Date post: | 16-Feb-2017 |
Category: |
Education |
Upload: | zhulkeflee-ismail |
View: | 197 times |
Download: | 20 times |
Using curriculum he has developed especially for English-speakingUsing curriculum he has developed especially for English-speakingMuslim converts and young English-speaking Adult Muslims. Muslim converts and young English-speaking Adult Muslims.
““To seek knowledge is obligatory upon every Muslim (male & female)”To seek knowledge is obligatory upon every Muslim (male & female)”
IT CAN ALSO BE A IT CAN ALSO BE A REFRESHER COURSE REFRESHER COURSE
FOR MUSLIM FOR MUSLIM PARENTS, EDUCATORS, PARENTS, EDUCATORS,
IN CONTEMPORARY IN CONTEMPORARY SINGAPORE. SINGAPORE. OPEN TO ALLOPEN TO ALL
IN THE NAME OF ALLAHIN THE NAME OF ALLAHMOST COMPASIONATEMOST COMPASIONATEMOST MERCIFULMOST MERCIFUL # # 1010
For further information and registration contact EFor further information and registration contact E--mail : mail : [email protected] +65 81234669 / +65 96838279or +65 81234669 / +65 96838279
LESSON
““INTRODUCTION TO STUDY OF INTRODUCTION TO STUDY OF TAUTAUHHEED – (AQA’ID)EED – (AQA’ID)””
Intermediate Level Islamic course in English for AdultsIntermediate Level Islamic course in English for Adultsconducted by Ustaz Zhulkeflee Hj Ismailconducted by Ustaz Zhulkeflee Hj Ismail
BATCH - #5
[AUGUST-DEC-2015]
Updated Updated 1818 November 2015 November 2015
18 weekly class starting: 18 weekly class starting: 12th AUGUST 2015 12th AUGUST 2015 Every Wadnesday night @ 8pm – 10pmEvery Wadnesday night @ 8pm – 10pmWisma Indah, 450 Changi Road, Wisma Indah, 450 Changi Road,
#02-00 next to Masjid Kassim#02-00 next to Masjid Kassim
All Rights Reserved © Zhulkeflee Hj Ismail (2015))
“ “TAUTAUHHEED AS-SIFAT” – EED AS-SIFAT” – AN INTRODUCTIONAN INTRODUCTION
PREVIOUS TOPICSPREVIOUS TOPICS
All Rights Reserved © Zhulkeflee Hj Ismail (2015))
BELIEVE IN THE ONE GOD – BELIEVE IN THE ONE GOD – WHO ALONE IS THE WHO ALONE IS THE CREATORCREATOR DIVINE. DIVINE.
(AL-KHALIQ-QIYYAH(AL-KHALIQ-QIYYAH ) )
BELIEVE IN THE ONE GOD – BELIEVE IN THE ONE GOD – WHO ALONE IS THE WHO ALONE IS THE SUSTAINERSUSTAINER DIVINE. DIVINE.
( AR-RUB-BUBIYYAH )( AR-RUB-BUBIYYAH )
This is not unique to Muslims. Even pagan worshippers and idolaters acknowledge this.
This is where Muslims differ with pagan worshippers, idolaters and unbelievers, because they erroneously ascribe to others besides Allah similar ‘Divine’ roles in the Sustainment of this universe.
All Rights Reserved © Zhulkeflee Hj Ismail (2015))
It can be discerned that people’s idea or knowledge that God exist,
generally pertains to Him being the Creator.
But, when we further consider God’s role in the universe and man’s
life, differences occur.
Those who deny Him as the only Absolute Sustainer, Cherisher of the
universe, would inadvertently be ascribing to others this divine role.
BELIEVE IN THE ONE GOD – BELIEVE IN THE ONE GOD – WHO ALONE IS THE WHO ALONE IS THE DIVINEDIVINE. .
( AL-ULUHIYYAH )
WHO IS THE ‘DIVINE’ ?WHO IS THE ‘DIVINE’ ?
All Rights Reserved © Zhulkeflee Hj Ismail (2015))
Therefore, because some people’s knowledge of God as Divine may Therefore, because some people’s knowledge of God as Divine may still be ambiguous, still be ambiguous,
they need to have clear understanding of what we mean by “they need to have clear understanding of what we mean by “Divinity and the Divinity and the
concept of the Divineconcept of the Divine” termed – ” termed – UluhiyyahUluhiyyah..
That in regard to God being “Divine” (That in regard to God being “Divine” (ILAAHILAAH) – there is only One, Who alone is ) – there is only One, Who alone is
the Divine, without associates or partners.the Divine, without associates or partners.
If they even accept or imagine the possibility of there being another ‘Divine’, it is If they even accept or imagine the possibility of there being another ‘Divine’, it is
termed termed SHIRKSHIRK..
Islam rejects this for our belief is termed – Islam rejects this for our belief is termed – TAUTAUHHEED AL-ULUHIYYAHEED AL-ULUHIYYAH..
All Rights Reserved © Zhulkeflee Hj Ismail (2015))
PREVIOUS TOPICSPREVIOUS TOPICS
All Rights Reserved © Zhulkeflee Hj Ismail (2015))
Knowledge concerning the “Divine” (ILAAHIYAT)Knowledge concerning the “Divine” (ILAAHIYAT)
All Rights Reserved © Zhulkeflee Hj Ismail (2015))
Knowledge concerning the “Divine” (ILAAHIYAT)Knowledge concerning the “Divine” (ILAAHIYAT)
““Say : He is Allah, the Absolute One. Say : He is Allah, the Absolute One.
Allah is the Eternal, the Most Besought of all Allah is the Eternal, the Most Besought of all **, ,
He begets not, and neither is He begotten; He begets not, and neither is He begotten;
and there is nothing that could be compared to and there is nothing that could be compared to
Him.”Him.”
((Qur’an: al-Ikhlas: 112: 1-4Qur’an: al-Ikhlas: 112: 1-4))
All Rights Reserved © Zhulkeflee Hj Ismail (2015))
[1] The name, proper noun for God is “[1] The name, proper noun for God is “ALLAH “ ALLAH “ He, most Exalted, is the Absolute One: indivisible, unique, the He, most Exalted, is the Absolute One: indivisible, unique, the
only Divine, without any other, before or after. only Divine, without any other, before or after.
If one entertains the possibility of another like “If one entertains the possibility of another like “AllahAllah”, then his ”, then his
understanding of what constitute the “understanding of what constitute the “DivinityDivinity” is flawed. ” is flawed.
Criterion which clarify our concept of GodCriterion which clarify our concept of God
PREVIOUS TOPICS
PREVIOUS TOPICS
All Rights Reserved © Zhulkeflee Hj Ismail (2015))
Criterion which clarify our concept of GodCriterion which clarify our concept of God
PREVIOUS TOPICS
PREVIOUS TOPICS
“ “Allah” Allah” : : Arabic proper noun; name for God, it Arabic proper noun; name for God, it
refers to the One and Only, the Unique Creator, refers to the One and Only, the Unique Creator,
Lord Sustainer of the Universe, Who Alone is God Lord Sustainer of the Universe, Who Alone is God
– there is none besides Allah.– there is none besides Allah.
No equivalent translation in non-Semitic language.No equivalent translation in non-Semitic language.
All Rights Reserved © Zhulkeflee Hj Ismail (2015))
Criterion which clarify our concept of GodCriterion which clarify our concept of God
PREVIOUS TOPICS
PREVIOUS TOPICS
[2] “Allah” is referred to as “[2] “Allah” is referred to as “As-SomadAs-Somad” (in Arabic) which has ” (in Arabic) which has
a profound meaning.a profound meaning.
There is no equivalent word for it in English, and requires There is no equivalent word for it in English, and requires
explanations.explanations.
**the original Arabic word the original Arabic word ““As-SomadAs-Somad” ” means means ““the Eternal, the Eternal,
the Uncaused Cause of all beingthe Uncaused Cause of all being””
All Rights Reserved © Zhulkeflee Hj Ismail (2015))
Criterion which clarify our concept of GodCriterion which clarify our concept of God
PREVIOUS TOPICS
PREVIOUS TOPICS
“ “As-Somad” As-Somad” is therefore applied to is therefore applied to
God Alone. It comprises the concept of the Primary Cause and God Alone. It comprises the concept of the Primary Cause and
Eternal, independent Being; and also the idea that everything Eternal, independent Being; and also the idea that everything
existing or conceivable goes back to Him as its source; and is existing or conceivable goes back to Him as its source; and is
therefore dependent on Him for its beginning as well as for its therefore dependent on Him for its beginning as well as for its
continued existence.continued existence.
All Rights Reserved © Zhulkeflee Hj Ismail (2015))
Criterion which clarify our concept of GodCriterion which clarify our concept of God
PREVIOUS TOPICS
PREVIOUS TOPICS
[3] “[3] “AllahAllah” – is the only “” – is the only “DivineDivine”.”.
Islam categorically refute any false notion which people ascribe to the Islam categorically refute any false notion which people ascribe to the
““DivineDivine”, especially that of God procreating (begetting another God).”, especially that of God procreating (begetting another God).
A “A “DivineDivine” exists without need for any other, whereas “” exists without need for any other, whereas “sonson” requires ” requires
a father. These two terms together are antithetical (contradictory and a father. These two terms together are antithetical (contradictory and
absurd).absurd).
All Rights Reserved © Zhulkeflee Hj Ismail (2015))
Criterion which clarify our concept of GodCriterion which clarify our concept of God
PREVIOUS TOPICS
PREVIOUS TOPICS
[4] Since “[4] Since “AllahAllah” – is Unique and the only “” – is Unique and the only “DivineDivine”, there is ”, there is
nothing that can be compared to Him, absolutely there can be nothing that can be compared to Him, absolutely there can be
no equivalent.no equivalent.
Whatever we can visualize or imagine, fall short of Allah’s Whatever we can visualize or imagine, fall short of Allah’s
Exaltedness, and must be negated - Glory be to Allah ( Exaltedness, and must be negated - Glory be to Allah ( SUB-SUB-
HHAANALLAAH AANALLAAH ! ). ! ).
All Rights Reserved © Zhulkeflee Hj Ismail (2015))
Only Allah is the God (Only Allah is the God (al- ilaahal- ilaah), there is no other that is God except ), there is no other that is God except
““AllahAllah”.”.
““LAA-ILAA-HA-IL-LALLAAH”LAA-ILAA-HA-IL-LALLAAH”
PREVIOUS TOPICS
PREVIOUS TOPICS
All Rights Reserved © Zhulkeflee Hj Ismail (2015))
IMPORTANT TO NOTEIMPORTANT TO NOTE
Conceptually regarding this aspect, i.e. Conceptually regarding this aspect, i.e. to only regard to only regard AllahAllah as as
the only Absolute One in His Divinity the only Absolute One in His Divinity ((ULUHIYYAHULUHIYYAH), and ), and to regard to regard
AllahAllah as the only Absolute Sustainer as the only Absolute Sustainer ((RUBBUBIYYAHRUBBUBIYYAH) marks the ) marks the
True Criterion in the belief in the Oneness of True Criterion in the belief in the Oneness of AllahAllah..
PREVIOUS TOPICS
PREVIOUS TOPICS
Those who assert that the non-Muslims, including even the Those who assert that the non-Muslims, including even the MUSHRIKEENMUSHRIKEEN in in
Makkah during the Prophet’s Makkah during the Prophet’s ملسو هيلع هللا ىلصملسو هيلع هللا ىلص period also adhere to period also adhere to TAUTAUHHEED AR-EED AR-
RUBUBIYYAHRUBUBIYYAH, are grossly mistaken. Acknowledging Allah as the exclusive , are grossly mistaken. Acknowledging Allah as the exclusive
ROBB-AL-‘AA-LAMEENROBB-AL-‘AA-LAMEEN, is one of the cornerstone of , is one of the cornerstone of TAUTAUHHEEDEED - to be attested - to be attested
and affirmed daily in our prayer – which the others do not truly acknowledge.and affirmed daily in our prayer – which the others do not truly acknowledge.
All Rights Reserved © Zhulkeflee Hj Ismail (2015))
PREVIOUS TOPICS
PREVIOUS TOPICS
All Rights Reserved © Zhulkeflee Hj Ismail (2015))
All Rights Reserved © Zhulkeflee Hj Ismail (2015))
SAY: "O you who deny the truth (SAY: "O you who deny the truth (AL-KAAFIRUNAL-KAAFIRUN)! )!
I do not worship that (I do not worship that (MA’BUDMA’BUD) which you worship, ) which you worship,
and neither do you worship that (and neither do you worship that (MA’BUDMA’BUD) which I ) which I
worship! And I will not worship that (worship! And I will not worship that (MA’BUDMA’BUD) which ) which
you have [ever] worshipped, and neither will you you have [ever] worshipped, and neither will you
[ever] worship that ([ever] worship that (MA’BUDMA’BUD) which I worship. ) which I worship.
Unto you, your Unto you, your DEENDEEN (religion and moral law), and (religion and moral law), and
unto me, mine!“unto me, mine!“
((Qur’an: al-Kaafirun: 109: 1-6Qur’an: al-Kaafirun: 109: 1-6))
All Rights Reserved © Zhulkeflee Hj Ismail (2015))
NOW TO CONTINUE NOW TO CONTINUE
All Rights Reserved © Zhulkeflee Hj Ismail (2015))
This is the continuation from my previous “Intermediate This is the continuation from my previous “Intermediate Lesson on Islam - Lesson on Islam - TAUTAUHHEEDEED” module *. In that part one ” module *. In that part one module, we have covered topics of :module, we have covered topics of :
[1] Introduction to the various Approaches in Developing [1] Introduction to the various Approaches in Developing AQEEDAH AQEEDAH - - TAUTAUHHEEDEED (Attestation to Oneness of God).(Attestation to Oneness of God).
[2] Causes of wrong thinking; Postulates in thinking; and [2] Causes of wrong thinking; Postulates in thinking; and Some important Cornerstone of Islamic thoughts.Some important Cornerstone of Islamic thoughts.
[3] [3] TAUTAUHHEED AL-EED AL-KHKHAALIQIYYAHAALIQIYYAH[4] [4] TAUTAUHHEED AR-RUBUBIYYAHEED AR-RUBUBIYYAH[5] [5] TAUTAUHHEED AL-ULUHIYYAH WAL- ‘UBUDIYYAHEED AL-ULUHIYYAH WAL- ‘UBUDIYYAH
So now, for TauSo now, for Tauhheed part two module, I shall covereed part two module, I shall cover “TAU“TAUHHEED AS-SIFAT”EED AS-SIFAT”
All Rights Reserved © Zhulkeflee Hj Ismail (2015))
All Rights Reserved © Zhulkeflee Hj Ismail (2015))
““LIMITLESS in His glory is thy Sustainer, the LIMITLESS in His glory is thy Sustainer, the
Lord of almightiness, [exalted] above anything Lord of almightiness, [exalted] above anything
that men may (attribute) devise by way of that men may (attribute) devise by way of
definition!”definition!”
((Qur’an: Shaffat: 37: 108Qur’an: Shaffat: 37: 108))
All Rights Reserved © Zhulkeflee Hj Ismail (2015))
““Utterly remote is Allah, in His limitless glory, Utterly remote is Allah, in His limitless glory,
from anything to which men may ascribe a from anything to which men may ascribe a
share in His divinity!share in His divinity!!”!”
((Qur’an: Shaffat: 59: 23Qur’an: Shaffat: 59: 23))
All Rights Reserved © Zhulkeflee Hj Ismail (2015))
MUQADDIMAH
MUQADDIMAH
INTRODUCTION
INTRODUCTION
This is one of the traditional approaches in This is one of the traditional approaches in ensuring the understanding of attributes of ensuring the understanding of attributes of
Allah, amongst Muslims who are exposed to Allah, amongst Muslims who are exposed to other religious or philosophical views, does not other religious or philosophical views, does not
deviate from that of the pious predecessors’ deviate from that of the pious predecessors’ (Salafus-Soleheen)(Salafus-Soleheen)
All Rights Reserved © Zhulkeflee Hj Ismail (2015))
"(To know Allah) Think and reflect upon "(To know Allah) Think and reflect upon
Allah's attributes (Allah's attributes (SifaatSifaat) and do not try ) and do not try
to think of (reality of) His Essence (to think of (reality of) His Essence (DzatDzat).“).“
(Hadith reported by Abu-Shaykh – al Jami’ : 134 Risalah Tauhid)
All Rights Reserved © Zhulkeflee Hj Ismail (2015))
When the Qur’an was revealed, it succinctly expounded and When the Qur’an was revealed, it succinctly expounded and
clarify the message of clarify the message of TAUTAUHHEEDEED, in the best Arabic to the , in the best Arabic to the
Arabic-speaking Arabic-speaking people whose mastery of Arabic was at the people whose mastery of Arabic was at the
highest.highest.
In fact, the Arabs then, had recognized the Qur’an as a miracle In fact, the Arabs then, had recognized the Qur’an as a miracle
- Divinely revealed - not the speech of man. - Divinely revealed - not the speech of man.
And they knew very wellAnd they knew very well the metaphors, the linguistic the metaphors, the linguistic
eloquence, the profound and depth to meanings, the detail eloquence, the profound and depth to meanings, the detail
and the general, etc. of the Qur’anic language - which to and the general, etc. of the Qur’anic language - which to
them, are adequately self-explanatory.them, are adequately self-explanatory.All Rights Reserved © Zhulkeflee Hj Ismail (2015))
Unfortunately, mastery of the Qur’anic (classical) Arabic language
amongst the Muslim masses tends to diminish, or it may become
weakened , except amongst Islamic scholars.
Thus the Muslims in general, have had to rely upon Islamic jurists
and scholars from whichever MADZAAHIB (schools of theology
and jurisprudence), to guide them regarding the teaching of
Islam.
Each strove to preserve and transmit the traditional scholastic
methods of understanding the primary sources (AL-QUR’AN and
AHADITH) and continue teaching these wisdom to the masses.
All Rights Reserved © Zhulkeflee Hj Ismail (2015))
The ‘golden era’ according to the Prophet The ‘golden era’ according to the Prophet ملسو هيلع هللا ىلصملسو هيلع هللا ىلص., which ., which
became the exemplary era from which Muslims of later period became the exemplary era from which Muslims of later period
relied upon as source of the pure Islamic teachings and relied upon as source of the pure Islamic teachings and
principle methodology (principle methodology (MANHAJMANHAJ), are called the period of the ), are called the period of the
pious predecessors (pious predecessors (SALAFUS-SOLISALAFUS-SOLIHHEENEEN).).
All Rights Reserved © Zhulkeflee Hj Ismail (2015))
The ‘golden era’ according to the Prophet The ‘golden era’ according to the Prophet ملسو هيلع هللا ىلصملسو هيلع هللا ىلص., which ., which
became the exemplary era from which Muslims of later period became the exemplary era from which Muslims of later period
relied upon as source of the pure Islamic teachings and relied upon as source of the pure Islamic teachings and
principle methodology (principle methodology (MANHAJMANHAJ), are called the period of the ), are called the period of the
pious predecessors (pious predecessors (SALAFUS-SOLISALAFUS-SOLIHHEENEEN).).
““The best of mankind – (believers) – are in my The best of mankind – (believers) – are in my
generation, then (a generation) after it, and then generation, then (a generation) after it, and then
(another generation) after that.”(another generation) after that.”
((Hadith reported by Bukhary and MuslimHadith reported by Bukhary and Muslim))
All Rights Reserved © Zhulkeflee Hj Ismail (2015))
During the first three generations (Qurn’ Salafus-Soliheen),
religious or theological disagreements or dissensions amongst
Islamic scholars were very rare.
But inevitably schism did arose much later as prophesised :
All Rights Reserved © Zhulkeflee Hj Ismail (2015))
During the first three generations (Qurn’ Salafus-Soliheen),
religious or theological disagreements or dissensions amongst
Islamic scholars were very rare.
But inevitably schism did arose much later as prophesised :
“And whoever amongst you live after me will see many
conflicts (disagreements), let him then adhere to whatever
they know of my Sunnah and the Sunnah of my Rightly
guided Successors (Khalifah).”
(Hadith reported by Ahmad)
All Rights Reserved © Zhulkeflee Hj Ismail (2015))
Beginning with issue of succession, it was compounded later by the people
being exposed to other cultural-thoughts, philosophy and methods
(especially from the ancient Greek-Persian-Indo civilizations) .
Thus the method and approach to teaching the Qur’anic creed of
TAUHEED of the pious generation (Salafus-Solih), had to be revised to
respond as needed, to preserve the true understanding of AQEEDAH*, lest
misinterpretations due to man’s own weakness may occur.
Please note, it is the approach, method of teaching that was revised, not the
Creed (AQEEDAH). This is in conformity with the Prophet’s Sunnah ملسو هيلع هللا ىلصملسو هيلع هللا ىلص.:
“Speak to people in accordance with their intellectual capacity.”
All Rights Reserved © Zhulkeflee Hj Ismail (2015))
In the first three generations (SHAHABI, TABI’ and TABIT-TABI’IN –
period ), the understanding of AQEEDAH of the Muslims
regarding MA’RIFATULLAAH (Knowledge in Knowing Allah) was
never a problem.
Although differences of opinion regarding politics and other
secondary issues did occur, yet in deriving understanding of
theological and creedal matters (AQEEDAH) , reliance upon
revealed knowledge (QUR’AN & AHADITH) overrides any human
speculations.
All Rights Reserved © Zhulkeflee Hj Ismail (2015))
It was in later era (known as ‘KHALAF ’ era), when many non-Arabs
came into Islam; when adherence to primary sources by the
general Muslims decreased, whereas the learning and translation
of all available sciences from other civilizations especially the
Greek philosophy - and speculative theology and rational
discourses became popular - that problems arose.
The dominance of the rationalists (MU’TAZILITE) scholars
threatened to undermine the traditional reliance upon Revelation.
All Rights Reserved © Zhulkeflee Hj Ismail (2015))
When the When the Mu’tazilitesMu’tazilites (rationalists - influenced by Greek (rationalists - influenced by Greek
philosophy) introduced innovations (philosophy) introduced innovations (BID’AHBID’AH) that threatened to ) that threatened to
undermine and replace the true creed (undermine and replace the true creed (AQEEDAHAQEEDAH) which must ) which must
remain consistent with that of the Prophetic generation, that remain consistent with that of the Prophetic generation, that
Islamic scholars – notably Islamic scholars – notably Imam Abul Hassan al-Ash-’arie Imam Abul Hassan al-Ash-’arie and and
Abu Mansur al-Maturidi Abu Mansur al-Maturidi et. al. et. al. ; - came up with the relevant ; - came up with the relevant
response to safeguard its theological belief – (termed as the response to safeguard its theological belief – (termed as the
creed of “creed of “the People of Tradition and the Communitthe People of Tradition and the Communityy” or “” or “AHLUS-AHLUS-
SUNNAH WAL- JAMA-’AH SUNNAH WAL- JAMA-’AH ”) or ”) or AHLUS-SUNNAHAHLUS-SUNNAH or simply or simply SUNNIYSUNNIY
All Rights Reserved © Zhulkeflee Hj Ismail (2015))
At that time there was tension between several extreme views :
[1] The Literalists – who follow textual basis (AL-QUR’AN and AHADITH)
as it is, and refusing the use of reasoning (TA’WIL ) in understanding
those verses which are allegorical (MUTASHA-BIHAT), since most from
SALAF generation refrained from interpreting these.
Yet the difference with them from the SALAF generation was that many
amongst them tend to insist on the literal meaning of these verses (or
allow such erroneous literal understanding in the mind of the masses to
persist), and thus created controversy (FITNAH).
LITERALISTS
All Rights Reserved © Zhulkeflee Hj Ismail (2015))
At that time there was tension between several extreme views:
[1] The Literalists –
There were some amongst them who were even accused of being
‘anthropomorphic’ (MUJASSIMAH ) or ‘those who rely on allegorical
verses’ (MUTASHA-BIHAT) - for asserting (or subtly insinuating) that
these verses are to be accepted literally - highlighting them (without
explaining its correct meaning) and were adamant in chastising as
deviant, whoever are providing the necessary explanation thereof
through TA’WIL. Yet these are clearly metaphors which are ambiguous.
LITERALISTS
All Rights Reserved © Zhulkeflee Hj Ismail (2015))
At that time there was tension between several extreme views:
[1] The Literalists –
They ruled that doing TA’WIL to be a heretical innovation
(BID’AH DOLAA-LAH), although we know that there were many
of Prophet’s companions who interpreted and did TA’WIL.
Not only this, they even went on to condemn logic and
philosophy, and many other ‘new’ ideas and improvements
developed due to changing needs in teaching the Muslims.
LITERALISTS
All Rights Reserved © Zhulkeflee Hj Ismail (2015))
Then another group with yet another extreme view appear :
[2] The Rationalists –
They were those who regarded reasoning as being higher than that
of Revelation - that in their interpretations of the Revealed texts
(AL-QUR’AN & AHADITH), they advocated drastic changes even to
the Scriptural text itself ( tampering -TAHRIF).
RATIONALISTS
All Rights Reserved © Zhulkeflee Hj Ismail (2015))
Then another group with yet another extreme view appear :
[2] The Rationalists –
Their radicalism in using reason, perhaps were the very cause why
the ‘literalist’ reacted the other way (albeit, they the literalists
were equally guilty of being radical too, in the other extreme.)
Some of these Rationalists were accused of being religious
‘innovators’ (MUB-TADI’ ) because of these attempts, seen as
people of HAWA (followers of desire) rather than of revelation –
changing the DEEN to suit their thinking.
RATIONALISTS
All Rights Reserved © Zhulkeflee Hj Ismail (2015))
The third group with another extreme view were the :
[3] The Pseudo-Sufis –
These were groups claiming to be Sufis yet display ignorance of
the SHARI’AH in their belief and practices of Islam.
Because of them, the ‘literalists’ and ‘rationalists’ gained
credibility for attacking ‘Traditional Islamic scholars’ mistaking
them to be similar in their views, whereas these (Traditional)
scholars had condemned all ‘pseudo Sufis‘ and regarded them
also as religious ‘innovators’ (MUB-TADI’ ) of that time.
PSEUDO-SUFISPSEUDO-SUFIS
All Rights Reserved © Zhulkeflee Hj Ismail (2015))
We Muslims are to follow the middle, or balanced way
(UMMATAN WASOTAN) – regarded as traditional or orthodox.
““Thus have We made of you an Ummah justly balanced Thus have We made of you an Ummah justly balanced
that ye might be witnesses over the nations and the that ye might be witnesses over the nations and the
Messenger a witness over yourselves”Messenger a witness over yourselves”
((Qur’an: Baqarah: 2: 143Qur’an: Baqarah: 2: 143))All Rights Reserved © Zhulkeflee Hj Ismail (2015))
We Muslims are to follow the middle, or balanced way
(UMMATAN WASOTAN) – regarded as traditional or orthodox.
““Those who listen to the Word, and Those who listen to the Word, and follow the best follow the best
(meaning) in it(meaning) in it: those are the ones whom Allah has guided, : those are the ones whom Allah has guided,
and those are the ones endued with understanding.” and those are the ones endued with understanding.”
((Qur’an: Baqarah: 39: 18Qur’an: Baqarah: 39: 18))
All Rights Reserved © Zhulkeflee Hj Ismail (2015))
We Muslims are to follow the middle, or balanced way
(UMMATAN WASOTAN) – regarded as traditional or orthodox.
““Be not like those who are divided amongst themselves
and fall into disputations after receiving Clear signs; for
them is a dreadful penalty.― “
((Qur’an: Aali ‘Imran: 3: 105Qur’an: Aali ‘Imran: 3: 105))All Rights Reserved © Zhulkeflee Hj Ismail (2015))
We Muslims are to follow the middle, or balanced way
(UMMATAN WASOTAN) – regarded as traditional or orthodox.PROPHET MUHAMMAD ملسو هيلع هللا ىلصملسو هيلع هللا ىلص SAID:
All Rights Reserved © Zhulkeflee Hj Ismail (2015))
We Muslims are to follow the middle, or balanced way
(UMMATAN WASOTAN) – regarded as traditional or orthodox.
““Allah most Exalted will never allow the affairs of my Allah most Exalted will never allow the affairs of my
ummah to be with what deviates (from Truth) forever; so ummah to be with what deviates (from Truth) forever; so
follow the majority (of my ummah – follow the majority (of my ummah – SAWAA-DUL-A’-ZOMSAWAA-DUL-A’-ZOM). ).
Allah’s hand is upon the Jama’ah (united community), Allah’s hand is upon the Jama’ah (united community),
whoever defers away from it , defers toward Hell-fire.”whoever defers away from it , defers toward Hell-fire.”
((Hadith reported by al-Hakim from Ibn JarirHadith reported by al-Hakim from Ibn Jarir))
PROPHET MUHAMMAD ملسو هيلع هللا ىلصملسو هيلع هللا ىلص. SAID:
All Rights Reserved © Zhulkeflee Hj Ismail (2015))
(874 – 936CE) 874 – 936CE) Imam Abul Hassan Ash-’arie in fact, begun as a
MU’TAZILI (rationalists) but returned to the fold of pure creed
(AQEEDAH of AHLUS-SUNNAH WAL-JAMA’AH), and thus was
most competent to refute the MU’TAZILI, by upholding the
Revealed basis of the creed of the SALAF generation (NAQLIYAH),
and supported it with logic and reasoning approaches (‘AQLIYAH)
in argument and explanation, relevant to refute those
rationalists of his time because they were familiar with it and
favour such approaches in their argument and discourses.
All Rights Reserved © Zhulkeflee Hj Ismail (2015))
His method, sometimes termed as the school (MADZHAB) of
Imam Ash-’arie (ASH-’ARITE), reconciled these two extreme
views of the time (Literalist-Rationalist), but most importantly,
it preserved and provide guidance in how should the Muslims’
understanding the creed of the AHLUS-SUNNAH WAL-JAMA’AH
should be, based upon Revealed text (NAQLIYAH), yet putting
the use of reason (‘AQLIYAH) and rational arguments as
important and necessary, but not higher than the proof of
revelation.
All Rights Reserved © Zhulkeflee Hj Ismail (2015))
As one’s belief in God is conceptual, the use of reason must
not be left unguided without God’s Revealed proof – because
man, instinctively, has the tendency towards
‘anthropomorphism’ (to imagine God as in human form) if left
to his own device.
All Rights Reserved © Zhulkeflee Hj Ismail (2015))
His method was further developed by Imam Abu Mansur
Maturidi (853- 944CE) (853- 944CE) and Imam Muhammad bin Yusuf As-
Sanusi (895CE) and since then has been taught – as a legacy of
and represent the creed of AHLUS-SUNNAH WAL-JAMA’AH *,
which serves to circumvent the likelihood of the ‘rationalists’
and ‘literalists’, resurfacing again with their extreme views.
* This was the creed which has been unanimously understood to conform
with and represent the creed (AQEEDAH) of the SALAF generation – in the
subsequent generations which follow them, known as KHALAF generations.
All Rights Reserved © Zhulkeflee Hj Ismail (2015))
It must be appreciated, that this methodology was developed
(as were the “MADZAAHIB” in FIQH and other Islamic sciences
e.g. Musthalah-al-Hadith , Tafsir, Nahwu, Qira’at, etc.) after
the time of the SALAF era – precisely because it was needed to
provide relevant response to the challenges of the time, in
guiding and educating the subsequent generation of the
Ummah in later times, upon the Right Path.
All Rights Reserved © Zhulkeflee Hj Ismail (2015))
It’s objective in fact was to uphold and defend the pristine Creed
of the SALAFUS-SOLIH against the challenges of the subsequent
generations prone to attacks by the rationalists, the
anthropomorphist and innovators of the DEEN (MUBTADI’ ) –
albeit, using the approaches relevant to address and refute their
erroneous assertions accordingly.
All Rights Reserved © Zhulkeflee Hj Ismail (2015))
Arguing that the method cannot be accepted because it (the
method) was never used by the SALAF generation and by the earlier
Muslim Scholars e.g. Imam Malik (711 – 795CE)(711 – 795CE), , Imam Imam Shafi’ie
(745-820CE), etc. - this is tenuous, childish and only exposed the
persons’ lack of understanding of the fuller history of Islam and of
the Muslim intellectuals and Islamic scholarship; the development
of creedal and Islam’s legal history (TARIKH TASH-RI’) .
All Rights Reserved © Zhulkeflee Hj Ismail (2015))
It is foolish to argue that this methodological approach (of the
ASH-’ARIYAH) is categorised as “BID’AH” (innovation) and not part of
Islamic heritage and scholarship – just as they had erroneously dismissed
every other “MADZAAHIB” that developed after the era of the SALAFUS-
SOLIH – categorized by them as “BID’AH” too, simply because they
themselves have not understood its relevance and are clearly
unappreciative of how it has saved the Ummah from misguidance.
Their dismissive attitude may be regarded perhaps as naïve by some,
and this strict rigidity reveal sheer arrogance - a sign of ungratefulness
towards the intellectual legacy of most of our earlier Islamic scholars.
All Rights Reserved © Zhulkeflee Hj Ismail (2015))
Similarly, it is indeed foolish to ‘ritualistically’ teach the ASH ’ARIE –
MATURUDIYY method, (merely repeating them mechanically from
traditional text) without linking (highlighting) it’s relevance in the
present context of ideological thoughts, explaining how it is to be
applied in correcting the errors of current intellectual discourse in
AQEEDAH.
Remember, AQEEDAH is not to be taught merely as a subject, but the
inculcating understanding or rather instilling a believe (Creed) in
such a way to convince people of the Truth. To believe is to be
convinced with ‘certainty’, rather than simply to ‘know’ or be
informed of various subjects or information.All Rights Reserved © Zhulkeflee Hj Ismail (2015))
In today’s context, this methodology is much needed as
safeguard for the Muslim’s understanding of the Islamic creed
against the onslaught of “secularist-atheistic-rationalists” ideas
being propagated .
It must be noted that even now, there are Muslim intellectuals
who have been influenced by their Orientalist mentors, and
are seeking to glamorize and revive the MU’TAZILITE
discourses.
These are the “Liberal Muslims” or we would rather refer to
them as NEO-MU’TAZILITES. * NEO – means “new”
All Rights Reserved © Zhulkeflee Hj Ismail (2015))
All Rights Reserved © Zhulkeflee Hj Ismail (2015))
Who are the NEO-MU’TAZILITES ?
The original MU’TAZILITES were followers of Wasil bin Atha’
(700–748CE) (700–748CE) who begun learning the Greek philosophy and logic.
In discussing religion and theology, because they adamantly
regard “reason” (‘AQL) as foremost even to be above revelation
(WAHYU) , they broke away from AHL-SUNNAH WAL JAMA’AH.
All Rights Reserved © Zhulkeflee Hj Ismail (2015))
Who are the NEO-MU’TAZILITES ?
In spite of this misguidance, they had contributed much
towards eradicating ‘blind and literal ’ adherence to text, and
gross lack in using logical arguments (logic and reason) in
matters of proving the Islamic creed (AQEEDAH).
In engaging these original MU’TAZILITES, the AHLUS-SUNNAH
scholars had triumphed over them and was able to refute all of
their false assertions - even using their mode of philosophy
and rational arguments.All Rights Reserved © Zhulkeflee Hj Ismail (2015))
Who are the NEO-MU’TAZILITES ?
In can be said that this MADZHAB had long ceased to exist ,
extinct – although their ideas are still studied for comparison and
as part of Islamic intellectual history by Muslim scholars in USUL-
UDDEEN.
It was the Orientalists who were fascinated by them and had
sought to revive their ‘rationalism’ . But this had long been
confined mostly in intellectual discourses and academic writings
(much of it in non-Arabic languages).All Rights Reserved © Zhulkeflee Hj Ismail (2015))
Who are the NEO-MU’TAZILITES ?
When in recent years, Muslims who had began studying Islam
from these Orientalists and in Western-based learning
institutions, MU’TAZILI ideas now is being promoted by these
Muslims. Even to the extent of starting movements , reading
groups etc., mostly supported by secular institutions seeking to
undermine the traditional MADZAAHIB and the traditionalists.
In fact they are not “MU’TAZILITE” , but a pretender of one,
trying to gain acceptance from unsuspecting Muslims.
All Rights Reserved © Zhulkeflee Hj Ismail (2015))
Who are the NEO-MU’TAZILITES ?
These NEO-MU’TAZILITE are made to look ‘progressive’ and with
logical thoughts whereas these were ‘rehashed’ ideas (rather poor
imitations which) have already been refuted by past scholars of
AHLUS-SUNNAH WAL JAMA’AH – the knowledge of these refutations
are still available amongst traditional Islamic scholars.
Other names they may claim for themselves e.g.:
“Liberal Islam”, “Islamic Reformers”, “Modernist Muslim”, “Progressive
Islam” , “Radical Muslim thinkers” etc.
All Rights Reserved © Zhulkeflee Hj Ismail (2015))
Who are the NEO-MU’TAZILITES ?
It is most unfortunate that the general Muslims are ’lazy’ to learn
Islam – the traditionally transmitted teachings - and are contented
to be ‘simplistic’ in their grasp on knowledge of their AQEEDAH.
Or they are being misled by those who mock the traditional
ASH’ARITE school of AHLUS-SUNNAH , even accusing it to be a
‘deviant’ sect while favouring another extreme group, the literalist
view of the “NEO-SALAFIS”.
waAllaahu a’lamwaAllaahu a’lam * NEO – means “new”
All Rights Reserved © Zhulkeflee Hj Ismail (2015))
All Rights Reserved © Zhulkeflee Hj Ismail (2015))
Who are the “NEO-SALAFIS” ?
As explained, the original term SALAF (‘predecessor’) refers to the
Muslims in the first three generations closest to our Prophet
Muhammad’s period ( .(ملسو هيلع هللا ىلصملسو هيلع هللا ىلص
After that era, all Muslims are regarded as KHALAF (‘successor’).
The purity of the SALAFI ’s adherence to basic source of Islamic
knowledge (AL-QUR’AN and AHADITH), had ensured that no
changes were made to these early text.
All Rights Reserved © Zhulkeflee Hj Ismail (2015))
Who are the “Who are the “NEO-SALAFISNEO-SALAFIS” ?” ?
Yet, the reality is that certain verses (statements) in the Yet, the reality is that certain verses (statements) in the QUR’ANQUR’AN
and and AHADITHAHADITH are are metaphoricalmetaphorical, and , and must not must not be understood be understood
literallyliterally..
The people of The people of SALAF SALAF generation,generation, because of their excellentbecause of their excellent grasp grasp
of Islam and mastery of Qur’an classical Arabic, it had ascertained of Islam and mastery of Qur’an classical Arabic, it had ascertained
that no confusion nor misinterpretation occurred regarding their that no confusion nor misinterpretation occurred regarding their
common understanding of these allegorical (metaphorical) verses common understanding of these allegorical (metaphorical) verses
in the text.in the text.
All Rights Reserved © Zhulkeflee Hj Ismail (2015))
Who are the “NEO-SALAFIS” ?
When asked about these allegorical verses (AAYAT
MUTASHABIHAT), they would accept the words as they are (to
ensure no tampering of the original text) and “leave its meaning
to Allah” (TAFWIDW) without takyif (by asking how) nor ta’thil
(denying the words as it is used) nor tamthil (making similitude for
them), but most importantly they all forbade and warned against
these verses AAYAT MUTASHABIHAT , to be taken and
understood literally.
All Rights Reserved © Zhulkeflee Hj Ismail (2015))
Who are the “NEO-SALAFIS” ?
In the KHALAF period, to prevent the general Muslims from the
mistake of taking these allegorical verses AAYAT MUTASHABIHAT
literally, Islamic scholars apply TA’WIL (interpretation) to them,
ever since. This has been adhered to by subsequent scholars of
AHLUS-SUNNAH.
It is obvious, why TA’WIL generally was not done previously was
because there was no such danger of misinterpretation by the
people during that SALAF period (unlike in later KHALAF era).
All Rights Reserved © Zhulkeflee Hj Ismail (2015))
Who are the “NEO-SALAFIS” ?
During KHALAF period, leaving these verses without the right
TA’WIL, will definitely invite ‘misinterpretation’ from the general
masses, and have even led to the rise of deviant MUJASSIMAH
(anthropomorphist) groups.
Those who may not be aware, please note that TA’WIL on the
Qur’an itself was approved by the Prophet ملسو هيلع هللا ىلصملسو هيلع هللا ىلص when he
prayed for Allah to grant Ibnu Abbas r.a. this knowledge.
All Rights Reserved © Zhulkeflee Hj Ismail (2015))
When later, the controversially known scholar from Harran controversially known scholar from Harran
Imam Taqiyuddin Ibn Taymiyyah (1263 -1328CE) (1263 -1328CE) , raised the
objection again regarding TA’WIL, it rekindled once more the
controversy (FITNAH) , the opportunity for the MUJASSIMAH
(anthropomorphist) and the literalists since then, to justify and
promote their misguided agenda.
Imam Ibn Taymiyyah may have valid concern then, at the
period when his views could be scrutinized by his peers or more
competent Islamic scholars of his time.
All Rights Reserved © Zhulkeflee Hj Ismail (2015))
And indeed some of his views were accommodated but all his other
controversial views have been well refuted.
But in today's context, this view was revived by Muhammad ibn Abd
al-Wahhab (1703–92) bringing up more controversial views. It had
again caused much confusion to the common Muslims whose
knowledge of Islam, generally, is very much deficient.
This was compounded when many of these new ‘SALAFIS’ (or other
referred to them as ‘WAHABIY’) even condemned other Muslims
studying the Islamic traditional sciences of Theology (‘ILMU KALAM),
logic (MANTIQ), philosophy (FALASIFAH), Sufism (TASAWWUF) etc.
All Rights Reserved © Zhulkeflee Hj Ismail (2015))
A revived interest of promoting his opinions, especially in the
early 20th century Arabia, led to the ‘literalist’ group using it to re-
introduce many controversial discourses – worldwide.
In the absence of right TA’WIL, the general Muslims thus would
be easily misled to think in anthropomorphic terms.
Although aware of this danger, yet many from this group
adamantly promoted this kind of discourse and some even went
on to condemn all those doing TA’WIL (or even the following of a
MADZHAB) as wrong, nay as “deviancy” .
All Rights Reserved © Zhulkeflee Hj Ismail (2015))
To gain credence from public, they even styled themselves as the
SALAFIYYIN – (or SALAFIS), as though implying, that the rest of the
Muslims have not adhered to the true methodology of the “early
pious predecessors”, but only their group “are upon the true path.”
We need to qualify and acknowledge that we do not here refer to
those who are true and legitimate followers of any MADZAAHIB .
We respect those amongst them who honestly identify themselves
with the HANABALI and AHLIL-HADITH rather than using the term
SALAFI label and claim exclusivity for themselves.
All Rights Reserved © Zhulkeflee Hj Ismail (2015))
It is the misappropriation of the label “SALAFI ” which is misleading,
and therefore needs to be highlighted and corrected.
This ‘movement’ which was formed rather late (truncated) in
history, still belongs to the KHALAF period, and cannot be the
“SALAF “ as referred to by the Prophet ملسو هيلع هللا ىلصملسو هيلع هللا ىلص.
Thus we would rightfully termed them as NEO-SALAFIS.
waAllaahu a’lamwaAllaahu a’lam* NEO – means “new”
All Rights Reserved © Zhulkeflee Hj Ismail (2015))
All Rights Reserved © Zhulkeflee Hj Ismail (2015))
Who are the “PSEUDO-SUFIS” ?
Islam has to be implemented in three aspects, viz. Belief,
Practice and Perfection – (IIMAN-ISLAM-IHSAN).
It is from IHSAN , that later on, the Sciences of the “Self”
(‘ILMUN-NAFS) or “Human Disposition” (AKHLAQ), or
“Purification of the Self” (TAZKIYA-AN-NAFS), or Detachment
(ZUHUD), or “Knowledge of the Divine“ (IRFAN), or Sufism
(TASAWWUF )” etc. were developed.
All Rights Reserved © Zhulkeflee Hj Ismail (2015))
Who are the “PSEUDO-SUFIS” ?
Those who take exception to these terminologies (especially term
‘TASAWWWUF’ ) should first understand that the general definition
of these, are in fact all referring to a common objective of:
“the practice of Islam at the level of IHSAN.”
All Rights Reserved © Zhulkeflee Hj Ismail (2015))
Who are the “PSEUDO-SUFIS” ?
Those who take exception to these terminologies (especially term
‘TASAWWWUF’ ) should first understand that the general definition
of these, are in fact all referring to a common objective of:
“the practice of Islam at the level of IHSAN.”
““Al-IAl-Ihhsansan (righteousness or best conduct) is that you (righteousness or best conduct) is that you worship (serve) Allah as though you are seeing Him; worship (serve) Allah as though you are seeing Him; while you see Him not, yet truly He sees you”while you see Him not, yet truly He sees you”
((Hadith reported by MuslimHadith reported by Muslim))
All Rights Reserved © Zhulkeflee Hj Ismail (2015))
Who are the “PSEUDO-SUFIS” ?
As in all things Islam, there are ADAB to be strictly obeyed. This
aspect IHSAN in fact, are regarded as the aspect of perfecting a
Muslim’s state of “Submission or worship or servitude to Allah.”
Therefore, this comes after development of their correct belief
(IIMAN) and proper understanding of the Shari’ah (FIQH), without
which, those indulging in this may be led astray – NA-UUDZU-
BILLAAH. (we seek Allah’s protection)
All Rights Reserved © Zhulkeflee Hj Ismail (2015))
Who are the “PSEUDO-SUFIS” ?
We should heed the warning and advice of Imam Malik r.a. who said:
““He who He who TASAWWAFATASAWWAFA (practices Sufism) without learning (practices Sufism) without learning
FIQHFIQH (Sacred Law) corrupts his Faith (becomes a (Sacred Law) corrupts his Faith (becomes a ZINDIQZINDIQ), ),
while he who learns while he who learns FIQHFIQH (Sacred Law) without (Sacred Law) without TASAWWUFTASAWWUF
(practicing Sufism) corrupts himself (becomes a (practicing Sufism) corrupts himself (becomes a FASIQFASIQ). ).
Only he who combines the two proves True (Only he who combines the two proves True (TAHAQQUQTAHAQQUQ).”).”
((Iqaz al-himam fee sharh al-HikamIqaz al-himam fee sharh al-Hikam))
All Rights Reserved © Zhulkeflee Hj Ismail (2015))
Who are the “PSEUDO-SUFIS” ?
As we have learnt, that the primary cause for SHIRK is ignorance.
Especially when acts of worship and matters pertaining to the
religion are “blindly imitated ” , as when rituals or ‘belief’ are
followed without possessing true knowledge.
It is from this group (pseudo-Sufis ) that many religious
terminologies ( regarding special terms pertaining to AQEEDAH as
it is used by the true MUTASAWWIF ) may also be “carelessly
parroted” to the general public by them, which may cause FITNAH.
All Rights Reserved © Zhulkeflee Hj Ismail (2015))
Who are the “PSEUDO-SUFIS” ?
Yet it is doubtful that most of them (and the general Muslim
public) truly understand their true profound and exclusive
meanings. Thus the ignorance and confusion of knowledge is
compounded.
This is further exacerbated by many of them neglecting the
pursuit in serious learning of the DEEN, but instead they promote
highly their “Dzikr” sessions to people who may actually have little
or inadequate basic Islamic knowledge.
All Rights Reserved © Zhulkeflee Hj Ismail (2015))
Who are the “PSEUDO-SUFIS” ?
And just like the NEO-SALAFIS, these PSEUDO-SUFIS also in a
way, are claiming exclusivity for themselves, as though
implying (and some don’t even hide their arrogance by
asserting that) other Muslims who do not identify themselves
with their group (TARIQAH), are not really “practicing Islam at
the level of IHSAN” or perhaps “not as good as us the SUFIS”.
They even styled themselves as “AHLIL-HAQIQAT (Esoteric)”
while condemning others derogatively as “AHLI-SHARI’AT
(Exoteric)”.All Rights Reserved © Zhulkeflee Hj Ismail (2015))
WaAllaahu a’lamWaAllaahu a’lam
All Rights Reserved © Zhulkeflee Hj Ismail (2015))
““And whoever obeys Allah and the Messenger - those will And whoever obeys Allah and the Messenger - those will
be with the ones upon whom Allah has bestowed favour of be with the ones upon whom Allah has bestowed favour of
the prophets (the prophets (NABIYYINNABIYYIN), the steadfast affirmers of truth ), the steadfast affirmers of truth
((SwIDDIQEENSwIDDIQEEN), the martyrs (), the martyrs (SHUHADAASHUHADAA) and the ) and the
righteous (righteous (SwOLISwOLIHHEENEEN). And excellent are those as ). And excellent are those as
companions. That is the bounty from Allah, and sufficient companions. That is the bounty from Allah, and sufficient
is Allah as Knower.”is Allah as Knower.”
((Qur’an: an-Nisa’: 4: 69-70Qur’an: an-Nisa’: 4: 69-70))
All Rights Reserved © Zhulkeflee Hj Ismail (2015))
““Those Those who listen to the Word, and follow the best (meaning) in itwho listen to the Word, and follow the best (meaning) in it: :
those are the ones whom Allah has guided, and those are the onesthose are the ones whom Allah has guided, and those are the ones
endued with understanding.” endued with understanding.”
((Qur’an: Az-Zumar:39:18Qur’an: Az-Zumar:39:18))
All Rights Reserved © Zhulkeflee Hj Ismail (2015))
““Exalted is your Lord (Exalted is your Lord (ROBBROBB), the Lord of might, above ), the Lord of might, above
what they describe. And peace upon the messengers. what they describe. And peace upon the messengers.
And praise to Allah, Lord (And praise to Allah, Lord (ROBBROBB) of the worlds.”) of the worlds.”
((Qur’an: Saffat: 37: 180-182Qur’an: Saffat: 37: 180-182))
All Rights Reserved © Zhulkeflee Hj Ismail (2015))
IMPORTANT DU’AIMPORTANT DU’A
ALLAA-HUM-MA – ARI-NAL-HAQ-QA - HAQ-QANWAR- ZUQ-NAT - TI-BAA- ’A
WA-ARI-NAL – BAA-TWILA – BAA-TWI-LAANWAR-ZUQ-NAJ – TI –NAA - BAH
““O Allah! Make us see the Truth to be true O Allah! Make us see the Truth to be true
and grant us ability to follow it.and grant us ability to follow it.
And make us see Falsehood to be false and And make us see Falsehood to be false and
grant us the ability to reject it.”grant us the ability to reject it.”All Rights Reserved © Zhulkeflee Hj Ismail (2015))
TO BE CONTINUED TO BE CONTINUED - -
All Rights Reserved © Zhulkeflee Hj Ismail (2015))
http://an-naseehah.blogspot.com/
http://introductiontotauhid.blogspot.com/
http://oyoubelievers.blogspot.com/
http://al-amthaal.blogspot.com/
http://zhulkeflee-archive.blogspot.com/
http://criteriaforaholybook-quran.blogspot.com/
http://with-the-truthful.blogspot.com/
http ://muqaddam-nurul.blogspot.com/
All welcome to visit my web-blog:All welcome to visit my web-blog:
91All Rights Reserved © Zhulkeflee Hj Ismail (2015))