47
SMCCCD College of San Mateo - Curb Ramps September 2020 SSA Project # 19029.00 DRAFT Access Compliance Survey Report Appendix N: Curb Ramps SMCCCD - College of San Mateo 4288 of 4366
SMCCCD College of San Mateo - Curb Ramps September 2020SSA Project # 19029.00
DRAFTAccess Compliance Survey Report Appendix N: Curb Ramps SMCCCD - College of San Mateo
4288 of 4366
September 2020SSA Project # 19029.00
SMCCCD College of San Mateo - Curb Ramps - ACS Report
Table of Contents
I. Cover & Table of Contents
i. Report Navigation and Abbreviations ii. Cost Summary
II. Survey Data - Curb Ramps
4289 of 4366
September 2020SSA Project # 19029.00
SMCCCD College of San Mateo - Curb Ramps - ACS Report
NAVIGATION & LEGEND
4290 of 4366
September 2020SSA Project # 19029.00
SMCCCD College of San Mateo - Curb Ramps - ACS Report
NAVIGATION
1. Locator Number: Correspondstoauniquedatabaserecordtiedtothespecificcurbrampwhichcanbecrossreferencedacrossthisdata-base and its corresponding GIS database.
2. Ramp Type: Identifiesthetypeofcurbramp(parallel,perpendicular,curbramprequired,etc.).3. Specific Item: Categoryofaccessiblefeatureinwhichthebarrierbelongs.4. Survey Street: Surveystreetname.5. Field Condition: Descriptionofas-builtbarrierbasedonapplicableaccessibilitycodes.6. Measurement: Existingcondition/dimensionfeaturedontherampmeasuredasthemostseverebarrierontheparticularramp.7. Proposed Solution: Descriptionofstepsnecessarytoremovebarrierand,ifapplicable,aninterimsolutionornotes.8. Cross Street: Cross/intersectingstreetname.9. Codes / Info: -PROWAG: GuidelinestoenforceFederalaccessibilitystandardsinthepublicrights-of-way. -ADAAG/ADA2010: TheFederalStandardforaccessibilityadoptedbytheDepartmentofJustice. -CBC2007/CBC2016 TheCaliforniaBuildingCodes.10. Unit Cost: Estimatedcostspecificsolutionperoneunit.(Thefinalcostofbarrierremovalmayexceedthisestimatebasedonthe
yearofmitigation,designapproachandchosenmethodofmitigation)11. Ramp Features: Featuresofcurbrampmeasuredtodetermineaccessibility.12. Measurements: Existingcondition/dimensiondeterminedforeachramp. -(in) measurementininches -(%) measurementinpercentagegrade - BOLD textindicatenon-compliantdimensions. -Normal textindicatecompliantdimensions13. Priority: Prioritynumberassignedtospecificbarrierbasedonpriorizationcriteriawhichinclude:expectedfrequencyofuseand severityofthebarrier.Measureedonascaleof0to200,with200beingthehighestpriorityand0beingtheleast.
6542 81 11103 7 129 13
4291 of 4366
September 2020SSA Project # 19029.00
SMCCCD College of San Mateo - Curb Ramps - ACS Report
ADA AmericanswithDisabilitiesActADAAG ADAAccessibilityGuidelinesE EastFig. FigureJOB peronejob(lumpsum)lbs. PoundsLF LinearfootMUTCD ManualonUniformTrafficControlDevicesN NorthNE NortheastNW NorthwestNWn Northwest:NorthsideNWs Northwest:SouthsidePOT PathoftravelPROW PublicRight-of-WayPROWAG PublicRight-of-WayAccesibleGuidelinesQty QuantityREF Reference;Providedinlocationswithover- lappingissue;indicatesnoadditioncost requiredformitigationS SouthSE SoutheastSF SquarefootSW SouthwestTBD TobedeterminedW West
LEGEND ABBREVIATIONS
4292 of 4366
FeATURe: ADA/CBC GUIDeLINeStreet Grade Used for reference in regards to possible exceptionsWidth of Ramp Theclearwidthofcurbrampruns(excludinganyflaredsides),blendedtransitions,and
turningspacesshallbe48inchesminimum.Slope of the Ramp Ramprunsshallhavearunningslopenotsteeperthan1:12(8.3%).X Slope of the Ramp Thecrossslopeofcurbrampsandblendedtransitionsshallbe1:48(2.0%)maximum.Top Landing Length Landingsshallbeprovidedatthetopsofcurbrampsandblendedtransitions.Thelanding
clearlengthshallbe48inchesminimum.Top Landing Slope Theslopeofthelandinginalldirectionsshallbe1:48(2.0%)maximum.Top Landing X Slope Theslopeofthelandinginalldirectionsshallbe1:48(2.0%)maximum.Bottom Landing Length (ParallelCurbRamp)Aturningspace48inchesminimumby48inchesminimumshallbe
providedatthebottomofthecurbramp.Bottom Landing Slope (ParallelCurbRamp)Theslopeoftheturningspaceinalldirectionsshallbe1:48(2.0%)
maximum.Bottom Landing X Slope (ParallelCurbRamp)Theslopeoftheturningspaceinalldirectionsshallbe1:48(2.0%)
maximum.Left Flare Whereprovided,curbrampflaresshallnotbesteeperthan1:10(10.0%).Right Flare Whereprovided,curbrampflaresshallnotbesteeperthan1:10(10.0%).Gutter Lip Theadjacentsurfacesattransitionsatcurbrampstowalks,gutters,andstreetsshallbeat
thesamelevel.Gutter Slope Counterslopesofadjoiningguttersandroadsurfacesimmediatelyadjacenttoandwithin
24inchesofthecurbrampshallnotbesteeperthan1:20(5.0%).Gutter X Slope Thecrossslopeofcurbrampsandblendedtransitionsshallbe1:48(2.0%)maximum.Truncated Domes Curbrampsandblendedtransitionsshallhavedetectablewarnings.Dome Setback Detectablewarningsshallbelocatedsotheedgenearestthecurbis6inchesminimum
and8inchesmaximumfromthelineatthefaceofthecurbmarkingthetransitionbetweenthecurbandthegutter,streetorhighwayorflushatthetransitionforaparalellcurbrampandislandcut-through.
Within Crosswalk Thebottomofcurbrampsshallhaveaclearspace48inchesminimumoutsideactivetrafficlanesoftheroadway
MEASUREMENT BREAKDOWN
September 2020SSA Project # 19029.00
SMCCCD College of San Mateo - Curb Ramps - ACS Report
4293 of 4366
September 2020SSA Project # 19029.00
SMCCCD College of San Mateo - Curb Ramps - ACS Report
COST SUMMARY
4294 of 4366
College of San Mateo Access Compliance Survey Report - Curb Ramps Cost Summary
Street Names: Type:
Total Cost for Street: Aquatics Ln $12,000.00
ID:
Aquatics Ln $12,000.00and
$12,000.00Curb Ramp Required226
Street Names: Type:
Total Cost for Street: Beethoven Lot 2 $10,250.00
ID:
Beethoven Lot 2 $10,250.00and
$10,250.00Perpendicular232
Street Names: Type:
Total Cost for Street: College Center 10 $27,000.00
ID:
College Center 10 $7,000.00and East Hall 12
$7,000.00Blended Transition270
College Center 10 $20,000.00and Forum Lot 8
$20,000.00Perpendicular275
Street Names: Type:
Total Cost for Street: College Heights Dr $10,000.00
ID:
College Heights Dr $10,000.00and Aquatics Ln
$10,000.00Blended Transition223
Street Names: Type:
Total Cost for Street: Csm Dr $32,500.00
ID:
Csm Dr $19,000.00and
$19,000.00Parallel215
Csm Dr $13,500.00and Theater Ln
$13,500.00Parallel207
Street Names: Type:
Total Cost for Street: East Hall 12 $6,500.00
ID:
East Hall 12 $6,500.00and East Hall 12
$6,500.00Perpendicular267
September 2020 Prepared by Sally Swanson Architects, Inc. Project # 19029
4295 of 4366
College of San Mateo Access Compliance Survey Report - Curb Ramps Cost Summary
Street Names: Type:
Total Cost for Street: East Perimeter Road $68,500.00
ID:
East Perimeter Road $10,500.00and Athletic Loop Road
$10,500.00Parallel260
East Perimeter Road $7,000.00and Bulldog Lot 9
$7,000.00Curb Ramp Required282
East Perimeter Road $13,500.00and Bulldog Lot 9A
$13,500.00Blended Transition280
East Perimeter Road $37,500.00and East Perimeter Road
$37,500.00Curb Ramp Required283
Street Names: Type:
Total Cost for Street: Forum Lot 8 $17,500.00
ID:
Forum Lot 8 $7,000.00and East Perimeter Road
$7,000.00Curb Ramp Required265
Forum Lot 8 $10,500.00and Forum Lot 8
$10,500.00Perpendicular278
Street Names: Type:
Total Cost for Street: Galileo Lot 6 $24,500.00
ID:
Galileo Lot 6 $24,500.00and Galileo Lot 6
$24,500.00Perpendicular298
Street Names: Type:
Total Cost for Street: North Hall 18 $7,000.00
ID:
North Hall 18 $7,000.00and Marie Curie Lot 5
$7,000.00Curb Ramp Required295
Street Names: Type:
Total Cost for Street: Planetarium $6,500.00
ID:
Planetarium $6,500.00and Planetarium
$6,500.00Perpendicular296
Street Names: Type:
Total Cost for Street: South Hall 14 $14,000.00
ID:
September 2020 Prepared by Sally Swanson Architects, Inc. Project # 19029
4296 of 4366
College of San Mateo Access Compliance Survey Report - Curb Ramps Cost Summary
South Hall 14 $14,000.00and Central Hall 16
$14,000.00Curb Ramp Required293
Street Names: Type:
Total Cost for Street: Stadium Lot 11 $0.00
ID:
Stadium Lot 11 $0.00and
$0.00Perpendicular246
Street Names: Type:
Total Cost for Street: Marie Curie Lot 5 $2,500.00
ID:
Marie Curie Lot 5 $2,500.00and North Hall 18
$2,500.00Parallel294
Total Cost for Curb Ramps: $238,750.00
September 2020 Prepared by Sally Swanson Architects, Inc. Project # 19029
4297 of 4366
September 2020SSA Project # 19029.00
SMCCCD College of San Mateo - Curb Ramps - ACS Report
SURVEY DATA
4298 of 4366
!(
!(
247
249250251252253254
255256
257258
259260
261
265266267
268269
270
271272273
275276 277
278
279280
281
282283
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
206207
208209 210
211
215
222223
224225
226
227228
232
245
246
202
203
Route
65 SW
Route
64 SW
Route
24 NE
Rou
te10
0 N
Rou
te99
NRoute30 NW
Rou
te 6
7 N
Route27 NW
Route
23 NE
Route
18 SE
Route61 W
Route40 NW
Route53 E
Route
11 N
E
Route
10 NE
Route
36 NE
Route7 NW
Route
60 SW
Route
32 NE
Rou
te 8
2N
W /
NE
Route 15 NW
Route 22 NW
Route 90 NW
Route 51 NE
Route 58 SE
Route 21 NW
Route 44 SW
Route 46 E
Route 66 NE
Route
56N / S
Route 47 SE
Route 9 NW
Route 97 NE
Route 29 SE
Route 57 E
Route 85 NW
Rou
te 3
8 S
Route 113 NW
Route 31 NE
Route 48 NERoute 39 SE
Route 66 N / E
Route 14 NE
Route 59 SW
Route 81 SW
Route 19 SW
Route
49 S
E
Route 45 NW
Route 13 NW
Route 41 E
Route 34 NW
Route 68 SE
Route 37 NW
Route
54 S
W
Route 52 S
Route 43 NW
Route 35 NE
Route 16 NE
Route 42 SWRou
te 17 N
W
Lot 6
Lot 5
PlanetariumB36
B18
B17B16
B19 B12
B10
Lot 8
Lot 7B34
Lot 9A
Lot 9B
Lot 9C
Lot 9D
BaseballField
Turf Field
B35
SoftballField
B30A
College HeightsStadium (Football& Track)
B30
Tennis Courts
Lot 11
B8
AquaticsCenter
B7
Lot 12
B5
B9
B1Lot 3
B2
B3B4
Lot 2
Lot 10
B33
B15Lot 4
B14
Source: Esri, DigitalGlobe, GeoEye, Earthstar Geographics, CNES/Airbus DS, USDA, USGS, AeroGRID, IGN, and the GIS User Community
College of San Mateo Path of Travel Routes 0 290 580 870 1,160145Feet
LegendNodes
Ramps
Pedestrian Signals Priority!( 131.875000
!( 131.875001 - 133.500000
Curb Ramps Priority100.000000 - 105.000000
105.000001 - 118.000000
118.000001 - 132.500000
Path of Travel Route Priority100.000000 - 106.250000
106.250001 - 120.000000
120.000001 - 153.000000
µ
4299 of 4366
College of San Mateo Access Compliance Survey Report - Curb Ramps AQUATICS LN
Codes / Mitigation InfoExisting Access Barrierand Proposed SolutionRamp TypeID # Measurements
Aquatics LnCross StreetSurvey StreetYear Completed
TBD
X Slope of the Ramp / Pad
• Proposed Solution:
• As-Built Description:Detectable warning surface not provided where a curbramp, landing, blended transition, pedestrian pad, orisland cut through connects to a street.
Detectable Warnings
Install a truncated dome surface that extends the fullwidth and depth (36" min.) of the curb ramp, landing,blended transition, pedestrian pad, or island cut throughexcluding the flared sides, inside the grooved border.
Perpendicular
R305.1PROWAG
4.7.7ADAAG
$2500.00Unit Cost
705.1ADA-2010
CBC 2007 1127B.5.7
(in) 96.0Width of Ramp / Pad
(%)Slope of the Ramp / Pad 7.9(%) 0.4
Left Flare N/A(%)Right Flare N/A(%)
1.1Top Landing Slope (%)0.4Top Landing X Slope (%)
48.0Top Landing Length (in)
N/AGutter Lip (in)Truncated Domes NO(y/n)
No
No X-walk
Stop/Yield Control:
Crosswalks Served:
224
Tee Intersection:
Vertical Curb:
CBC 2016 11B-705.1.2.2
No
Vertical
Length of Ramp / Pad (in) 92.0
Street Grade (Left / Right) 0.2 N/A(%)
Sidewalk Width: 6.0(ft)
Priority
104
X Slope of the Ramp / Pad
• Proposed Solution:
• As-Built Description:Detectable warning surface not provided where a curbramp, landing, blended transition, pedestrian pad, orisland cut through connects to a street.
Detectable Warnings
Install a truncated dome surface that extends the fullwidth and depth (36" min.) of the curb ramp, landing,blended transition, pedestrian pad, or island cut throughexcluding the flared sides, inside the grooved border.
Perpendicular
R305.1PROWAG
4.7.7ADAAG
$2500.00Unit Cost
705.1ADA-2010
CBC 2007 1127B.5.7
(in) 59.0Width of Ramp / Pad
(%)Slope of the Ramp / Pad 7.8(%) 0.1
Left Flare N/A(%)Right Flare N/A(%)
1.6Top Landing Slope (%)0.2Top Landing X Slope (%)
48.0Top Landing Length (in)
N/AGutter Lip (in)Truncated Domes NO(y/n)
No
No X-walk
Stop/Yield Control:
Crosswalks Served:
225
Tee Intersection:
Vertical Curb:
CBC 2016 11B-705.1.2.2
No
Vertical
Length of Ramp / Pad (in) 84.0
Street Grade (Left / Right) 0.1 N/A(%)
Sidewalk Width: 6.0(ft)
Priority
104
September 2020 Prepared by Sally Swanson Architects, Inc. Project # 19029
4300 of 4366
College of San Mateo Access Compliance Survey Report - Curb Ramps AQUATICS LN
X Slope of the Ramp / Pad
• Proposed Solution:
• As-Built Description:Curb ramp or blended transition not provided where apedestrian access route crosses a curb.
Access Route
Provide a parallel curb ramp, including detectablewarning surfaces, and top and bottom landings asrequired.
Curb Ramp Required
R207.1PROWAG
4.7.1ADAAG
$7000.00Unit Cost
CBC 2007 1127B.5.1LEFT RIGHT
(in)Width of Ramp / Pad
(%)Slope of the Ramp / Pad
(%)
No
No X-walk
Stop/Yield Control:
Crosswalks Served:
226
Tee Intersection:
Vertical Curb:No
RolledSidewalk Width: 6.0(ft)
Priority
100
Total Costs for Curb Ramps at : andAquatics Ln $12,000.00
Total Costs for Curb Ramps along : Aquatics Ln $12,000.00
September 2020 Prepared by Sally Swanson Architects, Inc. Project # 19029
4301 of 4366
College of San Mateo Access Compliance Survey Report - Curb Ramps BEETHOVEN LOT 2
Codes / Mitigation InfoExisting Access Barrierand Proposed SolutionRamp TypeID # Measurements
Beethoven Lot 2Cross StreetSurvey StreetYear Completed
TBD
X Slope of the Ramp / Pad
• Proposed Solution:
• As-Built Description:
• As-isMeasurement:
Running slope at top landing of existing perpendicularcurb ramp exceeds the 1:48 (2%) maximum.
2.1%
Ramp Landing
Demolish existing and provide new, perpendicular curbramp, including detectable warning surfaces, and top andbottom landings as required.
Perpendicular
R304.2.2PROWAG
4.8.4; 4.8.6ADAAG
$6500.00Unit Cost
CBC 2007 1127B.5.4
(in) 71.0Width of Ramp / Pad
(%)Slope of the Ramp / Pad 8.1(%) 0.6
Left Flare N/A(%)Right Flare N/A(%)
2.1Top Landing Slope (%)0.1Top Landing X Slope (%)
48.0Top Landing Length (in)
Within Crosswalk YES
0.25Gutter Lip
Dome Setback
(in)
3.9Gutter Slope (%)0.0Gutter XSlope (%)
0.0(in)
(y/n)
Truncated Domes YES(y/n)
No
1 X-walk
Stop/Yield Control:
Crosswalks Served:
227
Tee Intersection:
Vertical Curb:
CBC 2016 11B-406.5.3
No
Vertical
Length of Ramp / Pad (in) 87.0
Street Grade (Left / Right) 0.0 N/A(%)
Sidewalk Width: 6.0(ft)
Priority
103.5
X Slope of the Ramp / Pad
• Proposed Solution:
• As-Built Description:
• As-isMeasurement:
The detectable warning surface is not located between 6"- 8" from the curb line on a curb ramp or at the edges on apedestrian island, cut-through island, pedestrian pad,perpendicular curb ramp or blended transition. (0" fromcurb line on a parallel curb ramp.)
12.0"
Detectable Warning Surface
Relocate the detectable warning surface.
Blended Transition
4.7.7, 4.29.1&2ADAAG
$500.00Unit Cost
705.1ADA-2010
LEFT RIGHT(in)Width of Ramp / Pad
(%)Slope of the Ramp / Pad(%)
Top Landing Slope (%)Top Landing X Slope (%)
Top Landing Length (in)
0.6Bottom Landing Slope (%)2.0Bottom Landing X Slope (%)
70.5Bottom Landing Length (in)
Within Crosswalk YES
N/AGutter Lip
Dome Setback
(in)
12.0(in)
(y/n)
Truncated Domes YES(y/n)
No
1 X-walk
Stop/Yield Control:
Crosswalks Served:
228
Tee Intersection:
Vertical Curb:
CBC 2016 11B-705.1.2.2
No
Vertical
Length of Ramp / Pad (in)
Street Grade (Left / Right) 0.0 N/A(%)
Sidewalk Width: 6.0(ft)
Priority
100
September 2020 Prepared by Sally Swanson Architects, Inc. Project # 19029
4302 of 4366
College of San Mateo Access Compliance Survey Report - Curb Ramps BEETHOVEN LOT 2
X Slope of the Ramp / Pad
• Proposed Solution:
• As-Built Description:
• As-isMeasurement:
Cross slope at top landing of existing perpendicular curbramp exceeds 2%.
2.6%
Ramp Landing
Demolish existing and provide new, perpendicular curbramp, including detectable warning surfaces, and top andbottom landings as required.
Perpendicular
R304.5.3PROWAG
4.8.4; 4.8.6ADAAG
$3250.00Unit Cost
405.7ADA-2010
CBC 2007 1127B.5.4
(in) 70.0Width of Ramp / Pad
(%)Slope of the Ramp / Pad 5.8(%) 1.2
Left Flare (%)Right Flare (%)
0.2Top Landing Slope (%)2.6Top Landing X Slope (%)
48.0Top Landing Length (in)
0.5
Gutter Lip
Dome Setback
(in)
5.4
Gutter Slope (%)0.4
Gutter XSlope (%)
50.0
(in)Truncated Domes
YES
(y/n)
No
No X-walk
Stop/Yield Control:
Crosswalks Served:
232
Tee Intersection:
Vertical Curb:
CBC 2016 11B-406.5.3
No
Vertical
Length of Ramp / Pad (in) 84.0
Street Grade (Left / Right) 1.2 N/A(%)
Sidewalk Width: 6.0(ft)
Priority
108.5
Total Costs for Curb Ramps at : andBeethoven Lot 2 $10,250.00
Total Costs for Curb Ramps along : Beethoven Lot 2 $10,250.00
September 2020 Prepared by Sally Swanson Architects, Inc. Project # 19029
4303 of 4366
College of San Mateo Access Compliance Survey Report - Curb Ramps COLLEGE CENTER 10
Codes / Mitigation InfoExisting Access Barrierand Proposed SolutionRamp TypeID # Measurements
College Center 10 East Hall 12Cross StreetSurvey StreetYear Completed
TBD
X Slope of the Ramp / Pad
• Proposed Solution:
• As-Built Description:Curb ramp, blended transition, island cut-through, islandperpendicular, or pedestrian pad surveyed for thefollowing items are in compliance with the ADA andapplicable building codes.
Compliant Curb Ramp
Provide routine inspection and maintenance to maintainaccessible access route.
Blended Transition
$0.00Unit Cost
LEFT RIGHT(in)Width of Ramp / Pad
(%)Slope of the Ramp / Pad(%)
Top Landing Slope (%)Top Landing X Slope (%)
Top Landing Length (in)
0.2Bottom Landing Slope (%)1.2Bottom Landing X Slope (%)
72.0Bottom Landing Length (in)
Within Crosswalk YES
N/AGutter Lip
Dome Setback
(in)
8.0(in)
(y/n)
Truncated Domes YES(y/n)
No
1 X-walk
Stop/Yield Control:
Crosswalks Served:
268
Tee Intersection:
Vertical Curb:
No
Vertical
Length of Ramp / Pad (in)
Street Grade (Left / Right) 0.3 N/A(%)
Sidewalk Width: 4.0(ft)
Priority
100
X Slope of the Ramp / Pad
• Proposed Solution:
• As-Built Description:
• As-isMeasurement:
Running slope at bottom landing of existing blendedtransition exceeds 2%.
2.9%
Ramp Landing
Demolish existing and provide new, blended transition,including detectable warning surfaces, and top andbottom landings as required.
Blended Transition
R304.3.2PROWAG
4.8.4; 4.8.6ADAAG
$3500.00Unit Cost
LEFT RIGHT(in)Width of Ramp / Pad
(%)Slope of the Ramp / Pad(%)
Top Landing Slope (%)Top Landing X Slope (%)
Top Landing Length (in)
2.9Bottom Landing Slope (%)0.9Bottom Landing X Slope (%)
95.0Bottom Landing Length (in)
N/AGutter Lip (in)Truncated Domes NO(y/n)
No
No X-walk
Stop/Yield Control:
Crosswalks Served:
269
Tee Intersection:
Vertical Curb:
CBC 2016 11B-406.3.2
No
Vertical
Length of Ramp / Pad (in)
Street Grade (Left / Right) 1.5 N/A(%)
Sidewalk Width: 4.0(ft)
Priority
100
September 2020 Prepared by Sally Swanson Architects, Inc. Project # 19029
4304 of 4366
College of San Mateo Access Compliance Survey Report - Curb Ramps COLLEGE CENTER 10
X Slope of the Ramp / Pad
• Proposed Solution:
• As-Built Description:
• As-isMeasurement:
Running slope at bottom landing of existing blendedtransition exceeds 2%.
5.9%
Ramp Landing
Demolish existing and provide new, blended transition,including detectable warning surfaces, and top andbottom landings as required.
Blended Transition
R304.3.2PROWAG
4.8.4; 4.8.6ADAAG
$3500.00Unit Cost
LEFT RIGHT(in)Width of Ramp / Pad
(%)Slope of the Ramp / Pad(%)
Top Landing Slope (%)Top Landing X Slope (%)
Top Landing Length (in)
5.9Bottom Landing Slope (%)1.4Bottom Landing X Slope (%)
96.0Bottom Landing Length (in)
N/AGutter Lip (in)Truncated Domes NO(y/n)
No
No X-walk
Stop/Yield Control:
Crosswalks Served:
270
Tee Intersection:
Vertical Curb:
CBC 2016 11B-406.3.2
No
Vertical
Length of Ramp / Pad (in)
Street Grade (Left / Right) 2.0 N/A(%)
Sidewalk Width: 4.0(ft)
Priority
100
Total Costs for Curb Ramps at : East Hall 12andCollege Center 10 $7,000.00
X Slope of the Ramp / Pad
• Proposed Solution:
• As-Built Description:
• As-isMeasurement:
Running slope at top landing of existing perpendicularcurb ramp exceeds the 1:48 (2%) maximum.
2.9%
Ramp Landing
Demolish existing and provide new, perpendicular curbramp, including detectable warning surfaces, and top andbottom landings as required.
Perpendicular
R304.2.2PROWAG
4.8.4; 4.8.6ADAAG
$6500.00Unit Cost
CBC 2007 1127B.5.4
(in) 60.0Width of Ramp / Pad
(%)Slope of the Ramp / Pad 7.3(%) 0.3
Left Flare N/A(%)Right Flare N/A(%)
2.9Top Landing Slope (%)0.4Top Landing X Slope (%)
48.0Top Landing Length (in)
N/AGutter Lip (in)Truncated Domes NO(y/n)
No
No X-walk
Stop/Yield Control:
Crosswalks Served:
272
Tee Intersection:
Vertical Curb:
CBC 2016 11B-406.5.3
No
Vertical
Length of Ramp / Pad (in) 93.0
Street Grade (Left / Right) 0.6 N/A(%)
Sidewalk Width: 4.0(ft)
Priority
109
September 2020 Prepared by Sally Swanson Architects, Inc. Project # 19029
4305 of 4366
College of San Mateo Access Compliance Survey Report - Curb Ramps COLLEGE CENTER 10
X Slope of the Ramp / Pad
• Proposed Solution:
• As-Built Description:
• As-isMeasurement:
Running slope of existing perpendicular curb ramp is lessthan 5% or greater than 8.3%.
8.8%
Ramp Slope
Demolish existing and provide new, perpendicular curbramp, including detectable warning surfaces, and top andbottom landings as required.
Perpendicular
R304.2.2PROWAG
4.7.2; 4.8.2ADAAG
$6500.00Unit Cost
405.2ADA-2010
CBC 2007 1127B.5.3
(in) 60.0Width of Ramp / Pad
(%)Slope of the Ramp / Pad 8.8(%) 1.5
Left Flare N/A(%)Right Flare N/A(%)
0.1Top Landing Slope (%)0.3Top Landing X Slope (%)
48.0Top Landing Length (in)
N/AGutter Lip (in)Truncated Domes NO(y/n)
No
No X-walk
Stop/Yield Control:
Crosswalks Served:
273
Tee Intersection:
Vertical Curb:
CBC 2016 11B-406.2.1
No
Vertical
Length of Ramp / Pad (in) 85.0
Street Grade (Left / Right) 0.1 N/A(%)
Sidewalk Width: 4.0(ft)
Priority
106.5
X Slope of the Ramp / Pad
• Proposed Solution:
• As-Built Description:
• As-isMeasurement:
Running slope at blended transition exceeds 5%.
5.1%
Blended Transition
Demolish existing and provide new, blended transition,including detectable warning surfaces, and top andbottom landings as required.
Blended Transition
R304.4.1PROWAG
$7000.00Unit Cost
LEFT RIGHT(in) 60.0Width of Ramp / Pad
(%)Slope of the Ramp / Pad 5.1(%) 0.0
1.3Top Landing Slope (%)0.1Top Landing X Slope (%)
48.0Top Landing Length (in)
N/AGutter Lip (in)Truncated Domes NO(y/n)
No
No X-walk
Stop/Yield Control:
Crosswalks Served:
274
Tee Intersection:
Vertical Curb:
No
Vertical
Length of Ramp / Pad (in) 84.0
Street Grade (Left / Right) 0.9 N/A(%)
Sidewalk Width: 5.0(ft)
Priority
100
September 2020 Prepared by Sally Swanson Architects, Inc. Project # 19029
4306 of 4366
College of San Mateo Access Compliance Survey Report - Curb Ramps COLLEGE CENTER 10
X Slope of the Ramp / Pad
• Proposed Solution:
• As-Built Description:Curb ramp, blended transition, island cut-through, islandperpendicular, or pedestrian pad surveyed for thefollowing items are in compliance with the ADA andapplicable building codes.
Compliant Curb Ramp
Provide routine inspection and maintenance to maintainaccessible access route.
Perpendicular
$0.00Unit Cost
(in) 115.0Width of Ramp / Pad
(%)Slope of the Ramp / Pad 6.8(%) 1.2
Left Flare N/A(%)Right Flare N/A(%)
0.5Top Landing Slope (%)0.7Top Landing X Slope (%)
48.0Top Landing Length (in)
N/AGutter Lip
Dome Setback
(in)
6.0(in)Truncated Domes YES(y/n)
No
No X-walk
Stop/Yield Control:
Crosswalks Served:
275
Tee Intersection:
Vertical Curb:
No
Vertical
Length of Ramp / Pad (in) 84.0
Street Grade (Left / Right) 1.6 N/A(%)
Sidewalk Width: 5.0(ft)
Priority
100
Total Costs for Curb Ramps at : Forum Lot 8andCollege Center 10 $20,000.00
Total Costs for Curb Ramps along : College Center 10 $27,000.00
September 2020 Prepared by Sally Swanson Architects, Inc. Project # 19029
4307 of 4366
College of San Mateo Access Compliance Survey Report - Curb Ramps COLLEGE HEIGHTS DR
Codes / Mitigation InfoExisting Access Barrierand Proposed SolutionRamp TypeID # Measurements
College Heights Dr Aquatics LnCross StreetSurvey StreetYear Completed
TBD
X Slope of the Ramp / Pad
• Proposed Solution:
• As-Built Description:
• As-isMeasurement:
Cross slope of existing parallel curb ramp exceeds 2%.
Right: 2.5%
Ramp Cross Slope
Demolish existing and provide new parallel curb rampincluding detectable warning surfaces, and top andbottom landings as required.
Parallel
R304.5.3PROWAG
4.8.6ADAAG
$7000.00Unit Cost
LEFT RIGHT(in) 73.0 73.0Width of Ramp / Pad
(%)Slope of the Ramp / Pad 3.3 4.7(%) 1.1 2.5
7.7 2.1Top Landing Slope (%)2.1 2.4Top Landing X Slope (%)
48.0Top Landing Length 48.0(in)
1.1Bottom Landing Slope (%)1.4Bottom Landing X Slope (%)
96.0Bottom Landing Length (in)
Within Crosswalk YES
N/AGutter Lip
Dome Setback
(in)
8.0(in)
(y/n)
Truncated Domes YES(y/n)
No
1 X-walk
Stop/Yield Control:
Crosswalks Served:
222
Tee Intersection:
Vertical Curb:
CBC 2016 11B-406.5.7
No
Vertical
Length of Ramp / Pad (in) 76.0 78.0
Street Grade (Left / Right) 2.9 N/A(%)
Sidewalk Width: 6.0(ft)
Priority
110.5
X Slope of the Ramp / Pad
• Proposed Solution:
• As-Built Description:
• As-isMeasurement:
The slope of the gutter area or street at the foot of a curbramp, blended transition, pedestrian pad, or island cutthrough exceeds 1:20 (5%) in the direction of thepedestrian crossing.
9.5%
Gutter
Demolish gutter or street area as required and provide 48"x 48" area at foot of curb ramp, blended transition,pedestrian pad, or island cut through with slope nogreater than 5%.
Blended Transition
R304.5.4PROWAG
4.7.2ADAAG
$3000.00Unit Cost
406.2ADA-2010
CBC 2007 1127B.5.3
LEFT RIGHT(in) 72.0Width of Ramp / Pad
(%)Slope of the Ramp / Pad 2.0(%) 0.3
1.4Top Landing Slope (%)0.3Top Landing X Slope (%)
48.0Top Landing Length (in)
Within Crosswalk YES
0.5Gutter Lip
Dome Setback
(in)
9.5Gutter Slope (%)1.5Gutter XSlope (%)
0.0(in)
(y/n)
Truncated Domes YES(y/n)
No
1 X-walk
Stop/Yield Control:
Crosswalks Served:
223
Tee Intersection:
Vertical Curb:
CBC 2016 11B-406.5.8
No
Vertical
Length of Ramp / Pad (in) 112.0
Street Grade (Left / Right) 1.2 N/A(%)
Sidewalk Width: 6.0(ft)
Priority
100
Total Costs for Curb Ramps at : Aquatics LnandCollege Heights Dr $10,000.00
Total Costs for Curb Ramps along : College Heights Dr $10,000.00
September 2020 Prepared by Sally Swanson Architects, Inc. Project # 19029
4308 of 4366
College of San Mateo Access Compliance Survey Report - Curb Ramps CSM DR
Codes / Mitigation InfoExisting Access Barrierand Proposed SolutionRamp TypeID # Measurements
Csm DrCross StreetSurvey StreetYear Completed
TBD
X Slope of the Ramp / Pad
• Proposed Solution:
• As-Built Description:
• As-isMeasurement:
The cross slope of the gutter area or street at the foot of acurb ramp, blended transition, pedestrian pad, or islandcut through exceeds 2%.
2.4%
Gutter
Demolish gutter or street area as required and provide 48"x 48" area at foot of curb ramp, blended transition,pedestrian pad, or island cut through with a cross slopeno greater than 2%.
Blended Transition
R304.5.3PROWAG
4.8.6ADAAG
$3000.00Unit Cost
CBC 2007 1127B.5
LEFT RIGHT(in)Width of Ramp / Pad
(%)Slope of the Ramp / Pad(%)
Top Landing Slope (%)Top Landing X Slope (%)
Top Landing Length (in)
1.2Bottom Landing Slope (%)1.3Bottom Landing X Slope (%)
91.0Bottom Landing Length (in)
Within Crosswalk YES
0.0Gutter Lip
Dome Setback
(in)
1.0Gutter Slope (%)2.4Gutter XSlope (%)
41.0(in)
(y/n)
Truncated Domes YES(y/n)
Yes-Stop Sign
1 X-walk
Stop/Yield Control:
Crosswalks Served:
208
Tee Intersection:
Vertical Curb:
CBC 2016 11B-406.5.8
No
Vertical
Length of Ramp / Pad (in)
Street Grade (Left / Right) 1.0 0.5(%)
Sidewalk Width: 8.0(ft)
Priority
100
X Slope of the Ramp / Pad
• Proposed Solution:
• As-Built Description:Detectable warning surface not provided where a curbramp, landing, blended transition, pedestrian pad, orisland cut through connects to a street.
Detectable Warnings
Install a truncated dome surface that extends the fullwidth and depth (36" min.) of the curb ramp, landing,blended transition, pedestrian pad, or island cut throughexcluding the flared sides, inside the grooved border.
Island-Cut Through
R305.1PROWAG
4.7.7ADAAG
$2500.00Unit Cost
705.1ADA-2010
CBC 2007 1127B.5.7
(in) 92.0Width of Ramp / Pad
(%)Slope of the Ramp / Pad 0.5(%) 0.6
Within Crosswalk YES
0.0Gutter Lip (in)
(y/n)
Truncated Domes NO(y/n)
No
2 X-walk
Stop/Yield Control:
Crosswalks Served:
209
Tee Intersection:
Vertical Curb:
CBC 2016 11B-705.1.2.2
No
Vertical
Length of Ramp / Pad (in) 72.0
Street Grade (Left / Right) 0.5 1.4(%)
Sidewalk Width: 8.0(ft)
Priority
100
September 2020 Prepared by Sally Swanson Architects, Inc. Project # 19029
4309 of 4366
College of San Mateo Access Compliance Survey Report - Curb Ramps CSM DR
X Slope of the Ramp / Pad
• Proposed Solution:
• As-Built Description:
• As-isMeasurement:
Cross slope at bottom landing of existing blendedtransition exceeds 2%.
2.4%
Ramp Landing
Demolish existing and provide new, blended transition,including detectable warning surfaces, and top andbottom landings as required.
Blended Transition
R304.3.2PROWAG
4.8.4; 4.8.6ADAAG
$3500.00Unit Cost
LEFT RIGHT(in)Width of Ramp / Pad
(%)Slope of the Ramp / Pad(%)
Top Landing Slope (%)Top Landing X Slope (%)
Top Landing Length (in)
0.2Bottom Landing Slope (%)2.4Bottom Landing X Slope (%)
96.0Bottom Landing Length (in)
Within Crosswalk YES
N/AGutter Lip
Dome Setback
(in)
42.0(in)
(y/n)
Truncated Domes YES(y/n)
No
1 X-walk
Stop/Yield Control:
Crosswalks Served:
210
Tee Intersection:
Vertical Curb:
CBC 2016 11B-406.3.2
No
Vertical
Length of Ramp / Pad (in)
Street Grade (Left / Right) 0.2 N/A(%)
Sidewalk Width: 8.0(ft)
Priority
100
X Slope of the Ramp / Pad
• Proposed Solution:
• As-Built Description:
• As-isMeasurement:
The slope of the gutter area or street at the foot of a curbramp, blended transition, pedestrian pad, or island cutthrough exceeds 1:20 (5%) in the direction of thepedestrian crossing.
11.1%
Gutter
Demolish gutter or street area as required and provide 48"x 48" area at foot of curb ramp, blended transition,pedestrian pad, or island cut through with slope nogreater than 5%.
Parallel
R304.5.4PROWAG
4.7.2ADAAG
$3000.00Unit Cost
406.2ADA-2010
CBC 2007 1127B.5.3
LEFT RIGHT(in) 95.5 96.0Width of Ramp / Pad
(%)Slope of the Ramp / Pad 5.2 9.1(%) 1.0 1.8
0.8 0.2Top Landing Slope (%)1.8 1.9Top Landing X Slope (%)
48.0Top Landing Length 48.0(in)
0.1Bottom Landing Slope (%)1.1Bottom Landing X Slope (%)
246.0Bottom Landing Length (in)
0.25Gutter Lip
Dome Setback
(in)
11.1Gutter Slope (%)1.1Gutter XSlope (%)
6.0(in)Truncated Domes YES(y/n)
No
No X-walk
Stop/Yield Control:
Crosswalks Served:
211
Tee Intersection:
Vertical Curb:
CBC 2016 11B-406.5.8
No
Vertical
Length of Ramp / Pad (in) 87.0 84.0
Street Grade (Left / Right) 1.2 N/A(%)
Sidewalk Width: 8.0(ft)
Priority
109
September 2020 Prepared by Sally Swanson Architects, Inc. Project # 19029
4310 of 4366
College of San Mateo Access Compliance Survey Report - Curb Ramps CSM DR
X Slope of the Ramp / Pad
• Proposed Solution:
• As-Built Description:
• As-isMeasurement:
Cross slope of existing parallel curb ramp exceeds 2%.
Right: 3.2%
Ramp Cross Slope
Demolish existing and provide new parallel curb rampincluding detectable warning surfaces, and top andbottom landings as required.
Parallel
R304.5.3PROWAG
4.8.6ADAAG
$7000.00Unit Cost
LEFT RIGHT(in) 72.0 72.0Width of Ramp / Pad
(%)Slope of the Ramp / Pad 7.2 7.6(%) 0.3 3.2
3.4 3.6Top Landing Slope (%)0.1 1.0Top Landing X Slope (%)
48.0Top Landing Length 48.0(in)
2.1Bottom Landing Slope (%)1.2Bottom Landing X Slope (%)
72.0Bottom Landing Length (in)
N/AGutter Lip
Dome Setback
(in)
40.0(in)Truncated Domes YES(y/n)
No
No X-walk
Stop/Yield Control:
Crosswalks Served:
215
Tee Intersection:
Vertical Curb:
CBC 2016 11B-406.5.7
No
Vertical
Length of Ramp / Pad (in) 86.0 121.0
Street Grade (Left / Right) 0.7 N/A(%)
Sidewalk Width: 6.0(ft)
Priority
110.5
Total Costs for Curb Ramps at : andCsm Dr $19,000.00
X Slope of the Ramp / Pad
• Proposed Solution:
• As-Built Description:
• As-isMeasurement:
Cross slope of an existing perpendicular curb rampexceeds 1:48 (2%).
3.1%
Ramp Slope
Demolish existing and provide new, perpendicular curbramp, including detectable warning surfaces, and top andbottom landings as required.
Perpendicular
R304.5.3PROWAG
4.8.6ADAAG
$6500.00Unit Cost
405.3ADA-2010
CBC 2007 1133B.5.3.1
(in) 67.0Width of Ramp / Pad
(%)Slope of the Ramp / Pad 6.2(%) 3.1
Left Flare N/A(%)Right Flare N/A(%)
3.3Top Landing Slope (%)1.1Top Landing X Slope (%)
48.0Top Landing Length (in)
Within Crosswalk YES
0.0Gutter Lip
Dome Setback
(in)
4.1Gutter Slope (%)2.3Gutter XSlope (%)
16.0(in)
(y/n)
Truncated Domes YES(y/n)
Yes-Stop Sign
1 X-walk
Stop/Yield Control:
Crosswalks Served:
206
Tee Intersection:
Vertical Curb:
CBC 2016 11B-406.5.7
No
Vertical
Length of Ramp / Pad (in) 122.0
Street Grade (Left / Right) 0.3 1.4(%)
Sidewalk Width: 5.5(ft)
Priority
112.5
September 2020 Prepared by Sally Swanson Architects, Inc. Project # 19029
4311 of 4366
College of San Mateo Access Compliance Survey Report - Curb Ramps CSM DR
X Slope of the Ramp / Pad
• Proposed Solution:
• As-Built Description:
• As-isMeasurement:
Cross slope of existing parallel curb ramp exceeds 2%.
Left: 2.5%
Ramp Cross Slope
Demolish existing and provide new parallel curb rampincluding detectable warning surfaces, and top andbottom landings as required.
Parallel
R304.5.3PROWAG
4.8.6ADAAG
$7000.00Unit Cost
LEFT RIGHT(in) 72.0 96.0Width of Ramp / Pad
(%)Slope of the Ramp / Pad 7.0 6.4(%) 2.5 0.3
1.8 1.3Top Landing Slope (%)1.6 0.2Top Landing X Slope (%)
48.0Top Landing Length 48.0(in)
1.6Bottom Landing Slope (%)0.0Bottom Landing X Slope (%)
103.0Bottom Landing Length (in)
Within Crosswalk YES
0.0Gutter Lip
Dome Setback
(in)
7.1Gutter Slope (%)2.2Gutter XSlope (%)
30.0(in)
(y/n)
Truncated Domes YES(y/n)
Yes-Stop Sign
1 X-walk
Stop/Yield Control:
Crosswalks Served:
207
Tee Intersection:
Vertical Curb:
CBC 2016 11B-406.5.7
No
Vertical
Length of Ramp / Pad (in) 101.0 96.0
Street Grade (Left / Right) 1.0 0.8(%)
Sidewalk Width: 8.0(ft)
Priority
107.5
Total Costs for Curb Ramps at : Theater LnandCsm Dr $13,500.00
Total Costs for Curb Ramps along : Csm Dr $32,500.00
September 2020 Prepared by Sally Swanson Architects, Inc. Project # 19029
4312 of 4366
College of San Mateo Access Compliance Survey Report - Curb Ramps EAST HALL 12
Codes / Mitigation InfoExisting Access Barrierand Proposed SolutionRamp TypeID # Measurements
East Hall 12 East Hall 12Cross StreetSurvey StreetYear Completed
TBD
X Slope of the Ramp / Pad
• Proposed Solution:
• As-Built Description:
• As-isMeasurement:
Running slope at top landing of existing perpendicularcurb ramp exceeds the 1:48 (2%) maximum.
2.4%
Ramp Landing
Demolish existing and provide new, perpendicular curbramp, including detectable warning surfaces, and top andbottom landings as required.
Perpendicular
R304.2.2PROWAG
4.8.4; 4.8.6ADAAG
$6500.00Unit Cost
CBC 2007 1127B.5.4
(in) 71.0Width of Ramp / Pad
(%)Slope of the Ramp / Pad 7.1(%) 0.6
Left Flare N/A(%)Right Flare N/A(%)
2.4Top Landing Slope (%)0.0Top Landing X Slope (%)
48.0Top Landing Length (in)
Within Crosswalk YES
N/AGutter Lip
Dome Setback
(in)
8.0(in)
(y/n)
Truncated Domes YES(y/n)
No
1 X-walk
Stop/Yield Control:
Crosswalks Served:
267
Tee Intersection:
Vertical Curb:
CBC 2016 11B-406.5.3
No
Vertical
Length of Ramp / Pad (in) 94.0
Street Grade (Left / Right) 0.4 N/A(%)
Sidewalk Width: 4.0(ft)
Priority
102.5
Total Costs for Curb Ramps at : East Hall 12andEast Hall 12 $6,500.00
Total Costs for Curb Ramps along : East Hall 12 $6,500.00
September 2020 Prepared by Sally Swanson Architects, Inc. Project # 19029
4313 of 4366
College of San Mateo Access Compliance Survey Report - Curb Ramps EAST PERIMETER ROAD
Codes / Mitigation InfoExisting Access Barrierand Proposed SolutionRamp TypeID # Measurements
East Perimeter Road Athletic Loop RoadCross StreetSurvey StreetYear Completed
TBD
X Slope of the Ramp / Pad
• Proposed Solution:
• As-Built Description:
• As-isMeasurement:
Running slope at bottom landing of existing blendedtransition exceeds 2%.
4.9%
Ramp Landing
Demolish existing and provide new, blended transition,including detectable warning surfaces, and top andbottom landings as required.
Blended Transition
R304.3.2PROWAG
4.8.4; 4.8.6ADAAG
$3500.00Unit Cost
LEFT RIGHT(in)Width of Ramp / Pad
(%)Slope of the Ramp / Pad(%)
Top Landing Slope (%)Top Landing X Slope (%)
Top Landing Length (in)
4.9Bottom Landing Slope (%)3.3Bottom Landing X Slope (%)
72.0Bottom Landing Length (in)
Within Crosswalk YES
0.0Gutter Lip
Dome Setback
(in)
4.5Gutter Slope (%)1.5Gutter XSlope (%)
6.0(in)
(y/n)
Truncated Domes YES(y/n)
Yes-Stop Sign
1 X-walk
Stop/Yield Control:
Crosswalks Served:
259
Tee Intersection:
Vertical Curb:
CBC 2016 11B-406.3.2
Yes
Vertical
Length of Ramp / Pad (in)
Street Grade (Left / Right) 1.8 0.4(%)
Sidewalk Width: 6.0(ft)
Priority
100
X Slope of the Ramp / Pad
• Proposed Solution:
• As-Built Description:
• As-isMeasurement:
Running slope of existing parallel curb ramp, where therun is less than 15' in length, is less than 5% or more than8.3%.
Right: 12.7%
Ramp Slope
Demolish existing and provide new parallel curb rampincluding detectable warning surfaces, and top andbottom landings as required.
Parallel
R304.3.2PROWAG
4.8.2ADAAG
$7000.00Unit Cost
CBC 2007 1127B.5.3
LEFT RIGHT(in) 48.0 48.0Width of Ramp / Pad
(%)Slope of the Ramp / Pad 0.6 12.7(%) 0.8 3.2
4.3 3.4Top Landing Slope (%)1.6 2.2Top Landing X Slope (%)
48.0Top Landing Length 48.0(in)
1.2Bottom Landing Slope (%)1.8Bottom Landing X Slope (%)
48.0Bottom Landing Length (in)
Within Crosswalk YES
0.0Gutter Lip
Dome Setback
(in)
1.3Gutter Slope (%)2.0Gutter XSlope (%)
8.0(in)
(y/n)
Truncated Domes YES(y/n)
No
2 X-walk
Stop/Yield Control:
Crosswalks Served:
260
Tee Intersection:
Vertical Curb:
CBC 2016 11B-406.3.1
Yes
Vertical
Length of Ramp / Pad (in) 64.0 117.0
Street Grade (Left / Right) 3.1 0.9(%)
Sidewalk Width: 4.0(ft)
Priority
115
Total Costs for Curb Ramps at : Athletic Loop RoadandEast Perimeter Road $10,500.00
September 2020 Prepared by Sally Swanson Architects, Inc. Project # 19029
4314 of 4366
College of San Mateo Access Compliance Survey Report - Curb Ramps EAST PERIMETER ROAD
X Slope of the Ramp / Pad
• Proposed Solution:
• As-Built Description:Curb ramp or blended transition not provided where apedestrian access route crosses a curb.
Access Route
Provide a parallel curb ramp, including detectablewarning surfaces, and top and bottom landings asrequired.
Curb Ramp Required
R207.1PROWAG
4.7.1ADAAG
$7000.00Unit Cost
CBC 2007 1127B.5.1LEFT RIGHT
(in)Width of Ramp / Pad
(%)Slope of the Ramp / Pad
(%)
No
1 X-walk
Stop/Yield Control:
Crosswalks Served:
282
Tee Intersection:
Vertical Curb:No
RolledSidewalk Width: 5.0(ft)
Priority
100
Total Costs for Curb Ramps at : Bulldog Lot 9andEast Perimeter Road $7,000.00
X Slope of the Ramp / Pad
• Proposed Solution:
• As-Built Description:
• As-isMeasurement:
Running slope of existing perpendicular curb ramp is lessthan 5% or greater than 8.3%.
12.0%
Ramp Slope
Demolish existing and provide new, perpendicular curbramp, including detectable warning surfaces, and top andbottom landings as required.
Perpendicular
R304.2.2PROWAG
4.7.2; 4.8.2ADAAG
$6500.00Unit Cost
405.2ADA-2010
CBC 2007 1127B.5.3
(in) 63.0Width of Ramp / Pad
(%)Slope of the Ramp / Pad 12.0(%) 1.9
Left Flare N/A(%)Right Flare N/A(%)
6.4Top Landing Slope (%)1.3Top Landing X Slope (%)
48.0Top Landing Length (in)
1.0Gutter Lip (in)
4.1Gutter Slope (%)5.8Gutter XSlope (%)
Truncated Domes NO(y/n)
Yes-Stop Sign
No X-walk
Stop/Yield Control:
Crosswalks Served:
279
Tee Intersection:
Vertical Curb:
CBC 2016 11B-406.2.1
Yes
Vertical
Length of Ramp / Pad (in) 171.0
Street Grade (Left / Right) 4.4 7.0(%)
Sidewalk Width: 5.0(ft)
Priority
127
September 2020 Prepared by Sally Swanson Architects, Inc. Project # 19029
4315 of 4366
College of San Mateo Access Compliance Survey Report - Curb Ramps EAST PERIMETER ROAD
X Slope of the Ramp / Pad
• Proposed Solution:
• As-Built Description:
• As-isMeasurement:
Running slope at blended transition exceeds 5%.
5.9%
Blended Transition
Demolish existing and provide new, blended transition,including detectable warning surfaces, and top andbottom landings as required.
Blended Transition
R304.4.1PROWAG
$7000.00Unit Cost
LEFT RIGHT(in) 94.0Width of Ramp / Pad
(%)Slope of the Ramp / Pad 5.9(%) 0.8
1.2Top Landing Slope (%)1.7Top Landing X Slope (%)
48.0Top Landing Length (in)
Within Crosswalk YES
N/AGutter Lip
Dome Setback
(in)
0.0(in)
(y/n)
Truncated Domes YES(y/n)
No
1 X-walk
Stop/Yield Control:
Crosswalks Served:
280
Tee Intersection:
Vertical Curb:
Yes
Vertical
Length of Ramp / Pad (in) 151.0
Street Grade (Left / Right) 2.2 5.1(%)
Sidewalk Width: 5.0(ft)
Priority
100
Total Costs for Curb Ramps at : Bulldog Lot 9AandEast Perimeter Road $13,500.00
X Slope of the Ramp / Pad
• Proposed Solution:
• As-Built Description:
• As-isMeasurement:
Running slope of existing parallel curb ramp, where therun is less than 15' in length, is less than 5% or more than8.3%.
Right: 9.0%
Ramp Slope
Demolish existing and provide new parallel curb rampincluding detectable warning surfaces, and top andbottom landings as required.
Parallel
R304.3.2PROWAG
4.8.2ADAAG
$7000.00Unit Cost
CBC 2007 1127B.5.3
LEFT RIGHT(in) 72.0 73.0Width of Ramp / Pad
(%)Slope of the Ramp / Pad 1.9 9.0(%) 0.4 0.4
N/A N/ATop Landing Slope (%)N/A N/ATop Landing X Slope (%)
0.0Top Landing Length 0.0(in)
0.7Bottom Landing Slope (%)6.0Bottom Landing X Slope (%)
72.0Bottom Landing Length (in)
Within Crosswalk YES
N/AGutter Lip
Dome Setback
(in)
8.0(in)
(y/n)
Truncated Domes YES(y/n)
No
1 X-walk
Stop/Yield Control:
Crosswalks Served:
257
Tee Intersection:
Vertical Curb:
CBC 2016 11B-406.3.1
No
Vertical
Length of Ramp / Pad (in) 184.0 194.0
Street Grade (Left / Right) 7.2 N/A(%)
Sidewalk Width: 5.0(ft)
Priority
118
September 2020 Prepared by Sally Swanson Architects, Inc. Project # 19029
4316 of 4366
College of San Mateo Access Compliance Survey Report - Curb Ramps EAST PERIMETER ROAD
X Slope of the Ramp / Pad
• Proposed Solution:
• As-Built Description:
• As-isMeasurement:
Cross slope of an existing perpendicular curb rampexceeds 1:48 (2%).
4.9%
Ramp Slope
Demolish existing and provide new, perpendicular curbramp, including detectable warning surfaces, and top andbottom landings as required.
Perpendicular
R304.5.3PROWAG
4.8.6ADAAG
$6500.00Unit Cost
405.3ADA-2010
CBC 2007 1133B.5.3.1
(in) 144.0Width of Ramp / Pad
(%)Slope of the Ramp / Pad 6.5(%) 4.9
Left Flare N/A(%)Right Flare N/A(%)
6.5Top Landing Slope (%)4.6Top Landing X Slope (%)
48.0Top Landing Length (in)
Within Crosswalk YES
0.0Gutter Lip
Dome Setback
(in)
5.7Gutter Slope (%)6.9Gutter XSlope (%)
6.0(in)
(y/n)
Truncated Domes YES(y/n)
No
1 X-walk
Stop/Yield Control:
Crosswalks Served:
258
Tee Intersection:
Vertical Curb:
CBC 2016 11B-406.5.7
No
Vertical
Length of Ramp / Pad (in) 72.0
Street Grade (Left / Right) 7.9 N/A(%)
Sidewalk Width: 12.0(ft)
Priority
132.5
X Slope of the Ramp / Pad
• Proposed Solution:
• As-Built Description:
• As-isMeasurement:
Running slope at bottom landing of existing parallel curbramp exceeds 2%.
2.6%
Ramp Landing
Demolish existing bottom landing and provide new,including detectable warning surface. Ramp to remain.
Parallel
R304.3.2PROWAG
4.8.4; 4.8.6ADAAG
$3500.00Unit Cost
LEFT RIGHT(in) 60.0 N/AWidth of Ramp / Pad
(%)Slope of the Ramp / Pad 6.8 N/A(%) 1.6 N/A
0.9 N/ATop Landing Slope (%)1.5 N/ATop Landing X Slope (%)
48.0Top Landing Length N/A(in)
2.6Bottom Landing Slope (%)2.0Bottom Landing X Slope (%)
60.0Bottom Landing Length (in)
Within Crosswalk YES
N/AGutter Lip
Dome Setback
(in)
8.0(in)
(y/n)
Truncated Domes YES(y/n)
No
1 X-walk
Stop/Yield Control:
Crosswalks Served:
261
Tee Intersection:
Vertical Curb:
CBC 2016 11B-406.3.2
Yes
Vertical
Length of Ramp / Pad (in) 81.0 N/A
Street Grade (Left / Right) 1.5 N/A(%)
Sidewalk Width: 4.0(ft)
Priority
101.5
September 2020 Prepared by Sally Swanson Architects, Inc. Project # 19029
4317 of 4366
College of San Mateo Access Compliance Survey Report - Curb Ramps EAST PERIMETER ROAD
X Slope of the Ramp / Pad
• Proposed Solution:
• As-Built Description:Curb ramp or blended transition not provided where apedestrian access route crosses a curb.
Access Route
Provide a parallel curb ramp, including detectablewarning surfaces, and top and bottom landings asrequired.
Curb Ramp Required
R207.1PROWAG
4.7.1ADAAG
$7000.00Unit Cost
CBC 2007 1127B.5.1LEFT RIGHT
(in)Width of Ramp / Pad
(%)Slope of the Ramp / Pad
(%)
No
1 X-walk
Stop/Yield Control:
Crosswalks Served:
266
Tee Intersection:
Vertical Curb:No
VerticalSidewalk Width: 4.0(ft)
Priority
100
X Slope of the Ramp / Pad
• Proposed Solution:
• As-Built Description:
• As-isMeasurement:
Running slope of existing perpendicular curb ramp is lessthan 5% or greater than 8.3%.
13.5%
Ramp Slope
Demolish existing and provide new, perpendicular curbramp, including detectable warning surfaces, and top andbottom landings as required.
Perpendicular
R304.2.2PROWAG
4.7.2; 4.8.2ADAAG
$6500.00Unit Cost
405.2ADA-2010
CBC 2007 1127B.5.3
(in) 264.0Width of Ramp / Pad
(%)Slope of the Ramp / Pad 13.5(%) 8.2
Left Flare N/A(%)Right Flare N/A(%)
5.9Top Landing Slope (%)6.0Top Landing X Slope (%)
48.0Top Landing Length (in)
Within Crosswalk YES
N/AGutter Lip
Dome Setback
(in)
8.0(in)
(y/n)
Truncated Domes YES(y/n)
No
1 X-walk
Stop/Yield Control:
Crosswalks Served:
281
Tee Intersection:
Vertical Curb:
CBC 2016 11B-406.2.1
Yes
Rolled
Length of Ramp / Pad (in) 36.0
Street Grade (Left / Right) 8.7 N/A(%)
Sidewalk Width: 5.0(ft)
Priority
132.5
September 2020 Prepared by Sally Swanson Architects, Inc. Project # 19029
4318 of 4366
College of San Mateo Access Compliance Survey Report - Curb Ramps EAST PERIMETER ROAD
X Slope of the Ramp / Pad
• Proposed Solution:
• As-Built Description:Curb ramp or blended transition not provided where apedestrian access route crosses a curb.
Access Route
Provide a parallel curb ramp, including detectablewarning surfaces, and top and bottom landings asrequired.
Curb Ramp Required
R207.1PROWAG
4.7.1ADAAG
$7000.00Unit Cost
CBC 2007 1127B.5.1LEFT RIGHT
(in)Width of Ramp / Pad
(%)Slope of the Ramp / Pad
(%)
No
1 X-walk
Stop/Yield Control:
Crosswalks Served:
283
Tee Intersection:
Vertical Curb:No
RolledSidewalk Width: 5.0(ft)
Priority
100
Total Costs for Curb Ramps at : East Perimeter RoadandEast Perimeter Road $37,500.00
Total Costs for Curb Ramps along : East Perimeter Road $68,500.00
September 2020 Prepared by Sally Swanson Architects, Inc. Project # 19029
4319 of 4366
College of San Mateo Access Compliance Survey Report - Curb Ramps FORUM LOT 8
Codes / Mitigation InfoExisting Access Barrierand Proposed SolutionRamp TypeID # Measurements
Forum Lot 8 East Perimeter RoadCross StreetSurvey StreetYear Completed
TBD
X Slope of the Ramp / Pad
• Proposed Solution:
• As-Built Description:Curb ramp or blended transition not provided where apedestrian access route crosses a curb.
Access Route
Provide a parallel curb ramp, including detectablewarning surfaces, and top and bottom landings asrequired.
Curb Ramp Required
R207.1PROWAG
4.7.1ADAAG
$7000.00Unit Cost
CBC 2007 1127B.5.1LEFT RIGHT
(in)Width of Ramp / Pad
(%)Slope of the Ramp / Pad
(%)
No
1 X-walk
Stop/Yield Control:
Crosswalks Served:
265
Tee Intersection:
Vertical Curb:No
VerticalSidewalk Width: 4.0(ft)
Priority
100
Total Costs for Curb Ramps at : East Perimeter RoadandForum Lot 8 $7,000.00
X Slope of the Ramp / Pad
• Proposed Solution:
• As-Built Description:
• As-isMeasurement:
The detectable warning surface is not located between 6"- 8" from the curb line on a curb ramp or at the edges on apedestrian island, cut-through island, pedestrian pad,perpendicular curb ramp or blended transition. (0" fromcurb line on a parallel curb ramp.)
30.0"
Detectable Warning Surface
Relocate the detectable warning surface.
Perpendicular
4.7.7, 4.29.1&2ADAAG
$500.00Unit Cost
705.1ADA-2010
(in) 79.0Width of Ramp / Pad
(%)Slope of the Ramp / Pad 8.0(%) 0.9
Left Flare N/A(%)Right Flare N/A(%)
0.6Top Landing Slope (%)1.3Top Landing X Slope (%)
48.0Top Landing Length (in)
N/AGutter Lip
Dome Setback
(in)
30.0(in)Truncated Domes YES(y/n)
No
No X-walk
Stop/Yield Control:
Crosswalks Served:
271
Tee Intersection:
Vertical Curb:
CBC 2016 11B-705.1.2.2
No
Vertical
Length of Ramp / Pad (in) 90.0
Street Grade (Left / Right) 1.7 N/A(%)
Sidewalk Width: 4.0(ft)
Priority
100
September 2020 Prepared by Sally Swanson Architects, Inc. Project # 19029
4320 of 4366
College of San Mateo Access Compliance Survey Report - Curb Ramps FORUM LOT 8
X Slope of the Ramp / Pad
• Proposed Solution:
• As-Built Description:Curb ramp, blended transition, island cut-through, islandperpendicular, or pedestrian pad surveyed for thefollowing items are in compliance with the ADA andapplicable building codes.
Compliant Curb Ramp
Provide routine inspection and maintenance to maintainaccessible access route.
Blended Transition
$0.00Unit Cost
LEFT RIGHT(in)Width of Ramp / Pad
(%)Slope of the Ramp / Pad(%)
Top Landing Slope (%)Top Landing X Slope (%)
Top Landing Length (in)
0.4Bottom Landing Slope (%)1.0Bottom Landing X Slope (%)
112.0Bottom Landing Length (in)
N/AGutter Lip
Dome Setback
(in)
6.0(in)Truncated Domes YES(y/n)
No
No X-walk
Stop/Yield Control:
Crosswalks Served:
276
Tee Intersection:
Vertical Curb:
No
Vertical
Length of Ramp / Pad (in)
Street Grade (Left / Right) 1.0 N/A(%)
Sidewalk Width: 5.0(ft)
Priority
100
X Slope of the Ramp / Pad
• Proposed Solution:
• As-Built Description:
• As-isMeasurement:
Running slope at bottom landing of existing blendedtransition exceeds 2%.
2.3%
Ramp Landing
Demolish existing and provide new, blended transition,including detectable warning surfaces, and top andbottom landings as required.
Blended Transition
R304.3.2PROWAG
4.8.4; 4.8.6ADAAG
$3500.00Unit Cost
LEFT RIGHT(in)Width of Ramp / Pad
(%)Slope of the Ramp / Pad(%)
Top Landing Slope (%)Top Landing X Slope (%)
Top Landing Length (in)
2.3Bottom Landing Slope (%)1.6Bottom Landing X Slope (%)
112.0Bottom Landing Length (in)
N/AGutter Lip
Dome Setback
(in)
8.0(in)Truncated Domes YES(y/n)
No
No X-walk
Stop/Yield Control:
Crosswalks Served:
277
Tee Intersection:
Vertical Curb:
CBC 2016 11B-406.3.2
No
Vertical
Length of Ramp / Pad (in)
Street Grade (Left / Right) 0.9 N/A(%)
Sidewalk Width: 5.0(ft)
Priority
100
September 2020 Prepared by Sally Swanson Architects, Inc. Project # 19029
4321 of 4366
College of San Mateo Access Compliance Survey Report - Curb Ramps FORUM LOT 8
X Slope of the Ramp / Pad
• Proposed Solution:
• As-Built Description:
• As-isMeasurement:
Running slope at top landing of existing perpendicularcurb ramp exceeds the 1:48 (2%) maximum.
3.4%
Ramp Landing
Demolish existing and provide new, perpendicular curbramp, including detectable warning surfaces, and top andbottom landings as required.
Perpendicular
R304.2.2PROWAG
4.8.4; 4.8.6ADAAG
$6500.00Unit Cost
CBC 2007 1127B.5.4
(in) 112.0Width of Ramp / Pad
(%)Slope of the Ramp / Pad 7.7(%) 0.9
Left Flare N/A(%)Right Flare N/A(%)
3.4Top Landing Slope (%)1.1Top Landing X Slope (%)
48.0Top Landing Length (in)
N/AGutter Lip
Dome Setback
(in)
6.0(in)Truncated Domes YES(y/n)
No
No X-walk
Stop/Yield Control:
Crosswalks Served:
278
Tee Intersection:
Vertical Curb:
CBC 2016 11B-406.5.3
No
Vertical
Length of Ramp / Pad (in) 74.0
Street Grade (Left / Right) 1.5 N/A(%)
Sidewalk Width: 5.0(ft)
Priority
105
Total Costs for Curb Ramps at : Forum Lot 8andForum Lot 8 $10,500.00
Total Costs for Curb Ramps along : Forum Lot 8 $17,500.00
September 2020 Prepared by Sally Swanson Architects, Inc. Project # 19029
4322 of 4366
College of San Mateo Access Compliance Survey Report - Curb Ramps GALILEO LOT 6
Codes / Mitigation InfoExisting Access Barrierand Proposed SolutionRamp TypeID # Measurements
Galileo Lot 6 Galileo Lot 6Cross StreetSurvey StreetYear Completed
TBD
X Slope of the Ramp / Pad
• Proposed Solution:
• As-Built Description:Curb ramp, blended transition, island cut-through, islandperpendicular, or pedestrian pad surveyed for thefollowing items are in compliance with the ADA andapplicable building codes.
Compliant Curb Ramp
Provide routine inspection and maintenance to maintainaccessible access route.
Perpendicular
$0.00Unit Cost
(in) 96.0Width of Ramp / Pad
(%)Slope of the Ramp / Pad 6.6(%) 0.5
Left Flare (%)Right Flare (%)
1.1Top Landing Slope (%)0.3Top Landing X Slope (%)
48.0Top Landing Length (in)
N/A
Gutter Lip
Dome Setback
(in) 6.0
(in)Truncated Domes
YES
(y/n)
No
No X-walk
Stop/Yield Control:
Crosswalks Served:
245
Tee Intersection:
Vertical Curb:
No
Vertical
Length of Ramp / Pad (in) 82.0
Street Grade (Left / Right) 0.1 N/A(%)
Sidewalk Width: 5.0(ft)
Priority
100
X Slope of the Ramp / Pad
• Proposed Solution:
• As-Built Description:Curb ramp, blended transition, island cut-through, islandperpendicular, or pedestrian pad surveyed for thefollowing items are in compliance with the ADA andapplicable building codes.
Compliant Curb Ramp
Provide routine inspection and maintenance to maintainaccessible access route.
Perpendicular
$0.00Unit Cost
(in) 60.0Width of Ramp / Pad
(%)Slope of the Ramp / Pad 6.0(%) 0.1
Left Flare N/A(%)Right Flare N/A(%)
1.6Top Landing Slope (%)0.1Top Landing X Slope (%)
48.0Top Landing Length (in)
N/AGutter Lip
Dome Setback
(in)
6.0(in)Truncated Domes YES(y/n)
No
No X-walk
Stop/Yield Control:
Crosswalks Served:
247
Tee Intersection:
Vertical Curb:
No
Vertical
Length of Ramp / Pad (in) 80.0
Street Grade (Left / Right) 0.1 N/A(%)
Sidewalk Width: 5.0(ft)
Priority
100
September 2020 Prepared by Sally Swanson Architects, Inc. Project # 19029
4323 of 4366
College of San Mateo Access Compliance Survey Report - Curb Ramps GALILEO LOT 6
X Slope of the Ramp / Pad
• Proposed Solution:
• As-Built Description:
• As-isMeasurement:
Running slope at top landing of existing perpendicularcurb ramp exceeds the 1:48 (2%) maximum.
2.2%
Ramp Landing
Demolish existing and provide new, perpendicular curbramp, including detectable warning surfaces, and top andbottom landings as required.
Perpendicular
R304.2.2PROWAG
4.8.4; 4.8.6ADAAG
$6500.00Unit Cost
CBC 2007 1127B.5.4
(in) 96.0Width of Ramp / Pad
(%)Slope of the Ramp / Pad 6.4(%) 0.1
Left Flare N/A(%)Right Flare N/A(%)
2.2Top Landing Slope (%)0.1Top Landing X Slope (%)
48.0Top Landing Length (in)
N/AGutter Lip
Dome Setback
(in)
8.0(in)Truncated Domes YES(y/n)
No
No X-walk
Stop/Yield Control:
Crosswalks Served:
248
Tee Intersection:
Vertical Curb:
CBC 2016 11B-406.5.3
No
Vertical
Length of Ramp / Pad (in) 80.0
Street Grade (Left / Right) 0.3 N/A(%)
Sidewalk Width: 5.0(ft)
Priority
102.5
X Slope of the Ramp / Pad
• Proposed Solution:
• As-Built Description:Curb ramp, blended transition, island cut-through, islandperpendicular, or pedestrian pad surveyed for thefollowing items are in compliance with the ADA andapplicable building codes.
Compliant Curb Ramp
Provide routine inspection and maintenance to maintainaccessible access route.
Blended Transition
$0.00Unit Cost
LEFT RIGHT(in)Width of Ramp / Pad
(%)Slope of the Ramp / Pad(%)
Top Landing Slope (%)Top Landing X Slope (%)
Top Landing Length (in)
0.1Bottom Landing Slope (%)0.5Bottom Landing X Slope (%)
96.0Bottom Landing Length (in)
Within Crosswalk YES
N/AGutter Lip
Dome Setback
(in)
6.0(in)
(y/n)
Truncated Domes YES(y/n)
No
1 X-walk
Stop/Yield Control:
Crosswalks Served:
249
Tee Intersection:
Vertical Curb:
No
Vertical
Length of Ramp / Pad (in)
Street Grade (Left / Right) 0.4 N/A(%)
Sidewalk Width: 5.0(ft)
Priority
100
September 2020 Prepared by Sally Swanson Architects, Inc. Project # 19029
4324 of 4366
College of San Mateo Access Compliance Survey Report - Curb Ramps GALILEO LOT 6
X Slope of the Ramp / Pad
• Proposed Solution:
• As-Built Description:
• As-isMeasurement:
Running slope at bottom landing of existing blendedtransition exceeds 2%.
2.8%
Ramp Landing
Demolish existing and provide new, blended transition,including detectable warning surfaces, and top andbottom landings as required.
Blended Transition
R304.3.2PROWAG
4.8.4; 4.8.6ADAAG
$3500.00Unit Cost
LEFT RIGHT(in)Width of Ramp / Pad
(%)Slope of the Ramp / Pad(%)
Top Landing Slope (%)Top Landing X Slope (%)
Top Landing Length (in)
2.8Bottom Landing Slope (%)0.2Bottom Landing X Slope (%)
96.0Bottom Landing Length (in)
Within Crosswalk YES
N/AGutter Lip
Dome Setback
(in)
6.0(in)
(y/n)
Truncated Domes YES(y/n)
No
1 X-walk
Stop/Yield Control:
Crosswalks Served:
250
Tee Intersection:
Vertical Curb:
CBC 2016 11B-406.3.2
No
Vertical
Length of Ramp / Pad (in)
Street Grade (Left / Right) 0.2 N/A(%)
Sidewalk Width: 5.0(ft)
Priority
100
X Slope of the Ramp / Pad
• Proposed Solution:
• As-Built Description:
• As-isMeasurement:
Running slope at bottom landing of existing blendedtransition exceeds 2%.
2.8%
Ramp Landing
Demolish existing and provide new, blended transition,including detectable warning surfaces, and top andbottom landings as required.
Blended Transition
R304.3.2PROWAG
4.8.4; 4.8.6ADAAG
$3500.00Unit Cost
LEFT RIGHT(in)Width of Ramp / Pad
(%)Slope of the Ramp / Pad(%)
Top Landing Slope (%)Top Landing X Slope (%)
Top Landing Length (in)
2.8Bottom Landing Slope (%)1.3Bottom Landing X Slope (%)
96.0Bottom Landing Length (in)
N/AGutter Lip
Dome Setback
(in)
6.0(in)Truncated Domes YES(y/n)
No
No X-walk
Stop/Yield Control:
Crosswalks Served:
251
Tee Intersection:
Vertical Curb:
CBC 2016 11B-406.3.2
No
Vertical
Length of Ramp / Pad (in)
Street Grade (Left / Right) 0.6 N/A(%)
Sidewalk Width: 5.0(ft)
Priority
100
September 2020 Prepared by Sally Swanson Architects, Inc. Project # 19029
4325 of 4366
College of San Mateo Access Compliance Survey Report - Curb Ramps GALILEO LOT 6
X Slope of the Ramp / Pad
• Proposed Solution:
• As-Built Description:
• As-isMeasurement:
Running slope at bottom landing of existing blendedtransition exceeds 2%.
3.4%
Ramp Landing
Demolish existing and provide new, blended transition,including detectable warning surfaces, and top andbottom landings as required.
Blended Transition
R304.3.2PROWAG
4.8.4; 4.8.6ADAAG
$3500.00Unit Cost
LEFT RIGHT(in)Width of Ramp / Pad
(%)Slope of the Ramp / Pad(%)
Top Landing Slope (%)Top Landing X Slope (%)
Top Landing Length (in)
3.4Bottom Landing Slope (%)0.4Bottom Landing X Slope (%)
96.0Bottom Landing Length (in)
N/AGutter Lip
Dome Setback
(in)
6.0(in)Truncated Domes YES(y/n)
No
No X-walk
Stop/Yield Control:
Crosswalks Served:
252
Tee Intersection:
Vertical Curb:
CBC 2016 11B-406.3.2
No
Vertical
Length of Ramp / Pad (in)
Street Grade (Left / Right) 0.1 N/A(%)
Sidewalk Width: 5.0(ft)
Priority
100
X Slope of the Ramp / Pad
• Proposed Solution:
• As-Built Description:
• As-isMeasurement:
Running slope at bottom landing of existing blendedtransition exceeds 2%.
2.2%
Ramp Landing
Demolish existing and provide new, blended transition,including detectable warning surfaces, and top andbottom landings as required.
Blended Transition
R304.3.2PROWAG
4.8.4; 4.8.6ADAAG
$3500.00Unit Cost
LEFT RIGHT(in)Width of Ramp / Pad
(%)Slope of the Ramp / Pad(%)
Top Landing Slope (%)Top Landing X Slope (%)
Top Landing Length (in)
2.2Bottom Landing Slope (%)0.1Bottom Landing X Slope (%)
96.0Bottom Landing Length (in)
N/AGutter Lip
Dome Setback
(in)
6.0(in)Truncated Domes YES(y/n)
No
No X-walk
Stop/Yield Control:
Crosswalks Served:
253
Tee Intersection:
Vertical Curb:
CBC 2016 11B-406.3.2
No
Vertical
Length of Ramp / Pad (in)
Street Grade (Left / Right) 0.3 N/A(%)
Sidewalk Width: 5.0(ft)
Priority
100
September 2020 Prepared by Sally Swanson Architects, Inc. Project # 19029
4326 of 4366
College of San Mateo Access Compliance Survey Report - Curb Ramps GALILEO LOT 6
X Slope of the Ramp / Pad
• Proposed Solution:
• As-Built Description:
• As-isMeasurement:
Running slope at bottom landing of existing blendedtransition exceeds 2%.
4.3%
Ramp Landing
Demolish existing and provide new, blended transition,including detectable warning surfaces, and top andbottom landings as required.
Blended Transition
R304.3.2PROWAG
4.8.4; 4.8.6ADAAG
$3500.00Unit Cost
LEFT RIGHT(in)Width of Ramp / Pad
(%)Slope of the Ramp / Pad(%)
Top Landing Slope (%)Top Landing X Slope (%)
Top Landing Length (in)
4.3Bottom Landing Slope (%)0.4Bottom Landing X Slope (%)
96.0Bottom Landing Length (in)
N/AGutter Lip
Dome Setback
(in)
6.0(in)Truncated Domes YES(y/n)
No
No X-walk
Stop/Yield Control:
Crosswalks Served:
254
Tee Intersection:
Vertical Curb:
CBC 2016 11B-406.3.2
No
Vertical
Length of Ramp / Pad (in)
Street Grade (Left / Right) 0.3 N/A(%)
Sidewalk Width: 5.0(ft)
Priority
100
X Slope of the Ramp / Pad
• Proposed Solution:
• As-Built Description:Curb ramp, blended transition, island cut-through, islandperpendicular, or pedestrian pad surveyed for thefollowing items are in compliance with the ADA andapplicable building codes.
Compliant Curb Ramp
Provide routine inspection and maintenance to maintainaccessible access route.
Blended Transition
$0.00Unit Cost
LEFT RIGHT(in)Width of Ramp / Pad
(%)Slope of the Ramp / Pad(%)
Top Landing Slope (%)Top Landing X Slope (%)
Top Landing Length (in)
1.1Bottom Landing Slope (%)0.3Bottom Landing X Slope (%)
480.0Bottom Landing Length (in)
N/AGutter Lip
Dome Setback
(in)
6.0(in)Truncated Domes YES(y/n)
No
No X-walk
Stop/Yield Control:
Crosswalks Served:
255
Tee Intersection:
Vertical Curb:
No
Vertical
Length of Ramp / Pad (in)
Street Grade (Left / Right) 0.1 N/A(%)
Sidewalk Width: 5.0(ft)
Priority
100
September 2020 Prepared by Sally Swanson Architects, Inc. Project # 19029
4327 of 4366
College of San Mateo Access Compliance Survey Report - Curb Ramps GALILEO LOT 6
X Slope of the Ramp / Pad
• Proposed Solution:
• As-Built Description:Curb ramp, blended transition, island cut-through, islandperpendicular, or pedestrian pad surveyed for thefollowing items are in compliance with the ADA andapplicable building codes.
Compliant Curb Ramp
Provide routine inspection and maintenance to maintainaccessible access route.
Blended Transition
$0.00Unit Cost
LEFT RIGHT(in)Width of Ramp / Pad
(%)Slope of the Ramp / Pad(%)
Top Landing Slope (%)Top Landing X Slope (%)
Top Landing Length (in)
1.9Bottom Landing Slope (%)0.0Bottom Landing X Slope (%)
480.0Bottom Landing Length (in)
N/AGutter Lip
Dome Setback
(in)
6.0(in)Truncated Domes YES(y/n)
No
No X-walk
Stop/Yield Control:
Crosswalks Served:
256
Tee Intersection:
Vertical Curb:
No
Vertical
Length of Ramp / Pad (in)
Street Grade (Left / Right) 0.2 N/A(%)
Sidewalk Width: 5.0(ft)
Priority
100
X Slope of the Ramp / Pad
• Proposed Solution:
• As-Built Description:
• As-isMeasurement:
The detectable warning surface is not located between 6"- 8" from the curb line on a curb ramp or at the edges on apedestrian island, cut-through island, pedestrian pad,perpendicular curb ramp or blended transition. (0" fromcurb line on a parallel curb ramp.)
8.0"
Detectable Warning Surface
Relocate the detectable warning surface.
Parallel
4.7.7, 4.29.1&2ADAAG
$500.00Unit Cost
705.1ADA-2010
LEFT RIGHT(in) 74.0 73.0Width of Ramp / Pad
(%)Slope of the Ramp / Pad 7.3 5.7(%) 1.9 2.0
0.7 2.4Top Landing Slope (%) 0.7 1.3Top Landing X Slope (%)
Top Landing Length (in)
0.8Bottom Landing Slope (%)0.1Bottom Landing X Slope (%)
250.0Bottom Landing Length (in)
N/AGutter Lip
Dome Setback
(in)
8.0(in)Truncated Domes YES(y/n)
No
No X-walk
Stop/Yield Control:
Crosswalks Served:
297
Tee Intersection:
Vertical Curb:
CBC 2016 11B-705.1.2.2
No
Vertical
Length of Ramp / Pad (in) 170.0 79.0
Street Grade (Left / Right) 0.3 N/A(%)
Sidewalk Width: 5.0(ft)
Priority
107.5
September 2020 Prepared by Sally Swanson Architects, Inc. Project # 19029
4328 of 4366
College of San Mateo Access Compliance Survey Report - Curb Ramps GALILEO LOT 6
X Slope of the Ramp / Pad
• Proposed Solution:
• As-Built Description:Curb ramp, blended transition, island cut-through, islandperpendicular, or pedestrian pad surveyed for thefollowing items are in compliance with the ADA andapplicable building codes.
Compliant Curb Ramp
Provide routine inspection and maintenance to maintainaccessible access route.
Perpendicular
$0.00Unit Cost
(in) 60.0Width of Ramp / Pad
(%)Slope of the Ramp / Pad 6.3(%) 0.2
Left Flare N/A(%)Right Flare N/A(%)
1.4Top Landing Slope (%)0.3Top Landing X Slope (%)
48.0Top Landing Length (in)
N/AGutter Lip
Dome Setback
(in)
6.0(in)Truncated Domes YES(y/n)
No
No X-walk
Stop/Yield Control:
Crosswalks Served:
298
Tee Intersection:
Vertical Curb:
No
Vertical
Length of Ramp / Pad (in) 80.0
Street Grade (Left / Right) 0.5 N/A(%)
Sidewalk Width: 5.0(ft)
Priority
100
Total Costs for Curb Ramps at : Galileo Lot 6andGalileo Lot 6 $24,500.00
Total Costs for Curb Ramps along : Galileo Lot 6 $24,500.00
September 2020 Prepared by Sally Swanson Architects, Inc. Project # 19029
4329 of 4366
College of San Mateo Access Compliance Survey Report - Curb Ramps NORTH HALL 18
Codes / Mitigation InfoExisting Access Barrierand Proposed SolutionRamp TypeID # Measurements
North Hall 18 Marie Curie Lot 5Cross StreetSurvey StreetYear Completed
TBD
X Slope of the Ramp / Pad
• Proposed Solution:
• As-Built Description:Curb ramp or blended transition not provided where apedestrian access route crosses a curb.
Access Route
Provide a parallel curb ramp, including detectablewarning surfaces, and top and bottom landings asrequired.
Curb Ramp Required
R207.1PROWAG
4.7.1ADAAG
$7000.00Unit Cost
CBC 2007 1127B.5.1LEFT RIGHT
(in)Width of Ramp / Pad
(%)Slope of the Ramp / Pad
(%)
No
1 X-walk
Stop/Yield Control:
Crosswalks Served:
295
Tee Intersection:
Vertical Curb:No
VerticalSidewalk Width: 5.0(ft)
Priority
100
Total Costs for Curb Ramps at : Marie Curie Lot 5andNorth Hall 18 $7,000.00
Total Costs for Curb Ramps along : North Hall 18 $7,000.00
September 2020 Prepared by Sally Swanson Architects, Inc. Project # 19029
4330 of 4366
College of San Mateo Access Compliance Survey Report - Curb Ramps PLANETARIUM
Codes / Mitigation InfoExisting Access Barrierand Proposed SolutionRamp TypeID # Measurements
Planetarium PlanetariumCross StreetSurvey StreetYear Completed
TBD
X Slope of the Ramp / Pad
• Proposed Solution:
• As-Built Description:
• As-isMeasurement:
Slope of flare(s) along curb at perpendicular curb rampexceed(s) 10%.
Right: 10.8%
Ramp Flare
Demolish existing and provide new, perpendicular curbramp, including detectable warning surfaces, and top andbottom landings as required.
Perpendicular
R304.2.3PROWAG
4.7.5ADAAG
$6500.00Unit Cost
406.3ADA-2010
CBC 2007 1127B.5.3
(in) 60.0Width of Ramp / Pad
(%)Slope of the Ramp / Pad 7.2(%) 1.1
Left Flare 9.2(%)Right Flare 10.8(%)
1.2Top Landing Slope (%)0.4Top Landing X Slope (%)
48.0Top Landing Length (in)
Within Crosswalk YES
N/AGutter Lip
Dome Setback
(in)
6.0(in)
(y/n)
Truncated Domes YES(y/n)
No
1 X-walk
Stop/Yield Control:
Crosswalks Served:
296
Tee Intersection:
Vertical Curb:
CBC 2016 11B-406.2.2
No
Vertical
Length of Ramp / Pad (in) 64.0
Street Grade (Left / Right) 2.3 N/A(%)
Sidewalk Width: 5.0(ft)
Priority
104
Total Costs for Curb Ramps at : PlanetariumandPlanetarium $6,500.00
Total Costs for Curb Ramps along : Planetarium $6,500.00
September 2020 Prepared by Sally Swanson Architects, Inc. Project # 19029
4331 of 4366
College of San Mateo Access Compliance Survey Report - Curb Ramps SOUTH HALL 14
Codes / Mitigation InfoExisting Access Barrierand Proposed SolutionRamp TypeID # Measurements
South Hall 14 Central Hall 16Cross StreetSurvey StreetYear Completed
TBD
X Slope of the Ramp / Pad
• Proposed Solution:
• As-Built Description:Curb ramp or blended transition not provided where apedestrian access route crosses a curb.
Access Route
Provide a parallel curb ramp, including detectablewarning surfaces, and top and bottom landings asrequired.
Curb Ramp Required
R207.1PROWAG
4.7.1ADAAG
$7000.00Unit Cost
CBC 2007 1127B.5.1LEFT RIGHT
(in)Width of Ramp / Pad
(%)Slope of the Ramp / Pad
(%)
No
1 X-walk
Stop/Yield Control:
Crosswalks Served:
292
Tee Intersection:
Vertical Curb:Yes
RolledSidewalk Width: 5.0(ft)
Priority
100
X Slope of the Ramp / Pad
• Proposed Solution:
• As-Built Description:Curb ramp or blended transition not provided where apedestrian access route crosses a curb.
Access Route
Provide a parallel curb ramp, including detectablewarning surfaces, and top and bottom landings asrequired.
Curb Ramp Required
R207.1PROWAG
4.7.1ADAAG
$7000.00Unit Cost
CBC 2007 1127B.5.1LEFT RIGHT
(in)Width of Ramp / Pad
(%)Slope of the Ramp / Pad
(%)
No
1 X-walk
Stop/Yield Control:
Crosswalks Served:
293
Tee Intersection:
Vertical Curb:No
VerticalSidewalk Width: 5.0(ft)
Priority
100
Total Costs for Curb Ramps at : Central Hall 16andSouth Hall 14 $14,000.00
Total Costs for Curb Ramps along : South Hall 14 $14,000.00
September 2020 Prepared by Sally Swanson Architects, Inc. Project # 19029
4332 of 4366
College of San Mateo Access Compliance Survey Report - Curb Ramps STADIUM LOT 11
Codes / Mitigation InfoExisting Access Barrierand Proposed SolutionRamp TypeID # Measurements
Stadium Lot 11Cross StreetSurvey StreetYear Completed
TBD
X Slope of the Ramp / Pad
• Proposed Solution:
• As-Built Description:Curb ramp, blended transition, island cut-through, islandperpendicular, or pedestrian pad surveyed for thefollowing items are in compliance with the ADA andapplicable building codes.
Compliant Curb Ramp
Provide routine inspection and maintenance to maintainaccessible access route.
Perpendicular
$0.00Unit Cost
(in) 96.0Width of Ramp / Pad
(%)Slope of the Ramp / Pad 7.0(%) 0.6
Left Flare (%)Right Flare (%)
1.2Top Landing Slope (%)1.6Top Landing X Slope (%)
48.0Top Landing Length (in)
N/A
Gutter Lip
Dome Setback
(in) 8.0
(in)Truncated Domes
YES
(y/n)
No
No X-walk
Stop/Yield Control:
Crosswalks Served:
246
Tee Intersection:
Vertical Curb:
No
Vertical
Length of Ramp / Pad (in) 142.0
Street Grade (Left / Right) 0.3 N/A(%)
Sidewalk Width: 5.0(ft)
Priority
100
Total Costs for Curb Ramps at : andStadium Lot 11
Total Costs for Curb Ramps along : Stadium Lot 11
September 2020 Prepared by Sally Swanson Architects, Inc. Project # 19029
4333 of 4366
College of San Mateo Access Compliance Survey Report - Curb Ramps MARIE CURIE LOT 5
Codes / Mitigation InfoExisting Access Barrierand Proposed SolutionRamp TypeID # Measurements
Marie Curie Lot 5 North Hall 18Cross StreetSurvey StreetYear Completed
TBD
X Slope of the Ramp / Pad
• Proposed Solution:
• As-Built Description:Detectable warning surface not provided where a curbramp, landing, blended transition, pedestrian pad, orisland cut through connects to a street.
Detectable Warnings
Install a truncated dome surface that extends the fullwidth and depth (36" min.) of the curb ramp, landing,blended transition, pedestrian pad, or island cut throughexcluding the flared sides, inside the grooved border.
Parallel
R305.1PROWAG
4.7.7ADAAG
$2500.00Unit Cost
705.1ADA-2010
CBC 2007 1127B.5.7
LEFT RIGHT(in) N/A 66.0Width of Ramp / Pad
(%)Slope of the Ramp / Pad N/A 7.6(%) N/A 0.6
N/A 2.8Top Landing Slope (%)N/A 0.8Top Landing X Slope (%)
N/ATop Landing Length 48.0(in)
1.8Bottom Landing Slope (%)0.7Bottom Landing X Slope (%)
60.0Bottom Landing Length (in)
N/AGutter Lip (in)Truncated Domes NO(y/n)
No
No X-walk
Stop/Yield Control:
Crosswalks Served:
294
Tee Intersection:
Vertical Curb:
CBC 2016 11B-705.1.2.2
No
Vertical
Length of Ramp / Pad (in) N/A 72.0
Street Grade (Left / Right) 0.9 N/A(%)
Sidewalk Width: 5.0(ft)
Priority
108
Total Costs for Curb Ramps at : North Hall 18andMarie Curie Lot 5 $2,500.00
Total Costs for Curb Ramps along : Marie Curie Lot 5 $2,500.00
$238,750.00Grand Total for Curb Ramps:
September 2020 Prepared by Sally Swanson Architects, Inc. Project # 19029
4334 of 4366
