SOURCE TEST REPORT 2019 RELATIVE ACCURACY ... OF VANCOUVER - WESTSIDE...2019/07/17 · TABLE 4-2...

SOURCE TEST REPORT 2019 RELATIVE ACCURACY TEST AUDIT WESTSIDE WATER RECLAMATION FACILITY FLUIDIZED BED INCINERATOR VANCOUVER, WASHINGTON

Prepared For:

CH2M-Jacobs I City of Vancouver 2323 West Mill Plain Blvd Vancouver, WA 98221

For Submittal To:

SWCAA- Southwest Clean Air Agency 11815 NE 99th Street, Suite 1294 Vancouver, WA 98682

Prepared By:

Montrose Air Quality Services, LLC 13585 NE Whitaker Way Portland, OR 97230

Document Number: Test Date: Submittal Date:

W006AS-583309A-RT-235 July 17, 2019 August 20, 2019

AUG 3 0 2019

Uri _ __ _ Jerry E. __ _

d:@D___, __

Wcss~---Clint .

~.---Vannessa =-· ~-,---Jerry - -- ·---~ - ,~ ·-Biian ·-- ·~-.-,,~·-Duane ~- ·-~~ ·-- ___ _ Monica .•. ..,,.......... ___ _

Crystal - -··- _ Chip ____ _ Traci __ _ Tina ___ _

- f~e ___ _

~ MONTROSE

l_l I\ I I I' \ \ , I,

City of Vancouver Westside Water Reclamation Facility Fluidized Bed Incinerator 2019 Source Test Report-FBI RATA (02 & CO)

REVIEW AND CERTIFICATION

All work, calculations, and other activities and tasks performed and presented in this document were carried out by me or under my direction and supervision. I hereby certify that, to the best of my knowledge, Montrose operated in conformance with the requirements of the Montrose Quality Management System and ASTM D7036-04 during this test project.

Signature: 9,&J.Jl )nUd.L.Uael Date: _ ___ o_s_/_2_0_/_2_0_1_9 _ ____ _

Name: Josh Muswieck Title: Project Manager

I have reviewed, technically and editorially, details, calculations, results, conclusions, and other appropriate written materials contained herein. I hereby certify that, to the best of my knowledge, the presented material is authentic, accurate, and conforms to the requirements of the Montrose Quality Management System and ASTM D7036-04.

Signature: dJ/~ Date: 08/19/2019 ----'--=---'---=- ---- ----- ------- ----

Name: Andy Vella, PE Title: Reporting/QC Specialist

W006AS-583309A-RT-235 2 of 11 9

City of Vancouver Westside Water Reclamation Facility Fluidized Bed Incinerator 2019 Source Test Report- FBI RATA (02 & CO)

TABLE OF CONTENTS

SECTION

1.0 SUMMARY OF TEST PROGRAM AND RESUL TS ...... .. .... .. .. .............................................. 5

1.1 PROGRAM OBJECTIVES ............... ......................... .................... ... ........................... 5

1.2 PROJECT CONTACTS ............................................................................... ... ............. 6

1.3 QUALITY STATEMENT ........ ................... .......... .. ... ... ...... ..... ... ... ... ... ................. ....... .. 6

2.0 SOURCE DESCRIPTION ....................................... ............................................................. 7

2.1 FACILITY AND SOURCE DESCRIPTION .................................................................. 7

2.1.1 CE MS Description .......... ..................... ..... ..... ........ ........ .......... .......................... 7

2.2 SAMPLING LOCATIONS AND ACCESS .................................................................... 8

2.3 OPERATING CONDITIONS AND PROCESS DATA .............. .............. ............. ...... .... 8

3.0 TEST METHOD DETAILS ................................................................................................... 9

3.1 LIST OF TEST METHODS .......................................................................................... 9

3.1.1 Gaseous Emissions ....................................... ............... ........................ .. .. ...... .. 9

3.1.2 Relative Accuracy Test Audit ............................................................................ 9

4.0 TEST RESULTS AND OVERVIEW .................................................................................... 10

4.1 DISCUSSION OF RES UL TS ................... .......... ... ... ...... ........................................... 10

4.2 DEVIATIONS AND EXCEPTIONS .. ... ........ .......................... ...... .. ..... ..... .............. .... . 10

APPENDIX A CALCULATIONS .. .................... ............ .. ..... ................. .. ..... ...... ..... ..... ...... .... ..... 13

A.1 Gaseous Emissions Spreadsheets .............................................................................. 14

A.2 Relative Accuracy Spreadsheets ........ .......................................... ....... ........ ................ 16

A.3 Example Calculations .................................................. ................ ............... ................. 19

A.4 General Emissions Calculations ... ... ............. ................ ........... ................... ....... ...... .. .. 24

APPENDIX B FIELD AND COMPUTER-GENERATED DATA .................................................. 30

B.1 Sampling Locations ................................. .................................................................... 31

B.2 Reference Method Data ............................................................................................... 34

APPENDIX C CLIENT CEMS AND PROCESS DATA .............................................................. 55

C.1 Process and CEMS Data during RATA ....................................................................... 56

APPENDIX D QUALITY ASSURANCE/QUALITY CONTROL .... .... .............................. ............. 68

D.1 Quality Assurance Program Summary and Equipment Calibration Schedule .............. 69

D.2 ASTM D-7036 Accreditation and QI Certificates .......................................................... 74

D.3 Reference Method Analyzer Calibration Data .... .. ............. .... . ..... ........... .... .................. 78

D.4 Span Gas Certificates ............................... ...... ... ." ..... ............... ............... ............... ..... .. 86

APPENDIX E MISCELLANEOUS INFORMATION ........... .............. .. ..... .. .. ..... .. ...... ...... ....... ...... 92

E.1 Agency Correspondence ....... ....... .... .. ........ ..... ......... . ................................... ............... 93

E.2 Permit Excerpts ... .... .. ......... .. ... ..... ................. .................. ..... ......... ....... .... ................. 114

W006AS-583309A-RT-235 3 of 119


LIST OF TABLES

TABLE 1-1 SUMMARY OF AVERAGE RATA RESUL TS ............................................................ 5

TABLE 2-1 GEMS INFORMATION ......................................... .................................................... 7

TABLE 3-1 TEST PROCEDURES ......... ... .. ................ .... ...... .................................... ...... ...... ...... 9

TABLE 4-1 RELATIVE ACCURACY TEST RESULTS 02% ............... ... ..................... .. .... ........ . 11

TABLE 4-2 RELATIVE ACCURACY TEST RES UL TS CO ......................... ..... ..... ... .................. 12

W006AS-583309A-RT-235 4 of 119


1.0 SUMMARY OF TEST PROGRAM AND RESULTS

1.1 PROGRAM OBJECTIVES

Montrose Air Quality Services, LLC (Montrose) was contracted by Jacobs to perform a series of air emission tests at the Westside Water Reclamation Facility in Vancouver, Washington. The tests were performed to audit the performance of the continuous emission monitoring system (CEMS) in accordance with 40 CRF, part 60, Appendix B on the Fluidized Bed Incinerator (FBI) per the source testing limitations of the Southwest Clean Air Agency (SWCAA) Air Operating Permit (ADP) No. 13-3047.

The testing was conducted by Josh Muswieck, Preston Bauder and Austin Goracke of Montrose on July 17, 2019 but was originally scheduled for July 18, 2019. SWCAA was informed by email of the change by Josh Muswieck. Rani Senkbeil of Jacobs and Frank Dick of City of Vancouver coordinated the testing program. The tests were conducted according to a test plan dated June 13, 2019. Montrose performed the tests to measure the following emission parameters:

• Relative Accuracy Test Audit:

~ CO (ppm volume dry, ppmvd @ 7% 0 2)

~ 02 (% dry)

This report presents the test results and supporting data, descriptions of the testing procedures, descriptions of the facility and sampling locations, and a summary of the quality assurance procedures used by Montrose. The average emission test results are summarized and compared to their respective performance specifications in Table 1-1 . Detailed results for individual test runs can be found in Section 4.0. All supporting data can be found in the appendices.

TABLE 1-1 SUMMARY OF AVERAGE RATA RESULTS WEST WATER RECLAMATION FACILITY

FLUDIZED BED INCINERATOR JULY 17, 2019

Parameter Relative Accuracy Performance Specification

0 2 Analyzer: % volume dry

CO Analyzer: ppm@ 7% 02

a% 0 2 (based on actual difference between CEMS and RM analyzer readings) b PPM of the absolute difference plus the confidence coefficient of the applicable standard

W006AS-583309A-RT-235 5 of 119

1

5


1.2 PROJECT CONTACTS

A list of project participants is included below:

Facility Information Source Location: Jacobs I City of Vancouver

Westside Water Reclamation Facility 2323 West Mill Plain Blvd

Project Contact: Role:

Company: Telephone:

Email:

Agency Information

Vancouver, WA 98660 Rani Senkbeil Lab/I PP Manager Jacobs 360-695-0092 [email protected]

Regulatory Agency: Southwest Clean Air Agency Agency Contact: John St. Clair

Telephone: 360-574-3058 x127 Email: [email protected]

Testing Company Information

Frank Dick Wastewater Engineering Supervisor City of Vancouver 360-487-7179 [email protected]

Testing Firm: Montrose Air Quality Services, LLC (Montrose) Contact: Josh Muswieck Kristina Schafer

Title : Field Project Manager Hub District Manager Telephone: 541-227-1292 253-480-3801

Ema ii: jm [email protected] ksch [email protected] m

1.3 QUALITY STATEMENT

Montrose is qualified to conduct this test program and has established a quality management system that led to accreditation with ASTM Standard D7036-04 (Standard Practice for Competence of Air Emission Testing Bodies). Montrose participates in annual functional assessments for conformance with D7036-04 which are conducted by the American Association for Laboratory Accreditation (A2LA). All testing performed by Montrose is supervised on site by at least one Qualified Individual (QI) as defined in D7036-04 Section 8.3.2. Data quality objectives for estimating measurement uncertainty within the documented limits in the test methods are met by using approved test protocols for each project as defined in D7036-04 Sections 7.2.1 and 12.10. Additional quality assurance information is included in the report appendices.

W006AS-583309A-RT-235 6 of 119


2.0 SOURCE DESCRIPTION

2.1 FACILITY AND SOURCE DESCRIPTION

The Westside Water Reclamation facility is located at 2323 West Mill Plain Boulevard in Vancouver, Washington. The FBF (sewage sludge incinerator) is a custom designed unit engineered by U.S. Filter/Zimpro. The unit is configured as a vertically-oriented shell in which a bed of hot sand, approximately 60 inches thick, is mixed with sludge and simultaneously fluidized by injected air at pressures from 20 to 35 kilopascals (5.0 psig). The combustor bed is five feet high with a 16-foot inside diameter. The preheat burner is rated at 8.0 MMBtu/hr and is fueled on natural gas or No. 2 fuel oil. The unit is designed to combust up to 16,131 lb/hr (31.5 gpm) of wet sludge which contains 4,833 lb/hr of dry sludge (26.4% solids) and 80.0 dry lb/hr of scum. The sludge is mixed with 7,324 scfm of combustion air which exits the combustor at 1,550°F and produces 1,049 lb/hr of ash.

Exhaust gases from the combustor are used to preheat the fluidizing air to 1,000°F while cooling the exhaust air to 1, 153°F using a shell and tube heat exchanger from Thermal Transfer Corporation. Exhaust from the preheat exchanger is routed to a second heat exchanger where plume suppression air is used to further cool the exhaust gases. The hot plume suppression air at 3,500 scfm is designed to be injected into the stack to heat the exhaust gases to increase plume rise and eliminate the condensate plume. The exhaust from the second heat exchanger is routed to a pre-cooler with a water flowrate of 53 gpm. Exhaust from the pre-cooler is routed to a damper type variable throat venturi manufactured by Emtrol. The variable damper scrubber is designed to operate at a minimum pressure drop of 40" H20 column at 140 gpm of scrubber water. Exhaust from the scrubber is routed to a four-tray scrubber manufactured by Emtrol. The exhaust from the tray scrubber is routed through a mercury sorbent media scrubber and wire mesh mist eliminator manufactured by Envirocare. The pressure drop across the entire scrubber system should be a minimum of 45" H20 column.

Exhaust for the FBF and control system is discharged vertically through a 29.5" diameter stack at a height of 73' 6" above ground level.

2.1.1 CEMS Description

Referenced below in Table 2.1 are the specifications for each CEMS analyzer, including analyzer manufacturer, model number, type, and serial number.

TABLE 2-1 CEMS INFORMATION

Analyzer Type Manufacturer Model No.

Siemens

co Siemens

Oxymat 6E

Ultramat 6E

2.2 SAMPLING LOCATIONS AND ACCESS

Information regarding the sampling location is presented below:

W006AS-583309A-RT-235 7 of 119

Serial No.

7MB2021-1AA00-0BA 1

7MB2121-1 BEOO-OAA 1

City of Vancouver Westside Water Reclamation Facility Fluidized Bed Incinerator 2019 Source Test Report - FBI RATA (02 & CO)

Sample location ID: FBI Scrubber Exhaust-FBI building sampling location (RATA Testing) Configuration: Cylindrical, vertical

Dimensions: 29.5 inches internal diameter Port access Scissor lift to access sample port

Traverse point information is presented below:

• Gaseous RATA tests - 3 points total - 16. 7, 50.0, and 83.3 percent of internal diameter

2.3 OPERATING CONDITIONS AND PROCESS DATA

Plant personnel established the test conditions and collected all applicable unit-operating data. Data collected includes the following parameters:

• CEMS data

• Stack temp, °F

• Furnace temp, °F

• Scrubber dp, in-we

• Sludge feed, lbs/hr

• Startup mode, mins

• Burn mode, ppm CO @7% 02

W006AS-583309A-RT-235 8 of 119


3.0 TEST METHOD DETAILS

3.1 LIST OF TEST METHODS

The test procedures for this test program are summarized in Table 3-1 below. Additional information regarding specific applications or modifications to standard procedures is presented in the following sub-sections.

Parameter

co

3.1.1 Gaseous Emissions

TABLE 3-1 TEST PROCEDURES

Measurement Principle

Paramagnetism

Gas filter correlation NDIR

Reference Method

EPA 3A (PS-3)

EPA 10 (PS-4A)

Concentrations of the gaseous constituents of stack gas (02 & CO) are measured using Montrose's dry extractive reference method (RM) monitor system in accordance with EPA Method 3A and 10. This system meets the requirements of EPA methods for gaseous species. Pertinent information regarding the performance of the method is presented below:

• Method Deviations: None

• Method Options: N/A

Sampling traverse points for gaseous emissions were determined in accordance with EPA Method 3A. As required by 40 CFR Part 60, the stack gas was sampled at three traverse points. The probe tips were located at 16. 7%, 50% and 83.3% of the internal diameter. Source gas was sampled for a period of 21 minutes for each of the 1 O audit runs.

3.1.2 Relative Accuracy Test Audit

The relative accuracy of each CEMS was audited per the procedures of 40 CFR, Part 60, Appendix B. Pertinent information regarding the performance of the audit is presented below:

• Traverse Points: Three located along the measurement line

• Relevant Performance Specifications: 40 CFR 60, PS 3 and 4A

W006AS-583309A-RT-235 9 of 119


4.0 TEST RES UL TS AND OVERVIEW

4.1 DISCUSSION OF RESULTS

The average results are compared to the performance specifications in Table 1-1. The results of individual relative accuracy test runs performed on the FBI are presented in Tables 4-1 and 4-2. The RATA results were calculated using nine of the ten test results. All of the analyzers performed within their applicable performance specifications.

Additional information is included in the appendices. Appendix A presents the general and specific equations used for the emissions calculations and computer spreadsheets. Data acquisition printouts are included in Appendix B. CEM and process data provided by the client is located in Appendix C. Appendix D presents the quality assurance information, including instrument calibration data. Additional correspondence and relevant regulatory information are located in Appendix E.

4.2 DEVIATIONS AND EXCEPTIONS

MAQDAQ and sample run times were set to facility CE Ms time which is one hour earlier than Pacific Daylight Time. There were no other issues are exceptions during testing.

W006AS-583309A-RT-235 10 of 119


Run

TABLE 4-1 RELATIVE ACCURACY TEST RESULTS

0 2 ANALYZER, % VOL. DRY JACOBS / CITY OF VANCOUVER WWRF

FBI

Number Date Time Montrose RM Plant GEMS Difference

Run 1 7/17/19 0840-0901 Run2 7/17/19 0910-0931 Run 3 7/17/19 0941-1002 Run4 7/17/19 1010-1 031 Run 5 7/17/19 1038-1059 Run 6 7/17/19 1107-1128 Run 7 7/17/19 1135-1156 ~ 7/17/19 12G5 122@ Run 9 7/17/19 1235-1256 Run 10 7/17/19 1303-1324

AVERAGES:

STANDARD DEVIATION:

CONFIDENCE COEFFICIENT:

RELATIVE ACCURACY,%:

6.93 6.95 6.10 6.37 6.45 6.45 7.37 +.ea 7.52 8.28

6.94

6.90 6.91 6.13 6.33 6.36 6.36 7.21 +AS 7.38 8.17

6.86

0.02 0.04 -0.03 0.04 0.09 0.09 0.16 Q.47 0.14 0.11

0.07

0.059

0.046

< 0.1

Note: Percent relative accuracy is based on the absolute difference using nine of the ten available test runs.

W006AS-583309A-RT-235 11 of 11 9


Run

TABLE 4-2 RELATIVE ACCURACY TEST RESULTS

CO ANALYZER, PPMVD @ 7% 02 JACOBS/ CITY OF VANCOUVER WWRF

FBI

Number Date Time Montrose RM PlantCEMS Difference

Run 1 7/17/19 0840-0901 Run 2 7/17/19 0910-0931 Run 3 7/17/19 0941-1002 Run 4 7/17/19 1010-1031 Run 5 7/17/19 1038-1059 Run 6 7/17/19 1107-1128 RHR-7 7/17/19 11Ja 11ae Run 8 7/17/19 1205-1226 Run 9 7/17/19 1235-1256

Run 10 7/17/19 1303-1324

AVERAGES:

STANDARD DEVIATION:

CONFIDENCE COEFFICIENT:

RELATIVE ACCURACY,%:

2.67 2.56 2.63 2.41 2.17 2.75 4c+2 1.56 1.81 2.01

2.29

3.64 3.51 3.61 3.45 3.31 3.78 ~ 2.68 2.82 3.02

3.31

-0.97 -0.95 -0.98 -1.05 -1.14 -1.03 -44§

-1.11 -1.01 -1.01

-1.03

0.065

0.050

1.1

Note: Percent relative accuracy is based on the absolute difference between RM and CEM plus the 2.5% CC using nine of the ten available test runs.

W006AS-583309A-RT-235 12 of 119


W006AS-583309A-RT-235

APPENDIX A CALCULATIONS

13 of 119


Appendix A.1 Gaseous Emissions Spreadsheets

W006AS-583309A-RT-235 14 of 11 9 ~ MO NT ROSE ii I. /\!:::: O ... U.\UI\: .'i U l.Vl<:n.

§ 0 0) )> (J) I

CJ1 OJ (.,.) (.,.) 0 (0

t' :::0 -I

I I\.) (.,.) CJ1

->.

CJ1 0 -->. ->. (0

Test No.

Date

Start T ime

0 2, % volume dry ...•.. .•.•

CO, ppm volume dry .. ...• CO, ppm dry @ 7% 0 2 •• •

Run 1

7/17/19

840-901

6.927

2.680 2.666

RELATIVE ACCURACY TEST AUDIT DETERMINATION Jacobs / City of Vancouver WWRF

FBI

Run 2 Run 3 Run4 Run 5 Run6 Run 7 Run 8

7/17/19 7/17/19 7/17/19 7/17/19 7/17/19 7/17/19 7/17/19 910-931 941-1002 1010-1031 1038-1059 1107-1128 1135-1156 1205-1226

6.951 6.100 6.370 6.446 6.452 7.371 7.652 2.573 2.802 2.517 2.254 2.857 1.675 1.491 2.564 2.632 2.408 2.168 2.749 1.721 1.564

Run 9 Run 10 Average

7/17/19 7/17/19 Runs 1-10

1235-1256 1303-1324 -7.518 8.280 7.007

1.744 1.823 2.242 1.812 2.008 2.229


Appendix A.2 Relative Accuracy Spreadsheets

W006AS-583309A-RT-235 16 of 11 9

RELATIVE ACCURACY TEST AUDIT DETERMINATION EPA CFR 40, PART 60, APPENDIX B, PS 4/4A

Jacobs / City of Vancouver WWRF FBI

CO, ppm @ 7°/o 0 2

Run# Date Time RM CEMS Difference !! to.91s

Run 1 7/ 17/19 840-901 2.67 3.64 -0.97 1 100.00

Run2 7/ 17/19 910-931 2.56 3.51 -0.95 2 12.706

Run3 7/17/19 941-1002 2.63 3.61 -0.98 3 4.303

Run4 7/ 17/19 1010-1031 2.41 3.45 -1.05 4 3.182

Run5 7/17/ 19 1038-1059 2.17 3.31 -1.14 5 2.776

Run6 7/17/19 1107-1128 2.75 3.78 -1.03 6 2.571

~ 7/17/19 1135 1156 ~ ~ +.-1-5- 7 2.447

Run8 7/17/19 1205-1226 1.56 2.68 -1.11 8 2.365

Run9 7/17/19 1235-1256 1.81 2.82 -1.01 9 2.306

Run 10 7/17/19 1303-1324 2.01 3.02 -1.01 10 2.262

AVERAGES: 2.29 3.31 -1.03 choose only_ one o{_the

EMISSION LIMIT: 100.00 three available criteria

STANDARD DEVIATION : 0.065 Criteria Result

CONFIDENCE COEFFICIENT: 0.050

RELATIVE ACCURACY (BASED ON APPLICABLE STANDARD), %: ~5 1.08

RELATIVE ACCURACY (BASED ON DIFFERENCE), PPM: -4A onlJ!..- ~5 1.08

Note: Performance Specification (PS) 4 is to be used on sources operating above 200 ppm analyzer span and PS 4A on sources operating below 200 ppm analyzer span. The relative accuracy (RA) of the CEMS must be no greater than 10 percent when the average reference method (RM) value is used to calculate RA, 5 percent when the applicable standard (AS) is used to calculate RA, or within 5 ppm (to be used with PS 4A only) when the RA is calculated as the absolute average difference between the RM and CEMS plus the 2.5 percent confidence coefficient.

W006AS-583309A-RT-235 17 of 119

RELATIVE ACCURACY TEST AUDIT DETERMINATION EPA CFR 40, PART 60, APPENDIX B, PS 3

Jacobs/ City of Vancouver WWRF FBI

0 2, 0/o volume dry

Run# Date Time RM CEMS Difference .!! to.975

Run 1 7/17/19 840-901 6.93 6.90 0.02 1 100.00 Run2 7/17/19 910-931 6.95 6.91 0.04 2 12.706

Run3 7/17/19 941-1002 6.10 6.13 -0.03 3 4.303

Run4 7/17/19 1010-1031 6.37 6.33 0.04 4 3.182 Runs 7/17/19 1038-1059 6.45 6.36 0.09 5 2.776 Run6 7/17/19 1107-1128 6.45 6.36 0.09 6 2.571

Run 7 7/17/19 1135-1156 7.37 7.21 0.16 7 2.447

:RttH-8 7/17/19 liW§ 1~~6 ~ -7-AS ~ 8 2.365

Run9 7/17/19 1235-1256 7.52 7.38 0.14 9 2.306

Run 10 7/17/19 1303-1324 8.28 8.17 0.11 10 2.262

AVERAGES: 6.94 6.86 0.07

STANDARD DEVIATION: 0.059 Criteria Result

CONFIDENCE COEFFICIENT: 0.046 RELATIVE ACCURACY (BASED ON ABSOLUTE DIFFERENCE),%: <1 0.07

Note: The relative accuracy (RA) of the CEMS must be no greater than 1.0 percent 0 2 •

W006AS-583309A-RT-235 18 of 119


W006AS-583309A-RT-235

Appendix A.3 Example Calculations

19 of 119

Page~

~ EXAMPLE CALCULATIONS

RELATIVE ACCURACY CALCULATIONS

Project name: :J Aco/JJ lo, rY l'M I ' ' Computed by: }?1lJA-U/1C£

Analyzer, Units: CO f p/fl. EMISSIONS DATA RA TA Results

Number of runs, n

t-value associated with n, to.975

Project number: · t:PaG,4-5 -'5835Cif

Calculation date: 7 / 17 / I 'I •

Equipment Unit: _F:_B_r_· ---~

'{ n

<j I 1 () 6 to.975

Adapted from Figure 2-1 of 40 CFR 60 Appendix B, Performance Specification 2:

2 3 4 5 6 7 8 :

9 1.0 11 12 13 n

to.075 12.706 4.303 3.182 2.776 2.571 2.447 2.365 · 2.306 2.262 2.228 2.201 2.179

Note: The resulfs calculated in the pages thatfollow may differ slightly fro~ the resulfs prest1'fed in the final report. This differ:en~ can bf! attributed to "signljicant dig!t rq11nil-,ff errors" co11J,n'Oh when comparing computer sprealf!hee_ts· results with those di!tived {t'Qln · -~ing a ~~iltor.

W006AS-583309A-RT-235 20 of 119

6. RELATIVE AcCURAcv·TESTAUDiT CALCULATIONS

a. Arithmetic Mean of Differences, d

J ~. ~ ~ ( -9,t,5 )

d= -1,05

b. Standard Deviation, Sd

S" = n-1

r 1 2]Yi _ q,,;4 ~--q--(-'l ,'2-5)

sd -~ -1

W006AS-583309A-RT-235 21 of 119

Pag~3

~ c. 2.5 % Error Confidence Coefficient (one-tailed), CC

CC = t0.m( Jn)

CC= 6 , 0 l../~t.J

d. Relative Accuracy (based on applicable standard), RA

RA ~ell + lcG1) ~--xlOO

AS

~'tA /-/,o.5}+ Je.05'0}=-1,0&

~-/.03 1+1 °·0~1) RA=~ . . . xlOO

IC()

RA= I ,08 e. Relative Accuracy (based on reference method data), RA

~~+lcC1) RA= xIOO

RM

RA=-~ __ j_+l __ l)xlOO

Where,

AS = Applicable standard

RM = Arithmetic mean of reference method data

W006AS-583309A-RT-235 22 of 119

)

Oz, {'()/ZR£mlOIV 7D 7% Oz._

R.u!Jtl.10

Co= I ,82-5 ~%;; 8,Z8D

- /~8'2.3 · zo.,- 7 ) zt,.'f-8~2&

W006AS-583309A-RT-235 23 of 119


Appendix A.4 General Emissions Calculations

W006AS-583309A-RT-235 24 of 119

EMISSION CALCULATIONS

1. Volumetric Flow and lsokinetics

a. Standard sample gas volume, dscf

(Tstd + 460) (Pbar + -f,A) Vmstd = CVm)(Y) (Tm+ 460)(Pstd)

b. Water vapor volume, scf

(Tstd + 460)

Vwstd = (0.0471S)(Vic) 528

c. Moisture content, non-dimensional

B _ Vwstd

ws - CVm std + Vw std)

d. Stack gas molecular weight, lb/lb mole (dry)

MWctry = [0.44(%C02)] + [0.32(%02)] + [0.28(%N2 )]

e. Stack gas molecular weight, lb/lb mole (wet)

MWwet = [MWdry(l - Bws)] + [18(Bws)]

f. Absolute stack pressure, in Hg

Ps = Pbar + ( ~~6)

g. Stack velocity, ft/sec

h. Actual stack flow rate, acfm

Q = (vs)(A 5 )(60 min/hr)

i. Standard stack gas flow rate, wscfm

. (Tstd + 460) ( Ps ) Qws = (vs)(As)(60 mm/hr) Ts+ 460 Pstd

j. Standard stack gas flow rate, dscfm

. (Tstd + 460) ( Ps ) Qds = (vs)(A 5 )(60 mm/hr)(l - Bws) T. 460

p s + std

k. Percent isokinetic

(Ts)CVm std)(Pstd)(100) l =--------------

(Tstd + 460)(vs)(8)(An)(Ps)(60)(1- Bws)

W006AS-583309A-RT-235 25 of 119

Page 1 of 5

2. Gaseous Emissions

a. Concentration, ppm volume wet (i.e. to calculate wet ppm from dry ppm)

Cw= (C)(l - Bw5 )

b. Concentration, ppm @ 3% 02 dry

[ (20.9 - 3.0) ]

C3 = (C) (20.9 - % 02

)

c. Concentration, ppm@ 12% CO2 dry

( 12.0 )

C12 = (C) % CO2

d. Concentration, ppm volume dry (i.e. to calculate dry ppm from wet ppm)

C= [ Cw ]

(1- Bws)

e. Mass emission rate, lb/hr

M = (C)(CF)(Qd5 )(60 min/hr)

where,

CF = conversion factor from ppm to lb/scf:

CFNox = 1.194 X 10-7 (lbfscf) ppm

CF502

= 1.660 x 10-7 (lb !set) ppm

CFx = CFNox ( MWx ) for other compounds (x) MWNox

f. Emission rate, lb/MMBtu

( 20.9 )

E = (C)(CF)(Fd) 20

.9

_ % 02

g. Mass emission rate, grams/bhp-hr

(453.59 g/lb)

Mj = (M) J

W006AS-583309A-RT-235 26 of 119

Page 2 of 5

3. Particulate Emissions

a. Grain loading, gr/dscf

G = (0.0154) (vGm ) mstd

b. Grain loading corrected to 12% CO2, gr/dscf@ 12% CO2

( 12.0 )

G12 = (G) % COz

c. Mass emission rate, lb/hr

( 60 min/hr)

M = (G)(Qds) 7,000 gr/lb

d. Emission rate, lb/MMBtu

( llb ) ( 20.9 )

E = (G) 7,000 gr (Fd) 20.9 - % 02

4. Fuel Factor "F"

Page 3 of 5

a. Choice #1 - use the values for Fd provided in Method 19, Table 19-1 Choice #2 - if you have fuel ultimate and proximate analysis, calculate Fd

(need fuel weight %CHONS, HHV) Stoichiometric fuel factor at 68 °F, dscf/MMBtu at 0% 02:

(106 )[3.64(% H) + 1.53(% C) + 0.14(% N) + 0.57(% S) - 0.46(% O)] Fd = HHV,Btu/lb

b. Fuel factor at 60 °F (use if all your volumes and flows are at 60 °F)

(520°R)

Fd 60 = Fd 5280R

W006AS-583309A-RT-235 27of119

Page 4 of 5

5. Miscellaneous Equations

a. Standard stack gas flow rate, calculated from fuel flow and F factor, dscfm

Note: Ot and HHV need to be in units of either lb/hr and Btu/lb, or scf/hr and Btu/scf. Do not mix units!

( calculation based on stack %02)

Qds = ( Qt )(HHV)(10- 6 )(Fd) (2 9

20·! 0

) /(60 min/hr) 0. - Mi 2

or (calculation based on stack %CO2 - see EPA Method 19 for values of Fe)

( 100 ) Qds = ( Qt )(HHV)(10- 6 )(Fc) % CO

2 /(60 min/hr)

b. Destruction efficiency of emission control device, %

EFF = ( c;n-.Cout) (100%) based on concentrations Cm

or

(M · - M t) EFF = m . ou (100%) based on mass emission rates

Mm

c. Cylinder gas audit, % accuracy

(C -C) Ac = m C a (100%) a

W006AS-583309A-RT-235 28 of 119

Page 5 of 5

Nomenclature: Ac = accuracy of CEMS during cylinder gas audit (CGA), % difference An = nozzle area, in2 (n r2), where 1t = 3.1416 and r = radius (% diameter) in inches As = stack area, ft2 (n r2), where 1t = 3.1416 and r = radius (% diameter) in feet Bws = flue gas moisture content (multiply by 100 for% by volume) C = concentration of gaseous species, ppm volume dry Ca = concentration of audit gas, ppm (for CGA, equation 5c) Cm = concentration measured by CEMS, ppm (for CGA, equation 5c) Cp = calibration factor for pitot tube, dimensionless Cw = concentration of gaseous species, ppm volume wet C3 = corrected concentration of gaseous species, ppm @ 3% 02 dry C12 = corrected concentration of gaseous species, ppm @ 12% CO2 dry E = mass emission rate, lb/MMBtu EFF = destruction or removal efficiency of emission control device, % efficiency Fe = stoichiometric "F" factor of fuel based on CO2, dscf/MMBtu @ 100% CO2 Fd = stoichiometric "F" factor of fuel based on 02, dscf/MMBtu @ 0% 02 G = particulate matter grain loading, grains/dscf G12 = corrected particulate matter grain loading, grains/dscf@ 12% CO2 Gm = mass of collected particulate matter, mg HHV = higher heating value, Btu/cubic foot I = % isokinetic sampling rate, % J = brake horsepower, bhp Mj = mass emission rate of measured species (s), g/hp-hr M = mass emission rate, lb/hr MWd,y = molecular weight of stack gas, dry basis MWwet = molecular weight of stack gas, wet basis MWs = molecular weight of gaseous species (s) , lb/lb mole:

Ows sv

Tstd Ts

= = = = = = = = = = = = = = =

V mstd = Vwstd = y 11H 11P e

= = = =

CO: 28.01 (can use 28) NO, as N02: 46.01 (can use 46) SO, as S02: 64.06 (can use 64) Hydrocarbons as C: 12.01 (can use 12) Hydrocarbons as CH,: 16.04 (can use 16) Hydrocarbons as C3Ha: 44.10 (can use 44) NH3: 17.03 (can use 17)

nitrogen content of stack gas, % volume dry barometric pressure, in. Hg stack absolute pressure, in. Hg stack static pressure, inches of water, gauge (iwg) wet stack gas flow rate at actual conditions, acfm fuel flow rate, scfh or lb/hr (be careful of units) dry stack gas flow rate at standard conditions, dscfm wet stack gas flow rate at standard conditions, wscfm specific molar volume of an ideal gas at standard conditions, ft3/lb mole meter temperature, 0 R reference temperature, 0 R stack gas temperature, 0 R stack gas velocity, ft/sec volume of liquid collected in impingers, ml dry meter volume uncorrected, act dry meter volume corrected to standard conditions, dscf volume of water vapor at standard conditions, set meter calibration coefficient, dimensionless average pressure differential across meter, inches water average velocity head of stack gas, inches water sampling time, minutes

W006AS-583309A-RT-235 29 of 11 9


APPENDIX B FIELD AND COMPUTER-GENERATED DATA

W006AS-583309A-RT-235 30 of 119


W006AS-583309A-RT-235

Append ix B.1 Sampling Locations

31 of 11 9

INSERT FACILITY I UNIT NAME HERE TRAVERSE POINT LAYOUT (RA TA)

CIRCULAR STACKS OVER 24 INCHES

Stack diameter: 29.5 inches A

Upstream diameter (A): 87.0 inches Downstream diameter (8): 132.0 inches

Port length: 4.00 inches Number of ports being used: 1 see note

B Equivalent upstream diameter (A): 2.949 Pass

Equivalent downstream diameter (8): 4.475 Pass All points at least 1.0" from stack wall: 4.900 Pass

Total points: 3 Points per port: 3

Point % Diameter Inside wall Outside port

Distance (in) Distance (in)

1 16.7 4.9 8.9

0

i Typical vertical

flow exhaust stack

2 50.0 14.8 18.8 DUCT AREA = 4.746 ff

3 83.3 24.6 28.6

N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A

N/A #N/A #NIA #N/A

N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A

N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A

N/A #N/A #NIA #N/A

N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A

N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A

N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A I

Example: Location of 3 points

N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A

Note: No traverse point shall be within 1.0" of the stack walls (see Sections 11.3.1)

Ducts :5 2.4 met ers (7.8 ft) : Points are at 16.7, 50.0 and 83.3 percent of measurement line

Ducts > 2.4 meters (7 .8 ft) : Points are at 0.4, 1.2 and 2.0 met ers from duct wall

W006AS-583309A-RT-235 32 of 11 9

EPA 'M~THOD 1 FIELD DATA Project Information

~lient / Facility t JI. 7 JV'\ /VCuit..voe<tb< J.-/4-Source I Location ,f g I: Q&:1:, ._ ~ · Duct Measurements Type of duct (circular, rectangular, elliptical)

Far wall to outside of port distance, in.: M1

Port length, in. (confirm flush with inside wall): M2

Duct inner diameter, in. (M1 - M2)

Duct ID using adjacent, 90° port (for elliptical ducts)

Upstream distance (A), in.

t;>owtistream distance (8), in. Number of ports (for circular, must be 90° to each other)

Internal width (for rectangular ducts only), in. •

PQrt'inner diameter, in.

Duct Parameters Material (~berglass, PVC:) Type of pptt ~. npt nlpple, etc.)

· Qtientatiofl (~I. horizontal. if diagonal specify angle) l;:l_evation of ports above gr'o1,md, ft.

-A

8

Date Data takeri by ,

I---· . .

'I--

'( __ _

Disturbance

. ------ ·· Measurement Site

Disturbance

Cyclonic flow expected?

Pltot ID

Diagram of duct and sampling location

Traverse Outside port point distance, in.

" .. s.z~

1 t~.~ ·1 -~-7~ . '1 . . q>/R

.. :J ,; 'Y.f

' I '-1 9' '7 71 Y(

_-- g · w .u PJ '}j 7t ii 7 /J . .. t ~ Vz. '.7 ..... ... J2-~7 \ ..

2 ;

'1

"-In -'i

j

I.I l l \'{/

. Average ·of absolute a

Null angle, a

.. .

-

, ..

~a1cv4\

Cfoss+~e'ction sketch showing port locations arid numbering Label the following: port number 1, 2, etc.

north direction or other landmark flow direction - ® into page 0 out of page

•1f schematics are unavallable, internal width can be estimated by measuring the portion of the port length not visible on the outside of the duct, which would be an estimate of the insulation thickness. Double this distance and subtract It from the outside width

W006AS-583309A-RT-235 33 of 119 Ml Field Data Sheet· Rl


W006AS-583309A-RT-235

Appendix 8.2 Reference Method Data

34 of 11 9

~ MONTROSE t N V I R l 1 N M L N I A I.

iName:

· Make/Model:

· Jul 17 2019 08:41:00

lJul 17 2019 108:42:00

Jul 172019 08:43:00

,Jul 17 2019 io8:44:oo

!Jul 17 io19 08:45:00

!Jul 1720 19 i08:46:00

Jul 172019 08:47:00

:Jul 17 2019 108:48:00

Jull72019 08:49:00

lJul 172019 '08:50:00

Jul 172019 08:51:00

!Jul 172019 I 08:52; QQ

' Jul 172019 08:53:00

!Jul 172019 ' 08:54:00

Jul 17 20 19 08:55:00

' Jul 17 20 19 : 08:56:QO

Jul 17 2019 08:57:00

.Jul 172019 , 08:58:00

Jul l 72019 08:59:00

Jul 172019 !09:00:00

Jul 17 2019 09:01:00

Average:

iMax:

'Min:

Port 1 Point

I

2

3

I Strat diff:

Strat % :

MAQDAQ 1.0 : Project Name: Jacobs/City of Project Number: 006AS-: Vancouver WW!lf _583309

; Run Lengt_h: ? I : R<!cord. Interval: 6

'Trave_rse: True · Port_s: 1

• CEMS Operator: Josh :M.uswieck

,\ ye rage Interval: 60

· Poi11t~ per port 3

Run I Average Results 08:40:00 - 09:01 :00

102-12

,Servomex ' 1400

6.743

,6.467

7.035

7.070

7.083 17.022

6.966

6.771

6.508

6.267

6.474

7.757

7.556

7.508

7.540

7.427

7.222

·6.897

6.704

' 6.582

6.690

6.966

7.757

6.267

0 2-12

6.897 I ' 7.051

6.932

•0.091

1.307

I . '. C0-529 I

Teledyne iT300M

2.152

12.560

2.656

. 3.Q87

3.052

j 3.084

2.823

End of port I point 1

' 2.548

2.994

, 2.86_2

2.935

1.984

1.944

2.733

End of port 1 point 2

2.771

2.547

2.696

3.051

3.269

3.060

2.982

2.752

3.269

1.944

End_ of port I point 3

Stratification Results C0 -529

2.824

i2.570

2.890

0.129

' 6.929

Page I

W006AS-583309A-RT-235 35 of 119

j Unit/Condition: FBI / Scrubber Exhaust . ...........

: Tripl_i<:~te ~~m.pl(11g: F~_l s~

, DAQ Q~vice: !)T~806(00)

Jul 17 20 19-09:02:31

~ MAQDAQ 1.0

MONTROSE E f\! \' I I\ 0 NM I. r,; I :\ I.

Name:

, Make/Model: I

i25A or7E:

:Raw Avg: 1Max:

IMin:

Zero:

;~o.'Y: l\1Ld: High:

! Project Name; Jacobs/City of Project Number: 006AS-Vancouyer \YWRF . 583}09

'R._u.!1 ~e!lgtJt.: 2.1 Record lrtterv_al; ~ Traverse: True Ports; I . -·- •· ·--· - ..

I , 02-12

Servomex 1400

7E

:6.966

h .757

i6.267

, 0.000

10.14

:20.93

Run 1 Post run bias

08:40:00 - 09:01:00 ' ~0-529

: Teledyne :BOOM

7E

Run summary data

7.?52

3.269 11.944

Cylinder Concentrations

0.000

4.060

8.834

Ze_~o read_ing: , -Q.908

~ow read_ing:_

Calibration Readings

· -0.031

M.id_ reading; 10.16

, H!g!! reading: 20.94

,4.202

8.668

• CEMS Operator: Josh Muswieck

Averiige I~!~rval: 6Q

: Points pe~ port: 3

EPA Method 7E Error Calculations

Zero %Err: I 1<2.0 -0.038

:Mid %Err: <2.0 0.096

High %Err: ,<2.0 0.048

Zero reading: · 0.085

,Span reading: , 10.23

Zero % bias: . <5.0 0.444

·Span _% bias: '<5.0 0.334

: Zero reading: 0.078

Span reading: 10.09

:?ero. ~ b!_~~: <:~,Q 0.411

Span o/~ ,l)!l!s: <~O Zero % drift: <3.0

: Spa!! % drift: • <3.0

:cor Avg:

' -0.334

'0.033

·0.668

' 6.927

W006AS-583309A-RT-235

' -0.351

1.607

-1.879

-0.127

4.171

1.789 . -0.351

0.085

4.058

1.313

-1.630

0.476

1.279

Initial Bias Data

Final Bias Data

Bias Corrected Averages

,2.680

Page I

36 of 119

I

Unit/Condition: FBI I Squ~~~r ~xlia,u_s_t

"[ripliciit_e ~a!Tlpl_i!lg: f~\s~ DAQ Devic~: I)T9~06(QO)

·-!

Jul 17 20 19 - 09:08; 14

~ MONTROSE tN V l!ll) ~M I. NI A I.

!Name:

i Make/Model:

Jul 172019 09:11 :00

Jul 17 2019 i09:12:00

Jul 172019 09:13:00

, Jul 17 2019 /09:14:00

Jul 17 2019 09:15:00

' Jul 172019 109:16:00.

Jul172019 09:17:00

.Jul 17 2019 ' 09:18:00

Jul 172019 09:19:00

Jul l72019 ,09:20:00

Jul 172019 09:21:00

Jul 172019 ,09:2_2:00

Jul 17 2019 09:23:00

Jul 172019 09:24:00

Jul 17 2019 09:25:00

Jul 172019 ' 09:26:00

Jul 172019 09:27:00

Jul 1720!9 109:28:00

Jul 172019 09:29:00 I

Jul 17 2019 ;09:3Q:OO

Jul 172019 09:31:00

A:verage:

Max: ;Miu:

Port . Point

12

3

I Strat diff:

._Strat o/~:

MAQDAQ 1.0 , Project Name: Jacobs/City of 'Project Number: 006AS- CEMS Operator: Josh

Muswieck Vancouver WWR:F 583309 t •• - ••

, R~ll Lengt.~: _21

: Traverse: True

02-12

Servomex ' 1400

6.846

'6.695

6.763

' 7.746

7.988 17.789

7.729

' 7.406

7.301

7.294

7.088

7.103

6.84 1

6.623

6.647

6.764

6.554

6p3

6.268

6.269

6.220

6.962

7.988

6.220

02-1 2

7.417

7.068

6.376

0.463

8.307

: Record Interval: 6

Ports: 1

· _Av~r~ge Inte~al: 60

· f otnts per p9rt: 3

Run 2 Average Results 09: 10:00 - 09:31 :00

. C0-529

Teledyne T300M

2.947

12.632

2.248

1.608

2.053

' 2.342

2.698


2.706

2.764

2.650

2.651

2,622

2.490

; 3.012


2.983

2.203

1.709

2.417

2.999

· 3.1 39

3.042

, 2.567

3.139

1.608

End of po~ I po_int ~

Stratification Results C0-529

2.352

2.717

2.60 1

0.160

8.005

Page I

W006AS-583309A-RT-235 37 of 119

Unit/Condition: FBI I i Scrubber ~xha.Es~

: Tripli~ate ~8111p!i11g: _Fa,l~e

. DA_Q Device: PT?~..06(09)

Jul 17 2019 - 09:3 1:19

~ MAQDAQ 1.0

MONTROSE fNV ltlON MI. N ! ,\ I.

Name: ' , Make/Model:

125A or7E:

·Raw Avg:

'Max:

!Min:

Zero:

' Low:

M~d:

,High:

Z~!'o rea~jng:_

· L~w reacl_ing:_

J\!!cl reacling:

High r! acli!)_g:

; Project Name: Jacobs/City of Project Number: 006AS-i Yancouver WWRF ' 583309

J Run Length: 2 1 'Record Interval: 6

i Tr~~~rse: rn;~ . Ports: I

,02-12

: s ervomex , 1400

' 7E

6.962

7.988

i~220

0.000

10.14

20.93

-0.008

10.16

20.94

Run 2 Post run bias 09:10:00 - 09:31:00

,CQ-529

Teledyne T300M

,7E

'

Run summary data

, 2.567

' 3.139

• 1.608

Cylinder Conc~ntrations

0.000

4.060

• 8.834


: -0._931

4.202

8.668

, CEMS Operator: Josh ' Muswieck

·Average Interval_: 60

; Points per port 3

Zero %Err: ·<2.0 -0.038


I -0.351

,Mid %Err: <2.0 ' o.096

!High %Err: ;<2.0 ' 0.048

1 Zero reading: 0.078

Span reading: . 10.09

' Zero % bias: '<5.0 0.411

Span% bias: <5.0 -0.334

~ero r(!a_cling: .O.J 4_5 Span reading: )O_J2

z_~ro •;~ ~~-~: <5-.Q · 0,7JA

~p_?D % bia_s_: , <5.0

Zer~ 'Y~ dri~t: <3.Q Span ·~ drift: : <3.0

Cor Avg:

-OJJI ,0.3fQ 0.143

6.951

W006AS-583309A-RT-235

' 1.607

' -1.879

,0.085

;4.058

1.313

-1.630

-0.019

4.005

0.136

-2.J~O

1.177 , 0.600

Initial Bias Data

Final Bias Data


2.573

Page I

38 of 119

1unit/Condition: FBI I I Scrubber Exhaust 1· · - ••••• •

iTripJic~\~ Samp)jng: F~ls~

j DAQ Device: DT9806(00)

Jul 17 20 19 - 09:38:58

~ MONTROSE l NVIR ON MI.N 1 ,\ I.

;

, Name:

! Make/Model:

' Jul 172019 09:42:00

' Jul17 2019 09:43:00

Jul 172019 09:44:00

Jul 172019 09:45:00

Jul 172019 09:46:00

iJul 1720 19 109:47:00

Jul 17 20 19 09:48:00

·Jul 172019 09:49:00

Jul 172019 09:50:00

Jul 17 2019 09:51:00

Jul 172019 09:52:00

Jul 1720 19 09:53:00

Jul 17 2019 09:54:00

Jul 17 2019 · 09:55:00

Jul 172019 09:56:00

•Jul 172019 ' 09:57:00

Jul 172019 09:58:00

!Jul 172019 ,09:59:00

Jul 17 2019 10:00:00

;Jul 17 2019 . 10:01:00

Jul 172019 10:02:00

Aver~ge:

·Max:

Min:

Port ,Point

12

3

Strat diff:

, Strat %:

MAQDAQ 1.0 ! Project Name: Jacobs/City of ' Project Number: 006AS-I Vam;ouver WV/RF 58330?

i Run Length: 21 , Record Interval: 6 : Traver~;: T;;e I Po~: 1 - - . -·

· CEMS Operator: Josh Muswieck

i Ay~rage In.~eiyat: 6Q ! Pojnts per port: ?

Run 3 Average Results

02-12

Servomex 1400

6.5 14 i 6.349

6.275

, 6.186

6.054

i 5.867

6.429

6.457

6.498

6.396

6.232

6.084

6.091

6.079

5.882

' 5.820

5.662

5.903

5.893

6.194

5.887

6.131

6.514

5.662

:02-12

6.242

:6.217

5.904

0.121

3.545

09:41 :00 - 10:02:00 C0-529

Teledyne ,T300M

2.260

j2.545

2.569

' 2.468

2.572

' 3.017

2.956


2.841

2.887

' 2.406

2.776

2.962

3.067

2.677


2.470

2.755

3.462

: 3.304

2.939

2.?89

2.576

2.771

3.462

,2.260

End of pQrt 1 pajn t 3

Stratification Results ,C0-529

2.667 12.761

2.917

' 0. 135

· 4.865

Page I

W006AS-583309A-RT-235 39 of 119

! Unit/Condition: FBI / 1 ~c~bber EJ<!ial!~~ I i Triplicate Sampling: False

I DAQ Deyi~~: DT9806(.00)

Jul 172019 - 10:02: 15

MAQDAQ 1.0

~ I 11· Project Name: Jacobs/City of Project Number: 006AS-. Vancouver WWRF 583309

: CEMS Operator: Josh ,Muswieck

1 · - .. ' R,un Le_ngth: 2 1

..... __ _

MONTROSE ' Tr!!verse: True

~NVIRIJNMLN 1 ,\1,

. Name: I :92-12 ,·

[ Make/Model: : Servomex ' 1400

.25A or7E:

•Raw Avg:

:Max: 1Mio:

Zero:

Low:

' Mid:

·High:

' 7E

16. 131

16.514

:5.662

:0.000

· 10.14

. 20.93

Zer~ rea_d!1_1g: , -0,00_8

· !,()\\' rea~i1_1g:,

'. M.id reading: _IQ.!~

}!ig~ i:eadiog:, ' ~Q-~_4

I

· Zero %Err: <2.0 -0.038

. 0.096

0.048

Mid %Err: <2.0

High %Err: <2.0

· Zero reading: 0.145

Span reading: r 10.12

Zero% bias: <5.0 0.731

Span % bias: <5.0 -0.191

·~ero rea_<!jng:. ,0.16Q

· Span reading: 10.,.0§

Zero% bias: . <5.0 0...§Q~

<5.0 -0.478

Zero% drift: '<3.0 0 .. 07?

Span % _!lr~f!: <3.0 0.~87

1Cor Avg: ' 6.100

W006AS-583309A-RT-235

Record Interval: 6 . . .

Ports: 1

Run 3 Post run bias 09:41 :00 - 10:02:00

,C0-529

, Teledyne ,T300M 17E

Run summary data

, 2.771

3.462

12 .260


0.000

4.060

· 8.834


-0.031

4.202

8.668

! Average Interval: .60

Poi£l!S P!r port: ?


-0.351

1.607

-1.879

-0.019

4.005

0.136

-2 .230

:Q-.O?? 4.Q47

.Q,Q~4. - 1.755

0.102

0.475

Initial Bias Data

Final Bias Data


2.802

Page 1

40 of 119

·1 Unit/Condition: FBI/ . Scrubber Exhau.st

[Triplicate Sampling: False

iDAQDe~ice: DT9?06(0Ql

Jul 17 2019 - 10:07:50

~ MONTROSE ~ N ,, I I\. ( l N M l N I ,\ L

I

Name:

Make/Model:

Jul 17 2019 10:11:00

Jul 172019 . IO: 12:00

· Jul 17 2019 10:13:00

;Jul 17 2019 ' 10:14:QO

Jul 17 2019 10:15:00

'. Jul I7io19 110:16:00

1Jul 172019 10:17:00

Jul 17 2019 . 10: 18:00

Jul 172019 10:19:00

Jul 172019 10:20:00

Jul 172019 10:21:00

Jul 17201 ? 10:22:00

Jul 172019 10:23:00

,Jul 17 2019 10:24:00

Jul 172019 10:25:00

•Jul 172019 , 1026,00

Jul 17 2019 10:27:00

: Jul 17 20 19 10:28:00

Jul 17 2019 10:29:00

:1u1172019 , 10:30:00

Jul 172019 10:31:00

,Aver:ige:

Max:

Mio:

.Port 'Point

' 2

3

Strat diff:

. Strat % :

MAQDAQ 1.0 , Project Name: Jacobs/City of . Project Number: 006AS-1 Vancouver WWRJ' 583309

j ~ -u~-L~ngt_h:.21 Record Interval: 6 ; Traverse: 1rue : Ports: j . ·- ..

; CEMS Operator: Josh Muswieck

; I\ v_erage Int_ery~I: 6Q , P_oints per port: 3


' , 02- 12

i Servomex , 1400

5.814

, 5,652

5.751

/5.955

6.260 16.567

6.563

'6.535

6.136

· 6.425

6.4 17

6.390

6.537

6.600

6.728

.6.665

6.681

16.481

6.436

6.554

6.495

6.364

6.728

5.652

.02- 12

6.077

.6.458

6.554 10.191

,4.495

10:10:00 - 10:31:00 ;C0-529 I

Teledyne T300M

2.666

.2.947

3.062

2.605

2.655

12.824

2.629


·2.674

2.647

2.381

2.472

2.525

2.820

. 2.818


2.318

2.186

1.925

,2.124

2.097

,2.155

2.358

2.518

, 3.062

1.925

Ef!_d of port_ ! p9in_t 3


2.771

2.614

2.177

0.250

9.93 1

Page 1

W006AS-583309A-RT-235 41 of 119

Unit/Condition: FBI/ Sc_rubber E.x,Ji_aust

Triplicat_e S3,mpling: f a,ls~

DAQ I)ev_ice: DT98Q6_(00)

Jul 17 2019 - 10:31:06

~ MAQDAQ 1.0

.l MONTROSE 'tl\!VI R(1 NM Lt'-' I ,\ I.

I Name:

1 Make/Model:

' 25A or 7E:

:Raw Avg:

!Max: !Mio:

Zero:

•Low:

Mid:

•High:

: Project Name: Jacobs/City of i Project Number: 006AS-Vancouver WWRF ' 583309

i llun Length: 2_1 I Recor~ Interval: 6 : Tn1vt!rse: True · Ports: I

'02-12

:Servomex : 1400 •7E

16.364

·6.n8 : 5.652

:o.ooo

10.14

20.93

Run 4 Post run bias 10:10:00-10:31:00

:co.529

' Teledyne T300M

,7E

· 2.518 : 3.062

! 1.925

Run summary data

Cylinder Concentrations I

, 0.000

.4.060

' 8,~34

Ze,ro reading: ' -O.Q08 \ Low reading:


-0.03 1

'. ~i<.I reading: ' 10.16 'High reading: 20.94

4.202

8.668

'. CEMS Operator: Josh ;Muswieck

:Ave.rag,e ~nt.e.rv!il: 60 'Points per port: 3

EPA Method 7E Error Calculations ' Zero %Err: :<2.0 -0.038

Mid %Err: <2.0 0.096

.High %Err: <2.0 0.048

, Zero reading: 0.160

Span reading: . 10.06

Zero % bias: <5.0 · 0.803

S(!_an %.bias: <S.O -0.478

I ~~ro reading: i Q,093 !§pan reading: !000?

: J;e~~ 'Y~ ~\~_S: I <~_9 0.483 §pan °(o b\l!s: . ~~o -0.526

,z;ero % dr!_ft: ! <3.0 0.320

, Span % ~-rift: : <3.0 0.048

:<::or Avg: ,6.370

W006AS-583309A-RT-235

' · -0.351

'. 1.607

-1.879

-0.028

4.047

0.034

- 1. 755

0.077

4.047

1.223

-1.755

1.189 0.000

Initial Bias Data

Final Bias Data


2.5 17

Page I

42 of 119

1 Unit/Condition: FBI / I ~c.rubber ~xhau~t _ 1Tfiplicat,e ~ill!IP\il.lg: F:als_e

' I>A.Q IJ.evice: I>T9?06(00)

Jul 172019 - 10:36:38

~ J MONTROSE t N V I It ll N M L N I :\ I.

•Name:

; Make/Model:

Jul 17 2019 10:39:00

· Jul 17 2019 : 10:40:00

Jul 172019 10:41:00

' Jul 172019 110:42:00

Jul 17 2019 10:43:00

!Jul 172019 ! 10:44:00

Jul 172019 10:45:00

Jul 172019 10:46:00

Jul 17 2019 10:47:00

,Jul 17 2019 10:48:00

Jul 172019 10:49:00

·Jul 172019 10:50:00

Jul 172019 10:51:00

Jul 172019 10:52:00

Jul 172019 10:53:00

Jul 172019 10:54:00

Jul 17 2019 10:55:00 I

iJul172019 ' 10:56:00

Jul 172019 10:57:00

:Jul 172019 · 10:5?:00

Jul 172019 10:59:00

.. __ Average:

Max:

Min:

I Port Point

1 1

2

3 Strat diff:

Strat %:

MAQDAQ 1.0 ! Project Name: Jacobs/City of ; Project Number: 006AS-; Vancouver WVf!U' • 5833Q~

! Run Length: 21 . Record Interval: 6 , - . . ·- . - - . -· . -, Tff!verse: T~e ; Ports: I

CEMS Operator: Josh . M.uswiec~

/\ v_erage_.IP-t.e.rv~t 60

P<:Jin~s per. po.rt: ;i


'. 02-12

!f~~omex

6.250

;6.248

6.365 I i 6.407

6.410

i6.712

6.725

16.503

6.388

, 6.332

6.366

. 6.276

6.138

6.170

6.591

6.7~9

6.727

!6.788

6.455

:6.1 14

6.070

6.419

· 6.788

6.070

02-12

6.459

· 6.253

6.461

0.070

2.159

10:38:00 - 10:59:00 I iC0-529

•Teledyne inOOM

2.256 I 12.313

2.737

:2.312

2.418

12.248

2.240


. 2.561

2.108

2.062

2.178

2. 156

2.127

'2.544

End of port l point 2

2.294

1.891

1.900

1.924

2.074

, 2.256

2.671

2.251

2.737

J. 891

End of port 1 poinp


2.386

'2.229

2.195

0.1 16

5.110

Page I

W006AS-583309A-RT-235 43 of 119

i Unit/Condition: FBI/ 1. S~rubber E.xha.us.t

! Trip!icate_ ~.ilTlpljl}g: !)J~e_ i PAQ Qeyice_: _!)T9806(0Q)

Jul 17 2019 - 10:59:17

~ t i Project Name: Jacobs/City of : Van_c:ot1ver WW.I_U'

MAQDAQ 1.0 Project Number: 006AS-583309

' CEMS Operator: Josh . Muswieck

... _ •.

MONTROSE £1\!VII\ONMI.N 1 ,\ 1.

I 'Name:

i Rµ11 L.~ngth; . 21 ; Traverse: Tru.e .

: Make/Model: ' Servomex , 1400

'. 25Aor7E: !1E

.Raw Avg: I •

IMax:

:Min:

Zero:

Low:

, Mid:

:High:

:6.419

i6.788

16.070

0.000

10.14

!20:~j

Zero rea~ing: -0.008

. l,!)W rea_(!_i_!)g:

!\'Ii<! re~di!)g: i 10.16 High n,ading: ; 20.94

! Zero %Err: <2.0

Mid %Err: <2.0

High %Err: <2.0

-0.038

.0.096

:0.048

Zero reading: i 0.093

. Sp~n rel!~_i!)g: ! I 0.05

Zero % bias: <5.0 0.483

Sp!'._n o/o b!_~~ · <5.0 ' -0.526

Zero reading: , 0,093 Span reading: , [0.04

Zero 0/o -~~as: <~.O O 4..~~ '. Span % bi_as: <?.0

, ~ero % drift: <3.0

· Span % drift: ; <3.0

, -0.573

0.000

:0.047

Gor Avg: . 6.446

W006AS-583309A-RT-235

Record Interval : 6 .. ··- .. ... . Ports: I

Run 5 Post run bias 10:38:00 - 10:59:00

I

·C0-529

, Teledyne •T300M 7E

Run summary data I

:2.251 :

!2.737 I 1.891


0.000

4.060

! 8.834


, -0.031

, 4.202

8.668

, AYE~age Irit_erva,I : 6Q : P(?ints per port_: 3


-0.351

1.607 1 -1.879

0.077 4.047

1.223

-1.755

•Q.QOt 3.998

Q.:m ; -2.30_9 ' 0.849

' 0.554

Initial Bias Data

Final Bias Data


2.254

Page 1

44 of 119

: Unit/Condition: FBI/ f ~c_r1:1~ber .E.?'h!3u;,! ! Trijllica,te ~ai:np_li!)g:f a,l;,e ' DAQ_D~vicJ: D_T9-806_(00)

Jul 17 2019 - 11 :05:05

~ MONTROSE E N \' I R C.l N ,\ I I. rs; I :\ I.

;Name:

, Make/Model: I i

' Jul 172019 11:08:00 1Jul 17 _2019 11:09:00

Jull72019 11:10:00

1Jul 17JQ19 ! 11_ :l 1:00

,Jul 172019 11 :12:00

!Jul 172019 111:13:00

Jul 172019 11:14:00

iJul 172019 11 : 15:00

Jul 172019 11 :16:00 1Jul 172019 '. 11 :17:00

Jul 172019 11:18:00

:JuJ !7_2Q19 11 :19:00

Jul 172019 11 :20:00 ! Jul 172Q19 · 11 :21 :00

Jul 172019 11 :22:00

Jul 172Ql9 11 :23:00

,Jul 172019 11 :24:00

;Ju} 17]019 j ll :25:00

Jul 172019 11 :26:00

Ju]l7 ~Q19 111:27:00

Jul 172019 11 :28:00

Average:

•Max:

Min:

;Port Point

1 11 !2

3

, Strat diff:

Strat %:

MAQDAQ 1.0 : Project Name: Jacobs/City of • Project Number: 006AS-, Vancouver WWRF , 583309 I . . .. ..... • •

! Run Length: 21 Record Interval: 6 1 Tra~ers~: T~; · p·orts: i . . .. . --

, CEMS Operator: Josh "Muswieck

Average J11tervaj: 60

' Po_ints pi:~ P.o~: ?.


' ()2-12

Servomex 1400

6.477

16.268

6.187

: 6.237

6.207

6.292

6.511

6.675

6.677 I

6.413

6.210

6.J34

5.934

6.106

6, 210

6)79

6.51 1

6J_3J

6.986

6.863

6.675

· 6.409

6.986

5.934

0 2-12

6.311

6.297

6.623

0.213

. 3.3 18

11 :07:00 - 11 :28:00 /co-529 I - •

j Teledyne 1T300M

2.529

12.895

3.109 12.867

2.506 12.773

2.535

End of port 1 point I

' 2.273

2.257

• 2.442

2.567

; 2=89~ 3.225

3.261


3.145

3.377

3.050

• 2.822

2.966

. 2.9~8

2.703

End ~f port 1 point 3

2.810

3.377

2.257


2.738 ·2.729

2.982

0.166

5.882

Page 1

W006AS-583309A-RT-235 45 of 119

Unit/Condition: FBI / : ~crubber F:xhal!_S_t

!Triplicate ~<!mp!i.ng: F*~

' DAQ Device: l)T9806(00)

Jul 172019- 11:28:02

~ MAQDAQ 1.0

MONTROSE I'! ,,. I I\ (l NM I. N I ,\ I.

I !Name:

; Make/Model:

, 25A or7E:

!Raw Avg: 1· 11\fax:

IMin:

Zero:

•Low: 'Mid:

iHigb:

! Project Name: Jacobs/City of : Project Number: 006AS-' Vancouver WWRF · 583309

! Run L;ngtil;. 2 i · .Re~~rd InI_erval : 6

j Traverse: True Ports: I

02-12

Servomex , 1400

17E

, 6.409

16.986

I 5_934

10.000

110.14

20.93

Run 6 Post run bias 11 :07:00 - 11 :28:00

I •

!C.0-5.29 :Teledyne iT300M

,7E

Run summary data

i2.8!0

· 3.377

!2.257


:0.000

·4 ,960

' 8._834

?,ero i:ea~ing: · -O.Q08

L_ow read!_!Jg:


-0.031

; ~<!. re:id!_J_tg: 10.16

lligb r~a<iiog: 20.94

4.202

8.668

CEMS Operator: Josh Muswieck

• A ver<!ge IntervaL 60

'Roin_ts per port: 3

EPA Method 7E Error Calculations ;Zero %Err: 'Mid %Err: ' High %Err:

<2.0 -0.038

'<2.0 0.096

<2.0 0.048

Zero reading: 0.093

Span reading: 10.04

Zero % bias: : <5.0 0.483

Sp~!!_% _bi:is_;__., <5.0 1 -0.573

?;ei_:<1 r~_ad!ug: 0.038

· Span rea~ing: 19-93

Ze!:<1 ~~ bia_s: <5.0 ~~~.9 SP!!!!.. 0(o bja~: <5.0 -0.621

: Zero % drift: <3.0 0.263 - . . -. ~pa'! ~ drif!: <3.0 'Q,048

_Cor Avg: : 6.452

W006AS-583309A-RT-235

1-0.351 11.607

- 1.879

0.002

3.998

0.374

-2.309

, -00 0}7

4.002

-_Q..Q6-~ -2.2§_4

0.442

' 0.045

'

Initial Bias Data

Final Bias Data


' 2.857

Page I

46 of 119

' Unit/Condition: FBI/ ' Scrubber Exhaust

•• • c • ' • •

, Triplicate Sampling: False r . • ···-. : . ... • . • • - ··.

; DAQ !)ev1ce: DT98Q!>(OO)

Jul 17 2019 - 11 :33: 11

~ '· -

MONTROSE t N\/ Jll. ONi\llN f :\ I.

1Name:

. Make/Model:

I Jul 17 2019 11:36:00

,J~l 17 2019 I I 11:37:00

Jul 172019 11:38:00

fJul 172.0}9 111 :39:00

Jul 17 2019 11:40:00 I Ju) )7 20i9 i 11 :41:00

Jul 172019 11 :42:00

Jul 172019 . 11 :43,00

Jul 172019 11:44:00

Jul 17 20 19 11 :45:00

Jul 17 20 19 11:46:00

,Juj 17 ~0 1? 11:47:00

Jul 1720 19 11:48:00

Jul 172019 11:49:00

Jul l72019 11 :50:00

J_u] 1729\9 -11 :51:00

Jul 172019 11 :52:00

!Jul 172019 ; 11:53:00

IJul 1?2Q!9 11:54:01

Jul 17 2019 11:55:00

Jul 17 2019 11:56:00

Average:

Max:

Min:

Port Point

2

3

Strat diff:

.S~rat %:

MAQDAQ 1.0 ! Project Name: Jacobs/City of , Project Number: 006AS-i Vancou"'.e.r wwru: 58~309

I Run Length: 21 · _13.t:cord Interval: 6

J°T;av~r;~: T~~ : Ports: l

, CEMS Operator: Josh , Mu_;,wieck

, Av~r.iigt: lnterval: __ 60

. P<Ji11ts per port: 3.


02- 12

, Servomex ' 1400

7.688

•7.559

7.601 17.771

7.727 ; 7.792

7.865

: 7_351

7.371

7.268

6.917

•6.83 1

6.936

,7.176

7.086

6.941

7.124 17.321

7.248

7.285

7.119

·1.332

7.865

6.83 1

02-12

7.724

7.072

7.177

0.400

5.457

11 :35:00 - 11 :56:00 1C0-529

Teledyne :T300M

2.123

: 2.785

2.407 12.321

1.975

. 1.391

1.306


· 1.783

1.607

1.390

1.433

1.670

1.461

1.293


1.345

1.366

1.676

1.342

1.290

1.442

1.613

1.668

2.785

1.290

~11-9 of port 1 point 3


2.029

1.516

1.480

0.354

9.493

Pagel

W006AS-583309A-RT-235 47 of 119

1 Unit/Condition: FBI/ : Scrubber Exhaust

: Trip[icate ~a_mP.ling: Fa.ls~

DAQ Device: DT9806(00)

Jul 17 2019 - 11:56:08

MAQDAQ 1.0

~ i J , Project Name: Jacobs/City of : Project Number: 006AS- ! CEMS Operator: Josh .M~s\.Viecl< V,mc.ouyer WWRF • 583309

MONTROSE

; Run Le11gt_h: 21

i Travt:rse.: True

~V J RO N ML N J ,i l.

izero %Err:

;Mid %Err:

'High %Err:

!Name: : 02-12

, Make/Model: ! Servomex ! 1400

25A or7E:

'Raw Avg:

IMax: 1Mio:

Zero:

'Low:

Mid:

,High:

' 7E

7.332

; 7.865

!6.831

0.000

10.14

' 20.93

Zero reading: ·Q.008

· !,ow re11ding:

~<! ~eading: ' !0. 16

High reading: · 20.94

·<2.0 -0.038

.<2.0 0.096

<2.0 0.048

1 Zero reading: 0.038

Span reading: ' 10.03

Zero % bias: <5.0 0.220

Span % bias: · <5.0 -0.621

?;er(! reJ!<!i~g: 0.0??

' ~pl!n reading: J0,10

, Zero % bias: ~~.:!I · o_,.4!1 . • S_pa_n '.\"o ~i_;i~;

'!,!rO % drift,

~Pll_D o/~ d_r if!:

' <5.0

<3.0

<3.0

;_ Cor Avg:

' ~0.2_87

·0)91

'0}34

17.37 1

W006AS-583309A-RT-235

. , !lecorcl Interv11\ :_ ~

' Ports : I

Run 7 Post run bias 11 :35 :00 - 11 :56:00

I 1C0-529

: Teledyne JT300M

'. 7E

, 1.668

2.785

: 1.290

Run summary data


0.000

4 .060

, 8,834


-0.031

!4.2Q2.

8.668

! Aye_rage Intef\/a.t 60

. P~ints per port: 3

EPA Method 7E Error Calculations ; -0.351

; 1.607

- 1.879

-0.037

4.002

-0.068

-2.264

·0.074

~.03!

IJ.?9 -1.9~6

1.257

0.328

Initial Bias Data

Final Bias Data

Bias Corrected Averages , 1.675

Page I

48 of 119

: Unit/Condition: FBI/ , Scrubber Exhaust . ... ·- ....

I Triplicate_ S<!mpling: F11J!!e

, DAQ pevi~e: DT9896(00)

Jul 17 201 9 - 12:02:29

~ MONTROSE 1 I'= V I I{ l' N M L N I ,\ I.

·Name:

J Make/Model:

Jul172019 12:06:00

i Jul 17 20 19 12:07:00

I Jul 17 20 19 12:08:00 I !Jul 17 2019 ' 12:09:00

Jul 17 2019 12:10:01

:1u, 172019 I

' 12: 11:00

Jul 172019 12:12:00

Jul 172019 12:13:00

Jul 172019 12:14:00

Jul 17 2019 12:15:00

Jul 172019 12:16:00

Jul 17 2019 , 12:11;00

Jul 17 2019 12:18:00

Jul 17 2019 12:19;00

' Jul 172019 12:20:00

1Jull72019 , 12:2 1:00

•Jul 172019 12:22:00

Jul 172019 12}}:00

Jull72019 12:24:00

· Jul 17 2019 12:25:00

Jul 172019 12:26:00

- .. •Average:

Max:

Min:

,Port Point

1 1

'. 1 ' 2 I

1 3

Strat diff:

,Strat %:

MAQDAQ 1.0 I Project Name: Jacobs/City of · Vancouver WWRF

Project Number: 006AS-58330~

· CEMS Operator: Josh Muswieck

I Run ie~~; 21 · , .. . - . - .. .. i Tn1yerse_, T~e _

102-12

! Servomex ' 1400

7.529

'7.716

7.646

j 7.377

7.479 17.519

7.385

· 7.405

7.309

· 7.408

7.379

7.444

7.481

7.460

8.150

8.010

7.854

7.877

7.986

' 7.982

7.833

.. 7.630

8.150

7.309

0 2- 12

7.522

'. 7.472

8.028

0.354

4.613

· Record Interval: ~

' Ports.: I

Average Interval: 60

Points per port:. 3


12:05:00 - 12:26:00 :co-529

:Teledyne : DOOM

1.509

' 1.361

1.361

l 1.493

1.582 1 I.567

1.401

End of port I point I

1.399

1.650

1.523

1.544

, 1.566

1.442

· 1.593


1.403

, 1.233

1.470

! 1.662

1.408

1.432

1.56 1

1.484

. 1.662

1.233

End of port 1 point)


1.474

1.547

1.458

0.054

3.617

Page 1

W006AS-583309A-RT-235 49 of 119

i Unit/Condition: FBI I ; Scrubber Exhaust

I 1;ipl;;~te·s~;i}~;, f~!~e_ • 1 DA.Q Device: D'r:98.~6(00)

Jul 17201 9 -12:26:27

~ MAQDAQ 1.0

. Project Name: Jacobs/City of : Project Number: 006AS-: Vancouver WWRF 583309

... -· -··- -· ··-

: Run L!c11gtJ:i: ? 1 _ i ~ec:orq Ir1t~rval: 6

MONTROSE i Traver~e: T[!!_e Ports:

l N V I R '-' N M L N I :\ I_

Name: 102-12

Make/Model: ,Servomex 1400

'25A or7E: 7E

iRawAvg: 7.630

Max: 18.1?0

1Min: i1.309

Zero: i0,000

Low:

•Mid: 10.14

:High: 120.93

~!ro reading: , -O.Q08

Low reading:

MiA read\og: . IQ. I~

High ~ea!'ing: 20.94

Run 8 Post run bias

12:05:00 - 12:26:00 ;C0-529

!Teledyne iT300M

:1E

Run summary data

1.484 I ' 1.662

I t.233


0.000

4.060

. 8.834


-0.031

'4.202

8.668


: Ave.rage Inte.rvaJ; ~o Points_ per po_rt: -~

Zero %Err: <2.0 ' -0.038

· 0.096

, 0.048


-0.351

Mid %Err: <2.0

High %Err: <2.0

· Zero % bias:

, Span % bias:

' Zero reading~ _ 0.078

S(l!!D re_adi~g: IO.IO

<5.0 0.411

<5.0 -0.287

~ero read~ng: , 0.0?_§

Spa!) reading: 10.07

, Zero 0/ '!. bii_1s, '<5.0 0.41 1

§pan "!• IJ.i_a~: <5.0 -0,~ Q Zero % drift: <3.0

Span % d!if(: '<3.0

Cor Avg:

0.000

0.143

7.652

W006AS-583309A-RT-235

1.607

-1.879

· 0.074

4.031

, 1.189

-1.936

. -0.051

4.012

-0.226

-2.151

1.415

0.215

Initial Bias Data

Final Bias Data

Bias Corrected Ave_rages . 1.491

Page 1

50 of 119

Unit/Condition: FBI/ Sc_r~~~er !=:xhau_st

Triplicate Sampling]alse __

D.1\Q De.vice~ J:)_T_98.06(09)

Jul 17 201 9 - 12:32:50

~ MONTROSE tN,' 1 1tO N M I. N l i'1 l

;Na~e:

; Make/Model:

iJul 17 2019 . 12:36:00

:Jul 172019 112:37:00

:Jul 1720i9 12:38:00

)Jul 172019 : 12:39:00

Jul 172019 12:40:00

J1u117~019 I 12:41:00

Jul 17 2019 12:42:00

, Jul 17 2019 12:43:00

Jul 172019 12:44:00

Jul 172019 ' 12:45:00

Jul 172019 12:46:00

;Jul 17 2019 12:47:00

Jul 172019 12:48:00

Jul 17 2019 12:49:00

' Jul 172019 12:50:00

Jul 172019 12:51 :00

Jul 172019 12:52:00

Jul 172019 ' 12:53:00

Jul 172019 12:54:00

Jul 172019 12:55:00

Jul 17 2019 12:56:00

Average:

Max:

Mio:

'Port Point

I ' 1 2

1 3

i Strat diff:

,strl!_t %:

MAQDAQ 1.0 , Project Name: Jacobs/City of Project Number: 006AS-J Yancouver ~ ~8;B09

' R.,U11_~~n~_b: 2! ; R._ec~r9 ~tqv~: ~ i Traverse: True .. . ~ ... - . Port~: l

: CEMS Operator: Josh Muswieck

: A. vi:r~g~ !nt~rva.J: . 60

: Points per po_rt_: ~


:02-12

!servomex : 1400

7.971

' 17.800

7.604 ' •7.375

7.404

: 7.400

7.228

, 7.624

7.978

7.735

7.421

7.559

7.689

7.385

7.357

7.333

7.334

' 7.212

7.220

,7.36 1

7.557

7.502

7.978

7.2 12

0 2- 12

7.489

7.633

7.252

0.175

2.762

12:35:00 - 12:56:00 ;co-529

:Teledyne ,T300M

1.574

1.489

1.383

1.465

1.495 I 1.551

1.637

End of port I point l

1.752

1.635

1.608

1.741

1.618

1.733

1.774

End of _port 1 point 2

1.798

! 1.866

1.902

1.938

1.970

1.971

1.807

1.700

1.971

1.383

End of port 1 poi!]_! }


1.519

1.689

1.880

0.184

10.85

Page 1

W006AS-583309A-RT-235 51 of 119

' Unit/Condition: FBI/ : ~c!11bber Exhau!I

: 'fripli~ate S~mp!_i!_lg: F~I§~ .

'P_A.Q Device_: QT9806(00)

Jul 17 2019 - 12:56:05

MAQDAQ 1.0

~ . Project Name: Jacobs/City of Project Number: 006AS-' yanc<mver wylRJ' . 583309

. CEMS Operator: Josh -Muswieck

MONTROSE L N V I It (' ,'< M L N I .~ I,

I iName: I. I Make/Model: ' !

25A or7E:

I Raw Avg:

Max: !Mio:

Zero:

Low:

Mid:

High:

~ero _rea_ding:

L_(!~ rea<!_i11g:

l\ficl re_adj_11g:_

~ig~ rea<ling:

' Zero %Err: '<2.0

,Mid %Err: <2.0

High %Err: <2.0

~ero reading:

Run Length: 21

: Traverse: Tru~.

92-12

Servomex 11400

7E

17.502

,7.978

' 7.212

,0.000

10.14

20.93

.-0.008

10.16

20.94

-0.038

0.096

0.048

0.078

Span reading: ' 10.07

Zero% bias: <5.0 0.411

'Span % bias: .<S.O -0.430

· ~-~r~ r ~a.!!ing: .' 0.145 Spa_!! reading: 10.09

Zero% bias: <5.0 .9..:71.!. ·--· ·- - ---• §_paf! o/! ~i!!_S_2 •<5.0 -Q.}14

i ~er!!_ % cl_ri_ft: <3.0 0.320

:_Spa11 % !!rift: <3.0 , 0,096

iCor Avg: 7.518

W006AS-583309A-RT-235

' Record Interval: 6 . ~- - . -·

Ports: 1

Run 9 Post run bias 12:35:00 - 12:56:00

iC0_-529

!Teledyne :T300M

i7E

Run summary data 11.700

i L971

i 1.383


0.000

4.060

, 8.834

Calibration Readings -0.031

4.202

8.668

; Aver11ge I_11terval: 60.

, Poin~ per port: 3


-0.351

1.607 ' - 1.879

Initial Bias Data

-0.051

•4.012

. -0.226

; .2.151

Final Bias Data , -_Q,029

4.0!0

!\LQ.2}

~2. 173 ! Q.24_9

, 0.02.2


1.744

Page 1

52 of 119

: Unit/Condition: FBI/ I Scrubber Exhaust

I I;i~ii~~t~.i~-~~i_ill~: F~J~e

.1 DAQ pevi~_e: J?J9~06(00)

I

Jul 17 2019 - 13:01 :42

~ J. MONTROSE E N V l R L' N "1 L 1' I -~ I.

,Name:

: Make/Model:

Jul 17 2019 13:04:00

iJu_l 17~01? ! 13:05:00

Jul 172019 13:06:00

!Jul 17 2019 13:07:00

Jul 172019 13:08:00

i Jul 17 2019 I 13:09:00

Jul 172019 13:10:00

Jul 172019 13:11:00

Jul 172019 13: 12:00

•Jul 172019 13:13:00

Jul 172019 13:14:00

Jul 172019 13:15:00

Jul 172019 13:16:00

Jul 17 2019 13: 17:00

Jul 17 2019 13:18:00

'. Jut 172019 13:19:00 - '

Jul 172019 13:20:00

' Jul 172019 13:21:00

Jul 172019 13:22:00

: Jul 17 2019 13:23:00

Jul 17 2019 13:24:00

Average:

Max:

Min:

Port Point

: 1 I

' 1 I :2

1 3

Strat diff:

Strat % :

MAQDAQ 1.0 , Project Name: Jacobs/City of Project Number: 006AS-: Vancouver WWRf · 583309

; Run Lengtll: 2I_ 'Re~ord, Interval: 6

i Trllverse: True Po~: I


~verage_Intt:rval: 60

Poit]ts per port: ~

Run IO Average Results

' 02-12

;servomex ! 1~00

8.279 ; 8.319

8.166

i8.059

8.193 18.0'72

8.057

8.301

8.303

8.278

8.300 I . 8.105

8.351

's.ios

8.073

8.034

8.399

8.435

8.278

' 8.403

8.240

I

8.226

8.435

8.034

'02-12

8.156

8.182

8.101

0.036

0.556

13:03:00 - 13:24:00 I C0-529

Teledyne , T300M

1.866

1.608

1.843

, L8Q6

1.852

' 1.931

1.901

End of port I point I

1.766

1.698

1.827

1.753

1.857

1.706

1.655


1.821

1.781

1.747

1.592

1.620

1.632

1.774

1.764

1.931

1.592

End of port _I_ point 3


1.815

1.759

1.707

0.055

3.105

Page I

W006AS-583309A-RT-235 53 of 119

j Unit/Condition: FBI/ ! ~cru~ber Exhaus_t

ITriplic_ate Sampling: Fa_l~e_

I DA_9 Device: IH9806(00)

Jul 17 201 9 - 13:24:02

~ t MAQDAQ 1.0

I Project Name: Jacobs/City of : Project Number: 006AS-/ Vancouver WW.RF 583_309

i ll_un Length: 21 ; Jl!:cor~ Int~rval: 6 . .,._ .. I Traverse: True ; Ports: 1

MONTROSE E I" \' I I\ l ' N M L N I A I.

lName: 102-12 I Make/Model: 'Servomex

' 1400 ' .

!25A or 7E: :1E

iRaw Avg:

iMax:

!Min:

Zero: I

Low:

Mid:

,High:

18.226

: 8.4~5 i8.034

0.000

10.14

120._93

'~ero read~l!g: • -Q,008

• L_~w readJng: 1

•J\1id readi!)g: 10.16

High_ i::eac:t~ng: · 20.94

. . .. . . .

Run 10 Post run bias

13:03:00 - 13:24:00 !C0-529

'. Teledyne 1T300M

7E

. 1.764

' 1.931 ! 1.592

Run summary data


0.000

4.060

: 8.834


-0.031

4.202

8.668

, CEMS Operator: Josh M.uswiec~

-_Average Inti:rvaj: 60

; Points per port: 3

'Zero %Err: ,Mid %Err:

'<2.0

'<2.0

<2.0

:-0.038 ;0.096

:0.048


-0.35 1

High %Err:

Zero reading: i 0.145

Spll_!! r! a~il!g\ 10.09 Zero% bias: <5.0 ; 0.731

· Span % bias: , <5.0 , -0.334

Zero reading: , 0.068 Sp~n rea-di~g: 1 io.01

~ er~ 'Y!_!>i_a~: '-:=5,Q . 'QJ§i _!:iPl!!l °t• !>ia_s; , ~er!} % !'rift:

, Spa_':) 'Y• dr!ft:

<5.0

.<3.0

<3.0

Cor Avg:

-0.717 ,0.368 10.383

W006AS-583309A-RT-235

1.607

-1.879

-0.029

4.010

0.023

-2.173

.-om1 3.970

-.9_,_,m :~,~26

9.47~ ,Q,45_3

Initial Bias Data

Final Bias Data


: 1.823

Page I

54 of 119

; Unit/Condition: FBI / i Scrubber Exhaust .. . .. ·- .

iTriplicate Sampling: False

! DAQ p evice: DJ?806(00)

Jul 172019 - 13:27:33


APPENDIX C CLIENT CEMS AND PROCESS DATA

W006AS-583309A-RT-235 55 of 119 ~ MONTROSE i '· /l l P. (\.IIA L IT\' .\l, RV I C: r s


Append ix C.1 Process and CEMS Data during RATA

W006AS-583309A-RT-235 56 of 11 9

§ 0 0) )> (J) I

en co (.,J w 0 co :p,

~ I\.) (.,J en

en -...J 0 -,, ....>. ....>.

co

COMPANY: LOCATION: SOURCE: CEMS ID:

VANCOUVER WESTSIDE WRF VANCOUVER WA FLUIDIZED BED INCINERATOR 1234567

02 (%)

Run 1 6.905 Run 2 6.909 Run 3 6.127 Run 4 6.332 Run 5 6.359 Run 6 6.364 Run 7 7.209 Run 8 7.482 Run 9 7.382 Run 10 8. 173

STACK FURNACE co TEMP TEMP

(PPMVD) (DEG (DEG F) F)

3.659 201.86 144 1.68 3.532 202.32 144 1.59 3.841 204.95 1442.82 3.627 206.82 1444.09 3.468 205.64 1448.55 3.950 206.95 1441.68 2.818 202.77 1439. 14 2.582 201.27 1438.50 2.759 200.82 1437.18 2.782 198.18 1437.91

BURN SCRUBBER SLUDGE BURN co MODE MOISTURE

MODE @7% co DP FEED {IN-WC) {LBS/HR)

(%) (MINUTES) {PPMVD) @7%

{PPMVD)

63.46 11421.50 4.03 1 3.636 3.636 63.51 11355.32 4.03 1 3.509 3.509 63.62 12532.14 4.28 1 3.609 3.609 63.56 12298.4 1 4.22 1 3.455 3.455 63.63 12000.41 4.22 1 3.309 3.309 63.71 12550.73 4.41 1 3.782 3.782 63.47 12581.32 4.06 1 2.868 2.868 63.47 12474.64 4.04 1 2.677 2.677 63.60 12323.77 4.07 1 2.823 2.823 63.46 11971.32 3.95 1 3.018 3.018

§ 0 O> )> (/)

I

CJ1 CX) w w 0

~ :::0 -I

I I'.) u) CJ1

CJ1 CX)

0 -...... ...... (.0

1 MINUTE REPORT

COMPANY: VANCOUVER WESTSIDE WRF LOCATION: VANCOUVER WA

SOURCE: FLUIDIZED BED INCINERATOR

CEMS ID: 1234567

DATE CREATED: 07/17/2019@ 10:30 PERIOD: 07/17/2019 00:00 - 07/17/2019 23:59

SOURCE 02 co

DATE-TIME ON (%) (PPMVD)

(MINS)

Rlin.1 .;)- .. ~ - , ',, ~ :- ~ .. .,.. _,

1- - ..... .J~1.1.

07/17/2019 08:40 1 6.5 3.3 07/17/2019 08:41 1 6.3 3.8 07/17/2019 08:42 1 7 3.9 07/17/2019 08:43 1 6.9 4 07/17/2019 08:44 1 7 3.9

07/17/2019 08:45 1 6.9 3.9

07/17/2019 08:46 1 6.9 3.S

07/17/2019 08:47 l 6.7 3.7

07/17/2019 08:48 1 6.5 3.9

07/17/2019 08:49 1 6.2 3.8

07/17/2019 08:50 1 6.6 3.S

07/17/2019 08:51 1 7.8 2.6

07/17/2019 08:52 1 7.S 3.4

07/17/2019 08:53 1 7.6 3.7

07/17/2019 08:54 1 7.5 3.5

07/17/2019 08:55 1 7.4 3.5

07/17/2019 08:56 1 7.2 3.8 07/17/2019 08:57 1 6.8 4.2

07/17/2019 08:58 1 6.7 4

07/17/2019 08:59 1 6.5 4 07/17/2019 09:00 1 6.7 3.4 07/17/2019 09:01 1 6.7 3.2

AVERAGE 1 6.905 3.659

STACK TEMP

(DEG

F)

_,:,...,;_...

201 201 201 201 201 201 202 202 202 203 203 202 202 201

201 202 202

203 203 203 202

202

202

FURNACE BURN

TEMP SCRUBBER SLUDGE co STARTUP MODE

MOISTURE (DEG

DP FEED (%)

@7% MODE co

F) (IN-WC) (LBS/HR) (PPMVD) (MINUTES) @7%

(PPMVD)

b~ I I ... ~ -- --~ - ---- -~., !' ,.' - '

1441 63.3 5545 4.04 3.2 0 3.2 1441 63.7 11472 4.04 3.6 0 3.6 1442 63.3 12643 4.04 3.9 0 3.9 1442 63.4 12549 4.04 4 0 4 1442 63.2 12507 4.04 3.9 0 3.9 1442 63.5 12576 4.04 3.9 0 3.9 1441 63.4 12613 4.04 3.S 0 3.S 1441 63.5 125S5 4.04 3.7 0 3.7 1441 63.6 9837 4.09 3.8 0 3.8 1440 63.5 4468 4.13 3.6 0 3.6 1441 63.7 12257 3.99 3.4 0 3.4 1442 63.7 12S45 3.95 2.8 0 2.8 1443 63.3 12392 3.9S 3.5 0 3.5 1444 63 12411 3.95 3.8 0 3.8 1443 63.4 12590 3.95 3.6 0 3.6 1443 63.4 12595 4 3.6 0 3.6 1443 63.5 12327 4.04 3.9 0 3.9 1442 63.7 12300 4.04 4.1 0 4.1 1441 63.4 12556 4.04 3.9 0 3.9 1440 63.2 12593 4.04 3.9 0 3.9 1441 63.8 12383 4.04 3.3 0 3.3 1441 63.7 7559 4.04 3.1 0 3.1

1442 63.5 11422 4.03 3.636 0 3.636

§ 0 O') )> Cl)

I 01 0::, w w 0 co )>

I

;:o -;-, N w (J'I

01 co 0 -....... ....... co

1 MINUTE REPORT

COMPANY: VANCOUVER WESTSIDE WRF LOCATION: VANCOUVER WA SOURCE: FLUIDIZED BED INCINERATOR CEMS ID: 1234567

DATE CREATED: 07/17/2019@ 10:30 PERIOD: 07/17/2019 00:00 - 07/17/2019 23:59

SOURCE 02

DATE-TIME ON (%)

(MINS)

Run2 _ :, .. ., 07/17/2019 09:10 1 6.8 07/17/2019 09:11 1 6.6

07/17/2019 09:12 1 6.8

07/17/2019 09:13 1 7.8 07/17/2019 09:14 1 7.9 07/17/2019 09:15 1 7.7 07/17/2019 09:16 1 7.7 07/17/2019 09:17 1 7.3 07/17/2019 09:18 1 7.1 07/17/2019 09:19 1 7.3 07/17/2019 09:20 1 7 07/17/2019 09:21 1 7.1 07/17/2019 09:22 1 6.8 07/17/2019 09:23 1 6.6 07/17/2019 09:24 1 6.7 07/17/2019 09:25 1 6.8 07/17/2019 09:26 1 6.5

07/17/2019 09:27 1 6.3

07/17/2019 09:28 1 6.3 07/17/2019 09:29 1 6.3 07/17/2019 09:30 1 6.3 07/17/2019 09:31 1 6.3

AVERAGE 1 6,909



- \' ., - - -3.8 202 1440 3.5 203 1440 2.7 203 1441 2.7 202 1442 3.2 202 1442 3.4 202 1443 3.6 202 1443 3.6 202 1442 3.6 202 1442 3.4 202 1442 3.7 201 1442 3.3 201 1441 3.7 202 1440 4.2 203 1440 3.6 203 1440 2.9 203 1441 2.9 202 1442 4 202 1442 4 203 1442

4.1 203 1442 3.9 203 1443 3.9 203 1443

3.532 202 1442

BURN SCRUBBER SLUDGE

MOISTURE co STARTUP MODE

DP FEED (%)

@7% MODE co (IN-WC) (LBS/HR) (PPMVD) (MINUTES) @7%

(PPMVD)

7 'l i ~ I !I ~ - - - ..... l

63.6 12174 4.04 3.7 0 3.7 63.3 3044 4.04 3.4 0 3.4 63.7 8175 3.97 2.7 0 2.7 63.8 12360 3.95 2.8 0 2.8 63.4 12390 3.95 3.4 0 3.4 63.7 12498 3.95 3.6 0 3.6 63.3 12579 3.95 3.8 0 3.8 63.5 12428 3.95 3.7 0 3.7 63.4 12268 3.95 3.7 0 3.7 63.4 12363 4.04 3.5 0 3.5 63.5 12504 4.04 3.7 0 3.7 63.7 12482 4.04 3.3 0 3.3 63.6 12419 4.04 3.7 0 3.7 63.2 11297 4.04 4.1 0 4.1 63.5 12579 4.04 3.5 0 3.5 63.5 12632 4.04 2,9 0 2.9 63.5 12548 4.04 2.8 0 2.8 63.8 12330 4.04 3.8 0 3.8 63.5 12386 4.08 3.8 0 3.8 63.5 12426 4.18 3.9 0 3.9 63.4 11266 4.18 3.7 0 3.7 63.5 4669 4.14 3.7 0 3.7

63.5 11355 4.03 3.509 0 3.509

§ 0 0) )> (f) I

CJ1 CX) w w 0 co )>

I

~ "' (.,.) 01

0) 0 0 -->. ->.

<O

1 MINUTE REPORT

COMPANY: LOCATION: SOURCE: CEMS ID: DATE CREATED:

PERIOD:

DATE-TIME

R11113 . - -07/17/2019 09:41 07/17/2019 09:42 07/17/2019 09:43 07/17/2019 09:44 07/17/2019 09:45 07/17/2019 09:46 07/17/2019 09:47 07/17/2019 09:48 07/17/2019 09:49 07/17/2019 09:50 07/17/2019 09:51 07/17/2019 09:52 07/17/2019 09:53 07/17/2019 09:54 07/17/2019 09:55 07/17/2019 09:56 07/17/2019 09:57 07/17/2019 09:58

07/17/2019 09:59 07/17/2019 10:00 07/17/2019 10:01 07/17/2019 10:02

AVERAGE

VANCOUVER WESTSIDE WRF VANCOUVER WA FLUIDIZED BED INCINERATOR 1234567 07/17/2019 @ 10:30

07/17/2019 00:00 - 07/17/2019 23:59

SOURCE 02

ON (%)

(MINS)

.. . . .. .,__ 1 6.5 1 6.3 1 6.3

1 6.2

1 6 1 5.9 1 6.4 1 6.5 1 6.5 1 6.4 1 6.3 1 6.1 1 6.1 1 6.1 1 5.9 1 5.8 1 5.7 1 6 1 5.9 1 6.2

1 5.9

1 5.8

1 6.127



... _.j, ~e...u_:_ __.

3.4 204 1444 3.7 204 1443 3.5 204 1443 3.6 204 1443 3.9 205 1443 4.1 204 1443 3.8 204 1442 3.8 203 1443

3.5 203 1443 3.6 204 1443 3.8 205 1443 4.1 206 1444

4 206 1443

3.6 206 1443

3.8 206 1443

4.2 205 1443 4.6 205 1443 4.1 206 1442

4 206 1442

3.6 206 1442

4 206 1442 3.8 207 1442

3.841 205 1443

BURN SCRUBBER SLUDGE co STARTUP MODE

MOISTURE DP FEED @7% MODE co

(IN-WC) (LBS/HR) (%)

(PPMVD) (MINUTES) @7%

(PPMVDl

I ' ~. I· -- ..:- ~ - ...,__ -.s.c.·.:!, ~· -- - , . . ~

63.6 12815 4.18 3.3 0 3.3 63.6 12809 4.18 3.5 0 3.5 63.5 12688 4.18 3.3 0 3.3 63.6 12575 4.18 3.4 0 3.4 64 12567 4.18 3.6 0 3.6

63.7 12548 4.18 3.8 0 3.8 63.3 12429 4.18 3.6 0 3.6 63.5 12425 4.18 3.7 0 3.7 63.6 12453 4,18 3.4 0 3.4 63.7 12493 4.18 3.4 0 3.4 63.5 12424 4.18 3.6 0 3.6 63.4 12518 4.18 3.9 0 3.9 63.4 12533 4.18 3.7 0 3.7 63.7 12512 4.37 3.4 0 3.4 63.8 12499 4.42 3.5 0 3.5 63.5 12605 4.42 3.9 0 3.9 63.9 12630 4.42 4.3 0 4.3 63.5 12595 4.42 3.8 0 3.8 63.8 12489 4.42 3.7 0 3.7 63.8 12425 4.42 3.4 0 3.4 63.6 12364 4.42 3.7 0 3.7 63.7 12311 4.42 3.5 0 3.5

63.6 12532 4.28 3.609 0 3.609

§ 0

~ (/)

I (]1 CX> w w 0 co 1" ~ N (.,.) (]1

en ....... 0 -....... ....... co

1 MINUTE REPORT

COMPANY: VANCOUVER WESTSIDE WRF LOCATION: VANCOUVER WA SOURCE: FLUIDIZED BED INCINERATOR CEMS ID: 1234S67 DATE CREATED: 07/17/2019 @ 12:07 PERIOD: 07/17/2019 00:00 - 07/17/2019 23:59

SOURCE 02 co

DATE-TIME ON (%) (PPMVD}

(MINS)

Run4 ..,~ 1

,..,,~ - "

' - " ' "' -- - '.

07 /17 /201910:10 1 5.8 4 07/17/2019 10:11 1 5.7 4,1

07/17/2019 10:12 1 5.8 4.1

07/17/2019 10:13 1 6 3.6

07/17/2019 10:14 1 6.3 4 07/17/2019 10:15 1 6.6 3.7

07/17/2019 10:16 1 6.6 3.7 07/17/2019 10:17 1 6.6 3.7 07/17/2019 10:18 1 6.2 3.7 07/17/2019 10:19 1 6.5 3.5 07/17/2019 10:20 1 6.4 3.7 07/17/2019 10:21 1 6.5 3.8 07/17/2019 10:22 1 6.6 4 07/17/2019 10:23 1 6.5 3.5 07/17/2019 10:24 1 6.6 3.3 07/17/2019 10:25 1 6.5 3.1 07/17/2019 10:26 1 6.5 3.2 07/17/2019 10:27 1 6.3 3.2

07/17/2019 10:28 1 6.3 3.3

07/17/2019 10:29 1 6.4 3.4

07/17/2019 10:30 1 6.3 3.6

07/17/2019 10:31 1 6.3 3.6

AVERAGE 1 6.332 3.627

STACK TEMP (DEG

F)

I, " l.. 207 208 208

207 207 206 206 206 206 207 207 207 207 207 207 207 206 207 207 207 207 206

207

FURNACE BURN

TEMP SCRUBBER SLUDGE co STARTUP MODE

MOISTURE (DEG

DP FEED @7% MODE co (IN-WC} (LBS/HR)

(%) (PPMVD) (M INUTES) @7% F)

(PPMVD)

1 :, ~- ~ I - - \, = - - - - - ~ .._ M ~~ ' 1442 63.7 12156 4.42 3.7 0 3.7 1443 63.7 12012 4.42 3.8 0 3.8 1443 63.7 12005 4.42 3.7 0 3.7 1444 63.5 12063 4.42 3.3 0 3.3 1444 63.8 12119 4.19 3.8 0 3.8 1444 63.5 12309 4.18 3.6 0 3.6 1444 63.3 12346 4.18 3.6 0 3.6 1445 63.4 12353 4.18 3.6 0 3.6 1445 63.6 12254 4.18 3.5 0 3.5 1445 63.6 12260 4.18 3.4 0 3.4 1445 63.2 12362 4.18 3.6 0 3.6 1445 63.7 12334 4.18 3.6 0 3.6 1445 64 12297 4.18 3.9 0 3.9 1445 63.3 12248 4.18 3.4 0 3.4 1444 63.8 12249 4.18 3.2 0 3.2 1444 63.5 12297 4.18 3 0 3 1444 63.3 12361 4.18 3.1 0 3.1 1444 63.6 12304 4.18 3 0 3 1444 63.4 12199 4.18 3.1 0 3.1 1444 63.3 12439 4.18 3.3 0 3.3 1444 63.9 12791 4.18 3.4 0 3.4 1443 63.6 12807 4.18 3.4 0 3.4

1444 63.6 12298 4.22 3.455 0 3.455

§ 0 O') )> (J) I

CJ'l co w w 0 co =!> :::0 --i I

N w CJ'l

O') N 0 -...... ...... co

1 MINUTE REPORT

COMPANY: VANCOUVER WESTSIDE WRF LOCATION: VANCOUVER WA

SOURCE: FLUIDIZED BED INCINERATOR CEMS ID: 1234567 DATE CREATED: 07/17/2019@ 12:07 PERIOD: 07/17/2019 00:00 - 07/17/2019 23:59

SOURCE 02

DATE-TIME ON (%)

(MINS)

Ru~$: .H ··" -<~ --¥ : - '· .,._ .jili

07/17/2019 10:38 1 6.1 07/17/2019 10:39 1 6.1

07/17/2019 10:40 1 6.2

07/17/2019 10:41 1 6.3 07/17/2019 10:42 1 6.3

07/17/2019 10:43 1 6.6

07/17/2019 10:44 1 6.6 07/17/2019 10:45 1 6.4 07/17/2019 10:46 1 6.4 07/17/2019 10:47 1 6.3 07/17/2019 10:48 1 6.4 07/17/2019 10:49 1 6.3 07/17/2019 10:50 1 6.1 07/17/201910:51 1 6.1 07/17/2019 10:52 1 6.6 07/17/2019 10:53 1 6.8 07/17/2019 10:54 1 6.8 07/17/2019 10:55 1 6.8 07/17/2019 10:56 1 6.5 07/17/2019 10:57 1 6.1 07/17/2019 10:58 1 6.1

07/17/2019 10:59 1 6

AVERAGE 1 6.359

STACK co TEMP

(PPMVD) (DEG F)

' . - 1 ~ . - . -3.3 207 3.9 207 3.7 206 3.4 206 3.7 206 3.3 207 3.7 206 3.5 205 3.2 205 3.4 205 3.3 206 3.3 206 3.6 206 3.6 205 3.2 205 2.9 205 3.2 205 3.1 205 3.3 205 3.6 205 4.2 205 3.9 206

3.468 206

FURNACE BURN

TEMP SCRUBBER SLUDGE


(DEG DP FEED

(%) @7% MODE co

F) (IN-WC) (LBS/HR) (PPMVD) (MINUTES) @7%

(PPMVD)

I l ~- l - - . - - - - .. -

1446 63.8 11351 4.18 3.1 0 3.1 1447 63.3 12019 4.18 3.6 0 3.6 1446 63.4 12416 4.18 3.5 0 3.S 1447 63.8 7157 4.18 3.2 0 3.2 1447 63.6 11867 4.18 3.6 0 3.6 1447 63.6 12148 4.18 3.2 0 3.2 1448 63.6 12305 4.18 3.6 0 3.6 1449 63.4 12329 4.18 3.3 0 3.3 1449 63.6 12302 4.18 3.1 0 3.1 1449 63.5 12258 4.23 3.2 0 3.2 1450 63.9 12291 4.21 3.1 0 3.1 1450 63.7 12300 4.2 3.1 0 3.1 1449 63.3 12223 4.24 3.4 0 3.4 1450 63.5 12053 4.18 3.4 0 3.4 1450 63.8 12061 4.18 3.1 0 3.1 1450 63,6 12254 4.18 2.9 0 2.9 1450 63.5 12350 4.18 3.1 0 3.1 1450 63.9 12360 4.18 3.1 0 3.1 1449 63.8 12413 4.22 3.2 0 3.2 1449 63.7 12511 4.42 3.4 0 3.4 1448 63.7 12543 4.42 3.9 0 3.9 1448 63.8 12498 4.42 3.7 0 3.7

1449 63.6 12000 4.22 3.309 0 3.309

§ 0 0)

>(/)

I (J1 CX) (,.) (,.) 0

f ~ N (,.) (J1

0) (,.)

0 -->. ->.

co

1 MINUTE REPORT

COMPANY: VANCOUVER WESTSIDE WRF LOCATION: VANCOUVER WA SOURCE: FLUIDIZED BED INCINERATOR CEMS ID: 1234567 DATE CREATED: 07/17/2019@ 12:07 PERIOD: 07/17/2019 00:00 - 07/17/2019 23:59

SOURCE 02

DATE-TIME ON (%)

(MINS)

Run 6 ' . I 07/17/2019 11:07 1 6.5

07/17/2019 11:08 1 6.3

07/17/2019 11:09 1 6.2

07/17/2019 11:10 1 6.2

07/17/2019 11:11 1 6.2

07/17/2019 11:12 1 6.3

07/17/201911:13 1 6.5

07/17/201911:14 1 6.7

07/17/2019 11:15 1 6.6 07/17/2019 11:16 1 6.4 07/17/201911:17 1 6.2

07/17/2019 11:18 1 6.1

07/17/2019 11:19 1 5.9

07/17/2019 11:20 1 6.1 07/17/2019 11:21 1 6.2 07/17/2019 11:22 1 6.3 07/17/2019 11:23 1 6.5

07/17/2019 11:24 1 6.7

07/17/201911:25 1 6.7 07/17/2019 11:26 1 6.5

07/17/2019 11:27 1 6.4

07/17/2019 11:28 . 1 6.5

AVERAGE 1 6.364



' ~

3.8 207 1445 4.2 207 1445 4.2 207 1444 3.7 207 1444 3.8 207 1444 3.8 207 1444 3.5 207 1444 3.4 207 1443 3.6 207 1442 3.6 207 1442

4 207 1441 4.2 207 1441 4.5 207 1441 4.3 207 1441 4.5 207 1440 4.2 207 1440 4.1 207 1440

3.9 207 1440 4.3 207 1440 4 207 1439 4 207 1438

3.3 206 1439

3.950 207 1442

BURN SCRUBBER SLUDGE co STARTUP MODE

MOISTURE OP FEED @7% MODE co

(IN-WC) (LBS/ HR) (%)

(PPMVD) (MINUTES) @7%

(PPMVD)

: ,~ 1f. - l .... , ~ -~ ,,

63.6 12449 4.42 3.6 0 3.6 63.5 12475 4.42 4 0 4 63.8 12559 4.42 4 0 4 63.9 12545 4.42 3.6 0 3.6 63.6 12518 4.42 3.6 0 3.6 63.9 12598 4.42 3.6 0 3.6 63.6 12594 4.42 3.4 0 3.4 63.4 12626 4.42 3.4 0 3.4 63.7 12589 4.42 3.5 0 3.5 63.8 12566 4.42 3.4 0 3.4 63.7 12497 4.42 3.8 0 3.8 63.9 12534 4.42 3.9 0 3.9 64 12S36 4.42 4.2 0 4.2

63.7 12495 4.42 4.1 0 4.1 63.6 12510 4.42 4.3 0 4.3 63.6 12486 4.42 4 0 4 64 12573 4.42 3.9 0 3.9

63.5 12608 4.42 3.8 0 3.8 63.7 12640 4.42 4.2 0 4.2 63.6 12658 4.42 3.9 0 3.9 63.9 12568 4.42 3.8 0 3.8 63.6 12492 4.3 3.2 0 3.2

63.7 12551 4.41 3.782 0 3.782

§ 0

~ (/)

I

C.TI CXl c.,J c.,J 0 co :p,

~ c.,J C.TI

0) .J:,,.

0 ....,, .... .... co

1 MINUTE REPORT

COMPANY: LOCATION:

SOURCE:

CEMS ID:

DATE CREATED:

PERIOD:

DATE-TIME

Run.7~ - -07/17/2019 11:35

07/17/2019 11:36

07/17/2019 11:37

07/17/2019 11:38

07/17/2019 11:39

07/17/2019 11:40

07/17/2019 11:41 07/17/2019 11:42 07/17/2019 11:43

07/17/2019 11:44

07/17/2019 11:45 07/17/2019 11:46

07/17/2019 11:47

07/17/2019 11:48

07/17/2019 11:49

07/17/2019 11:50 07/17/2019 11:51 07/17/2019 11:52

07/17/2019 11:53

07/17/2019 11:54

07/17/2019 11:55

07/17/2019 11:56

Average

VANCOUVER WESTSIDE WRF VANCOUVER WA

FLUIDIZED BED INCINERATOR

1234567

07/17/2019 @ 14:19

07/17/2019 11:20 - 07/17/2019 13:30

STACK SOURCE

02 co TEMP ON

(%) (PPMVD) (DEG (MINS)

F)

·~:, )I • •, .

- a' - " = .- ' -1 7.4 3.8 205

1 7.3 3.6 205

1 7.4 3.4 204 1 7.5 3.3 203

1 7.5 2.6 203

1 7.6 2.5 203 1 7.7 2.6 202 1 7.2 2.9 202 1 7.3 2.5 202

1 7.2 2.6 203

1 6.8 2.7 203 1 6.8 2.8 203 1 6.9 2.6 203

1 7.1 2.5 203 1 7 2.5 203

1 6.9 2.8 203 1 7.1 2.6 202

1 7.3 2.5 202

1 7.2 2.6 202

1 7.3 2.5 201

1 7 3.1 202

1 7.1 3 202

1 7.209 2.818 203

FURNACE BURN SCRUBBER SLUDGE co STARTUP MODE TEMP MOISTURE

(DEG DP FEED

(%) @7% MODE co

F) {IN-WC} (LBS/ HR) (PPMVD) (MINUTES) @7%

(PPMVD)

" ".J ...... i . I '~ - - "- ~~

1440 63.6 12723 4.15 3.9 0 3.9 1440 63.2 12650 4.18 3.7 0 3.7 1439 63.3 12571 4.13 3.5 0 3.5 1439 63.4 12635 4.04 3.4 0 3.4 1439 63.5 12645 4.04 2.7 0 2.7 1440 63.5 12586 4.04 2.6 0 2.6 1439 63.1 12514 4.04 2.7 0 2.7 1439 63.3 12487 4.04 3 0 3 1438 63.4 12629 4.04 2.6 0 2.6 1438 63.7 12613 4.04 2.7 0 2.7 1438 63.5 12610 4.05 2.7 0 2.7 1439 63.4 12494 4.06 2.7 0 2.7 1439 63.6 12591 4.04 2.6 0 2.6 1439 63.7 12542 4.04 2.5 0 2.5 1439 63.2 12539 4.04 2.5 0 2.5 1439 63.3 12501 4.04 2.8 0 2.8 1439 63.4 12461 4.04 2.7 0 2.7 1439 63.7 12559 4.04 2.5 0 2.5 1440 63.7 12595 4.04 2.6 0 2.6 1440 63.7 12561 4.04 2.6 0 2.6 1439 63.6 12680 4.04 3.1 0 3.1 1440 63.5 12603 4.17 3 0 3

1439 63.5 12581 4.06 2.868 0 2.868

§ 0 O') )> CJ)

I

CJ1 co c...., c...., 0 co ~ :;o -;--1 N c...., CJ1

O') CJ1 0 .... ->. ->. co

1 MINUTE REPORT

COMPANY:

LOCATION:

SOURCE:

CEMS ID:

DATE CREATED: PERIOD:

DATE-TIME

!Run s ~

07/17/2019 12:05 07/17/2019 12:06

07/17/2019 12:07

07/17/2019 12:08

07/17/2019 12:09

07/17/2019 12:10

07/17/2019 12:11

07/17/2019 12:12

07/17/2019 12:13

07/17/2019 12:14 07/17/2019 12:15 07/17/2019 12:16

07/17/2019 12:17

07/17/2019 12:18 07/17/2019 12:19 07/17/2019 12:20

07/17/2019 12:21

07/17/2019 12:22

07/17/2019 12:23 07/17/2019 12:24

07/17/2019 12:25

07/17/2019 12:26

Average

VANCOUVER WESTSIDE WRF

VANCOUVER WA


1234567 07/17/2019@ 14:19

07/17/2019 11:20 - 07/17/2019 13:30

SOURCE 02

ON (%)

(MINS)

.. I ..

1 7.5 1 7.7

1 7.6

1 7.3

1 7.5

1 7.5

1 7.3

1 7.4

1 7.3

1 7.4 1 7.4

1 7.4

1 7.5

1 7.5 1 7.8

1 7.6

1 7.4

1 7.5

1 7.6

1 7.5

1 7.4

1 7.5

1 7.482

STACK FURNACE

co TEMP TEMP {PPMVD) (DEG (DEG

F) F)

" ,, .. .. -2.6 202 1439 2.5 201 1440 2.5 201 1439

2.7 201 1438

2.7 201 1439

2.6 201 1438

2.5 201 1438 2.6 201 1439

2.7 201 1439 2.6 201 1438 2.7 201 1438 2.5 201 1438

2.5 201 1438

2.6 201 1438 2.4 201 1439 2.4 201 1438 2.7 201 1439

2.7 202 1439

2.5 202 1439 2.6 202 1438

2.6 202 1438 2.6 202 1438

2.582 201 1439

BURN SCRUBBER SLUDGE co STARTUP MODE MOISTURE

DP FEED {%1

@7% MODE co (IN-WC) (LBS/HRI (PPMVD) (MINUTES) @7%

(PPMVD) °;;";" .......

I ~ · ~ _,., I

- - - - _..,_j l,,;....; - ,. ~

63.1 12524 4.04 2.7 0 2.7 63.4 12419 4.04 2.6 0 2.6 63.4 12548 4.04 2.6 0 2.6 63.1 12590 4.04 2.8 0 2.8 63.3 12591 4.04 2.8 0 2.8 63.4 12467 4.04 2.7 0 2.7 63.7 1 2479 4.04 2.6 0 2.6 63.3 12504 4.04 2.7 0 2.7 63.3 12544 4.04 2.7 0 2.7 63.6 12461 4.04 2.7 0 2.7 63.6 12453 4.04 2.8 0 2.8 63.6 12598 4.04 2.6 0 2.6 63.6 12498 4.04 2.6 0 2.6 63.7 12433 4.04 2.7 0 2.7 63.6 12407 4.04 2.5 0 2.5 63.7 12394 4.04 2.5 0 2.5 63.6 12471 4.04 2.8 0 2.8 63.6 12378 4.04 2.8 0 2.8 63.3 12383 4.04 2.6 0 2.6 63.6 12399 4.04 2.7 0 2.7 63.4 12484 4.04 2.7 0 2.7 63.4 12417 4.04 2.7 0 2.7

63.5 12475 4.04 2.677 0 2.677

§ 0 0) )> (/)

I

CJ1 CX) w c..> 0 c.o t> ::u -;-l N (,J CJ1

0) 0)

0 -...>. ...>.

c.o

1 MINUTE REPORT

COMPANY:

LOCATION: SOURCE:

CEMS ID: DATE CREATED:

PERIOD:

DATE-TIME

Run9 ,. 07/17/2019 12:35 07/17/2019 12:36 07/17/2019 12:37

07/17/2019 12:38

07/17/2019 12:39

07/17/2019 12:40

07/17/2019 12:41

07/17/ 2019 12:42

07/17/ 2019 12:43

07/17/2019 12:44

07/ 17/2019 12:45 07/17/2019 12:46 07/17/2019 12:47

07/17/2019 12:48

07/17/2019 12:49

07/ 17/ 2019 12:50 07/17/2019 12:51

07/17/ 2019 12:52 07/ 17/ 2019 12:53

07/ 17/2019 12:54

07/17/2019 12:55

07/17/2019 12:56

Average



1234567

07/17/2019@14:19

07/17/2019 11:20 - 07/17/ 2019 13:30

SOURCE 02

ON (%)

(MINS)

'.): - __ , -- ...,.,". 1 7.6 1 7.4

1 7.2

1 7

1 7

1 7

1 6.8

1 7.5

1 8

1 7.7

1 7.4

1 7.6

1 7.6

1 7.3

1 7.3

1 7.3

1 7.4

1 7.2

1 7.2

1 7.4

1 7.7

1 7.8

1 7.382

STACK

co TEMP (PPMVD) (DEG

F)

r

=· 'T' • .-,,,

2.8 201

2.6 200

2.6 200

2.7 201

2.7 201

2.8 202

3 202 2.8 202

2.6 202 2.7 201

2.7 201

2.7 201

2.7 201 2.7 - 200

2.7 200

2.9 201

2.9 200

2.9 200

3 200 2.9 200

2.7 201

2.6 201

2.759 201

FURNACE BURN

SCRUBBER SLUDGE co STARTUP MODE TEMP MOISTURE (DEG

DP FEED (%)

@7% MODE co (iN-WC) (LBS/ HR) (PPMVD) (MINUTES) @7% F)

(PPMVD)

I 1- " - ~ -~ .i ..I.. - I ~ - .'J ·-~ -1439 63.5 12414 4.04 2.9 0 2.9 1439 63.8 12467 4.04 2.7 0 2.7 1438 63.5 12501 4.07 2.6 0 2.6 1438 63.9 12475 4.18 2.7 0 2.7 1437 63.8 12449 4.18 2.7 0 2.7 1436 63.5 12369 4.18 2.8 0 2.8 1437 63.6 12420 4.15 2.9 0 2.9 1436 63.5 12447 4.04 2.9 0 2.9 1437 63.7 12261 4.04 2.8 0 2.8 1437 63.5 12312 4.04 2.8 0 2.8 1437 63.7 12303 4.04 2.8 0 2.8 1437 63.8 12389 4.04 2.8 0 2.8 1437 63.2 12304 4.04 2.8 0 2.8 1437 63.6 12319 4.04 2.8 0 2.8 1436 63.7 12426 4.04 2.8 0 2.8 1437 63.6 12380 4.04 2.9 0 2.9 1437 63.7 12365 4.04 2.9 0 2.9

1437 63.7 12308 4.04 2.9 0 2.9 1437 63.5 12302 4.04 3 0 3 1437 63.4 12104 4.04 3 0 3 1437 63.5 11928 4.04 2.8 0 2.8 1438 63.4 11880 4.04 2.8 0 2.8

1437 63.6 12324 4.07 2.823 0 2.823

~ 0 0) )> (/)

I c.n CXl vJ vJ 0 (0 )>

I

;;o -;--l N vJ c.n

0) -....J 0 -....>. ....>.

(0

1 MINUTE REPORT

COMPANY: LOCATION: SOURCE:

CEMS ID:

DATE CREATED:

PERIOD:

DATE-TIME

RunlO' 07/17/2019 13:03 07/17/2019 13:04

07/17/2019 13:05

07/17/2019 13:06

07/17/2019 13:07

07/17/2019 13:08

07/17/2019 13:09

07/17/2019 13:10

07/17/2019 13:11

07/17/2019 13:12 07/17/2019 13:13 07/17/2019 13:14

07/17/2019 13:15 07/17/2019 13:16 07/17/2019 13:17

07/17/2019 13:18

07/17/2019 13:19 07/17/2019 13:20

07 /17 /201913:21 07/17/2019 13:22

07/17/2019 13:23

07/17/2019 13:24

Average


FLUIDIZED BED INCINERATOR 1234567

07/ 17/2019@ 14:19

07/17/2019 11:20 - 07/17/2019 13:30

SOURCE 02

ON (%)

(MINS)

,, ' 1 8.4

1 8.3

1 8.2

1 8.1

1 8.3

1 8.1

1 8.1

1 8 .3

1 8.3

1 8.3 1 8 .3 l 8 .2

1 8.4 1 8 .1 1 8.1

1 8.1

1 8.1 1 8 1 7.9 1 8.1

1 8

1 8.1

1 8.173

STACK FURNACE

co TEMP TEMP (PPMVD) (DEG (DEG

F) F)

- --' ,L 2.6 199 1438 2.8 199 1438 2.9 199 1437

2.8 198 1437

2.9 198 1438

3.1 198 1438

2.8 199 1438

2.8 198 1438

2.8 198 1438

Z.8 198 1438

2.9 198 1438 2.9 198 1438 2.6 198 1437 2.8 198 1438 2.8 198 1438 2.7 198 1438

2.7 198 1438

2.7 198 1438

2.7 198 1438 2.7 198 1438 2.8 198 1438 2.6 198 1439

2.782 198 1438

BURN SCRUBBER SLUDGE


DP FEED (%)

@7% MODE co (IN-WC) (LBS/ HR) (PPMVD) (MINUTES) @7%

(PPMVD)

j ~ i i:_:_ ' {! .- - ' ._."' " - ~ . - =- ,....,.,.:..;--., ·-63.6 11916 3.95 2.9 0 2.9 63.4 12038 3.95 3.1 0 3.1 63.6 12040 3.95 3.1 0 3.1 63.S 12055 3.95 3 0 3 63.5 12020 3.95 3.2 0 3.2 63.5 12008 3.95 3.3 0 3.3 63.3 11972 3.95 3 0 3 63.5 12054 3.95 3.1 0 3.1 63.3 12012 3.95 3.1 0 3.1 63.5 11850 3.95 3.1 0 3.1 63.4 11875 3.95 3.2 0 3.2 63.6 11921 3.95 3.1 0 3.1 63.6 11949 3.95 2.9 0 2.9 63.3 11878 3.95 3 0 3 63.1 11856 3.95 3 0 3 63.4 11873 3.95 2.9 0 2.9 63.5 11905 3.95 2.9 0 2.9 63.6 12077 3.95 2.9 0 2.9 63.5 12066 3.95 2.9 0 2.9 63.5 11982 3.95 2.9 0 2.9 63.4 12034 3.95 3 0 3 63.6 11988 3.95 2.8 0 2.8

63.5 11971 3.95 3.018 0 3.018


APPENDIX D QUALITY ASSURANCE/QUALITY CONTROL

W006AS-583309A-RT-235 68 of 119

City of Vancouver Westside Water Reclamation Facility Fluidized Bed Incinerator 2019 Source Test Report - FBI RAT A (02 & CO)

Appendix D.1 Quality Assurance Program Summary and

Equipment Calibration Schedule

W006AS-583309A-RT-235 69 of 119

QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM SUMMARY AND CERTIFICATIONS

Montrose Air Quality Services, LLC (Montrose) ensures the quality and validity of its emission measurement and reporting procedures through a rigorous quality assurance (QA) program. The program is developed and administered by internal QA personnel and encompasses seven major areas:

1. Development and use of an internal QA manual 2. QA reviews of reports, laboratory work, and field testing 3. Equipment calibration and maintenance 4. Chain of custody 5. Continuous training 6. Knowledge of current test methods 7. Audit program

Each of these areas is discussed individually below.

Quality Assurance Manual. Montrose has prepared a QA Manual according to EPA guidelines and ASTM 0-7036. The manual serves to document and formalize all of Montrose's QA efforts. The manual is constantly updated, and each employee involved in technical services for emission measurements is required to read, understand its contents, and sign a statement that all work they perform will conform to its practices. The manual includes details on the other seven QA areas discussed below.

QA Reviews. Montrose 's review procedure includes review of each source test report by the QA Manager or equivalent position including data input, calculations and averages, and report text. The laboratory manager or equivalent reviews all laboratory work, and the qualified individual on-site reviews all field work and data sheets.

The most important review is the one that takes place before a test program begins. The QA Manager works with testing personnel to prepare and review test protocols. Test protocol review includes selection of appropriate test procedures, evaluation of any interferences or other restrictions that might preclude use of standard test procedures, and evaluation and/or development of alternate procedures.

Equipment Calibration and Maintenance. The equipment used to conduct the emission measurements is maintained according to the manufacturer's instructions to ensure proper operation. In addition to the maintenance program, calibrations are carried out on each measurement device according to the schedule outlined below. The schedules for maintenance and calibrations are given in Tables A-1 and A-2.

Quality control checks are also conducted in the field for each test program. A partial list of checks made as part of each continuous analyzer system test series is included below as an example of the field QA procedures.

• Sample acquisition and conditioning system leak check • 3-point analyzer calibrations (all analyzers) • Complete system calibration check ("dynamic calibration" through entire sample system)

W006AS-583309A-RT-235 70 of 119

• Periodic analyzer calibration checks are conducted at the start and end of each test run. Any change between pre- and post-test readings are recorded.

• All calibrations are conducted using EPA Protocol gases certified by the manufacturer • Calibration and continuous analyzer performance data are fully documented, and are

included in each source test report

Chain of Custody. Montrose maintains full chain of custody documentation on all samples and data sheets. In addition to normal documentation of changes between field sample custodians, laboratory personnel, and field test personnel, Montrose documents every individual who handles any test component in the field (e.g., probe wash, impinger loading and recovery, filter loading and recovery, etc.).

Samples are stored in a locked area to which only laboratory personnel have access. Neither other Montrose employees nor cleaning crews have keys to this area.

Training. Personnel training is essential to ensure quality testing. Montrose has formal and informal training programs which may include some or all of the following:

1. Attendance at EPA-sponsored training courses 2. A requirement for all technicians to read, understand, and sign Montrose 's QA Manual 3. In-house training and Montrose meetings on a regular basis 4. Maintenance of training records 5. Administration of internal qualified individual (QI) tests for all methods performed 6. Participation in the Qualified Source Testing Individual (QSTI) program administered by

the Source Evaluation Society (SES)

Knowledge of Current Test Methods. With the constant updating of standard test methods and the wide variety of emerging test methods, it is essential that any qualified source tester keep abreast of new developments. Montrose subscribes to services which provide updates on EPA reference methods, and on EPA and local agency rules and regulations. Additionally, source test personnel regularly attend and present papers at testing and emission-related seminars and conferences.

Audit Program. Montrose participates in the TNI Stationary Source Audit Sample (SSAS) audit program for all methods for which audit samples are available.

W006AS-583309A-RT-235 71 of 119

TABLE A-1 SAMPLING INSTRUMENTS AND

EQUIPMENT CALIBRATION SCHEDULE

Instrument Type Frequency of Standard of Comparison Acceptance Limits Calibration1 or Method of Calibration

Orifice Meter(large) 12 months Calibrated dry test meter ± 2% of volume measured

Dry Gas Meter 6 months or when Calibrated dry test meter ± 2% of volume measured

repaired Critical Orifice 6 months Calibrated dry test meter ± 0.5% of average K'

S-Type Pitot (for use Geometric measurements with EPA-type 6 months EPA Method 2 within method-specified sampling train) ranges

\

Vacuum Gauges 12 months NIST-traceable gauge :s 1.0 in Hg difference Temperature NBS mercury thermometer ±4 °F for <400 °F Measurement 12 months or NBS calibrated platinum ± 1.5% for >400 °F

(thermocouples) , RTD Temperature Readout

6 months Thermocouple simulator ± 2% full scale reading Devices

Analytical Balance 12 months (check NIST-traceable weights ± 0.5 mg of stated weight prior to each use)

Range <± 0.10 mm for Probe Nozzles 12 months Nozzle diameter check micrometer three

measurements

Every field day, As specified by manufacturers'

Continuous Analyzers Depends upon operating manuals, EPA

Satisfy all limits specified use, frequency in operating specifications

and performance NBS gases and/or reference methods

1 The tabulated calibration frequencies are minimum standards. In certain instances, calibrations are performed more frequently.

W006AS-583309A-RT-235 72 of 119

TABLE A-2 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE SCHEDULE

Based on Manufacturer's Specifications and Montrose's Experience

Equipment Performance Requirement Maintenance Corrective Action lnterval2

1. Absence of leaks 1. Visual inspection

Pumps 2. Ability to draw

6 months 2. Clean

manufacturer required 3. Replace worn parts vacuum and flow 4. Leak check

Flow 1. Free mechanical 1. Visual inspection Measuring movement 6 months 2. Clean

Device 2. Absence of malfunction 3. Calibrate

Sampling 1. Absence of malfunction

As required by the As recommended by Instruments

2. Proper response to zero, manufacturer manufacturer

span gas

Mobile Van 1. Change filters

Sampling Absence of leaks Depends on nature 2. Leak check

of use 3. Check for system Systems

contamination Sampling Sample degradation less After each test or Blow filtered air through line

Lines than 2% test series until dry

2 The tabulated maintenance intervals are minimum standards. In certain instances, maintenance is performed more frequently.

W006AS-583309A-RT-235 73 of 119


Appendix D.2 ASTM D-7036 Accreditation and QI Certificates

W006AS-583309A-RT-235 74 of 119

§ 0 CJ) )> (./)

I 01 CX) <.,J <.,J 0 (0

=!> ::0 -;-I "' <.,J 01

-..J 01 0 -->. ->. (0

STA<! STAC1CTESTIN~ ACCREDITATION COUNOl

~· ~ · ·~;~~~ . "'-

, ·~~

~it\ .'3J /J .I American Association for Laboratory Accreditation

Accredited Air Emission Testing Body A2LA has accredited

MONTROSE AIR QUALITY SERVICES

In recognition of the successful completion of the joint A2LA and Stack Testing Accreditation Council (STAC) evaluation process, this laboratory is accredited to perform testing activities in compliance with

ASTM D7036:2004 - Standard Practice for Competence of Air Emission Testing Bodies.

Presented this 5th day of March 2018.

,& President a nd CEO For the Accreditation Council Certificate Number 3925.01 Valid to February 29, 2020

This accreditation program is not included under the A2LA ILAC Mutual Recognition Arrangement.

[1, . .

ti

,P.

soUR.CE EVALUATION SOCIET~

~ Qualified Source Test.ing Individual

LET IT BE KNOWN THAT

JOSHUA E. MUSWIECK HAS SUCCESSFULLY PASSED A COMPREHENSIVE EXAMINATION AND SATISFIED

EXPERIENCE REQUIREMENTS IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE GUIDELINES ISSUED BY THE SES QUALIFIED SOURCE TEST INDIVIDUAL REVIEW BOARD FOR

GAS,EiOUS POLLUTANTS INSTRUMENTAL SAMPLING METHODS

ISSUED THIS 47TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2017 AND EFFECTIVE UNTIL FEBRUARY 26TH, 2022

~~ c:1~~ J. W.de Bke, QSTVQSTO R,v-,_w 80flrd

~). t~·.-;1---~I/!:. ;ro;r=-,--Karen D. ~/ya-N/lq , QSTVQSTO R..,,_ Board -~ ... - . - --· -···· --J?/~

""'.,. ::,. MIQ/ntl, y::;TVQSTO Revfew Board

~7>1.~ T11eresa Lowe, QSTIJQSTO Review Board Bruce Randall QSTVQSTO Rwtew Board

-- ···--~----- ------- - --------------

CERTIFICATE NO.

2017-982

MONTROSE f- ,-.; \I I R l) .-..; M ~ ~ f ,-.. l

Qualified Individual Conformance Statement

__ ili_.0...<-.5h-'--',-~-- =4 ..... l"-'----'-;e_v_k ___ , as a QI (Qualified Individual) sign this

Conformance Statement to verify that each of the test projects that I perform, and

each of the test projects performed under my supervision will conform with the

Montrose Air Quality Services Management System, the test methods applicable to

the testing, and ASTM D 7036-04.

I realize that as a Qualified Individual I have the proper knowledge to perform these

tests correctly, and that I am held to a high standard of integrity.

/2 -2-2 ,.f / Date

W006AS-583309A-RT-235 77 of 119


Appendix D.3 Reference Method Analyzer Calibration Data

W006AS-583309A-RT-235 78 of 11 9

~ J MONTROSE fNVIRONMlNII\I.

!N.a.m_e: 102-12 ! Make/Model: I Servomex 1400 i

:2sA o~ 7E: ;7E

I voltage max: I

!voltage offset: 0

\Ra~ge: 25

jUpscale: 'Downscale:

I ;fero ]".lumber: . 9 c201789 '_f _ero C:on_!:: ; 0

; ~ow Nul_!l~~r: 1Low Cone: -·---- ..•.. ··-! Mid !'/u111_b_er: ' CCI '?6377

'Mid Cone: : IQ)1 i }!igh Number: : CC40998N

._l:l!gh g one: ~0.93

l!i_a~ !'!umber_: .9C:!J6377 .Bias Cone: ; IQ.14

MAQDAQ 1.0 ' Project Name: Jacobs/City of 'Project Number: 006AS-' Vancouver WWRF · 583309

R_lln Len~~:-~ I 'Traverse: True

, Record Interval: 6 .. .. - .

, Ports:

: CEMS Operator: Josh :Mus_wieck

'Av_erl!ge Interval: 60 ' Points per P.Ort: 3

Analyzer Configuration ' ' C0-529

' Teledyne T300M 1

7E

I JO 'o , 10

C:C201789

0

CC701414

4.06

CC:}998_23

8:~3_4 CC701414

4.06

Cylinder Information

W006AS-583309A-RT-235 Page I

79 of 119

Unit/Condition: FBI/ Scrubber Exhaust .. -· --· . ·-Tripl_Lcate Signp!i11g: Fal~.e

i ~AQ Device: DT9806(00)

Jul 17 2019 - 08:27:30

~ MAQDAQ 1.0

'Project Name: Jacobs/City of Project Number: 006AS-yari~o_llv'<! WWRF 583309

. R.,un L.e.ngt.h.: ~ 1 ! g,ec9rd fo!erval: 6

MONTROSE ; Trave~~e: Trt1e ; p9rt.s.: I

"[ I'< V I R (' N M I. N I ,\ I.

!Name: 0,2-12

i Make/Model: Servomex 1400

l 2SA or 7E: 7E

Zero: ' 0.000

Low:

iMid: I . 10.14

' High: 20.93

Zero reading: -0.008

Low_ reading: 0.000

~d re_ad~g:. · 10.16

!Ugh ~ea<!_i~g: . 20.94

Calibration ·~,<)-529

!Teledyne IT300M

7E


,o.ooo

;4.060

8.834

Calibratio? Readings

-0.03 1

0.000

' 4.202

8.668

: CEMS Operator: Josh M\lswi~ck

; A_yerage Ixitervat: 69 Points per portc 3

Zero %Err: <2.0 -0.038


-0.351

'Mid %Err: <2.0 0.096 1.607

, ff.:igli _ 'y._Err:. <2.0 , 0_:048 - 1.879

Page I

W006AS-583309A-RT-235 80 of 119

1Unit/Condition: FBI/ · Scrubber Exhaust

. . . ·-· ··-'Tripl.i~-~te Sampl_i!,1g: F~!!le. 'DAQ pevice: DI9~9§(00)

Jul 17 2019 - 08:27:30

~ MAQDAQ 1.0

I Project Name: Jacobs/City of : Project Number: 006AS-I Vancouver WWRF 583309

i R,u~ i,,e_~gth: 2 j' . 'Re~o~d-Interyal: 6

MONTROSE [ Tr.av~rs~: True_

ENVIRll N MLNf .\ l.

•Name: 102-12

I Make/Model: Servomex !~OQ

• 25~ or 7E: 1 7E

Zero: ' 0.000

'Low:

!'11~.: High:

/ 10,1_4

,20.93

Zero reading: • -0.008

· Lo~. re_l!d]ng! : QJ)QO 'Mid r~adJ'!g:_ ' 1Q.l6

High r~a_ding: J_0.94

Ports:

Initial bias C0-529

IT;l;dyne TIOOM

i7~


!o.ooo

;4_,96Q : 8.834


, -0.031

' 0.000 14.202

8.668

. CEMS Operator: Josh -Muswieck

; l\ v_er!!gefoterval: 60

, Poin_ts_ p~r port: 3


~~o%~rr: ,Mid %Err: I .~ --

H1g~ °(oE_rr~

<2.0 ' -0.038

<2.0 0.096

·<2.0 0.048

Zero reading: 0.085

Span reading: : I 0.23

1 Zero % bias: <5.0 0.444

, Span % bias: <5.0 0.334

W006AS-583309A-RT-235

!-O)J l , 1.607

:-1,?.72

0.127

4.171

, 1.789

•-0.35 1

Initial Bias Data

Page I

81 of 119

!I Unit/Condition: FBI / Scrubber Exhaust

rT~ipiicat~-Sa~piing: False

I DAQ D~vi;e; DT9806(00)

Jul 17 2019 • 08:35:31

INTERFERENCE RESPONSE TEST

Date of Test: 1/24/02 Name: Mike Eisele Analyzer: Type/ Model: Oz I Servomex 1400 Serial Number: 000012

Concentration, % of Span Test Gas ppmv or% Analyzer Output Response, % (25 %) S02 170.3 ppmv 0.0 0.0 *CO2 10.5% 0.0 0.0 **CO 510.6 ppmv 0.0 0.0

*Used bottle of CO2 at 100% concentration and diluted it with 100% N2 to get a concentration of about 10% CO2.

**Used CO mix cylinder with 2553 ppmv CO and diluted it with 100% N2 to get a concentration of about 500 ppmv.

Bias Check: Test Gas Concentration,% 02 20.95

Performance Specifications:

Analyzer EPA Ref. Method

6C 6C 6C 20

Allowable Interference (% of analyzer span) 7% 7% 7% 2%

Bias Check % 0.6

Gas Values To Introduce Into Analyzers (EPA Method 20) 200±20 ppm 20.9±1 percent 10±1 percent 500±50 ppm

Note: Concentration for S02 was slightly lower than listed; 170.3 ppmv was the closest concentration cylinder available at the time of the interference checks.

W006AS-583309A-RT-235 82 of 119

INTERFERENCE RESPONSE TEST

Date of Test: 8/25/2017 Name: Josh Muswieck Analyzer: Type/ Model: CO, CO2/ Teledyne T300M Serial Number: 92/ PN # 070320000

Method Referenced: EPA Method 7E

CO Results·

Concentration, Analyzer Output Response Test Gas ppmv or% ppmv S02 27.02 -0.342 02 21.05 -0.112 CO2 18.01 -1.194 NO 47.89 -0.006 N02 50.08 -0.0131 Ch4 50.66 0.14

Interference% of Span (124.7 ppmv) .274 .089 .957 .005 .011 .112

A Calibration Cylinder containing 124. 7 ppmv Carbon Monoxide was used to Span Analyzer

Results: Max Allowable

Sum of Absolute Sum of Individual Gases Percent of Span Test Gas Differences Percent Interferences Interference (%) co 1.8071 1.448 2.5

CO2 Results· Interference%

Concentration, Analyzer Output Response of Span Test Gas ppmv or% % (18.01%) S02 27.02 -0.001 .006 02 21 .05 -0.003 .017 co 124.7 0.290 1.6 NO 47.89 0.000 0.000 N02 50.08 -0.001 0.006 Ch4 50.66 -0.001 0.006

W006AS-583309A-RT-235 83 of 119

A Calibration Cylinder containing 18.01 % Carbon Dioxide was used to Span Analyzer

Results: Max Allowable

Sum of Absolute Sum of Individual Gases % Percent of Span Test Gas Differences % Interferences Interference (%) CO2 0.296 1.635 2.5

W006AS-583309A-RT-235 84 of 11 9

CEMS CONFIGURATION DATA Project Information

Client I Facility . Jt~l, c1!,s . /ti~ qf Vl1'1l<14vlr Vv'\y' R J= Source I Location · · · ·F B;t 1 /Q; ".ft / · ·; a Bt i/J, · , · · · ·.· · · ·.· · · · • Test Dates . ]; - 11-14 ' . Project Mana.ger I ~am (i~itials) -- -~ . ~4}_/ p B A &

Project No.~() .. · · •. ,~

Method(s) . · /ri ·- ··~

Analyzers In.Service ... ·~ ... , -·

Please circle all applicable (fJ CO2 @ NOx S02 -·· ··· ... . Rtisponse 1:'irne (seconds) ~ 'l 0

TRS THC

Filtration (circle) ~-FIiter Type In-Stack Sintered Other

Filter Material Glass N/A Other

. .

-· Sample Probe (circle)

Length 6' 8' 10' 12' 14' Other ----'---Material ~ Glass Teflon Titanium Quartz lnconel other

Heated

PrC>be Temperature

Trap Material

Leak Checks

Pre-Test

Post-Test

System Flow Rate

Leak Rate

Yes ;@ OF ..

Steel

Go/ .....

An~e

@las;> J

Q~"lioil., ~@ ')..,'1 in. Hg

Q O '7.,,/• llfls. @ Z.. vi in. Hg

-is r,., ,,, cni

Post~Test-:C~) . _. 100 = 0 %

System Flow Rate (cfh)

Fill In locations of elements of the CEM system, as applicable

Electric

Teflon

Q9 = Cal Tee D = Filter Legend

Stack :

. ·A

·O = Heated

Pump

1......,, __ --'n,..·r ·..,..:-t-l \---~ ' ~

Upstream of conditioner Sample Line Length ...._

Sample Line Material

Sample Line Temp.

feet

X = Sample

Split

If.this information·{~ not accurate for all runs, note exceptions here.

W006AS-583309A-RT-235 85 of 119

-----,-

Other -----Other

-....--- cfh @ ___ . in. Hg

-----'-'--'-- cfh @ in. Hg

--,---

~ "' Gas Conditioner

0 = Citrate · · · Buffer

0) =Tube

· Furnace

cfh ___ %

Oi. &0

-:--. _ _:..._... _.-4:: , Analyzers

Downstream of conditioner Sample Line Length / 4 0 _ feet

Sample Line Material f't!t, '14'1 Sample Line Temp. Al4t ? . deg F

CEMS Config Data Sheet · RO


W006AS-583309A-RT-235

Appendix D.4 Span Gas Certificates

86 of 119

Airgas. an Air Liquide company

CEllTIFICATE OF BATCH ANALYSIS Grade of Product: CEM-CAL ZERO

Airgas USA, LLC ~ · 525 North Industrial Loop Road Tooele, UT 84074 Airgas.com

0 ~,.

Part Number: NI CZ15A CC708643

Reference Number: 153-401516987-1 142.0 CF Cylinder Analyzed ·

Laboratory: Analysis Date: Lot Number:

Component

NITROGEN CARBON DIOXIDE NOx

., S02 THC

124 - Tooele (SAP) - UT Jun 03, 2019 153-401516987-1

Cylinder Volume: Cylinder Pressure: Valve Outlet:

Expiration Date: Jun 03, 2027

ANALYfICAL RESULTS Requested Purity

99.9995 % < 1.0 PPM < 0.1 PPM < 0.1 PPM < 0.1 PPM

CARBON MONOXIDE < 0.5 PPM

2000 PSIG 580

Certified Concentration

99.9995 % <LDL 0.01 PPM <LDL 0.01 PPM <LDL 0.1 PPM <LDL 0.03 PPM <LDL 0.03 PPM

Permanent Notes:Airgas certifies that the contents of this cylinder meet the requirements of 40 CFR: 72.2

Cylinders in Batch: . . .

ALM-034509, ALM-046745, ALM025754, CC119239, CC16974, CC19131~2}20t~C241534, CC273401, CC325736, CC330632, CC3401 37, CC480630, CC.480641 , CC483919, CC484019, CC484024, CC48f?607, CC487316, CC487479, CC495431, CC702159, CC708643, CC708671, EB0020301, EB0086822, EB0086920, EB0090590, EB0107205, EB0123107, SG-860268, SG9132737BAL

·Impurities verified against analytical standards traceable to NIST by weight and/or analysis.

,-~ ~ ..... · .

A~~f~ P~ge 1 of 153..o401516987-1

W006AS-583309A-RT-235 87 of 11 9

Airuas,. an Air Liquide company

CijRTlFlCATE OFANALYSJS

Part Number: Cylinder Number: Laboratory: PGVP Number: Gas Code:

Grade of Product: EPA Protocol E03Nl80E15A0138 CC156377 124 - Tooele (SAP) - UT 872019 C02,02,BALN

-El!Cplratlcm Date.:

Reference Number: Cylinder Volume: Cylinder Pressure: Valve Outlet: Certification Date:

.Mar 11 2027

Airgas Specialty Gases Airgas USA, LLC 525 North Industrial Loop Road Tooele, UT 84074 Airgas.com

153-401443589-1 150.9 CF 2015 PSIG 590 Mar 11, 2019

. Certlflcalion performed In accordance with 'EPA Traceability Protocol° for Assay and Certification cif Gaseous Calibration Standatds (May 2012)" document EPA 600/R-12/531, using the assay procedures listed Analytical Methodology does not require correction for analytical interference. This cylinder has a total analytical

uncertainly as stated below with a confidence level of 95% There are no significant Impurities which affect the use of this calibraUon mixture All concentrations are on a volume/volume basis unlei;s otherwise no!ed,

. Do Not Use This .Cvlindet.below 100.D$la. Le. 0.7 m!i9aoascals. . . .. .. .. . ... .. . . ·~

ANALYTICAL RESULTS . . . .

Component Requested Actual Protocol Total Relative Assay -~ -· . C9ncentratlon Concentr~tion M~Jti~d Uncertainty D~tea

CARBONDfOXIDE . . 10:00 o/o .. .. . .. 9.924 % --- . .

G1 ..

+/- 0.9% NIST Traceable 03/11/2019 OXYGEN 10.00% 10.14 % G1 +/-0.7% NIST Traceable 03/11/2019

. NITROGEN . .... Balance . .•

OOIBRATION STANDARDS ... .........

Type Lot ID Cylinder No Concentration Uncertainty Expiration Date NTRM 13060628 CC413727 13.359 % CARBON DIOXIDE/NITROGEN 0.6% May 09, 2019 NTRM 98051014 SG9162888_8AL 12.05 % OXYGEN/NITROGEN 0.7% Dec 14, 2023 ..

ANALYTICAL EQUIPMENT l~strume11t!M~ke/ft'l9_c,tel . Analytical Principle Last Multipoint CaUbration . ···-··

! 'Hontia ViA-510 SV4MEUT J CO2 CO2 NDIR (Dixon)· . Feb 20; 201!:i Horiba MPA-510 W603MM58 02 02 Paramagnetic (Mason) Feb 20, 2019

Triad Data Available Upon Request

Page 1 of 153-401443589-1

W006AS-583309A-RT-235 88 'of 119

. .

I .. I

Airgas~ an Air Liquide company

CE.RTIFICA'm OF ANl\.LYSlS Grade of Product: EPA Protocol

Part Number: E03Nl60E15A2996 Reference Number: Cylinder Number: Laboratory: PGVP Number:

CC40998N Cylinder Volume: 124 - Tooele (SAP) - UT Cylinder Pressure: 872019 Valve Outlet:

Gas Code: C02,02,BALN . Certification Date: · .. E><pir"ti!;)ri pate: Mar 11.1.2021

Airgas Specialty Gases Airgas USA, LLC 525 North Industrial Loop Road Tooele, UT 84074 Airgas.com

153-401443590-1 158.9 CF 2015 PSIG 590 Mar11,2019

Cer)ificadon performed in accordance with "EPA Traceability Protocol for Assay and Certification of Gaseous Calibration Standards (May 2012)' document EPA 600/R-12/531, using the assay procedures listed. Analytical Methodology does not require correction for analytical Interference. This cylinder has a total analytical

uncertainty es stated below with a confidence level of 95%, There are no significant Impurities which affect the use of this calibration mixture. All concentrations are on a volume/Volume basis unless otherwise noted.

Component

CARBON DIOXIDE OXYGEN NITROGEN

Type .NTRM

NTRM

Lot ID

12062019

Requested Concentration

19;00 % 21.00 % Balance

Cylinder No CC416643 .

CC367606

Instrument/Make/Model

Horiba VIA-510 SV4MEUT J CO2 J-joril:la MPA-51 Q .'J'l/6.03MM.58 02


W006AS-583309A-RT-235

Do Not. Use This €iAfnder below , oo,11ski,,i.e ... 0.7 ·rileaeoascals.

ANALYI'ICAL RESULTS Actual Protocol Concentration Method

18.55 % G1

20.93 % G1

CALIBRATION STANDARDS Co~c~!ltl'.~~lon __

. 24.04 % CARBON DIOXIDE/NITROGEN ' ..

22.883 % OXYGEN/NITROGEN . .

ANALYTICAL EQui:PMENT. Analytical Principle

CO2 NDIR (Dixon) 02 Paramagne.tic{N!ason)

89 of 119

Total Relative Uncertainty

+/~ 0.6% NIST Traceable +/- 0.3% NIST Traceable

!,Jnce~al~ty . . 0.6%" 0.050%

Assay Dates ,.

03/11/2019 03/11/2019

Expiration_ Date

May 16, 2019 May 14, .2024

Last Multipoint Calibration

Feb 20, 2019

Feb.?O., 2019

Page 1 of 153-401443590-1

" - ~ . . , ·· ~·· , .. - ··~ ·· ....... ·~ ... , ... ~ ... . ... ........... . .,.., ~ .. -. ~ . .,,. ............ -~.~·---·-·

Airgas, an Air Liquide company

Airgas Specialty Gases Airgas USA, U.C 11711 S. Alamedl! Street Los Angeles, CA 90059 Airgas.com

• CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSlS .•" ·• I • • # ' , • - • " . ' ' • • ~ • •

Grade of Product: EPA Protocol Part Number: Cylinder Number: Laboratory:

E04Nl94E15ACOea Reference Number: CC300823 Cylinder Voiume: 124 - Los Angeles (SAP) - CA Cylinder Pressure:

48-400992897-1 146.9 Cubic Feet 2015 PSIG

PGVP Number: B32017 Valve Outlet: 660 Gas Code: CO,NO,NOX,C02,aALN Certification Date:

Explr•tlo~ Date: Sep .151 2020 Sep 15, 2017

Certilfcation performed illj~Y~~'Wllh'•l;f'A 'f~91.Wlni9 eyo~! lo~ Assay and Certlllc01ion ~($1$8!>!1!1' ¢~111:ira(ior'I $1ancla~:(~y 20i2f".t!Qc~merit EP.A ' 600/R-12/531, using the .a~a~~)1ur~ Uijled, ·M\!)Ytical "'l!l1hl>llo!ilQV~s l'tOI require c:,;,rractlo!l lor analytical Jnteiferencl!, This cyllnderl'la$./l lotaJ 11naly1~1

uncertainty as stated below wllh a,¢onlldenceJliv.al.of~5~;'1'1Je@·11re: 11Q.&1$1nlflc;an1 Impurities which affect Ille use ol'thls calibratlon mhrtunt. All concentr11tlops'ilre:on a · v·o1ume/volume basis unless otherwise noted.. ·

Component

·NOX

CARBON MONOXIDE NITRIC OXIDE CARBON DIOXIDE

.NITROGEN

Type Lot ID

NTRM 12062825 PRM 12367 NTRM 16060703 GMIS 0224201602 NTRM 10060105

Requested Concentration

9.000PPM 9.000PPM 9.000PPM 5.000% Balance

Cyljnder. No _ .

CC366934 APEX1099237 CC344931 CC500997 CC281 146

Actual Protocol Total Relative Concentration Method Uncertainty 9.080 PPM ·G1 +/-1 .4% NIST Traceable 8.834 PPM G1 +/- 0.4% NIST Traceable 8.878 PPM G1 +/-1.4% NIST Traceable 5.002 % G1 +/- 0.5% NIST Traceable

CALIBRATION STANDARDS Conce~~tlon -·

-9.766 PPM CARBON MONOXiDE/NITROGEN - -9.82 PPM NITROGEN DIOXIDE/AIR 10.08 PPM NITRIC OXIDE/NITROGEN 5.100 PPM NITROGEN DIOXIDE/NITROGEN 5.027 % CARBON DIOXIDE/NITROGEN

Uncertainty

+/- 0,3% +/. 2.0%

+/- 1.0% +/. 2.0% +/. 0.4%

. The SRM, P8M or RGM n·Q~ above !s-O)Jly,in reference to the .GMIS used In t~e a~y,and-notl)111t'of lhe,~lii,

ANALYI'ICAL EQUIPMENT · c·

Assay Dates

09/08/2017, 09/15/2017 .

09/12/~017 09/08/2017, 09/15/2017

09/12/2017

Expiration Date

Sep 07, 2018 Jun 02, 2017 Jun 28, 2018 Feb 24, 1019 Dec 02. 2021

lnatrume11t/Make/f,ft_~del Analytical Principle . . . La.st llultlpoint Calibration . SIEMENS 6E CO2

Thermo 48i-TLE 1132250557 CO Nicolet 6700 AHR0801551 NO Nlco~t6700 AHR0801551 N02


NDIR NDIR FTIR FTIR

Approved for Release

W006AS-583309A-RT-235 90 of 119

Aug Hi, 2017 Aug 31, 2017 Aug 21, 2017 Sep 05, 2017

Page 1 of 48-400992897-1

' i

'

'

.,


APPENDIX E MISCELLANEOUS INFORMATION

W006AS-583309A-RT-235 92 of 119


Appendix E.1 Agency Correspondence

W006AS-583309A-RT-235 93 of 119

SOURCE TEST PLAN 2019 COMPLIANCE & RATA TESTING JACOBS/ CITY OF VANCOUVER WESTSIDE WATER RECLAMATION FACILITY FLUIDIZED BED INCINERATOR VANCOUVER, WASHINGTON

Prepared For:

Jacobs / City of Vancouver 2323 West Mill Plain Blvd Vancouver, WA 98660

For Submittal To:

Southwest Clean Air Agency 11815 NE 99th Street, Suite 1294 Vancouver, WA 98682

US EPA Region 10 1200 5th Ave, Suite 900, OAW-150 Seattle, WA 98101-1128

Prepared By:

Montrose Air Quality Services, LLC 13585 NE Whitaker Way Portland, OR 97230

Document Number: W006AS-583309-PP-66R1 Proposed Test Dates: July 16-18, 2019 Revised Test Plan Submittal Date: June 26, 2019

W006AS-583309A-RT-235 94 of 119

Jacobs/City of Vancouver - Westside Water Reclamation Facility 2019 FBI Source Test Plan

REVIEW AND CERTIFICATION

I certify that, to the best of my knowledge, the information contained in this document is complete and accurate and conforms to the requirements of the Montrose Quality Management System and ASTM D7036-04.

Signature: 9&,/l ~el, Date: ____ 0_6_/_1_3_/ _2_0_1_9 ___ _ _

Name: Josh Muswieck Title: ____ F_ie_l_d_P_r~oj~e_ct_M_ a_na~g-e_r ___ _

I have reviewed, technically and editorially, details and other appropriate written materials contained herein. I hereby certify that to the best of my knowledge the presented material is authentic and accurate and conforms to the requirements of the Montrose Quality Management System and ASTM D7036-04.

Signature: ----'-4 .... ~:;___..;;..4-' ..... U'---ut----'-. --'....,. _ __ Date: _____ 0_6_/ _1_3_/ _2_0_1_9 _____ _

Name: ____ A_n_d...._y_V_e_ll_a ___ _ Title: ____ R_e._po_rt_i......,ng..._H_u_b_M_a_n_a__,,g'-e_r __ _

W006AS-583309A-RT-235 95 of 11 9

TABLE OF CONTENTS

SECTION

1.0 OBJECTIVES AND SUMMARY OF TEST PROGRAM .... ... ...................... ........................... 5

1.1 PROGRAM OBJECTIVES ............................................................... ........................... 5 1.2 APPLICABLE REGULATIONS AND PERMIT LIMITS ....... .......................................... 6

1.3 PROJECT CONTACTS ........... ................................... ..... ................. .... .... ................... 8 1.3.1 Test Personnel and Responsibilities .................. ... .. .............. ............ ...... .. ... .... . 9

1.3.2 Quality Statement ........ .. , .. ....... .... .. ....... .... .... ............ ... ..... .. .... .......... ................ 9

2.0 SOURCE DESCRIPTION ................ ....... ........ .......... .... ... ..... ....... ........ .. ............... ............. 10 2.1 FACILITY AND SOURCE DESCRIPTION ... .. ........................................................... 10

2.1.1 GEMS and DAS Description ........................ .. ................................................. 1 O

2.2 SAMPLING LOCATIONS AND ACCESS ................ ..... .......... .. ............. .. ... .. ... .......... 11

2.3 OPERATING CONDITIONS AND PROCESS DATA. ............................. .. ................. 12

2.4 PLANT SAFETY ....... .......... .. ......... .. .. ..... .. .......... ........................ .. .... ............. .. .... .. ... 12

2.4.1 Safety Responsibilities ....... ~ .............................................. .............................. 12

2.4.2 Safety Program ......... .......... .......... .... ............................... ... ..................... ....... 13

2.4.3 Safety Requirements ...... ... ... .......................... .......... .. ............ ................. ... .... 13

3.0 TEST METHOD DETAILS ......... .......... .. ... .. ........................... ........ ... ............. ....... ....... ... ... 14 3.1 LIST OF TEST METHODS ....... ..... ... ........ ............. ... ..... .. .... ...................................... 14

3.1.1 EPA Method 1 - Traverse Points ..................................... .. .... ....... .... ....... ....... 14

3.1.2 EPA Method 2 - Velocity .............. ........................... .. ................... .... .. .... ......... 15

3.1.3 Alternative EPA Method 2 Thermocouple Calibration Procedure (ALT-011) .... 15 3.1.4 EPA Method 4 - Moisture Content.. .. ..... ........................... .... .... ........ ...... ... .. ... 15

3.1.5 Determination of Sampling Traverse Points (Gaseous Sampling) ..... .... ...... .... 16

3.1 .6 Gaseous Emissions .. ................... .... .............. .... ........ ...... ....... ........ ........... .... . 16

3.1. 7 Total and Speciated Volatile Organic Compounds ................ ................ ......... . 16

3.1.8 Particulate Matter Emissions ...... ... ............................ ...... ...... .......... ... .. ........... 16

3.1 .9 Hydrogen Chloride Emissions ............... ............ ............. ...... .... .. ............ ....... .. 17

3.1.10 Mercury Emissions ....... .. ............. ........................... ........................ .... ..... .. ..... 17

3.1.11 Relative Accuracy Test Audit ... ............ .... .... ..... ...... ...... .. ... ....... ... ................... 17

3.1.12Visible Emissions ..................... ........................................... ........ .................... 17

4.0 QUALITY ASSURANCE AND REPORTING ... .... .... ... ..... ... ... ..... ....... ... .. ...... ...... .. ......... ..... 18

4.1 SAMPLING AND ANALYTICAL QNQC ......... .... ....... ........ .. ......... .... . .... ..... .... ........... 18 4.2 QUALITY CONTROL PROCEDURES ....................... ...... .......... .. .......... .. .... ........ .... . 18

4.2.1 Equipment Inspection and Maintenance ..... .............. ......... .. ........ ..... ......... .... . 18

4 .2.2 Audit Samples ........ ................................ ..... .. .................... ............................ .. 18 4.3 DATA ANALYSIS AND VALIDATION ....... .... ....................... ...... ..... ..... ...... ....... .. ..... .. 18

4.4 REPORTING ............. .... ..... ..... .. .. ... .. ....... ... ... ........... .. .. ................... ...... ........... ......... 19 4.4.1 Example Report Format ....... .. .......... .............. ..... ........................ ... ............. .... 19

W006AS-583309A-RT-235 96 of 119

4.4.2 Example Data Presentation Format ................................................................ 19

APPENDIX A MISCELLANEOUS INFORMATION ............ .... .... .... ... .. ........ .. .. ..... ... ..... ...... .. ... ... 21

APPENDIX "S" FIELD WORK SAFETY PLAN ........................... .. ................ ... ....... ... ........ ... ..... 23

LIST OF TABLES

TABLE 1-1 SUMMARY OF TEST PROGRAM AND PROPOSED SCHEDULE. .......................... 6

TABLE 1-2 EMISSION LIMITS .................................. ......................... .... ..................................... 6

TABLE 1-3 SUMMARY OF PERFORMANCE SPECIFICATIONS .. ............................................. ?

TABLE 2-1 CEMS INFORMATION ... ........ ... . .. ... ............. .......................................................... 11

TABLE 3-1 TEST PROCEDURES ...................................... ... ... ..... .. .. ........ ........ ..... .. .. ... .... ... .... 14

TABLE 4-1 TYPICAL REPORT FORMAT ........ .......................... ... ......... .. .. ... ... .. ................ ... .... 19

TABLE 4-2 RESULTS SUMMARY MERCURY EMISSIONS .................................................. .. . 20

W006AS-583309A-RT-235 97 of 119

1.0 OBJECTIVES AND SUMMARY OF TEST PROGRAM

1.1 PROGRAM OBJECTIVES

Montrose Air Quality Services, LLC (Montrose) has been contracted by Jacobs to perform a series of air emission tests at the Westside Water Reclamation Facility in Vancouver, Washington. The tests will be conducted to determine compliance with the emission limits and standards of the Southwest Clean Air Agency (SWCAA) Air Discharge Permit (ADP) No. 13-3047 and 40 CFR Part 62, Subpart LLL. Testing is currently scheduled to take place from July 16-18, 2019. Montrose will perform the tests to measure the following emission parameters:

• SWCAA ADP No. 13-3047 Emission Compliance:

~ CO (ppm volume dry, ppmvd@ 7% 02, lb/hr)

~ NOx (ppm volume dry, ppmvd@ 7% 02, lb/hr)

~ S02 (ppm volume dry, ppmvd @ 7% 02, lb/hr)

~ voe (ppm volume dry, ppmvd@ 7% 02, lb/hr)

~ HCI (ppm volume dry, ppmvd @ 7% 02, lb/hr)

~ PM (total) (gr/dscf, gr/dscf@ 7% 02, lb/hr)

~ 1,4 - Dichlorobenzene (ppm volume dry, ppmvd @ 7% 02, lb/hr)

~ Visual emissions (% opacity)

• EPA Subpart LLL Emission Compliance

~ Hg (mg/dscm, mg/dscm @ 7% 02, lb/hr)

• 02 and CO2 (% volume dry) - for molecular weight & dilution calculations

• Stack volumetric flow rate (dscfm) and moisture content(% by volume)

• Part 60 Relative Accuracy Test Audit 02 (% volume dry) and CO (ppmvd@ 7% 0 2)

Montrose will provide the test personnel and the necessary equipment to measure emissions as outlined in this test plan. Facility personnel will provide the process and production data to be included in the final report. A summary of the test program and proposed schedule is presented in Table 1-1.

W006AS-583309A-RT-235 98 of 119

TABLE 1-1 JACOBS/CITY OF VANCOUVER

WESTSIDE WATER RECLAMATION FACILITY SUMMARY OF TEST PROGRAM AND PROPOSED SCHEDULE

Activity/ No. Date Source Name Pollutants Test Methods Runs Duration

0 2, CO2, CO, NOx, EPA 3A, 10, 7E 1, 2, 3 60 minutes so2, voe EPA6C, 25A 1, 2, 3 60 minutes

7/16/19 Fluidized Bed PM, Moisture EPA 4, 5/202 1, 2, 3 60 minutes Incinerator Volumetric flow rate EPA 1, 2 1, 2, 3 60 minutes

1,4-Dichlorobenzene Modified T0-15 1, 2, 3 60 minutes Visual emissions EPA/SWCAA 91 1, 2,3 6 minutes

0 2, CO2 EPA3A 1, 2, 3 60 minutes

Fluidized Bed Hg EPA 308 1, 2, 3 60 minutes

7/17/19 Incinerator HCI EPA26A 1, 2, 3 60 minutes

Moisture EPA4 1,2, 3 60 minutes Volumetric flow rate EPA 1, 2 1, 2, 3 60 minutes

7/18/19 Fluidized Bed 0 2, CO RATA EPA 3A, 10 1-9(12) 21 minutes Incinerator

1-With Agency approval Montrose plans to do abbreviated 6-minute opacity observations

1.2 APPLICABLE REGULATIONS AND PERMIT LIMITS

The results from this test program will be presented in units consistent with those listed in the permit or subpart. The limits are presented in Table 1-2:

Emission Parameter

co NOx S0 2 v oe HCI PM VE Hg


WESTSIDE WATER RECLAMATION FACILITY FLUIDIZED BED INCINERATOR-EMISSION LIMITS

Units of Measurement Permit Limits Emission Limit Reference

ppmvd @7% 0 2 100 ADP Req. No. 5 ppmvd @7% 0 2 80 ADP Req. No. 4 ppmvd @ 7% 0 2 30 ADP Req. No. 4

ppmvd @ 7% 0 2 as Methane 50 ADP Req. No. 4 lb/hr 0.35 ADP Req. No. 7

gr/dscf @ 7% 0 2 0.015 ADP Req. No. 4 % opacity 01 ADP Req. No. 8

mg/dscm @ 7% 0 2 0.037 Subpart LLL Table 2

W006AS-583309A-RT-235 99 of 11 9

1. Visual emissions shall not exceed 0% opacity for more than three minutes in any one-hour period

The emission limits are also used as the "applicable standards" for alternate pass/fail criteria in reporting RATA results. The performance specifications for the RATA are presented in Table 1-3:


WESTSIDE WATER RECLAMATION FACILITY SUMMARY OF PERFORMANCE SPECIFICATIONS

Parameter

Performance Specification

40 CFR, Part 60 Appendix B

02 Analyzer % volume dry

CO Analyzer ppmvd@7% 02

40 CFR, Part 60

3, Section 13.2

4A, Section 13.2

a No greater than 1% 0 2 (based on actual analyzer readings)

Specification Limit

a

b,c, ord

b No greater than 10% of the applicable standard (if average emissions are less than 50% of the emission standard) c No greater than 5% of the applicable standard d Within 5 ppm absolute difference between the RM and CEMS, plus confidence coefficient

W006AS-583309A-RT-235 100 of 119

1.3 PROJECT CONTACTS

A list of project participants is included below:

Facility Information Source Location: Jacobs I City of Vancouver

Westside Water Reclamation Facility 2323 West Mill Plain Blvd Vancouver, WA 98660

Project Contact: Rani Senkbeil Role: Lab/lPP Manager

Company: Jacobs Telephone: 360-695-0092

Email: [email protected]

Agency Information Regulatory Agency: Southwest Clean Air Agency

Agency Contact: John St. Clair Telephone: 360-57 4-3058 X 127

Email: [email protected]

Regulatory Agency: US EPA Region 10 Agency Contact: Geoffrey L. Glass

Telephone: 206-553-1847 Email : [email protected]

Testing Company Information

Frank Dick Wastewater Engineering Supervisor City of Vancouver 360-487-7179 [email protected]

Testing Firm: Montrose Air Quality Services, LLC (Montrose) Contact: Josh Muswieck Kristina Schafer

Title: Field Project Manager Hub District Manager Telephone: 541-227-1292 253-480-3801

Email: [email protected] [email protected]

Laboratory Information Hg Laboratory: Montrose 1

City, State: Chicago, Illinois PM Laboratory: Antech 1

City, State: Corbett, Oregon HCI Laboratory Chester Labnet1

City, State: Tigard, Oregon Speciated voe Enthalpy Analytical

Laboratory: City, State: Durham, North Carolina

1 Montrose reserves the right to select a different laboratory than the ones stated here.

W006AS-583309A-RT-235 101 of 119

1.3.1 Test Personnel and Responsibilities

The test team will consist of one Field Project Manager and two Field Technicians. The Field Project Manager is responsible for overseeing sample and data collection, while Field Technicians work at the sampling location. It is anticipated that Josh Muswieck, QSTI (1-4) will be assigned to the role of Field Project Manager. The staff assignments for the Field Technician positions have not been finalized as of the date of this test plan. The team will be fully qualified to perform all test methods listed in this test plan. At least one team member will hold current QSTI and/or QI certifications for all test methods included in this test program.

1.3.2 Quality Statement

Montrose is qualified to conduct this test program and has established a quality management system that led to accreditation with ASTM Standard D7036-04 (Standard Practice for Competence of Air Emission Testing Bodies). Montrose participates in annual functional assessments for conformance with D7036-04 which are conducted by the American Association for Laboratory Accreditation (A2LA). All testing performed by Montrose is supervised on site by at least one Qualified Individual (QI) as defined in D7036-04 Section 8.3.2. Data quality objectives for estimating measurement uncertainty within the documented limits in the test methods are met by using approved test protocols for each project as defined in D7036-04 Sections 7.2.1 and 12.10. Additional quality assurance information is presented in Section 4.0 of this document.

W006AS-583309A-RT-235 102 of 11 9


2.1 FACILITY AND SOURCE DESCRIPTION

The Westside Water Reclamation facility is located at 2323 West Mill Plain Boulevard in Vancouver, Washington. The FBF (sewage sludge incinerator) is a custom designed unit engineered by U.S. Filter/Zimpro. The unit is configured as a vertically-oriented shell in which a bed of hot sand, approximately 60 inches thick, is mixed with sludge and simultaneously fluidized by injected air at pressures from 20 to 35 kilopascals (5.0 psig). The combustor bed is five feet high with a 16-foot inside diameter. The preheat burner is rated at 8.0 MMBtu/hr and is fueled on natural gas or No. 2 fuel oil. The unit is designed to com bust up to 16,131 lb/hr (31.5 gpm) of wet sludge which contains 4,833 lb/hr of dry sludge (26.4% solids) and 80.0 dry lb/hr of scum. The sludge is mixed with 7,324 scfm of combustion air which exits the combustor at 1,550°F and produces 1,049 lb/hr of ash.

Exhaust gases from the combustor are used to preheat the fluidizing air to 1,000°F while cooling the exhaust air to 1, 153°F using a shell and tube heat exchanger from American Schack. Exhaust from the preheat exchanger is routed to a second heat exchanger where plume suppression air is used to further cool the exhaust gases. The hot plume suppression air at 3,500 scfm is designed to be injected into the stack to heat the exhaust gases to increase plume rise and eliminate the condensate plume. The exhaust from the second heat exchanger is routed to a pre-cooler with a water flowrate of 53 gpm. Exhaust from the pre-cooler is routed to a damper type variable throat venturi manufactured by Emtrol. The variable damper scrubber is designed to operate at a minimum pressure drop of 40" H20 column at 140 gpm of scrubber water. Exhaust from the scrubber is routed to a four-tray scrubber manufactured by Emtrol. The exhaust from the tray scrubber is routed through a mercury sorbent media scrubber and wire mesh mist eliminator manufactured by Envirocare. The pressure drop across the entire scrubber system should be a minimum of 45" H20 column.

Exhaust for the FBF and control system is discharged vertically through a 29.5" diameter stack at a height of 73' 6" above ground level.

2.1.1 CEMS and DAS Description

A CEMS for CO and 02 is installed upstream of the reintroduction of the plume suppression air. All flue gas pollutant and diluent measurements are made on a dry basis. Effluent gas from the sampling location is filtered and transported through a heated sample line to the sample conditioning system in the main analyzer cabinet. The sample conditioning system again filters the effluent gas and a chilled condenser removes the moisture. The dry, particulate-free effluent gas is then routed to the analyzers. The analog outputs of the analyzers and certain plant inputs are transmitted to a system controller.

The CEMS data acquisition and reporting system is controlled by the data acquisition system (DAS). The DAS is a PC-based, multi-user, multi-tasking system. The DAS provides automated data monitoring and management capabilities to the CEMS using supplied software. The DAS is utilized for operator interface, data storage, report generation, and data display. The Allen Bradley Programmable Logic Control system transmits data from the analyzers to the DAS and polls the Contee system every ten seconds. The system generates one-minute averages, from which 15-minute values are then calculated. All data is then reduced to 1-hour averages to comply with 40 CFR, Part 75.10 (d)(1).

W006AS-583309A-RT-235 103 of 119

The DAS will indicate any occurrence of specification limit exceedances or CEMS operational problems and will generate reports in the required format for submittal to the applicable regulatory agencies. These reports may be produced in either hard copy or electronic format and can be made available for telemetry transmission.

Analyzer Type


WESTSIDE WATER RECLAMATION FACILITY CEMS INFORMATION ·

Manufacturer Model No. Serial No.

co

Siemens

Siemens

Oxymat 6E

Ultramat 6E

7MB2021-1AAOO-OBA1

7MB2121-1 BEOO-OAA 1

2.2 SAMPLING LOCATIONS AND ACCESS

Information regarding the sampling location is presented below:

Sample location ID: FBI Scrubber Exhaust Duct-Roof Sampling Platform

Stack exit height: 73 feet, 6 inches

Configuration: Cylindrical , vertical

Dimensions: 29.5 inches internal diameter Port locations: Appx. 10 ft. (-4.1 duct diameters) upstream from the stack exit

Appx. 16.5 ft. (-6.7 duct diameters) downstream from nearest stack disturbance ·

Port access: Stairs and ladder to rooftop from which access to permanent platform is provided

Sample location ID: FBI Scrubber Exhaust-FBI building sampling location (RATA Testing)

Configuration: Cylindrical, vertical

Dimensions: 29.5 inches internal diameter

Port access Scissor lift to access sample port

Traverse point information is presented below:

• Particulate and HCI tests - 24 points total , 12 from each of 2 ports located 90 degrees apart from one another

• Mercury tests - 3 points total- 16.7, 50.0, and 83.3 percent of internal diameter

• Gaseous RATA tests - 3 points total - 16.7, 50.0, and 83.3 percent of internal diameter

• Gaseous compliance tests - stratification test and sampling point selection performed per EPA Method 7E

W006AS-583309A-RT-235 104 of 119

2.3 OPERATING CONDITIONS AND PROCESS DATA

The emission tests will be conducted while the fluidized bed incinerator is operated at conditions specified in the ADP permit or subpart. For mercury testing the FBI will be operated at a minimum of 85 percent of the maximum permitted capacity, as required by Subpart LLL. The SWCAA ADP 13-3047 stipulates that testing must be performed at normal maximum operating conditions.

Plant personnel will establish the test conditions and will collect all applicable unit-operating data. Montrose will monitor the collection of process data and will provide additional data collection as necessary to document operation. Data collected will include the following parameters:

• Dry sludge feed rate

• Sludge moisture content

• FBI bed temperature2

• Scrubber pressure drop

• Venturi scrubber2

• Scrubber train (venturi + tray + mercury sorption module)

• Scrubber liquid flow rate2

• Venturi scrubber2

• Tray scrubber2

• Tray scrubber liquid pH2

2.4 PLANT SAFETY

Safety is a priority at Montrose. A discussion of the field safety measures which will be employed on this project are detailed below. A detailed Site Safety Plan is attached to this test plan in Appendix S.

2.4.1 Safety Responsibilities

As per 40 CFR 60 Subpart A, Section 60.8, the facility should provide the following provisions at each sample location:

• Sampling ports, which meet EPA minimum requirements for testing. The caps should be removed or be hand-tight.

• Safe sampling platforms

• Safe access to the platforms and test ports, including any scaffolding or man lifts

• Sufficient utilities to perform all necessary testing

Montrose will comply with all safety requirements at the facility. The facility plant safety coordinator is responsible for ensuring routine compliance with plant entry, health, and safety requirements. The facility plant site safety coordinator has the authority to impose or waive facility restrictions. The Montrose test team leader has the authority to negotiate any deviations from the facility restrictions with the plant site safety coordinator. Any deviations must be documented.

2 Denotes process data which will be collected for internal records

W006AS-583309A-RT-235 105 of 119

2.4.2 Safety Program

Montrose has a comprehensive health and safety program that satisfies State and Federal OSHA requirements. The program includes an Illness and Injury Prevention Program, site-specific safety meetings, and training in safety awareness and procedures. The basic elements include:

• Written policies and procedures

• Routine training of employees and supervisors

• Medical monitoring as necessary, including Hearing Conservation

• Use of personal protection equipment (PPE)

• Hazard communication

• Pre-test and daily safety meetings

• Routine surveillance and inspection of on-going work

• Near-miss and accident reporting procedures

• Following Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA) regulations, as applicable

Montrose will provide all PPE to its employees. The PPE will include, but is not limited to; hard hats, safety shoes, safety glasses with side shields (or goggles), hearing protection, and hand protection.

2.4.3 Safety Requirements

All on-site personnel will adhere to the following standard safety measures:

• All OSHA and facility mandated safety training and accreditation will be completed before arrival. This will include MSHA, OSHA 10-hr, TWIG, Aerial Work Platform, etc., as required.

• Complete any site-specific training as necessary

• Complete Site Safety Plan before work activities begin

• Daily Tool Box Meetings

• Confine themselves to the testing and administration areas only

• Wear all mandated PPE

• Know the location of first aid equipment and fire extinguishers

• Smoke only in designated areas

W006AS-583309A-RT-235 106 of 119


3.1 LIST OF TEST METHODS

The test procedures for this test program are summarized in Table 3-1 below. Additional information regarding specific applications or modifications to standard procedures is presented in the following sub-sections.


WESTSIDE WATER RECLAMATION FACILITY TEST PROCEDURES

Test Parameter Reference Method Analytical Approach

Oxygen (02) EPA 3A Paramagnetism

Carbon dioxide (CO2) EPA 3A Non-dispersive infrared ------ -------·----------Carbon monoxide (CO) EPA 10 Gas filter correlation

--- ----------------------Nitrogen oxides (NOx as N02)

EPA ?E Chemiluminescence -----------------------------

Sulfur Dioxide (S02) --·----------EPA6C

EPA26A

EPA25A

Non-dispersive ultraviolet

Ion chromatography Hydrogen Chloride (HCI)

Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC)

1,4-Dichlorobenzene

Mercury (Hg)

Particulate Matter (PM)

Moisture content

Volumetric flow rate -----Opacity

1. Ted/ar bags with analysis by GC/MS

3.1.1 EPA Method 1 - Traverse Points

Modified1 T0-15

Flame ionization

Gas chromatography

EPA 308 Ultraviolet atomic absorption

EPA 51202 Gravimetric w/ condensable analysis

EPA 4 Wet impingement ---· ---------------------·

EPA 1 & 2 --·----·- --

EPA & SWCAA9

Pitot / temperature traverse

Visual observation

EPA Method 1 is used to assure that representative measurements of volumetric flow rate are obtained by dividing the cross-section of the stack or duct into equal areas, and then locating a traverse point within each of the equal areas. Acceptable sample locations must be located at least two stack or duct equivalent diameters downstream from a flow disturbance and one-half equivalent diameter upstream from a flow disturbance. An EPA Method 1 diagram is included in the final report.

Quality control procedures for this method include:

• A check for cyclonic flow is made by measuring null angles using a protractor and pitot tube

• Pre- and post-test leak checks of the pitot tube lines

W006AS-583309A-RT-235 107 of 119

3.1.2 EPA Method 2 -Velocity

EPA Method 2 is used to measure the gas velocity using an S-type pitot tube connected to a pressure measurement device, and to measure the gas temperature using a calibrated thermocouple connected to a thermocouple indicator. Typically, Type S (Stausscheibe) pitot tubes conforming to the geometric specifications in the test method are used, along with an inclined manometer. The measurements are made at traverse points specified by EPA Method 1. The molecular weight of the gas stream is determined from independent measurements of 02, CO2, and moisture. The stack gas volumetric flow rate is calculated using the measured average velocity head, the area of the duct at the measurement plane, the measured average temperature, the measured duct static pressure, the molecular weight of the gas stream, and the measured moisture.

Method-specific options are listed below:

• S-type pitot tube coefficient is 0.84

• Inclined manometer or Shortridge multimeter is used to measure velocity

Velocity and volumetric flow rate are reported in the following units:

• feet per second (fps) or feet per minute (fpm)

• actual cubic feet per minute (acfm)

• dry standard cubic feet per minute (dscfm)

Quality control procedures for this method include:

• Pre- and post-test leak checks of the pitot tube lines

• Pitot tubes are examined before and after each use to confirm that they are in alignment

• Stack gas temperatures thermocouples are checked using EPA Alternate Method 011 (ALT-011). A single-point calibration is performed using a NIST-traceable thermometer. Temperatures must agree within ± 2° F.

• Thermocouples are checked at ambient temperature before heaters are turned on

3.1.3 Alternative EPA Method 2 Thermocouple Calibration Procedure (AL T-011)

Approved Alternative Method 011 (AL T-011) is used as an alternative to the EPA Method 2 twopoint thermocouple calibration. This procedure involves a single-point in-field check using a reference thermometer to confirm that the thermocouple system is operating properly. The temperatures of the thermocouple and reference thermometers shall agree to within ±2 °F.

3.1.4 EPA Method 4 - Moisture Content

Stack gas moisture content will be determined using EPA Method 4 in conjunction with every particulate test run or wet chemical test run. The impingers are connected in series and contain reagents as listed in the applicable method descriptions. The impingers are contained in an ice bath to assure condensation of the flue gas stream moisture. Any moisture that is not condensed

W006AS-583309A-RT-235 108 of 119

in the impingers is captured in the silica gel; therefore, all moisture is weighed and entered into moisture content calculations.

3.1 .5 Determination of Sampling Traverse Points (Gaseous Sampling)

Sampling traverse points for gaseous methods are determined in accordance with EPA Method 7E. For RATA testing a 3-point probe traverse is performed along the measurement line of the inner diameter of the stack exhaust at 16.7%, 50%, and 83.3%. If the stack diameter is greater than 2.4 meters, and stratification is not expected, then sampling is performed 0.4, 1.2, and 2.0 meters from the stack wall. Source gas will be sampled for at least 21 minutes during each run.

3.1.6 Gaseous Emissions

Concentrations of the gaseous constituents of stack gas (02, CO2, NOx, CO, & S02) are measured using Montrose's dry extractive reference method (RM) monitor system in accordance with EPA Methods 3A, 6C, 7E and 10. This system meets the requirements of EPA methods for gaseous species. Pertinent information regarding the performance of the method is presented below:


• Permit Deviations: Montrose plans on using EPA Method 6C for S02 determination. The SWCAA ADP stipulates the use of EPA Method 6 for S02 testing. EPA method 6 is a wet chemistry method and is relatively uncommon. The proposed test program aligns with historical test procedures.

• Detection Limits: 2% of calibration span

3.1.7 Total and Speciated Volatile Organic Compounds

Concentrations of total hydrocarbons (THCs) are measured using EPA Method 25A. A flame ionization detector (FID) type analyzer is used for measurement of the concentrations as described in EPA Method 25A. Concentrations of 1,4-Dichlorobenzene will be determined using modified T0-15. T0-15 has been modified for the use of Tedlar bags as the sampling media instead of summa canisters. Tedlar bags will be filled with conditioned sample gas at the outlet of the gas sampling manifold.


• Target Analytes: Total hydrocarbons and 1,4-Dichlorobenzene

• Analytical Laboratory: Enthalpy Analytical - Durham, NC

3.1.8 Particulate Matter Emissions

Emissions of total particulate matter (PM) are measured using a combination of EPA Methods 5 and 202. Pertinent information regarding the performance of the methods are presented below:


• Method Options: Sampling glassware will be baked per EPA method 202. If glassware is not baked for six hours prior to use, a field train proof blank will be analyzed. A pressurized nitrogen purge will be performed on all trains which have visible condensate in the first two impingers.

W006AS-583309A-RT-235 109 of 119

• Minimum Required Sample Duration: 60 minutes

• Analytical Laboratory: Antech, Corbett, OR

3.1.9 Hydrogen Chloride Emissions

Hydrogen chloride (HCI) will be measure using EPA Method 26A. Pertinent information regarding the performance of the methods are presented below:

• Method Deviations: EPA 26A sampling train will be modified to omit impingers 3 and 4 (dilute sodium hydroxide), as HCI is soluble in the dilute acid impingers (impingers 1 and 2).

• Method Options: None

• Minimum Required Sample Duration: 60 minutes

• Target Analytes: HCI

• Analytical Laboratory: Chester LabNet, Tigard, OR

3.1 .10 Mercury Emissions

Concentrations of mercury will be determined using EPA Method 308. Pertinent information regarding the performance of the method is presented below:

• Method Deviations: pre-survey sample may not be collected

• Method Options: N/A

• Target and/or Minimum Required Sample Duration: 60 minutes

• Target Sample Volume: 30 liters

• Detection Limit: 1.0 µg/m3

• Analytical Laboratory: Montrose - Chicago, IL

3.1.11 Relative Accuracy Test Audit

The relative accuracy of each CEMS will be audited per the procedures of 40 CFR, Part 60, Appendices B. Pertinent information regarding the performance of the audit is presented below:

• Traverse Points: Three located along the measurement line

• Relevant Performance Specifications: 40 CFR 60, PS 3 and 4A

3.1.12 Visible Emissions EPA and SWCAA Method 9 requires that a qualified observer shall use the following procedures for visually determining the opacity. The qualified observer shall stand at a distance sufficient to provide a clear view of the emissions with the sun oriented in the 140° sector to his back. The opacity observer shall be recording to the nearest five percent at 15-second intervals on an observational record sheet. A minimum of 24 observations shall be recorded per test run. Each momentary observation shall be deemed to represent the average opacity for a 15-second period. Montrose plans on conducting abbreviated 6-minute opacity observations as an alternative to the permit required 60-minute observations. Both EPA and SWCAA Method 9 opacity averages will be included in the final test report. Josh Muswieck is certified to read opacity and will perform three six-minute test runs at the FBI exhaust for visible emissions per EPA and SWCAA Method

W006AS-583309A-RT-235 110 of 119

9. If a reading above 0% opacity is observed in a six-minute test run, the test run will be extended to sixty minutes.

4.0 QUALITY ASSURANCE AND REPORTING

4.1 SAMPLING AND ANALYTICAL QA/QC

Montrose has instituted a rigorous QA/QC program for its air quality testing. Quality assurance audits are performed as part of the test program to ensure that the results are calculated using the highest quality data available. This program ensures that the emissions data we report are as accurate as possible. The procedures included in the cited reference methods are followed during preparation, sampling, calibration, and analysis. Montrose will be responsible for preparation, calibration, and cleaning of the sampling apparatus. Montrose will also perform the sampling, sample recovery, storage, and shipping. Approved contract laboratories may perform some of the preparation and sample analyses, as needed.

4.2 QUALITY CONTROL PROCEDURES

Montrose calibrates and maintains equipment as required by the methods performed and applicable regulatory guidance. Montrose follows internal procedures to prevent the use of malfunctioning or inoperable equipment in test programs. All equipment is operated by trained personnel. Any incidence of nonconforming work encountered during testing is reported and addressed through the corrective action system.

4.2.1 Equipment Inspection and Maintenance

• Each piece of field equipment that requires calibration is assigned a unique identification number to allow tracking of its calibration history

• All field equipment is visually inspected prior to testing and includes pre-test calibration checks as required by the test method or regulatory agency

4.2.2 Audit Samples

When required by the test method, Montrose obtains EPA TNI SSAS audit samples from an accredited provider for analysis along with the samples. The audit samples are stored, shipped, and analyzed along with the emissions samples collected during the test program. The audit sample results are reported along with the emissions sample results. For this test program an HCI audit sample will be obtained from ERA.

4.3 DATA ANALYSIS AND VALIDATION

Montrose converts the raw field, laboratory, and process data to reporting units consistent with the permit or subpart. Calculations are made using proprietary computer spreadsheets or data acquisition systems. One run of each test method is also verified using a separate example calculation. The example calculations are checked against the spreadsheet results and are included in the final report. The "Standard Conditions" for this project are 29.92 inches of mercury and 68 °F.

W006AS-583309A-RT-235 111 of 119

4.4 REPORTING

There will be three reports associated with this test program. One report will contain testing associated with the SWCAA ADP compliance testing, one report will cover mercury compliance testing per subpart LLL and the last report will detail relative accuracy testing. In addition, an ERT will be submitted to the EPA for subpart LLL mercury testing. Montrose will prepare final reports to present the test data, calculations/equations, descriptions, and results. Prior to release by Montrose, each report will be reviewed and certified by the project manager and their supervisor, or a peer. Source test reports will be submitted to the appropriate regulatory agency (upon Jacobs approval) within 45 days of the completion of the field work. The report will include a series of appendices to present copies of the intermediate calculations and example calculations, raw field data, laboratory analysis data, process data, and equipment calibration data.

4.4.1 Example Report Format

The report will be divided into various sections describing the different aspects of the source testing program. Table 4-1 presents a typical Table of Contents for the final report.

Cover Page

Certification of Report

Table of Contents

Section

TABLE 4-1 TYPICAL REPORT FORMAT

1.0 SUMMARY OF TEST PROGRAM AND RES UL TS



4.0 TEST RESULTS AND OVERVIEW

Appendices

APPENDIX A- CALCULATIONS

APPENDIX B - FIELD AND COMPUTER-GENERATED DATA

APPENDIX C - LABORATORY ANALYSIS DATA

APPENDIX D- FACILITY CEMS AND PROCESS DATA

APPENDIX E - QUALITY ASSURANCE/QUALITY CONTROL

APPENDIX F - MISCELLANEOUS INFORMATION

4.4.2 Example Data Presentation Format

Table 4-2 presents the typical tabular format that will be used to summarize the results in the final source test report. Separate tables will outline the results for each target analyte and compare them to their respective emissions limits.

W006AS-583309A-RT-235 112 of 119

TABLE 4-2 RESULTS SUMMARY MERCURY EMISSIONS

JACOBS/CITY OF VANCOUVER WESTSIDE WATER RECLAMATION FACILITY


Parameter Average Results Subpart LLL Limit

Unit Data:

Furnace temp., °F X Scrubber dP, in. 1-izO X Wet sludge feed, lb/hr X FBI feed solids,% X FBI feed moisture, % X Dry sludge feed, ton/hr X Tray scrubber pH X Total scrubber liq. flow, gpm X

Hg Emissions:

mg/dscm X mg/dscm @ 7% 02 X 0.037

lb/hr X

W006AS-583309A-RT-235 113 of 11 9


W006AS-583309A-RT-235

Appendix E.2 Permit Excerpts

114 of 119

TECHNICAL SUPPORT DOCUMENT

Air Discha_rge Permit 1_3~3047 Air Discharge Permit Application CL-1956

City of Vancouver - Westside Water Reclamation .F~cility SWCAA IJ;>-1106

Prepared By: Joh.ti St.Clair Air Quality Engineer Southwest Clean Air Agency

W006AS-583309A-RT-235

Date: March 28; 2013

115 of 119

TABLE OF CONTENTS

1. FACILITY IDENTIFICATION ......................................... ; ........................ ........ ;,., ................... l

2. FACILITY D:l3SCR1PTION .................... · .......................................... ; ............................ , ............ 1

3. CURRENT P.ERM.ITTING ACTION ......• .... , ............. , ........................... ....... ......................... ... I

4. PRoCEss oEscRIPTION ........................... ..................................................... ............. ..... · ........ ... z 5. EQUIPMENT/ACTIViTY IDENTIFICATION , ............... ,., ....... ,, ... ,, ... ......................... , ........ A 6. EMISSIONS DETERMINATION .... , ............. , .... , .............................................. ,. ... , ........................ 1.0 7. REGULATI.ONS AND EMISSION ·STANDARDS .............................................................. , ... 16

8. RACT /BACT/BART/LAER./PSD/CAM DETERMINATIONS ........ .................................... . 23

9. AMBIENT IMPACT ANALYSIS ................. ......... ......... , ........ .............................................. .. ,.24

10. DISCUSSION OF APPROVAL CONDITIONS ................ ......................................... ........... 26

11. START-UP AND SHUTDOWN/ALTERNATIVE OPERATING SCENARIOS/POLLUTION PREVENTION.,:" ........ , ........ ,., ........ , ............ , ... .... , ...... , ... ; ....... .. 29

12. EMISSION :MONITQRINGAND TESTING ........ , ........... , .... , ................. ..... ............... , ... .. ..... 30

13. FACILITY HISTORY ........ , ................. ,, .... ,.; ................................... ,., ............ . , ..................... .. .... 3 J 14. PUBLIC INVOLV1$MENT bPPORTUNITY ... ,, .. , ............. .. .. , ................ ............ " ......... , .. ..... 33

W006AS-583309A-RT-235 116 of 119

ABBR.EVIA TiONS

acfm ... , ....• , .. ,Actual cubic fpot p~r miri\!te

ADJ> ... ,, .. , ... ,.Air Discharge Permit. AP-4~ .,., ...... Compilatiorl of Emi$sion Factors, f\P-42,

.:5th E;ilition, Volume l , Stationary Point and Ai:ea Sour~es - pubiished by EPA .

A~IJ:; ·····:-··, .. ,Acc¢pta\Jle Sourc.e. Impact Level ATS , ............ Air Treatment Systertl BACT .......... Best available control technology BART ... , .... ,.B.e$t!\'vailable Retrofit Technology

bhp., .....•.•..... Brake horsepower BODs ,.,,., .. , .. 5:dayail':lcbemical O;,cygen Demand ·.

C.AM ...... , ...• ~Compliance Assurance Monitoring

CAS #.,.; ...... Chemical Abstracts Service registry .numb~r

CEM ., .......... Continuous ·Emis$iop lv{(?nit9r

CFR ............. Code of federal ReiuMions

~ ....... , ..... ,Methane

CO .......... ..... Carbon monoxide

CO2 .............. Carbon dit;>xide Cb2e ............ C.arbon ~iox(de equivalent

dscf .............. Dry Standard cubic.foot EPA ..•..•. , ... , .. U..S. E1;ivirtmnienta) Prou:ction _Agency EU ............... J:missiori Unit

FBf .............. Fluidi.zed Bed Fur.mice FNOV/C .. : ... Field Notice ofViolatioiV'Field. Noti~e of

Correcti~n · ·

g/Nrri~c1ry .....•. Grams per Normal (i.e. Standard) cubic meter, dry

gpm ... , ...... , ... Qalk>n per nunµte gr/dscf... ....... Grain per q,ry standar<J. cubic foot

H2S .............. Hydrogen suifide HAP ......•. , ...• Hazardous air pollutant listed pursuant to

$ec.tion 112 of the ·Federal Clean-Air Act

JPC~ ......... ,.,lntergqve~m,~rm1\ Pan~! o~ Clinrat~ Chan~e

LAER ., •.•..... Lowes.t c1cltievllble ti:russion rate M~D ..... , .... JvUllion Qallon pet Day

MHI ...•.......• :Multiple Hearth. l:ncinetator

MMB~ ........ Million Btu

NESF(A:P .. , .. National Emis.s.ipn ~tandards for Hazardous Air Pollutants

N02 .............. Nitrogen dioxide

NOx .............. Nitrogen oxides

W006AS-583309A-RT-235

:NSPS ..•..... ,., New Source Feifon:nailce Standard

02 .....•......... , O~ygen Q3_ ... , .. , ••.. ,..;,. O;i:~ne 'ORP . ........... ... Oxidation Reduction Potential

pH ............... Negative lqg of the· h.ydrogen foµ . ~oncentr~tiQil; pH,;;,-.log([H'])

PM ............... Partic.ufate Matter 'ivjth ,an aerodynamic diameter <.100 _µ.m; PM. totlll includes both· filterable PM and. condensable PM

PM t<t············ i>M wiW. 8* a'eroaynamic diam,e~er .sW µm; _l>M19, tq/ai in¢1udes .~oih fi.lterable PM,o and con~ensable PM Jo

PMH ........... PM \Yith~ aerp4ynamfo di~m.:eter ~2 .5 µnr; PM2.s, total .includ~$· both :filterable PM2 s and condensable PM2.s

ppm .. , .......... Parts per million

ppmv ........... Part$. per. mil Hon by voiume

ppmw ..... , .... Parts per milliqri by weight

PSD .. , .. , .... , .. }>Ievcntiop qf Significant peterioration

psig .............. Pounds per squ;µ:e inch, ,gauge R.ACT.. ......... Reasonably Available .Control

TecbnoJogy

8.CW ........... Revise!! Code of Wa~hington -scfm ............. Standard cubic fo.of per min.life

S02 .............. Sulfur dioxide SQ.ER ......... Small 'Quantity Emission Rate listed in

WAC 173-460 .

Standard ...... ·Standatd conQ.itious a te.nJp~atQte c;if20°C .(68~F) and ap~,~su.t;e of29.92 inches (760 mm)Hg

SWCAA ...... Southwest .¢Jean Air Agency

T-BACT ...... Best Available Control Technology for -toxic air pollutants

TA,f ., ... , ... , ... i:o~ip ilir po!JutaQt pµrsmmt to Chapter 173460W.AC

TGQC ·- ...... Total Oasepus Organic carboil THC ............ Total 8y'1tocarbQµs

.tpy ............... Ton's per ye·ar TSP ........... ,.Total Suspentled Particulate

TSS .,, .•.. , ..... Total Suspe.µded So1ids

VOC .; .. , ....... Vol~til~ e>rg~n.ic compound WAC ... , ........ Wil&hlngt9.n Achninistt:afive:CQde WS~ ...... We~t$ide Water J.l~cl~01ation Facility

AOP· Applic.a:tion CL-1956 Technie,al ,Sl,lpport Qo~ument

Up.der 40 CFR .61 Subpart E, tr1etcury emissions .are Jinlite.d to 3,200 g/day; however, prev:ious pennittihg .actions have established a rnctxinwm merc1,1ry emission limit of ;3$Q g/day, which under the ~ludge throughput assumptions given above eqqates to 7.2'/. mg/kg on a sludge mass bas}s. Note that during the. 1999 .source test, the control efficienii.y was·deteimiri.ed to l>enegative and for calcufation purposes i~,considered.zero.

Sluage rnortitoring is tl$ed parametrically jil lieu of nieta{s emissions testing for c~lcl.ll~tipg annual emissions.

The hi:mr limit of570 hr/yr, Wi:lS retained, despite the engipes bemg subject to 40 GFR (i3 .Stibp~ zzzz. This lirilit was established in prior permits and is Coi)Sistent wHh EPA guidance for determining potential"'fo-emit for emergency engines. EPA .has ·stated that for pllrpos~s of NSR, that an upper bound :for .emissions must be established (which typically is _500.hr/yr or less of operation). B.ecawle previous perinits have established 570 hr/yr as a reason~bl~ upper bound for operation c)f the ~ngines, this value is u~ed for calculati.on of emissions. The hours limit in the NE~»A.P is indep¢nd~nt from tpe assun.iptions u~ed to calculate emissio~s under NSR. The limitation o.f .l.00 hr/yr fqt maintenanc¢ checks and readiness testing was induded as part of the requirements under 40 ¢FR 63 ~.ubpiut ZZZZ, Altb,<lugh SWCAA has. not requested delegation for area soqrc~s su~ject to 40 CFR 63 SuQpart ZZ.ZZ, the regUlations will become requirement under th~ eventual Title V 'permit. By including the requirements in the .ADP, it prevents future co.nflicts in the requirements in the Title V p~rmit.

10.d. Monitoring and Recordkeq,ing Requirements. AO)> l~,:3047 est~blishes mdnitoring artd reco.rdkeepiftg requirements· sufficient to . ilocument compJiartee With applicable emission limits, t:DS\lfe proper operation ()f approved equipment and provide for compliance with generally ,applicable requirements.

WAC 173-.:400-105.(8) requires that . th~ fa~ility maintain ·at least 95% vaiid data, mstall and operate .the CHMS :in compliance with 40 CFR 60 Appendix B, audit tlie CEMS in complian~e with 40 CFR 60 Appendi:x; F., and supply SW CAA with periodic reports. The regulation all.ows SWCAA to establish a reporting period other than monthly in the ADP. ·SWCAA believes that for this facility that quarterly reporting is sufficient fo demonstrate @n.ipliance.

U11der §503.46(a)(2), the monitoring freq1:1ency for met~ls in the sludge varies according to . Ole maximum sludge incinerated in a 365-day period. Assuming max.imum permitted throughput for 255 days (5 day/week for 51 week/yr) at 58 dry ton/day (52.6 t/day), illis ~u~tes to 13,413 t/yr or ~suming the S-yr average rate of 39.3 ton/day (35. 7 t/day); this equates to ?,104 t/yr. In either case, the monitoring frequency, acbording to the chart in ·§503.46(a)(2) is· once every 60 days. Because basing the frequency on days pr~ents the potential to miss 111onitoring, SWCAA believes that the intent was to monitor six times per ye~; Md therefore req1,1_ires monitoring once every two calendar months.

ADP 1'3~3047

W006AS-583309A-RT-235

Page28 of33

118 of 119

City of V ancpµver/WSWRF


THIS IS THE LAST PAGE OF THIS DOCUMENT

If you have any questions, please contact one of the following individuals by email or phone.

Name:

Title: Region:

Email: Phone:

Name:

Title: Region:

Email: Phone:

W006AS-583309A-RT-235

Josh Muswieck

Field Project Manager West Region

[email protected] 541-227-1292

Kristina Schafer

Hub District Manger West Region

[email protected] 253-480-3801

119 of 119

Date post:	27-May-2020
Category:	Documents
Upload:	others
View:	3 times
Download:	0 times

SOURCE TEST REPORT 2019 RELATIVE ACCURACY ... OF VANCOUVER - WESTSIDE...2019/07/17 · TABLE 4-2...

Documents