Construction Traffic Management Plan – Marrickville Utility works
Project: Sydney Metro City & Southwest – TSE Works
Document No: SMCSWTSE‐JCG‐DSY‐CN‐PLN‐002303
DOCUMENT APPROVAL REVISION DATE PREPARED
BY REVIEWED BY
APPROVED BY
REMARKS
A 22/10/17 Sue Lewis . Internal review
B 28/10/17 S Lewis N Bryant External review
C 18/12/17 S Lewis N Bryant T Ferrero For approval
D 22/12/17 S Lewis N Bryant T Ferrero For approval
Signature:
Marrickvillle Utility Works CTMP - Sydney Metro
Tino / SueIn accordance with Schedule C1 Appendix A.9 Section 2.1 ( c ) and 2.2 ( c ) of the Principal’s General Specifications G10 – Traffic and Transport Management and Minister’s Condition of Approval E82 for the Sydney Metro City & South West the Roads and Maritime Service of NSW and the Sydney Coordination Office approve the Sydney Metro City & South West Construction Traffic Management Plan – Marrickville Utility Works - TSE Works Rev D SMCSWTSE-JCG-DSY-CN-PLN-002303 for utility relocation subject to the following requirements:
• Obtaining Road Occupancy Licences (ROLs) from the Transport Management Centre(TMC) for any required lane closures and/or speed reduction;
• Addressing any safety issues identified in the Road Safety Audit review of this CTMP;The Construction Traffic Management Plan is reviewed upon approval of the TMPframework documentation to ensure it aligns with the approval;
• Addressing any issues raised by Council, STA, Taxi Council, residents/businesses,Emergency Services in the CTMP approval process;
Addressing any issues raised through Council’s traffic committee;The Construction Traffic Management Plan being updated as required prior to construction commencing to ensure consistency with the final Construction Traffic Management Framework when it is approved;
• Access to commercial and residential properties is to be maintained safely at all times;• Approval from Council in relation to parking changes on Princes Highway should they be
long term; and• Promptly addressing any SCO and/or TMC and/or RMS issue that eventuates during the
worksRegards
Giovanny RamirezAssociate Director Operations CBD & EastCBD Transport Taskforce | Sydney Coordination Office Transport for NSW
Transport for NSWSydney Coordination Office25 Garden St | Bio Medical Bldg | Eveleigh 2015
RAMIREZ GiovannyTue 16/01/2018 11:38 AM
To:Tino Ferrero <Sydney Metro>; Sue Lewis <Sydney Metro>;
Cc:BERRY Adam <RMS>; ISSA Steven C <TMC Transport>; CHEN Chao <RMS>;
Construction Traffic Management Plan – Marrickville Utility works
SMCSWTSE-JCG-DSY-CN-PLN-002303Construction Traffic Management Plan – Marrickville Utility works Page 2 of 16
Table of Contents 1. Introduction ................................................................................................................. 4
1.1. Project Overview ......................................................................................................... 4
1.2. Purpose of this Plan .................................................................................................... 4
2. Locality and existing conditions ............................................................................... 5
2.1. Edinburgh Road .......................................................................................................... 5
2.2. Bedwin Road ............................................................................................................... 6
2.3. Edgeware Road ........................................................................................................... 6
2.4. Lord Street ................................................................................................................... 6
2.5. John Street .................................................................................................................. 6
2.6. Council Street .............................................................................................................. 7
2.7. May Street ................................................................................................................... 7
2.8. Princes Highway .......................................................................................................... 7
3. Site operations ............................................................................................................ 7
3.1. Works Required ........................................................................................................... 7
3.2. Operating Conditions ................................................................................................... 8
4. Other Considerations ............................................................................................... 10
4.1. Road Safety Audits .................................................................................................... 10
4.2. Weekly Traffic Forecast ............................................................................................. 10
4.3. Police and Emergency Services ................................................................................ 10
4.4. Communications and the community ........................................................................ 10
4.5. Inspections and monitoring ....................................................................................... 12
4.6. Environmental Management ..................................................................................... 12
4.7. Site Contacts ............................................................................................................. 12
4.8. References ................................................................................................................ 12
Appendix 1 Traffic control plans and implementation .................................................... 13
Appendix 2 Road safety audit ............................................................................................ 15
Appendix 3 Review comments .......................................................................................... 16
Construction Traffic Management Plan – Marrickville Utility works
SMCSWTSE-JCG-DSY-CN-PLN-002303Construction Traffic Management Plan – Marrickville Utility works Page 3 of 16
Figures Figure 1 Sydney Metro Project ............................................................................................... 4
Figure 2: Marrickville Utility Works .......................................................................................... 5
Tables Table 1: Parking impacts and alternatives .............................................................................. 9
Table 2 Proposed Communications ...................................................................................... 11
Table 3: Stakeholder Consultation ........................................................................................ 11
Table 4: Site contacts ........................................................................................................... 12
Construction Traffic Management Plan – Marrickville Utility works
SMCSWTSE-JCG-DSY-CN-PLN-002303Construction Traffic Management Plan – Marrickville Utility works Page 4 of 16
1. Introduction
1.1. Project Overview
The Sydney Metro is Australia’s biggest public transport project. The metro project currently consists of:
Stage one is the Sydney Metro Northwest, formerly the North West Rail Link, connecting the north western suburbs of Sydney, through to Chatswood.
Stage two is the City & South West project linking Chatswood through to Sydenham. Stage three includes the upgrade of the existing rail line between Sydenham and
Bankstown.
Figure 1 shows the proposed Sydney Metro project and stages.
Figure 1 Sydney Metro Project
1.2. Purpose of this Plan
The purpose of this Construction Traffic Management Plan (CTMP): MARRICKVILLE UTILITY WORKS is to detail the site operations for the utility relocation phase of the Sydney Metro City & South West project. This plan will set out the traffic management initiative that will be deployed to minimise disruption to, and ensure the safety of the wide range of stakeholders potentially affected by the works, including but not limited to: motorists, pedestrians; cyclists;
Construction Traffic Management Plan – Marrickville Utility works
SMCSWTSE-JCG-DSY-CN-PLN-002303Construction Traffic Management Plan – Marrickville Utility works Page 5 of 16
public transport users, local residents and property owners; business owners; and workers/staff engaged on the Project.
2. Locality and existing conditions
The Marrickville Dive site is bounded by Sydney Steel Road to the west, Edinburgh Road to the north, Sydenham rail corridor to the east and a water treatment adjacent to Garden Street. The Utility works required for the site operations is highlighted on Figure 2 below. The existing parking restrictions at the site are detailed below.
Figure 2: Marrickville Utility Works
2.1. Edinburgh Road
Edinburgh Road is a local road under the care and control of Inner West Council. It commences at Bedwin Road and ends at Victoria Road in Enmore. The speed limit is 60km/hr. This area has substantial industrial land uses with high heavy vehicle use. Edinburgh Road is one of the main access points into the Marrickville Metro Shopping Centre and the industrial areas of Sydenham and Marrickville.
Construction Traffic Management Plan – Marrickville Utility works
SMCSWTSE-JCG-DSY-CN-PLN-002303Construction Traffic Management Plan – Marrickville Utility works Page 6 of 16
Roundabouts exist at the intersections of Railway Parade and Murray Street. significant drainage infrastructure and driveways exists on the southern side of Edinburgh Road.
No bus stops exist on this section of Edinburgh Road, bus service 355 travels along Edinburgh Road.
Parking is typically unrestricted in the area, with No Stopping signposted at all intersections.
There is no on road cycling facility. The footpaths are 1.6m with verges typically located between the footpath and roadway (2.1m). there are no pedestrian crossing facilities along Edinburgh Road other than the use of the splitter islands located at the roundabouts
2.2. Bedwin Road
Bedwin Road is classified as a local road and is under the control of council. Bedwin Road commence at Unwins Bridge Road and ceases at Edgeware Road. The speed limit on Bedwin Road is the default speed limit of 50km/hr.
There are no bus stops on Bedwin Road. There are No Stopping restrictions along its length.
The existing footpaths are approximately 1.2m wide. There are no cycling facilities on this section of Bedwin Road, however there is on road cycle lane markings at its intersection with Edinburgh Road.
2.3. Edgeware Road
Edgeware Road is classified as a local road which connects Stanmore Road to Railway Parade. The default speed limit of 50km/hr applies.
Parking is available along most of Edgeware Road and is unrestricted in the section between Darley Street and Lord Street, where the works are proposed.
The existing footpaths are approximately 1m wide between Darley Street and Lord Street on the north-eastern side. There is no footpath on the south-western side. There are no cycling facilities.
2.4. Lord Street
Lord Street is classified as a local road which connects King Street to Edgeware Road. Lord Street is one way southwest (ie from King Street to Edgeware Road). The default speed limit of 50km/hr applies. Lord Street is typically 7.0m in width with a 2.7 to 2.8m travel lane.
Parking is available along both sides of Lord Street and is time restricted.
The existing footpaths are approximately 1m wide. There are no cycling facilities.
2.5. John Street
John Street is classified as a local road which connects the rail lines through to Wells Street. The default speed limit of 50km/hr applies. John Street is typically 7.0m in width with a 2.7 to 2.8m travel lane. John Street is a No Through Road from Lord Street to the rail lines and services 1 driveway.
Parking is available along both sides of John Street and is time restricted.
The existing footpaths are approximately 1m wide. There are no cycling facilities.
Construction Traffic Management Plan – Marrickville Utility works
SMCSWTSE-JCG-DSY-CN-PLN-002303Construction Traffic Management Plan – Marrickville Utility works Page 7 of 16
2.6. Council Street
Council Street is classified as a local road which connects the rail lines through to May Street. Council Street is one way from Goodsell Street through to May Street. The default speed limit of 50km/hr applies. Council Street is typically 7.0m in width with a 2.7 to 2.8m travel lane. Council Street is a No Through Road from Goodsell Street to the rail lines. It services 1 property and Camdenville Oval parking area. Parking is available along both sides of Council Street and is time restricted.
The existing footpaths are approximately 1m wide. There are no cycling facilities although a shared path through Camdenville Oval ends at Council Street.
2.7. May Street
May Street is classified as a regional road which connects Unwins Bridge Road through to the Princes Highway. The default speed limit of 50km/hr applies. May Street is typically 2 travel lanes with parking available from Applebee Street through to Bedwin Road on both sides of the road.
The existing footpaths are approximately 1m wide. There are no cycling facilities. No bus stops or known bus routes use May Street.
2.8. Princes Highway
Princes Highway is classified as a state road and forms one of only 2 continuous links between Sydney and Melbourne. The speed limit of 60km/hr applies. Turning movements at its intersection with May Street are signal controlled. Pedestrian crossings are only located across May Street and on the southern approach on Princes Highway. No parking is available near this location.
The existing footpaths are approximately 1.2m wide. There are no cycling facilities.
Bus routes 348 and 422 use the Princes Highway. Route 348 ceases services at 11PM weekdays and Saturdays with services ceasing earlier on a Sunday. Route 422 ceases services inbound at 1130PM and outbound services at 1230AM weekdays and Saturdays – earlier on Sundays.
3. Site operations
Duration: 4 months Timing: 8th January to April 2018
3.1. Works Required
Ausgrid works include the installation of TBM power supply across Edinburgh Road at the roundabout, across Bedwin Road, on Edgeware Road between Lord Street and Darley Street using existing conduits, Lord Street between Edgeware Road and John Street using existing conduits except at the intersection of John Street, under bore from John Street through to Council Street under the rail lines, along Council Street into May Street and across the Princes Highway jointing into existing HV feeders located in the eastern footpath of the Princes Highway near Sydney Park.
Work to be undertaken in Murray Street is capping of the existing watermain. The works are immediately adjacent to the site boundary. Access to the driveway for Cas Del Desserts will be maintained at all times.
Construction Traffic Management Plan – Marrickville Utility works
SMCSWTSE-JCG-DSY-CN-PLN-002303Construction Traffic Management Plan – Marrickville Utility works Page 8 of 16
3.2. Operating Conditions
Works to be undertaken at night are proposed at the following locations:
Edinburgh Road – trenching across and along Edinburgh Road for its full width from the Railway Parade roundabout through to Bedwin Road – 4-6 shifts
Bedwin Road – trenching across the road from Edinburgh Road to Edgeware Road – 2-4 shifts
May Street from Council Street through to the Princes Highway – trenching works are within the parking lane – 6-10 shifts
Princes Highway from May Street across to the footpath adjacent to Sydney Park 4-6 shifts
Works to be undertaken during the day are proposed at the following locations:
Edgeware Road between Bedwin Road and Lord Street – using existing conduits – 2-3 shifts
Lord Street between 20m west of John Street and John Street – trenching within the existing parking lane – 3-4 shifts
Lord Street between 20m west of John Street and Edgeware Road – using existing conduits – 2 shifts
John Street – closure at Lord Street for approximately 2 weeks Council Street – closure at Goodsell Street for approximately 2 weeks Murray Street – stop/ slow/ lane closure near site for approximately 1 week.
Refer to Appendix 1 for Traffic control plans. The works will happen progressively along the nominated corridor for the Ausgrid works. The water main works in Murray Street will be undertaken at any time.
3.2.1. Impact on Traffic Flows
The operation of the site will have minimal impact on existing traffic conditions as it is proposed to undertake the works on high volume roads at night. The roads will be returned to its current operation by 0500 every morning. Steel plates may be used, but in most instances backfilling of the trench will be undertaken. If steel plates are used TSE will ensure that they are duly secured by asphalt ramps and that appropriate warning is given to motorists
For works proposed during the day, these works are on local roads which have no significant traffic flows.
3.2.2. Impact on Public Transport
There is no long-term impact on public transport as there are no existing bus stops along the streets impacted by the works. It is noted that 1 bus service uses Edgeware Road/ Railway Parade.
3.2.3. Impact on Pedestrians and Cyclists
Depending on the outcome of the service investigation works, there may be minor pedestrian diversions during the works, especially where works impact on the footpath area. Pedestrians may be diverted during works at the following locations:
Lord Street – parking lane trenching – pedestrians diverted to the opposite side of the road
Edgeware Road – footpath trenching – pedestrians diverted to parking lane
Construction Traffic Management Plan – Marrickville Utility works
SMCSWTSE-JCG-DSY-CN-PLN-002303Construction Traffic Management Plan – Marrickville Utility works Page 9 of 16
Where pedestrians are required to be diverted onto the road way, reduced speed limits, separation between traffic and pedestrians and traffic controllers will be used to provide safe passage.
3.2.4. Impacts on commercial and residential access
There are numerous commercial and residential properties along the route. Driveway access will be maintained at all locations except for Council Street and John Street (1 driveway at each location) Discussions will be held with residents on alternate arrangements during the works. Pedestrian access to properties will be maintained through the works using plating to provide a smooth traversable surface.
3.2.5. Impact on street parking
There is no long-term impact on parking, however, during the works parking on Edgeware Road, Lord Street, John Street, Council Street and May Street will be impacted. Refer to Table 1 for impacts and alternatives available.
Table 1: Parking impacts and alternatives
LOCATION DURATION SPACES AFFECTED ALTERNATIVES
Edgeware Road between Lord St and Bedwin Rd1
2-3 shifts 4 (restricted 2P) Edgeware Road southside/ Railway Parade
Lord Street 3-4 shifts 16 at any one time (restricted 2P)
Edgeware Road/ John Street
John Street 2 weeks 3 (unrestricted) John Street west of Lord Street
Council Street (north of Goodsell Street)
2 weeks 6 (unrestricted ( Council Street south of Goodsell Street, Goodsell Street
Council Street (south of Goodsell Street)
2 weeks 10 (unrestricted) Council Street north of Goodsell Street or May Street
May Street2 6-10 shifts 16 at any one time (restricted P)
May Street, Goodsell Street, Council Street
3.2.6. Cumulative impacts
It is noted that there is advertising of apartment construction on Edinburgh Road, but no details are provided on timing of the works. From site inspections the site has been dormant for quite a while.
WestConnex has commenced works on Campbell Street and have intermittent closures of Campbell Street, east of Unwins Bridge Road. WestConnex have also undertaken partial road/ lane closures on May Street and the Princes Highway. We will continue to liaise with
1 Most properties have off street parking 2 Most properties have off street parking
Construction Traffic Management Plan – Marrickville Utility works
SMCSWTSE-JCG-DSY-CN-PLN-002303Construction Traffic Management Plan – Marrickville Utility works Page 10 of 16
WestConnex directly and through the Sydney Coordination Office on works that have the potential to impact on either project
3.2.7. Special Events
In reviewing Inner West Council’s website for special events near the site, there are no special events listed, which would be impacted by the works.
3.2.8. Traffic Control Plan (TCP) / Road Occupancy License (ROL) Identified Works
Works that have been identified as requiring a Traffic Control Plan are detailed below. Appendix 0 provides details on expected durations, timing for implementation, the works being undertaken and the expected traffic impacts.
1. Traffic control on Edinburgh Road, Bedwin Road, Edgeware Road, Lord Street, John Street, Council Street, May Street and the Princes Highway
3.2.9. Inner West Council required approvals
Works that have been identified as requiring Council approval include:
1. Road opening permits
4. Other Considerations
4.1. Road Safety Audits
Road safety audits will be undertaken during the development of the CTMP and upon implementation of the long-term work site. Refer to Appendix 2 for the audit report.
4.2. Weekly Traffic Forecast
A weekly traffic forecast is provided to local councils, RMS, Emergency Services, TfNSW, SCO and other stakeholders as requested. This forecast details the up and coming works and details of timings including hours of the day and dates of works that will impact traffic- road, public transport, pedestrians and cyclist.
4.3. Police and Emergency Services
The Police and relevant Emergency Services will be informed in a timely manner of relevant activities proposed within this CTMP. The initial communication to these stakeholders will be via the Traffic and Transport Liaison Group (TTLG). Regular updates will be provided to emergency services, including changes to road network configurations, changes to road conditions and worksite access locations, through emails and face to face discussions.
4.4. Communications and the community
The TSE will be responsible for the dissemination of information to the community including affected residents, relevant Councils, businesses and the public. Refer to Sydney Metro Community Consultation Strategy – Early Works.
Any enquiries, complaints and/ or compliments are to be directed to the TfNSW’s Sydney Metro Project Information line - 1800 171 386 or via email to: [email protected] or Sydney Metro City & Southwest, PO Box K659, Haymarket, NSW 1240 or Sydney Metro City & Southwest Website.
Construction Traffic Management Plan – Marrickville Utility works
SMCSWTSE-JCG-DSY-CN-PLN-002303Construction Traffic Management Plan – Marrickville Utility works Page 11 of 16
Table 2 provides the proposed communications to be implemented for this CTMP
Table 2 Proposed Communications
NOTIFICATION APPLICABLE
Community notice YES
Precinct update/ e-update YES
Email YES
Internet YES
Community information centre NO
On site briefings YES
Print advertising YES – Quarterly newsletter only
Variable message signs NO
Advanced warning signs YES
4.4.1. Travelling public
Where our works will impact on the travelling public we will undertake the following:
Public transport interruptions will be communicated via on site signage Motoring public will be forewarned of any changes, including road closures, road changes
and lane closures well in advance using appropriate signage, including variable message signs (VMS), where identified on the plans.
Pedestrians and cyclists will be provided with advance warning signs
4.4.2. Stakeholders consulted
Table 3Error! Reference source not found. identifies the stakeholders consulted during the development of this CTMP:
Table 3: Stakeholder Consultation
STAKEHOLDER DATE CONSULTATION MAIN CONTACT PEOPLE
TCG 17 Oct 2017 All members SCO/ TfNSW/ IWC/ RMS
TTLG 26 Oct 2017 All members SCO/ TfNSW/ Councils/ ES/ RMS
Inner West Council 29 Oct 2017 CTMP Submission Emilio Andari
RMS 29 Oct 2017 CTMP Submission Ian McCarthy
SCO 29 Oct 2017 CTMP Submission Aaron Gale/ Justine Bryant
TfNSW 30 Oct 2017 CTMP Submission Berin Gordon
Inner West Council 18 Dec 2017 CTMP Resubmission Emilio Andari/ John Stephens
RMS 18 Dec 2017 CTMP Resubmission Ian McCarthy/ Chao Chen
SCO 18 Dec 2017 CTMP Resubmission Giovanny Ramirez/ Aaron Gale/ Justine Bryant
TfNSW 18 Dec 2017 CTMP Resubmission Berin Gordon
Construction Traffic Management Plan – Marrickville Utility works
SMCSWTSE-JCG-DSY-CN-PLN-002303Construction Traffic Management Plan – Marrickville Utility works Page 12 of 16
4.5. Inspections and monitoring
The site will be monitored by the site supervisor. Any changes as noted in this CTMP, to signs/ lines that impact on the public will be monitored daily during site operating hours.
Traffic control used for pedestrian management, lane closures etc will need to provide records of the traffic control implemented. Any changes required to the traffic control set up will be authorised by a holder of an RMS “Prepare a Work Zone Traffic Management Plan” or equivalent.
4.6. Environmental Management
All works will be undertaken in accordance with the TSE Construction Environmental Management Plan (SMCTSE-JCG-TPW-EM-PLN-002010) and associated sub plans including the Construction Noise and Vibration Management Plan (SMCSTSE-JCG-TPW-EM-PLN-002012). The TSE Works are also regulated by the NSW Environment Protection Authority and works to be undertaken outside of standard construction hours will need to comply with the requirements of the Environment Protection License.
4.7. Site Contacts
Table 4: Site contacts
NAME POSITION CONTACT #
Fernando Tinolo Project Engineer
Kevin Redmond Utilities Foreman
4.8. References
The following documents were used in the development of this CTMP:
Construction Traffic Management Framework – TfNSW, Tender version Principal’s General Specification G10 Traffic and Transport Management, v2.0 Roads and Maritime Service Traffic Control at Worksites Manual v 4.0 Relevant AustRoads Guides and RMS Supplements Sydney Metro Principal Contractor Health and Safety Standard
Construction Traffic Management Plan – Marrickville Utility works
SMCSWTSE-JCG-DSY-CN-PLN-002303Construction Traffic Management Plan – Marrickville Utility works Page 13 of 16
Appendix 1 Traffic control plans and implementation
TCP # LOCATION FROM TO TIMING TRAFFIC CONTROL
WORKS IMPACTS
SMCSWTSE-JCG-DSY-TCP-002303-0001
Edinburgh Road
West of Railway Parade
North of roundabout
Nights Stop/ Slow/ lane closure
Trenching Lane closures and stop/ slow at night and/ or outside of peak periods
No stopping restrictions through the work site
SMCSWTSE-JCG-DSY-TCP-002303-0002
Edinburgh Road
West of Bedwin Road
Bedwin Road
Nights Stop/ Slow/ lane closure
Trenching Lane closures and stop/ slow at night and/ or outside of peak periods
No stopping restrictions through the work site
SMCSWTSE-JCG-DSY-TCP-002303-0003
Bedwin Road Edinburgh Road
Edgeware Road
Nights Stop/ Slow/ lane closure
Trenching Lane closures and stop/ slow at night and/ or outside of peak periods
No stopping restrictions through the work site
SMCSWTSE-JCG-DSY-TCP-002303-0004
Lord Street John Street Edgeware Road
Days Stop/ Slow/ lane closure
Trenching Lane closures and stop/ slow will impact residents
Removal of parking through the installation of No Stopping restrictions through the work site
SMCSWTSE-JCG-DSY-TCP-002303-0005
Council and John Streets
Rail Lines To next cross street
Days Road closures Trenching Road closures
Removal of parking through the installation of No Stopping restrictions through the work site
SMCSWTSE-JCG-DSY-TCP-002303-0006
May Street Council Street
Princes Highway
Nights Stop/ Slow/ lane closures
Trenching Lane closures and stop/ slow at night and/ or outside of peak periods
No stopping restrictions through the work site
SMCSWTSE-JCG-DSY-
Princes Highway
May Street Sydney Park Nights Stop/ Slow/ lane closures
Trenching Lane closures and stop/ slow at night and/ or outside of peak periods
Construction Traffic Management Plan – Marrickville Utility works
SMCSWTSE-JCG-DSY-CN-PLN-002303Construction Traffic Management Plan – Marrickville Utility works Page 14 of 16
TCP # LOCATION FROM TO TIMING TRAFFIC CONTROL
WORKS IMPACTS
TCP-002303-0007
No stopping restrictions through the work site
SMCSWTSE-JCG-DSY-TCP-002303-0008
Princes Highway
May Street Sydney Park Nights Stop/ Slow/ lane closures
Trenching Lane closures and stop/ slow at night and/ or outside of peak periods
No stopping restrictions through the work site
SMCSWTSE-JCG-DSY-TCP-002303-0009
Princes Highway
May Street Sydney Park Nights Stop/ Slow/ lane closures
Trenching Lane closures and stop/ slow at night and/ or outside of peak periods
No stopping restrictions through the work site
SMCSWTSE-JCG-DSY-TCP-002303-0010
Edgeware Road
Bedwin Road Lord Street Days Stop/ Slow/ lane closures
Trenching Removal of parking through the installation of No Stopping restrictions through the work site
SMCSWTSE-JCG-DSY-TCP-002303-0011
Council Street Goodsell Street
May Street Days Stop/ Slow/ lane closures
Trenching Removal of parking through the installation of No Stopping restrictions through the work site
SMCSWTSE-JCG-DSY-TCP-002303-0012
Murray Street Edinburgh Road
Site All Stop/ Slow/ lane closures
Trenching Lane closures and stop/ slow
WORK VEHICLE
WORK ZONE
AUTHORISED TRAFFICCONTROLLER
700 MM TRAFFIC CONESWITH REFLECTIVE NIGHT STRIP WITH 220 MM SPACING
LEGEND
TRAFFIC CONTROLPLAN
DATE: 05/12/2017
*Traffic control works shall be installed & maintained in accordance with A.S. 1742.3 (Traffic Control Devices for Works on Roads) & RTA Traffic controlat Work Sites Manual Version 4 June 2010.
*Local constraints may not allow sign and devices to be placed exactlyin accordance withthe TCP, therefore it may be necessary to place sign and devices as close as possible to the spacing indicated.
*Signs should generally placed 1 metre clear of the travelled path.
*Signs are to be Class 1 retro-reflective (day/night)
Install as per TCP and in accordance with any changes as shown on TCP
Team Leader (Onsite):
Signature:
Date:
Ticket: Orange/Red/Yellow (Circle Appropriate)
Ticket No:
Reasons for modification:
Email to: [email protected]
AREA:
LOCATION:
TCP NO:
SHEET NO:
DSY
EDINBURGH ROAD,MARRICKVILLE
SMCSWTSE-JCG-DSY-TCP-002303-0001
1 OF 1
DRAWN BY:
CERTIFICATE NO:
SIGNATURE:
PLAN CHECKED BY:
CERTIFICATE NO:
SIGNATURE:
SAMANTH JADALA
0044399691
SUE LEWIS
0022818927
SAFETY BARRIERS
EDINBURGH ROAD
EDINBURGH ROAD
EDINBURGH ROAD
BE
DW
IN R
OA
D
BE
DW
IN R
OA
D
BE
DW
IN R
OA
D
BE
DW
IN R
OA
D
RA
ILWAY
PAR
AD
E
ED
GE
WA
RE
RO
AD
ED
GE
WA
RE
RO
AD
LORD STREET
ONE
WAY
ONE
WAY
ONE
WAY
ONE
WAY
DARLEY STREET
SMIDMORE STREET
ON
LY
RO
AD
WO
RK
A
HE
AD
T1-1
T1-5
-2 *
40
RO
AD
WO
RK
R4-2
12
PR
EP
AR
ET
OS
TO
P
T1-18
T1-200-2*
15M 15M 15M 15M 15M
T5-5
NOT TO SCALE
N
40EN
D
ROAD WORK
AHEAD
T1-1
T1-5-2 *
40ROAD
WORK
R4-212
PREPARE
TO
STOP
T1-18
T1-200-2*
15M
15M
15M
15M
15M
T1-5-2 *
40ROADWORK
R4-212
PREPARE
TO
STOP
T1-18
T1-200-2*
45M
45M
45M
45M
45M
ROAD WORK
ON SIDE ROAD
30MM
ER
GE
TA
PE
R
T1-200-2*
PREPARE
TO
STOP
T1-18
40ROAD
WORK
R4-212
T1-5-2 *
ROAD WORK
ON SIDE ROAD
T1-25
45M
45M
45M
40
END
R4-12
40END
R4-12
T5-5
T5-5
PR
EPA
RE
TO
STO
PT1-1
8
T1-200-2*15M15M
SCOPE OF WORKS: STOP/SLOW WORKS
*TRAFFIC CONTROLLER ASSIST WORK VEHICLE ENTRY & EXIT.
*RESIDENTS & BUSINESS ACCESS TO BE MAINTAINED ALL TIMES.
*TRAFFIC CONTROLLER & SIGN LOCATION ON PLAN IS FOR ILLUSTRATION PURPOSEONLY & WILL CHANGE ACCORDINGLY.
* TRAFFIC CONTROLLER ENSURE THERE IS AN ADEQUATE ESCAPE ROUTE.
* TWO WAY RADIO TO BE USED WITH CLEAR COMMUNICATION BEFOR RELEASING TRAFFIC.
* ENSURE EXCLUSION ZONE IS FORMED ON FOOTWAYS ALONG WORK ZONES.
*APPROPRIATE LIGHTING TO BE PROVIDED FOR NIGHT WORKS
NIGHTROADWORK
AHEAD
T1-223 * T1-224 *
NOTE: SIGNS TO BE USED AT NIGHT
T1-200-3*
www.invarion.com
WORK VEHICLE
WORK ZONE
AUTHORISED TRAFFICCONTROLLER
700 MM TRAFFIC CONESWITH REFLECTIVE NIGHT STRIP WITH 220 MM SPACING
LEGEND
TRAFFIC CONTROLPLAN
DATE: 05/12/2017
*Traffic control works shall be installed & maintained in accordance with A.S. 1742.3 (Traffic Control Devices for Works on Roads) & RTA Traffic controlat Work Sites Manual Version 4 June 2010.
*Local constraints may not allow sign and devices to be placed exactlyin accordance withthe TCP, therefore it may be necessary to place sign and devices as close as possible to the spacing indicated.
*Signs should generally placed 1 metre clear of the travelled path.
*Signs are to be Class 1 retro-reflective (day/night)
Install as per TCP and in accordance with any changes as shown on TCP
Team Leader (Onsite):
Signature:
Date:
Ticket: Orange/Red/Yellow (Circle Appropriate)
Ticket No:
Reasons for modification:
Email to: [email protected]
AREA:
LOCATION:
TCP NO:
SHEET NO:
DSY
EDINBURGH ROAD,MARRICKVILLE
SMCSWTSE-JCG-DSY-TCP-002303-0002
1 OF 1
DRAWN BY:
CERTIFICATE NO:
SIGNATURE:
PLAN CHECKED BY:
CERTIFICATE NO:
SIGNATURE:
SAMANTH JADALA
0044399691
SUE LEWIS
0022818927
SAFETY BARRIERS
TRAFFIC FLOW
EDINBURGH ROAD
EDINBURGH ROAD
EDINBURGH ROAD
BE
DW
IN R
OA
D
BE
DW
IN R
OA
D
BE
DW
IN R
OA
D
BE
DW
IN R
OA
D
RA
ILWAY
PAR
AD
E
ED
GE
WA
RE
RO
AD
ED
GE
WA
RE
RO
AD
ED
GE
WA
RE
RO
AD
LORD STREET
ONE
WAY
ONE
WAY
ONE
WAY
ONE
WAY
DARLEY STREET
SMIDMORE STREET
ON
LY
RO
AD
WO
RK
A
HE
AD
T1-1
T1-5
-2 *
40
RO
AD
WO
RK
R4-2
12
PR
EP
AR
ET
OS
TO
P
T1-18
T1-200-2*
15M 15M 15M 15M 15M
NOT TO SCALE
N
T1-5-2 *
40ROAD
WORK
R4-212
15M
15M
15M
15M
T1-5-2 *
40ROADWORK
R4-212
PREPARE
TO
STOP
T1-18
T1-200-2*
45M
45M
45M
45M
45M
T1-200-2*
PREPARE
TO
STOP
T1-18
40ROAD
WORK
R4-212
T1-5-2 *
45M
45M
45M
40END
R4-12
SCOPE OF WORKS: TURNING LANE CLOSURE
*TRAFFIC CONTROLLER ASSIST WORK VEHICLE ENTRY & EXIT.
*RESIDENTS & BUSINESS ACCESS TO BE MAINTAINED ALL TIMES.
*TRAFFIC CONTROLLER & SIGN LOCATION ON PLAN IS FOR ILLUSTRATION PURPOSEONLY & WILL CHANGE ACCORDINGLY.
* TRAFFIC CONTROLLER ENSURE THERE IS AN ADEQUATE ESCAPE ROUTE.
* TWO WAY RADIO TO BE USED WITH CLEAR COMMUNICATION BEFOR RELEASING TRAFFIC.
* ENSURE EXCLUSION ZONE IS FORMED ON FOOTWAYS ALONG WORK ZONES.
*APPROPRIATE LIGHTING TO BE PROVIDED FOR NIGHT WORKS
NIGHTROADWORK
AHEAD
T1-223 * T1-224 *
NOTE: SIGNS TO BE USED AT NIGHT
T1-200-3*
PREPARE
TO
STOP
T1-18
T1-200-2*
40
END
R4-12
40END
R4-12
T5-5
ROAD WORK
ON SIDE ROAD
T1-25
ROAD WORK
AHEAD
T1-1
ROAD WORK
AHEAD
T1-1
www.invarion.com
SCOPE OF WORKS: LATERAL SHIFT CLOSURE/ALLOW 3.2 TRAFFIC FLOW, STOP/SLOW
*TRAFFIC CONTROLLER ASSIST WORK VEHICLE ENTRY & EXIT.
*RESIDENTS & BUSINESS ACCESS TO BE MAINTAINED ALL TIMES.
*TRAFFIC CONTROLLER & SIGN LOCATION ON PLAN IS FOR ILLUSTRATION PURPOSEONLY & WILL CHANGE ACCORDINGLY.
* TRAFFIC CONTROLLER ENSURE THERE IS AN ADEQUATE ESCAPE ROUTE.
* TWO WAY RADIO TO BE USED WITH CLEAR COMMUNICATION BEFOR RELEASING TRAFFIC.
* ENSURE EXCLUSION ZONE IS FORMED ON FOOTWAYS ALONG WORK ZONES.
*APPROPRIATE LIGHTING TO BE PROVIDED FOR NIGHT WORKS
NIGHTROADWORK
AHEAD
T1-223 * T1-224 *
NOTE: SIGNS TO BE USED AT NIGHT
T1-200-3*
WORK VEHICLE
WORK ZONE
AUTHORISED TRAFFICCONTROLLER
700 MM TRAFFIC CONESWITH REFLECTIVE NIGHT STRIP WITH 220 MM SPACING
LEGEND
TRAFFIC CONTROLPLAN
DATE: 05/12/2017
*Traffic control works shall be installed & maintained in accordance with A.S. 1742.3 (Traffic Control Devices for Works on Roads) & RTA Traffic controlat Work Sites Manual Version 4 June 2010.
*Local constraints may not allow sign and devices to be placed exactlyin accordance withthe TCP, therefore it may be necessary to place sign and devices as close as possible to the spacing indicated.
*Signs should generally placed 1 metre clear of the travelled path.
*Signs are to be Class 1 retro-reflective (day/night)
Install as per TCP and in accordance with any changes as shown on TCP
Team Leader (Onsite):
Signature:
Date:
Ticket: Orange/Red/Yellow (Circle Appropriate)
Ticket No:
Reasons for modification:
Email to: [email protected]
AREA:
LOCATION:
TCP NO:
SHEET NO:
DSY
BEDWIN ROAD, MARRICKVILLE
SMCSWTSE-JCG-DSY-TCP-002303-0003
1 OF 1
DRAWN BY:
CERTIFICATE NO:
SIGNATURE:
PLAN CHECKED BY:
CERTIFICATE NO:
SIGNATURE:
SAMANTH JADALA
0044399691
SUE LEWIS
0022818927
SAFETY BARRIERS
TRAFFIC FLOW
EDINBURGH ROAD
EDINBURGH ROAD
BE
DW
IN R
OA
D
BE
DW
IN R
OA
D
BE
DW
IN R
OA
D
BE
DW
RA
ILWAY
PAR
AD
E
ED
GE
WA
RE
RO
AD
ED
GE
WA
RE
RO
AD
ED
GE
WA
RE
RO
AD
LORD STREET
ONE
WAY
ONE
WAY
ONE
WAY
ONE
WAY
DARLEY STREET
SMIDMORE STREET
ON
LY
40ROADWORK
R4-212
T1-5-2 *
ROAD WORK
AHEAD
T1-1
45M
45M
45M
45M
T5-5
60M
MERGE
TAPER
40ROADW
ORK
T1-5-2 *
ROAD WORK
AHEADT1-1
15M
15M
15M
T1-5-2 *
ROAD WORK
AHEAD
T1-1
PREPARE
TO
STOP
T1-18
T1-200-2*
15M
15M
15M
15M
T1-5-2 *
ROAD WORK
AHEAD
T1-1
PREPARE
TO
STOP
T1-18
T1-200-2*
40ROAD
WORK
R4-212
45M
45M
45M
45M
45M
T5-5
MAINTAIN 3.2M TRAFFIC FLOWBOTH NORTH & SOUTH DIRECTIONS
40END
R4-12
40END
R4-12
40EN
D
R4-1
2
www.invarion.com
WORK VEHICLE
WORK ZONE
AUTHORISED TRAFFICCONTROLLER
700 MM TRAFFIC CONESWITH REFLECTIVE NIGHT STRIP WITH 220 MM SPACING
LEGEND
TRAFFIC CONTROLPLAN
DATE: 05/12/2017REV DATE: 18/12/2017
*Traffic control works shall be installed & maintained in accordance with A.S. 1742.3 (Traffic Control Devices for Works on Roads) & RTA Traffic controlat Work Sites Manual Version 4 June 2010.
*Local constraints may not allow sign and devices to be placed exactlyin accordance withthe TCP, therefore it may be necessary to place sign and devices as close as possible to the spacing indicated.
*Signs should generally placed 1 metre clear of the travelled path.
*Signs are to be Class 1 retro-reflective (day/night)
Install as per TCP and in accordance with any changes as shown on TCP
Team Leader (Onsite):
Signature:
Date:
Ticket: Orange/Red/Yellow (Circle Appropriate)
Ticket No:
Reasons for modification:
Email to: [email protected]
AREA:
LOCATION:
TCP NO:
SHEET NO:
DSY
LORD ST, MARRICKVILLE
SMCSWTSE-JCG-DSY-TCP-002303-0004
1 OF 1
DRAWN BY:
CERTIFICATE NO:
SIGNATURE:
PLAN CHECKED BY:
CERTIFICATE NO:
SIGNATURE:
SAMANTH JADALA
0044399691
SUE LEWIS
0022818927
SAFETY BARRIERS
TRAFFIC FLOW
NOSTOPPING
NOSTOPPING
NOSTOPPING
NOSTOPPING
LORD STREET
JOH
N S
TR
EE
T
RO
AD
WO
RK
A
HE
AD
T1-1
T1-5
-2 *
PR
EP
AR
ET
OS
TO
P
T1-1
8
T1-2
00-2
*
15M
15M
15M
15M
NOT TO SCALE
N
ON
LY
ON
LYT5-5T5-5
WORK ZONEMAX 50M AREA
EN
DR
OA
D W
OR
K
T2-1
6
T1-5-2 *
15M
www.invarion.com
NOT TO SCALE
N
WORK VEHICLE
WORK ZONE
AUTHORISED TRAFFICCONTROLLER
700 MM TRAFFIC CONESWITH REFLECTIVE NIGHT STRIP WITH 220 MM SPACING
LEGEND
TRAFFIC CONTROLPLAN
DATE: 05/12/2017
*Traffic control works shall be installed & maintained in accordance with A.S. 1742.3 (Traffic Control Devices for Works on Roads) & RTA Traffic controlat Work Sites Manual Version 4 June 2010.
*Local constraints may not allow sign and devices to be placed exactlyin accordance withthe TCP, therefore it may be necessary to place sign and devices as close as possible to the spacing indicated.
*Signs should generally placed 1 metre clear of the travelled path.
*Signs are to be Class 1 retro-reflective (day/night)
Install as per TCP and in accordance with any changes as shown on TCP
Team Leader (Onsite):
Signature:
Date:
Ticket: Orange/Red/Yellow (Circle Appropriate)
Ticket No:
Reasons for modification:
Email to: [email protected]
AREA:
LOCATION:
TCP NO:
SHEET NO:
DSY
JOHN ST, MARRICKVILLE
SMCSWTSE-JCG-DSY-TCP-002303-0005
1 OF 1
DRAWN BY:
CERTIFICATE NO:
SIGNATURE:
PLAN CHECKED BY:
CERTIFICATE NO:
SIGNATURE:
SAMANTH JADALA
0044399691
SUE LEWIS
0022818927
SAFETY BARRIERS
TRAFFIC FLOW
SID
E R
OA
DC
LO
SE
D
T1-3
2
SID
E R
OA
DC
LO
SE
D
T1-3
2
ROAD CLOSEDAHEAD
T2-Q02a
T1-5
-2 *
40 RO
AD
WO
RK
R4-2
12
40ROADWORK
R4-212
T1-5-2 *
T1-5
-2 *
ROAD CLOSEDT2-4
NOTHROUGH
ROAD
NO
NOTHROUGH
ROAD
NO
40EN
D
R4-
12
ROAD CLOSEDT2-4
40END
R4-12GOODSELL STREET
CO
UN
CIL
ST
RE
ET
JOH
N S
TR
EE
T
LORD STREET
ONEWAY
15M
15M
15M
15M
15M
15M
15M
15M
ON
EW
AY
ON
EW
AY
SCOPE OF WORKS: BORE COMPOUND
*TRAFFIC CONTROLLER TO ASSIST WORK VEHICLE ENTRY & EXIT.*TRAFFIC CONTROLLER TO CARRY OUT PEDESTRIAN MANAGEMENT.*TRAFFIC CONTROLLER TO INSTALL PRE-WARNING SINGS ACCORDING TO THE WORK LOCATION*TRAFFIC CONTROLLER TO ENSURE THERE IS AN ADEQUATE ESCAPE ROUTE.*TWO WAY RADIO COMMUNICATION NEEDED IF REQUIRED.*ENSURE EXCLUSION ZONE ZONE IS FORMED ON FOOTPATHS ALONG WORK ZONES
RAIL TRACKS
www.invarion.com
NOT TO SCALE
N
WORK VEHICLE
WORK ZONE
AUTHORISED TRAFFICCONTROLLER
700 MM TRAFFIC CONESWITH REFLECTIVE NIGHT STRIP WITH 220 MM SPACING
LEGEND
TRAFFIC CONTROLPLAN
DATE: 05/12/2017
*Traffic control works shall be installed & maintained in accordance with A.S. 1742.3 (Traffic Control Devices for Works on Roads) & RTA Traffic controlat Work Sites Manual Version 4 June 2010.
*Local constraints may not allow sign and devices to be placed exactlyin accordance withthe TCP, therefore it may be necessary to place sign and devices as close as possible to the spacing indicated.
*Signs should generally placed 1 metre clear of the travelled path.
*Signs are to be Class 1 retro-reflective (day/night)
Install as per TCP and in accordance with any changes as shown on TCP
Team Leader (Onsite):
Signature:
Date:
Ticket: Orange/Red/Yellow (Circle Appropriate)
Ticket No:
Reasons for modification:
Email to: [email protected]
AREA:
LOCATION:
TCP NO:
SHEET NO:
DSY
MAY ST, MARRICKVILLE
SMCSWTSE-JCG-DSY-TCP-002303-0006
1 OF 1
DRAWN BY:
CERTIFICATE NO:
SIGNATURE:
PLAN CHECKED BY:
CERTIFICATE NO:
SIGNATURE:
SAMANTH JADALA
0044399691
SUE LEWIS
0022818927
SAFETY BARRIERS
TRAFFIC FLOW
CO
UN
CIL
ST
RE
ET
CAROLINE LN
GOODSELL STREET
MAY
LA
NE
PR
INC
ES
HW
Y
T1-200-2*PREPARE
TOSTOP
T1-18
40ROADWORK
R4-212
T1-5-2 *ROAD WORK
AHEAD
T1-1
T1-5
-2 *
T1-2
00-2
*P
RE
PA
RE
TO
ST
OP
T1-1
840R
OA
DW
OR
K
R4-2
12
T1-5
-2 *
RO
AD
WO
RK
A
HE
AD
T1-1
PARKING LANEPARKING LANE PARKING LANE PARKING LANE
T1-200-2*PREPARE TOSTOP
T1-18
T1-5-2 *
15M 15M 15M 15M 15M
15M
15M
15M
15M
15M15
M
ON
E W
AY
ON
E W
AY
SCOPE OF WORKS: PARKING LANE CLOSURE*T/C TO ASSIST WORK VEHICLE ENTRY & EXIT.*T/C & SIGN LOCATION ON PLAN IF FOR ILLUSTRATION PURPOSE ONLY & WILL CHANGE ACCORDINGLY.*T/C TO ENSURE THERE IS AN ADEQUATE ESCAPE ROUTE.*TWO WAY RADIOS TO BE USED IF REQUIRED.*ENSURE EXCLUSION ZONE IF FORMED ON FOOTWAYS ALONG WORK ZONES.Eg: CONES,, TIGER TAILS & SAFETY BARRIERS.
WORK ZONEMAX 50M AREA
AT A TIME
40END
R4-12
TO BE PLACED ACCORDINGTO END WORK ZONES.
MAY STREET
www.invarion.com
*TRAFFIC LOOP ACTIVATION BY TRAFFIC CONTROLLERS
*TC TO ACTIVATE TRAFFIC LOOP FOR PRINCES HWY TRAFFIC
NOT TO SCALE
NWORK VEHICLE
WORK ZONE
AUTHORISED TRAFFICCONTROLLER
700 MM TRAFFIC CONESWITH REFLECTIVE NIGHT STRIP WITH 220 MM SPACING
LEGEND
TRAFFIC CONTROLPLAN
DATE: 05/12/2017REV DATE: 22/12/2017
*Traffic control works shall be installed & maintained in accordance with A.S. 1742.3 (Traffic Control Devices for Works on Roads) & RTA Traffic controlat Work Sites Manual Version 4 June 2010.
*Local constraints may not allow sign and devices to be placed exactlyin accordance withthe TCP, therefore it may be necessary to place sign and devices as close as possible to the spacing indicated.
*Signs should generally placed 1 metre clear of the travelled path.
*Signs are to be Class 1 retro-reflective (day/night)
Install as per TCP and in accordance with any changes as shown on TCP
Team Leader (Onsite):
Signature:
Date:
Ticket: Orange/Red/Yellow (Circle Appropriate)
Ticket No:
Reasons for modification:
Email to: [email protected]
AREA:
LOCATION:
TCP NO:
SHEET NO:
DSY
MAY ST/PRINCES HWY,MARRICKVILLE
SMCSWTSE-JCG-DSY-TCP-002303-0009
1 OF 1
DRAWN BY:
CERTIFICATE NO:
SIGNATURE:
PLAN CHECKED BY:
CERTIFICATE NO:
SIGNATURE:
SAMANTH JADALA
0044399691
SUE LEWIS
0022818927
SAFETY BARRIERS
TRAFFIC FLOW
KE
EP
CLE
AR
ON
E W
AY
NIG
HT
RO
AD
WO
RK
AH
EA
D
T1-223 *
T1-224 *
40RO
AD
WO
RK
R4-212
15M
15M
15M
40ROAD WORK
R4-212
T1-224 * NIGHT ROADWORK AHEAD
T1-223 *
45M
45M
45M
45M
40
END
R4-12
PR
INC
ES
HW
Y
MAY STREET
AP
PLE
BE
E S
TR
EE
T
MA
Y L
AN
E
SCOPE OF WORKS: LANE CLOSURES
*T/C TO ASSIST WORK VEHICLE ENTRY & EXIT.*T/C TO MONITOR PEDESTRIAN MANAGEMENT.*T/C & SIGN LOCATION ON PLAN IF FOR ILLUSTRATION PURPOSE
ONLY & WILL CHANGE ACCORDINGLY.*T/C TO ENSURE THERE IS AN ADEQUATE ESCAPE ROUTE.*TWO WAY RADIOS TO BE USED IF REQUIRED.*ENSURE EXCLUSION ZONE IF FORMED ON FOOTWAYS ALONG WORK ZONES.*T/C TO SLOW TRAFFIC ONLY, TRAFFIC SIGNALS REMAIN IN OPERATION.
40E
ND R4-
12
60MMERGETAPER
90MLATERALSHIFT
60MMERGETAPER
T5-5
T5-5
T5-5
T5-5
www.invarion.com
SCOPE OF WORKS: PARKING LANE CLOSURE
*TRAFFIC CONTROLLER ASSIST WORK VEHICLE ENTRY & EXIT.
*RESIDENTS & BUSINESS ACCESS TO BE MAINTAINED ALL TIMES.
*TRAFFIC CONTROLLER & SIGN LOCATION ON PLAN IS FOR ILLUSTRATION PURPOSEONLY & WILL CHANGE ACCORDINGLY.
* TRAFFIC CONTROLLER ENSURE THERE IS AN ADEQUATE ESCAPE ROUTE.
* TWO WAY RADIO TO BE USED WITH CLEAR COMMUNICATION BEFOR RELEASING TRAFFIC.
* ENSURE EXCLUSION ZONE IS FORMED ON FOOTWAYS ALONG WORK ZONES.
*APPROPRIATE LIGHTING TO BE PROVIDED FOR NIGHT WORKS
NIGHTROADWORK
AHEAD
T1-223 * T1-224 *
NOTE: SIGNS TO BE USED AT NIGHT
EDINBURGH ROAD
BE
DW
IN R
OA
D
BE
DW
IN R
OA
DRA
ILWAY
PAR
AD
E
ED
GE
WA
RE
RO
AD
ED
GE
WA
RE
RO
AD
ED
GE
WA
RE
RO
AD
LORD STREET
ONE
WAY
ONE
WAY
ONE
WAY
ONE
WAY
DARLEY STREETSMIDMORE STREET
ON
LY
WORK VEHICLE
WORK ZONE
AUTHORISED TRAFFICCONTROLLER
700 MM TRAFFIC CONESWITH REFLECTIVE NIGHT STRIP WITH 220 MM SPACING
LEGEND
TRAFFIC CONTROLPLAN
DATE: 05/12/2017REV DATE: 22/12/2017
*Traffic control works shall be installed & maintained in accordance with A.S. 1742.3 (Traffic Control Devices for Works on Roads) & RTA Traffic controlat Work Sites Manual Version 4 June 2010.
*Local constraints may not allow sign and devices to be placed exactlyin accordance withthe TCP, therefore it may be necessary to place sign and devices as close as possible to the spacing indicated.
*Signs should generally placed 1 metre clear of the travelled path.
*Signs are to be Class 1 retro-reflective (day/night)
Install as per TCP and in accordance with any changes as shown on TCP
Team Leader (Onsite):
Signature:
Date:
Ticket: Orange/Red/Yellow (Circle Appropriate)
Ticket No:
Reasons for modification:
Email to: [email protected]
AREA:
LOCATION:
TCP NO:
SHEET NO:
DSY
EDGEWARE RD,MARRICKVILLE
SMCSWTSE-JCG-DSY-TCP-002303-0010
1 OF 1
DRAWN BY:
CERTIFICATE NO:
SIGNATURE:
PLAN CHECKED BY:
CERTIFICATE NO:
SIGNATURE:
SAMANTH JADALA
0044399691
SUE LEWIS
0022818927
SAFETY BARRIERS
TRAFFIC FLOW
NOT TO SCALE
N
T1-200-2*
PREPARE
TO
STOP
T1-18
40ROAD
WORK
R4-212
T1-5-2 *
15M
15M
15M
PAR
KIN
G LN
PAR
KIN
G LN
T5-5
www.invarion.com
NOT TO SCALE
N
WORK VEHICLE
WORK ZONE
AUTHORISED TRAFFICCONTROLLER
700 MM TRAFFIC CONESWITH REFLECTIVE NIGHT STRIP WITH 220 MM SPACING
LEGEND
TRAFFIC CONTROLPLAN
DATE: 05/12/2017
*Traffic control works shall be installed & maintained in accordance with A.S. 1742.3 (Traffic Control Devices for Works on Roads) & RTA Traffic controlat Work Sites Manual Version 4 June 2010.
*Local constraints may not allow sign and devices to be placed exactlyin accordance withthe TCP, therefore it may be necessary to place sign and devices as close as possible to the spacing indicated.
*Signs should generally placed 1 metre clear of the travelled path.
*Signs are to be Class 1 retro-reflective (day/night)
Install as per TCP and in accordance with any changes as shown on TCP
Team Leader (Onsite):
Signature:
Date:
Ticket: Orange/Red/Yellow (Circle Appropriate)
Ticket No:
Reasons for modification:
Email to: [email protected]
AREA:
LOCATION:
TCP NO:
SHEET NO:
DSY
COUNCIL ST, MARRICKVILLE
SMCSWTSE-JCG-DSY-TCP-002303-0011
1 OF 1
DRAWN BY:
CERTIFICATE NO:
SIGNATURE:
PLAN CHECKED BY:
CERTIFICATE NO:
SIGNATURE:
SAMANTH JADALA
0044399691
SUE LEWIS
0022818927
SAFETY BARRIERS
TRAFFIC FLOW
CO
UN
CIL
ST
RE
ET
CAROLINE LN
GOODSELL STREET
MAY
LA
NE
PR
INC
ES
HW
Y
T1-2
00-2
*P
RE
PA
RE
TO
ST
OP
T1-1
8 40 RO
AD
WO
RK
R4-2
12
T1-5
-2 *
RO
AD
WO
RK
A
HE
AD
T1-1
T1-2
00-2
*P
RE
PA
RE
TO
ST
OP
T1-1
8 40 RO
AD
WO
RK
R4-2
12
T1-5
-2 *
RO
AD
WO
RK
A
HE
AD
T1-1
PARKING LANE
15M15M15M15M15M
15M
15M
15M
15M
15M
ON
E W
AY
ON
E W
AY
SCOPE OF WORKS: PARKING LANE CLOSURE*T/C TO ASSIST WORK VEHICLE ENTRY & EXIT.(VIA MAY STREET)*T/C & SIGN LOCATION ON PLAN IF FOR ILLUSTRATION PURPOSE ONLY & WILL CHANGE ACCORDINGLY.*T/C TO ENSURE THERE IS AN ADEQUATE ESCAPE ROUTE.*TWO WAY RADIOS TO BE USED IF REQUIRED.*ENSURE EXCLUSION ZONE IF FORMED ON FOOTWAYS ALONG WORK ZONES.
40END
R4-12
TO BE PLACED ACCORDINGTO END WORK ZONES.
MAY STREET
NOTHROUGH
ROAD
NO
RAIL TRACKS
www.invarion.com
OVERBRIDG
E
OVER
BRIDGE
OVERB
RIDGE
/
/ /
/ /
/
/
0 5 20 25m1510
SCALE 1:500 AT ORIGINAL SIZE
SCALE:
OF
SCALEPROJECT
Plot Date: Cad File No:29 October 2017 - 5:23 PM C:\Users\samue\OneDrive\FDConsulting\102-SUELEWISCONSULTING\13-SYDNEYMETRO\002303-MARRICKVILLE\TCP-0012-MURRAYSTLANECLOSURE\002303-TCP-0012-P1.dwg
DRAWN BY:
DRW CHECK:
APPROVED:
IND REVIEW:
DRAWING No:
SHEET
REVISIONHEIGHT DATUM:COORDINATE SYSTEM:
SYDNEY METRO
SYDNEY METRO
MARRACKVILLEUTILITY RELOCATION WORKS
MURRAY ST PARTIAL ROAD CLOSURE
1 1
P1
LS
SS
Construction Traffic Management Plan – Marrickville Utility works
SMCSWTSE-JCG-DSY-CN-PLN-002303Construction Traffic Management Plan – Marrickville Utility works Page 15 of 16
Appendix 2 Road safety audit
RSA-06386
Page 1 of 7 Sydney Metro City and South West
Road Safety Audit Report SHORT FORMAT
Title Sydney Metro City and South West RSA P/L Reference RSA-06386 Sub-Title / Work Package Construction Traffic Management Plan
Marrickville Utility Works Report Date 30 October 2017
Audit Stage Desktop Lead (Senior) Auditor Secondary Auditor / Reviewer
Peter Harris Chris Keramidas, Anthea Jennings
Client John Holland CPB Ghella
TMP / Drawings Construction Traffic Management Plan: SMCSWTSE-JCG-DSY-TCP-002303-0001 to 5 SMCSWTSE-JCG-DSY-TCP-002303-0007 to 9
Report Provider Road Safety Audits P/L Scope: The scope of the audit is to assess the construction traffic management plans on their merits and in the context of the road environment, not compliance-checking to standards and guidelines.
RSA-06386
Page 2 of 7 Sydney Metro City and South West
Sydney Metro City and South West T Audit Point Comment / Suggestion
John Holland CPB Ghella Contact:
Response
x Status
y Headers*****
1. SMCSWTSE-JCG-DSY-TCP-002303-0001 There are two sets of traffic controller approach warning signs on Edgwear Road, presumably warning of the TC on the side road.
These are not appropriate for Edgewear Road. There should be one set on the side road itself (traffic has turned at low speed).
Accept Drawing amended
2. SMCSWTSE-JCG-DSY-TCP-002303-0002 The ‘left / right’ sign is confusing and could lead a driver the wrong way (yellow line). Also, it’s unnecessary.
It is strongly suggested that it be omitted. Accept Drawing amended
RSA-06386
Page 3 of 7 Sydney Metro City and South West
Sydney Metro City and South West T Audit Point Comment / Suggestion
John Holland CPB Ghella Contact:
Response
x Status
y Headers*****
3. SMCSWTSE-JCG-DSY-TCP-002303-0002 The bollards used to channel drivers away from the worksite seem to have minimal buffer between where the driver movement occurs and the beginning of the site (considering the curve).
Review appropriateness of offset /risk / works / protection.
Reject This is low speed environment coming around a corner. The area is quite wide and sufficient buffer is provided
RSA-06386
Page 4 of 7 Sydney Metro City and South West
Sydney Metro City and South West T Audit Point Comment / Suggestion
John Holland CPB Ghella Contact:
Response
x Status
y Headers*****
4. SMCSWTSE-JCG-DSY-TCP-002303-0002 and 0003 Several arrays of traffic controller / prepare to stop signs are shown, but they don’t appear to be relevant.
Review. (either omit the signs or show the traffic controllers, or both)
Accept Drawing amended
5. SMCSWTSE-JCG-DSY-TCP-002303-0003 Northbound on Bedwin Road, traffic is being merged into the left lane which is a turn lane.
It is strongly suggested that lane status signs be provided to indicate: a. The merge b. The lane configuration intent which is
to breech the road rules and progress north within the turn lane
Accept Drawing amended
6. SMCSWTSE-JCG-DSY-TCP-002303-005 All of the approach signs seem irrelevant. All that is happening is a road closed ahead.
Replace signs with one sign ‘road closed ahead’ or side road closed ahead’.
Accept Drawing amended
7. SMCSWTSE-JCG-DSY-TCP-002303-007 1. The use of the lane status sign on Princes Highway
is not supported. There is no driver ‘decision’ and no changed lane configuration. They are merely blocked from one of two turn lanes.
2. The lane status sign on May Street looks good on paper but will be highly confusing at night.
3. The lane status sign on Appleby Street would by highly confusing and lost on these side road drivers.
1. Omit signs. 2. Omit the two ‘closed lane’ symbols
(unnecessary with the volumes). 3. Omit the lane status sign. 4. To provide enhanced guidance for
May St and Appleby St, install the right hand side portion of the lane status sign closer to the intersection.
Accept Drawings amended
RSA-06386
Page 5 of 7 Sydney Metro City and South West
Sydney Metro City and South West T Audit Point Comment / Suggestion
John Holland CPB Ghella Contact:
Response
x Status
y Headers*****
RSA-06386
Page 6 of 7 Sydney Metro City and South West
Sydney Metro City and South West T Audit Point Comment / Suggestion
John Holland CPB Ghella Contact:
Response
x Status
y Headers*****
8. SMCSWTSE-JCG-DSY-TCP-002303-0008 The merges along the Princes Hwy appear to be quite short.
Review length / reduced speed signage. Accept Drawing amended
9. SMCSWTSE-JCG-DSY-TCP-002303-0008 / 0009 The swept path for the left (008) and right (009) turn from May Street into Princes Highway might not work due to the two closed lanes on Princes Highway.
Review. Accept Drawing amended
10. SMCSWTSE-JCG-DSY-TCP-002303-0009 Eastbound on Princes Highway, the ‘through’ lane on the lane status sign appears to be a through/right lane on the plan.
Review. Accept The intent was to allow only 1 right turn lane and provide a dedicated through lane on the highway.
11. SMCSWTSE-JCG-DSY-TCP-002303-0009 It’s unclear why drivers on May Street are exposed to ‘traffic controller’ signs. It would be dangerous for them to be stopped within the Princes Highway intersection by the traffic controller on the opposite side.
Review. Accept Drawing amended
RSA-06386
Page 7 of 7 Sydney Metro City and South West
Explanatory Notes
Short Format: This ‘short format’ report has been used by RSA P/L since 2008, initiated through requests by clients to assist their processes, for ease with stakeholders, and for timeliness. It is typically confined in use to construction traffic management and typically for discrete packages of plans / areas and often for large projects with repetitious small audit sections. The use of this format assumes that the reader/s know what a road safety audit is and how to respond to it. Projects: Audit points are often raised in projects in relation to: 1. specific themes (e.g. the use of a safety barrier type), or 2. the treatment of particular locations. Once key issues have been initially raised, they will not necessarily be re-raised in future audits. This will depend on the issue, the RSA’s perception of the client’s assessment and understanding of the issue, and other factors. Therefore, discrete audits as part of a project should be read and actioned by a project representative who is familiar with the audit history. Responding: Although the client receiving the report does not have to agree to the audit findings/suggestions, the issues and associated risks should be carefully considered. A written response should be made to all of the audit findings raised, then signed off by the responsible person from the project team. X
Response: The responder should fully or partially accept / reject the audit point and the comment / suggestion (i.e. not merely the suggestion) Y
Status: The status of the issue as it sits with the Project. i.e. ‘actioned’, ‘closed’, ‘pending information / further guidance’. Language: 1. Note: RSA P/L does not typically use the Austroads risk rating method, mostly because it can only be applied to some points and therefore can skew the perceived risk of other
points, and also due to it being a highly subjective approach, giving the false impression of objectivity. 2. ‘Urgent’ / ‘High-Risk’: Needs immediate attention / changes as per RSA suggestion or similar. 3. ‘Recommend’ / ‘Serious’ / ‘Important’: Must be robustly reviewed. Most likely requires a change to avoid a high-risk road environment for one or more user groups. 4. ‘Should’ / ‘Suggest’ / ‘Significant’: Based on the view of the RSA team the suggestion should be done, but it concedes that there could be reasons why inaction or alternative
action is equally correct. Must be robustly reviewed by contractor and where relevant key traffic engineering project stakeholders. 5. ‘Review’ / ‘Consider’: RSA is raising an observation but has no strong opinion on the outcome and need for changes. Project should review because it’s not an immediate and
high risk and may not be immediately obvious to RSA the reasons for the practice / setup / behaviour. May need monitoring. 6. ‘Minor’: Typically a low road-safety consequence / compliance issues (to guidelines or plans) / administrative controls. Unlikely to increase risk of crash. 7. ‘Note’: Little or no road safety significance. Typically added to give a complete picture of the design, site, context, analysis, auditors understanding. Intent of Issues Listing Order: Audit points might be clustered according to location, theme, or time. When this is not done and the audit comprises an uncategorised list of points, the key issues are often discussed first. However, there is no official ordering of points, and they should all be read on their merits and on the basis of the language guide below. References: 1. Austroads Guide to Road Safety – Road Safety Audit – 2009, 2. AS 1742.3 – 2009, 3. RMS Traffic Control at Work Sites V. 4.0 (June 2010) Safe System: Austroads guidelines encourage practitioners to adopt safe system principles within design and within road safety audits. Safe system (roads) calls for a design to not allow serious injury and fatalities to occur for the expected road users and the typical crash types expected for that design type. This design-objective is considered within this road safety audit as a ‘good practice’ objective. However, a road safety audit by definition does not have the aim of checking ‘Safe System conformance’. Process and Quality: RSA P/L’s quality assurance process is based on its senior auditors having a rich experience base, but also utilises customised checklists designed for niche areas in traffic engineering/road design (e.g. safety barriers, pavement shaping, CBD traffic management), in conjunction with a four-layer audit process: 1. on-site inspection; 2. media and data capture and review; 3. specialist / second auditor input; and (where warranted) 4. secondary blinded reviews. Audit Coverage: The audit has attempted to balance the safety needs of all road users. As per Austroads guidelines, the suggestions provided have attempted to be realistic/feasible and commensurate with the actual risk posed. Suggestions are made are from a safety perspective only, and are made in the absence of full project knowledge and design constraints. RSA P/L can provide a detailed risk assessment / issue evaluation report upon request. The audit raises potential safety risks noted / observed / anticipated by the audit team, and in particular the higher-risk issues. However, a road safety audit is fundamentally a subjective qualitative process undertaken by people, highly influenced by the experience, views and limitations of the individual team members. It is expected that the project team has competence to identify safety issues itself as the project progresses, and to ask the audit team further questions where necessary.
Construction Traffic Management Plan – Marrickville Utility works
SMCSWTSE-JCG-DSY-CN-PLN-002303Construction Traffic Management Plan – Marrickville Utility works Page 16 of 16
Appendix 3 Review comments
Document: CTMP ‐ Marrickville Utility Works
Version: B
Date of review: 13/11/2017
Item No
Contract Contractor Doc RevItem Description, Page, Para, Drg
refStakeholder
Requirement Ref (COA or REMM)
TfNSW comment Contractor Response
1 TSE JHCPBG JV B SCOFront page Revision number/letter missing from the front
page document approval tableDocument amended
2 TSE JHCPBG JV B SCO
2 ‐ Figure 2 Is the highlighting on figure 2 of any significance?
This, in conjunction with the street name
placement, inhibits seeing where the utility works
will take place
These are the wroks for this CTMP as noted in the document.
3 TSE JHCPBG JV B SCO2.1.6 Consideration should be paid for cyclists in works
effecting Council St due to the end of a shared
path in this location from the oval
Noted
4 TSE JHCPBG JV B SCO
2.2.1 Should investigations determine trenching is
required in the footpath, details are to be
provided to relevant stakeholders at the
contractors earliest convenience
Noted and agreed
5 TSE JHCPBG JV B SCOPlease note that the works listed will be subject
to ROL approvalNoted and agreed
6 TSE JHCPBG JV B SCOSuggest providing a reference to Appendix 1 in
the text for a visual of proposed work areas and
impacts
Document amended
7 TSE JHCPBG JV B SCO2.2.3 Can you provide some detail on how you will
ensure road plates do not come loose or cause
excess noise if used?
Document amended
8 TSE JHCPBG JV B SCO2.2.4 What about bus services on May St, Princes Hwy
and Edinburgh Rd?Document amended
9 TSE JHCPBG JV B SCO2.2.5 Where pedestrians are instructed to use the
parking lane, how will you ensure their safety is
maintained?
Document amended
10 TSE JHCPBG JV B SCOWhat alternative arrangements have been (or will
be) made for those who are unable to access their
driveways?
Document amended
Stakeholder Comment TrackerSydney Metro City & Southwest
2.2.6
2.2.2
RESPONSE STATUSO OpenC ClosedCS Closed subject to additional action / information
11 TSE JHCPBG JV B SCO
Should trenching need to take place in the
footpath, how will you ensure access is
maintained to properties? What safety measures
will be in play?
Document amended
12 TSE JHCPBG JV B SCO
You should request information from Inner West
Council regarding the apartment construction for
details on timing, footprint etc. and consult with
the proponent.
Document amended
13 TSE JHCPBG JV B SCOEnsure you regularly consult with WestConnex as
works progressNoted and agreed
14 TSE JHCPBG JV B SCO3.1 & Appendix 2 Please provide and include a copy of the RSA in
the correct section, and refer to Appendix 2 in the
text
Document amended
15 TSE JHCPBG JV B SCO3.3 Please include a table of indicative
communications to be used for these worksDocument amended
16 TSE JHCPBG JV B SCO3.3.2 Please note that should works impact upon a bus
stop, you will be required to consult with STA as
part of your ROL approval
Noted and agreed
17 TSE JHCPBG JV B SCO3.6 Are there any other contacts that need to be
provided here? If so, please update to include this
information or remove the blank rows
Document amended
18 TSE JHCPBG JV B SCO
Will the removal of parking and no stopping
restrictions (as detailed on page 1 ‐ lines 4 and 5,
and page 2 ‐ lines 3 and 4) only be in place for the
duration listed in section 2.2.2?
Yes
19 TSE JHCPBG JV B SCO
Assume the no stopping restrictions mentioned
for other works are pre‐existing, and hence are
not really an impact of the works?
No ‐ they are to be installed within
the work site to stop people
parking
20 TSE JHCPBG JV B SCO
TCP‐002303‐
0009
Have you looked into the turning paths of vehicles
turning right from May St into Princes Hwy? There
may be potential for large vehicles to overshoot
and enter the work area. Demonstrate how
14.5m long vehicles will be accomodated in each
tcp setup
Drawings amended
21 TSE JHCPBG JV B SCOAppendix 1 ‐ all partial lane closures need to show the
remaining road width on the tcp'sDrawings amended
Register No.2 XXX
Register No.3 XXX
Appendix 1 ‐
Table
2.2.7
Document: CTMP - Marrickville UtilityVersion: BDate of review: 16/11/2017
Item No Contract Contractor Doc Rev Requirement Ref (COA or REMM) Stakeholder Reviewer Date Item Description, Page, Para, Drg ref RMS comment Contractor Response
1 TSE JHCPBG B RMS CC 16-Nov-2017 Section 2.2 Timing: November 2017 to March 2018 need to be revised depending final CTMP approval Document amended
2 TSE JHCPBG B RMS CC 16-Nov-2017 Section 2.1.5SMCSWTSE-JCG-DSY-TCP-002303-0005: John Street is subject to "Road Closure". 1 driveway in service, please clarify whether access will be maintained during works.
as noted in Section 3.2.4 this access cannot be maintained during the works. Consultation will be undertaken with the affected resident prior to the commencement of works
3 TSE JHCPBG B RMS CC 16-Nov-2017 Section 2.2.1 Provide details on pedestrian management strategy for "footpath trenching works" Document amended
4 TSE JHCPBG B RMS CC 16-Nov-2017 Section 2.2.1
"Access to the driveway for Cas Del Desserts will be maintained at all time". In reference to "SMCSWTSE-JCG-DSY-TCP-002303-0012": Road closure will be applied in Murray St. Please clarify the timing on when the road closure will happen
the access to Casa Del Desserts is provided for - refer to green arrows for local access
5 TSE JHCPBG B RMS CC 16-Nov-2017 Section 2.2.6 Please provide street parking management plan during works. Document amended
6 TSE JHCPBG B RMS CC 16-Nov-2017 Section 2.2.9All TCPs shall be approved and signed by the designer, lists the design'ers certificate number, has provide an identifying number and dated on the TCP
Drawings amended
7 TSE JHCPBG B RMS CC 16-Nov-2017 Section 3.1 Road safety audits shall be provided for final CTMP approval Document amended
8 TSE JHCPBG B RMS CC 16-Nov-2017 Section 3.4
TC@WS stipulated only pesrsonnel who have successfully completed the Seletct/Modify traffic control plans training course can make minor modifcations to TCPs. The location risk assessment from TC@WS appendix D is to be completed at the time of TCP modification.
TSE have their own checklist based on this document
9 TSE JHCPBG B RMS CC 16-Nov-2017 all TCPs General note: All TCPs shall be approved and signed by the designer, lists the design'ers certificate number, has provide an identifying number and dated on the TCP
Refer to response to Item 6
10 TSE JHCPBG B RMS CC 16-Nov-2017 all TCPs Specify Taper length for lane closure Drawings amended
11 TSE JHCPBG B RMS CC 16-Nov-2017 all TCPs Some TCPs have '"Changed Condtions Ahead" sign shall be "Changed Traffic Conditions Ahead" Drawings amended
12 TSE JHCPBG B RMS CC 16-Nov-2017 all TCPs All TCPs shall obtain ROLs prior to implementation agree13 TSE JHCPBG B RMS CC 16-Nov-2017 SMCSWTSE-JCG-DSY-TCP-002303-0005 Missing "End of Roadwork" sign Drawings amended
14 TSE JHCPBG B RMS CC 16-Nov-2017SMCSWTSE-JCG-DSY-TCP-002303-0007
to SMCSWTSE-JCG-DSY-TCP-002303-0009
General note: "#1 Traffic controller is required where ADT<1,500…" Considering Prince Hwy is the State road, all TCPs designed for Princes Hwy related works shall be revised in accordance with TC@WS mannual
Drawings amended
15 TSE JHCPBG B RMS CC 16-Nov-2017
SMCSWTSE-JCG-DSY-TCP-002303-0007
Traffic setup in May St / Princes Hwy will not work. Proposed work site blcking E/B May St, and diver traffic onto W/B May St turning to Princes Hwy will no trigger traffic loop. Please check.
Note added to drawing - loop activiation to be done by traffic controller
16 TSE JHCPBG B RMS CC 16-Nov-2017SMCSWTSE-JCG-DSY-TCP-002303-0008
Please check parking on the left lane on N/B Princes Hwy. And provide parking management details.
Parking is not allowed north of the median break so no impact on parking at this location
17 TSE JHCPBG B RMS CC 16-Nov-2017
SMCSWTSE-JCG-DSY-TCP-002303-0009
Lane status sign is incorrect. 3r lane is a shared lane, not a through lane
Noted, however, we are trying to encourage people to use this as a through lane otherwise the highway traffic is stopped when May Street right turn movement is stopped
18 TSE JHCPBG B RMS CC 16-Nov-2017
SMCSWTSE-JCG-DSY-TCP-002303-0009
2 lanes closure will have issue with long traffic queue. In this case the third traffic lane is a shared right turn lane, if two vehicles are waiting for the right turn, this will create queue traffic. Please clarify whether this case has been considered in the TCP design
It has hence the lane status sign mentioned in Item 17
Stakeholder Comment TrackerSydney Metro City & Southwest
RESPONSE STATUSO OpenC ClosedCS Closed subject to additional action / information
Document: CTMP - Marrickville site - UtilitiesVersion: B-00Date of review: 8/11/2017
Item No
Contract Contractor Doc RevRequirement Ref (COA or REMM)
Stakeholder Reviewer DateItem Description, Page, Para, Drg
refTfNSW comment Contractor Response
1 TSE JHCPBG JV B-00 IG BG 08-Nov-2017 Section 2.2 "Duration 4 months". Is it possible to get a likely calendar of works (or similar)?
This document is a CTMP for the approval of access/ egress arrangements and for works that impact traffic. The Traffic Forecast sent out weekly captures works at present within the next 4 weeks but it will be extended where possible. The durations are listed within the document
2 TSE JHCPBG JV B-00 IG BG 08-Nov-2017 Section 2.2.1Section currently reads as if all works happen all the time. Suggest clarifying (likely time frames) what works occur when. Appendix 3 states All or Night but nothing further.
Document amended
3 TSE JHCPBG JV B-00 IG BG 08-Nov-2017 Section 2.2.1Section states "may involve footpath trenching". So if it does involve footpath trenching, what are the planned management measures? Likely time frames?
Document amended and refer to Sections 3.2.3 and Table 1
4 TSE JHCPBG JV B-00 IG BG 08-Nov-2017 Section 2.2.2All works are in different locations. Will these works occur at the same time or is it one after the other? Can the TCPs be referenced in line with each dot point? Section 2.2.9 is for TCPs can there be just one section to avoid repetition?
Document amended
5 TSE JHCPBG JV B-00 IG BG 08-Nov-2017 Section 2.2.5Can the TCPs be referenced in line with each dot point? Section 2.2.9 is for TCPs can there be just one section to avoid repetition?
No
6 TSE JHCPBG JV B-00 IG BG 08-Nov-2017 Section 2.2.6It is noted accesses will be retained, but what is the affect on the operation of the accesses? Will they be blocked at any time? Closed for short periods?
as described in the document
7 TSE JHCPBG JV B-00 IG BG 08-Nov-2017 Section 2.2.6How will parked vehicles be removed if they ignore attempts to make space, especially on Lord St?
works will not proceed until parking is removed
8 TSE JHCPBG JV B-00 IG BG 08-Nov-2017 Section 2.2.9 This section is for TCPs can there be just one section to avoid repetition with 2.2.2 and 2.2.5? This section details approvals required
9 TSE JHCPBG JV B-00 IG BG 08-Nov-2017 Section 3.2 "…regular updates" How will this be achieved?through the traffic forecast and meetings/ discussions
10 TSE JHCPBG JV B-00 IG BG 08-Nov-2017 Section 3.3Information in this section is general. What notification/s will actually be done for establishing site and the associated short term works?
Document amended
11 TSE JHCPBG JV B-00 IG BG 08-Nov-2017 Section 3.3.1 Provide detail on VMS messages, timeframes and locations Document amended
12 TSE JHCPBG JV B-00 IG BG 08-Nov-2017 Section 3.3.2 (Table) TfNSW received the CTMP on 30 October 2017Documen 3.3.2 (Tablet amen 3.3.2 (Tableded
13 TSE JHCPBG JV B-00 IG BG 08-Nov-2017 Section 3.4How will JHCPBG JV capture changes to the short term works, on the night? How will it "... provide records of the traffic control implemented." ?
Document amended
14 TSE JHCPBG JV B-00 IG BG 08-Nov-2017 Section 3.5 This section does not give any detail on how environmental maintenance will be undertaken. Document amended
15 TSE JHCPBG JV B-00 IG BG 08-Nov-2017 Section 3.6Will these engineers be on site? If not who is the on-site contact? Are these contacts night or day contacts?
Document amended
16 TSE JHCPBG JV B-00 IG BG 08-Nov-2017Notes on TCP generally reference AS1742.3 and TCAWs but sometimes these documents conflict. In these TCPs sign spacings are from AS1742.3, while sign face is from TC@WS, i.e. AS1742.3 does not use night signs. Keep these difference s in mind when designing TCPs
Checklists
17 TSE JHCPBG JV B-00 IG BG 08-Nov-2017 TCPs are not signed (5.1.2 of TC@Ws Manual). Drawings amended
18 TSE JHCPBG JV B-00 IG BG 08-Nov-2017TCPs should not be drawn on aerials photographs, see TC@AWS Appendix D. The aerial does lack clarity when trying to establish lanes closed
There is no requirement for this within TCAWS manual
19 TSE JHCPBG JV B-00 IG BG 08-Nov-2017What is the worksite protection method/device? Referencing AS1742.3 Section 4.2 and TC@Ws Section 3.6
Reduced speed limit, bollards, traffic controllers as noted on the drawings
20 TSE JHCPBG JV B-00 IG BG 08-Nov-2017TCPs state traffic controllers on stop/slow will also manage pedestrians. Suggest reviewing this and adjusting as required
Drawings amended
21 TSE JHCPBG JV B-00 IG BG 08-Nov-2017 END 40 signs are placed with ENDWORK signs. Review. Drawings amended
22 TSE JHCPBG JV B-00 IG BG 08-Nov-2017All TCPs reference an ADT of <1500, this will not apply on roads like Princes Hwy and this note should be reviewed on all TCPs.
Drawings amended
23 TSE JHCPBG JV B-00 IG BG 08-Nov-2017CHANGED CONDITIONS AHEAD sign is used in several TCPs. Is this meant to be a T1-23, CHANGED TRAFFIC CONDITIONS?
Drawings amended
24 TSE JHCPBG JV B-00 IG BG 08-Nov-2017 Many instances where END ROADWORK signs are not shown Drawings amended
25 TSE JHCPBG JV B-00 IG BG 08-Nov-2017In several TCPs a non-standard lane status sign is used on several approaches. Will this sign be manufactured for the work? If not, what sign will be used?
The sign shown on the TCP will be used
26 TSE JHCPBG JV B-00 IG BG 08-Nov-2017Where traffic controllers are in use there is no worker protection, e.g. cover vehicle and for night work there is no mention of lighting
Note added to drawings
27 TSE JHCPBG JV B-00 IG BG 08-Nov-2017 No mention of the Westconnex footpath closures. Will this affect sign placements?No - footpaths closed are on Bedwin and Unwins Bridge roads
28 TSE JHCPBG JV B-00 IG BG 08-Nov-2017What happens when the left turn into Edinburgh Rd, from Bedwin WB, is stopped? Queues may form onto and along Bedwin Rd. How will this be managed?
Drawings amended
29 TSE JHCPBG JV B-00 IG BG 08-Nov-2017 Stop/slow related signage installed. Why are there no traffic controllers? Is stop/slow occurring? Drawings amended30 TSE JHCPBG JV B-00 IG BG 08-Nov-2017 Left turn out of Edinburgh appears narrow. Can vehicles make the turn as it appears tight? Drawings amended
31 TSE JHCPBG JV B-00 IG BG 08-Nov-2017 Cones have been installed WB on Bedwin Rd, why? How will they be maintained if knocked over? Drawings amended
32 TSE JHCPBG JV B-00 IG BG 08-Nov-2017 It appears one traffic controller is watching three directions with no protection. Is this correct? Drawings amended33 TSE JHCPBG JV B-00 IG BG 08-Nov-2017 No taper lengths shown, and only one T5-5 in the taper. Drawings amended
34 TSE JHCPBG JV B-00 IG BG 08-Nov-2017 Why does sign placement on Edinburgh Rd start so far back from Bedwin Rd?To provide warning of the implemented traffic control
SMCSWTSE-JCG-DSY-TCP-002303-0002
SMCSWTSE-JCG-DSY-TCP-002303-0003
Sydney Metro City & Southwest
All TCPs
Stakeholder Comment Tracker
SMCSWTSE-JCG-DSY-TCP-002303-0001
RESPONSE STATUSO OpenC ClosedCS Closed subject to additional action / information
35 TSE JHCPBG JV B-00 IG BG 08-Nov-2017 Traffic controllers are in use but no signage is installed in advance of their position. Drawings amended
36 TSE JHCPBG JV B-00 IG BG 08-Nov-2017Is the NO STOPPING existing? Council approval required for a NO STOPPING, has this been obtained? How will parked vehicle be removed if they ignore attempts to make space?
Not exisitng No Stopping. CTMP has been provided to Inner West Council a few times now. If vehicles are parked works will not be able to proceed.
37 TSE JHCPBG JV B-00 IG BG 08-Nov-2017How long is the work site? Is this a long term set-up? If, so will cones be enough to protect the worksite? How will they be maintained outside work hours?
Drawing amended. Backfilling will occur prior to opening area to traffic at the end of each shift
38 TSE JHCPBG JV B-00 IG BG 08-Nov-2017Is the NO STOPPING existing? Council approval required for a NO STOPPING, has this been obtained? How will parked vehicle be removed if they ignore attempts to make space?
Refer to response to Item 36
39 TSE JHCPBG JV B-00 IG BG 08-Nov-2017Is this a long term set-up? If, so will cones be enough to protect the worksite? How will they be maintained outside work hours?
Refer to response to Item 37
40 TSE JHCPBG JV B-00 IG BG 08-Nov-2017 END ROADWORK signs are missing Drawings amended41 TSE JHCPBG JV B-00 IG BG 08-Nov-2017 40 speed zone in place, long term? Where are the signs to show speed going back to 50? Drawings amended
42 TSE JHCPBG JV B-00 IG BG 08-Nov-2017Notes mention the barrier type and they do not appear to rigid enough to keep pedestrians/onlookers from the bore site. How will the work site be protected?
Drawings amended
43 TSE JHCPBG JV B-00 IG BG 08-Nov-2017Is the NO STOPPING existing? Council approval required for a NO STOPPING, has this been obtained? How will parked vehicle be removed if they ignore attempts to make space?
Refer to response to Item 36
44 TSE JHCPBG JV B-00 IG BG 08-Nov-2017Is this a long term set-up? If, so will cones be enough to protect the worksite? How will they be maintained outside work hours?
Refer to response to Item 37
45 TSE JHCPBG JV B-00 IG BG 08-Nov-2017 TCP ID (SMCSWTSE-JCG-DSY-TCP-002303-0006) missing from TCP Drawing amended46 TSE JHCPBG JV B-00 IG BG 08-Nov-2017 Signs spacings missing on Council St. Drawing amended
47 TSE JHCPBG JV B-00 IG BG 08-Nov-201740 speed zone in place, long term? Where are the signs to show speed going back to 50? Consider a midway 40ROADWORK sign
Drawing amended
48 TSE JHCPBG JV B-00 IG BG 08-Nov-2017 How is access maintained to Mays Ln. Several garages along here. Drawing amended
49 TSE JHCPBG JV B-00 IG BG 08-Nov-2017 Is there any Westconnex work occurring in the area? If so, this needs to be addressed in the TCPNo it will be addressed through the ROL process
50 TSE JHCPBG JV B-00 IG BG 08-Nov-2017 Appears stop/slow may occur at the traffic signals? If so, should they be on flashing yellow? Drawing amended51 TSE JHCPBG JV B-00 IG BG 08-Nov-2017 Taper lengths are not shown Drawing amended
52 TSE JHCPBG JV B-00 IG BG 08-Nov-2017Vehicle will be turning right from the SB through lane on Princes Hwy. Is this correct? Will this create delays
Drawing amended
53 TSE JHCPBG JV B-00 IG BG 08-Nov-2017 Appears stop/slow may occur at the traffic signals? If so, should they be on flashing yellow? Drawing amended54 TSE JHCPBG JV B-00 IG BG 08-Nov-2017 Taper lengths are not shown Drawing amended55 TSE JHCPBG JV B-00 IG BG 08-Nov-2017 How is access maintained to Mays Ln. Several garages along here. Drawing amended
56 TSE JHCPBG JV B-00 IG BG 08-Nov-2017Will SB traffic on Princes Hwy be heading south and turn in right from one lane? Will this create delays?
Yes that is why it is being undertaken at night
57 TSE JHCPBG JV B-00 IG BG 08-Nov-2017 Taper lengths are not shown Drawing amended58 TSE JHCPBG JV B-00 IG BG 08-Nov-2017 TCP ID (SMCSWTSE-JCG-DSY-TCP-002303-0010) missing from TCP Drawing amended
59 TSE JHCPBG JV B-00 IG BG 08-Nov-201740 speed zone in place, long term? Where are the signs to show speed going back to 50? Consider a midway 40ROADWORK sign
Drawing amended
60 TSE JHCPBG JV B-00 IG BG 08-Nov-2017Is this a long term set-up? If, so will cones be enough to protect the worksite? How will they be maintained outside work hours?
Refer to response to Item 36
61 TSE JHCPBG JV B-00 IG BG 08-Nov-2017 TCP ID (SMCSWTSE-JCG-DSY-TCP-002303-0011) missing from TCP Drawing amended
62 TSE JHCPBG JV B-00 IG BG 08-Nov-201740 speed zone in place, long term? Where are the signs to show speed going back to 50? Consider a midway 40ROADWORK sign
Drawing shows End 40 signs
63 TSE JHCPBG JV B-00 IG BG 08-Nov-2017 Can detail be added on the resident access measure that will be in place at Caroline Ln? Drawing amended
64 TSE JHCPBG JV B-00 IG BG 08-Nov-2017What is the lane width available to traffic when part road is closed? Especially as this road is where rubbish bins are stored, by residents, for collection
Drawing amended
65 TSE JHCPBG JV B-00 IG BG 08-Nov-2017Is this a long term set-up? If, so will cones be enough to protect the worksite? How will they be maintained outside work hours?
Refer to response to Item 37
66 TSE JHCPBG JV B-00 IG BG 08-Nov-2017 Road Safety Audit to be included Document amended67 TSE JHCPBG JV B-00 IG BG 08-Nov-2017 Review comments to be included Are now
MCSWTSE-JCG-DSY-TCP-002303-0011
SMCSWTSE-JCG-DSY-TCP-002303-0004
SMCSWTSE-JCG-DSY-TCP-002303-0005
SMCSWTSE-JCG-DSY-TCP-002303-0006
SMCSWTSE-JCG-DSY-TCP-002303-0007
MCSWTSE-JCG-DSY-TCP-002303-0008
MCSWTSE-JCG-DSY-TCP-002303-0010
MCSWTSE-JCG-DSY-TCP-002303-0009
Document: CTMP - Marrickville UtilityVersion: CDate of review: 19/12/2017
Item No Contract Contractor Doc Rev Requirement Ref (COA or REMM) Stakeholder Reviewer Date Item Description, Page, Para, Drg ref RMS comment Contractor Response
1 TSE JHCPBG C RMS CM 19-Dec-2017 SMCSWTSE-JCG-DSY-TCP-002303-0007
ORIGINAL COMMENT:Traffic setup in May St / Princes Hwy will not work. Proposed work site blcking E/B May St, and diver traffic onto W/B May St turning to Princes Hwy will no trigger traffic loop. Please check.
CONTRACTORS RESPONE:Note added to drawing - loop activation to be done by traffic controller
UPDATED COMMENT:No note was found on TCP relating to loop activation by traffic controllers
Drawing amended
2 TSE JHCPBG C RMS CM 19-Dec-2017 SMCSWTSE-JCG-DSY-TCP-002303-0008
ORIGINAL COMMENT:Please check parking on the left lane on N/B Princes Hwy. And provide parking management details.
CONTRACTOR RESPONSE:Parking is not allowed north of the median break so no impact on parking at this location.
UPDATED COMMENT:Google street view images show parking is available on the northbound kerbside lane of Princes Highway north of May Street outside of the AM and PM peak hours.
Drawing amended
3 TSE JHCPBG C RMS CM 19-Dec-2017 SMCSWTSE-JCG-DSY-TCP-002303-0008 Traffic travelling southbound from Princes Highway turning right into May Street will not be able to trigger traffic loop. Drawing amended
4 TSE JHCPBG C RMS CM 19-Dec-2017 SMCSWTSE-JCG-DSY-TCP-002303-0009
NEW ISSUE IN THIS REVISION:Lane Arrows (symbolic) showing the wrong lanes being closed on the signs compared to what is shown on the road. Drawing amended
5 TSE JHCPBG C RMS CM 19-Dec-2017 SMCSWTSE-JCG-DSY-TCP-002303-0010NEW ISSUE IN THIS REVISION:Roadwork signage shows Traffic Controller (symbolic) however, there are no traffic controllers shown on the TCP.
Drawing amended
Register No. Issued to: Date of IssueRegister No.1 XXXRegister No.2 XXXRegister No.3 XXX
Stakeholder Comment TrackerSydney Metro City & Southwest
RESPONSE STATUSO OpenC ClosedCS Closed subject to additional action / information