+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Smile! A History of Emoticons

Smile! A History of Emoticons

Date post: 15-Aug-2016
Category:
Upload: miltonxx
View: 17 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
Description:
It started 31 years ago, when a joke about a fake mercury spill at Carnegie Mellon University was posted on a digital message board and mistaken for a genuine safety warning.
12
Smile! A History of Emoticons
Transcript
Page 1: Smile! A History of Emoticons

Smile! A History of Emoticons

Page 2: Smile! A History of Emoticons

This summer, Facebook rolled out "stickers" on its website: cartoony takes on the

emoticon for users to post in their chats, from a love-struck cactus to a pizza-eating

cat. Still, for many of us, the simple sideways smiley face still reigns in

electronic communication.

Page 3: Smile! A History of Emoticons

It started 31 years ago, when a joke about a fake mercury spill at Carnegie Mellon

University was posted on a digital message board and mistaken for a

genuine safety warning. The board's users cast about for a means to distinguish

humorous posts from serious content. On Sept. 19, 1982, faculty member Scott E.

Fahlman entered the debate with the following message:

Page 4: Smile! A History of Emoticons

I propose that [sic] the following character sequence for joke markers:

:-)

Read it sideways. Actually, it is probably more economical to mark things that are NOT jokes,

given current trends. For this, use:

:-(

Page 5: Smile! A History of Emoticons

The rest is Internet history. Dr. Fahlman's expressive, minimal icons became an

integral part of online communication, if not always a welcome one. These

"smileys," as they came to be known, were effectively the first online irony

marks. But emoticons recur throughout modern history.

Page 6: Smile! A History of Emoticons

Though it is difficult to nail down the first appearance in print, one likely contender appears in an 1862 transcript of a speech

by President Abraham Lincoln. The transcript records the audience's response

to Lincoln's droll introduction as "(applause and laughter ;)." Without

corroborating evidence, however, it is impossible to decide whether this is a true

emoticon.

Page 7: Smile! A History of Emoticons

Counting in its favor, the transcript was typeset by hand, before mechanical

typesetting brought with it the risk of gummed-up Linotypes accidentally

transposing characters. So it is plausible that ";)"—rather than the more

grammatically sensible ");"—was intentional. Moreover, later audience reactions to the same speech appear between square brackets rather than parentheses, reinforcing the likelihood

that this particular interjection was typeset deliberately.

Page 8: Smile! A History of Emoticons

On the negative side of the ledger, this single ";)" was the only such "emoticon" in

the speech, and the rest of the text suffers from enough typographical errors

that we cannot be certain it was a calculated addition. Though its form is

undeniably familiar, the precise meaning of this first emoticon remains unknown.

Page 9: Smile! A History of Emoticons

The meandering path toward the modern emoticon continued in 1887, when the celebrated (and feared)

critic Ambrose Bierce penned a tongue-in-cheek essay on writing reform entitled "For Brevity and Clarity." Alongside helpful contractions of phrases such as

"much esteemed by all who knew him" (mestewed), Bierce presented a new mark of punctuation intended to help less fortunate writers convey humor or irony,

which he called "the snigger point, or note of cachinnation." (Now almost extinct, "cachinnation"

means "loud or immoderate laughter.") It looked like a line with the ends turned up and, he wrote,

"represents, as nearly as may be, a smiling mouth." Of course, his proposal was itself an ironic act, and

unsurprisingly, the mark didn't catch on.

Page 10: Smile! A History of Emoticons

The last pre-Internet emoticons ambled casually into view at the end of the 1960s. First, in 1967, a Baltimore Sunday Sun columnist named Ralph

Reppert was quoted in the May edition of Reader's Digest. Reppert, writing that his "Aunt Ev is the only

person I know who can write a facial expression," explained that: "Aunt Ev's expression is a symbol that

looks like this: —) It represents her tongue stuck in her cheek. Here's the way she used it in her last

letter: 'Your Cousin Vernie is a natural blonde again —)[.]' " Its appearance was apparently a one-off.

Page 11: Smile! A History of Emoticons

Two years later, on a literary plane far removed from the Reader's Digest, another analog smiley sprung

from the mind of Vladimir Nabokov. A famously controlling interviewee, Nabokov insisted on being

provided with questions in advance. Once, recounting a reporter's question as to where

Nabokov ranked himself among writers of his era, the Russian émigré replied obliquely: "I often think there should exist a special typographical sign for a smile—some sort of concave mark, a supine round bracket, which I would now like to trace in reply to

your question."

Page 12: Smile! A History of Emoticons

Resources:

http://www.mogicons.com/

http://online.wsj.com/news/articles/SB100014240527023042139045790936618141

58946


Recommended