Soil Mound Remediation Strategy Area B CV31 3TA

Soil Mound Remediation Strategy

Area B Spa Park

Leamington Spa CV31 3TA

Prepared for: BlackRock

London

Prepared by: ENVIRON Bath, UK

Date: April 2014

Project or Issue Number:

UK14-19583

Contract No: UK14-18523 Issue: 4 Author Jo McKay (signature): Project Manager/Director Andy Goddard (signature): Date: April 2014

This report has been prepared by ENVIRON with all reasonable skill, care and

diligence, and taking account of the Services and the Terms agreed between

ENVIRON and the Client. This report is confidential to the client, and ENVIRON

accepts no responsibility whatsoever to third parties to whom this report, or any

part thereof, is made known, unless formally agreed by ENVIRON beforehand.

Any such party relies upon the report at their own risk.

ENVIRON disclaims any responsibility to the Client and others in respect of any

matters outside the agreed scope of the Services.

Version Control Record

Issue Description of Status Date Reviewer Initials

Author Initials

4 Fourth Issue 22/04/14 AG JM

BlackRock Remediation Options Appraisal and Strategy

Area B, Spa Park

UK14-19583 Issue: 4 ENVIRON

Contents

1 Introduction 1

Background 1 1.1

Objectives 1 1.2

Report Layout 1 1.3

Regulatory Authorities 2 1.4

2 Site Description 3

Site Location 3 2.1

Summary of Past Work 3 2.2

3 Ground Conditions 5

Soil Mound 5 3.1

Area B 5 3.2

4 Conceptual Site Model Review 7

Contaminant Sources 7 4.1

Receptors 7 4.2

Pathways 7 4.3

5 Remediation Options Appraisal 8

Introduction 8 5.1

Sustainable Remediation 8 5.2

Remedial Options 8 5.3

Options Appraisal Outcome 13 5.4

6 Remediation Strategy 14

Current Guidance for the Remediation of Asbestos in Soils 14 6.1

Approach 14 6.2

Enabling Works 15 6.3

Extent of Area Requiring Remediation 16 6.4

Remediation Works 17 6.5

Site Security 19 6.6

7 Remediation Management 21

Health & Safety 21 7.1

Environmental Management of Remediation Activities 21 7.2

8 Verification Process & Plan 25

Outline 25 8.1

Verification Plan 25 8.2

Verification Report Layout 26 8.3

Annex A: Figures


Area B, Spa Park


Annex B: Trial Pit Logs

Annex C: Photographic Log

Annex D: Analytical Results

BlackRock Area B, Spa Park

UK14-19583 Issue: 4 1 ENVIRON

1 Introduction

Background 1.1

ENVIRON UK Limited (ENVIRON) was commissioned by BlackRock Inc. to produce a Remediation Options Appraisal and Remediation Strategy for asbestos contaminated soil identified in the mound located at Area B, Spa Park, Leamington Spa, CV31 3TA.

The strategy follows legislation and guidance for assessing and remediating potentially contaminated land, including Part 2A of the Environmental Protection Act 1990 and Contaminated Land Report 11: Model Procedures for the Management of Land Contamination (CLR11, EA & DEFRA, 2004) and CIRIA guidance document ‘Asbestos in Soil and Made Ground: a guide to understanding and managing risks (C733)’.

A significant theme in legislation and guidance is the need for remediation work to be sustainable and take into consideration environmental, economic and social factors. This theme is reinforced in recent guidance and legislation that was introduced in 2012, including the National Planning Policy Framework and new Part 2A statutory guidance.

The soil mound has been investigated and assessed during historical site investigations. This has included sampling and analysis. The previous site characterisation works for the soil mound are summarised in Section 2 of this report.

Objectives 1.2

The objectives of the remediation strategy and options appraisal are:

to mitigate risks to human health from the presence of identified asbestos contamination within the soil mound;

to consider plausible source-pathway-receptor linkages in the context of statutory guidance under Part 2A of the Environmental Protection Act (1990);

to assess the feasibility of the different remedial techniques which could be used to address the asbestos contamination; and

identify the most appropriate technical option which takes into consideration environmental, economic and social factors.

Report Layout 1.3

This remediation strategy report comprises the following section:

Section 1: Introduction

Section 2: Review of past investigations and risk assessments

Section 3: Ground condition of the soil mound and wider site area

Section 4: Conceptual Site Model review

Section 5: Remediation options appraisal

Section 6: Remedial strategy for the soil mound

Section 7: Remediation management

Section 8: Verification plan



Regulatory Authorities 1.4

This report is based on ENVIRON’s experience of similar remediation projects and typical regulatory requirements. ENVIRON has not approached the local authority for approval of the remediation strategy at this stage.

On behalf of BlackRock, ENVIRON has engaged Pegasus Planning Group to prepare a planning application for the remediation works.

Due to the presence of asbestos within the soil mound and in order to comply with Regulation 3(2) of the Control of Asbestos Regulations 2012, notification of the remediation work to the Health and Safety Executive (HSE) will be required. Notification in writing to the HSE is required at least 14 days before commencing the work.



2 Site Description

Site Location 2.1

The site is situated in a mixed industrial and residential area on the southern outskirts of Leamington Spa. The site is roughly ‘L’ shaped and occupies an area of 12.4 hectares.

Area B has had a mainly industrial use since the 1960s and activities which currently take place at the site include manufacturing of clutches and brakes by three tenants (Delphi, Caparo and Raican Clutch Ltd).

The soil mound is located within the Delphi car park in the north-west section of the site. The origin of the soil and waste materials in the mound is not known, but it is assumed to comprise waste materials derived from the site, including demolition materials. The site layout is shown in Figure 2, Annex A.

Summary of Past Work 2.2

A number of historical environmental reports have been undertaken for Spa Park, which have included intrusive site investigation work at Area B of the site. Most recently, ENVIRON has undertaken two stages of site investigation in 2008 and 2012 which included characterisation of the mound. This section provides a background to the site and summarises the points that are relevant to the remediation strategy and is not a full review of past work. The relevant reports include:

Phase I Review and Limited Scope Phase II Site Investigation, Phase B Spa Park, ENVIRON, September 2008 (report ref: 65-C13745);

Phase I Environmental Assessment, Area B Spa Park, ENVIRON, January 2012 (report ref: UK14-17439); and

Phase II Environmental Site Investigation, Area B Spa Park, ENVIRON, April 2012.

2.2.1 Phase I Review and Limited Phase II Investigation, 2008

ENVIRON was commissioned by a client to undertake a Phase I and Phase II at ‘Area B’ in 2008. The site inspection at the time identified the vegetated mound within the Delphi car park in the north-west section of Area B surrounded by a fence. The mound was reported to occupy an area of approximately 1,800m2 and was estimated to be 5m in height towards the centre of the mound. Anecdotal information suggested that various waste materials were present in the mound, including clutch pads and assorted car components.

Site investigation of the soil mound included six trial pits to a maximum depth of 3m bgl in order to characterise the mound. Soil samples were analysed for a range of contaminants, including pH, phenol, cyanide, sulphate, a range of metals, polyaromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), total petroleum hydrocarbons (TPH), volatile organic compounds (VOCs), asbestos, polychlorinated biphenyl (PCBs). 12 soil samples were collected from the soil mound.

Within soil samples collected from the soil mound, slightly elevated concentrations above the Method Reporting Limit (MRL) of total petroleum hydrocarbons TPH (max. of 1,400mg/kg), PAHs (max. of 0.32mg/kg of fluoranthene) and cyanide (max. of 14mg/kg) were recorded and a single concentration of PCBs (0.154mg/kg) and 1,2,3-trichlorobenzene was recorded (0.34mg/kg). However, all concentrations were recorded below ‘Tier 1 screening values’ for a commercial end-use and the soil mound was not considered to pose a significant risk to human health whilst in its current layout.



Asbestos fibres (chrysotile only) were recorded within two samples taken from suspected asbestos containing material (ACMs) in the soil mound. This related to a fragment of asbestos cement (TP5 at 0.5m depth) and bituminous board (TP1 at 0.5m depth). No asbestos fibres were identified in soil samples. Given that the mound is fenced to prevent access and asbestos was recorded beneath the vegetative cover, the ACMs were not considered to pose a significant risk to site users whilst remaining in its configuration at the time of the investigation.

2.2.2 Phase I Assessment, 2012

ENVIRON was commissioned by BlackRock Inc. to carry out an environmental assessment of Area B.

Facility personnel reported that the mound contained demolition material and was noted during the inspection to include large fragments of concrete, metal and other debris.

The soil mound was identified as potential area of concern (‘PAOC’) and it was recommended that it be included within a site investigation to assess the contents.

2.2.3 Phase II Investigation, 2012

The site investigation was undertaken in March 2012 and included six trial pits to a maximum depth of 4m bgl within the soil mound. Soil samples were analysed for a range of potential contaminants , including pH, a range of metals, sulphate, total cyanide, PAHs, speciated TPH (TPH CWG), asbestos, total organic carbon (TOC), VOCs and semi-volatile organic compounds (SVOCs). 11 soil samples were collected from the soil mound.

Within soil samples collected from the soil mound, all determinands (with the exception of asbestos) were recorded at concentrations below the respective Generic Assessment Criteria (GAC) for a commercial use. However, asbestos was identified in ten samples, typically as free fibres (including chrysotile and amosite), and locally as fragments of lagging and asbestos cement. It was reported that the mound is fenced off and site personnel do not access this area of the site, however; a theoretical risk of windblown dust containing asbestos fibres was identified.



3 Ground Conditions

The ground conditions identified during previous site investigations are summarised below to assist the prospective remediation contractors with their understanding of current site conditions. Trial pit logs for the soil mound which were undertaken as part of the site investigations in 2008 and 2012 are presented in Annex B and the trial pit locations are presented in Figure 3, Annex A. Photographs of the mound are presented in Annex C.

Soil Mound 3.1

Made Ground within the soil mound has been identified as comprising sand gravelly silt with varying proportions of demolition type materials, including fragments of brick, concrete, masonry, tiles, ceramic, white ware, metal sheets and wire, textile, glass, plastics, ash and clinker. One empty five litre rusty metal tin of ‘machine finish’ was also identified in 2008.

In addition, samples from potential ACMs were collected in 2008 which were confirmed to contain asbestos, including part of gasket and pipe. Analysis of soil samples in 2012 confirmed the presence of asbestos fibres within the majority of samples, typically as free fibres (including chrysotile and amosite), and locally as fragments of lagging and asbestos cement.

The thickness of the soil mound was not proven to the top of the mound during the two phases of investigation. The maximum recorded thickness was recorded as being 4m bgl in 2012 and visual observations indicate that the thickness of the mound may reach up to 5m bgl.

Natural strata was encountered beneath the mound at three trial pits locations in the western section of the mound at depths of approximately 2m bgl. The natural strata comprised sandy slightly gravelly silt to clay (Alluvium/Superficial Deposits). No visual evidence of contamination was observed within the natural ground beneath the mound.

Area B 3.2

In summary, the site geology encountered during the two stages of investigation comprised the following:

Made Ground – typically comprising asphalt or concrete underlain by brown sand and gravel underlain by dark brown firm clay to a maximum depth of 1.3m bgl.

Alluvium/Superficial Deposits – encountered in the north of the site only including land within the vicinity of the soil mound. The alluvium typically comprised silt to clay encountered to depths of between 1.3m bgl to 2.6m bgl.

River Terrace Deposits (Secondary A Aquifer) – encountered in the east and centre of the site and typically comprised red brown gravelly sand with occasional lenses of clay and bands of coarse gravel. The River Terrace Deposits were encountered to a maximum depth of 6.5m bgl.

Mercia Mudstone (Secondary B Aquifer) – encountered beneath the Alluvium or River Terrace Deposits as stiff red brown clay (weathered mudstone) which tended towards a stronger mudstone with depth. The Mercia Mudstone was proven to a maximum depth of 10m bgl.

The Mercia Mudstone is further underlain by Bromsgrove Sandstone (a Principal Aquifer), which is present at approximately 70m bgl in the vicinity of the site.



Perched groundwater was not encountered during the site investigation in the area of the soil mound. Groundwater was typically encountered during the site investigation of the wider Area B within the River Terrace Deposits from approximately 2.4m bgl. Localised shallow groundwater was encountered during drilling at approximately 2.3m bgl within the alluvial deposits in the north of the site. Rest groundwater levels were recorded in 2012 at depths of between 1.6m bgl and 3.48m bgl. Groundwater monitoring indicates an overall groundwater flow towards the north-west within the River Terrace Deposits and towards the west within the Mercia Mudstone; however, flow direction appears to vary in the vicinity of the Raicam and Delphi facilities.

The nearest surface water features to the site are an unnamed drainage ditch adjacent to the Delphi northern border (this is approximately 100m north of the soil mound) and the Myton Queensway Brook located approximately 255m north-west of the site. The drainage ditch is considered too shallow to be in continuity with the underlying groundwater. Groundwater within the River Terrace Deposits is considered likely to be continuity with the Myton Queensway Brook.



4 Conceptual Site Model Review

A conceptual site model (CSM) for the site was completed by ENVIRON in 2012 as part of the Phase II site investigation report. The CSM is based on the investigations and risk assessments which have been carried out at the site.

The conceptual site model follows the contaminant-pathway-receptor philosophy that is a main principle of UK guidance and legislation. The conceptual site model presented in this section provides the basis of the remediation strategy and focuses on the potential impacts to human health from asbestos fibres.

Contaminant Sources 4.1On the basis of the site investigation, the following contaminant source was identified associated with the soil mound:

Asbestos free fibres and fragments of asbestos lagging and cement within the soil mound.

Receptors 4.2

Based on a continued commercial site use, the identified receptors are current and future commercial site users.

Only marginal exceedances of the water environment GAC were noted as part of the laboratory leachability analysis of soil samples from the mound, and the actual risks to groundwater underlying the soil mound are considered to be low, given the low permeability of the underlying natural ground (alluvium/superficial deposits).

The nearest surface watercourse is an unnamed drainage ditch located approximately 100m north of soil mound. Given the distance to the soil mound and the type of contaminants detected (asbestos fibres) there is not a plausible pathway to the surface watercourse.

Pathways 4.3

The pathway considered in this remediation strategy is the inhalation of windblown dust containing asbestos fibres.

All other contaminants in soils from the mound were below human health GAC and not considered to pose a risk to commercial site users.



5 Remediation Options Appraisal

Introduction 5.1

In accordance with UK guidance, the remediation options appraisal builds on the conceptual site model to ensure that the remediation approach and technologies consider the following objectives:

remediation is sustainable in the context of environmental, social and economic factors;

technical feasibility of available remediation options; and

consideration of identified pollutant linkages by the conceptual site model.

Sustainable Remediation 5.2

A sustainable remediation approach is ‘the practice of demonstrating, in terms of environmental, economic and social indicators, that the benefit of undertaking remediation is greater than its impact and that the optimum remediation solution is selected through the use of a balanced decision-making process.1’

ENVIRON has followed legislation and good practice to design a sustainable remediation strategy that balances environmental, social and economic factors in order to:

effectively manage the contamination risks;

minimise impact of the remediation on the environment and surrounding communities; and

consider the environmental and economic effects of remediation and maximising the net environmental benefit of clean-up actions.

Remedial Options 5.3

A wide range of potential remedial options for dealing with contaminated land are available, which fall into four main categories: physical, chemical, biological and thermal. The remediation options are used to either reduce contamination concentrations to acceptable levels, therefore reducing risks to identified receptors, or to break the pathways identified between the contamination and the receptors.

Table 4.1 reviews the main remediation options available for the soil mound and discusses the feasibility of each option in terms of sustainability and technical feasibility.

1 A Framework for Assessing the Sustainability of Soil and Groundwater Remediation, Sustainable

Remediation Forum UK (SuRF), March 2010



Table 4.1: Remediation Options Appraisal

Remediation Option

Sustainable Indicators Technical Feasibility Overall Feasibility of

Option Environmental Social Economic

Physical Options

Capping The placement of an impermeable capping layer (e.g. concrete) over the mound would isolate the asbestos contaminated soil from both windblown fibre and direct contact.

Noise, plant, machinery and traffic movements required to place capping layer which may cause impact.

By keeping the soil mound in-situ, this area of the site would remain unusable by site personnel.

There are costs involved in importing and placing a quantity of material as a capping layer; however, this option could be more cost effective than disposal or treatment of contaminated soil.

Capping the soil mound would successfully break the pathway between contaminated soil and site users.

However, given the height of the soil mound (approximately 4 to 5m at the centre), the use of a capping layer would result in this area of the site remaining unusable by tenants and future costs may be incurred if this area of the site is redeveloped in the future.

Low Feasibility – Based on the height of the mound and potential future issues that may arise.

Excavation and Disposal

The technique would remove the identified asbestos contaminated soil from the site and move it to a an engineered waste disposal site.

A proportion of the excavated material will require disposal as hazardous waste.

Potential short term impacts to tenants and local community through potential noise and dust during excavation and haulage.

However, excavation and disposal can be carried out reasonably quickly, dust can be mitigated and this area of the site would become usable in the future by tenants.

Excavation can be an expensive due to landfill costs, and if additional localised contamination be encountered during remedial work, costs can potentially increase.

However, segregation of the potentially contaminated materials during excavation work will reduce the overall costs.

Excavation of the soil mound would result in the removal of the contamination source and this area of the site would become accessible by tenants for potential future use.

Substantial disposal costs may be involved, however, by segregating the inert materials in the mound (i.e. larger fragments of concrete, brick and other demolition materials), the percentage of the mound that would be disposed as hazardous waste would be kept to a minimum.

Feasible – Considered feasible for removing the contamination source and enabling future re-use of this area by tenants.

This option is discussed further in Section 6.




Remediation Option



Soil Washing Soil washing could be used to concentrate the fines in the soil, which may remove a proportion of the asbestos fibres. However, complete removal of the asbestos cannot be guaranteed. A relatively large area of the site would be needed to house the soil washing plant and waste water would need to be managed, treated and disposed.

Soil washing plant would increase the time period of the works, increasing potential noise and traffic impacts

The use of soil washing could be cost effective in reducing the amount of asbestos in the mound, but the mound would still remain, The presence of the mound limits the use of the site and the potential for redevelopment in the future.

Due to the type of contaminants at the site (i.e. asbestos fibres), soil washing is not considered to be a viable technique.

Low Feasibility

Stabilisation and Solidification Methods

Solidification Technique can be used to reduce the mobility of asbestos fibres in the soil mound by binding the material to a solid matrix which will retain the loose fibres securely and prevent them from escaping into the air.

This technology will would require plant machinery and equipment with impacts through noise and traffic movements.

By keeping the soil mound in-situ, this area of the site would remain unusable by

Costs involved in the quantity of binding material required and in-situ techniques (i.e. rotary auger or jet injection).

Method could be more cost effective that disposal or treatment of contaminated soil. However, the mound

Theoretically, this option could successfully break the pathway between contaminated soil and site users. However, this area of the site would remain unusable by tenants and future costs may be incurred if redevelopment takes place which requires re-profiling of the soil mound.

Treatment of the soils using this method would be hampered by the presence of large items of demolition materials within

Low Feasibility




Remediation Option



site personnel. would still remain on site limiting the use of this part of the site and the potential for redevelopment I the future.

the soil mound.

Vitrification The material from the soil mound would be mixed with glass cullet (scrap glass) or glass forming material and heated in a furnace to melt asbestos. On cooling the mixture forms a dense glass-like material which does not contain fibres.

Noise, plant, machinery and traffic movements may impact local community.

The inert glass produced can be recycled for other uses such as aggregate for construction.

Method is energy inefficient and costly.

The treatment of asbestos fibres by this technique would be hampered by the large quantity of demolition materials present in the soil mound.

Not considered a viable technique due to the expense of setting up the vitrification plant on site and energy costs to run the plant.

Low Feasibility

Chemical Options

Chemical Oxidation Chemical oxidation is not a viable technique used to treat asbestos in soils.

Chemical oxidation is not a viable technique used to treat asbestos in soils.

Chemical oxidation is not a viable technique used to treat asbestos in soils.

Due to the type of contaminants at the site (i.e. asbestos fibres), chemical oxidation is not a viable technique.

Not Viable

Biological Options

Bioremediation Bioremediation methods are not viable techniques used to

Bioremediation methods are not viable techniques used to

Bioremediation methods are not viable techniques used to

Due to the type of contaminants at the site (i.e. asbestos fibres), biological options are not a viable technique.

Not Viable




Remediation Option



treat asbestos fibres. treat asbestos fibres. treat asbestos fibres.

Thermal Options

Incineration All inorganic materials including asbestos can be treated using this method.

Remaining end product would be an ash material that can be stabilised and reused as a sub-base material or disposed to landfill.

Public perception of incineration has historically been negative and permission may be difficult to obtain.

Exhaust emissions produced can include acid gases (including dioxins and furans) which are considered to be serious health hazards.

Noise, plant, machinery and traffic movements may impact local community.

The cost would be prohibitive.

A significant area would be required for placement of the incinerator and stockpiling of the excavated soil.

Not considered a viable technique due to the prohibitive cost.

Not Viable

Thermal Desorption Thermal desorption is not a viable technique to treat asbestos fibres.

Thermal desorption is not a viable technique to treat asbestos fibres.

Thermal desorption is not a viable technique to treat asbestos fibres.

Due to the type of contaminants at the site (i.e. asbestos fibres), thermal desorption is not a viable technique.

Not Viable



Options Appraisal Outcome 5.4

Based on the sustainability and technical appraisals discussed in Table 5.1 above, and to meet the objectives required of the conceptual site model, the most appropriate remediation method is excavation of the soil mound followed by disposal off-site.

Segregation of the material in the soil mound from the soil based ‘fines’ which are likely to contain asbestos fibres and the larger demolition materials (e.g. bricks, concrete, etc.) will be used where possible to reduce the amount of material disposed as hazardous waste.



6 Remediation Strategy

Current Guidance for the Remediation of Asbestos in Soils 6.1

There are currently a number of guidance documents covering the various aspects of asbestos assessment and management in accordance with the Control of Asbestos Regulations 2012. However, the majority of guidance is aimed at compliance with regards to asbestos materials within buildings rather than in soil.

A new CIRIA guidance document ‘Asbestos in Soil and Made Ground: a guide to understanding and managing risks (C733)’ was published in April 2014 (following the issue of previous versions of this report) and has been referred to for the remediation strategy approach outlined in this report. This guidance was developed alongside CL:AIRE and the Environmental Industries Commission (EIC) and aims to improve confidence and performance of risk assessment and risk management on site’s with asbestos containing soils.

Additional asbestos guidance documents which have been referred to in the development of this remediation strategy, include:

Managing and Working with Asbestos – Control of Asbestos Regulations 2012 Approved Code of Practice and Guidance, HSE, L143 (2013);

Site Investigation Asbestos Risk Assessment for the protection of Site Investigation and geotechnical Laboratory Personnel, AGS Interim Guidance (2013); and

ICRCL Guidance Note 64/85: Asbestos on Contaminated Sites (1990).

Approach 6.2

In addition to guidance relating to asbestos, the remediation approach will also be undertaken in accordance with relevant construction industry practices, Environment Agency (EA) guidance and industry-accepted standards of ‘good working practice’ including but not limited to, the following:

Environmental Protection (Duty of Care) Regulations 1991 SI 2839;

Hazardous Waste (England and Wales) (Amendment) Regulations 2009 SI 507;

Hazardous Waste (England and Wales) Regulations 2005 SI 894 & Amendments;

Control of Pollution (Oil Storage) (England) Regulations 2001 SI 2954;

Construction (Design and Management) Regulations 2007;

Health and Safety at Work Act 1974;

The Workplace (Health, Safety and Welfare) Regulations 1992;

Control of Noise at Work Regulations 2005;

Control of Substances Hazardous to Health Regulations 2002 (CoSHH);

Water Resources Act 1990 (Part III);

Management of Health and Safety at Work Regulations 1998;

Personal Protective Equipment Regulations 1992;

Environment Agency: Model Procedures for the Management of Contaminated Land (CLR 11) EA (2004);

Environment Agency: Verification of remediation of land contamination - Science Report NC/00/38/SR (2010) & Project Summary SC030114/R1;



CIRIA: R132 Guide to Safe Working on Contaminated Sites (1996);

CIRIA: C532 Control of Pollution from Construction Sites;

CIRIA: Waste Minimisation and Recycling in Construction – A Site Handbook: SP133;

CIRA: Managing Materials and Components On-Site: SP146;

CIRIA: C692 Environmental Good Practice On-Site (2010);

Environment Agency: PPG5 Works and maintenance in or near water (2007);

Environment Agency: PPG6 Working at Construction and Demolition Sites (2012);

DEFRA: Non Statutory Guidance for Waste Management Plans (April 2008);

BS 5930: 1999 Code of practice for site investigations;

BS10175:2011 Investigation of Potentially Contaminated Sites; and

Manual of Contract Documents for Highway Works, Series 600, Highways Agency.

Enabling Works 6.3

6.3.1 Enabling Works Oversight

BlackRock will employ an environmental consultant to oversee the remedial activities. The objective of the oversight role will be to interact closely with the remediation contractor, to ensure that their systems of work, monitoring, recording and verification processes are consistent with the detailed requirements of the remediation strategy. The contractor will be responsible for compliance with regulatory and other relevant guidance referenced in the strategy.

The scope of the oversight role will comprise:

1. Preliminary Work: review and comment upon the contractor’s tender submission, programme of work, method statements and overall remediation strategy compliance in advance of commencing works site.

2. Remediation Oversight:

Regular meetings with the remediation contractor together with regular site inspections to monitor the progress of works and to check the remediation contractors’ performance against the overall scope, the prescribed methods and programme;

Documented reporting to BlackRock in relation to progress including as to any non-compliance and rectification measures on the part of the contractors; and

Review of the validation process during the works to ensure the completed excavation work has been properly validated and that materials proposed for re-use (if applicable) and any imported sub-base material are also properly validated.

3. Review of the Verification Report: review of the contactor’s verification report against the requirements listed in Section 8 of this strategy report.

6.3.2 Permits and Licenses

Due to the presence of asbestos within the soil mound and in order to comply with Regulation 3(2) of the Control of Asbestos Regulations 2012, notification of the remediation work to the Health and Safety Executive (HSE) will be required. Notification in writing to the HSE is required at least 14 days before commencing the work. This will be the responsibility of the contractor.



It is the responsibility of the contractor to obtain all relevant licenses, exemptions, consents and deployment forms relevant to the remediation works prior to beginning any work. The contractor shall comply with and give all notices required by any regulation or by-law applicable to the works. The contractor will obtain the necessary permits for all equipment in terms of potential nuisance (e.g. noise and odour), and agree these with the relevant regulatory authorities (e.g. Environment Agency, Local Authority).

6.3.3 Welfare Facilities and Service Utilities

The contractor will provide their own welfare facilities which can be positioned on a vacant area of concrete hardstanding at the site. The location of this is to be confirmed.

The wider site is operational and has its own electricity and water supply. However, for the purpose of the mound remediation works the contractor shall provide its own water, electricity and welfare facilities.

Particular care shall be exercised for work close to any drainage systems (surface and foul) and measures shall be put in place by the remediation contractor to protect drains from soil, debris and run-off during the remediation work.

The remediation contractor will be responsible for locating, marking out and avoiding all underground and above ground services within the remediation area.

6.3.4 Access to the Soil Mound

The soil mound is located in a fenced-off section of the Delphi car park, which is located to the north of Block 19 in the north-west section of Area B (refer to Figure 2, Annex A).

Following a site visit and meeting with representatives from Delphi, it has been agreed that the existing external storage area adjacent to the north of soil mound can be used by the contractor as a dedicated remediation area. Vehicles (including waste disposal vehicles) will access the remediation area via the main access road to the north and then will exit the remediation area via a dedicated fenced access route through the HGV parking area. Temporary heras fencing and sheeting will be placed around the perimeter of the soil mound, external storage area and along the access route through the HGV parking area. The fencing will demarcate the remediation areas and prevent unauthorised entry. The proposed access route and temporary fencing is shown in Figure 4, Annex A.

6.3.5 Contractor's Method Statement

Prior to starting the works, the remediation contractor shall supply the consultant with copies of all relevant method statements and associated risk assessments for the soil excavation work and details of specialist contractors, including air monitoring consultants, waste operators and landfill operators and any other supporting documentation required to undertake the remediation works.

Extent of Area Requiring Remediation 6.4

Information which has been obtained from the two stages of site investigation in 2008 and 2012, both of which included six trial pits of the soil mound indicate the following:

The soil mound covers an area of approximately 1,800m2.



The height of the soil mound reaches approximately 2.0m in height at the western edge of the mound.

The maximum extent of the majority of the soil mound has not been confirmed but is estimated to reach up to a maximum height of 5m.

In order to calculate the volume of the soil mound that requires disposal, the remediation contractor will need to procure a topographical survey of the mound and associated features (for example, fencing, manholes, drains, surface coverings, ground levels) prior to, and following remediation. The remediation contractor will be responsible for calculating it’s contingencies for the volume of material which requires excavation, and the breakdown of types of material requiring off-site disposal in accordance with the strategy.

The location and extent of the soil mound is shown graphically in Figure 2, Annex A and photographs of the soil mound are presented in Annex C.

Remediation Works 6.5

6.5.1 Preparatory Works

Prior to the remediation works taking place, it is considered prudent that the following preparatory works are undertaken prior to the commencing the excavation work:

provide the consultant with a detailed programme of works;

notification to the HSE of the intended works and mitigation measures that will be employed;

all service which may be affected by the works are located and marked out and drains covers in close proximity to the soil mound are protected;

topographical survey of the mound and associated features;

the operatives carrying out the work have received a suitable induction by the remediation contractor and are familiar with the method statements and health and safety procedures of the work (discussed further in Section 6.7);

welfare facilities have been made available, including a decontamination unit adjacent to the working area which can be used by site operatives during the excavation of all the asbestos contaminated soil; and

vegetation which is growing on the soil mound will need to be cleared prior to excavation work. Note: the vegetation clearance work was completed in March 2013.

6.5.2 Ecological Considerations

The soil mound is isolated within the centre of an industrial estate with no connectivity to vegetation via terrestrial routes. Therefore, the likelihood of terrestrial protected species (such as reptiles) utilising this habitat is likely to be low.

The soil mound was densely vegetated with scrub that could provide a suitable nesting habitat for birds during the breeding season. Preparatory vegetation removal took place in March 2014 in order to avoid this work taking place later in the year whilst birds may be nesting at the site. During the vegetation clearance works, the contractor did not report the presence of any breeding birds.

6.5.3 Soil Mound Excavation

The following overall methodology for the excavation of the soil mound will be provided by the remediation contractor. This is anticipated to include:



excavation of the entire soil mound to 300mm below the surrounding ground level. The materials within the soil mound will be segregated and stockpiled into the following categories:

- soil based ‘fines’ (i.e. the sandy gravelly silt within the soil mound which is assumed to contain asbestos fibres);

- suspected fragment of asbestos containing materials within the soil mound;

- demolition type materials (i.e. concrete, brick, glass, plastics, etc.); and

- in the event that ‘hot spots’ of previously unidentified soil contamination are encountered during the excavation work, then these will also be segregated and stockpiled.

the excavation work will be supervised by an appropriately qualified remediation engineer and records kept of visual and olfactory observations and ground conditions;

verification samples will be collected from the base of the soil mound (i.e. at 300mm below ground level) in order to verify that the ground underlying the soil mound meets the remedial objectives (refer to Section 8 for frequency and analytical requirements); and

the soil mound area will remain fenced off from site personnel until validation results from the laboratory are confirmed, following confirmation that the ground is free from asbestos fibres; and

a 300mm clean sub-base layer shall be compacted across the unsurfaced ground and finished level with the surrounding hard surfacing. It is not intended to reinstate fencing.

6.5.4 Materials Management Plan

Any stockpiled materials will be placed on polythene sheeting or existing impermeable hardstanding and will be quarantined within a designated area.

Visible dust must not be generated and all stockpiles shall be dampened down to minimise dust generation and prevent the release of airborne asbestos fibres. The remediation contractor will prepare a Waste Management Plan to identify how waste would be managed.

6.5.5 Waste Disposal

The remediation contractor will classify the stockpiled waste and ensure it is disposed of at a suitably licensed landfill facility in accordance with the Duty of Care and Waste Management Regulations.

The remediation contractor will ensure that loading and transportation of the waste is performed in a manner so as to prevent the escape of contaminants (including airborne asbestos fibres) and that the vehicles are suitable for use. The access route for the waste transport vehicles has been agreed with Delphi and is present in Figure 4, Annex A.

It has been estimated that the remediation works will require the following number of waste transportation vehicles:

Approximately 30 artic bulkers for hazardous soil

Approximately 350 tipper lorries for non-hazardous and stable non-reactive hazardous soil

Approximately one skip for bulk handpicked asbestos containing material



Travel movement on public highways will use the most direct route avoiding town centres and residential areas, where possible. The tipper lorries will transport waste to a landfill in Ufton and it is proposed that they travel east from the site using the A425 away from Leamington Spa. The wagons will transport hazardous waste to a landfill in Middlesbrough and it is proposed that they travel south from the site using the B4087 joining the M40 at Junction 13.

Transportation of the waste should be carried out in accordance with transportation regulations for hazardous waste, including the Hazardous Waste Regulations and the Control of Asbestos Regulations 2012.

The remediation contractor will provide a valid copy of the waste transfer certificate for each load of material taken for off-site disposal during the works, including proof of receipt of the material at the landfill site. Copies of all associated waste transfer notes/consignment notes would be retained and included within the verification report.

6.5.6 Material Re-Use On-Site

It may be feasible to retain a proportion of the demolition type material at the site, which could be crushed and re-used during reinstatement of the mound area. However, the contractor will need to provide confirmatory evidence that the crushed material is free from asbestos fibres and is uncontaminated. It should be noted that the volume of concrete within the mound is not known.

The re-use of materials would be subject to agreement with the regulatory authorities. The remediation contractor would be responsible for ensuring any permits/exemptions required for re-use of materials are obtained.

6.5.7 Capping

Following verification that the ground beneath the soil mound is suitable for use, it is proposed that a clean sub-base layer is imported to restore the site level and ensure that the area can be used in the future by tenants (e.g. as car parking or external storage).

The sub-base material should be obtained from a reputable source and evidence of origin provided. To confirm that the sub-base material is suitable for use, confirmatory analysis should be undertaken for a general suite of contaminants which has been agreed by the environmental consultant. This is likely to include pH, a range of metals, asbestos, speciated TPH, BTEX and PAHs. The quality of the material will need to be agreed with the environmental consultant prior to use.

6.5.8 Record of Works

A verification report will be prepared which documents all of the remediation work undertaken and provide a statement of the site condition following remediation. The verification report would be in general accordance with Environmental Agency guidance. Further details are provided in Section 8 of this report.

Site Security 6.6

The remediation contractor shall ensure that the remediation area, including the soil mound and area used for stockpiling, access routes and entrances will be made secure during remedial works, ensuring so far as is reasonably practicable, the health, safety and welfare of all those involved and on-site, and preventing unauthorised access. Temporary heras



fencing and sheeting will be used to demarcate these areas. This is presented graphically in Figure 4, Annex A.

All appropriate Health & Safety signage and contact details will be clearly displayed by the contractor at the entrance to the remediation area and any other areas where the contractor is required to work.



7 Remediation Management

Health & Safety 7.1

These remedial works constitute ‘construction’ by virtue of the Construction (Design and Management) Regulations 2007 (CDM 2007), Regulation 2(1), and are deemed notifiable as per Regulation 2(3). Consequently, the works are covered to the fullest extent by CDM 2007.

The contractor will be the Principal Contractor and Designed for the works. BlackRock will be the Client and the consultant will act as CDM co-ordinator. Attention is drawn to the requirement for the appointed contractor (i.e. the Principal Contractor under CDM 2007) to perform the role of Designer as detailed in CDM 2007 Regulation 11 and outlined in HSE L144 Approved Code of Practice. Information relating to the nature, extent and potential human health impacts of the contaminants found to date is provided within the pre-contract information.

The contractor shall demonstrate competency and outline a proposed approach to the following key health and safety issues:

on-site and project management, key personnel and responsibilities;

implementing safe systems of work with respect to asbestos and general airborne dust control, mitigation and monitoring;

ensuring appropriate mechanisms are in place for the safe and effective interaction and communication with the Client and tenant on-site and other contractors/ activities across the site;

safe movement of vehicles within the remediation area and around the wider site area;

provision of suitable welfare facilities;

selection of appropriate personnel, training and provision of required personal protective equipment (e.g. overalls and suitable respirators);

effective hazard identification, assessment of risk, development and implementation of suitable and sufficient risk control measures (e.g. physical hazards, including mechanical handling of soils/demolition material, utilities, noise, etc.);

emergency response (effective and coordinated approach); and,

effective monitoring, performance evaluation and implementation / tracking of corrective actions within the context of a formalized HS management system.

Within reason, the representatives of the relevant regulatory authorities (e.g. Local Authority, Environment Agency) will have unrestricted access to the remediation area, although reasonable prior notification is required and the remediation contractor and/or environmental consultant will accompany the regulatory authority personnel on any such visits.

Environmental Management of Remediation Activities 7.2

In light of the site setting and proposed remediation works, the following principal potentially sensitive receptors have been identified:

on-site tenants and neighbouring tenants; and

public highways.



In order to be suitably protective of the sensitive receptors, the remedial works outlined in Section 6 above shall include provision for mitigation procedures from published guidance documents including, but not limited to the CIRIA Guide to Good Practice on Site and HSE document Protection of Workers and General Public during the developments of Contaminated Land, as well as relevant Environment Agency Pollution Prevention Guidelines (e.g. ‘Working at Construction and Demolition Sites: PPG6, Pollution Prevention Guidelines’).

Specific mitigation measures to be incorporated as part of the remedial works, with respect to asbestos fibre and dust suppression, noise reduction and vehicle cleanliness are outlined below:

7.2.1 Dust Control and Asbestos Fibre Suppression

Dust control is of importance in respect of any major earthmoving, on-site stockpiling or vehicle loading and movement over unsurfaced areas. Given the presence of asbestos fibres within the soil mound and that a potential exists for the release of airborne asbestos fibres from poor handling practices, including misuse of vehicles and equipment, the following measures shall be incorporated as part of the remedial works:

workers must wear disposable coveralls and suitable respiratory protection within the working area and suitable decontamination facilities provided (i.e. bootwash, washing facilities and a suitable method for disposal of contaminated coveralls);

vehicles working in the remediation area will have closed cabs and plant operatives shall remain inside the vehicles when handling soil potentially contaminated with asbestos;

controlled excavation of the asbestos contaminated soils, including the use of dust suppression in dry weather (e.g. misting soils with water) to prevent dust emissions;

dust suppression of the stockpiles prior to disposal off-site, including either the use of controlled irrigation or covering stockpiles with sheeting to prevent the surface drying out; and

reassurance air monitoring of asbestos fibre concentrations to ensure the effectiveness of the precautions in place during the remediation works. Static perimeter monitoring should be carried out as well as personal monitoring of the workers.

7.2.2 Vehicle Cleanliness

The remediation contractor will take all reasonable measures to prevent, as far as is practically possible, the deposit or tracking of mud or debris (potentially including asbestos fibres) arising from the operating site onto public areas outside of the site (this will include public highways and areas of public access).

The following procedures will be put in place by the remediation contractor as part of its Method Statement:

during excavation activities, the loading of vehicles shall be performed in an organised manner so as to prevent the escape of materials. All vehicles will be appropriately designed to hold the waste without release during transit, and sheeted prior to leaving site. All reasonable and applicable measures to prevent the escape of material during loading and transportation shall be taken;

soil waste should be maintained in a damp condition;

all vehicles shall be inspected prior to departure and where necessary loose material

removed; and



drivers will inspect their vehicles prior to leaving the site and ensure that their loads are secure.

7.2.3 Noise

Whilst it is not envisaged that set noise criteria will be required as part of the remedial works, a number of ‘best practice’ measures are considered prudent in order to reduce noise as far as is reasonably practicable. In particular:

restricted working hours for operating plant (8am-5:30pm);

plant and equipment used for the works will be properly maintained, silenced where appropriate, and operated to prevent excessive noise. Plant should be certified to meet any relevant EC Directives/UK/BS5228 standards;

the guidance in relevant British Standards will be applied;

static construction plant (e.g. compressors) will be installed and appropriately enclosed or screened unless the location can be shown not to require it; and

items of plant operating on the site in intermittent use will be shut down in the intervening periods between use.

7.2.4 General Considerations

In addition to the above, the following measures are also required as part of the remedial strategy for the site:

whilst ENVIRON has advanced a number of trial pits within the soil mound in order to characterise the materials present, a potential exists for previously undiscovered limited contamination hotspots to be discovered during the remediation. Therefore a watching brief shall be maintained during the remediation works by appropriately qualified personnel in order to address any further currently unknown contamination. The location of any identified further contamination shall be documented along with the provisions undertaken to mitigate the risk to all identified potential receptors and the appropriate disposal route utilised;

the use of plant equipment on site during the remediation works could result in the potential for the release of contaminants to ground, such as fuel, oils, coolants and lubricants. To avoid the accidental leakage of fuel, oils and/or lubricants, all plant should be maintained to a safe and efficient working condition at all times and any oils or fuels should be contained in accordance with The Control of Pollution (Oil Storage) (England) Regulations 2001. As a minimum all liquids and solids of a potentially hazardous nature (e.g. diesel fuel, oils, degreasers etc.) will be stored with appropriate secondary containment (e.g. bunding). A dedicated area for the refuelling of plant and vehicles away from any water courses shall be established and the fuelling area shall be kept clean at all times. No refuelling shall be undertaken outside of the established refuelling area. Any spillages or leaks of fuel will be cleaned up immediately by the contractor and contingency arrangements for dealing with spillages shall be available at all times, including absorbency granules and dedicated spill response kit;

all equipment containing fuel/oils (e.g. pumps and generators) will be placed on drip trays and these will be maintained by the contractor to remove standing water as appropriate to their correct operation and containment of the plant in question; and

procedures shall be put in place to deal with emergencies and incidents. Environmental incidents can be defined as unexpected events which lead to, or could in different



circumstances have led to, adverse effects on people, property or on environmental resources (e.g. identified watercourses).


Area B, Spa Park


8 Verification Process & Plan

Outline 8.1

Verification is defined in current EA guidance2 as ‘the process of demonstrating that the risks have been reduced to meet remediation criteria and objectives based on a quantitative assessment of remediation performance’. Verification is identified in CLR 11 as a key part of the risk management process, and reference has been made to both CLR 11 and the current EA guidance for this remediation strategy.

There are three key stages involved in the verification process for the soil mound:

1. First Stage: development of a remediation strategy, which this document comprises;

2. Second Stage: development of a verification plan, which identifies the roles, responsibilities and sampling approach needed to verify that the remediation goal has been satisfied; and

3. Third Stage: implementation of the verification plan and production of a verification report which provides a complete record of all remediation activities carried out on-site and the data collected to support compliance with agreed objectives and criteria. The report also presents a description of the works carried out, and details of any unexpected conditions encountered and how they were dealt with.

This remediation strategy meets the first stage of the verification process, and also details the verification plan stipulated under the second stage. The remediation contractor will be responsible for Stage 3: implementing the verification plan, and producing the verification report.

Verification Plan 8.2

The verification plan details the sampling and quality assurance measures which will be undertaken to ensure the verification undertaken is robust, and are outlined below:

8.2.1 Sampling and Laboratory Analysis

Following the removal of the soil mound from the site, confirmatory sampling from the base of the excavated area will take place and should be taken on a frequency of one sample per 10m x 10m grid. Records of each excavation, including drawing and photographs will form the basis of the verification plan.

All sampling will be undertaken by the contractor in accordance with BS10175:2011 The Investigation of Potentially Contaminated Sites and the Environment Agency guidance on the Verification of Remediation of Land Contamination, 2010, following the principles below:

minimise the risk for cross contamination of samples both during sampling and transit;

every sample will have a unique name / reference;

store samples in clean, laboratory supplied vessels;

all samples should be labelled, stored appropriately (i.e. cool boxes, ice packs) and transported under chain of custody to the laboratory; and

2 Draft Verification of Remediation of Land Contamination published by the EA in 2010


Area B, Spa Park


steps should be taken to ensure quality assurance of samples and analysis, including duplicates, field blanks etc.

In order to confirm that all asbestos contaminated soil has been removed from the excavated soil mound, verification samples will be analysed for an asbestos screen and quantification in order to establish that there is less that 0.001% by weight of asbestos across the remediated area (this is the current asbestos limit commonly offered by laboratories). The asbestos analysis should be undertaken by a UKAS (ISO17025) accredited laboratory.

The remediation contractor shall provide the consultant with details of its proposed sampling methods, analysis (method reporting limits, laboratory, accreditations) and quality assurance procedures (duplicates, trip blanks, transit procedures). In addition, details of how the data will be validated (e.g. check results against visual observations of contamination, duplicate assessment) will be provided in the method statement and verification report.

Verification Report Layout 8.3

The verification report will be provided by the remediation contractor and contain the following information, in accordance with EA guidance on verification:

the details and roles of all contractors and sub-contractors involved in the project;

a summary of the original site conditions, with reference to the original site investigations and assessments;

the remediation objectives and criteria, together with the basis on which the criteria were to be achieved (i.e. refer to the remediation strategy);

the Conceptual Site Model for the remediation and reference to the lines of evidence for the pollutant linkages to be broken;

a description of the remedial activities with reference to relevant design reports including the method statements, detailed designs, permits, phasing etc.;

a detailed photographic record of works, together with plans indicating the dates and locations of remediation activities;

a clear description of the verification plan, including the methods used for data collection and interpretation;

a summary of progress data such as excavation records, waste consignment notes, imported fill records, any variations;

details of communications held with regulators during the remediation works;

reference to the Health and Safety file;

a clear statement that the remedial objectives have been completed; and

supporting documents should include where appropriate analytical results, monitoring data, health and safety documentation, quality management documentation.


Area B, Spa Park


Annex A: Figures

Aberdeen

Glasgow Edinburgh

Newcastle

Liverpool

Belfast

Dublin

Cork

York

BirminghamNorwich

London

Bristol

Plymouth

Newquay

Cardiff

Scale

DateSiteTitle

Drawn byClientProject No. Issue

Reproduced from Ordnance Survey Map Data with the permission of the Controller of HMSO, Crown Copyright Reserved Licence No. ES 100022432

Reproduced from Ordnance Survey Map Data with the permission of the Controller of HMSO, Crown Copyright Reserved Licence No. ES 100022432

As shown

April 2014Area B, Spa ParkLeamington Spa,

Figure 1: Site Location

DMBlackRockUK14-19583 4

N

0 1km

0 10km

Site Location

N

Scale

Date

Site

Title

Key

Drawn by

Client

Project No.

Issue

1:500 @A4

April 2014

UK14-19583

Area BSpa ParkLeamingtion Spa

Figure 2:Site Detail

JM

BlackRock

4

N

Possibleformer AST

Former lorrywash catch pit

Former vehicle fuelUST (now removed)

Delphi

Warehouse

Northern Access Road

Raicam

Manufacturing Area

Caparo

Manufacturing

Area

Raicammanufacturingarea

Soil Mound

Northern carpark and yardarea

Shared surfacewater drainageinterceptor

Adjacent currentcommercial land uses,former AP facility

ApproximateSite Boundary

ApproximateArea Boundary

Extent of SoilMound ArearequiringRemediation

LPG storage area

WB

264100

N

Scale

Date

Site

Title

Key

Drawn by

Client

Project No.

Issue

NTS

April 2014

UK14-19583


Figure 3:2008 and 2012Trial Pit Locations

JM

BlackRock

4

Soil MoundBoundary

Approximate 2012Trial Pit Location

Approximate 2008Trial Pit Location

TP4

TP5 TP1

TP2TP3

TP4TP5

TP6

TP2

TP3

TP1TP6

1.22mRH

Issues

Mast

WB

264100

264200

N

0 20m

Scale

Date

Site

Title

Key

Drawn by

Client

Project No.

Issue

1:400 @ A41:30,000 @ A4(Inset)

April 2014

UK14-19583


Figure 4:Proposed AccessRoute DuringRemediation

JM

BlackRock

4

Soil moundboundary

Tarmaccar park

HGVparking area

Pedestrianwalkway

External storagearea

Staff shelter

Existing site gate

Proposed routefor waste disposalvehicles

Temporary sheeting betweenmound and car park

Approximate locationof LPG storage area

Proposed temporaryheras fencing andsheeting duringremediation

Existing site gate

Excavator accessduring remediation

Security hut

Delphi facility

Location of soil mound

0 1km

Area B, Spa ParkSite Boundary


Area B, Spa Park


Annex B: Trial Pit Logs

Trial Pit:

TRIAL PIT LOG

Date:

Plant Used:

Project No:

Client:

Site Location:

Logged by:

Remarks: Checked by:

Sheet: 1 of 1

Dep

th (

m)

0.00

1.00

2.00

3.00

4.00

5.00

Sym

bo

l

Description

Un

it

Dep

th

Sam

ple

TP1

18/08/08

3CX Type Excavator

65-C13745

HSBC

Spa Park Phase B

JC

Ground Surface

MADE GROUNDRed brown sandy gravelly SILT with frequent rootlets in the top 100mm. Gravel is subrounded to rounded quartzite. Frequent gravel to cobble size fragments of brick and concrete, occasional fragments of wood. Rare gravel size fragments of glass and ceramic. 1 possible fragment of asbestos containing material (part of a gasket?) submitted to the lab for screening.

MADE GROUNDMoist red brown gravelly very clayey fine to medium SAND with gravel to large cobble size fragments of brick and concrete.

MADE GROUNDBrown friable sandy gravelly SILT with frequent fragments of brick and concrete, occasional fragments of ceramic, occasional metal rods, strips and mesh.

2.6 m bgl

0.00

-1.10

-1.90

-2.60

0.5 D + J

1.8 D + J

2.5 D + J

MRNo groundwater encountered during excavation.Trial pit terminated of large fragments of concrete at the base.

Trial Pit:

TRIAL PIT LOG

Date:

Plant Used:

Project No:

Client:

Site Location:

Logged by:


Sheet: 1 of 1

Dep

th (

m)

0.00

1.00

2.00

3.00

4.00

5.00

Sym

bo

l

Description

Un

it

Dep

th

Sam

ple

TP2

18/08/08

3CX Type Excavator

65-C13745

HSBC

Spa Park Phase B

JC

Ground Surface

MADE GROUNDCobble and boulder size fragments of concrete over red brown sandy gravelly SILT with frequent gravel to cobble size fragments of brick and concrete. 1 No. empty plastic binliner.

MADE GROUNDMoist red brown sandy gravelly CLAY with frequent fragments of brick, concrete, cccasional fragments of asphalt, rotted wood, shell and plastic cups. Trial pit ternminated at 1.7m due to a potential unknown metal pipe in the base of the pit.

1.7 m bgl

0.00

-0.50

-1.70

1.0 D + J

MRNo groundwater encountered during excavation.

Trial Pit:

TRIAL PIT LOG

Date:

Plant Used:

Project No:

Client:

Site Location:

Logged by:


Sheet: 1 of 1

Dep

th (

m)

0.00

1.00

2.00

3.00

4.00

5.00

Sym

bo

l

Description

Un

it

Dep

th

Sam

ple

TP3

18/08/08

3CX Type Excavator

65-C13745

HSBC

Spa Park Phase B

JC

Ground Surface

MADE GROUNDFriable silt overlying grey sub-base.

MADE GROUNDRed brown friable sandy gravelly SILT with gravel to cobble size fragments of brick and concrete, occasional fragments of plastic bag, textile, asphalt, white ware, metal wire. With more frequent and larger size fragments of concrete and bricks below 1.5m depth.

Stiff dark brown slightly friable slightly gravelly sandy SILT.

Stiff red brown sandy slightly gravelly CLAY. Gravel is fine to medium subrounded quartzite and flint.

2.5 m bgl

0.00

-0.20

-2.00

-2.40-2.50

1.0 D + J

2.2 D + J


Trial Pit:

TRIAL PIT LOG

Date:

Plant Used:

Project No:

Client:

Site Location:

Logged by:


Sheet: 1 of 1

Dep

th (

m)

0.00

1.00

2.00

3.00

4.00

5.00

Sym

bo

l

Description

Un

it

Dep

th

Sam

ple

TP4

18/08/08

3CX Type Excavator

65-C13745

HSBC

Spa Park Phase B

JC

Ground Surface

MADE GROUNDCobble size fragments of concrete and bricks in a dark brown silty matrix with occasional lenses of red brown sandy clay and yellow brown sand. Occasional plastic carrier bags, 1 No. metal tray, occasional fragments of metal wire. Trial pit terminated at 2.1m depth on a concrete slab.

2.1 m bgl

0.00

-2.10

0.3 D + J

2.0 D + J


Trial Pit:

TRIAL PIT LOG

Date:

Plant Used:

Project No:

Client:

Site Location:

Logged by:


Sheet: 1 of 1

Dep

th (

m)

0.00

1.00

2.00

3.00

4.00

5.00

Sym

bo

l

Description

Un

it

Dep

th

Sam

ple

TP5

18/08/08

3CX Type Excavator

65-C13745

HSBC

Spa Park Phase B

JC

Ground Surface

MADE GROUNDDark brown sandy gravelly SILT with frequent bricks, cobble to boulder size fragments of concrete, gravel size fragments of ceramic pipe, occasional fragments of metal. 1 No. 5 litre size rusted empty metal tin of 'Manders Machine Finish Georgian Green MF1'' (machine paint). Fragments of possible asbestos containing pipe were recovered from below approximately 0.5m, evidence of a broken pipe within the northern wall of the trial pit.

MADE GROUNDDark grey moist slightly sandy gravelly CLAY with occasionalblue grey lenses. With gravel to cobble size fragments of concrete and brick. Natural organic odour. Slight groundwater seepage from the walls at 1.8m depth.

Firm to stiff dark brown becoming reddish with depth sandy slightly gravelly CLAY. Gravel is fine to medium subrounded quartzite.

Stiff red brown slightly sandy CLAY.

2.6 m bgl

0.00

-1.60

-2.00

-2.40

-2.60

D + J

2.0 D + J

2.5 D + J

MRSlight groundwater seepage encountered at 1.8m depth.

Trial Pit:

TRIAL PIT LOG

Date:

Plant Used:

Project No:

Client:

Site Location:

Logged by:


Sheet: 1 of 1

Dep

th (

m)

0.00

1.00

2.00

3.00

4.00

5.00

Sym

bo

l

Description

Un

it

Dep

th

Sam

ple

TP6

18/08/08

3CX Type Excavator

65-C13745

HSBC

Spa Park Phase B

JC

Ground Surface

MADE GROUNDVegetation over dark brown friable sandy SILT with gravel to cobble size fragments of brick, concrete, paving slab and occasional fragments of wood and metal pipe. Becoming red brown below 2.2m depth and with blocks of masonry below 2.5m depth.

3 m bgl

0.00

-3.00

D + J

2.0 D + J

2.5 D + J


Trial Pit:

TRIAL PIT LOGDate:

Plant Used:

Project No:

Client:

Site Location:

Logged by:


Sheet: 1 of 1

Dep

th (

m)

0.00

1.00

2.00

3.00

4.00

5.00

Sym

bo

l

Description

Un

it D

epth

Gro

un

dw

ater

Sam

ple

TP1

6/3/2012

Wheeled Excavator

UK14-17550

BNP Paribas

Leamington Spa Park

SH

Ground SurfaceMADE GROUNDLoose brown gravelly slightly silty SAND with some ash. Gravel is fine to coarse sub-angular to sub-rounded of mixed lithologies including fragments of concrete, red brick, rare tile and metal fragments with much rootlets.

MADE GROUNDBrown sandy GRAVEL. Gravel is medium to coarse with frequent cobbles of bricks and concrete with rare plastic.

Becoming to red/brown from 3.5m bgl.

End of Trial Pit at 4 m bgl

0.00

-2.00

-4.00

10 300 50ppm

PID Reading

1.5

1.4

1.7

1.3

0.8-1.0

2.8-3.0

a) Natural not proven b) Groundwater strike not encountered during excavation. JC

1 of 1

Trial Pit:

TRIAL PIT LOGDate:

Plant Used:

Project No:

Client:

Site Location:

Logged by:


Sheet: 1 of 1

Dep

th (

m)

0.00

1.00

2.00

3.00

4.00

5.00

Sym

bo

l

Description

Un

it D

epth

Gro

un

dw

ater

Sam

ple

TP2

6/3/2012

Wheeled excavator

UK14-17550

BNP Paribas

Leamington Spa Park

SH

Ground SurfaceMADE GROUNDBrown gravelly slightly silty SAND. Gravel is fine to coarse sub-angular to sub-rounded of mixed lithologies with much red brick and occasional glass, tile, plastic, fabric, wood, metal and some rootlets.

Large concrete boulder with rebar found at 1.0m bgl.

End of Trial Pit at 3.5 m bgl

0.00

-3.50

10 300 50ppm

PID Reading

1.5

1.6

0.5-0.8

3.2-3.5

a) Refusal at 3.5m bgl due to cobbles and boulders of concrete b) No groundwater strike observed JC

1 of 1

Trial Pit:

TRIAL PIT LOGDate:

Plant Used:

Project No:

Client:

Site Location:

Logged by:


Sheet: 1 of 1

Dep

th (

m)

0.00

1.00

2.00

3.00

4.00

5.00

Sym

bo

l

Description

Un

it D

epth

Gro

un

dw

ater

Sam

ple

TP3

6/3/2012

Wheeled excavator

UK14-17550

BNP Paribas

Leamington Spa Park

SH

Ground SurfaceMADE GROUNDBrown slightly ashy gravelly SAND with some rootlets. Gravel is fine to coarse sub-angular to sub-rounded of mixed lithologies including crushed concrete, clinker and red brick and rare metal pipe.

MADE GROUNDRed/brown slightly sandy GRAVEL. Gravel is sub-angular to sub-rounded of mixed lithologies including crushed concrete, glass, and occasional red brick and rare plastic sheet

Becoming to brown from 2.5m bgl


0.00

-2.00

-3.30

10 300 50ppm

PID Reading

1.5

1.81.8-2.0

3.1-3.3

a) Refusal at 3.3m bgl on cobbles and boulders or concrete. b) No groundwater strike observed JC

1 of 1

Trial Pit:

TRIAL PIT LOGDate:

Plant Used:

Project No:

Client:

Site Location:

Logged by:


Sheet: 1 of 1

Dep

th (

m)

0.00

1.00

2.00

3.00

4.00

5.00

Sym

bo

l

Description

Un

it D

epth

Gro

un

dw

ater

Sam

ple

TP4

6/3/2012

Wheeled excavator

UK14-17550

BNP Paribas

Leamington Spa Park

SH

Ground SurfaceMADE GROUNDRed/brown sandy GRAVEL. Gravel is fine to coarse sub-angular to sub-rounded of crushed concrete and rebar with occasional tile, red brick and large cobbles of concrete.

MADE GROUNDCoarse angular to sub-angular GRAVEL and COBBLES of crushed concrete with rare red brick and metal.

Grading to boulders of concrete with much rebar and scrap metal and rare plastic from 2.0m bgl.


0.00

-1.20

-2.30

10 300 50ppm

PID Reading

1.40.8-1.0

a) Refusal at 2.3m bgl on boulders of concrete. b) No groundwater strike encountered. JC

1 of 1

Trial Pit:

TRIAL PIT LOGDate:

Plant Used:

Project No:

Client:

Site Location:

Logged by:


Sheet: 1 of 1

Dep

th (

m)

0.00

1.00

2.00

3.00

4.00

5.00

Sym

bo

l

Description

Un

it D

epth

Gro

un

dw

ater

Sam

ple

TP5

6/3/2012

Wheeled excavator

UK14-17550

BNP Paribas

Leamington Spa Park

SH

Ground SurfaceMADE GROUNDBrown clayey sandy GRAVEL. Gravel is fine to coarse sub-angular to sub-rounded of mixed lithologies including red brick, concrete and rare glass and tile.

Some black ash noted at 1.0m bgl.

Frequent cobbles of concrete with rebar noted at 2.0m bgl.

MADE GROUNDBrown/black gravelly SAND with much ash. Gravel is fine to coarse sub-angular to sub-rounded of mixed lithologies, including crushed concrete and red brick with occasional rebar and plastic.

MADE GROUNDBrown slightly silty sandy GRAVEL. Gravel is coarse sub-angular to sub-rounded of concrete and red brick with some cobbles and boulders of concrete, and with frequent metal rebar.


0.00

-2.30

-3.00

-3.30

10 300 50ppm

PID Reading

2.1

2.2

1.5

2.6

1.3-1.5

2.3-2.5

1) No groundwater strike encountered. JC

1 of 1

Trial Pit:

TRIAL PIT LOGDate:

Plant Used:

Project No:

Client:

Site Location:

Logged by:


Sheet: 1 of 1

Dep

th (

m)

0.00

1.00

2.00

3.00

4.00

5.00

Sym

bo

l

Description

Un

it D

epth

Gro

un

dw

ater

Sam

ple

TP6

6/3/2012

Wheeled excavator

UK14-17550

BNP Paribas

Leamington Spa Park

SH

Ground SurfaceMADE GROUNDBrown gravelly silty SAND. Gravel is fine to coarse sub-angular to sub-rounded of mixed lithologies, including red brick and crushed concrete with some plastic, tile and metal and rare glass.

SUPERFICIAL DEPOSITSBrown slightly sandy SILT.

SUPERFICIAL DEPOSITSRed slightly sandy CLAY with occasional medium to coarse sub-angular to sub-rounded gravel.

End of Trial Pit at 3 m bgl

0.00

-1.90

-2.50

-3.00

10 300 50ppm

PID Reading

1.7

2.4

3.3

1.2-1.5

2.0-2.2

a) No groundwater strike encountered. JC

1 of 1


Area B, Spa Park


Annex C: Photographic Log

Title: Photographic Log Client: BlackRock

Site: Soil Mound, Spa Park Date: January 2014

UK14-19583 ENVIRON

Photo 1. North-east corner of mound (January 2012)

Photo 2. Eastern face of mound (January 2012)



UK14-19583 ENVIRON

Photo 3. Western face of mound (January 2012)

Photo 4. Southern face of mound (January 2012)



UK14-19583 ENVIRON

Photo 5. Trial pit excavation of mound (March 2012)

Photo 6. Soil arising from Trial Pit 1 (March 2012)



UK14-19583 ENVIRON

Photo 7. Soil arisings from Trial Pit 3 (March 2012)

Photo 8. Soil arisings from Trial Pit 4 (March 2012)


Area B, Spa Park


Annex D: Analytical Results

Page 1 of 17David Schofield

Environ UK Ltd8 The WharfBridge StreetBirminghamB1 2JS

04 September 2008

Rexona Rahman Sharon Googh

Analytical Reporting Manager Project Co-Ordinator

ALCONTROL LABORATORIES ALCONTROL LABORATORIES

This test report shall not be reproduced, except in full, without written approval of the laboratory.

TEST REPORT

Final instructions received on 20/08/2008 (CoC No. 42328)

Project Name: Spa Park, Leamington Spa

22 soil samples received on 20/08/2008

Our Report Number: 08-54016

Your Order Reference: N/A

All laboratory analysis completed by 04 September 2008

Results contained herein relate only to the samples tested. Test methods are documented in house procedures or where appropriate standard methods. Non accredited tests (if applicable) are identified on each page. Procedures for sampling are outside the scope of the laboratory UKAS accreditation. Opinions and interpretations expressed herein are outside the scope of our UKAS accreditation. All samples connected with this report , including any 'on hold', will be stored and disposed of according to company policy. A copy of this policy is available on request.

Project Code: 65C13745

Laboratory analysis started on 20 August 2008

ALcontrol LaboratoriesTable Of Results

Project Name: Spa Park, Leamington SpaClient : Environ UK Ltd

Job Number : 08-54016Matrix : SoilProject Code: 65C13745

Sample ReferenceTP1 Poss

ACMTP1 TP1 TP2 TP3

Sample Depth (m) 0.5 0.5 2.5 1.0 1.0

Date Sampled 18/08/08 18/08/08 18/08/08 18/08/08 18/08/08

Date Scheduled 20/08/08 20/08/08 20/08/08 20/08/08 20/08/08

Laboratory Reference No 333917 † 333918 333920 † 333921 † 333922

Analysis

Moisture Content (Dry Weight) - 13.4 - - 12.4 % 0.1

Moisture Content (Wet Weight) - 11.8 - - 11.0 % 0.1

Asbestos (Screen) Suspected - Absent Absent - 001a

Asbestos DescriptionBitumen Board - - - - Subcon 001

Asbestos Type

Chrysotile - Sampele

Condemned - - - - Subcon 001

Arsenic - 13 - - 16 069SIM mg/kg 3

Cadmium - 2.8 - - 2.2 069SIM mg/kg 0.5

Chromium - 29 - - 37 069SIM mg/kg 10

Copper - 69 - - 150 069SIM mg/kg 5

Lead - 74 - - 93 069SIM mg/kg 10

Mercury - < 0.6 - - < 0.6 069SIM mg/kg 0.6

Nickel - 24 - - 43 069SIM mg/kg 4

Selenium - < 2.5 - - < 2.5 069SIM mg/kg 2.5

W/S Sulphate as SO4 - 0.20 - - 0.39 074IM g/l 0.02

Zinc - 220 - - 270 069SIM mg/kg 10

Total Cyanide - 5.7 - - < 1 061SIM mg/kg 1

Organic Carbon - - - - - 092IM % 0.1

pH - 10.2 - - 9.1 084SIM pH Units 1

* * PCB SUITE * *

PCB Congener 28 - < 0.002 - - < 0.002 039SIM mg/kg 0.002







PCB's (Sum of ICES Congeners) - ND - - ND 039SI mg/kg 0.002

* * PHENOLS SUITE * *

Phenol - < 0.1 - - < 0.1 020SIM mg/kg 0.1

Total Monohydric Phenols - < 1 - - < 1 020SImg/kg 1

LO

D

Me

tho

d N

o

Un

its

I ISO 17025 accredited.M MCERTS accredited for sand, loam and clay. Page 2 of 17




Sample Reference

Sample Depth (m)

Date Sampled

Date Scheduled

Laboratory Reference No

Analysis

Moisture Content (Dry Weight)

Moisture Content (Wet Weight)

Asbestos (Screen)

Asbestos Description

Asbestos Type

Arsenic

Cadmium

Chromium

Copper

Lead

Mercury

Nickel

Selenium

W/S Sulphate as SO4

Zinc

Total Cyanide

Organic Carbon

pH

* * PCB SUITE * *

PCB Congener 28

PCB Congener 52

PCB Congener 101

PCB Congener 118

PCB Congener 138

PCB Congener 153

PCB Congener 180

PCB's (Sum of ICES Congeners)


Phenol

Total Monohydric Phenols

TP4 TP4 TP5 Poss

ACMTP5 TP6

0.3 2.0 0.5 2.0 1.2

18/08/08 18/08/08 18/08/08 18/08/08 18/08/08

20/08/08 20/08/08 20/08/08 20/08/08 20/08/08

333924 333925 † 333926 † 333927 333929 †

14.7 - - 19.1 - % 0.1

12.8 - - 16.0 - % 0.1

- Absent Suspected - Absent 001a

- -

Tile & Cement Product - - Subcon 001

- -

Chrysotile - Sample

Condemned - - Subcon 001

43 - - 15 - 069SIM mg/kg 3

6.2 - - 1.3 - 069SIM mg/kg 0.5

210 - - 29 - 069SIM mg/kg 10

590 - - 36 - 069SIM mg/kg 5

180 - - 50 - 069SIM mg/kg 10

< 0.6 - - < 0.6 - 069SIM mg/kg 0.6

340 - - 28 - 069SIM mg/kg 4

< 2.5 - - < 2.5 - 069SIM mg/kg 2.5

0.24 - - 0.14 - 074IM g/l 0.02

2000 - - 120 - 069SIM mg/kg 10

1.5 - - < 1 - 061SIM mg/kg 1

- - - - - 092IM % 0.1

9.2 - - 9.1 - 084SIM pH Units 1

< 0.002 - - < 0.002 - 039SIM mg/kg 0.002

< 0.002 - - < 0.002 - 039SIM mg/kg 0.002

< 0.002 - - < 0.002 - 039SIM mg/kg 0.002

< 0.002 - - < 0.002 - 039SIM mg/kg 0.002

< 0.002 - - < 0.002 - 039SIM mg/kg 0.002

< 0.002 - - < 0.002 - 039SIM mg/kg 0.002

< 0.002 - - < 0.002 - 039SIM mg/kg 0.002

ND - - ND - 039SI mg/kg 0.002

< 0.1 - - < 0.1 - 020SIM mg/kg 0.1

< 1 - - < 1 - 020SImg/kg 1

Me

tho

d N

o

Un

its

LO

D





Sample Reference

Sample Depth (m)

Date Sampled

Date Scheduled


Analysis

Moisture Content (Dry Weight)

Moisture Content (Wet Weight)

Asbestos (Screen)

Asbestos Description

Asbestos Type

Arsenic

Cadmium

Chromium

Copper

Lead

Mercury

Nickel

Selenium

W/S Sulphate as SO4

Zinc

Total Cyanide

Organic Carbon

pH

* * PCB SUITE * *

PCB Congener 28

PCB Congener 52

PCB Congener 101

PCB Congener 118

PCB Congener 138

PCB Congener 153

PCB Congener 180

PCB's (Sum of ICES Congeners)


Phenol

Total Monohydric Phenols

TP6

3.0

18/08/08

20/08/08

333930

9.3 % 0.1

8.5 % 0.1

- 001a

- Subcon 001

- Subcon 001

19 069SIM mg/kg 3

2.3 069SIM mg/kg 0.5

32 069SIM mg/kg 10

80 069SIM mg/kg 5

90 069SIM mg/kg 10

< 0.6 069SIM mg/kg 0.6

33 069SIM mg/kg 4

< 2.5 069SIM mg/kg 2.5

0.18 074IM g/l 0.02

210 069SIM mg/kg 10

< 1 061SIM mg/kg 1

- 092IM % 0.1

8.6 084SIM pH Units 1

0.014 039SIM mg/kg 0.002

0.018 039SIM mg/kg 0.002

0.034 039SIM mg/kg 0.002

0.024 039SIM mg/kg 0.002

0.038 039SIM mg/kg 0.002

0.022 039SIM mg/kg 0.002

0.005 039SIM mg/kg 0.002

0.154 039SI mg/kg 0.002

< 0.1 020SIM mg/kg 0.1

< 1 020SImg/kg 1

Un

its

LO

D

Me

tho

d N

o



Project Name: Spa Park, Leamington SpaClient : Environ UK LtdJob Number : 08-54016

Matrix : SoilProject Code: 65C13745

Sample Reference TP1 TP3 TP4

Sample Depth (m) 0.5 1.0 0.3

Date Sampled 18/08/08 18/08/08 18/08/08

Date Scheduled 20/08/08 20/08/08 20/08/08

Laboratory Reference No 333918 333922 333924

Analysis

* * PAH SUITE * *

Naphthalene < 0.1 < 0.1 < 0.1 022SIM mg/kg 0.1

Acenaphthylene < 0.1 < 0.1 < 0.1 022SIM mg/kg 0.1

Acenaphthene < 0.1 < 0.1 < 0.1 022SIM mg/kg 0.1

Fluorene < 0.1 < 0.1 < 0.1 022SIM mg/kg 0.1

Phenanthrene < 0.1 < 0.1 < 0.1 022SIM mg/kg 0.1

Anthracene < 0.1 < 0.1 < 0.1 022SIM mg/kg 0.1

Fluoranthene 0.14 0.18 0.14 022SIM mg/kg 0.1

Pyrene 0.14 0.18 0.15 022SIM mg/kg 0.1

Benzo(a)anthracene < 0.1 0.10 < 0.1 022SIM mg/kg 0.1

Chrysene < 0.1 0.11 0.10 022SIM mg/kg 0.1

Benzo(b)fluoranthene 0.12 0.15 0.17 022SIM mg/kg 0.1

Benzo(k)fluoranthene < 0.1 < 0.1 < 0.1 022SIM mg/kg 0.1

Benzo(a)pyrene < 0.1 0.11 0.13 022SIM mg/kg 0.1

Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene < 0.1 < 0.1 < 0.1 022SIM mg/kg 0.1

Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene < 0.1 < 0.1 < 0.1 022SIM mg/kg 0.1

Benzo(g,h,i)perylene < 0.1 < 0.1 0.10 022SIM mg/kg 0.1

PAH (Sum of Dutch 10) 0.14 0.51 0.47 022SI mg/kg 0.1

PAH (Sum of EPA 16) ND ND ND 022SI mg/kg 1.6

Meth

od

No

Un

its

LO

D





Sample Reference

Sample Depth (m)

Date Sampled

Date Scheduled


Analysis

* * PAH SUITE * *

Naphthalene

Acenaphthylene

Acenaphthene

Fluorene

Phenanthrene

Anthracene

Fluoranthene

Pyrene

Benzo(a)anthracene

Chrysene

Benzo(b)fluoranthene

Benzo(k)fluoranthene

Benzo(a)pyrene

Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene

Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene

Benzo(g,h,i)perylene

PAH (Sum of Dutch 10)

PAH (Sum of EPA 16)

TP5 TP6

2.0 3.0

18/08/08 18/08/08

20/08/08 20/08/08

333927 333930

< 0.1 < 0.1 022SIM mg/kg 0.1

< 0.1 < 0.1 022SIM mg/kg 0.1

< 0.1 < 0.1 022SIM mg/kg 0.1

< 0.1 < 0.1 022SIM mg/kg 0.1

< 0.1 0.13 022SIM mg/kg 0.1

< 0.1 < 0.1 022SIM mg/kg 0.1

0.23 0.32 022SIM mg/kg 0.1

0.21 0.30 022SIM mg/kg 0.1

< 0.1 0.16 022SIM mg/kg 0.1

0.13 0.20 022SIM mg/kg 0.1

0.17 0.25 022SIM mg/kg 0.1

< 0.1 < 0.1 022SIM mg/kg 0.1

< 0.1 0.20 022SIM mg/kg 0.1

< 0.1 0.12 022SIM mg/kg 0.1

< 0.1 < 0.1 022SIM mg/kg 0.1

< 0.1 0.15 022SIM mg/kg 0.1

0.36 1.28 022SI mg/kg 0.1

ND 1.82 022SI mg/kg 1.6

LO

D

Meth

od

No

Un

its





Sample Reference TP1

Sample Depth (m) 0.5

Date Sampled 18/08/08

Date Scheduled 20/08/08

Laboratory Reference No 333918

Analysis

* * CWG SUITE * *

Aliphatic C5-C6 < 0.10* CWGS mg/kg 0.01

Aliphatic >C6-C8 0.14 CWGS mg/kg 0.01

Aliphatic >C8-C10 < 0.10* CWGS mg/kg 0.01

Aliphatic >C10-C12 < 0.10* CWGS mg/kg 0.01

Aliphatic >C12-C16 3.5 CWGSI mg/kg 1

Aliphatic >C16-C21 28 CWGSI mg/kg 1

Aliphatic >C21-C35 200 CWGSI mg/kg 5

Total Aliphatics (C5-C35) 240 CWGS mg/kg 5

Aromatic C6-C7 < 0.10* CWGS mg/kg 0.01

Aromatic >C7-C8 < 0.10* CWGS mg/kg 0.01



Aromatic >C12-C16 1.6 CWGSI mg/kg 1

Aromatic >C16-C21 6.3 CWGSI mg/kg 1

Aromatic >C21-C35 79 CWGSI mg/kg 5

Total Aromatics (C5-C35) 87 CWGS mg/kg 5

Volatile Hydrocarbons (C5-C12) 0.14 CWGS mg/kg 0.01

Extractable Hydrocarbons (C12-C35) 320 CWGS mg/kg 5

Total Hydrocarbons (C5-C35) 320 CWGS mg/kg 5

MTBE < 0.10* CWGSIM mg/kg 0.01

Benzene < 0.10* CWGSIM mg/kg 0.01

Toluene < 0.10* CWGSIM mg/kg 0.01

Ethylbenzene < 0.10* CWGSIM mg/kg 0.01

m,p-Xylenes < 0.10* CWGSIM mg/kg 0.01

o-Xylene < 0.10* CWGSIM mg/kg 0.01

1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene < 0.10* CWGSIM mg/kg 0.01

1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene < 0.10* CWGSIM mg/kg 0.01

Meth

od

No

Un

its

LO

D





Sample Reference

Sample Depth (m)

Date Sampled

Date Scheduled


Analysis

* * CWG SUITE * *

Aliphatic C5-C6

Aliphatic >C6-C8

Aliphatic >C8-C10

Aliphatic >C10-C12

Aliphatic >C12-C16

Aliphatic >C16-C21

Aliphatic >C21-C35

Total Aliphatics (C5-C35)

Aromatic C6-C7

Aromatic >C7-C8

Aromatic >C8-C10

Aromatic >C10-C12

Aromatic >C12-C16

Aromatic >C16-C21

Aromatic >C21-C35

Total Aromatics (C5-C35)

Volatile Hydrocarbons (C5-C12)

Extractable Hydrocarbons (C12-C35)

Total Hydrocarbons (C5-C35)

MTBE

Benzene

Toluene

Ethylbenzene

m,p-Xylenes

o-Xylene

1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene

1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene

TP3 TP4 TP5 TP6

1.0 0.3 2.0 3.0

18/08/08 18/08/08 18/08/08 18/08/08

20/08/08 20/08/08 20/08/08 20/08/08

333922 333924 333927 333930

0.03 0.03 0.01 < 0.01 CWGS mg/kg 0.01

0.03 0.03 0.02 0.04 CWGS mg/kg 0.01

< 0.01 < 0.01 < 0.01 < 0.01 CWGS mg/kg 0.01

< 0.01 < 0.01 < 0.01 0.01 CWGS mg/kg 0.01

5.5 4.4 24 5.5 CWGSI mg/kg 1

49 27 210 24 CWGSI mg/kg 1

340 210 790 170 CWGSI mg/kg 5

400 240 1000 200 CWGS mg/kg 5

< 0.01 < 0.01 < 0.01 < 0.01 CWGS mg/kg 0.01

< 0.01 < 0.01 < 0.01 < 0.01 CWGS mg/kg 0.01

0.02 0.01 < 0.01 0.01 CWGS mg/kg 0.01

0.01 < 0.01 < 0.01 0.02 CWGS mg/kg 0.01

3.7 4.1 4.3 3.4 CWGSI mg/kg 1

8.1 6.5 61 6.9 CWGSI mg/kg 1

73 69 290 52 CWGSI mg/kg 5

85 80 350 62 CWGS mg/kg 5

0.09 0.07 0.03 0.08 CWGS mg/kg 0.01

480 320 1400 260 CWGS mg/kg 5

480 320 1400 260 CWGS mg/kg 5

< 0.010 < 0.010 < 0.010 < 0.010 CWGSIM mg/kg 0.01

< 0.010 < 0.010 < 0.010 < 0.010 CWGSIM mg/kg 0.01

< 0.010 < 0.010 < 0.010 < 0.010 CWGSIM mg/kg 0.01

< 0.010 < 0.010 < 0.010 < 0.010 CWGSIM mg/kg 0.01

< 0.010 < 0.010 < 0.010 < 0.010 CWGSIM mg/kg 0.01

< 0.010 < 0.010 < 0.010 < 0.010 CWGSIM mg/kg 0.01

< 0.010 < 0.010 < 0.010 < 0.010 CWGSIM mg/kg 0.01

< 0.010 < 0.010 < 0.010 < 0.010 CWGSIM mg/kg 0.01

LO

D

Meth

od

No

Un

its










Analysis

* * VOC SUITE * *

Dichlorodifluoromethane < 25 071SIM ug/kg 25

Chloromethane < 25 071SIM ug/kg 25

Vinyl Chloride < 25 071SI ug/kg 25

Bromomethane < 25 071S ug/kg 25

Chloroethane < 25 071SIM ug/kg 25

Trichlorofluoromethane < 25 071SIM ug/kg 25

1,1-Dichloroethene < 25 071S ug/kg 25

112-Trichloro-122-Trifluoroethane < 25 071SI ug/kg 25

Dichloromethane < 50 071SI ug/kg 50

Carbon Disulfide < 25 071SIM ug/kg 25

Trans-1,2 Dichloroethene < 25 071S ug/kg 25

MTBE < 25 071SI ug/kg 25

1,1 -Dichloroethane < 25 071SI ug/kg 25

Cis-1,2 Dichloroethene < 25 071SIM ug/kg 25

Bromochloromethane < 25 071SIM ug/kg 25

Chloroform < 25 071SIM ug/kg 25

2,2-Dichloropropane < 25 071SIM ug/kg 25

1,1,1-Trichloroethane < 25 071SI ug/kg 25

1,2-Dichloroethane < 25 071SI ug/kg 25

1,1-Dichloropropene < 25 071SIM ug/kg 25

Benzene < 25 071SI ug/kg 25

Carbon Tetrachloride < 25 071SIM ug/kg 25

Dibromomethane < 25 071SIM ug/kg 25

1,2-Dichloropropane < 25 071SIM ug/kg 25

Trichloroethene < 25 071SIM ug/kg 25

Bromodichloromethane < 25 071SIM ug/kg 25

Cis-1,3 Dichloropropene < 25 071SIM ug/kg 25

Trans-1,3 Dichloropropene < 25 071SIM ug/kg 25

1,1,2-Trichloroethane < 25 071SIMug/kg 25

Meth

od

No

Un

its

LO

D










Analysis

Meth

od

No

Un

its

LO

D * * VOC SUITE Cont.. * *

Toluene < 25 071SI ug/kg 25

1,3 -Dichloropropane < 25 071SIM ug/kg 25

Dibromochloromethane < 25 071SIM ug/kg 25

1,2-Dibromoethane < 25 071SIM ug/kg 25

Tetrachloroethene < 25 071S ug/kg 25

1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane < 25 071SI ug/kg 25

Chlorobenzene < 25 071SIM ug/kg 25

Ethyl Benzene < 25 071SI ug/kg 25

m,p-Xylenes < 50 071SI ug/kg 50

Bromoform < 25 071SIM ug/kg 25

Styrene < 25 071SIM ug/kg 25

o-Xylene < 25 071SI ug/kg 25

1,1,2,2 Tetrachloroethane < 25 071SI ug/kg 25

1,2,3-Trichloropropane < 25 071SIM ug/kg 25

Isopropylbenzene < 25 071SIM ug/kg 25

Bromobenzene < 25 071SIM ug/kg 25

n-propylbenzene < 25 071SIM ug/kg 25

2-Chlorotoluene < 25 071SIM ug/kg 25

4-Chlorotoluene < 25 071SIM ug/kg 25

1,3,5 Trimethylbenzene < 25 071SI ug/kg 25

tert-butylbenzene < 25 071SIM ug/kg 25

1,2,4 Trimethylbenzene < 25 071SI ug/kg 25

sec-butylbenzene < 25 071SIM ug/kg 25

1,3 Dichlorobenzene < 25 071SI ug/kg 25


4-Isopropyltoluene < 25 071SIM ug/kg 25


n-butylbenzene < 25 071SI ug/kg 25

1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene < 25 071S ug/kg 25










Analysis

Meth

od

No

Un

its

LO

D * * VOC SUITE Cont.. * *

1,2-Dibromo-3-Chloropropane < 25 071SI ug/kg 25

Hexachlorobutadiene < 50 071S ug/kg 50

1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene < 25 071S ug/kg 25

VOC TIC'S ND 071S 1





Sample Reference

Sample Depth (m)

Date Sampled

Date Scheduled


Analysis

* * VOC SUITE * *

Dichlorodifluoromethane

Chloromethane

Vinyl Chloride

Bromomethane

Chloroethane

Trichlorofluoromethane

1,1-Dichloroethene

112-Trichloro-122-Trifluoroethane

Dichloromethane

Carbon Disulfide

Trans-1,2 Dichloroethene

MTBE

1,1 -Dichloroethane

Cis-1,2 Dichloroethene

Bromochloromethane

Chloroform

2,2-Dichloropropane

1,1,1-Trichloroethane

1,2-Dichloroethane

1,1-Dichloropropene

Benzene

Carbon Tetrachloride

Dibromomethane

1,2-Dichloropropane

Trichloroethene

Bromodichloromethane

Cis-1,3 Dichloropropene

Trans-1,3 Dichloropropene

1,1,2-Trichloroethane

TP3 TP4 TP5 TP6

1.0 0.3 2.0 3.0

18/08/08 18/08/08 18/08/08 18/08/08

20/08/08 20/08/08 20/08/08 20/08/08

333922 333924 333927 333930

< 25 < 25 < 25 < 25 071SIM ug/kg 25

< 25 < 25 < 25 < 25 071SIM ug/kg 25

< 25 < 25 < 25 < 25 071SI ug/kg 25

< 25 < 25 < 25 < 25 071S ug/kg 25

< 25 < 25 < 25 < 25 071SIM ug/kg 25

< 25 < 25 < 25 < 25 071SIM ug/kg 25

< 25 < 25 < 25 < 25 071S ug/kg 25

< 25 < 25 < 25 < 25 071SI ug/kg 25

< 50 < 50 < 50 < 50 071SI ug/kg 50

< 25 < 25 < 25 < 25 071SIM ug/kg 25

< 25 < 25 < 25 < 25 071S ug/kg 25

< 25 < 25 < 25 < 25 071SI ug/kg 25

< 25 < 25 < 25 < 25 071SI ug/kg 25

< 25 < 25 < 25 < 25 071SIM ug/kg 25

< 25 < 25 < 25 < 25 071SIM ug/kg 25

< 25 < 25 < 25 < 25 071SIM ug/kg 25

< 25 < 25 < 25 < 25 071SIM ug/kg 25

< 25 < 25 < 25 < 25 071SI ug/kg 25

< 25 < 25 < 25 < 25 071SI ug/kg 25

< 25 < 25 < 25 < 25 071SIM ug/kg 25

< 25 < 25 < 25 < 25 071SI ug/kg 25

< 25 < 25 < 25 < 25 071SIM ug/kg 25

< 25 < 25 < 25 < 25 071SIM ug/kg 25

< 25 < 25 < 25 < 25 071SIM ug/kg 25

< 25 < 25 < 25 < 25 071SIM ug/kg 25

< 25 < 25 < 25 < 25 071SIM ug/kg 25

< 25 < 25 < 25 < 25 071SIM ug/kg 25

< 25 < 25 < 25 < 25 071SIM ug/kg 25

< 25 < 25 < 25 < 25 071SIMug/kg 25

LO

D

Meth

od

No

Un

its





Sample Reference

Sample Depth (m)

Date Sampled

Date Scheduled


Analysis

* * VOC SUITE Cont.. * *

Toluene

1,3 -Dichloropropane

Dibromochloromethane

1,2-Dibromoethane

Tetrachloroethene

1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane

Chlorobenzene

Ethyl Benzene

m,p-Xylenes

Bromoform

Styrene

o-Xylene

1,1,2,2 Tetrachloroethane

1,2,3-Trichloropropane

Isopropylbenzene

Bromobenzene

n-propylbenzene

2-Chlorotoluene

4-Chlorotoluene

1,3,5 Trimethylbenzene

tert-butylbenzene

1,2,4 Trimethylbenzene

sec-butylbenzene

1,3 Dichlorobenzene

1,4 Dichlorobenzene

4-Isopropyltoluene

1,2 Dichlorobenzene

n-butylbenzene

1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene

TP3 TP4 TP5 TP6

1.0 0.3 2.0 3.0

18/08/08 18/08/08 18/08/08 18/08/08

20/08/08 20/08/08 20/08/08 20/08/08

333922 333924 333927 333930

LO

D

Meth

od

No

Un

its

< 25 < 25 < 25 < 25 071SI ug/kg 25

< 25 < 25 < 25 < 25 071SIM ug/kg 25

< 25 < 25 < 25 < 25 071SIM ug/kg 25

< 25 < 25 < 25 < 25 071SIM ug/kg 25

< 25 < 25 < 25 < 25 071S ug/kg 25

< 25 < 25 < 25 < 25 071SI ug/kg 25

< 25 < 25 < 25 < 25 071SIM ug/kg 25

< 25 < 25 < 25 < 25 071SI ug/kg 25

< 50 < 50 < 50 < 50 071SI ug/kg 50

< 25 < 25 < 25 < 25 071SIM ug/kg 25

< 25 < 25 < 25 < 25 071SIM ug/kg 25

< 25 < 25 < 25 < 25 071SI ug/kg 25

< 25 < 25 < 25 < 25 071SI ug/kg 25

< 25 < 25 < 25 < 25 071SIM ug/kg 25

< 25 < 25 < 25 < 25 071SIM ug/kg 25

< 25 < 25 < 25 < 25 071SIM ug/kg 25

< 25 < 25 < 25 < 25 071SIM ug/kg 25

< 25 < 25 < 25 < 25 071SIM ug/kg 25

< 25 < 25 < 25 < 25 071SIM ug/kg 25

< 25 < 25 < 25 < 25 071SI ug/kg 25

< 25 < 25 < 25 < 25 071SIM ug/kg 25

< 25 < 25 < 25 < 25 071SI ug/kg 25

< 25 < 25 < 25 < 25 071SIM ug/kg 25

< 25 < 25 < 25 < 25 071SI ug/kg 25

< 25 < 25 < 25 < 25 071SI ug/kg 25

< 25 < 25 < 25 < 25 071SIM ug/kg 25

< 25 < 25 < 25 < 25 071SI ug/kg 25

< 25 < 25 < 25 < 25 071SI ug/kg 25

< 25 < 25 < 25 < 25 071S ug/kg 25





Sample Reference

Sample Depth (m)

Date Sampled

Date Scheduled


Analysis

* * VOC SUITE Cont.. * *

1,2-Dibromo-3-Chloropropane

Hexachlorobutadiene

1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene

VOC TIC'S

TP3 TP4 TP5 TP6

1.0 0.3 2.0 3.0

18/08/08 18/08/08 18/08/08 18/08/08

20/08/08 20/08/08 20/08/08 20/08/08

333922 333924 333927 333930

LO

D

Meth

od

No

Un

its

< 25 < 25 < 25 < 25 071SI ug/kg 25

< 50 < 50 < 50 < 50 071S ug/kg 50

< 25 < 25 < 25 < 25 071S ug/kg 25

ND ND ND ND 071S 1


ALcontrol LaboratoriesTable Of Results - Appendix



Method No. Reference Description

071SIn-house method based on EPA624 "Volatile Organic Compounds in Soils/Sludges"

Determination of volatile organic compounds in soil samples by headspace GC-MS

W

061SIn-house method based on Method 4500-CN, "Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Waste Water", APHA AWWA WEF, Edition 18, 1992

Determination of cyanides and thiocyanate in soil samples by continuous flow colorimetry (Skalar)

W

039S In-house methodDetermination of PCB congeners in soil samples by hexane/acetone extraction followed by GC-MS determination

W

022S In-house method

Determination of PAH compounds in soil samples by hexane / acetone extraction followed by GC-MS detection [Note: this method does not separate benzo(j)fluoranthene, and this PAH will be included in the sum of benzo(b)fluoranthene & benzo(k)fluoranthene]

W

020SIn-house method based on Second Site Property: Environmental Assessment Guidance Version 3: March 2003

Determination of methanol/water based mobile phase extractable phenols in soil samples by HPLC with electrochemical detection

W

CWGSIn-house method based on "Total Petroleum Hydrocarbon Criteria Working Group" series, 1998-9

Determination of "CWG" banded petroleum hydrocarbons in soil samples using a combination of headspace GC-FID (C5-C12) and hexane:acetone extraction / silica-alumina aliphatic - aromatic split / GC-FID (C12-C35) techniques with banding by comparison to alkane standards

W

092 In-house methodDetermination of organic content and organic carbon in soil samples by combustion analyser

D

084SIn-house method referencing BS1377: Part 3: 1990 and Second Site Property: Environmental Assessment Guidance Version 3: March 2003

Determination of pH by addition of water followed by electrometric measurement

D

074In-house method based on BS1377 Part 3, "Chemical and Electrochemical Tests", 1990

Determination of 2:1 water soluble sulphate in soil samples by Inductively Coupled Plasma - Optical Emission Spectrometry (ICP-OES)

D

Summary of methods contained within report :

We

t/Dry

A

na

lys

is

Page 15 of 17

ALcontrol LaboratoriesTable Of Results - Appendix



Method No. Reference Description

Summary of methods contained within report :

We

t/Dry

A

na

lys

is

069SIn-house method based on MEWAM "Methods for the Determination of Metals in Soil", HMSO, 1986

Determination of metals in soil samples by aqua-regia digestion followed by ICP-OES detection

D

Subcon 001 In-house method based on HSG 248

Identification of asbestos in bulk materials using polarised light microscopy. For indicative values of asbestos content for different material types please refer to MDHS100. Note that this test is subcontracted to UKAS laboratory number 0642 so is outside the scope of laboratory 1141 accreditation.

001a In-house method based on HSG 248Visual screening of soil samples for fibrous material requiring further identification according to method 001 (note for samples > approximately 1kg it may be necessary to sub-sample prior to screening)

Soil results are expressed on a dry weight basis. Where the test uses as-received sample, a moisture correction factor is applied to the wet weight result. This factor is determined gravimetrically using weight loss on drying at 30º (+/-5) C.

Page 16 of 17

Our Report Number: 08-54016

Code

On Results

*

¥

‡

NAD

$

U/S

I/S

M/S

ND

ç

§

On the Sample Numbers

†

¢

General Statements

æ

¶

¤

Note:

Note:

Note:

Note:

Note:

Note:

"Total" results calculated by summing individual components are not rounded

The reporting limit stated in the LOD column is the standard method reporting limit, derived statistically from validation data, however it is occasionally necessary to raise reporting limits due to matrix interference or limited sample availability

Description

Please note product present, therefore this result is for indicative purpose only

Sample type outside the scope of our MCERTS accreditation since matrix not included in method validation

Unsuitable for analysis due to asbestos content

Please note TOC's & LOI's have been repeated and the apparently anomalous results confirmed

Sample cannot be located within the laboratory

Not detected (below relevant analytical detection limit)

Sample filtered prior to analysis

Fe(II) and dissolved Fe are analysed by different methods, sometimes leading to slight discrepancy between results

During soil preparation, best efforts are made to produce analytical subsamples representative of the entire submitted sample, without exclusion of stones

UKAS and/or MCERTS accreditation removed due to duration of sample in laboratory prior to testing

The BOD analysis was carried out prior to the COD analysis and included an oily layer, which is the likely cause of the anomalous results

Analysis carried out for organic compounds on water samples containing free product is on a "best endeavour" basis

All results calculated from organic carbon on a dry weight basis

Appendix

Detection limit(s) raised due to matrix interference

Detection limit(s) raised due to reduced amount of sample available for analysis

Dilution factor applied due to nature of sample

No asbestos detected

Analysis sub-contracted

Analysis unsuitable for sample due to its matrix or properties

Insufficient sample

Page 17 of 17

Our Ref: EFS/122525 (Ver. 1)Your Ref: UK14-17550

Environmental ChemistryESG

Bretby Business Park

Ashby Road

Burton-on-Trent

Ms S Harper Staffordshire

Environ UK Ltd DE15 0YZ

8 The WharfBridge Street Telephone: 01283 554400

Birmingham Facsimile: 01283 554422

West MidlandsB1 2JS

For the attention of Ms S Harper

Dear Ms Harper

Soil Sample Analysis - UK14-17550 Spa Park

Samples from the above site have been analysed in accordance with the schedule supplied.The sample details and the results of analyses for these samples are given in the appended report.

An invoice for this work will follow under a separate cover.

Where appropriate the samples will be kept until 18/04/12 when they will be discarded. Please call 01283 554547 foran extension of this date.Please be aware that from 1 January 2003 our policy for the retention of paper based laboratory records and analysis reportswill be 6 years.

If I can be of any further assistance please do not hesitate to contact me.

Yours sincerely

for ESG

J ColbourneProject Co-ordinator01283 554547

March 16, 2012

The work was carried out in accordance with Environmental Scientifics Group Ltd (Laboratory and Analytical) Standard Terms and Conditions of Contract.

Environmental Chemistry, ESG, P.O. Box 100, Burton-upon-trent, DE15 0XD Tel: 01283 554400 Fax: 01283 554422Environmental Scientifics Group Limited.

Registered No: 2880501 EFS/122525 Ver. 1

Environ UK Ltd8 The WharfBridge StreetBirminghamWest MidlandsB1 2JS

Site: UK14-17550 Spa Park

The analysis was completed by:

Tests where the accreditation is set to N or No, and any individual data items marked with a * are not UKAS accreditedAny opinions or interpretations expressed herein are outside the scope of any UKAS accreditation held by ESG.

The following tables are contained in this report:

On behalf ofESG : Date of Issue: 16-Mar-2012Andrew Timms Operations Manager

Table 1 Main Analysis Results (Pages 2 to 3)Table of PAH (MS-SIM) (80) Results (Pages 4 to 14)Table of PCB Congener Results (Page 15)Table of SVOC Results (Pages 16 to 21)Table of GRO Results (Page 22)Table of TPH (Si) banding (std) (Page 23)GC-FID Chromatograms (Pages 24 to 45)Table of VOC (HSA) Results (Pages 46 to 51)Table of Asbestos Screening Results (Page 52)Analytical and Deviating Sample Overview (Pages 53 to 54)Table of Method Descriptions (Page 55)Table of Report Notes (Page 56)

16-Mar-2012

The 11 samples described in this report were registered for analysis by ESG on 07-Mar-2012. This report supersedes any versions previously issued by the laboratory.

TEST REPORTSOIL SAMPLE ANALYSIS

Report No. EFS/122525 (Ver. 1)

Tests marked '^' have been subcontracted to another laboratory.

ESG accepts no responsibility for any sampling not carried out by our personnel.

Page 1 of 56Where individual results are flagged see report notes for status.

EFS/122525 Ver. 1

Units : mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/l pH Units mg/kg mg/kgMethod Codes : ICPBOR ICPMSS ICPMSS ICPMSS ICPMSS ICPMSS ICPMSS ICPMSS ICPMSS ICPMSS ICPMSS ICPSOIL ICPWSS PHSOIL SFAPI SFAPI

Method Reporting Limits : 0.5 0.3 0.1 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.1 0.5 0.5 0.6 3 1 10 0.5 0.5UKAS Accredited : Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes

LAB

ID N

umber C

L/

Client Sample Description

Sam

ple Date

Boron (H

20 Soluble)

Arsenic (M

S)

Cadm

ium (M

S)

Chrom

ium (M

S)

Copper (M

S)

Lead (MS

)

Mercury (M

S)

Nickel (M

S)

Selenium

(MS

)

Vanadium

(MS

)

Zinc (M

S)

Beryllium

.

SO

4-- (H2O

sol) mg/l

pH units (A

R)

Cyanide(T

otal) (AR

)

Phenol Index.(A

R)

1256844 TP1 0.80-1.00 06-Mar-12 1.2 14.4 1.46 33.6 253 117.7 0.25 47.4 <0.5 40.5 236.7 1.34 106 8.6 0.6 <0.5

1256845 TP1 2.80-3.00 06-Mar-12 1.3 12 1.37 37.8 90.9 73 0.29 39.4 <0.5 39.2 154.9 1.72 458 8.7 2.5 <0.5

1256846 TP2 0.50-0.80 06-Mar-12 <0.5 12.2 1.18 27.6 57.2 70.9 0.16 27.4 <0.5 31.6 218.8 0.84 341 8.5 0.5 <0.5

1256847 TP2 3.20-3.50 06-Mar-12 0.7 14.2 1.45 32.5 67.4 86.4 0.14 31.8 <0.5 35.5 221.9 0.98 365 9.6 <0.5 <0.5

1256848 TP3 1.80-2.00 06-Mar-12 1.6 11.4 0.47 42.6 90 107.9 0.11 24.7 0.5 35.9 143.5 1.08 156 8.6 <0.5 <0.5

1256849 TP3 3.00-3.30 06-Mar-12 0.8 13.3 1.92 32.6 103.4 52.2 0.13 27.4 <0.5 35.9 158.2 0.94 270 9.4 0.9 <0.5

1256850 TP4 0.80-1.00 06-Mar-12 0.7 8.6 1.55 70.8 54.2 50.2 0.25 31.2 <0.5 32.8 126.1 1.22 184 8.7 2.6 <0.5

1256851 TP5 1.30-1.50 06-Mar-12 1.4 12.5 1.16 29.8 48.7 122 0.36 32.2 <0.5 37.8 164.6 1.5 130 8.7 <0.5 0.5

1256852 TP5 2.30-2.50 06-Mar-12 0.9 9.7 0.6 22.6 43.3 173.3 0.17 21.4 <0.5 26.1 138.2 0.83 243 9.5 <0.5 <0.5

1256853 TP6 1.20-1.50 06-Mar-12 <0.5 13.9 1.67 64.4 163.2 151 1.32 37.4 <0.5 45.4 348.1 0.9 274 8.7 0.6 <0.5

1256854 TP6 2.00-2.20 06-Mar-12 <0.5 7.2 0.16 23.6 12.7 21.7 <0.1 22.7 <0.5 25.6 55.2 0.77 38 7.5 <0.5 <0.5

Contact

Date Printed

Report Number EFS/122525

Table Number 1

Fax +44 (0) 1283 554422

16-Mar-2012

UK14-17550 Spa Park

Bretby Business Park, Ashby Road

Burton-on-Trent, Staffordshire, DE15 0YZ

Tel +44 (0) 1283 554400

Client Name Environ UK Ltd Soil Sample Analysis

Ms S Harper


EFS/122525 Ver. 1

Units : mg/kg µg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg % M/M µg/kg mg/kgMethod Codes : Sub002a TPHUSSI VOCHSAS GROHSA KONECR PCBUSECDAR SVOCMSUS WSLM59 BTEXHSA PAHMSUS

Method Reporting Limits : 10 0.2 0.1 0.01 20UKAS Accredited : Yes Yes Yes No No No No No Yes Yes

LAB

ID N

umber C

L/


Sam

ple Date

^Asbestos S

creen

TP

H by G

CF

ID (A

R/S

i)

VO

C H

SA

-GC

MS

GR

O (A

A) by H

SA

GC

-FID

Chrom

ium vi:

PC

B-7 C

ongeners Analysis

SV

OC

by GC

MS

(AR

)

Total O

rganic Carbon

MT

BE

PA

H (16) by G

CM

S

1256844 TP1 0.80-1.00 06-Mar-12 CH Req Req Req <0.1 Req Req <20 Req

1256845 TP1 2.80-3.00 06-Mar-12 CH AM Req Req Req <0.1 Req Req 2.01 <20 Req

1256846 TP2 0.50-0.80 06-Mar-12 CH Req Req Req 0.2 Req Req <20 Req

1256847 TP2 3.20-3.50 06-Mar-12 CH Req Req 0.1 <20 Req


1256849 TP3 3.00-3.30 06-Mar-12 AM Req Req Req 1.6 Req Req 1.34 <20 Req


1256851 TP5 1.30-1.50 06-Mar-12 CH Req Req Req <0.1 Req Req <20 Req


1256853 TP6 1.20-1.50 06-Mar-12 CH AM Req Req Req 0.3 Req Req <20 Req

1256854 TP6 2.00-2.20 06-Mar-12 NAIIS Req Req <0.1 <20 Req

Contact

Date Printed

Report Number EFS/122525

Table Number 1

Fax +44 (0) 1283 554422

16-Mar-2012

UK14-17550 Spa Park



Tel +44 (0) 1283 554400

Client Name Environ UK Ltd Soil Sample Analysis

Ms S Harper


EFS/122525 Ver. 1

1

Polycyclic Aromatic HydrocarbonsGC/MS (SIM)

Customer and Site Details: Environ UK Ltd: UK14-17550 Spa ParkSample Details: TP1 0.80-1.00 Job Number: S12_2525LIMS ID Number: CL1256844 Date Booked in: 07-Mar-12QC Batch Number: 120231 Date Extracted: 12-Mar-12

Quantitation File: Initial Calibration Date Analysed: 13-Mar-12Directory: 1212PAH.GC5\ Matrix: SoilDilution: 1.0 Ext Method: Ultrasonic

UKAS accredited?: Yes

Target Compounds CAS # R.T. Concentration % Fit(min) mg/kg

Naphthalene 91-20-3 - < 0.08 -Acenaphthylene 208-96-8 - < 0.08 -Acenaphthene 83-32-9 - < 0.08 -Fluorene 86-73-7 - < 0.08 -Phenanthrene 85-01-8 - < 0.08 -Anthracene 120-12-7 - < 0.08 -Fluoranthene 206-44-0 7.62 0.11 79Pyrene 129-00-0 7.93 0.10 89Benzo[a]anthracene 56-55-3 - < 0.08 -Chrysene 218-01-9 - < 0.08 -Benzo[b]fluoranthene 205-99-2 11.22 0.13 75Benzo[k]fluoranthene 207-08-9 - < 0.08 -Benzo[a]pyrene 50-32-8 - < 0.08 -Indeno[1,2,3-cd]pyrene 193-39-5 - < 0.08 -Dibenzo[a,h]anthracene 53-70-3 - < 0.08 -Benzo[g,h,i]perylene 191-24-2 - < 0.08 -Total (USEPA16) PAHs - - < 1.38 -

"M" denotes that % fit has been manually interpreted

Internal Standards % Area Surrogates % Rec1,4-Dichlorobenzene-d4 NA Nitrobenzene-d5 NANaphthalene-d8 89 2-Fluorobiphenyl 89Acenaphthene-d10 87 Terphenyl-d14 93Phenanthrene-d10 90Chrysene-d12 85Perylene-d12 74

Concentrations are reported on a wet weight basis.

The Total PAH result is the sum of non-rounded individual PAH results and therefore may differ to the sum of the rounded individual PAH results printed above. By convention, whereany one or more result is a "less than", the total is expressed as a "less than" and includes the "less than" concentration within the total.


EFS/122525 Ver. 1

1






Naphthalene 91-20-3 - < 0.08 -Acenaphthylene 208-96-8 - < 0.08 -Acenaphthene 83-32-9 - < 0.08 -Fluorene 86-73-7 - < 0.08 -Phenanthrene 85-01-8 6.20 0.14 99Anthracene 120-12-7 - < 0.08 -Fluoranthene 206-44-0 7.62 0.30 95Pyrene 129-00-0 7.93 0.27 95Benzo[a]anthracene 56-55-3 9.66 0.18 92Chrysene 218-01-9 9.71 0.22 98Benzo[b]fluoranthene 205-99-2 11.22 0.38 92Benzo[k]fluoranthene 207-08-9 11.25 0.14 91Benzo[a]pyrene 50-32-8 11.66 0.24 99Indeno[1,2,3-cd]pyrene 193-39-5 13.11 0.26 99Dibenzo[a,h]anthracene 53-70-3 - < 0.08 -Benzo[g,h,i]perylene 191-24-2 13.47 0.25 66Total (USEPA16) PAHs - - < 2.86 -






EFS/122525 Ver. 1

1












EFS/122525 Ver. 1

1






Naphthalene 91-20-3 - < 0.08 -Acenaphthylene 208-96-8 - < 0.08 -Acenaphthene 83-32-9 - < 0.08 -Fluorene 86-73-7 - < 0.08 -Phenanthrene 85-01-8 - < 0.08 -Anthracene 120-12-7 - < 0.08 -Fluoranthene 206-44-0 7.62 0.09 91Pyrene 129-00-0 7.93 0.09 92Benzo[a]anthracene 56-55-3 - < 0.08 -Chrysene 218-01-9 - < 0.08 -Benzo[b]fluoranthene 205-99-2 11.22 0.11 74Benzo[k]fluoranthene 207-08-9 - < 0.08 -Benzo[a]pyrene 50-32-8 - < 0.08 -Indeno[1,2,3-cd]pyrene 193-39-5 - < 0.08 -Dibenzo[a,h]anthracene 53-70-3 - < 0.08 -Benzo[g,h,i]perylene 191-24-2 - < 0.08 -Total (USEPA16) PAHs - - < 1.33 -






EFS/122525 Ver. 1

1












EFS/122525 Ver. 1

1






Naphthalene 91-20-3 - < 0.08 -Acenaphthylene 208-96-8 - < 0.08 -Acenaphthene 83-32-9 - < 0.08 -Fluorene 86-73-7 - < 0.08 -Phenanthrene 85-01-8 6.20 0.14 98Anthracene 120-12-7 - < 0.08 -Fluoranthene 206-44-0 7.62 0.27 95Pyrene 129-00-0 7.93 0.24 96Benzo[a]anthracene 56-55-3 9.66 0.15 93Chrysene 218-01-9 9.71 0.15 97Benzo[b]fluoranthene 205-99-2 11.22 0.20 73Benzo[k]fluoranthene 207-08-9 - < 0.08 -Benzo[a]pyrene 50-32-8 11.66 0.14 96Indeno[1,2,3-cd]pyrene 193-39-5 13.10 0.12 72Dibenzo[a,h]anthracene 53-70-3 - < 0.08 -Benzo[g,h,i]perylene 191-24-2 13.47 0.10 64Total (USEPA16) PAHs - - < 2.07 -






EFS/122525 Ver. 1

1






Naphthalene 91-20-3 - < 0.08 -Acenaphthylene 208-96-8 - < 0.08 -Acenaphthene 83-32-9 - < 0.08 -Fluorene 86-73-7 - < 0.08 -Phenanthrene 85-01-8 - < 0.08 -Anthracene 120-12-7 - < 0.08 -Fluoranthene 206-44-0 7.62 0.16 79Pyrene 129-00-0 7.93 0.15 94Benzo[a]anthracene 56-55-3 9.66 0.11 91Chrysene 218-01-9 9.71 0.12 98Benzo[b]fluoranthene 205-99-2 11.22 0.18 74Benzo[k]fluoranthene 207-08-9 - < 0.08 -Benzo[a]pyrene 50-32-8 11.66 0.12 97Indeno[1,2,3-cd]pyrene 193-39-5 13.11 0.14 82Dibenzo[a,h]anthracene 53-70-3 - < 0.08 -Benzo[g,h,i]perylene 191-24-2 13.47 0.14 59Total (USEPA16) PAHs - - < 1.76 -






EFS/122525 Ver. 1

1












EFS/122525 Ver. 1

1






Naphthalene 91-20-3 - < 0.08 -Acenaphthylene 208-96-8 - < 0.08 -Acenaphthene 83-32-9 - < 0.08 -Fluorene 86-73-7 - < 0.08 -Phenanthrene 85-01-8 - < 0.08 -Anthracene 120-12-7 - < 0.08 -Fluoranthene 206-44-0 7.62 0.26 94Pyrene 129-00-0 7.93 0.28 94Benzo[a]anthracene 56-55-3 9.66 0.16 96Chrysene 218-01-9 9.71 0.18 99Benzo[b]fluoranthene 205-99-2 11.22 0.30 95Benzo[k]fluoranthene 207-08-9 11.25 0.10 94Benzo[a]pyrene 50-32-8 11.66 0.21 98Indeno[1,2,3-cd]pyrene 193-39-5 13.10 0.23 73Dibenzo[a,h]anthracene 53-70-3 - < 0.08 -Benzo[g,h,i]perylene 191-24-2 13.47 0.25 90Total (USEPA16) PAHs - - < 2.53 -






EFS/122525 Ver. 1

1






Naphthalene 91-20-3 - < 0.08 -Acenaphthylene 208-96-8 - < 0.08 -Acenaphthene 83-32-9 - < 0.08 -Fluorene 86-73-7 - < 0.08 -Phenanthrene 85-01-8 - < 0.08 -Anthracene 120-12-7 - < 0.08 -Fluoranthene 206-44-0 - < 0.08 -Pyrene 129-00-0 - < 0.08 -Benzo[a]anthracene 56-55-3 - < 0.08 -Chrysene 218-01-9 - < 0.08 -Benzo[b]fluoranthene 205-99-2 - < 0.08 -Benzo[k]fluoranthene 207-08-9 - < 0.08 -Benzo[a]pyrene 50-32-8 - < 0.08 -Indeno[1,2,3-cd]pyrene 193-39-5 - < 0.08 -Dibenzo[a,h]anthracene 53-70-3 - < 0.08 -Benzo[g,h,i]perylene 191-24-2 - < 0.08 -Total (USEPA16) PAHs - - < 1.28 -






EFS/122525 Ver. 1

1






Naphthalene 91-20-3 - < 0.08 -Acenaphthylene 208-96-8 - < 0.08 -Acenaphthene 83-32-9 - < 0.08 -Fluorene 86-73-7 - < 0.08 -Phenanthrene 85-01-8 - < 0.08 -Anthracene 120-12-7 - < 0.08 -Fluoranthene 206-44-0 - < 0.08 -Pyrene 129-00-0 - < 0.08 -Benzo[a]anthracene 56-55-3 - < 0.08 -Chrysene 218-01-9 - < 0.08 -Benzo[b]fluoranthene 205-99-2 - < 0.08 -Benzo[k]fluoranthene 207-08-9 - < 0.08 -Benzo[a]pyrene 50-32-8 - < 0.08 -Indeno[1,2,3-cd]pyrene 193-39-5 - < 0.08 -Dibenzo[a,h]anthracene 53-70-3 - < 0.08 -Benzo[g,h,i]perylene 191-24-2 - < 0.08 -Total (USEPA16) PAHs - - < 1.28 -






EFS/122525 Ver. 1

Polychlorinated Biphenyls (congeners)

Customer and Site Details: Environ UK Ltd: UK14-17550 Spa Park Matrix: SOILJob Number: S12_2525 Date Booked in: 07-Mar-12QC Batch Number: 120067 Date Extracted: 12-Mar-12Directory: 0313PCB.GC8 Date Analysed: 15-Mar-12Method: Ultrasonic

* This sample data is not UKAS accredited.Concentration, (µg/kg)

Sample ID Customer ID PCB28 PCB52 PCB101 PCB118 PCB153 PCB138 PCB180* CL1256844 TP1 0.80-1.00 <5.0 <5.0 14.5 5.4 6.8 16.7 <5.0* CL1256845 TP1 2.80-3.00 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 6.7 <5.0* CL1256846 TP2 0.50-0.80 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 5.3 <5.0* CL1256849 TP3 3.00-3.30 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0* CL1256851 TP5 1.30-1.50 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 6.5 <5.0* CL1256853 TP6 1.20-1.50 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0


EFS/122525 Ver. 1

1Semi-Volatile Organic Compounds

UKAS accredited?: NoCustomer and Site Details: Environ UK Ltd: UK14-17550 Spa Park Matrix: Soil QC Batch Number: 32Sample Details: TP1 0.80-1.00 Date Booked in: 07-Mar-12 Ext Method: Ultrasonic Multiplier: 0.2LIMS ID Number: CL1256844 Date Extracted: 12-Mar-12 Operator: SO Dilution Factor: 1Job Number: S12_2525 Date Analysed: 13-Mar-12 7:34 PM Directory/Quant File: 12SVOC.MS16\ 0312_CCC3.DGPC (Y/N) N

Target Compounds CAS # R.T. Concentration % Fit Target Compounds CAS # R.T. Concentration % Fit(min) mg/kg mg/kg

Phenol 108-95-2 - < 2.0 - 2,4-Dinitrophenol 51-28-5 * - < 1.0 -bis(2-Chloroethyl)ether 111-44-4 - < 0.5 - Dibenzofuran 132-64-9 - < 0.5 -2-Chlorophenol 95-57-8 - < 2.0 - 4-Nitrophenol 100-02-7 - < 5.0 -1,3-Dichlorobenzene 541-73-1 - < 0.5 - 2,4-Dinitrotoluene 121-14-2 - < 0.5 -1,4-Dichlorobenzene 106-46-7 - < 0.5 - Fluorene 86-73-7 - < 0.2 -Benzyl alcohol 100-51-6 - < 0.5 - Diethylphthalate 84-66-2 - < 0.5 -1,2-Dichlorobenzene 95-50-1 - < 0.5 - 4-Chlorophenyl-phenylether 7005-72-3 - < 0.5 -2-Methylphenol 95-48-7 - < 0.5 - 4,6-Dinitro-2-methylphenol 534-52-1 - < 5.0 -bis(2-Chloroisopropyl)ether 108-60-1 - < 0.5 - 4-Nitroaniline 100-01-6 - < 0.5 -Hexachloroethane 67-72-1 - < 0.5 - N-Nitrosodiphenylamine 86-30-6 * - < 0.5 -N-Nitroso-di-n-propylamine 621-64-7 - < 0.5 - 4-Bromophenyl-phenylether 101-55-3 - < 0.5 -3- & 4-Methylphenol 108-39-4/106-44-5 - < 2.0 - Hexachlorobenzene 118-74-1 - < 0.5 -Nitrobenzene 98-95-3 - < 0.5 - Pentachlorophenol 87-86-5 - < 5.0 -Isophorone 78-59-1 - < 0.5 - Phenanthrene 85-01-8 - < 0.2 -2-Nitrophenol 88-75-5 - < 2.0 - Anthracene 120-12-7 - < 0.2 -2,4-Dimethylphenol 105-67-9 - < 2.0 - Di-n-butylphthalate 84-74-2 - < 0.5 -Benzoic Acid 65-85-0 * - < 10.0 - Fluoranthene 206-44-0 - < 0.2 -bis(2-Chloroethoxy)methane 111-91-1 - < 0.5 - Pyrene 129-00-0 - < 0.2 -2,4-Dichlorophenol 120-83-2 - < 2.0 - Butylbenzylphthalate 85-68-7 - < 0.5 -1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 120-82-1 - < 0.5 - Benzo[a]anthracene 56-55-3 - < 0.2 -Naphthalene 91-20-3 - < 0.2 - Chrysene 218-01-9 - < 0.2 -4-Chlorophenol 106-48-9 - < 2.0 - 3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine 91-94-1 - < 2.0 -4-Chloroaniline 106-47-8 * - < 0.5 - bis(2-Ethylhexyl)phthalate 117-81-7 - < 0.5 -Hexachlorobutadiene 87-68-3 - < 0.5 - Di-n-octylphthalate 117-84-0 - < 0.2 -4-Chloro-3-methylphenol 59-50-7 - < 0.5 - Benzo[b]fluoranthene 205-99-2 - < 0.2 -2-Methylnaphthalene 91-57-6 - < 0.2 - Benzo[k]fluoranthene 207-08-9 - < 0.2 -1-Methylnaphthalene 90-12-0 - < 0.2 - Benzo[a]pyrene 50-32-8 - < 0.2 -Hexachlorocyclopentadiene 77-47-4 * - < 0.5 - Indeno[1,2,3-cd]pyrene 193-39-5 - < 0.2 -2,4,6-Trichlorophenol 88-06-2 - < 2.0 - Dibenzo[a,h]anthracene 53-70-3 - < 0.2 -2,4,5-Trichlorophenol 95-95-4 - < 2.0 - Benzo[g,h,i]perylene 191-24-2 - < 0.2 -2-Chloronaphthalene 91-58-7 - < 0.2 - "M" denotes that % fit has been manually interpretedBiphenyl 92-52-4 - < 0.2 -Diphenyl ether 101-84-8 - < 0.2 - Internal Standards % Area Surrogates % Rec2-Nitroaniline 88-74-4 - < 0.5 - 1,4-Dichlorobenzene-d4 99 2-Fluorophenol 91Acenaphthylene 208-96-8 - < 0.2 - Naphthalene-d8 96 Phenol-d5 91Dimethylphthalate 131-11-3 - < 0.5 - Acenaphthene-d10 96 Nitrobenzene-d5 922,6-Dinitrotoluene 606-20-2 - < 0.5 - Phenanthrene-d10 99 2-Fluorobiphenyl 95Acenaphthene 83-32-9 - < 0.2 - Chrysene-d12 104 2,4,6-Tribromophenol 553-Nitroaniline 99-09-2 - < 0.5 - Perylene-d12 108 Terphenyl-d14 103Compounds marked with a * are reported not UKAS.Concentrations are reported on a wet weight basis."M" denotes that % fit has been manually interpreted


EFS/122525 Ver. 1




Phenol 108-95-2 - < 2.0 - 2,4-Dinitrophenol 51-28-5 * - < 1.0 -bis(2-Chloroethyl)ether 111-44-4 - < 0.5 - Dibenzofuran 132-64-9 - < 0.5 -2-Chlorophenol 95-57-8 - < 2.0 - 4-Nitrophenol 100-02-7 - < 5.0 -1,3-Dichlorobenzene 541-73-1 - < 0.5 - 2,4-Dinitrotoluene 121-14-2 - < 0.5 -1,4-Dichlorobenzene 106-46-7 - < 0.5 - Fluorene 86-73-7 - < 0.2 -Benzyl alcohol 100-51-6 - < 0.5 - Diethylphthalate 84-66-2 - < 0.5 -1,2-Dichlorobenzene 95-50-1 - < 0.5 - 4-Chlorophenyl-phenylether 7005-72-3 - < 0.5 -2-Methylphenol 95-48-7 - < 0.5 - 4,6-Dinitro-2-methylphenol 534-52-1 - < 5.0 -bis(2-Chloroisopropyl)ether 108-60-1 - < 0.5 - 4-Nitroaniline 100-01-6 - < 0.5 -Hexachloroethane 67-72-1 - < 0.5 - N-Nitrosodiphenylamine 86-30-6 * - < 0.5 -N-Nitroso-di-n-propylamine 621-64-7 - < 0.5 - 4-Bromophenyl-phenylether 101-55-3 - < 0.5 -3- & 4-Methylphenol 108-39-4/106-44-5 - < 2.0 - Hexachlorobenzene 118-74-1 - < 0.5 -Nitrobenzene 98-95-3 - < 0.5 - Pentachlorophenol 87-86-5 - < 5.0 -Isophorone 78-59-1 - < 0.5 - Phenanthrene 85-01-8 - < 0.2 -2-Nitrophenol 88-75-5 - < 2.0 - Anthracene 120-12-7 - < 0.2 -2,4-Dimethylphenol 105-67-9 - < 2.0 - Di-n-butylphthalate 84-74-2 - < 0.5 -Benzoic Acid 65-85-0 * - < 10.0 - Fluoranthene 206-44-0 12.80 0.6 100bis(2-Chloroethoxy)methane 111-91-1 - < 0.5 - Pyrene 129-00-0 13.15 0.5 972,4-Dichlorophenol 120-83-2 - < 2.0 - Butylbenzylphthalate 85-68-7 - < 0.5 -1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 120-82-1 - < 0.5 - Benzo[a]anthracene 56-55-3 15.06 0.3 93Naphthalene 91-20-3 - < 0.2 - Chrysene 218-01-9 15.12 0.3 904-Chlorophenol 106-48-9 - < 2.0 - 3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine 91-94-1 - < 2.0 -4-Chloroaniline 106-47-8 * - < 0.5 - bis(2-Ethylhexyl)phthalate 117-81-7 - < 0.5 -Hexachlorobutadiene 87-68-3 - < 0.5 - Di-n-octylphthalate 117-84-0 - < 0.2 -4-Chloro-3-methylphenol 59-50-7 - < 0.5 - Benzo[b]fluoranthene 205-99-2 16.67 0.3 772-Methylnaphthalene 91-57-6 - < 0.2 - Benzo[k]fluoranthene 207-08-9 - < 0.2 -1-Methylnaphthalene 90-12-0 - < 0.2 - Benzo[a]pyrene 50-32-8 17.11 0.2 96Hexachlorocyclopentadiene 77-47-4 * - < 0.5 - Indeno[1,2,3-cd]pyrene 193-39-5 - < 0.2 -2,4,6-Trichlorophenol 88-06-2 - < 2.0 - Dibenzo[a,h]anthracene 53-70-3 - < 0.2 -2,4,5-Trichlorophenol 95-95-4 - < 2.0 - Benzo[g,h,i]perylene 191-24-2 - < 0.2 -2-Chloronaphthalene 91-58-7 - < 0.2 - "M" denotes that % fit has been manually interpretedBiphenyl 92-52-4 - < 0.2 -Diphenyl ether 101-84-8 - < 0.2 - Internal Standards % Area Surrogates % Rec2-Nitroaniline 88-74-4 - < 0.5 - 1,4-Dichlorobenzene-d4 94 2-Fluorophenol 91Acenaphthylene 208-96-8 - < 0.2 - Naphthalene-d8 93 Phenol-d5 88Dimethylphthalate 131-11-3 - < 0.5 - Acenaphthene-d10 96 Nitrobenzene-d5 852,6-Dinitrotoluene 606-20-2 - < 0.5 - Phenanthrene-d10 100 2-Fluorobiphenyl 89Acenaphthene 83-32-9 - < 0.2 - Chrysene-d12 105 2,4,6-Tribromophenol 543-Nitroaniline 99-09-2 - < 0.5 - Perylene-d12 106 Terphenyl-d14 96Compounds marked with a * are reported not UKAS.Concentrations are reported on a wet weight basis."M" denotes that % fit has been manually interpreted


EFS/122525 Ver. 1




Phenol 108-95-2 - < 2.0 - 2,4-Dinitrophenol 51-28-5 * - < 1.0 -bis(2-Chloroethyl)ether 111-44-4 - < 0.5 - Dibenzofuran 132-64-9 - < 0.5 -2-Chlorophenol 95-57-8 - < 2.0 - 4-Nitrophenol 100-02-7 - < 5.0 -1,3-Dichlorobenzene 541-73-1 - < 0.5 - 2,4-Dinitrotoluene 121-14-2 - < 0.5 -1,4-Dichlorobenzene 106-46-7 - < 0.5 - Fluorene 86-73-7 - < 0.2 -Benzyl alcohol 100-51-6 - < 0.5 - Diethylphthalate 84-66-2 - < 0.5 -1,2-Dichlorobenzene 95-50-1 - < 0.5 - 4-Chlorophenyl-phenylether 7005-72-3 - < 0.5 -2-Methylphenol 95-48-7 - < 0.5 - 4,6-Dinitro-2-methylphenol 534-52-1 - < 5.0 -bis(2-Chloroisopropyl)ether 108-60-1 - < 0.5 - 4-Nitroaniline 100-01-6 - < 0.5 -Hexachloroethane 67-72-1 - < 0.5 - N-Nitrosodiphenylamine 86-30-6 * - < 0.5 -N-Nitroso-di-n-propylamine 621-64-7 - < 0.5 - 4-Bromophenyl-phenylether 101-55-3 - < 0.5 -3- & 4-Methylphenol 108-39-4/106-44-5 - < 2.0 - Hexachlorobenzene 118-74-1 - < 0.5 -Nitrobenzene 98-95-3 - < 0.5 - Pentachlorophenol 87-86-5 - < 5.0 -Isophorone 78-59-1 - < 0.5 - Phenanthrene 85-01-8 10.98 0.2 992-Nitrophenol 88-75-5 - < 2.0 - Anthracene 120-12-7 - < 0.2 -2,4-Dimethylphenol 105-67-9 - < 2.0 - Di-n-butylphthalate 84-74-2 - < 0.5 -Benzoic Acid 65-85-0 * - < 10.0 - Fluoranthene 206-44-0 12.80 0.4 99bis(2-Chloroethoxy)methane 111-91-1 - < 0.5 - Pyrene 129-00-0 13.15 0.4 972,4-Dichlorophenol 120-83-2 - < 2.0 - Butylbenzylphthalate 85-68-7 - < 0.5 -1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 120-82-1 - < 0.5 - Benzo[a]anthracene 56-55-3 15.06 0.2 91Naphthalene 91-20-3 - < 0.2 - Chrysene 218-01-9 15.11 0.2 884-Chlorophenol 106-48-9 - < 2.0 - 3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine 91-94-1 - < 2.0 -4-Chloroaniline 106-47-8 * - < 0.5 - bis(2-Ethylhexyl)phthalate 117-81-7 - < 0.5 -Hexachlorobutadiene 87-68-3 - < 0.5 - Di-n-octylphthalate 117-84-0 - < 0.2 -4-Chloro-3-methylphenol 59-50-7 - < 0.5 - Benzo[b]fluoranthene 205-99-2 16.67 0.4 772-Methylnaphthalene 91-57-6 - < 0.2 - Benzo[k]fluoranthene 207-08-9 - < 0.2 -1-Methylnaphthalene 90-12-0 - < 0.2 - Benzo[a]pyrene 50-32-8 17.11 0.3 98Hexachlorocyclopentadiene 77-47-4 * - < 0.5 - Indeno[1,2,3-cd]pyrene 193-39-5 18.52 0.2 822,4,6-Trichlorophenol 88-06-2 - < 2.0 - Dibenzo[a,h]anthracene 53-70-3 - < 0.2 -2,4,5-Trichlorophenol 95-95-4 - < 2.0 - Benzo[g,h,i]perylene 191-24-2 18.86 0.2 992-Chloronaphthalene 91-58-7 - < 0.2 - "M" denotes that % fit has been manually interpretedBiphenyl 92-52-4 - < 0.2 -Diphenyl ether 101-84-8 - < 0.2 - Internal Standards % Area Surrogates % Rec2-Nitroaniline 88-74-4 - < 0.5 - 1,4-Dichlorobenzene-d4 96 2-Fluorophenol 97Acenaphthylene 208-96-8 - < 0.2 - Naphthalene-d8 95 Phenol-d5 97Dimethylphthalate 131-11-3 - < 0.5 - Acenaphthene-d10 97 Nitrobenzene-d5 922,6-Dinitrotoluene 606-20-2 - < 0.5 - Phenanthrene-d10 100 2-Fluorobiphenyl 94Acenaphthene 83-32-9 - < 0.2 - Chrysene-d12 109 2,4,6-Tribromophenol 583-Nitroaniline 99-09-2 - < 0.5 - Perylene-d12 110 Terphenyl-d14 102Compounds marked with a * are reported not UKAS.Concentrations are reported on a wet weight basis."M" denotes that % fit has been manually interpreted


EFS/122525 Ver. 1




Phenol 108-95-2 - < 2.0 - 2,4-Dinitrophenol 51-28-5 * - < 1.0 -bis(2-Chloroethyl)ether 111-44-4 - < 0.5 - Dibenzofuran 132-64-9 - < 0.5 -2-Chlorophenol 95-57-8 - < 2.0 - 4-Nitrophenol 100-02-7 - < 5.0 -1,3-Dichlorobenzene 541-73-1 - < 0.5 - 2,4-Dinitrotoluene 121-14-2 - < 0.5 -1,4-Dichlorobenzene 106-46-7 - < 0.5 - Fluorene 86-73-7 - < 0.2 -Benzyl alcohol 100-51-6 - < 0.5 - Diethylphthalate 84-66-2 - < 0.5 -1,2-Dichlorobenzene 95-50-1 - < 0.5 - 4-Chlorophenyl-phenylether 7005-72-3 - < 0.5 -2-Methylphenol 95-48-7 - < 0.5 - 4,6-Dinitro-2-methylphenol 534-52-1 - < 5.0 -bis(2-Chloroisopropyl)ether 108-60-1 - < 0.5 - 4-Nitroaniline 100-01-6 - < 0.5 -Hexachloroethane 67-72-1 - < 0.5 - N-Nitrosodiphenylamine 86-30-6 * - < 0.5 -N-Nitroso-di-n-propylamine 621-64-7 - < 0.5 - 4-Bromophenyl-phenylether 101-55-3 - < 0.5 -3- & 4-Methylphenol 108-39-4/106-44-5 - < 2.0 - Hexachlorobenzene 118-74-1 - < 0.5 -Nitrobenzene 98-95-3 - < 0.5 - Pentachlorophenol 87-86-5 - < 5.0 -Isophorone 78-59-1 - < 0.5 - Phenanthrene 85-01-8 - < 0.2 -2-Nitrophenol 88-75-5 - < 2.0 - Anthracene 120-12-7 - < 0.2 -2,4-Dimethylphenol 105-67-9 - < 2.0 - Di-n-butylphthalate 84-74-2 - < 0.5 -Benzoic Acid 65-85-0 * - < 10.0 - Fluoranthene 206-44-0 12.80 0.2 99bis(2-Chloroethoxy)methane 111-91-1 - < 0.5 - Pyrene 129-00-0 - < 0.2 -2,4-Dichlorophenol 120-83-2 - < 2.0 - Butylbenzylphthalate 85-68-7 - < 0.5 -1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 120-82-1 - < 0.5 - Benzo[a]anthracene 56-55-3 - < 0.2 -Naphthalene 91-20-3 - < 0.2 - Chrysene 218-01-9 - < 0.2 -4-Chlorophenol 106-48-9 - < 2.0 - 3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine 91-94-1 - < 2.0 -4-Chloroaniline 106-47-8 * - < 0.5 - bis(2-Ethylhexyl)phthalate 117-81-7 - < 0.5 -Hexachlorobutadiene 87-68-3 - < 0.5 - Di-n-octylphthalate 117-84-0 - < 0.2 -4-Chloro-3-methylphenol 59-50-7 - < 0.5 - Benzo[b]fluoranthene 205-99-2 - < 0.2 -2-Methylnaphthalene 91-57-6 - < 0.2 - Benzo[k]fluoranthene 207-08-9 - < 0.2 -1-Methylnaphthalene 90-12-0 - < 0.2 - Benzo[a]pyrene 50-32-8 - < 0.2 -Hexachlorocyclopentadiene 77-47-4 * - < 0.5 - Indeno[1,2,3-cd]pyrene 193-39-5 - < 0.2 -2,4,6-Trichlorophenol 88-06-2 - < 2.0 - Dibenzo[a,h]anthracene 53-70-3 - < 0.2 -2,4,5-Trichlorophenol 95-95-4 - < 2.0 - Benzo[g,h,i]perylene 191-24-2 - < 0.2 -2-Chloronaphthalene 91-58-7 - < 0.2 - "M" denotes that % fit has been manually interpretedBiphenyl 92-52-4 - < 0.2 -Diphenyl ether 101-84-8 - < 0.2 - Internal Standards % Area Surrogates % Rec2-Nitroaniline 88-74-4 - < 0.5 - 1,4-Dichlorobenzene-d4 102 2-Fluorophenol 90Acenaphthylene 208-96-8 - < 0.2 - Naphthalene-d8 100 Phenol-d5 90Dimethylphthalate 131-11-3 - < 0.5 - Acenaphthene-d10 102 Nitrobenzene-d5 882,6-Dinitrotoluene 606-20-2 - < 0.5 - Phenanthrene-d10 107 2-Fluorobiphenyl 91Acenaphthene 83-32-9 - < 0.2 - Chrysene-d12 115 2,4,6-Tribromophenol 513-Nitroaniline 99-09-2 - < 0.5 - Perylene-d12 114 Terphenyl-d14 98Compounds marked with a * are reported not UKAS.Concentrations are reported on a wet weight basis."M" denotes that % fit has been manually interpreted


EFS/122525 Ver. 1




Phenol 108-95-2 - < 2.0 - 2,4-Dinitrophenol 51-28-5 * - < 1.0 -bis(2-Chloroethyl)ether 111-44-4 - < 0.5 - Dibenzofuran 132-64-9 - < 0.5 -2-Chlorophenol 95-57-8 - < 2.0 - 4-Nitrophenol 100-02-7 - < 5.0 -1,3-Dichlorobenzene 541-73-1 - < 0.5 - 2,4-Dinitrotoluene 121-14-2 - < 0.5 -1,4-Dichlorobenzene 106-46-7 - < 0.5 - Fluorene 86-73-7 - < 0.2 -Benzyl alcohol 100-51-6 5.76 0.6 88 Diethylphthalate 84-66-2 - < 0.5 -1,2-Dichlorobenzene 95-50-1 - < 0.5 - 4-Chlorophenyl-phenylether 7005-72-3 - < 0.5 -2-Methylphenol 95-48-7 - < 0.5 - 4,6-Dinitro-2-methylphenol 534-52-1 - < 5.0 -bis(2-Chloroisopropyl)ether 108-60-1 - < 0.5 - 4-Nitroaniline 100-01-6 - < 0.5 -Hexachloroethane 67-72-1 - < 0.5 - N-Nitrosodiphenylamine 86-30-6 * - < 0.5 -N-Nitroso-di-n-propylamine 621-64-7 - < 0.5 - 4-Bromophenyl-phenylether 101-55-3 - < 0.5 -3- & 4-Methylphenol 108-39-4/106-44-5 - < 2.0 - Hexachlorobenzene 118-74-1 - < 0.5 -Nitrobenzene 98-95-3 - < 0.5 - Pentachlorophenol 87-86-5 - < 5.0 -Isophorone 78-59-1 - < 0.5 - Phenanthrene 85-01-8 - < 0.2 -2-Nitrophenol 88-75-5 - < 2.0 - Anthracene 120-12-7 - < 0.2 -2,4-Dimethylphenol 105-67-9 - < 2.0 - Di-n-butylphthalate 84-74-2 - < 0.5 -Benzoic Acid 65-85-0 * - < 10.0 - Fluoranthene 206-44-0 12.81 0.8 99bis(2-Chloroethoxy)methane 111-91-1 - < 0.5 - Pyrene 129-00-0 13.15 0.8 992,4-Dichlorophenol 120-83-2 - < 2.0 - Butylbenzylphthalate 85-68-7 - < 0.5 -1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 120-82-1 - < 0.5 - Benzo[a]anthracene 56-55-3 15.07 0.8 82Naphthalene 91-20-3 - < 0.2 - Chrysene 218-01-9 15.12 0.8 844-Chlorophenol 106-48-9 - < 2.0 - 3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine 91-94-1 - < 2.0 -4-Chloroaniline 106-47-8 * - < 0.5 - bis(2-Ethylhexyl)phthalate 117-81-7 - < 0.5 -Hexachlorobutadiene 87-68-3 - < 0.5 - Di-n-octylphthalate 117-84-0 - < 0.2 -4-Chloro-3-methylphenol 59-50-7 7.51 0.5 97 Benzo[b]fluoranthene 205-99-2 16.68 2.0 772-Methylnaphthalene 91-57-6 - < 0.2 - Benzo[k]fluoranthene 207-08-9 16.71 0.7 641-Methylnaphthalene 90-12-0 - < 0.2 - Benzo[a]pyrene 50-32-8 17.12 1.5 96Hexachlorocyclopentadiene 77-47-4 * - < 0.5 - Indeno[1,2,3-cd]pyrene 193-39-5 18.53 1.2 782,4,6-Trichlorophenol 88-06-2 - < 2.0 - Dibenzo[a,h]anthracene 53-70-3 18.55 0.3 952,4,5-Trichlorophenol 95-95-4 - < 2.0 - Benzo[g,h,i]perylene 191-24-2 18.86 1.1 972-Chloronaphthalene 91-58-7 - < 0.2 - "M" denotes that % fit has been manually interpretedBiphenyl 92-52-4 - < 0.2 -Diphenyl ether 101-84-8 - < 0.2 - Internal Standards % Area Surrogates % Rec2-Nitroaniline 88-74-4 - < 0.5 - 1,4-Dichlorobenzene-d4 101 2-Fluorophenol 100Acenaphthylene 208-96-8 8.70 0.3 99 Naphthalene-d8 101 Phenol-d5 101Dimethylphthalate 131-11-3 - < 0.5 - Acenaphthene-d10 105 Nitrobenzene-d5 922,6-Dinitrotoluene 606-20-2 - < 0.5 - Phenanthrene-d10 112 2-Fluorobiphenyl 94Acenaphthene 83-32-9 - < 0.2 - Chrysene-d12 122 2,4,6-Tribromophenol 693-Nitroaniline 99-09-2 - < 0.5 - Perylene-d12 120 Terphenyl-d14 100Compounds marked with a * are reported not UKAS.Concentrations are reported on a wet weight basis."M" denotes that % fit has been manually interpreted


EFS/122525 Ver. 1


UKAS accredited?: NoCustomer and Site Details: Environ UK Ltd: UK14-17550 Spa Park Matrix: Soil QC Batch Number: 32Sample Details: TP6 1.20-1.50 Date Booked in: 07-Mar-12 Ext Method: Ultrasonic Multiplier: 1LIMS ID Number: CL1256853 Date Extracted: 12-Mar-12 Operator: SO Dilution Factor: 5Job Number: S12_2525 Date Analysed: 13-Mar-12 7:34 PM Directory/Quant File: 12SVOC.MS16\ 0312_CCC3.DGPC (Y/N) N


Phenol 108-95-2 - < 10.0 - 2,4-Dinitrophenol 51-28-5 * - < 5.0 -bis(2-Chloroethyl)ether 111-44-4 - < 2.5 - Dibenzofuran 132-64-9 - < 2.5 -2-Chlorophenol 95-57-8 - < 10.0 - 4-Nitrophenol 100-02-7 - < 25.0 -1,3-Dichlorobenzene 541-73-1 - < 2.5 - 2,4-Dinitrotoluene 121-14-2 - < 2.5 -1,4-Dichlorobenzene 106-46-7 - < 2.5 - Fluorene 86-73-7 - < 1.0 -Benzyl alcohol 100-51-6 - < 2.5 - Diethylphthalate 84-66-2 - < 2.5 -1,2-Dichlorobenzene 95-50-1 - < 2.5 - 4-Chlorophenyl-phenylether 7005-72-3 - < 2.5 -2-Methylphenol 95-48-7 - < 2.5 - 4,6-Dinitro-2-methylphenol 534-52-1 - < 25.0 -bis(2-Chloroisopropyl)ether 108-60-1 - < 2.5 - 4-Nitroaniline 100-01-6 - < 2.5 -Hexachloroethane 67-72-1 - < 2.5 - N-Nitrosodiphenylamine 86-30-6 * - < 2.5 -N-Nitroso-di-n-propylamine 621-64-7 - < 2.5 - 4-Bromophenyl-phenylether 101-55-3 - < 2.5 -3- & 4-Methylphenol 108-39-4/106-44-5 - < 10.0 - Hexachlorobenzene 118-74-1 - < 2.5 -Nitrobenzene 98-95-3 - < 2.5 - Pentachlorophenol 87-86-5 - < 25.0 -Isophorone 78-59-1 - < 2.5 - Phenanthrene 85-01-8 - < 1.0 -2-Nitrophenol 88-75-5 - < 10.0 - Anthracene 120-12-7 - < 1.0 -2,4-Dimethylphenol 105-67-9 - < 10.0 - Di-n-butylphthalate 84-74-2 - < 2.5 -Benzoic Acid 65-85-0 * - < 50.0 - Fluoranthene 206-44-0 - < 1.0 -bis(2-Chloroethoxy)methane 111-91-1 - < 2.5 - Pyrene 129-00-0 - < 1.0 -2,4-Dichlorophenol 120-83-2 - < 10.0 - Butylbenzylphthalate 85-68-7 - < 2.5 -1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 120-82-1 - < 2.5 - Benzo[a]anthracene 56-55-3 - < 1.0 -Naphthalene 91-20-3 - < 1.0 - Chrysene 218-01-9 - < 1.0 -4-Chlorophenol 106-48-9 - < 10.0 - 3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine 91-94-1 - < 10.0 -4-Chloroaniline 106-47-8 * - < 2.5 - bis(2-Ethylhexyl)phthalate 117-81-7 - < 2.5 -Hexachlorobutadiene 87-68-3 - < 2.5 - Di-n-octylphthalate 117-84-0 - < 1.0 -4-Chloro-3-methylphenol 59-50-7 - < 2.5 - Benzo[b]fluoranthene 205-99-2 - < 1.0 -2-Methylnaphthalene 91-57-6 - < 1.0 - Benzo[k]fluoranthene 207-08-9 - < 1.0 -1-Methylnaphthalene 90-12-0 - < 1.0 - Benzo[a]pyrene 50-32-8 - < 1.0 -Hexachlorocyclopentadiene 77-47-4 * - < 2.5 - Indeno[1,2,3-cd]pyrene 193-39-5 - < 1.0 -2,4,6-Trichlorophenol 88-06-2 - < 10.0 - Dibenzo[a,h]anthracene 53-70-3 - < 1.0 -2,4,5-Trichlorophenol 95-95-4 - < 10.0 - Benzo[g,h,i]perylene 191-24-2 - < 1.0 -2-Chloronaphthalene 91-58-7 - < 1.0 - "M" denotes that % fit has been manually interpretedBiphenyl 92-52-4 - < 1.0 -Diphenyl ether 101-84-8 - < 1.0 - Internal Standards % Area Surrogates % Rec2-Nitroaniline 88-74-4 - < 2.5 - 1,4-Dichlorobenzene-d4 100 2-Fluorophenol 99Acenaphthylene 208-96-8 - < 1.0 - Naphthalene-d8 97 Phenol-d5 104Dimethylphthalate 131-11-3 - < 2.5 - Acenaphthene-d10 99 Nitrobenzene-d5 992,6-Dinitrotoluene 606-20-2 - < 2.5 - Phenanthrene-d10 104 2-Fluorobiphenyl 105Acenaphthene 83-32-9 - < 1.0 - Chrysene-d12 111 2,4,6-Tribromophenol 623-Nitroaniline 99-09-2 - < 2.5 - Perylene-d12 102 Terphenyl-d14 112Compounds marked with a * are reported not UKAS.Concentrations are reported on a wet weight basis."M" denotes that % fit has been manually interpreted


EFS/122525 Ver. 1

Gasoline Range Organics(BTEX and Aliphatic Carbon Ranges)

Customer and Site Details: Environ UK Ltd : UK14-17550 Spa Park Matrix: Soil

Job Number: S12_2525 Date Booked in: 07-Mar-12

Directory: D:\TES\DATA\Y2012\0312HSA_GC09\031212A 2012-03-13 06-18-42\126F5601.D Date extracted: 14-Mar-12

Method: Headspace GCFID Date Analysed: 13-Mar-12, 23:40:04

* Sample data with an asterisk are not UKAS accredi ted.

Concentration, (mg/kg) - as wet weight AliphaticsSample ID Client ID Benzene Toluene Ethyl benzene m/p-Xylene o-Xylene C5 - C 6 >C6 - C7 >C7 - C8 >C8 - C10 Total GRO

CL1256844 TP1 0.80-1.00 <0.010 <0.010 <0.010 <0.010 <0.010 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2

CL1256845 TP1 2.80-3.00 <0.010 <0.010 <0.010 <0.010 <0.010 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2

CL1256846 TP2 0.50-0.80 <0.010 <0.010 <0.010 <0.010 <0.010 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2

CL1256847 TP2 3.20-3.50 <0.010 <0.010 <0.010 <0.010 <0.010 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2

CL1256848 TP3 1.80-2.00 <0.010 <0.010 <0.010 <0.010 <0.010 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2

CL1256849 TP3 3.00-3.30 <0.010 <0.010 <0.010 <0.010 <0.010 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2

CL1256850 TP4 0.80-1.00 <0.010 <0.010 <0.010 <0.010 <0.010 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2

CL1256851 TP5 1.30-1.50 <0.010 <0.010 <0.010 <0.010 <0.010 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2

CL1256852 TP5 2.30-2.50 <0.010 <0.010 <0.010 <0.010 <0.010 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2

CL1256853 TP6 1.20-1.50 <0.010 <0.010 <0.010 <0.010 <0.010 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2

CL1256854 TP6 2.00-2.20 <0.010 <0.010 <0.010 <0.010 <0.010 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2

Note: Benzene elutes between C6 and C7, toluene elutes between C7 and C8, ethyl benzene and the xylenes elute between C8 and C9.Each BTEX compound is deducted from the appropriate band to give the aliphatic fractions, however aromatic compounds may still be contributing to these fractions


EFS/122525 Ver. 1

ALIPHATIC / AROMATIC FRACTION BY GC/FID

Customer and Site Details: Environ UK Ltd : UK14-17550 Spa Park Matrix: SoilJob Number: S12_2525 Separation: Silica gel Date Booked in: 07-Mar-12QC Batch Number: 120231/120242 Eluents: Hexane, DCM Date Extracted: 12/03/12-15/03/12Directory: D:\TES\DATA\Y2012\03\0313TPH_GC3\055B5901.D Date Analysed: 14-Mar-12Method: Ultra Sonic

Concentration, (mg/kg) - as wet weight* This sample data is not UKAS accredited. >C8 - C10 >C10 - C12 >C12 - C16 >C16 - C21 >C21 - C35 >C8 - C40

Sample ID Client ID Aliphatics Aromatics Aliphatics Aromatics Aliphatics Aro matics Aliphatics Aromatics Aliphatics Aromatics Aliphat ics Aromatics

CL1256844 TP1 0.80-1.00 <4 <4 <4 <4 <4 <4 18.7 6.88 134 57.8 169 77.4

CL1256845 TP1 2.80-3.00 <4 <4 <4 <4 <4 <4 34.2 8.54 221 95.8 281 123

CL1256846 TP2 0.50-0.80 <4 <4 <4 <4 <4 <4 10.8 8.19 85.4 99 113 136

CL1256847 TP2 3.20-3.50 <4 <4 <4 <4 <4 <4 13.1 <4 103 46 135 60.4

CL1256848 TP3 1.80-2.00 <4 <4 <4 <4 <4 <4 14.6 6.06 100 50.4 134 68.8

CL1256849 TP3 3.00-3.30 <4 <4 <4 <4 <4 <4 16.3 6.69 151 72.9 179 94.9

CL1256850 TP4 0.80-1.00 <4 <4 <4 <4 <4 <4 10.1 4.79 62.6 35 80.3 46.2

CL1256851 TP5 1.30-1.50 <4 <4 <4 <4 12.6 <4 81 21.2 223 134 345 185

CL1256852 TP5 2.30-2.50 <4 <4 <4 <4 <4 <4 33.1 7.72 141 71.4 195 95.3

CL1256853 TP6 1.20-1.50 <4 <4 <4 <4 <4 <4 8.79 <4 68.7 32.3 88.5 43.7

CL1256854 TP6 2.00-2.20 <4 <4 <4 <4 <4 <4 <4 <4 11 9.6 <20 <20


EFS/122525 Ver. 1

Petroleum Hydrocarbons (C8 to C40) by GC/FID Alipha tics Fraction.

Sample ID: CL1256844ALI Job Number: S12_2525Multiplier: 14.82 Client: Environ UK LtdDilution: 1 Site: UK14-17550 Spa ParkAcquisition Method: 5UL_RUNF_SLOW.M Client Sample Ref: TP1 0.80-1.00Acquisition Date/Time: 14-Mar-12Datafile: D:\TES\DATA\Y2012\03\0313TPH_GC3\042F4901.D

min0 1 2 3 4 5

pA

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

450

FID1 A, (0313TPH_GC3\042F4901.D)


EFS/122525 Ver. 1

Petroleum Hydrocarbons (C8 to C40) by GC/FID Aromat ics Fraction.

Sample ID: CL1256844ARO Job Number: S12_2525Multiplier: 11.02 Client: Environ UK LtdDilution: 1 Site: UK14-17550 Spa ParkAcquisition Method: 5UL_RUNF_SLOW.M Client Sample Ref: TP1 0.80-1.00Acquisition Date/Time: 14-Mar-12Datafile: D:\TES\DATA\Y2012\03\0313TPH_GC3\092B4901.D

min0 1 2 3 4 5

pA

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

450

FID2 B, (0313TPH_GC3\092B4901.D)


EFS/122525 Ver. 1



min0 1 2 3 4 5

pA

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

450

FID1 A, (0313TPH_GC3\043F5001.D)


EFS/122525 Ver. 1



min0 1 2 3 4 5

pA

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

450

FID2 B, (0313TPH_GC3\093B5001.D)


EFS/122525 Ver. 1



min0 1 2 3 4 5

pA

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

450

FID1 A, (0313TPH_GC3\044F5101.D)


EFS/122525 Ver. 1



min0 1 2 3 4 5

pA

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

450

FID2 B, (0313TPH_GC3\094B5101.D)


EFS/122525 Ver. 1



min0 1 2 3 4 5

pA

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

450

FID1 A, (0313TPH_GC3\045F5201.D)


EFS/122525 Ver. 1



min0 1 2 3 4 5

pA

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

450

FID2 B, (0313TPH_GC3\095B5201.D)


EFS/122525 Ver. 1



min0 1 2 3 4 5

pA

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

450

FID1 A, (0313TPH_GC3\046F5301.D)


EFS/122525 Ver. 1



min0 1 2 3 4 5

pA

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

450

FID2 B, (0313TPH_GC3\096B5301.D)


EFS/122525 Ver. 1



min0 1 2 3 4 5

pA

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

450

FID1 A, (0315TPH_GC3\045F5301.D)


EFS/122525 Ver. 1



min0 1 2 3 4 5

pA

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

450

FID2 B, (0313TPH_GC3\097B5401.D)


EFS/122525 Ver. 1



min0 1 2 3 4 5

pA

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

450

FID1 A, (0313TPH_GC3\048F5501.D)


EFS/122525 Ver. 1



min0 1 2 3 4 5

pA

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

450

FID2 B, (0313TPH_GC3\098B5501.D)


EFS/122525 Ver. 1



min0 1 2 3 4 5

pA

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

450

FID1 A, (0313TPH_GC3\049F5601.D)


EFS/122525 Ver. 1



min0 1 2 3 4 5

pA

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

450

FID2 B, (0313TPH_GC3\099B5601.D)


EFS/122525 Ver. 1



min0 1 2 3 4 5

pA

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

450

FID1 A, (0313TPH_GC3\050F5701.D)


EFS/122525 Ver. 1



min0 1 2 3 4 5

pA

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

450

FID2 B, (0313TPH_GC3\100B5701.D)


EFS/122525 Ver. 1



min0 1 2 3 4 5

pA

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

450

FID1 A, (0313TPH_GC3\004F5801.D)


EFS/122525 Ver. 1



min0 1 2 3 4 5

pA

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

450

FID2 B, (0313TPH_GC3\054B5801.D)


EFS/122525 Ver. 1



min0 1 2 3 4 5

pA

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

450

FID1 A, (0313TPH_GC3\005F5901.D)


EFS/122525 Ver. 1



min0 1 2 3 4 5

pA

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

450

FID2 B, (0313TPH_GC3\055B5901.D)


EFS/122525 Ver. 1

Volatile Organic Compounds by HSA-GCMS

UKAS accredited?: YesCustomer and Site Details: Environ UK Ltd: UK14-17550 Spa Park Directory/Quant file: 314VOC_MS19\ Initial Calibration Matrix: SoilSample Details: TP1 0.80-1.00 Date Booked in: 07-Mar-12 Method: HeadspaceLIMS ID Number: CL1256844 Date Analysed: 14-Mar-12 Multiplier: 1Job Number: S12_2525 Operator: TP Position: 2

Target Compounds CAS # R.T. Concentration % Fit Target Compounds CAS # R.T. Concentration % Fit(min.) µg/kg (min.) µg/kg

Dichlorodifluoromethane 75-71-8 ** - < 1 - o-Xylene 95-47-6 - < 2 -Chloromethane 74-87-3 * - < 3 - Styrene 100-42-5 5.79 2 MVinyl Chloride 75-01-4 - < 1 - Bromoform 75-25-2 5.89 4 M

Bromomethane 74-83-9 - < 1 - iso-Propylbenzene 98-82-8 - < 1 -Chloroethane 75-00-3** - < 2 - 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 79-34-5 ** 6.02 2 MTrichlorofluoromethane 75-69-4 - < 1 - Propylbenzene 103-65-1 6.03 1 M1,1-Dichloroethene 75-35-48 * - < 1 - Bromobenzene 108-86-1 6.04 2 Mtrans 1,2-Dichloroethene 156-60-5 - < 1 - 1,2,3-Trichloropropane 96-18-4 - < 1 -1,1-Dichloroethane 75-34-3 - < 1 - 2-Chlorotoluene 95-49-8 6.09 2 MMTBE 1634-04-4 - < 1 - 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene 108-67-8 6.08 3 M2,2-Dichloropropane 594-20-7 - < 1 - 4-Chlorotoluene 106-43-4 6.13 2 Mcis 1,2-Dichloroethene 156-59-2 - < 10 - tert-Butylbenzene 98-06-6 - < 1 -Bromochloromethane 74-97-5 - < 1 - 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene 95-63-6 6.22 4 MChloroform 67-66-3 - < 1 - sec-Butylbenzene 135-98-8 6.27 1 M1,1,1-Trichloroethane 71-55-6 - < 1 - p-Isopropyltoluene 99-87-6 - < 1 -Carbon Tetrachloride 56-23-5 - < 1 - 1,3-Dichlorobenzene 541-73-1 6.36 4 M1,1-Dichloropropene 563-58-6 - < 1 - 1,4-Dichlorobenzene 106-46-7 6.38 5 MBenzene 71-43-2 4.31 2 M n-Butylbenzene 104-51-8 * 6.46 2 M1,2-Dichloroethane 107-06-2 - < 1 - 1,2-Dichlorobenzene 95-50-1 6.52 5 MTrichloroethene 79-01-6 4.58 9 M 1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane 96-12-8 - < 1 -1,2-Dichloropropane 78-87-5 - < 1 - 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 120-82-1 * 7.14 28 MDibromomethane 74-95-3 - < 1 - Hexachlorobutadiene 87-68-3 ** 7.18 6 MBromodichloromethane 75-27-4 - < 1 - Naphthalene 91-20-3 7.27 34 Mcis 1,3-Dichloropropene 10061-01-5 - < 1 - 1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene 87-61-6 7.39 25 MToluene 108-88-3 - < 5 - Compounds marked * are not MCERTS accreditedtrans 1,3-Dichloropropene 10061-02-6 - < 1 - Compounds marked ** are not UKAS or Mcerts accredited1,1,2-Trichloroethane 79-00-5 - < 1 - "M" denotes that % fit has been manually interpretedTetrachloroethene 127-18-4 5.28 5 M1,3-Dichloropropane 142-28-9 - < 1 - Internal standards R.T. Area % Surrogates % RecDibromochloromethane 124-48-1 5.38 1 M Pentafluorobenzene 4.13 65 Dibromofluoromethane 1081,2-Dibromoethane 106-93-4 - < 1 - 1,4-Difluorobenzene 4.47 62 Toluene-d8 97

Chlorobenzene 108-90-7 5.59 1 M Chlorobenzene-d5 5.58 52Ethylbenzene 100-41-4 - < 2 - Bromofluorobenzene 5.97 391,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane 630-20-6 - < 1 - 1,4-Dichlorobenzene-d4 6.37 31m and p-Xylene 108-38-3/106-42-3 - < 4 - Naphthalene-d8 7.25 10Note: Volatile compounds degrade with time, and this may affect the integrity of the data depending on the timescale between sampling and analysis. It is recommended that analysis takes place within 7 days of sampling.


EFS/122525 Ver. 1




Dichlorodifluoromethane 75-71-8 ** - < 1 - o-Xylene 95-47-6 - < 2 -Chloromethane 74-87-3 * - < 3 - Styrene 100-42-5 5.79 1 MVinyl Chloride 75-01-4 - < 1 - Bromoform 75-25-2 - < 2 -

Bromomethane 74-83-9 - < 1 - iso-Propylbenzene 98-82-8 - < 1 -Chloroethane 75-00-3** - < 2 - 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 79-34-5 ** - < 1 -Trichlorofluoromethane 75-69-4 - < 1 - Propylbenzene 103-65-1 - < 1 -1,1-Dichloroethene 75-35-48 * - < 1 - Bromobenzene 108-86-1 - < 1 -trans 1,2-Dichloroethene 156-60-5 - < 1 - 1,2,3-Trichloropropane 96-18-4 - < 1 -1,1-Dichloroethane 75-34-3 - < 1 - 2-Chlorotoluene 95-49-8 - < 1 -MTBE 1634-04-4 - < 1 - 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene 108-67-8 6.08 3 M2,2-Dichloropropane 594-20-7 - < 1 - 4-Chlorotoluene 106-43-4 - < 1 -cis 1,2-Dichloroethene 156-59-2 - < 10 - tert-Butylbenzene 98-06-6 - < 1 -Bromochloromethane 74-97-5 - < 1 - 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene 95-63-6 6.22 6 MChloroform 67-66-3 - < 1 - sec-Butylbenzene 135-98-8 - < 1 -1,1,1-Trichloroethane 71-55-6 - < 1 - p-Isopropyltoluene 99-87-6 - < 1 -Carbon Tetrachloride 56-23-5 - < 1 - 1,3-Dichlorobenzene 541-73-1 6.36 1 M1,1-Dichloropropene 563-58-6 - < 1 - 1,4-Dichlorobenzene 106-46-7 6.38 2 MBenzene 71-43-2 4.31 2 M n-Butylbenzene 104-51-8 * - < 1 -1,2-Dichloroethane 107-06-2 - < 1 - 1,2-Dichlorobenzene 95-50-1 6.52 1 MTrichloroethene 79-01-6 4.58 5 M 1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane 96-12-8 - < 1 -1,2-Dichloropropane 78-87-5 - < 1 - 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 120-82-1 * 7.15 6 MDibromomethane 74-95-3 - < 1 - Hexachlorobutadiene 87-68-3 ** - < 2 -Bromodichloromethane 75-27-4 - < 1 - Naphthalene 91-20-3 7.26 20 Mcis 1,3-Dichloropropene 10061-01-5 - < 1 - 1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene 87-61-6 7.39 8 MToluene 108-88-3 - < 5 - Compounds marked * are not MCERTS accreditedtrans 1,3-Dichloropropene 10061-02-6 - < 1 - Compounds marked ** are not UKAS or Mcerts accredited1,1,2-Trichloroethane 79-00-5 - < 1 - "M" denotes that % fit has been manually interpretedTetrachloroethene 127-18-4 5.28 5 M1,3-Dichloropropane 142-28-9 - < 1 - Internal standards R.T. Area % Surrogates % RecDibromochloromethane 124-48-1 - < 1 - Pentafluorobenzene 4.13 59 Dibromofluoromethane 1101,2-Dibromoethane 106-93-4 - < 1 - 1,4-Difluorobenzene 4.47 56 Toluene-d8 96

Chlorobenzene 108-90-7 - < 1 - Chlorobenzene-d5 5.58 46Ethylbenzene 100-41-4 - < 2 - Bromofluorobenzene 5.97 341,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane 630-20-6 - < 1 - 1,4-Dichlorobenzene-d4 6.37 24m and p-Xylene 108-38-3/106-42-3 - < 4 - Naphthalene-d8 7.25 9Note: Volatile compounds degrade with time, and this may affect the integrity of the data depending on the timescale between sampling and analysis. It is recommended that analysis takes place within 7 days of sampling.


EFS/122525 Ver. 1




Dichlorodifluoromethane 75-71-8 ** - < 1 - o-Xylene 95-47-6 - < 2 -Chloromethane 74-87-3 * - < 3 - Styrene 100-42-5 - < 1 -Vinyl Chloride 75-01-4 - < 1 - Bromoform 75-25-2 - < 2 -

Bromomethane 74-83-9 - < 1 - iso-Propylbenzene 98-82-8 - < 1 -Chloroethane 75-00-3** - < 2 - 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 79-34-5 ** - < 1 -Trichlorofluoromethane 75-69-4 - < 1 - Propylbenzene 103-65-1 - < 1 -1,1-Dichloroethene 75-35-48 * - < 1 - Bromobenzene 108-86-1 - < 1 -trans 1,2-Dichloroethene 156-60-5 - < 1 - 1,2,3-Trichloropropane 96-18-4 - < 1 -1,1-Dichloroethane 75-34-3 - < 1 - 2-Chlorotoluene 95-49-8 - < 1 -MTBE 1634-04-4 - < 1 - 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene 108-67-8 - < 1 -2,2-Dichloropropane 594-20-7 - < 1 - 4-Chlorotoluene 106-43-4 - < 1 -cis 1,2-Dichloroethene 156-59-2 - < 10 - tert-Butylbenzene 98-06-6 - < 1 -Bromochloromethane 74-97-5 - < 1 - 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene 95-63-6 6.22 2 MChloroform 67-66-3 - < 1 - sec-Butylbenzene 135-98-8 - < 1 -1,1,1-Trichloroethane 71-55-6 - < 1 - p-Isopropyltoluene 99-87-6 - < 1 -Carbon Tetrachloride 56-23-5 - < 1 - 1,3-Dichlorobenzene 541-73-1 - < 1 -1,1-Dichloropropene 563-58-6 - < 1 - 1,4-Dichlorobenzene 106-46-7 - < 1 -Benzene 71-43-2 4.31 2 M n-Butylbenzene 104-51-8 * - < 1 -1,2-Dichloroethane 107-06-2 - < 1 - 1,2-Dichlorobenzene 95-50-1 - < 1 -Trichloroethene 79-01-6 4.58 3 M 1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane 96-12-8 - < 1 -1,2-Dichloropropane 78-87-5 - < 1 - 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 120-82-1 * - < 3 -Dibromomethane 74-95-3 - < 1 - Hexachlorobutadiene 87-68-3 ** - < 2 -Bromodichloromethane 75-27-4 - < 1 - Naphthalene 91-20-3 7.26 7 Mcis 1,3-Dichloropropene 10061-01-5 - < 1 - 1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene 87-61-6 - < 3 -Toluene 108-88-3 - < 5 - Compounds marked * are not MCERTS accreditedtrans 1,3-Dichloropropene 10061-02-6 - < 1 - Compounds marked ** are not UKAS or Mcerts accredited1,1,2-Trichloroethane 79-00-5 - < 1 - "M" denotes that % fit has been manually interpretedTetrachloroethene 127-18-4 - < 3 -1,3-Dichloropropane 142-28-9 - < 1 - Internal standards R.T. Area % Surrogates % RecDibromochloromethane 124-48-1 - < 1 - Pentafluorobenzene 4.13 62 Dibromofluoromethane 1081,2-Dibromoethane 106-93-4 - < 1 - 1,4-Difluorobenzene 4.47 60 Toluene-d8 95



EFS/122525 Ver. 1





Bromomethane 74-83-9 - < 1 - iso-Propylbenzene 98-82-8 - < 1 -Chloroethane 75-00-3** - < 2 - 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 79-34-5 ** - < 1 -Trichlorofluoromethane 75-69-4 - < 1 - Propylbenzene 103-65-1 - < 1 -1,1-Dichloroethene 75-35-48 * - < 1 - Bromobenzene 108-86-1 - < 1 -trans 1,2-Dichloroethene 156-60-5 - < 1 - 1,2,3-Trichloropropane 96-18-4 - < 1 -1,1-Dichloroethane 75-34-3 - < 1 - 2-Chlorotoluene 95-49-8 - < 1 -MTBE 1634-04-4 - < 1 - 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene 108-67-8 - < 1 -2,2-Dichloropropane 594-20-7 - < 1 - 4-Chlorotoluene 106-43-4 - < 1 -cis 1,2-Dichloroethene 156-59-2 - < 10 - tert-Butylbenzene 98-06-6 - < 1 -Bromochloromethane 74-97-5 - < 1 - 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene 95-63-6 6.22 1 MChloroform 67-66-3 - < 1 - sec-Butylbenzene 135-98-8 - < 1 -1,1,1-Trichloroethane 71-55-6 - < 1 - p-Isopropyltoluene 99-87-6 - < 1 -Carbon Tetrachloride 56-23-5 - < 1 - 1,3-Dichlorobenzene 541-73-1 - < 1 -1,1-Dichloropropene 563-58-6 - < 1 - 1,4-Dichlorobenzene 106-46-7 - < 1 -Benzene 71-43-2 - < 1 - n-Butylbenzene 104-51-8 * - < 1 -1,2-Dichloroethane 107-06-2 - < 1 - 1,2-Dichlorobenzene 95-50-1 - < 1 -Trichloroethene 79-01-6 4.58 3 M 1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane 96-12-8 - < 1 -1,2-Dichloropropane 78-87-5 - < 1 - 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 120-82-1 * - < 3 -Dibromomethane 74-95-3 - < 1 - Hexachlorobutadiene 87-68-3 ** - < 2 -Bromodichloromethane 75-27-4 - < 1 - Naphthalene 91-20-3 7.26 8 Mcis 1,3-Dichloropropene 10061-01-5 - < 1 - 1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene 87-61-6 - < 3 -Toluene 108-88-3 - < 5 - Compounds marked * are not MCERTS accreditedtrans 1,3-Dichloropropene 10061-02-6 - < 1 - Compounds marked ** are not UKAS or Mcerts accredited1,1,2-Trichloroethane 79-00-5 - < 1 - "M" denotes that % fit has been manually interpretedTetrachloroethene 127-18-4 - < 3 -1,3-Dichloropropane 142-28-9 - < 1 - Internal standards R.T. Area % Surrogates % RecDibromochloromethane 124-48-1 - < 1 - Pentafluorobenzene 4.13 65 Dibromofluoromethane 1091,2-Dibromoethane 106-93-4 - < 1 - 1,4-Difluorobenzene 4.47 63 Toluene-d8 95



EFS/122525 Ver. 1





Bromomethane 74-83-9 - < 1 - iso-Propylbenzene 98-82-8 - < 1 -Chloroethane 75-00-3** - < 2 - 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 79-34-5 ** - < 1 -Trichlorofluoromethane 75-69-4 - < 1 - Propylbenzene 103-65-1 - < 1 -1,1-Dichloroethene 75-35-48 * - < 1 - Bromobenzene 108-86-1 - < 1 -trans 1,2-Dichloroethene 156-60-5 - < 1 - 1,2,3-Trichloropropane 96-18-4 - < 1 -1,1-Dichloroethane 75-34-3 - < 1 - 2-Chlorotoluene 95-49-8 - < 1 -MTBE 1634-04-4 - < 1 - 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene 108-67-8 6.08 2 M2,2-Dichloropropane 594-20-7 - < 1 - 4-Chlorotoluene 106-43-4 - < 1 -cis 1,2-Dichloroethene 156-59-2 3.91 13 M tert-Butylbenzene 98-06-6 - < 1 -Bromochloromethane 74-97-5 - < 1 - 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene 95-63-6 6.22 3 MChloroform 67-66-3 - < 1 - sec-Butylbenzene 135-98-8 - < 1 -1,1,1-Trichloroethane 71-55-6 4.15 4 M p-Isopropyltoluene 99-87-6 - < 1 -Carbon Tetrachloride 56-23-5 - < 1 - 1,3-Dichlorobenzene 541-73-1 - < 1 -1,1-Dichloropropene 563-58-6 - < 1 - 1,4-Dichlorobenzene 106-46-7 - < 1 -Benzene 71-43-2 4.31 2 M n-Butylbenzene 104-51-8 * - < 1 -1,2-Dichloroethane 107-06-2 - < 1 - 1,2-Dichlorobenzene 95-50-1 - < 1 -Trichloroethene 79-01-6 4.58 30 71 1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane 96-12-8 - < 1 -1,2-Dichloropropane 78-87-5 - < 1 - 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 120-82-1 * - < 3 -Dibromomethane 74-95-3 - < 1 - Hexachlorobutadiene 87-68-3 ** - < 2 -Bromodichloromethane 75-27-4 - < 1 - Naphthalene 91-20-3 7.27 8 Mcis 1,3-Dichloropropene 10061-01-5 - < 1 - 1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene 87-61-6 - < 3 -Toluene 108-88-3 - < 5 - Compounds marked * are not MCERTS accreditedtrans 1,3-Dichloropropene 10061-02-6 - < 1 - Compounds marked ** are not UKAS or Mcerts accredited1,1,2-Trichloroethane 79-00-5 - < 1 - "M" denotes that % fit has been manually interpretedTetrachloroethene 127-18-4 5.28 4 M1,3-Dichloropropane 142-28-9 - < 1 - Internal standards R.T. Area % Surrogates % RecDibromochloromethane 124-48-1 - < 1 - Pentafluorobenzene 4.13 53 Dibromofluoromethane 1081,2-Dibromoethane 106-93-4 - < 1 - 1,4-Difluorobenzene 4.47 50 Toluene-d8 98



EFS/122525 Ver. 1





Bromomethane 74-83-9 - < 1 - iso-Propylbenzene 98-82-8 - < 1 -Chloroethane 75-00-3** - < 2 - 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 79-34-5 ** - < 1 -Trichlorofluoromethane 75-69-4 - < 1 - Propylbenzene 103-65-1 - < 1 -1,1-Dichloroethene 75-35-48 * - < 1 - Bromobenzene 108-86-1 - < 1 -trans 1,2-Dichloroethene 156-60-5 - < 1 - 1,2,3-Trichloropropane 96-18-4 - < 1 -1,1-Dichloroethane 75-34-3 - < 1 - 2-Chlorotoluene 95-49-8 - < 1 -MTBE 1634-04-4 - < 1 - 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene 108-67-8 - < 1 -2,2-Dichloropropane 594-20-7 - < 1 - 4-Chlorotoluene 106-43-4 - < 1 -cis 1,2-Dichloroethene 156-59-2 - < 10 - tert-Butylbenzene 98-06-6 - < 1 -Bromochloromethane 74-97-5 - < 1 - 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene 95-63-6 6.22 1 MChloroform 67-66-3 - < 1 - sec-Butylbenzene 135-98-8 - < 1 -1,1,1-Trichloroethane 71-55-6 4.14 1 M p-Isopropyltoluene 99-87-6 - < 1 -Carbon Tetrachloride 56-23-5 - < 1 - 1,3-Dichlorobenzene 541-73-1 - < 1 -1,1-Dichloropropene 563-58-6 - < 1 - 1,4-Dichlorobenzene 106-46-7 - < 1 -Benzene 71-43-2 4.31 1 M n-Butylbenzene 104-51-8 * - < 1 -1,2-Dichloroethane 107-06-2 - < 1 - 1,2-Dichlorobenzene 95-50-1 - < 1 -Trichloroethene 79-01-6 4.58 3 M 1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane 96-12-8 - < 1 -1,2-Dichloropropane 78-87-5 - < 1 - 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 120-82-1 * - < 3 -Dibromomethane 74-95-3 - < 1 - Hexachlorobutadiene 87-68-3 ** - < 2 -Bromodichloromethane 75-27-4 - < 1 - Naphthalene 91-20-3 7.26 5 Mcis 1,3-Dichloropropene 10061-01-5 - < 1 - 1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene 87-61-6 - < 3 -Toluene 108-88-3 - < 5 - Compounds marked * are not MCERTS accreditedtrans 1,3-Dichloropropene 10061-02-6 - < 1 - Compounds marked ** are not UKAS or Mcerts accredited1,1,2-Trichloroethane 79-00-5 - < 1 - "M" denotes that % fit has been manually interpretedTetrachloroethene 127-18-4 5.28 4 M1,3-Dichloropropane 142-28-9 - < 1 - Internal standards R.T. Area % Surrogates % RecDibromochloromethane 124-48-1 - < 1 - Pentafluorobenzene 4.13 60 Dibromofluoromethane 1121,2-Dibromoethane 106-93-4 - < 1 - 1,4-Difluorobenzene 4.47 59 Toluene-d8 95



EFS/122525 Ver. 1

Page 1 of 1

Report No:

Report Date:

Project Number:

Sample Number

Sample Date Sample Location Test DateTotal Sample Dry Weight

(g)

Weight of <2mm

Fraction (g)

Asbestos(g) in >8mm+>2mm

Asbestos(g) in <2mm

% Asbestos by weight of Total Dried Sample

CL/1256844 06/03/12 TP1 0.80-1.00 16/03/2012 Screen & ID

CL/1256845 06/03/12 TP1 2.80-3.00 16/03/2012 Screen & ID

CL/1256846 06/03/12 TP2 0.50-0.80 16/03/2012 Screen & ID

CL/1256847 06/03/12 TP2 3.20-3.50 16/03/2012 Screen & ID

CL/1256848 06/03/12 TP3 1.80-2.00 16/03/2012 Screen & ID

CL/1256849 06/03/12 TP3 3.00-3.30 16/03/2012 Screen & ID

CL/1256850 06/03/12 TP4 0.80-1.00 16/03/2012 Screen & ID

CL/1256851 06/03/12 TP5 1.30-1.50 16/03/2012 Screen & ID

CL/1256852 06/03/12 TP5 2.30-2.50 16/03/2012 Screen & ID

CL/1256853 06/03/12 TP6 1.20-1.50 16/03/2012 Screen & ID

CL/1256854 06/03/12 TP6 2.00-2.20 16/03/2012 Screen Only

Name: Andrew ElsbyAuthorised Signatory:

Position: Regional Manager

ESG Asbestos Limited is a wholly owned subsidiary of Environmental Scientifics Group Limited (ESG), registered in England and Wales, registered company 04951688. Form ESG-SOIL-011 v04 Oct'11

ASBESTOS ANALYSIS RESULTS - SOIL ANALYSIS

Site Address:

ANO-0488-2737Etwall House, Bretby Business Park, Ashby Road, Burton upon Trent

Client:

Detection limit of Method SCI-ASB-020 is 0.001%

Sampling has been carried out by client

For the attention of:

Address:

ESG Environmental Chemistry

16/03/2012

ESG Asbestos limited Certificate of Analysis for As bestos in Soils

Amosite & Chrysotile - Free Fibres

Chrysotile - Lagging

Environ UK Ltd

Asbestos Fibre Types Identified

S122525UK14-17550 Spa Park

Chrysotile - Lagging

Chrysotile - Free Fibres


No Asbestos Identified in Sample



Amosite & Chrysotile - Free Fibres

Amosite - Free Fibres

Chrysotile - Free Fibres & Cement

The sample analysis for the above results was carried out using the procedures detailed in ESG Asbestos Limited in house method (SCI-ASB-020) based on HSE document MDHS 90 - Asbestos Contaminated Land - Draft 5 - November 1997 (withdrawn). Fibre identification was carried out using ESG Asbestos Limited in house method of transmitted/polarised light microscopy and centre stop dispersion staining (SCI-ASB-007), based on HSE’s HSG 248. The analysis of fine fraction for asbestos content only includes fibres and does not discriminate non-asbestos fibres. All fibres are assumed, unless specified, to be amphiboles. All tests were carried out at ESG Asbestos Laboratory, Ashbourne House, Bretby Business Park, Ashby Road, Burton-upon-Trent, Staffordshire. DE15 0XD, UKAS Laboratory Number 1089.

NAACR = Not Analysed at Clients Request NAIIS = No Asbestos Identified in Sample (Screens O nly)

NADIS = No Asbestos Detected in Sample (ID & Quant Only)Keys


EFS/122525 Ver. 1

SOIL Analysis S122525

CustomerSiteReport No S122525

MethodID

BT

EX

HS

A

CustS

erv

GR

OH

SA

ICP

BO

R

ICP

MS

S

ICP

SO

IL

ICP

WS

S

KO

NE

CR

NR

A Leachate

PA

HM

SU

S

PC

BU

SE

CD

AR

PH

SO

IL

SF

AP

I

Sub002a

SV

OC

MS

US

ID Number Description Sampled

MT

BE

(µg/kg)

RE

PO

RT

A

GR

O (A

A) by H

SA

GC

-FID

Boron (H

20 Soluble)

Arsenic (M

S)

Cadm

ium (M

S)

Chrom

ium (M

S)

Copper (M

S)

Lead (MS

)

Mercury (M

S)

Nickel (M

S)

Selenium

(MS

)

Vanadium

(MS

)

Zinc (M

S)

Beryllium

.

SO

4-- (H2O

sol) mg/l

Chrom

ium vi:

NR

A Leachate

PA

H (16) by G

CM

S

PC

B-7 C

ongeners Analysis

pH units (A

R)

Cyanide(T

otal) (AR

)

Phenol Index.(A

R)

^Asbestos S

creen

SV

OC

by GC

MS

(AR

)

��

CL/1256844 TP1 0.80-1.00 06/03/12CL/1256845 TP1 2.80-3.00 06/03/12CL/1256846 TP2 0.50-0.80 06/03/12CL/1256847 TP2 3.20-3.50 06/03/12CL/1256848 TP3 1.80-2.00 06/03/12CL/1256849 TP3 3.00-3.30 06/03/12CL/1256850 TP4 0.80-1.00 06/03/12CL/1256851 TP5 1.30-1.50 06/03/12CL/1256852 TP5 2.30-2.50 06/03/12CL/1256853 TP6 1.20-1.50 06/03/12CL/1256854 TP6 2.00-2.20 06/03/12

Deviating Sample KeyA The sample was received in an inappropriate container for this analysisB The sample was received without the correct preservation for this analysisC Headspace present in the sample containerD The sampling date was not supplied so holding time may be compromised - applicable to all analysisE Sample processing did not commence within the appropriate holding timeRequested Analysis Key

Analysis RequiredAnalysis dependant upon trigger result - Note: due date may be affected if triggeredNo analysis scheduled

^ Analysis Subcontracted

The integrity of data for samples/analysis that have been categorised as Deviating may be compromised. Data may not be representative of the sample at the time of sampling.

Accredited to ISO17025

Note: For analysis where the Report Due date is gre ater than 7 days (PAH, Pesticides, PCB, Phenols, Herbicides) or 2 days (BOD) after the sampling date, although we will do our ut most to prioritise your samples, they may become deviant whilst being processed in the Laboratory.

In this instance, please contact the Laboratory imm ediately should you wish to discuss how you would like us to procee d. If you do not respond within 24 hours, we will proceed as ori ginally requested.

UK14-17550 Spa Park Date Logged 07-Mar-2012

Report Due 15-Mar-2012

ESG Environmental ChemistryAnalytical and Deviating Sample Overview

Environ UK Ltd Consignment No S27517


EFS/122525 Ver. 1

SOIL Analysis S122525

CustomerSiteReport No S122525

MethodID

TP

HU

SS

I

VO

CH

SA

S

WS

LM59


TP

H by G

CF

ID (A

R/S

i)

VO

C H

SA

-GC

MS

Total O

rganic Carbon

��

CL/1256844 TP1 0.80-1.00 06/03/12CL/1256845 TP1 2.80-3.00 06/03/12CL/1256846 TP2 0.50-0.80 06/03/12CL/1256847 TP2 3.20-3.50 06/03/12CL/1256848 TP3 1.80-2.00 06/03/12CL/1256849 TP3 3.00-3.30 06/03/12CL/1256850 TP4 0.80-1.00 06/03/12CL/1256851 TP5 1.30-1.50 06/03/12CL/1256852 TP5 2.30-2.50 06/03/12CL/1256853 TP6 1.20-1.50 06/03/12CL/1256854 TP6 2.00-2.20 06/03/12













EFS/122525 Ver. 1

Matrix MethodID Analysis Basis

Method Description

Soil BTEXHSA As Received Determination of Benzene, Toluene, Ethyl benzene and Xylenes (BTEX) by Headspace GCFID

Soil GROHSA As Received Determination of Total Gasoline Range Organics Hydrocarbons (GRO) by Headspace GCFID

Soil ICPBOR Air Dried Determination of Boron in soil samples by hot water extraction followed by ICPOES detection

Soil ICPMSS Air Dried Determination of Metals in soil samples by aqua regia digestion followed by ICPMS

Soil ICPSOIL Air Dried Determination of Metals in soil samples by aqua regia digestion followed by ICPOES detection

Soil ICPWSS Air Dried Determination of Water Soluble Sulphate in soil samples by water extraction followed by ICPOES detection

Soil KONECR Air Dried Determination of Chromium vi in soil samples by water extraction followed by colorimetric detection

Soil PAHMSUS As Received Determination of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAH) by hexane/acetone extraction followed by GCMS detection

Soil PCBUSECDAR As Received Determination of Polychlorinated Biphenyl (PCB) congeners/aroclors by hexane/acetone extraction followed by GCECD detection

Soil PHSOIL As Received Determination of pH of 2.5:1 deionised water to soil extracts using pH probe.

Soil SFAPI As Received Segmented flow analysis with colorimetric detectionSoil SubCon* * Contact Laboratory for details of the methodology used by the sub-

contractor.Soil SVOCMSUS As Received Determination of Semi Volatile Organic Compounds in soil samples

by Dichloromethane/Acetone extraction followed by GCMS detection

Soil TPHUSSI As Received Determination of hexane/acetone extractable Hydrocarbons in soil with GCFID detection including quantitation of Aromatic and Aliphatic fractions.

Soil VOCHSAS As Received Determination of Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC) by Headspace GCMS

Soil WSLM59 Air Dried Determination of Organic Carbon in soil using sulphurous Acid digestion followed by high temperature combustion and IR detection

Report Number: EFS/122525

Method Descriptions


EFS/122525 Ver. 1

Report Notes

Generic Notes

Soil/Solid Analysis

Unless stated otherwise,- Results expressed as mg/kg have been calculated on an air dried basis- Sulphate analysis not conducted in accordance with BS1377- Water Soluble Sulphate is on a 2:1 water:soil extract

Waters AnalysisUnless stated otherwise results are expressed as mg/lNil : Where "Nil" has been entered against Total Alkalinity or Total Acidity this indicates that a measurementwas not required due to the inherent pH of the sample.

Oil analysis specific

Unless stated otherwise,- Results are expressed as mg/kg- SG is expressed as g/cm3@ 15oC

Gas (Tedlar bag) Analysis

Unless stated otherwise, results are expressed as ug/l

Asbestos Analysis

CH Denotes ChrysotileCR Denotes CrocidoliteAM Denotes AmositeNAIIS No Asbestos Identified in SampleNADIS No Asbestos Detected In Sample

Symbol Reference

^ Sub-contracted analysis.$$ Unable to analyse due to the nature of the sample¶ Samples submitted for this analyte were not preserved on site in accordance with laboratory protocols.

This may have resulted in deterioration of the sample(s) during transit to the laboratory.Consequently the reported data may not represent the concentration of the target analyte present in the sample at the time of sampling

¥ Results for guidance only due to possible interference& Blank corrected resultI.S Insufficient sample to complete requested analysisI.S(g) Insufficient sample to re-analyse, results for guidance onlyIntf Unable to analyse due to interferencesN.D Not determinedN.Det Not detectedReq Analysis requested, see attached sheets for resultsÞ Raised detection limit due to nature of the sample* All accreditation has been removed by the laboratory for this result‡ MCERTS accreditation has been removed for this result

Note: The Laboratory may only claim that data is accredited when all of the requirements of our QualitySystem have been met. Where these requirements have not been met the laboratory may elect to include the data in its final report and remove the accreditation from individual data items if it believes that the validity of thedata has not been affected. If further details are required of the circumstances which have led to the removal of accreditation then please do not hesitate to contact the laboratory.

END OF REPORT


EFS/122525 Ver. 1

Our Ref: EXR/133232 (Ver. 1)Your Ref: UK14-17550

Environmental ChemistryESG

Bretby Business Park

Ashby Road

Burton-on-Trent

Ms S Harper Staffordshire

Environ UK Ltd DE15 0YZ

8 The WharfBridge Street Telephone: 01283 554400

Birmingham Facsimile: 01283 554422

West MidlandsB1 2JS

For the attention of Ms S Harper

Dear Ms Harper

NRA Leachate Sample Analysis - UK14-17550 Spa Park

Samples from the above site have been analysed in accordance with the schedule supplied.The sample details and the results of analyses for these samples are given in the appended report.

An invoice for this work will follow under a separate cover.

Please be aware that from 1 January 2003 our policy for the retention of paper based laboratory records and analysis reportswill be 6 years.

If I can be of any further assistance please do not hesitate to contact me.

Yours sincerely

for ESG

J ColbourneProject Co-ordinator01283 554547

March 16, 2012

The work was carried out in accordance with Environmental Scientifics Group Ltd (Laboratory and Analytical) Standard Terms and Conditions of Contract.

Environmental Chemistry, ESG, P.O. Box 100, Burton-upon-trent, DE15 0XD Tel: 01283 554400 Fax: 01283 554422Environmental Scientifics Group Limited.

Registered No: 2880501 EXR/133232 Ver. 1

Environ UK Ltd8 The WharfBridge StreetBirminghamWest MidlandsB1 2JS

Site: UK14-17550 Spa Park

The analysis was completed by:

Tests where the accreditation is set to N or No, and any individual data items marked with a * are not UKAS accreditedAny opinions or interpretations expressed herein are outside the scope of any UKAS accreditation held by ESG.

The following tables are contained in this report:

On behalf ofESG : Date of Issue: 16-Mar-2012Andrew Timms Operations Manager

Table 1 Main Analysis Results (Pages 2 to 3)Table of PAH (MS-SIM) (10) Results (Pages 4 to 7)Table of PCB Congener Results (Page 8)GC-FID Chromatograms (Pages 9 to 12)Analytical and Deviating Sample Overview (Page 13)Table of Method Descriptions (Page 14)Table of Report Notes (Page 15)

16-Mar-2012

The 4 samples described in this report were registered for analysis by ESG on 07-Mar-2012. This report supersedes any versions previously issued by the laboratory.

TEST REPORTNRA LEACHATE SAMPLE ANALYSIS

Report No. EXR/133232 (Ver. 1)

Tests marked '^' have been subcontracted to another laboratory.

ESG accepts no responsibility for any sampling not carried out by our personnel.


EXR/133232 Ver. 1

Units : mg/l mg/l mg/l mg/l µg/l mg/l mg/l mg/l mg/l mg/l mg/l mg/l mg/l mg/l mg/l mg/lMethod Codes : ICPWATVAR ICPMSW ICPMSW ICPMSW PAHMSW ICPMSW ICPMSW ICPMSW ICPMSW ICPWATVAR ICPMSW ICPMSW ICPMSW KONENS TPHFID ICPWATVAR

Method Reporting Limits : 3 0.001 0.001 0.0001 0.001 0.001 0.002 0.001 0.01 0.0001 0.001 0.001 0.01 0.01 0.01UKAS Accredited : Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No

LAB

ID N

umber E

X/


Sam

ple Date

Total S

ulphur as SO

4 (Dissolved) a

Nickel as N

i (Dissolved)

Chrom

ium as C

r (Dissolved)

Cadm

ium as C

d (Dissolved)

PA

H G

C-M

S (16) o

Copper as C

u (Dissolved)

Lead as Pb (D

issolved)

Zinc as Z

n (Dissolved)

Arsenic as A

s (Dissolved)

Boron as B

(Dissolved) a

Mercury as H

g (Dissolved)

Selenium

as Se (D

issolved)

Vanadium

as V (D

issolved)

Chrom

ium V

I as Cr

TP

H G

C

Barium

as Ba (D

issolved) a

1275316 TP1 2.80-3.00 06-Mar-12 59 0.002 0.004 <0.0001 Req 0.014 0.003 0.101 0.004 0.21 <0.0001 0.002 0.005 <0.01 0.09 0.22

1275317 TP3 3.00-3.30 06-Mar-12 28 0.001 0.017 <0.0001 Req 0.026 0.014 0.096 0.01 0.32 <0.0001 0.002 0.014 0.02 0.15 0.29

1275318 TP5 1.30-1.50 06-Mar-12 7 0.002 0.006 <0.0001 Req 0.013 0.012 0.144 0.005 0.26 0.0001 0.001 0.005 <0.01 0.07 0.23

1275319 TP6 1.20-1.50 06-Mar-12 12 0.001 0.01 <0.0001 Req 0.01 0.004 0.11 0.005 0.2 0.0002 0.001 0.008 <0.01 0.03 0.25

Contact

Date Printed

Report Number EXR/133232

Table Number 1

Fax +44 (0) 1283 554422

16-Mar-2012

UK14-17550 Spa Park



Tel +44 (0) 1283 554400

Client Name Environ UK Ltd NRA Leachate Sample Analysis

Ms S Harper


EXR/133232 Ver. 1

Units : mg/lMethod Codes : ICPWATVAR

Method Reporting Limits : 0.01UKAS Accredited : No

LAB

ID N

umber E

X/


Sam

ple Date

Beryllium

as Be (D

issolved) a

1275316 TP1 2.80-3.00 06-Mar-12 <0.01

1275317 TP3 3.00-3.30 06-Mar-12 <0.01

1275318 TP5 1.30-1.50 06-Mar-12 <0.01

1275319 TP6 1.20-1.50 06-Mar-12 <0.01

Contact

Date Printed

Report Number EXR/133232

Table Number 1

Fax +44 (0) 1283 554422

16-Mar-2012

UK14-17550 Spa Park



Tel +44 (0) 1283 554400

Client Name Environ UK Ltd NRA Leachate Sample Analysis

Ms S Harper


EXR/133232 Ver. 1

1


Customer and Site Details: Environ UK Ltd: UK14-17550 Spa ParkSample Details: TP1 2.80-3.00 Job Number: W13_3232LIMS ID Number: EX1275316 Date Booked in: 07-Mar-12QC Batch Number: 120192 Date Extracted: 13-Mar-12

Quantitation File: Initial Calibration Date Analysed: 13-Mar-12Directory: 313MS17.PAH\ Matrix: WaterDilution: 1.0 Ext Method: Bottle


Target Compounds CAS # R.T. Concentration % Fit(min) ug/l

Naphthalene 91-20-3 3.24 0.157 98Acenaphthylene 208-96-8 - < 0.010 -Acenaphthene 83-32-9 4.39 0.014 91Fluorene 86-73-7 4.77 0.020 92Phenanthrene 85-01-8 5.57 0.010 86Anthracene 120-12-7 5.62 0.024 81Fluoranthene 206-44-0 6.86 0.062 100Pyrene 129-00-0 7.14 0.073 99Benzo[a]anthracene 56-55-3 8.78 0.020 90Chrysene 218-01-9 8.83 0.013 91Benzo[b]fluoranthene 205-99-2 10.28 0.015 98Benzo[k]fluoranthene 207-08-9 10.32 0.013 94Benzo[a]pyrene 50-32-8 10.71 0.015 87Indeno[1,2,3-cd]pyrene 193-39-5 12.07 0.012 85Dibenzo[a,h]anthracene 53-70-3 12.10 0.012 66Benzo[g,h,i]perylene 191-24-2 12.36 0.011 94Total (USEPA16) PAHs - - < 0.481 -





EXR/133232 Ver. 1

1






Naphthalene 91-20-3 3.24 1.390 100Acenaphthylene 208-96-8 4.28 0.034 96Acenaphthene 83-32-9 4.39 0.078 98Fluorene 86-73-7 4.77 0.119 94Phenanthrene 85-01-8 5.57 0.072 97Anthracene 120-12-7 5.62 0.071 97Fluoranthene 206-44-0 6.86 0.195 97Pyrene 129-00-0 7.14 0.270 98Benzo[a]anthracene 56-55-3 8.78 0.024 95Chrysene 218-01-9 8.83 0.017 99Benzo[b]fluoranthene 205-99-2 - < 0.010 -Benzo[k]fluoranthene 207-08-9 - < 0.010 -Benzo[a]pyrene 50-32-8 - < 0.010 -Indeno[1,2,3-cd]pyrene 193-39-5 - < 0.010 -Dibenzo[a,h]anthracene 53-70-3 - < 0.010 -Benzo[g,h,i]perylene 191-24-2 - < 0.010 -Total (USEPA16) PAHs - - < 2.330 -





EXR/133232 Ver. 1

1











EXR/133232 Ver. 1

1











EXR/133232 Ver. 1

Polychlorinated Biphenyls (congeners)

Customer and Site Details: Environ UK Ltd: UK14-17550 Spa Park Matrix: LeachateJob Number: W13_3232 Date Booked in: 07-Mar-12QC Batch Number: 120014 Date Extracted: 12-Mar-12Directory: 0313PCB.GC8 Date Analysed: 14-Mar-12Method: Separating Funnel

* This sample data is not UKAS accredited.Concentration, (µg/l)

Sample ID Customer ID PCB28 PCB52 PCB101 PCB118 PCB153 PCB138 PCB180* EX1275316 TP1 2.80-3.00 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05* EX1275317 TP3 3.00-3.30 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05


EXR/133232 Ver. 1

Petroleum Hydrocarbons (C8 to C40) by GC/FID

Sample ID: EX1275316 Job Number: W13_3232Multiplier: 0.005 Client: Environ UK LtdDilution: 1 Site: UK14-17550 Spa ParkAcquisition Method: TPH_RUNF.M Client Sample Ref: TP1 2.80-3.00Acquisition Date/Time: 13-Mar-12, 19:12:02Datafile: D:\TES\DATA\Y2012\031312TPH_GC15\031312 2012-03-13 08-36-50\020F3801.D

min0 2 4 6 8

pA

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

FID1 A, Front Signal (020F3801.D)


EXR/133232 Ver. 1


Sample ID: EX1275317 Job Number: W13_3232Multiplier: 0.005 Client: Environ UK LtdDilution: 1 Site: UK14-17550 Spa ParkAcquisition Method: TPH_RUNF.M Client Sample Ref: TP3 3.00-3.30Acquisition Date/Time: 13-Mar-12, 18:37:27Datafile: D:\TES\DATA\Y2012\031312TPH_GC15\031312 2012-03-13 08-36-50\065B3601.D

min0 2 4 6 8

pA

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

FID2 B, Back Signal (065B3601.D)


EXR/133232 Ver. 1



min0 2 4 6 8

pA

0

100

200

300

400

500

600



EXR/133232 Ver. 1



min0 2 4 6 8

pA

0

100

200

300

400

500

600



EXR/133232 Ver. 1

WATER Analysis W133232

CustomerSiteReport No W133232

MethodID

CU

ST

SE

RV

ICP

MS

W

ICP

WA

TV

AR

KO

NE

NS

LeachPrep

PA

HM

SW

PC

BC

ON

EC

TP

HF

ID


Report B

(NR

A)

Nickel as N

i MS

(Dissolved)

Chrom

ium as C

r MS

(Dissolved)

Cadm

ium as C

d MS

(Dissolved)

Copper as C

u MS

(Dissolved)

Lead as Pb M

S (D

issolved)

Zinc as Z

n MS

(Dissolved)

Arsenic as A

s MS

(Dissolved)

Mercury as H

g MS

(Dissolved)

Selenium

as Se M

S (D

issolved)

Vanadium

as V M

S (D

issolved)

Total S

ulphur as SO

4 (Diss) V

AR

Barium

as Ba (D

issolved) VA

R

Boron as B

(Dissolved) V

AR

Beryllium

as Be (D

issolved) VA

R

Chrom

ium V

I. as Cr (K

one)

Leachate Prep

PA

H G

C-M

S (16)

PC

B - 7 C

ongeners Analysis

TP

H G

C

��

EX/1275316 TP1 2.80-3.00 06/03/12EX/1275317 TP3 3.00-3.30 06/03/12EX/1275318 TP5 1.30-1.50 06/03/12EX/1275319 TP6 1.20-1.50 06/03/12













EXR/133232 Ver. 1

Matrix MethodID Analysis Basis

Method Description

Water ICPMSW As Received Direct quantitative determination of Metals in water samples using ICPMS

Water ICPWATVAR As Received Direct determination of Metals and Sulphate in water samples using ICPOES

Water KONENS As Received Direct analysis using discrete colorimetric analysisWater PAHMSW As Received Determination of PolyAromatic Hydrocarbons in water by pentane

extraction GCMS quantitationWater TPHFID As Received Determination of pentane extractable hydrocarbons in water by

GCFID

Report Number: W/EXR/133232

Method Descriptions


EXR/133232 Ver. 1

Report Notes

Generic Notes

Soil/Solid Analysis

Unless stated otherwise,- Results expressed as mg/kg have been calculated on an air dried basis- Sulphate analysis not conducted in accordance with BS1377- Water Soluble Sulphate is on a 2:1 water:soil extract

Waters AnalysisUnless stated otherwise results are expressed as mg/lNil : Where "Nil" has been entered against Total Alkalinity or Total Acidity this indicates that a measurementwas not required due to the inherent pH of the sample.

Oil analysis specific

Unless stated otherwise,- Results are expressed as mg/kg- SG is expressed as g/cm3@ 15oC

Gas (Tedlar bag) Analysis

Unless stated otherwise, results are expressed as ug/l

Asbestos Analysis

CH Denotes ChrysotileCR Denotes CrocidoliteAM Denotes AmositeNAIIS No Asbestos Identified in SampleNADIS No Asbestos Detected In Sample

Symbol Reference

^ Sub-contracted analysis.$$ Unable to analyse due to the nature of the sample¶ Samples submitted for this analyte were not preserved on site in accordance with laboratory protocols.

This may have resulted in deterioration of the sample(s) during transit to the laboratory.Consequently the reported data may not represent the concentration of the target analyte present in the sample at the time of sampling

¥ Results for guidance only due to possible interference& Blank corrected resultI.S Insufficient sample to complete requested analysisI.S(g) Insufficient sample to re-analyse, results for guidance onlyIntf Unable to analyse due to interferencesN.D Not determinedN.Det Not detectedReq Analysis requested, see attached sheets for resultsÞ Raised detection limit due to nature of the sample* All accreditation has been removed by the laboratory for this result‡ MCERTS accreditation has been removed for this result

Note: The Laboratory may only claim that data is accredited when all of the requirements of our QualitySystem have been met. Where these requirements have not been met the laboratory may elect to include the data in its final report and remove the accreditation from individual data items if it believes that the validity of thedata has not been affected. If further details are required of the circumstances which have led to the removal of accreditation then please do not hesitate to contact the laboratory.

END OF REPORT


EXR/133232 Ver. 1

Date post:	20-Mar-2022
Category:	Documents
Upload:	others
View:	2 times
Download:	0 times