+ All Categories

SHWATA

Date post: 08-Aug-2018
Category:
Upload: anonymous-v9e1zjtwoe
View: 212 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend

of 54

Transcript
  • 8/22/2019 SHWATA

    1/54

    CERTIFICATE

    This is to certify that in miss R.K.SWATI has carried out the research embodied in

    the present dissertation entitled RURAL DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMMES IN

    INDIA:-AN OVERVIEW.Under my supervision as a part of 8th

    paper of 6th

    sem

    B.A(Hons.) part Third Arts in mahila mahavidhayalay, BHU.This dissertation is an

    independent work and not constitute part of any material submitted for any

    research degree or diploma here or elsewhere.

    Supervisior

    Professor InuMehta

    B.H.U.

  • 8/22/2019 SHWATA

    2/54

    ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

    It gives me immense pleasure to express my gratitude to my dissertation supervisor

    , Prof (mrs.) Inu Mehta, for her able guidance and encouragement .Without her it

    would not have been possible to bring out this work.

    I have no words to express my heartful gratitudes to my father

    Mr. Kamendra kumar roy, mother Mrs. Ragini roy, brother (priyanshu) and sister

    (R.K.tripti), whose const ant love, affection and support have always been a source

    of inspiration for me.

    I

    Must thank my friends moral support during period of my dissertation work.

    April,2013

    NAME: R.K.SWATI

    ROLL NO:10131MM236

  • 8/22/2019 SHWATA

    3/54

    CONTENT

    S. NOS. TOPICS

    1. INTRODUCTION

    2. LITERATURE REVIEW

    3. SCOPE AND IMPORTANCE OF RURAL DEVELOPMENT

    4. PROBLEMS IN RURAL DEVELOPMENT

    5. RURAL DEVELOPMENT-STRATEGIES & CAPACITIES

    6. NAME OF RURAL DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMMES: PRE &

    POST INDEPENDENCE

    7. COOPERATIVES FOR PEOPLE-CENTRED RURAL

    DEVELOPMENT

    8. RURAL DEVELOPMENT THROUGH DECENT WORK

    9. SOME IMPORTANT AGENCIES FOR RURAL DEVELOPMENT

    10. CONCLUSION

  • 8/22/2019 SHWATA

    4/54

    Rural Development Programmes In ndia:-An Overview

    INTRODUCTION

    There are no universally accepted approaches to rural development. It is a choice

    Influenced by time, space and culture. The term rural development connotes overalldevelopment of rural areas to improve the quality of life of rural people. In this sense,

    it is a comprehensive and multidimensional concept, and encompasses the

    development of agriculture and allied activities, village and cottage industries and

    crafts, socio-economic infrastructure, community services and facilities and, above

    all, human resources in rural areas. As a phenomenon, rural development is the end-

    result of interactions between various physical, technological, economic, social,

    cultural and institutional factors. As a strategy, it is designed to improve the

    economic and social well-being of a specific group of people the rural poor. As a

    discipline, it is multi-disciplinary in nature, representing an intersection of

    agriculture, social, behavioural, engineering and management sciences. (Katar Singh

    1999). In the Indian context rural development assumes greater significance as 72.22

    per cent (according to the 2001 census) of its population still live in rural areas. Most

    of the people living in rural areas draw their livelihood from agriculture and allied

    sectors (60.41 % of total work force), and poverty mostly persists here (27.1 % in

    1999-2000). At the time of independence around 83 per cent of the Indian population

    were living in rural areas. Accordingly, from the very beginning, our planned strategy

    emphasized rural development and will continue to do so in future. Strategically, the

    focus of our planning was to improve the economic and social conditions of the

    underprivileged sections of rural society. Thus, economic growth with social justice

    became the proclaimed objective of the planning process under rural development. It

    began with an emphasis on agricultural production and consequently expanded to

    promote productive employment opportunities for rural masses, especially the poor,

    by integrating production, infrastructure, human resource and institutionaldevelopment measures. During the plan periods, there have been shifting strategies

  • 8/22/2019 SHWATA

    5/54

    for rural development. The First Plan (1951-56) was a period when community

    development was taken as a method and national extension services as the agency for

    rural development. Co-operative farming with local participation was the focus of the

    Second Plan (1956-61) strategy. The Third Plan (1961-66) was the period of re-

    strengthening the Panchayati Raj System through a democratic decentralized

    mechanism. Special Area Programmes were started for the development of backward

    areas in the Fourth Plan (1969-74). In the Fifth Plan (1974-79), the concept of

    minimum needs programme was introduced to eradicate poverty in rural areas. There

    was a paradigm shift in the strategy for rural development in the Sixth Plan (1980-

    85). The emphasis was on strengthening the socio-economic infrastructure in rural

    areas, and initiatives were taken to alleviate disparities through the Integrated Rural

    Development Programme (IRDP). During the Seventh Plan (1985-90), a new strategy

    was chalked out to create skill-based employment opportunities under different

    schemes. Special programmes for income generation through creation of assets,

    endowments and land reforms were formulated for participation by the people at

    the grassroots level.

  • 8/22/2019 SHWATA

    6/54

    LITERATURE REVIEW

    1.ROLE OF WOMEN IN PROMOTING RURAL SANITATION:STUDY BASED

    OBSERVATION FROM WEST BENGAL:-

    1)Women plays the decisive role in promption and prper management of household-

    level sanitation in a family.

    2.Interestingly it was found that women from 65% of selected household,happily

    invested their money earned from self help group(SHG)activies while installation of

    their house-hold.

    3.Children from female-headed families werw found much more conscious and

    concern about personal hygiene norms than male-headed families.

    2.THESIS ON COPERATIVE AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT IN INDIA BY

    KATAT SINGH AND R S PUNDIR

  • 8/22/2019 SHWATA

    7/54

    Institute of Rural Management, Anand388 001, India

    August 2000

    List of Abbreviations

    AMUL : Anand Milk Union Limited

    CEO : Chief Executive Officer

    CIP : Co-operative Initiative Panel

    CPRs : Common Pool Resources

    DCCB : District Central Co-operative BDDP : Dairy Development Programme

    EEC : European Economic Community

    FSS : Farmers Service Society

    GOI : Government of India

    ICA : International Co-operative Alliance

    IFFCO : Indian Farmers Fertiliser Co-operative

    IRMA : Institute of Rural Management Anand

    KRIBHCO : Krishak Bharti Co-operative

    LAMPS : Large - sized Adivasi Multipurpose Society

    LT : Long Term

    NABARD : National Bank for Agriculture and Rural Development

    NDC : National Development Council

    NDDB : National Dairy Development Board

    NEP : New Economic Policy

    NGO : Non Governmental Organisation

    NRM : Natural Resource Management

    OED : Operations Evaluation Department

    OF : Operation Flood

  • 8/22/2019 SHWATA

    8/54

    PACS : Primary Agricultural Credit Society

    PCARDB : Primary Co-operative Agriculture and Rural Development Bank

    SCARDB : State Co-operative Agriculture and Rural Development Bank

    SCB : State Co-operative Bank

    ST : Short Term

    WDC : Womens Dairy Co-operative Society

    WTO : World Trade Organisation

  • 8/22/2019 SHWATA

    9/54

    WHY DO WE NEED RURAL DEVELOPMENT

    Rural development has always been an important issue in all discussions pertaining

    to economic development, especially of developing countries, throughout the world.

    In the developing countries and some formerly communist societies, rural mass

    comprise a substantial majority of the population. Over 3.5 billion people live in the

    Asia and Pacific region and some 63% of them in rural areas. Although millions of

    rural people have escaped poverty as a result of rural development in many Asian

    countries, a large majority of rural people continue to suffer from persistent poverty.

    The socio-economic disparities between rural and urban areas are widening and

    creating tremendous pressure on the social and economic fabric of many developing

    Asian economies. These factors, among many others, tend to highlight the

    importance of rural development. The policy makers in most of the developing

    economies recognize this importance and have been implementing a host of programs

    and measures to achieve rural development objectives. While some of these countries

    have achieved impressive results, others have failed to make a significant dent in the

    problem of persistent rural underdevelopment Rural - Is an area, where the people

    are engaged in primary industry in the sense that they produce things directly for the

    first time in cooperation with nature as stated by Srivastava (1961). Rural areas are

    sparsely settled places away from the influence of large cities and towns. Such areas

    are distinct from more intensively settled urban and suburban areas, and also from

    unsettled lands such as outback or wilderness. People live in village, on farms and in

    other isolated houses. Rural areas can have an agricultural character, though many

    rural areas are characterized by an economy based on logging, mining, oil and gas

    exploration, or tourism. Lifestyles in rural areas are different than those in urban

    areas, mainly because limited services are available. Governmental services like law

    enforcement, schools, fire departments, and libraries may be distant, limited in scope,

    or unavailable. Utilities like water, sewer, street lighting, and garbage collection maynot be present. Public transport is sometimes absent or very limited; people use their

  • 8/22/2019 SHWATA

    10/54

    own vehicles, walk or ride an animal. A society or community can be classified as

    rural based on the criteria of lower population density, less social differentiation, less

    social and spatial mobility, slow rate of social change, etc. Agriculture would be the

    major occupation of rural area. Development: It refers to growth, evolution, stage of

    inducement or progress. This progress or growth is gradual and had sequential

    phases. Always there is increasing differentiation. It also refers to the over all

    movement towards greater efficiency and complex situations.

  • 8/22/2019 SHWATA

    11/54

    SCOPE AND IMPORTANCE OF RURAL DEVELOPMENT

    Rural development is a dynamic process, which is mainly concerned with the rural

    areas. These include agricultural growth, putting up of economic and socialinfrastructure, fair wages as also housing and house sites for the landless, village

    planning, public health, education and functional literacy, communication etc. Rural

    development is a national necessity and has considerable importance in India because

    of the following reasons.

    1. About three-fourth of India's population live in rural areas, thus rural development

    is needed to develop nation as whole.

    2. Nearly half of the country's national income is derived from agriculture, which is

    major occupation of rural India.

    3. Around seventy per cent of Indian population gets employment through

    agriculture.

    4. Bulks of raw materials for industries come from agriculture and rural sector.

    5. Increase in industrial population can be justified only in rural population s

    motivation and increasing the purchasing power to buy industrial goods.

    6. Growing disparity between the urban elite and the rural poor can lead to political

    instability.

    Rural development is a national necessity and has considerable importance in Indiabecause of the following reasons.

    1. To develop rural area as whole in terms of culture, society, economy, technology

    and health.

    2. To develop living slandered of rural mass.

    3. To develop rural youths, children and women.

  • 8/22/2019 SHWATA

    12/54

    4. To develop and empower human resource of rural area in terms of their

    psychology, skill, knowledge, attitude and other abilities.

    5. To develop infrastructure facility of rural area.

    6. To provide minimum facility to rural mass in terms of drinking water, education,transport, electricity and communication.

    7. To develop rural institutions like panchayat, cooperatives, post, banking and credit.

    8. To provide financial assist to develop the artisans in the rural areas, farmers and

    agrarian unskilled labor, small and big rural entrepreneurs to improve their economy.

    9. To develop rural industries through the development of handicrafts, small scaled

    industries, village industries, rural crafts, cottage industries and other related

    economic operations in the rural sector.

    10. To develop agriculture, animal husbandry and other agricultural related areas.

    11. To restore uncultivated land, provide irrigation facilities and motivate farmers to

    adopt improved seed, fertilizers, package of practices of crop cultivation and soil

    conservation methods.

    12. To develop entertainment and recreational facility for rural mass.

    13. To develop leadership quality of rural area.

    14. To improve rural marketing faciliy

    15. To minimise gap between the urban and rural in terms of facilities availed.

    16. To improve rural peoples participation in the development of state and nation as

    whole.

    17. To improve scopes of employment for rural mass.

    18. For the sustainable development of rural area.

    19. To eliminate rural poverty.

    20. To solve the problems faced by the rural mass for their development.

  • 8/22/2019 SHWATA

    13/54

    PROBLEMS IN RURAL DEVELOPMENT

    1. People related:

    1. Traditional way of thinking.

    2. Poor understanding.

    3. Low level of education to understand developmental efforts and new technology.

    4. Deprived psychology and scientific orientation.

    5. Lack of confidence.

    6. Poor awareness.

    7. Low level of education.

    8. Existence of unfelt needs.

    9. Personal ego.

    2. Agricultural related problems:

    1. Lack of expected awareness, knowledge, skill and attitude.

    2. Unavailability of inputs.

    3. Poor marketing facility.

    4. Insufficient extension staff and services.

    5. Multidimensional tasks to extension personnel.

    6. Small size of land holding.

    7. Division of land.

    8. Unwillingness to work and stay in rural areas.

  • 8/22/2019 SHWATA

    14/54

    3. Infrastructure related problems:

    1. Poor infrastructure facilities like water, electricity, transport, educational

    institutions, communication, health, storage facility etc.

    4. Economic problems:

    1. Unfavourable economic condition to adopt high cost technology.

    2. High cost of inputs.

    3. Underprivileged rural industries

    5. Social and Cultural problems:

    1. Cultural norms and traditions

    2. Conflict within and between groups, castes, religions, regions, languages.

    6. Leadership related problems:

    1. Leadership among the hands of inactive and incompetent people.

    2. Malafied interest of leaders.

    3. Biased political will.

    7. Administrative problems:

    1. Earlier, majority of the programmes were planning based on top to bottom

    approach and were target oriented.

    2. Political interference.

    3. Lack of motivation and interest.

    4. Unwillingness to work in rural area.

    5. Improper utilization of budget.

  • 8/22/2019 SHWATA

    15/54

    Rural Developmentstrategies and capacities

    Rural India finds mention in every document on poverty, inequality, malnutrition, un-

    and

    disguised employment, agriculture and artisanal livelihoods, and genderrelationships.

    Almost all these refer to the limited capacities for economic growth and

    development.

    Thereby, technologies and investments in people and infrastructure for these

    technologies

    have become the bedrock of rural development efforts in the country. This theme

    presents

    an overview of S&T strategies for rural development in India. The focus is on

    understanding the S&T capacities that exist, and how the knowledge and

    technologies are

    accessed and used for rural development.

    India is Rural (2000-01 to 2004-05)

    Rural Population of 830 Millionin 1100 Million Cultivators + Main and Marginal workers430 Million Urban Literacy Rate (81%); Rural (61%) Female Literacy 45% in Rural Areas (70% in Urban Areas) Malnourished49% of Children and 39% of Women in Rural India (36% and

    20% in Urban Areas)

    Rural Infant Mortality Rate- 61 (37 in Urban Areas) in 1000Source:NSSO (various rounds); NCEUS, 2007.

    Overall rural development efforts in India focus on:

    Provision of basic infrastructure facilities in the rural areas e.g. schools, health

    facilities, roads, drinking water, electrification etc.

  • 8/22/2019 SHWATA

    16/54

    NAME OF RURAL DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMMES :-PRE AND AFTER

    INDEPENDENCE

    RURAL

    DEVELOPME

    NT

    PROGRAMM

    ES Sr. No.

    Name of the

    Programme

    Started by Year

    Pre independence

    1 Sriniketan

    Project

    Shri Rabindra

    Nath Tagore

    1914

    2 Marthandam

    Project

    Dr.Spencer

    Hatch

    1921

    3 Gurgaon

    Experiment

    F.L.Brayne 1928

    4 Sarvoday

    Programme

    Shri Vinoba

    Bhave

    1948-49

    Post early independence(1947-53)

    1 Firka

    Development

    Madras

    Government

    1948

    2 Etawah Pilot

    Project

    Albert Mayor 1948

    3 Nilokheri

    Experiment

    S.K.Dey 1948

    4 Community

    Development

    Programme

    (CDP)

    Government of

    India

    1952

  • 8/22/2019 SHWATA

    17/54

    5 National

    Extension

    Service (NES)

    Government of

    India

    1953

    RURAL

    DEVELOPMEN

    T EFFORTS /

    PROGRAMMES

    AFTER

    INDEPENDENC

    E No

    Year Name of the

    Programme after

    independence

    1 1948 GMFC Grow More

    Food

    Campaign

    2 1950 JMPC Japanese

    Method of

    Paddy

    Cultivation

    3 1952 CDP Community

    Development

    Programme

    4 1953 NES National

    Extension

    Service

    5 1961 IADP Intensive

    Agriculture

    District

  • 8/22/2019 SHWATA

    18/54

    Programme

    6 1963 ANP Applied

    Nutrition

    Programme

    7 1964-65 IAAP Integrated

    Agricultural

    Area

    Programme

    8 1964 ICDP Integrated

    Cattle

    Development

    Programme

    9 1965 NDP National

    Demonstratio

    n Project

    10 1966 ODP Oilseed

    Development

    Programme

    11 1966-67 HYVP High

    Yielding

    Varieties

    Programme

    12 1966 FTEP Farmers

    Training and

    Education

    Programme

    13 1966 FTC Farmers

  • 8/22/2019 SHWATA

    19/54

    Training

    Centre

    14 1966 MCP Multiple

    Crop

    Programme

    15 1970 DPAP Draught

    Prone Area

    Programme

    16 1970 DFAP Dry Farming

    Area

    Programme

    17 1971 ICDP Integrated

    Cotton

    Development

    Programme

    18 1971 WVDP Whole

    Village

    Development

    Programme

    19 1971 SFDA Small

    Farmers

    Development

    Agency

    20 1971 MFAL Marginal

    Farmers and

    Agricultural

    Labour

  • 8/22/2019 SHWATA

    20/54

    Agency

    21 1971-72 TADP Tribal Area

    Development

    Programme

    22 1973 HADP Hill Area

    Development

    Programme

    23 1974 T&V Training and

    Visit System

    24 1974 KVK Krushi

    Vigyan

    Kendra

    25 1974 TDB Tribal

    Development

    Block

    26 1975 CADP Command

    Area

    Development

    Programme

    27 1976 IRDP Intergraded

    Rural

    Development

    Programme

    28 1976 ORP Operational

    Research

    Project

    29 1976 SF Social

  • 8/22/2019 SHWATA

    21/54

    Forestry

    30 1977 DDP Desert

    Development

    Programme

    31 1978 LLP Lab-to-Land

    Programme

    32 1978 NARP National

    Agricultural

    Research

    Project

    33 1979 TRYSEM Training of

    Rural Youth

    for Self

    Employment

    34 1980 NREP National

    Rural

    Employment

    Programme

    35 1980 DRDA District Rural

    Development

    Agency

    36 1980-81 TUP Tribal

    Upliftment

    Project

    37 1981 RLEGP Rural

    Landless

    Employment

  • 8/22/2019 SHWATA

    22/54

    Guarantee

    Programme

    38 1982 DWCRA Development

    of Women

    and Children

    in Rural

    Areas

    39 1984-85 NAEP National

    Agricultural

    Extension

    Project

    40 1986-87 NWDP National

    Watershed

    Development

    Project

    41 1989 JRY Jawahar

    Rojgar

    Yojana

    42 1990-91 NWDPRA National

    Water

    Development

    Project for

    Rain fed

    Areas

    43 1998 NATP National

    Agricultural

    Technology

  • 8/22/2019 SHWATA

    23/54

    Project

    44 1998 ATMA Agricultural

    Technology

    Management

    Agency

    45 2005 NAIP National

    Agricultural

    Innovation

    Project

  • 8/22/2019 SHWATA

    24/54

    Cooperatives for People-Centred Rural Development

    Cooperatives play a major self-help role in rural areas, particularly where private

    businesses hesitate to go and public authorities do not provide basic services. They

    are instrumental in providing opportunities for productive employment, as well as

    offering health care, education, potable water, improved sanitation, roads, and market

    access, while giving a strongervoice to rural groups.

    Why action is needed

    Cooperatives

    Create opportunity for employment, income generation, and increase theavailability of goods and services, all of which also contribute to economic

    growth.

    members are also thebeneficiaries

    Are strongly rooted in their community, and are thus more likely to positivelyinfluence it.

    Are guided by a set of underlying values and ethics and are schools of socialdialogue and democracy.

    Are based on the values of self-help, self-responsibility, democracy, equality,equity and solidarity; as well as ethical values of honesty, openness, social

    responsibility, and caring for others.

  • 8/22/2019 SHWATA

    25/54

    -type activities into legally protected and productive

    work.

    Mobilize self-help and motivate people to make better use of their self-helppotential.

    economic and socialdevelopment needs of their members and the larger community, because

    members are both producers and beneficiaries.

    Are often the only provider of services in rural communities, given that othertypes of enterprises often find it too costly to invest in these areas or anticipate

    low levels of economic return. This is the case for electricity, water resources,

    financial services, and consumer supplies. In India, for instance, the consumer

    needs of 67 percent of rural households are covered by cooperatives.

    communityidentity and strengthen the social fabric, particularly important in post-crisis

    contexts.

    Offer an economic future for youth in rural areas, and thus prevent ruraldepopulation.

    Themes Rural Policy Briefs Facts and figures

    cooperatives. In Uganda, forinstance, they increased from 554 in 1995 to 7,500 in 2009.1

    Roughly one billion people are members of cooperatives, and over 100 millionwork in them.

  • 8/22/2019 SHWATA

    26/54

    in rural areas.

    Sustainable energy cooperatives are experiencing rapid expansion, with windpower cooperatives in Canada, Denmark, India and the United Kingdom and

    photovoltaic cooperatives in Brazil and Mexico.

    for USD 1 trillion inturnover.

    Cooperatives are resilient to crises. During the ongoing financial and economiccrisis, savings and credit cooperatives, and cooperative banks have

    experienced an increase in almost every facet of their business, including:

    increases in assets and deposits, in volume of lending, members, and better

    interest rates.

    their oftenlimited resources, mobility and voice. This also applies for disadvantaged

    groups such as indigenous populations and disabled persons.

    Withstand crises better than their capital-centered counterparts. of their member-

    driven nature, a key approach for rural areas whose populations depend on the

    resilience of natural resources such as land, water, and soil quality.

    Encourage modernization by facilitating the dissemination of new technologiesand processes.

  • 8/22/2019 SHWATA

    27/54

    Agriculture

    to farmers,through sharing and pooling of resources, improved access to markets, higher

    returns for their products, and strengthened bargaining position.

    Cooperatives are a means to facilitate engaging in food processing, therebyallowing their members to access and benefit from higher value-added

    markets.

    Farmer cooperatives improve member livelihoods and local re-investments,support rural development and the viability of rural communities.

    Cooperatives also address the social protection needs of their members,thereby reducing farmers vulnerability, particularly in times of crisis, and

    prevent them from falling into poverty.

    cooperatives are involvedin agriculture. In Ethiopia, for instance, 900,000 people in agriculture are

    estimated to generate part of their income through cooperatives.

    Health

    with medicalservices otherwise not available through public or private health programmes,

    including

    home-based care (e.g. for individuals with HIV/AIDS).

    services, member-owned, not-for-profit health cooperatives such as in Brazil, Colombia and

    Japan, may constitute an alternative to private insurers. In Benin, the savingsand credit cooperative federation, FECECAM, is providing financial services

  • 8/22/2019 SHWATA

    28/54

    including affordable micro-health and life insurance to over 500,000 individual

    members, 90 percent of whom live in rural areas.

    Housing, Infrastructure and Utilities

    Housing and building cooperatives directly create employment through theconstruction and maintenance of housing facilities, while providing housing at

    considerably low costs. For example, housing cooperatives for seniors in rural

    areas are popular in the USA.

    Cooperatives develop infrastructure (roads, water, schools and playgrounds),which generates employment, while helping provide an enabling environment

    for other enterprises, as well as an attractive setting for workers and their

    families.

    l in the overall electricity supply of rural areas.Currently, 85 percent of people without electricity live in rural areas of

    developing countries, mostly in sub-Saharan Africa and South Asia. In 2005,

    58 percent of rural electricity in Argentina was provided by cooperatives,

    without which advancements in agriculture would have been compromised and

    jobs in rural communities lost.

    Tourism

    increasing worldwide. Through tourism cooperatives, rural populations can generate important and

    complementary income. For example, agri-tourism cooperatives in Italy

    emphasize

    home-made and locally produced foods for tourists that seek a specificallyrural or farm experience.

  • 8/22/2019 SHWATA

    29/54

    Through tourism cooperatives, members may also increase their say in the

    overall nature, extent, speed and other modalities of tourism development in

    their area.

    Defining a Cooperative

    than other corporateforms. It is, an autonomous association of persons united voluntarily to meet

    their common economic, social and cultural needs and aspirations through ajointly owned and democratically controlled enterprise.

    Rural contexts can host a variety of cooperatives, in agriculture (production,processing, marketing, purchasing and sales), but also financial services

    (banking, credit and loan, insurance), in health, electricity,telecommunications, water, consumer goods and services, housing, tourism,

    and

    handicrafts. Source: ILO: The Promotion of Cooperatives Recommendation, 2002 (No.193)

    Savings and credit and other financial organizations

    to banking isscarce, the large majority of adults store money at home, with friends or

    through other means.Cooperative financial institutions represent 30 to 50 cent

    of cooperatives in any given country.

    Access to finance creates opportunity for producers to purchase goods andservices that increase their productivity. For instance, agriculture producers

  • 8/22/2019 SHWATA

    30/54

    require access to finance to cover costs between harvesting periods, help them

    manage seasonal liquidity shortages and cover unforeseen expenses.

    Policy options

    Strengthen the cooperative business model using ILO's Promotion of

    Cooperatives Recommendation,

    2002 (No. 193)

    practices (e.g.registration procedures, taxation policies, accounting standards, capital

    standards for financial

    institutions as well as ability to access funding) that support the establishmentand growth of cooperatives, in consultation with cooperative organizations.

    Develop and implement an adequate regulatory framework for cooperatives,including for instance, labour law, taxation law, accounting standards and

    competition law.

    Establish equal treatment between cooperatives and other enterprises, takinginto consideration the distinctive structure of cooperatives and their member-

    regulation needs to focus, first of all, on the self-control mechanisms of

    cooperatives.

    Provide special support for cooperatives that address specific social and publicpolicy needs and activities benefiting disadvantaged groups or regions.

    Provide for an efficient and effective implementation of the regulatoryframework, such as provisions on registration of cooperatives and auditing.

  • 8/22/2019 SHWATA

    31/54

    Promote the establishment of secondary and tertiary cooperative structures

    (that is, associations of cooperatives) as well as horizontal linkages between

    primary cooperatives, so that the value-added in the processing and

    commercialization of products remains with cooperative members.

    Raise awareness among policymakers, for instance, to promote entrepreneurialdiversity in the banking industry, including cooperative banks.

    business model and itsadvantages, at all appropriate levels of the national education and training

    systems, and in the wider society.

    Materials and Techniques forCooperative Management Training

    (MATCOM)

    This is a high quality, standardized and comprehensive training package. The

    MATCOM project (1978-1993) developed cooperative management training

    materials, which were put at the disposal of national cooperative movements and

    development partners, who could then prepare local versions. MATCOM consists of

    40 trainers manuals and 60 learning elements covering different types of

    cooperatives in various economic sectors, different target groups and different levels

    of cooperative management. Many of the manuals have been translated into French,

    Spanish, Portuguese, as well as 40 other local languages. The package is currently

    undergoing updates and revisions.

    COOPREFORM

    This programme (1993-2002) was part of the ILO-DANIDA initiative on cooperative

    development in rural areas to promote genuine cooperatives in the context of

    democratization, decentralization and structural adjustment. At least 61 countries

    benefited from COOPREFORM assistance directly or indirectly, and some 29

    countries either promulgated a new cooperative law or embraced a new cooperativespolicy (or both). This prepared the ground for ILOs ongoing substantial work to

  • 8/22/2019 SHWATA

    32/54

    support constituents and cooperative organizations to strengthen their policies and

    legal frameworks in line with R. 193.

    SYNDICOOP

    This joint initiative (2004-2006) among the International Cooperative Alliance

    (ICA), the International Trade Union Confederation (ITUC) and the ILO helped

    strengthen organization among informal economy workers, and improve employment

    opportunities, income and working conditions through cooperatives in Kenya,

    Rwanda, the United Republic of Tanzania, South Africa and Uganda. Lessons

    learned from SYNDICOOP have guided programmes such as COOPAFRICA (2007-

    2010), which updated and replicated certain aspects in nine African countries

    (Ethiopia, Kenya, Lesotho, Rwanda Swaziland, Tanzania, Uganda, Zambia and

    Zanzibar). COOPAFRICA aimed at mobilizing the cooperative self-help mechanism

    to tackle development constraints, such as unemployment, lack of social protection,

    lack of empowerment and poverty.

    Strengthen the productivity of existing cooperatives and their competitiveness,among others by providing for training and other forms of assistance to

    members,

  • 8/22/2019 SHWATA

    33/54

    office-bearers and staff of cooperatives in order to develop technical,

    entrepreneurial and managerial skills.

    workersorganizations, and cooperatives.

    Encourage employers organizations to extend membership to cooperativeswishing to join them.

    cooperative membersto join them, and to assist their own members to establish cooperatives.

    ILO's role

    international governmental legal

    instrument to promote cooperatives, namely R. 193.

    the last 15 years alone it

    has assisted over 65 countries in their cooperative policy and law reform. Most

    recently, it has contributed to the design of the Ley Marco para las cooperatives de

    America Latina; the Uniform Cooperative Act for OHADA (Organisation pour l'

    Harmonisation en Afrique du Droit des Affaires); and the implementation assessment

    of the 2003 European Union Regulation on cooperatives in the 27 EU member

    countries and 3 European Economic Area countries.

    cooperative organizations in

    developing cooperatives of all types and sizes, focusing on four closely interrelated

    areas:

    political importance of

    cooperatives

    -specific research, education and training

    ILO closely cooperates with the International Co-operative Alliance (ICA),comprised of 240 cooperative member organizations in 90 countries; and is a

  • 8/22/2019 SHWATA

    34/54

    member of the Committee for the Promotion and Advancement of Cooperatives

    (COPAC), composed of ICA, ILO, FAO and UN.

    1 ILO: Resilience of the Cooperative Business Model in Times of Crisis (Geneva:

    2009)

    2 ICA: Statistical Information on the Co-Operative Movement (2011) Available at:

    http://www.ica.coop/coop/statistics.html#economic

    3 Statistical Information on the Co-Operative Movement, op. cit.

    4 ICA: Global 300. Available at:

    5 ILO: Resilience of the Cooperative Business Model in Times of Crisis (Geneva:

    2009)

    6Information from the National Co-operative Union of India (NCUI) Available at:

    7 Chambo, Suleman Adam: Agricultural Co-operatives: Role in Food Security and

    Rural Development (New York: 2009)

    8 Pollet, Ignace: Cooperatives in Africa: The Age of Reconstruction Synthesis of a

    Survey in Nine African Countries, CoopAFRICA Working Paper No. 7 (ILO: Dar es

    Salaam, 2009)

    9 Lemma, Teigist: Growth Without Structures: The Cooperative Movement in

    Ethiopia (ILO/World Bank Institute, Geneva: 2007)

    10 ILO: Cooperatives and Rural Employment, Fact Sheet (Geneva: 2007) 11 ICA:

    Housing Co-operatives in USA (August: 2007) Available at:

    12 Nietz, Alexandra: Comparative Study on Rural Electrification Policies in

    Emerging Economies. Keys to Successful Policies (International Energy Agency:

    Paris, 2010) Available at:

    13 Federacin Argentina de Cooperativas de Electricidad y Otros Servicios Pblicos

    Limitada (2011) Available at:

  • 8/22/2019 SHWATA

    35/54

    14 Schneiderman, Ross M. and Doskow, Vivian: "Savings for the Poor," in

    Newsweek (24 January 2011)

    DIFFERENT PROGRAMMES AND AGENCIES FOR RURAL

    DEVELOPMENT

    1.THE DISTRICT RURAL DEVELOPMENT AGENCY (DRDA) The District

    Rural Development Agency (DRDA) has traditionally been the principal organ at the

    District level to oversee the implementation of different anti-poverty programmes.

    Since its inception, the administrative costs of the DRDAs were met by way of

    setting apart a share of the allocations for each programme. However, of late, the

    number of the programmes had increased and while some of the programmes

    provided for administrative costs of the DRDAs, others did not. There was no

    uniformity among the different programmes with reference to administrative costs.

    Keeping in view the need for an effective agency at the district level to coordinate the

    anti-poverty effort, a new Centrally Sponsored Scheme for strengthening the DRDAs

    has been introduced with effect from 1st April, 1999. Accordingly, the administrative

    costs are met by providing a separate budget provisions. This scheme which is

    funded on a 75:25 basis between Centre and States, aims at strengthening and

    professionalising the DRDAs.

    Role and Functions of the DRDA

    1 If effective programme design is critical to successful implementation of rural

    development programmes, so is an effective delivery agency. None of the anti-

  • 8/22/2019 SHWATA

    36/54

    poverty programmes can have impact unless they are implemented with clarity of

    purpose and a commitment to the task. It is here that the DRDAs play a critical role.

    The DRDAs are not the implementation through overseeing the implementation of

    different programmes and ensuring that necessary linkages are provided. To this

    extent the DRDA is a supporting and facilitation organization and needs to play a

    very effective role as a catalyst in development process.

    2 The district Rural Development Agency is visualized as specialized and a

    professional agency capable of managing the anti-poverty programmes of the

    Ministry of Rural Development on the one hand and to effectively relate these to the

    overall effort of poverty eradication in the District. In other words, while the DRDA

    will continue to watch over and ensure effective utilization of the funds intended for

    anti-poverty programmes, it will need to develop a far greater understanding of the

    processes necessary for poverty alleviation/eradication. It will also need to develop

    the capacity to build synergies among different agencies involved for the most

    effective results. It will therefore need to develop distinctive capabilities rather than

    perform tasks that are legitimately in the domain of the PRIs or the line departments.

    The role of the DRDA will therefore be distinct from all the other agencies, including

    the Zilla Parishad.

    3 DRDAs must themselves be more professional and should be able to interact

    effectively with various other agencies. They are expected to coordinate with the line

    department, the Panchayati Raj Institutions, the banks and other financial institutions,

    resources required for poverty reduction effort in the district. It shall be their

    endeavor and objective to secure inter-sectoral and inter-departmental coordination

    and cooperation for reducing poverty in the district. It is their ability to coordinate

    and bring about a convergence of approach among different agencies for povertyalleviation and would set them apart.

  • 8/22/2019 SHWATA

    37/54

    4 The DRDAs are expected to coordinate effectively with the Panchayati Raj

    Instructions. Under no circumstances will they perform functions of PRIs.

    5 The DRDAs will maintain their separate identity but will function under the

    chairmanship of the Chairman of Zilla Parishad. They are expected to be a

    facilitating and supporting organization to Zilla Parishad, providing necessary

    executive and technical support in respect of poverty reduction efforts. Wherever the

    Zilla Parishads are not in existence of are not functional, the DRDAs would function

    under the Collector/District Magistrate/Deputy Commissioner, as the case may be.

    6 The DRDAs are expected to oversee the implementation of different anti-poverty

    programmes of the Ministry of Rural Development in the district. This is not be

    confused with actual implementation, which will be by the Panchayati Raj and other

    Institutions. The DRDAs will monitor closely the implementation through obtaining

    of periodic reports as well as frequent field visits. The purpose of the visit should be

    to facilitate the implementing agencies in improving implementation process, besides

    ensuring that the quality of implementation of programmes is high. This would

    include overseeing whether the intended beneficiaries are receiving the benefits

    under the different programmes.

    7 The DRDAs shall keep the Zilla Parishad, the State and Central Government duly

    informed of the progress of the implementation of the programmes through periodic

    reports in the prescribed formats. Special report, as and when called for, shall be

    provided.

  • 8/22/2019 SHWATA

    38/54

    8 It shall be the duty of the DRDAs to oversee and ensure that the benefits

    specifically earmarked for certain target groups (SC/ST, women and disabled) reach

    them. They shall all necessary steps to achieve the prescribed norms.

    9 The DRDAs shall take necessary step to improve the awareness regarding rural

    development and poverty alleviation particularly among the rural poor. This would

    involve issues of poverty, the opportunities available to the rural poor and generally

    infusing a sense of confidence in their ability to overcome poverty. It would also

    involve sensitizing the different functionaries in the district to the different aspects of

    poverty and poverty alleviation programmes.

    10 The DRDAs will strive to promote transparency in the implementation of different

    anti-poverty programmes. Towards this end, they shall publish periodically, the

    details of the different programmes and their implementation.

    11 Keeping in view, the substantial investment that are being made in poverty

    alleviation programmes, the DRDAs shall ensure financial discipline in respect of the

    funds received by them, whether from Central of State Governments. They shall also

    ensure that the accounts are properly maintained including in respect of the funds

    allocated to banks or implementing agencies in accordance with the guidelines of

    different programmes.

    12 Thus the role of the DRDA is in terms of planning for effective implementation of

    anti-poverty programmes; coordinating with other agencies-Governmental, non-

    Governmental, technical and financial for successful programme implementation;

    enabling the community and the rural poor to participate in the decision marking

    process, overseeing the implementation to ensure

  • 8/22/2019 SHWATA

    39/54

    20 T5 1

  • 8/22/2019 SHWATA

    40/54

    adherence to guidelines, quality, equity and efficiency; reporting to the prescribed

    authorities on the implementation; and promoting transparency in decision making

    and implementation.

    13 In addition the DRDAs shall coordinate and oversee the conduct of the BPL

    Census and such other surveys that are required from time to time.

    14 The DRDAs shall also carry out / aid in carrying out action research/ or evaluation

    studies that are initiated by the Central/State Governments.

    15 The DRDAs should deal only with the anti-poverty programmes of the Ministry of

    Rural Development. If DRDAs are to be entrusted with programmes of other

    ministries or those of the State Governments, it should be ensured that these have a

    definite antipoverty focus. Entrusting of any programme to the DRDAs, other than

    anti-poverty programmes of the Ministry, be it of any other Ministry of Government

    of India or the respective State Government will have to be done with the approval of

    the Secretary, Rural Development of the respective State (s), who should examine

    such request in consultation with the Ministry of Rural Development, Government of

    India. In such cases, it must be ensured that adequate provision is made for requisite

    staffing needed for proper implementation of the programme.

  • 8/22/2019 SHWATA

    41/54

    Agriculture & Rural Development has been the key mantra for

    a sustained and long-termeconomic growth in India. The same is in

    the sharper focus today with the Government taking keen interest to

    ensure a comprehensive and visible uplift of this sector through

    effective implementation of various old and new schemes. The

    Government runs its large-scale rural development schemes mainly

    through the Ministry of Rural Devel- opment, National Bank for

    Agriculture and Rural De- velopment (NABARD), and Khadi and

    Village Industries Commission (KVIC). Be- sides, some

    autonomous bod- ies like District Rural De- velopment Agency

    (DRDA), National Institute of Rural Development (NIRD), Na-

    tional Rural Roads Develop- ment Agency (NRRDA) and Council for

    Advancement of Peoples Action and Rural Technology

    (CAPART) are also working in tandem with the Government for a

    better Rural India.

    Given Below is an over- view of the various schemes of NABARD

    and KVIC related to the rural development:

  • 8/22/2019 SHWATA

    42/54

    1.NABARD

    NABARD was set up with a mission to promote sustain- able

    and equitable agriculture and rural development through

    effective credit support, related services, institution building

    and other innovative initia- tives. Primarily its objectives

    are to (i) serve as an apex fi-

    nancing agency; (ii) take mea- sures towards institution build- ing for

    improving absorptive capacity of the credit delivery system,

    including monitoring, formulation of rehabilitation schemes,

    restructuring of credit institutions, training of person- nel, etc.; (iii)

    co-ordinate the rural financing activities of all institutions engaged in

    devel- opmental work at the field level and liaise with Government of

    India, state governments, Re- serve Bank of India (RBI) and other

    national level institutions concerned with policy for- mulation;

    and (iv) undertake monitoring and evaluation of projects refinanced

    by it.

    Schemes Available

    I. Investment Credit (Medium

    And Long Term) Refinance: Special Focus: Refinance on

    liberal terms for strengthening the rural credit delivery system for the

    development of North- Eastern region; Guidelines of hi-tech and

    export-oriented projects in farm and non-farm sectors and set-up

    Agriculture Development Finance Com- panies in Andhra

    Pradesh, Tamil Nadu and Karnataka for financing hi-tech/com-

    mercial ventures. Beneficiaries: State Co- operative Agriculture &

  • 8/22/2019 SHWATA

    43/54

    Rural Development Banks (SCARD- Bs), State Co-operative Banks

    (SCBs), Regional Rural Banks (RRBs), Commercial Banks (CBs),

    State Agricultural De- velopment Finance Companies (ADFCs) and

    Primary Urban Co-operative Banks.

    Period of Refinance: 15years

  • 8/22/2019 SHWATA

    44/54

    Quantum of Refinance:

    In the range of 90100 per cent of the project depending upon thenature of Financial Institution involved, Region of Project (whether

    North- eastern region or other re- gion) and category of Sector

    involved.

    Interest on Refinance:

    6-6.75 per cent (based on the loan size and activity/region).

    II. Production Credit NABARD provides short- term refinance for

    various types of production/ market- ing/ procurement activities.

    Different types of refinance available, term of refinance, eligible

    Financial Institutions and rate of interests charge- able for that are

    given in Table

    1 on the next page:

    III. Rural Infrastructure Devel- opment Fund (RIDF) Beneficiaries:

    State Gov- ernments, Panchayat Raj Institutions (PRIs), Non-

    Governmental Organisa- tions (NGOs) and Self-Help Groups

    (SHGs).

    Activities Covered: Primary Schools, Primary Health Cen- tres,

    Village Haats, Joint For- est Management, Terminal and Rural

    Market, Rain Water Harvesting, Fish Jetties, Mini Hydel and System

    Improve- ment Projects in Power Sector, Rural Drinking Water Supply

    Scheme, Citizen Information Centres, Anganwadi Centres and

    Shishu Shiksha Kendras. Methodology: All new project

  • 8/22/2019 SHWATA

    45/54

    concepts received are placed before the Proj- ects Sanctioning

    Committee (PSC) for approval before ac- cepting detailed projects.

  • 8/22/2019 SHWATA

    46/54

    Sl.no Available towhom

    Activity/Purpose

    Short Term

    Refinance

    Rate of

    Interest

    %

    1. SCBs on behalf

    of all eligible

    DCCDs in form

    of consolidated

    limits

    Seasonal

    Agricultural

    Operation (SAO)

    If level

    of NPAs

    is upto

    20% den

    5.25

    otherwise

    5.75

    SCBs.

    2. SCBs on behalf

    of all eligible

    DCCDs in form

    of consolidated

    limits

    For financing

    approved short

    term

    agricultural/allied

    and marketingactivities

    6.50

    3. SCBs on behalf

    of all eligible

    DCCDs in form

    of consolidated

    limits

    Marketing of

    crops

    6.00

  • 8/22/2019 SHWATA

    47/54

    4. SCBs on behalf

    of all eligible

    DCCDs in form

    of consolidatedlimits

    Primary Weavers

    Cooperative

    Societies

    (PWCS) forproduction and

    marketing of

    cloth

    6.00

    5. State

    Cooperative

    Banks

    For Financing

    Procurement and

    Marketing of

    Cloth and

    Trading in Yarn

    by

    Apex/Regional

    Weavers

    Cooperative

    Societies

    6.25

    6. Scheduled

    Commercial

    Banks

    For Financing

    Working Capital

    Requirements of

    Primary

    Handloom

    Weavers

    Cooperative

    Societies

    6.25

    7. State

    Cooperative

    For Financing

    Working Capital

    6.25

  • 8/22/2019 SHWATA

    48/54

    Banks/Scheduled

    Commercial

    Banks

    Requirements of

    SHDCs and

    SHnDCs

    8. SCBs on behalf

    of

    DCCBs/DICBs

    For Financing

    Working Capital

    Requirements of

    Cottage,

    Village,Small

    scale, Primary

    and Apex

    Industrial

    Cooperative

    Societies

    Apex

    Societies

    6.25

    Primary

    Societies

    6.00

    9. SCBs on behalf

    of

    DCCBs/DICBs

    For Financing

    Working Capital

    Requirements of

    Laboer Contract

    and Forest

    Labour

    Cooperative

    Societies

    Apex

    Societies

    6.25

    Primary

    Societies

    6.00

    10. SCBs/DCCBs For Financing

    Working Capital

    Requirements of

    Rural Artisans

    for Production

    6.00

  • 8/22/2019 SHWATA

    49/54

    IV. Research and Development

    Fund

    Objective: To acquire new insights into theproblems ofagriculturaland

    ruraldevelop- mentthroughin-depthstudies and applied research and try- ing

    outinnovativeapproachesbacked upby technical and economicstudies.

    Beneficiaries: Approved re- search institutions, organisa- tionsandother

    agencies,which areengagedinaction-oriented applied research.

    V.OtherSchemes

    Besides the above-men- tioned schemes NABARD is also running

    Kisan Credit Card and Micro Finance schemes.Both these schemes are

    not discussedhere as they have already been covered in detail in an article

    published elsewhere in this journal.

    and Marketing

  • 8/22/2019 SHWATA

    50/54

    2.KVIC

    Khadi and Village Indus- tries Commission is a statu- torybodyestablishedbyanact

    of Parliament in April 1957 for the development of Khadi andVillageIndustriesin

    India. Broad objectives for its estab- lishment are social objectives of providing

    employment,eco- nomic objective ofproducing saleablearticles and thewiderobjective of

    creating self-reli- ance amongst the poor andbuilding up of a strong rural community

    spirit. The high- lightsofthemainschemesofKVICareasfollows:

    Schemes Available

    I.Rural EmploymentGeneration

    Programme(REGP)

    KVIC launched Ru- ral Employment Genera- tion Programme (REGP) or

    GramodyogRojgarYojanafor

  • 8/22/2019 SHWATA

    51/54

    one hand and to effectively relate these to the overall effortofpovertyeradicationinthe

    district.

    3.NIRD

    National Institute of Rural Development (NIRD) facilitates rural development

    through government and non-governmental initiatives.NIRD is the countrys apex

    body for undertaking training, research, action and consultancy functions in the rural

    development sector. It works as an autonomous organization sup- ported by the

    MinistryofRuralDevelopment,Gov- ernmentofIndia.

    4.NRRDA

    Construction of rural roads brings multifaceted benefitsto thehithertodeprived

    ruralareasandalsoan effectivepoverty reduction strategy. Pradhan Mantri Gram Sadak

    Yojana (PMGSY)was takenupby the GovernmentofIndiawithanobjectivetoprovide

    con- nectivity to the unconnected Habitations in the rural areas.In2002 theNational

    Rural Roads Development Agency (NRRDA) was established to extend support to

    PMGRYthroughadviceontechnicalspecifications,projectappraisalandmanagementofa

    system ofNa- tional Quality Monitors, Management of Monitoring Systems and

    submission of Periodic Reports to the MinistryofRuralDevelopment.

    5.CAPART

    Council for Advancement of Peoples Action and RuralTechnology (CAPART)is

    an autonomous body registered under the Societies Registration Act, 1860 and is

    functioning under the aegis of the Ministry of Rural Development. CAPART is

    involved in catalys- ing and co-coordinating the emerging partnership be- tween

  • 8/22/2019 SHWATA

    52/54

    Voluntary Organisations and the Government ofIndia for sustainable development of

    RuralAreas.

    OtherSchemes ofRuralDevelopment

    Beside the above-mentioned schemes some more schemes of Government of India

    like National Ru- ral Employment Guarantee Scheme, National Rural Health

    Mission,RajivGandhiNationalDrinkingWa- terMission,RuralInfrastructure,Rural

    Electrification andIndiraAwasYojana are also availablebut as this compilationstresses

    onNABARDandKVICschemes theseotherschemeshavenotbeendiscussed.

    Relevant Websites:

    NABARD:

    www.nabard.org

    KVIC:

    www.kvic.org

    DRDA:www.rural.nic.in/drda.htm

    NIRD:www.nird.org.in

    NRRDA:www.pmgsy.nic.in/nrrda.asp

    CAPART:www.capart.nic.in

    MinistryofRuralDevelopment:www.rural.nic.in

    MinistryofAgroandRuralIndustries:www.ari.nic.in

  • 8/22/2019 SHWATA

    53/54

    Conclusion:-

    The governments policies and programs have laid emphasis on poverty elevation,

    generation of employment and income opportunities & provision of infrastructure

    and basic facilities to meet the needs of rural poor. For realizing these objectives, selfemployment and wage employment programs continued to pervade in one form or

    other institutions in terms of functions,power and finance. Grama Sabha, NGOs, Self

    help groups and PRIs hav been accorded adequate role to make participatory

    democracy meaningful and effective.

    Rural Development : Review of Nineth Plan Performance

    An outlay of Rs. 2000 crore was provided for rural development sector during Nineth

    Plan period. The budgetary support and allocation from 1997-98 to 2001-02. For

    various schemes Rs.2498 crores have been provided ]. The year wise outlay and

    expenditures are indicated below. During the Nineth 5 Year Plan, under IRDP,

    Income Generating Assets were provided 3235 lakh families through subsidy and

    credit. During 1999-2000 the IRDP, TRYSEM,OWCRA were merged to form a new

    self employment program called Swarna Jayanti Gram Swarojgar Yojna

    (SJGSY).

    Thus, to sum up we can say that many Government Programs and Schemes have

    failed in the recent years hence there is essential need of new, innovative and

    effective programs for the development of rural areas.

  • 8/22/2019 SHWATA

    54/54

    BIBILOGRAPHY

    1.Institutes of rural management,ANAND: 388 001,INDIA

    Cooperatives & rural development in

    india(abstract) by katar singh & R S Pundir

    2.Rural development schemes: an overview

    Datas and tables are from the chartered accountant

    1199(February 2006)

    3.sustainability of rural development project: india case study(IFAD)

    4.A journal on rural development: role of women in promoting rual

    sanitation

    5.case study on rual development from different website:www.nabard.org and

    www.rural.nic.in