+ All Categories
Home > Documents > SOURCE: World Development Report 2008: Agriculture for Development. World Bank, October 2007.

SOURCE: World Development Report 2008: Agriculture for Development. World Bank, October 2007.

Date post: 06-Jan-2016
Category:
Upload: romeo
View: 32 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
Description:
SOURCE: World Development Report 2008: Agriculture for Development. World Bank, October 2007. SOURCE: Gómez-Barbero, M., Berbel, J. and Rodríguez-Cerezo, E. 2008. Bt corn in Spain—the performance of the EU's first GM crop. Nature Biotechnology 26: 384-386. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Popular Tags:
16
SOURCE: World Development Report 2008: Agriculture for Development. World Bank, October 2007.
Transcript
Page 1: SOURCE: World Development Report 2008: Agriculture for Development. World Bank, October 2007.

SOURCE: World Development Report 2008: Agriculture for Development. World Bank, October 2007.

Page 2: SOURCE: World Development Report 2008: Agriculture for Development. World Bank, October 2007.

SOURCE: Gómez-Barbero, M., Berbel, J. and Rodríguez-Cerezo, E. 2008. Bt corn in Spain—the performance of the EU's first GM crop. Nature Biotechnology 26: 384-386.

Page 3: SOURCE: World Development Report 2008: Agriculture for Development. World Bank, October 2007.

SOURCE: “In Lean Times, Biotech Grains Are Less Taboo”, New York Times, April 19, 2008http://www.nytimes.com/2008/04/21/business/21crop.html?_r=1&oref=slogin&pagewanted=print

"...tightening global supply has made it harder to get nonengineered corn...Millers and food companies are less

able to pay the surcharge to keep nonengineered corn separate from biotech varieties.”

Reality for the Korean Corn Processing Industry Association.

In Lean Times, Biotech Grains Are Less TabooApril 21, 2008

Page 4: SOURCE: World Development Report 2008: Agriculture for Development. World Bank, October 2007.

The Contraction of Product Quality Innovation in Agricultural BiotechnologyThe Contraction of Product Quality Innovation in Agricultural Biotechnology

SOURCE: Graff, G.D., Zilberman, D. and Bennett, A.B. 2009. The contraction of agbiotech product quality innovation in agricultural biotechnology.

Nature Biotechnology, in press (August, 2009).

Surveys of actual and expected progress in ten categories of product quality innovations with transgenic plants.

Page 5: SOURCE: World Development Report 2008: Agriculture for Development. World Bank, October 2007.

The Contraction of Product Quality Innovation in Agricultural BiotechnologyThe Contraction of Product Quality Innovation in Agricultural Biotechnology

SOURCE: Graff, G.D., Zilberman, D. and Bennett, A.B. 2009. The contraction of agbiotech product quality innovation in agricultural biotechnology.

Nature Biotechnology, in press (August, 2009).

Location and sector of the organizations responsible for the 558 transgenic product quality innovations identified in the primary survey.

Page 6: SOURCE: World Development Report 2008: Agriculture for Development. World Bank, October 2007.

The Contraction of Product Quality Innovation in Agricultural BiotechnologyThe Contraction of Product Quality Innovation in Agricultural Biotechnology

SOURCE: Graff, G.D., Zilberman, D. and Bennett, A.B. 2009. The contraction of agbiotech product quality innovation in agricultural biotechnology.

Nature Biotechnology, in press (August, 2009).

Annual counts of product quality innovations in the R&D pipeline as identified in the primary survey.

Page 7: SOURCE: World Development Report 2008: Agriculture for Development. World Bank, October 2007.

SOURCE: Capital Press, December 4, 2009

Page 8: SOURCE: World Development Report 2008: Agriculture for Development. World Bank, October 2007.

SOURCE: Stein, A.J. and Rodríguez-Cerezo, E. 2009. The global pipeline of new GM crops: implications of asynchronous approval for international trade. JRC Scientific and Technical Report EUR Number: 23846 EN.

http://ipts.jrc.ec.europa.eu/publications/pub.cfm?id=2420

“Another development in the R&D of GM crops is the emergence of more players. While currently it is private companies from the USA or

Europe that develop most of the GM events and crops (which are generally first authorized and cultivated in North America), over the

next years more GM crops will be supplied by private and public entities from Asia, in particular from China and India. ”

Page 9: SOURCE: World Development Report 2008: Agriculture for Development. World Bank, October 2007.

SOURCE: CSA News, May 2010, Vol. 55, page 27. Original source of chart is at http://www.aaas.org/spp/rd/presentations/aaasrd20100316.pdf

Page 10: SOURCE: World Development Report 2008: Agriculture for Development. World Bank, October 2007.

SOURCE: Subramanian, A., Kirwan, K., Pink, D. and Qaim, M. 2010. GM crops and gender issue. Nature Biotechnology 28, Pages: 404–406.

Use of GM insect-resistant Bacillus thuringiensis toxin (Bt) cotton generated not only higher income for rural workers but also more employment…about 424 million additional days of

employment for female earners

Page 11: SOURCE: World Development Report 2008: Agriculture for Development. World Bank, October 2007.

SOURCE: http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20100920/sc_afp/safricachinatradefarmfoodenvironment

JOHANNESBURG (AFP) – South Africa produces too much maize. Its neighbours not enough. But rather than feeding its neighbours, South Africa's surplus maize may feed Chinese

chickens, due to regional worries about genetically modified crops.

Page 12: SOURCE: World Development Report 2008: Agriculture for Development. World Bank, October 2007.

SOURCE: “More agricultural groups endorse GMO wheat”, Capital Press, June 10, 2014http://www.capitalpress.com/Nation_World/Nation/20140610/more-agricultural-groups-endorse-gmo-

wheat#.U7HJwo1dXog

““16 U.S., Canadian and 16 U.S., Canadian and Australian agricultural Australian agricultural organizations endorse organizations endorse

use of biotech in wheat. use of biotech in wheat. Why? To make wheat Why? To make wheat more competitive.”more competitive.”

““16 U.S., Canadian and 16 U.S., Canadian and Australian agricultural Australian agricultural organizations endorse organizations endorse

use of biotech in wheat. use of biotech in wheat. Why? To make wheat Why? To make wheat more competitive.”more competitive.”

Page 13: SOURCE: World Development Report 2008: Agriculture for Development. World Bank, October 2007.

SOURCE: “GM sugar beets save Idaho, Oregon growers millions”, Capital Press, 1/20/15. http://www.capitalpress.com/Idaho/20150120/gm-sugar-beets-save-idaho-Oregon-growers-millions

Page 14: SOURCE: World Development Report 2008: Agriculture for Development. World Bank, October 2007.

Big mergers “could change food supplies and costs

worldwide”1.U.S. Dow Chemical is buying Dupont-Pioneer2.Germany’s Bayer is buying Monsanto3.ChemChina is buying Syngenta

Colvin, G. “China’s $43Billion Bid for Food Security” Fortune May 2017: 79-86.

These $170B deals will have a profound effect on

future of global agriculture

Page 15: SOURCE: World Development Report 2008: Agriculture for Development. World Bank, October 2007.

SOURCE: “China’s $43 billion bid for food security”, Fortune Magazine, 5/1/17http://fortune.com/2017/04/21/chemchina-syngenta-acquisition-deal/

Big mergers “could change food supplies and costs worldwide”

1.U.S.: Dow Chemical is buying Dupont-Pioneer2.Germany: Bayer is buying Monsanto3.China: ChemChina is buying Syngenta This $170B in consolidation deals

will have a profound effect on future of global agriculture

Source” Colvin, G. “China’s $43Billion Bid for Food Security” Fortune May 2017: 79-86.

Page 16: SOURCE: World Development Report 2008: Agriculture for Development. World Bank, October 2007.

SOURCE: “China’s $43 billion bid for food security”, Fortune Magazine, 5/1/17http://fortune.com/2017/04/21/chemchina-syngenta-acquisition-deal/


Recommended