Solid Waste Management Coordinating Board
Meeting Agenda
Wednesday
July 25, 2012
Meeting: 10:30 – 11:00 a.m. Tour: 11:30 – 12:15 p.m.
Carver County Justice Center
(Attached to Govt. Ctr.)
600 East 4th Street Chaska, MN 55318
Page # Action
I. Call to Order ----- - - - - -
II. Meeting Agenda ----- Approval
III.
Consent Items
SWMCB May 30, 2012
Draft Meeting Minutes
May and June Checks and Claims
3-6
7-8
Approval
IV.
V.
VI.
VII.
Administrative Actions
Long-Term Contract Procurement: Requests for Qualifications
Samantha Werre, SWMCB Jeff Harthun, Dakota County Zack Hansen, Ramsey County
Lobbying Services Contract
Extension Ryan O’Connor, SWMCB
Staff Reports Research & Planning for the Future
Cost and Billing Study Workplan Progress Report
Regional Policy and Programs §473.848 Enforcement Report
Recycling at Transit Facilities Location of September Board Meeting
Proposal: MN Landscape Arboretum
Adjourn
9-20
21-22
23-58
59-60
Approval
Updates
Approval
NOTE: The tour of By The Yard (16775 Greystone Lane, Jordan, MN
55352) will start approximately 20 minutes after the conclusion of the Board meeting.
1
2
To: Board MembersFrom: StaffDate: July 19, 2012RE: Draft May 30, 2012 Meeting Minutes
Action Requested: Approval of Draft Meeting Minutes
Meeting Location: Metropolitan Counties Government Center
Members PresentCommissioner Victoria Reinhardt, Ramsey Co.Commissioner Jan Callison, Hennepin Co.Commissioner Joseph Harris, Dakota Co.Commissioner Jim Kordiak, Anoka Co.Commissioner Matt Look, Anoka Co.Commissioner Tom Workman, Carver Co.
Commissioner Liz Workman, Dakota Co.Commissioner Peter McLaughlin, Hennepin Co.Commissioner Gary Kriesel, Washington Co.Commissioner Autumn Lehrke, Washington Co.David Benke, MPCA
Others PresentBrad Fields, Anoka Co.Jeff Harthun, Dakota Co.Carl Michaud, Hennepin Co.Judy Hunter, Washington Co.Amy Roering, Hennepin Co.Angie Timmons, Hennepin Co.Norm Schiferl, Ramsey Co.John Springman, Ramsey Co.Jeff Travis, Washington Co.Tina Patton, MPCA
Wayne Gjerde, MPCAJennifer Volkman, MPCADoug Carnival, McGrann Shea CarnivalTim Steinbeck, GREDon Chapdelaine, SKBRyan O’Gara, SKBSam Walseth, SWMCBTrudy Richter, RRARyan O’Connor, RRASamantha Werre, RRA
Agenda Item #1. Call to OrderCommissioner Callison called the meeting to order at 10:33 a.m. on May 30, 2012.
Agenda Item #2. Approval of Meeting AgendaCommissioner Kordiak moved to approve the agenda as presented. Commissioner LizWorkman seconded and the motion passed by voice vote.
Agenda Item #3. Consent Items SWMCB March 28, 2012 Draft Meeting Minutes March and April Checks and Claims
Commissioner Callison noted that a revised version of the March and AprilChecks and Claims had been provided to SWMCB members for consideration andaction. Commissioner Kordiak moved to approve both the minutes of the March28, 2012 meeting and the March and April checks and claims as presented.Commissioner Tom Workman seconded and the motion passed by voice vote.
Agenda Item #4. Regional Policy & Programs 2012 Legislative Session Review
Sam Walseth gave an overview of the 2012 legislative session. A summaryreport was distributed to members at the meeting.
3
Plastics Recycling ChangesWayne Gjerde, MPCA, gave a presentation regarding recent changes to plasticsrecycling in Minnesota. It was noted that Mr. Gjerde’s presentation andsupporting information would be made available on swmcb.org following themeeting.
Angie Timmons, Hennepin County, gave a presentation on SWMCBcommunications activities, including updated recycling communicationsresources, in response to the recent changes in plastics recycling.
Pharmaceutical Collection ProgramsAmy Roering, Hennepin County, and Jennifer Volkman, MPCA, gave apresentation on county pharmaceutical collection programs and ongoing MPCAefforts regarding pharmaceuticals.
Ryan O’Connor noted the draft resolution, “Key Elements of PharmaceuticalCollection and Disposal Programs: A Vision for the Great Lakes Region” includedin the board packet for SWMCB consideration. It was noted that the resolvingclauses included in the resolution were as follows:
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the Solid Waste ManagementCoordinating Board endorses the Key Elements of Pharmaceutical Collection andDisposal Programs: A Vision for the Great Lakes Region which advocates thatcollection programs be ongoing, convenient, comprehensive, secure, free at thepoint of delivery for disposal, and widely promoted, and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Solid Waste Management CoordinatingBoard recommends that member county boards adopt a similar resolution ofsupport, and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that pharmaceutical collection programs shouldminimize the impact on the environment by destroying drugs throughincineration or the best available technology, and they should be sustainably andadequately funded by those who benefit from the manufacture, sale and use ofpharmaceuticals.
Commissioner Callison moved to adopt the resolution as presented.Commissioner Kriesel seconded and the motion passed by a voice vote.
Agenda Item #5. Staff ReportsCommissioner Callison gave an update on a SWMCB meeting with MPCA leadership andstaff.
Commissioner Lehrke shared a summary of information from the recent NationalAssociation of Counties (NaCO) forum on solid waste.
Ryan O’Connor presented information on the SWMCB summer meeting schedule andBy The Yard, the proposed location for the July SWMCB tour. Commissioner Harrismoved to approve By The Yard as the July tour location. Commissioner Lehrkeseconded and the motion passed by voice vote.
4
Agenda Item #6. AdjournThere being no further business, the meeting adjourned at 12:13 p.m.
Minutes respectfully submitted by Samantha Werre, RRA
5
6
To: Board Members
From: Staff
Date: July 19, 2012
RE: Checks and Claims: Ratification of Invoices
Action Requested: Ratification of the invoices listed below
Background:
The Fiscal Management and Reporting Procedures adopted eleven years ago by the Boardin January 2001 set forth the procedure for payment of invoices submitted to the SWMCB.The procedure states that “No payment on any professional services contract invoice, orany invoice for services performed by a consultant or any other person or organizationproviding professional services, shall be made unless approved by the Chair, Vice-Chairand fiscal agent, so long as the payment is within the overall contract amount approvedby the Board or Chair. In the absence of the Chair or Vice-Chair, the Secretary/Treasurermay also approve such payment with the Chair or Vice-Chair. The Chair shall report tothe Board, and the Board shall ratify, any such payments for professional services at itsnext meeting.”
The Chair and Vice-Chair approved for payment the following:
Payment of $5,317.90 to Hennepin County Public Works for February-April 2012 VSQGmanifest data entry services (Contract #2012-03).
Payment of $4,002.00 to LG Consulting for May 2012 Round 12 Community POWER grantmanagement services (Contract #2012-04).
Payment of $1,380.00 to LG Consulting for May 2012 Round 11 Community POWER grantmanagement services (Contract #2011-09).
Payment of $1,450.00 to Gorton Studios for May 2012 web development services(Contracts #2012-02 and #2012-10).
Payment of $772.75 to Risdall Marketing Group, LLC for May 2012 public relations andadvertising services (Contract #2012-06).
Payment of $28,845.00 to Richardson Richter for May project management services(Contract #2012-05).
Payment of $25,207.25 to Richardson Richter for June 2012 project management services(Contract #2012-05).
Payment of $3,820.25 to Emerge Knowledge for 3rd Quarter Re-TRAC subscription servicesand VSQG database hosting services (Contract #2012-01).
Payment of $3,050.00 to Risdall Marketing Group, LLC for June 2012 public relations andadvertising services (Contract #2012-06).
Payment of $1,091.25 to Gorton Studios for June 2012 web development services (Contract#2012-02 & #2012-10).
Payment of $2,070.00 to LG Consulting, LLC for June 2012 Round 11 Community POWERgrant management services (Contract #2011-09).
Payment of $4,002.00 to LG Consulting, LLC for June 2012 Round 12 Community POWERgrant management services (Contract #2012-04).
7
8
To: Board MembersFrom: Executive CommitteeDate: July 19, 2012RE: Long-Term Contract Procurement: Requests for Qualifications
Action Requested: Approval to release Requests for Qualifications for
procurement of ongoing professional services and to postpone solicitation
of long-term agreements for select services as recommended by staff.
BackgroundSection IX subsection I of the SWMCB’s Fiscal Management and Reporting
Procedures states, “For formal contracts for ongoing services (e.g. SWMCB
administrative services and legal services contracts), the Board may enter into
contracts after going through a procurement process using a request for
qualifications, request for proposals, or both, every five years. The Board may
choose to go through a procurement process more frequently if appropriate.”
Due to uncertainty in SWMCB funding in 2010 and development of the Regional
Solid Waste Master Plan in 2011, the SWMCB previously acted to postpone
competitive solicitation for services that would have otherwise been required to go
through a procurement process per the Board’s Fiscal Management and Reporting
Procedures above. As such, the 2012 SWMCB Workplan includes conducting a
competitive solicitation process for the ongoing professional services of the Board.
A complete list of the SWMCB’s ongoing professional services is provided in
Attachment #1. The list includes the year in which a competitive solicitation was
last conducted, the current contractor and contract term dates, and
recommendations for 2012.
Services Recommended for Procurement in 2012
The Executive Committee recommends that a Request for Qualifications (RFQ) be
issued for the following services in 2012 in accordance with the Board’s Fiscal
Management and Reporting Procedures, as well as to provide consistent timelines
for future procurement.
Advertising, Public Relations and Graphic Design
Website Services
Communications Assistance
Community POWER Program Management
SWMCB Policy and Management Services
Scopes of service for each RFQ are provided as Attachment #2.
9
Other Ongoing Services
The Executive Committee recommendations for other ongoing services of the Board
are as follows:
Data Management Services
Due to continuing data management and measurement discussions with the
Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, the Executive Committee recommends
postponing solicitation for data management services until the SWMCB’s
future data management needs are more clearly defined. In the interim, the
Executive Committee recommends a contract extension with the SWMCB’s
current vendor, Emerge Knowledge Design, through January 2014.
Legal Services
In the past, SWMCB legal needs have been varied and highly specialized
(e.g. trademark and copyright law). As such, the Executive Committee
recommends including a contingency in future SWMCB annual budgets for
procuring legal services on an as needed basis.
Lobbying Services
A competitive solicitation for lobbying services was conducted in 2011 and as
such the Executive Committee is not recommending procurement for
lobbying services in 2012. Information on recommendations for the lobbying
services contract is provided under Agenda Item #4-2.
Timeline and Next Steps
The timeline and next steps for the procurement of ongoing services is as follows:
July- 7/25: SWMCB approval- Final preparations for RFQ release
August- 8/6: Release RFQs- 8/24: Questions Due- 8/26: Responses to questions posted
September- 9/7: Proposals due- Review proposals- Conduct interviews as needed
October- Final recommendations by staff- 10/11: Executive Committee review and recommendations- 10/24: SWMCB final selection and approval
10
Attachment #1
SWMCB Procurement Tracker: Ongoing Services to the BoardUpdated: July 16, 2012
Service LastProcured
CurrentContractor
ContractedSince
ContractExpires
Recommendations/Notes
Advertising, PublicRelations andGraphic Design
2007 Risdall MarketingGroup
1/1/2008 12/31/2012 Issue RFQ in 2012
Website Services 2005 Gorton Studios 1/1/2006 12/31/2012 Issue RFQ in 2012
CommunicationsAssistance
2008 TypeCommunications(ColleenHillesheim)
2/1/2009 12/31/2012 Issue RFQ in 2012
Community POWERProgramManagement
2009 LG Consulting(Laurie Gustafson)
1/1/2010 12/31/2012 Issue RFQ in 2012
SWMCB Policy andManagementServices
2006 Richardson,Richter &Associates, Inc.
1/1/2007 12/31/2012 Issue RFQ in 2012
Data ManagementServices
2004 Emerge KnowledgeDesign
1/1/2005 1/31/2013 Extend contract through Jan. 2014to evaluate future SWMCB datamanagement needs – see boardmemo for additional detail.
Legal Services 2006 Stoel Rives 7/1/2007 12/31/2012 Discuss specific legal needs asthey arise - see board memo foradditional detail.
Lobbying 2011 Rob Vanasek withCapitol HillConsultants
1/1/2012 12/31/2012 See board memo for detailedrecommendation.
11
12
Attachment #2
SWMCB 2012 Competitive Solicitation – RFQ Scopes of Service
Advertising, Public Relations and Graphic Design ServicesOverall Project GoalsThe goal of this project is to contract with a vendor that can provideadvertising, public relations and graphic design services to the SWMCB toincrease the reach and effectiveness of its public education campaign. Thisincludes an increase in traffic to RethinkRecycling.com, as well as an increasein total consumer impressions received from public relations and advertisingefforts.
It is expected that the selected contractor will have:
Experience working with government or small non-profit clients and anunderstanding of related issues.
Established contacts with Twin Cities news media and advertisingoutlets.
Experience targeting a diverse range of audience groups, includingmulti-cultural and multi-generational groups.
Experience with and understanding of web-based campaigns.
Specific Project TasksThe selected contractor will perform the following tasks for this project:
Implement the Rethink Recycling strategic marketing plan.
Provide overall communications strategy advice and identifyopportunities for expanding the reach of the Rethink Recyclingcampaign as requested.
Provide guidance and strategy recommendations on reaching differentaudience groups as requested (e.g. millenials, multicultural groups).
Develop and manage public relations efforts to communicate theSWMCB’s environmental messages and the availability ofRethinkRecycling.com.
Develop and manage advertising efforts to communicate the SWMCB’senvironmental messages and the availability of RethinkRecycling.com.Tasks may include, but are not limited to:
o Art directiono Copy writingo Productiono Media buyingo General project management
Provide recommendations on enhancing SWMCB social media effortsas requested.
Provide graphic design and production services to support the RethinkRecycling campaign, including toolkit updates and development ofpromotional materials. This may include, but is not limited to:
o Production of original photos for toolkits and advertising efforts
13
o Development of videos for educational and/or promotionalpurposes.
o Development of advertisement and collateral templates forcustomization by regional solid waste partners.
Participate in monthly communications team meetings, staff planningmeetings and presentations to Board as requested.
Participate in communications training events for SWMCB staff andregional solid waste partners as requested.
Provide data on campaign activities that allows SWMCB to assess thecampaign outcomes and reach.
Grant Manager Services for the Community POWER ProjectOverall Project GoalsThe intent of the Community POWER grant program is to partner withcommunity groups such as neighborhood organizations, schools, churches,senior citizen groups, youth organizations, and civic groups to reachindividuals who are not currently aware of waste reduction practices.
Grant applicants must be schools or non-profit organizations. Organizationswhose primary mission is NOT environmental education or environmentaladvocacy are strongly encouraged to apply. Environmental organizations areencouraged to partner with other organizations.
Grant applicants must serve communities in Anoka, Carver, Dakota,Hennepin, Ramsey and Washington Counties. Past grantees include schools,churches, arts organizations, block nurse programs and neighborhoodassociations.
Specific Project TasksThe selected contractor will generally perform the tasks in the list below.The SWMCB will negotiate specific project tasks and a 2013 work plan andbudget with the selected contractor prior to the execution of the contract.The project will be undertaken in cooperation with a team of countycommunication and technical staff.
Note to all applicants: Templates for all grant application solicitations andreports have been developed and used in previous grant rounds. Allpreviously developed materials, such as evaluation forms, grant materials,resource sheets, and other materials, will be available to the selectedcontractor and the contractor is expected to use, build upon or revise asappropriate.
1. Pre-proposal, planning, request for proposals and marketingDeliverable: In partnership with county staff, solicit qualityapplications to move through the review process and ensuresuccessful projects. Manage process with county staff to produce the Request for Proposals.
14
Market grant round using the website and Community POWER database,and plan informational meetings for interested applicants.
Act as primary contact for interested applicants. Initial planning for future grant rounds.
2. Grant procurementDeliverable: Efficient and fair review process, work plans and budgetthat meet Community POWER criteria. Work with potential applicants. Update review procedures including meeting facilitation, instructions for
county staff and process as needed. Plan and facilitate review meetings with county staff. Negotiate work plans and budget for contracts and assist SWMCB with
grantee contract execution.
3. Grantee orientation, support and trainingDeliverable: Each grantee understands reporting, budgeting andevaluation expectations, and knows of all RethinkRecycling.com andcounty resources available. Support regional and special project grantees. Coordinate and facilitate grantee orientation, training and celebration
meetings including evaluation. Prepare welcome packet for all grantees. Be the point of contact for grantees throughout the grant year and contact
county staff regarding grantee project concerns. Send updates and announcements to all past and present grantees as
needed. Assist grantees with reporting requirements.
4. Evaluation, measurement and reportingDeliverable: County staff and commissioners understand granteeresults. Facilitate communication among key stakeholders: SWMCB, county staff,
SWMCB staff, applicants and grantees. Co-manage Community POWERstaff team.
Update guidelines for progress and final reports. Report and promote project results. Develop a one-year follow-up report on past grantees projects from the
previous round and incorporate those results into Community POWERinformation on RethinkRecycling.com.
Update website with grantee descriptions and resources. Identify opportunities for program efficiency, improvements, and best
practices and make recommendations. Assist with the management of any Community POWER program
improvement projects as needed. Update the Community POWER contact database.
15
Communications Assistant ServicesOverall Project GoalsThe goal of this project is to contract with a vendor that can provide generalcommunications assistance to the SWMCB. It is expected that the selectedcontractor will:
Have strong written communications skills and experience producingmaterials such as articles, newsletter items and website copy.
Have a strong understanding of and experience with implementingsocial media programs.
Respond to SWMCB staff and vendor requests in a timely manner. Work collaboratively with SWMCB staff and vendors to develop
communications resources that are reflective of SWMCB countypriorities and feedback.
Specific Project TasksThe selected contractor will perform the following tasks for this project:
Draft and edit content for integrated Rethink Recyclingcommunications efforts, including monthly articles, social media posts,e-newsletters, website content, fact sheets, brochures and other printand electronic campaign materials. Assist in dissemination ofmaterials.
Assist SWMCB staff and the SWMCB Public Relations vendor withdrafting press releases and other needed resources for media relationsas requested.
Write, edit and post website content and materials toRethinkRecycling.com and swmcb.org using the sites’ contentmanagement system.
Assist SWMCB staff and the SWMCB web vendor with updates orexpansions of RethinkRecycling.com and the toolkits section ofswmcb.org.
Assist with the management of Rethink Recycling social marketingefforts including Facebook, Twitter and the Rethink Recycling blog.
Provide writing and research support for updates to educationaltoolkits.
Assist SWMCB staff and other vendors with the development ofmulticultural outreach materials as requested.
Monitor, record, and create reports on web traffic, social marketingefforts and regional solid waste partner use of SWMCBcommunications resources.
Identify, coordinate and staff community and regional events at whichthe SWMCB may have a presence as requested.
Attend monthly Communications Team meetings and regularmeetings/phone consultations with the SWMCB staff.
Provide miscellaneous campaign implementation assistance to theSWMCB Communications Team and SWMCB staff as requested.
16
Website ServicesOverall Project GoalsTo contract with a vendor that can update and maintain two separatewebsites: SWMCB.org and RethinkRecycling.com
1. SWMCB.org Goals To cost-effectively maintain and update SWMCB.org in a manner that
is consistent with SWMCB administrative and communicationspriorities.
To organize the website in a manner that makes finding administrativeinformation and communications resources as easy as possible.
2. RethinkRecycling.com Goals To cost-effectively maintain and update RethinkRecycling.com in a
manner that is consistent with SWMCB communications strategies. To utilize creative techniques to attract and retain visitors to
RethinkRecycling.com. To identify and implement techniques that increase website usability
and accessibility.
Specific Project TasksThe selected contractor will perform the following tasks for this project:
1. SWMCB.org Tasks Provide web management and technical services necessary to maintain
and update SWMCB.org using the Drupal content managementplatform. Specific tasks may include but are not limited to:
o Implement changes to navigation and content organization asrequested.
o Run broken link reports and repair broken links.o Identify and implement security updates.o Manage content management system user settings and
permission levels. Recommend and implement organizational changes to increase
website usability. Provide support and training to SWMCB staff as needed on using the
content management system. Host the website.
2. RethinkRecycling.com Tasks Provide web management and technical services necessary to maintain
and update RethinkRecycling.com using the Drupal contentmanagement platform. Specific tasks may include but are not limitedto:
o Implement changes to navigation and content organization asrequested.
o Develop banner and thumbnail images.
17
o Run broken link reports and repair broken links.o Identify and implement security updates.o Manage content management system user settings and
permission levels. Recommend and implement organizational changes to increase
website usability and accessibility. Work in consultation with SWMCB staff to identify ways that
RethinkRecycling.com can support and enhance SWMCBcommunications campaigns.
Design and implement a mobile website strategy. Maintain the Green Tips electronic newsletter subscriber list and send
bi-monthly Green Tips electronic newsletters to subscribers. Provide support to SWMCB staff on website measurement using
Google Analytics. Provide support and training to SWMCB staff as requested on using the
content management system. Advise SWMCB on the technical issues related to federal
communications legislation as requested (e.g. CIPA) Host the website.
Policy and Management ServicesBackgroundThe Solid Waste Management Coordinating Board (SWMCB) is the issuingagency for the Request for Qualifications (RFQ) for Policy and ManagementServices. The SWMCB, formed in 1990, is a joint powers board of six of theTwin Cities Metropolitan Area counties, and whose membership includes twocounty commissioners from each of the member counties of Anoka, Carver,Dakota, Hennepin, Ramsey and Washington. To enhance intergovernmentalcoordination, the SWMCB also includes a representative from the MinnesotaPollution Control Agency (MPCA) as an ex-officio member. The mission of theSWMCB is to increase the efficiency and environmental effectiveness of theregion’s solid waste management system. More information about theSWMCB, including the joint powers agreement creating the SWMCB, can befound at www.SWMCB.org
The SWMCB is the policy-making body for the joint powers agreement. Anumber of committees of staff from member counties carry out the work ofthe SWMCB, The SWMCB also retains private contractors to perform specificactivities, such as website development, public relations, legal services andintergovernmental relations. A Policy Staff committee consisting ofmanagement staff from the member counties guides SWMCB activities.Administration and management of SWMCB activities, and certainprofessional services, are provided by a private vendor.
It is standard practice for the SWMCB to go through a procurement processfor professional services on a regular basis. This RFQ is soliciting responses
18
from qualified firms that may be interested in providing those administrativeand professional services. The Policy and Management Services being soughtthrough this RFQ are the same as those provided by the SWMCB’s currentvendor.
Project TasksThe type of Policy and Management services being sought are the same asthose provided to the SWMCB under contract with the current firm andinclude at a minimum the following tasks:
1. Facilitate collaboration among counties and others involved in solidwaste, drawing together entities with diverse and sometimes conflictinginterests.
2. Manage the work of the SWMCB to reflect the policy direction of theBoard and the Regional/County Solid Waste Master Plan; activelyparticipate in the technical aspects of some work elements, prepare andpresent work products, and prepare work plans, agendas, and meetingnotes.
3. Work with elected officials to frame policy issues. , identify issues for theBoard, provide recommendations, and manage the regularly scheduledExecutive Committee and Board meetings.
4. Prepare reports and memoranda that address policy issues fordeliberation by staff and the Board.
5. Coordinate public relations and communications, including routinemaintenance of the SWMCB websites.
6. Coordinate the support required to further the SWMCB legislativeobjectives.
7. Negotiate complex issues and contracts with public and private entities.
8. Identify legal issues; manage grants and contracts, and annually carryout SWMCB projects.
9. Manage the SWMCB budget, including managing procurement andcontract development, processing invoices, managing vendor contracts,and assisting in preparation of the annual budget and work plan.
10. Manage major initiatives undertaken by the SWMCB, such as the MasterPlan revision 2010-2011.
19
20
To: Board MembersFrom: Executive CommitteeDate: July 19, 2012RE: Legislative Services Contract
Action Requested: Designate Vanasek Consulting and Capitol HillAssociates as the preferred SWMCB vendor for the next four years;
approve a $45,000 funding level for 2013 lobbying services.
Budget History of the SWMCB Legislative Contract
2009Barry Tilley
$50,000.00
2010Barry Tilley
$48,000.00
2011Barry Tilley
$40,000.00
2012Rob Vanasek & Sam Walseth
$30,000.00
Four Year Average $42,000.00
Recommended for 2013Rob Vanasek & Sam Walseth
$45,000.00
Issue Summary
Vanasek Consulting and Capitol Hill Associates, the entity selected to lobby on
behalf of the SWMCB during 2012, is seeking a renewal of its contract now so that
it can work with legislative candidates throughout the summer with the knowledge
that it will be representing the SWMCB during the 2013-14 legislative biennium.
Recommendation
The Executive Committee recommends extending the lobbying contract by the
maximum four year period, thus securing Vanasek/Capitol Hill as the SWMCB’s
lobbying vendor for the next two legislative biennia. Additionally, since the SWMCB
sets funding amounts on an annual basis for its contracts, staff recommends that
SWMCB staff approve a $45,000.00 funding level for Vanasek/Capitol Hill for the
2013 legislative session.
21
Rationale for Recommendation
Vanasek/Capitol Hill managed a large advocacy workload for the SWMCB during the
2012 legislative session. Due to the unexpected attention to issues regarding
inverse condemnation and enforcement of §473.848, work for the SWMCB lobbyists
was significantly increased from preceding years.
As the SWMCB seeks to maintain fiscal discipline while also securing the ongoing
work of its hard-working, respected and successful lobbying team for what
promises to be an active session at the Capitol in 2013, it must consider increasing
the compensation amount from 2012. By extending the contract and adding
security over the long-term by designating Vanasek/Capitol Hill as the preferred
SWMCB vendor for four years, the SWMCB can again negotiate a rate that is below
the market level for similar regional entities that procure state lobbying services
(example: the Counties Transit Improvement Board spent $62,000 on state
lobbying services in 2012).
The $45,000.00 recommended funding level for 2013 comes one year after saving
25% ($30,000.00 instead of $40,000.00) from the expected funding level.
Moreover, the $45,000 recommended funding level for 2013 would result in the
SWMCB spending $75,000.00 during its first two years with Vanasek/Capitol Hill, an
amount that is 8.5% below two-year SWMCB lobbying average ($84,000.00) during
the previous four year period. It is anticipated that this contract will comprise
approximately 5% of the overall 2013 SWMCB budget.
22
To: Board MembersFrom: StaffDate: July 19, 2012RE: Staff Report of Ongoing Activity
No Action Requested (Updates)
BackgroundPer the request of Executive Committee members, the following updates regarding
summer SWMCB developments are being highlighted for Board attention:
Research and Planning for the Future
Cost and Billing Study Request for Proposals (RFP) to be released in July
The Executive Committee approved the scope for a cost and billing research
study at its July 11 meeting. The RFP will be released during July so
substantive work can begin this fall. The Board will likely receive from the
Executive Committee a vendor recommendation and request to authorize a
contract at the September 26 SWMCB meeting. For additional information
about the scope of the cost and billing study and its integration with the 2012
workplan, please consult Attachments 3 and 4.
Workplan Progress Report
The Executive Committee reviewed a report of the SWMCB’s workplan
progress (as assessed on June 5, 2012) at its July 11 meeting. The workplan
progress report, included as Attachment 5, analyzes progress toward all
outcomes in the 2012 workplan. The workplan assessment identified that the
SWMCB has made or is making substantive progress on 50 (87.7%) of its 57
outcomes in the 2012 workplan. Focusing on the seven outcomes
(highlighted within Attachment 5 for emphasis) for which no progress has yet
occurred, additional information is provided below:
o Four outcomes were identified as being unable to be assessed for
progress until later in 2012;
o Two outcomes were identified as having made no progress to date due
to factors outside of SWMCB control; and
o One outcome was identified as having made no progress due to an
oversight during workplan implementation planning. This issue (review
of fiscal procedures) has since been added to the task list for the
second half of 2012 and is expected to be accomplished by the end of
the year.
23
Regional Policy and Programs
Legislatively-Required Enforcement Report Regarding §473.848
The MPCA is expected to release a report regarding how it intends to enforce
§473.848 on August 1. Statute §473.848 requires that no waste be
landfilled in the metropolitan area until the region’s processing facilities have
first been filled to permitted capacity, thus ensuring that waste is managed
at the highest level possible on the hierarchy and that the economics of
recycling and source reduction can be appropriately reflected across the
Region. SWMCB member counties, having made significant investments in
resource recovery facilities and with a desire to meet ambitious state
objectives for recycling by 2015, are closely monitoring developments
associated with this report (reminder: this effort was identified on page 12 of
the 2012 workplan as a top policy and programmatic priority).
Following the release of the report, staff will reassess opportunities to lead
efforts and coordinate communication in ways that support the MPCA in this
important enforcement process. Depending upon that staff assessment and
discussions with the Executive Committee in August, Board members may
receive during the September 26 meeting a request to utilize a portion of the
contingency policy and programs fund that was included in the 2012
workplan.
Recycling at Transit Facilities throughout the Region
As the metropolitan area continues to build out its transit infrastructure (with
a significant portion of the funding for transit development coming from
counties), the issue of increasing recycling at transit facilities throughout the
Region has gained attention as an opportunity to enhance the Region’s
recycling performance. To that end, the Executive Committee has initiated
dialogues with the Metropolitan Council to assist in developing a program to
offer recycling at their public facilities – specifically at transit stations
(including LRT, commuter rail, BRT and bus facilities). While issues
regarding cost and implementation remain under discussion, collaborative
dialogue continues and progress is being made. SWMCB leadership hopes to
be able to invite Metropolitan Council leadership to a future SWMCB meeting
during which time Members will be able to learn about a new recycling plan
at transit facilities the Region.
24
Attachment #3
*The following Cost and Finance excerpt is found on page 34 of The 2012SWMCB Workplan and Budget.
Cost and FinanceEvaluate contract and billing practices in the Region
IssuesAddressed
Cost and Finance - Strategy #3 in “Cost and Finance” section of theRegional Master Plan
Stakeholders SWMCB, Member Counties, Waste Haulers & Recycling Haulers
Tasks
Commission research to evaluate contract and billing with non-residential waste and recycling collection in the Region so as toassess how incentives can be leveraged to increase recycling andorganics recovery
Identify recommendations for next steps following a final SWMCBstaff analysis of the completed research
2012Outcomes
The SWMCB will more fully understand current contract and billingpractices in the Region and how those practices impact efforts tomake progress toward the state’s solid waste managementobjectives
SWMCB staff will develop recommendations for SWMCB membersregarding what, if any, actions can be taken in 2012 or 2013 toimprove billing and/or other waste information provided to non-residential waste generators in the Region
Budget Detail for Program
Cost and Finance Research Firm (to be selected in 2012) $50,000
SWMCB will procure the services of a firm to research cost and finance issues toachieve the outcomes listed above. This funding will require approval from the SWMCBExecutive Committee prior to disbursement.
25
26
SWMCB Cost & Billing Research Project Outline(Note: The Executive Committee approved release of an RFP on July 11, 2012)
Project Leader:SWMCB Cost & Billing Oversight Team
Norm Schiferl Joel AndersonDale Stoerzinger Amy UlbrichtBrad Hanzel
Project Cost:$50,000.00
(note: the SWMCB allocated up to $50,000 for thisinitiative on pg. 34 of the 2012 workplan & budget)
Project Purpose:1. Commission research to evaluate contract and billing with non-residential waste and recycling collection in the
Region so as to assess how incentives can be leveraged to increase recycling and organics recovery and identifyexisting and future opportunities for policy consistency; and
2. Identify recommendations for next steps following a final SWMCB staff analysis of the completed research
Background:See Attachment #1
Project Description:The SWMCB will procure the services of a research firm to gather relevant national and local information that enablescounties to increase recycling and organics recovery rates. SWMCB member counties will achieve increased theseincreased recycling and organics recovery rates by using the information obtained through the research project toprovide information and implement policies that support improved non-residential waste and recycling collectionpractices. Once the research is compiled, the SWMCB will determine what, if any, actions should be taken to translatethose research findings into regional or local waste management policies.
Deliverables:1. The research firm will identify national examples of public entities that are similar to the SWMCB that have
leveraged improved cost and billing information to improve waste management outcomes;2. The research firm will conduct individual interviews with organizations that comprise a representative sample of
non-residential entities (based on classification and size) from throughout the Region to identify the mostsignificant contract and invoice issues impeding improved waste management outcomes; and
3. The research firm will communicate with local and national haulers to assess how they communicate importantinformation and service options to non-residential customers and to better understand what is included in astandard non-residential service contract for waste and recycling services.
4. The research firm will make recommends about how SWMCB member counties can improve their policies and/orpractices based on the findings from the cost and billing analysis.
Measures of Success:1. The SWMCB will more fully understand non-residential contract and billing practices in the Region and how those
practices impact efforts to make progress toward the state’s solid waste management objectives; and2. SWMCB staff will be able to develop recommendations for SWMCB members regarding what actions, if any, can
be taken in 2012 or 2013 to improve billing and/or other waste information provided to non-residential wastegenerators
Schedule/Milestones:June: Evaluate the scope of the research project; seek Executive Committee approval to draft and publish RFP forresearch servicesJuly: Issue RFP and accept proposalsAugust: Review proposals and recommend preferred proposal to Executive Committee for final recommendationSeptember: Board approves Executive Committee-recommended research firm. Project starts.December: Firm completes research; SWMCB receives presentation on findings and discusses what actions, if any,should be taken in 2013 to build upon the research findings
Attachment #4
27
Attachment #1:
BACKGROUND INFORMATION AVAILABLE FROM RECENT STUDIES AND INTERVIEWS WITH THOSE FAMILIAR
WITH COMMERCIAL WASTE AND RECYCLING HAULING CONTRACTS
The following summary information related to commercial waste and recycling hauling contracts was derived from the sources listed
below. While the research cited for this background description has a Ramsey and Washington County focus, the important issues
are relevant to all SWMCB members.
1. Consultants to Ramsey County on recycling, organics management, and other waste management issues, along with countystaff familiar with these issues
2. Ramsey County 2011 Business Recycling and Solid Waste Management Practices Survey (ISG, July 2011)3. Residents’ and business representatives’ views and recycling and solid waste management, A report for Saint Paul-Ramsey
County Public Health (Wilder Research, August 2011)4. Washington County Waste Master Plan Stakeholder Outreach Initiative (October, 2011)
http://www.co.washington.mn.us/_asset/dhl6bg/SHW-WMPStakeholder.pdf
For these purposes the terms “commercial generator,” “generator,” and “customer” all refer to any type of non-residential waste
generator. Based on specific information, reference is made at times to subsets of non-residential waste generators, including
businesses in general, large businesses (20+ employees), small businesses (5-19 employees), institutions in general, and public
entities. The terms “trash” and “waste” are used interchangeably, as are the terms “invoice” and “bill.”
Motivation for Recycling and Waste Management Decisions Price/cost is the driving factor for businesses, although some other factors may be considered as well. An exception is that for small businesses (5-19 employees) that are tenants in leased space and do not have control of
waste and recycling contracts, recycling may be pursued more “to do the right thing.” Two general motivations affecting recycling and waste reduction activities in the business sector are economic motivations
and resource conservation motivations. Businesses were less likely to cite economic motivations as their reason to recyclingor reduce waste. Businesses did city economic motivations when identifying barriers to action. However, resourceconservation ( i.e. being green, sustainability)appeared to be relatively strong reason for taking action or changing behavior,but primarily when the change did not violate cost sensitivity
Business leases generally are structured in a way that prevents improvements in recycling and waste reduction economicopportunities
Small businesses are isolated from the price signal of the County Environmental Charge (CEC) and economic opportunitiesto recycling and reduce waste
o Large number of businesses lease their spaceo Common property assessment clauses isolate both lessee and lesser from price signalso Lessees have limited control over structure of space to accommodate setting up recycling systemso Developing new lease structures requires substantial work with property managers
Some institutions, such as public entities and educational organizations, may balance price/cost with other factors. Many public entities do not know about requirements in State law regarding provision of recycling services and use of
disposal facilities designated in the county solid waste plan. Some property management firms have expressed interest in free technical assistance for waste and recycling contracting.
Potential Barriers to Increasing Recycling and Organics Management Related to Contracts and Invoices for
Waste Hauling and Recycling Services Most businesses had no or limited awareness of CEC
Even businesses that knew of CEC had limited knowledge recyclables are exempt
Business waste streams vary greatly depending on the type of business, but almost all types do not take full advantage of
existing recycling opportunities
Many businesses have not evaluated their own waste stream for opportunities
Most are unaware of opportunities to divert organics
Businesses need help setting up organic recycling programs
28
Priorities and time
Garbage and recycling services are not a high priority for many businesses from a financial viewpoint because they do notconstitute a large percentage of the bottom line.
For many smaller businesses there is little available time to pursue additional recycling or to try to procure more cost-effective services.
Many businesses feel they are already recycling as much as they can. Many businesses do not look on a regular basis at potentially changing waste haulers, for several reasons, including that
service agreements are commonly for multiple years, service agreements often have automatic renewal clauses, andtrash/recycling is a low priority—so unless there is a “problem” with the hauler, brand loyalty prevails.
Businesses that do contract directly for trash and recycling services may only review those contracts annually or less often,if at all.
Relationship
There are varying degrees of directness of relationship and influence between the customer and both waste hauling/recycling
contract(s) and paying invoice(s). Customer contracts directly with hauler(s) and pays invoice
Customer contracts with hauler(s) but another department or corporate office pays invoice; Customer is a tenant but sees specific line item for trash/recycling on lease/rental invoice. Customer is a tenant, trash/recycling is part of monthly expense and not delineated. If there is not a direct connection between the contract and invoice, the customer may see no direct financial benefit from
potential increases in recycling/organics management or changes in waste/recycling contracts.
Regional or national corporate decision-making
Contracts dictated from afar might not reflect local issues, such is knowledge of the exemption of recycling charges fromthe State Solid Waste Management Tax and county hauler-collected service charges in Hennepin, Ramsey, and Washingtoncounties (County Environmental Charge or CEC in Ramsey and Washington counties).
However, larger businesses may use waste brokers to leverage more control over waste and recycling contracts anddecisions; these brokers may or may not be familiar with local issues such as the knowledge of the SWMT and CEC.
Lack of integration of recycling and organics management with trash collection service levels and pricing
Even when trash and recycling services are provided by the same hauling firm, increased recycling diversion may notnecessarily entail a reduction in trash service and cost. This could be due to a lack of sufficient diversion to warrant areduction in trash service, the trash service already being at the lowest level, or the lack of incentive for the hauler to offerreduced service and the generator to monitor the service closely.
Some generators hire different firms for trash service and recycling and or organics management services, and thus theremay not be an incentive for the trash hauler to assist the generator in right-sizing of trash services.
Lack of complete, transparent cost information
As discussed in more detail under Contracts and Invoices below, how services are actually being charged for may not bebroken out with sufficient detail such that a generator knows exactly what they are paying for. For example, the bill mayshow only a lump fee for the State Solid Waste Management Tax and for the CEC, without showing which items thesecharges apply to or their rates.
As a result, while a business is typically seeking a “least cost fit” for each of its cost components, which can include wasteand recycling services, the business may not have sufficiently complete cost information upon which to make decisions. Forexample, if a trash hauler receives a county hauler rebate or processing credit for using a resource recovery facility, thatrebate will not necessarily be passed on to the customer in the form of a price reduction.
Automatic renewal
For example, for a 36-month contract, which is not uncommon, there may be a provision specifying automatic renewal unless the
business/customer notifies the hauler by certified mail no more than 180 days and no less than 90 days before the end of the term.
For the many businesses that review their hauling contracts annually or less often, this could result in unintended automatic
renewals.
29
Right of first refusal/right to compete
Connected to contracts with automatic renewal provisions, should a business seek to cancel a contract during the stated period
(e.g., >/= 90 days/</= 180 days), the hauler would get the first right of refusal to match any new hauling offer obtained by the
business.
Liquidated damages
For example, a business/customer who seeks different and/or less expensive service may either have to wait to terminate the
contract or may have to pay the hauler liquidated damages in the form of lost payment for services for the remaining contract term
to buy its way out of the contract.
Lack of flexibility for appropriate right-sizing of service levels
For example, the service level in terms of container size(s) and pickup frequency may be fixed in the contract, making it more
difficult for the business to adjust its trash service levels to accommodate changes related to the business. An example would be a
business that produces food waste and seeks to divert it from the trash by beginning a food-to-livestock or source-separated
composting program.
Lack of price controls
For example, provisions that allow the hauler to increase rates at their discretion and to add additional fees, such as for fuel
surcharges, administration, late payments, overflow charges, or recycling processing.
Uncontrolled fuel surcharges
Haulers use a variety of approaches for calculating fuel surcharges, and some approaches can result in higher charges than the
incremental increase of actual fuel costs over a base amount (if even specified).
Unspecified services
For example, trash collection services that do not specifically cite by location both the size of waste receptacles (“Dumpster” or cart)
and collection frequency, and that lack definition of what is defined as an overweight receptacle and when overflow charges would
be incurred.
Exclusivity
A provision that the hauler has exclusive right to haul all waste and recycling services at that generator location, which could inhibit
the ability of a business to engage in diversion programs not offered by the hauler.
Waste disclosure information
While haulers are required to inform customers annually about where waste is disposed, those disclosures often are not specific to
the customer’s waste and may include multiple facilities. A customer may want to know if its trash is going to landfill vs. going to a
waste-to-energy/resource recovery facility. For one thing, if the latter, it may be missing out on a county hauler rebate or
processing credit.
Lack of specificity and transparency for invoices
This is both an issue for what requirements are included in the hauling contract regarding specificity for invoices, and how the actual
invoice is presented to the customer. The following are examples of items for which specificity and transparency may be lacking in
hauler bills:
Unspecified services: for example, “4-yd front-loader trash, $450/month” that does not specify how many times thereceptacle was picked up.
No distinction made between taxable trash services, such as trash service and a trash collection fuel surcharge, and non-taxable recycling and organics management services.
Lack of the rate charged for the State Solid Waste Management Tax and for any county hauler-collected service charges Lack of tonnages for compactor service.
30
Last Updated 02/23/12
Attachment #5
31
Last Updated 02/23/12
This Page Intentionally Left Blank
32
Last Updated 02/23/12
------------------------------------------------------------
The remainder of this workplan and budget (pages 11-41)details by category the specific tasks and outcomes that
the SWMCB will seek to achieve during 2012
------------------------------------------------------------
I. Regional Policy and Programmatic Efforts
The SWMCB will identify and act upon opportunities to deliver consistent andcoordinated regional approaches regarding solid waste policy and programmaticinitiatives.
The Regional Policy and Programmatic Efforts section is divided into two sub-sections in order to recognize that a successful waste management systemrequires leadership at the state and/or regional level, depending upon thenature of each specific initiative.
Regional Policy and Programs 2012 Budget:$91,500
MPCA-Led, SWMCB Supported Efforts $25,000
SWMCB-Led Efforts $66,500
Regional Policy and Programs Budget Analysis
SWMCB Contractor Support (as needed) $25,000
Richardson, Richter and Associates $20,000
Hennepin County Program Support $17,400
Stoel Rives $15,000
Hazwoper Training Event $6,500
Emerge Database Management $5,000
Regional Hauler Licensing Program $2,600
33
Last Updated 02/23/12
---------- MPCA-Led, SWMCB-Supported Efforts ----------
Note: Specific SWMCB tasks that support each of the four state-led initiativeslisted below will develop as 2012 progresses.
ProcessingSupport full enforcement and utilization of the state’s existing processing andrecycling tools
IssuesAddressed
Processing - Strategies #2, 4, 5, 6, 7 & 8 in Processing section ofthe Regional Master Plan
Stakeholders SWMCB, Member Counties & MPCA
2012Outcomes
The MPCA will enforce Minn. Stat. §473.848 beginning in 2012
The SWMCB and SWMCB member counties will identify new solidwaste management opportunities at higher levels of the solid wastehierarchy due to MPCA’s full enforcement of Minn. Stat. §473.848
The MPCA will fully enforce public entities law within the Region in2012
Progressto Date
Per legislation passed during the 2012 session, the MPCA is draftingplans to enforce §473.848 that will be available to the public in latesummer to early fall. The SWMCB has been invited to participate inthat process and has identified staff that will serve as liaisons withthe Agency. Enforcement of the law is expected to begin in early2013, and the SWMCB should be prepared to defend the need forenforcement during the 2013 legislative session.
Staff from the MPCA and SWMCB have met to discuss enforcement ofpublic entities law. The Agency asks that counties assist inidentifying non-compliant entities within the Region, with the Agencyultimately tasked with then responding to that information andensuring compliance.
AdditionalComments
The SWMCB and SWMCB member counties have not yet identifiedopportunities after the start of §473.848 enforcement; this workplanoutcome should be carried into 2013 as enforcement is not expectedto begin until early next year.
34
Last Updated 02/23/12
Measurement & AccountabilitySupport and implement improved regional solid waste performance measures
IssuesAddressed
Organics Recovery, Recycling, Source Reduction and other solidwaste topics – Strategies #1, 2 & 3 in Measurement andAccountability section of the Regional Master Plan
Stakeholders SWMCB, Member Counties & MPCA
2012Outcomes
The MPCA will create and disseminate information regardingimproved regional performance measures that will be used bySWMCB and its member counties to advance the outcomes set forthin the state’s 2010-2030 Metropolitan Solid Waste Policy Plan
The MPCA will incorporate yard waste into performance measuresfor organics recovery by the end of 2012
Progressto Date
Staff and leadership from the MPCA and SWMCB have met todiscuss improved performance measurement to monitor Regionalprogress; the MPCA has committed to advancing improvedperformance measurement as an extension of SCORE Revampefforts, and additional meetings to further advance this effort andbegin planning what (if any) legislative initiatives are required willoccur in early July.
AdditionalComments
Staff from the SWMCB continually advocate for incorporating yardwaste into organics performance measurement, but there has beenno indication to date from the MPCA that changes are beingconsidered for the near future.
Source Reduction and ReuseParticipate in state-led organizations that advance source reduction and reuse
IssuesAddressed
Source Reduction and Reuse – Strategies #2, 4, 5, 6, 7 & 8 in SourceReduction and Reuse section of the Regional Master Plan
Stakeholders SWMCB, Member Counties, MPCA & Other Waste Stakeholders
2012Outcomes
SWMCB will strengthen relationships with source reduction and reusestakeholders that will be enable additional progress toward thestate’s source reduction and reuse objectives in 2013
Progressto Date
Staff from the MPCA and SWMCB are convening a Source Reductionforum on June 25, 2012 to discuss how to make progress on theoutcome listed above.
AdditionalComments
None
35
Last Updated 02/23/12
Recycling and Non-MSW ManagementEncourage and support the development of new recycling markets
IssuesAddressed
Recycling and Non-MSW Management - Strategy #11 in Recyclingsection; Strategy #7 in Non-MSW section of the Regional MasterPlan
Stakeholders SWMCB, Member Counties, MPCA & Other Waste Stakeholders
2012Outcomes
The SWMCB will monitor the MPCA’s new market developmentefforts and identify opportunities to advance solid wastemanagement objectives within those new markets, as appropriate
Progressto Date
Staff from the MPCA and SWMCB are convening a MarketDevelopment forum on July 12 or 24, 2012 (date not finalized whenthis progress report was created) to discuss how to make progresson the outcome listed above.
AdditionalComments
None
36
Last Updated 02/23/12
-------------------- SWMCB-Led Efforts --------------------
RegulatoryCoordinate the Regional Hauler Licensing Program and identify opportunities forfuture program development
IssuesAddressed
Regulations – Strategy #2 in Regulation section of the RegionalMaster Plan
Stakeholders SWMCB, Member Counties, MPCA, Waste Haulers & Waste Facilities
Tasks
Explore the expansion of including non-MSW, recycling and organicscollection services and facilities in the Regional Hauler LicensingProgram in 2013 or 2014, which may include:
Leading a discussion among SWMCB member counties andthe MPCA to outline regional licensing provisions;
Coordinating SWMCB member county conversations with non-MSW, recycling and organics industry haulers to garnerfeedback on potential proposals;
Developing licensing provisions for recommendationto SWMCB member counties;
Taking public testimony on proposed licensing; and Amending the SWMCB JPA to include new regional license
provisions, as necessary
Issue base and operating licenses for the Regional Hauler LicensingProgram and procure the necessary decals for licensed trucks. Trackdata on number of licensed haulers and trucks in the region
2012Outcomes
SWMCB staff will develop recommendations for SWMCB membersregarding the inclusion of non-MSW, recycling and organicscollection services in the Regional Hauler Licensing Program in 2013
Operating and base hauler licenses issued
Progressto Date
The Regional Hauler Licensing Program, an original activity under theJoint Powers Agreement, continues to operate as described in thetasks and outcomes boxes above.
AdditionalComments
Developments on the performance measurement initiatives(discussed under the “MPCA-Led, SWMCB-Supported Initiatives”have implications for the progress of this effort, so no action has yetbeen taken to explore Regional Hauler Licensing Expansion. It isexpected that initial exploratory efforts will begin in late summer2012.
37
Last Updated 02/23/12
Manage the VSQG database, a regional tool that enhances member counties'ability to track manifests of very small quantity generators
IssuesAddressed
Regulations – Strategy #1 in Regulation section of the RegionalMaster Plan
Stakeholders SWMCB, Member Counties, MPCA & Hazardous Waste Generators
Tasks
Enter hazardous waste manifest information into the VSQG database
Maintain VSQG database system and generate reports, as needed
Monitor changes to the Uniform Manifest Rules to determine itsimpact on VSQGs and any changes in responsibilities or requirementsfor the tracking of VSQG manifests
2012Outcomes
SWMCB will update and continually improve the VSQG database
Progressto Date
The Very Small Quantity Generator Program, a traditional SWMCBactivity, continues to operate as described in the tasks and outcomesboxes above.
AdditionalComments
None
Coordinate hazardous waste operator (Hazwoper) training sessions forhazardous waste regulatory staff
IssuesAddressed
Regional Regulatory Coordination
Stakeholders SWMCB, Member Counties & MPCA
TasksPlan and host a 2012 Hazwoper training session for staff of SWMCBmember counties
2012Outcomes
Hazardous waste regulatory staff in SWMCB member counties will betrained
Progressto Date
The Hazwoper training program, a traditional SWMCB activity,continues to operate as described in the tasks and outcomes boxesabove.
AdditionalComments
None
38
Last Updated 02/23/12
Source Reduction and ReuseParticipate in multi-stakeholder efforts to increase source reduction and reuse inthe Region
IssuesAddressed
Source Reduction and Reuse – Strategies #1 & 2 in SourceReduction and Reuse section of the Regional Master Plan
Stakeholders SWMCB, Member Counties & Other Waste Stakeholders
TasksExplore opportunities to support and participate in productstewardship organizations such as the Minnesota ProductStewardship Council
2012Outcomes
SWMCB will be recognized as a key participant in advancing productstewardship initiatives in Minnesota
SWMCB will strengthen relationships with source reductionstakeholders that will then be needed to make additional progresstoward the state’s source reduction and reuse objectives in 2013
Progressto Date
The Minnesota Product Stewardship Council presented to staff fromthe SWMCB and MPCA in May 2012 and will return with a moresubstantive request for involvement during the fall.
Staff from the MPCA and SWMCB have been in frequentcommunication to plan for 2013 product stewardship legislativeinitiatives.
Staff from the MPCA and SWMCB successfully coordinated aresponse to incorrect pharmaceutical information disseminatedthroughout the state by SMARxT.
Pharmaceutical product stewardship was a topic of focus during theMay SWMCB meeting, and the Board passed a resolution of supportfor the Great Lakes Vision for pharmaceutical management.
AdditionalComments
State-Region product stewardship legislative initiatives will likely bea focus of future 2012 SWMCB meetings; this workplan outcomeshould be carried into 2013 as any product stewardship proposalswill require legislative action next year.
39
Last Updated 02/23/12
Measurement & AccountabilityReview county-specific solid waste strategies and progress from county MasterPlans
IssuesAddressed
All Regional Master Plan Waste Topics
Stakeholders SWMCB & Member Counties
Tasks
In accordance with the SWMCB Joint Powers Agreement, annuallymonitor the progress of SWMCB member counties and their plans forfuture solid waste management efforts
Create an annual summary of key regional performance measures
2012Outcomes
The SWMCB will create a chart of key 2011 performance that will beused to inform SWMCB planning for the second half of 2012 and2013
All SWMCB member counties will present their solid wastemanagement progress during 2012 and initial plans for 2013
Progressto Date
The SWMCB is currently preparing a summary report on behalf of allSWMCB member counties that will be sent to the MPCA by the end ofJune 2012.
SWMCB member counties continually provide updates about localprogress at SWMCB Policy Staff meetings and have already begundiscussing preliminary plans for 2013.
AdditionalComments
None
40
Last Updated 02/23/12
Regional Consistency and CoordinationCreate county-led SWMCB subcommittees to evaluate opportunities andemerging issues for regional consistency and coordination. Examples ofpotential issue areas include recycling, organics recovery, toxicity reduction andnon-MSW management.
IssuesAddressed
All Regional Master Plan Waste Topics
Stakeholders SWMCB & Member Counties
Tasks
Identify solid waste management issues requiring subcommitteeefforts during 2012
Convene SWMCB subcommittees to enhance regional consistencyand/or coordination by sharing current county best practices anddiscussing opportunities for the future
2012Outcomes
SWMCB subcommittees will provide information andrecommendations that support SWMCB workplan efforts and theefforts of SWMCB member counties during 2012
Staff from SWMCB member counties will organize and lead theSWMCB subcommittees and ensure that subcommittee efforts arealigned with all other ongoing SWMCB policy, programmatic,communications and legislative activities
Progressto Date
The SWMCB has convened (or already has specific plans in place toconvene) subcommittees in the following areas during 2012:
- Cost & Billing- Source Reduction- Market Development- E-Waste- Processing Enforcement
AdditionalComments
Additional subcommittee efforts may be required as 2012progresses.
Coordinating communication among SWMCB subcommittees andother SWMCB entities (i.e. Policy Team, Executive Committee,Board) has worked well, but it has been challenging to identify astaff lead on many of the subcommittees that have been convened(an issue which, if left unaddressed, could result in coordinationchallenges)
41
Last Updated 02/23/12
II. Communications and Outreach
The SWMCB will advance partnerships and awareness of solid wastemanagement initiatives through regionally coordinated communications andoutreach efforts.
Communications and Outreach 2012 Budget:
Communications and Outreach Budget Analysis
Community POWER Regional Program Grant Recipients $93,750
Richardson, Richter and Associates $91,369
Risdall Marketing Group $69,000
Gorton’s Studios $36,000
LG Consulting $31,250
Type Communications $26,200
SWMCB General Overhead Expenses $16,750
Community POWER Technology Upgrades $8,500 (New Addition)
Community POWER County Special Projects $118,617
Community POWER County Special Projects Budget Analysis
Community POWER Special Projects Grant Recipients $88,962
LG Consulting $29,655
$372,819
42
Last Updated 02/23/12
Maintain Website Information and ResourcesContinue using RethinkRecycling.com as a primary communications tool for theSWMCB and all regionally coordinated waste management activities. Continueusing SWMCB.org to provide information about the SWMCB activities andprovide toolkit resources to our partners.
IssuesAddressed
Communications – Strategies #2, 3, 4, 6 & 7 in Communicationssection of the Regional Master Plan
StakeholdersSWMCB, Member Counties, Residential & Non-Residential WasteGenerators
Tasks
Maintain RethinkRecycling.com web pages, updating the residentialsection and creating an Education and Resources section
Send consumer Green Tips electronic newsletters to residentialsubscribers throughout the Region
Maintain the SWMCB.org website
Track usage of websites
Manage website domain registrations and website hosting services
2012Outcomes
RethinkRecycling.com and swmcb.org will contain up-to-date wasteinformation
The SWMCB will advance its policy and programmatic initiatives byusing its websites to disseminate information to waste stakeholders
SWMCB will increase the average number of site visits toRethinkRecycling.com as compared to 2011
Progressto Date
RethinkRecycling.com has been updated with new residentialrecycling and county medicine collection program information. A fullreview and update of RethinkRecycling.com/residents is in progressand is scheduled to be complete this fall. The new Education andResources section has been created and additional content will beadded by August.
Swmcb.org has been updated to include a news feed feature thatpromotes the most recent policy and programmatic information.
Two issues of the Green Tips e-newsletters have been sent to date.
Traffic to RethinkRecycling.com from January 1 – June 1 hasincreased approx. 25% over the same time period last year.
AdditionalComments
None
43
Last Updated 02/23/12
Develop and Disseminate Consistent Regional MessagesCreate communications materials and planning tools that encourage andadvance regional consistency
IssuesAddressed
Communications – Strategies #1, 2, 3, 4 & 7 in Communicationssection of the Regional Master Plan
StakeholdersSWMCB, Member Counties, MPCA, Other Public Entities in the Region,Residential and Non-Residential Waste Generators
Tasks
Develop a communications planning matrix for 2012 that supportsthe SWMCB’s high-priority policy initiatives
Develop materials to promote the business-focused ResourcefulWaste Management Guide
Update the residential recycling toolkit to address the addition of newmaterials to many curbside recycling programs throughout theRegion
Develop multicultural materials for existing toolkit resources thatexpand the reach of SWMCB communications
Explore the use of videos for promotions and create a repository forvideos and other SWMCB member county-developed waste resourcesthat could be used by other entities within the Region
Use public relations, advertising, and social media to disseminatemessages to waste generators
2012Outcomes
The SWMCB’s communications and policy staff will cooperativelydevelop a 2012 communications matrix
The SWMCB will develop and execute a monthly communications planbased on its planning matrix
The SWMCB will create, update and disseminate communicationsmaterials that encourage regional consistency
The SWMCB will increase from 2011 its total number of impressionsdue to its communications efforts in 2012
Progressto Date
A 2012 communications matrix has been developed and is currentlybeing executed.
The residential recycling toolkit update is complete. Outreach toregional solid waste partners on the importance of regionalconsistency and updated resources available will be conducted in thecoming weeks.
Development of an advertising and public relations campaign topromote the Resourceful Waste Management Guide is in progress andwill be conducted this fall.
Creation of a multicultural resource and video repository is inprogress and will be complete by August.
44
Last Updated 02/23/12
Social media outreach has been conducted weekly this year. As ofJune 8, Rethink Recycling had 3,600+ “likes” on Facebook and 351followers on Twitter.
AdditionalComments
Total impressions information will not be available until year-end asSWMCB advertising and public relations efforts are focused onbusiness promotions and will take place this fall. Increasing totalimpressions may be challenging given the reduced budget foradvertising and public relations in 2012.
The Communications Team will continue to stay in communicationswith Policy Staff regarding policy priorities and implementation of thecommunications matrix.
Advance Regional PartnershipsCreate resources that advance collaborative relationships for SWMCB membercounties and other entities within the Region that have a role in regulatingand/or managing waste
IssuesAddressed
Communications – Strategies #1, 3, 4 & 7 in Communicationssection of the Regional Master Plan
StakeholdersSWMCB, Member Counties, MPCA, Other Public Entities in theRegion & Non-Residential Waste Generators
Tasks
Continue the creation and dissemination of a SWMCB e-newsletterfor regional, public entity partners
Work with partners to evaluate existing GreenGatherings resourcesand identify additional tools needed for advancing waste reductionand recycling at events in the Region
Host a SWMCB-sponsored workshop for regional public entities toaddress the communications elements of a priority wastemanagement issue within the Region
Participate in ongoing dialogues with public and private wastestakeholders to ensure that communications efforts are effectivelytargeted at appropriate audiences
2012Outcomes
The SWMCB will send out a newsletter to regional, public entitypartners
The SWMCB will develop a list of recommendations for updating anddeveloping GreenGatherings resources for advancing recycling andwaste reduction at events throughout the Region
The SWMCB will host one workshop and dialogues with regionalpartners on an as needed basis during 2012
Progressto Date
Two editions of the SWMCB regional solid waste partner e-newsletter have been distributed to date. Additional editions will be
45
Last Updated 02/23/12
sent on an as needed basis throughout the year.
The GreenGatherings evaluation is in the planning stage and isscheduled to begin the coming weeks. A list of recommendationswill be complete by this fall.
A workshop for regional partners is planned for this fall. Thetentative focus will be communications with businesses and thelaunch of the SWMCB business promotional campaign.
AdditionalComments
Informal dialogues with regional solid waste stakeholders haveoccurred through various communications efforts (e.g. terminologyprocess, ongoing county-city coordination). Additional needs to bedetermined.
Award Grants to Entities Promoting SWMCB InitiativesAdvertise and award Regional Community POWER grants to non-profitorganizations and K-12 schools that advance recycling, source reduction andtoxicity reduction in the region.
IssuesAddressed
Communications – Strategy #5 in Communications section of theRegional Master Plan
StakeholdersSWMCB, Member Counties, Non-Profit Community Organizations, K-12 Schools & Residents
Tasks
Provide direct project assistance to Community POWER Round 12grantees, including meetings and individual conferences with thegrantees, as needed
Provide current and past Community POWER grantees with existingSWMCB communication campaign materials
Provide Round 12 Community POWER funding to non-profitorganizations and schools for projects that further SWMCB objectives
Build upon the 2011 development of the Community POWER toolkitby broadly disseminating the toolkit to interested community groupsduring 2012
2012Outcomes
SWMCB staff will meet regularly to oversee grant round 12, developthe toolkit, and provide overall program oversight
The SWMCB will allocate Round 12 regional Community POWERgrants to applicants in 2012
The SWMCB will enhance its performance measures associated withCommunity POWER grants so as to more clearly delineate programsuccesses and opportunities for future program improvement
Progressto Date
The SWMCB is currently reviewing Round 12 Community PowerApplications; application numbers increased from 2011, likely inrelation to the new online Community POWER application process.
46
Last Updated 02/23/12
AdditionalComments
The Community POWER team first focused its efforts on improvingthe application process (moving from a two-stage, paper-basedprocess to a one-step, online application). Improved programevaluation will be a focus during the remainder of 2012, but noinitiatives have been started at this time.
Per grant round timelines, Round 12 of the Community POWERprogram is not scheduled to be completed until the middle of 2013.
County Special Projects Initiative – Community POWER:Create Community POWER county priority grants that advance regional solidwaste management objectives by targeting specific solid waste priorities withinSWMCB member counties
IssuesAddressed
Communications – Strategy #5 in Communications section of theRegional Master Plan
StakeholdersSWMCB, Member Counties & Targeted Waste Stakeholders withinSWMCB Member Counties
Tasks
Develop and implement a grant program that is targeted atindividual county solid waste priorities and advances regional solidwaste management objectives
Manage trademark issues, as necessary
2012Outcomes
SWMCB will make progress toward the Region’s solid wastemanagement objectives through the execution of county-specificgrants
Progressto Date
Ramsey, Dakota and Washington County utilized Special Projectsfunding to target specific initiatives of interest within their particularjurisdiction; commercial recycling (Ramsey) and funding additionalmini-grants (Dakota and Washington) were the focuses of the Round12 Community POWER Special Project funds.
AdditionalComments
Per grant round timelines, Round 12 of the Community POWERprogram is not scheduled to be completed until the middle of 2013.
47
Last Updated 02/23/12
III. Legislative Advocacy and Intergovernmental Relations .
The SWMCB will work with the governor, Legislature and state agencies toadvance waste management outcomes for the Region.
Legislative Advocacy & Intergovernmental Relations2012 Budget:
$55,000
Legislative Advocacy & Intergovernmental Relations Budget Analysis
Vanasek Consulting with Capitol Hill Associates $30,000
Richardson, Richter and Associates $25,000
48
Last Updated 02/23/12
Develop and Advance SWMCB Legislative InitiativesCreate opportunities for SWMCB members, Legislators, staff and SWMCBindustry partners to collaborate on solid waste policy initiatives and raiseawareness about improved solid waste management practices
IssuesAddressed
All Regional Master Plan Waste Topics
StakeholdersSWMCB, Member Counties, Governor, Legislature, MPCA & OtherWaste Stakeholders
Tasks
Address 2012 legislative issues and develop 2012 legislative platform
Provide testimony on legislative initiatives and provide technicalinformation in support of the SWMCB legislative platform
Introduce and/or support legislation that advances the SWMCBlegislative platform
2012Outcomes
The SWMCB will approve a 2012 legislative platform
The SWMCB will receive regular legislative updates from its lobbyist
SWMCB members will be briefed throughout the legislative session sothat they are prepared to discuss current waste issues and SWMCBpolicy priorities with other local government officials, Legislators, theAdministration and the MPCA
The SWMCB will testify during legislative hearings and/or participatein conversations with the Administration regarding waste issues thatimpact the Region, when appropriate
Progressto Date
The SWMCB approved of a legislative platform successfully thatnavigated the organization through a challenging year at the Capitol.
SWMCB lobbyists provided (and continue to provide) updates toSWMCB staff and members at all Policy Staff and Board meetings,with regular communication with SWMCB staff between meetings.
Every member of the SWMCB Executive Committee testified duringthe 2012 legislative session.
AdditionalComments
It is expected that 2013 will be an active year for the SWMCB at theCapitol with the following waste management issues likely to receiveattention:
- Inverse Condemnation/Organized Collection- Enforcement of §473.848- Product Stewardship Expansion- Performance Measurement Improvements
49
Last Updated 02/23/12
Engage in Administrative Policy and RulemakingIdentify and address administrative policy and rulemaking initiatives that impactregional solid waste management.
IssuesAddressed
All Regional Master Plan Waste Topics
Stakeholders SWMCB, Member Counties Governor & MPCA
Tasks
Address emerging intergovernmental policy initiatives and advanceSWMCB policy positions
Comment on MPCA rulemaking processes impacting SWMCB membercounties
Meet with MPCA leadership to address ongoing policy and fundingissues and identify opportunities for future State-Region collaboration
2012Outcomes
The SWMCB will monitor legislative and MPCA initiatives and provideinput on issues that impact the Region
The SWMCB will comment on MPCA rulemaking processes that impactthe Region
SWMCB leadership will meet with MPCA leadership on a semi-annualbasis to discuss current and future waste issues that impact theRegion
Progressto Date
The SWMCB has instituted regular meetings at both the leadershipand staff levels with the MPCA to coordinate activities and plan forfuture efforts on priority issues. SWMCB leadership and staffleadership are now meeting on a semi annual and regular basis,respectively to plan for the future and discuss current progress.
Staff from SWMCB member counties have been involved in statecompost rulemaking and shared all updates with all SWMCBmembers.
The MPCA publicly announced that the current funding agreementbetween the MPCA and counties (through which funds are availableto fund the SWMCB) has been extended until 2015.
AdditionalComments
None
50
Last Updated 02/23/12
Data Collection, Research and Planning for the FutureThe SWMCB will undertake research, data gathering, and planning efforts toensure that current and future efforts are as effective as possible.
Data Collection, Research and Planning for the Future2012 Budget:
$176,000
Data Collection, Research and Planning for the Future Budget Analysis
SWMCB High Priority Research $60,000
Richardson, Richter and Associates $55,000
Cost and Finance Research Firm (to be selected in 2012) $50,000
Emerge Database Management $11,000
51
Last Updated 02/23/12
Cost and FinanceEvaluate contract and billing practices in the Region
IssuesAddressed
Cost and Finance - Strategy #3 in “Cost and Finance” section of theRegional Master Plan
Stakeholders SWMCB, Member Counties, Waste Haulers & Recycling Haulers
Tasks
Commission research to evaluate contract and billing with non-residential waste and recycling collection in the Region so as toassess how incentives can be leveraged to increase recycling andorganics recovery
Identify recommendations for next steps following a final SWMCBstaff analysis of the completed research
2012Outcomes
The SWMCB will more fully understand current contract and billingpractices in the Region and how those practices impact efforts tomake progress toward the state’s solid waste managementobjectives
SWMCB staff will develop recommendations for SWMCB membersregarding what, if any, actions can be taken in 2012 or 2013 toimprove billing and/or other waste information provided to non-residential waste generators in the Region
Progressto Date
A SWMCB subcommittee initially scoped the cost and billing researchinitiative on June 1, 2012 with future review and approval scheduledfor Policy Staff (June 13) and the Executive Committee (June 14).The results of this research will enable the SWMCB to fulfill bothoutcomes listed above.
AdditionalComments
The final recommendations stage of this workplan initiative will likelyneed to be carried into 2013 to ensure that the research can becompleted and properly evaluated prior to making finalrecommendations about possible next steps to the SWMCB.
52
Last Updated 02/23/12
Research for SWMCB High Priority IssuesCommission research that informs and supports SWMCB efforts to improve solidwaste management in the Region
IssuesAddressed
All Regional Master Plan Waste Topics
Stakeholders SWMCB & Member Counties
TasksThe SWMCB will develop and release RFPs for research related toinitiatives listed in the 2012 workplan, as necessary
2012Outcomes
Commissioned research will provide best practices findings and/orpolicy recommendations to SWMCB that furthers 2012 workplaninitiatives
Future workplans will include information and suggested strategiesderived from research commissioned by the SWMCB in 2012
Progressto Date
Other than the aforementioned cost and billing research initiative,no research needs have been identified for 2012.
AdditionalComments
SWMCB staff will continue to monitor opportunities where researchwould enhance decision-making and improve solid wastemanagement in the Region.
Collect Regional Solid Waste DataCollect and analyze regional data through the use of an electronic database
IssuesAddressed
All Regional Master Plan Waste Topics
Stakeholders SWMCB, Member Counties & MPCA
TasksManage the ReTRAC system including: a) guiding the use ofsoftware, b) ensuring consistency of data, and c) running reports onrecycling, HHW, and environmental benefits
2012Outcomes
County staff will continue using ReTRAC as an electronic databasefor collection and analysis of regional solid waste data
Progressto Date
Management of the ReTRAC system, a traditional SWMCB activity,continues to operate as described in the tasks and outcomes boxesabove.
AdditionalComments
ReTRAC modifications may be required in 2013 once there is moreunderstanding regarding the ongoing MPCA-led performancemeasurement improvement efforts (referenced in Section I above).
53
Last Updated 02/23/12
SWMCB Workplan DevelopmentUsing information from 2012 and the general strategies included in the RegionalMaster Plan as guides, develop a 2013 SWMCB workplan that targets regionalefforts at the highest priority solid waste management issues
IssuesAddressed
All Regional Master Plan Waste Topics & Community POWER
Stakeholders SWMCB & Member Counties
Tasks
Convene SWMCB members and staff groups to generate ideas forcontinued and future SWMCB activities for the workplan
Identify solid waste issue areas of highest priority and developoutcomes for all 2013 workplan tasks
Provide program evaluation support to the Community POWERProgram to improve evaluation measures and research bestpractices.
Develop the 2013 work plan and budget
Prepare budget documents supporting the workplan
Prepare grant application materials related to future fundingopportunities
Prepare 2012 budget and work plan amendments, as necessary
2012Outcomes
SWMCB members will approve a 2013 workplan that is consistentwith the priorities and regional strategies contained within theRegional Master Plan and builds upon initiatives listed in the 2012workplan
SWMCB will receive recommendations for how to improve theevaluation and overall program delivery of Community POWER forround 13
Progressto Date
Policy Staff and the Executive Committee will comprehensivelyreview workplan progress to date on June 13 and 14, respectively.
Preliminary 2013 workplan tasks and outcomes will be discussed atthe August Policy Staff and Executive Committee meetings, withfinal workplan and budget reviews by those groups scheduled forOctober. The SWMCB will then be asked to review the workplan andbudget (October) and approve the document (November).
AdditionalComments
After adding an online application process for Community POWERRound 12, the Community POWER team wishes to focus onimproving program measurement tools during 2013.
SWMCB staff will enhance its monitoring of potential grant fundingduring the second half of 2012 as it is a task that has receivedminimal attention to date.
54
Last Updated 02/23/12
Procurement of Future SWMCB ServicesDevelop and implement procurement processes for all major SWMCB contracts
IssuesAddressed
Overall Organizational Structure and Maintenance
Stakeholders SWMCB & Member Counties
Tasks
Develop, advertise and execute five-year contracts for:- Overall SWMCB administration- Advertising, public relations and graphic design- Communications campaign implementation assistance- Web development- Database management services (VSQG and ReTRAC)
Execute one-year, 2012 contract extensions for the followingfunctions:
- Overall SWMCB administration- Advertising, public relations and graphic design- Community POWER administration- Communications campaign implementation assistance- Web development- Database management for VSQG and ReTRAC- Legal services
Execute a one-year lobbying services contract and recommend ifthe SWMCB option to extend the contract should be exercised
2012Outcomes
The SWMCB will secure five-year contracts for necessaryprofessional services that begin in 2013
The SWMCB will execute one-year contract extensions to deliverSWMCB services in 2012
The SWMCB will evaluate the one-year lobbying services contractat the end of 2012 and determine a course of action for 2013
Progressto Date
One-year contracts for 2012 SWMCB services were executed withthe firms listed above.
SWMCB staff has developed a procurement timeline to completeall procurement activities by the end of October, thus providingthe SWMCB with long-term options on all vendors listed above.The full plan and draft RFQ’s will be presented to the SWMCBExecutive Committee on June 14, 2012 as the first step in theprocurement process.
SWMCB staff will provide a final evaluation of the one-yearSWMCB lobbying services contract with the Executive Committeeon June 14, 2012.
AdditionalComments
None
55
Last Updated 02/23/12
General Administration
The SWMCB will meet regularly and procure the administrative contractsnecessary to achieve the regional outcomes articulated in the annual workplanand the 2011-2030 Regional Solid Waste Master Plan.
General Administration 2012 Budget:
Data Collection, Research and Planning for the Future Budget Analysis
Richardson, Richter and Associates $175,000
Administrative Overhead Expenses $15,000 (New Addition)
$190,000
56
Last Updated 02/23/12
Financial Management and Contract ImplementationManage overall financial and contractor management issues for the SWMCB.
IssuesAddressed
Overall Organizational Administration
Stakeholders SWMCB
Tasks
Manage SWMCB's accounting system (i.e. review invoices, forwardinvoices for approval and processing, coordinate receipt ofpayments, and prepare purchase orders)
Manage all SWMCB contractor invoices
Manage financial reporting requirements and prepare financialreports to the SWMCB
Prepare technical and other budget amendments, as needed
Review and update the SWMCB’s Financial Management Procedures
Provide overall financial management and reporting services for theSWMCB, and coordinate with Dakota County, the SWMCB financialagent, to retain and disburse all funds on behalf of the SWMCB
Research and evaluate additional funding sources and grantopportunities, as appropriate
Develop a 2013 budget to compliment the 2013 workplan
2012Outcomes
The SWMCB will actively manage all invoices and other financialissues related to the operation of the organization
The SWMCB will manage the budget and any related budgetamendments to ensure that the 2012 workplan is implemented ascompletely as possible
The SWMCB will review and update its Financial ManagementProcedures
The SWMCB will produce publically available budget documents totransparently depict regional waste policy, communications andresearch efforts
Progressto Date
All financial invoices and issues have been managed in the mannerthat is consistent with SWMCB policies.
The SWMCB workplan, as evidenced by this review, is beingimplemented within budget and timeline with few exceptions (whichwere highlighted so as to draw additional attention).
All 2012 budget documents are publically available at swmcb.org
AdditionalComments
SWMCB staff have not developed a timeline or plan for review of theorganization’s financial management procedures, but will now do soto ensure the outcome is met during 2012.
57
Last Updated 02/23/12
Board & Committee General AdministrationHold Board and Committee meetings to develop policy and perform the functionsof the SWMCB; communicate SWMCB activities to members, staff, andinterested parties; update and manage www.swmcb.org.
IssuesAddressed
Overall Organizational Administration
Stakeholders SWMCB
Tasks
Hold monthly Board meetings
Hold five Executive Committee meetings
Hold monthly policy and communications SWMCB staff meetings
Use SWMCB.org to communicate SWMCB agendas, reports, andother printed materials to SWMCB staff and project partners.
Purchase supplies and website domain registrations; manageprinting, postage, and meeting expenses
Manage the SWMCB FTP site for document posting
Provide timely responses to waste stakeholders with questions forthe SWMCB or refer questions to member counties, as appropriate
2012Outcomes
The SWMCB will meet on a monthly basis throughout the year
The Executive Committee will meet five times throughout the year
SWMCB policy and communications staff will meet on a monthlybasis throughout the year
The SWMCB will regularly provide policy, financial and planninginformation to the public through SWMCB communications tools
The SWMCB will enhance relationships with waste stakeholdersthrough timely responses to inquiries
Progressto Date
The SWMCB, Executive Committee, Policy Staff team andCommunications Team have been regularly meeting and willcontinue to regularly meet during 2012.
The SWMCB website has been updated so that all information andavailable tools are as accessible and understandable as possible.
All stakeholder inquiries have been responded to in a timely manner.
AdditionalComments
None
58
To: Board MembersFrom: Executive CommitteeDate: July 19, 2012RE: Information about the Proposed September SWMCB Meeting and Tour
Action Requested: Approve a date and time change for the September 26, 2012SWMCB meeting.
About the ArboretumThe Minnesota Landscape Arboretum is a University of Minnesota foundation dedicated toproviding a community and national resource for horticultural and environmentalinformation, research and public education and to maintaining displays, collections,model landscapes, and conservation areas. The University of Minnesota LandscapeArboretum is part of the Department of Horticultural Science within the College of Food,Agricultural and Natural Resource Sciences at the University of Minnesota.
This year’s summer exhibit at the Arboretum is called “Dirt-O-Rama”, a special exhibitfocused on soil. The exhibition also showcases Carver County and SpecializedEnvironmental Technologies’ Demonstration Organics Compost Site, where yard andkitchen organics are turned into rich humus.
To foster further collaboration with the University, Carver County, in conjunction with theFoundation, invites the Solid Waste Management Coordinating Board to host itsSeptember meeting at the Arboretum and tour the various exhibits for Dirt-O-Ramaincluding Art of the Earth, Real Dirt Lab, Compost Corner: Gardener’s Gold, Biochar forGardens, and the Demonstration Compost Site
Meeting and TourFollowing the SWMCB’s regular business meeting that would start at 9:30 AM, theArboretum will provide a short overview of “Dirt-O-Rama: Intriguing Tales of theUnderground” and will offer tours including Art of the Earth: five winning design teams’art focused on the mysteries of the earth beneath our feet. The Carver County and SETDemonstration Organics Composting Facility will also be highlighted during the tour.
59