Date post: | 14-Dec-2015 |
Category: |
Documents |
Upload: | octavia-manning |
View: | 215 times |
Download: | 0 times |
Slide 1
Slides 11Modelling and
Simulation (for SC and...
Business Strategy in general)
Slide 2
IT & Strategic Decision Making
1. Interaction between in IT and Business 2. Software for Strategic Planning 3. Executives and Managers 4. Setting the Stage 5. The Paradigm of
Systems Thinking 6. An IT Tool for
Systems Thinking
Slide 3
1. Interaction IT and Business
Main Developments and Trends – IT: more processing power and connectivity
– Business: more and global competition
Interaction ? – Business is ‘demanding’ IT developments.
Example: businesses demand better networksRelated to Efficiency - do the things right
– IT developments present opportunities to business. Example: new ways of doing business through internetRelated to Effectiveness - do the right things
Slide 4
New role for IT in Business New opportunities for IT Can we gain a competitive advantage ? Examples:
– Otis Elevators, with Otisline– Compaq, had ‘best practices’ but was challenged– Amazon Bookshop, new kind of player
IT not just for more efficiency, but for rethinking the whole process of doing business
application of IT today focuses more at strategic issues – for effectiveness, for competitiveness
Slide 5
Levels of Decision Making
Strategic, e.g. mergers, R&D planning Tactical, e.g. budget control, sales analysis Operational, e.g. accounts, orders, invoices Data or transaction processing
Slide 6
IT Application in BusinessIssues Focused over Time
Strategic issues Tactical issues Operational issues Data processing issues
Trend
Slide 7
IT Application in BusinessFeatures of Bottom and Top FROM: Features of structured, data and transaction
processing: facts, many data, internal, history, where processes/procedures are certain
TO: Features of unstructured, management decision
making: estimates, few data, external, future, where processes/procedures are uncertain
THEREFORE: New kind of ‘qualities’ in IT are required
Slide 8
2. Strategic Planning Software Market growth:
– about 50% annual growth
– acceptance of computer-based technology
– recognition strategic planning force in creating growth
More intelligence is being built into software– Complicated functions more accessible. More
processing power, so more complex software can run. This complex software is easier for the user !
Change in the kind of packages– Spreadsheets, mapping tools, dynamic mapping tools
Slide 9
3. Executives and Managers Managers are typically dealing with resources, their
planning and control: people, money, time Often related to a certain functional area and
involved with TQM issues. Sometimes also dealing with (cross functional) projects
Executive: decisive, a policy maker, appropriate term given changes within/between organisations
Executive is outward, future oriented and often involved with BPR issues
We will address both executives and managers
Slide 10
4. Setting the Stage
Daily, worldwide, millions of executives and managers use spreadsheets - for strategic planning– It seems an intellectual exercise, but is stretching the
fingers more than stretching the mind
– Spreadsheets: a data focus, not a concept focus
– They reduce the apparent complexity of problems
– They put all complexity into abstract formulas
– The ‘what-if’ cannot be performed to the formulas
Spreadsheet make us feel very comfortable
Slide 11
Spreadsheets and What-if Analysis Risk management by spreadsheet is tricky
– Playing with numbers can be done in spreadsheet, but how can we play with the real assumptions - with the formulas - the processes, the procedures ?
– We need to explore real risk in a visible manner – Spreadsheets mainly show numbers and often we take
the spreadsheet formulas for granted. – But: the processes higher in our ‘pyramid’ are harder to
be represented by formulas Spreadsheets are not wrong, they are just less
suitable for issues at the top of the business
Slide 12
“There’s nothing wrong with yourspreadsheet planning model.
You just don’t have any money.”
© Ted Goff
Slide 13
5. Systems Thinking Paradigm The game is getting tougher – a world wide game The very sustainable competitive advantage is the
ability to learn faster than the competition. Businesses are often only using tactics:
– Examples: Proprietary Technology, Privileged Access to Raw Materials, Pricing Tactics (e.g. undercutting competitor), Advertising (e.g. outspending small competitors), Benchmarking, Best Practices, Etc.
Often they do not know why they use the tactics ! Real winners are the ones that know
what is really going on, that learnedhow to learn …and change
Slide 14
Co-operation Within Customers do not anymore just look for
‘functionality’, they look for all-in-all solutions, including all the services
Not only each piece of a business should become smart, more important is that all pieces have to co-operate, that business have to cooperate across
We need to offer complete solutions, functional pieces within the organization will have to make music, like an orchestra or a football team
This is new and tough for large organizations
Slide 15
Co-operation Across We must reach out to customers, suppliers
and even to our competitors (business webs) Strategic alliances are needed and being formed.
Think of the airline industry You may end up with strange “bedfellows”:
– Examples are HP/Compaq and Philips/Sony, – The game is not within function but with world: our
customers, our government, other businesses Supplier networks are developed (VMI) We have highly interdependent realities and we
must learn how to operate in these new realities
Slide 16
Main Barriers to Learn
Two barriers to learning (learning how to compete effectively) are:– a local spatial orientation (Local in Space)– a local temporal orientation (Local in Time)
Those orientations, today more than yesterday, prevent us from learning
An example of local (or spreadsheet) thinking is the case of the Dutch Railways
Slide 17
Example: Dutch Railways Before: students in Holland had paid about HFL 60
per month on average for train transport After: student train travel was free: the grant to
students went down from Euro 300 to 250 per month, the government paid Euro 45 per student per month to the railways
Goals: improve finances of government and railways, reduce hitch-hiking, make students get to know Holland, make universities compete fairly, boost popularity of train with new generations
What did really happen ?
Slide 18
Local in Space Operating reality in business (and government) is often
a stove pipe or fire house. Communication -if at all - occurs mainly at the top. There is functional, but no cross-functional co-operation.Decisions are taken with a local perspective
Examples:– Stock markets worldwide (USA, Asia)– Use of resources like water (Central Asia)– National policies on drug use (USA, Netherlands)– Research and development (Philips speech technology)
Our actions can have consequences for others. And that again can affect us negatively, later on
Slide 19
Local in Time We often operate as if the “next quarter” is the finish
line. Our perspective is local in time Examples:
– Investment in education (Philippines, Russia)– Effects of a marketing campaign - can be long term– Politicians and business leaders often get the blame for the
mess that others, before them, have created– It can take days before raw materials are being delivered
and assembled into finished goods The (unintended) consequences of our actions come
later and are often opposite of what we want So: look around in the world, and in the future
Slide 20
Need for New Paradigm In the global economy there are less space limits,
less time limits. A local orientation in space and time inhibits business to learn how to compete !
Proposed is a change in habits of thought– think “dynamic”, not “static” (not local)– think “operations”, not “correlations”
This paradigm is called Systems Thinking, it can enable us to see relationships between things and not just see the things themselves
It will be hard to leave the old paradigm of (Laundry or Shopping) List Thinking
Slide 21
Moral 1: think dynamic not static The example Dutch Railways shows us
Moral 2: think operational not correlational An example to illustrate this is a recent
article in a prestigious economics journal reporting on a model designed to forecast annual milk production
From Factor Thinkingto Systems Thinking (1)
Slide 22
From Factor Thinkingto Systems Thinking (2) Model statistical methods Find link between milk production and economy Annual milk production is dependent Macroeconomic variables (such as GDP, interest rates,
agricultural commodity prices and inflation) are the independents
Est(MP) = 5 + 3*GDP - 2*IR + 5*ACP - 7*IN This model was good and quite precise….. Now suppose that you would like to take action (new
strategy) and increase milk production? This is a real operational question !
Slide 23
Slide 24
6. A Tool for Systems Thinking Now we have a new paradigm. How can we be
successful with the new paradigm ? Technology of the former century does not help Spreadsheets are List Thinker’s Dream Machines The bottom line is what matters – revenues/profits,
but how can we be certain that the planned “bottom line” has been calculated according to the right processes and assumptions?
Better is a process oriented approach Spreadsheets show the numbers, but
the processes deserve most attention
Slide 25
Dynamic Mapping (1)
Dynamic mapping tools have become available to replace spreadsheets for top decision making. They can be useful in a discussion about business processes:– They show and analyze how processes work– How are different elements of a strategy related– And how these forces work out over time
• Note: some tools do not have that last feature
Slide 26
Dynamic Mapping (2) A tool that stimulates fruitful discussion about
how a strategy will work out should have the following three characteristics:– clear set of symbols and easy to understand/maintain– able to show and integrate elements across-functions
and across businesses (SPACE)– include dynamics: what will a certain process cause to
other processes and the system over time (TIME) Note: structure laid out in a map alone is NO
guarantee that you will be able to deduce the dynamic behaviour !
Slide 27
The Tool ithink
Process language called ithink The ithink language has 4 symbols
– We will see this in the next 2 slides
We can illustrate this with a very simple and structured example from HR - will be shown in the slides later, first the symbols
Slide 28
Symbols of the tool ithink (1) 1. stocks
– Stocks represent accumulations. For an organisation these can be: raw materials, work in process, finished goods, labour, knowledge,people, policies, cash
2. flows– Flows (pipes) are the changes of the
stocks over time. For an organisation these can be: deliveries, production, consumption, learning, hiring of staff, revenues, expenses, payments
Stock
flow
Slide 29
3. converters – these are numbers, formulas or graphs
4. connectors– these are information flows (indicated with red arrows)
We can use a simple and structured example from Personnel Management (Rookies and Pros) that can evolve into a model for Order and Inventory Management – a general planning model, for example for Supply Chain Management
converter
Symbols of the tool ithink (2)
Slide 30
Pros
quits
quit rate
Rookies
hires new pros
– Initially we have 100 Pros and 0 Rookies– Every year 20% of the Pros quits– It will take the Rookies 2 years to become Pros
– > To compensate we hire as many as are quitting– > How does the # of Pros develop over time ?
Slide 31
Malt Beverage Game
You are a Malt Beverage retailer and are ordering from a manufacturer.
Play the Corresponding Beergame: – try to satisfy demand from your customers
In the meantime – try to keep stock at a ‘safety level’ of 12
cases……
What is the problem ?
Slide 32
Order Model
You see a single player in the supply chain, run the corresponding order model
You see two players in the supply chain, run the corresponding order model
What is the problem ? Think of adequate order strategies !
Slide 33
Building a Supplies Planning Model
Build the Rookies-Pros Model Change it to a Supplier-Buyer Model Build an interactive game on top of the
model What is the influence of
– Lead time ?– Demand uncertainty ?
Slide 34
ithink revisited
Revisiting the 3 characteristics– Clear set of symbols and easy to understand – We can show elements across; we can let a
result of a process flow from one sector or function/department/company to another;the space element is present
– The model can be ‘run’;the time element is present
Slide 35
Role of IT in Planning
Human beings are good at understanding thestructure of relationships that make a system work
We are not good at intuiting how the dynamics generated by the relationships will play out.
Computers are good at simulation. Software ‘ithink’ helps linking the structural relationships to dynamic behaviour – it is easy/cheap to apply
‘ithink’ can play plays a role in learning. Learning - modelling and simulating business
processes: here IT can play a great role!
Slide 36
Thanks for your attention !
TheEnd