+ All Categories
Home > Documents > SkiboAppA-EA taylor cmn AMSa123.g.akamai.net/7/123/11558/abc123/forestservic... · 2013. 6. 19. ·...

SkiboAppA-EA taylor cmn AMSa123.g.akamai.net/7/123/11558/abc123/forestservic... · 2013. 6. 19. ·...

Date post: 26-Jan-2021
Category:
Upload: others
View: 0 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
64
Skibo Project Environmental Assessment June 2013 A-1 Appendix A APPENDIX A VEGETATION TREATMENT DESCRIPTIONS AND UNIT SPECIFIC DESIGN CRITERIA The table below describes the Skibo Project proposed vegetation treatments associated with Alternative 2. The treatment codes (listed with the treatment title in the first column below) are associated with each stand included for the proposed alternative. Alternative 3 (No Herbicide Use Alternative) is similar to Alternative 2, with the difference of mechanical methods of site preparation and no herbicide application. Secondary treatment codes and definitions are shown in Table A-2 and are applied as proposed to the stands in Appendix B-1. Reforestation treatment codes and definitions are shown in Table A-3 and are applied as proposed to the stands in Appendix B-1. The secondary and reforestation treatments are not indicated on the Alternative 2 Map. Tables A-4 defines the forest type codes used and Table A-5 defines the harvest mitigations that can be found for each unit in Appendix B. Table A-1: Description of Primary Treatment Types for the Skibo Project Primary Treatment Description CCR Stand Clearcut (with leave trees). An even-aged regeneration or harvest method that removes most trees in the stand producing an exposed microclimate for the development of a new age class in one entry. A minor (less than approximately ten percent of full stocking) live component is retained for reasons other than regeneration. Coppice cut (with leave trees). A regeneration method in which most trees in the previous stand are cut and most of the regeneration is from sprouts or root suckers. A minor (less than approximately ten percent of full stocking) live component is retained for reasons other than regeneration. SW Seed-tree seed cut (with and without leave trees). A type of cut that removes trees except those needed for the purposes of seed production. Prepares the seed bed and creates a new age class in an exposed microenvironment. Additional trees may be retained to provide a minor (less than approximately ten percent of full stocking) live component after the removal cut, for reasons other than regeneration. TH Commercial thin, predominately pine and spruce stands. An intermediate harvest with the objective of reducing stand density primarily to improve growth, enhance forest health, and other resources objectives. Treatment can recover potential mortality while producing merchantable material. Thinning includes the following: chemical, crown, free, low, mechanical or row, and selection. TH-SF Commercial thin, predominately deciduous/balsam fir stands. An intermediate harvest with the objective of reducing stand density primarily to improve growth, enhance forest health, and other resources objectives. Treatment can recover potential mortality while producing merchantable material. NHR Non-harvest reforestation. Converting a stand back to a forested condition without harvest. FT Fuels treatment. Fuels thinning. Selective felling of trees and shrubs for non-commercial hazardous fuels reduction purposes only.
Transcript
  • Skibo Project Environmental Assessment

    June 2013 A-1 Appendix A

    APPENDIX A VEGETATION TREATMENT DESCRIPTIONS AND

    UNIT SPECIFIC DESIGN CRITERIA

    The table below describes the Skibo Project proposed vegetation treatments associated with Alternative 2. The treatment codes (listed with the treatment title in the first column below) are associated with each stand included for the proposed alternative. Alternative 3 (No Herbicide Use Alternative) is similar to Alternative 2, with the difference of mechanical methods of site preparation and no herbicide application. Secondary treatment codes and definitions are shown in Table A-2 and are applied as proposed to the stands in Appendix B-1. Reforestation treatment codes and definitions are shown in Table A-3 and are applied as proposed to the stands in Appendix B-1. The secondary and reforestation treatments are not indicated on the Alternative 2 Map. Tables A-4 defines the forest type codes used and Table A-5 defines the harvest mitigations that can be found for each unit in Appendix B. Table A-1: Description of Primary Treatment Types for the Skibo Project

    Primary Treatment

    Description

    CCR

    Stand Clearcut (with leave trees). An even-aged regeneration or harvest method that removes most trees in the stand producing an exposed microclimate for the development of a new age class in one entry. A minor (less than approximately ten percent of full stocking) live component is retained for reasons other than regeneration.

    Coppice cut (with leave trees). A regeneration method in which most trees in the previous stand are cut and most of the regeneration is from sprouts or root suckers. A minor (less than approximately ten percent of full stocking) live component is retained for reasons other than regeneration.

    SW

    Seed-tree seed cut (with and without leave trees). A type of cut that removes trees except those needed for the purposes of seed production. Prepares the seed bed and creates a new age class in an exposed microenvironment. Additional trees may be retained to provide a minor (less than approximately ten percent of full stocking) live component after the removal cut, for reasons other than regeneration.

    TH

    Commercial thin, predominately pine and spruce stands. An intermediate harvest with the objective of reducing stand density primarily to improve growth, enhance forest health, and other resources objectives. Treatment can recover potential mortality while producing merchantable material. Thinning includes the following: chemical, crown, free, low, mechanical or row, and selection.

    TH-SF Commercial thin, predominately deciduous/balsam fir stands. An intermediate harvest with the objective of reducing stand density primarily to improve growth, enhance forest health, and other resources objectives. Treatment can recover potential mortality while producing merchantable material.

    NHR Non-harvest reforestation. Converting a stand back to a forested condition without harvest.

    FT Fuels treatment. Fuels thinning. Selective felling of trees and shrubs for non-commercial hazardous fuels reduction purposes only.

  • Skibo Project Environmental Assessment

    June 2013 A-2 Appendix A

    Table A-2: Description of Secondary Treatment Types for the Skibo Project Secondary Treatments

    Description

    SP-MEC-SD Mechanical site preparation. Mechanical manipulation of a site to enhance the success of regeneration on sites that will be seeded, mainly jack pine or black spruce stands.

    SP-MEC-N Mechanical site preparation. Mechanical manipulation of a site to enhance the success of regeneration on sites that will be naturally seeded, mainly birch stands.

    SP-MEC-P Mechanical site preparation. Mechanical manipulation of a site to enhance the success of regeneration on sites that will be planted.

    SP-MEC-HB Herbicide site preparation. Herbicide manipulation of a site to enhance the success of regeneration on sites that will be naturally seeded, mainly birch stands.

    SP-BB Burning for site preparation. Manipulation of a site by prescribed burning to enhance the success of regeneration on sites that will be planted or seeded.

    BB

    Broadcast burning over most of a harvested unit. Prescribed burning activity where fire is applied to most or all of an area within well-defined boundaries for reduction of fuel hazard, as a resource management treatment, or both.

    UB

    Underburning over most of a mature stand, mainly pine. Prescribed burning activity where fire is applied to most or all of an area within well-defined boundaries for reduction of fuel hazard, as a resource management treatment, or both.

    NHRC Non-harvest restoration by crushing for the reduction of fuel hazards.

  • Skibo Project Environmental Assessment

    June 2013 A-3 Appendix A

    Table A-3: Description of Reforestation Treatment Types for the Skibo Project Reforestation Treatments

    Description

    SDBS

    Seed black spruce. Scattering or placement of seed more or less evenly over a designated area for establishment of forest stand or tree cover; includes broadcast, partial, full, or aerial seeding with or without site preparation.

    SDJP Seed jack pine. Scattering or placement of seed more or less evenly over a designated area for establishment of forest stand or tree cover; includes broadcast, partial, full, or aerial seeding with or without site preparation.

    SDJPBS

    Seed jack pine and black spruce. Scattering or placement of seed more or less evenly over a designated area for establishment of forest stand or tree cover; includes broadcast, partial, full, or aerial seeding with or without site preparation.

    SDJPRP

    Seed jack pine and red pine. Scattering or placement of seed more or less evenly over a designated area for establishment of forest stand or tree cover; includes broadcast, partial, full, or aerial seeding with or without site preparation.

    FPWP Full plant white pine trees. The establishment or re-establishment of forest cover by planting seedlings with or without site preparation.

    UPWP Underplant white pine trees under a canopy. Provide future white pine in stand. DP Diversity plant. Provide diversity in stand.

    Table A-4: Forest Type

    Forest Type Codes Forest Type

    1 Jack Pine

    2 Red Pine

    3 White Pine

    8 White Spruce

    11 Balsam-aspen/paper birch

    12 Black spruce

    16 White spruce – balsam fir

    17 Upland black spruce

    23 White spruce – balsam fir – aspen

  • Skibo Project Environmental Assessment

    June 2013 A-4 Appendix A

    Table A-5 includes descriptions (with codes) of stand-specific implementation practices needed to prepare stands for treatments. This site-specific stand direction is provided where site-specific information can be applied. All Forest Plan Operational Standards and Guidelines (Appendix C) will be considered for each stand and will be implemented if applicable, but may not be specified in the stands in the table of Appendix B-2. For example, during implementation, legacy patch location will depend on the actual size and condition of a stand (G-TM-5) and this information cannot be specified at this time. Table A-5: Stand-specific Implementation Treatment Codes and Definitions for Skibo Project Heritage Resources HR1 Site within unit will have one chain flagged buffer prior to project implementation. HR1, HR2 Site within and adjacent to unit - one chain buffer, also unsurveyed shoreline -

    survey needed. HR2 Unsurveyed shoreline will be surveyed prior to project implementation if

    recommended by heritage resource staff. Plants and Non-Native resources PLANT1 Rare plant occurrence. See comments for details. PLANT2 Avoid NNIS occurrences, either relocate skid trails, temp roads, landings if use

    would be in growing season, OR treat before use in growing season. See comments for details.

    Table A-4: Forest Type

    Forest Type Codes Forest Type

    24 Balsam fir

    30 Mixed pines

    71 Black ash-American elm/red maple

    84 Red maple (dry site)

    85 Sugar maple

    89 Mixed hardwoods

    91 Aspen

    92 Paper birch

    95 Aspen – white spruce/balsam fir

    97 Lowland shrubs

    98 Upland brush

  • Skibo Project Environmental Assessment

    June 2013 A-5 Appendix A

    Recreation REC1 Motorized trail within/adjacent to unit. Do not use system trails for hauling/

    skidding. Minimize trail crossings. Sign trail to warn of harvest/heavy equipment activity. Pile slash/logging debris out of view of trail. Repair damage to trail as it occurs.

    REC1/REC2 Shared use, all-season rec. route. Coordinate use of system trails for hauling/skidding. Minimize trail crossings. Sign trail to warn of harvest equipment activity. Pile slash/logging debris out of view of trail. Repair damage to route as it occurs.

    REC2 Non-motorized trail within/adjacent to unit. Do not use system trails for hauling/skidding. Minimize trail crossings. Sign trail to warn of harvest equipment activity. Pile slash/logging debris out of view of trail. Repair damage to trail as it occurs.

    REC3 Maintain 100ft buffer from edge of cleared area around developed and dispersed campsites. Retain shade trees within buffer area; trim lower branches if within fuel reduction units. Avoid periods of peak rec use.

    Soils S1 Harvest ops, temp roads, skid trails limited to frozen ground conditions. No fill in

    wetlands. S2 Harvest ops restricted to the dry season or to periods when the ground is frozen.

    Suspend operations if excessive rutting occurs. S2/S7 Harvest ops restricted to the dry season or to periods when the ground is frozen.

    Suspend operations if excessive rutting occurs. Avoid wetlands (ELT 2,4,5,6) in unit or operate under frozen conditions.

    S4 On slopes >18%, confine ops to lower end of slope. Slopes >35%, use equipment and techniques to minimize ops on slopes.

    S7 Avoid wetlands (ELT 2,4,5,6) in unit or operate under frozen conditions. Scenery SC1 Near Concern Level 1 road or High Scenic integrity area, follow scenic mitigations.

    Follow direction in Appendix C, SKB-SC-1, pg. C-19. SC2 Minimize visual impact of management activities within area seen from water

    body, rec access road, trail, or lookout. Use adequate buffers and natural screening between management and recreational areas. Pile slash/logging debris out of view of rec area.

    Wildlife WL11 Goshawk post-fledging area. No disturbance during nesting season (March 1 -

    August 30). WL12 Wolf den previously located in this stand. Check with Biologist for status. If

    active, no disturbance during denning season (April - June). WL2 Stick nest present, maintain 50-foot buffer around stick nests. WL6 Wood turtles may be present. No harvest from May 30 - Oct. 1st. Keep all roads a

    minimum of 330 feet from stream channel. Before site prep (mechanical or burning), look for wood turtles and remove from site.

  • Skibo Project Environmental Assessment

    June 2013 A-6 Appendix A

    Wetlands WS1 Stream > 5' in width and slope < 5%; no management within a tree length from the

    ordinary high water mark of the stream unless for riparian functions. WS3 Stream < 5' in width and slope < 5% = no management within 50' from the side of

    stream unless for riparian function. WS5 Lakes and Open Water Wetland with slope < 5%; no management within 100' of

    ordinary high water mark unless for riparian function. Season of Operation (Interdisciplinary)

    as All season

    w Winter (Frozen Ground)

    ws Winter or Summer (Dry or Frozen Ground)

  • Skibo Project Environmental Assessment

    June 2013 B-1 Appendix B

    APPENDIX B PROPOSED TREATMENTS BY STAND UNIT FOR ALTERNATIVE 2

    Table B-1 contains the treatment activities that would occur in each unit under Alternative 2. The treatment columns show the primary, secondary, and reforestation treatment types. If any reforestation activities are needed, it is listed in the reforestation column. This table also identifies the unit number and site-specific design criteria that would be implemented based on Appendix A treatment codes. The design criteria in Appendix C – Operational Standards and Guidelines also apply to all units. Units listed in Table B-1 with a secondary treatment of SP-HB* would have a secondary treatment of SP-MEC-N under Alternative 3.

    Table B-1: Proposed Treatment by Stand Unit for Alternative 2

    Unit Number Acres

    Forest Type Code

    Alternative 2 Design Criteria

    Primary

    Treatment

    Secondary Treatm

    ent

    Reforestation

    Season of H

    arvest

    Plants and

    NNIS

    Recreation Wildlife Wetlands Scenery Soil

    Heritage

    1  9  92  SW  SP‐MEC‐N     w                 S1    

    2  9  12  CCR  SP‐BB  SDBS  w                 S1    3  61  91  CCR  BB     w                 S1    4  6  95  CCR  SP‐BB  SDJPBS  ws                 S7    5  3  12  CCR  SP‐BB  SDBS  w                 S1    6  7  12  CCR  SP‐BB  SDBS  w                 S1    7  8  11  CCR        ws                 S7    8  9  12  CCR     SDBS  w     REC1           S1    9  11  91  SW  SP‐MEC‐P  FPWP  ws              SC1  S7    

    10  51  2  TH  UB     ws  PLANT2              S2    11  112  2  TH  UB     w  PLANT2              S1    

  • Skibo Project Environmental Assessment

    June 2013 B-2 Appendix B

    Table B-1: Proposed Treatment by Stand Unit for Alternative 2

    Unit Number Acres

    Forest Type Code

    Alternative 2 Design Criteria

    Primary

    Treatment

    Secondary Treatm

    ent

    Reforestation

    Season of H

    arvest

    Plants and

    NNIS

    Recreation Wildlife Wetlands Scenery Soil

    Heritage

    12  8  16  TH        ws  PLANT2              S2    13  15  95  CCR        ws                 S7    14  17  95  CCR        w                 S1    15  12  91  CCR        ws                 S7    16  23  95  CCR        w                 S1    17  31  95  CCR        ws                 S7    18  25  95  CCR        ws  PLANT2           SC1  S7    19  10  91  CCR  SP‐BB  SDJP  ws  PLANT2           SC1  S2    20  35  23  FT  NHRC     ws  PLANT2  REC3        SC  S7    21  12  95  CCR        ws     REC2           S7    22  57  92  SW  SP‐MEC‐N     ws     REC2           S7    

    23  20  92  CCR  SP‐MEC‐SD  SDJP  ws     REC2           S7    

    24  26  11  CCR        w  PLANT2              S1    25  23  1  CCR  SP‐BB  SDJPBS  w                 S1    26  8  16  CCR  SP‐BB  SDJPBS  w        WL6  WS1  SC1  S1  HR2 27  19  95  CCR  SP‐BB  SDJPBS  w        WL6  WS1  SC1  S1  HR2 28  20  95  SW  SP‐MEC‐P  FPWP  ws        WL6  WS1  SC1  S7    29  26  2  TH        ws  PLANT2  REC2           S2    30  14  16  TH        wr  PLANT2  REC1/REC2           S1    31  113  91  CCR        w  PLANT2  REC2           S1    

  • Skibo Project Environmental Assessment

    June 2013 B-3 Appendix B

    Table B-1: Proposed Treatment by Stand Unit for Alternative 2

    Unit Number Acres

    Forest Type Code

    Alternative 2 Design Criteria

    Primary

    Treatment

    Secondary Treatm

    ent

    Reforestation

    Season of H

    arvest

    Plants and

    NNIS

    Recreation Wildlife Wetlands Scenery Soil

    Heritage

    32  61  91  CCR        w  PLANT2  REC2        SC1  S1  HR2 33  27  92  SW  SP‐MEC‐P  UPWP  w     REC1     WS1  SC1  S1  HR2 34  19  91  SW  SP‐MEC‐P  UPWP  w  PLANT2  REC1     WS1  SC1  S1  HR2 35  13  16  TH        w  PLANT2              S1    36  4  2  TH        as                      37  4  2  TH        as                      38  5  2  TH        ws                 S2    39  11  2  TH        ws                 S2    40  11  2  TH        as                      41  7  2  TH        ws                 S2    42  24  2  TH        ws                 S2    43  9  3  TH        ws                 S2    44  122  16  TH        ws                 S7    45  26  2  TH        ws   PLANT2              S2    46  4  2  TH        ws  PLANT1              S2    47  65  2  TH        w  PLANT1              S1    48  30  2  TH        ws  PLANT2              S2    49  97  2  TH        ws  PLANT1              S2    50  36  2  TH        ws  PLANT2              S2    51  28  2  TH        ws                 S2    52  24  3  TH        ws        WL2        S2    

  • Skibo Project Environmental Assessment

    June 2013 B-4 Appendix B

    Table B-1: Proposed Treatment by Stand Unit for Alternative 2

    Unit Number Acres

    Forest Type Code

    Alternative 2 Design Criteria

    Primary

    Treatment

    Secondary Treatm

    ent

    Reforestation

    Season of H

    arvest

    Plants and

    NNIS

    Recreation Wildlife Wetlands Scenery Soil

    Heritage

    53  21  3  TH        ws                 S2    54  11  3  TH        ws                 S2    55  84  1  CCR  SP‐BB  SDJP  ws  PLANT2              S2/S7    56  2  91  CCR  SP‐BB  SDJPRP  ws  PLANT2              S2    57  11  2  TH  UB     ws                 S2    58  10  91  CCR  SP‐BB  SDJPRP  w                 S1    59  31  2  TH  UB     ws  PLANT2              S7    60  8  91  CCR  SP‐BB  SDJPRP  w                 S1    61  18  91  CCR  SP‐BB  SDJPRP  w                 S1    62  1  91  CCR  SP‐BB  SDJPRP  w                 S1    63  4  2  TH  UB     w                 S1    64  13  2  TH  UB     ws                 S7    65  20  30  TH  UB     ws                 S2    66  33  3  TH  UB     ws                 S2    67  15  16  TH  UB     w                 S1    68  12  2  TH  UB     ws                 S2    69  5  95  CCR  SP‐BB  SDJPRP  w                 S1    70  14  1  CCR  SP‐BB  SDJP  ws                 S2    71  13  2  TH  UB     ws                 S2    72  11  91  FT  UB     ws                 S2    73  13  2  TH  UB     ws  PLANT2              S2  HR1 

  • Skibo Project Environmental Assessment

    June 2013 B-5 Appendix B

    Table B-1: Proposed Treatment by Stand Unit for Alternative 2

    Unit Number Acres

    Forest Type Code

    Alternative 2 Design Criteria

    Primary

    Treatment

    Secondary Treatm

    ent

    Reforestation

    Season of H

    arvest

    Plants and

    NNIS

    Recreation Wildlife Wetlands Scenery Soil

    Heritage

    74  5  2  TH  UB     ws  PLANT2  REC1/REC2        SC2  S2    75  2  97  FT  UB     ws     REC1/REC2        SC2  S2    76  15  91  FT        ws  PLANT2  REC1/REC2        SC2  S2    77  29  2  TH  UB     ws  PLANT2  REC1/REC2        SC2  S7    78  10  16  TH        ws                 S2    79  29  16  TH        w                 S1    80  48  16  TH        ws  PLANT2  REC1           S2  HR1 81  83  2  TH        ws     REC1           S2    82  38  2  TH        ws     REC1           S2    83  19  2  TH        ws      REC1           S2    84  11  2  TH        ws  PLANT2  REC1           S2    85  8  2  TH        ws     REC1           S2    86  10  2  TH        ws                 S2    88  17  3  TH        ws                 S2    89  36  3  TH        ws                 S2    90  8  2  TH        ws                 S7    92  7  2  TH        w     REC1           S1    93  29  2  TH        ws     REC1           S7    94  4  16  TH        w  PLANT2  REC1           S1    95  25  92  SW  SP‐MEC‐N     ws                 S7    96  23  92  SW  SP‐MEC‐N     ws                 S7    

  • Skibo Project Environmental Assessment

    June 2013 B-6 Appendix B

    Table B-1: Proposed Treatment by Stand Unit for Alternative 2

    Unit Number Acres

    Forest Type Code

    Alternative 2 Design Criteria

    Primary

    Treatment

    Secondary Treatm

    ent

    Reforestation

    Season of H

    arvest

    Plants and

    NNIS

    Recreation Wildlife Wetlands Scenery Soil

    Heritage

    97  19  92  SW  SP‐MEC‐N     w                 S1    98  13  92  SW  SP‐MEC‐N     w                 S1    99  23  95  CCR        w                 S1    

    100  7  2  TH        ws                 S2    101  41  95  CCR        w     REC1           S1    103  28  91  CCR        ws     REC1           S7    104  17  91  CCR        ws                 S7    105  23  91  CCR        ws                 S7    106  28  91  CCR        w                 S1    107  61  91  CCR        ws  PLANT2  REC1           S2    108  29  71  CCR        ws                 S2    109  14  71  CCR        w     REC1           S1    110  14  95  CCR        w     REC1           S1    111  12  1  CCR  SP‐MEC‐N     ws     REC1           S2    112  9  91  CCR        ws  PLANT2  REC1           S2    113  7  11  CCR        ws     REC1           S2    114  7  95  CCR        ws     REC1     WS3     S2    115  3  71  CCR        as  PLANT2        WS3          116  20  95  CCR        w  PLANT2        WS3     S1    117  41  71  CCR        w                 S1    118  31  92  SW  SP‐MEC‐N     w  PLANT1              S1    

  • Skibo Project Environmental Assessment

    June 2013 B-7 Appendix B

    Table B-1: Proposed Treatment by Stand Unit for Alternative 2

    Unit Number Acres

    Forest Type Code

    Alternative 2 Design Criteria

    Primary

    Treatment

    Secondary Treatm

    ent

    Reforestation

    Season of H

    arvest

    Plants and

    NNIS

    Recreation Wildlife Wetlands Scenery Soil

    Heritage

    119  34  92  SW  SP‐MEC‐N     w                 S1    120  41  91  CCR        w  PLANT2              S1    121  11  92  SW  SP‐MEC‐N     w                 S1    122  9  95  CCR        w                 S1    123  12  95  CCR        ws                 S2    124  17  95  CCR        w                 S1    125  14  95  CCR        w                 S1    126  3  95  CCR        ws                 S2    127  33  12  CCR  SP‐BB  SDBS  w                 S1    128  20  12  CCR  SP‐BB  SDBS  w           WS3     S1    129  18  11  CCR        w           WS3     S1    130  11  95  CCR        w                 S1    131  19  11  CCR        w                 S1    132  12  17  CCR        ws                 S7    133  12  95  CCR        w                 S1    134  19  95  CCR        w                 S1    135  31  95  CCR        w                 S1    136  9  91  CCR        w                 S1    137  12  95  CCR        w                 S1    138  44  95  CCR        ws                 S7    139  35  95  CCR        w                 S1    

  • Skibo Project Environmental Assessment

    June 2013 B-8 Appendix B

    Table B-1: Proposed Treatment by Stand Unit for Alternative 2

    Unit Number Acres

    Forest Type Code

    Alternative 2 Design Criteria

    Primary

    Treatment

    Secondary Treatm

    ent

    Reforestation

    Season of H

    arvest

    Plants and

    NNIS

    Recreation Wildlife Wetlands Scenery Soil

    Heritage

    140  37  91  CCR        w           WS3     S1  HR2 141  14  92  SW  SP‐MEC‐N     ws                 S2    142  24  91  CCR        w                 S1    143  85  91  CCR        w           WS3     S1    144  35  16  TH        ws                 S2    145  25  16  TH        ws                 S2    146  22  2  TH        ws                 S2    147  13  12  CCR     SDBS  w                 S1    148  4  12  CCR     SDBS  w                 S1    149  2  2  TH        ws  PLANT2           SC1  S2    150  8  95  CCR        ws              SC1  S7    151  7  12  CCR     SDBS  w                 S1    152  4  2  TH        ws                 S7    153  20  2  TH        ws                 S7    154  18  12  CCR     SDBS  w                 S1    155  15  2  TH        ws                 S7    156  18  2  TH        ws                 S7    157  8  1  TH        ws                 S7    158  7  2  TH        as                      159  9  2  TH        ws                 S2    160  35  95  CCR        w                 S1    

  • Skibo Project Environmental Assessment

    June 2013 B-9 Appendix B

    Table B-1: Proposed Treatment by Stand Unit for Alternative 2

    Unit Number Acres

    Forest Type Code

    Alternative 2 Design Criteria

    Primary

    Treatment

    Secondary Treatm

    ent

    Reforestation

    Season of H

    arvest

    Plants and

    NNIS

    Recreation Wildlife Wetlands Scenery Soil

    Heritage

    161  6  95  CCR        as                      162  44  95  CCR        w                 S1    163  19  11  CCR        w                 S1    164  20  92  SW  SP‐MEC‐N     w                 S1    165  14  92  SW  SP‐MEC‐N     ws                 S2    166  59  95  CCR        w                 S1    167  79  16  TH        w                 S1    168  20  98  NHR        ws                 S2    169  60  91  CCR        w                 S1    170  49  16  CCR        w                 S1    171  18  95  CCR        ws                 S7    172  15  71  CCR        w                 S1    173  9  2  TH        w                 S1    174  7  2  TH        ws                 S2    175  17  2  TH        ws                 S7    176  18  2  TH        ws        WL11        S2    177  13  2  TH        ws  PLANT2     WL11        S7    178  3  2  TH        as        WL11             179  8  2  TH        ws                 S7    180  41  2  TH        as        WL12           HR2 181  58  95  CCR        as                      

  • Skibo Project Environmental Assessment

    June 2013 B-10 Appendix B

    Table B-1: Proposed Treatment by Stand Unit for Alternative 2

    Unit Number Acres

    Forest Type Code

    Alternative 2 Design Criteria

    Primary

    Treatment

    Secondary Treatm

    ent

    Reforestation

    Season of H

    arvest

    Plants and

    NNIS

    Recreation Wildlife Wetlands Scenery Soil

    Heritage

    182  5  24  CCR        w                 S1    183  12  12  CCR     SDBS  w                 S1    184  37  92  CCR  SP‐MEC‐N     ws                 S7    185  7  11  CCR        w                 S1    186  3  11  CCR        w                 S1    187  19  11  CCR        ws                 S7    188  13  17  CCR        w           WS3     S1    189  53  92  SW  SP‐MEC‐N     ws                 S7    190  20  92  SW  SP‐MEC‐N     ws                 S2    191  34  71  SW  SP‐MEC‐N     w           WS3     S1    192  64  11  CCR        w           WS3     S1    193  16  92  CCR        w                 S1    194  13  91  CCR        w                      195  18  89  CCR        ws                 S7    196  83  92  SW  SP‐MEC‐N     ws                 S7    197  91  11  CCR        w                 S1    198  21  92  SW  SP‐MEC‐N     ws                 S2    199  10  91  CCR        ws                 S7    200  41  92  SW  SP‐MEC‐N     ws                 S2    201  24  2  TH        ws  PLANT2           SC1  S7    202  32  2  TH        ws              SC1  S7    

  • Skibo Project Environmental Assessment

    June 2013 B-11 Appendix B

    Table B-1: Proposed Treatment by Stand Unit for Alternative 2

    Unit Number Acres

    Forest Type Code

    Alternative 2 Design Criteria

    Primary

    Treatment

    Secondary Treatm

    ent

    Reforestation

    Season of H

    arvest

    Plants and

    NNIS

    Recreation Wildlife Wetlands Scenery Soil

    Heritage

    203  16  23  TH        ws           WS3     S7    204  30  30  TH        ws     REC2        SC1  S7    205  7  1  CCR        w  PLANT2  REC2        SC1  S1    206  14  95  CCR        ws     REC2           S7    207  13  89  CCR        ws     REC2           S2    208  14  11  CCR        w     REC2  WL11        S1    209  54  92  CCR        ws     REC2  WL11        S7    210  43  8  TH        ws              SC1  S7    211  13  95  TH        ws                 S2    212  42  91  CCR        ws                 S7    213  15  91  CCR        ws           WS5  SC2  S7  HR2 214  5  95  CCR        w                 S1    215  14  12  CCR     SDBS  w                 S1    216  16  91  CCR        ws                 S7    217  15  91  CCR        w                 S1    218  14  91  CCR        w                 S1    219  15  91  CCR        w              SC2  S1  HR2 220  13  2  TH        ws              SC2  S2    221  79  1  TH  UB     ws     REC3     WS5  SC2  S7  HR1 222  15  95  SW  SP‐MEC‐P  FPWP  ws     REC3     WS5  SC2  S2    223  41  11  SW  SP‐HB*     ws  PLANT2              S2    

  • Skibo Project Environmental Assessment

    June 2013 B-12 Appendix B

    Table B-1: Proposed Treatment by Stand Unit for Alternative 2

    Unit Number Acres

    Forest Type Code

    Alternative 2 Design Criteria

    Primary

    Treatment

    Secondary Treatm

    ent

    Reforestation

    Season of H

    arvest

    Plants and

    NNIS

    Recreation Wildlife Wetlands Scenery Soil

    Heritage

    224  67  92  SW  SP‐HB*     w                 S1    225  12  92  SW  SP‐HB*     w                 S1    226  37  91  CCR        ws                 S7    227  36  92  CCR        w                 S1    228  19  91  CCR        ws           WS5  SC2  S7  HR2 229  14  85  CCR        w              SC2  S1    230  28  92  CCR        ws           WS5  SC2  S7  HR2 231  7  12  CCR     SDBS  w                 S1    232  32  91  CCR        ws                 S2    233  38  91  CCR        ws           WS5     S7    234  17  91  CCR        ws                 S2    235  21  91  CCR        w                 S1    236  35  11  TH‐SF        w                 S1    237  20  11  TH‐SF        ws                 S2    238  15  11  TH‐SF        w                 S1    239  17  11  TH‐SF        ws                 S7    240  5  91  TH‐SF        ws                 S2    241  116  11  TH‐SF        w           WS3     S1  HR2 242  10  95  CCR        ws                 S2    243  26  91  CCR        ws  PLANT2              S7    244  18  91  CCR        ws  PLANT2              S7    

  • Skibo Project Environmental Assessment

    June 2013 B-13 Appendix B

    Table B-1: Proposed Treatment by Stand Unit for Alternative 2

    Unit Number Acres

    Forest Type Code

    Alternative 2 Design Criteria

    Primary

    Treatment

    Secondary Treatm

    ent

    Reforestation

    Season of H

    arvest

    Plants and

    NNIS

    Recreation Wildlife Wetlands Scenery Soil

    Heritage

    245  21  11  CCR        w                 S1    246  24  11  CCR        ws                 S7    247  8  71  CCR        w                 S1    248  32  91  CCR        ws  PLANT2              S7    249  37  92  SW  SP‐MEC‐N     ws           WS1     S2  HR2 250  74  91  CCR        ws           WS1     S7  HR1, HR2 251  18  92  SW  SP‐MEC‐N     as                 S4    252  20  11  SW  SP‐MEC‐N                            253  12  91  CCR        w                 S1    254  13  84  CCR  SP‐MEC‐N     ws                 S2    255  20  11  CCR  SP‐MEC‐N     ws                 S2    256  33  91  CCR        ws                 S7    257  31  91  CCR        ws                 S7    258  9  95  CCR        ws                 S7    259  20  91  CCR        ws                 S7    260  4  92  SW  SP‐MEC‐N     as                      261  23  23  CCR        ws           WS3     S7    262  8  11  CCR        w                 S1    263  17  11  CCR        ws                 S2    264  18  92  SW  SP‐MEC‐N     ws                 S7    265  20  95  CCR        w                 S1    

  • Skibo Project Environmental Assessment

    June 2013 B-14 Appendix B

    Table B-1: Proposed Treatment by Stand Unit for Alternative 2

    Unit Number Acres

    Forest Type Code

    Alternative 2 Design Criteria

    Primary

    Treatment

    Secondary Treatm

    ent

    Reforestation

    Season of H

    arvest

    Plants and

    NNIS

    Recreation Wildlife Wetlands Scenery Soil

    Heritage

    266  37  16  TH        as                      267  17  95  CCR        w                 S1    268  21  91  CCR        w                 S1    269  36  95  CCR        w                 S1    270  9  91  CCR        ws                 S2    271  66  92  SW  SP‐MEC‐N     ws                 S2  HR1 272  19  12  CCR  SP‐BB  SDBS  w           WS3     S1    273  82  95  CCR        w                 S1    274  8  17  CCR  SP‐BB  SDBS  ws                 S7    275  13  91  CCR        w                 S1    276  11  11  CCR        ws     REC2     WS5  SC2  S7  HR2 277  17  92  CCR        ws     REC2           S2    278  91  92  CCR        w     REC2     WS5  SC2  S1  HR1, HR2 279  24  95  CCR        w     REC2           S1    280  18  92  SW  SP‐MEC‐N     ws              SC2  S7    281  54  92  SW  SP‐MEC‐N     ws              SC2  S7    282  25  95  CCR        ws                 S7    283  10  89  CCR        ws                 S2    284  26  91  CCR        ws                 S7    285  5  92  SW  SP‐MEC‐N     ws                 S2    286  28  92  SW  SP‐MEC‐N     ws                 S7    

  • Skibo Project Environmental Assessment

    June 2013 B-15 Appendix B

    Table B-1: Proposed Treatment by Stand Unit for Alternative 2

    Unit Number Acres

    Forest Type Code

    Alternative 2 Design Criteria

    Primary

    Treatment

    Secondary Treatm

    ent

    Reforestation

    Season of H

    arvest

    Plants and

    NNIS

    Recreation Wildlife Wetlands Scenery Soil

    Heritage

    287  10  16  TH        ws                 S2    288  18  92  SW  SP‐MEC‐N     ws                 S2    289  5  12  CCR  SP‐BB  SDBS  w                 S1    290  11  12  CCR  SP‐BB  SDBS  w                 S1    291  8  92  SW  SP‐MEC‐N     ws                 S7    292  35  17  CCR  SP‐BB  SDBS  w  PLANT1           SC1  S1    293  48  11  CCR        w           WS3     S1  HR1 294  8  91  CCR        w                 S1    295  31  12  CCR     SDBS  w                 S1    296  35  12  CCR     SDBS  w           WS1     S1    297  21  95  CCR        w                 S1    298  32  92  SW  SP‐MEC‐N     ws                 S7    299  31  92  CCR        ws                 S7    300  43  95  CCR        w           WS3     S1  HR2 301  21  95  CCR        ws                 S7    302  3  17  CCR  SP‐BB  SDBS  ws                 S7    303  33  8  TH        as              SC1  S7    304  22  8  TH        ws              SC1  S2    305  41  91  CCR        w                 S1    306  14  12  CCR  SP‐BB  SDBS  w                 S1    307  21  1  CCR  SP‐BB  SDJP  w                 S1    

  • Skibo Project Environmental Assessment

    June 2013 B-16 Appendix B

    Table B-1: Proposed Treatment by Stand Unit for Alternative 2

    Unit Number Acres

    Forest Type Code

    Alternative 2 Design Criteria

    Primary

    Treatment

    Secondary Treatm

    ent

    Reforestation

    Season of H

    arvest

    Plants and

    NNIS

    Recreation Wildlife Wetlands Scenery Soil

    Heritage

    308  31  11  CCR        ws                 S7    309  11  8  TH        as                      310  12  95  CCR        as                      311  29  8  TH        w           WS1     S1    312  22  2  TH        ws  PLANT2           SC1  S2    313  26  11  CCR        ws              SC1  S7    314  18  11  SW  SP‐MEC‐P  FPWP  ws  PLANT2           SC1  S7    315  15  92  CCR        ws  PLANT2              S2  HR1 316  47  92  NHR  SP‐MEC‐N     w                 S1    317  7  11  CCR  SP‐BB  SDJPBS  ws                 S2    318  24  11  CCR  SP‐BB  SDJPBS  ws                 S7    319  55  91  CCR        ws                 S7    320  29  12  CCR  SP‐BB  SDBS  w                 S1    321  11  91  CCR  SP‐BB  SDJPBS  w                 S1    322  17  95  CCR        ws                 S2    323  8  98  NHR  SP‐MEC‐P  FPWP  ws                 S2    324  10  98  NHR  SP‐MEC‐P  FPWP  w                 S1    325  28  11  CCR  SP‐MEC‐N     ws                 S2    326  22  11  SW  SP‐MEC‐N     ws                 S7    327  48  92  SW  SP‐MEC‐N     w                 S1    328  34  11  CCR        ws                 S2    

  • Skibo Project Environmental Assessment

    June 2013 B-17 Appendix B

    Table B-1: Proposed Treatment by Stand Unit for Alternative 2

    Unit Number Acres

    Forest Type Code

    Alternative 2 Design Criteria

    Primary

    Treatment

    Secondary Treatm

    ent

    Reforestation

    Season of H

    arvest

    Plants and

    NNIS

    Recreation Wildlife Wetlands Scenery Soil

    Heritage

    329  26  11  CCR        ws           WS3     S7    330  19  11  CCR        w                 S1    331  17  95  CCR        ws                 S7    332  36  12  CCR  SP‐BB  SDBS  w           WS3     S1  HR2 333  156  12  CCR  SP‐BB  SDBS  w           WS3     S1  HR2 334  22  95  CCR  BB     ws                 S7    335  8  11  CCR        w                 S1  HR1 336  18  11  CCR  BB     w                 S1    337  11  92  SW  SP‐MEC‐N     ws                 S7    338  17  11  CCR        ws                 S7    339  8  95  CCR        ws                 S7  HR1 340  7  95  CCR        ws                 S7    341  21  95  CCR        ws  PLANT2              S7    342  6  92  SW  SP‐MEC‐N     ws  PLANT2              S2    343  61  2  TH        ws                 S7    344  7  95  CCR        as                      345  22  91  CCR        as                      346  13  92  SW  SP‐MEC‐N     w                 S1    347  56  95  CCR        ws                 S2    348  59  2  TH        ws  PLANT2              S7    349  20  2  TH        w     REC1           S1    

  • Skibo Project Environmental Assessment

    June 2013 B-18 Appendix B

    Table B-1: Proposed Treatment by Stand Unit for Alternative 2

    Unit Number Acres

    Forest Type Code

    Alternative 2 Design Criteria

    Primary

    Treatment

    Secondary Treatm

    ent

    Reforestation

    Season of H

    arvest

    Plants and

    NNIS

    Recreation Wildlife Wetlands Scenery Soil

    Heritage

    350  18  11  TH‐SF        ws                 S7    351  15  11  TH‐SF        w  PLANT2  REC1           S1    352  30  2  TH        ws  PLANT2              S7    353  21  11  TH‐SF        w     REC1           S1    354  5  95  CCR        as  PLANT2  REC1                355  40  2  TH        ws  PLANT2  REC1           S7    356  38  2  TH        w  PLANT2  REC1           S1    357  13  2  TH        ws                 S7    358  22  11  CCR  SP‐HB*  SDJP  ws                 S7    359  9  2  TH        ws     REC1           S7    360  13  2  TH        ws                 S7    361  17  2  TH        w                 S1    362  128  12  CCR  SP‐BB  SDBS  w           WS1     S1  HR2 363  13  11  CCR  BB     ws                 S7    364  12  11  CCR  UB     ws           WS1     S7  HR2 365  20  95  CCR        ws                 S7    366  37  95  CCR        w                 S1    367  23  11  CCR        ws                 S7    368  7  95  CCR        w                 S1    369  19  95  CCR        w                 S1    370  29  11  CCR        w  PLANT2              S1    

  • Skibo Project Environmental Assessment

    June 2013 B-19 Appendix B

    Table B-1: Proposed Treatment by Stand Unit for Alternative 2

    Unit Number Acres

    Forest Type Code

    Alternative 2 Design Criteria

    Primary

    Treatment

    Secondary Treatm

    ent

    Reforestation

    Season of H

    arvest

    Plants and

    NNIS

    Recreation Wildlife Wetlands Scenery Soil

    Heritage

    371  8  11  CCR        w  PLANT2              S1    372  9  95  CCR        w  PLANT2              S1    373  5  71  CCR        w                 S1    374  7  12  CCR     SDBS  w                 S1    375  12  11  CCR        ws           WS1     S7    376  11  95  CCR        ws  PLANT2        WS1     S7    377  13  91  CCR        ws  PLANT2              S7    378  6  92  SW  SP‐HB*     ws  PLANT2              S2    379  45  95  CCR        w  PLANT2              S1    380  32  92  SW  SP‐HB*     ws  PLANT2              S7  HR1 381  7  91  CCR        w  PLANT2              S1    382  13  11  CCR        ws                 S7    383  12  95  CCR        ws  PLANT2              S7    384  18  95  CCR        w                 S1    385  18  92  SW  SP‐HB*     ws                 S2    386  48  11  TH‐SF        w                 S1    387  11  11  TH‐SF        w  PLANT2              S1    388  32  11  TH‐SF        w  PLANT2  REC1           S1    389  60  91  NHR  SP‐MEC‐N     ws  PLANT2           SC2  S7    390  71  91  NHR  SP‐MEC‐P  DP  w  PLANT2           SC2  S1    391  64  2  TH        ws  PLANT2  REC3        SC1  S2    

  • Skibo Project Environmental Assessment

    June 2013 B-20 Appendix B

    This page is intentionally blank.

  • Skibo Project Environmental Assessment

    June 2013 C-1 Appendix C

    APPENDIX C OPERATIONAL STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES

    Introduction This document lists the Forest Plan Standards and Guidelines, State Best Management Practices, and project recommendations that are routinely employed during harvesting, road work, and prescribed burning operations. The direction in this document is applicable to all proposed actions and would be required during implementation of the proposed management activities for the Skibo Project. Forest Plan operational standards and guidelines are outlined in silvicultural prescriptions, marking plans, cruise plans, and burn plans. Personnel use these practices during on-the-ground work laying out treatment units, administering timber sales, prescribed burning, and reforestation activities. See Forest Plan p. 1-8 for a description of Forest Plan Standards and Guidelines. Some implementation practices (SKB) have been developed specifically for the Skibo Project and are also listed below. The Superior National Forest implements the Minnesota Forest Resources Council (MFRC) Voluntary Site-level Guidelines when managing forest resources. Forest Plan standards and guidelines are intended to provide equal or greater protection than MFRC guidelines. MFRC guidelines may be modified if the proposed change provides equal or greater benefits to forest resources.

    Table C-1: Key to Numbering S Standard G Guideline

    MFRC Minnesota Forest Resource Council Guidelines SKB Skibo Project AQ Air Quality BM Biomass FW Forest-wide HR Heritage Resources ID Insects, Diseases, and Disturbance Processes

    MN Minerals PH Public Health and Hazardous Materials PU Pesticide Use

    REC Recreation RTL Trails SC Scenic Resources TM Timber Management TS Transportation Systems WL Terrestrial and Aquatic Wildlife

    WS Watershed Health, Riparian Areas, and Soil Resources

    Example of Numbering S-AQ-1

    Standard Air Quality

    First in a series

  • Skibo Project Environmental Assessment

    June 2013 C-2 Appendix C

    Consistency with Minnesota Forest Resources Council (MFRC) Voluntary Site-level Guidelines G-FW-1 The Forest Service will implement the MFRC management guidelines when managing forest resources on the National Forest. These measures are described in Sustaining Minnesota Forest Resources: Voluntary site-level Management Guidelines. (Available at: http://www.frc.state.mn.us/FMgdline/Guidelines.html) Note that not all of the MFRC guidelines are repeated in this document. Air Quality and Smoke Management (AQ) S-AQ-1 Prescribed burning activities on the National Forest will only be conducted if they

    comply with requirements of the most current Minnesota Smoke Management Plan.

    SKB-AQ-1 Burn plans developed for the implementation of prescribed burn activities will specify which publics will be notified prior to a burn.

    Biomass (BM) MFRC-BM-1 Avoid harvest of additional biomass from within RMZ’s over and above the

    tops and limbs of trees normally removed in a roundwood harvest under existing timber harvesting guidelines (MFRC, Forest Biomass Harvesting, pg 19).

    MFRC-BM-2 Avoid biomass harvesting on organic soils deeper than 24 inches that are ombrotrophic. Ombrotrophic sites typically have more than 90 percent of the basal area in black spruce, with no alder or willow in the understory (MFRC, Forest Biomass Harvesting, pg. 22). (ELT 5 & 6)

    MFRC-BM-3 Avoid biomass harvesting on aspen or hardwood cover types on shallow soils (8 inches or less) over bedrock (MFRC, Forest Biomass Harvesting, pg. 22). (ELT 18)

    MFRC-BM-4 Ensure that landings or on-site areas used to store biomass are in a condition that favors regeneration and growth of native vegetation and trees after use (MFRC, Forest Biomass Harvesting, pg. 23).

    MFRC-BM-5 Avoid additional biomass harvest from erosion-prone sites (e.g., those sites on steep slopes of 35 percent or more) over and above the tops and limbs of trees normally removed in a roundwood harvest under existing timber harvesting guidelines (MFRC, Forest Biomass Harvesting, pg. 23).

    MFRC-BM-6 Avoid re-entry into the general harvest area of a site with a second operation for the purpose of harvesting biomass once regeneration has begun or planting has been completed (MFRC, Forest Biomass Harvesting, pg. 25).

    MFRC-BM-7 If using a re-entry into a previously harvested site: Retain slash piles that show evidence of use by wildlife. Piles left on site for an extended period may be inhabited by species such as Canada lynx, black bears, and other wildlife known to den in slash piles. In addition, consider retaining slash piles that are difficult to access (MFRC, Forest Biomass Harvesting, pg. 26).

    MFRC-BM-8 Leave all snags possible standing in harvest areas. Snags cut for safety reasons should be left where they fall (MFRC, Forest Biomass Harvesting, pg. 27).

  • Skibo Project Environmental Assessment

    June 2013 C-3 Appendix C

    MFRC-BM-9 Retain and limit disturbance to all pre-existing coarse woody debris (except in skid trails or landings) (MFRC, Forest Biomass Harvesting, pg. 27).

    MFRC-BM-10 Avoid biomass harvest in leave tree clumps, except tops and limbs of trees normally removed in a roundwood harvest under existing timber harvesting guidelines (MFRC, Forest Biomass Harvesting, pg. 28).

    MFRC-BM-11 Retain and scatter tops and limbs from 20 percent of trees harvested in the general harvest area (one “average-sized” tree out of every five trees harvested) (MFRC, Forest Biomass Harvesting, pg. 28).

    MFRC-BM-12 If harvesting brush and small tress for biomass associated with a timber harvest, leave 20 percent of this material on the site. This material may be run over or cut, but it should remain on site (MFRC, Forest Biomass Harvesting, pg. 28).

    MFRC-BM-13 For soils with 8–20 inches of soil over bedrock and droughty sands, consider that the recommended retention of one-third or more of fine woody debris on the site benefits soil productivity as well as biodiversity. Fine woody debris should be distributed relatively evenly throughout the site rather than piled (MFRC, Forest Biomass Harvesting, pg. 29).

    MFRC-BM-14 Avoid biomass harvesting in native plant communities listed in (MFRC Guidelines) Appendix J and Appendix 2 (MFRC, Forest Biomass Harvesting, pg. 19).

    MFRC-BM-15 When harvesting understory vegetation for fuel reduction: Retain understory vegetation in several reserve patches that total at least 20 percent of the harvest area (MFRC, Forest Biomass Harvesting, pg. 23).

    MFRC-BM-16 When harvesting understory vegetation for fuel reduction: Retain snags greater than 12 inches DBH and down logs where at least one end is greater than 12 inches in diameter and 6 feet in length. Place emphasis on retaining only larger snags and pre-existing coarse woody debris, because these larger fuels do not contribute as much to the initial speed and flame length of a wildfire (MFRC, Forest Biomass Harvesting, pg. 23).

    Watershed Health, Riparian, and Soil Resources (WS)

    Watershed Health S-WS-2 Excavated soil material, construction debris, spoils or debris from dredging

    projects, and debris and soil moved from upland sites during timber management activity (such as timber harvest, shearing or brush raking) will be deposited or spread out in upland locations. Stabilize soil deposited in this manner with vegetation.

    S-WS-3 Salvage and reuse topsoil for site rehabilitation during construction projects or other land use activities. When topsoil is unsuitable for reuse, other methods or tools such as sodding, hydro-seeding, fertilization, or erosion-resistant matting may be used to help rehabilitate disturbed areas.

    S-WS-6 Management activities involving heavy equipment crossing (by road, trail, or skid trail) of any stream or drainage ditch, or operations on the immediate shoreline of any lake or open water wetland will be designed and conducted in a way that:

  • Skibo Project Environmental Assessment

    June 2013 C-4 Appendix C

    a. Limits the number of crossing locations to the absolute minimum needed to conduct the activity.

    b. Maintains or improves channel stability (dimension, pattern and profile) or shoreline stability in the affected or connected waters.

    c. Uses filter strips as directed by Forest Plan guideline G-WS-4 and MFRC site level guidelines.

    G-WS-1 Restore eroded sites, generally employing natural-appearing stabilization materials. Native species will be used in the restoration of vegetative cover. Non-native annuals may be used as nurse crops to obtain rapid stabilization while slower-growing native species are becoming established. For Riparian Areas as a Whole (Both the Aquatic and Non-aquatic Portions).

    Non-Aquatic portion of Riparian Areas

    MFRC-WS-1 Filter strips of appropriate widths will be applied to all perennial and intermittent streams, lakes, open water wetlands and seasonal ponds. Filter strip widths are dependent upon the slope of the land between activity and water body:

    0-10% slope: 50-foot filter strip 11-20% slope: 70-foot filter strip 21-40% slope: 110-foot filter strip >40% slope: 150-foot filter strip

    Filter strips are applied independently of the width of the riparian management zone and except when the recommended 5 percent maximum level of mineral soil exposure is unacceptable for the regeneration of certain desired species:

    Limit mineral soils exposure to less than 5 percent, well distributed throughout the filter strip.

    Avoid concentrating disturbance in the filter strip, to prevent concentration of flows across the filter strip.

    G-WS-4 On slopes averaging 18 percent or steeper, the width of filter strips adjacent to lakes or streams will be either 150 ft. from the ordinary high water mark, 150 ft. from the bankfull elevation, or the width of the entire slope that is adjacent to the water’s edge, whichever is greater.

    Exceptions to filter strip guidelines are allowed for projects specifically designed for stream, lakeshore, or wetland restoration.

    G-WS-5 In project areas subject to soil or vegetation disturbance, where the landward limit of the functional riparian area has not been site-specifically identified as part of project planning, a default “near bank” and “remainder” riparian management zone width of 100 feet each will generally be used along lakes, open water, wetlands, and streams.

    Near-Bank Riparian Management Zone S-WS-9 Within the near-bank zone, harvest trees only to maintain or restore riparian

    ecological function.

  • Skibo Project Environmental Assessment

    June 2013 C-5 Appendix C

    S-WS-10 Within the near-bank zone, do not deposit debris or spoils from maintenance, construction, or dredging. However, depositing materials for habitat improvement or restoration is allowed.

    G-WS-6 Within the near-bank zone, minimize soil disturbance and avoid activities that may destabilize soils or add sediment to the water.

    G-WS-7 Within the near-bank zone, minimize mowing or any other activity involving intensive removal of understory vegetation.

    Soils

    G-WS-8 Follow the limitations on management activities as specified in Table G-WS-8.

  • Skibo Project Environmental Assessment

    June 2013 C-6 Appendix C

    Table G-WS-8: Limits on Management Activities Designed to Safeguard Soil Productivity on Superior National Forest. (Mitigations are shown as codes which are listed and explained in Table G-WS-8a. A brief description of each ELT, and principle threats to soil productivity associated with activities on each ELT, is shown in Table G-WS-8b).

    Activity/Limitation 1 2 3 4 5** 6 7 8 9 10 11 12** 13 14 15 16 17 18**

    Skidding Ax, B A Ax , B A #, A A B, E E

    B, E Ax

    B, E

    #,A, E B

    Ax, B,

    Ax,B

    Ax,B, E

    #,Ax, B, E

    #, A, E

    Landings A A A A #, A A + + -- Ax + -- + Ax Ax #, Ax # --

    Whole tree Logging + + + + -- # #, E, F

    +, E, F

    #, E, F

    +#, E, F

    -- + + + +, E, F

    #, E, F,

    #, E, F,

    Tracked vehicles (feller buncher etc) Ax A Ax A #, A A + + # + + # + + + + # #, A

    Temp roads, trails #, Ax #, A

    #, Ax

    #, A #, A

    #, A + + +

    Ax,B + -- + Ax Ax + -- --

    Discing Az, B -- Az,B -- -- -- B B --

    Az,B B -- B

    Az, B Az B -- --

    Reforestation + + + + E + E, F + + + E, F E, F + + + E, F

    E, F E, F

    Machine Planting Ax, B -- Ax,B -- -- --

    Ax, B

    Ax, B

    #, B

    Ax,B B -- B

    Ax, B

    Ax,B B -- --

    Bracke scarification and Barrel scarification Az -- Az -- -- -- C, E

    C, E # Az

    C, E -- C Az Az

    C, E

    C, E --

    Blading, Shearing, Rockraking

    Ax, B A

    Ax,B A #, A A D, E

    D. E

    D, E

    Ax,D

    D, E

    #, D, E D

    Ax, D

    Ax,D

    Ax,D, E

    -- --

    Machine Piling/Bundler Ax A Ax A #, E E E E -- + E #, E, + + + E E #, E

    Prescribed Fire + + + + #, E, F, G +E, F,

    G

    E, F, G

    #, E, F, G

    +E, F, G

    #, E, F, G + + +

    E, F, G

    E, F, G

    #, E, F, G

    Use of low psi tires or other equipment with similar integrity

    H H H H H H + + + + + -- + + + + H H

  • Skibo Project Environmental Assessment

    June 2013 C-7 Appendix C

    Table G-WS-8a: Activity Limit Codes Used in Table G-WS-8

    Code Activity Limitation Designed to Protect Soil Productivity

    **

    No activities are permitted on these ELTs for purposes of timber production. Activities done for salvage, or to achieve other multiple use desired conditions or objectives are strongly discouraged on these ELTs and are subject to any applicable limitations shown elsewhere in this table.

    + Practice permitted on this ELT, subject to any applicable limitations specified elsewhere in this table.

    -- Practice not permitted on this ELT.

    # Practice is strongly discouraged on this ELT. If undertaken, it is subject to any applicable limitations specified elsewhere in this table.

    A Limit activity to frozen soil (frozen to a depth that will support equipment that is being used).

    Ax Limit activity to frozen soil (frozen to a depth that will support equipment that is being used) or during normal dry period (generally July 1- Sept 15).

    Az Limit activity to normal dry period (generally July 1- Sept 15).

    B

    On slopes exceeding 18%, confine operations to the lower end of slopes and avoid creating long uninterrupted equipment “paths” that could channel water and erode soil. For slopes that exceed 35%, design for and favor activities that would provide for use of equipment and techniques that minimize operations on these slopes.

    C Bracke scarification not allowed when slopes exceed 18%.

    D Shearing not allowed on unfrozen ground when slopes exceed 18%, with the exception that it may be permitted during dry conditions if mineral soil is not exposed.

    E Retain/return distributed slash or woody debris and, where appropriate, retain stumps and bark on site.

    F

    Determine long term strategy on these ELTs for soil nutrient and tree nutrient efficiency. Favor maintaining or converting to pine/conifer type within LE vegetation composition by type objectives, and favor vegetation objectives for older growth stages. If existing stand is aspen/birch, favor partial cut & under plant to convert, or leaving more residual basal area when converting.

    G Follow G-WS-10.

    H Take precautionary measures to minimize soil disturbance when using this equipment on these sites.

  • Skibo Project Environmental Assessment

    June 2013 C-8 Appendix C

    G-WS-9 During resource management activities, minimize adverse impacts to soil productivity by striving to have no more than 15 percent of a treatment area in a detrimentally compacted, eroded, rutted, displaced, or severely burned condition.

    G-WS-10 When conducting prescribed burns on ELTs 7, 8, 9, 11, 12, 16, 17, and 18, minimize the loss of forest floor (surface O layer). Provide for one of the following:

    a. Igniting burns only when the Canadian Fire Weather Index System Build Up Index (BUI) is 50 or less. (If the BUI system becomes outdated, another predictive model or index system may be used provided it affords a level of organic soil layer protection that is equivalent to a BUI of 50 or less.)

    b. Adjustment of ignition timing and firing patterns c. Taking into account vegetation type, topography, number of days since

    precipitation, wind, air temperature, humidity, and fuel loadings.

    G-WS-11 On Ecological Land Types (ELTs) 7, 8, 9, 11, 12, 16, 17, and 18, management activities used for vegetation competition control will be designed and conducted in ways that minimize loss of the forest floor (surface O layer and duff layer).

    Wetlands

    S-WS-11 Activity fuels will not be pushed into windrows that encircle wetlands.

    G-WS-12 Use of wetlands under frozen conditions for temporary roads and skid trails will generally be permitted as long as no fill is placed in the wetland. These roads or trails will be blocked to discourage vehicle use under unfrozen conditions.

    G-WS-13 Wetland impacts will be avoided whenever possible. Where impacts are unavoidable, minimize and compensate for loss when undertaking projects.

    G-WS-14 Avoid felling trees into non-forested wetlands except where done for purposes of habitat restoration.

    G-WS-15 Wetlands will be managed to prevent the reduction of their water quality, fish and wildlife habitat, and aesthetic values. Management actions will not reduce water quality within a wetland, or upstream or downstream of a wetland, unless restoration of natural conditions is the primary goal of the activity.

    MFRC-WS-1 Seasonal ponds and other lowland inclusions provide important habitat for woodland insects, amphibians and other species. Seasonal ponds have an identifiable edge caused by annual flooding and may be identified during dry periods by the lack of forest litter in the depression.

    In upland stands, seasonal (vernal) ponds and other small lowland inclusions identified during layout will be protected with a minimum 50 filter strip. This buffer can be used to help meet legacy patch and/or reserve tree needs. If this buffer is not being used to help with legacy patch needs then on sites with wind firm soils limited harvest can occur within this buffer, but a minimum of 80 basal area should be retained (MFRC, General guidelines, pg. 24-28; 73). Care should be taken to keep equipment out of the pond itself.

  • Skibo Project Environmental Assessment

    June 2013 C-9 Appendix C

    Insects, Diseases, and Disturbance Processes (ID) G-ID-1 Minimum Impact Management Tactics1 (MIMT) will generally be utilized on

    wildland fire suppression and prescribed fire application to reduce adverse fire suppression effects. Considerations shall include both operations and logistical functions.

    G-ID-3 Avoid delivery of chemical retardant, foam, additives, or gray water to all surface waters and riparian areas.

    SKB-ID-1 Utilize existing natural or man-made barriers, such as drainages, cliffs, streams, roads, and trails instead of constructed firelines for prescribed fire and suppression activities where practical and safe for firefighters and the public. (note this is G-ID-3)

    Minerals (MN) D-MN-1 Exploration and development of mineral and mineral material resources is

    allowed on national Forest System land, except for federally owned minerals in designated wilderness (BWCAW) and mining Protection Area (MPA)

    D-MN-2 Ensure that exploring, developing, and producing mineral material resources are

    conducted in an environmentally sound manner so that they may contribute to economic growth and national defense.

    S-MN-2 The removal of more than 5,000 cubic yards of mineral materials per year from

    any source requires an approved development and reclamation plan. Pesticide Use (PU) MFRC-PU-1 Employ integrated pest management (IPM) strategies.

    MFRC-PU-2 Use only pesticides registered by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and Minnesota Department of Agriculture.

    MFRC-PU-3 Read and follow all label directions carefully prior to using any pesticide.

    MFRC-PU-4 Maintain current labels and Material Safety Data Sheets (MSDS).

    MFRC-PU-5 Evaluate other factors besides effectiveness and cost when selecting among pesticide options.

    MFRC-PU-6 Promote protection or growth of mast species and browse.

    MFRC-PU-7 Favor band treatment or spot treatment over broadcast treatment.

    MFRC-PU-8 Select pesticides, application methods, equipment, and formulations that:

    Minimize the potential for pesticide drift

    Minimize pesticide residue movement to surface water and ground water MFRC-PU-9 Leave untreated or selectively treated areas adjacent to travel routes and

    recreation areas. 1 http://www.wildfirelessons.net/documents/GB_MIST_Guidelines.pdf

  • Skibo Project Environmental Assessment

    June 2013 C-10 Appendix C

    MFRC-PU-10 Treat spills properly.

    Act quickly

    Protect yourself

    Control the spill

    Contain the spill

    Guard the site

    Notify the authorities

    Clean up the spill MFRC-PU-11 Maintain an adequate spill kit.

    MFRC-PU-12 Inspect all containers prior to loading, and ensure that all caps, plugs, and bungs are tightened.

    MFRC-PU-13 Exercise care and caution during mixing and loading of pesticides.

    MFRC-PU-14 Avoid mixing near wells or where pesticide spills could enter open water or wetlands.

    MFRC-PU-15 Mix and load pesticides outside of riparian management zones, filter strips, and other reserve areas.

    MFRC-PU-16 Replace pour caps and close bags or other containers immediately after use.

    MFRC-PU-17 Provide an air gap between the water source and the mixture surface to prevent backsiphoning.

    MFRC-PU-18 Avoid filling pesticide mixing or application equipment directly from surface water unless the equipment contains proper and functioning anti-backsiphoning mechanisms.

    MFRC-PU-19 Triple rinse all empty plastic and metal pesticide containers and add the rinse water to the spray solution.

    MFRC-PU-20 Ensure that pesticide applicators are properly licensed.

    MFRC-PU-21 Protect vegetation that is part of a cultural resource if it will be impacted by herbicide applications.

    MFRC-PU-22 Mark the boundaries of the area for treatment.

    MFRC-PU-23 Refer to label directions before applying a herbicide.

    MFRC-PU-24 Avoid applying pesticides when the likelihood of significant drift exists.

    MFRC-PU-25 Use a drift control where appropriate.

    MFRC-PU-26 Consider applying pesticides near dawn or dusk, when wind speeds are generally lowest.

    MFRC-PU-27 Apply pesticides when wind speeds are 10 mph or less for ground broadcast application.

  • Skibo Project Environmental Assessment

    June 2013 C-11 Appendix C

    MFRC-PU-28 Check all application equipment carefully, particularly for leaking hoses and connections and plugged or worn nozzles.

    MFRC-PU-29 Calibrate spray equipment periodically to achieve uniform pesticide distribution and rate.

    MFRC-PU-30 Employ the lowest reasonable equipment pressure when applying pesticides.

    MFRC-PU-31 Mix pesticides in upland areas, where practical.

    MFRC-PU-32 Apply pesticides in accordance with the product label.

    MFRC-PU-33 Avoid applying pesticides on small wetland inclusions in upland areas.

    MFRC-PU-34 Avoid cleaning pesticide application equipment in surface waters.

    MFRC-PU-35 Clean equipment in areas where pesticide residues will not enter streams, lakes, wetlands or groundwater.

    MFRC-PU-36 Rinse mixing apparatus at least three times.

    MFRC-PU-37 Apply rinsate in spray form to the area to be treated.

    MFRC-PU-38 Dispose of pesticide wastes and containers according to state and federal laws.

    MFRC-PU-39 Rinse all empty plastic and metal pesticide containers three times, and add the rinse water to the spray solution.

    MFRC-PU-40 Dispose of the triple-rinsed containers in one of two ways:

    By recycling through an approved program.

    As ordinary solid waste at a landfill licensed by the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency.

    SKB-PU-1 All guidelines presented in Forest Service Manual 2150, Pesticide Use Management and Coordination, in Forest Service Handbook 2109.14, Pesticide Use Management and Coordination Handbook, and in the Forest Service Health and Safety Code Handbook chapter 22.1 would be observed.

    SKB-PU-2 Weather forecasts will be obtained prior to herbicide treatment. Treatment activities will be halted, if necessary, to prevent runoff during heavy rain events.

    SKB-PU-3 Applicators would be trained in safe and proper herbicide application techniques as detailed in the Health and Safety Code Handbook, Job Hazard Analyses, and herbicide labels.

    Timber (TM) S-TM-4 Five years after clearcutting or final removals in seed tree or shelterwood harvest,

    stands must be adequately restocked. The minimum trees per acres necessary to adequately restock forests after even-aged tree harvest are shown in Table S-TM-4 by forest type group.

  • Skibo Project Environmental Assessment

    June 2013 C-12 Appendix C

    Table S-TM-4: Minimum trees per acres at five years of age necessary to adequately restock forests after tree harvest.

    Forest Type Group Minimum Trees* per Acres Conifers 400

    Northern Hardwoods, Birch, and Ash 1,000

    Aspen 4,000 *Any commercial tree species may be included in the minimum

    G-TM-4 Allow harvest of white cedar trees (in any forest type) only when re-growth of cedar is likely to be successful or for research purposes.

    G-TM-5 In stands 20 acres or larger that were regenerated with clearcuts, retain a minimum of 5 percent of the stand in legacy patches of live trees where no harvest occurs. Wherever possible these should be at least two acres in size. These legacy patches will protect soil organic matter and associated organisms and remaining vegetation will aid in the re-colonization of the adjacent managed area.

    G-TM-6 In northern hardwoods forest types, generally maintain a closed canopy (70 percent or greater where possible) of mature forest vegetation in a minimum 200-foot zone surrounding seasonal ponds. Seasonal ponds included in this guideline must typically persist at least six weeks and be free of fish. The area will generally be managed to prevent the soil and water from warming excessively, to prevent erosion, and to provide large woody debris and leaf litter.

    MFRC-TM-1 Legacy patches should be no less than one-quarter acre in size (MFRC, Ch. 2, Wildlife Habitat, pg. 44). When locating legacy patches or leave tree clumps consider including important features such as wetland inclusions, seasonal ponds, riparian areas, forested corridors, den trees, cavity trees, trees with stick nests, large mature white pine, rare plant locations and rare native plant communities (MFRC, Timber Harvesting, pg. 35). Patches should be in representative habitats throughout the site (MFRC, Chap. 2, Wildlife Habitat, pg. 43).

    MFRC-TM-2 In general, retain a minimum of 6-12 live leave trees per acre to provide present and future benefits including shelter, resting sites, cavities, perches, rest sites, foraging sites, mast, and coarse woody debris. The trees will be at least six inches in diameter and include at least two trees per acre from the largest size classes available on site. A variety of species would be selected for within-stand species and structural diversity. (MFRC, General Guidelines, pg. 75-77).

    MFRC-TM-3 Leave trees may be left individually or in clumps ranging from one-quarter acre and larger. Minimal harvest within clumps is acceptable (down to a minimum of 80 BA) as long as the integrity of the clump or key leave trees is not disturbed, and as long as the clump is not doubling as a legacy patch (MFRC, Timber Harvesting, pg. 35).

  • Skibo Project Environmental Assessment

    June 2013 C-13 Appendix C

    MFRC-TM-4 Unmerchantable trees, dead standing trees and trees not designated for harvest will be left. The operator will be allowed to fell (and leave in place) a portion of these trees in areas where deemed necessary to facilitate the logging operations, as well as for safety reasons (MFRC, Timber Harvesting, pg. 33).

    MFRC-TM-5 “Consider retaining more than the recommended number of leave trees in harvest sites of greater than 100 acres. This practice would better mimic natural disturbances, such as fire and windstorm” (MFRC, Timber harvesting, pg. 40).

    Landings (from MFRC Guidelines, p. 26 - 27)

    Specify the number and location of landings as part of the harvesting agreement.

    Size landings to the minimum required for the acres to be harvested, the equipment likely to be used, and the products to be cut.

    Plan roads and landings to occupy no more than one to three percent of the timber harvest area. See Figure TH-8.

    Locate landings so that they are:

    On upland areas whenever practical. On stable ground. Outside of filter strips or the riparian management zone (RMZ), whichever is

    wider, where practical (See General Guidelines: Maintaining Filter Strips (pages 24-28) and General Guidelines: Managing Riparian Areas (pages 29-67).

    Away from areas where a cultural resource is present. Avoid landings in locations that will concentrate runoff from surrounding

    areas onto the landing. Use an appropriate combination of ditches, water bars, and outsloping to keep the landing area dry.

    Avoid locating landings and yarding areas on open water wetlands. Skidding and Skid Trails (from MFRC Guidelines, p. 22)

    Locate, design, construct and maintain skid trails to minimize damage to cultural resources or to the residual stand; minimize rutting; maintain surface and subsurface water flows in wetlands; and reduce erosion and sedimentation to protect water quality.

    Lay out skid trails to minimize the number of skid trails and site disturbance while also achieving necessary operating efficiency.

    If practical and feasible, keep skid trails away from cultural resource areas. Avoid locating skid trails in filter strips and riparian management zones

    (RMZs). See General Guidelines: Maintaining Filter Strips and General Guidelines: Managing Riparian Areas.

    Avoid construction of skid trails with grades exceeding thirty-five percent. Limit skid trails to no more than ten to fifteen percent of the timber harvest

    area. Limit equipment traffic off the skid trails to no more than twenty to thirty percent of the area with no more than one to two passes with heavy equipment. (Small or irregularly shaped units may result in higher percentages

  • Skibo Project Environmental Assessment

    June 2013 C-14 Appendix C

    of area occupied by infrastructure.) (See General Guidelines: Designing Operations to Fit Site Conditions, page 20.)

    Skid low on a slope or across a slope to minimize erosion. Minimize long, straight skid trails that channel water. If long stretches cannot

    be avoided by careful sighting, provide adequate drainage to avoid concentration of surface water flow. Divert water by proper shaping of the trail surface and by using broad-based dips, lead-off ditches or water bars. See Forest Road Construction and Maintenance: Drainage.

    Use full-tree skidding rather than tree-length skidding in the vicinity of a cultural resource, if practical and feasible.

    Concentrate equipment traffic on skid trails. Maximize the area not impacted by traffic by concentrating equipment movements to common trails. Skidders should always use skid trail routes, rather than the shortest distance, to travel to and from landings.

    Concentrate skidding to a set of well-developed skid trails for upland sites with mineral soils.

    Avoid concentrating well-developed skid trails on shallow and deep organic soils. Operations on organic soils should only occur when soils are adequately frozen.

    Prepare skid trails for anticipated traffic needs to avoid unnecessary maintenance or relocation of trails. Techniques can include packing of snow or ground cover to ensure freezing, placing of slash mats on skid trails prior to skidding, or the use of appropriate wetland road construction methods to provide a stable trail surface.

    Maintain skid trails in good repair so that additional skid trails are not required.

    Reuse skid trails for thinning operations as trails for future thinnings and final harvest.

    If skid trails do not hold up (resulting in excessive rutting or requiring the need to create new skid trails), curtail operations until soils dry out.

    Vegetation Management (VG) Vegetation Composition and Structure

    S-VG-4 In mature or older red and white pine forest types managed to maintain patch sizes of >100 acres, vegetation management treatments that maintain a sixty percent minimum canopy closure and maintain large diameter trees are allowable.

    G-VG-3 In Spatial Zones 1 and 2, in mature and older upland forest types managed to

    maintain patch sizes of ≥300 acres, vegetation management treatments are allowable where they maintain a 50% (60% for red and white pine) minimum canopy closure at time of treatment and favor retention of larger and older trees characteristic of the patch.

  • Skibo Project Environmental Assessment

    June 2013 C-15 Appendix C

    Terrestrial & Aquatic Wildlife (WL)

    Lynx

    G-WL-2 Provide for the protection of known active den sites during denning season.

    Bald Eagle

    S-WL-3 Management activities for the bald eagle will be governed by Northern Lakes States Bald Eagle Recovery Plan: 1983 (From the Northern States Bald Eagle Recovery Plan 1983 –USFWS) Disturbance Buffer Zones for Nest Trees.

    1. Primary Zone: 330 feet from the nest. All land use except actions necessary to protect or improve the nest site should be prohibited in this zone. Human entry and low-level aircraft operations should be prohibited during the most critical and moderately critical periods, unless performed in connection with eagle research or management by qualified individuals. Motorized access into this zone should be prohibited. Restrictions on human entry at other times should be addressed in the breeding area management plan considering the types, extents, and durations of proposed or likely activities.

    2. Secondary Zone: 660 feet from the nest. Land-use activities that result in significant changes in the landscape, such as clearcutting, land clearing, or major construction, should be prohibited. Actions such as thinning tree stands or maintenance of existing improvements can be permitted, but not during the most critical and moderately critical periods. Human entry and low-level aircraft operations should be prohibited during the most critical period unless performed in connection with necessary eagle research and management by qualified individuals. Roads and trails in this zone should be obliterated, or at least closed during the most and moderately critical periods. Restrictions on human entry at other times should be addressed in the breeding area management plan, considering the types, extents, and durations of proposed or likely activities.

    3. Tertiary Zone: ¼ mile from the nest, but may extend up to ½ mile if topography and vegetation permit a direct line of sight from the nest to potential activities at that distance. The configuration of this zone, therefore, may be variable. Some activities are permissible in this zone except during the most critical period. Each breeding area management plan may identify specific hazards that require additional constraints.

    Roosting and Potential Nest Trees a) Three or more super-canopy trees (preferably dead or with dead tops) should be identified and preserved within ¼ mile of each nest as roosting and perching sites.

    b) In areas identified as potential nesting habitat, there should be at least 4 - 6 over-mature trees of species favored bald eagles for every 320 acres within 1320 feet of a river or lake larger than 40 acres. These trees should be taller than surrounding trees or at the edge of the forest stand, and there should be clear flight paths to them.

  • Skibo Project Environmental Assessment

    June 2013 C-16 Appendix C

    Regional Forester Sensitive Species (WL) All Sensitive Species

    G-WL-11 Avoid or minimize negative impacts to known occurrences of sensitive species.

    Gray Wolf

    G-WL-10 Provide for the protection of known active gray wolf den sites during denning season.

    Boreal owl

    S-WL-6 Prohibit management activities within 300 feet of known nest sites.

    G-WL-13 Minimize activities that may disturb nesting pairs during critical nesting season (March 1-June 1).

    Great gray owl

    G-WL-14 Allow, to the extent practical, only activities that protect, maintain, or enhance site conditions within 660 feet of a known nest site.

    G-WL-15 Minimize activities that may disturb nesting pairs during critical nesting season (March 1 - June 1).

    Three-toed woodpecker

    G-WL-17 Protect known nest sites within a 200-foot radius surrounding nest sites until young have fledged.

    G-WL-18 Where ecologically appropriate, retain 6-10 jack pine per acre in even-aged regeneration harvests in mixed conifer stands.

    Sensitive Fish, Mollusks, Aquatic Insects

    G-WL-19 Protect known sensitive mussel beds.

    G-WL-20 Avoid management activities that may change microclimate or microhabitat conditions in steep ravines or on cliffs and talus slopes that are known or are highly likely to harbor sensitive plants.

    Sensitive Plants

    G-WL-20 Avoid management activities that may change microclimate or microhabitat


Recommended