Slavery and Western Expansion

• Contrast the economies, societies, and political views of the North and the South.

• Describe the role of the Free-Soil Party in the election of 1848.

• Analyze why slavery in the territories was a divisive issue between North and South and how Congress tried to settle the issue in 1850.

Objectives

• Wilmot Proviso – outlawed slavery in lands won from Mexico

• Free-Soil Party – a political party that promised free soil, free speech, free labor, and free men

• popular sovereignty – followers believed a territory’s voters should decide themselves whether to allow slavery

Terms and People

• secede – to break away, especially from the Union

• Compromise of 1850 – legislation designed to avoid division between North and South over slavery

• Fugitive Slave Act – stringent laws that required citizens to apprehend fugitive slaves

Terms and People (continued)

How did Congress try to resolve the dispute between North and South over slavery?

As the nation expanded, the problem of slavery became a divisive and difficult issue to resolve.

Different economies and viewpoints of the North and the South hindered compromise.

The North, a manufacturing society

The South, an agricultural society

• Cities and towns were trade centers

• Factories and farms produced goods

• Paid labor source, few slaves

• Many immigrants

• Cities and towns were few and far between

• Large plantations and small farms were source of wealth

• Enslaved labor force of African Americans

• Few immigrants

The North and the South had very different views of slavery.

Slavery and the North Slavery and the South

Few people had slaves and slavery ended by 1860.

Slavery was an integral part of life with over 1 million

enslaved African Americans.

Early in the 1800s, some northerners began to work for the abolition of slavery.

Many believed God intended blacks to provide labor

for whites.

Many northern states limited the rights and migration of free

African Americans, so many white northerners had little contact

with them.

Southerners claimed that enslaved people were healthier

and happier than northern wage earners.

The North and South had different views about new territories.

The South wanted thenew territories to be

slave states.

The North wanted the new territories to be free

states.

Keeping a balance between free and slave states became the focus of Congress.

It was defeated, but it brought the slavery issue into public debate.

In 1846, the Wilmot Proviso stated that all lands acquired from Mexico would be free territories.

In the election of 1848, the two political parties, the Democrats and the Whigs, split over the issue of slavery and a third party was formed, the Free-Soil Party.

“free soil, free speech, free labor, and free men”

The Free-Soil party lost the election but had a large influence on politics before the Civil War.

Platform Impact

“Free soil, free speech, free labor, and free men.”

It won 10 percent of the vote

Keep slavery out of the western territories.

It raised the question as to who would decide the slavery issue.

A national platform of “freedom.”

Tensions increased when California sought to join the

Union as a free state.

The Democrats and Whigs were forced to address the slavery issue.

Both parties supported popular sovereignty, having voters in a territory decide whether their territory would be free or slave.

Having voters decide had wide appeal since it seemed to keep with the tradition of American democracy. It would also remove Congress from the controversy.

Daniel Webster from the North

John Calhoun from the South

Henry Clay from the West

Once again, the slavery issue was debated in the Senate by three political leaders.

Henry Clay proposed a compromise balancing the number of free states and slave states in Congress known as the Compromise of 1850.

Calhoun and Webster’s positions on Clay’s compromise during Senate debate:

Calhoun Webster

• Clay’s compromise did not give the South enough protection.

• The South would break away from the Union if it did not get its demands on the slavery issue.

• Any state had the right to secede if it disagreed with national laws.

• The states should rally to the cause of unity.

• Sectional compromise was needed in order to preserve the Union.

• Webster supported popular sovereignty.

The North The South

California would be admitted to the Union as a free state.

Congress would pass a stricter fugitive slave law.

The territories of New Mexico and Utah would decide on slavery

by a vote.

Slavery would be enforced in Wash., DC, although the slave

trade would be abolished.

The compromise brought calm to the nation, but larger crises loomed.

The Compromise of 1850 finally became a law stating that:

Compromise of 1850

• California would be admitted as a free state• Popular sovereignty would be used to decide

the question of slavery in the Mexico and Utah territories

• The slave trade would be abolished in D.C., but slavery would remain

• A stronger fugitive slave law would be passed• Texas would give up its claim to New Mexico in

return for $10 million

Kansas-Nebraska Act

• 1854• Senator Stephen Douglas proposed using popular

sovereignty to decide the issue of slavery• It was believed that Nebraska would choose to

be a free territory and Kansas would choose to be slave

• Some believed that this overturned the Missouri Compromise which had been in place for over 30 years