Site Visit Report
The site visit process is a sample on a particular day of an installation's compliance with some of its licence conditions. Where non-compliance against a particular condition has not been reported, this should not be construed to mean that there is full compliance with that condition of the licence.
Instructions and actions arising from the visit shall be addressed, or where applicable noted, by the licensee in order to ensure compliance, to improve the environmental performance of the installation and to provide clarification on certain issues.
The licensee shall take the actions specified to close out the non-compliances and observations raised in this Site Visit Report.
Licensee
Name of Installation Town of Monaghan Co-Operative Agricultural and Dairy Society
Licensee Town of Monaghan Co-Operative Agricultural and Dairy Society
Licence Register No. P0815-02
CRO Number
Site Address Coolshannagh, Monaghan, Monaghan
Site Visit Reference No. SV10489
Report Detail
Issue Date 12/10/2017
Prepared By Ken Murphy
Site Visit Detail
Date Of Inspection 23/08/2017 Announced No
Time In 09:00 Time Out 17:00
Visited by on behalf of the EPA Fitz Scientific Ltd
Licensee Personnel and Role See Report
Photo Taken No Samples Taken Yes Video Taken No
Odour Assessment No
Site Visit Report - SV10489 - Town of Monaghan Co-Operative Agricultural and Dairy Society Page 1 of 43
Scope
This is a report on monitoring of emissions to air at this site. Please find the detailed technical report attached.
Media
Air
Site Areas Inspected
See Report
Documents Inspected
See Report
Site Visit Report - SV10489 - Town of Monaghan Co-Operative Agricultural and Dairy Society Page 2 of 43
Site Visit Report - SV10489 - Town of Monaghan Co-Operative Agricultural and Dairy Society Page 3 of 43
Town of Monaghan Co-OperativeCoolshannagh, Monaghan, Co Monaghan.
P0815-02CAR17-01
Emissions to AtmosphereReport No:
Report Date:
Fitz Scientific
Unit 35, Boyne Business Park, Drogheda, Co Louth
Phone: +353 41 98 45440
07/09/2017
Environmental Protection Agency
Industrial Emissions Licence: P0815-02
Page 1 of 39Site Visit Report - SV10489 - Town of Monaghan Co-Operative Agricultural and Dairy Society Page 4 of 43
Fitz Scientific
Coolshannagh, Monaghan, Co Monaghan.
Town of Monaghan Co-Operative
Visit No: 1Year: 2017
Report for the Periodic Monitoring of Emissions to Air
Executive Summary
Licence / Permit Number:
Job Quote Number:
P0815-02
EPA17065
Operator Name:
Installation:
Phone:
Contact Name:
Town of Monaghan Co-Operative
Coolshannagh, Monaghan, Co Monaghan.
047 81400
Marie Mc Kenna
Monitoring Dates:
Monitoring Organisation: Fitz Scientific
Unit 35, Boyne Business Park, Drogheda, Co. Louth, Ireland
Phone: +353 41 98 45440 / Fax: +353 41 98 46171
email: [email protected]
UKAS Registration number 2802
Report Date: 07/09/2017
Signed: ____________________________ Signed: ____________________________
-1
P0815-02Industrial Emissions Licence
Report created using QRSys version
P0815-02CAR17-01
23/08/2017
Jason McGuirk
MM14 1320
Level 2
Technician
TE1, TE2, TE3, TE4
Written By:
MCERTS Reg:
Competency:
Function:
Endorsements:
Aadil Khan
MM11 1120
Level 2
Field Services Manager
TE1, TE2, TE3, TE4
Approved By:
MCERTS Reg:
Competency:
Function:
Endorsements:
3.8 August 2017
Page 2 of 39Site Visit Report - SV10489 - Town of Monaghan Co-Operative Agricultural and Dairy Society Page 5 of 43
Contents
1.- Part 1
1.1.- Monitoring Objectives
1.2.- Special Monitoring Requirements
1.3.- Monitoring Results
1.4.- Operational Information
1.5.- Monitoring Deviations
1.6.- Monitoring Procedures and Deviations
2.- Part 2
Appendix 1: General Information
Appendix 2: Monitoring Information
Fitz Scientific
Coolshannagh, Monaghan, Co Monaghan.
Town of Monaghan Co-Operative
Visit No: 1Year: 2017
P0815-02Industrial Emissions LicenceP0815-02CAR17-01
Page 3 of 39Site Visit Report - SV10489 - Town of Monaghan Co-Operative Agricultural and Dairy Society Page 6 of 43
Fitz Scientific
Coolshannagh, Monaghan, Co Monaghan.
Town of Monaghan Co-Operative
Visit No: 1Year: 2017
P0815-02Industrial Emissions LicenceP0815-02CAR17-01
1.- Part 1
1.1.- Monitoring Objectives
1.2.- Special Monitoring Remarks
All the sampling points were obtainable Yes
All parameters were sampled Yes
Opinions and interpretations expressed in this report are outside the scope of any claimed UKAS accreditation.EPA requirements AG1 (Safety) and AG2 (Monitoring Guidance Note) were applied during the monitoring.
Additional information
NOx conversion efficiency: 95.2% tested on 04/11/2016
The monitoring was carried out at this installation as part of compliance monitoring of an Industrial Emissions Licence requirement. This Air Emissions Monitoring has been carried out by Fitz Scientific on behalf of the Environmental Protection Agency. The substances monitored at the emission points are listed below.
AE-1
Parameter Result
NOx 606.4 mg/m3
O2 5.38 %
Particulates 100.2 mg/m3
SO2 811.8 mg/m3
Volumetric flow 6134.3 m3/h
Page 4 of 39Site Visit Report - SV10489 - Town of Monaghan Co-Operative Agricultural and Dairy Society Page 7 of 43
Fitz Scientific
Coolshannagh, Monaghan, Co Monaghan.
Town of Monaghan Co-Operative
Visit No: 1Year: 2017
P0815-02Industrial Emissions LicenceP0815-02CAR17-01
1.3.- Monitoring Results
Analysis information
Emission Point
ReferenceSubstance to be Monitored ELV Result
Uncert (+/-) Units
Date of sampling
Start - End
Times Reference Method Accr.velocity
(m/s)LOD
AE-1 NOx 606.4 27.8 23/08/2017 13:44-14:26
BS EN 14792:2017 MCERTS9.110.04 mg/m3900 mg/m3
AE-1 O2 5.38 0.22 23/08/2017 13:44-14:26
BS EN 14789:2017 MCERTS9.110.01 %n/a
AE-1 Particulates 100.2 3.32 23/08/2017 15:15-15:45
BS EN 13284-1:2002 MCERTS9.110.1 mg/m3150 mg/m3
AE-1 SO2 811.8 75.29 23/08/2017 12:21-12:51
BS EN 14791:2017 MCERTS9.110.4 mg/m31700 mg/m3
AE-1 Volumetric flow 6134.3 180.8 23/08/2017 15:15-15:45
BS EN 16911-1:2013 MCERTS9.11n/a m3/h10000 m3/h
NOx Fitz Scientific
O2 Fitz Scientific
Particulates Fitz Scientific
SO2 Fitz Scientific
Volumetric flow Fitz Scientific
Particulates-blank <0.1 0.005 23/08/2017 15:01-15:03
BS EN 13284-1:2002 MCERTS9.110.1 mg/m3AE-1
SO2-blank <0.4 0.03 23/08/2017 12:05-12:07
BS EN 14791:2017 MCERTS9.110.4 mg/m3AE-1
Sampling stage carried out as per MCERTS requirementsNo*:
Page 5 of 39Site Visit Report - SV10489 - Town of Monaghan Co-Operative Agricultural and Dairy Society Page 8 of 43
Fitz Scientific
Coolshannagh, Monaghan, Co Monaghan.
Town of Monaghan Co-Operative
Visit No: 1Year: 2017
P0815-02Industrial Emissions LicenceP0815-02CAR17-01
Additional information
* The reported uncertainty is based on a standard uncertainty multiplied by a coverage factor k=2, providing a level of confidence of approximately 95%
** Results reported at following Reference Conditions
Reference Conditions
Abatement system and process load
Emission Point Reference Temperature (K) Pressure (KPa) Moisture (%) Oxygen (%)
Monitoring Result Reference Conditions
AE-1 273 101.3 3Dry
Abatement system In Operation Fuel type and LoadLocation
None n/a As per Production demand
AE-1 Fuel-oil
Page 6 of 39Site Visit Report - SV10489 - Town of Monaghan Co-Operative Agricultural and Dairy Society Page 9 of 43
Fitz Scientific
Coolshannagh, Monaghan, Co Monaghan.
Town of Monaghan Co-Operative
Visit No: 1Year: 2017
P0815-02Industrial Emissions LicenceP0815-02CAR17-01
1.4.- Operating Information
Emission Point Reference Date Process Type
ProcessDuration Substance CEMS PR Units
AE-1 23/08/2017 n/a 606.4NOxCombustion Continuous mg/m3
AE-1 23/08/2017 n/a 5.38O2Combustion Continuous %
AE-1 23/08/2017 n/a 100.2ParticulatesCombustion Continuous mg/m3
AE-1 23/08/2017 n/a 811.8SO2Combustion Continuous mg/m3
AE-1 23/08/2017 n/a 6134.3Volumetric flowCombustion Continuous m3/h
* CEMS: Continuous Emission Monitoring System Results
* PR: Periodic Monitoring Results
Page 7 of 39Site Visit Report - SV10489 - Town of Monaghan Co-Operative Agricultural and Dairy Society Page 10 of 43
Fitz Scientific
Coolshannagh, Monaghan, Co Monaghan.
Town of Monaghan Co-Operative
Visit No: 1Year: 2017
P0815-02Industrial Emissions LicenceP0815-02CAR17-01
1.5.- Monitoring Deviations
Monitoring carried out as per Standard Methods. No deviations were recorded
Isokinetic conditions were outside the requirements of BS EN 13282-1 section 10.4.
Due to the high velocity in the duct a smaller nozzle size was used than required by BS EN 13282-1 section 5.2.4 (6mm) to carry out isokinetic sampling.
Emission monitoring point does not have required number of ports as per AG1 section 2.1/2.2 (per M1 Figure A2.5).
The ELV is such that the LOD for the analysis does not allow for the requirement of >10% ELV to be achieved (for ELV >5 mg/m3) (MID 13248-1 section 10.6)
The ELV is such that the LOD for the analysis does not allow for the requirement of >20% ELV to be achieved (for ELV <5 mg/m3) (MID 13248-1 section 10.6)
Negative flow was found (BS EN 13284-1 section 5.2 b).
The stack flow direction doesn’t meet the minimum requirement of 15 degrees with regard the axis of the stack. (BS EN 13284-1 section 5.2 a).
The ratio of highest to lowest local gas velocity is outside (higher than 3:1) of BS EN 13284-1 section 5.2 d) requirements.
Emission point does not meet the requirements of BS EN 15259:2007 Section 6.2.1 NOTE 4 and AG1 section 2.1/2.2 (per M1 Annex 1) - The measurement plane is not in a section of duct that is at least 5 hydraulic diameters of straight duct upstream of the sampling plane and 2 hydraulic diameters downtream (5 hydraulic diameters from the top of the stack)
Sampling port size is too small for velocity, temperature and pressure measurements to be carried out as per AG1 section 2.1/2.2 (M1 Annex 1).
Differential pressure lower than 5Pa measured with pitot tube (BS EN 13284-1 section 5.2 c).
SO2 Impinger efficiency is lower than the requirements of 95% total of concentration in the first impinger (BS EN 14791:2017 section 6.6.1)
NOx calibration drift is higher than 2% of the span value. Results are corrected to drift. (TGN M22 Section 6)
The blank reading does not meet the required target of <10% of the daily limit value (for ELV >10 mg/m3) (BS EN 12384-1 section 10.6)
AE-1Emission Point NOxParameter
NOx overall uncertainty calculated is outside requirement of <10% at the daily ELV, or the lowest limit value assigned by the local authorities, expressed on dry basis before correction to O2 reference concentration as per Section 8 BS EN 14789:2017
CO overall uncertainty calculated is outside requirement of <6% at the daily ELV expressed on dry basis before correction to O2 reference concentration as per 7.3 BS EN 15058:2017.
O2 overall uncertainty calculated is outside requirement of <6% of the value expressed on dry basis, or 0.3% expressed as a volume concentration as per Section 8 BS EN 14789:2017
CO calibration drift is higher than 2% of the span value. Results are corrected to drift. (TGN M22 Section 6)
O2 calibration drift is higher than 2% of the span value. Results are corrected to drift. (EN 14789:2017 Section 9.4.2.3)
TVOC calibration drift is higher than 2% of the span value. Results are corrected to drift. (BS EN 12619:2013 Section 6.2.3)
HCl Impinger efficiency is lower than the requirements of 95% total of concentration in the first impinger (BS EN 1911:2010 section 5.2.1.2.2)
HF Impinger efficiency is lower than the requirements of 95% total of concentration in the first impinger (BS ISO 15713:2006 section 6.4).
Homogeneity test is required for this stack as per BS EN 15259:2007 but customer did not require it in the Confirmation Form
The measurement values are invalid as the corresponding blank result is greater than the requirement identified in CEN/TS 13649:2014 section 10 (c) (must be <10% of the limit values)
Page 8 of 39Site Visit Report - SV10489 - Town of Monaghan Co-Operative Agricultural and Dairy Society Page 11 of 43
Fitz Scientific
Coolshannagh, Monaghan, Co Monaghan.
Town of Monaghan Co-Operative
Visit No: 1Year: 2017
P0815-02Industrial Emissions LicenceP0815-02CAR17-01
Monitoring carried out as per Standard Methods. No deviations were recorded
Isokinetic conditions were outside the requirements of BS EN 13282-1 section 10.4.
Due to the high velocity in the duct a smaller nozzle size was used than required by BS EN 13282-1 section 5.2.4 (6mm) to carry out isokinetic sampling.
Emission monitoring point does not have required number of ports as per AG1 section 2.1/2.2 (per M1 Figure A2.5).
The ELV is such that the LOD for the analysis does not allow for the requirement of >10% ELV to be achieved (for ELV >5 mg/m3) (MID 13248-1 section 10.6)
The ELV is such that the LOD for the analysis does not allow for the requirement of >20% ELV to be achieved (for ELV <5 mg/m3) (MID 13248-1 section 10.6)
Negative flow was found (BS EN 13284-1 section 5.2 b).
The stack flow direction doesn’t meet the minimum requirement of 15 degrees with regard the axis of the stack. (BS EN 13284-1 section 5.2 a).
The ratio of highest to lowest local gas velocity is outside (higher than 3:1) of BS EN 13284-1 section 5.2 d) requirements.
Emission point does not meet the requirements of BS EN 15259:2007 Section 6.2.1 NOTE 4 and AG1 section 2.1/2.2 (per M1 Annex 1) - The measurement plane is not in a section of duct that is at least 5 hydraulic diameters of straight duct upstream of the sampling plane and 2 hydraulic diameters downtream (5 hydraulic diameters from the top of the stack)
Sampling port size is too small for velocity, temperature and pressure measurements to be carried out as per AG1 section 2.1/2.2 (M1 Annex 1).
Differential pressure lower than 5Pa measured with pitot tube (BS EN 13284-1 section 5.2 c).
SO2 Impinger efficiency is lower than the requirements of 95% total of concentration in the first impinger (BS EN 14791:2017 section 6.6.1)
NOx calibration drift is higher than 2% of the span value. Results are corrected to drift. (TGN M22 Section 6)
The blank reading does not meet the required target of <10% of the daily limit value (for ELV >10 mg/m3) (BS EN 12384-1 section 10.6)
AE-1Emission Point O2Parameter
NOx overall uncertainty calculated is outside requirement of <10% at the daily ELV, or the lowest limit value assigned by the local authorities, expressed on dry basis before correction to O2 reference concentration as per Section 8 BS EN 14789:2017
CO overall uncertainty calculated is outside requirement of <6% at the daily ELV expressed on dry basis before correction to O2 reference concentration as per 7.3 BS EN 15058:2017.
O2 overall uncertainty calculated is outside requirement of <6% of the value expressed on dry basis, or 0.3% expressed as a volume concentration as per Section 8 BS EN 14789:2017
CO calibration drift is higher than 2% of the span value. Results are corrected to drift. (TGN M22 Section 6)
O2 calibration drift is higher than 2% of the span value. Results are corrected to drift. (EN 14789:2017 Section 9.4.2.3)
TVOC calibration drift is higher than 2% of the span value. Results are corrected to drift. (BS EN 12619:2013 Section 6.2.3)
HCl Impinger efficiency is lower than the requirements of 95% total of concentration in the first impinger (BS EN 1911:2010 section 5.2.1.2.2)
HF Impinger efficiency is lower than the requirements of 95% total of concentration in the first impinger (BS ISO 15713:2006 section 6.4).
Homogeneity test is required for this stack as per BS EN 15259:2007 but customer did not require it in the Confirmation Form
The measurement values are invalid as the corresponding blank result is greater than the requirement identified in CEN/TS 13649:2014 section 10 (c) (must be <10% of the limit values)
Page 9 of 39Site Visit Report - SV10489 - Town of Monaghan Co-Operative Agricultural and Dairy Society Page 12 of 43
Fitz Scientific
Coolshannagh, Monaghan, Co Monaghan.
Town of Monaghan Co-Operative
Visit No: 1Year: 2017
P0815-02Industrial Emissions LicenceP0815-02CAR17-01
Isokinetic conditions were outside the requirements of BS EN 13282-1 section 10.4.
Due to the high velocity in the duct a smaller nozzle size was used than required by BS EN 13282-1 section 5.2.4 (6mm) to carry out isokinetic sampling.
Emission monitoring point does not have required number of ports as per AG1 section 2.1/2.2 (per M1 Figure A2.5).
The ELV is such that the LOD for the analysis does not allow for the requirement of >10% ELV to be achieved (for ELV >5 mg/m3) (MID 13248-1 section 10.6)
The ELV is such that the LOD for the analysis does not allow for the requirement of >20% ELV to be achieved (for ELV <5 mg/m3) (MID 13248-1 section 10.6)
Negative flow was found (BS EN 13284-1 section 5.2 b).
The stack flow direction doesn’t meet the minimum requirement of 15 degrees with regard the axis of the stack. (BS EN 13284-1 section 5.2 a).
The ratio of highest to lowest local gas velocity is outside (higher than 3:1) of BS EN 13284-1 section 5.2 d) requirements.
Emission point does not meet the requirements of BS EN 15259:2007 Section 6.2.1 NOTE 4 and AG1 section 2.1/2.2 (per M1 Annex 1) - The measurement plane is not in a section of duct that is at least 5 hydraulic diameters of straight duct upstream of the sampling plane and 2 hydraulic diameters downtream (5 hydraulic diameters from the top of the stack)
Sampling port size is too small for velocity, temperature and pressure measurements to be carried out as per AG1 section 2.1/2.2 (M1 Annex 1).
Differential pressure lower than 5Pa measured with pitot tube (BS EN 13284-1 section 5.2 c).
SO2 Impinger efficiency is lower than the requirements of 95% total of concentration in the first impinger (BS EN 14791:2017 section 6.6.1)
NOx calibration drift is higher than 2% of the span value. Results are corrected to drift. (TGN M22 Section 6)
The blank reading does not meet the required target of <10% of the daily limit value (for ELV >10 mg/m3) (BS EN 12384-1 section 10.6)
AE-1Emission Point ParticulatesParameter
NOx overall uncertainty calculated is outside requirement of <10% at the daily ELV, or the lowest limit value assigned by the local authorities, expressed on dry basis before correction to O2 reference concentration as per Section 8 BS EN 14789:2017
CO overall uncertainty calculated is outside requirement of <6% at the daily ELV expressed on dry basis before correction to O2 reference concentration as per 7.3 BS EN 15058:2017.
O2 overall uncertainty calculated is outside requirement of <6% of the value expressed on dry basis, or 0.3% expressed as a volume concentration as per Section 8 BS EN 14789:2017
CO calibration drift is higher than 2% of the span value. Results are corrected to drift. (TGN M22 Section 6)
O2 calibration drift is higher than 2% of the span value. Results are corrected to drift. (EN 14789:2017 Section 9.4.2.3)
TVOC calibration drift is higher than 2% of the span value. Results are corrected to drift. (BS EN 12619:2013 Section 6.2.3)
HCl Impinger efficiency is lower than the requirements of 95% total of concentration in the first impinger (BS EN 1911:2010 section 5.2.1.2.2)
HF Impinger efficiency is lower than the requirements of 95% total of concentration in the first impinger (BS ISO 15713:2006 section 6.4).
Homogeneity test is required for this stack as per BS EN 15259:2007 but customer did not require it in the Confirmation Form
The measurement values are invalid as the corresponding blank result is greater than the requirement identified in CEN/TS 13649:2014 section 10 (c) (must be <10% of the limit values)
Page 10 of 39Site Visit Report - SV10489 - Town of Monaghan Co-Operative Agricultural and Dairy Society Page 13 of 43
Fitz Scientific
Coolshannagh, Monaghan, Co Monaghan.
Town of Monaghan Co-Operative
Visit No: 1Year: 2017
P0815-02Industrial Emissions LicenceP0815-02CAR17-01
Monitoring carried out as per Standard Methods. No deviations were recorded
Isokinetic conditions were outside the requirements of BS EN 13282-1 section 10.4.
Due to the high velocity in the duct a smaller nozzle size was used than required by BS EN 13282-1 section 5.2.4 (6mm) to carry out isokinetic sampling.
Emission monitoring point does not have required number of ports as per AG1 section 2.1/2.2 (per M1 Figure A2.5).
The ELV is such that the LOD for the analysis does not allow for the requirement of >10% ELV to be achieved (for ELV >5 mg/m3) (MID 13248-1 section 10.6)
The ELV is such that the LOD for the analysis does not allow for the requirement of >20% ELV to be achieved (for ELV <5 mg/m3) (MID 13248-1 section 10.6)
Negative flow was found (BS EN 13284-1 section 5.2 b).
The stack flow direction doesn’t meet the minimum requirement of 15 degrees with regard the axis of the stack. (BS EN 13284-1 section 5.2 a).
The ratio of highest to lowest local gas velocity is outside (higher than 3:1) of BS EN 13284-1 section 5.2 d) requirements.
Emission point does not meet the requirements of BS EN 15259:2007 Section 6.2.1 NOTE 4 and AG1 section 2.1/2.2 (per M1 Annex 1) - The measurement plane is not in a section of duct that is at least 5 hydraulic diameters of straight duct upstream of the sampling plane and 2 hydraulic diameters downtream (5 hydraulic diameters from the top of the stack)
Sampling port size is too small for velocity, temperature and pressure measurements to be carried out as per AG1 section 2.1/2.2 (M1 Annex 1).
Differential pressure lower than 5Pa measured with pitot tube (BS EN 13284-1 section 5.2 c).
SO2 Impinger efficiency is lower than the requirements of 95% total of concentration in the first impinger (BS EN 14791:2017 section 6.6.1)
NOx calibration drift is higher than 2% of the span value. Results are corrected to drift. (TGN M22 Section 6)
The blank reading does not meet the required target of <10% of the daily limit value (for ELV >10 mg/m3) (BS EN 12384-1 section 10.6)
AE-1Emission Point SO2Parameter
NOx overall uncertainty calculated is outside requirement of <10% at the daily ELV, or the lowest limit value assigned by the local authorities, expressed on dry basis before correction to O2 reference concentration as per Section 8 BS EN 14789:2017
CO overall uncertainty calculated is outside requirement of <6% at the daily ELV expressed on dry basis before correction to O2 reference concentration as per 7.3 BS EN 15058:2017.
O2 overall uncertainty calculated is outside requirement of <6% of the value expressed on dry basis, or 0.3% expressed as a volume concentration as per Section 8 BS EN 14789:2017
CO calibration drift is higher than 2% of the span value. Results are corrected to drift. (TGN M22 Section 6)
O2 calibration drift is higher than 2% of the span value. Results are corrected to drift. (EN 14789:2017 Section 9.4.2.3)
TVOC calibration drift is higher than 2% of the span value. Results are corrected to drift. (BS EN 12619:2013 Section 6.2.3)
HCl Impinger efficiency is lower than the requirements of 95% total of concentration in the first impinger (BS EN 1911:2010 section 5.2.1.2.2)
HF Impinger efficiency is lower than the requirements of 95% total of concentration in the first impinger (BS ISO 15713:2006 section 6.4).
Homogeneity test is required for this stack as per BS EN 15259:2007 but customer did not require it in the Confirmation Form
The measurement values are invalid as the corresponding blank result is greater than the requirement identified in CEN/TS 13649:2014 section 10 (c) (must be <10% of the limit values)
Page 11 of 39Site Visit Report - SV10489 - Town of Monaghan Co-Operative Agricultural and Dairy Society Page 14 of 43
Fitz Scientific
Coolshannagh, Monaghan, Co Monaghan.
Town of Monaghan Co-Operative
Visit No: 1Year: 2017
P0815-02Industrial Emissions LicenceP0815-02CAR17-01
Isokinetic conditions were outside the requirements of BS EN 13282-1 section 10.4.
Due to the high velocity in the duct a smaller nozzle size was used than required by BS EN 13282-1 section 5.2.4 (6mm) to carry out isokinetic sampling.
Emission monitoring point does not have required number of ports as per AG1 section 2.1/2.2 (per M1 Figure A2.5).
The ELV is such that the LOD for the analysis does not allow for the requirement of >10% ELV to be achieved (for ELV >5 mg/m3) (MID 13248-1 section 10.6)
The ELV is such that the LOD for the analysis does not allow for the requirement of >20% ELV to be achieved (for ELV <5 mg/m3) (MID 13248-1 section 10.6)
Negative flow was found (BS EN 13284-1 section 5.2 b).
The stack flow direction doesn’t meet the minimum requirement of 15 degrees with regard the axis of the stack. (BS EN 13284-1 section 5.2 a).
The ratio of highest to lowest local gas velocity is outside (higher than 3:1) of BS EN 13284-1 section 5.2 d) requirements.
Emission point does not meet the requirements of BS EN 15259:2007 Section 6.2.1 NOTE 4 and AG1 section 2.1/2.2 (per M1 Annex 1) - The measurement plane is not in a section of duct that is at least 5 hydraulic diameters of straight duct upstream of the sampling plane and 2 hydraulic diameters downtream (5 hydraulic diameters from the top of the stack)
Sampling port size is too small for velocity, temperature and pressure measurements to be carried out as per AG1 section 2.1/2.2 (M1 Annex 1).
Differential pressure lower than 5Pa measured with pitot tube (BS EN 13284-1 section 5.2 c).
SO2 Impinger efficiency is lower than the requirements of 95% total of concentration in the first impinger (BS EN 14791:2017 section 6.6.1)
NOx calibration drift is higher than 2% of the span value. Results are corrected to drift. (TGN M22 Section 6)
The blank reading does not meet the required target of <10% of the daily limit value (for ELV >10 mg/m3) (BS EN 12384-1 section 10.6)
AE-1Emission Point Volumetric flowParameter
NOx overall uncertainty calculated is outside requirement of <10% at the daily ELV, or the lowest limit value assigned by the local authorities, expressed on dry basis before correction to O2 reference concentration as per Section 8 BS EN 14789:2017
CO overall uncertainty calculated is outside requirement of <6% at the daily ELV expressed on dry basis before correction to O2 reference concentration as per 7.3 BS EN 15058:2017.
O2 overall uncertainty calculated is outside requirement of <6% of the value expressed on dry basis, or 0.3% expressed as a volume concentration as per Section 8 BS EN 14789:2017
CO calibration drift is higher than 2% of the span value. Results are corrected to drift. (TGN M22 Section 6)
O2 calibration drift is higher than 2% of the span value. Results are corrected to drift. (EN 14789:2017 Section 9.4.2.3)
TVOC calibration drift is higher than 2% of the span value. Results are corrected to drift. (BS EN 12619:2013 Section 6.2.3)
HCl Impinger efficiency is lower than the requirements of 95% total of concentration in the first impinger (BS EN 1911:2010 section 5.2.1.2.2)
HF Impinger efficiency is lower than the requirements of 95% total of concentration in the first impinger (BS ISO 15713:2006 section 6.4).
Homogeneity test is required for this stack as per BS EN 15259:2007 but customer did not require it in the Confirmation Form
The measurement values are invalid as the corresponding blank result is greater than the requirement identified in CEN/TS 13649:2014 section 10 (c) (must be <10% of the limit values)
Page 12 of 39Site Visit Report - SV10489 - Town of Monaghan Co-Operative Agricultural and Dairy Society Page 15 of 43
Fitz Scientific
Coolshannagh, Monaghan, Co Monaghan.
Town of Monaghan Co-Operative
Visit No: 1Year: 2017
P0815-02Industrial Emissions LicenceP0815-02CAR17-01
Licence / Permit Number:
Job Quote Number:
P0815-02
EPA17065
Operator Name:
Installation:
Phone:
Contact Name:
Town of Monaghan Co-Operative
Coolshannagh, Monaghan, Co Monaghan.
Marie Mc Kenna
047 81400
Monitoring Dates:
Monitoring Organisation: Fitz Scientific
Unit 35, Boyne Business Park, Drogheda, Co. Louth, Ireland
Phone: +353 41 98 45440 / Fax: +353 41 98 46171
email: [email protected]
2.- Part 2
Supporting information
23/08/2017
Laboratory details
NOx
Address Contact email Phone Acc. Number
Unit 35, Boyne Business Park, Drogheda, Co. Louth, Ireland
Geoff Fitzpatrick
[email protected] +353 41 98 45440 - ext 2
UKAS 2802Fitz Scientific
O2
Address Contact email Phone Acc. Number
Unit 35, Boyne Business Park, Drogheda, Co. Louth, Ireland
Geoff Fitzpatrick
[email protected] +353 41 98 45440 - ext 2
UKAS 2802Fitz Scientific
Particulates
Address Contact email Phone Acc. Number
Unit 35, Boyne Business Park, Drogheda, Co. Louth, Ireland
Geoff Fitzpatrick
[email protected] +353 41 98 45440 - ext 2
UKAS 2802Fitz Scientific
SO2
Address Contact email Phone Acc. Number
Page 13 of 39Site Visit Report - SV10489 - Town of Monaghan Co-Operative Agricultural and Dairy Society Page 16 of 43
Fitz Scientific
Coolshannagh, Monaghan, Co Monaghan.
Town of Monaghan Co-Operative
Visit No: 1Year: 2017
P0815-02Industrial Emissions LicenceP0815-02CAR17-01
Unit 35, Boyne Business Park, Drogheda, Co. Louth, Ireland
Geoff Fitzpatrick
[email protected] +353 41 98 45440 - ext 2
UKAS 2802Fitz Scientific
Volumetric flow
Address Contact email Phone Acc. Number
Unit 35, Boyne Business Park, Drogheda, Co. Louth, Ireland
Geoff Fitzpatrick
[email protected] +353 41 98 45440 - ext 2
UKAS 2802Fitz Scientific
Page 14 of 39Site Visit Report - SV10489 - Town of Monaghan Co-Operative Agricultural and Dairy Society Page 17 of 43
Fitz Scientific
Coolshannagh, Monaghan, Co Monaghan.
Town of Monaghan Co-Operative
Visit No: 1Year: 2017
P0815-02Industrial Emissions LicenceP0815-02CAR17-01
Appendix 1:
Sampling personnel used
Substances Monitored
Equipment Checklist References
As an accredited organisation Fitz scientific have implemented procedures to ensure that the requirements of TPS 63 (UKAS Policy on Deviating Samples) are met with regard to samples taken and tested for chemical analysis. As such all samples, when applicable, have been transported in containers, and in an environment, that meet the relevant standard requirements where applicable
Substance Fitz SOPMethod used for Monitoring
NOx BS EN 14792:2017 161
O2 BS EN 14789:2017 161
Particulates BS EN 13284-1:2002 101
SO2 BS EN 14791:2017 167
Volumetric flow BS EN 16911-1:2013 122
Stack: AE-1
EM402
n/a
n/a
Probe1
EM372
n/a
n/a n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a n/a
n/a
n/a
TCR
Nozzles
Impingers
Probe
Pitot tube
Weights
Caliper Filters
Horiba
FID
FTIR
Testo Gases
Handheld pumps
Tubes
Volumetric flowParameter:
EM402
n/a
Set C
Probe1
n/a
EM201 (a
n/a n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a n/a
n/a
n/a
TCR
Nozzles
Impingers
Probe
Pitot tube
Weights
Caliper Filters
Horiba
FID
FTIR
Testo Gases
Handheld pumps
Tubes
SO2Parameter:
EM402
Set1
Set C
Probe1
EM372
n/a
EM389 EM3297/EM3296
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a n/a
n/a
n/a
TCR
Nozzles
Impingers
Probe
Pitot tube
Weights
Caliper Filters
Horiba
FID
FTIR
Testo Gases
Handheld pumps
Tubes
ParticulatesParameter:
23/08/2017 Technician Name Position Qualification TEs MCERTS no
Aadil Khan Team Leader Level 2 TE1, TE2, TE3, TE4
Patrick (Jamie) Rog Technician Trainee -
MM11 1120
MM16 1391
Page 15 of 39Site Visit Report - SV10489 - Town of Monaghan Co-Operative Agricultural and Dairy Society Page 18 of 43
Fitz Scientific
Coolshannagh, Monaghan, Co Monaghan.
Town of Monaghan Co-Operative
Visit No: 1Year: 2017
P0815-02Industrial Emissions LicenceP0815-02CAR17-01
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a n/a
EM209
n/a
n/a
n/a n/a
n/a
n/a
TCR
Nozzles
Impingers
Probe
Pitot tube
Weights
Caliper Filters
Horiba
FID
FTIR
Testo Gases
Handheld pumps
Tubes
O2Parameter:
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a n/a
EM209
n/a
n/a
n/a EA53XU6
n/a
n/a
TCR
Nozzles
Impingers
Probe
Pitot tube
Weights
Caliper Filters
Horiba
FID
FTIR
Testo Gases
Handheld pumps
Tubes
NOxParameter:
Page 16 of 39Site Visit Report - SV10489 - Town of Monaghan Co-Operative Agricultural and Dairy Society Page 19 of 43
Fitz Scientific
Coolshannagh, Monaghan, Co Monaghan.
Town of Monaghan Co-Operative
Visit No: 1Year: 2017
P0815-02Industrial Emissions LicenceP0815-02CAR17-01
Appendix 2:
Monitoring Information
1
4
9.11
100.392
197.99
0.71
12979.2
7455.8
6134.3
273
101.3
-1.1
5.38
5.08
Number of Ports
Number of Points
Average Velocity v'a (m/s)
Average Pressure (KPa)
Average Temperature (ºC)
Stack Diameter (m)
Actual Moisture Flow rate (m3/h)
Moisture Flow rate at STP (m3/h)
Dry Flow rate at STP, Ref O2 (m3/h)
T reference (Deg K)
P reference (KPa)
Isokinetic condition (%)
Oxygen measured (%)
Water vapor (%)
Wet Stack (yes/no) No
Probe Temperature (°C) n/a
Impinger efficiency (%) SO2(99.9)
Size of Nozzle 10
AE-1Stack Parameter: Volumetric flow, NOx, O2, Particulates, SO2
Max Flow Rate in Licence (m3/h): 10000
Page 17 of 39Site Visit Report - SV10489 - Town of Monaghan Co-Operative Agricultural and Dairy Society Page 20 of 43
Fitz Scientific
Coolshannagh, Monaghan, Co Monaghan.
Town of Monaghan Co-Operative
Visit No: 1Year: 2017
P0815-02Industrial Emissions LicenceP0815-02CAR17-01
Diagram of Sampling Location (not to scale)
X
X X X
A
AE-1
Circular
1
4
ports
points
Point % of Diameter Location (cm) Velocity (m/s) Temperature (ºC)
Traverse Length 0.71 m
Line
1 6.80 4.8 7.157 151.7841
2 25.10 17.8 7.789 157.7011
3 75.10 53.3 4.459 163.2231
4 93.40 66.3 6.89 163.6861
Page 18 of 39Site Visit Report - SV10489 - Town of Monaghan Co-Operative Agricultural and Dairy Society Page 21 of 43
Fitz Scientific
Coolshannagh, Monaghan, Co Monaghan.
Town of Monaghan Co-Operative
Visit No: 1Year: 2017
P0815-02Industrial Emissions LicenceP0815-02CAR17-01
Monitoring result calculations and uncertainty calculations
Page 19 of 39Site Visit Report - SV10489 - Town of Monaghan Co-Operative Agricultural and Dairy Society Page 22 of 43
Fitz ScientificP0815-02CAR17-01Yar: 2017 Visit no: 1________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Town of Monaghan Co-OperativeIndustrial Emissions Licence P0815-02
Volumetric Flowrate Correction Template BS EN 16911-1:2013Company Town of Monaghan Co-Operative Date of Test 23/08/2017Site Coolshannagh, Monaghan, Co Monaghan. Reference No P0815-02Plant Identification AE-1 Operator Id MM11 1120Test carried out by Aadil Khan TE's TE1, TE2, TE3, TE4
P0815-02CAR17-01
Stack information:
Stack dimensions
m Stack Area m2 No ports / No pointsSuitable ports
(Y/N)?
Comply with 5 Up / 2 Down?
(Y/N) Pressure kPa Temperature K Moisture % Oxygen %
Circular Stack 0.71 0.395919214 1 Yes NoReference Condition 101.3 273 0 3
Rectangular stack 0.00 0.00 0.00 4Stack Conditions 100.4 471.0 5.1 5.38
Actual Value: 0.395919214
PointVelocity m/s (v'a)
Temp degC (ta) Temp K Presssure kPa (Pa)
Flow Rate m3/sec:
Actual Flow rate m3/hr
Moisture Flow rate at STP m3/hr Moisture
Flow rate at STP, Dry m3/hr O2 %
Flow Rate at STP, Dry, Ref O2 m3/hr
1 9.11 197.985 470.985 100 3.6 12979.2 7455.8 5.1 7077.0 5.38 6134.3Volumetric flow 9.11 197.99 470.99 100.392 3.6 12979.2 7455.8 5.1 7077.0 5.38 6134.3Uncertainty 197.99 470.99 100.392 382.6 219.8 5.1 208.6 5.38 180.8
Maximum volumetric flow as per Licence 10000.0 m3/h
Report Number :
Calculation spreadsheet v.48Page 20 of 39
Site Visit Report - SV10489 - Town of Monaghan Co-Operative Agricultural and Dairy Society Page 23 of 43
Fitz ScientificP0815-02CAR17-01Yar: 2017 Visit no: 1_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Town of Monaghan Co-OperativeIndustrial Emissions Licence P0815-02
v1.4 Oct-16Enter data in orange cells onlyConstantsGas constant 8.314 J/(K.mol)
1990 Pa0.01 Pa
2 % of value0.2 % of range between calibrations
PITOT 0.04 % of rangeSampling probe: Probe1 0.64 Pa
Pitot EM372 Water vapour me 7.44 % relativePitot coefficient, K 0.847 0.61 °C CO content meas 0.00 % relativeExpanded uncertainty (95%, k=2) 0.02 1007.11 Pa CO2 content mea 0.37 % relative
0.50 % O2 content measu 4.09 % relative
Duct dimensions Circular RectangularDiameter 0.71 m a mArea 0.4 m2 b m
Area 0.00 m2Uncertainty (%) 0.501408451 Uncertainty (%) 0.00116889
All Pressures should be entered in Pascals, Pa
Measurement Point Atmospheric Pressure, PaStack Pressure, Pa Static Pressure, Pa meas1, Pa meas2, Pa meas3, Pa meas4, Pa meas5, Pa Delta P, Pa Stack Temperature, C
Water Vapour Content, % CO, ppm CO2, % N2, % O2, % dry molecular wt, g/mol stack molecular wt, g/mol
1 100411 100392 43.753 43.75 197.99 5.08 0.00 12.06561109 82.6 5.38 30.15 29.532 5.08 0.00 12.06561109 82.6 5.38 30.15 29.533 5.08 0.00 12.06561109 82.6 5.38 30.15 29.534 5.08 0.00 12.06561109 82.6 5.38 30.15 29.535 5.08 0.00 12.06561109 82.6 5.38 30.15 29.536 5.08 0.00 12.06561109 82.6 5.38 30.15 29.537 5.08 0.00 12.06561109 82.6 5.38 30.15 29.538 5.08 0.00 12.06561109 82.6 5.38 30.15 29.539 5.08 0.00 12.06561109 82.6 5.38 30.15 29.53
10 5.08 0.00 12.06561109 82.6 5.38 30.15 29.5311 5.08 0.00 12.06561109 82.6 5.38 30.15 29.5312 5.08 0.00 12.06561109 82.6 5.38 30.15 29.5313 5.08 0.00 12.06561109 82.6 5.38 30.15 29.5314 5.08 0.00 12.06561109 82.6 5.38 30.15 29.5315 5.08 0.00 12.06561109 82.6 5.38 30.15 29.5316 5.08 0.00 12.06561109 82.6 5.38 30.15 29.5317 5.08 0.00 12.06561109 82.6 5.38 30.15 29.5318 5.08 0.00 12.06561109 82.6 5.38 30.15 29.5319 5.08 0.00 12.06561109 82.6 5.38 30.15 29.5320 5.08 0.00 12.06561109 82.6 5.38 30.15 29.53
Mean 100411 100392 #DIV/0! 43.75 #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! 43.75 197.99 5.08 0.0 12.1 82.6 5.4 30.15 29.53
Circular duct Rectangular ductMean velocity 9.11 m/sec Flow rate (stack conditions) 12979 m3/hour 0 m3/hour
Standard uncerta 0.12 m/sec 1.4 % of value Vol. flow rate expanded uncertain 383 m3/hour #DIV/0! m3/hour
Mean density 0.757 kg/m3 Expanded uncert 0.25 m/sec 2.7 % of value Vol. flow rate expanded uncertain 2.9 % of value #DIV/0! % of value
Developed for the STA by David Butterfield & Chris Dimopoulos, NPL
Repeatability of Delta P transducerDrift of Delta P transducerLack of fit of measurement system
Uncertainty calculation for Velocity and Volume Flow Rate Measurement by Pitot tube EN ISO 16911‐1
Characteristics of pressure sensor used for Delta PEnter uncertainties as (95%,k=2) where relevant
Range of Delta P transducerResolution of Delta P transducer
Uncertainty in duct area measurement
Dry gas basis
Uncertainty in stack gas compositionUncertainty in Delta P transducer Enter uncertainties as (95%,k=2) where relevant
Uncertainty in temperature readout systemUncertainty in atmospheric pressure transducer
Enter uncertainties as (95%,k=2) where relevant
Calculation spreadsheet v.48Page 21 of 39
Site Visit Report - SV10489 - Town of Monaghan Co-Operative Agricultural and Dairy Society Page 24 of 43
Fitz ScientificP0815-02CAR17-01Yar: 2017 Visit no: 1_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Town of Monaghan Co-OperativeIndustrial Emissions Licence P0815-02
Velocity associated uncertainties
Pitot Tube CoefficientExpanded uncertainty (95%, k=2) 0.02Standard uncertainty (Dimensionless) 0.01
Table 1
Delta P Standard uncertanites^2 Measurement Point SD of the mean of the DP measurements (Standard uncertainty Delta P)^2 u2(Dpi)Velocity (m/s) Standard uncertainty velocity m/s
Sigma DP See Table 1 1 0.9 2.5 8E‐04 9.1 0.29Resolution uncertainty 0.00 2Calibration uncertainty 0.10 3Lack of fit 0.21 4Drift 5.28 5
67
Molar Mass 8u(H2O) 0.188987197 9(O2)wet 5.1 10u(O2)wet 0.11 11(CO2)wet 11.5 12u(CO2)wet 0.03 13(CO)wet 0.0 14u(CO)wet 0.00 15Oxygen sensitivity 4.00E‐05 16Water sensitivity 1.00E‐04 17CO2 sensitivity 1.60E‐04 18CO sensitivity 4.00E‐08 19
20standard uncertainty 0.000020 kg/mol 0.07 % of value Average 0.88 2.52164393 8E‐04 9.11 0.287268999
Temperaturestandard uncertainty 0.31 K 0.06 % of value
Stack static pressurestandard uncertainty 0.0 Pa #DIV/0! % of value
Stack pressurestandard uncertainty 1007.1 Pa 1.00 % of value
Stack gas densitystandard uncertainty 0.0076 kg/m3 1.01 % of value
Standard uncertainty of velocity 0.12 m/sec 1.4 % of value
Expanded uncertainty in velocity 0.25 m/sec 2.7 % of value
Calculation spreadsheet v.48Page 22 of 39
Site Visit Report - SV10489 - Town of Monaghan Co-Operative Agricultural and Dairy Society Page 25 of 43
Fitz ScientificP0815-02CAR17-01Yar: 2017 Visit no: 1_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Town of Monaghan Co-OperativeIndustrial Emissions Licence P0815-02
Volume flow rate associated uncertainties
Circular duct Rectangular ductArea uncertainty 0.01 m2 #DIV/0! m2
Flow rate standard uncertainty 191 m3/h #DIV/0! m3/h
Volume flow rate expanded uncertainty 383 m3/h #DIV/0! m3/h
Volume flow rate expanded uncertainty 2.9 % of value #DIV/0! % of value
Calculation spreadsheet v.48 Page 23 of 39Site Visit Report - SV10489 - Town of Monaghan Co-Operative Agricultural and Dairy Society Page 26 of 43
Fitz ScientificP0815-02CAR17-01Yar: 2017 Visit no: 1_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Town of Monaghan Co-OperativeIndustrial Emissions Licence P0815-02
Lookup tables
Factor Loading Function
Number of measurments dn2 0.8853 0.5914 0.4865 0.436 0.3957 0.378 0.3519 0.337
10 0.32511 0.31512 0.30715 0.28820 0.26825 0.25430 0.24540 0.22750 0.22260 0.21680 0.206
100 0.199
Calculation spreadsheet v.48 Page 24 of 39Site Visit Report - SV10489 - Town of Monaghan Co-Operative Agricultural and Dairy Society Page 27 of 43
Fitz ScientificP0815-02CAR17-01Yar: 2017 Visit no: 1_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Town of Monaghan Co-OperativeIndustrial Emissions Licence P0815-02
Swirl Test Record BS EN 16911-1:2013Company Town of Monaghan Co-Operative Date of Test 23/08/2017Site Coolshannagh, Monaghan, Co Monaghan. Reference No P0815-02Plant Identification AE-1 Operator Id MM11 1120Test carried out by Aadil Khan TE's TE1, TE2, TE3, TE4
Sampling Line APoint Distance to duct (m) Diff. Pressure (Pa) Temp oC Velocity (m/s) Angle of Swirl
1 4.80 31.96 151.78 7.16 0.002 17.80 37.42 157.70 7.79 0.003 53.30 11.91 163.22 4.46 0.004 66.30 28.90 163.69 6.89 0.0056789
101112
Average 27.55 159.10 6.57 0.00Min 11.91 151.78 4.46 0.00Max 37.42 163.69 7.79 0.00
Sampling Line BPoint Distance to duct (m) Diff. Pressure (Pa) Temp oC Velocity (m/s) Angle of Swirl
123456789
101112
Average #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0!Min 0 0 0 0Max 0 0 0 0
Calculation spreadsheet v.48 Page 25 of 39
Site Visit Report - SV10489 - Town of Monaghan Co-Operative Agricultural and Dairy Society Page 28 of 43
Fitz ScientificP0815-02CAR17-01Yar: 2017 Visit no: 1________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Town of Monaghan Co-OperativeIndustrial Emissions Licence P0815-02
Moisture Content BS EN 14790:2017Company Town of Monaghan Co-Operative 23/08/2017Site Coolshannagh, Monaghan, Co Monaghan. P0815-02Plant Identification AE-1 MM11 1120Test carried out by Aadil Khan TE1, TE2, TE3, TE4Report Number : P0815-02CAR17-01
Dry at Gas Meter: (Vg) 0.07 m3Gas Meter Temperature: (tg) 21.318 294.318 K TCR EM No. Volume:orrection Fact Calibration Date:Ambient Pressure Measured:(Pa) 100.399 kPa EM036 0.5 0.9976 22/02/2017Gas Volume STP (Vgn) 0.06435226 m3 1 1.0020Gas Volume Factor Correction: 0.9791 taken from this table --> 1.5 1.0098Corrected Volume STP 0.063007298 m3 2 1.0151
2.5 1.0258Before EM003 0.5 1.0051 08/05/2017
Readings: Line Impinger 1 Impinger 2 Impinger 3 Impinger 4 Sum: 1 1.01161 261.9 505.3 513.7 355.0 601.7 2237.6 1.5 1.01972 261.9 505.3 513.7 355.0 601.8 2237.7 2 1.02873 262.0 505.4 513.7 355.0 601.8 2237.9 2.5 1.03824 262.0 505.4 513.7 355.0 601.8 2237.9 EM207 0.5 0.9958 17/01/20175 262.0 505.4 513.7 355.0 601.8 2237.9 1 0.98686 262.0 505.4 513.7 355.0 601.8 2237.9 1.5 0.98977 262.0 505.4 513.7 355.0 601.8 2237.9 2 0.99388 262.0 505.4 513.7 355.0 601.8 2237.9 2.5 1.00329 262.0 505.4 513.7 355.0 601.8 2237.9 EM402 0.72 0.9791 27/09/2016
10 262.0 505.4 513.8 355.0 601.8 2238 1.44 0.9824Standard Deviation: 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 2.16 0.9865
Average: 262.0 505.4 513.7 355.0 601.8 2237.9 2.88 0.9963.6 0.9996
After:Readings: Line Impinger 1 Impinger 2 Impinger 3 Impinger 4 Sum:
1 262.6 505.9 513.8 355.0 603.2 2240.52 262.6 505.9 513.8 355.0 603.2 2240.53 262.7 505.9 513.9 355.0 603.2 2240.74 262.7 505.9 513.9 355.0 603.1 2240.65 262.7 505.9 513.9 355.0 603.1 2240.66 262.7 505.9 513.9 355.0 603.1 2240.67 262.7 505.9 513.9 355.0 603.1 2240.68 262.7 505.9 513.9 355.0 603.1 2240.69 262.7 505.9 513.9 355.0 603.0 2240.5
10 262.7 505.9 513.9 355.0 603.0 2240.5Standard Deviation: 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1
Average: 262.7 505.9 513.9 355.0 603.1 2240.6
Difference in weigh of impingers after and before measurements: 2.7 g
43.01 g/m3
3 %5.38 %
5.1 %5.9 %
Weights: Before Sampling: After Sampling: Difference:Silca trap: 601.8 603.1 1.32 g
Efficiency: 99.8 %
Correction Factors for Volume:
TE's
Date of TestReference NoOperator Id
Corrected to O2ref:
Referenced oxygen:Meas oxygen:
Water vapour content on STP basis:
Water vapour content in % on wet basis:
Calculation spreadsheet v.48
Page 26 of 39
Site Visit Report - SV10489 - Town of Monaghan Co-Operative Agricultural and Dairy Society Page 29 of 43
Fitz ScientificP0815-02CAR17-01Yar: 2017 Visit no: 1________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Town of Monaghan Co-OperativeIndustrial Emissions Licence P0815-02
Moisture Uncertainty Calculations
Measured concentration 5.1 % (at STP)
Measured Quantities Symbol Value Standard uncertainty UnitsSampled Volume Vm 0.063007298 uVm 0.001 m3Sampled gas Temperature Tm 470.985 uTm 2 kSampled gas Pressure ρm 100.392 uρm 1 kPaEfficiency Ɛ 99.78 %Oxygen content O2,m 5.38 uO2,m 0.1 % by volumeWater collected in condensation stage 601.80Water collected in adsorption stage 1.32Wate collected in addidional unit 1.32Water collected in trapping m 603.12 um 0.00 gIntermediate calculationsVwc 106.30073 ^2
0.0 0.0 Efficiency uncertain 0.00-0.1 0.0 support 0.00-1.2 1.5 calculations -0.17
√water in trapping unit 24.6
water in adsorption stage 1.1Uncertainty Efficiency^2 0.2Volume ^2 0.3Sensityvity coefficiency 0.4Uncertainty efficiency 0.03
Repatability standard devWeight in the field st 0.1 0.1Sampled Volume 0.002 0.0Sampled gas Temperature 0.02 0.0Sampled gas Pressure 0.3 0.2
Combined measurement uncertainty 0.19 %
Expanded uncertainty as percentage of measured value 7.44 % measured of value expressed with a level of confidence of 95%(Using a coverage factor k=2)
Expanded uncertainty in units of measuremen 0.38 % of water vapour
Overall uncertainty should be less than +/-20% of the measured concentration.
Calculation spreadsheet v.48
Page 27 of 39
Site Visit Report - SV10489 - Town of Monaghan Co-Operative Agricultural and Dairy Society Page 30 of 43
Fitz ScientificP0815-02CAR17-01Yar: 2017 Visit no: 1_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Town of Monaghan Co-OperativeIndustrial Emissions Licence P0815-02
Flue gases O2 BS EN 14789:2017, NOx BS EN 14792:2017, CO BS EN 15058:2017, CO2 ISO 12039:2001Company Town of Monaghan Co-Operative Date of TestSite Coolshannagh, Monaghan, Co Monaghan. Reference NoPlant Identification AE-1 Operator IdTest carried out by Aadil Khan TE'sReport Number : P0815-02CAR17-01
No. O2 % CO2 % CO ppm NOx ppm SO2 ppm1 5.38 12.07 - 256.38 -
Flue Gas parameter Concentration UnitRef O2 Value 3 % If no correction for oxygen use the same value as for measured oxygen.Meas O2 Value O2 5.38 % Deviation?Uncertainty 0.22 % FALSENOx 256.38 ppmConvert to NO2 mg/Nm3 525.6 Nmg/m3Corrected to ref. O2 % NOx 606.4 Nmg/m3 Deviation?Uncertainty 27.8 Nmg/m3 FALSEMass concentration STP, dry, Ref O2 3.7 kg/hrUncertainty 0.0 kg/hrCO #VALUE! ppmConvert to mg/m3 #VALUE! Nmg/m3Corrected to ref. O2 % CO #VALUE! Nmg/m3 Deviation?Uncertainty #REF! Nmg/m3 #REF!Mass concentration STP, dry, Ref O2 #VALUE! kg/hrUncertainty #REF! kg/hrSO2 #VALUE! ppmConvert to mg/Nm3 #VALUE! Nmg/m3Corrected to ref. O2 % SO2 #VALUE! Nmg/m3Uncertainty #REF! Nmg/m3Mass concentration STP, dry, Ref O2 #VALUE! kg/hrUncertainty #REF! kg/hrCO2Meas CO2 Value CO2 12.1 %Uncertainty 3.0 %
Flow Rate STP,dry,RefO2 6134.32 m3/hr
Calibration Cylinder No: Concentration ppm Concentration mg/m3NO EA53XU6 200.76 411.558CO - - #VALUE!SO2 - - #VALUE!
Concentration%CO2 EA53XU6 15.02O2 Ambient Air 20.9Drift Calculations NO ppm CO ppm SO2 ppm O2 % CO2
Sampling time 30 30 30 30 30Span expected Value 200.76 - - 20.9 15.02Zero expected result 0 0 0 0 0Zero reading before 1 0 - - 0 0Span reading before measurement 201.66 - - 20.92 15.04Zero reading before 2 0 - - -0.01 0.04Zero reading after 0 - - 0.05 0.02Span reading after measurement 200 - - 20.94 14.96
Span adjustment 0.996 #VALUE! #VALUE! 0.999 0.999Span Check 1.004 #VALUE! #VALUE! 1.000 1.005Deviation 0.008 #VALUE! #VALUE! 0.001 0.007Drift/Min 0.000275432 #VALUE! #VALUE! 4.7824E-05 0.00022282
Zero adjustment 1 0 #VALUE! #VALUE! 0 0Zero Adjustment 2 0 #VALUE! #VALUE! 0.00999044 -0.0399468Zero check 1 0 #VALUE! #VALUE! -0.0500239 -0.0201071Zero Check 2 0 #VALUE! #VALUE! -0.0500239 -0.0201071Deviation 1 0 #VALUE! #VALUE! 0.05002393 0.0201071Deviation 2 0 #VALUE! #VALUE! 0.06001437 -0.0198397Drift/min 1 0 #VALUE! #VALUE! 0.00166746 0.00067024Drift/min 2 0 #VALUE! #VALUE! 0.00200048 -0.0006613Drift 0.826295745 #VALUE! #VALUE! 0.43062221 0.53636532Actual measured Concentration 256.38 #DIV/0! #DIV/0! 5.38 12.07Corrected concentration for drift 256.38 #VALUE! #VALUE! 5.38 12.07Deviation FALSE #VALUE! #VALUE! FALSE FALSE
TE1, TE2, TE3, TE4
23/08/2017P0815-02
MM11 1120
If the span or zero are higher than 2% of the span value, it is necessary to correct result for
zero and span drifts. The results shal be rejected if the drift in zero or span gas is higher
than 5%
Calculation spreadsheet v.48
Page 28 of 39
Site Visit Report - SV10489 - Town of Monaghan Co-Operative Agricultural and Dairy Society Page 31 of 43
Fitz ScientificP0815-02CAR17-01Yar: 2017 Visit no: 1_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Town of Monaghan Co-OperativeIndustrial Emissions Licence P0815-02
Uncertainty calculation for Gaseous Measurement Oxygen EN14789V2.2 Jul-08
Limit value n/a %vol Calibration gas 20.9 %volMeasured concentration 5.38 %vol Full Scale 25 %vol
Performance characteristic Value specificationResponse time 56 seconds < 200 sLogger sampling interval 15 seconds 0.00 % volMeasurement period 30 minutes 0.00 % valueNumber of readings in measurement 30 Assuming 1 minute collected over 1 hourRepeatability at zero 0.03 % by volume stdev <0.2 % rangeRepeatability at span level 0.02 % by volume stdev <0.4 % rangeDeviation from linearity 0.1 % vol +/- <0.3 % volumeZero drift (during measurement period) 4.7824E-05 % vol at zero level +/- <2% of volume / 24hrSpan drift (during measurement period) 4.7824E-05 % vol at span level +/- <2% volume/24hr min max value at calibvolume or pressure flow dependence 0.1 % of fs / 10l/h +- 5 l/h <1% range flow 5 15 10 l/hatmospheric pressure dependence 0.19 % of fs/kPa +- 2kPa < 1.5 % range pressure 99.00 101 100 kPaambient temperature dependence -0.21 % by volume /10K +- 15K <0.3% volume 10 K temp 280 285 285 KCO2 (% vol) 15 0.07 % by volume per 15 CO2 range 8 15 0 % volNO (mg/m3) 300 0.02 % by volume per 300 NO range 100 150 0 mg/m3NO2 (mg/m3) 30 0 % by volume per 30 NO2 range 5 7.5 0 mg/m3Combined interference 0.56 % range <2% range Voltage 105 115 110 VDependence on voltage 0.02 % by volume /10V +- 5% < 0.1%vol /10 voltLosses in the line (leak) 0.27 % of value < 2% of valueUncertainty of calibration gas 0.5 % of value
Performance characteristic Uncertainty Value of uncertainty quantity % volStandard deviation of repeatability at zero ur0 for mean Only use rep at spanStandard deviation of repeatability at span level urs for mean 0.00Lack of fit ufit 0.06Drift u0dr 0.00volume or pressure flow dependence uspres 0.01atmospheric pressure dependence uapres 0.03ambient temperature dependence utemp -0.06CO2 0.05 Use largest of sum of all positive or all negative influencesNO 0.01 0.06 all +ves CriteriaNO2 0.00 0 all -ves sum <2% valueCombined interference (from mcerts) 0.08 0.06 largest 0.107686dependence on voltage uvolt 0.01 Value to use for intereference uncertaintylosses in the line (leak) uleak 0.01 unit 0.06Uncertainty of calibration gas ucalib 0.02
Measurement uncertainty 5.38 %volCombined uncertainty 0.11 %vol% of value 2.05 %Coverage factor k = 2Expanded uncertainty expressed with a level of confidence of 95% 4.09 % of valueExpanded uncertainty expressed with a level of confidence of 95% 0.22 % vol
Requirement for SRM is that Uncertaitny should be < 6% of value, on a dry gas basis, or 0.3% expressed as a volume concentration
Effect of drift
range of variation from conditions at calibration
Calculation spreadsheet v.48
Page 29 of 39
Site Visit Report - SV10489 - Town of Monaghan Co-Operative Agricultural and Dairy Society Page 32 of 43
Fitz ScientificP0815-02CAR17-01Yar: 2017 Visit no: 1_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Town of Monaghan Co-OperativeIndustrial Emissions Licence P0815-02
Uncertainty calculation for Gaseous Measurement NOxv4
Limit value 900 mg.m-3 (corrected) NOGas NO Correction for reference conditionsFull Scale 250 ppm O2, % Moisture, %Pressure, Temperature, K
Measured concentration 256.38 ppm Cal gas conc 200.76 ppm ref 3 0.00 101.30 273.00Measured concentration 525.59 mg.m-3 (273K, 101.3kPConversion 2.05 measured 5.38 5.08 100.39 470.99Ratio NO/NO2 5.00 Full Scale 512.5 mg.m-3 (NO2) Factors 1.15 1.05 1.01 1.73
Cal gas conc 411.558 mg.m-3 (NO2) Correction Factor 2.12
Performance characteristic Value specification Effect of driftResponse time 55 seconds 180.000 0.00 mg/m3Number of readings in measurement 120 0.00 % valueRepeatability at zero 0 % full scale 0.200Repeatability at span level 0.1 % full scale 2.000Deviation from linearity 0.75 % of value 2.000 rangesZero drift 0 % full scale 2.000 min max value at calibSpan drift 0.000275432 % full scale 2.000 flow 0.3 0.5 0.4volume or pressure flow dependence 0.02 % of full scale/kPa 0.033 pressure 101.30 101.5 101.3atmospheric pressure dependence 0.1 % of value/kPa 0.750 temp 283 289 283ambient temperature dependence 0.01 % full scale/10K 0.300 NH3 range 0 0 0NH3 (20 mg/m3) 1.2 mg/m3 CO2 range 0 0.5 0CO2 (15%) 1.2 % by vol H2O range 0 0.5 0H2O (30%) 1.2 % by vol 4.000 Instrument Voltage Rating 110dependence on voltage -0.23 % full scale/10V 2%fs/10V Voltage 104.5 115.5 110converter efficiency 95 % 95%losses in the line (leak) 0.29 % of value 2% of valueUncertainty of calibration gas 2 % of value
Measurement performance related to stationary conditionsPerformance characteristic UncertaintyStandard deviation of repeatability at zero ur0 for mean use rep at spanStandard deviation of repeatability at span level urs for mean 0.01 Use largest negative or positive interferent effectLack of fit ufit 2.22 0 0.00Drift u0dr 0.00 0 0.02volume or pressure flow dependence uspres 0.00 0 0.01atmopsheric pressure dependence uapres 0.06 0 0.03ambient temperature dependence utemp 0.00 Interference uncertainty 0.03NH3 (20 mg/m3) uinterf 0.00CO2 (15%) 0.02H2O (30%) 0.01
Dependence on voltage uvolt -0.07Converter efficiency uceff 0.76losses in the line (leak) uleak 0.88Uncertainty of calibration gas ucalib 6.07
Measurement uncertainty Result 525.59 mg/m3
Combined uncertainty 6.57 mg/m3
Expanded uncertainty k = 2 13.13 mg/m3
Uncertainty corrected to std conds 27.79 mg.m-3 (corrected)Expanded uncertainty expressed with a level of confidence of 95% 3.09 % ELVExpanded uncertainty expressed with a level of confidence of 95% 27.79 mg.m-3 at ELV
Requirement in standard is for uncertainty to be < 10% at ELV, or the lowest limit value assigned by the local authorities, expressed on a dry basis before correction to O2 reference concentration
Value of uncertainty quantity
Calculation spreadsheet v.48
Page 30 of 39
Site Visit Report - SV10489 - Town of Monaghan Co-Operative Agricultural and Dairy Society Page 33 of 43
Fitz ScientificP0815-02CAR17-01Yar: 2017 Visit no: 1_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Town of Monaghan Co-OperativeIndustrial Emissions Licence P0815-02
Uncertainty calculation for Gaseous Measurement CO2V2.2 Jul-08
Limit value n/a %vol Calibration gas 15.02 %volMeasured concentration 12.07 %vol Full Scale 25 %vol
Performance characteristic Value specificationResponse time 60 seconds < 200 sLogger sampling interval 60 seconds 0.00 % volMeasurement period 30 minutes 0.01 % valueNumber of readings in measurement 30 Assuming 1 minute collected over 1 hourRepeatability at zero 0 % by volume stdev <0.2 % rangeRepeatability at span level 0.1 % by volume stdev <0.4 % rangeDeviation from linearity 0.13 % vol +/- <0.3 % volumeZero drift (during measurement period) 0.000670237 % vol at zero level +/- <2% of volume / 24hrSpan drift (during measurement period) 0.000222818 % vol at span level +/- <2% volume/24hr min max value at calibvolume or pressure flow dependence 0 % of fs / 10l/h +- 5 l/h <1% range flow 5 15 10 l/hatmospheric pressure dependence 0.3 % of fs/kPa +- 2kPa < 1.5 % range pressure 99.00 101 100 kPaambient temperature dependence -0.07 % by volume /10K +- 15K <0.3% volume 10 K temp 280 285 285 KCO2 (% vol) 15 0.07 % by volume per 15 CO2 range 8 15 0 % volNO (mg/m3) 300 0.02 % by volume per 300 NO range 100 150 0 mg/m3NO2 (mg/m3) 30 0 % by volume per 30 NO2 range 5 7.5 0 mg/m3Combined interference 0.56 % range <2% range Voltage 105 115 110 VDependence on voltage 0.1 % by volume /10V +- 5% < 0.1%vol /10 voltLosses in the line (leak) 2 % of value < 2% of valueUncertainty of calibration gas 0.5 % of value
Performance characteristic Uncertainty Value of uncertainty quantity % volStandard deviation of repeatability at zero ur0 for mean Only use rep at spanStandard deviation of repeatability at span level urs for mean 0.02Lack of fit ufit 0.08Drift u0dr 0.00volume or pressure flow dependence uspres 0.00atmospheric pressure dependence uapres 0.04ambient temperature dependence utemp -0.02CO2 0.05 Use largest of sum of all positive or all negative influencesNO 0.01 0.06 all +ves CriteriaNO2 0.00 0 all -ves sum <2% valueCombined interference (from mcerts) 0.08 0.06 largest 0.241312dependence on voltage uvolt 0.03 Value to use for intereference uncertaintylosses in the line (leak) uleak 0.14 unit 0.06Uncertainty of calibration gas ucalib 0.03
Measurement uncertainty 12.07 %volCombined uncertainty 0.18 %vol% of value 1.52 %Coverage factor k = 2Expanded uncertainty expressed with a level of confidence of 95% 3.04 % of valueExpanded uncertainty expressed with a level of confidence of 95% 0.37 % vol
Requirement for SRM is that Uncertaitny should be < 6% of value, on a dry gas basis
range of variation from conditions at calibration
Effect of drift
Calculation spreadsheet v.48
Page 31 of 39
Site Visit Report - SV10489 - Town of Monaghan Co-Operative Agricultural and Dairy Society Page 34 of 43
Fitz ScientificP0815-02CAR17-01Yar: 2017 Visit no: 1_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Town of Monaghan Co-OperativeIndustrial Emissions Licence P0815-02
Date / Time NOx (ppm) O2 (%)23/08/2017 13:44 13.06 256.33 4.3623/08/2017 13:44 12.63 262.33 4.7423/08/2017 13:44 10.39 227.67 7.4923/08/2017 13:45 12.58 258.00 4.8823/08/2017 13:45 12.80 293.67 4.5223/08/2017 13:45 13.09 317.33 4.1123/08/2017 13:45 13.09 327.00 4.0923/08/2017 13:46 13.08 331.33 4.0923/08/2017 13:46 13.14 331.00 4.0223/08/2017 13:46 13.05 328.00 4.1123/08/2017 13:46 13.00 318.33 4.1823/08/2017 13:47 12.70 302.67 4.5323/08/2017 13:47 12.50 274.67 4.8123/08/2017 13:47 10.13 228.67 7.5623/08/2017 13:47 10.60 226.67 7.3223/08/2017 13:56 10.41 229.00 7.4723/08/2017 13:56 12.62 259.00 4.8323/08/2017 13:56 12.69 290.33 4.6423/08/2017 13:56 12.46 288.00 4.9023/08/2017 13:57 12.21 265.33 5.1123/08/2017 13:57 9.67 211.67 8.3523/08/2017 13:57 11.83 244.00 5.8123/08/2017 13:57 12.80 257.67 4.5223/08/2017 13:58 12.99 257.67 4.2523/08/2017 13:58 13.20 263.00 3.9423/08/2017 13:58 13.10 267.00 4.0423/08/2017 13:58 12.65 263.33 4.6023/08/2017 13:59 11.96 256.33 5.4723/08/2017 13:59 11.80 251.33 5.7223/08/2017 13:59 12.02 254.00 5.4523/08/2017 13:59 11.79 253.67 5.6923/08/2017 14:00 11.71 250.00 5.8523/08/2017 14:00 10.90 246.00 6.7123/08/2017 14:00 9.86 214.67 8.1823/08/2017 14:00 9.05 206.33 9.1623/08/2017 14:01 10.85 216.00 7.1723/08/2017 14:01 10.74 232.67 6.8223/08/2017 14:01 10.75 224.33 7.2223/08/2017 14:01 11.96 250.67 5.6023/08/2017 14:02 12.21 255.67 5.2423/08/2017 14:02 12.52 259.00 4.8523/08/2017 14:02 12.51 259.67 4.8423/08/2017 14:02 10.81 247.67 6.7623/08/2017 14:03 8.90 201.33 9.4223/08/2017 14:03 12.97 238.00 4.5023/08/2017 14:03 14.29 259.33 2.5823/08/2017 14:03 12.94 247.33 4.1523/08/2017 14:04 12.78 267.00 4.4623/08/2017 14:04 11.56 251.67 5.7823/08/2017 14:04 8.78 196.67 9.5323/08/2017 14:04 10.51 226.67 7.4123/08/2017 14:05 12.56 246.67 4.8923/08/2017 14:05 11.11 240.33 6.3723/08/2017 14:05 10.61 221.00 7.3523/08/2017 14:05 11.37 239.00 6.3323/08/2017 14:06 12.88 268.33 4.4523/08/2017 14:06 12.82 291.33 4.4623/08/2017 14:06 12.47 274.67 4.8723/08/2017 14:06 11.05 238.00 6.5423/08/2017 14:07 11.82 243.00 5.8023/08/2017 14:07 12.37 256.00 5.0223/08/2017 14:07 12.73 259.33 4.5723/08/2017 14:07 13.04 260.67 4.1523/08/2017 14:08 13.04 265.00 4.1323/08/2017 14:08 11.60 248.00 5.89
Calculation spreadsheet v.48 Page 32 of 39Site Visit Report - SV10489 - Town of Monaghan Co-Operative Agricultural and Dairy Society Page 35 of 43
Fitz ScientificP0815-02CAR17-01Yar: 2017 Visit no: 1_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Town of Monaghan Co-OperativeIndustrial Emissions Licence P0815-02
Date / Time NOx (ppm) O2 (%)23/08/2017 14:08 12.66 259.33 4.6423/08/2017 14:08 12.05 258.67 5.2923/08/2017 14:09 10.53 225.00 7.3023/08/2017 14:09 12.07 241.33 5.4923/08/2017 14:09 12.59 260.67 4.6123/08/2017 14:09 9.74 215.33 8.2223/08/2017 14:10 9.42 208.00 8.7623/08/2017 14:10 11.04 219.00 6.9123/08/2017 14:10 12.61 261.67 4.7323/08/2017 14:10 11.84 247.67 5.5723/08/2017 14:11 11.59 236.33 6.1123/08/2017 14:11 12.63 262.00 4.6523/08/2017 14:11 12.41 261.33 4.9523/08/2017 14:11 11.52 242.00 6.0423/08/2017 14:12 12.16 247.67 5.3623/08/2017 14:12 12.77 268.00 4.5123/08/2017 14:12 12.53 281.67 4.7823/08/2017 14:12 12.44 261.33 4.8923/08/2017 14:13 11.74 245.33 5.7623/08/2017 14:13 12.66 255.33 4.6723/08/2017 14:13 12.54 277.67 4.7623/08/2017 14:13 12.50 264.00 4.8523/08/2017 14:14 11.92 247.00 5.5423/08/2017 14:14 12.13 253.33 5.3123/08/2017 14:14 12.72 257.33 4.5723/08/2017 14:14 12.22 265.67 5.1723/08/2017 14:15 12.88 258.33 4.3623/08/2017 14:15 11.69 243.33 5.8023/08/2017 14:15 12.55 255.00 4.7923/08/2017 14:15 12.17 264.67 5.2523/08/2017 14:16 12.24 251.00 5.1123/08/2017 14:16 12.61 254.67 4.7123/08/2017 14:16 12.43 276.33 4.8823/08/2017 14:16 12.37 259.33 5.0123/08/2017 14:17 12.09 248.00 5.3123/08/2017 14:17 12.32 255.33 5.0523/08/2017 14:17 12.64 258.33 4.6423/08/2017 14:17 12.00 260.33 5.3923/08/2017 14:18 12.53 256.33 4.8323/08/2017 14:18 12.47 265.00 4.8123/08/2017 14:18 12.06 265.00 5.3623/08/2017 14:18 12.10 260.67 5.3423/08/2017 14:19 13.49 258.33 3.6623/08/2017 14:19 13.56 256.33 3.4523/08/2017 14:19 12.94 259.67 4.2123/08/2017 14:19 12.92 288.00 4.3123/08/2017 14:20 12.29 280.00 5.0523/08/2017 14:20 12.03 254.67 5.4023/08/2017 14:20 12.14 249.00 5.3223/08/2017 14:20 12.51 259.33 4.8223/08/2017 14:21 12.61 258.33 4.7023/08/2017 14:21 12.46 274.33 4.8723/08/2017 14:21 12.20 271.33 5.1723/08/2017 14:21 11.88 247.00 5.5923/08/2017 14:22 12.53 258.33 4.84
Average 12.07 256.38 5.38
Calculation spreadsheet v.48 Page 33 of 39Site Visit Report - SV10489 - Town of Monaghan Co-Operative Agricultural and Dairy Society Page 36 of 43
Fitz ScientificP0815-02CAR17-01Yar: 2017 Visit no: 1_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Town of Monaghan Co-OperativeIndustrial Emissions Licence P0815-02
Particulates BS EN 13284-1:2002Company Town of Monaghan Co-Operative Date of Test 23/08/2017Site Coolshannagh, Monaghan, Co Monaghan. Reference No P0815-02Plant Identification AE-1 Operator Id MM11 1120Test carried out by Aadil Khan TE's TE1, TE2, TE3, TE4
Report Number: P0815-02CAR17-01
Particulate ConcentrationsLab Results g Certificate Number: Laboratory: Accreditation status: Analytical Method Date of AnalysisFilter #1 0.07915 5790/625/05 Fitz Scientific MCERTS Gravimetry 30/08/2017Rinse 0.00078 5790/625/06 Fitz Scientific MCERTSFilter Blank 0.00006 5790/625/07 Fitz Scientific MCERTSRinse Blank 0.00005 5790/625/08 Fitz Scientific MCERTSLOD Filter 0.00006 n/aLOD Nozzle Wash 0.00005 n/aTotal Particulate g mg Deviation?LOD 0.00011 0.11 Nozzle 10 FALSERun 0.07993 79.93 Isokinetic Ratio -1.1 FALSEBlank 0.00011 0.11 5 up / 2 down (Y/N?) No TRUE
No of ports 1 TRUERequirements:
Dry at Gas Meter: (Vg) 1.02400 m3 Blank < 10% ELV FALSEGas Meter Temperature: (tg) 22.88700 295.887 K ELV>5mg/m3 --> LOD<10%ELV FALSEAmbient Pressure Measured:(Pa) 100.41100 KPa ELV<=5mg/m3 --> LOD<20%ELV FALSEGas Volume STP (Vgn) 0.936501691 m3Gas Volume Factor Correction: 0.98240Corrected Volume STP 0.920019262 m3
Resultsmg/Nm3 @ STP Dry Gas
mg/Nm3 @ STP Dry Gas Ref Oxygen Uncertainty mg/m3 kg/h Uncertainty Kg/h
LOD 0.1 0.1 n/a 0.001 n/aRun 86.9 100.2 3.317 0.615 0.02035Blank 0.1 0.1 0.005 0.001 0.00003
O2 meas = 5.384305552 %O2 Reference = 3 %
Flow Rate as reference conditions 6134.32 m3/hr
Before Blank : After Blank: Before Sample After SampleLeak Test Results: 0 0 0.1 0.15 cc/min
Calculation spreadsheet v.48
Page 34 of 39
Site Visit Report - SV10489 - Town of Monaghan Co-Operative Agricultural and Dairy Society Page 37 of 43
Fitz ScientificP0815-02CAR17-01Yar: 2017 Visit no: 1_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Town of Monaghan Co-OperativeIndustrial Emissions Licence P0815-02
Run CalculationsUncertainty calculation for EN 13284 Determination of low range mass concentration of dust, Manual Gravimetric Methodv14 Measurement EquationLimit value (ELV) 150 mg.m-3 Reference oxygen 3 % by volumeMeasured concentration 100.2 mg.m-3 (at reference conditions)
Measured Quantities Symbol Value Standard uncertainty Units Uncertainty as percentage Uncertainty aRequirement of stdSampled Volume Vm 0.920019262 uVm 0.001 m3 0.11 <=2%Sampled gas Temperature Tm 470.985 uTm 2 k 0.42 <=1%Sampled gas Pressure ρm 100.392 uρm 1 kPa 1.00 <=1%Sampled gas Humidity Hm 5.080532585 uHm 1 % by volume 19.68 <=1%Oxygen content O2,m 5.384305552 uO2,m 0.1 % by volume 1.86 <=5%Mass particulate m 79.93 um 0.00 mg 0.00 0.00 <5% of limit valueNote - Sampled gas humidity, temperature and pressure are values at the gas meterLeak L 0.0008152 % 0.00 <=2%Uncollected Mass UCM 0 mg 0 <=10%(Instack filter - no rinse)Intermediate calculationsFactor for std conds fs 0.55uncertainty components symbol sensitivity coeff u (in units of fs)
ρm 0.005 0.005Hm 0.006 0.006Tm 0.001 0.002ufs 0.008 1.51
Corrected volume V 0.50 uV 0.008 m3 1.52
Factor for O2 correction fc 1.15uncertainty components symbol sensitivity coeff u
O2,m 0.07 0.007Factor for O2 Correction ufc 1.15 0.007 0.64
Parameter Value Units Sensitivity coeff Uncertainty contribution Uncertainty as %Corrected Volume (standard V 0.50 m3 199.80 1.53 mg.m-3 1.52 %Mass m 79.93 mg 1.25 0.00 mg.m-3 0.00 %Factor for O2 Correction fc 1.15 86.88 0.65 mg.m-3 0.64 %Leak L 0.00 mg.m-3 1.00 0.00 mg.m-3 0.00 %Uncollected mass UCM 0.00 mg 1.25 0.00 mg.m-3 0.00 %Combined measurement uncertainty 1.66 mg.m-3
Expanded uncertainty as percentage of measured value 3.31 % measured of value expressed with a level of confidence of 95%(Using a coverage factor k=2)
Expanded uncertainty in units of measurement 3.32 mg.m-3
Expanded uncertainty as percentage of limit value 2.2 % ELV
Requirement in standard is for uncertainty to be < 30% at ELV at standard conditions
sm fVV
m
refc O
Of
,2
,2
2121
cfVmc
3.101273
100)100( m
m
ms T
Hf
Calculation spreadsheet v.48
Page 35 of 39
Site Visit Report - SV10489 - Town of Monaghan Co-Operative Agricultural and Dairy Society Page 38 of 43
Fitz ScientificP0815-02CAR17-01Yar: 2017 Visit no: 1_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Town of Monaghan Co-OperativeIndustrial Emissions Licence P0815-02
Blank CalculationsUncertainty calculation for EN 13284 Determination of low range mass concentration of dust, Manual Gravimetric Methodv14
Measurement EquationLimit value (ELV) 15 mg.m-3 Reference oxygen 3 % by volumeMeasured concentration 0.1 mg.m-3 (at reference conditions)
Measured Quantities Symbol Value Standard uncertainty Units Uncertainty as percentage Uncertainty aRequirement of stdSampled Volume Vm 0.920019262 uVm 0.001 m3 0.11 <=2%Sampled gas Temperature Tm 470.985 uTm 2 k 0.42 <=1%Sampled gas Pressure ρm 100.392 uρm 1 kPa 1.00 <=1%Sampled gas Humidity Hm 5.080532585 uHm 1 % by volume 19.68 <=1%Oxygen content O2,m 5.384305552 uO2,m 0.1 % by volume 1.86 <=5%Mass particulate m 0.11 um 0.00 mg 0.00 0.00 <5% of limit valueNote - Sampled gas humidity, temperature and pressure are values at the gas meterLeak L 0 % 0.00 <=2%Uncollected Mass UCM 0 mg 0 <=10%(Instack filter - no rinse)Intermediate calculationsFactor for std conds fs 0.55uncertainty components symbol sensitivity coeff u (in units of fs)
ρm 0.005 0.005Hm 0.006 0.006Tm 0.001 0.002ufs 0.008 1.51
Corrected volume V 0.50 uV 0.008 m3 1.52
Factor for O2 correction fc 1.15uncertainty components symbol sensitivity coeff u
O2,m 0.07 0.007Factor for O2 Correction ufc 1.15 0.007 0.64
Parameter Value Units Sensitivity coeff Uncertainty contribution Uncertainty as %Corrected Volume (standard V 0.50 m3 0.27 0.00 mg.m-3 0.00 %Mass m 0.11 mg 1.25 0.00 mg.m-3 0.00 %Factor for O2 Correction fc 1.15 0.12 0.00 mg.m-3 0.00 %Leak L 0.00 mg.m-3 1.00 0.00 mg.m-3 0.00 %Uncollected mass UCM 0.00 mg 1.25 0.00 mg.m-3 0.00 %Combined measurement uncertainty 0.00 mg.m-3
Expanded uncertainty as percentage of measured value 3.31 % measured of value expressed with a level of confidence of 95%(Using a coverage factor k=2)
Expanded uncertainty in units of measurement 0.00 mg.m-3
Expanded uncertainty as percentage of limit value 0.0 % ELVNote:
sm fVV
m
refc O
Of
,2
,2
2121
3.101273
100)100( m
m
ms T
Hf
cfVmc
Calculation spreadsheet v.48
Page 36 of 39
Site Visit Report - SV10489 - Town of Monaghan Co-Operative Agricultural and Dairy Society Page 39 of 43
Fitz ScientificP0815-02CAR17-01Yar: 2017 Visit no: 1_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Town of Monaghan Co-OperativeIndustrial Emissions Licence P0815-02
SO2 BS EN 14791:2017Company: Town of Monaghan Co-Operative Date of test: 23/08/2017Site: Coolshannagh, Monaghan, Co Monaghan. Reference No: P0815-02Plant Identification AE-1 Operator Id MM11 1120Test Carried out by: Aadil Khan TE's TE1, TE2, TE3, TE4Report Number: P0815-02CAR17-01
Run Laboratory Results: mgSO4/L Cert Number: Laboratory Accredtation Analytical MethDate of AnalysisLOQ 0.1 Fitz Scientific MCERTS IC 01/09/2017Impinger 1 365.600 5790/625/01 Fitz Scientific MCERTSImpinger 2 0.236 5790/625/02 Fitz Scientific MCERTS
BlankImpinger 1 0.100 5790/625/03 Fitz Scientific MCERTSImpinger 2 0.100 5790/625/04 Fitz Scientific MCERTS
Run BlankSample Volumes
ml L ml L181.8 0.1818 130.0 0.13144.6 0.1446 124.1 0.1241
0.063007298 Nm3
SO4 mgmgSO2/m3 at
STP,Dry
mgSO2/m3 at Reference Conditions
Uncertainty mgSO2/m3 SO2 kg/hr
Uncertainty SO2 kg/hr
LOQ 0.03 0.3 0.4 n/a 0.002444084 n/aRun 66.50 703.6 811.8 75.29 4.979536679 0.461823786Blank 0.03 0.3 0.3 0.03 0.001902701 0.000176465
3 %5.4 %
6134.32 m3/hr
DeviationAbsorption efficiency(Impinger 1 should absorb 95% of total sulphate): 99.9 % Deviation FALSEor result in second absorber should be <LOQ
Sampled Volume corrected to reference conditionsSTP, Dry
Flow Rate at reference conditions
Reference oxygen:Measured oxygen:
Calculation spreadsheet v.48
Page 37 of 39
Site Visit Report - SV10489 - Town of Monaghan Co-Operative Agricultural and Dairy Society Page 40 of 43
Fitz ScientificP0815-02CAR17-01Yar: 2017 Visit no: 1_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Town of Monaghan Co-OperativeIndustrial Emissions Licence P0815-02
Uncertainty calculation for EN 14791 Determination of mass concentration of sulphur dioxide, Reference methodV2RunLimit value (ELV) 1700 mg.m-3 Reference oxygen 3 % by volumeMeasured concen 811.8 mg.m-3 (at reference conditions)
Measured QuantitSymbol Value Standard uncertainty Units Uncertainty as percUncertainty at lv Requirement of stdSampled Volume Vm 0.063007298 uVm 0.001 m3 1.59 <=2%Sampled gas Tem Tm 470.985 uTm 2 k 2.00 <2.5 kSampled gas Pres ρm 100.392 uρm 1 kPa 1.00 <=1%Sampled gas Hum Hm 5.080532585 uHm 1 % by volume 19.68 <=1%Oxygen content O2,m 5.38 uO2,m 0.1 % by volume 1.86 <=5%Concentration in C 365.8 uC 10.97508 mg/l 3.00 <5%Impinger solution VS 326.4 uVS 0.001 l 0.00 <1%Mass SO2 m 66.5 um 2.00 mg 3.00 1.43 <5% of limit valueNote - Sampled gas humidity, temperature and pressure are values at the gas meteLeak L 2 % 2.00 <=2%
Intermediate calculationsFactor for std con fs 0.55uncertainty comp symbolsensitivity coeff u (in units of fs)
ρm 0.005 0.005Hm 0.006 0.006Tm 0.001 0.002ufs 0.008 1.51
Corrected volume V 0.03 uV 0.001 m3 3.28
Factor for O2 cor fc 1.15uncertainty comp symbolsensitivity coeff u
O2,m 0.07 0.007Factor for O2 Cor ufc 1.15 0.007 0.64
Parameter Value Units Sensitivity coeff Uncertainty contribution Uncertainty as %Corrected Volume V 0.03 m3 23628.24 26.62 mg.m-3 3.28 %Mass m 66.50 mg 12.21 24.35 mg.m-3 3.00 %Factor for O2 Corre fc 1.15 703.62 5.23 mg.m-3 0.64 %Leak L 9.37 mg.m-3 1.00 9.37 mg.m-3 1.15 %
Combined uncertainty 37.64 mg.m-3
Expanded uncertainty as percentage of measured value 9.27 % measured of value expressed with a level of confidence of 95%(Using a coverage factor k=2)
Expanded uncertainty in units of measurement 75.29 mg.m-3
Expanded uncertainty as percentqge of limit value 4.4 % ELV
sm fVV
m
refc O
Of
,2
,2
2121
cfVmc
3.101273
100)100( m
m
ms T
Hf
Calculation spreadsheet v.48
Page 38 of 39
Site Visit Report - SV10489 - Town of Monaghan Co-Operative Agricultural and Dairy Society Page 41 of 43
Fitz ScientificP0815-02CAR17-01Yar: 2017 Visit no: 1_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Town of Monaghan Co-OperativeIndustrial Emissions Licence P0815-02
Uncertainty calculation for EN 14791 Determination of mass concentration of sulphur dioxide, Reference methodBlank
Limit value (ELV) 170 mg.m-3 Reference oxygen 3 % by volumeMeasured concen 0.3 mg.m-3 (at reference conditions)
Measured QuantitSymbol Value Standard uncertainty Units Uncertainty as percUncertainty at lv Requirement of stdSampled Volume Vm 0.1 uVm 0.001 m3 1.59 <=2%Sampled gas Tem Tm 470.985 uTm 2 k 2.00 <2.5 kSampled gas Pres ρm 100.392 uρm 1 kPa 1.00 <=1%Sampled gas Hum Hm 5.080532585 uHm 1 % by volume 19.68 <=1%Oxygen content O2,m 5.38 uO2,m 0.1 % by volume 1.86 <=5%Concentration in C 0.2 uC 0.006 mg/l 3.00 <5%Impinger solution VS 254.1 uVS 0.001 l 0.00 <1%Mass SO2 m 0.0 um 0.00 mg 3.00 0.01 <5% of limit valueNote - Sampled gas humidity, temperature and pressure are values at the gas meteLeak L 2 % 2.00 <=2%
Intermediate calculationsFactor for std con fs 0.55uncertainty comp symbolsensitivity coeff u (in units of fs)
ρm 0.005 0.005Hm 0.006 0.006Tm 0.001 0.002ufs 0.008 1.51
Corrected volume V 0.03 uV 0.001 m3 3.28
Factor for O2 cor fc 1.15uncertainty comp symbolsensitivity coeff u
O2,m 0.07 0.007Factor for O2 Cor ufc 1.15 0.007 0.64
Parameter Value Units Sensitivity coeff Uncertainty contribution Uncertainty as %Corrected Volume V 0.03 m3 9.03 0.01 mg.m-3 3.28 %Mass m 0.03 mg 12.21 0.01 mg.m-3 3.00 %Factor for O2 Corre fc 1.15 0.27 0.00 mg.m-3 0.64 %Leak L 0.00 mg.m-3 1.00 0.00 mg.m-3 1.15 %
Combined uncertainty 0.01 mg.m-3
Expanded uncertainty as percentage of measured value 9.27 % measured of value expressed with a level of confidence of 95%(Using a coverage factor k=2)
Expanded uncertainty in units of measurement 0.03 mg.m-3
Expanded uncertainty as percentqge of limit value 0.0 % ELV
sm fVV
m
refc O
Of
,2
,2
2121
cfVmc
3.101273
100)100( m
m
ms T
Hf
Calculation spreadsheet v.48
Page 39 of 39
Site Visit Report - SV10489 - Town of Monaghan Co-Operative Agricultural and Dairy Society Page 42 of 43
Summary
FOLLOW-UP ACTIONS
You are required to complete the instructions and actions, as outlined in this report, within the specified timeframe. Where required, you shall respond to actions specified in Compliance Investigations within the required timeframe.The licensee shall maintain documentary evidence, for review by the EPA, that the prescribed corrective actions were completed within the required timeframe.
(i) Compliance Investigations
You are not required to respond directly to items contained in this EPA site visit report; where an issue requires a direct response, the EPA will generate a Compliance Investigation through the EDEN system. You will receive notification when a Compliance Investigation instruction or action is generated.
(ii) Publication of reports and licensee response.
Please note that this Site Visit Report will be made available for public viewing via the EPA’s Licence Enforcement Access Portal within one day of the issue date and will be published on the Licence Details Page of the EPA’s website, www.epa.ie, that relates to your licence 60 calendar days after the issue date.
You may if you choose submit, within 45 calendar days of the issue date of this Site Visit Report, a Licensee Public Response that will be published alongside the Site Visit Report. This Response, should you wish to avail of it, provides you with an opportunity to inform the public about how you are implementing the actions set out in the report, activities underway, timescales and target completion dates. Please be aware that the content of your Licensee Public Response must be factual and should not breach the EPAs stated online publication standards.
If you wish to submit a Licensee Public Response to an EPA Site Visit Report, you should do this by clicking on the ‘Make a Response’ link on the Site Visits page in EDEN. A .pdf document containing your response can be attached and submitted from here.
(iii) Response to Site visit report
Where you do wish to respond directly to a site visit report, you should do this by generating a ‘Licensee Return’ of the type ‘Site Updates/Notifications’ and the sub-type ‘Response to EPA Report’ in EDEN.
Please note that you are required to comply with the conditions of your licence at all times, and where noncompliance occurs you must restore compliance within the shortest possible time. These actions will be verified during subsequent EPA visits.
Please quote the above Inspection Reference Number in any future correspondence in relation to this Report.
Site Visit Report - SV10489 - Town of Monaghan Co-Operative Agricultural and Dairy Society Page 43 of 43