. South Dakota Department of Environment and Natural Resources

Protecting South Dakota 's Tomor.row .•. Today

DENR FY 2016 BUDGET REQUEST

presented to the

JOINT APPROPRIATIONS COMMITTEE

February 18, 2015

DENR Programs

Secretary

Division of Environmental Services (DES)

DENR Budget Brief - page 5

Air Quality Drinking Water

Feedlot Permit Groanchn1ter Quality

l\.6nerals and Mining Surface Water Quality

Waste Management Water Rights

Division of Financial and Technical &sistance (DFT A)

DENR Budget Brief - page 4

Geological Sun·ey

" ' ater and " ' aste Funding Watenbed Protection

DENR Administratin Services

Facilities l\llanage,ment F~cal .:Management Information Se~ic:es

Legal Senioes

BOARDS A1'1D COl\lli\USSI ONS

Board of Board of BoaJ'dof State Board of Small Petroleum ,·;vater " iater &. l\-fi.nern.ls and EmeJ·aencv .. . Operntor Business Release

1'.fanagement Natural Emironm.ent Resporue Ce.rti:fication Clean Afr Compensation Re.sou.rc,es Co1:runis~ion Advisory Boal'd

P:me;J - \Vate:r U,e - Sta<te 1.Vater Plan - Air Qua i!y - Chemic • rl)iate1 and - Air Qua ity - Releaee Appropriation - Financial - Asb-i!Sto; Reporting lJ/::i;tenra.ter Sn:,;ill Bu.sines; Compensation - \Vate:r Qualify Assietmce for - Ha.zan!oue - Community Operator Omlbud!;i!!'.iJ!ll& R.egula.tiom \'" ater & Solid \Va;te Right to Know Certification As.:iisbJ1ce - Dri~king \Varte Project:; - Mi.nmg ,:vater - Oil a:nd Gas

- Solid \Va.ate

2

1. DENR's Budget

Review of FY 2014 End of Year

Budget Status

• Excluding its informational budgets, 74% ofDENR's budget is personnel services;. 260/o is operating; DENR utilized 9·1 o/o ofits total budget authority

• DENR utilized 98% of its FTE allocation • DENR utilized 100 % ofits general funds • No transfers between personal services and operating ·were needed

2. Informational Budgets • Regulated Substance Response F,md

a.. Create,d by d1e 1988 Legislature to deal ,;1,,,:itl1 environmental cleanups b.. Uti lized $262,747 last year on 3 site:,, c. FY 2014 end-of-year bala;nce - $4.74 nulhoo. d. Includes Sl ,990,000 transfer to LUST Trust subaccount established by SDCL 34A-1 2-3.1

to provide EPA-mandated reimbursement for cleanup of 42 petro leum release sit.es. e. Future liabilities to the Fund

• Environ.mental cleanups - about 200 to 250 spills per year • EPA Brolun Ivfine Superfund site - state must provide 10% match for the projected

$97 million EPA Superfund cleanup; the state is then 100% liable for long-term 1,,vater treatment costs after EPA leaves

• Subaccount - cleanup ofpet:roleum release sites eligible for LUST Trust

• Environment.al Livestock Cleanup Fund a. Created by die 1998 Legislature to act as a safety net for environ.mental livestock

cleanups; the Legislature capped the fund at $2 111.i.llion b. Utilized $0 last year c. FY 2014 end-of-year ba]ance - $1.25 million d. Future liabdities to the Fund

• Safety net for agricultural livestock operations • Potential bankruptcies pose largest risks

• Petroleum Release Compensation Fund a. Created by the 1988 Legislature to financially assist tank owners with the cle:mup cost of

petroleum releases and to meet the federal financial responsibility requirements for regulated underground tank owners

b. Utilized $720,591 of the informational budgetto pay 210 claims at 11 1 sites; includes remoi,.-a1 of 121 abandoned underground petroleum storage tanks

c. FY 20 14 end-of-year balance - $4.03 nullion d. Future ]iabdities to the Fund

• Reimbursement for cleanup of petroleum leaks and spills from tanks • Reimbursement for eligible cases cleaned up with federal LUST Trust funds • Provide training to tank owners to comp]y wiili federa] training rnquiremen1s • Abandotmcl underground petroleum tank removals

3

Overview of DENR's Budget Request

DENR FY 2016 Budget Request • Status Quo Budget Request

A. UE.NR is requesting NO expansion in FTEs B. DENR is requesting NO expansion in personal senrices C. DE.NR is requesting ~O expansion in operating expenses D. DENR wiU continue to use its exis ting resources to get the job done

Cf!NRGon.or~• Fund lludl!l"'Hi"""ry

1.-tala ll'i•c .. ;;,..,..

Putting UE.NR's FY 2016 Budget Request in context ·with historical budget history: • DENR's 2016 general fund budget request is ($274,434) less than its FY 2009 budget. • DENR 's 201 6 general fund budget request has fewer general funds than in FY 2008. • DENR''S 201 6 budget request has (24.3) fe·wer FTE than FY 1987.

D.1- ·R n , nc R , HD 1i"T1r 111_ ,011'\"

,,.

DENRGOALS

1. Protect public health and the environment,

2. Maintain a business-friendly climate, and

3. Treat everyone as our customer.

Including federal grant commitments DENR uses hundreds of measures to see if it is getting the job done; the number of Performance Indicators in the Budget Book are:

• 40 for the Division of Technical and Financial Assistance, • 240 for the Dh ision of Em,;ronmental Services, and • 14 for the Petroleum Release Compensation Program.

5

50

II 410

I!

10

C>

16

l4

2

0

Key Envkonmental Measure: Meeting Federal Ambient Air Quality Standards

Particulate Matter 10 Trends in South Dakota

lO

"' "' .u 2& 21 . .

26 z,. ,. . 2 4 )112• ,. • ,. ;M 1.C n • 11 • 2 n • 23 • • • 22 2l . • ... J..!( ]o IU ll l'l )I

N ,a 20 ~o lC ........ >- fi"- ..... u . 17

.1.a 11 ,. ··~ H

' - - - - -

I C.

GCl7 ,_ - 2000 200t :3Xl2 2003 2004 2 2CXll! 2007 a:al 3lOCI 2010 :!01 20 2 :!l13

Calendar YeaJ

Particulate Matter 2.5 Trends for South Dakota

sf,. I a I IT!e

1J I, ,,= ~

10 10 10 10 lD ... ... ... - -• ;a

2001

,,=

- - - - -1 • y 1 7 - - - - -- - - - -

- - ..- - -- - - - -

I

2003 200!

--..:. ~.;.

- -- -- -

I

2007

Cal n d Y,

' .c -I --

--

~ .c -= - - -7 -- 6 4 -..

- - ........

- - -20,0 201 1 2012

SD is 1 of only 7 states in full "Attainment"

.J - -- i -I- I-

- -I

2013

6

Looming Air Quality Issues that could impact

South Dakota's Full Attainment Status

1. EPA's Proposed 111(b) Rules

• EPA's plan to cut carbon dioxide emissions from NEW power plants.

* EPA's carbon dioxide limit for coal-fired plants - 1,100 pounds per megawatt-hour

* EPA's carbon dioxide limit for natural-gas fi red plants - 1,000 pounds per megawatt -hour for larger units

• Result will be no new coal-fired plants built as the technology to meet the llimits for new coal-fi red plants is not commercially available.

2. EPA's Proposed 111(d) Rules

• EPA's plan to cut carbon dioxide emissions from EXISTING power plants

• South Dakota has only one coal-fired power plant (Big Stone near Milbank) and one natural gas combined cyc le plant (Deer Creek near Brookings)

* About 74 percent of our electrical production in 2012 was renewable (50 percent hydropower and 24 percent wind) making us a leader in low carbon emissions with only three states emitt:ing less ca rbon dioxide than South Dakota.

* Result will be EPA's standard fo r SD of only 741 pounds per megawatt-hour is not possible with out shutting down the Big Stone plant and stranding $384 million of pollution contro ls currently under construction to meet EPA's Regional Haze ru le.

* HB 1203 jeopardizes our potential litigation against EPA

3. EPA's Proposed Ozone Rules

• As indicated by graphs on preceding page, South Dakota 's air meets ALL federal ambient air quality standards, but EPA recently proposed to lower the air quality standard for ozone from the current level of 0.075 parts per mill ion to betvveen 0.060 and 0.070.

• DENR monitors ozone at six sites throughout the state; the graph below shows ozone concentrations at all six sites are GREATER than 0.060 parts per mill ion.

• If South Dakota does not meet th e new lower ozone standard, EPA wil l impose contro l measures at a signi·ficant cost that will result in no environmental benefit.

0 !lCl1

a. 0 10

7

100

7

0

100

75

25

0

!!I - .c: IA ,II .. -IQ 0 - ,__

- ,__

, - -

Key Environmental Measure:

Meeting Surface Water Quality Standards

Percent or Fecal Coliform Samples That Meet South Dakota Surface Water Quality Standards

... ,a ... ""' """

... .c: ;,. I& ""' ;; • -:: ;; • 11 .. - • II - II - ..

Cl a • ,__ - - "" ,__ - ,__ - -I! I!

,__ - - - ,__ - -

- - - - - - -

""" .. .. -IA .-. SI - la II -,__ - -·

,-. - -

- - -

2002 2003 2004 2005 2008 2007 200!! 2009 2 010 201 1 2012 2013 201

S Q te F:1s ,o.a1 Y • ar

Percent of Tota l Suspended Solids Samples That Meet Sout h D kota Surface Water Quality Samples

,-

,-

-~

~' .. l ·l - ;l 'l .. :L r;L ;l -:L ;l 1: l!i. ll al ~ -I;:- :s ..

1: ,_ • • i Ii :;;

'1 ;: II :.\ "' Cl II a - - - - - - Iii,-. - - - - - -1:

- - ,__ - ,__ - ...... ,__ - ,- - ,__ -

- - ,__ - - - - ,__ - - - ,__ -..,,

2002 2003 2004 2CXJl:i 2006 2007 2008 2000 2010 2011 20, 2 2013 20, .. $ ... te Fl Pl Yw<

Whi e 78 to 99 percent of the samples are meeting standards, some waters are f' sted as " impaired" under federal definitions.

8

-o1~, Big Sioux Segments in Red and Orange are

"lmpairednon Total Maximum Daily Load List

THE 2014 SOlJTH DAKOTA INTEGRA TEO REPORT FOR SIJRF"ACE WATER QUALITY

ASSESSMENT

PrepandBy SOUTH l!)J.K0TA OE:PARTM NT OF

5NVIRONMENT N-10 NATURAL RESOURCES

Lower Big Sioux. !River Basin

---=~==:zll.lM

ln~gratedl R~port Cate,go ry Leg imd

Jn"'11il: D.Jla (3)

Upper Big Sioux River Basin

. ·--¢r-·

..

9

Big Sioux River Water Qual ity Hlead ines

''Impaired" segments of the Big Sioux River have generated some unflattering headlines during the past year:

1. Programs created to further improve Big Sioux River .,,ar. 21, 2014, Written by Nick Lowrey

2. Officials: Clean up Big Sioux River,, Skunk Creek in Sioux Fa 11 S By Peter Harriman -Argus Leader, May 26, 2014

3. Lallley: Lawmaker reaction to Skunk Creek pollution stinks Patrick Lalley, plalley@argus!eacter.com 9:23 a.m. CDT June 29., 201·4

4. Big Sioux water quality at risk, board chairman warns Peter Harriman, SFA 12:28 a.m. CDT June 16, 2014

5. Group mulls signs to warn of pollutiion in Big Sioux J .L At'feo, jatveo@argusleader.com 12:37 a.m. CDT Ju,ry 11, 201·4

6. Skunk Creek polllution incentives catch on Peter Harriman, pharrima@arqusleader. com 12:22 a.m. CDT Au9·1..Nst 8, 2014

10

/)j"":':',.:.:(t::::::;"' Background Behind Big Sioux Water Quality

o Watershed

- 5,382 square miles in South Dakota

- 3,000 square miles in Minnesota and Iowa

c, Monitoring

- 19 DENR water qual ity monitori ng stations

- 23 USGS flow gauging stations

- 37 lakes

o Water quality impairments

- Too many bacteria (fecal coliform & E. Coli) impair recreational use

- Too much sediment (Total Suspended Sol ids) impairs fishery use

- Too many nutrients (nitrogen & phosphorus) in lakes promote algae

growth which impairs fishery and recreational use 11

Beadle

S nllom n r

v,son n$01'l

Point Source Municipal Pollution: Communities along Big Sioux River that have Upgraded Wastewater Treatment Faci1lities

La e

Co I

Turn r

Y n on

So 11th Dakota Department of Enmonnumt and Natural Re1ourru

Continuous Discharger

Intermittent Discharger

X No Discharge Facility

Flandreau

Corson Village

Brandon

Valley Springs Sanitary Distr ict

Jefferson 0 5 10 20 30 40 50 ••• Mis

12

Gosts to Reduce Point Source Municipal!

Pollution to the Big Sioux River

COMMUNITY CONSTRUCTION lYPE OF WASTEWATER YEARS TREATEMENT SYSTEM

Summit 1959, 2000, 2010 4 cell pond system

Watertown 1930, 1960, 1085 mechanical plant with infi ltration/ 1992, 1998 percolation basins

Castlewood 1957 2 cell pond with artific ial wet.lands

Estelline 1963, 1985, 1996 5 cell pond system

Bruce 1977 3 cell pond system

Volga 1959, 1970, 1990, 3 cell pond system with aeration 2013 cells and artificial wetlands

Brookings 1980, 2013-2015 advanced mechanical plant

Flandreau 1979 3 cell pond system

Egan 1973 2 cell pond with artific ial wet.lands

Trent 1972, 19'99 3 cell pond with artifi cial wetlands

Dell Rapids 1975, 2001 5 cell pond system with aeration ,___ ....

Baltic 1994 2 cell pond

Sioux Falls 1985 advanced mechanical plant

Corson Villlage 1970 septic tanks with 2 ce ll pond

Brandon 1983, 1991 , 1993, 3 cell pond system with aeration

2002 ,___ Valley Springs 1999 3 cell pond with artific ial wetlands

Canton 1956, 1980, 2010 4 cell pond system with aeration

Hudson 1974 2 cell pond system with

infi ltration/percolation basins

Jefferson 1961, 2004 4 cell pond with artific ial wetlands

TOTAL

Color legend: c:::J - continuous discharger c:::J - intermittent discharger ~ - no discharge

TREATMENT CAPITAL COSTS ONLY;

NO SEWER LINE COSTS

$100,000

$33,727,272

$264,000

$704,767

$256,000

$1,316,993

$44,154,000

$1,295,000

$67,000

$173,000

$1,301,818

$565,909

$86,392,344

unknown

$1,430,393

·"

$420,000

$3,358,000

$101 ,000

$635 ,000

$176,266,521

13

Examples of Municipa Wastewater Treatment in the Big Sioux Basin

DENR provides financial assistance to publicly owned

wastewater treatment systems through the State Water

Planning Process using funds from the state Water and

Environment Fund and EPA State Revolving Funds to build :

Artificial wetlands for wastewater treatment

Wastewater stabil ization pond

Aerial view of Sioux Falls advanced mechanical p lant

1

Large Livestock Operations Are Also Point Sources

Runoff and manure regulated by DENR's

General Water Pollution Control Permit for

Concentrated Animal Feeding Operations

rrli acion rea. in . 1

" Conce trated Anim Feeding Operation (CAFO)

o South Dakota Department of Agriculture 's County Site Analysis Program helps local offic ials site new livestock operations.

o Working together, growing our livestock industry protects water quality.

15

Clarlc

20

Best Management Practices Used to Reduce Nonpoint Source Pollution in the Big Sioux

40 M~es

Big Sioux Basin Best Management Practices

Implementation

Four projects support improvements to water quality within lhe Sig Sioux River &Jsin. The NE Glacial kes project seeks lo improve and preserve U1e water quality of natural lakes in the northeast r gion. Other projects Include Improvements to 11\e popula r La e Poinsett Area and the Cenlral and Upper Big Sioux. Major impairments in 11\e r ·on include exceedances for sediment and bacleria rn slreem5, chlorophyll and pH impairments in lakes. BMPs to minimize lmpairmenls Include ag asle syst ms, critical planling ar&as. bank stablMzation ands dimenl traps.

Water Quality Monltonn11 Sites • W.lo<Oua MonlloMQ

Imp Jred w~1et'l --~ o,,.,,oi;.,u. ---.... ----.. -°"IIO""

--Ytallf'!f TMper~

--101itl S.,,, .. ndodllald<(TS!I)

- pH

Belft Man'"91men1 Praellcn ... A; ......

• er-..-... . --­• °"'"' 61W'

Open lmplementatlo~ Projects

~ NE Ciloclal H

'-llcS..U.R!r«

fZZI Ull!.lt-&aoWJ -.er

16

Best Management Practices Used to Reduce

Nonpoint Source Pollution in the Big Sioux

Animal Waste Pond for Open Lot Monos lope Barn for Cattle

Riparian Buffers

Grassed Waterways Bank Stabilization 17

Practices and Costs lo Reduce Nonpoint

Source Pollution lo the Big Sioux River

Big Sioux River Best Managem1ent Practice (BMPs) Implemented 2005 - 2014 Using Cost-Share

Best Manaaement Practices Number Comcleted 1. Animal Waste System Installations 43

2. Feedlot Relocation 3 3. Stream Bank & Shoreline Protection (linear feet) 66,624 If.

4 Conservation Reserve Program Acres Enrolled 1 ;849 ac 5 Conservation Tillage (acres) 4 814 ac_ 6. RiQ,a rian Easements (acr,es) 5 662 ac_ 7. Wetland Restoration {acres) 1,481 ac _ 8. Planned Grazingi Systems (acres) 5,573 ac_ 9. A lt,ernative Water systems 13 1 O_ Terrace installation / Restoration (linear feet) 92 ,736 If_

11 _ Grass Watervvays {linear feet) 38,476 If. 12_ Filter Strips / Critica l Area Pia ntings ac. 1 ;.689 ac. 13_ Riparian Buffers / Protection (l inear feet) 416,498 If_ 14_ Sediment Traps 118

Funding Sources & Dollars Spent 2005 - 2014

Projects EPA Other Clean Local Othe.r Total Section State Water Federal

319 Funds !Revolving

ortheast $694,909 $1,584,579 $0.00 $238,374 i343, 178 $2,861 ,040 Glac ial Lakes

Upper Big $1 ,578,595 $0.00 $253,937 $2, 168,727 $55,341 $4,056,600 Sioux

I Lake Poinsett $613,125 $8,561 $0.00 $1 ,650,559 $170,1 28 $2,442,373

Central Big $2, 117,812 $91,548 $5,200,953 $2,338,641 $1,430,261 $11,179,215 Sioux

I Total Funding $5,004,441 $1,684 688 $5,454,890 $6,396,301 $1,998,908 $20,539,228

Pollutant Load Reductions from Best Management Practices Installed between 2005 - 2014

-­_ .... _

Historical Feca Coliform Trends

in Big Sioux River

Watertown

™ I

T r r

, -. ....... bt .... S--fl01

''""""'"'"'

----

19

I I

1-.

114c" S- lwa- •*._ Mtarl•1ffl ..,...f)l'ft ... killd,

Historical Trends in Total Suspended Solids

in Big Sioux River

Watertown

Deuel r l

fN:JSoll.JIMt'ltcliOWI f$1 To.:.., sv.,.-1'lilla Sol

---

Turner

• water Monitoring Sites

:l l:

20

l '

1.-

i.

I.

'"'"""""""''IIM':" .... 'Nlla~ Am-

Historical Trends in Ammionia

in Big Sioux River

Watertown

Deuel

l

'I '

I.

Turner

• wa1er Monitoring, Siles

21

l J.

- ·--

Historical Trends in Di,ssolved Oxygen in Big Sioux River

Turner

I Watertown

Deuel

• Waler Monitoring Siles

22

Summary of Water Quatity

of the Big Sioux River

1. In spite of increased development, population, and agricultural production

throughout the basin , water quality in the Big Sioux River during the last 35 years

has generally improved , but progress is slow, intermittent, and dependent on

precipitation and river flows;

2. Reducing pollution from both point and nonpoint sources will remain a high priority

as evidenced by the Big Sioux River being recently named as a "High Impact" project by the US Department of Ag ricu lture; and

3. DENR will continue to provide resources as available to local sponsors to continue making more water quality improvement projects a reality.

Meanwhile, DENR will continue to manage growing workloads. Examples of growing workloads are:

23

2,700

2.100

,.eoo

1,500

1,200

900

800

300

12.000

10.000

6 ,000

B.000

<l,000

2.000

0

Key Environmental Measure: DENR's ncreasing Workloads

Hazardous Wast.e Generators

2,427

2,2119

1 ,H 4

2002 2003 200! 2006 2007 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014

Contaminated Splll Si tes (Since 1972}

~ 10.074 10 ,38!1

9604 ,....9,828 -11,334 . ,= - -I

6 ,673 9 ,080 ,c:::; ~ rt 1

8,<M6 8 .623 -~ ri :: 7 ,1ilS5 8 ,22 1 ~ ~ -i 7 ,739 1. 7,AOO

~ T :!I

= ... --:l - - - ·--- - - -.. ! ... ! ~ ! ... ~. l - - - -

I - -2002 2004 200$ 2006

- s -,_ -- .. - ~

Ill ~ ..:

- -200?

mte F

-:II - ~

-

2009 I Vea r

-

-- 5

-

2010

- - - - -- ,_ - - ,_

5 i ! ! ,.r - - - - -- - - - -

20 11 2012 2014

24

Key Environmental Measure: DENR's Increasing Workloads

Air Quality Permits Regulated

2002 2003 2004 2005 200& 2001 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014

Slat Fiscal Ye.or

Water R ght Permits Regula1ed

s.ooo 8,12&

a.ooo 7,603

7.000

6 ,000

~.000

... 000

3.000

2 .000

,.ooo

2005 2008 2007 2003 2009 2010 2011 2012 201 2014

Stat Ff•c"'I Y

25

Key Environmental Measure: DENR's Increasing Workloads

Number of Producing OIi Wells In South Dakota

180 171

14;0

140

120

100 ~ !! :,

-z 80

80

40

20

0 2001 2002 2003 200.1 2005 200G 2007 2008 2009 2010 2012 2013

c .,. f!itn darYear

People Served by Regulated Public Drinking Water Systems

810.000 1 780.000

750000

~ ... ~ .-~

§

~ i E - >- -ill ...

>; - I ~

i - - - - -720.000 - -690.000

t J:'.! - l: ~ !I - - - - - - - -J! ~ - - - ~ - ~ -66().000

630.000

.. - ..... ,..a= - ; !l II

, I j ! I - ? - - - - - - - - - - - -600000

~ 17

2002 2003 2004 1IOOl5 2006 2007 :2008 20<» 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014

Stale Fl:acal Year

26

DENR's 37 FoxPro Databases

Conversion Project

DENR uses technology to boost productivity, efficiency, effectiveness, communication, and services to our customers.

• DENR has kept up with increased workloads largely by DENR staff building, maintaining; and using 37 FoxPro databases to manage work, track records , and provide automated customer services.

• However, Microsoft has announced no FoxPro support after 20 15.

• DENR has committed $16,020 per month or $192,240 per year from our existing budget to BIT to convert the FoxPrn databases over a period of years and include Geographic Information Syslem (GIS) applications to provide on-l ine acc ess to our customers.

• BIT's current status is below; additional resources in SB 55 will be used to accelerate remaining conversions. Data.base rvame/Des.cripaon

Dotobo.se Name/De.sr;riptio1i

1. Aird a ta base - track air polh.'ta!lts air permits, fees, models - 4% complete

2. Emironmental Fees - ;,;as ewater, water, air, solid waa.te- 20% comJJ ete

I Database Nome/Description

13. CoIL,\gg - tracb !icemed co11Structioo ag,__gi:e:!!ate mines - 100% complete

14. EXl'il - tracb. mineral exploration am mine perniits

15. Air - tracks permitted asphalt plant and

25. Location :'\otice - dam 'dugou notice~ - 100% c.omplete

26. Drillers - !fats ancl tracks w ell driller~ licellied in outh Dakota

2 . Pump Installers - lists: and traw pump i11.st aller~ licensed in SD

3. :'\ew \¥ell-track water quality samples fr.am new domestic wells t1011m.etal!ic mineral processing plant:. 23. Iquest - generates and trad::s annual

4. Operator Cer·tification - w ater and wasta•,•ater operntors, houri>, and te1;ts

S. SYSNames- track regulated public drinking w ai ec systems & I•..-ater quality

6. Project :\lanagement - track p am for water, ,xa~tewater, \\·aste - 76% c.om~ te

7. Soursce \Yater Assessments - source water areas & pollution sources

8. Emironmental E,·ents Database -internet ~pill tracking- 1 (,Ci% com12lete

irrigation ,1,-ater u.,,e reporu

16. Wells - tracks permitted oil, gas, and underground inJec.tion v:ells - 1 CO% comp lete 29. Lakeinfo - lake. data to inc.lude id,.

name, le.gal,. high & lo-w \¥ater mad.:;:. 17. Feedlots - tracks permitted CO!ll.centrated animal feeding operations 30. Lakelev I - table,e; ofwate,r lev-eli;

measured semi-awiually in lakes 18. Storm \Vater Database. - tracb permits: from. construe-ti.on and industrial

19. Surface Water Discharge Database -tracb permits: feeds IOS - 32% complete

20. Temporary Dewate:ring Database -tracks approved de,vate.ring operatiom

31. Log.s - w e.II construction c!ata to indude legal, depth, log , and driller

32. Obs94a - water right observation wel ts to incfude legal, yield, and depth

33. S11atdam2 - ,1ate Safety of Dams inventc1)' to include. leg al, o,mer, size

9. TA_NKDATABASE -tracb regulated 21. Recycling Database - in•:entory of all 34. \ \le,,el - observation w ell measurem.enti;

~tor age tanks - 100% complete recyc.ling facilities in $tate - 100%, complete

10. Tier II & TRI- SAR'\ chemical ~torage reJJ2!!s and toxic release~ - 93 %

11. Ground Water :Monitoring - data from facili Le$ on shallo,,· agu ifers - 6%

12. 1'.ilS or Abruidoned ~·fined Lands -B lack Hilk invento1y

22. Hazardous Waste Database - tracb hazardous 1.vaste generators-10()% complete

23. Asbestos Database - c.ertification data from -.i;ork= and demolition notices -1 '8{)%

24. Solid \Yaste Database - tracb permitted solid ,1,ai.1:e di~posal sites - 4 %

35. Wpapp - track new applicatiom :for water righ penruts

36. Wrinfo - :rerie.s of water right Table: and Wai er me data

3 . Lookup Table~ - ables o replace abbrev i:itions in report; and Caspio

27

OEN R's One-Stop, GIS Interactive Map Dashboard

PREVIOU S IROLLOUTS OF DENR GIS IN11ERAC111VE MAPS

1. 2012 and 2013 Legislatures - Oil! and Gas Interactive Map provides linlks to fi les

for 1 ;900 oil and gas holes plus 34,350 test holes and 62)45 water we ll logs.

2. 201 4 Legislature - Constructiion Aggregate !Interactive Map with 4,651 active and reclaimed construction aggregate mines such as sand and gravel pits,

pegmatite mines, and minera l mines for materials used in cement.

2015 GIS INTERACTIVE MAP ROLLOUTS

1. Property Search for Spilll Sites and Sites wiitih Environmental Reports -

identifies more than 13,250 sites; demonstrated by Rick Lancaster, DENR

2. Tanks Database -find tank information for about 5,000 closed and active regulated storage tanks; demonstrated by Nayyer Syed, DENR

3. Recycling Facilities in South Dakota - search 156 different locations for materials they take to recycle; demonstrated by Nick Emme, DENR

4. Dry Draw Location Notice - search 97,62.0 f i ling1s for water right dry draw

location notices; demonstrated by Ron Duvall, DENIR

28

DENR's Legislative Agenda for 2015

BILLS

1. Governor Daugaard's 2015 Executive Reorganization Order No. 2015-01

::;> Transfers authority to regulate bottled water quality from the Department of Public Safety to DENR

2. !Bureau of Finance and Management's SIB 55 to Amend FY 2015 !Budget

~ Includes special appropriation of $350,000 for the Bureau of Information and Technology to speed up work on DENR's 37 FoxPro Database Conversion Project and provide natural resource data online using GIS interactive maps.

3. Governor Daugaard's 2015 Water and Environment Funding Bill S!B 173 (also known as the Annual Governor's Omnibus Water Funding Bill)

~ Innovative Wheeling Option gets water to all South Dakota members of Lewis & Clark Regional Water System by putting West River/Lyman-Jones $12.5 mill ion loan prepayment immediately back to work

• Bi lll appropriates $7.7 million to Lewis & Clark Regional Water and authorizes $4.8 mill ion in state Consolidated funding for Big Sioux Community Water and Minnehaha Communi1ty Water System for Madison Wheeling Option.

• Wheeling Option saves $17 million of state dolla rs needed to construct the remaining segments of the Lewis & Clark service line to livladison.

4. DENR's HB 1014 from Governor Daugaard's Red Tape Review

~ Repeals five unnecessary statutes that have been exec uted or are obso lete.

• Deletes another 392 worcls from the code.

5. Governor Daugaard's IBilll to Develop Model of the lower Big Sioux HB 1188

;;;;> The extensive development in the lower Big Sioux basin makes it the most vulnerab le river segment in South Dakota to threaten loss of life and property from flood damag1e

• Approp riates $500;000 to develop a fllood model to predic t inundation areas. • Amended by House Appropriations to $ 1

6. Governor Daugaard's Recommended FY 2016 Budget Request for DENR

a;::> Status Quo Budget Request • DENR i1s requesting NO expansion in FTEs • DENR i1s requesting NIQ expansion in personal services • DENR iis requestin g NIQ expansion in operating

29