MicroFinanzaRa,ng:SocialPerformanceManagement
MarcoBoa
MicroFinanza
2010RBAP‐MABSNa.onalRoundtableConferenceHya=HotelandCasino,ManilaJune2‐3,2010
SocialPerformanceManagement
Concept
SocialPerformanceManagement
3
Performance Management
Social Performance
Financial Performance
Mission
Social performance is not just about measuring short and long term results that an MFI achieves, but also concerns the processes of the MFI, the activities it undertakes, the products it offers and the organizational values and behavior it promotes not only results but also the process to achieve these results
What is explicitly defined and measured is what is managed
SocialPerformanceMeasurement
4
SocialPerformanceManagement
Howtomeasure?
SocialRa.ng
6
It provides an opinion on the capacity of an MFI to put its social mission into practice and to achieve its social goals.
It is based on an in-depth analysis of an MFI social performance management system and social responsibility and an evaluation of its
results
External and independent Quantitative and qualitative
Objective Comparable
Stand-alone or coupled with financial rating
SocialRa.ngvsImpactStudy
7
Social rating does not measure impact; rather, it analyzes the objectives, systems and results of
the Rural Bank, before the impact that these may have on clients.
SOCIAL RATING and IMPACT STUDY are: complementary tools designed to respond to different needs.
SOCIAL RATING
An impact study measures the change in the living conditions of one population due to the
action of Rural Bank.
IMPACT STUDY
MicroFinanzaRa.ngSocialRa.ng
8
DIMENSION SUB-DIMENSION
SOCIAL PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
Social Mission, Objectives and Strategy, Governance MIS and Social performance tracking and monitoring system Alignment of the operational systems to the mission (HR, Internal control, product design)
SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY SR towards the clients (including consumer protection) SR towards the staff SR towards the community and the environment
OUTREACH Operational areas Target reached
QUALITY OF THE SERVICE Variety of the service Appropriateness to clients’ needs and client satisfaction Non-financial services
MicroFinanzaRa.ng’sApproach
9
COMPREHENSIVE SOCIAL RATING
Collection of clients level information: submission of a questionnaire
focus group discussion with clients Deeper Analysis:
Indicators about clients socio-economic profile
Feedback from clients about satisfaction/dissatisfaction
STANDARD SOCIAL RATING
Data available at institutional level
Proxies
Differences can be more or less relevant depending on the effectiveness and reliability of the SP monitoring system of the MFI
SocialPerformanceManagement
BenefitsandValues
BenefitsandValues
11
INTERNAL EXTERNAL
To give a clear picture of social performance to the staff of the MFI
To enter in a learning process
To improve social the performance management system:
mission statement;
Strategy;
Marketing;
Clients satisfaction
MFI’s own social performance vs. best practices.
Baseline for impact studies (comprehensive social rating)
To prove social performance to investors (and donors)
To promote transparency in the microfinance field thanks to an independent and standard tool recognized by donors and investors
To align to international standards for measuring social performance
To report on MIX social performance indicators
To explore new market niches
SocialPerformanceManagement
Trendsinthesector
Trends:Governance,StrategyandMission
13
SPMANAGEMENTSYSTEM
SOCIALRESPONSIBILITY
OUTREACH
QUALITYOFTHESERVICES
The intentions are well reflected in the mission
Key terms of the mission are not adequately defined (poor, rural, etc)
Good social / financial balance in governance, even if Improvable SPM knowledge and general weaknesses compared to the
good practices in governance In some cases, the strategy is mainly focused on financial performance,
Broad social goals are seldom translated into specific operational targets to guide decision making, reducing the effectiveness of the social strategy
The mission is overall well disseminated Even if less among new staff and distant branches, due to the lack of
formalized channels of dissemination / refreshment
Trends:MIS,HRandRiskManagement
14
SPMANAGEMENTSYSTEM
SOCIALRESPONSIBILITY
OUTREACH
QUALITYOFTHESERVICES
Good potential level of information for social performance tracking
The MIS is not adequate to track and monitor the progress towards the mission
The risk management system can be positively affected by an environment conducive and good reputation.
The audit function rarely includes specific and formalized checks on the reliability of social performance data. Client protection norms are not always formalized and lack adequate mechanisms to verify compliance
The mission is often considered during the staff selection and induction process
The staff performance assessment and salary incentives are not explicitly linked to social goals
Trends:CSRtowardsStaffandEnvironment
15
Financial Institutions are committed to Social responsibility and see it as an integral part of their orientation
Positive labour climate and internal growth opportunities
Partial participation of staff and bottom-up communication
High staff turn-over rate particularly in competitive markets
SPMANAGEMENTSYSTEM
SOCIALRESPONSIBILITY
OUTREACH
QUALITYOFTHESERVICES
CSR towards the environment and the community can bring relevant benefits
No formal policies to prevent harmful activities for the community and the environment
Trends:CSRtowardsClients
16
SPMANAGEMENTSYSTEM
SOCIALRESPONSIBILITY
OUTREACH
QUALITYOFTHESERVICES
Risk of client over-indebtedness is a critical issue:
– MFI not always equipped with effective policies to mitigate it
– Necessity of effective Credit Bureaux – Improve analysis of repayment capacity – Policy for maximum level of indebtedness
10
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80
Paraguay
Kenya
Bosnia and
Herzegoniva
Ecuador
Colom
bia
Philippines
El S
alvador
Mexico
Honduras
Niger
Azerbaijan
Nicaragua
Honduras
Palestine
Average*
Risk of client over-indebtedness
Clients with additional loans Score over-indebtedness Clients with previous loans from banks and regulated MFI
Trends:CSRtowardsClients
17
Transparency towards clients is an area of improvement
Even if generally acceptable for regulated Financial Institutions
Limited client financial awareness. Not clearly correlated to client education
SPMANAGEMENTSYSTEM
SOCIALRESPONSIBILITY
OUTREACH
QUALITYOFTHESERVICES
55 54
82 81
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
Hon
dura
s E
cuad
or
Mex
ico
Ecu
ador
E
cuad
or
Nic
arag
ua
Hon
dura
s P
eru
Per
u P
eru
Mex
ico
Nic
arag
ua
Bol
ivia
E
cuad
or
Col
ombi
a E
l Sal
vado
r LA
C
Aze
rbai
jan
Bos
nia
and
Her
zego
niva
P
hilip
pine
s P
ales
tine
Nig
er
Aver
age*
Client financial awareness, transparency and education
Score transparency
Clients with at least primary school completed
Financial awareness of clients on Interest rate
Trends:Outreach
18
SPMANAGEMENTSYSTEM
SOCIALRESPONSIBILITY
OUTREACH
QUALITYOFTHESERVICES
The poverty incidence among clients is lower than the national poverty incidence . Microfinance does not seem to suite the needs of the poorest segment of the pyramid, rather the economically active poor or wealthier.
Financial inclusion is character ized by a rather high variation. P h i l i p p i n e s i s o n average in line with LAC.
55 63
79
62 54
64
90
40
24
64
0
20
40
60
80
100
LAC
EC
A
Afri
ca
Pal
estin
e
Phi
lippi
nes
Financial exclusion, recent clients
Clients without previous access to formal credit
Clients without access to saving services
Trends:ProductQuality
19
SPMANAGEMENTSYSTEM
SOCIALRESPONSIBILITY
OUTREACH
QUALITYOFTHESERVICES
The average client drop-out rate is quite high in all the regions.
Client drop out is difficult to measure, as a standard formula may not capture the relevant information (e.g. resting clients)
Data do not show a clear correlation between the client drop out rate and the quality of services perceived by clients.
SocialPerformanceManagement
MicroFinanzaRa.ngBriefProfile
Whoweare
Privateandindependentra.ngagencyspecializedinmicrofinanceandruralfinance
Ra.ngagencyregisteredintheIADBRa.ngandAssessmentFundandintheADAMicrofinanceRa.ngandAssessmentIni.a.ve
HeadquartersareinMilan(Italy)with6officesin4con,nents
Ecuador:coveringLa.nAmerica
Nicaragua:coveringCentralAmerica
Mexico:forMexicanMFIs
Kenya:coveringAfrica KyrgyzRepublic:coveringNIS andCentralAsia
Philippines:coveringAsia
21
Marketcoverage
Morethan480evalua,onsin60countries
LARGESTMARKETSHAREin2007accordingtothelastADA‐KPMG“Ra.ngMarketOutlookReport2008”
MicroFinanzaRa.nghaspioneeredthesocialra.ngformicrofinanceins.tu.ons,developinganinnova.vemethodologywhichincludethedirectcollec.onofclient‐leveldata(55SRconductedsofar).
22
23
TheSocialra,ngprocess
I. Preliminary analysis
Preliminary analysis of basic documents sent by the MFI (financial statements, company profile, other documents, questionnaires sent by Microfinanza Rating).
II. Rating visit
On-site visit of 5-8 days / 10 days for SRC (depending on the size and characteristics of the institution) of two Microfinanza Rating analysts. Activities: interviews and meetings with managers, employees and directors, info collection, visit to the branches, meetings with other relevant actors.
III. Draft report Preparation of a first draft of the report to be submitted to the MFI for feedback.
IV. Final report Preparation of the final rating report after discussion and deliberation by the Rating Committee Unit.
ADARa,ngIni,a,ve:
Providesgrantfundingupto70%oftheSocialra.ngCOST!
SOCIALRa.ng:Co‐fund70%ofafirstra.ngwithamaximumof€11,000forasocialra.ngincludingaclientsurveyand€8,000forasocialra.ngwithoutaclientsurvey.
FINANCIALRa.ng:70%ofafirstperformancera.ngwithanimposedceilingof€8,000and50%ofasecondfinancialra.ngwithanimposedceilingof€6,000
Formoreinfo:h=p://www.ra.ngini.a.ve.org24
Contacts
Thankyou!!!
OurMANILAoffice:Unit34Ca=leyaGardens,111C.PalancaSt.,
LegazpiVillage,1229Maka.CityPhone:+6328173767
Mobile:+63(0)9183500821Email:[email protected]
www.microfinanzarating.com [email protected] 25