+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Solid State Conformational Preferences of a Flexible ...

Solid State Conformational Preferences of a Flexible ...

Date post: 15-Oct-2021
Category:
Upload: others
View: 3 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
15
Solid State Conformational Preferences of a Flexible Molecular Backbone Derived from Acetone. Dependence on Electron Donating/Withdrawing Ability of Substitutions Sunil Varughese and Sylvia M. Draper Supporting Information Index No. Contents Page 1 ORTEP of 1,3bis(phenyl)acetones S1 2 Hydrogen bond table S3 3 Experimental section S4 4 Infra-red spectra S7 5 SEM Images S9
Transcript

 

Solid State Conformational Preferences of a Flexible

Molecular Backbone Derived from Acetone. Dependence

on Electron Donating/Withdrawing Ability of Substitutions

Sunil Varughese and Sylvia M. Draper

 

Supporting Information

 

Index

No. Contents Page

1 ORTEP of 1,3bis(phenyl)acetones S1 2 Hydrogen bond table S3 3 Experimental section S4 4 Infra-red spectra S7 5 SEM Images S9

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

S1  

ORTEP of bis(phenyl)acetones

1,3-Bis(phenyl)acetone, 1

 

1,3-Bis(4-methylphenyl)acetone, 2

 

1,3-Bis(4-tert-butylphenyl)acetone, 3

 

S2  

 

1,3-Bis(4-methoxyphenyl)acetone, 4

 

1,3-Bis(4-bromophenyl)acetone, 5

 

1,3-Bis(4-methoxycarbonylphenyl)acetone, 6

S3  

 

 

1,3-Bis(4-nitrophenyl)acetone, 7

 

Hydrogen bond table

C–H...O 1 2.48 3.25 135

2.71 3.61 159 2.99 3.90 154

2 2.51 3.45 173

3 2.75 3.66 168 2.77 3.69 168 2.80 3.74 171 2.82 3.74 171

4 2.53 3.47 168 2.64 3.47 143

5 2.58 3.55 172 2.69 3.50 141 2.73 3.44 130 2.77 3.43 128 2.86 3.46 123 2.95 3.86 163

6 2.47 3.32 143

S4  

2.74 3.44 133 2.75 3.47 132

7 2.38 3.25 147 2.47 3.41 174 2.47 3.21 131 2.55 3.39 145 2.55 3.25 127 2.60 3.45 149 2.62 3.34 130 2.85 3.48 125 2.86 3.59 134 2.88 3.69 144 2.89 3.85 166 2.90 3.82 164 2.92 3.80 149 2.97 3.77 142

 

Experimental section

The chemicals were purchased from Aldrich and used without further purification.

Reagent grade solvent was used for the reaction. 1,3-Bis(phenyl)acetone, 1, was obtained

from Aldrich and was used for crystallization. The substituted bis(phenyl)acetones were

prepared as per the procedure available in the literature.

General preparation method for 2, 3, 5 and 6.

An aqueous solution (100 cm3) of calcium hydroxide (2 mol) and tetra-n-

butylammoniumhydrogensulfate (phase-transfer catalyst) (0.25 mol) was prepared and

introduced into a 500 cm3, three-necked flask kept at room temperature. Measured quantities

of respective benzylbromide (1 mol) and dichloromethane (100 cm3) were then added to the

reactor. The solution was agitated at 700 rpm for 15 min and the reactor was purged with

inert nitrogen gas. A known quantity of iron pentacarbonyl (0.5 mol) was then added to the

reactor. The purging was continued for a further 30 min and the flask was tightly closed and

was left for stirring overnight. The resulting reaction mixture was further supplied with 100

cm3 dichloromethane and was purged with air for 15 min to quench the reaction. Further, a

10% HCl solution (25 cm3) was added and was continuously purged with air with vigorous

stirring. The resulting reaction mixture was extracted with dichloromethane and the volume

was reduced under vacuum. The resulting material was purified using column

chromatography on silica.1

S5  

In the case of the methyl derivative 2, instead of dichloromethane, benzene was used

as the reaction solvent.2

Methyl derivative, 2:

Column chromatography on silica using hexane:ethylacetate (9:1) as eluent.

1HNMR (CDCl3, δ/ppm): 7.18 (d, 4H, Ar), 7.10 (d, 4H, Ar), 3.72 (s, 4H, –CH2–),

2.39 (s, 6H, –CH3). Melting point: 52 oC.

t-Butyl derivative, 3:

Column chromatography on silica using dichloromethane:hexane (1:1) as eluent. 1HNMR (CDCl3, δ/ppm): 7.35 (d, 4H, Ar), 7.21 (d, 4H, Ar), 3.61 (s, 4H, –CH2–),

1.32 (s, 18H, –C(CH3)3).

Bromo derivative, 5:

Column chromatography on silica using dichloromethane:hexane (6:4) as eluent. 1HNMR (CDCl3, δ/ppm): 7.47 (d, 4H, Ar), 7.03 (d, 4H, Ar), 3.71 (s, 4H, –CH2–).

Melting point: 117 oC.

Ester derivative, 6:

Column chromatography on silica using hexane:ethylacetate (8:2) as eluent. 1HNMR (CDCl3, δ/ppm): 7.19 (d, 4H, Ar), 7.06 (d, 4H, Ar), 3.81 (s, 4H, –CH2–),

2.38 (s, 6H, –OCH3). Melting point: 140 oC.

General preparation method for 4 and 7.

A solution of substituted phenylacetic acid (1 mol) in dry dichloromethane was added

slowly to a solution of DCC (1 mol) and DMAP (0.25 mol) in dry dichloromethane in an

inert atmosphere. The reaction mixture was kept for 24 hrs stirring at room temperature and

then filtered. The filtrate was distilled off and the residue was purified by column

chromatography over silica gel.3

Methoxy derivative, 4:

Column chromatography on silica using ethylacetate:hexane (3:7) as eluent. 1HNMR (CDCl3, δ/ppm): 7.08 (d, 4H, Ar), 6.88 (d, 4H, Ar), 3.82 (s, 6H, –OCH3),

3.61 (s, 4H, –CH2–). Melting point: 85.5 oC.

Nitro derivative, 7:

S6  

Column chromatography on silica using dichloromethane as eluent. 1HNMR (CDCl3, δ/ppm): 8.22 (d, 4H, Ar), 7.36 (d, 4H, Ar), 3.96 (s, 4H, –CH2–).

Melting point: 178-179 oC.

X-ray analysis: Single crystals of 1-7 were carefully chosen after they were viewed through

a microscope supported by a rotatable polarizing stage. The crystals were glued to a thin glass

fibre using NIH immersion oil and mounted on a diffractometer equipped with an APEX

CCD area detector. All the data were collected at 123K. The intensity data were processed

using Bruker’s suite of data processing programs (SAINT), and absorption corrections were

applied using SADABS.4 The structure solution of all the complexes was carried out by

direct methods, and refinements were performed by full-matrix least-squares on F2 using the

SHELXTL-PLUS suite of programs.4 All the non-hydrogen atoms were refined

anisotropically, and the hydrogen atoms were fixed on the calculated positions using

appropriate AFIX commands and were refined isotropically. Intermolecular interactions were

computed using the PLATON program. 5

Nanoparticle preparation and analysis: The nanoparticles were prepared by the rapid

injection of 50 μL 10-3 M compound in dimethylformamide (DMF) (filtered through a

nanoporous alumina membrane (Whatman, Anodisc 13)) to 20 mL Millipore water under

ultrasonication. The solution was kept at isothermal condition (45 oC) for 24 hours and was

filtered through anodisc (20nm). The morphology of the nanoparticles was analyzed using a

TESCAN scanning electron microscope using a beam voltage of 5kV.

References:

(1) Draper, S. M.; Gregg, D. J.; Madathil, R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 3486-3487.

(2) Wu, H. –S.; Tan, W. –H.; J. Chem. Tech. Biotechnol. 1996, 67, 381-387.

(3) Sumita, B.; Suprabhat, R. Synth. Commun. 1998, 28, 765-771.

(4) a) Siemens, SMART System, Siemens Analytical X-ray Instruments Inc., Madison,

WI, USA, 1995; b) Sheldrick, G. M. SADABS Siemens Area Detector Absorption

Correction Program, University of Gottingen, Gottingen, Germany, 1994; c)

Sheldrick, G. M. SHELXTL-PLUS Program for Crystal Structure Solution and

Refinement, University of Gottingen, Gottingen, Germany.

(5) Spek, A. L. PLATON, Molecular Geometry Program, University of Utrecht, The

Netherlands, 1995.

S7  

IR Spectra of 1,3-bis(phenyl)acetones,1-4

1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500

t-butyl

-CH3

-H

Acetone

Tra

ns

mit

tan

ce

Wave number

-OMe

 

S8  

IR Spectra of 1,3-bis(phenyl)acetones,1 & 5-7

1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500

Ester

-Br

-H

Acetone

Tra

nsm

itta

nc

e

Wavenumber

Nitro

 

S9  

Additional SEM images

Methyl derivative (2)

 

  

 

 

 

S10  

t-Butyl derivative (3) 

 

  

 

 

 

S11  

Methoxy derivative (4) 

 

  

 

 

S12  

Bromo derivative (5) 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

S13  

Ester derivative (6) 

 

  

 

 

 

 

S14  

Nitro derivative (7) 

 

  

 

 

 

 


Recommended