+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Single-letter Characterization of Signal Estimation … Characterization of Signal Estimation from...

Single-letter Characterization of Signal Estimation … Characterization of Signal Estimation from...

Date post: 24-May-2018
Category:
Upload: tranhuong
View: 215 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
25
Single-letter Characterization of Signal Estimation from Linear Measurements Dongning Guo Dror Baron Shlomo Shamai The work has been supported by the European Commission in the framework of the FP7 Network of Excellence in Wireless Communications NEWCOM++, by the Israel Science Foundation, and by the National Science Foundation.
Transcript

Single-letter Characterization of Signal Estimation

from Linear Measurements

Dongning Guo

Dror Baron

Shlomo Shamai

The work has been supported by the European Commission in the framework of the FP7 Network of Excellence in Wireless Communications NEWCOM++, by the Israel Science Foundation, and by the National Science Foundation.

Linear Measurement Systems

•  1809: Theoria motus corporum coelestium •  Gauss introduced application of least squares

(regression) to solve noisy linear systems –  motivated by astronomy/navigation

•  Goal: estimate input x to explain measurements y

Non-linear Signal Estimation •  Linear signal estimation (least squares) sub-optimal

–  example: “hard decisions” used to estimate binary data

•  Difficult problem with noisy observations –  even over-determined problems can be challenging

 Need information theoretic framework for non-linear signal estimation in linear measurement systems

underdetermined overerdetermined

Linear Measurement Application Areas

 Compressed sensing

 Multiuser communication (CDMA)

•  Medical imaging (tomography)

•  Financial prediction

•  Electromagnetic scattering

•  Seismic imaging (oil industry)

Problem Definition

Setting •  Replace samples by more general measurements

based on a few linear projections (inner products)

measurements sparse signal

# non-zeros

Signal Model •  Signal entry Xn= BnUn

•  iid Bn» Bernoulli(ε) sparse •  iid Un» PU

PU

Bernoulli(ε)

Multiplier

PX

Non-Sparse Input

•  Can use ε=1 Xn= Un

PU

Measurement Noise •  Measurement process is typically analog •  Analog systems add noise, non-linearities, etc.

•  Assume Gaussian noise for ease of analysis

•  Can be generalized to non-Gaussian noise [Guo & Wang 2007; Rangan 2010]

•  Noiseless measurements denoted y0 •  Noise •  Noisy measurements •  Unit-norm columns SNR=γ

Noise Model

noiseless

SNR

•  Model process as measurement channel

•  Measurements provide information!

 Preliminary single-letter bound for compressed sensing and linear measurement systems

channel

CS measurement CS decoding

source encoder

channel encoder

channel decoder

source decoder

Allerton 2006 [Sarvotham, Baron, & Baraniuk]

•  Numerous single-letter bounds –  [Aeron, Zhao, & Saligrama] –  [Akcakaya and Tarokh] –  [Rangan, Fletcher, & Goyal] –  [Gastpar & Reeves] –  [Wang, Wainwright, & Ramchandran] –  [Tune, Bhaskaran, & Hanly]

•  BP Multiuser detection –  [Tanaka & Takeda] –  [Guo & Wang] –  [Montanari & Tse]

•  Arbitrary noise –  [Rangan] –  [Guo & Wang]

Related Results

Goal: Precise Single-letter Characterization of Optimal CS

[Guo, Baron, & Shamai 2009]

What Single-letter Characterization?

• Ultimately what can one say about Xn given Y?

(sufficient statistic)

• Very complicated • Want a simple characterization of its quality • Large-system limit:

Φ ,Φ

channel posterior

Main Result: Single-letter Characterization

•  Result1: Conditioned on Xn=xn, the observations (Y,Φ) are statistically equivalent to

η easy to compute…

•  Estimation quality from (Y,Φ) just as good as noisier scalar observation

degradation

Φ ,Φ

channel posterior

•  η2(0,1) is fixed point of

•  Take-home point: degraded scalar channel

•  Non-rigorous owing to replica method w/ symmetry assumption –  used in CDMA detection [Tanaka 2002, Guo & Verdu 2005]

•  Related analysis [Rangan, Fletcher, & Goyal 2009] –  MMSE estimate (not posterior) using [Guo & Verdu 2005]

–  extended to several CS algorithms particularly LASSO

Details

Decoupling [Guo, Baron, & Shamai 2009]

•  Result2: Large system limit; any arbitrary (constant) L input elements decouple:

•  Take-home point: “interference” from each individual signal entry vanishes

Decoupling Result

Sparse Measurement Matrices

[Sarvotham, Baron, & Baraniuk 2006] [Guo, Baron, & Shamai 2009]

[Baron, Sarvotham, & Baraniuk 2010]

Sparse Measurement Matrices

•  LDPC measurement matrix (sparse) •  Mostly zeros in Φ; nonzeros » PΦ

•  Each row contains ¼Nq randomly placed nonzeros •  Fast matrix-vector multiplication

 fast encoding / decoding

sparse matrix

CS Decoding Using BP [Baron, Sarvotham, & Baraniuk 2006]

•  Measurement matrix represented by graph •  Estimate input iteratively •  Implemented via nonparametric BP [Bickson,Sommer,…]

measurements y

signal x

Identical Single-letter Characterization w/BP [Montanari & Tse 2006; Guo & Wang 2008]

•  Result3: Conditioned on Xn=xn, the observations (Y,Φ) are statistically equivalent to

•  Rigorous result

•  Sparse matrices just as good •  BP is asymptotically optimal!

identical degradation

100 200 300 400 500 600 700

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

IHT

CoSaMP

GPSR

LP

M

MMSE

CS-BP vs Other CS Methods (N=1000, ε=0.1, q=0.02)

M

MM

SE

Conclusion

•  Single-letter characterization of CS

•  Decoupling

•  Sparse matrices just as good

•  Asymptotically optimal CS-BP algorithm

THE END


Recommended