+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Some geometric bounds on eigenvalues of elliptic PDEs Evans Harrell Georgia Tech harrell Spectral...

Some geometric bounds on eigenvalues of elliptic PDEs Evans Harrell Georgia Tech harrell Spectral...

Date post: 13-Dec-2015
Category:
Upload: kristian-turner
View: 215 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
51
Some geometric bounds on eigenvalues of elliptic PDEs Evans Harrell Georgia Tech www.math.gatech.edu/~harrell Spectral Theory Network 25 July, 2004 Cardiff
Transcript

Some geometric bounds on eigenvalues of elliptic PDEs

Evans Harrell

Georgia Techwww.math.gatech.edu/~harrell

Spectral Theory Network 25 July, 2004 Cardiff

• Geometric lower bounds for the spectrum of elliptic PDEs with Dirichlet conditions in part, preprint, 2004.

• Commutators, eigenvalue gaps, and mean curvature in the theory of Schrödinger operators, preprint, 2003.

• Derived from one-dimensional “Hardy inequality”• Related inequalities of “Barta” form:

Proof:

QED

“Barta” type bounds

And now for something completely different

On a (hyper) surface,what object is most like

the Laplacian?

( = the good old flat scalar Laplacian of Laplace)

• Answer #1 (Beltrami’s answer): Consider only tangential variations.

The Laplace-Beltrami operator is an intrinsic object, and as such is unaware that the surface is immersed.

• Answer #2 (The nanoanswer):

Perform a singular limit and renormalization to attain the surface as the limit of a thin domain:

- + q,

Some other answers

• In other physical situations, such as reaction-diffusion, q(x) may be other quadratic expressions in the curvature, usually q(x) ≤ 0.

• The conformal answer: q(x) is a multiple of the scalar curvature.

Heisenberg's Answer(if he had thought about it)

Heisenberg's Answer(if he had thought about it)

Note: q(x) ≥ 0 !

Gap Lemma

Commutators and gaps

Commutators and gaps

Commutators and gaps

The Serret-Frenet equations as commutator relations:

Sum on m and integrate. QED

Sum on m and integrate. QED

Bound is sharp for the circle:

Gap bounds for (hyper) surfaces

Here h is the sum of the principal curvatures.

where

where

Bound is sharp for the sphere:

Spinorial Canonical Commutation

Spinorial Canonical Commutation

Sum Rules

Sum Rules

Proof

Sharp universal bound for all gaps

Sharp universal bound for all gaps

Partition function

Z(t) := tr(exp(-tH)).

Partition function

which implies


Recommended