Date post: | 26-Mar-2015 |
Category: |
Documents |
Upload: | gabriella-porter |
View: | 213 times |
Download: | 0 times |
Social Cognition
Molly Marshall
What is social cognition?
How we think about other people
How we process social information
How we explain other people’s behavior
How we explain our own behaviour
Prejudice and Discrimination
Prejudice - Allport (1958)
“an antipathy based on a faulty and inflexible generalisation. It may be felt or expressed. It may be directed towards a group or toward an individual because he or she is a member of that group”
Prejudice and Discrimination Prejudice can be seen as part of
the process of ethnocentrism
What is ‘ethnocentrism’
Prejudice and Discrimination Ethnocentrism --- the syndrome
The tendency to undervalue the products of an OUT GROUP to which we do NOT belong Hostility & rejection of out group
members
Prejudice and Discrimination Ethnocentrism --- the syndrome
The tendency to overvalue the products of an IN GROUP to which we do belong Increased liking for in group members +
pressure for conformity & group cohesion
Prejudice and Discrimination Ethnocentrism --- the syndrome
Name some groups to whom we belong IN GROUPS to whom we do not belong OUT GROUPS
Prejudice and Discrimination THREE major theories of prejudice
the psychoanalytic (within the individual)
the interaction between groups theory the social categorisation theory
Prejudice and Discrimination the psychoanalytic (within the individual)
locates prejudice within the individual personality - Adorno et al (1950)
caused by unresolved childhood conflicts - but this cannot explain why entire societies may be prejudiced
Prejudice and Discrimination the interaction between groups theory locates the cause of prejudice in the
struggle between social groups for scarce social resources (housing, jobs)
Sherif (1956) describes competition
between groups as the cause of prejudice
Prejudice and Discrimination the interaction between groups theory Sherif - the robber’s cave experiment
Famous study - USA teenagers in a summer camp The eagles & the rattlers
Prejudice and Discrimination Now let us do a VERY small
experiment
YOU will learn more about this in a minute
You are all allocated a code number please memorise it!!
Prejudice and Discrimination You are about to be shown a screen covered
with dots
Very quickly - and IN SILENCE estimate the number of DOTS on the
screen; write this down, fold up your answer, write
your code number on the fold
Prejudice and Discrimination
Prejudice and Discrimination And again You are about to be shown two more
screens covered with dots Very quickly - and IN SILENCE estimate the number of DOTS on each
screen; write this down, fold up your answer,
write your code number on the fold
Prejudice and Discrimination
Prejudice and Discrimination
Prejudice and Discrimination
Sorting it all out !
Prejudice and Discrimination
over estimators list TWO traits you think over
estimators have in commonthenlist TWO traits you think under estimators have in common
Prejudice and Discrimination
under estimators list TWO traits you think under
estimators have in commonthenlist TWO traits you think over estimators have in common
Prejudice and Discrimination
both groups note + for each positive trait or - for each negative trait Mark your slip O or UPut your list in the O or U heap
Prejudice and Discrimination
We will look at our results at the end of the session …...
Prejudice and Discrimination the social categorisation theory
TAJFEL (1970)
The minimal group studies
Prejudice and Discrimination the social categorisation theory TAJFEL (1970)
What does it take to make you believe you are a member of a group?
TAJFEL - The minimal group studies
What Tajfel did -
EXPERIMENT 1
A laboratory experiment
TAJFEL - The minimal group studies
The participants
64 school boys from Bristol Age range 14 - 15 All knew each other well
TAJFEL - The minimal group studies
Came into psychology ‘lab’ in groups of 8
TAJFEL - The minimal group studies
They were told:
That Tajfel was investigating visual judgements
TAJFEL - The minimal group studies
40 clusters of dots flashed onto a screen
The boys asked to estimate how many dots they had seen each time
TAJFEL - The minimal group studies
Experimenters then ‘pretended’ to judge the boys answers
BUT really The boys were randomly assigned
to one of two groups
TAJFEL - The minimal group studies
OVER ESTIMATORS OR UNDER ESTIMATORS
How many were there in each group?
TAJFEL - The minimal group studies
The boys were given 18 page booklets - indicating money (pence)
Choice Number 1 2 34
Boy no 1 9 11 12 1 Boy no 2 5 9 11 3
TAJFEL - The minimal group studies
The boys were asked to make three types of choice
In group choices - both boys IN Out group choices - both boys
OUT Inter group choices - one each
TAJFEL - The minimal group studies
INTER GROUP CHOICES the important choice
Most boys chose a ticket which would give their own group most
TAJFEL - The minimal group studies
The second experiment
Another lab experiment
(Still Tajfel)
TAJFEL - The minimal group studies
Groups of 16 boys tested Flashed up 12 paintings Klee or Kandinsky (abstract art) Afterwards randomly categorised
as preferring Klee or Kandinsky
TAJFEL - The minimal group studies
The boys again given 18 page booklets - indicating money (pence)
Choice Number 1 2 34
Boy no 1 9 11 12 1 Boy no 2 5 9 11 3
TAJFEL - The minimal group studies
Which of THREE variables had the greatest effect
Maximum joint profit largest reward to members of both
groups
TAJFEL - The minimal group studies
OR
largest reward to member of in group …. regardless of size of reward for boy in out group
TAJFEL - The minimal group studies
OR
MAXIMUM DIFFERENCE - largest possible difference - in favour of the in group
TAJFEL - The minimal group studies
For example … Boy (in group) 9 11 12 16 Boy (out group) 5 9 11 19 Max joint profit = blue row Largest reward to in group = blue Max difference = green
TAJFEL - The minimal group studies
The results Most boys chose maximum difference
Boys left the study with LESS money than they would have if they had awarded maximum joint profit
TAJFEL - The minimal group studies
The independent variable (IV) The group of the participant
Over estimator or under estimator
TAJFEL - The minimal group studies
The dependent variable (DV)
The boys reward decisions
TAJFEL - The minimal group studies
Tajfel concluded
Out group discrimination is very easy to trigger off
mere categorisation is enough!
TAJFEL - The minimal group studies
Ecological validity?
Demand characteristics - Artificial setting - not like real life
TAJFEL - The minimal group studies
The participants?
Teenage boys are competitive (esp in western culture) Unrepresentative sample - all boys
same age all from same school
TAJFEL - The minimal group studies
Ethics !!
No informed consent Right to withdraw?
TAJFEL - The minimal group studies
How did our experiment go!
Count up the +s and -s for each group
Did the over estimators give more -s to under estimators and vice versa?
TAJFEL - The minimal group studies
What to do now…
Read a chapter on prejudice & discrimination
TAJFEL - The minimal group studies
THE END