+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Social Annotation in Social Network Sites Fred Stutzman SILS, UNC-Chapel Hill [email protected].

Social Annotation in Social Network Sites Fred Stutzman SILS, UNC-Chapel Hill [email protected].

Date post: 14-Jan-2016
Category:
Upload: rose-kerry-jackson
View: 215 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
12
Social Annotation in Social Network Sites Fred Stutzman SILS, UNC-Chapel Hill [email protected]
Transcript
Page 1: Social Annotation in Social Network Sites Fred Stutzman SILS, UNC-Chapel Hill fred@metalab.unc.edu.

Social Annotation in Social Network

SitesFred Stutzman

SILS, UNC-Chapel [email protected]

Page 2: Social Annotation in Social Network Sites Fred Stutzman SILS, UNC-Chapel Hill fred@metalab.unc.edu.

Tagging in SNS?

Page 3: Social Annotation in Social Network Sites Fred Stutzman SILS, UNC-Chapel Hill fred@metalab.unc.edu.

Tagging One’s Self

•What are rates of maintenance and upkeep of these self tags?

•How are individuals using self tags in social network sites?

•What types of tags exist in social network sites?

Page 4: Social Annotation in Social Network Sites Fred Stutzman SILS, UNC-Chapel Hill fred@metalab.unc.edu.

Tag Maintenance

•Longitudinal analysis (n=3505, t=16 weeks)

•UNC-Chapel Hill Freshman, 2005

•How are self tags maintained over time?

•What are the most popular self tags?

•What is the self tag rate of change?

Page 5: Social Annotation in Social Network Sites Fred Stutzman SILS, UNC-Chapel Hill fred@metalab.unc.edu.

Findings

Page 6: Social Annotation in Social Network Sites Fred Stutzman SILS, UNC-Chapel Hill fred@metalab.unc.edu.

Findings

Element Share Rate Change Rate

Gender 98% .21%Home State 93% 1.8%

Major 85% 12%Rel. Stat. 90% 26%

Looking For 63% 28%Friends 100% 93%

Page 7: Social Annotation in Social Network Sites Fred Stutzman SILS, UNC-Chapel Hill fred@metalab.unc.edu.

Findings

Elements Share, 1 Share, 16 Delta

Books 4.7 4.9 43.1%

Movies 8.9 9.7 52%

Interests 7.8 8.5 54.8%

Music 13.4 14.5 55.8%

Page 8: Social Annotation in Social Network Sites Fred Stutzman SILS, UNC-Chapel Hill fred@metalab.unc.edu.

Self-tags in SNS

•Pilot content analysis (n=50), undergraduate profiles at UNC-Chapel Hill

•Boundary of a tag: hyperlinked referent from a profile to a “pool”

•Concentration: Fluid elements

•Specific concentration: Interests, Favorites

Page 9: Social Annotation in Social Network Sites Fred Stutzman SILS, UNC-Chapel Hill fred@metalab.unc.edu.

Preliminary Analysis

•Tag types

•Object - Wedding Crashers, Blink 182

•Genre - Chick Flicks, Hip-Hop, Layin’ in the sun

•Concept - Random things, All things Pumpkin

•Action - Playing (x), Chillin’

Page 10: Social Annotation in Social Network Sites Fred Stutzman SILS, UNC-Chapel Hill fred@metalab.unc.edu.

Preliminary Analysis

•Self tags as

• Individual descriptors (my favorite book, genres of films)

•Group memberships

•Society-level (religion, political belief)

•Present-network level (campus groups, inside jokes)

Page 11: Social Annotation in Social Network Sites Fred Stutzman SILS, UNC-Chapel Hill fred@metalab.unc.edu.

Next steps

•Other self-tags in profiles?

•Photo tags

•Group memberships

•Application participation

Page 12: Social Annotation in Social Network Sites Fred Stutzman SILS, UNC-Chapel Hill fred@metalab.unc.edu.

Thank you

•Email: [email protected]

•Website: http://ibiblio.org/fred

•Blog: http://chimprawk.blogspot.com


Recommended