+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Siby v bank Partners and other 2302788-2016 SHELF · 2017. 4. 26. · Case Number: 2302788/2016 1...

Siby v bank Partners and other 2302788-2016 SHELF · 2017. 4. 26. · Case Number: 2302788/2016 1...

Date post: 06-Oct-2020
Category:
Upload: others
View: 0 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
2
Case Number: 2302788/2016 ph outcome re case management 2013 rules, Jan 2014 1 EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS Claimant Respondent Mr. T. Siby v Bank Partners Limited (1) Epsom and St Helier University Hospitals NHS Trust (2) PRELIMINARY HEARING Heard at: London South, Croydon On: 11 April 2017 Before: Employment Judge Sage Appearances For the Claimant: In person but assisted by his friend Ms. G. McCann For the Respondent: Mr Crozier of Counsel for the First Respondent Ms. Nathan Solicitor for the Second Respondent JUDGMENT 1. The claimant was not an employee or worker of the first respondent; the claims against the first respondent are dismissed. The claim against the second respondent proceeds. 2. The hearing is listed for a further preliminary hearing to discuss and identify the issues as further detailed below. Note: Reasons for the decision having been given orally at the hearing, written reasons will not be provided unless a written request is received from either party within 14 days of the sending of this record of the decision
Transcript
Page 1: Siby v bank Partners and other 2302788-2016 SHELF · 2017. 4. 26. · Case Number: 2302788/2016 1 ph outcome re case management 2013 rules, Jan 2014 EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS Claimant

Case Number: 2302788/2016

ph outcome re case management 2013 rules, Jan 2014 1

EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS Claimant Respondent Mr. T. Siby v Bank Partners Limited (1)

Epsom and St Helier University Hospitals NHS Trust (2)

PRELIMINARY HEARING

Heard at: London South, Croydon On: 11 April 2017 Before: Employment Judge Sage Appearances For the Claimant: In person but assisted by his friend Ms. G. McCann For the Respondent: Mr Crozier of Counsel for the First Respondent Ms. Nathan Solicitor for the Second Respondent

JUDGMENT

1. The claimant was not an employee or worker of the first respondent; the claims against the first respondent are dismissed. The claim against the second respondent proceeds.

2. The hearing is listed for a further preliminary hearing to discuss and identify the

issues as further detailed below. Note: Reasons for the decision having been given orally at the hearing, written reasons will not be provided unless a written request is received from either party within 14 days of the sending of this record of the decision

Page 2: Siby v bank Partners and other 2302788-2016 SHELF · 2017. 4. 26. · Case Number: 2302788/2016 1 ph outcome re case management 2013 rules, Jan 2014 EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS Claimant

Case Number: 2302788/2016

ph outcome re case management 2013 rules, Jan 2014 2

Employment Judge Sage 24 April 2017


Recommended