D.Ram Mohan Rao
Associate Prof. in MJ Enagg. College, Banjara Hills, Hyd
SOFT WARE APPLICATIONS WATER SUPPLY SYSTEMS
30-06-2012
Guest Lecture
What we designWater supply(? How much is area)How many people?How much Q we supply?What we require to design & implement?What are precautions required?Is my design optimal?
Water flowOpen channel flow
Pipe flow
Peizometric HeadP/r= pressure head(1)
Z=Datum head(2)
Peizo head=(1+2)
We require elevation****Pressure (Pipe flow)Source of elevation SurveyWhat survey?Not you learned in your( BE or B.tech)Why ?
WATER SUPPLYDATAMAP OF AREAPOPULATIONDEMAND PATTERNELEVATIONS(CONTOUR MAP)ROAD NETWORK MAP
SOFT WARES
1)AUTO CAD LAND DEVRLOPMENT
2)RASTER GIS(EG SAGA – GIS)
(To- day case study)
3)EPANET(WATER SUPPLY)
4) MS – EXCEL
5) SWMM
6)SEWER 3.0
7)OTHER COMMERCIAL SOFT WARES
Pipes are aligned only along ROADSWe need road mapWe require demand & supply( source)Treatment ?(WE leave to others)Where to provide storage (Bank, money bank, may be
Yes)
1)AUTO CAD LAND DEVELOPMENTHow is different from AutocadWhat is terrain analysis?What we require?Map & x,y,z co-ordinatesBuild surface from data,ST we know z for any pointDemo?
Open new dwg & nameSave with name closeOpen again with pre hidden folder to create
project(heigher folder)Project contains many folders like cogoSave with same name
1)AUTO CAD LAND DEVRLOPMENT
1)AUTO CAD LAND DEVRLOPMENT
Import pointsImport points (x,y,z) to dwgBuild surfaceSurface has z at all(x,y)So we know z at all points & junctionsInterpolatin mistakes ?
Saga GIS
DIGITAL ELEVATION MODEL NALGONDA TOWN
ZONE OF TANDUR WITH ROAD NETWORK +LEVELS
Surface viewTIN
DEM
CONTOURS (difficult)
TIN
We will see in demo
Creation of DEM
Software for Decision Making for Design of Sewer System
GENERATION OF DEM(X,Y,Z)
FROM FILE SHAPES IMPORT TO SAGA
OBTAIN DEM FOR REQUIRED GRID SIZE
INTER POLATION -YES
DEM OF STUDY AREA
CALUCLATION OF DEMAND
EXCEL EXAMPLE SIMPLE MODELAPPLICATION ON EPANET
DESIGN OF
WATER SUPPLY SYSTEMS
Components of Water Supply SystemComponents of Water Supply System
1. 1. Intake StructureIntake Structure2. Raw water Storage (optional)2. Raw water Storage (optional)
3. Raw water conveyance3. Raw water conveyance4. Treatment Plant4. Treatment Plant
5. Clear water Storage 5. Clear water Storage 6. Clear water conveyance6. Clear water conveyance
7. Distribution System7. Distribution Systemi. Main or Trunk linei. Main or Trunk line
ii. Branch lineii. Branch lineii. Service lineii. Service line
Intake Structure
Raw Water Storage
Raw Water Conveyance
Treatment Plant
Clear Water Storage – GLSR/ELSR
Distribution Network
S. No. Component Design Period in
years
1 Storage by Dams 50
2 Infiltration Works 30
3 Pump House (Civil Works) 30
4 Pump House (Electrical Works) 15
5 WTP 15
6 Raw water and Clear Water Pipes, Pipe connections to treatment units etc
30
7 Service Reservoirs, Clear water reservoirs 15
8 Distribution System 30
Time lag between design and completion of the project should be between two to five years.
Design Period for various components
Design StepsDesign Steps
Population Estimates
Demand Estimates
Zoning
Feeder Mains
Distribution System
Filter plant with all its components
Population Forecasting Population Forecasting
Based on the following factors:
IndustrialCommercialEducationalSocialAdministrative SpheresSpecial factors like sudden immigration and influx
1. Demographic Method: Arithmetic 1. Demographic Method: Arithmetic Balancing is done by considering the births, Balancing is done by considering the births, deaths, migration. The prevailing and deaths, migration. The prevailing and anticipated birth rates and death rates and anticipated birth rates and death rates and the immigration to the city, growth of city the immigration to the city, growth of city area is taken into account.area is taken into account.
2. Arithmetical Increase Method: Applicable 2. Arithmetical Increase Method: Applicable to large and old cities. The method gives to large and old cities. The method gives low valueslow values
Population Forecasting MethodsPopulation Forecasting Methods
3. Incremental Increase Method: The increment 3. Incremental Increase Method: The increment in arithmetical increase is determined from the in arithmetical increase is determined from the past decades and the average is added to the past decades and the average is added to the average increase.average increase.
4. Geometric Increase Method: This method 4. Geometric Increase Method: This method gives much higher values and is used for gives much higher values and is used for growing towns and cities having vast scope for growing towns and cities having vast scope for expansion. In this the percentage increase is expansion. In this the percentage increase is taken as the rate of growth.taken as the rate of growth.
5. Decreasing Rate of Growth Method: Used 5. Decreasing Rate of Growth Method: Used when the rate of percentage increase when the rate of percentage increase decreases. Used in cities where rate of decreases. Used in cities where rate of growth is negativegrowth is negative
6. Graphical Method: Computed either by 6. Graphical Method: Computed either by considering the city in question alone or by considering the city in question alone or by taking similar cities into consideration. The taking similar cities into consideration. The population curve is smoothly extended for population curve is smoothly extended for getting future values. Method of least getting future values. Method of least squares may be used to get the best fit line.squares may be used to get the best fit line.
8. Logistic Method: The complete trend of 8. Logistic Method: The complete trend of growth of the city from beginning to saturation growth of the city from beginning to saturation limit is obtained as a S shaped logistic curve.limit is obtained as a S shaped logistic curve.
9. Method of Density: Sector wise trend in 9. Method of Density: Sector wise trend in rate of density increase is used to project the rate of density increase is used to project the populationpopulation
FINAL FORECAST: After projecting the FINAL FORECAST: After projecting the population a discerning judgment has to be population a discerning judgment has to be made about the zonal increase based upon made about the zonal increase based upon the master plan.the master plan.
Per capita SupplyPer capita Supply
i. Domestic needsi. Domestic needsii. Institutional Needsii. Institutional Needsiii. Public useiii. Public useiv. Industrial and Commercial iv. Industrial and Commercial UseUsev. Fire Fightingv. Fire Fightingvi. Livestock requirementvi. Livestock requirementvii. Minimum permissible vii. Minimum permissible UFWUFW
Maximum Lpcd
1 Towns with piped WS but no Sewerage System
70
2 Cities with piped WS and Sewerage System
135
3 Metropolitan and Mega Cities 150
In urban areas if water is provided through public stand posts 40 LPCD suffices
Unaccounted for Water should be limited to 15%
Demand includes supply to commercial, institutional and minor industries. Bulk supplies to be assessed separately.
Pressure Requirements Pressure Requirements 24 hour supply 24 hour supply recommendedrecommendedIntermittent supplies not Intermittent supplies not desirable from PH point of desirable from PH point of view and economy.view and economy.One Storeyed buildings – 7 One Storeyed buildings – 7 mmTwo storeyed buildings – 12 Two storeyed buildings – 12 mmThree storeyed buildings 17 Three storeyed buildings 17 mm
Transmission of WaterTransmission of Water1. Open Channel Flow1. Open Channel Flow2. Pressure Conduit Flow2. Pressure Conduit FlowMannings formula for open Mannings formula for open channel and Hazen-Williams channel and Hazen-Williams formula for pressure conduits formula for pressure conduits are popularly used.are popularly used.
Distribution System is designed for hourly variation of flow.Peak Factor
challenges
10/09/10
Thank You
51
Sewer System design
Design Period•Design period of 30 years is recommended in the Manual on sewerage And sewage Treatment by CPHEEO, Government of India. •Sewer are deigned for maximum expected discharge to meet the requirement of ultimate population of the area.•Population existing and anticipated in various zones to be served by a particular sewer is arrived at and designs will be carried for it. •Consideration should be given to the pattern of future development as indicated in town planning schemes. •Load coming on sewerage scheme from industrial units should be taken into consideration and capacities of sewer lines increased accordingly.
Population Forecast : •Forecast population for design period by using standard methods and check the same for its validity. •Where population details are not available, the Manual on sewerage, government of India recommends following densities of population
Density of Population Size of town Population
Density of population per hectare
Up to 5,000 75-1505,000-20,000 150-25020,000-50,000 250-30050,000-100,000 300-350above 100,000 350-1000
Carrying CapacityThe carrying capacity of the sewers is designed on the basis of prospective population and taking into consideration that 80% of water supply (manual of sewerage) will reach the sewer, multiplied by the peak factor (the ratio of maximum to average flows).
Peak FactorContributory Population Peak factor Up to 20,000 3.520,000-50,000 2.550,000-7,50,000 2.25Above - 7,50,000 2.0
Recommended Depth of flow in sewers Due to consideration of ventilation in waste water flow, sewers are not designed to run full. Manual on sewerage recommends the following depth of flow :
Size of Sewer Depth of Flow Up to 400mm dia 4/5 depth above 400 mm dia 4/5 depth
Sizes of sewersMinimum size of sewer : As per recommendations the minm. diameter for public sewer shall be 150mm.In hilly areas where steep slopes are prevalent, minimum size may be 100mm
Minimum And Maximum Velocity Sewers should be constructed with gradients which produce self cleaning velocities sufficient to carry forward all solids and avoid settlements. A minimum velocity of 0.6m /sec should reach at least for present peak flows.
The maximum velocity to be permitted is of the order of 3.0 m/sec.
Manholes Manholes should be provided at all places of start of sewer lines, change of direction, change of gradients, change of size and at junction of two or more sewers. The location of manholes should be at convenient places depending upon the size of the sewer lines. Along straight length of sewers, the Manual on Sewerage recommends that the manholes should be so spaced that maximum distance between manholes should not exceed
Spacing of Manholes : Size of Sewer Maximum distance between manholes
Upto 300 mm dia 30 mLarger Sewers may go upto 100 m or moreManholes shall be ensured to be water tight to exclude any infiltration.
for depth 0.8m or less : 0.75m x 0.75mfor depths between 0.8m and 2.10m : 1.20m x 0.9mfor depths more than 2.1m : Circular chambers with a
min. dia of 1.4 m or rectangular chamber with internal dimensions of 1.2m x 0.9m
Shape and Size of Manholes
The minimum internal size of manholes as recommended by IS1742 are as under:
Saga GIS - TANDUR
GENERATION OF GEM FROM POINT FILE(X,Y,Z)EG
POINT FILE FROM AUTOCAD LDDT
HOW TO ALIGN SEWER LINES ?
Saga GIS
PREPARATION OF DEM WITH HELP OF POINT FILE
SURFACE IS CREATED FROM ELEVATION DATA(FROM TOTAL STATION SURVEY(EG))
CHANGE TO X,Y,Z FORMAT WITHHELP OF
MS EXCEL
WHAT IT’S MEANS WHEN ZOOMED
GRID SIZE 50M X 50M
1) POPLLATION OF TOWN OR CITY
DATA REQUIRED
2) PECPITA WATER SUPPLY
3)ROAD LAYOUT MAP
4) Elevation data ANALYSIS ?
5) MAP OF WATER BODIES
PREPROCESSED DEM REMVAL OF PITS
CATCHMENT AREA AND CHANNEL NETWORK
MAP(EG)
SEWER LINES SHOULD FOLLOW NATURAL DRAINAGE PATTERN(EG)
PREPROCESSED DEM ? REMOVAL OF SINKS(EG)
DERIVATION OF CATCHMENTAREA MANY METHODS, PARALLEL PROCESSING
CHANNEL NETWORK RASRER FORMAT
CHANNEL NETWORK RASRER FORMAT
TRANSFERRING TO AUTOCAD
DISCHARGEON ROAD LAYOUT MAP LOCATE MANHOLESMINIMUM DISTANCECHANGE OF ALIGNMENT JUNCTION OF ROADSCEATE POINT FILE FROM AUTOCAD
LDDT,COVERT TO EXCEL
CALUCLATION OF DISCHARGE
Q/M LENGTH=AREA IN SQ KM*POPULATOIN DES/(LENGTH IN M)*C*PCC
EG AREA =10SQ KM ;L=3000M C=0.8;PD=30000/SQKM;PCC=140L/DAY
Q/M=10*30000*0.8*140/3000=1120L/(DAY*M)=1.12CUM M/(DAY*M)
AUTOCAD LDDT
DRAWING AND PROJECT
DIFFERENCE : 2D AND 3D
TERRAIN MODEL EXPLORER
SURFACE MODEL EG
SMALL DEMO
CONTOURS AND TIN
OTHER SOFTWARES
SEWER 3.0
SWMM
SEWERAGE SYSTEM DESIGN PARAMETERS
Allowable FSI : 1.0Number of persons/Ha : 0.7650 x 10000 x 1.0 / 9.0
: 850 persons /haPer capita Water Consumption : 150 lpdPeak Factor : 2.25Adopted Sewer System : SeparateMaximum allowable Velocity in Pipes For SWG pipes : 3.0 m/s For Cement Pipes : 2.5 m/s
Minm. Velocity adopted : 0.45m/s
Adopted pipes : upto 12” dia SWG Pipes: Above 12” dia Cement Pipes
Minm. Depth of Pipe Invert : 1.0mManhole spacing : maximum 40.0 m in straight run
: Average spacing of Manhole locations 15.0mMinm. Diameter adopted : 200 mmLimitation of the System : Capable of carrying only DWF Flow
SUGGESTIONS GIVEN BY THE HMWS & SB
To consider adjoining Panchayatis/ Cantonment Area load if flowing
towards Municipality
Per Capita Water Demand as 150 lpcd instead 100 lpcd for DWF
estimations (Krishna Water Support)
To treat sewage to river standards (BOD < 20mg/l ) before treated
effluent reaches open drains/ lakes)
Design Period as 2031
To ensure existing open Nallahs clear from encroachments if possible to
construct Pucca Open Drains for Storm Water and for treated water
Isolated Sewage Treatment Plants are economical if maintained properly
(Reduces Trunk and Sub Main Dias Significantly)
GREEN HYDERABAD ENVIRONMENT PROGRAMME (GHEP)
87 Lakes were selected for Development in GHEP Project
Two Lakes namely Maisamma Tank and Ranga Raidu were selected for development in Kukatpally Municipality
Development includes Construction of Sewerage Treatment Plant and open drain for surplus water to connect to downstream lake/river/ nallah.
DISPOSAL POINTS IN THE PROJECT INFLUENCE AREA
ZONING SYSTEM FOR PROJECT INFLUENCE AREA
LOCATIONS OF PROPOSED SEWERAGE TRETMENT PLANTS
CRITERIA OXIDATION POND
ASP MOVING BED REACTOR
Rating on scale of 10( Maximum)
COMPACTNESSArea Required
1 5 10
Simplicity 10 3 4
Noise free Operation
10 3 6
Odour free Operation
4 7 10
Variable Hydraulic Loading.
10 3 8
Ease of Sludge handling
4 8 6
Power consumption 10 2 2
Total Rating 7.0 4.42 6.57
STANDARDS FOR SEWERAGE TREATMENT PLANTS/PONDS
Types of Reuse Treatment Water Quality
Agricultural irrigation with restricted access of fodder,fiber, seed crops, sod farms, Pasture land, and areas with restricted public access.
Secondary and chlorination or storage ponds with 25 days of detention time
<30 mg/l BOD, <30 mg/l SS, and <200/100 ml fecal coliforms
Agricultural irrigation of food crops commercially processed and foods eaten raw and irrigation of orchards and vineyards
Surface Irrigation: Secondary,disinfection Spray Irrigation: Secondary,coagulation,filtration,disinfection
<30 mg/l Bod, <30 mg/l SS, and <23/100 ml Fecal Colifoirms <10 mg/l Bod <2 NTU, and <2.2/100 ml fecal coliforms
Urban irrigation with restricted access such as golf courses, cementeries and roadway medians
Secondary and disinfection <10 mg/l BOD, <10 mg/l SS, and <23/100 ml fecal coliforms
Urban reuse with unrestricted access, such as irrigation of parks, residential, and commercial areas
Secondary, coagulation, filtration, disinfection
<10 mg/l BOD, <2 NTU, and <2.2/100 ml fecal coliforms
Industrial reuse for cooling water, pulp and paper, textiles and similar applications
Secondary and disinfection <10 mg/l BOD, <10 mg/l SS, and <23/100 ml fecal coliforms
Groundwater recharge and potable water reuse by subsurface injection and short detention surface water
Secondary, lime coagulation, filtration, carbon adsorption, disinfection and possible reverse osmosis
<0.5 NTU, <2 TOC, <1000 TDS, zero fecal coliforms, and meeting other drinking water standards.
UNDER GROUND SEWERAGE SYSTEM FOR KUKATPALLY MUNICIPALITY
ZONEWISE LENGTHS OF PROPOSED UGD SYSTEM
Group/ Zone
900 mm dia.
750 mm dia.
600 mm dia.
450 mm dia.
300 mm dia.
250 mm dia.
200 mm dia
Total Length
1. Zone-1 11.10 1.10 3.83 6.57 12.05 21.91 23.01 41.09 109.57
2. Zone-2 7.48 0.00 0.69 2.07 6.89 17.90 16.52 24.79 68.85
3. Zone-3 7.36 0.00 0.63 1.90 6.32 16.43 15.17 22.75 63.19
4. Zone-4 7.60 0.00 0.83 2.50 8.32 21.62 19.96 29.94 83.17
5. Zone-5 2.69 0.00 0.00 0.00 4.66 8.15 9.31 16.69 38.81
6. Zone-6 1.22 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.25 2.19 2.51 4.49 10.45
7. Zone-7 0.98 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.29 2.26 2.59 4.64 10.78
8. Zone-8 4.98 0.00 0.61 1.84 6.13 15.95 14.72 22.08 61.34
TOTAL 43.41 1.10 6.60 14.87 46.91 106.43 103.79 166.46 446.16
LENGTH OF PROPOSED SEWERAGE SYSTEM (km.)Sl. No.
Area (Sq.km.)
UNDER GROUND SEWERAGE SYSTEM FOR KUKATPALLY MUNICIPALITY
ESTIMATED COST (SSR 2003-’04, Hyderabad, West Circle)Group/ Zone
900 mm dia.
750 mm dia.
600 mm dia.
450 mm dia.
300 mm dia.
250 mm dia.
200 mm dia
Total
1. Zone-1 11.10 43 141 205 225 238 178 278 1308 368 1677
2. Zone-2 7.48 0 25 64 128 195 128 168 709 248 957
3. Zone-3 7.36 0 23 59 118 179 118 154 650 244 894
4. Zone-4 7.60 0 31 78 155 235 155 202 856 252 1108
5. Zone-5 2.69 0 0 0 87 89 72 113 361 89 450
6. Zone-6 1.22 0 0 0 23 24 19 30 97 40 138
7. Zone-7 0.98 0 0 0 24 25 20 31 100 33 133
8. Zone-8 4.98 0 23 57 114 174 114 149 631 165 796
TOTAL 43.41 43 243 464 875 1158 804 1125 4712 1440 6152
STP Cost - Secondary (Rs. Lakhs)
TOTAL COST
(Rs. Lakhs)
Sl. No.
Area (Sq.km.)
COST OF PROPOSED SEWERAGE SYSTEM (Rs. In Lakhs)
Note : STP proposed is Secondary Level (BOD < 20 mg/l, river/lake standard)
Urban reuse with unrestricted access, such as irrigation of parks, residential, and commercial areas.
FINANCIAL RESOURCES MOBILISATION
Kukatpally Municipality = Rs. 12.00 Cr.
Mega City Fund = Rs. 10.00 Cr.
Users’ Contribution = Rs. 10.00 Cr.
A.P.Government Grant = Rs. 25.00 Cr(Through Sale of open land by District Collector, R.R.District )
GHEP- HUDA = Rs. 5.00 Cr.
TOTAL = Rs. 62.00 Cr.
NOMENCLATURE OF SEWERS
SLDISTANC
ECUM.
NUMBER OF
TRIBUTED
TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL SEWAGE CUMILAT
IVEGROUND
CUM GROUND
ULTIMATE
NOIN
DISTANCE
PLOTSINCREAM
ENTALCUMILAT
IVEPOPULATIO
N
CUM POPULATI
ONFLOW SEWAGE WATER WATER
AVERAGE
FROM TO
(IN Mt.) SERVING AREA AREA(@115
persons/Ha.)
(@ 115 persons/Ha.
)
INCREMNTL @80%
of 125Lt/Cap
ita.
FLOW @80% of
125 Lt/Capita
INFILTRATION @
10000 Ltr/Ha
INFILTRATION @
10000 Ltr/Ha
FLOW
(IN Mtr) (In Hect) MLD MLD IN (MLD) IN (MLD) IN (MLD)
1 2 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 151 2A2B MH12 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.0002 2A2B MH12 MH11 30 30.000 6.562 0.072 0.072 8.301 8.301 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.0023 2A2B MH11 MH10 30 60.000 6.562 0.072 0.144 8.301 16.601 0.001 0.002 0.001 0.001 0.0034 2A2B MH10 MH9 30 90.000 6.562 0.072 0.217 8.301 24.902 0.001 0.002 0.001 0.002 0.0055 2A2B MH9 MH8 30 120.000 6.562 0.072 0.289 8.301 33.202 0.001 0.003 0.001 0.003 0.0066 2A2B MH8 MH7 30 150.000 6.562 0.072 0.361 8.301 41.503 0.001 0.004 0.001 0.004 0.0087 2A2B MH7 MH6 30 180.000 6.562 0.072 0.433 8.301 49.803 0.001 0.005 0.001 0.004 0.0098 2A2B MH6 MH5 30 210.000 6.562 0.072 0.505 8.301 58.104 0.001 0.006 0.001 0.005 0.0119 2A2B MH5 MH4 30 240.000 6.562 0.072 0.577 8.301 66.404 0.001 0.007 0.001 0.006 0.01210 2A2B MH4 MH3 30 270.000 6.562 0.072 0.650 8.301 74.705 0.001 0.007 0.001 0.006 0.01411 2A2B MH3 MH2 30 300.000 6.562 0.072 0.722 8.301 83.005 0.001 0.008 0.001 0.007 0.01612 2B2C MH2 MH1 30 330.000 6.562 0.750 1.472 86.250 169.255 0.009 0.017 0.008 0.015 0.032
DISTANCE
PRESENT FLOW DESIGN CALCULATIONS
SLDISTANC
ECUM.
NUMBER OF
TRIBUTED
TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL SEWAGECUMILAT
IVEGROUND
CUM GROUND
ULTIMATE
NOIN
DISTANCE
PLOTSINCREAM
ENTALCUMILAT
IVEPOPULAT
IONCUMILAT
IVEFLOW SEWAGE WATER WATER
AVERAGE
FROM TO
(IN Mt.) SERVING AREA AREA(@224
persons/Ha.)
POPULATION
INCREMNTL @80%
of 150Lt/Cap
ita.
FLOW @80% of
150 Lt/Capita
INFILTRATION @ 10000 Ltr/Ha
INFILTRATION @ 10000 Ltr/Ha
FLOW
(IN Mtr) (In Hect) SERVING SERVING MLD IN (MLD) IN (MLD) IN (MLD)
1 2 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 17 18 19 20 21 22 231 2A2B MH12 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0 0.000 0.0000 0.000 0.0000 0.000 0.00002 2A2B MH12 MH11 30 30.000 6.562 0.072 0.072 18 18.261 0.0022 0.002 0.0007 0.001 0.00293 2A2B MH11 MH10 30 60.000 6.562 0.072 0.144 18 36.522 0.0022 0.004 0.0007 0.001 0.00584 2A2B MH10 MH9 30 90.000 6.562 0.072 0.217 18 54.783 0.0022 0.007 0.0007 0.002 0.00875 2A2B MH9 MH8 30 120.000 6.562 0.072 0.289 18 73.045 0.0022 0.009 0.0007 0.003 0.01176 2A2B MH8 MH7 30 150.000 6.562 0.072 0.361 18 91.306 0.0022 0.011 0.0007 0.004 0.01467 2A2B MH7 MH6 30 180.000 6.562 0.072 0.433 18 109.567 0.0022 0.013 0.0007 0.004 0.01758 2A2B MH6 MH5 30 210.000 6.562 0.072 0.505 18 127.828 0.0022 0.015 0.0007 0.005 0.02049 2A2B MH5 MH4 30 240.000 6.562 0.072 0.577 18 146.089 0.0022 0.018 0.0007 0.006 0.023310 2A2B MH4 MH3 30 270.000 6.562 0.072 0.650 18 164.350 0.0022 0.020 0.0007 0.006 0.026211 2A2B MH3 MH2 30 300.000 6.562 0.072 0.722 18 182.612 0.0022 0.022 0.0007 0.007 0.029112 2B2C MH2 MH1 30 330.000 6.562 0.750 1.472 190 372.362 0.0228 0.045 0.0075 0.015 0.0594
DISTANCE
PROJECTED FLOW DESIGN CALCULATIONS
Column – 2: MANHOLE NUMBER OF UPSTREAM POINT – MH 12
Column – 3: MANHOLE NUMBER OF DOWNSTREAM POINT – MH 11
Column – 4: DISTANCE BETWEEN THE MANHOLES – 30 mt
Column – 5: CUMULATIVE DISTANCE BETWEEN THE POINTS – 30 mt
Column – 6: NUMBER OF PLOTS
ASSUMING EACH PLOT SIZE 40’ X 30’
FOR ONE PLOT = 30 X .3048 = 9.14 mt
NO. OF PLOTS = 30’ X .3048 X 30 mt
FOR 30 mts = 30/9.144 = 3.28 No’s
CONSIDERING PLOTS ON BOTH SIDES OF THE ROAD
SO 3.28 X 2 = 6.56 No’s
COLUMN – 7: AREA OF PLOT PER HECTARE = 30’ X 40’ X .3048 X .3048/10000 = .011 HecSO TOTAL AREA CONTRIBUTED IN THAT SEWER = .011 X 6.56 = 0.072 Hec
COLUMN – 8: CUMULATIVE AREA CONTRIBUTE
COLUMN – 9: PRESENT POPULATIONPOPULATION DENSITYTOTAL POPULATION OF THE ZONE / TOTAL AREA OF THE SLUM = TOTAL AREA IS 8000 HECTARES TOTAL POPULATION IS 70 PERSONSPOPULATION DENSITY = 80 X 70 = 115 PERSONS PER HECTARE NUMBER OF PERSONS ALONG THAT SEWER = 0.072 X 115 = 8.28 PERSONS
COLUMN – 10: CUMULATIVE POPULATIONCOLUMN – 11: CONSIDERING PERCAPITA DEMAND 150 LPCD
80% OF 150 LPCD WILL COME TO THE SEWER = 80% X 150 = 120 Lts.
COLUMN – 11: CONSIDERING PERCAPITA DEMAND 150 LPCD 80% OF 150 LPCD WILL COME TO THE SEWER = 80% X 150 = 120 Lts. TOTAL SEWER CONTRIBUTE = 120 LPCD X 8.3 = 997.2 Lts. = 0.000997 MLD
COLUMN – 12: CUMULATIVE SEWAGECOLUMN – 13: GROUND WATER INFILTRATION
CONSIDERING GROUND WATER INFILTRATION 10,000 Lts. PER HECTARE 0.072 X 10,000 = 720 Lts. PER HECTARE = 0.00072 MLD
COLUMN – 14: CUMULATIVE GROUND WATER INFILTRATIONCOLUMN – 15: TOTAL SEWAGE = COLUMN 14 + COLUMN 12COLUMN – 16: CONSIDERING PEAK FACTOR AS 2.25
ULTIMATE PEAK FLOW = COLUMN 12 X 2.25 + COLUMN 14 0.000997 X 2.25 + 0.00072 = 0.00296 MLD
CALCULATIONS FOR PROJECTED POPULATIONS
COLUMN 1 TO 8 SAME AS ABOVECOLUMN – 17: PROJECTED POPULATION
CONSIDERING RATE GROWTH AS 25% AND DESIGN PERIOD OF 30 YEARS AS PRESENT POPULATION DENSITY = 150 PERSON PER HECTARE PROJECTED POPULATION = 150 X 1.25 X 1.25 X 1.25 = 225 PERSONS PER HECTARE
COLUMN – 18: CUMULATIVE POPULATIONCOLUMN – 19: SEWAGE CONTRIBUTION FOR PROJECTED POPULATION
225 X 120 = 27,000 = 0.027 MLDCOLUMN – 20: CUMULATIVE SEWAGECOLUMN – 21: SAME AS COLUMN 13COLUMN – 22: SAME AS COLUMN 14
COLUMN – 23: ULTIMATE SEWAGE FLOWCOLUMN – 24: CONSIDERING PEAK FACTOR AS 2.25 X COLUMN 19 + COLUMN 13
= 2.25 X 0.0027 + 0.00072 = 0.0061 MLDHYDRAULIC CALCULATIONS
CALCULATE THE SLOPE ACCORDING THE GROUND CONDITIONS IN THIS CASE ASSUMING SLOPE AS 200 TAKING MINIMUM DIAMETER AS PER CPHEEO 200 mm
AS THE FLOW IS OPEN CHANNEL FLOW CONSIDER MANNINGS EQUATION I.e. V = 1/n R2/3 S1/2
n = 0.013SLOPE = 1/200 = 0.0005R = A/P A = AREA OF SEWER = 3.14 / 4 X 0.2 X 0.2 = 0.0314P = WETTED PERIMETER = 3.14 X 0.2 = 0.628A/P = 0.05A/P^2/3 = 0.135S^1/2 = 0.07V = 1/0.013 X 0.07 X 0.135 = 0.726Q FULL = DISCHARGE = V X A
0.726 X 0.0314 = 0.022 CUM / SEC
Q ACTUAL FOR PRESENT = 0.00296 X 1000/24 X 3600 = 0.000034 CUM/SECQ ACTUAL / Q FULL = 0.000034/0.022 = 0.0015 v/V = 0.3d/D = 0.07SELF CLEANING VELOCITY = v/V X V = 0.07 X 0.726 =0.22
Q ACTUAL FOR PROJECTED = 0.0061 MLD = .0061 X 1000 / 24 X 60 X 60 = 0.000072 CUM/SECQ ACTUAL / Q FULL = 0.003
FROM THE TABLE S d/D = 0.30 v/V = 0.07
SELF CLEANING VELOCITY FOR PROJECTED = 0.51 X 0.564 = 0.22
Pre-Construction Tests1. Diameter of pipe 7. Brick Size2. Length of pipe. 8. Brick Strength.3. Strength of pipe. 9. FRC Frame and Cover.4. Acid Resistance. 10. FRC Frame and Cover Strength.5. Alkali Resistance. 11. Cement Quality.6. Water Absorption. 12. Sand Quality.
Post- Construction Tests.1. Edge protection and finishing of manhole cover, /frames & Covers.2. Lifting Hooks.3. Load Test.
Scale of sampling for load test DimensionRequirment Upto 100 manholes 2 10101 to 200 3 15201 to 300 4 20301 to 500 5 30
4. Water flow test5. Ball test6. Smoke test
PRACTICAL HINTS FOR DESIGNING A SEWERAGE SCHEME
General : While designing a sewerage system, the following points should kept in view :
(a)the out –fall point should be very carefully selected first and then adhered to strictly. While selecting the out fall points, the direction of wind should also be kept in view so that waft of bad odour are avoided. All town improvement and town planning schemes should be carefully considered so that shifting of out-fall point with the growth of town in that directions is avoided.(b)The scheme should be started from out fall end so that sewers may be utilized from the beginning, thus ensuring that the functioning of scheme has not to wait for till the completion of the entire scheme.(c) The scheme should be planned in progressive stages so that investment yield benefits from the beginning. To ensure that various stages fit in the main scheme, the scheme should be planned as a whole and various stages worked out thereafter.(d)Method of treatment or disposal should be decided while preparing the project, instead of postponing it till the completion of the scheme.(e)Sewerage should not be introduced without ensuring adequate water supply.
Thank You(visit us at [email protected])
USE OF AUTOCAD LDTMAKING OF PJOJECTCREATE POINTS OPTIONIMPORTCREATE SURFACECREATE CONTOURSEXPORT POINTS