SimplifiedEnvironmental Statement
3
Table of contents 4 Preamble
6 1. Year 2013 at Audi Hungaria
14 SIGNIFICANT EVENTS IN 2013
16 2. The most important changes of the Environmental Management System
22 2013 - ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT ON THE RIGHT TRACK
24 3. Our environmental performance
26 Input - Output balance
30 Waste management
35 Energy-management
39 Water protection
45 Protection of air-quality
47 Biodiversity
47 Environmental expenditures
48 Social responsibility
50 Environmental Verifier’s Declaration
Published by: AUDI HUNGARIA MOTOR Kft. Written by: András Torma dr. Date: May 2014.Editor of publication: X-Meditor Lapkiadó, Oktatás- és Rendezvényszervező Kft. Graphic planning: XMEDITOR STÚDIÓ www.xmeditor.hu
All the photos in the publication, including the photos with natural theme were taken on the site of AUDI HUNGARIA MOTOR Kft.
This publication is the abridged version of the overall Environmental Statement. The overall Environmental Statement can be downloaded from the App Store and from the Google Play.
4 5
Foreword
Achim HeinflingManaging director, ProductionEnvironmental Management Representative
The past few years have been a defining period in our company’s history. We recently celebrated the twentieth anniversary of the company’s foundation, which coincided with other im-portant milestones such as the production of the twenty five millionth engine and the five hundred thousandth TT.
2013 was also a record-breaking year with nearly two million en-gines manufactured. The development of our engine production portfolio continued: we launched the series production of 7 new engine models last year. The new engines will be more economical and environmentally friendly than the previous versions.
After years of preparatory work, series production was launched last summer within the framework of full-depth vehicle produc-tion. The A3 Limousine and Cabriolet models are exclusively
DEAR READER,
AUDI HUNGARIA MOTOR Kft. has been a key player in the economy of the region and Hungary for 20 years now. Our company has developed constantly over the past two decades, and in 2013, by supplementing our existing engine production activities, we launched our vehicle manufacturing activities, which now cover the entire manufacturing process. We are proud that we have been able to rely on our dedicated and talented workforce throughout that process.
to minimise our environmental impact. Last year, we introduced numerous measures to help us achieve this objective. We strive to coordinate ecological and business interests in order to find solutions that are beneficial for all stakeholders. It remains a key objective of ours to improve energy efficiency; last year, we made strategic commitments in this field and we achieved numerous energy savings as a result.
Audi Hungaria, as part of the Volkswagen Group, has agreed to reduce its environmental impact by 25% in the major areas of environmental aspects by 2018, and in this way we will contrib-ute to maintaining our leadership as the most environmentally friendly company in the vehicle industry. This strategic goal, of course, brought new challenges for us, and in 2013 we defined numerous measures to reach this objective.
You can find out more about these measures, our metrics, our activities related to environmental protection and corporate responsibility, and the “human side” of these in our interactive environmental statement app, and also in our print publication summarising our key environmental protection indicators.
I trust you will find the information presented in this material useful and of interest to you.
I do hope you will enjoy reading this document.
manufactured in Győr and they represent a new chapter in our company’s history. With the launch of production, we further raised the number of jobs at our company: last year, our head-count exceeded 10.000.
The launch of the new activity has also generated environ-mental protection tasks. In addition to acquiring the neces-sary environmental permissions, we extended the scope of our environmental management system as we successfully integrated our vehicle production activities into the exist-ing system. By doing so, we have laid the foundation for the continuous improvement of our environmental performance.
We have been working hard for 20 years now to refine our opera-tions according to the principles of environment protection and
Trend: the tendency of the environmental performance (better, constant, worsen)
iPad: more information in the inter-active environmental statement
Information: value of the environmental key performance indicator
7
Our site occupies close to 400 hectares in the indus-trial park of Győr, a Hungarian city of county rank. The area of the plant didn’t change significantly in the year 2013. The only significant change in the built-up area that occurred last year concerned the roads outside the production hall. As part of infrastructural development connected to vehicle production, roads and walkways were completed last year, increasing the size of the area designated for this purpose by nearly 70%. We take our proximity to nature very seriously, which means that we make sure the propor-tion of green areas at our site is high. This proportion exceeded 70% of the total area last year.
Year 2013 at Audi Hungaria
01
In 2013 a moderated development was observable with regard to the engine production. The number of manufactured units exceeded the previous year’s number by 0,5% and so we concluded the most successful year in engine production in the Company’s history. The production volumes of vehicle production exceeded that of the previous year by 28%. The start of the production at the new vehicle factory generated a significant effect on this. In accordance with previous years, the number of pieces of bodywork components manufactured has further increased (+20% in relation to 2012). The investments values moderated last year because of the finishing of the investments regarding the new vehicle factory. Our staff level stepped over the 10 000 employees last year, so we realized a record-size growth on this field also.
Profile and products
Engine production
Vehicle production
Press tool and car body elements production
8 9
launch of the series production of 7 new engine types further extension of the production hall of the eight-
cylinder engine manufacturing
HIGHLIGHTS OF THE ENGINE PRODUCTION IN 2013
production of the 25 millionth engine installation of the new dust and climate analysis
test bench
GENERAL INFORMATIONS ENGINE PRODUCTION
GENERAL INFORMATIONS ABOUT THE SITE
Unit 2011 2012 2013 Change ’12–’13 (%)
Engine production piece 1 883 757 1 915 567 1 925 636 0,5
Vehicle production (TT – A3 Limousine – A3 Cabriolet) piece 39 518 33 553 42 851 27,7
Car body elements production piece 241 678 327 123 391 778 19,8
Total sales revenues million euro 5598 5282 5588 5,8
Total investment million euro 685 1038 968 -6,7
Number of employees (as of 31 December) person 7322 8663 10 337 19,3
Unit 2011 2012 2013 Change ’12–’13 (%)
Factory area m2 3 912 232 3 951 006 3 964 982 0,4
Built-in area m2 400 804 654 473 1 712 950 8,9
Solid road surface (roads, pavements, car parks) m2 118 450 264 580 2 447 000 68,9
Total built-in area m2 519 254 919 053 1 159 950 26,2
Ratio of green area % 89,76 3 76,74 70,75 -6,0
Unit 2011 2012 2013
R4 (gasoline) thousand units 719 815 888
R4 (diesel) thousand units 681 607 547
R5 (gasoline) thousand units 4,4 5,0 2,4
V6 (gasoline) thousand units 240 265 256
V6 (diesel) thousand units 208 193 189
V8 (gasoline) thousand units 19 22 29
V8 (diesel) thousand units 7,9 6,0 11,3
V10 (gasoline) thousand units 4,3 3,3 2,8
V12 (diesel) thousand units 0,5 0,2 0,04
Total thousand units 1884 1916 1926
1 During calculating the value the characteristic values of the construction of the new vehicle production was taken into consideration.2 During calculating the value the characteristic values of the construction of the new vehicle production was taken into consideration.3 During calculating the rate of green-field area the values of the land purchased in 2010 was already taken into consideration.
10 11
PROFILE AND PRODUCTSIn addition to engine production, since 2013, the company’s profile has included the entire vehicle production process. In addition, small-series body-work manufacturing, individual manufacturing of press tools and pressing machines, and engine and vehicle development all play a key role.
ENGINE PRODUCTIONThe number of engine models manufactured in 2013 was 207. A 2013-ban gyártott motorvariánsok száma 207 volt. We continued the renewal of our engine portfolio, last year we integrated 7 new engine types into the production. The portfolio covers a range of engines with a displacement from 1,2 litre to 6,0 litre. Our range of products offered still includes four-, five-, six-, eight-, ten- and twelve-cylinder models. Last year the jubilee 25 millionth engine was produced.
VEHICLE PRODUCTIONIn 2013 the production was launched in the new vehicle factory of the Audi Hungaria. In the new production halls, which was built up only in 2 years as a result of a 900 million EUR, the production of the new A3 Limou-sine and Cabriolet and in the future the new generation of TT will be produced. Our product portfolio included last year so the TT (Coupé és Roadster), the cooperation production of the previous version of the A3 Cabriolet and the full-range production of the new A3 Limou-sine and Cabriolet types. Due to the production start of the full-range production the manufactured value increased significantly also.
1,2–2,0 l63–221 kW
2,5 l250–265 kW
2,5–3,0 l140–245 kW
4,0–4,2 l265–412 kW
5,2 l386–419 kW
3,0 l150–230 kW
4,2 l250–283 kW
6,0 l368 kW
1,6–2,0 l66–135 kW
R-ENGINES V-ENGINES
Cylinder displacementPower
Cylinder displacementPower
GASOLINEENGINES
DIESEL ENGINES
4 cylinder 5 cylinder 6 cylinder 8 cylinder 10 cylinder 12 cylinder
gasoline diesel
RATIO OF GASOLINE – DIESEL ENGINES IN THE ENGINE FAMILIES
R4 V6 V8/V10/V12 Total
38%
62%
42%
26%
74%
39%
61%
70%
80%
90%
100%
50%
60%
40%
20%
10%
30%
0%
58%
RATIO OF ENGINE TYPES IN THE PRODUCTION
R4 gasoline (46,1%)
R4 diesel (28,4%)
V6 gasoline (13,4%)
V6 diesel (9,8%)
V8/V10/V12 (2,3%)
12 13
HIGHLIGHTS OF VEHICLE PRODUCTION IN 2013The most important event of the year 2013 was the production start of the new vehicle factory. After finishing the investments the series production started in the mid of the last year.
further expansion of the building of the the press tool and car body elements production launch of 3 new project sin the small scale car body elements production
PRESS TOOL AND CAR BODY ELEMENTS PRODUCTIONIn 2013 the production volume increased regarding to the small scale car body production. This growth was supported by the 3 new project we realized last year. The manufactured volume of the press tools is related with the ammount of new orders, last year we realized 120 projects in this field.
start of series production in the new vehicle production plant
international première of the A3 Limousine international première of the A3 Cabriolet 500,000th Audi TT establishment of the new Departement of
Vehicle-development on the Széchenyi István University
HIGHLIGHTS OF PRESS TOOL AND CAR BODY ELEMENTS PRODUCTION IN 2013
RATIO OF VEHICLE TYPES IN THE PRODUCTION
TT Coupé (34,6%)
TT Roadster (8,3%)
Audi A3 Limousine (50,4%)
Audi A3 Cabriolet (6,7%)
Unit 2011 2012 2013 Change ’12–’13 (%)
Total units 241 678 327 123 391 778 35,4
CAR BODY ELEMENTS PRODUCTION
Unit 2011 2012 2013 Change ’12–’13 (%)
TT Coupé units 19 704 16 940 14 808 -12,6
TT Roadster units 5804 4940 3550 -28,1
Audi RS3 Sportback units 2236 3433 – –
Audi A3 Limousine units – 151 21 607 –
Audi A3 Cabriolet units 11 753 8089 28864 -64,3
Vehicles before market intro-duction (only for internal use) units 21 – – –
Total units 39 518 33 553 42 851 27,7
VEHICLE PRODUCTION
4 361 pieces of new series A3 Cabriolet.
14 15
Significant events in 2013
The 20th birthday of the Audi Hungaria
Seven new engine model in series
International première of the A3 Cabriolet
Two special milestones: the plant produced the 25 millionth engine and the 500,000th TT
Establishment of the new Departement of Vehicle-development on the Széchenyi István University
Installation of the new dust and climate analysis test bench
Employement of the 10 000th employee
Start of series production in the new vehicle production plant
Strategic cooperation agreement signed with the Government
International première of the A3 Limousine
Supporting the development of the Pér Airport
17
02 ENVIRONMENTAL ASPECTS AND IMPACTSWe regularly analyze our processes and technologies to recognise at what points there is a need for intervention. The analysis of the environmental aspects is supported by the application of our scientifically proven BUWAL method as we made it last year also. The analysis was made last year only for the engine production.
As the infrastructural investment related to vehicle production development gradually came to an end, the related environ-mental impact was also reduced. The reduction of the total and the specific value reflects the results of the above and our measures to improve the efficiency of production.
The most important changes of the Environmental Managements SystemSustainable operation is only possible through deliberate and well-designed steps. That is facilitated by our integrated environment management system, which complies with EMAS (the EU’s premium environment management instrument), the international ISO 14001 standard and the requirements of the ISO 50001 energy management standard.The environmental management system is an integral part of Audi Hungaria’s strategic systems; in 2013, its extension to vehicle production activities got underway.
The most typical environmental impacts of our company in-volve waste generation (77%) and energy consumption (20%).
There were no significant changes in the environmental impacts of the typical production stages. As in the past, mechanical machining (53%) continues to have the biggest environmental impact within engine production. At the same time, the weight of engine assembly (27%) has increased while that of logistics (10%) has been reduced to some extent.
Environmental aspects and impacts
Environmental target system
2013 - Environmental Mana-gement on the Right Track
18 19
ENVIRONMENTAL TARGET SYSTEMSeventy well-designed environmental programmes covering the entire company guarantee the consist-ent implementation of our strategy. When planning the various points and their implementation, we take into account the most typical environmental effects and include them in the planning process. Our com-prehensive environmental programme, which also includes energy efficiency items, spans a period of three years (2012-2014).
Mechanical machining
Engine assembly
Vehicle assembly (TT)
Technical development
LogisticsPress tool and car
body manufacturingTotal
Energy 21,20% 10,39% 16,30% 48,57% 34,47% 19,16% 19,74%
Logistics 1,39% 3,00% 1,13% 4,44% 2,82% 5,38% 2,12%
Waste 76,16% 85,93% 81,86% 45,12% 62,41% 73,52% 77,14%
Water 1,17% 0,62% 0,42% 1,33% 0,30% 1,85% 0,91%
Air-quality 0,08% 0,06% 0,29% 0,54% 0,00% 0,09% 0,09%
100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%
Mechanical machining
Engine assembly
Vehicle assembly (TT)
Technical development
LogisticsPress tool and car
body manufacturingTotal
Energy 56,81% 14,07% 4,74% 3,89% 17,61% 2,88% 100%
Logistics 34,76% 37,89% 3,05% 3,32% 13,42% 7,56% 100%
Waste 52,22% 29,78% 6,08% 0,92% 8,16% 2,83% 100%
Water 67,55% 18,18% 2,61% 2,30% 3,32% 6,02% 100%
Air-quality 48,69% 19,29% 19,16% 9,77% 0,00% 3,10% 100%
ECO-POINTS OF THE COMPANY BY TYPICAL PRODUCTION STAGES
ECO-POINTS OF THE COMPANY BY CERTAIN ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS
ECO-POINTS OF THE COMPANY BY ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS
Energy (19,8%)
Logistics (2,1%)
Waste (77,1%)
Water (0,9%)
Air-quality (0,1%)
27
03
1
30
41
7
15
87
9
14
35
0
2011 2012
30
02
0
15
58
9
2013
ECO-POINTS OF THE COMPANY (TOTAL AND SPECIFIC)
20 000
40 000
30 000
10 000
0
Eco-points (specific, EP)Eco-points (total, MEP)
MEP = 1 000 000 EP
21
PRIZES WON IN 2013 European EMAS Award of the
European Commission to Large Organisations of Member States
Virtual Power Plant Programme Energy-Effi cient Company Award
PAG
E15.GLOBAL ENVIRONMENTAL PROGRAMME 2012–2014
ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY
PAG
E12.
Environmental programmes identified by production units
13
7
92
2011 2012
11
2
2013
NUMBER OF IDENTIFIED ENVIRONMENTAL PROGRAMMES (2011-2013)
50
150
75
100
125
25
0
22 23
foundations of interactive training on energy efficiency. The training allows participants to learn more about the basic questions of energy efficiency and to learn methods for improving energy efficiency.
Successful compensation We provide nature protection compensation in connection
with the infrastructural development related to expansion of our production capacity. Last year, the tasks prescribed in connection with this were completed successfully.
Another nature conservation day It is possible to ensure the compatibility of industrial
production with our natural surroundings. Our company has set biodiversity objectives and strives to promote an attitude of natural conversation. For this purpose, last
year, the company organized a tree planting drive at the company’s site with the involvement of the management. The programme fostered the diversity of flora and also expressed our commitment to the issue.
Supporting an Eco-School We strengthened our partnership with Móricz Zsigmond
Elementary School of Győrszentiván. Students of this institution, which holds the prestigious title of an eco-school, had the opportunity to attend a conference on nature conservation and global climate change. We also provided support for a popular science publication of the school about the importance of nature protection.
2013 – Environmental Management on the Right Track
Our environmental management system meets the relevant standards
Our environmental management system successfully passed another round of certification. In the course of the certification, our systems were tested by external experts based on the EMAS, ISO 14001 and ISO 50001 standards
Modernised communication We have also improved our environmental statement,
which is available in the form of an interactive app. Since last year, the document has been available to Android operating system users as well as iOS users.
Full-scale environmental management A significant challenge last year was to integrate vehicle
manufacturing operations into the existing integrated environmental management system. During the project, we paid particular attention to ensuring that the opinions of all stakeholders were taken into account.
Software development in the field of waste management Increasing complexity and changes to the effective regula-
tions made it necessary to revise our waste management sys-tem. As part of these efforts, we introduced an integrated software solution that enables the full-scale supervision and monitoring of our waste management processes. The software is module-based, which allows us to add new environmental fields to the solution in the future.
Energy efficiency in focus It is our company’s objective to reduce the specific level of
energy used for production. In 2013, we further increased our efforts and introduced complex measures in order to collect information about our consumption patterns and to identify possible savings.
Improving energy awareness Beyond technological measures, the shaping of attitudes
is one of the areas where we can take action in the inter-est of improving efficiency. In 2013, we developed the
25
03
Our environmental performanceThe improvement of our environmental performance together with the constant reduction of our environmental load is a company target at Audi Hungary. To achieve this target, we take planned measures within the framework of our environmental management system.
Chapter 3 provides an overview of the trends of our most important environmental indicators, as recorded in the past three years (2011–2013). When selecting these indicators, a decisive as-pect for us was the analysis of environmental aspects. We demonstrate changes in those indi-cators which most precisely reflect the trend of our performance.
In each case we compare the results of the cur-rent year (2013) with the value of the previous year and if the extent of change exceeds 15% we also provide the reasons. The EMAS key indicators in support of the summarized evaluation of our performance are presented always in relation to the specialist field section concerned.
Input - Output balance
Waste management
Energy-management
Water protection
Protection of air-quality
Biodiversity
Environmental expenditures
26 27
Input – Output balance Tendency
Key-indicator (MATERIAL-USE): 1,07Total yearly material use (A): 608 949 tTotal output material flows (B): 571 752 t
Detergents t 335 387 369 -5
Adhesives t 1,1 0,99 0,90 -9
Lacquer t 1,14 0,94 2,37 152Production start of pre-series vehicles
Paints t 0,14 0,001 0,03 2900
Glycol t 222 213 93 -56Change in the number of engines subjected to test runs and reduction in TT production
PURCHASED COMPONENTS6
Engine production t 157 468 367 754 406 283 10
These are calculated values, so specific conclusions cannot be drawn from changes in the values
TT and A3 Cabriolet assembly t 46 889 39 865 22 943 -42
Press tool and car body part production t 44 3 30 900
TOTAL MATERIAL CONSUMPTION PER YEAR (for key indicators –A values)
Total material consumption (A values) t 391 256 574 710 608 949 6
WATER
All water types (total) m3 474 111 523 531 474 555 -9
Drinking water m3 86 077 103 260 148 191 44 Increase in the number of staff (domestic water use)
Well water m3 296 424 272 416 199 954 -27 Change in ratios within the water consumption structure
Industrial water m3 91 610 147 855 126 410 -15
Input Unit 2011 2012 2013 Change ’12–’13 (%) Reason for the change
RAW AND BASE MATERIALS
Engine production
Aluminium t 43 733 36 566 38 371 5
Change in the material composition of engines and components produced
Steel t 44 255 48 152 61 088 27
Cast metal t 85 980 71 130 69 785 -2
Total t 173 969 155 848 169 244 9
Vehicle production
Raw car body parts – TT and A3 Cabriolet assembly t 10 471 8800 4800 -45 Reduction in number of units produced
Press tool and car body part production
Aluminium (car body part production) t 968 559 2650 374 Change in the material composition of
body parts manufactured
Cast metal (tool production) t 1447 1881 1000 -47 Reduction in number of press tool units manufactured
AUXILIARY MATERIALS
Emulsion oil t 170 129 126 -2
Engine oil t 10 026 10 181 9590 -6
Other oils5 t 1297 1552 1021 -34 Changes in machining technology
Fuel l 3 586 099 3 397 062 2 763 698 -19Change in the number of engines subjected to test runs and reduction in TT production
5 Any other oil used for production (e.g.: honing oil, cooling and lubricating oil, conserving oil, hydraulic oil) besides emulsion oil and engine oil. 6 Values calculated on the basis of the incoming and outgoing material flow as well as the amount of waste relevant to the given product.
28
iPAD 24. PAGE
Input – Output balance Tendency
Key-indicator (MATERIAL-USE): 1,07Total yearly material use (A): 608 949 tTotal output material flows (B): 571 752 t
Output Unit 2011 2012 2013 Change ’12–’13 (%) Reason for the change
ENGINE PRODUCTION
Engines piece 1 883 757 1 915 567 1 925 636 0,5
Engines – total weight t 278 587 324 305 253 629 -22 Change in unit weight of the engine types produced
Engine components – total weight t 18 762 164 973 285 632 73 Significant increase in the number of engine components produced
VEHICLE PRODUCTION
Vehicles – TT and A3 Cabriolet
piece 39 410 33 293 20 805 -38
Reduction in number of units
Vehicles – total weight – TT and A3 Cabriolet
t 57 279 48 610 29 714 -39
PRESS TOOL AND CAR BODY PART PRODUCTION
Press tools piece 153 207 120 -42Reduction in number of units
Press tools – total weight t 1423 1830 970 -47
Car body parts piece 241 678 327 123 391 778 20Increasing production volume, change in unit weight of body parts manufactured
Car body parts – total weight t 497 638 1808 183
TOTAL OUTPUT PER YEAR (for key indicators –B values)
B-value t 356 547 540 356 571 752 6
EMISSION INTO THE ENVIRONMENT7
Total generated waste t 56 892 58 145 66 375 14
Waste water m3 226 931 220 466 217 869 -1
Direct CO2-emission t 7215 6869 6152 -10
NOX-emission t 31 22 19 -14
Input Unit 2011 2012 2013 Change ’12–’13 (%) Reason for the change
ENERGY
Electricity MWh 295 745 309 897 306 938 -1
Steam and hot water MWh 72 020 71 766 68 045 -5
Cooling energy (purchased amount) MWh 30 556 14 054 10 046 -29 Continuous transition to own
energy-generating
Natural gas m3 95 000 150 071 239 206 59Increase in the relative weight of gas nitridation technology in surface hardening of camshafts
7 Only engine production.
30 31
iPAD 25. PAGE
Key-indicator (HAZARDOUS WASTE): 0,03Total yearly hazardous waste generation (A): 19 131 tTotal output material fl ows (B): 571 752 t
Key-indicator (TOTAL WASTE): 0,12Total yearly waste generation (A): 66 375 tTotal output material fl ows (B): 571 752 t
Waste management Tendency
66
37
5
65
39
1
98
4
30 000
40 000
50 000
60 000
70 000
10 000
20 000
0
10
87
2012
58
14
5
55
96
1
2011
20
56
56
89
2
54
83
6
Recycled (material + thermal)Not recycled
DEVELOPMENT OT TOTAL QUANTITY OF WASTE (t/year)
Total quantity of waste generated
2013
2011 2012 2013
100%
95%
90%
80%
75%
85%
70%
96,24% 98,52%96,39%
DEVELOPMENT OF RATIO OF RECYCLING (%)
Ratio of recycling
Cast-steel chip (25%)
Steel chip (15%)
Aluminium chip (11%)
Other (49%)
CHARACTERISTIC TYPES OF PRODUCTION WASTE 2013 (%)
TOTAL VOLUME: 47 244 t
CHARACTERISTIC TYPES OF HAZARDOUS WASTE 2013 (%)
TOTAL VOLUME: 19 131 t
Washing-lye (74%)
Machining sludge (9%)
Emulsion (8%)
Other (9%)
32 33
iPAD 25. PAGE
Waste management Tendency
Key-indicator (HAZARDOUS WASTE): 0,03Total yearly hazardous waste generation (A): 19 131 tTotal output material flows (B): 571 752 t
Key-indicator (TOTAL WASTE): 0,12Total yearly waste generation (A): 66 375 tTotal output material flows (B): 571 752 t
Recycling ratio (material + thermal potential)
% 93,18 93,30 94,91 1,6
Specific value kg/engine 8,36 8,38 9,94 19 Effect of periodic emulsion changes
Unit 2011 2012 2013 Change ’12–’13 (%) Reason for the change
INDUSTRIAL WASTE
Total quantity of industrial waste
t 40 638 41 515 47 244 14
Recycled (in respect of material)
t 40 157 41 031 47 234 15
Recycled (in respect of material + thermal potential)
t 40 157 41 031 47 234 15
Non-recycled t 8 15 9,3 -38 Reduction in the quantity of grindstone disposed of
Recycling ratio (material)
% 98,82 98,84 99,98 1,1
Recycling ratio (material + thermal potential)
% 98,82 98,84 99,98 1,1
Specific value kg/engine 21,57 21,67 24,53 13
Unit 2011 2012 2013 Change ’12–’13 (%) Reason for the change
TOTAL WASTE
Total quantity of waste t 56 892 58 145 66 375 14
Recycled (in respect of material) t 54 570 55 707 65 192 17Planned reduction in non-recycled proportionRecycled (in respect of
material + thermal potential)t 54 836 55 961 65 391 17
Non-recycled t 2056 1087 --984 -9
Recycling ratio (material) % 95,92 95,81 98,22 2,4
Recycling ratio (material + thermal potential)
% 96,39 96,24 98,52 2,3
Specific value kg/engine 30,20 30,35 34,47 14
HAZARDOUS WASTES
Total quantity of hazardous waste generated
t 15 754 16 002 19 131 20 Effect of periodic emulsion changes
Total quantity of hazardous waste recycled in respect of material
t 14 413 14 676 17 958 22
Effect of periodic emulsion changes, recycling of emulsion wasteTotal quantity of hazardous waste
recycled in respect of material and thermal potential
t 14 680 14 930 18 157 22
Non-recycled t 1075 1072 974 -9
Recycling ratio (material) % 91,49 91,71 93,87 2,2
34 35
continuous monitoring and optimization of waste routes commissioning of vacuum evaporator to treat the cleaning
water • recycling and reuse of the generated cleaning water taking deliberate further action to reduce waste at the
technological level (increasing the lifetime of emulsions, machining with minimum lubrication • reduction in emulsion waste)
tendering a general waste management service and choosing the best service provider both in relation to engine manufacturing and vehicle production
examining recycling possibilities for grindstone waste (which is currently landfilled)
tendering metal waste transportation and choosing the best service provider
design and successful implementation of a waste management system in the field of vehicle production
introducing special waste management software and integrating it with the existing systems
preparing for the introduction of a Group-level system for the sale of metal waste
Energy-managementiPAD 25. PAGE iPAD 26. PAGE
ACTION AREAS 2013
Key-indicator (HAZARDOUS WASTE): 0,03Total yearly hazardous waste generation (A): 19 131 tTotal output material flows (B): 571 752 t
Key-indicator (TOTAL WASTE): 0,12Total yearly waste generation (A): 66 375 tTotal output material flows (B): 571 752 t
Waste management
ENERGY-CYCLE DIAGRAM OF THE AUDI HUNGARIA MOTOR KFT. FOR THE YEAR 2013 (ENGINE PRODUCTION)
1952MWh/a
Cooling water saupply
48 569 MWh/a (own production)
Natural gas station
306 938MWh/a
68 045MWh/a
10 046MWh/a(purchased value)
PRODUCTION
SANITARYENGINEERING
EQUIPMENT
Heat-energycentre
Cooled water supply
Pressurized air supply
Electric energystation
Cooling-energycentre
Unit 2011 2012 2013 Change ’12–’13 (%) Reason for the change
COMMUNAL WASTE
Total quantity of communal waste
t 500 628 661 5
Recycled t 500 628 661 5
Non-recycled t 0 0 0 –
Recycling ratio % 100,00 100,00 100,00 –
Specific valuekg/
employee68,60 71,62 63,61 -11
36 37
Energy-management Tendency
Key-indicator (ENERGY): 0,68Total direct energy-use (A): 386 981 MWhTotal output material flows (B): 571 752 t iPAD 26. PAGE
Fuel consumption l 3 586 099 3 397 062 2 763 698 -19Change in the number of engines subjected to test runs and reduction in TT production
Total energy consumption9 MWh/year 399 224 397 136 386 981 -3
SPECIFIC VALUES
Specific electric energy consumption (total)
MWh / engine 0,157 0,162 0,159 -2
Specific electric energy consumption – engine production
MWh / engine 0,143 0,148 0,145 -2
Specific electricity consumption – TT assembly
MWh/vehicle 0,463 0,078 0,169 117Reduction of the production volume of TT, production start of pre-series vehicles
Specific electric energy consumption – press tool and car body part production
MWh/car body element
0,034 0,031 0,027 -13
Specific technological heat consumption
MWh/engine 0,006
0,037 0,035 -5Specific heat consumption for building heating purposes
MWh/m2 0,153
Specific cooling energy consumption
MWh/engine 0,032 0,024 0,030 25 Increase in production depth, higher cooling demands
Specific natural gas consumption m3/engine 0,050 0,078 0,124 59Increase in the relative weight of gas nitridation technology in surface hardening of camshafts
Energy-management Unit 2011 2012 2013 Change ’12–’13 (%) Reason for the change
ENERGY CONSUMPTION
Electrical energy consumption MWh/year 295 745 309 897 306 938 -1
Electrical energy consumption – engine production
MWh/year 269 284 282 719 278 547 -1
Electrical energy consumption – TT production
MWh/year 18 227 2603 3521 35 Production start of pre-series vehicles
Electrical energy consumption – press tool and car body part production
MWh/year 8234 10 103 10 434 3
Technological heat consumption MWh/year 10 800
71 766 68 045 -5Heat energy for building heating purposes
MWh/year 61 220
Cooling energy consumption (total value)
MWh/year 61 111 46 307 58 615 27 Increase in production depth, higher cooling demands
Cooling energy consumption (purchased value)
MWh/year 30 556 14 054 10 046 -29Continuous transition to own energy-generating
Cooling energy consumption (own production) 8
MWh/year 30 556 32 253 48 569 51
Natural gas consumption m3 95 000 150 071 239 206 59Increase in the relative weight of gas nitridation technology in surface hardening of camshafts
8 Integrated in electrical energy consumption values. 9 Involving the energy volumes of fuel consumption related to engine test-running procedures as well as testing and filling of produced vehicles.
38 39
Water protectioniPAD 27. PAGE
Successful certification of the energy management system in accordance with the provisions of the ISO 50001 standard
Defining an overall energy efficiency objective at the company level
Setting annual energy saving targets for each production areas
Implementation of regular energy saving measures in the various production areas
Review of the compressed air system Review and optimization of the lighting of halls Complete review of hydraulic systems, changes to work stations Review of energy efficiency of the blow-off stations Successful closure of the pilot project on measuring
energy per machine Preparing and launching planning of the project to
measure energy per machine Development and launch of basic energy training programme
ACTION AREAS 2013
Energy-management
WATER SUPPLY DIAGRAM OF THE AUDI HUNGARIA MOTOR KFT. FOR THE YEAR 2013 (ENGINE PRODUCTION)
INPUT WATER-USE OUTPUT
Wastewater217 869 m3
Rainwater
Water from AHM well199 954 m3
Drinking-water137 626 m3
Evaporation222 379 m3
Waste15 742 m3
Technology (preparation of emulsion, washing equipment, cleaning, preparation of glycol,vehicle washing)
75 070 m3
Cooling for technology(cooling-tower)
243 294 m3
Watering
Construction works / Watering8000 m3
Water from well(purchased)
126 410 m3
Watering
Construction works / Watering8000 m3
Social consumption137 626 m3
TendencyKey-indicator (WATER-USE): 0,83Total yearly water-use (A): 474 555 m3
Total output material flows (B): 571 752 t
Water protection
WATER CONSUMPTION AND WASTEWATER EMISSIONS
Unit 2011 2012 2013 Change ’12–’13 (%) Reason for the change
INPUT SIDE
Total water consumption m3/year 474 111 608 678 474 555 -22 Effect of the water saving measures introduced
From which drinking water m3/year 86 077 130 710 148 191 13
From which well water m3/year 296 424 330 113 199 954 -39 Effect of the water saving measures introduced
From which industrial water m3/year 91 610 147 855 126 410 -15 Effect of the water saving measures introduced
OUTPUT SIDE
Generated waste water m3/year 226 931 220 466 217 869 -1
SPECIFIC VALUES
Specific drinking water consumption m3/employee 11,82 14,89 14,26 -4
Specific technological water consumption
m3/engine 0,21 0,22 0,17 -23 Effect of the water saving measures introduced
Total water consumption m3/engine 0,25 0,32 0,25 -22 Effect of the water saving measures introduced
Specific generated waste water m3/engine 0,120 0,115 0,113 -2
42
iPAD 27. PAGE
Key-indicator (WATER-USE): 0,83Total yearly water-use (A): 474 555 m3
Total output material flows (B): 571 752 t
Components Unit Limit value Measured value
GENERAL CHEMICAL COMPONENTS
pH – 6,5–10 8,73
Organic Solvent Extract (OSE) mg/l 50,00 20,70
KOI (cr) mg/l 1000,00 562,00
BOI5 mg/l 500,00 230,00
HEAVY METALS
Pb µg/l 200,00 <25
Hg µg/l 50,00 0,09
Components Unit Limit value Measured value 2. well Measured value 5. well Measured value 9. well
GENERAL CHEMICAL COMPONENTS
Nitrate mg/l 5 19,10 12,40 5,99
Ammonium mg/l 0,5 <0,02 <0,02 <0,02
Sulphate mg/l 250 41,70 40,30 177,00
pH – 6,5–9,0 7,41 7,55 7,73
HEAVY METALS
Zn µg/l 200,00 <10 <10 10
Hg µg/l 1,00 <0,02 <0,02 <0,02
QUALITATIVE VALUES OF WASTEWATER EMITTED ACCORDING TO THE MEASUREMENT ON THE 22.05.2013 (RÉSUMÉ)
QUALITATIVE VALUES OF GROUND WATER ACCORDING TO THE MEASUREMENT ON THE 14.08.2013 (RÉSUMÉ)
44 45
Protection of air-qualityTendencyiPAD 27. PAGE iPAD 28. PAGE
commissioning of a vacuum evaporator to recycle cleaning water, devising the collection and recycling system
optimization of water monitoring, installation of more water meters
examining recycling possibilities for the waste water from desalination
regular optimisation of logistics processes and keeping the ratio of railway transportation at a high level
to bring the ratio of hot engine testing closer to the technologically required minimum
making wider use of the minimal-lubrication machining process, reducing the generated emulsion mist
ACTION AREAS 2013ACTION AREAS 2013
examining the application of a membrane bioreactor system for cleaning and recycle the waste water of the whole company
continuing water saving measures at technological level (minimal lubrication, fluid management)
analysis of water use habits in the social areas, drawing up an action plan for water saving
review and optimisation of the maintenance system for filtering equipment
preparation for the certification of AUDI AG’s carbon footprint
Key-indicator (WATER-USE): 0,83Total yearly water-use (A): 474 555 m3
Total output material flows (B): 571 752 t
Water protection Tendency
Unit 2011 2012 2013 Change ’12–’13 (%) Reason for the change
Dust emission t/year 2,81 1,72 1,67 -3
Oil and emulsion vapour emission t/year 25,93 21,54 23,69 10
Nitrogen-oxide emission t/year 30,93 22,29 19,33 -13
CO2 EMISSION
Direct CO2 emission 10 t/year 7215 6869 6152 -10
Total CO2 emission (direct + indirect) 11 t/year 187 576 197 239 193 216 -2
Specific CO2 emission (direct)
kg/engine 3,83 3,59 3,20 -11
Specific CO2 emission (direct + indirect)
kg/engine 99,58 102,97 100,34 -3
10 The material flows involved in the establishment of direct values: fuel consumption and natural gas consumption.11 The material flows involved in the establishment of direct values: direct flows + power plant emission related to electrical energy consumption.
EMISSIONS OF AIR POLLUTANTS
2011 2012
350 000
400 000
450 000
500 000
550 000
600 000
650 000
250 000
300 000
200 000
100 000
50 000
150 000
0
130 71086 077
330 113296 424
147 855
91 610
608 678
474 111
2013
148 191
199 954
126 410
474 555
Industrial water Well-water Drinking water
DEVELOPMENT OF WATER CONSUMPTION (m3/a)
46 47
Protection of air-quality BiodiversityEnvironmental expenditures
TendencyKey-indicator (GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS): 0,01Total yearly greenhouse gas emission (A): 6359 tTotal output material flows (B): 571 752 t
Key-indicator (TECHNOLOGICAL EMISSIONS): 0,04Total yearly technological emission of air-polluting material (A): 21 017 tTotal output material flows (B): 571 752 t
managing green areas on a nature conservation basis taking measures to protect flora and fauna preparation of a green register and using it to
support planning decisions programme to increase biodiversity
ACTION AREAS 2013
Key-indicator (BIODIVERSITY): 1,18Total built-in area (A): 676 000 m2
Total output material flows (B): 571 752 tTendency iPAD 29–30. PAGE
awareness raising and organising nature protection events
coordination of compensation measures “carbon dioxide absorbing oak forest” project cooperation with and funding of eco-school140 000
160 000
180 000
200 000
100 000
120 000
80 000
40 000
20 000
60 000
0
2011 2012
180 361
7215
187 576197 239
190 370
6869
2013
193 216
187 064
6152
direct CO2
emissions indirect CO2 emissions
DEVELOPMENT OF TOTAL CO2 EMISSIONS (t/a)
Unit 2011 2012 2013 Change ’12–’13 (%)
EXPENDITURES
Operational costs12 EUR/year 264 146 2 084 210 2 254 582 8
Waste-related costs EUR/year 4 674 487 4 631 379 4 671 187 1
Environmental protection-related investments13 EUR/year 7 592 951 5 318 755 10 406 072 96
Total expenditures EUR/year 12 531 584 12 034 344 17 331 841 44
INCOMES
Income from the selling of generated waste EUR/year 17 190 761 16 665 749 18 232 842 9
PROFIT
Result of environmental protection-related activities EUR/year 4 659 178 4 631 405 901 001 -81
12 Running costs mostly related to the operation of our environmental management system, e.g. measurement costs, certification-related costs, permitting and compensation costs regarding construction works related to the new vehicle factory.
13 Costs of environmental protection-related investments, e.g. procurement of new environment technical equipment, installation of cold-testing cabinets, etc.
AIR-QUALITY MEASUREMENTS 2013 (RÉSUMÉ)
Type of pollutant UnitP596 Camshaft
machiningP065 Driving
rod machiningP463 power test
bench (petrol)
Dust mg/Nm3 1,38
Oil mist mg/Nm3 9,56
NOX mg/Nm3 3,49
CO2 mg/Nm3 20 500,00
CO mg/Nm3 9,06
ENVIRONMENTAL EXPENDITURES
49
04Social responsibility
Fostering our cooperation with higher education Dual vocational training Partnership with the Hungarian Olympic Committee
Collecting donations at ChristmasTrainees at Audi HungariaFlood aid
iPAD 21. PAGE
50
Ferjancsik Zsombor
By signing this declaration, I declare that: the verification and validation has been carried out in full compli-
ance with the requirements of Regulation (EC) No 1221/2009, the outcome of the verification and validation confirms that
there is no evidence of non-compliance with applicable legal requirements relating to the environment,
the data and information of the updated environmental state-ment of the organisation reflect a reliable, credible and cor-rect image of all the organisations activities, within the scope mentioned in the environmental statement.
Environmental Verifier’s Declaration on Verification and Validation Activities*Gergely Zsombor Ferjancsik with EMAS environmental verifier registration number HU-V-0003/2012 accredited or licensed for the scope C29 declares to have verified the whole organisation as indicated in the updated environmental statement of the organisation (AUDI HUNGARIA MOTOR Kft.) with registration number HU-000001 meet all requirements of Regulation (EC) No 1221/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 November 2009 on the voluntary participation by organisations in a Community eco-management and audit scheme (EMAS).
This document is not equivalent to EMAS registration. EMAS registration can only be granted by a Competent Body under Regulation (EC) No 1221/2009. This document shall not be used as a stand-alone piece of public communication.
Done at Győr, 16th of May 2014
* The Abridged Environmental Statement is a simplified version of the interactive Environmental Statement. The declaration of the environmental verifier concerns to the overall interactive Environmental Statement, which is available in the App Store and in the Google Play.
AUDI HUNGARIA MOTOR Kft.
H-9027 Győr, Kardán út 1.Tel.: +36-96/661-000. Fax: +36-96/661-210.www.audi.hu
Printed on CO2-neutral recycled paper.