+ All Categories
Home > Documents > SMCCCD - College of San Mateo N - College of... · SMCCCD College of San Mateo - Curb Ramps - ACS...

SMCCCD - College of San Mateo N - College of... · SMCCCD College of San Mateo - Curb Ramps - ACS...

Date post: 24-Sep-2020
Category:
Upload: others
View: 5 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
47
SMCCCD College of San Mateo - Curb Ramps September 2020 SSA Project # 19029.00 DRAFT Access Compliance Survey Report Appendix N: Curb Ramps SMCCCD - College of San Mateo 4288 of 4366
Transcript
Page 1: SMCCCD - College of San Mateo N - College of... · SMCCCD College of San Mateo - Curb Ramps - ACS Report NAVIGATION 1. Locator Number: Corresponds to a unique database record tied

SMCCCD College of San Mateo - Curb Ramps September 2020SSA Project # 19029.00

DRAFTAccess Compliance Survey Report Appendix N: Curb Ramps SMCCCD - College of San Mateo

4288 of 4366

Page 2: SMCCCD - College of San Mateo N - College of... · SMCCCD College of San Mateo - Curb Ramps - ACS Report NAVIGATION 1. Locator Number: Corresponds to a unique database record tied

September 2020SSA Project # 19029.00

SMCCCD College of San Mateo - Curb Ramps - ACS Report

Table of Contents

I. Cover & Table of Contents

i. Report Navigation and Abbreviations ii. Cost Summary

II. Survey Data - Curb Ramps

4289 of 4366

Page 3: SMCCCD - College of San Mateo N - College of... · SMCCCD College of San Mateo - Curb Ramps - ACS Report NAVIGATION 1. Locator Number: Corresponds to a unique database record tied

September 2020SSA Project # 19029.00

SMCCCD College of San Mateo - Curb Ramps - ACS Report

NAVIGATION & LEGEND

4290 of 4366

Page 4: SMCCCD - College of San Mateo N - College of... · SMCCCD College of San Mateo - Curb Ramps - ACS Report NAVIGATION 1. Locator Number: Corresponds to a unique database record tied

September 2020SSA Project # 19029.00

SMCCCD College of San Mateo - Curb Ramps - ACS Report

NAVIGATION

1. Locator Number: Correspondstoauniquedatabaserecordtiedtothespecificcurbrampwhichcanbecrossreferencedacrossthisdata-base and its corresponding GIS database.

2. Ramp Type: Identifiesthetypeofcurbramp(parallel,perpendicular,curbramprequired,etc.).3. Specific Item: Categoryofaccessiblefeatureinwhichthebarrierbelongs.4. Survey Street: Surveystreetname.5. Field Condition: Descriptionofas-builtbarrierbasedonapplicableaccessibilitycodes.6. Measurement: Existingcondition/dimensionfeaturedontherampmeasuredasthemostseverebarrierontheparticularramp.7. Proposed Solution: Descriptionofstepsnecessarytoremovebarrierand,ifapplicable,aninterimsolutionornotes.8. Cross Street: Cross/intersectingstreetname.9. Codes / Info: -PROWAG: GuidelinestoenforceFederalaccessibilitystandardsinthepublicrights-of-way. -ADAAG/ADA2010: TheFederalStandardforaccessibilityadoptedbytheDepartmentofJustice. -CBC2007/CBC2016 TheCaliforniaBuildingCodes.10. Unit Cost: Estimatedcostspecificsolutionperoneunit.(Thefinalcostofbarrierremovalmayexceedthisestimatebasedonthe

yearofmitigation,designapproachandchosenmethodofmitigation)11. Ramp Features: Featuresofcurbrampmeasuredtodetermineaccessibility.12. Measurements: Existingcondition/dimensiondeterminedforeachramp. -(in) measurementininches -(%) measurementinpercentagegrade - BOLD textindicatenon-compliantdimensions. -Normal textindicatecompliantdimensions13. Priority: Prioritynumberassignedtospecificbarrierbasedonpriorizationcriteriawhichinclude:expectedfrequencyofuseand severityofthebarrier.Measureedonascaleof0to200,with200beingthehighestpriorityand0beingtheleast.

6542 81 11103 7 129 13

4291 of 4366

Page 5: SMCCCD - College of San Mateo N - College of... · SMCCCD College of San Mateo - Curb Ramps - ACS Report NAVIGATION 1. Locator Number: Corresponds to a unique database record tied

September 2020SSA Project # 19029.00

SMCCCD College of San Mateo - Curb Ramps - ACS Report

ADA AmericanswithDisabilitiesActADAAG ADAAccessibilityGuidelinesE EastFig. FigureJOB peronejob(lumpsum)lbs. PoundsLF LinearfootMUTCD ManualonUniformTrafficControlDevicesN NorthNE NortheastNW NorthwestNWn Northwest:NorthsideNWs Northwest:SouthsidePOT PathoftravelPROW PublicRight-of-WayPROWAG PublicRight-of-WayAccesibleGuidelinesQty QuantityREF Reference;Providedinlocationswithover- lappingissue;indicatesnoadditioncost requiredformitigationS SouthSE SoutheastSF SquarefootSW SouthwestTBD TobedeterminedW West

LEGEND ABBREVIATIONS

4292 of 4366

Page 6: SMCCCD - College of San Mateo N - College of... · SMCCCD College of San Mateo - Curb Ramps - ACS Report NAVIGATION 1. Locator Number: Corresponds to a unique database record tied

FeATURe: ADA/CBC GUIDeLINeStreet Grade Used for reference in regards to possible exceptionsWidth of Ramp Theclearwidthofcurbrampruns(excludinganyflaredsides),blendedtransitions,and

turningspacesshallbe48inchesminimum.Slope of the Ramp Ramprunsshallhavearunningslopenotsteeperthan1:12(8.3%).X Slope of the Ramp Thecrossslopeofcurbrampsandblendedtransitionsshallbe1:48(2.0%)maximum.Top Landing Length Landingsshallbeprovidedatthetopsofcurbrampsandblendedtransitions.Thelanding

clearlengthshallbe48inchesminimum.Top Landing Slope Theslopeofthelandinginalldirectionsshallbe1:48(2.0%)maximum.Top Landing X Slope Theslopeofthelandinginalldirectionsshallbe1:48(2.0%)maximum.Bottom Landing Length (ParallelCurbRamp)Aturningspace48inchesminimumby48inchesminimumshallbe

providedatthebottomofthecurbramp.Bottom Landing Slope (ParallelCurbRamp)Theslopeoftheturningspaceinalldirectionsshallbe1:48(2.0%)

maximum.Bottom Landing X Slope (ParallelCurbRamp)Theslopeoftheturningspaceinalldirectionsshallbe1:48(2.0%)

maximum.Left Flare Whereprovided,curbrampflaresshallnotbesteeperthan1:10(10.0%).Right Flare Whereprovided,curbrampflaresshallnotbesteeperthan1:10(10.0%).Gutter Lip Theadjacentsurfacesattransitionsatcurbrampstowalks,gutters,andstreetsshallbeat

thesamelevel.Gutter Slope Counterslopesofadjoiningguttersandroadsurfacesimmediatelyadjacenttoandwithin

24inchesofthecurbrampshallnotbesteeperthan1:20(5.0%).Gutter X Slope Thecrossslopeofcurbrampsandblendedtransitionsshallbe1:48(2.0%)maximum.Truncated Domes Curbrampsandblendedtransitionsshallhavedetectablewarnings.Dome Setback Detectablewarningsshallbelocatedsotheedgenearestthecurbis6inchesminimum

and8inchesmaximumfromthelineatthefaceofthecurbmarkingthetransitionbetweenthecurbandthegutter,streetorhighwayorflushatthetransitionforaparalellcurbrampandislandcut-through.

Within Crosswalk Thebottomofcurbrampsshallhaveaclearspace48inchesminimumoutsideactivetrafficlanesoftheroadway

MEASUREMENT BREAKDOWN

September 2020SSA Project # 19029.00

SMCCCD College of San Mateo - Curb Ramps - ACS Report

4293 of 4366

Page 7: SMCCCD - College of San Mateo N - College of... · SMCCCD College of San Mateo - Curb Ramps - ACS Report NAVIGATION 1. Locator Number: Corresponds to a unique database record tied

September 2020SSA Project # 19029.00

SMCCCD College of San Mateo - Curb Ramps - ACS Report

COST SUMMARY

4294 of 4366

Page 8: SMCCCD - College of San Mateo N - College of... · SMCCCD College of San Mateo - Curb Ramps - ACS Report NAVIGATION 1. Locator Number: Corresponds to a unique database record tied

College of San Mateo Access Compliance Survey Report - Curb Ramps Cost Summary

Street Names: Type:

Total Cost for Street: Aquatics Ln $12,000.00

ID:

Aquatics Ln $12,000.00and

$12,000.00Curb Ramp Required226

Street Names: Type:

Total Cost for Street: Beethoven Lot 2 $10,250.00

ID:

Beethoven Lot 2 $10,250.00and

$10,250.00Perpendicular232

Street Names: Type:

Total Cost for Street: College Center 10 $27,000.00

ID:

College Center 10 $7,000.00and East Hall 12

$7,000.00Blended Transition270

College Center 10 $20,000.00and Forum Lot 8

$20,000.00Perpendicular275

Street Names: Type:

Total Cost for Street: College Heights Dr $10,000.00

ID:

College Heights Dr $10,000.00and Aquatics Ln

$10,000.00Blended Transition223

Street Names: Type:

Total Cost for Street: Csm Dr $32,500.00

ID:

Csm Dr $19,000.00and

$19,000.00Parallel215

Csm Dr $13,500.00and Theater Ln

$13,500.00Parallel207

Street Names: Type:

Total Cost for Street: East Hall 12 $6,500.00

ID:

East Hall 12 $6,500.00and East Hall 12

$6,500.00Perpendicular267

September 2020 Prepared by Sally Swanson Architects, Inc. Project # 19029

4295 of 4366

Page 9: SMCCCD - College of San Mateo N - College of... · SMCCCD College of San Mateo - Curb Ramps - ACS Report NAVIGATION 1. Locator Number: Corresponds to a unique database record tied

College of San Mateo Access Compliance Survey Report - Curb Ramps Cost Summary

Street Names: Type:

Total Cost for Street: East Perimeter Road $68,500.00

ID:

East Perimeter Road $10,500.00and Athletic Loop Road

$10,500.00Parallel260

East Perimeter Road $7,000.00and Bulldog Lot 9

$7,000.00Curb Ramp Required282

East Perimeter Road $13,500.00and Bulldog Lot 9A

$13,500.00Blended Transition280

East Perimeter Road $37,500.00and East Perimeter Road

$37,500.00Curb Ramp Required283

Street Names: Type:

Total Cost for Street: Forum Lot 8 $17,500.00

ID:

Forum Lot 8 $7,000.00and East Perimeter Road

$7,000.00Curb Ramp Required265

Forum Lot 8 $10,500.00and Forum Lot 8

$10,500.00Perpendicular278

Street Names: Type:

Total Cost for Street: Galileo Lot 6 $24,500.00

ID:

Galileo Lot 6 $24,500.00and Galileo Lot 6

$24,500.00Perpendicular298

Street Names: Type:

Total Cost for Street: North Hall 18 $7,000.00

ID:

North Hall 18 $7,000.00and Marie Curie Lot 5

$7,000.00Curb Ramp Required295

Street Names: Type:

Total Cost for Street: Planetarium $6,500.00

ID:

Planetarium $6,500.00and Planetarium

$6,500.00Perpendicular296

Street Names: Type:

Total Cost for Street: South Hall 14 $14,000.00

ID:

September 2020 Prepared by Sally Swanson Architects, Inc. Project # 19029

4296 of 4366

Page 10: SMCCCD - College of San Mateo N - College of... · SMCCCD College of San Mateo - Curb Ramps - ACS Report NAVIGATION 1. Locator Number: Corresponds to a unique database record tied

College of San Mateo Access Compliance Survey Report - Curb Ramps Cost Summary

South Hall 14 $14,000.00and Central Hall 16

$14,000.00Curb Ramp Required293

Street Names: Type:

Total Cost for Street: Stadium Lot 11 $0.00

ID:

Stadium Lot 11 $0.00and

$0.00Perpendicular246

Street Names: Type:

Total Cost for Street: Marie Curie Lot 5 $2,500.00

ID:

Marie Curie Lot 5 $2,500.00and North Hall 18

$2,500.00Parallel294

Total Cost for Curb Ramps: $238,750.00

September 2020 Prepared by Sally Swanson Architects, Inc. Project # 19029

4297 of 4366

Page 11: SMCCCD - College of San Mateo N - College of... · SMCCCD College of San Mateo - Curb Ramps - ACS Report NAVIGATION 1. Locator Number: Corresponds to a unique database record tied

September 2020SSA Project # 19029.00

SMCCCD College of San Mateo - Curb Ramps - ACS Report

SURVEY DATA

4298 of 4366

Page 12: SMCCCD - College of San Mateo N - College of... · SMCCCD College of San Mateo - Curb Ramps - ACS Report NAVIGATION 1. Locator Number: Corresponds to a unique database record tied

!(

!(

247

249250251252253254

255256

257258

259260

261

265266267

268269

270

271272273

275276 277

278

279280

281

282283

292

293

294

295

296

297

298

206207

208209 210

211

215

222223

224225

226

227228

232

245

246

202

203

Route

65 SW

Route

64 SW

Route

24 NE

Rou

te10

0 N

Rou

te99

NRoute30 NW

Rou

te 6

7 N

Route27 NW

Route

23 NE

Route

18 SE

Route61 W

Route40 NW

Route53 E

Route

11 N

E

Route

10 NE

Route

36 NE

Route7 NW

Route

60 SW

Route

32 NE

Rou

te 8

2N

W /

NE

Route 15 NW

Route 22 NW

Route 90 NW

Route 51 NE

Route 58 SE

Route 21 NW

Route 44 SW

Route 46 E

Route 66 NE

Route

56N / S

Route 47 SE

Route 9 NW

Route 97 NE

Route 29 SE

Route 57 E

Route 85 NW

Rou

te 3

8 S

Route 113 NW

Route 31 NE

Route 48 NERoute 39 SE

Route 66 N / E

Route 14 NE

Route 59 SW

Route 81 SW

Route 19 SW

Route

49 S

E

Route 45 NW

Route 13 NW

Route 41 E

Route 34 NW

Route 68 SE

Route 37 NW

Route

54 S

W

Route 52 S

Route 43 NW

Route 35 NE

Route 16 NE

Route 42 SWRou

te 17 N

W

Lot 6

Lot 5

PlanetariumB36

B18

B17B16

B19 B12

B10

Lot 8

Lot 7B34

Lot 9A

Lot 9B

Lot 9C

Lot 9D

BaseballField

Turf Field

B35

SoftballField

B30A

College HeightsStadium (Football& Track)

B30

Tennis Courts

Lot 11

B8

AquaticsCenter

B7

Lot 12

B5

B9

B1Lot 3

B2

B3B4

Lot 2

Lot 10

B33

B15Lot 4

B14

Source: Esri, DigitalGlobe, GeoEye, Earthstar Geographics, CNES/Airbus DS, USDA, USGS, AeroGRID, IGN, and the GIS User Community

College of San Mateo Path of Travel Routes 0 290 580 870 1,160145Feet

LegendNodes

Ramps

Pedestrian Signals Priority!( 131.875000

!( 131.875001 - 133.500000

Curb Ramps Priority100.000000 - 105.000000

105.000001 - 118.000000

118.000001 - 132.500000

Path of Travel Route Priority100.000000 - 106.250000

106.250001 - 120.000000

120.000001 - 153.000000

µ

4299 of 4366

Page 13: SMCCCD - College of San Mateo N - College of... · SMCCCD College of San Mateo - Curb Ramps - ACS Report NAVIGATION 1. Locator Number: Corresponds to a unique database record tied

College of San Mateo Access Compliance Survey Report - Curb Ramps AQUATICS LN

Codes / Mitigation InfoExisting Access Barrierand Proposed SolutionRamp TypeID # Measurements

Aquatics LnCross StreetSurvey StreetYear Completed

TBD

X Slope of the Ramp / Pad

• Proposed Solution:

• As-Built Description:Detectable warning surface not provided where a curbramp, landing, blended transition, pedestrian pad, orisland cut through connects to a street.

Detectable Warnings

Install a truncated dome surface that extends the fullwidth and depth (36" min.) of the curb ramp, landing,blended transition, pedestrian pad, or island cut throughexcluding the flared sides, inside the grooved border.

Perpendicular

R305.1PROWAG

4.7.7ADAAG

$2500.00Unit Cost

705.1ADA-2010

CBC 2007 1127B.5.7

(in) 96.0Width of Ramp / Pad

(%)Slope of the Ramp / Pad 7.9(%) 0.4

Left Flare N/A(%)Right Flare N/A(%)

1.1Top Landing Slope (%)0.4Top Landing X Slope (%)

48.0Top Landing Length (in)

N/AGutter Lip (in)Truncated Domes NO(y/n)

No

No X-walk

Stop/Yield Control:

Crosswalks Served:

224

Tee Intersection:

Vertical Curb:

CBC 2016 11B-705.1.2.2

No

Vertical

Length of Ramp / Pad (in) 92.0

Street Grade (Left / Right) 0.2 N/A(%)

Sidewalk Width: 6.0(ft)

Priority

104

X Slope of the Ramp / Pad

• Proposed Solution:

• As-Built Description:Detectable warning surface not provided where a curbramp, landing, blended transition, pedestrian pad, orisland cut through connects to a street.

Detectable Warnings

Install a truncated dome surface that extends the fullwidth and depth (36" min.) of the curb ramp, landing,blended transition, pedestrian pad, or island cut throughexcluding the flared sides, inside the grooved border.

Perpendicular

R305.1PROWAG

4.7.7ADAAG

$2500.00Unit Cost

705.1ADA-2010

CBC 2007 1127B.5.7

(in) 59.0Width of Ramp / Pad

(%)Slope of the Ramp / Pad 7.8(%) 0.1

Left Flare N/A(%)Right Flare N/A(%)

1.6Top Landing Slope (%)0.2Top Landing X Slope (%)

48.0Top Landing Length (in)

N/AGutter Lip (in)Truncated Domes NO(y/n)

No

No X-walk

Stop/Yield Control:

Crosswalks Served:

225

Tee Intersection:

Vertical Curb:

CBC 2016 11B-705.1.2.2

No

Vertical

Length of Ramp / Pad (in) 84.0

Street Grade (Left / Right) 0.1 N/A(%)

Sidewalk Width: 6.0(ft)

Priority

104

September 2020 Prepared by Sally Swanson Architects, Inc. Project # 19029

4300 of 4366

Page 14: SMCCCD - College of San Mateo N - College of... · SMCCCD College of San Mateo - Curb Ramps - ACS Report NAVIGATION 1. Locator Number: Corresponds to a unique database record tied

College of San Mateo Access Compliance Survey Report - Curb Ramps AQUATICS LN

X Slope of the Ramp / Pad

• Proposed Solution:

• As-Built Description:Curb ramp or blended transition not provided where apedestrian access route crosses a curb.

Access Route

Provide a parallel curb ramp, including detectablewarning surfaces, and top and bottom landings asrequired.

Curb Ramp Required

R207.1PROWAG

4.7.1ADAAG

$7000.00Unit Cost

CBC 2007 1127B.5.1LEFT RIGHT

(in)Width of Ramp / Pad

(%)Slope of the Ramp / Pad

(%)

No

No X-walk

Stop/Yield Control:

Crosswalks Served:

226

Tee Intersection:

Vertical Curb:No

RolledSidewalk Width: 6.0(ft)

Priority

100

Total Costs for Curb Ramps at : andAquatics Ln $12,000.00

Total Costs for Curb Ramps along : Aquatics Ln $12,000.00

September 2020 Prepared by Sally Swanson Architects, Inc. Project # 19029

4301 of 4366

Page 15: SMCCCD - College of San Mateo N - College of... · SMCCCD College of San Mateo - Curb Ramps - ACS Report NAVIGATION 1. Locator Number: Corresponds to a unique database record tied

College of San Mateo Access Compliance Survey Report - Curb Ramps BEETHOVEN LOT 2

Codes / Mitigation InfoExisting Access Barrierand Proposed SolutionRamp TypeID # Measurements

Beethoven Lot 2Cross StreetSurvey StreetYear Completed

TBD

X Slope of the Ramp / Pad

• Proposed Solution:

• As-Built Description:

• As-isMeasurement:

Running slope at top landing of existing perpendicularcurb ramp exceeds the 1:48 (2%) maximum.

2.1%

Ramp Landing

Demolish existing and provide new, perpendicular curbramp, including detectable warning surfaces, and top andbottom landings as required.

Perpendicular

R304.2.2PROWAG

4.8.4; 4.8.6ADAAG

$6500.00Unit Cost

CBC 2007 1127B.5.4

(in) 71.0Width of Ramp / Pad

(%)Slope of the Ramp / Pad 8.1(%) 0.6

Left Flare N/A(%)Right Flare N/A(%)

2.1Top Landing Slope (%)0.1Top Landing X Slope (%)

48.0Top Landing Length (in)

Within Crosswalk YES

0.25Gutter Lip

Dome Setback

(in)

3.9Gutter Slope (%)0.0Gutter XSlope (%)

0.0(in)

(y/n)

Truncated Domes YES(y/n)

No

1 X-walk

Stop/Yield Control:

Crosswalks Served:

227

Tee Intersection:

Vertical Curb:

CBC 2016 11B-406.5.3

No

Vertical

Length of Ramp / Pad (in) 87.0

Street Grade (Left / Right) 0.0 N/A(%)

Sidewalk Width: 6.0(ft)

Priority

103.5

X Slope of the Ramp / Pad

• Proposed Solution:

• As-Built Description:

• As-isMeasurement:

The detectable warning surface is not located between 6"- 8" from the curb line on a curb ramp or at the edges on apedestrian island, cut-through island, pedestrian pad,perpendicular curb ramp or blended transition. (0" fromcurb line on a parallel curb ramp.)

12.0"

Detectable Warning Surface

Relocate the detectable warning surface.

Blended Transition

4.7.7, 4.29.1&2ADAAG

$500.00Unit Cost

705.1ADA-2010

LEFT RIGHT(in)Width of Ramp / Pad

(%)Slope of the Ramp / Pad(%)

Top Landing Slope (%)Top Landing X Slope (%)

Top Landing Length (in)

0.6Bottom Landing Slope (%)2.0Bottom Landing X Slope (%)

70.5Bottom Landing Length (in)

Within Crosswalk YES

N/AGutter Lip

Dome Setback

(in)

12.0(in)

(y/n)

Truncated Domes YES(y/n)

No

1 X-walk

Stop/Yield Control:

Crosswalks Served:

228

Tee Intersection:

Vertical Curb:

CBC 2016 11B-705.1.2.2

No

Vertical

Length of Ramp / Pad (in)

Street Grade (Left / Right) 0.0 N/A(%)

Sidewalk Width: 6.0(ft)

Priority

100

September 2020 Prepared by Sally Swanson Architects, Inc. Project # 19029

4302 of 4366

Page 16: SMCCCD - College of San Mateo N - College of... · SMCCCD College of San Mateo - Curb Ramps - ACS Report NAVIGATION 1. Locator Number: Corresponds to a unique database record tied

College of San Mateo Access Compliance Survey Report - Curb Ramps BEETHOVEN LOT 2

X Slope of the Ramp / Pad

• Proposed Solution:

• As-Built Description:

• As-isMeasurement:

Cross slope at top landing of existing perpendicular curbramp exceeds 2%.

2.6%

Ramp Landing

Demolish existing and provide new, perpendicular curbramp, including detectable warning surfaces, and top andbottom landings as required.

Perpendicular

R304.5.3PROWAG

4.8.4; 4.8.6ADAAG

$3250.00Unit Cost

405.7ADA-2010

CBC 2007 1127B.5.4

(in) 70.0Width of Ramp / Pad

(%)Slope of the Ramp / Pad 5.8(%) 1.2

Left Flare (%)Right Flare (%)

0.2Top Landing Slope (%)2.6Top Landing X Slope (%)

48.0Top Landing Length (in)

0.5

Gutter Lip

Dome Setback

(in)

5.4

Gutter Slope (%)0.4

Gutter XSlope (%)

50.0

(in)Truncated Domes

YES

(y/n)

No

No X-walk

Stop/Yield Control:

Crosswalks Served:

232

Tee Intersection:

Vertical Curb:

CBC 2016 11B-406.5.3

No

Vertical

Length of Ramp / Pad (in) 84.0

Street Grade (Left / Right) 1.2 N/A(%)

Sidewalk Width: 6.0(ft)

Priority

108.5

Total Costs for Curb Ramps at : andBeethoven Lot 2 $10,250.00

Total Costs for Curb Ramps along : Beethoven Lot 2 $10,250.00

September 2020 Prepared by Sally Swanson Architects, Inc. Project # 19029

4303 of 4366

Page 17: SMCCCD - College of San Mateo N - College of... · SMCCCD College of San Mateo - Curb Ramps - ACS Report NAVIGATION 1. Locator Number: Corresponds to a unique database record tied

College of San Mateo Access Compliance Survey Report - Curb Ramps COLLEGE CENTER 10

Codes / Mitigation InfoExisting Access Barrierand Proposed SolutionRamp TypeID # Measurements

College Center 10 East Hall 12Cross StreetSurvey StreetYear Completed

TBD

X Slope of the Ramp / Pad

• Proposed Solution:

• As-Built Description:Curb ramp, blended transition, island cut-through, islandperpendicular, or pedestrian pad surveyed for thefollowing items are in compliance with the ADA andapplicable building codes.

Compliant Curb Ramp

Provide routine inspection and maintenance to maintainaccessible access route.

Blended Transition

$0.00Unit Cost

LEFT RIGHT(in)Width of Ramp / Pad

(%)Slope of the Ramp / Pad(%)

Top Landing Slope (%)Top Landing X Slope (%)

Top Landing Length (in)

0.2Bottom Landing Slope (%)1.2Bottom Landing X Slope (%)

72.0Bottom Landing Length (in)

Within Crosswalk YES

N/AGutter Lip

Dome Setback

(in)

8.0(in)

(y/n)

Truncated Domes YES(y/n)

No

1 X-walk

Stop/Yield Control:

Crosswalks Served:

268

Tee Intersection:

Vertical Curb:

No

Vertical

Length of Ramp / Pad (in)

Street Grade (Left / Right) 0.3 N/A(%)

Sidewalk Width: 4.0(ft)

Priority

100

X Slope of the Ramp / Pad

• Proposed Solution:

• As-Built Description:

• As-isMeasurement:

Running slope at bottom landing of existing blendedtransition exceeds 2%.

2.9%

Ramp Landing

Demolish existing and provide new, blended transition,including detectable warning surfaces, and top andbottom landings as required.

Blended Transition

R304.3.2PROWAG

4.8.4; 4.8.6ADAAG

$3500.00Unit Cost

LEFT RIGHT(in)Width of Ramp / Pad

(%)Slope of the Ramp / Pad(%)

Top Landing Slope (%)Top Landing X Slope (%)

Top Landing Length (in)

2.9Bottom Landing Slope (%)0.9Bottom Landing X Slope (%)

95.0Bottom Landing Length (in)

N/AGutter Lip (in)Truncated Domes NO(y/n)

No

No X-walk

Stop/Yield Control:

Crosswalks Served:

269

Tee Intersection:

Vertical Curb:

CBC 2016 11B-406.3.2

No

Vertical

Length of Ramp / Pad (in)

Street Grade (Left / Right) 1.5 N/A(%)

Sidewalk Width: 4.0(ft)

Priority

100

September 2020 Prepared by Sally Swanson Architects, Inc. Project # 19029

4304 of 4366

Page 18: SMCCCD - College of San Mateo N - College of... · SMCCCD College of San Mateo - Curb Ramps - ACS Report NAVIGATION 1. Locator Number: Corresponds to a unique database record tied

College of San Mateo Access Compliance Survey Report - Curb Ramps COLLEGE CENTER 10

X Slope of the Ramp / Pad

• Proposed Solution:

• As-Built Description:

• As-isMeasurement:

Running slope at bottom landing of existing blendedtransition exceeds 2%.

5.9%

Ramp Landing

Demolish existing and provide new, blended transition,including detectable warning surfaces, and top andbottom landings as required.

Blended Transition

R304.3.2PROWAG

4.8.4; 4.8.6ADAAG

$3500.00Unit Cost

LEFT RIGHT(in)Width of Ramp / Pad

(%)Slope of the Ramp / Pad(%)

Top Landing Slope (%)Top Landing X Slope (%)

Top Landing Length (in)

5.9Bottom Landing Slope (%)1.4Bottom Landing X Slope (%)

96.0Bottom Landing Length (in)

N/AGutter Lip (in)Truncated Domes NO(y/n)

No

No X-walk

Stop/Yield Control:

Crosswalks Served:

270

Tee Intersection:

Vertical Curb:

CBC 2016 11B-406.3.2

No

Vertical

Length of Ramp / Pad (in)

Street Grade (Left / Right) 2.0 N/A(%)

Sidewalk Width: 4.0(ft)

Priority

100

Total Costs for Curb Ramps at : East Hall 12andCollege Center 10 $7,000.00

X Slope of the Ramp / Pad

• Proposed Solution:

• As-Built Description:

• As-isMeasurement:

Running slope at top landing of existing perpendicularcurb ramp exceeds the 1:48 (2%) maximum.

2.9%

Ramp Landing

Demolish existing and provide new, perpendicular curbramp, including detectable warning surfaces, and top andbottom landings as required.

Perpendicular

R304.2.2PROWAG

4.8.4; 4.8.6ADAAG

$6500.00Unit Cost

CBC 2007 1127B.5.4

(in) 60.0Width of Ramp / Pad

(%)Slope of the Ramp / Pad 7.3(%) 0.3

Left Flare N/A(%)Right Flare N/A(%)

2.9Top Landing Slope (%)0.4Top Landing X Slope (%)

48.0Top Landing Length (in)

N/AGutter Lip (in)Truncated Domes NO(y/n)

No

No X-walk

Stop/Yield Control:

Crosswalks Served:

272

Tee Intersection:

Vertical Curb:

CBC 2016 11B-406.5.3

No

Vertical

Length of Ramp / Pad (in) 93.0

Street Grade (Left / Right) 0.6 N/A(%)

Sidewalk Width: 4.0(ft)

Priority

109

September 2020 Prepared by Sally Swanson Architects, Inc. Project # 19029

4305 of 4366

Page 19: SMCCCD - College of San Mateo N - College of... · SMCCCD College of San Mateo - Curb Ramps - ACS Report NAVIGATION 1. Locator Number: Corresponds to a unique database record tied

College of San Mateo Access Compliance Survey Report - Curb Ramps COLLEGE CENTER 10

X Slope of the Ramp / Pad

• Proposed Solution:

• As-Built Description:

• As-isMeasurement:

Running slope of existing perpendicular curb ramp is lessthan 5% or greater than 8.3%.

8.8%

Ramp Slope

Demolish existing and provide new, perpendicular curbramp, including detectable warning surfaces, and top andbottom landings as required.

Perpendicular

R304.2.2PROWAG

4.7.2; 4.8.2ADAAG

$6500.00Unit Cost

405.2ADA-2010

CBC 2007 1127B.5.3

(in) 60.0Width of Ramp / Pad

(%)Slope of the Ramp / Pad 8.8(%) 1.5

Left Flare N/A(%)Right Flare N/A(%)

0.1Top Landing Slope (%)0.3Top Landing X Slope (%)

48.0Top Landing Length (in)

N/AGutter Lip (in)Truncated Domes NO(y/n)

No

No X-walk

Stop/Yield Control:

Crosswalks Served:

273

Tee Intersection:

Vertical Curb:

CBC 2016 11B-406.2.1

No

Vertical

Length of Ramp / Pad (in) 85.0

Street Grade (Left / Right) 0.1 N/A(%)

Sidewalk Width: 4.0(ft)

Priority

106.5

X Slope of the Ramp / Pad

• Proposed Solution:

• As-Built Description:

• As-isMeasurement:

Running slope at blended transition exceeds 5%.

5.1%

Blended Transition

Demolish existing and provide new, blended transition,including detectable warning surfaces, and top andbottom landings as required.

Blended Transition

R304.4.1PROWAG

$7000.00Unit Cost

LEFT RIGHT(in) 60.0Width of Ramp / Pad

(%)Slope of the Ramp / Pad 5.1(%) 0.0

1.3Top Landing Slope (%)0.1Top Landing X Slope (%)

48.0Top Landing Length (in)

N/AGutter Lip (in)Truncated Domes NO(y/n)

No

No X-walk

Stop/Yield Control:

Crosswalks Served:

274

Tee Intersection:

Vertical Curb:

No

Vertical

Length of Ramp / Pad (in) 84.0

Street Grade (Left / Right) 0.9 N/A(%)

Sidewalk Width: 5.0(ft)

Priority

100

September 2020 Prepared by Sally Swanson Architects, Inc. Project # 19029

4306 of 4366

Page 20: SMCCCD - College of San Mateo N - College of... · SMCCCD College of San Mateo - Curb Ramps - ACS Report NAVIGATION 1. Locator Number: Corresponds to a unique database record tied

College of San Mateo Access Compliance Survey Report - Curb Ramps COLLEGE CENTER 10

X Slope of the Ramp / Pad

• Proposed Solution:

• As-Built Description:Curb ramp, blended transition, island cut-through, islandperpendicular, or pedestrian pad surveyed for thefollowing items are in compliance with the ADA andapplicable building codes.

Compliant Curb Ramp

Provide routine inspection and maintenance to maintainaccessible access route.

Perpendicular

$0.00Unit Cost

(in) 115.0Width of Ramp / Pad

(%)Slope of the Ramp / Pad 6.8(%) 1.2

Left Flare N/A(%)Right Flare N/A(%)

0.5Top Landing Slope (%)0.7Top Landing X Slope (%)

48.0Top Landing Length (in)

N/AGutter Lip

Dome Setback

(in)

6.0(in)Truncated Domes YES(y/n)

No

No X-walk

Stop/Yield Control:

Crosswalks Served:

275

Tee Intersection:

Vertical Curb:

No

Vertical

Length of Ramp / Pad (in) 84.0

Street Grade (Left / Right) 1.6 N/A(%)

Sidewalk Width: 5.0(ft)

Priority

100

Total Costs for Curb Ramps at : Forum Lot 8andCollege Center 10 $20,000.00

Total Costs for Curb Ramps along : College Center 10 $27,000.00

September 2020 Prepared by Sally Swanson Architects, Inc. Project # 19029

4307 of 4366

Page 21: SMCCCD - College of San Mateo N - College of... · SMCCCD College of San Mateo - Curb Ramps - ACS Report NAVIGATION 1. Locator Number: Corresponds to a unique database record tied

College of San Mateo Access Compliance Survey Report - Curb Ramps COLLEGE HEIGHTS DR

Codes / Mitigation InfoExisting Access Barrierand Proposed SolutionRamp TypeID # Measurements

College Heights Dr Aquatics LnCross StreetSurvey StreetYear Completed

TBD

X Slope of the Ramp / Pad

• Proposed Solution:

• As-Built Description:

• As-isMeasurement:

Cross slope of existing parallel curb ramp exceeds 2%.

Right: 2.5%

Ramp Cross Slope

Demolish existing and provide new parallel curb rampincluding detectable warning surfaces, and top andbottom landings as required.

Parallel

R304.5.3PROWAG

4.8.6ADAAG

$7000.00Unit Cost

LEFT RIGHT(in) 73.0 73.0Width of Ramp / Pad

(%)Slope of the Ramp / Pad 3.3 4.7(%) 1.1 2.5

7.7 2.1Top Landing Slope (%)2.1 2.4Top Landing X Slope (%)

48.0Top Landing Length 48.0(in)

1.1Bottom Landing Slope (%)1.4Bottom Landing X Slope (%)

96.0Bottom Landing Length (in)

Within Crosswalk YES

N/AGutter Lip

Dome Setback

(in)

8.0(in)

(y/n)

Truncated Domes YES(y/n)

No

1 X-walk

Stop/Yield Control:

Crosswalks Served:

222

Tee Intersection:

Vertical Curb:

CBC 2016 11B-406.5.7

No

Vertical

Length of Ramp / Pad (in) 76.0 78.0

Street Grade (Left / Right) 2.9 N/A(%)

Sidewalk Width: 6.0(ft)

Priority

110.5

X Slope of the Ramp / Pad

• Proposed Solution:

• As-Built Description:

• As-isMeasurement:

The slope of the gutter area or street at the foot of a curbramp, blended transition, pedestrian pad, or island cutthrough exceeds 1:20 (5%) in the direction of thepedestrian crossing.

9.5%

Gutter

Demolish gutter or street area as required and provide 48"x 48" area at foot of curb ramp, blended transition,pedestrian pad, or island cut through with slope nogreater than 5%.

Blended Transition

R304.5.4PROWAG

4.7.2ADAAG

$3000.00Unit Cost

406.2ADA-2010

CBC 2007 1127B.5.3

LEFT RIGHT(in) 72.0Width of Ramp / Pad

(%)Slope of the Ramp / Pad 2.0(%) 0.3

1.4Top Landing Slope (%)0.3Top Landing X Slope (%)

48.0Top Landing Length (in)

Within Crosswalk YES

0.5Gutter Lip

Dome Setback

(in)

9.5Gutter Slope (%)1.5Gutter XSlope (%)

0.0(in)

(y/n)

Truncated Domes YES(y/n)

No

1 X-walk

Stop/Yield Control:

Crosswalks Served:

223

Tee Intersection:

Vertical Curb:

CBC 2016 11B-406.5.8

No

Vertical

Length of Ramp / Pad (in) 112.0

Street Grade (Left / Right) 1.2 N/A(%)

Sidewalk Width: 6.0(ft)

Priority

100

Total Costs for Curb Ramps at : Aquatics LnandCollege Heights Dr $10,000.00

Total Costs for Curb Ramps along : College Heights Dr $10,000.00

September 2020 Prepared by Sally Swanson Architects, Inc. Project # 19029

4308 of 4366

Page 22: SMCCCD - College of San Mateo N - College of... · SMCCCD College of San Mateo - Curb Ramps - ACS Report NAVIGATION 1. Locator Number: Corresponds to a unique database record tied

College of San Mateo Access Compliance Survey Report - Curb Ramps CSM DR

Codes / Mitigation InfoExisting Access Barrierand Proposed SolutionRamp TypeID # Measurements

Csm DrCross StreetSurvey StreetYear Completed

TBD

X Slope of the Ramp / Pad

• Proposed Solution:

• As-Built Description:

• As-isMeasurement:

The cross slope of the gutter area or street at the foot of acurb ramp, blended transition, pedestrian pad, or islandcut through exceeds 2%.

2.4%

Gutter

Demolish gutter or street area as required and provide 48"x 48" area at foot of curb ramp, blended transition,pedestrian pad, or island cut through with a cross slopeno greater than 2%.

Blended Transition

R304.5.3PROWAG

4.8.6ADAAG

$3000.00Unit Cost

CBC 2007 1127B.5

LEFT RIGHT(in)Width of Ramp / Pad

(%)Slope of the Ramp / Pad(%)

Top Landing Slope (%)Top Landing X Slope (%)

Top Landing Length (in)

1.2Bottom Landing Slope (%)1.3Bottom Landing X Slope (%)

91.0Bottom Landing Length (in)

Within Crosswalk YES

0.0Gutter Lip

Dome Setback

(in)

1.0Gutter Slope (%)2.4Gutter XSlope (%)

41.0(in)

(y/n)

Truncated Domes YES(y/n)

Yes-Stop Sign

1 X-walk

Stop/Yield Control:

Crosswalks Served:

208

Tee Intersection:

Vertical Curb:

CBC 2016 11B-406.5.8

No

Vertical

Length of Ramp / Pad (in)

Street Grade (Left / Right) 1.0 0.5(%)

Sidewalk Width: 8.0(ft)

Priority

100

X Slope of the Ramp / Pad

• Proposed Solution:

• As-Built Description:Detectable warning surface not provided where a curbramp, landing, blended transition, pedestrian pad, orisland cut through connects to a street.

Detectable Warnings

Install a truncated dome surface that extends the fullwidth and depth (36" min.) of the curb ramp, landing,blended transition, pedestrian pad, or island cut throughexcluding the flared sides, inside the grooved border.

Island-Cut Through

R305.1PROWAG

4.7.7ADAAG

$2500.00Unit Cost

705.1ADA-2010

CBC 2007 1127B.5.7

(in) 92.0Width of Ramp / Pad

(%)Slope of the Ramp / Pad 0.5(%) 0.6

Within Crosswalk YES

0.0Gutter Lip (in)

(y/n)

Truncated Domes NO(y/n)

No

2 X-walk

Stop/Yield Control:

Crosswalks Served:

209

Tee Intersection:

Vertical Curb:

CBC 2016 11B-705.1.2.2

No

Vertical

Length of Ramp / Pad (in) 72.0

Street Grade (Left / Right) 0.5 1.4(%)

Sidewalk Width: 8.0(ft)

Priority

100

September 2020 Prepared by Sally Swanson Architects, Inc. Project # 19029

4309 of 4366

Page 23: SMCCCD - College of San Mateo N - College of... · SMCCCD College of San Mateo - Curb Ramps - ACS Report NAVIGATION 1. Locator Number: Corresponds to a unique database record tied

College of San Mateo Access Compliance Survey Report - Curb Ramps CSM DR

X Slope of the Ramp / Pad

• Proposed Solution:

• As-Built Description:

• As-isMeasurement:

Cross slope at bottom landing of existing blendedtransition exceeds 2%.

2.4%

Ramp Landing

Demolish existing and provide new, blended transition,including detectable warning surfaces, and top andbottom landings as required.

Blended Transition

R304.3.2PROWAG

4.8.4; 4.8.6ADAAG

$3500.00Unit Cost

LEFT RIGHT(in)Width of Ramp / Pad

(%)Slope of the Ramp / Pad(%)

Top Landing Slope (%)Top Landing X Slope (%)

Top Landing Length (in)

0.2Bottom Landing Slope (%)2.4Bottom Landing X Slope (%)

96.0Bottom Landing Length (in)

Within Crosswalk YES

N/AGutter Lip

Dome Setback

(in)

42.0(in)

(y/n)

Truncated Domes YES(y/n)

No

1 X-walk

Stop/Yield Control:

Crosswalks Served:

210

Tee Intersection:

Vertical Curb:

CBC 2016 11B-406.3.2

No

Vertical

Length of Ramp / Pad (in)

Street Grade (Left / Right) 0.2 N/A(%)

Sidewalk Width: 8.0(ft)

Priority

100

X Slope of the Ramp / Pad

• Proposed Solution:

• As-Built Description:

• As-isMeasurement:

The slope of the gutter area or street at the foot of a curbramp, blended transition, pedestrian pad, or island cutthrough exceeds 1:20 (5%) in the direction of thepedestrian crossing.

11.1%

Gutter

Demolish gutter or street area as required and provide 48"x 48" area at foot of curb ramp, blended transition,pedestrian pad, or island cut through with slope nogreater than 5%.

Parallel

R304.5.4PROWAG

4.7.2ADAAG

$3000.00Unit Cost

406.2ADA-2010

CBC 2007 1127B.5.3

LEFT RIGHT(in) 95.5 96.0Width of Ramp / Pad

(%)Slope of the Ramp / Pad 5.2 9.1(%) 1.0 1.8

0.8 0.2Top Landing Slope (%)1.8 1.9Top Landing X Slope (%)

48.0Top Landing Length 48.0(in)

0.1Bottom Landing Slope (%)1.1Bottom Landing X Slope (%)

246.0Bottom Landing Length (in)

0.25Gutter Lip

Dome Setback

(in)

11.1Gutter Slope (%)1.1Gutter XSlope (%)

6.0(in)Truncated Domes YES(y/n)

No

No X-walk

Stop/Yield Control:

Crosswalks Served:

211

Tee Intersection:

Vertical Curb:

CBC 2016 11B-406.5.8

No

Vertical

Length of Ramp / Pad (in) 87.0 84.0

Street Grade (Left / Right) 1.2 N/A(%)

Sidewalk Width: 8.0(ft)

Priority

109

September 2020 Prepared by Sally Swanson Architects, Inc. Project # 19029

4310 of 4366

Page 24: SMCCCD - College of San Mateo N - College of... · SMCCCD College of San Mateo - Curb Ramps - ACS Report NAVIGATION 1. Locator Number: Corresponds to a unique database record tied

College of San Mateo Access Compliance Survey Report - Curb Ramps CSM DR

X Slope of the Ramp / Pad

• Proposed Solution:

• As-Built Description:

• As-isMeasurement:

Cross slope of existing parallel curb ramp exceeds 2%.

Right: 3.2%

Ramp Cross Slope

Demolish existing and provide new parallel curb rampincluding detectable warning surfaces, and top andbottom landings as required.

Parallel

R304.5.3PROWAG

4.8.6ADAAG

$7000.00Unit Cost

LEFT RIGHT(in) 72.0 72.0Width of Ramp / Pad

(%)Slope of the Ramp / Pad 7.2 7.6(%) 0.3 3.2

3.4 3.6Top Landing Slope (%)0.1 1.0Top Landing X Slope (%)

48.0Top Landing Length 48.0(in)

2.1Bottom Landing Slope (%)1.2Bottom Landing X Slope (%)

72.0Bottom Landing Length (in)

N/AGutter Lip

Dome Setback

(in)

40.0(in)Truncated Domes YES(y/n)

No

No X-walk

Stop/Yield Control:

Crosswalks Served:

215

Tee Intersection:

Vertical Curb:

CBC 2016 11B-406.5.7

No

Vertical

Length of Ramp / Pad (in) 86.0 121.0

Street Grade (Left / Right) 0.7 N/A(%)

Sidewalk Width: 6.0(ft)

Priority

110.5

Total Costs for Curb Ramps at : andCsm Dr $19,000.00

X Slope of the Ramp / Pad

• Proposed Solution:

• As-Built Description:

• As-isMeasurement:

Cross slope of an existing perpendicular curb rampexceeds 1:48 (2%).

3.1%

Ramp Slope

Demolish existing and provide new, perpendicular curbramp, including detectable warning surfaces, and top andbottom landings as required.

Perpendicular

R304.5.3PROWAG

4.8.6ADAAG

$6500.00Unit Cost

405.3ADA-2010

CBC 2007 1133B.5.3.1

(in) 67.0Width of Ramp / Pad

(%)Slope of the Ramp / Pad 6.2(%) 3.1

Left Flare N/A(%)Right Flare N/A(%)

3.3Top Landing Slope (%)1.1Top Landing X Slope (%)

48.0Top Landing Length (in)

Within Crosswalk YES

0.0Gutter Lip

Dome Setback

(in)

4.1Gutter Slope (%)2.3Gutter XSlope (%)

16.0(in)

(y/n)

Truncated Domes YES(y/n)

Yes-Stop Sign

1 X-walk

Stop/Yield Control:

Crosswalks Served:

206

Tee Intersection:

Vertical Curb:

CBC 2016 11B-406.5.7

No

Vertical

Length of Ramp / Pad (in) 122.0

Street Grade (Left / Right) 0.3 1.4(%)

Sidewalk Width: 5.5(ft)

Priority

112.5

September 2020 Prepared by Sally Swanson Architects, Inc. Project # 19029

4311 of 4366

Page 25: SMCCCD - College of San Mateo N - College of... · SMCCCD College of San Mateo - Curb Ramps - ACS Report NAVIGATION 1. Locator Number: Corresponds to a unique database record tied

College of San Mateo Access Compliance Survey Report - Curb Ramps CSM DR

X Slope of the Ramp / Pad

• Proposed Solution:

• As-Built Description:

• As-isMeasurement:

Cross slope of existing parallel curb ramp exceeds 2%.

Left: 2.5%

Ramp Cross Slope

Demolish existing and provide new parallel curb rampincluding detectable warning surfaces, and top andbottom landings as required.

Parallel

R304.5.3PROWAG

4.8.6ADAAG

$7000.00Unit Cost

LEFT RIGHT(in) 72.0 96.0Width of Ramp / Pad

(%)Slope of the Ramp / Pad 7.0 6.4(%) 2.5 0.3

1.8 1.3Top Landing Slope (%)1.6 0.2Top Landing X Slope (%)

48.0Top Landing Length 48.0(in)

1.6Bottom Landing Slope (%)0.0Bottom Landing X Slope (%)

103.0Bottom Landing Length (in)

Within Crosswalk YES

0.0Gutter Lip

Dome Setback

(in)

7.1Gutter Slope (%)2.2Gutter XSlope (%)

30.0(in)

(y/n)

Truncated Domes YES(y/n)

Yes-Stop Sign

1 X-walk

Stop/Yield Control:

Crosswalks Served:

207

Tee Intersection:

Vertical Curb:

CBC 2016 11B-406.5.7

No

Vertical

Length of Ramp / Pad (in) 101.0 96.0

Street Grade (Left / Right) 1.0 0.8(%)

Sidewalk Width: 8.0(ft)

Priority

107.5

Total Costs for Curb Ramps at : Theater LnandCsm Dr $13,500.00

Total Costs for Curb Ramps along : Csm Dr $32,500.00

September 2020 Prepared by Sally Swanson Architects, Inc. Project # 19029

4312 of 4366

Page 26: SMCCCD - College of San Mateo N - College of... · SMCCCD College of San Mateo - Curb Ramps - ACS Report NAVIGATION 1. Locator Number: Corresponds to a unique database record tied

College of San Mateo Access Compliance Survey Report - Curb Ramps EAST HALL 12

Codes / Mitigation InfoExisting Access Barrierand Proposed SolutionRamp TypeID # Measurements

East Hall 12 East Hall 12Cross StreetSurvey StreetYear Completed

TBD

X Slope of the Ramp / Pad

• Proposed Solution:

• As-Built Description:

• As-isMeasurement:

Running slope at top landing of existing perpendicularcurb ramp exceeds the 1:48 (2%) maximum.

2.4%

Ramp Landing

Demolish existing and provide new, perpendicular curbramp, including detectable warning surfaces, and top andbottom landings as required.

Perpendicular

R304.2.2PROWAG

4.8.4; 4.8.6ADAAG

$6500.00Unit Cost

CBC 2007 1127B.5.4

(in) 71.0Width of Ramp / Pad

(%)Slope of the Ramp / Pad 7.1(%) 0.6

Left Flare N/A(%)Right Flare N/A(%)

2.4Top Landing Slope (%)0.0Top Landing X Slope (%)

48.0Top Landing Length (in)

Within Crosswalk YES

N/AGutter Lip

Dome Setback

(in)

8.0(in)

(y/n)

Truncated Domes YES(y/n)

No

1 X-walk

Stop/Yield Control:

Crosswalks Served:

267

Tee Intersection:

Vertical Curb:

CBC 2016 11B-406.5.3

No

Vertical

Length of Ramp / Pad (in) 94.0

Street Grade (Left / Right) 0.4 N/A(%)

Sidewalk Width: 4.0(ft)

Priority

102.5

Total Costs for Curb Ramps at : East Hall 12andEast Hall 12 $6,500.00

Total Costs for Curb Ramps along : East Hall 12 $6,500.00

September 2020 Prepared by Sally Swanson Architects, Inc. Project # 19029

4313 of 4366

Page 27: SMCCCD - College of San Mateo N - College of... · SMCCCD College of San Mateo - Curb Ramps - ACS Report NAVIGATION 1. Locator Number: Corresponds to a unique database record tied

College of San Mateo Access Compliance Survey Report - Curb Ramps EAST PERIMETER ROAD

Codes / Mitigation InfoExisting Access Barrierand Proposed SolutionRamp TypeID # Measurements

East Perimeter Road Athletic Loop RoadCross StreetSurvey StreetYear Completed

TBD

X Slope of the Ramp / Pad

• Proposed Solution:

• As-Built Description:

• As-isMeasurement:

Running slope at bottom landing of existing blendedtransition exceeds 2%.

4.9%

Ramp Landing

Demolish existing and provide new, blended transition,including detectable warning surfaces, and top andbottom landings as required.

Blended Transition

R304.3.2PROWAG

4.8.4; 4.8.6ADAAG

$3500.00Unit Cost

LEFT RIGHT(in)Width of Ramp / Pad

(%)Slope of the Ramp / Pad(%)

Top Landing Slope (%)Top Landing X Slope (%)

Top Landing Length (in)

4.9Bottom Landing Slope (%)3.3Bottom Landing X Slope (%)

72.0Bottom Landing Length (in)

Within Crosswalk YES

0.0Gutter Lip

Dome Setback

(in)

4.5Gutter Slope (%)1.5Gutter XSlope (%)

6.0(in)

(y/n)

Truncated Domes YES(y/n)

Yes-Stop Sign

1 X-walk

Stop/Yield Control:

Crosswalks Served:

259

Tee Intersection:

Vertical Curb:

CBC 2016 11B-406.3.2

Yes

Vertical

Length of Ramp / Pad (in)

Street Grade (Left / Right) 1.8 0.4(%)

Sidewalk Width: 6.0(ft)

Priority

100

X Slope of the Ramp / Pad

• Proposed Solution:

• As-Built Description:

• As-isMeasurement:

Running slope of existing parallel curb ramp, where therun is less than 15' in length, is less than 5% or more than8.3%.

Right: 12.7%

Ramp Slope

Demolish existing and provide new parallel curb rampincluding detectable warning surfaces, and top andbottom landings as required.

Parallel

R304.3.2PROWAG

4.8.2ADAAG

$7000.00Unit Cost

CBC 2007 1127B.5.3

LEFT RIGHT(in) 48.0 48.0Width of Ramp / Pad

(%)Slope of the Ramp / Pad 0.6 12.7(%) 0.8 3.2

4.3 3.4Top Landing Slope (%)1.6 2.2Top Landing X Slope (%)

48.0Top Landing Length 48.0(in)

1.2Bottom Landing Slope (%)1.8Bottom Landing X Slope (%)

48.0Bottom Landing Length (in)

Within Crosswalk YES

0.0Gutter Lip

Dome Setback

(in)

1.3Gutter Slope (%)2.0Gutter XSlope (%)

8.0(in)

(y/n)

Truncated Domes YES(y/n)

No

2 X-walk

Stop/Yield Control:

Crosswalks Served:

260

Tee Intersection:

Vertical Curb:

CBC 2016 11B-406.3.1

Yes

Vertical

Length of Ramp / Pad (in) 64.0 117.0

Street Grade (Left / Right) 3.1 0.9(%)

Sidewalk Width: 4.0(ft)

Priority

115

Total Costs for Curb Ramps at : Athletic Loop RoadandEast Perimeter Road $10,500.00

September 2020 Prepared by Sally Swanson Architects, Inc. Project # 19029

4314 of 4366

Page 28: SMCCCD - College of San Mateo N - College of... · SMCCCD College of San Mateo - Curb Ramps - ACS Report NAVIGATION 1. Locator Number: Corresponds to a unique database record tied

College of San Mateo Access Compliance Survey Report - Curb Ramps EAST PERIMETER ROAD

X Slope of the Ramp / Pad

• Proposed Solution:

• As-Built Description:Curb ramp or blended transition not provided where apedestrian access route crosses a curb.

Access Route

Provide a parallel curb ramp, including detectablewarning surfaces, and top and bottom landings asrequired.

Curb Ramp Required

R207.1PROWAG

4.7.1ADAAG

$7000.00Unit Cost

CBC 2007 1127B.5.1LEFT RIGHT

(in)Width of Ramp / Pad

(%)Slope of the Ramp / Pad

(%)

No

1 X-walk

Stop/Yield Control:

Crosswalks Served:

282

Tee Intersection:

Vertical Curb:No

RolledSidewalk Width: 5.0(ft)

Priority

100

Total Costs for Curb Ramps at : Bulldog Lot 9andEast Perimeter Road $7,000.00

X Slope of the Ramp / Pad

• Proposed Solution:

• As-Built Description:

• As-isMeasurement:

Running slope of existing perpendicular curb ramp is lessthan 5% or greater than 8.3%.

12.0%

Ramp Slope

Demolish existing and provide new, perpendicular curbramp, including detectable warning surfaces, and top andbottom landings as required.

Perpendicular

R304.2.2PROWAG

4.7.2; 4.8.2ADAAG

$6500.00Unit Cost

405.2ADA-2010

CBC 2007 1127B.5.3

(in) 63.0Width of Ramp / Pad

(%)Slope of the Ramp / Pad 12.0(%) 1.9

Left Flare N/A(%)Right Flare N/A(%)

6.4Top Landing Slope (%)1.3Top Landing X Slope (%)

48.0Top Landing Length (in)

1.0Gutter Lip (in)

4.1Gutter Slope (%)5.8Gutter XSlope (%)

Truncated Domes NO(y/n)

Yes-Stop Sign

No X-walk

Stop/Yield Control:

Crosswalks Served:

279

Tee Intersection:

Vertical Curb:

CBC 2016 11B-406.2.1

Yes

Vertical

Length of Ramp / Pad (in) 171.0

Street Grade (Left / Right) 4.4 7.0(%)

Sidewalk Width: 5.0(ft)

Priority

127

September 2020 Prepared by Sally Swanson Architects, Inc. Project # 19029

4315 of 4366

Page 29: SMCCCD - College of San Mateo N - College of... · SMCCCD College of San Mateo - Curb Ramps - ACS Report NAVIGATION 1. Locator Number: Corresponds to a unique database record tied

College of San Mateo Access Compliance Survey Report - Curb Ramps EAST PERIMETER ROAD

X Slope of the Ramp / Pad

• Proposed Solution:

• As-Built Description:

• As-isMeasurement:

Running slope at blended transition exceeds 5%.

5.9%

Blended Transition

Demolish existing and provide new, blended transition,including detectable warning surfaces, and top andbottom landings as required.

Blended Transition

R304.4.1PROWAG

$7000.00Unit Cost

LEFT RIGHT(in) 94.0Width of Ramp / Pad

(%)Slope of the Ramp / Pad 5.9(%) 0.8

1.2Top Landing Slope (%)1.7Top Landing X Slope (%)

48.0Top Landing Length (in)

Within Crosswalk YES

N/AGutter Lip

Dome Setback

(in)

0.0(in)

(y/n)

Truncated Domes YES(y/n)

No

1 X-walk

Stop/Yield Control:

Crosswalks Served:

280

Tee Intersection:

Vertical Curb:

Yes

Vertical

Length of Ramp / Pad (in) 151.0

Street Grade (Left / Right) 2.2 5.1(%)

Sidewalk Width: 5.0(ft)

Priority

100

Total Costs for Curb Ramps at : Bulldog Lot 9AandEast Perimeter Road $13,500.00

X Slope of the Ramp / Pad

• Proposed Solution:

• As-Built Description:

• As-isMeasurement:

Running slope of existing parallel curb ramp, where therun is less than 15' in length, is less than 5% or more than8.3%.

Right: 9.0%

Ramp Slope

Demolish existing and provide new parallel curb rampincluding detectable warning surfaces, and top andbottom landings as required.

Parallel

R304.3.2PROWAG

4.8.2ADAAG

$7000.00Unit Cost

CBC 2007 1127B.5.3

LEFT RIGHT(in) 72.0 73.0Width of Ramp / Pad

(%)Slope of the Ramp / Pad 1.9 9.0(%) 0.4 0.4

N/A N/ATop Landing Slope (%)N/A N/ATop Landing X Slope (%)

0.0Top Landing Length 0.0(in)

0.7Bottom Landing Slope (%)6.0Bottom Landing X Slope (%)

72.0Bottom Landing Length (in)

Within Crosswalk YES

N/AGutter Lip

Dome Setback

(in)

8.0(in)

(y/n)

Truncated Domes YES(y/n)

No

1 X-walk

Stop/Yield Control:

Crosswalks Served:

257

Tee Intersection:

Vertical Curb:

CBC 2016 11B-406.3.1

No

Vertical

Length of Ramp / Pad (in) 184.0 194.0

Street Grade (Left / Right) 7.2 N/A(%)

Sidewalk Width: 5.0(ft)

Priority

118

September 2020 Prepared by Sally Swanson Architects, Inc. Project # 19029

4316 of 4366

Page 30: SMCCCD - College of San Mateo N - College of... · SMCCCD College of San Mateo - Curb Ramps - ACS Report NAVIGATION 1. Locator Number: Corresponds to a unique database record tied

College of San Mateo Access Compliance Survey Report - Curb Ramps EAST PERIMETER ROAD

X Slope of the Ramp / Pad

• Proposed Solution:

• As-Built Description:

• As-isMeasurement:

Cross slope of an existing perpendicular curb rampexceeds 1:48 (2%).

4.9%

Ramp Slope

Demolish existing and provide new, perpendicular curbramp, including detectable warning surfaces, and top andbottom landings as required.

Perpendicular

R304.5.3PROWAG

4.8.6ADAAG

$6500.00Unit Cost

405.3ADA-2010

CBC 2007 1133B.5.3.1

(in) 144.0Width of Ramp / Pad

(%)Slope of the Ramp / Pad 6.5(%) 4.9

Left Flare N/A(%)Right Flare N/A(%)

6.5Top Landing Slope (%)4.6Top Landing X Slope (%)

48.0Top Landing Length (in)

Within Crosswalk YES

0.0Gutter Lip

Dome Setback

(in)

5.7Gutter Slope (%)6.9Gutter XSlope (%)

6.0(in)

(y/n)

Truncated Domes YES(y/n)

No

1 X-walk

Stop/Yield Control:

Crosswalks Served:

258

Tee Intersection:

Vertical Curb:

CBC 2016 11B-406.5.7

No

Vertical

Length of Ramp / Pad (in) 72.0

Street Grade (Left / Right) 7.9 N/A(%)

Sidewalk Width: 12.0(ft)

Priority

132.5

X Slope of the Ramp / Pad

• Proposed Solution:

• As-Built Description:

• As-isMeasurement:

Running slope at bottom landing of existing parallel curbramp exceeds 2%.

2.6%

Ramp Landing

Demolish existing bottom landing and provide new,including detectable warning surface. Ramp to remain.

Parallel

R304.3.2PROWAG

4.8.4; 4.8.6ADAAG

$3500.00Unit Cost

LEFT RIGHT(in) 60.0 N/AWidth of Ramp / Pad

(%)Slope of the Ramp / Pad 6.8 N/A(%) 1.6 N/A

0.9 N/ATop Landing Slope (%)1.5 N/ATop Landing X Slope (%)

48.0Top Landing Length N/A(in)

2.6Bottom Landing Slope (%)2.0Bottom Landing X Slope (%)

60.0Bottom Landing Length (in)

Within Crosswalk YES

N/AGutter Lip

Dome Setback

(in)

8.0(in)

(y/n)

Truncated Domes YES(y/n)

No

1 X-walk

Stop/Yield Control:

Crosswalks Served:

261

Tee Intersection:

Vertical Curb:

CBC 2016 11B-406.3.2

Yes

Vertical

Length of Ramp / Pad (in) 81.0 N/A

Street Grade (Left / Right) 1.5 N/A(%)

Sidewalk Width: 4.0(ft)

Priority

101.5

September 2020 Prepared by Sally Swanson Architects, Inc. Project # 19029

4317 of 4366

Page 31: SMCCCD - College of San Mateo N - College of... · SMCCCD College of San Mateo - Curb Ramps - ACS Report NAVIGATION 1. Locator Number: Corresponds to a unique database record tied

College of San Mateo Access Compliance Survey Report - Curb Ramps EAST PERIMETER ROAD

X Slope of the Ramp / Pad

• Proposed Solution:

• As-Built Description:Curb ramp or blended transition not provided where apedestrian access route crosses a curb.

Access Route

Provide a parallel curb ramp, including detectablewarning surfaces, and top and bottom landings asrequired.

Curb Ramp Required

R207.1PROWAG

4.7.1ADAAG

$7000.00Unit Cost

CBC 2007 1127B.5.1LEFT RIGHT

(in)Width of Ramp / Pad

(%)Slope of the Ramp / Pad

(%)

No

1 X-walk

Stop/Yield Control:

Crosswalks Served:

266

Tee Intersection:

Vertical Curb:No

VerticalSidewalk Width: 4.0(ft)

Priority

100

X Slope of the Ramp / Pad

• Proposed Solution:

• As-Built Description:

• As-isMeasurement:

Running slope of existing perpendicular curb ramp is lessthan 5% or greater than 8.3%.

13.5%

Ramp Slope

Demolish existing and provide new, perpendicular curbramp, including detectable warning surfaces, and top andbottom landings as required.

Perpendicular

R304.2.2PROWAG

4.7.2; 4.8.2ADAAG

$6500.00Unit Cost

405.2ADA-2010

CBC 2007 1127B.5.3

(in) 264.0Width of Ramp / Pad

(%)Slope of the Ramp / Pad 13.5(%) 8.2

Left Flare N/A(%)Right Flare N/A(%)

5.9Top Landing Slope (%)6.0Top Landing X Slope (%)

48.0Top Landing Length (in)

Within Crosswalk YES

N/AGutter Lip

Dome Setback

(in)

8.0(in)

(y/n)

Truncated Domes YES(y/n)

No

1 X-walk

Stop/Yield Control:

Crosswalks Served:

281

Tee Intersection:

Vertical Curb:

CBC 2016 11B-406.2.1

Yes

Rolled

Length of Ramp / Pad (in) 36.0

Street Grade (Left / Right) 8.7 N/A(%)

Sidewalk Width: 5.0(ft)

Priority

132.5

September 2020 Prepared by Sally Swanson Architects, Inc. Project # 19029

4318 of 4366

Page 32: SMCCCD - College of San Mateo N - College of... · SMCCCD College of San Mateo - Curb Ramps - ACS Report NAVIGATION 1. Locator Number: Corresponds to a unique database record tied

College of San Mateo Access Compliance Survey Report - Curb Ramps EAST PERIMETER ROAD

X Slope of the Ramp / Pad

• Proposed Solution:

• As-Built Description:Curb ramp or blended transition not provided where apedestrian access route crosses a curb.

Access Route

Provide a parallel curb ramp, including detectablewarning surfaces, and top and bottom landings asrequired.

Curb Ramp Required

R207.1PROWAG

4.7.1ADAAG

$7000.00Unit Cost

CBC 2007 1127B.5.1LEFT RIGHT

(in)Width of Ramp / Pad

(%)Slope of the Ramp / Pad

(%)

No

1 X-walk

Stop/Yield Control:

Crosswalks Served:

283

Tee Intersection:

Vertical Curb:No

RolledSidewalk Width: 5.0(ft)

Priority

100

Total Costs for Curb Ramps at : East Perimeter RoadandEast Perimeter Road $37,500.00

Total Costs for Curb Ramps along : East Perimeter Road $68,500.00

September 2020 Prepared by Sally Swanson Architects, Inc. Project # 19029

4319 of 4366

Page 33: SMCCCD - College of San Mateo N - College of... · SMCCCD College of San Mateo - Curb Ramps - ACS Report NAVIGATION 1. Locator Number: Corresponds to a unique database record tied

College of San Mateo Access Compliance Survey Report - Curb Ramps FORUM LOT 8

Codes / Mitigation InfoExisting Access Barrierand Proposed SolutionRamp TypeID # Measurements

Forum Lot 8 East Perimeter RoadCross StreetSurvey StreetYear Completed

TBD

X Slope of the Ramp / Pad

• Proposed Solution:

• As-Built Description:Curb ramp or blended transition not provided where apedestrian access route crosses a curb.

Access Route

Provide a parallel curb ramp, including detectablewarning surfaces, and top and bottom landings asrequired.

Curb Ramp Required

R207.1PROWAG

4.7.1ADAAG

$7000.00Unit Cost

CBC 2007 1127B.5.1LEFT RIGHT

(in)Width of Ramp / Pad

(%)Slope of the Ramp / Pad

(%)

No

1 X-walk

Stop/Yield Control:

Crosswalks Served:

265

Tee Intersection:

Vertical Curb:No

VerticalSidewalk Width: 4.0(ft)

Priority

100

Total Costs for Curb Ramps at : East Perimeter RoadandForum Lot 8 $7,000.00

X Slope of the Ramp / Pad

• Proposed Solution:

• As-Built Description:

• As-isMeasurement:

The detectable warning surface is not located between 6"- 8" from the curb line on a curb ramp or at the edges on apedestrian island, cut-through island, pedestrian pad,perpendicular curb ramp or blended transition. (0" fromcurb line on a parallel curb ramp.)

30.0"

Detectable Warning Surface

Relocate the detectable warning surface.

Perpendicular

4.7.7, 4.29.1&2ADAAG

$500.00Unit Cost

705.1ADA-2010

(in) 79.0Width of Ramp / Pad

(%)Slope of the Ramp / Pad 8.0(%) 0.9

Left Flare N/A(%)Right Flare N/A(%)

0.6Top Landing Slope (%)1.3Top Landing X Slope (%)

48.0Top Landing Length (in)

N/AGutter Lip

Dome Setback

(in)

30.0(in)Truncated Domes YES(y/n)

No

No X-walk

Stop/Yield Control:

Crosswalks Served:

271

Tee Intersection:

Vertical Curb:

CBC 2016 11B-705.1.2.2

No

Vertical

Length of Ramp / Pad (in) 90.0

Street Grade (Left / Right) 1.7 N/A(%)

Sidewalk Width: 4.0(ft)

Priority

100

September 2020 Prepared by Sally Swanson Architects, Inc. Project # 19029

4320 of 4366

Page 34: SMCCCD - College of San Mateo N - College of... · SMCCCD College of San Mateo - Curb Ramps - ACS Report NAVIGATION 1. Locator Number: Corresponds to a unique database record tied

College of San Mateo Access Compliance Survey Report - Curb Ramps FORUM LOT 8

X Slope of the Ramp / Pad

• Proposed Solution:

• As-Built Description:Curb ramp, blended transition, island cut-through, islandperpendicular, or pedestrian pad surveyed for thefollowing items are in compliance with the ADA andapplicable building codes.

Compliant Curb Ramp

Provide routine inspection and maintenance to maintainaccessible access route.

Blended Transition

$0.00Unit Cost

LEFT RIGHT(in)Width of Ramp / Pad

(%)Slope of the Ramp / Pad(%)

Top Landing Slope (%)Top Landing X Slope (%)

Top Landing Length (in)

0.4Bottom Landing Slope (%)1.0Bottom Landing X Slope (%)

112.0Bottom Landing Length (in)

N/AGutter Lip

Dome Setback

(in)

6.0(in)Truncated Domes YES(y/n)

No

No X-walk

Stop/Yield Control:

Crosswalks Served:

276

Tee Intersection:

Vertical Curb:

No

Vertical

Length of Ramp / Pad (in)

Street Grade (Left / Right) 1.0 N/A(%)

Sidewalk Width: 5.0(ft)

Priority

100

X Slope of the Ramp / Pad

• Proposed Solution:

• As-Built Description:

• As-isMeasurement:

Running slope at bottom landing of existing blendedtransition exceeds 2%.

2.3%

Ramp Landing

Demolish existing and provide new, blended transition,including detectable warning surfaces, and top andbottom landings as required.

Blended Transition

R304.3.2PROWAG

4.8.4; 4.8.6ADAAG

$3500.00Unit Cost

LEFT RIGHT(in)Width of Ramp / Pad

(%)Slope of the Ramp / Pad(%)

Top Landing Slope (%)Top Landing X Slope (%)

Top Landing Length (in)

2.3Bottom Landing Slope (%)1.6Bottom Landing X Slope (%)

112.0Bottom Landing Length (in)

N/AGutter Lip

Dome Setback

(in)

8.0(in)Truncated Domes YES(y/n)

No

No X-walk

Stop/Yield Control:

Crosswalks Served:

277

Tee Intersection:

Vertical Curb:

CBC 2016 11B-406.3.2

No

Vertical

Length of Ramp / Pad (in)

Street Grade (Left / Right) 0.9 N/A(%)

Sidewalk Width: 5.0(ft)

Priority

100

September 2020 Prepared by Sally Swanson Architects, Inc. Project # 19029

4321 of 4366

Page 35: SMCCCD - College of San Mateo N - College of... · SMCCCD College of San Mateo - Curb Ramps - ACS Report NAVIGATION 1. Locator Number: Corresponds to a unique database record tied

College of San Mateo Access Compliance Survey Report - Curb Ramps FORUM LOT 8

X Slope of the Ramp / Pad

• Proposed Solution:

• As-Built Description:

• As-isMeasurement:

Running slope at top landing of existing perpendicularcurb ramp exceeds the 1:48 (2%) maximum.

3.4%

Ramp Landing

Demolish existing and provide new, perpendicular curbramp, including detectable warning surfaces, and top andbottom landings as required.

Perpendicular

R304.2.2PROWAG

4.8.4; 4.8.6ADAAG

$6500.00Unit Cost

CBC 2007 1127B.5.4

(in) 112.0Width of Ramp / Pad

(%)Slope of the Ramp / Pad 7.7(%) 0.9

Left Flare N/A(%)Right Flare N/A(%)

3.4Top Landing Slope (%)1.1Top Landing X Slope (%)

48.0Top Landing Length (in)

N/AGutter Lip

Dome Setback

(in)

6.0(in)Truncated Domes YES(y/n)

No

No X-walk

Stop/Yield Control:

Crosswalks Served:

278

Tee Intersection:

Vertical Curb:

CBC 2016 11B-406.5.3

No

Vertical

Length of Ramp / Pad (in) 74.0

Street Grade (Left / Right) 1.5 N/A(%)

Sidewalk Width: 5.0(ft)

Priority

105

Total Costs for Curb Ramps at : Forum Lot 8andForum Lot 8 $10,500.00

Total Costs for Curb Ramps along : Forum Lot 8 $17,500.00

September 2020 Prepared by Sally Swanson Architects, Inc. Project # 19029

4322 of 4366

Page 36: SMCCCD - College of San Mateo N - College of... · SMCCCD College of San Mateo - Curb Ramps - ACS Report NAVIGATION 1. Locator Number: Corresponds to a unique database record tied

College of San Mateo Access Compliance Survey Report - Curb Ramps GALILEO LOT 6

Codes / Mitigation InfoExisting Access Barrierand Proposed SolutionRamp TypeID # Measurements

Galileo Lot 6 Galileo Lot 6Cross StreetSurvey StreetYear Completed

TBD

X Slope of the Ramp / Pad

• Proposed Solution:

• As-Built Description:Curb ramp, blended transition, island cut-through, islandperpendicular, or pedestrian pad surveyed for thefollowing items are in compliance with the ADA andapplicable building codes.

Compliant Curb Ramp

Provide routine inspection and maintenance to maintainaccessible access route.

Perpendicular

$0.00Unit Cost

(in) 96.0Width of Ramp / Pad

(%)Slope of the Ramp / Pad 6.6(%) 0.5

Left Flare (%)Right Flare (%)

1.1Top Landing Slope (%)0.3Top Landing X Slope (%)

48.0Top Landing Length (in)

N/A

Gutter Lip

Dome Setback

(in) 6.0

(in)Truncated Domes

YES

(y/n)

No

No X-walk

Stop/Yield Control:

Crosswalks Served:

245

Tee Intersection:

Vertical Curb:

No

Vertical

Length of Ramp / Pad (in) 82.0

Street Grade (Left / Right) 0.1 N/A(%)

Sidewalk Width: 5.0(ft)

Priority

100

X Slope of the Ramp / Pad

• Proposed Solution:

• As-Built Description:Curb ramp, blended transition, island cut-through, islandperpendicular, or pedestrian pad surveyed for thefollowing items are in compliance with the ADA andapplicable building codes.

Compliant Curb Ramp

Provide routine inspection and maintenance to maintainaccessible access route.

Perpendicular

$0.00Unit Cost

(in) 60.0Width of Ramp / Pad

(%)Slope of the Ramp / Pad 6.0(%) 0.1

Left Flare N/A(%)Right Flare N/A(%)

1.6Top Landing Slope (%)0.1Top Landing X Slope (%)

48.0Top Landing Length (in)

N/AGutter Lip

Dome Setback

(in)

6.0(in)Truncated Domes YES(y/n)

No

No X-walk

Stop/Yield Control:

Crosswalks Served:

247

Tee Intersection:

Vertical Curb:

No

Vertical

Length of Ramp / Pad (in) 80.0

Street Grade (Left / Right) 0.1 N/A(%)

Sidewalk Width: 5.0(ft)

Priority

100

September 2020 Prepared by Sally Swanson Architects, Inc. Project # 19029

4323 of 4366

Page 37: SMCCCD - College of San Mateo N - College of... · SMCCCD College of San Mateo - Curb Ramps - ACS Report NAVIGATION 1. Locator Number: Corresponds to a unique database record tied

College of San Mateo Access Compliance Survey Report - Curb Ramps GALILEO LOT 6

X Slope of the Ramp / Pad

• Proposed Solution:

• As-Built Description:

• As-isMeasurement:

Running slope at top landing of existing perpendicularcurb ramp exceeds the 1:48 (2%) maximum.

2.2%

Ramp Landing

Demolish existing and provide new, perpendicular curbramp, including detectable warning surfaces, and top andbottom landings as required.

Perpendicular

R304.2.2PROWAG

4.8.4; 4.8.6ADAAG

$6500.00Unit Cost

CBC 2007 1127B.5.4

(in) 96.0Width of Ramp / Pad

(%)Slope of the Ramp / Pad 6.4(%) 0.1

Left Flare N/A(%)Right Flare N/A(%)

2.2Top Landing Slope (%)0.1Top Landing X Slope (%)

48.0Top Landing Length (in)

N/AGutter Lip

Dome Setback

(in)

8.0(in)Truncated Domes YES(y/n)

No

No X-walk

Stop/Yield Control:

Crosswalks Served:

248

Tee Intersection:

Vertical Curb:

CBC 2016 11B-406.5.3

No

Vertical

Length of Ramp / Pad (in) 80.0

Street Grade (Left / Right) 0.3 N/A(%)

Sidewalk Width: 5.0(ft)

Priority

102.5

X Slope of the Ramp / Pad

• Proposed Solution:

• As-Built Description:Curb ramp, blended transition, island cut-through, islandperpendicular, or pedestrian pad surveyed for thefollowing items are in compliance with the ADA andapplicable building codes.

Compliant Curb Ramp

Provide routine inspection and maintenance to maintainaccessible access route.

Blended Transition

$0.00Unit Cost

LEFT RIGHT(in)Width of Ramp / Pad

(%)Slope of the Ramp / Pad(%)

Top Landing Slope (%)Top Landing X Slope (%)

Top Landing Length (in)

0.1Bottom Landing Slope (%)0.5Bottom Landing X Slope (%)

96.0Bottom Landing Length (in)

Within Crosswalk YES

N/AGutter Lip

Dome Setback

(in)

6.0(in)

(y/n)

Truncated Domes YES(y/n)

No

1 X-walk

Stop/Yield Control:

Crosswalks Served:

249

Tee Intersection:

Vertical Curb:

No

Vertical

Length of Ramp / Pad (in)

Street Grade (Left / Right) 0.4 N/A(%)

Sidewalk Width: 5.0(ft)

Priority

100

September 2020 Prepared by Sally Swanson Architects, Inc. Project # 19029

4324 of 4366

Page 38: SMCCCD - College of San Mateo N - College of... · SMCCCD College of San Mateo - Curb Ramps - ACS Report NAVIGATION 1. Locator Number: Corresponds to a unique database record tied

College of San Mateo Access Compliance Survey Report - Curb Ramps GALILEO LOT 6

X Slope of the Ramp / Pad

• Proposed Solution:

• As-Built Description:

• As-isMeasurement:

Running slope at bottom landing of existing blendedtransition exceeds 2%.

2.8%

Ramp Landing

Demolish existing and provide new, blended transition,including detectable warning surfaces, and top andbottom landings as required.

Blended Transition

R304.3.2PROWAG

4.8.4; 4.8.6ADAAG

$3500.00Unit Cost

LEFT RIGHT(in)Width of Ramp / Pad

(%)Slope of the Ramp / Pad(%)

Top Landing Slope (%)Top Landing X Slope (%)

Top Landing Length (in)

2.8Bottom Landing Slope (%)0.2Bottom Landing X Slope (%)

96.0Bottom Landing Length (in)

Within Crosswalk YES

N/AGutter Lip

Dome Setback

(in)

6.0(in)

(y/n)

Truncated Domes YES(y/n)

No

1 X-walk

Stop/Yield Control:

Crosswalks Served:

250

Tee Intersection:

Vertical Curb:

CBC 2016 11B-406.3.2

No

Vertical

Length of Ramp / Pad (in)

Street Grade (Left / Right) 0.2 N/A(%)

Sidewalk Width: 5.0(ft)

Priority

100

X Slope of the Ramp / Pad

• Proposed Solution:

• As-Built Description:

• As-isMeasurement:

Running slope at bottom landing of existing blendedtransition exceeds 2%.

2.8%

Ramp Landing

Demolish existing and provide new, blended transition,including detectable warning surfaces, and top andbottom landings as required.

Blended Transition

R304.3.2PROWAG

4.8.4; 4.8.6ADAAG

$3500.00Unit Cost

LEFT RIGHT(in)Width of Ramp / Pad

(%)Slope of the Ramp / Pad(%)

Top Landing Slope (%)Top Landing X Slope (%)

Top Landing Length (in)

2.8Bottom Landing Slope (%)1.3Bottom Landing X Slope (%)

96.0Bottom Landing Length (in)

N/AGutter Lip

Dome Setback

(in)

6.0(in)Truncated Domes YES(y/n)

No

No X-walk

Stop/Yield Control:

Crosswalks Served:

251

Tee Intersection:

Vertical Curb:

CBC 2016 11B-406.3.2

No

Vertical

Length of Ramp / Pad (in)

Street Grade (Left / Right) 0.6 N/A(%)

Sidewalk Width: 5.0(ft)

Priority

100

September 2020 Prepared by Sally Swanson Architects, Inc. Project # 19029

4325 of 4366

Page 39: SMCCCD - College of San Mateo N - College of... · SMCCCD College of San Mateo - Curb Ramps - ACS Report NAVIGATION 1. Locator Number: Corresponds to a unique database record tied

College of San Mateo Access Compliance Survey Report - Curb Ramps GALILEO LOT 6

X Slope of the Ramp / Pad

• Proposed Solution:

• As-Built Description:

• As-isMeasurement:

Running slope at bottom landing of existing blendedtransition exceeds 2%.

3.4%

Ramp Landing

Demolish existing and provide new, blended transition,including detectable warning surfaces, and top andbottom landings as required.

Blended Transition

R304.3.2PROWAG

4.8.4; 4.8.6ADAAG

$3500.00Unit Cost

LEFT RIGHT(in)Width of Ramp / Pad

(%)Slope of the Ramp / Pad(%)

Top Landing Slope (%)Top Landing X Slope (%)

Top Landing Length (in)

3.4Bottom Landing Slope (%)0.4Bottom Landing X Slope (%)

96.0Bottom Landing Length (in)

N/AGutter Lip

Dome Setback

(in)

6.0(in)Truncated Domes YES(y/n)

No

No X-walk

Stop/Yield Control:

Crosswalks Served:

252

Tee Intersection:

Vertical Curb:

CBC 2016 11B-406.3.2

No

Vertical

Length of Ramp / Pad (in)

Street Grade (Left / Right) 0.1 N/A(%)

Sidewalk Width: 5.0(ft)

Priority

100

X Slope of the Ramp / Pad

• Proposed Solution:

• As-Built Description:

• As-isMeasurement:

Running slope at bottom landing of existing blendedtransition exceeds 2%.

2.2%

Ramp Landing

Demolish existing and provide new, blended transition,including detectable warning surfaces, and top andbottom landings as required.

Blended Transition

R304.3.2PROWAG

4.8.4; 4.8.6ADAAG

$3500.00Unit Cost

LEFT RIGHT(in)Width of Ramp / Pad

(%)Slope of the Ramp / Pad(%)

Top Landing Slope (%)Top Landing X Slope (%)

Top Landing Length (in)

2.2Bottom Landing Slope (%)0.1Bottom Landing X Slope (%)

96.0Bottom Landing Length (in)

N/AGutter Lip

Dome Setback

(in)

6.0(in)Truncated Domes YES(y/n)

No

No X-walk

Stop/Yield Control:

Crosswalks Served:

253

Tee Intersection:

Vertical Curb:

CBC 2016 11B-406.3.2

No

Vertical

Length of Ramp / Pad (in)

Street Grade (Left / Right) 0.3 N/A(%)

Sidewalk Width: 5.0(ft)

Priority

100

September 2020 Prepared by Sally Swanson Architects, Inc. Project # 19029

4326 of 4366

Page 40: SMCCCD - College of San Mateo N - College of... · SMCCCD College of San Mateo - Curb Ramps - ACS Report NAVIGATION 1. Locator Number: Corresponds to a unique database record tied

College of San Mateo Access Compliance Survey Report - Curb Ramps GALILEO LOT 6

X Slope of the Ramp / Pad

• Proposed Solution:

• As-Built Description:

• As-isMeasurement:

Running slope at bottom landing of existing blendedtransition exceeds 2%.

4.3%

Ramp Landing

Demolish existing and provide new, blended transition,including detectable warning surfaces, and top andbottom landings as required.

Blended Transition

R304.3.2PROWAG

4.8.4; 4.8.6ADAAG

$3500.00Unit Cost

LEFT RIGHT(in)Width of Ramp / Pad

(%)Slope of the Ramp / Pad(%)

Top Landing Slope (%)Top Landing X Slope (%)

Top Landing Length (in)

4.3Bottom Landing Slope (%)0.4Bottom Landing X Slope (%)

96.0Bottom Landing Length (in)

N/AGutter Lip

Dome Setback

(in)

6.0(in)Truncated Domes YES(y/n)

No

No X-walk

Stop/Yield Control:

Crosswalks Served:

254

Tee Intersection:

Vertical Curb:

CBC 2016 11B-406.3.2

No

Vertical

Length of Ramp / Pad (in)

Street Grade (Left / Right) 0.3 N/A(%)

Sidewalk Width: 5.0(ft)

Priority

100

X Slope of the Ramp / Pad

• Proposed Solution:

• As-Built Description:Curb ramp, blended transition, island cut-through, islandperpendicular, or pedestrian pad surveyed for thefollowing items are in compliance with the ADA andapplicable building codes.

Compliant Curb Ramp

Provide routine inspection and maintenance to maintainaccessible access route.

Blended Transition

$0.00Unit Cost

LEFT RIGHT(in)Width of Ramp / Pad

(%)Slope of the Ramp / Pad(%)

Top Landing Slope (%)Top Landing X Slope (%)

Top Landing Length (in)

1.1Bottom Landing Slope (%)0.3Bottom Landing X Slope (%)

480.0Bottom Landing Length (in)

N/AGutter Lip

Dome Setback

(in)

6.0(in)Truncated Domes YES(y/n)

No

No X-walk

Stop/Yield Control:

Crosswalks Served:

255

Tee Intersection:

Vertical Curb:

No

Vertical

Length of Ramp / Pad (in)

Street Grade (Left / Right) 0.1 N/A(%)

Sidewalk Width: 5.0(ft)

Priority

100

September 2020 Prepared by Sally Swanson Architects, Inc. Project # 19029

4327 of 4366

Page 41: SMCCCD - College of San Mateo N - College of... · SMCCCD College of San Mateo - Curb Ramps - ACS Report NAVIGATION 1. Locator Number: Corresponds to a unique database record tied

College of San Mateo Access Compliance Survey Report - Curb Ramps GALILEO LOT 6

X Slope of the Ramp / Pad

• Proposed Solution:

• As-Built Description:Curb ramp, blended transition, island cut-through, islandperpendicular, or pedestrian pad surveyed for thefollowing items are in compliance with the ADA andapplicable building codes.

Compliant Curb Ramp

Provide routine inspection and maintenance to maintainaccessible access route.

Blended Transition

$0.00Unit Cost

LEFT RIGHT(in)Width of Ramp / Pad

(%)Slope of the Ramp / Pad(%)

Top Landing Slope (%)Top Landing X Slope (%)

Top Landing Length (in)

1.9Bottom Landing Slope (%)0.0Bottom Landing X Slope (%)

480.0Bottom Landing Length (in)

N/AGutter Lip

Dome Setback

(in)

6.0(in)Truncated Domes YES(y/n)

No

No X-walk

Stop/Yield Control:

Crosswalks Served:

256

Tee Intersection:

Vertical Curb:

No

Vertical

Length of Ramp / Pad (in)

Street Grade (Left / Right) 0.2 N/A(%)

Sidewalk Width: 5.0(ft)

Priority

100

X Slope of the Ramp / Pad

• Proposed Solution:

• As-Built Description:

• As-isMeasurement:

The detectable warning surface is not located between 6"- 8" from the curb line on a curb ramp or at the edges on apedestrian island, cut-through island, pedestrian pad,perpendicular curb ramp or blended transition. (0" fromcurb line on a parallel curb ramp.)

8.0"

Detectable Warning Surface

Relocate the detectable warning surface.

Parallel

4.7.7, 4.29.1&2ADAAG

$500.00Unit Cost

705.1ADA-2010

LEFT RIGHT(in) 74.0 73.0Width of Ramp / Pad

(%)Slope of the Ramp / Pad 7.3 5.7(%) 1.9 2.0

0.7 2.4Top Landing Slope (%) 0.7 1.3Top Landing X Slope (%)

Top Landing Length (in)

0.8Bottom Landing Slope (%)0.1Bottom Landing X Slope (%)

250.0Bottom Landing Length (in)

N/AGutter Lip

Dome Setback

(in)

8.0(in)Truncated Domes YES(y/n)

No

No X-walk

Stop/Yield Control:

Crosswalks Served:

297

Tee Intersection:

Vertical Curb:

CBC 2016 11B-705.1.2.2

No

Vertical

Length of Ramp / Pad (in) 170.0 79.0

Street Grade (Left / Right) 0.3 N/A(%)

Sidewalk Width: 5.0(ft)

Priority

107.5

September 2020 Prepared by Sally Swanson Architects, Inc. Project # 19029

4328 of 4366

Page 42: SMCCCD - College of San Mateo N - College of... · SMCCCD College of San Mateo - Curb Ramps - ACS Report NAVIGATION 1. Locator Number: Corresponds to a unique database record tied

College of San Mateo Access Compliance Survey Report - Curb Ramps GALILEO LOT 6

X Slope of the Ramp / Pad

• Proposed Solution:

• As-Built Description:Curb ramp, blended transition, island cut-through, islandperpendicular, or pedestrian pad surveyed for thefollowing items are in compliance with the ADA andapplicable building codes.

Compliant Curb Ramp

Provide routine inspection and maintenance to maintainaccessible access route.

Perpendicular

$0.00Unit Cost

(in) 60.0Width of Ramp / Pad

(%)Slope of the Ramp / Pad 6.3(%) 0.2

Left Flare N/A(%)Right Flare N/A(%)

1.4Top Landing Slope (%)0.3Top Landing X Slope (%)

48.0Top Landing Length (in)

N/AGutter Lip

Dome Setback

(in)

6.0(in)Truncated Domes YES(y/n)

No

No X-walk

Stop/Yield Control:

Crosswalks Served:

298

Tee Intersection:

Vertical Curb:

No

Vertical

Length of Ramp / Pad (in) 80.0

Street Grade (Left / Right) 0.5 N/A(%)

Sidewalk Width: 5.0(ft)

Priority

100

Total Costs for Curb Ramps at : Galileo Lot 6andGalileo Lot 6 $24,500.00

Total Costs for Curb Ramps along : Galileo Lot 6 $24,500.00

September 2020 Prepared by Sally Swanson Architects, Inc. Project # 19029

4329 of 4366

Page 43: SMCCCD - College of San Mateo N - College of... · SMCCCD College of San Mateo - Curb Ramps - ACS Report NAVIGATION 1. Locator Number: Corresponds to a unique database record tied

College of San Mateo Access Compliance Survey Report - Curb Ramps NORTH HALL 18

Codes / Mitigation InfoExisting Access Barrierand Proposed SolutionRamp TypeID # Measurements

North Hall 18 Marie Curie Lot 5Cross StreetSurvey StreetYear Completed

TBD

X Slope of the Ramp / Pad

• Proposed Solution:

• As-Built Description:Curb ramp or blended transition not provided where apedestrian access route crosses a curb.

Access Route

Provide a parallel curb ramp, including detectablewarning surfaces, and top and bottom landings asrequired.

Curb Ramp Required

R207.1PROWAG

4.7.1ADAAG

$7000.00Unit Cost

CBC 2007 1127B.5.1LEFT RIGHT

(in)Width of Ramp / Pad

(%)Slope of the Ramp / Pad

(%)

No

1 X-walk

Stop/Yield Control:

Crosswalks Served:

295

Tee Intersection:

Vertical Curb:No

VerticalSidewalk Width: 5.0(ft)

Priority

100

Total Costs for Curb Ramps at : Marie Curie Lot 5andNorth Hall 18 $7,000.00

Total Costs for Curb Ramps along : North Hall 18 $7,000.00

September 2020 Prepared by Sally Swanson Architects, Inc. Project # 19029

4330 of 4366

Page 44: SMCCCD - College of San Mateo N - College of... · SMCCCD College of San Mateo - Curb Ramps - ACS Report NAVIGATION 1. Locator Number: Corresponds to a unique database record tied

College of San Mateo Access Compliance Survey Report - Curb Ramps PLANETARIUM

Codes / Mitigation InfoExisting Access Barrierand Proposed SolutionRamp TypeID # Measurements

Planetarium PlanetariumCross StreetSurvey StreetYear Completed

TBD

X Slope of the Ramp / Pad

• Proposed Solution:

• As-Built Description:

• As-isMeasurement:

Slope of flare(s) along curb at perpendicular curb rampexceed(s) 10%.

Right: 10.8%

Ramp Flare

Demolish existing and provide new, perpendicular curbramp, including detectable warning surfaces, and top andbottom landings as required.

Perpendicular

R304.2.3PROWAG

4.7.5ADAAG

$6500.00Unit Cost

406.3ADA-2010

CBC 2007 1127B.5.3

(in) 60.0Width of Ramp / Pad

(%)Slope of the Ramp / Pad 7.2(%) 1.1

Left Flare 9.2(%)Right Flare 10.8(%)

1.2Top Landing Slope (%)0.4Top Landing X Slope (%)

48.0Top Landing Length (in)

Within Crosswalk YES

N/AGutter Lip

Dome Setback

(in)

6.0(in)

(y/n)

Truncated Domes YES(y/n)

No

1 X-walk

Stop/Yield Control:

Crosswalks Served:

296

Tee Intersection:

Vertical Curb:

CBC 2016 11B-406.2.2

No

Vertical

Length of Ramp / Pad (in) 64.0

Street Grade (Left / Right) 2.3 N/A(%)

Sidewalk Width: 5.0(ft)

Priority

104

Total Costs for Curb Ramps at : PlanetariumandPlanetarium $6,500.00

Total Costs for Curb Ramps along : Planetarium $6,500.00

September 2020 Prepared by Sally Swanson Architects, Inc. Project # 19029

4331 of 4366

Page 45: SMCCCD - College of San Mateo N - College of... · SMCCCD College of San Mateo - Curb Ramps - ACS Report NAVIGATION 1. Locator Number: Corresponds to a unique database record tied

College of San Mateo Access Compliance Survey Report - Curb Ramps SOUTH HALL 14

Codes / Mitigation InfoExisting Access Barrierand Proposed SolutionRamp TypeID # Measurements

South Hall 14 Central Hall 16Cross StreetSurvey StreetYear Completed

TBD

X Slope of the Ramp / Pad

• Proposed Solution:

• As-Built Description:Curb ramp or blended transition not provided where apedestrian access route crosses a curb.

Access Route

Provide a parallel curb ramp, including detectablewarning surfaces, and top and bottom landings asrequired.

Curb Ramp Required

R207.1PROWAG

4.7.1ADAAG

$7000.00Unit Cost

CBC 2007 1127B.5.1LEFT RIGHT

(in)Width of Ramp / Pad

(%)Slope of the Ramp / Pad

(%)

No

1 X-walk

Stop/Yield Control:

Crosswalks Served:

292

Tee Intersection:

Vertical Curb:Yes

RolledSidewalk Width: 5.0(ft)

Priority

100

X Slope of the Ramp / Pad

• Proposed Solution:

• As-Built Description:Curb ramp or blended transition not provided where apedestrian access route crosses a curb.

Access Route

Provide a parallel curb ramp, including detectablewarning surfaces, and top and bottom landings asrequired.

Curb Ramp Required

R207.1PROWAG

4.7.1ADAAG

$7000.00Unit Cost

CBC 2007 1127B.5.1LEFT RIGHT

(in)Width of Ramp / Pad

(%)Slope of the Ramp / Pad

(%)

No

1 X-walk

Stop/Yield Control:

Crosswalks Served:

293

Tee Intersection:

Vertical Curb:No

VerticalSidewalk Width: 5.0(ft)

Priority

100

Total Costs for Curb Ramps at : Central Hall 16andSouth Hall 14 $14,000.00

Total Costs for Curb Ramps along : South Hall 14 $14,000.00

September 2020 Prepared by Sally Swanson Architects, Inc. Project # 19029

4332 of 4366

Page 46: SMCCCD - College of San Mateo N - College of... · SMCCCD College of San Mateo - Curb Ramps - ACS Report NAVIGATION 1. Locator Number: Corresponds to a unique database record tied

College of San Mateo Access Compliance Survey Report - Curb Ramps STADIUM LOT 11

Codes / Mitigation InfoExisting Access Barrierand Proposed SolutionRamp TypeID # Measurements

Stadium Lot 11Cross StreetSurvey StreetYear Completed

TBD

X Slope of the Ramp / Pad

• Proposed Solution:

• As-Built Description:Curb ramp, blended transition, island cut-through, islandperpendicular, or pedestrian pad surveyed for thefollowing items are in compliance with the ADA andapplicable building codes.

Compliant Curb Ramp

Provide routine inspection and maintenance to maintainaccessible access route.

Perpendicular

$0.00Unit Cost

(in) 96.0Width of Ramp / Pad

(%)Slope of the Ramp / Pad 7.0(%) 0.6

Left Flare (%)Right Flare (%)

1.2Top Landing Slope (%)1.6Top Landing X Slope (%)

48.0Top Landing Length (in)

N/A

Gutter Lip

Dome Setback

(in) 8.0

(in)Truncated Domes

YES

(y/n)

No

No X-walk

Stop/Yield Control:

Crosswalks Served:

246

Tee Intersection:

Vertical Curb:

No

Vertical

Length of Ramp / Pad (in) 142.0

Street Grade (Left / Right) 0.3 N/A(%)

Sidewalk Width: 5.0(ft)

Priority

100

Total Costs for Curb Ramps at : andStadium Lot 11

Total Costs for Curb Ramps along : Stadium Lot 11

September 2020 Prepared by Sally Swanson Architects, Inc. Project # 19029

4333 of 4366

Page 47: SMCCCD - College of San Mateo N - College of... · SMCCCD College of San Mateo - Curb Ramps - ACS Report NAVIGATION 1. Locator Number: Corresponds to a unique database record tied

College of San Mateo Access Compliance Survey Report - Curb Ramps MARIE CURIE LOT 5

Codes / Mitigation InfoExisting Access Barrierand Proposed SolutionRamp TypeID # Measurements

Marie Curie Lot 5 North Hall 18Cross StreetSurvey StreetYear Completed

TBD

X Slope of the Ramp / Pad

• Proposed Solution:

• As-Built Description:Detectable warning surface not provided where a curbramp, landing, blended transition, pedestrian pad, orisland cut through connects to a street.

Detectable Warnings

Install a truncated dome surface that extends the fullwidth and depth (36" min.) of the curb ramp, landing,blended transition, pedestrian pad, or island cut throughexcluding the flared sides, inside the grooved border.

Parallel

R305.1PROWAG

4.7.7ADAAG

$2500.00Unit Cost

705.1ADA-2010

CBC 2007 1127B.5.7

LEFT RIGHT(in) N/A 66.0Width of Ramp / Pad

(%)Slope of the Ramp / Pad N/A 7.6(%) N/A 0.6

N/A 2.8Top Landing Slope (%)N/A 0.8Top Landing X Slope (%)

N/ATop Landing Length 48.0(in)

1.8Bottom Landing Slope (%)0.7Bottom Landing X Slope (%)

60.0Bottom Landing Length (in)

N/AGutter Lip (in)Truncated Domes NO(y/n)

No

No X-walk

Stop/Yield Control:

Crosswalks Served:

294

Tee Intersection:

Vertical Curb:

CBC 2016 11B-705.1.2.2

No

Vertical

Length of Ramp / Pad (in) N/A 72.0

Street Grade (Left / Right) 0.9 N/A(%)

Sidewalk Width: 5.0(ft)

Priority

108

Total Costs for Curb Ramps at : North Hall 18andMarie Curie Lot 5 $2,500.00

Total Costs for Curb Ramps along : Marie Curie Lot 5 $2,500.00

$238,750.00Grand Total for Curb Ramps:

September 2020 Prepared by Sally Swanson Architects, Inc. Project # 19029

4334 of 4366


Recommended