Date post: | 16-Jul-2015 |
Category: |
Health & Medicine |
Upload: | gaurav-acharya |
View: | 521 times |
Download: | 6 times |
Skeletal Age
Assessment
Presented by:
Dr. Gaurav Acharya
2nd year PG Resident
Department of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics
Peoples Dental College and Hospital, Kathmandu
Growth Prediction
Chronological Age
Dental Development
Growth Charts
Secondary Sexual
Characteristics
Skeletal Development
Hand wrist Radiograph
Most standardized method
Shows predictable and scheduled pattern of appearance, ossification & union.
Hand wrist Radiograph
Infancy
Toddlers
Pre-puberty
Puberty
Late Puberty
Post-puberty
Females: Birth to 10 months
Males: Birth to 14 months
Hamate Capitate
Hand wrist Radiograph
Infancy
Toddlers
Pre-puberty
Puberty
Late Puberty
Post-puberty
Females: 10 months to 2 years
Males: 14 months to 3 years
Hand wrist Radiograph
Infancy
Toddlers
Pre-puberty
Puberty
Late Puberty
Post-puberty
Females: 10 months to 2 years
Males: 14 months to 3 years
Hand wrist Radiograph
Infancy
Toddlers
Pre-puberty
Puberty
Late Puberty
Post-puberty
Females: 10 months to 2 years
Males: 14 months to 3 years
Hand wrist Radiograph
Infancy
Toddlers
Pre-puberty
Puberty
Late Puberty
Post-puberty
Females: 10 months to 2 years
Males: 14 months to 3 years
Hand wrist Radiograph
Infancy
Toddlers
Pre-puberty
Puberty
Late Puberty
Post-puberty
Females: 2 years to 7 years
Males: 3 years to 9 years
Hand wrist Radiograph
Infancy
Toddlers
Pre-puberty
Puberty
Late Puberty
Post-puberty
Females: 7 years to 13 years
Males: 9 years to 14 years
Hand wrist Radiograph
Infancy
Toddlers
Pre-puberty
Puberty
Late Puberty
Post-puberty
Females: 13 years to 15 years
Males: 14 years to 16 years
Hand wrist Radiograph
Infancy
Toddlers
Pre-puberty
Puberty
Late Puberty
Post-puberty
Females: 13 years to 15 years
Males: 14 years to 16 years
Hand wrist Radiograph
Infancy
Toddlers
Pre-puberty
Puberty
Late Puberty
Post-puberty
Females: 13 years to 15 years
Males: 14 years to 16 years
Hand wrist Radiograph
Infancy
Toddlers
Pre-puberty
Puberty
Late Puberty
Post-puberty
Females: 13 years to 15 years
Males: 14 years to 16 years
Hand wrist Radiograph
Infancy
Toddlers
Pre-puberty
Puberty
Late Puberty
Post-puberty
Females: 15 years to 17 years
Males: 17 years to 19 years
Hand wrist Radiograph
Different methods of assessing
1. Atlas of Greulich and Pyle (1959)
2. Bjork Method (1972)
3. Fishman Method (1982)
4. Hagg and Taranger (1982)
Cervical Vertebra
Suggested by Lamparski in 1972.
Possible with routinely taken lateral cephalograms
Cervical Vertebra
Variables analyzed:
1. Concavity at lower border of C2, C3 & C4
2. Shape of the body of C3 and C4
Trapezoid : least mature
Rectangular horizontal
Squared
Rectangular vertical : in adult life
Cervical Vertebra
Hassel & Farman1 suggested 6 stages of cervical vertebral maturation
1- Brent Hassel and Allan Farman. Skeletal maturation evaluation using cervical vertebrae, AJODO 1995:107:58-66
1. Initiation
2. Acceleration
3. Transition
4. Decceleration
5. Maturation
6. Completion
Cervical Vetebra
Init
iati
on
Acc
eler
atio
n
Tra
nsi
tion
Dec
cele
rati
on
Mat
ura
tion
Com
ple
tion
C2
C3
C4
Cervical Vertebrae
Co- relation of Hand wrist & Cervical Vertebra maturation Stages1
1- Garcia fernandez. The cervical vertebrae as maturational indicators, JCO APRIL 1998
Frontal Sinus
Study done by Ruf and Pancherz in 19961
1- Sabine Ruf, Hans Pancherz. Frontal Sinus Development as an indicator for somatic maturity at puberty?, AJODO 1996;110:476-82
Frontal Sinus
Radiographs taken at yearly intervals.
Average yearly growth velocity (millimeters per year) of the frontal sinus was calculated
Frontal Sinus
From longitudinal growth data of the subjects, the average yearly body height growth velocity (millimeters per year) was calculated
Frontal Sinus
Frontal sinus growth velocity at puberty is closely related to body height growth velocity.
Frontal sinus growth shows a well-defined pubertal peak (Sp) which on the average occurs 1.5 yr after body ht. peak
Midpalatine Suture1
Amount of approximation of the midpalatal suture compared with stages of ossification of the hand-wrist according to the Fishman’s system
1- Bernal Revalo, Fishman. Maturational evaluation of ossification of the mid palatal suture, AJO MARCH 1994
Midpalatine Suture
Key landmarks -
Point A→ most anterior point of premaxilla
Point B→ most posterior point on the posterior wall of the incisive foramen
Point P→ Point on the line tangent to the posterior walls of the greater palatine foramen
Midpalatine Suture
• A-P (total dimension of the suture)
• A-B (anterior dimension of the suture)
• B-P (posterior dimension of the suture)
• Percentage of osseous development were recorded
Midpalatine SutureResults
Increase in sutural approximation as SMI stages progressed.
SMI 1&2- decreased suturalapprox.
After SMI 9- significant increase in the sutural approx.
No significant difference b/n sexes.
Midpalatine Suture
Conclusion:
Best to accomplish ME-before SMI 9.
Ideal time- SMI 1- 4
Less orthopedic force required.
Mid palatal approx. occurs more posteriorly.
Conclusion
Chronological age of an individual is often not sufficient to assess the development age and somatic maturity of the patient
Skeletal age derived from Hand-wrist radiograph and cervical vertebra radiograph provide a reliable and efficient means of assessment.
Frontal sinus & midpalatine sutute evaluation are the new approaches for the skeletal maturity assessment
References
Vicente Gilsanz, Osman Ratib. Bone Age : A Digital Atlas of Skeletal Maturity, Springer publication 2005
Greulich-Pyle Hand &Wrist Atlas
Brent Hassel and Allan Farman. Skeletal maturation evaluation using cervical vertebrae, AJODO 1995:107:58-66
Sabine Ruf, Hans Pancherz. Frontal Sinus Development as an indicator for somatic maturity at puberty?, AJODO 1996;110:476-82
Heinrich Wehrbein and Faruk Yildizhan. Mid-palatal suture in young adults. European Journal of Orthodontics 23 (2001) 105—114
Garcia fernandez. The cervical vertebrae as maturational
indicators, JCO APRIL 1998