Sistema Universitario Ana G. Méndez School for Professional Studies
Florida Campuses Universidad del Este, Universidad Metropolitana, Un iversidad del Turabo
EDUC 214
Computers In Education Uso de la Computadora en la Educación
© Sistema Universitario Ana G. Méndez, 2008 Derechos Reservados.
© Ana G. Méndez University System, 2008. All rights reserved
EDUC 214 Computers in Education 2
Prep. 2004. Noridis Medina Fernández Rev. 2004. Carmen L. Lamboy, Ed.D, Rev. 2008. Ariadna Rivera Crawford, MA.Ed
TABLA DE CONTENIDO/TABLE OF CONTENTS
Página/Page
Prontuario .................................................................................................................................... 3
Study Guide ............................................................................................................................... 10
Workshop One .......................................................................................................................... 17
Taller Dos ................................................................................................................................... 22
Workshop Three ....................................................................................................................... 28
Taller Cuatro .............................................................................................................................. 31
Workshop Five/Taller Cinco .................................................................................................. 34
Anejo A/Appendix A ................................................................................................................ 37
Anejo B/Appendix B ................................................................................................................ 38
Anejo C/Appendix C ................................................................................................................ 40
Anejo D/Appendix D ................................................................................................................ 42
Anejo E/Appendix E ................................................................................................................. 45
Anejo F/Appendix F ................................................................................................................. 46
Anejo G/Appendix G ................................................................................................................ 47
Anejo H/Appendix H ................................................................................................................ 49
Anejo I/Appendix I .................................................................................................................... 51
Anejo J/Appendix J ................................................................................................................. 53
Anejo K/Appendix K ................................................................................................................ 54
Anejo L/Appendix L ................................................................................................................. 55
Anejo M/Appendix M ............................................................................................................... 56
Anejo N/Appendix N ................................................................................................................ 58
Anejo O/Appendix O ................................................................................................................ 59
Anejo P/Appendix P ................................................................................................................. 60
EDUC 214 Computers in Education 3
Prep. 2004. Noridis Medina Fernández Rev. 2004. Carmen L. Lamboy, Ed.D, Rev. 2008. Ariadna Rivera Crawford, MA.Ed
PRONTUARIO
Título del Curso: Uso de la Computadora en la Educación
Codificación: EDUC 214
Duración: Cinco Semanas
Prerrequisito: Ninguno
Descripción del Curso:
El curso EDUC 214, cubre el estudio de los orígenes, desarrollo, conceptos básicos,
descripción, manejo de implicaciones, rol y aplicaciones de la computadora desde una
perspectiva pedagógica. Las aplicaciones de las computadoras y su impacto en
nuestras vidas así como la utilización de material didáctico diseñado para la misma. Se
hace uso de la computadora, cuyo laboratorio es básico como práctica en el mismo
utilizando programas, procesador de palabras y otras aplicaciones de diferentes
programas educativos.
Objetivos Generales:
1. Desarrollar los conceptos básicos del uso y manejo de las aplicaciones de una
computadora a la sala de clases
2. Integrar las aplicaciones de la computadora como una herramienta
administrativa a los procesos de planificación diaria del facilitador
3. Demostrar actitud y aptitud favorable hacia las herramientas tecnológicas que se
adquieran en la escuela.
Texto Requerido:
Shelly, G. B., Cashman, T.J., & Vermaat, M. E.( 2000). Discovering Computers 2001-
Concepts for a Connected World. Course Technology.
Hirshbuhl, H. & Kelley, J. (2006). Annual Editions: Computers in Education (12 ed.).
McGraw-Hill/Dushkin
Referencias
Beekman,G. (1995). Computación & Informatica Hoy, Addison Wesley Iberoamericana.
Hofstetter, F.T. (2nd edition). Multimedia Literacy, New York: McGraw-Hill Co, Inc.
ISBN: 0139743871
EDUC 214 Computers in Education 4
Prep. 2004. Noridis Medina Fernández Rev. 2004. Carmen L. Lamboy, Ed.D, Rev. 2008. Ariadna Rivera Crawford, MA.Ed
Roblyer M.D.,& Edwards, J. (2000). Integrating Educational Technology into Teaching.
2nd Ed. Prentice Hall-ISBN: 0-13-974387-1
Shelly, G. B., Cashman, T.J., Vermaat, M. E. (1999). Discovering Computers 2000-
Concepts for a Connected World, 1ra. Ed., Course Technology.
Shelly, Gary B., & Cashman, T.J. (1998). Discovering Computers 98 – a Link to
the Future, 1ra. Ed., Course Technology
Evaluación
El estudiante será evaluado de acuerdo a los siguientes criterios:
Criterios Puntos
1. Asistencia 50
2. Participación en clase y en foro de discusión en Internet 50
3. Portafolio 100
Otros Criterios
Distribución por
taller
Puntos
Tal
ler
1
Tal
ler
2
Tal
ler
3
Tal
ler
4
Tal
ler
5
4. Asignaciones y tareas para entregar 280
a. Resumen de referencia electrónica ���� ���� ���� ���� 40
b. Ensayo: Historia de la computadora y
eventos históricos ����
50
c. Definición de computadora y
justificación de la efectividad de
integrar la computadora en una de
las materias educativas.
����
20
d. Ensayo sobre los beneficios y
ventajas del software.
����
50
e. Definición de software y ejemplo de
un software educativo y su
����
20
EDUC 214 Computers in Education 5
Prep. 2004. Noridis Medina Fernández Rev. 2004. Carmen L. Lamboy, Ed.D, Rev. 2008. Ariadna Rivera Crawford, MA.Ed
Otros Criterios
Distribución por
taller
Puntos
Tal
ler
1
Tal
ler
2
Tal
ler
3
Tal
ler
4
Tal
ler
5
integración en por lo menos una de
las materias educativas.
f. Presentación sobre dispositivos de
entrada y salida para la población
con necesidades especiales.
����
50
g. Ensayo sobre las ventajas y
desventajas de la comunicación
usando la computadora.
����
50
5. Proyecto ���� 100
6. Presentación de proyecto ���� 100
7. Examen final ���� 100
Total 780
Escala de Evaluación
100-90 A 89-80 B 79-70 C 69-60 D 59-00 F
Los anejos incluidos en el módulo, incluye las matr ices de valoración para la
evaluación de cada tarea. Utilice estas para guiar la preparación de cada tarea. El
facilitador y el estudiante pueden modificar, añadi r y/o eliminar criterios.
EDUC 214 Computers in Education 6
Prep. 2004. Noridis Medina Fernández Rev. 2004. Carmen L. Lamboy, Ed.D, Rev. 2008. Ariadna Rivera Crawford, MA.Ed
Descripción de las Normas del Curso
1. Este curso sigue el programa “Discipline-Based Dual-Language Immersion
Model®” del Sistema Universitario Ana G. Méndez, el mismo está diseñado para
promover el desarrollo de cada estudiante como un profesional bilingüe. Cada
taller será facilitado en inglés y español, utilizando el modelo 50/50. Esto
significa que cada taller deberá ser conducido enteramente en el lenguaje
especificado. Los lenguajes serán alternados en cada taller para asegurar que
el curso se ofrece 50% en inglés y 50% en español. Para mantener un balance,
el módulo debe especificar que se utilizarán ambos idiomas en el quinto taller,
dividiendo el tiempo y las actividades equitativamente entre ambos idiomas. Si
un estudiante tiene dificultad en hacer una pregunta en el idioma especificado,
bien puede escoger el idioma de preferencia para hacer la pregunta. Sin
embargo, el facilitador deberá contestar la misma en el idioma designado para
ese taller. Esto deberá ser una excepción a las reglas pues es importante que
los estudiantes utilicen el idioma designado. Esto no aplica a los cursos de
lenguaje que deben ser desarrollados en el idioma propio todo en inglés o todo
en español según aplique.
2. El curso es conducido en formato acelerado, eso requiere que los estudiantes se
preparen antes de cada taller de acuerdo al módulo. Cada taller requiere un
promedio de diez (10) horas de preparación y en ocasiones requiere más.
3. La asistencia a todos los talleres es obligatoria. El estudiante que se ausente al
taller deberá presentar una excusa razonable al facilitador. El facilitador
evaluará si la ausencia es justificada y decidirá como el estudiante repondrá el
trabajo perdido, de ser necesario. El facilitador decidirá uno de los siguientes:
permitirle al estudiante reponer el trabajo o asignarle trabajo adicional en
adición al trabajo a ser repuesto.
Toda tarea a ser completada antes del taller deberá ser entregada en la fecha
asignada. El facilitador ajustará la nota de las tareas repuestas.
4. Si un estudiante se ausenta a más de un taller el facilitador tendrá las siguientes
opciones:
EDUC 214 Computers in Education 7
Prep. 2004. Noridis Medina Fernández Rev. 2004. Carmen L. Lamboy, Ed.D, Rev. 2008. Ariadna Rivera Crawford, MA.Ed
a. Si es a dos talleres, el facilitador reducirá una nota por debajo basado en
la nota existente.
b. Si el estudiante se ausenta a tres talleres, el facilitador reducirá la nota a
dos por debajo de la nota existente.
5. La asistencia y participación en clase de actividades y presentaciones orales es
extremadamente importante pues no se pueden reponer. Si el estudiante provee
una excusa válida y verificable, el facilitador determinará una actividad
equivalente a evaluar que sustituya la misma. Esta actividad deberá incluir el
mismo contenido y componentes del lenguaje como la presentación oral o
actividad a ser repuesta.
6. En actividades de grupo el grupo será evaluado por su trabajo final. Sin
embargo, cada miembro de grupo deberá participar y cooperar para lograr un
trabajo de excelencia, pero recibirán una calificación individual.
7. Se espera que todo trabajo escrito sea de la autoría de cada estudiante y no
plagiado. Se debe entender que todo trabajo sometido esta citado
apropiadamente o parafraseado y citado dando atención al autor. Todo
estudiante debe ser el autor de su propio trabajo. Todo trabajo que sea plagiado,
copiado o presente trazos de otro será calificado con cero (vea la política de
honestidad académica).
8. Si el facilitador hace cambios al módulo o guía de estudio, deberá discutirlos y
entregar copia a los estudiantes por escrito al principio del primer taller.
9. El facilitador establecerá los medios para contactar a los estudiantes proveyendo
su correo electrónico, teléfonos, y el horario disponibles.
10. EL uso de celulares está prohibido durante las sesiones de clase; de haber una
necesidad, deberá permanecer en vibración o en silencio.
11. La visita de niños y familiares no registrados en el curso no está permitida en el
salón de clases.
12. Todo estudiante está sujeto a las políticas y normas de conducta y
comportamiento que rigen al SUAGM y el curso.
EDUC 214 Computers in Education 8
Prep. 2004. Noridis Medina Fernández Rev. 2004. Carmen L. Lamboy, Ed.D, Rev. 2008. Ariadna Rivera Crawford, MA.Ed
Nota: Si por alguna razón no puede acceder las dire cciones electrónicas
ofrecidas en el módulo, no se limite a ellas. Exis ten otros motores de búsqueda y
sitios Web que podrá utilizar para la búsqueda de l a información deseada. Entre
ellas están:
• www.google.com
• www.altavista.com
• www.ask.com
• www.excite.com
• www.pregunta.com
• www.findarticles.com
• www.telemundo.yahoo.com
• www.bibliotecavirtualut.suagm.edu
• www.eric.ed.gov/
• www.flelibrary.org/
El/la facilitador(a) puede realizar cambios a las d irecciones electrónicas y/o
añadir algunas de ser necesario.
Filosofía y Metodología Educativa
Este curso está basado en la teoría educativa del Constructivismo.
Constructivismo es una filosofía de aprendizaje fundamentada en la premisa, de que,
reflexionando a través de nuestras experiencias, podemos construir nuestro propio
conocimiento sobre el mundo en el que vivimos.
Cada uno de nosotros genera nuestras propias “reglas “y “métodos mentales”
que utilizamos para darle sentido a nuestras experiencias. Aprender, por lo tanto, es
simplemente el proceso de ajustar nuestros modelos mentales para poder acomodar
nuevas experiencias. Como facilitadores, nuestro enfoque es el mantener una
conexión entre los hechos y fomentar un nuevo entendimiento en los estudiantes.
También, intentamos adaptar nuestras estrategias de enseñanza a las respuestas de
EDUC 214 Computers in Education 9
Prep. 2004. Noridis Medina Fernández Rev. 2004. Carmen L. Lamboy, Ed.D, Rev. 2008. Ariadna Rivera Crawford, MA.Ed
nuestros estudiantes y motivar a los mismos a analizar, interpretar y predecir
información.
Existen varios principios para el constructivismo, entre los cuales están:
1. El aprendizaje es una búsqueda de significados. Por lo tanto, el aprendizaje debe
comenzar con situaciones en las cuales los estudiantes estén buscando
activamente construir un significado.
2. Significado requiere comprender todas las partes. Y, las partes deben entenderse
en el contexto del todo. Por lo tanto, el proceso de aprendizaje se enfoca en los
conceptos primarios, no en hechos aislados.
3. Para enseñar bien, debemos entender los modelos mentales que los estudiantes
utilizan para percibir el mundo y las presunciones que ellos hacen para apoyar
dichos modelos.
4. El propósito del aprendizaje, es para un individuo, el construir su propio significado,
no sólo memorizar las contestaciones “correctas” y repetir el significado de otra
persona. Como la educación es intrínsecamente interdisciplinaria, la única forma
válida para asegurar el aprendizaje es hacer del avalúo parte esencial de dicho
proceso, asegurando que el mismo provea a los estudiantes con la información
sobre la calidad de su aprendizaje.
5. La evaluación debe servir como una herramienta de auto-análisis.
6. Proveer herramientas y ambientes que ayuden a los estudiantes a interpretar las
múltiples perspectivas que existen en el mundo.
7. El aprendizaje debe ser controlado internamente y analizado por el estudiante.
EDUC 214 Computers in Education 10
Prep. 2004. Noridis Medina Fernández Rev. 2004. Carmen L. Lamboy, Ed.D, Rev. 2008. Ariadna Rivera Crawford, MA.Ed
STUDY GUIDE
Course Title: Computers in Education
Code: EDUC 214
Time Length: Five weeks
Prerequisite: None
Description:
The course EDUC 214 covers the study of the origins, development, basic concepts,
description, and implications of usage, role, and computer applications from a
pedagogical perspective. The application of computers and their impact in our lives as
well as the usage of didactic materials designed by computers. Computers and
computer laboratory are used for basic practice by using different software, word
processor and other computer applications.
General Objectives:
1. Develop the basic concepts on the use and management of computer
applications in a classroom.
2. Integrate computer applications for administrative processes in the
facilitator’s/teacher’s daily planning.
3. Demonstrate favorable attitude and aptitude toward the technological tools
acquired by schools.
Required Textbook: (most recent edition)
Gary B. Shelly, Thomas J. Cashman, Misty E. Vermaat. Discovering Computers
2001- Concepts for a Connected World. Course Technology, 2000
Hirshbuhl, H. & Kelley, J. (2006). Annual Editions: Computers in Education (12 ed.).
McGraw-Hill/Dushkin
References
Beekman,G. (1995). Computación & Informatica Hoy, Addison Wesley Iberoamericana.
Hofstetter, F.T. (2nd edition). Multimedia Literacy, New York: McGraw-Hill Co, Inc.
ISBN: 0139743871
Shelly, Gary B., & Cashman, T.J. (1998). Discovering Computers 98 – a Link to
the Future, 1ra. Ed., Course Technology
EDUC 214 Computers in Education 11
Prep. 2004. Noridis Medina Fernández Rev. 2004. Carmen L. Lamboy, Ed.D, Rev. 2008. Ariadna Rivera Crawford, MA.Ed
Evaluacion
The student will be assessed according to this criteria:
Criteria Points
1. Attendance 50
2. Participation in the classroom and Internet forum 50
3. Portfolio 100
Other Criteria
Distribution by
workshop
Points
Wor
ksho
p 1
Wor
ksho
p 2
Wor
ksho
p 3
Wor
ksho
p 4
Wor
ksho
p 5
4. Assignments 280
a. Summary of electronic reference ���� ���� ���� ���� 40
b. Essay: History of the computer and historical
events ����
50
c. Computer definition and the justification of how
effective is integrating computers to a subject
area.
����
20
d. Essay about benefits and advantages of the
software
����
50
e. Software definition and an example of an
educational software and its integration in the
curriculum
����
20
f. PowerPoint presentation about output and input
devices for the handicapped population. ����
50
g. Essay about the computer and communications
types. ����
50
EDUC 214 Computers in Education 12
Prep. 2004. Noridis Medina Fernández Rev. 2004. Carmen L. Lamboy, Ed.D, Rev. 2008. Ariadna Rivera Crawford, MA.Ed
Other Criteria
Distribution by
workshop
Points
Wor
ksho
p 1
Wor
ksho
p 2
Wor
ksho
p 3
Wor
ksho
p 4
Wor
ksho
p 5
5. Project ���� 100
6. Project presentation ���� 100
7. Final Test ���� 100
Total 750
Scale
100-90 A 89-80 B 79-70 C 69-60 D 59-00 F
Appendix is included in the module, include evaluation rubrics for each task or
assignment. Use these to guide you as you prepare each assignment. The facilitator
and students may agree on modifying, adding, and/or eliminating criteria.
Description of course policies
1. This course follows the Sistema Universitario Ana G. Méndez Discipline-Based
Dual-Language Immersion Model® designed to promote each student’s
development as a Dual Language Professional. Workshops will be facilitated in
English and Spanish, strictly using the 50/50 model. This means that each workshop
will be conducted entirely in the language specified. The language used in the
workshops will alternate to insure that 50% of the course will be conducted in
English and 50% in Spanish. To maintain this balance, the course module may
specify that both languages will be used during the fifth workshop, dividing that
workshop’s time and activities between the two languages. If students have difficulty
with asking a question in the target language in which the activity is being
conducted, students may choose to use their preferred language for that particular
EDUC 214 Computers in Education 13
Prep. 2004. Noridis Medina Fernández Rev. 2004. Carmen L. Lamboy, Ed.D, Rev. 2008. Ariadna Rivera Crawford, MA.Ed
question. However, the facilitator must answer in the language assigned for that
particular day. This should only be an exception as it is important for students to use
the assigned language. The 50/50 model does not apply to language courses where
the delivery of instruction must be conducted in the language taught (Spanish or
English only).
2. The course is conducted in an accelerated format and requires that students prepare
in advance for each workshop according to the course module. Each workshop
requires an average ten hours of preparation but could require more.
3. Attendance at all class sessions is mandatory. A student that is absent to a
workshop must present the facilitator a reasonable excuse. The facilitator will
evaluate if the absence is justified and decide how the student will make up the
missing work, if applicable. The facilitator will decide on the following: allow the
student to make up the work, or allow the student to make up the work and assign
extra work to compensate for the missing class time.
Assignments required prior to the workshop must be completed and turned in on the
assigned date. The facilitator may decide to adjust the grade given for late
assignments and make-up work.
4. If a student is absent to more than one workshop the facilitator will have the
following options:
a. If a student misses two workshops, the facilitator may lower one grade
based on the students existing grade.
b. If the student misses three workshops, the facilitator may lower two
grades based on the students existing grade.
5. Student attendance and participation in oral presentations and special class
activities are extremely important as it is not possible to assure that they can be
made up. If the student provides a valid and verifiable excuse, the facilitator may
determine a substitute evaluation activity if he/she understands that an equivalent
activity is possible. This activity must include the same content and language
components as the oral presentation or special activity that was missed.
EDUC 214 Computers in Education 14
Prep. 2004. Noridis Medina Fernández Rev. 2004. Carmen L. Lamboy, Ed.D, Rev. 2008. Ariadna Rivera Crawford, MA.Ed
6. In cooperative activities the group will be assessed for their final work. However,
each member will have to collaborate to assure the success of the group and the
assessment will be done collectively as well as individually.
7. It is expected that all written work will be solely that of the student and should not be
plagiarized. That is, the student must be the author of all work submitted. All quoted
or paraphrased material must be properly cited, with credit given to its author or
publisher. It should be noted that plagiarized writings are easily detectable and
students should not risk losing credit for material that is clearly not their own (see
Academic Honesty Policy).
8. If the Facilitator makes changes to the study guide, such changes should be
discussed with and given to students in writing at the beginning of the first workshop.
9. The facilitator will establish a means of contacting students by providing an email
address, phone number, hours to be contacted and days.
10. The use of cellular phones is prohibited during sessions; if there is a need to have
one, it must be on vibrate or silent mode during class session.
11. Children or family members that are not registered in the course are not allowed to
the classrooms.
12. All students are subject to the policies regarding behavior in the university
community established by the institution and in this course.
Note: If for any reason you cannot access the URL’s presented in the module, do
not stop your investigation. There are many search engines and other links you
can use to search for information. These are some examples:
• www.google.com
• www.altavista.com
• www.ask.com
• www.excite.com
• www.pregunta.com
• www.findarticles.com
• www.telemundo.yahoo.com
EDUC 214 Computers in Education 15
Prep. 2004. Noridis Medina Fernández Rev. 2004. Carmen L. Lamboy, Ed.D, Rev. 2008. Ariadna Rivera Crawford, MA.Ed
• www.bibliotecavirtualut.suagm.edu
• www.eric.ed.gov/
• www.flelibrary.org/
The facilitator may make changes or add additional web resources if deemed
necessary.
EDUC 214 Computers in Education 16
Prep. 2004. Noridis Medina Fernández Rev. 2004. Carmen L. Lamboy, Ed.D, Rev. 2008. Ariadna Rivera Crawford, MA.Ed
Teaching Philosophy and Methodology
This course is grounded in the learning theory of Constructivism. Constructivism
is a philosophy of learning founded on the premise that, by reflecting on our
experiences, we construct our own understanding of the world in which we live.
Each of us generates our own “rules” and “mental models,” which we use to make
sense of our experiences. Learning, therefore, is simply the process of adjusting our
mental models to accommodate new experiences. As teachers, our focus is on making
connections between facts and fostering new understanding in students. We will also
attempt to tailor our teaching strategies to student responses and encourage students to
analyze, interpret and predict information.
There are several guiding principles of constructivism:
1. Learning is a search for meaning. Therefore, learning must start with the issues
around which students are actively trying to construct meaning.
2. Meaning requires understanding wholes as well as parts. And parts must be
understood in the context of wholes. Therefore, the learning process focuses on
primary concepts, not isolated facts.
3. In order to teach well, we must understand the mental models that students use to
perceive the world and the assumptions they make to support those models.
4. The purpose of learning is for an individual to construct his or her own meaning, not
just memorize the "right" answers and regurgitate someone else's meaning. Since
education is inherently interdisciplinary, the only valuable way to measure learning is
to make the assessment part of the learning process, ensuring it provides students
with information on the quality of their learning.
5. Evaluation should serve as a self-analysis tool.
6. Provide tools and environments that help learners interpret the multiple perspectives
of the world.
7. Learning should be internally controlled and mediated by the learner.
EDUC 214 Computers in Education 17
Prep. 2004. Noridis Medina Fernández Rev. 2004. Carmen L. Lamboy, Ed.D, Rev. 2008. Ariadna Rivera Crawford, MA.Ed
Workshop One
Specific Content Objectives
At the end of Workshop One, the student will:
1. Discuss the background and history of computers.
2. Identify basic concepts and computer parts and their functions.
3. Classify the parts of a computer.
4. Relate the parts of a computer
5. Distinguish the purpose of computer parts: communication, peripherals, among
others.
Language Objectives:
The student will:
1. Use the reading process effectively.
2. Write an expository essay using appropriate vocabulary, grammar and style after
researching information.
3. Express their ideas in spoken English effectively using electronic presentations.
Electronic Links (URLs):
The History of Computers
http://inventors.about.com/library/blcoindex.htm
http://tdi.uregina.ca/~complit/comphist.htm
Basic & Advanced Computer Concepts
http://www.bedford.lib.nh.us/Basics.htm
Computer parts and functions
http://www.fayette.k12.il.us/99/Intro2Comp/parts.html
http://oregonstate.edu/instruct/ch490/lessons/lesson1_files/chap1.html
http://www.articlesender.com/Computers-Internet/Hardware-Tips/Parts--
Functions-of-a-Computer.htm
Components of a Computer System
http://old.ma.is/kenn/andy/Bradleycourse/Notes/chap01/ch01_3.html
http://agg3333.ifas.ufl.edu/components.htm
http://www2.krellinst.org/AiS/textbook/unit6/introcomp6.1.html
EDUC 214 Computers in Education 18
Prep. 2004. Noridis Medina Fernández Rev. 2004. Carmen L. Lamboy, Ed.D, Rev. 2008. Ariadna Rivera Crawford, MA.Ed
Laptop and Desktop Computer System
http://www.circuitprotection.com/applications/laptop.asp?lcd=1
http://www.circuitprotection.com/applications/desktop.asp?lcd=1
Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education
http://www.aace.org/
Assignments before Workshop One:
1. Read the recommended URL’s, textbooks and other reference materials. Pay
close attention to the rubrics in the Appendix section. These rubrics will be used
to assess your knowledge.
Note: Assignments should be word processed, double space and stapled.
Do not use a folder, instead create a title page. Appendix A displays an
example of a title page. Use APA format for essays at all times.
2. Access the following URL and present a written brief description.
http://www.tekxam.com/StudyGuide/concepts/General-
Concepts/Computer_Components.html
3. Read about computers and their historical background. Select the historical
events that were vital. Write an essay about the computer history and its
historical events.
4. Define the term computer and justify the effectiveness of integrating computers to
a subject area (select a subject area: Math, Science, History, and English). Write
your justification on the area you selected.
5. Final Project to present in Workshop Five. See A ppendix F for directions.
Activities :
1. The facilitator and the students will introduced themselves by engaging in an
icebreaking activity suggested by the facilitator.
2. Students should submit their essays and summaries at the beginning of the
workshop.
3. Introduction of the course:
a. Make sure that students are registered in the course and received the
course module.
EDUC 214 Computers in Education 19
Prep. 2004. Noridis Medina Fernández Rev. 2004. Carmen L. Lamboy, Ed.D, Rev. 2008. Ariadna Rivera Crawford, MA.Ed
b. Election of the student representative.
c. Discussion of the course rules.
d. Presentation of the course objectives, teaching strategies or methods, and
evaluation criteria.
4. Play video “Education today and tomorrow”
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fnh9q_cQcUE
5. The facilitator will ask the students to group by assigned numbers. Once the
groups are formed, each group will be assigned a topic.
a. Group #1 - Advantages of understanding the functions of a computer
based on the content of the video and how important is it to be updated or
have knowledge about the continuous development of computers and
their applications?
b. Group #2 - List and define computer categories and how are computers
used? Explain.
c. Group #3 - Different types of memory. Definition and functions of a
Motherboard: CPU, ALU, system watch?
d. Group #4 - Definition and functions of Central Processing Unit and
Expansion Slots
e. Group #5 - Definition and functions of Communication Ports and
Peripherals
6. Once the topic is assigned, each group will search for the information and
prepare an oral report that presents the definitions, the relationship with other
parts, applications and its evolution. The group will have 15 minutes to present
the findings.
EDUC 214 Computers in Education 20
Prep. 2004. Noridis Medina Fernández Rev. 2004. Carmen L. Lamboy, Ed.D, Rev. 2008. Ariadna Rivera Crawford, MA.Ed
7. Describe the evolution and computer history populating the following table.
Conduct a search on the topic or refer to the URL’s provided in page 17 of this
module to complete this exercise.
First
Generation
Second
Generation
Third
Generation
Fourth
Generation
Fifth
Generation
EDUC 214 Computers in Education 21
Prep. 2004. Noridis Medina Fernández Rev. 2004. Carmen L. Lamboy, Ed.D, Rev. 2008. Ariadna Rivera Crawford, MA.Ed
8. The facilitator may create and explain how to access a discussion board area for
the students in Blackboard. The purpose of establishing this area is to create
synchronous and asynchronous communication on issues related to the class.
Also the facilitator will track the students’ participation in the message board.
9. The instructor will discuss next workshop assignments.
Assessment:
1. Immediate critical reaction in English (5 min).
a. How does the computer impact the teaching-learning process?
2. Provide enough time for students to complete their reflective journals in English
(See Appendix B).
3. Students should insert both written documents in their portfolios (See Appendix
C).
EDUC 214 Computers in Education 22
Prep. 2004. Noridis Medina Fernández Rev. 2004. Carmen L. Lamboy, Ed.D, Rev. 2008. Ariadna Rivera Crawford, MA.Ed
Taller Dos
Objetivos Específicos:
Al finalizar la secuencia instruccional de actividades, el estudiante estará capacitado para:
1. Identificar la función del software.
2. Señalar el propósito y la evolución de un software.
3. Identificar las categorías principales de los sistemas operativos.
4. Reconocer la función de los sistemas operativos.
Objetivos del Lenguaje:
1. El estudiante resumirá las ideas principales usando adecuadamente la gramática
y la ortografía después de leer una amplia variedad de recursos impresos.
2. El estudiante utilizará estrategias efectivas para llevar a cabo discusiones
formales e informales incluyendo actividades de reflexión y análisis, respetando
los diversos puntos de vista de otros.
3. El estudiante escribirá un ensayo expositivo usando gramática, vocabulario y
estilo adecuados después de analizar e interpretar la información.
Enlaces Electrónicos:
Función del software
http://www.cosaslibres.com/software.html
http://www.geocities.com/sfraul2003/definicion.html
http://canalhanoi.iespana.es/informatica/software.htm
Sistema Operativo
http://www.masadelante.com/faq-sistema-operativo.htm
http://es.kioskea.net/contents/systemes/sysintro.php3
Computadoras en la educación
http://terry-freedman.org.uk/artman/publish/Computers_in_Classrooms.php
http://www.intel.com/education/
http://computersforlearning.gov/
Software educativo
http://www.kidware.com/mobius/17gropsspa.htm
EDUC 214 Computers in Education 23
Prep. 2004. Noridis Medina Fernández Rev. 2004. Carmen L. Lamboy, Ed.D, Rev. 2008. Ariadna Rivera Crawford, MA.Ed
http://www.pergaminovirtual.com.ar/categorias/Internet_y_Computacion_Softwar
e_Educativo.shtml
Asignaciones antes del Taller:
1. Busca información y escribe un ensayo contestando la siguiente pregunta: ¿Qué
ventajas o beneficios, si alguno, proveen los programas de Word, Excel y
PowerPoint a las tareas administrativas y educativas?
2. Localiza la siguiente dirección electrónica y describa cada uno de los sistemas
operativos mencionados en la tabla.
http://www.tau.org.ar/base/lara.pue.udlap.mx/sistoper/
Sistema
Operativo
Descripción
DOS
Windows 3x
Windows 95/98
Windows 2000
EDUC 214 Computers in Education 24
Prep. 2004. Noridis Medina Fernández Rev. 2004. Carmen L. Lamboy, Ed.D, Rev. 2008. Ariadna Rivera Crawford, MA.Ed
Sistema
Operativo
Descripción
Windows Vista
Windows NT
MAC
Unix
Linux
3. Busca la definición del término software e identifica un ejemplo de un software
educativo y cómo podría integrarse en el currículo. Selecciona una materia
(lenguaje, matemáticas, ciencias, etc.) y el nivel de enseñanza.
4. Continúe trabajando con su portafolio (ver Anejos I al O).
Actividades:
1. Discusión de la asignación tres.
2. El facilitador guiará una discusión acerca del software y sus diferentes tipos.
EDUC 214 Computers in Education 25
Prep. 2004. Noridis Medina Fernández Rev. 2004. Carmen L. Lamboy, Ed.D, Rev. 2008. Ariadna Rivera Crawford, MA.Ed
3. Desde la perspectiva de herramientas educativas y que fortalecen la experiencia
de aprendizaje, describa con al menos cinco palabras la función de Internet,
Software y Tutorial.
Software Tutorial
1. 1.
2. 2.
3. 3.
4. 4.
5. 5.
4. Los estudiantes presentarán la relación y diferencias entre Tutoriales y Software.
5. Para esta actividad los estudiantes trabajarán en dos grupos. Un grupo discutirá
la información relacionada con el software y el otro acerca del tutorial.
6. Los estudiantes realizarán una búsqueda en Internet acerca de los tipos de
tutoriales. Seleccionarán un ejemplo y presentarán y discutirán la información
con sus compañeros.
6. Localice en la Internet los siguientes recursos educativos y/o referencias
educacionales:
URL Descripción
http://www.nationalgeographic.com
http://www.loc.gov
EDUC 214 Computers in Education 26
Prep. 2004. Noridis Medina Fernández Rev. 2004. Carmen L. Lamboy, Ed.D, Rev. 2008. Ariadna Rivera Crawford, MA.Ed
URL Descripción
http://www.travlang.com/languages
http://www.cbc4kids.ca/
http://www.wvpubcast.org/
7. Laboratorio:
Localice el programado de Word, Transcriba los datos que corresponden al
ejercicio de Matricula y ponga en función los siguientes comandos:
a. Doble espacio
b. Letra: Arial 12
c. Márgenes a 1 pulgada
d. Justificado
e. Título en Bold
f. Transcriba el contenido en dos párrafos
g. Integre tablas
h. Desarrolle el texto en al menos dos párrafos
i. Una vez ejecute los comandos transcriba el siguiente contenido:
EDUC 214 Computers in Education 27
Prep. 2004. Noridis Medina Fernández Rev. 2004. Carmen L. Lamboy, Ed.D, Rev. 2008. Ariadna Rivera Crawford, MA.Ed
Ejercicio de Matricula
Estamos ubicados en la Calle Redondo #77 Urb. Cuadrado. La escuela sirve a
una matricula de 407 estudiantes de kindergarten a Sexto grado en una
organización sencilla de primero a sexto grado y una doble para kindergarten.
Inmersos en esta matricula tenemos a 17 estudiantes de educación especial
en el salón contenido y 54 estudiantes PEA. El desglose de la matricula
consiste de kindergarten 27 masculinos y 21 femeninos para un total de 48.
Primer grado tiene 30 masculinos y femeninos 24 = 54. Segundo grado 27
masculinos y femeninos 21 = 48. Tercer grado 28 masculinos y femeninos 26 =
54. Cuarto grado con 29 masculinos y femeninos 26 = 55. Quinto grado con 35
masculinos y femeninos 26 = 61. Sexto grado con 40 masculinos y femeninos
30=70. Educación Especial con 14 masculinos y 3 femeninos =17.
8. El facilitador discutirá los trabajos que son para entregar el próximo taller.
Avalúo
1. Reacción Inmediata en español (5 minutos). El estudiante deberá reflexionar
sobre estas preguntas:
a. ¿Qué fue lo más retante e interesante en el taller de hoy?
2. El tiempo para completar el Diario Reflexivo es de 5 minutos (en español) (Vea
el Anejo B). Ambos documentos deberán colocarse en su portafolio.
3. Matriz valorativa de trabajos escritos (ver Anejo C).
4. Matriz valorativa de participación en clase (ver Anejo G).
EDUC 214 Computers in Education 28
Prep. 2004. Noridis Medina Fernández Rev. 2004. Carmen L. Lamboy, Ed.D, Rev. 2008. Ariadna Rivera Crawford, MA.Ed
Workshop Three
Specific Objectives:
At the end of the instructional sequence, the learner will be able to:
1. Research assistive technology for the handicapped population.
2. Define and identify the computer hardware.
3. Identify ports from a computer
4. Recognize the input and output devices in a computer system.
5. Recognize differences between different storage systems.
6. Use PowerPoint to create educational materials beside an electronic
presentation.
Language Objectives:
The student will:
1. Summarize the main ideas using correct grammar and spelling in English
after reading a selection.
2. Use cooperative learning strategies to analyze and discuss a topic.
3. Develop ideas to solve problems in an effective way.
4. Write a reflective journal using appropriate vocabulary, grammar, and style.
Electronic Links (URLs):
Computers and Special Education
http://www.atarimagazines.com/creative/v10n10/96_Computers_make_special_ed.php
http://www.ericdigests.org/pre-927/software.htm
http://www.dmoz.org/Computers/Software/Educational/Special_Education/
http://www.bedu.com/Newsletterarticle/SpecialEd.html
http://www.dinf.ne.jp/doc/english/Us_Eu/conf/csun_97/csun97_116.html
Computer hardware
http://www.coolnerds.com/Newbies/Hardware/hardware.htm
http://www.ehow.com/information_1013-computer-hardware.html
Computer ports
http://www.tech-faq.com/computer-port.shtml
http://www.directron.com/ports.html
http://www.helium.com/items/449619-computer-ports-explained
EDUC 214 Computers in Education 29
Prep. 2004. Noridis Medina Fernández Rev. 2004. Carmen L. Lamboy, Ed.D, Rev. 2008. Ariadna Rivera Crawford, MA.Ed
Storage systems
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Computer_storage
http://searchnetworking.techtarget.com/searchNetworking/Downloads/IncidentResponseChapte
r10.pdf
http://www.technewsworld.com/story/59980.html?wlc=1227110328
http://www.technewsworld.com/story/59839.html
Input and output devices
http://cil.usu.edu/htm/cs/iodevices
http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/288883/inputoutput-device
http://old.ma.is/kenn/andy/Bradleycourse/Notes/chap01/ch01_7.html
Assignments before Workshop Three:
1. Conduct a research about input and output devices specifically to assist the
handicapped population. Choose one device and prepare a PowerPoint
presentation explaining how this device can help a handicapped student to
accomplish the learning objective. At least provide with a minimum of five
benefits.
2. Access the following URL and present a written brief description.
http://www.huascaran.gob.pe/estudiantes/educacion_especial/articulo4.htm
3. Watch the following video:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hxIKsD0_X8c&feature=related Write a brief
description of the technology mentioned and their uses.
4. Continue working with your portfolio.
Activities :
1. The facilitator will start the class with a short review.
2. Students presentation of assignment one.
3. The facilitator will guide a discussion about hardware, input and output devices,
and methods and media used for data storage.
4. The facilitator will use the Jeopardy game prepared in PowerPoint to review the
concepts. For this activity the students will work in two groups. Before conducting
the activity explain the game rules and practice with an example.
EDUC 214 Computers in Education 30
Prep. 2004. Noridis Medina Fernández Rev. 2004. Carmen L. Lamboy, Ed.D, Rev. 2008. Ariadna Rivera Crawford, MA.Ed
5. Students will discuss the description they made about the assistive technology
video.
6. Lab: The students will create, with the facilitator guidance, a memory game with
PowerPoint. See Appendix D for instructions.
7. The facilitator will discuss the assignments for the next workshop.
Assessment:
1. Immediate critical reaction in English (5 min).
a. How does the computer impact the teaching-learning process?
2. Provide enough time for students to complete their reflective journals in English
(See Appendix B).
3. Students should insert both documents in their portfolios.
EDUC 214 Computers in Education 31
Prep. 2004. Noridis Medina Fernández Rev. 2004. Carmen L. Lamboy, Ed.D, Rev. 2008. Ariadna Rivera Crawford, MA.Ed
Taller Cuatro
Objetivos Específicos:
Al finalizar la secuencia instruccional de actividades, el aprendiz adulto estará
capacitado para:
1. Definir el término Internet.
2. Identificar los elementos que dan acceso al Internet.
3. Experimentar con los componentes de conexión de un navegador.
4. Desarrollar y fortalecer las destrezas básicas de navegación.
5. Aplicar el proceso de búsqueda de información en la Internet.
4. Definir los componentes requeridos para una comunicación efectiva
5. Diferenciar entre un LAN y un WAN
6. Reconocer las funciones de las bases de datos.
Objetivos del Lenguaje:
1. El estudiante resumirá las ideas principales usando adecuadamente la gramática
y la ortografía después de leer una amplia variedad de recursos impresos.
2. El estudiante utilizará estrategias efectivas para llevar a cabo discusiones
formales e informales incluyendo actividades de reflexión y análisis, respetando
los diversos puntos de vista de otros.
3. El estudiante escribirá un ensayo expositivo usando gramática, vocabulario y
estilo adecuados después de analizar e interpretar la información.
Enlaces Electrónicos:
Internet
http://www.aulaclic.es/internet/f_internet.htm
http://www.masadelante.com/faq-internet.htm
http://www.angelfire.com/ak5/internet0/
http://definicion.de/internet/
El navegador o browser
http://www.enplenitud.com/nota.asp?articuloID=8121
https://ws003.juntadeandalucia.es/pls/intersas/servicios.configura_navegador
http://www.ordenadores-y-portatiles.com/navegador-web.html
EDUC 214 Computers in Education 32
Prep. 2004. Noridis Medina Fernández Rev. 2004. Carmen L. Lamboy, Ed.D, Rev. 2008. Ariadna Rivera Crawford, MA.Ed
¿Cómo navegar en la Internet?
http://www.prteducativo.com/ninos/comonavegar.htm
http://pedagogie.ac-toulouse.fr/espagnol/htm/tecnica/util_int.htm
http://www.aarp.org/espanol/dinero/search_engine_es.html
Comunicación y Redes
http://www.argo.es/medios/ponencia.html
http://uva.anahuac.mx/content/site/contenido/0a11_notas_03.htm
http://www.slideshare.net/latino/la-computadora-y-la-comunicacin-presentation/
http://www.geocities.com/Athens/Olympus/7428/red1.html
http://html.rincondelvago.com/red-de-computadoras.html
Excel Formulas
http://tlt.its.psu.edu/suggestions/gradebook/appendix.html#letter
Asignaciones antes del Taller:
1. Busca información sobre la comunicación y sus tipos usando la computadora.
Escribe un ensayo comparando ventajas y desventajas de ésta.
2. Localiza la siguiente dirección electrónica y escribe un resumen del contenido.
http://www.learnthenet.com
3. Defina redes y establezca la diferencia entre LAN y WAN.
4. Continúe trabajando con su portafolio.
Actividades:
1. El facilitador comenzará la clase con un breve repaso.
2. Discusión de asignación uno.
3. El facilitador presentará el tema de las redes de computadora.
4. Los estudiantes trabajarán la siguiente actividad en grupos asignados por el
facilitador. El facilitador asignará a cada grupo diferentes tipos de red. Los
estudiantes utilizarán sus asignaciones y búsqueda adicional para presentar el
concepto en la clase creando un mapa conceptual.
5. En los mismos grupos los estudiantes buscarán información sobre base de datos
y participarán en discusión guiada por el facilitador.
EDUC 214 Computers in Education 33
Prep. 2004. Noridis Medina Fernández Rev. 2004. Carmen L. Lamboy, Ed.D, Rev. 2008. Ariadna Rivera Crawford, MA.Ed
6. Laboratorio: El facilitador guiará al estudiante a crear un registro de notas en
Excel. Incluyendo las fórmulas para sacar promedio. El estudiante va a seguir
las instrucciones en el Anejo G para preparar el ejercicio. El instructor debe guiar
al estudiante en los pasos para sacar promedio y aplicarlo al programa de Excel
con las respectivas fórmulas.
7. El facilitador discutirá las asignaciones antes del próximo taller.
Avalúo
1. Reacción Inmediata en español (5 minutos). El estudiante deberá reflexionar
sobre estas preguntas:
a. ¿Qué fue lo más retante e interesante en el taller de hoy?
2. El tiempo para completar el Diario Reflexivo es de 5 minutos (en español) (Vea
el Anejo H). Ambos documentos deberán colocarse en su portafolio.
3. Matriz valorativa de trabajos escritos.
4. Matriz valorativa de participación en clase.
5. Matriz valorativa de presentaciones orales.
EDUC 214 Computers in Education 34
Prep. 2004. Noridis Medina Fernández Rev. 2004. Carmen L. Lamboy, Ed.D, Rev. 2008. Ariadna Rivera Crawford, MA.Ed
Workshop Five/Taller Cinco
NOTA: Este taller es bilingüe. Tanto,
el Facilitador como los estudiantes,
deberán utilizar el idioma asignado
para cada tarea y actividad.
NOTE: This is a bilingual workshop.
Both the facilitator and student
should use the language assigned
for each homework and activity.
Specific Objectives:
1. Submit the portfolio with assignments completed during this course.
2. Demonstrate the proper use of computers in the implementation of a lesson.
Language Objectives:
1. The student will use effective strategies to develop formal and informal
discussions, including analysis and reflection activities, considering others’ points
of view.
2. The student will develop ideas to solve problems effectively.
3. The student will write a reflective essay, using proper grammar, vocabulary, and
style.
Assignments before Workshop Five:
1. Continue working on the project and PowerPoint presentation.
2. Study for the final test.
3. Complete your portfolio to be submitted during workshop #5 (see Appendixes I -
O).
a.) In the portfolio, you should include the following:
i. Immediate written responses (in English and Spanish)
ii. Reflective diaries annotated by your facilitator (in English and
Spanish)
iii. Comparative table
iv. Outlines, drafts (in English and Spanish)
v. Others (in English and Spanish)
EDUC 214 Computers in Education 35
Prep. 2004. Noridis Medina Fernández Rev. 2004. Carmen L. Lamboy, Ed.D, Rev. 2008. Ariadna Rivera Crawford, MA.Ed
Activities :
1. The facilitator will start the class with a short review (in Spanish).
2. The facilitator will present Workshop Five objectives to the class (in Spanish).
3. Ask participants to submit the assignments required in Workshop Five.
4. Prepare the classroom and students to take the test (in Spanish).
5. Prepare the classroom and participants to conduct the presentations (in English).
6. Provide some free time to complete the end of course evaluation (in English).
7. Students will hand in the Portfolio (English and Spanish).
8. Closing activity – to be determined by the facilitator.
Assessment:
1. The student will complete the final test (in Spanish).
2. The student will present the final project (in English) – see Appendix H.
3. The students will submit their completed portfolios for final evaluation (see
Appendixes I to O).
EDUC 214 Computers in Education 36
Prep. 2004. Noridis Medina Fernández Rev. 2004. Carmen L. Lamboy, Ed.D, Rev. 2008. Ariadna Rivera Crawford, MA.Ed
Anejos/Appendixes
EDUC 214 Computers in Education 37
Prep. 2004. Noridis Medina Fernández Rev. 2004. Carmen L. Lamboy, Ed.D, Rev. 2008. Ariadna Rivera Crawford, MA.Ed
Anejo A/Appendix A Title Page/Página de Título
Title Using Capital and Lowercase Letter
by Juan Rivera
A Description of the Requisite For Example: A Research Project Submitted to the Ana G.
Mendez University System in Partial Fullfillment of the Requirements for EDU C 214
Florida Campuses (Date)
EDUC 214 Computers in Education 38
Prep. 2004. Noridis Medina Fernández Rev. 2004. Carmen L. Lamboy, Ed.D, Rev. 2008. Ariadna Rivera Crawford, MA.Ed
Anejo B/Appendix B Reflective Journals/Diarios Reflexivos
Reflection Complete the sentences and place it in the portfolio. Name: ______________________________ Date: _______ ______________
1. During Workshop ____ I felt…
2. How would you apply what you have learned? Comments: _____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
EDUC 214 Computers in Education 39
Prep. 2004. Noridis Medina Fernández Rev. 2004. Carmen L. Lamboy, Ed.D, Rev. 2008. Ariadna Rivera Crawford, MA.Ed
Reflección Completa las oraciones y coloque en su portafolio. Nombre: _____________________________ Fecha: ____________________
1. Durante el taller ____ me sentí…
2. Hasta hoy he logrado… Comentarios: _____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
EDUC 214 Computers in Education 40
Prep. 2004. Noridis Medina Fernández Rev. 2004. Carmen L. Lamboy, Ed.D, Rev. 2008. Ariadna Rivera Crawford, MA.Ed
Anejo C/Appendix C
RUBRIC TO EVALUATE WRITTEN WORK
Student Name: ______________________ Date: _______________
Criteria Value Points Student Score
Content
The paper is clear, focused and interesting. Identifies purpose, objectives and principal ideas included in the paper
10
Presentation of ideas is organized, coherent and can be easily followed
10
The paper properly explains content.
10
The presentation of ideas and arguments are based in sources presented, consulted or discussed in class.
10
The paper demonstrates substance, logic and originality.
10
The author presents his point of view in a clear, convincing and well based manner.
10
Contains well-constructed sentences and paragraphs that facilitate lecture and comprehension.
10
Language Demonstrate a command of standard English (vocabulary used, syntax and flow of ideas).
10
Uses grammar appropriately and correctly.
10
Manages and uses verbs appropriately and correctly.
10
Total Points 100 (70% content and 30% language)
Student’s total Score: _______
Student’s Signature: ____________________Facilitator’s Signature:___________________
EDUC 214 Computers in Education 41
Prep. 2004. Noridis Medina Fernández Rev. 2004. Carmen L. Lamboy, Ed.D, Rev. 2008. Ariadna Rivera Crawford, MA.Ed
MATRIZ VALORATIVA PARA TRABAJOS ESCRITOS
Nombre del Estudiante: ______________________ Fecha: _______________
Criteri o Puntos Puntuación
Contenido
Este trabajo esta claro, enfocado e interesante. Identifica el propósito, objetivos e ideas principales del documento o actividad.
10
La presentación de ideas es coherente y puede ser seguida fácilmente.
10
El documento explica propiamente el contenido.
10
La presentación de ideas y argumentos esta basada en recursos presentados, consultados o discutidos en clase.
10
El documento demuestra substancia, lógica y originalidad.
10
El autor presenta su punto de vista en una manera clara, convincente y bien estructurada.
10
Contiene oraciones bien estructuradas y párrafos que facilitan la lectura y comprensión del documento.
10
Lengua je Demuestra un conocimiento del español (vocabulario, sintaxis y flujo de ideas).
10
Usa gramática apropiada y correctamente.
10
Maneja verbos y acentuación apropiada y correctamente.
10
Total P untos 100 (70% conten ido y 30% lenguaje)
Puntuación T otal : _______
Student’s Signature: ____________________Facilitator’s Signature:___________________
EDUC 214 Computers in Education 42
Prep. 2004. Noridis Medina Fernández Rev. 2004. Carmen L. Lamboy, Ed.D, Rev. 2008. Ariadna Rivera Crawford, MA.Ed
Anejo D/Appendix D PowerPoint Exercise/Workshop Three
Objective: To use power point to develop an educati onal activity to use in the classroom.
Create a Memory game using PowerPoint Topic Steps Screen Image Blank Slide 1. Select the “Blank” slide on the
test layouts panel on the right side.
Image A
Image B
Drawing Shapes
2. Draw four rectangles, simulating a poker card.
a.) Select “Insert” b.) Click on “Picture” c.) Click on ‘Auto shapes” d.) Select “Basic shapes”
Image C
EDUC 214 Computers in Education 43
Prep. 2004. Noridis Medina Fernández Rev. 2004. Carmen L. Lamboy, Ed.D, Rev. 2008. Ariadna Rivera Crawford, MA.Ed
Changing Shapes Colors
3. Change the cards color to a different color.
a.) Click on the shape b.) Click on the “fill color” c.) Select “More colors” for
more variety. d.) Select the “Standard”
tab. e.) Click on the desire color
and then select “OK”. f.) Repeat steps A - E for
each shape.
Image D
Image E
Creating a Text Box
4. Select the “textbox” tool and create a text box for each card and place it over each one.
a.) Number each cards (1-4).
5. Make each textbox’s background transparent and invisible lines.
Image F
Creating a background
6. Select “format” then” background” 7. Click on the arrow and choose a
background color. 8. Click “Apply to all”.
Image G
Creating new slides
9. Add 10-new slides. 10. Repeat steps 1 - 2 for each slide.
11. In slide 2 insert the image of an apple in the first card.
a.) Continue the same step following the drawing below.
EDUC 214 Computers in Education 44
Prep. 2004. Noridis Medina Fernández Rev. 2004. Carmen L. Lamboy, Ed.D, Rev. 2008. Ariadna Rivera Crawford, MA.Ed
1 2
3 4
Slide 1
3
Slide 3
Apple
Pear
Slide 4
2
3
Apple
Pear
4
Slide 9
1
Pear
2
2
3 4
Slide 2
Apple
Slide 10
1
Pear
2
Pear
Slide 11
1 2
Pear 3
3 4
Apple Apple
Slide 5
3 4
Apple
Slide 6
1
4
Apple
Slide 7
1
Pear 3
Apple
Slide 8
1
Pear
EDUC 214 Computers in Education 45
Prep. 2004. Noridis Medina Fernández Rev. 2004. Carmen L. Lamboy, Ed.D, Rev. 2008. Ariadna Rivera Crawford, MA.Ed
Anejo E/Appendix E
Ejercicio de registro de notas en Excel
Use la siguiente información para crear un registro de notas con el programa MS Excel. Usted es maestro(o) de matemáticas para un grupo de tercer grado. Los estudiante serán evaluados con 10 notas. Una no ta por asistencia, una nota es combinando los puntos de 5 pruebas cortas, una n ota por el cuaderno de trabajo, seis notas de exámenes parcial, y el exame n final.
El grupo se compone de 25 estudiantes :
a. Minerva Ocasio b. Jose Centeno c. Cesar Ruiz d. Carolina Irizarry e. Dwight Howard f. Tyler McDowell g. Daniel Rivera h. Christopher Fernandez i. Jason Goodman j. Amelia Cruz k. Xiomara Martinez l. Mia Hall m. Danielle Harris
n. Rebeca Reynolds o. Brian Solano p. Terrie Acevedo q. Cristina Maldonado r. Gabriela Soto s. Omar Figueroa t. Jim Butler u. Janis Rudolph v. Carole Smith w. Kara Campbell x. Marla Owen y. Joe Cook
1. Todos los nombres deben ser escritos en la columna A. 2. Organice los nombres en orden alfabético. 3. Asigne títulos a cada columna.
a. Títulos en la columna B a la K deben de ser los nombres de los exámenes y actividades.
4. Totalice las notas siguiendo el método de curva que se utilice en educación.
a. La columna L debe tener la nota en puntos. b. La columna M debe tener la nota en letra.
EDUC 214 Computers in Education 46
Prep. 2004. Noridis Medina Fernández Rev. 2004. Carmen L. Lamboy, Ed.D, Rev. 2008. Ariadna Rivera Crawford, MA.Ed
Anejo F/Appendix F Final project
The school principal selected you to design, develop and conduct training to the school
faculty. The training consists on the computer use and integration in the subject areas.
Steps:
1. Select the subject area (language, math, science, etc.)
2. Select the grade level.
3. Select the concept.
4. Remember the objective of this project/training is to prepare faculty how to
integrate the computers in the classroom using subject area, level concepts, and
activities as examples.
5. The written project should have:
a. Title page
b. Title of the concept
c. Population to be addressed by the lesson
d. Lesson goal(s)
e. Activities - clear and specific
f. Assessment
g. URL’s
6. Prepare a PowerPoint with a minimum of 5 slides to present the training idea to
the class.
EDUC 214 Computers in Education 47
Prep. 2004. Noridis Medina Fernández Rev. 2004. Carmen L. Lamboy, Ed.D, Rev. 2008. Ariadna Rivera Crawford, MA.Ed
Anejo G/Appendix G
MATRIZ VALORATIVA PARA PARTICIPACIÓN EN GRUPO
Nombre del Estudiante: _____________________ Fecha: _______________
Grupo: ________ Nombre del estudiante evaluador: _____________________
Criteri o Puntos Puntuación del estudiante
Asistió a las reuniones o actividades del grupo.
10
Colaboró en la planificación y organización de las reuniones o actividades de grupo.
10
Demostró disposición para cooperar con el grupo.
10
Contribuyó frecuentemente a las discusiones del grupo
10
Participó activamente en las reuniones y actividades.
10
Demostró interés en las discusiones y actividades del grupo.
10
Vino preparado(a) a las reuniones, actividades y discusiones del grupo.
10
Demostró atención y apertura a los puntos y argumentos de sus compañeros.
10
Contribuyó al grupo con material e información adicional.
10
Contribuyó significativamente al trabajo que presentó el grupo.
10
Totals 100
EDUC 214 Computers in Education 48
Prep. 2004. Noridis Medina Fernández Rev. 2004. Carmen L. Lamboy, Ed.D, Rev. 2008. Ariadna Rivera Crawford, MA.Ed
RUBRIC TO EVALUATE PARTICIPATION IN GROUP ACTIVITIE S
Students name: _________________________ Date: _______________
Group: ________ Name of evaluating student: ______________________
Criteri a Points Students Points
Attended all the meetings and activities of the group.
10
Collaborated with the planning and organization of activities of the group.
10
Demonstrated cooperation and team work with the group.
10
Contributed frequently with the discussions of the group.
10
Participated actively in the meetings and activities.
10
Demonstrated interest in the discussions and activities of the group.
10
Came prepared to meetings, activities and discussions of the group.
10
Demonstrated attention to the arguments within the group.
10
Contributed to the group with additional information.
10
Contributed significantly with the work that presented the group.
10
Totals 100
EDUC 214 Computers in Education 49
Prep. 2004. Noridis Medina Fernández Rev. 2004. Carmen L. Lamboy, Ed.D, Rev. 2008. Ariadna Rivera Crawford, MA.Ed
Anejo H/Appendix H
MATRIZ VALORATIVA PARA EVALUAR PRESENTACION INDIVID UAL/GRUPAL
ORAL
Nombre del estudiante: _______________________Fecha:_________________
Criteri o Puntos Puntuación del estudiante
Conten ido Realiza una introducción efectiva del tema identificando el propósito, objetivo e ideas principales que se incluyen en la presentación.
10
La presentación es organizada y coherente y puede seguirse con facilidad.
10
El presentador demuestra dominio del tema o materia de la presentación al explicar con propiedad el contenido y no incurrir en errores.
10
Las ideas y argumentos de la presentación están bien fundamentados en los recursos presentados, consultados o discutidos en clase.
10
Capta la atención e interés de la audiencia y/o promueve su participación, según aplique.
10
Proyección efectiva, postura corporal adecuada, manejo de la audiencia, manejo del tiempo asignado.
10
Usa varias estrategias para hablar o definir conceptos, interpretaciones, aplicaciones y evaluación de procesos o experiencias en el contenido del curso.
10
Lenguaje Pronunciación de las palabras es clara y de manera correcta para que se entienda el lenguaje utilizado.
10
Uso correcto de la gramática y conjugación de verbos en el idioma asignado.
10
Uso correcto del vocabulario para expresar el mensaje adecuadamente.
10
Total de Puntos 100 (70% de contenido y 30%
Lenguaje)
Puntuación del Estudiante:
________ Firma del Estudiante: _________________ Firma del Facilitador: ____________________
EDUC 214 Computers in Education 50
Prep. 2004. Noridis Medina Fernández Rev. 2004. Carmen L. Lamboy, Ed.D, Rev. 2008. Ariadna Rivera Crawford, MA.Ed
RUBRIC TO EVALUATE INDIVIDUAL/GROUP PRESENTATION
Student Name:____________________________Date:___________________
Criteria Value Points Student Total Score
Content Performs an effective introduction to the theme identifying the objectives, ideas and principles that are included in the presentation.
10
The presentation is organized and coherent, and could be easily followed
10
The presenter demonstrates domain of the theme or subject by means of properly explaining content without incurring in errors
10
The ideas and arguments of the presentation are well founded by the resources presented, consulted or discussed in class
10
Capture of the attention and interest of the audience and/or promote their participation, as applicable
10
Effective personal projection, corporal posture and manage of the audience;
10
Uses a variety of speaking strategies to define concepts, interpretation, application and evaluation of processes using experience on concepts or content of class.
10
Language Student pronounces words in a clear and correct manner so as to make the correct language used understood to others.
10
Correct use of grammar and verb conjugation.
10
Use of correct use of vocabulary words to express message.
10
Total Points 100 (70% of content and 30% of language)
Student’s Total Score: ________
Student’s signature: __________________Facilitator’s Signature: __________________
EDUC 214 Computers in Education 51
Prep. 2004. Noridis Medina Fernández Rev. 2004. Carmen L. Lamboy, Ed.D, Rev. 2008. Ariadna Rivera Crawford, MA.Ed
Anejo I/Appendix I
PORTFOLIO
Guidelines to prepare the portfolio
1. Determination of sources of content
2. The following, but not limited to, documentation will be included:
a. Projects, surveys, and reports.
b. Oral presentations
c. Essays: dated writing samples to show progress
d. Research papers: dated unedited and edited first drafts to show progress
e. Written pieces that illustrate critical thinking about readings: response or
reaction papers.
f. Class notes, interesting thoughts to remember, etc.
g. Learning journals, reflexive diaries.
h. Self assessments, peer assessments, facilitator assessments.
i. Notes from student-facilitator conferences.
3. Organization of documentation
Documentation will be organized by workshop, and by type of assignment within
workshops. Workshops will be separated from one another using construction paper
or paper of different colors, with tabs indicating the workshop number.
4. Presentation of the portfolio
• Documentation will be posted in a binder or in a digital version (e-portfolio).
• The cover page will follow exactly APA guidelines applied to a cover page of
research papers submitted at Metro Orlando Campus. This cover page will be
placed at the beginning of the portfolio (Appendix A).
• The entire portfolio will follow APA style: Courier or Times New Roman font,
size 12, double space, and 1-inch margins. See a “Publication Manual of the
APA, Fifth Edition”
• A log of entries that can be expanded with each new entry properly
numbered. The table, which should be located at the beginning, should
include a brief description, date produced, date submitted, and date evaluated
(Appendix K ).
EDUC 214 Computers in Education 52
Prep. 2004. Noridis Medina Fernández Rev. 2004. Carmen L. Lamboy, Ed.D, Rev. 2008. Ariadna Rivera Crawford, MA.Ed
• Introduction and conclusion of the income and outcome of the portfolio.
• A list of references and appendixes of all assignments included will be added
to the end of the portfolio.
• The Portfolio Informational Sheet will be placed in the transparent front pocket
of the binder for identification purposes (Appendix J ).
5. Student-Facilitator Feedback Template: Progression follow-up
The final step in implementing portfolios, before returning them to the student or
school life, is sharing feedback with each student to review the contents, student
reflections, and your evaluations of individual items and all of the work together as
related to learning targets (Banks, 2005).
Facilitators will e-mail a feedback template to all students. This template will contain
information pertaining to weaknesses and strengths found in students’ portfolios
(Appendix N ). Facilitators will focus their attention on showing students what is
possible and their progress rather than what is wrong; however, this does not mean
that facilitators will not cover weaknesses and areas for improvement during the
conference. Facilitators will send this feedback template upon completion of
workshop one.
Students will also have the opportunity to respond to the facilitator’s feedback and
write their own comments and/or ideas of how to improve the quality of their
portfolios, and how to become better metacognitive learners on the feedback
template. Students will e-mail the template with their comments back to the facilitator
after every workshop.
6. Portfolio storage:
• Portfolio samples will be safely stored for a six-month term on campus.
• Students will sign an official document empowering Ana G. Mendez
University System with rights to use their portfolios with educational or
accreditation purposes during this term (Appendix O ).
• After this term, and if their authors authorize Ana G. Mendez University
System to discard their portfolios by signing an official document, portfolio
samples will be destroyed; otherwise, they will be returned to their original
authors (Appendix P ).
EDUC 214 Computers in Education 53
Prep. 2004. Noridis Medina Fernández Rev. 2004. Carmen L. Lamboy, Ed.D, Rev. 2008. Ariadna Rivera Crawford, MA.Ed
Anejo J/Appendix J
PORTFOLIO INFORMATIONAL SHEET
Sistema Universitario Ana G. Méndez Florida Campuses
Universidad del Este, Universidad Metropolitana, Un iversidad del Turabo Check one: � Universidad del Este � Universidad Metropolitana � Universidad del Turabo Check one: � Undergraduate
� Graduate
Concentration
Student’s Name
Facilitator’s Name
Course:
Portfolio rated as
Reason of this rate
EDUC 214 Computers in Education 54
Prep. 2004. Noridis Medina Fernández Rev. 2004. Carmen L. Lamboy, Ed.D, Rev. 2008. Ariadna Rivera Crawford, MA.Ed
Anejo K/Appendix K
Log of Entries
Entry Description
Date of Entry
Date
Submitted
Date
Evaluated
Page #
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
EDUC 214 Computers in Education 55
Prep. 2004. Noridis Medina Fernández Rev. 2004. Carmen L. Lamboy, Ed.D, Rev. 2008. Ariadna Rivera Crawford, MA.Ed
Anejo L/Appendix L
Checklist for Portfolio Assessment
Has the student set academic goals?
Does the portfolio include enough entries in each area to make
valid judgments?
Does the portfolio include evidence of complex learning in realistic
setting?
Does the portfolio provide evidence of various types of student
learning?
Does the portfolio include students’ self-evaluations and
reflections on what was learned?
Does the portfolio enable one to determine learning progress and
current level of learning?
Does the portfolio provide clear evidence of learning to users of
the portfolio?
Does the portfolio provide for student participation and
responsibility?
Does the portfolio present entries in a well-organized and useful
manner?
Does the portfolio include assessments based on clearly stated
criteria of successful performance?
Does the portfolio provide for greater interaction between
instruction and assessment?
Adapted from: Gronlund, N. E. (2003). Assessment of student achievement. 7th ed. Boston: Pearson
Education, Inc.
EDUC 214 Computers in Education 56
Prep. 2004. Noridis Medina Fernández Rev. 2004. Carmen L. Lamboy, Ed.D, Rev. 2008. Ariadna Rivera Crawford, MA.Ed
Anejo M/Appendix M
Portfolio Rubric
4 3 2 1
PORTFOLIO APPEARANCE
� Readable: Are entries typed in an appropriate font and size? Are
entries free of errors? Do ideas expressed in entries follow a logical sequence with appropriate transitions among paragraphs and topics?
� Professionalism: Is the appearance of the portfolio
professional? Are graphics, colors and portfolio language consistent with professional workplace expectations? Is the portfolio presented in a neat and orderly manner?
� Organization: Is the portfolio organized in a manner that makes
it easy to follow and easy to quickly locate information?
PORTFOLIO CONTENT AND FUNCTION
� Content: Are all required entries included in the portfolio? Are
entries relevant to the content of the portfolio? Do all entries contain the student’s reaction or reflection on the selected topics? Do entries provide thorough understanding of content? Resume, Activities List, Varied Samples of Written Work, Evidence of Problem Solving, and Evidence of Decision Making.
� Authenticity: Are the samples and illustrations a true reflection
of the student’s efforts and abilities?
� Growth/Development: Do samples provide thorough
understanding of growth and development related to their field of concentration? Do items show what the student has learned?
� Collaboration: Do items show examples of both individual and
group work? Does the student provide clear understanding of collaboration, and use collaboration to support his/her learning?
EDUC 214 Computers in Education 57
Prep. 2004. Noridis Medina Fernández Rev. 2004. Carmen L. Lamboy, Ed.D, Rev. 2008. Ariadna Rivera Crawford, MA.Ed
� Reflection and Personal growth: Do items show exceptional
understanding of how to be a reflective thinker and how to seek opportunities for professional growth? Does the student include self-reflective comments? Does the student reflect enthusiasm for learning?
� Professional Conduct: Do items show clear understanding of
ethical behavior and professional conduct? Do items display the pride the student has in his or her work?
Overall Portfolio Impact
� Is this portfolio an asset in demonstrating the student’s value
(skills, abilities, knowledge) to a potential employer or college representative?
Rating Scale 4 = Outstanding 3 = Very good 2 = Good 1 = Need s improvement Source: Retrieved from www.lcusd.net/lchs/portfolio/rubric.htm on February 10th, 2007. Adapted 02/10/2007 by Fidel R. Távara, M.Ed. Coordinator of Assessment and Placement – Metro Orlando Campus
EDUC 214 Computers in Education 58
Prep. 2004. Noridis Medina Fernández Rev. 2004. Carmen L. Lamboy, Ed.D, Rev. 2008. Ariadna Rivera Crawford, MA.Ed
Anejo N/Appendix N
Portfolio Assessment Feedback Template Strengths Weaknesses Improv ement Ideas Facilitator’s comments
Student’s response and comments
EDUC 214 Computers in Education 59
Prep. 2004. Noridis Medina Fernández Rev. 2004. Carmen L. Lamboy, Ed.D, Rev. 2008. Ariadna Rivera Crawford, MA.Ed
Anejo O/Appendix O
Use and Return of Portfolio
Sistema Universitario Ana G. Méndez Universidad del Este, Universidad Metropolitana, Un iversidad del Turabo
I, ____________________________________, grant permission to the office of
Assessment and Placement of the Ana G. Méndez University System, to keep in their
records a copy of my portfolio. I understand that the portfolio is going to be used for
accreditation or educational purposes only, and that is not going to be disclosed without
my consent.
By signing this document I authorize the office of Assessment and Placement to keep a
copy of my portfolio for six months and return it to me at the end of this period of time.
_______________________________ ___________
Student’s Name (print) Date
_______________________________ ___________
Student’s Signature Date
EDUC 214 Computers in Education 60
Prep. 2004. Noridis Medina Fernández Rev. 2004. Carmen L. Lamboy, Ed.D, Rev. 2008. Ariadna Rivera Crawford, MA.Ed
Anejo P/Appendix P
Use and Discard of Portfolio
Sistema Universitario Ana G. Méndez Universidad del Este, Universidad Metropolitana, Un iversidad del Turabo
I, ____________________________________, grant permission to the office of
Assessment and Placement of the Ana G. Méndez University System to keep in their
records a copy of my portfolio. I understand that the portfolio is going to be used for
accreditation or educational purposes only, and that is not going to be disclosed without
my consent.
By signing this document I authorize the Office of Placement and Assessment to keep a
copy of my portfolio for six months and discard it at the end of this period of time.
_______________________________ ___________
Student’s Name (print) Date
_______________________________ ___________
Student’s Signature Date