2,500 280,563

NDMA/OCHA Crop Area Affected 20,218 110,189

35 http://reliefweb.int/sites/reliefweb.int/files/resources/1E81D6C5A7396DAFC12577970048423B-Map.pdf 36 NDMA Losses and Damages Data as of 30th November 2011 37 Summary of NDMA Losses and Damages Data as of 30th November 2011 and UN OCHA District Shikarpur Profile as on 19 January 2011

Page 39: Shrine of Faqeerullah Shah Alvi, Shikarpur€¦ · Fayyaz Ali Khan, Craig Von Hagen and Mehdi Bokhari Desktop Publishing: Noman Ali and Sarfaraz Ayub GIS Analyses and Mapping: Imra

DISTRICT SHIKARPUR25

Table 2.2.2: Summary of Losses and Damages by Taluka for 2010

Taluka Total Population

A�ected Population

Total Area (Km2)

A�ected Area (KM2)

Total UCs

A�ected UCs

Lakhi 202,312 87,243 679 486 11 8 Garhi Ya Sin 312,747 70,954 581 348 11 6

Khanpur 303,015 87,243 387 114 10 11 Shikarpur 364,333 154,877 941 187 15 7 Total 1,182,407 400,317 2,589 1,135 47 32

Source: UNOCHA 2010-11

It is to be noted here that PDMA Sindh has mentioned 10 UCs of Khanpur Taluka whereas UNOCHA in its Profile for District Shikarpur updated as on January 2011, reported 11 affected UCs of Khanpur Taluka.

The latest situational update for District Shikarpur for the �oods 2012 are given below38

UC Sultan Kot: In sultankot town, UC Sultankot, Taulka Shikarpur, about 10 houses have so far collapsed. The water levels for now to 2 to 3 feet. DCO has called for a camp in hospital.

UC Hamayoun: Abdal town is flooded with 2 feet water, with crops completely submerged, in UC Hamayoun.

UC Lodra: The Lodra town is flooded with 3 feet water, drainage completely submerged. Few houses have collapsed there as well. In chandia village one person died due to roof collapse. About 20 houses have collapsed in Dergah bhudal Faqir, with no casualities. In village Taghio Jafri, two women and two children died due to roof collapse in the house.

Garhi Yasin Town: Two to three feet water levels in the town. A woman died of house collapse in Odhana mohla, and a male injured.

UC Zerkhail: 70 t0 80% houses have collapsed in villages Qazi Pati, Qalbali Wandh, Jangi Khan Brohi, Bego Brohi, Paaro Jafri, Mirani village and Umed Ali Brohi. In village Qalbali ji wandh between 40-50 houses have collapsed. The IDPs have taken shelter in a school building. The village is flooded with about two feet of water. The crops are completely flooded there, with reports of number of cattle heads dead as well. The building of Union council and one school has completely collapsed.

UC Wazirabad: building of BHU Wazirabad is completely inundated with flood water.

Shikarpur City: The Deputy Commissioner Dr Azhar has called upon an Emergency meeting of all the officers and an Emergency has been declared. In most of the low lying residential areas about 4 feet water levels there as well, with about 2 feet water inside people's bedrooms. The Army has been called to rescue people there.

38 Foundation for Urban and Rural Development (FURD) 11 September 2012.

Page 40: Shrine of Faqeerullah Shah Alvi, Shikarpur€¦ · Fayyaz Ali Khan, Craig Von Hagen and Mehdi Bokhari Desktop Publishing: Noman Ali and Sarfaraz Ayub GIS Analyses and Mapping: Imra

DISASTER HISTORY AND ITS IMPACT26

Map

dat

a so

urce

(s):

PCO

(Pop

ulai

on C

ensu

s O

rgan

izat

ion)

: Bou

ndar

ies

Popu

latio

n C

ensu

s 19

98: T

aluk

a-w

ise

Affe

cted

pop

ulat

ion

Den

sity

(Est

imat

ed)

Dis

clai

mer

s:Th

e de

sign

atio

ns

empl

oyed

an

d th

e pr

esen

tatio

n of

mat

eria

l on

this

map

do

not

impl

y th

e ex

pres

sion

of

any

opin

ion

wha

tsoe

ver

on t

he p

art o

f iM

MA

P or

the

USA

IDco

ncer

ning

the

lega

l sta

tus

of a

ny c

ount

ry, t

errit

ory,

city

or

area

or

of it

s au

thor

ities

, or

conc

erni

ng th

e de

limita

tion

ofits

fron

tiers

or b

ound

arie

s.

Map

Doc

Nam

e:

Cre

atio

n D

ate:

Proj

ectio

n/D

atum

:W

eb R

esou

rces

:N

omin

al S

cale

at A

4:1:

30,0

00,0

00

iM

MAP

_Shi

karp

ur_A

ffect

ed_P

opul

atio

n D

ensi

tyA4

L_v1

_01

Sept

embe

r,16

, 201

2W

GS8

4ht

tp://

ww

w.im

map

.org

Jaco

baba

d

Kas

hmor

e

Kha

irpur

Lark

ana

Shik

arpu

r

Sukk

ur

Gar

hiYa

sin

Kha

npur

Lakh

i

Shik

arpu

r

122

225

128

164

Indi

a

Paki

stan

Iran

Afgh

anis

tan

Uzb

ekis

tan

Turk

men

ista

n

Arab

ian

Sea

Tajik

ista

n

Dis

pute

d Te

rrito

ry

Punj

ab

Balo

chis

tan

Sind

hFata

Chi

na

Gilg

it Ba

ltist

anKP

K Azad

Kas

hmir

Map

Loc

ator

Dis

tric

t Shi

karp

ur A

ffect

ed P

opul

atio

n D

ensi

tySe

ptem

ber,

2012

Lege

nd Dis

trict

Bou

ndar

y

Talu

ka B

ound

ary

Affe

cted

Pop

ulat

ion

Den

sity

07.

515

3.75

Kilo

met

ers

Talu

kaPo

pul

nM

ale

Fem

ale

Pop

Den

sity

Sex

Ro

Ave

rage

HH

Size

Em

ated

HH

sG

AR

HIY

ASI

NTA

LUKA

312,

747

161,

824

150,

923

322

107

5.2

55,8

48KH

AN

PUR

TALU

KA30

3,01

515

8,28

414

4,73

148

210

94.

758

,272

LAKH

ITA

LUKA

202,

312

104,

093

98,2

1857

610

64.

934

,881

SHIK

AR

PUR

TALU

KA36

4,33

318

9,35

517

4,97

864

910

84.

753

,578

Tota

l1,

182,

407

613,

556

568,

851

471

108

5.9

202,

580

Sour

ce: 2

010

Estim

ated

Bas

ed o

n 19

98 C

ensu

s

Pers

ons/

Squa

re k

ilom

eter

123

- 128

129

- 164

165

- 225

Upt

o - 1

22

Page 41: Shrine of Faqeerullah Shah Alvi, Shikarpur€¦ · Fayyaz Ali Khan, Craig Von Hagen and Mehdi Bokhari Desktop Publishing: Noman Ali and Sarfaraz Ayub GIS Analyses and Mapping: Imra

DISTRICT SHIKARPUR27

2.2.2 Livelihood District Shikarpur has been the severe hit of floods, thrice, in 2010, 2011 and 2012. Analysis of both floods is given as under along with the data available at the time of writing this report on flood 2012.

2.2.2.1 Impact of Floods 2010 on Livelihood: According to the official statistics, 584 villages were inundated and affected due to the floods 201039. Due to the inundation and floods 2010, based on household recall of their main source of livelihood before the floods, significant changes in livelihood have occurred as a result of the floods. The percentage of household describing themselves as without a main source of livelihood has increased from 7.9% before the flood to almost 60%. Agriculture farming has reduced from around 50% of household’s main form of livelihood to being cited as the main source of livelihood for less than 10%40. Non-farm livelihoods were heavily affected by the floods. 55% of households not engaged in agriculture report that there business or employment situation has been totally affected by the floods. Only 19% of households reported that their non-agricultural livelihood had not been impacted. 40% of the people have been displaced from the land while 39% are not being able to return to your usual place of residence. As a result, 25% were not being able to afford to rebuild (25%). Overcrowding, lack of money and security issues were the most often mentioned concerns of both the male and female community groups. The highest priority in terms of the restoration of community infrastructure for both male and female community groups were mosques41.

2.2.2.2 Impact of Floods 2011 on Livelihood: The severity of floods 2011 was much lesser as compared to the floods 2010, nonetheless, a significant proportion of people were affected in 2011. Around Only 7 villages were affected in the total 4 talukas. Total 75 people were affected out of which 53 were male and 29 females42. As a result, there was no big shock to the sources of livelihood for people of Shikarpur due to floods 2011.

2.2.2.3 Impact of Floods 2012 on Livelihood: As compared to 2011 floods, the severity of 2012 floods is much higher. The district is inundated with 2-3 feet standing water. More than 100 houses were collapsed in 4 UCs. So far 6 casualties and 1 injury is reported in Shikapur District.

39 Provincial Disaster Management Authority (PDMA), Government of Sindh 40 Multi Cluster Rapid Humanitarian Need Assessment (2010), UNOCHA 41 ibid 42 Sindh Flood Situation Update (Sep,2011), UNOCHA

Page 42: Shrine of Faqeerullah Shah Alvi, Shikarpur€¦ · Fayyaz Ali Khan, Craig Von Hagen and Mehdi Bokhari Desktop Publishing: Noman Ali and Sarfaraz Ayub GIS Analyses and Mapping: Imra

DISASTER HISTORY AND ITS IMPACT28

2.2.3 Damage to Agriculture: It has been previously established that agriculture is the main source of livelihood/income for the people of district Shikarpur. So any damage to this sector directly affects the population, particularly the poor, in this district. Rice crop had been the most severely hit by the floods 2010 along with the minor effect on cotton. All the vegetables were damaged. As the table below depicts, almost all the food and cash crops had been affected but the extent of damage had been more severe in floods 2010 as compared to floods 2011.

Table 2.3.1: Crop Area Affected in District Shikarpur

District Name Crop type

Floods 2010 Floods 2011 Baseline Damage43 Baseline Damage44

Standing crop (000 acres)

Standing crop (000 acres)

Standing crop (acres) Standing crop (acres)

Shik

arpu

r

Cotton N/A N/A 82 12 (8% crop damage)

Rice 110 109.7

(100% crop damage) 102,000 8,160 (8% crop damage)

Sugarcane 16.6 13.3

(80% crop damage) 29 0

Fodder 5.5 4.4 (80% crop damage) N/A N/A

Total N/A 110,18945 252,356 20,218

(8% crop damage)

During floods 2012, standing crops have been completely submerged in UC Hamayoun and UC Zerkhail.

43 Flood Impact Profile: Shikarpur (2010), UNOCHA 44 Sindh Flood Situation (2011), UNOCHA 45 Rapid Crop Damage Assessment (2010), Pakistan: Flood/Rains, SUPARCO

Page 43: Shrine of Faqeerullah Shah Alvi, Shikarpur€¦ · Fayyaz Ali Khan, Craig Von Hagen and Mehdi Bokhari Desktop Publishing: Noman Ali and Sarfaraz Ayub GIS Analyses and Mapping: Imra

DISTRICT SHIKARPUR29

G

ap A

naly

sis

of L

ivel

ihoo

d an

d A

gric

ultu

re46

46 *R

apid

Cro

p Da

mag

e As

sess

men

t (20

10),

Paki

stan

: Flo

od/R

ains

, SU

PARC

O

**

Floo

d Im

pact

Pro

file:

Shi

karp

ur (2

010)

, UN

OCH

A

**

*Sin

dh F

lood

Situ

ation

(201

1), U

NO

CHA

**

**M

ulti

Clus

ter R

apid

Hum

anita

rian

Nee

d As

sess

men

t (20

10),

UN

OCH

A

**

***S

ocio

-Eco

nom

ic B

asel

ine

Surv

ey o

f Shi

karp

ur D

istric

t (20

10),

Rura

l Sup

port

Pro

gram

me

Net

wor

k (R

SPN

) Isla

mab

ad

Sect

or

Pre-

Floo

ds

Post

Flo

ods

Gap

Livelihood

� 56

% o

f the

pop

ulati

on a

ssoc

iate

d w

ith

farm

ing

� 7.

69%

of t

he p

eopl

e no

t doi

ng a

ny w

ork

� Bu

sines

s acti

vitie

s are

gen

erati

ng 2

.25%

of

the

inco

me

in th

is di

stric

t

� 1,

359

villa

ges w

ere

affec

ted

due

to fl

oods

778,

000

peop

le w

ere

affec

ted

� 27

4,29

3 pe

ople

wer

e ev

acua

ted

10%

of t

he p

eopl

e ar

e as

soci

ated

with

the

farm

ing

� 60

% o

f the

pop

ulati

on is

not

doi

ng a

ny w

ork

� 55

% o

f hou

seho

lds,

not

eng

aged

in a

gric

ultu

re

repo

rt th

at th

ere

busin

ess o

r em

ploy

men

t situ

ation

ha

s bee

n to

tally

affe

cted

by

the

flood

s �

117,

879

hous

es w

ere

dam

aged

out

of w

hich

94,

303

wer

e ka

cha

hous

es a

nd 2

3,57

6 pa

kka

hous

es

� 42

% o

f hou

seho

lds s

urve

yed

repo

rted

that

thei

r ho

use

was

com

plet

ely

dest

roye

d

� Al

mos

t 25,

000

peop

le w

ere

not

prov

ided

pro

per a

ssist

ance

for

evac

uatio

n �

The

thre

e hi

ghes

t prio

rities

for

resu

min

g ag

ricul

tura

l wor

k an

d liv

elih

ood

activ

ities

: �

Land

recl

amati

on

� Fi

nanc

e �

Inpu

ts

� 47

% o

f the

des

troy

ed h

ouse

s ne

ed a

ssist

ance

for

reha

bilit

ation

of t

heir

hous

es

Agriculture and Livestock

� 11

0,00

0 ac

res o

f sta

ndin

g cr

op o

f ric

e in

20

10

� 25

2,35

6 ac

res

wer

e so

wn

in 2

010-

11

� 33

hec

tare

s of c

otton

wer

e so

wn

in 2

010-

11

� To

tal l

ives

tock

pop

ulati

on in

the

dist

rict

Shik

arpu

r is 1

,891

,033

hea

ds

� To

tal a

gric

ultu

re lo

ss in

dist

rict S

hika

rpur

is

repo

rted

to b

e be

twee

n 90

% to

100

% d

ue to

flo

ods 2

010

� 10

9,70

0 ac

res

wer

e da

mag

ed d

ue to

floo

ds 2

010

� 20

,218

acr

es o

f cro

p ar

ea w

as a

ffect

ed in

floo

ds

2011

5 he

ctar

es o

f cott

on c

rops

wer

e da

mag

ed d

ue to

flo

ods 2

011

� 28

live

stoc

k po

pula

tion

wer

e lo

st d

ue to

floo

ds

2011

Sign

ifica

nt lo

ss in

ani

mal

fodd

er h

as b

een

repo

rted

� Si

ndh

hous

ehol

ds e

stim

ate

loss

es to

cro

p la

nd o

f bet

wee

n 90

% a

nd 1

00%

40%

of h

ouse

hold

s rep

ort

losin

g th

e m

ajor

ity o

r the

ir en

tire

rice

crop

Dist

ributi

on o

f whe

at s

eeds

w

as n

eede

d ur

gent

ly

Page 44: Shrine of Faqeerullah Shah Alvi, Shikarpur€¦ · Fayyaz Ali Khan, Craig Von Hagen and Mehdi Bokhari Desktop Publishing: Noman Ali and Sarfaraz Ayub GIS Analyses and Mapping: Imra

DISASTER HISTORY AND ITS IMPACT30

2.2.4 Analysis of Food Security Situation As established in the previous section, district Shikarpur is a food insecure district of Pakistan. Floods of 2010 and 2011 worsened the existing situation of the people. Thus the indicators of food security, availability, access, utilization and stability showed dismal situation in this district. Food availability became critical as 58% of households completely lost their stock of wheat flour and bread, 32% lost all pulses they had stored and cooking oil, ghee and butter was fully lost by 38% of the households. The immediate effects of the floods resulted in the loss of cereals as most of the most of the households did not have food stocks or that their stocks would last no more than one week. The lack of food stocks was the result of significant losses households have incurred due to the floods.

Due to the floods, many flood affected households had shifted their consumption to less preferred foods and borrowing was practiced by more than one third of households across the district. Skipping meals is widely practiced and the sale of farm animals was slightly high.

Floods, particularly of 2010, had grave impact on livelihoods, a majority of households lived below the poverty line, 52 % lived below the poverty line and 24 percent above the poverty line. The low income levels further exacerbated by higher than normal food prices, leaving many households unable to purchase the amount of food they needed. The share of household expenditures on food increased from 61.8% to 65% of more than 50% of the population47. Hence the short term effects of floods 2010 made the most of the population highly food insecure. But with the help of government and humanitarian partners’ assistance, in the form of wheat seeds, pesticides, food grains etc., the economic activity revitalized in the district in the last year. Also the extent of damage of floods 2011 was not much severe compared to the floods 2010. So the people started coming out of the poverty trap. Nonetheless, stability/sustainability of is still worrisome in this district so it is still a food insecure district.

2.2.5 Health No damage occurred to district and taluka headquarters hospitals in 2010 and floods but during 2010 floods many of the health facilities were partially damaged and destroyed. According to MacRAM 2010 approximately 50% of nursing mothers report at the household level that they have reduced breast feeding and around 15% have stopped breast feeding since the floods. Women report that they do not have sufficient privacy to breast feed. Around 10% of mothers with young children reported having to reduce the complementary food given. Specialized nutrition interventions were seldom reported by households. Community groups reported that they were most likely to access health care from a hospital or a health center. Fever, skin disease and diarrhea were the most common health concerns in the communities.

As on January 2011, 13 health facilities were rehabilitated and refurbished by World Health Organization (WHO), International Rescue Committee (IRC) government line departments.

47 Multi Cluster Rapid Humanitarian Need Assessment (2010), UNOCHA

Page 45: Shrine of Faqeerullah Shah Alvi, Shikarpur€¦ · Fayyaz Ali Khan, Craig Von Hagen and Mehdi Bokhari Desktop Publishing: Noman Ali and Sarfaraz Ayub GIS Analyses and Mapping: Imra

DISTRICT SHIKARPUR31

During floods 2011, out of total 35 basic health units (BHUs) 9 BUUs were damaged. Out of 7 rural health centres (RHCs) 1 RHC were damaged. Moreover each health facility requires 1-2 hours walking distance to be accessed.

During floods 2012, BHU Wazirabad is completely inundated with 2-4 feet standing water. 6 casualties and one injury has been reported so far.

2.2.6 Education No considerable damage was reported to education sector during floods 2011.

During floods 2012 in UC Zerkhail, village, villages Qazi Pati, Qalbali Wandh, Jangi Khan Brohi, Bego Brohi, Paaro Jafri, Mirani village and Umed Ali Brohi. In village Qalbali ji wandh between 40-50 houses have collapsed. The IDPs have taken shelter in a school building. The village is flooded with about two feet of water.

Page 46: Shrine of Faqeerullah Shah Alvi, Shikarpur€¦ · Fayyaz Ali Khan, Craig Von Hagen and Mehdi Bokhari Desktop Publishing: Noman Ali and Sarfaraz Ayub GIS Analyses and Mapping: Imra

HAZARD, VULNERABILITY AND CAPACITY ANALYSIS 32

3 Hazard Vulnerability and Capacity Analysis

3.1 Hazard Hazard simply means danger or risk. The synonyms used for hazards are jeopardy, venture, peril or chance. A hazard is the situation which triggers disaster. But it can be also defined as:

“Hazard is a potentially damaging physical event, phenomenon or human activity that may cause the loss of life or injury, property damage, social and economic disruption or environmental degradation 48“.

Thus, hazard is a situation that has the potential to harm the health and safety of a people or damage their property, plants and equipment etc. Hazards can be divided into two categories.

3.1.1 Natural hazard There are natural processes or phenomena within the earth system that may constitute a damaging event. Example typhoons, tsunamis, earthquake and volcanic eruption cyclones, earthquakes, floods, landslides, storms are natural hazards.

3.1.2 Man-made hazard Any industrial, nuclear, or transportation accident, explosion, power failure, resource shortage, or other condition, resulting from man-made causes, which threaten or cause damage to property, human suffering, hardship or loss of life are termed as Man-Made hazard.

Hazard matrix49

Hazard Frequency Area a�ected/union councils Severity/Force Year

Floods Monsoon Entire district High (2012,2011,2010 2005,2003)

Heavy rains Seasonal /monsoon Whole district High 2003,2010,

2011 Earthquake --- Entire district Low 2001 Epidemics Seasonal Entire district Low Every year Transport accidents Often Entire district Low Every year Environmental degradation Through out Entire district Low Every year

48 The “Urban Governance and Community Resilience Guides” (ADPC, 2010) 49 Sindh Contingency Plan 2012

Page 47: Shrine of Faqeerullah Shah Alvi, Shikarpur€¦ · Fayyaz Ali Khan, Craig Von Hagen and Mehdi Bokhari Desktop Publishing: Noman Ali and Sarfaraz Ayub GIS Analyses and Mapping: Imra

DISTRICT SHIKARPUR33

3.2 Vulnerability Vulnerability here means the state of being at risk of or being exposed to hazards. It also refers to the inability to withstand the effects of a hostile environment.

“The attributes and circumstances of a community or system that makes it sensitive, vulnerable or susceptible to the damaging effects of a hazard50”.

Vulnerability precedes disasters, contribute to their severity, hinder and obstruct the disaster response. Vulnerability is divided into three types, as follows.

3.2.1 Physical/material vulnerability: Weakness of the built environment and lack of access to physical and material resources i.e living in hazard prone areas or in unsafe buildings, lack of savings, insurance and assets.

3.2.2 Social/organizational vulnerability: Inequality in social systems that discriminate against and marginalize certain groups of people from accessing resources and services constitutes social/organizational vulnerability. People who have been marginalized in social, economic or political terms are vulnerable to disasters. Weakness in social and organizational areas may also cause disasters e.g. deep division can lead to conflict and war. Conflict of resources due to poverty can also lead to violence.

3.2.3 Attitudinal/motivational vulnerability: Existence of fatalistic myths and religious beliefs influence people’s vulnerability to disaster risks. If people believe that disasters are ‘acts of God’ and if they have low confidence in their ability to affect change or have ‘lost heart’ and feel defeated by events they cannot control, these people are often harder hit by disasters.

Vulnerability matrix

Physical/material Social/organizational Attitudinal/motivational

SHIKARPUR is prone to various kinds of natural hazards especially to the floods. River Indus which flows on the district North East side has inundated and hit hard SHIKARPUR in 2010 floods. The 2012 floods were causes due to heavy monsoon rains

Population is the major issue of the district. Rapid population growth in the district is out of control which is leading to many socio-economic problems in the society increasing crime rates, urbanization problems in cities, jobs scarcity, mismanagement etc.

Conservatism of some of the groups in the communities tries to avoid good positive change and foreign aid.

Developmental projects lack mainstreaming of DRR measures.

According to the statistics figured out in 1998, about

In spite of the NGOs awareness efforts most of

50 Participant’s Course workbook (ADPC)

Page 48: Shrine of Faqeerullah Shah Alvi, Shikarpur€¦ · Fayyaz Ali Khan, Craig Von Hagen and Mehdi Bokhari Desktop Publishing: Noman Ali and Sarfaraz Ayub GIS Analyses and Mapping: Imra

HAZARD, VULNERABILITY AND CAPACITY ANALYSIS34

Physical/material Social/organizational Attitudinal/motivational Non availability of disaster resilient structures and low standard material used in the construction has increased the structural vulnerability.

76% of the district population lived in rural areas lacking basic facilities of life like education and health etc.2

the local communities are still unawareness of their risks and natural hazards like flood.

Early warning system mechanism of the district is not efficient. Modern technology is required to install for better anticipation of the disasters.

Clashes among the tribes are common in Shikarpur district. Many innocent people have been killed in bilateral clashes of Maher and Jatoi tribes. Still issues have not been settled between these tribes 5

The patriarchal system is prevailed in the most of the tribes and rural areas which is limiting women rights. Sometimes females are exposed to domestic violence

Some local leaders of vulnerable communities misguide the local NGOs and try to influence them.

The district has an extreme climate. Maximum temperature in summer goes up to 42C. May, June and July are the hottest months while temperature in winter comes down to 90C. (minimum temp)2

The literacy rate of Shikarpur is not impressive though number of primary schools and colleges are there but still the quality of education system is not up to the mark.

SHIKARPUR is an historical district having much old building architecture. Such buildings are prone to natural disasters like earthquakes and floods.

People are lacking sustainable livelihood which further increases their vulnerability against disasters.

The Sindh Canal 6 and Begari Canal between Shikarpur and Jacobabad

districts, which developed a breach during floods 2010, inundated most

area of the district and damaged crops and buildings.4

Encroachments and settlements near river belt is making people vulnerable to flood hazard.

3.3 Capacity Capacity is contrasted to vulnerability. Ability to perform or produce is capacity. Capacities are resources, means and strengths, which exist in households and communities and which enable them to cope with, withstand, prepare for, prevent, mitigate or quickly recover from a disaster.

Page 49: Shrine of Faqeerullah Shah Alvi, Shikarpur€¦ · Fayyaz Ali Khan, Craig Von Hagen and Mehdi Bokhari Desktop Publishing: Noman Ali and Sarfaraz Ayub GIS Analyses and Mapping: Imra

DISTRICT SHIKARPUR35

The combination of all the strengths attributes and resources available within a community, society or organization that can be used to achieve agreed goals make up its capacity51.

3.3.1 Physical/material c apacity: In most disasters, people suffer their greatest losses in the physical and material realm. Access to physical/material things or objects count as physical capacity. Few examples of physical and material capacity are cash, food, land, properties and tools.

3.3.2 Social /organizational capacity: However, even when everything physical is destroyed, people still have their skills, experiences and knowledge; they have family and social networks. They have leaders and systems for making decisions. They also have local, collective ‘wisdom’ reflected in their cultural practices that help them reduce or cope with disaster risks.

3.3.3 Attitudinal/motivational capacity: People also have positive attitudes and strong motivations such as the will to survive and willingness to help each other.

Capacity matrix

Physical/material Social/organizational Attitudinal/motivational Many schools, colleges, mosques and health centres known as critical infrastructures are available in the district which can be helpful both in routine and extreme circumstances

DDMA Shikarpur is a capacity of the district. It implements the DRR policies and coordinates with other stakeholders in routine and extreme circumstances.

Skills and knowledge of the old age people is real capacity of the local area.

District contingency plan is the real asset of the district because it contains all the stakeholder’s contact numbers, flood camps, health facilities and Data of the available resources.3

District government departments are assigned their roles and responsibilities in the contingency plan of the district. They have already prepared and organized mobile teams of their respective departments like health and livestock

There is a great change felt in the attitudes of both

government officials and community by the formation

of DMAs.

SHIKARPUR acquired All local NGOs and INGOs and Wish/will to survive and

51 Participant’s Course workbook (ADPC)

Page 50: Shrine of Faqeerullah Shah Alvi, Shikarpur€¦ · Fayyaz Ali Khan, Craig Von Hagen and Mehdi Bokhari Desktop Publishing: Noman Ali and Sarfaraz Ayub GIS Analyses and Mapping: Imra

HAZARD, VULNERABILITY AND CAPACITY ANALYSIS36

Physical/material Social/organizational Attitudinal/motivational economic importance because of its strategic location on the map of Sindh, being directly accessible to those who come from Central and West Asia through the Bolan Pass.

aid agencies provide technical and financial support to the vulnerable and hard hit communities.

sense of independence has given strength to the community people. The villagers don’t love to be dependent on others.

As most of the population lives in rural areas so majority of the people are connected to agricultural sector and are producing crops like sugarcane, wheat, rice and cotton. There are two main crop seasons; Kharif" and "Rabi" in SHIKARPUR District.

Police and Pak Army with their limited resources help the disaster hit communities. Police try to evacuate people to safer places and maintain law and order situation while Army helps in search & rescue and first aid assistance. (Army Doctors)

Volunteers and philanthropists from all over the districts provide financial and physical support to the local population in times of emergency.

Agricultural land of the district is mostly irrigated by Canals. However, other modes of land irrigation like pumps and tube wells are also available.

Disaster Management Committees (DMCs) are formed at the union council levels which are in contact with DDMA Shikarpur and other stakeholders. 3

Some of the humanitarian organizations are running awareness sessions in the vulnerable communities regarding DRR and DRM. They are also doing advocacy for them on different platforms.

Urban Drainage Schemes are good enough in District Shikarpur and all urban localities are covered with drainage, sewerage or open pacca drain systems.

The local media augments the voices of the vulnerable segments of local population.

Trainings have been conducted in disaster prone UCs to train the local community on �rst aid and search and rescue.

Forests keep environment clean, stop soil erosion and meet domestic energy requirements. In Shikarpur District, the forest area is spread over 24.0 thousand hectares which is 2.1% of the total area under forest in Sindh in the year 1997-98. 2

The traditional joint family system is found in the rural areas of the district. Joint family system provides social security in the society.

Technical and educated people from the vulnerable communities are invited for risk assessment process. They do their assessment at local level.

The district has different manufacturing units like textile, beverage, rice and oil

Union council’s sectaries are helpful because they keep data and information of the

Page 51: Shrine of Faqeerullah Shah Alvi, Shikarpur€¦ · Fayyaz Ali Khan, Craig Von Hagen and Mehdi Bokhari Desktop Publishing: Noman Ali and Sarfaraz Ayub GIS Analyses and Mapping: Imra

DISTRICT SHIKARPUR37

Physical/material Social/organizational Attitudinal/motivational mills. There is an industrial estate established in Shikarpur district which is located in District Headquarters Shikarpur.

whole union council.

The district has national and provincial highways network

Religious organizations and madrasa’s students do provide their services in times of emergency and facilitate search and rescue activities.

. SHIKARPUR was known as “OLD Paris” because of its modern buildings of that time and still some of those buildings exist in the district.1

Pickles and sweets of the district are famous. Besides these metal goods, carpets, cotton cloth, and embroidery are also part of their trade and collecting revenue and income by exporting them to other districts

Page 52: Shrine of Faqeerullah Shah Alvi, Shikarpur€¦ · Fayyaz Ali Khan, Craig Von Hagen and Mehdi Bokhari Desktop Publishing: Noman Ali and Sarfaraz Ayub GIS Analyses and Mapping: Imra

COORDINATION AND SUPPORT SERVICES ANNEXURES38

Map

dat

a so

urce

(s):

PCO

(Pop

ulai

on C

ensu

s O

rgan

izat

ion)

: Bou

ndar

ies

WFP

(Wor

ld F

ood

Pro

gram

me)

: Roa

ds, R

ailw

ays

WH

O (W

orld

Hea

lth O

rgan

izat

ion)

: Hea

lth F

acilit

ies

ESR

I: R

iver

sU

nive

rsity

of G

eorg

ia: S

hika

rpur

Set

tlem

ents

MO

DIS

: Flo

od E

xten

ts

Dis

clai

mer

s:Th

e de

sign

atio

ns

empl

oyed

an

d th

e pr

esen

tatio

n of

mat

eria

l on

this

map

do

not

impl

y th

e ex

pres

sion

of

any

opin

ion

wha

tsoe

ver

on t

he p

art o

f iM

MA

P or

the

USA

IDc o

ncer

ning

the

lega

l sta

tus

of a

ny c

ount

ry, t

errit

ory,

city

or

area

or o

f its

aut

horit

ies,

or c

once

rnin

g th

e de

limita

tion

of

Map

Doc

Nam

e:

Cre

atio

n D

ate:

Proj

ectio

n/D

atum

:W

eb R

esou

rces

:N

omin

al S

cale

at A

4:1:

30,0

00,0

00

iM

MA

P_S

hika

rpur

_Flo

od H

azar

d An

alys

is_M

apA4

L_v1

_01

Sept

embe

r,16

, 201

2W

GS

84ht

tp://

ww

w.im

map

.org

! C! C

! C! C

! C! <

! C! C

! C! C

! C! C

! C! C

! C! C! <

! C! C! C

! C! C

! C! C

! C

! C! C

! C! C

! C! C

! C! <

! C! C

! C! C

! C! C! C

! C! C

! C! C

! C! C

! C

! C! C

! C! C

! C! C

! C! C

! C! C

! C! C

! C! C

! C

! C! <

Gar

hiYa

sin

Kha

npur

Lakh

i

Shik

arpu

r

Am

rote

Bha

mbh

ir

Dak

han

Gah

eja

Gar

hiYa

sin

Jind

oD

ero

Mad

eji

Mirz

apur

Nau

shah

roA

bro

Nim

Shha

toM

angi

War

yaso

Gar

hiTe

gho

Gha

riD

hako

Meh

moo

daB

agh

Mia

nSa

hib

Pir B

uxSh

ujra

hR

ahim

abad Sh

abira

Aba

dTh

anhr

io

Zark

hel

Abd

ooB

hirk

an

Cha

k

Jeha

nK

han

Lakh

i

Ruk

Rus

tam

Sehw

ani

Taib

Waz

iraba

d

Ham

ayun

Jaga

n

Jaha

nwah

Jano

Kar

an

Lodr

a

Sulta

nK

ot

Indi

a

Paki

stan

Iran

Afgh

anis

tan

Uzb

ekis

tan

Turk

men

ista

n

Arab

ian

Sea

Tajik

ista

n

Dis

pute

d Te

rrito

ry

Punj

ab

Balo

chis

tan

Sind

hFata

Chi

na

Gilg

it Ba

ltist

anKP

K Azad

Kas

hmir

Map

Loc

ator

Dis

tric

t Shi

karp

ur F

lood

Haz

ard

Anal

ysis

Se

ptem

ber,

2012

Lege

nd

! A

Dis

trict

Bou

ndar

y

Talu

ka B

ound

ary

Rai

lway

Lin

e

Riv

ers

Roa

ds

Settl

emen

ts

Uni

on C

ounc

ils B

ound

ary

Dis

tanc

e fro

m R

iver

(5 K

ilom

eter

)

Floo

d H

azar

d Zo

ne

Hea

lth F

acili

ties

!CBA

SIC

HE

ALT

H U

NIT

!CD

ISP

EN

SAR

Y!C

HO

SPI

TAL

!<M

ATER

NAL

& C

HIL

D H

EALT

H C

ENTR

E!C

RU

RAL

HEA

LTH

CE

NTR

E! A

SUB

HE

ALT

H C

EN

TRE

TB C

LIN

IC

Kas

hmor

e

Sukk

ur

Kha

irpur

Lark

ana

Jaco

baba

d

Abo

ut 1

52 v

illag

es a

nd m

ore

than

hal

f of h

ealth

faci

lity

cent

res

are

lyin

g w

ithin

the

flood

haz

ard

zone

. Who

le o

f dis

tric

t is

expo

sed

to fl

ood

haza

rd e

xcep

t som

e so

uth

wes

tern

and

cent

ral p

arts

of t

he d

istr

ict;

whi

ch a

re re

lativ

ely

less

pron

e to

floo

d ha

zard

.

07

143.

5Ki

lom

eter

s

Page 53: Shrine of Faqeerullah Shah Alvi, Shikarpur€¦ · Fayyaz Ali Khan, Craig Von Hagen and Mehdi Bokhari Desktop Publishing: Noman Ali and Sarfaraz Ayub GIS Analyses and Mapping: Imra

DISTRICT SHIKARPUR39

4 Coordination and Support Services

4.1 Important Contacts

4.1.1 Departmental Focal Points Focal Point Contact Number Source EDO Health 0761-920022 www.sindhhealth.gov.pk/

EDO Agriculture 0791 - 515095 http://allahdingroup.com/tel_dir.php EDO Education 0726-920060-3 www.rsu-sindh.gov.pk/Link/telehphones.html DPO Shikarpur 0726-920100, 920200-1 Sindh Contingency Plan

4.1.2 List of Taluka Nazims with Address Taluka Name Address

Shikarpur Zafar Ali Shaikh Pir Nabi Shah Muhalla Shikarpur

Garhi Yasin Mr. Najaf Ali Khan Soomra Muhalla Madeji Town

Lakhi Ghulam Shah Muhammad Imran Village Shafi Muhammad Mangi

Khanpur Mehdi Hassan Khan Jatoi Village Sardar Khadim Hussain Khan Jatoi , Taluka Khanpur. Source: Election Commission of Pakistan

4.1.3 List of NGOs Working in Shikarpur Name Contact Al-MSWA Shikarpur 0306-3646257 Azad SWA Shikarpur 0300-3181146 CRC Shikarpur 0301-3420456 DIN Shikarpur 0333-7289826 Shikarpur Historical Society 0333-2680895 Al- Madina Social Welfare Association 0331-3100355 Azad Social Welfare Association 0333-7124816 Human Social Development Organization 0344-397 9774 Sindhri Development welfare Organization 0302-2888781 Rustam Social Welfare Association 0306-3650948 Sindh Seengar Social Welfare Association 0333-7168458 Sartiyoon Social Welfare Organization 0301-3406577, 0726-602378 Marvi Women Welfare Association 0333-7273873 Mehran Village Development And Social Welfare Association 0301-3889951 Village Social Welfare Association Arain 0331-3672245

Source: SPO and Pakistan Centre for Development Communication

Page 54: Shrine of Faqeerullah Shah Alvi, Shikarpur€¦ · Fayyaz Ali Khan, Craig Von Hagen and Mehdi Bokhari Desktop Publishing: Noman Ali and Sarfaraz Ayub GIS Analyses and Mapping: Imra

COORDINATION AND SUPPORT SERVICES ANNEXURES 40

4.2 Health Facilities List of health facilities are provided by WHO

4.2.1 List of BHUs Sr # Name TALUKA UC

1 MIRZAPUR Garhi Yasin Amrote 2 AMROTE SHARIF Garhi Yasin Amrote 3 KABALO Garhi Yasin Bhambhir 4 DAKHAN Garhi Yasin Dakhan 5 ALI KHAN Garhi Yasin Dakhan 6 MAROO KAKEPOTA Garhi Yasin Garhi Yasin 7 CHATTO MANGI Garhi Yasin Jindo Dero 8 GAHEJA Garhi Yasin Mirzapur 9 DODO DETHO Garhi Yasin Naushahro Abro

10 NIM Garhi Yasin Nim 11 ALLAHABAD Garhi Yasin Shhato Mangi 12 NABI SHAH WAGAN Garhi Yasin Waryaso 13 GARHI TEGO Khanpur Garhi Tegho 14 GARHI BUDHAL Khanpur Ghari Dhako 15 HAJI KHAN KALHORO Khanpur Shabira Abad 16 RUSTAM Khanpur Thanhrio 17 TARAI Khanpur Zarkhel 18 ABDU Lakhi Bhirkan 19 NIMORO Lakhi Bhirkan 20 JHALIKALWARI Lakhi Lakhi 21 RUK Lakhi Lakhi 22 ESSO TANWARI Lakhi Rustam 23 BADO Lakhi Sehwani 24 TAIB GOTH Lakhi Taib 25 DHANI BUX MALIK Lakhi Taib 26 WAZIRABAD Lakhi Wazirabad 27 JAMRA Lakhi Wazirabad 28 DEPUTY JO BUNGLOW Shikarpur Hamayun 29 HAMAYOON Shikarpur Hamayun 30 JAGGAN Shikarpur Jagan 31 ADAM KHAN Shikarpur Jagan 32 JEHAN KHAN Shikarpur Jahanwah 33 SHERAN PUR Shikarpur Jahanwah 34 DARWESH KAKEPOTA Shikarpur Jano 35 HAJI KHAWASTI Shikarpur Lodra

Page 55: Shrine of Faqeerullah Shah Alvi, Shikarpur€¦ · Fayyaz Ali Khan, Craig Von Hagen and Mehdi Bokhari Desktop Publishing: Noman Ali and Sarfaraz Ayub GIS Analyses and Mapping: Imra

DISTRICT SHIKARPUR41

4.2.2 List of RHCs Sr # Name TALUKA UC

1 GARHI YASIN Garhi Yasin Nim 2 KHANPUR Khanpur Ghari Dhako 3 MIAN JO GOTH Khanpur Mian Sahib 4 RAHIMABAD Khanpur Rahimabad 5 NADIRABAD Khanpur Shabira Abad 6 CHAK Lakhi Sehwani 7 SULTAN KOT Shikarpur Hamayun

4.2.3 List of Dispensaries Sr # Name TALUKA UC

1 JINDO Garhi Yasin Jindo Dero 2 AAYO Garhi Yasin Mirzapur 3 SARDARPUR Khanpur Garhi Tegho 4 SHIKARPUR Khanpur Ghari Dhako 5 QADIR Khanpur Rahimabad 6 CHODIO Lakhi Abdoo 7 BUDH Lakhi Bhirkan 8 MOHAMMAD Lakhi Chak 9 BHIRKAN Lakhi Chak

10 BORRIRI Lakhi Rustam 11 POLICE Shikarpur Jano 12 NEW Shikarpur Lodra 13 MOHD. Shikarpur Lodra

4.2.4 List of Hospitals Sr # Name TALUKA UC

1 GOVT. Garhi Yasin Jindo Dero 2 TALUKA Lakhi Abdoo 3 RBUT Shikarpur Jano 4 WOMEN Shikarpur Jano 5 HIRANAND Shikarpur Jano

4.2.5 List of Maternal and Child Health Centres Sr # Name TALUKA UC

1 MIAN Khanpur Mian Sahib 2 BHIRKAN Lakhi Chak 3 SHIKARPUR Lakhi Ruk 4 ALIABAD Lakhi Rustam


Recommended