+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Shun-ichiro Karato Yale University Department of Geology & Geophysics New Haven, CT

Shun-ichiro Karato Yale University Department of Geology & Geophysics New Haven, CT

Date post: 02-Feb-2016
Category:
Upload: stacey
View: 46 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
Description:
Water distribution in the Earth ’ s mantle Inferred from Electrical Conductivity implications for the global water cycle. Shun-ichiro Karato Yale University Department of Geology & Geophysics New Haven, CT. Conclusions. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Popular Tags:
23
Water distribution in the Earth’s mantle Inferred from Electrical Conductivity implications for the global water cycle Shun-ichiro Karato Yale University Department of Geology & Geophysics New Haven, CT 06/18/22 1
Transcript
Page 1: Shun-ichiro Karato Yale University Department of Geology & Geophysics New Haven, CT

Water distribution in the Earth’s mantle Inferred from Electrical Conductivity

implications for the global water cycle

Shun-ichiro KaratoYale University

Department of Geology & Geophysics

New Haven, CT

04/22/23 1

Page 2: Shun-ichiro Karato Yale University Department of Geology & Geophysics New Haven, CT

• Electrical conductivity is a useful sensor for the water content in the mantle.

• Water content is both radially and laterally heterogeneous.• A large contrast in water content between the upper

mantle and the transition zone suggests partial melting at ~410-km.

Most of the upper mantle is partially melted (melt fraction is small and does not affect properties except for seismic wave velocities in the deep upper mantle).

Partial melting at 410-km stabilizes the ocean mass.

04/22/23 2

Conclusions

Page 3: Shun-ichiro Karato Yale University Department of Geology & Geophysics New Haven, CT

How to infer the distribution of water from geophysical observations?

04/22/23 3

X

X

X

X

X

?

* *

*: mostly for the upper mantle

Properties involving thermally activated processes are sensitive to water content.Lab studies are more complete for electrical conductivity than for Q and LPO.

Page 4: Shun-ichiro Karato Yale University Department of Geology & Geophysics New Haven, CT

seismic wave velocity versus water content

04/22/23 4

Seismic velocities are insensitive to water content.

Page 5: Shun-ichiro Karato Yale University Department of Geology & Geophysics New Haven, CT

5

Influence of water on seismic discontinuities

oli

oli

wad

wad

04/22/23

Topography of discontinuities is insensitive to water content (at high T).

Page 6: Shun-ichiro Karato Yale University Department of Geology & Geophysics New Haven, CT

6

electrical conductivity from geophysical studies

Kelbert et al. (2009)Tarits et al. (2004)Ichiki et al. (2006)Baba et al. (2010)

04/22/23

Page 7: Shun-ichiro Karato Yale University Department of Geology & Geophysics New Haven, CT

wadsleyite

Dai and Karato (2009b)

olivine, orthopyroxene, garnet, wadsleyite, ringwoodite

04/22/23 7

Page 8: Shun-ichiro Karato Yale University Department of Geology & Geophysics New Haven, CT

8

Sensitivity of electrical conductivity to T, Cw, fO2, Mg#

04/22/23

Electrical conductivity is sensitive to Cw, but not to other parameters.

Page 9: Shun-ichiro Karato Yale University Department of Geology & Geophysics New Haven, CT

Testing the model for the upper mantle

04/22/23 9

pyrolite (olivine+opx+pyrope), SIMS water calibration

[Dai and Karato (2009)]

Page 10: Shun-ichiro Karato Yale University Department of Geology & Geophysics New Haven, CT

Electrical conductivity and water in the mantle

04/22/23 10

Mineral physics model Geophysical model

Page 11: Shun-ichiro Karato Yale University Department of Geology & Geophysics New Haven, CT

04/22/23 11

XWater content is layered (+ lateral heterogeneity) Partial melting at ~ 410-km

Page 12: Shun-ichiro Karato Yale University Department of Geology & Geophysics New Haven, CT

What happens after 410-km melting?

04/22/23 12

a thick low velocity layer(due to complete wetting)

Most of the upper mantleis partially melted (with a small melt fraction).

Page 13: Shun-ichiro Karato Yale University Department of Geology & Geophysics New Haven, CT

04/22/23 13

thick low velocity regions above the 410-km (Tauzin et al. 2010)

Page 14: Shun-ichiro Karato Yale University Department of Geology & Geophysics New Haven, CT

04/22/23 14

410-km partial melting stabilizes the ocean mass.

No mid-mantle melting

With mid-mantle melting

Page 15: Shun-ichiro Karato Yale University Department of Geology & Geophysics New Haven, CT

15

conclusions

• Water content (Cw) in the transition zone/upper mantle can be mapped from electrical conductivity observations.

• Mantle water content is layered.– ~0.01 wt% for the upper mantle, ~0.1 wt% for the transition

zone partial melting at 410-km a majority of the upper mantle is partially melted. a thick low velocity layer above 410-km

• Ocean mass is buffered by partial melting at 410-kmNeed for experimental studies on lower mantle mineralsNeed for geophysical observations for the lower mantle

04/22/23

Page 16: Shun-ichiro Karato Yale University Department of Geology & Geophysics New Haven, CT

1604/22/23

Page 17: Shun-ichiro Karato Yale University Department of Geology & Geophysics New Haven, CT

1704/22/23

Page 18: Shun-ichiro Karato Yale University Department of Geology & Geophysics New Haven, CT

04/22/23 18

Page 19: Shun-ichiro Karato Yale University Department of Geology & Geophysics New Haven, CT

19

Ito et al. (1983) Dixon et al. (2002)

MORB source region (asthenosphere): well constrained (~0.01 wt%) OIB source regions: water-rich (FOZO) (~0.1 wt%)

How are they distributed?localized? global (layered)?

04/22/23

Page 20: Shun-ichiro Karato Yale University Department of Geology & Geophysics New Haven, CT

20

Influence of element partitioning

Fe H

wadsleyite

04/22/23

Page 21: Shun-ichiro Karato Yale University Department of Geology & Geophysics New Haven, CT

Meier et al. (2009)puzzling results <-- due to insensitivity of seismological properties to water content?

<-- radial heterogeneity in water content? <-- influence of kinetics on phase boundary topography?

Water-temperature distribution from VP,S and MTZ thickness

04/22/23 21

Page 22: Shun-ichiro Karato Yale University Department of Geology & Geophysics New Haven, CT

22

Water may affect seismological observations

• T-effect and water-effect on seismic wave velocities • T-effect and water-effect on the phase boundary

h

V

04/22/23

Page 23: Shun-ichiro Karato Yale University Department of Geology & Geophysics New Haven, CT

04/22/23 23


Recommended