+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Sonoma County Communities Significant GHG Reductions by 2010.

Sonoma County Communities Significant GHG Reductions by 2010.

Date post: 05-Jan-2016
Category:
Upload: cuthbert-martin
View: 213 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
Popular Tags:
19
Sonoma County Communities Significant GHG Reductions by 2010
Transcript
Page 1: Sonoma County Communities Significant GHG Reductions by 2010.

Sonoma County Communities

Significant GHG Reductions by 2010

Page 2: Sonoma County Communities Significant GHG Reductions by 2010.

Sebastopol’s Goal

30% Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Reduction Below 2000 Levels by 2008

Page 3: Sonoma County Communities Significant GHG Reductions by 2010.

Water Supply System

Variable Frequency Drive Pump #6

Variable Frequency Drive Pump #7

Replacement Pump #7

Pump System SCADA

Page 4: Sonoma County Communities Significant GHG Reductions by 2010.

Water Supply System

Analysis Water Measures

% Reduction 5.3%

Simple Pay Back 2.1

Internal Rate of Return 74%

Net Present Value $456,829

Year Net Cash Flow

2007 ($11,013)

2008 $8,345

2009 $9,118

2010 $30,433

2011 $31,246

2012 $32,079

2013 $32,933

2014 $33,808

2015 $34,705

2016 $35,625

Financial Summary

Page 5: Sonoma County Communities Significant GHG Reductions by 2010.

Adding HVAC

Analysis Plus HVAC

% Reduction 12.4%

Simple Pay Back 3.5

Internal Rate of Return 53%

Net Present Value $610,374

Year Net Cash Flow

2007 ($13,018)

2008 $1,010

2009 $2,337

2010 $24,219

2011 $25,614

2012 $27,043

2013 $28,508

2014 $30,010

2015 $31,549

2016 $33,126

Financial Summary

Page 6: Sonoma County Communities Significant GHG Reductions by 2010.

Adding Photo Voltaic Projects

Analysis Plus PV

% Reduction 23.2%

Simple Pay Back 2.8

Internal Rate of Return 69%

Net Present Value $974,466

Year Net Cash Flow

2007 ($13,018)

2008 $4,637

2009 $6,922

2010 $29,787

2011 $32,191

2012 $34,657

2013 $37,187

2014 $39,782

2015 $42,444

2016 $45,175

Financial Summary

Page 7: Sonoma County Communities Significant GHG Reductions by 2010.

Considering Completed Projects

Analysis Plus Completed

% Reduction 32.9%

Simple Pay Back 1.9

Internal Rate of Return 83%

Net Present Value $1,045,415

Year Net Cast Flow

2007 ($13,018)

2008 $8,362

2009 $10,763

2010 $33,747

2011 $36,273

2012 $38,864

2013 $41,522

2014 $44,248

2015 $47,045

2016 $49,914

Financial Summary

Page 8: Sonoma County Communities Significant GHG Reductions by 2010.

Over the Top42% GHG Reduction

Analysis Kitchen Sink

% Reduction 42.7%

Simple Pay Back 5.6

Internal Rate of Return 24%

Net Present Value $1,511,888

Year Net Cash Flow

2007 ($33,018)

2008 $8,362

2009 ($139,237)

2010 $43,740

2011 $46,506

2012 $49,343

2013 $52,253

2014 $55,238

2015 $58,299

2016 $61,438

Financial Summary

Page 9: Sonoma County Communities Significant GHG Reductions by 2010.

Complete Financial Picture

Pool Covers $18,738 $0 $10,087 124,470 1.9 59.2% $182,417 1.75%

Decommission Fountain $10,000 $0 $11,406 57,425 0.9 121.6% $216,937 0.81%

Boiler Replcmnt Sports Center

$72,604 $0 $4,777 58,943 15.2 7.9% $25,688 0.83%

Building HVAC $84,600 $0 $6,090 30,660 13.9 8.8% $40,340 0.43%

Addtl Lighting $46,698 $0 $11,750 57,181 4.9 24.3% $178,109 0.81%

Lift Station #1 $32,920 $0 $3,770 18,980 8.7 14.4% $43,497 0.27%

Pool Pump Measures $33,140 0 $13,340 67,160 2.5 45.2% $233,291 0.95%

Computer Network Controls

$4,138 $0 $2,500 12,586 1.7 66.0% $45,694 0.18%

PV5 $208,410 $599 $4,881 27,166 42.7 0.8% ($72,006) 0.38%

Biodiesel B20 $5,000 $0 -$224 35,163 NA NA ($9,205) 0.50%

Measure Description

Net Capital Cost

O&M incremental

Cost

Annual Cost Savings

Annual CO2 Reduction

Simple Payback

IRRNet Present

Value

% of Total GHG

Page 10: Sonoma County Communities Significant GHG Reductions by 2010.

The Key Information

Analysis Plan A Plan B Plan C Plan D Plan E

% Reduction 10.9% 23.2% 35.6% 42.9% 50.3%

SPB 2.1 1.1 12.4 16.5 20.1

IRR 76.6% 127.3% 15.3% 8.9% 3.4%

NPV $1,758,018 $1,517,448 $1,286,650 $979,700 ($357,822)

2007 $15,744 ($5,000) ($5,000) ($5,000) ($5,000)

2008 $21,330 $8,720 $4,436 $4,436 $4,436

2009 $43,216 $10,725 $15,394 ($50,471) ($141,716)

2010 $49,196 $26,389 $34,717 ($64,597) ($155,695)

2011 $55,383 $45,773 ($23,668) ($96,055) ($224,810)

2012 $61,783 $51,317 ($142,321) ($69,407) ($240,249)

2013 $68,406 $57,063 ($49,700) ($220,994) ($391,277)

2014 $108,060 $74,047 ($30,521) ($192,108) ($362,801)

2015 $115,149 $111,332 $9,031 ($159,583) ($330,695)

2016 $122,483 $117,721 $17,766 ($74,901) ($213,636)

2017 $130,071 $124,341 $26,809 ($55,182) ($194,351)

2018 $87,728 $142,132 $105,826 $183,602 $43,535

2019 $146,045 $69,443 $137,864 ($63,271) ($203,787)

2020 $154,449 $126,031 $94,993 $249,015 $108,040

GHG Action Plan Summary

Annual Net Cash Flow

Page 11: Sonoma County Communities Significant GHG Reductions by 2010.

Benefits to Financial Planning

Future Energy Cost Mitigation

$456,199

$320,762

$354,761

$332,429

$294,675

$227,161

$0

$50,000

$100,000

$150,000

$200,000

$250,000

$300,000

$350,000

$400,000

$450,000

$500,000

An

nu

al E

ner

gy

Co

st (

Fu

el, N

G, E

lec.

)

Escal. Rate N.Gas and Elec.= 3.5%

Diesel and Gas = 8%

No Action

Plan B

Plan C

Plan E

Plan A

Annual Energy Cost

Plan D

Less

Vul

nera

ble

- M

ore

Vul

nera

ble

Page 12: Sonoma County Communities Significant GHG Reductions by 2010.

Demonstrating Leadership

CO2 Reductions by Sector

-1,700

-1,500

-1,300

-1,100

-900

-700

-500

-300

-100

Year

CO2

(ton

s)

-50%

-40%

-30%

-20%

-10%

0%

Perc

enta

ge R

educ

tion

PV

Water/Sewer

Commute

Fleet

Street Lights

Buildings

978 tons CO2e Annual Reduction

$$$ Avoided Utility Company Payments $6,776,259

$$$ Avoided Fuel Purchases $1,473,872$$$ Invested Locally in GHG Projects $5,010,979

Community Benefits over 25 year Life of Plan

Internal Rate of Return on Investment 15.3%

Net Present Value of Investment $1,286,650

MSI Integrated Solutions, Inc. Climate Protection Campaign

Page 13: Sonoma County Communities Significant GHG Reductions by 2010.

Other Cities

Analysis Plan C% Reduction 35.6%

SPB 12.4IRR 15.3%NPV $1,286,650

Financial Summary

City of Sonoma 37.2% GHG Reduction

Analysis Plan D% Reduction 37.2%

SPB 13.7IRR 13.6%NPV $572,494

Financial Summary

CO2 Reduction by Sector

-2,750

-2,500

-2,250

-2,000

-1,750

-1,500

-1,250

-1,000

-750

-500

-250

0

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011

2012

2013

2014

2015

Year

CO

2 (

ton

s)

-100%

-90%

-80%

-70%

-60%

-50%

-40%

-30%

-20%

-10%

0%

Pe

rce

nta

ge

Re

du

cti

on

PV

Water/Sewer

Commute

Fleet

Street Lights

Buildings

CO2e Reduction by Sector

-700

-600

-500

-400

-300

-200

-100

0

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011

2012

2013

2014

2015

CO

2e (

ton

s)

-110%

-100%

-90%

-80%

-70%

-60%

-50%

-40%

-30%

-20%

-10%

0%

PV

Water/Sewer

Commute

Fleet

Street Lights

Buildings

Per

cen

tag

e R

edu

ctio

n

Rohnert Park 35.6% GHG Reduction

Page 14: Sonoma County Communities Significant GHG Reductions by 2010.

Sebastopol Next Steps

•Tiered Rates Structured for Conservation

•Expanded Water Efficiency Incentives

•PAYStm Water Bill Incentive Financing

•Zero Net Gain in Water Usage for General Plan

•Berkeley Muni Bonds for efficiency and renewables

Water and Waste Water Initiatives

Page 15: Sonoma County Communities Significant GHG Reductions by 2010.

Sebastopol Next Steps

REFERENCES:John Rosenblum, Ph.D. for water and wastewater operations ([email protected])Ned Orrett, P.E. for end-users ([email protected])Full details in upcoming report by Climate Protection Campaign (www.climateprotectioncampaign.org) for the City of Santa Rosa

2005 WATER-RELATED GHG EMISSIONS

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

WATER SUPPLY

WASTEWATER TREATMENT

END-USERS

CO

2e /

1 M

Gal

(T

on

s)

Emissions due mainly

to home water

heating

Page 16: Sonoma County Communities Significant GHG Reductions by 2010.

Sebastopol Next Steps

REFERENCES:John Rosenblum, Ph.D. for water and wastewater operations ([email protected])Ned Orrett, P.E. for end-users ([email protected])Full details in upcoming report by Climate Protection Campaign (www.climateprotectioncampaign.org) for the City of Santa Rosa

GHG Savings /1 M Gallons Water Conserved

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

WATER SUPPLY

WASTEWATER TREATMENT

END-USERS

CO

2e S

ave

d

(To

ns

)

SAVINGS1.5 tons-CO2e from water/watewater operations

10.5 tons-CO2e from end-users: water heating

Page 17: Sonoma County Communities Significant GHG Reductions by 2010.

Coordinated Action Countywide

Sonoma County Water Agency•On track to meet all power demand from renewable sources by 2015, a Carbon reduction: 15,000 tons/year

Sonoma County Transit Authority•Developing a Comprehensive Transit Plan which will address Countywide goal of 25% GHG reduction by 2015.

Page 18: Sonoma County Communities Significant GHG Reductions by 2010.

Sonoma County Water Agency

Demonstrations of Leadership

• Water Reuse for Zero-net Energy Communities• Utilization of Landfill Gas for Energy • Deployment of 2 MW Photo Voltaic Capacity• Deployment of PHEVs and EVs and Bulk Purchase• Incorporation of BioDiesel in the Fleet• Exploration of Wave Energy Potential for County• Collaborations: Emerging Technologies Conference

Page 19: Sonoma County Communities Significant GHG Reductions by 2010.

Local Governments Taking Action

MSI Integrated Solutions, Inc. Climate Protection Campaign


Recommended