SIA NSW Award Nomination: Excellence in Asset Management This Award nomination seeks recognition for excellence in the management of stormwater infrastructure in order to encourage and promote improved asset management planning and practices.
This nomination refers to
A plan that set out approaches and strategies to manage stormwater assets A program that undertakes management of stormwater infrastructure, including
maintenance or renewal programs A project that employ innovative methods or approaches to asset management.
We have remained within allocated word limits, excluding Tables and captions.
Project title: Centennial Parklands Ponds Management Plan 2012
Organisations and contact: Centennial Park & Moore Park Trust and Storm Consulting
Contact details:
Mr Mal Brown, Storm Consulting, 9499 4333, [email protected] .
Mr Steve Nichols, Centennial Park & Moore Park Trust, 9339 6623,
Category entered: Asset Management
Geographic coverage/location of project
The Centennial Park Ponds are “green” stormwater assets located 2km to the southeast
of Sydney CBD spanning the suburbs of Moore Park, Centennial Park, Paddington,
Queens Park and Kensington (Figure 1). The projects relates to the 12 ponds in the
Centennial Parklands, and their catchment (Figure 2).
The ponds collectively cover an area of 26Ha of stormwater assets and their
configuration and function in relation to stormwater flow is shown in Figure 3.
Figure 1: Centennial Parklands showing west to east Moore Park, Centennial Park and Queens Park
Figure 2: Centennial Parklands ponds catchment context showing approximate catchment boundary and flow paths
Outflow to Botany Wetlands and Botany Bay
SCG & SFS
Bondi Junction
Paddington
Randwick
Figure 3: Pond configuration and function in relation to stormwater
Project timeframe, including a statement confirming that the project has
been finished after 30th June, 2011
The Centennial Parklands Ponds Plan of Management and associated works were
completed at varying intervals throughout the period 30th June 2011 - 30th June 2012.
Overview/description of the project including objectives and outcomes
(maximum 200 words) which is suitable for use in a media release
This project is about provision of a Ponds Management Plan 2012 for the 12 Centennial
Park ponds green infrastructure stormwater assets.
As the catchments of the ponds have developed and become increasingly urbanised, the
ponds have acted as the receiving waters for stormwater pollutants.
In the 1990s, pond water quality deteriorated such that blue-green algal blooms
occurred over an extended period. This was symptomatic of the pond system being
substantially degraded.
A previous Ponds Restoration Strategy 1997 detailed pond restoration works and
maintenance activities with two underlying principles - wetland rehabilitation and
maintenance in perpetuity. The same principles are relevant today.
The objective of this Ponds Management Plan 2012 is to provide a planning level
document that will guide pond restoration works and maintenance activities over the
period 2012-2022. Consistent with this, the management objective for the whole pond
system is create a sustainable system and to maintain it in this state in perpetuity.
The only way to achieve this is for the ponds to be physically and ecologically robust and
to be provided with continuing maintenance. The rehabilitation recommendations are
tailored to water quality issues and problems, while also being aware of the constraints of
working within the Centennial Parkland environment.
Park volunteers proudly showing off their reed bed planting efforts behind
Identification of stormwater benefits provided by the project.
The Ponds Management Plan 2012 is a holistic and comprehensive planning
document that addresses stormwater benefits, as follows: Water quality – the main aim of the Ponds Management Plan is to improve
water quality in the ponds system. This is achieved by treating each stormwater
inflow to the ponds using GPTs, stilling basins, reed beds, etc. There is also a
maintenance framework established which provides for ongoing removal of
collected pollutants. By managing pollutant inputs, the ponds will be more
resilient and robust in terms of internal water quality processes, and a range of
ecosystem and amenity benefits are conferred.
Stormwater reuse – stormwater from the ponds is reused to irrigate 50Ha open
space and playing fields around the parklands. Maintaining the integrity of the
irrigation infrastructure and the water quality in the ponds was a major outcome
of the project.
Ecosystem health – by retaining and removing pollutants from the pond system,
the aquatic environments in the ponds will be able to support healthier
ecosystems. Noxious aquatic weeds will be removed systematically from the
ponds (they cover an extensive area) and macrophytes are proposed in various
ponds to improve biodiversity and provide habitat. Finally, European carp will be
removed systematically from the pond system and this will provide a range of
benefits including water quality improvement and less predation of native fauna
species.
Flooding and drainage control – the function of the ponds to provide a key
flood mitigation role in the catchment (protecting the low-lying areas in
Kensington, Kingsford, Mascot and Botany) is recognized and embedded in the
Ponds Management Plan. Hydraulic assessments were undertaken to ensure
proposed GPTs would not cause afflux in upstream residential areas.
Public health and safety – public health and safety is critically important and
features inherently in the proposed pond re-designs. A balance is struck between
attracting people to pond edges and their safety once they are there. Often
landscaping is proposed to provide separation from pond edges and open water.
The ponds will be safer for the public once all the works are complete. In
addition, water quality will be improved and so secondary contact recreation in
the ponds will be enhanced with less risk of disease.
Placemaking/amenity - given that the Centennial Parklands is the most visited
parkland in Australia, they already represent a major destination. The parklands
hold a distinctive and special place in Australian history and culture. The
parklands supported Sydney’s second water supply and on 1 January 1901,
Centennial Park became the focus of the nation as the site of the inauguration of
the Australian Federation. The ponds are one of the most popular features of the
parklands and the public is very keen to see them free from pollution (as
determined through user surveys). Therefore improved ponds contributes to
improved amenity within the parkland and this in turn consolidates the iconic
placemaking nature of the Parklands.
Adaptation to climate change – a major driver for the project is to manage
pond water quality and amenity during periods of drought. In the early to mid
1990s the pond system suffered from extensive and persistent algal blooms
caused by a lack of flows (stagnation) in combination with poorly treated inflows
and poor water circulation. The works proposed in the Ponds Management Plan
specifically address the deterioration in water quality and pond amenity arising
from stagnant conditions.
Description of how the project meets/demonstrates each of the judging criteria
for the nominated category (max 500 words/criterion) 1. The project will provide significant benefits.
o Improved governance and accountability o Enhanced service management and customer satisfaction o Improved financial efficiency o More sustainable decisions (International Infrastructure Management Manual, 2006)
The Centennial Parklands is managed by the Centennial Park and Moor Park Trust (the Trust)
which is a NSW Government agency under the Department of Premier and Cabinet. The
Trust is directly responsible to the Minister for the Environment.
Specifically, the Trust must maintain and improve Trust lands and ensure environmental
protection. The Ponds Management Plan 2012 facilitates these outcomes. The objective of
the Plan is to provide Parklands managers with a planning level document that will guide
pond restoration works and maintenance activities over the period 2012-2022.
Improved levels of service management guide each and every activity by the parkland
managers. The Trust is accountable to its visitors and customer feedback is actively sought
and freely given. Of critical importance to parkland users is the ponds, and the pollution of
the Park’s waterways is of utmost concern to visitors and as they rank cleanliness of the
ponds as a high priority. By facilitating the removal of pollution from the ponds and
improving their water quality, amenity and ecology, the Ponds Management Plan responds
to visitor values.
Without the Ponds Management Plan in place, stormwater pollutants were able to freely
enter the ponds and the Trust retrieved them when they had accumulated. This constituted
an unsustainable, inefficient and expensive way to manage pollutants. The measures
proposed in the Plan provide a contemporary and effective way of preventing the pollutants
from entering the ponds. Life cycle costing was used to inform the selection of the specific
pollution trapping strategies in each pond. The cost of removing pollutants from GPTs is far
less than that of retrieving them after they have been widely distributed in a pond.
The measures proposed in the Ponds management Plan 2012 provide a range of additional
outcomes including improving pond bank stability, removing aquatic weeds and European
Carp, etc. The combined effect of these strategies is to enhance not only the quality of the
ponds, but their asset life as well.
The Ponds Management Plan 2012 includes a maintenance framework for the ponds and
associated assets to maintain their condition and function in perpetuity.
The end result of the Ponds Management Plan 2012 is a document that supports and
enhances existing governance and accountability, provides enhanced levels of service and
customer satisfaction and which is proven to be financially prudent. It is a Plan based on
delivering sustainable outcomes from pond stormwater assets.
2. The project promotes or employs processes or practices that prolong the life cycle of
stormwater systems and ensure they meet required levels of service.
In this section we show how the Ponds Management Plan was strategically developed to
prolong the life of the ponds stormwater assets, and to improve their levels of service.
Note that the water quality issues with the ponds emerged in the early 1990s and there has
been a continuum of plans/strategies and works since that time. However, in this award
nomination we focus on the pond conditions, objectives, strategies and works that are
included in the Ponds Management Plan 2012 only.
The following issues are identified as being relevant to the pond stormwater assets:
the pond system has a long hydraulic retention time meaning water can stagnate;
pond stormwater inflows allow pollutants to spread, making retrieval impractical;
some ponds short circuit creating stagnant zones;
pond outflows do not allow for water level control;
pond sediments are nutrient-enriched and unstable making them susceptible to re-
suspension;
the ponds have extensive weed macrophytes as opposed to desirable reeds
Carp feeding behaviour constantly churns up sediments and re-releases nutrients.
In response, management objectives were set for each pond (Table 1).
Table 1: Management objectives for the Centennial Park pond system.
Pond Stormwater
inflow
treatment,
GPTs and
stilling basins
Irrigation
extraction
for the
Parklands
Fine particle
filtering, after
gross
pollutants
are removed
Aquatic
weed
removal,
extensive
Nymphaea
spp
Oxy-
genation of
flows, for
ponds that
are fed by
low O2
springs
1.Model Yacht
2. Fly Casting
3. Musgrave
4. One More Shot
5. Willow
6. Duck
7. Randwick
8. Lily
9. Busbys
10.Kensington East
11. Kensington West
12. Kippax
From this a summary of pond rehabilitation works/practices/strategies was developed (Table
2).
Table 2. Summary of mgt recommendations & related works & practices for CP Ponds.
Management
recommendation
Works, practices and strategies
Pond investigations Bathymetry, Hydraulic behaviour analysis, Water quality study
Pond water oxygenation options
Sediment disposal management plan
Catchment &
stakeholder Mgt
Pond Water Quality Mgt Committee with all catchment stakeholders
Pollution Incident Management Plan
Gross pollutant traps
at pond inflows
Look to improve performance of existing GPT at Musgrave Pond
Install a sympathetic GPT design at Kensington Pond East
Continue to maintain all GPTs /stilling basins at regular intervals
Sediment
accumulation zones
Accumulated sediments periodically monitored (every 5-10 yrs) and
removed from relevant Ponds
Reed beds Reed beds are a feature of the designs in Model Yacht, Fly Casting,
Randwick and Kensington Pond West.
Stagnant zone
elimination
Flow diversions (submerged banks) are in place in several Ponds
A stagnant zone in Kensington Pond West is to be replaced with a
shallow marsh wetland.
Water level control Install water level control weirs to all ponds
Operate all weirs when undertaking works or maintenance activities
Pond oxygenation Provide flow aeration system in Lily and Duck Ponds
Modifications within
ponds
Reduce carp numbers by Electrofishing in Ponds, continue Carp Program
Remove Nymphaea spp. water weeds in Ponds
Restoration of pond
edges
A hierarchy of bank/edge stabilisation measures have been developed &
shall be applied to Duck, Randwick, Busbys and Kensington Pond West
From this, strategies were prepared for each pond – Kensington Pond west used as an
example here (Error! Reference source not found.) and view in association with Figure 4.
Table 3: Example management recommendations for Kensington Pond west
Problem Management
recommendations Rationale
At the entrance of
channel inflow from
Busbys and Randwick
Ponds, large amounts
of organic debris and
sand have
accumulated.
Install a stilling basin at
the inlet to Kensington
Pond. Provide
maintenance access
ramp. Once stilling
basin is installed,
remove existing net
pollution trap from the
channel.
COMPLETED 2012
While the net traps are effective at
collecting debris, they also fill and
clog quickly.
Sediment builds up in the channel
behind the net trap which has no
effective means of removal in the
narrow and constrained channel.
The recommendation to create a
specifically designed accumulation
area at the inflow to the pond with
an access ramp will facilitate
routine cleaning.
Western inflow
accumulates sediment
and litter.
Install a CDS GPT.
Provide maintenance
access for routine
cleaning. Remove
existing net pollution
trap.
COMPLETED 2012
The inflow requires a gross
pollutant trapping strategy to catch
all particles down to coarse sand
size.
ii) Nymphaea spp. is
covering parts of the
pond area
Remove aquatic weed
(Nymphaea spp) from
the ponds.
COMPLETED 2012
Nymphaea is an aquatic weed
species that clumps, spreads and
periodically dies off in parts
providing a high organic load to
the ponds. It should be removed
and its re-growth should be
controlled through ongoing
removal.
Figure 4. Example of pond works and strategies in Kensington Ponds – Concept Design
The actions comprise each of the following:
Ongoing and improved liaison with catchment stakeholders
Investigations to fill information gaps
Capital works to implement pond rehabilitation actions
Recurrent maintenance activities, e.g. ongoing removal of collected pollutants,
aquatic weed, carp, etc.
Monitoring and review points
Inlet to Kensington Pond east before works showing
sediment accumulation, willows and poor visual
amenity,
Kensington Pond east after works, showing weed
removal, bank stabilisation, willow removal,
revegetation
Kensington Pond east before weed removal Weed removal process in pond, includes
roots/rhizomes on bed
LHS: Minor inlet to Kensington Pond east showing sediment and debris deposition moving into pond
RHS: stilling basin at same inlet with access ramp to facilitate removal of accumulated sediment/debris
Sediment removed from pond for drying, before
disposal.
Ugly net traps were replaced by a CDS unit
It can be seen in the discussion provided above that the derivation of actions has been
strategically developed to respond to identified problems in the ponds, and which also
respond to the management objectives set for each pond. In other words, the
recommendations are tailored to specifically increase the life and service levels (customer
satisfaction) of the pond stormwater assets.
3. The project demonstrates excellence in consideration of economic, environmental and social
factors. Weight 10%
Economic
Full costing was undertaken for investigations, works and strategies and for all maintenance activities.
Options were considered for gross pollution trapping, e.g. comparative analysis of litter net traps vs. installation of CDS GPT at major stormwater inlets. Capital and operational costs were used to determine life cycle costs.
Cost saving measures were identified for further consideration. As tipping fees are unaffordable in the medium-long term, it is imperative to have an option of disposing removed sediments and organic debris from the ponds within the Parklands. Classification of the waste occurred and a decision was made to dispose of it in landfill for works completed in 2011-12. Instead it is proposed to process the material and recycle it as compost to avoid tipping fees, to treat the material as a resource and to reduce the costs of imported mulches.
Options were identified that if implemented in one pond, they would provide benefits to several others concurrently. An example is Lily Pond which is fed by de-oxygenated spring water. This pond flows into three other downstream ponds and so it is essential to improve this water quality by oxygenating it. This will prevent the establishment of blue-green algal blooms by removing conditions which favour them from the outset. In this manner, five ponds benefit from the treatment of one.
Environmental
The presence of extensive blue-green algal blooms over several years of drought was a symptom of pond environmental decline. Most of the measures proposed are targeted at reducing pollution inputs to the ponds such that conditions which give rise to algal blooms are minimised.
The noxious weed Nymphaea spp. was starting to dominate the surface area of several of the lower ponds in the system. It spreads rapidly in spring/summer to increase areal coverage. The dying off plants from winter consume oxygen from the water making it putrid. The weed has been eradicated from two of the ponds with others to follow.
European carp infest the pond system and they continually cycle nutrients into the pond water columns through their feeding habits. They also eat or outcompete native aquatic fauna species. It is proposed to eradicate them.
The management of carp and aquatic weeds require continual monitoring and maintenance effort.
Social
The predominant social outcome of the project is in community education and awareness of the impacts of the external community to the ponds. A greater understanding of the ponds
as a connected part of the stormwater system within the eastern suburbs catchment will assist in reducing complaints from park visitors about pollution in ponds, as well as raised awareness for improved behaviour of responsible litter and pollutant management.
The community will be the recipients of improved pond amenity. The Trust has an extensive
program of community outreach, including: Streamwatch, work with local schools, volunteers
and other groups.
A key feature of the recommendations is the preservation of the cultural values associated
with the ponds, including heritage items. All works were chosen to protect or enhance these
values.
4. The project involved meaningful collaboration with stakeholders. Weight 10%
The Ponds Management Plan 2012 and components of it were prepared in consultation with
external and internal stakeholders. External stakeholders included catchment land managers
Waverley Council and the City of Sydney Council officers and they provided information and
review.
Project partners included the Sydney Metro Catchment Management Authority, the NSW
Environmental Trust and Waverley Council as providers of funding to implement some
works.
The main stakeholders were Trust staff. An Internal Working Group of staff from across
Management, Operations and Planning staff was established and the Plan was prepared in
consultation with them. Three review meetings were convened for providing feedback into
the Plan.
The work of Storm Consulting as specialist best practice design engineers was independently
peer reviewed by consultants e-quatica.
Summary of why the project is an exemplar of excellence in the nominated
category (max 500 words)
The Centennial Parklands are an iconic destination in Eastern Sydney. The parklands
represent 365Ha of green infrastructure are visited by over 3 million people per annum. The
Centennial Park ponds comprise 12 ornamental ponds covering a combined area of 26Ha
and these represent stormwater assets that require ongoing management.
The Parklands are a major attractor in Sydney with high visitation and the ponds are one of
the most popular features of the Parklands. It is imperative to maintain customer satisfaction
and service levels that are generated from and inherent within the ponds. Visitors to the
Parklands want to see the ponds clean and healthy and supporting biodiverse ecosystems.
They want to play at the water’s edge and be safe and healthy when they do so.
However, because the ponds are subject to major stormwater inflows from large contributing
catchments, they are also sinks for pollution. In the past, this uncontrolled pollution and the
long time that water can spend in the pond system can cause stagnation and give rise to
blue-green algal blooms. This causes ponds to turn green with floating scums that rot and
stink. Therefore there is a history of rapid pond water quality degradation, especially during
dry periods. This creates a need to act with proactive interventions that will prevent this
system decline such that the pond system can maintain its levels of service to park visitors.
With such a large and complex pond system to manage, a comprehensive and strategic
approach is required that responds to the many often competing issues and constraints of
working in the Parklands. The Plan developed for the pond system must not only provide
water quality improvement, it must provide a broad range of benefits and not cause conflict
with the Heritage elements of the Parklands, as well as being acceptable to visitors. The
Ponds Management Plan 2012 delivers all this and more.
The strategic nature of the Plan is rooted in the principles and approaches adopted,
including catchment analysis, stakeholder collaboration, system-wide and individual pond
objectives that align. The actions that have been proposed as a result of this are targeted
specifically at solving specific water quality problems and priority is assigned according to
water quality benefit. There is a recognition that pond water quality is fundamental to their
broader function in the Parklands.
The Ponds Management Plan 2012 provides a balance of strategies to ensure long term
success in management of the pond system, comprising: catchment stakeholder
consultation, investigations to fill data gaps, capital works and life cycle maintenance
activities. A comprehensive response has been developed which is cost effective, as it has
been based on feasibility assessments to determine life cycle costs of various options. The
alternative to the works and strategies is that pollution enters the ponds and moves through
the system where it festers and is extremely difficult and expensive to remove and dispose
of.
To round off the success of this Plan, there is a clear commitment and ability to deliver on
the various actions. Over the period 2009-2012 major capital works and maintenance
activities were completed in two of the most important ponds. Two GPTs were installed,
accumulated sediment was removed, noxious aquatic weeds were removed, and banks were
stabilised and revegetated. Some of these works were completed using Parklands volunteers
and they have been a complete success.
Estimated project cost, including the cost of the stormwater component and
total project cost (this is to allow the judges to compare the benefits relative to
the costs across projects)
The cost of preparing the Ponds Management Plan 2012 was $30,000.
Costs for implementation of works, actions and strategies are listed, and the costs for annual
maintenance are also shown. The costs are high reflecting the overall value of the 12 pond
stormwater assets in the various functions they provide to visitors, the environment and the
broader community. The costs represent a realistic investment to maintain these functions
such that the asset value of the ponds is increased and their life prolonged.
Recommendations were assigned priority based on the effect that they have on improving
water quality function. The total anticipated expenditure on High Priority (2012-2017)
recommendations is $1,979,000 (examples of actions shown in Table 5). The total
expenditure on Medium-Low Priority (2017-2021) recommendations is $772,500. The
high priority works shown below will be the subject of future ponds works funding bids.
Table 5. Examples of High Priority management recommendations for Centennial Park
ponds.
Pond Works, practices and strategies Priority Cost
(2012$)
System-wide Undertake feasibility assessment and prepare a
Sediment/Organic debris Waste Management Plan with a
view to processing and recycling sediment removed from
ponds as organic topsoil for use in the Parklands
Critical, by
2012
30,000
Lower ponds Reduce carp numbers by electrofishing, especially in Duck,
Lily, Busbys, Randwick and Kensington Ponds
Critical, by
2013
50,000
System-wide Consolidate Pond topographic/bathymetric and feature
survey data, identify gaps
Survey Ponds with recommended internal works –
Randwick, Busbys, Duck, One More Shot
Determine Operating Water Levels for each pond and
place water level markers on outlet weirs.
Critical, by
2013
50,000
System-wide Create and oversight a Pond Water Quality Management
Committee with all catchment stakeholders
Critical, by
2013
$6,000 p.a.
Musgrave
Pond
Remove accumulated sludge from the entire pond. Critical, by
2013
250,000
Fly Casting
Pond
Repair leak in outlet weir and at same time install a
variable level weir that will drain the whole pond
Critical, by
2013
30,000
Lily Pond Investigate feasibility of water aeration system in pond (do
in combination with Duck Pond)
Critical, by
2014
8,000
Repair outlet structure
Install variable level outlet weir that will drain whole pond
and baffle plate
Replace steel grille cover
Critical, by
2014
50,000
Remove accumulated sediment and organic debris from
pond
Remove aquatic weeds (Nymphaea spp) from the pond
Critical, by
2014
250,000
The Trust spent 1.8 million on pond rehabilitation works in two ponds during the period
2010-2012 (Kensington and Model Yacht Ponds) and this included the supply and
installation of two large CDS GPTs.
Maintenance will be a key feature of pond management into the future. Resources need to
be allocated to ensure the long term sustainability of the Centennial Park pond system
through appropriate operation and maintenance of the ponds. The consequences of not
maintaining will be that the ponds will not achieve their objectives, they will revert to a
degraded state, and they will be at risk of major water quality decline during any future
drought sequences. Table 6 is a schedule of life cycle maintenance for the ponds. The total
expenditure on pond life cycle activities is $173,600 per annum.
Table 6: Life cycle activity schedule and costs for Centennial Park Ponds
Maintenance activity Item Frequency of
maintenance
Cost per
episode
(2012$)
Cost per
annum
(2012$)
Removal and disposal of pollutants from GPTs
Model Yacht Pond CDS 6/annum 2,000 12,000
Musgrave Pond CDS 6/annum 1,600 9,600
Musgrave Pond Net trap 26x/annum 250 6,500
Musgrave Pond Channel upstream of net
trap
2/annum 3,500 7,000
Kensington Pond West CDS 4/annum 2,000 8,000
Kensington Pond East Net trap 26/annum 250 6,500
Removal and disposal of accumulated sediments & organic matter from pond inflows
Model Yacht Pond Accumulation zone 1/20 years 200,000 10,000
Musgrave Pond Whole pond 1/10 years 200,000 20,000
Kensington Pond East Whole pond 1/10 years 200,000 20,000
Kensington Pond West Accumulation zone
downstream of apron
1/20 years 200,000 10,000
Kensington Pond West Stilling basin on channel
from Busby/Randwick
2/annum 3,000 6,000
Randwick Pond southeast
inflow
Accumulation zone 1/annum 3,000 3,000
Randwick Pond - sthn
inflow
Trash rack 1/annum 1,000 1,000
Busbys Pond – Frog Hollow
Drain
Accumulation zone 1/annum 3,000 3,000
General pond maintenance
Clean up litter Pond edges and shallow
margins
Monthly 500 6,000
Electrofish for carp Especially in the lower
ponds,
Annually 25,000 25,000
Spray Nymphaea aquatic
weed
Typically Kensington,
Busbys, Randwick, Lily
Each spring 10,000 10,000
Remove/spray noxious and
environmental weeds
Pond edges and shallow
margins
Each spring - 10,000
Operate aeration devices Lily and Duck Ponds TBD TBD TBD
Contact details of two referees who can be contacted by the judging panel if
required:
Steve Nichols – Centennial Park & Moore Park Trust, Ph 9339 6623,
[email protected] Steve was the project coordinator from the Trust.
John Dahlenburg – John’s Botany Bay Coastal Catchment Initiative program
provided some funding to one component of the project.
[email protected] Ph 9895 6244.
At least three photos (jpg format)
Supplied separately
Logos (lead applicant and project collaborators) in jpeg or eps format,
including permission to use and any conditions or guides to use
Supplied separately
Statement confirming the information provided is accurate and not misleading
in any way and that all relevant permissions from collaborations and clients
have been obtained for the award application.
The information contained in this award nomination is accurate and reflects the work
undertaken by the Centennial Park and Moore Park Trust and Storm Consulting. No
permission is required from any other organisation.