SOUTH FEATHER WATER & POWER AGENCY · 11/22/2011 · Microwave Upgrade Communications Technician...

SOUTH FEATHER WATER & POWER AGENCY

AGENDA Regular Meeting of the Board of Directors of the

South Feather Water & Power Agency Board Room, 2310 Oro-Quincy Highway, Oroville, California

2:00 P.M., Tuesday; November 22, 2011

A. Roll Call

B. Approval of Minutes – Financial Workshop and Regular Meeting on October 25, 2011 (Tab 1)

C. Approval of Warrants (Tab 2)

D. Public Participation Individuals will be given an opportunity to address the Board regarding matters within the Agency’s jurisdiction that are not scheduled on the agenda, although the Board cannot take action on any matter not on the agenda. Comments will be limited to 5 minutes per speaker. An opportunity for comments on agenda items will be provided at the time they are discussed by the Board. Comments will be limited to five minutes per speaker per agenda item.

E. Staff Reports (Tab 3)

F. Directors’ Reports Directors may make brief announcements or reports for the purpose of providing information to the public or staff, or to schedule a matter for a future meeting. The Board cannot take action on any matter not on the agenda and will refrain from entering into discussion that would constitute action, direction or policy, until such time as the matter is placed on the agenda of a properly publicized and convened Board meeting.

G. Business – Change in Treated Water Rates (Tab 4) (a) Public Hearing to receive oral and written protests of the proposed changes in rates and charges. (b) If written protests are received from less than 50% of landowners who are subject to the Agency’s rates and charges, action will be considered to approve the proposed three-stage change in treated water rates. Reducing raw (irrigation) water rates may also be considered. 2012 Budget (Tab 5) Approval of the 2012 Agency Budget, as recommended by the Finance Committee. Foothill Boulevard Pavement Restoration Project – Construction Agreement (Tab 6) Approval of an agreement with Fairbanks Paving Company to repair damages to Foothill Boulevard caused when a water main broke, at a lump sum cost of $43,475. Consulting Services Agreement – FERC Part 12D Inspecting and Reporting (Tab 7) Approval of a consulting services agreement with AMEC Geomatrix, Inc., to provide dam-safety inspection and reporting services as required by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC “Part 12D”). Consulting Services Agreement – Annexation Processing (Tab 8) Approval of a consulting services agreement with Gallaway Consulting, a division of NorthStar Engineering (Chico), to process annexations, including preparation of applications, plats and CEQA documentation, and LAFCo coordination.

[CONTINUED ON BACK OF PAGE]

Termination of Annexation Fees (Tab 9) Termination of all annexation fees as specified in Part D of the Agency’s Rules & Regulations Governing Water Service. Conveyance Agreement – Hillview Ridge Apartments Phase II (Tab 10) Approval of a Conveyance Agreement with Oroville Pacific Associates II, LP, specifying the terms and conditions by which the Agency will accept the completed water distribution facilities for the Hillview Ridge Apartments Phase II. Forbestown Powerhouse – Condition Assessment (Tab 11) Approval of HDR Engineering’s Task Order No. 4, in the not-to-exceed amount of $263,096, to provide engineering consulting services for the preparation of a condition assessment (including WECC testing) for Forbestown Powerhouse. Closed Session. Conference Real Property Negotiator. Government Code §54956.8. (Tab 12) Property: APN 013-290-051. Agency Negotiator: Michael Glaze, General Manager. Negotiating Party: Mid Valley Title and Escrow Company, Trustee. Under Negotiation: Price.

H. Adjournment

217

MINUTES of the REGULAR MEETING of the BOARD of DIRECTORS of SOUTH FEATHER WATER & POWER AGENCY

Tuesday, October 25, 2011, 2:00 P.M., Agency Board Room, 2310 Oro-Quincy Hwy., Oroville, California

DIRECTORS PRESENT: James Edwards, Dee Hunter, Lou Lodigiani, Dennis Moreland and

Steve Onken. STAFF PRESENT: Steve Wong, Finance Division Manager; Arthur Martinez, Manager of Information Systems; Rick McCullough, Water Division Manager; Matt Colwell, Water Division Manager; Kathryn Zancanella, Power Division Manager; Dustin Cooper, Legal Counsel (arrived at 3:00 p.m.); Jeffrey Meith, Legal Counsel; Michael Glaze, General Manager. OTHERS PRESENT: Jeanne Enget; Charles and Suzie Rathbun. CALL TO ORDER President Edwards called the meeting to order at 2:00 p.m. and led the Pledge of Allegiance. APPROVAL OF MINUTES M/S/C (Moreland/Lodigiani) approving the Minutes of the regular meeting of September

27, 2011. APPROVAL OF WARRANTS M/S/C (Hunter/Onken) approving the total General Fund and Joint Facilities Operating

Fund expenditures for the month of September 2011 in the amount of $2,535,520.79; and, approving the total Power Division expenditures for the month of September 2011 in the amount of $554,181.36.

PUBLIC PARTICIPATION – Charles Rathbun and Jeanne Enget each asked questions about the proposed rate change. General Manager Michael Glaze answered their questions and gave them specific information about how the proposed rate change would affect their respective domestic water bills, using their past 12 months of consumption as a basis of comparison. POWER DIVISION MANAGER’S REPORT The Board reviewed a written report from Kathy Zancanella, Power Division Manager, including water management, powerhouse operations and power revenue for September 2011. Operations Rainfall to date at Forbestown Headquarters totals 5.01 inches. Flows from Little Grass Valley Reservoir were set at 400 cfs on September 30 and will continue through October 26, at which time they will be ramped down to 30 cfs. Little Grass Valley Dam Access Tunnel Work in the access tunnel was stopped on September 28 when flows were ramped up for the fall drawdown of Little Grass Valley Reservoir and the spill gates were opened per the Division of Dam Safety certificate. Most of the work was completed at that time, although Neil’s Controlled Blasting estimated that there are about two and a half more days of shotcreting to do. They will return to the job during the week of October 31 to complete the project when the flows are returned to minimum. They were unable to meet the originally planned schedule due to difficulty in getting a certified “nozzleman” with the necessary experience for the type of shotcrete placement they were doing. Kelly Powerhouse Outage The annual outage on Kelly Powerhouse began October 3 and was scheduled to end October 14. However, during testing the crew found a field pole piece with low voltage readings compared to

218

the other pole pieces, necessitating extending the outage to October 21. Some additional cleaning and testing was done, and vibration monitoring will be installed prior to returning the unit to service until a longer outage can be taken and the rotor pulled and the pole piece sent out for repairs. The other planned work went as expected, and HDR Engineering inspected the turbine shutoff valve in preparation for making a recommendation as to whether the valve can be rehabilitated or should be replaced. Charlie McCauley from the Water Division provided assistance on the outage. Miners Ranch Canal Outage The Miners Ranch Canal outage ran concurrently with the Kelly Powerhouse outage. In addition to the normal cleaning and patching of leaks, two other projects were accomplished. Syblon Reid made repairs to two sections of the gunite walls, removing the old wall sections, placing wire mesh, new shotcrete and expansion joints along the banks. A California Dept. of Corrections crew, under the supervision of the California Dept. of Forestry and Fire Protection, removed brush from the banks above the canal. New Water Division employee, Cory Nevers, assisted with this year’s canal outage. Microwave Upgrade Communications Technician Brian Howerton, and a small army of technicians from PG&E, Global Tower, Peninsula Engineering, and Martin Crane Services, completed the cutover of the Sly Creek microwave path. This was the most complex of the paths as it goes from the powerhouse to a set of dishes along the road to Sly Creek Dam, to an active repeater site near Sanborn Mine on Mooreville Ridge, and to Sunset Hill. They began the cutover just before the storms of October 4-6 hit, and completed the work in two days despite some adverse conditions. The final path to be upgraded will be the one from Kelly Powerhouse to a passive repeater on Monte De Oro to Sunset Hill. The primary challenge for this cutover will be access to the reflector on Monte De Oro. While the Agency owns the property where the repeater stands, there is no road access except for a “cattle road” across property owned by others. Sly Creek Dam Crest Modification Work in the spillway is continuing with the installation and testing of the rock anchors and placement of concrete for the abutment walls and ogee crest. Syblon Reid will work as a subcontractor to Teichert when assembly of the new spill gate begins the week of October 31. The new bridge deck will be installed after the air bladders are set (tentatively scheduled for November 5-6), and assembly of the gate panels will occur with the bridge in place. Teichert will then complete building the road approaches on either side of the bridge. All of the work on the spillway will be completed this year with the exception of the road paving; which work will be finished when temperatures allow for paving in the Spring. Lost Creek Dam Modifications Project - Permit Process The Preliminary Supporting Design Report for Lost Creek Dam was submitted to FERC (Washington, DC and San Francisco) on September 8 on CDs, since the reports and drawings resulted in over 1,100 pages of material. The FERC San Francisco staff subsequently requested a paper copy of everything, which was supplied to them by AECOM. On October 4, the Agency formally requested the start of consultation under the Historic Properties regulations, and requested that FERC delegate its Section 106 authority to the Agency so that the process can be moved forward. The next round of regulatory activity will involve seeking the various permits and agreements from the US Army Corps of Engineers, State Water Resources Control Board, and California Dept. of Fish and Game. WATER DIVISION MANAGER’S REPORT The Board reviewed a written report from Matt Colwell, Water Division Manager. Domestic Distribution Operations On Tuesday, October 4, at approximately 3:30 pm, Agency crews responded, in the rain, to a significant mainline break. Crews found Foothill Boulevard near Edgemont flooded with water erupting from both sides of the street. The mainline break was quickly isolated, exposed, and the cause determined to have occurred from substandard installation. The crews efficiently removed the ruptured section of pipe, jack-hammered away a rock outcropping, and reinstalled ductile iron pipe consistent with waterworks standards. The cost to repair the damaged road section is anticipated to exceed $10,000, so an insurance claim has been initiated.

219

Transmission and Distribution crews were commended for completing the repair efficiently (in less than four hours) and with minimal customer impact. During the week of October 3-6, Transmission and Distribution crews took advantage of Palermo School being out of session to isolate and improve the water distribution mainline feeding the area. A new 8-inch mainline isolation valve was installed to prevent a large area from being out of water and a new 4-inch tap, valve, and plumbing was installed to repair a failed valve. A leak at the Feather Falls Casino revealed a very unique situation. When the crew exposed a leak on the fire-service lateral feeding a hydrant and commercial fire system, they found a plumbing system that had been severely compromised by water hammer. It appears that someone (local fire or construction crews) operated the hydrant too fast and caused a separation of the fire service fittings to the point of failure. More unique is that, somehow and for sometime, the metal bolts on an isolated valve and flange assembly have been acting as electric anodes and corroded to the point of causing the actual leak. All surrounding metal joints and fittings appear to be in great shape as expected. The voltage source has yet to be determined. A CHP patrol car was rapidly pursuing a speeding driver when the driver lost control of the vehicle and hit a hydrant at the intersection of Power Hill and Ophir roads (the driver was later arrested). The break-off spool performed as intended preventing damage to the distribution system. The break-off spool and hydrant were replaced. Irrigation Operations The Agency irrigation system current releases are: Forbestown Ditch SF 14 = 0 cfs NYWD = 0 cfs WD 6 = 0 cfs Bangor Canal SF 25 = 8 cfs Palermo Canal = 2 cfs Water Treatment Operations MRTP operations are taking advantage of low water levels at Miners Ranch Reservoir resulting from Kelly Powerhouse outage operations. Staff is trying to acquire operational information about how low the reservoir can go and still meet hydraulic and water quality operational concerns for both domestic and power purposes. Previously, staff mitigated water quality and operational concerns at approximately 878 elevation – 8 feet lower than normal levels. The reservoir elevation is currently at 877, and it has been verified that it can operate at a lower elevation and for longer periods than previously assumed. This is important information because it allows staff to confidently react to any drawdown need, and it will hopefully exterminate the exposed milfoil. It appears that historically low levels at the reservoir can be maintained without significant, or any, operational impact (10’ drawdown has head impact). The 2011 MRTP cumulative demand is still tracking a new record low. It is reasonable to assume that the annual maximum daily demand (MDD) has now been achieved for the year. On July 9th and August 15th MRTP produced 9.0 million gallons per day, which is significantly lower than the MDD since 1994 (current records). REGULATORY COMPLIANCE MANAGER’S REPORT Dam Safety and Security Management – Functional Exercise Preparations continue for the functional exercise to be conducted on November 9. A functional exercise is intended to test the capability of a community’s entire emergency management system. It is based on a simulation of an emergency that will require the various skills represented by SFWPA and the local and state emergency management agencies. Conducted in real time, the success of this event will be determined by the spontaneous interaction of the organizations present. The scenario-related events and messages of increasing complexity, threat, and pressure are interspersed to test the player’s skills, knowledge, awareness, and ability.

220

Power Project Maintenance Woodleaf Powerhouse Rock Slope Maintenance Inspection During the night of April 9, 2005, a 1,000 cubic-yard rockslide from the slope above the Woodleaf Powerhouse covered part of the powerhouse roof and loosened material near the steeply inclined lowest section of the Woodleaf penstock. The rock face was subsequently stabilized and it was recommended that maintenance be conducted every five years thereafter. Recently, a maintenance inspection was performed by Don Beldon, owner of Neil’s Control Blasting, the firm that performed the work to stabilize the slope in 2005. Mr. Beldon was accompanied in this work by Chuck Kull, principal geotechnical engineer of Holdrege and Kull. Miners’ Canal Improvement During the last outage of Kelly Powerhouse, Syblon Reid General Engineering restored two sections of the Miner’s Ranch Canal. The cracked sections of the canal lining were removed and the slope behind them was reshaped and keyed to ensure the new sections would form to the soil beneath in a stable manner. Welded wire fabric and shotcrete were then placed. Each phase of the project was inspected to ensure compliance with plans and specifications. Shotcrete placement was performed by Dees-Hennessy, Inc, of Santa Carlos, California. Regulatory Compliance Management First Archeology Inspection As part of the application for the new FERC license, SFWPA had to develop a Historic Properties Management Plan (HPMP). The HPMP was developed with FERC and the California Historic Preservation Office (SHPO). In July, FERC and SHPO issued the Programmatic Agreement (PA) which directs SFWPA to implement the HPMP within six months of the license issuance, or six months after the execution of the PA. The HPMP has many components, not the least of which is monitoring of known historic and/or cultural sites by a professional archeologist. This monitoring of the existing cultural sites and historic properties for signs of degradation and unexpected damage is going to be conducted at the end of October. Neal Neuenschwander, an archeologist from Peak and Associates (subconsultants to HDR who worked on the relicensing project) will update site records and prepare site sketch maps. GPS-data collection will be used to record site datum and additional information as needed. This information will be included in site records and used to update Geographical Information System (GIS) and confidential maps of SFWPA historic properties. This is the first of many annual inspections and will be used as a baseline for future inspections. FINANCE DIVISION MANAGER’S REPORT The Board reviewed a written report from Steve Wong, Finance Division Manager. South Feather Relicensing Consulting Services No invoices have been submitted this month for relicensing consulting services. Total relicensing payments to-date, to HDR, the Agency’s consultant for relicensing, amount to $5,108,868 for services rendered through June 25, 2011. The budget balance remaining under this agreement is $41,893. Proposition 218 Notice Questions Finance Division employees have received and responded to phone calls and counter traffic asking about the proposed change in domestic water rates. For the most part the staff’s verbal explanations and clarifications have answered all of the questions. Spreadsheet templates have been prepared to project the impact of the rate changes for specific customers. The biggest complaint seems to be from customers/locations receiving multiple notices. CalPERS Computer Conversion From all of the public notices, it appears the major computer conversion at CalPERS last month has been successful. The Agency/Business Partner communications and file transactions have been delayed and resolutions and responses on questions have been difficult, frustrating and slow. On one phone call, a two-hour hold time was experienced. However, confirmation of all Agency submittals has been received and everything seems to point to an improved overall process and accessibility of relevant information.

221

2012 Budget Work on the 2012 Annual Budget has continued throughout the Agency. It is anticipated that a 2012 Proposed Budget will be completed and distributed by November 10 for a Budget and Finance Committee meeting the week of November 14 (Directors Edwards and Hunter). LEGAL COUNSEL’S REPORT Jeff Meith reported on recent efforts by North Yuba Water District to get the State Water Resources Control to consider processing its petition for extending its water-rights permits. GENERAL MANAGER'S REPORT The Board reviewed a written report from Michael Glaze, General Manager. Relicensing Since the board’s last meeting there have been no new relicensing developments. The State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) is continuing the approval process for the 401 Water Quality Permit for the Agency’s South Feather Power Project and is continuing its review of the CEQA-compliance documents submitted by the Agency earlier this year. The permit application was filed by the Agency on May 14, 2008. Proposed Rate Change The Proposition 218 notice approved by the board last month was in the mail boxes of property owners and customers the very next week. Subsequently, staff began to receive a number of interesting phone calls, emails and scrawled notes by US Mail – and they seem to span both extremes of approval and (confused) opposition. As an example, Dee Fairbanks sent the following email.

This is NOT a letter of protest, but a letter of affirmation in support of the proposed changes. I complement the District, its board and leaders for taking this bold move. I do not think that I am in the minority and I doubt that the majority who feel as I do will show up at the hearings. I just felt a need to let you know I feel. Feel free to use my name and this communication as you see fit.

On the other end of the pendulum was a note scribbled on the front page of the Prop. 218 notice sent to a property owner by the name of Ore Cal Investments. It read: “Your fees are excessive already. You are ripping everyone off.” Mr. Glaze speculated that whoever wrote this comment either did not read the notice, read it and didn’t understand it, or assumed the part about a rate reduction had to be a typographical error. In addition to returning phone calls to people with questions about the Prop. 218 notice and how it might affect them, and speaking to a local service club about the proposed rate change, Mr. Glaze worked with several large users to help them understand the impact the rate change will have on them. For example, Oroville Cemetery District (OCD) has two domestic water accounts. On the smaller account, OCD only minimally exceeds the Block 1 rate six months out of the year (based on the immediate past 12 months), and the new rates would result in an annual savings of $39 (-5.8%) in 2012, and up to $81 (-12.2%) after 2017. However, their larger account has significantly more consumption and substantially exceeds the Block 1 rate eight months annually. On that account the new rates would result in an annual cost increase of $382 (+8.6%) in 2012, and up to $1,334 (+30.1%) after 2017. Overall, OCD would see its total 12-month water bill go up by:

$343 (+6.7%) after 1/1/12; $685 (+13.4%) after 1/1/14; and,

$1,253 (+24.6%) after 1/1/17.

Installing a third meter – depending on the configuration of OCD’s internal plumbing – might prove to be a cost saver for them.

222

The rate-change story for Mooretown Rancheria’s nine accounts (hotel, casino, landscaping, gym, and headquarters) has a happier ending. The Rancheria’s total 12-month water bill will go down by:

$325 (-3.5%) after 1/1/12; $649 (-7.0%) after 1/1/14; and,

$495 (-5.4%) after 1/1/17. DIRECTORS’ REPORTS – None. CALL FOR NOMINATIONS – BCSDA EXECUTIVE BOARD Directors reviewed a letter received from Butte County Special Districts Association calling for nominations of representatives of enterprise and non-enterprise districts to stand for election to BCSDA’s Executive Board. They also reviewed the “2011 Executive Board Membership Roster” showing President Jim Edwards and General Manager Mike Glaze as presently on the BCSDA board. Mr. Edwards’ term expires this year and he is, therefore, up for re-election. Mr. Glaze’s term does not expire until the end of 2012. M/S/C (Lodigiani/Onken) nominating Jim Edwards and Dee Hunter for election to the

Butte County Special Districts Executive Board. FORBESTOWN DITCH – MORATORIUM ON ANNEXATION The Forbestown Ditch Strategic Planning Committee met on August 8, and again on October 4, 2011. Its primary focus was to analyze operations and demand on that ditch system to ensure its long-term ability to meet the needs of its existing customers (i.e., annexed parcels and parcels having a right to service by virtue of the Railroad Commission’s order). Of great concern to the Committee was the reality that, except for wet years, and notwithstanding the considerable improvements that have been made to the Lower Forbestown Ditch system, Agency personnel have great difficulty providing adequate service to customers at the end of the system. Foreman Rick McCullough explained that, as was experienced in 2009, his ditchtenders are unable to get water all the way to the end of the system when the previous winter and spring have been very dry. Committee Recommendations: Extend Domestic Water to Lost Horizon Drive To optimize the Agency’s ability to supply water to all the existing Forbestown Ditch customers, even during dry years, the Committee recommended that the domestic-water distribution system should be extended up Lost Horizon Drive so that nine current ditch customers along that street could be removed from the Lake Wyandotte system. (Mr. Glaze responded that planning for that project has already been incorporated into staff’s budget-development process and a 2013 project-completion date is anticipated.) Although Lake Wyandotte has been operated consistently in the recent past without the need to subsidize it with water from the Forbestown Ditch, transferring the Lost Horizon Drive customers over to the domestic system would almost guarantee that Lake Wyandotte could support the demand of its remaining customers with water stored in the winter time from its immediate watershed and without drafting from the Forbestown Ditch. Terminate Surplus Water Agreements on the Forbestown Ditch Out of the 81 parcels that previously received, and/or are presently receiving water from the Forbestown Ditch, nine of them received service by virtue of a surplus water contract (only two agreements were approved for 2011). The surplus water agreements specify that the surplus water is only a “temporary source” of water and will not be supplied “when needed for use elsewhere within the Agency, or on lands entitled to water under the Railroad Commission’s order.” Every agreement has a termination date at the end of the year in which it is executed. Theoretically, the sale of surplus water should only be approved for parcels at the end of a particular ditch or distribution system, where the water “tails off” and is no longer available for use by Railroad Commission parcels and those within the boundaries of the district. None of the nine parcels that have been sold surplus water meet this criteria (i.e., they are situated

223

along the ditch and not at its end). The Committee recommended that no surplus agreements be approved in the future for parcels on the Forbestown Ditch, and that the owners of the two parcels presently receiving surplus water be advised that they will be sold surplus water through 2012, if they elect, but that no surplus water agreements will be approved for their parcels thereafter. Establish a Permanent Moratorium on Annexations for Forbestown Ditch Service Adding additional customers only exacerbates the Agency’s ability to provide a consistent and reliable service to those who already have a right to service as owners of a parcel within the Agency’s boundaries or because they own a “Railroad Commission parcel.” Therefore, the Committee recommended that no new parcels be annexed into the Agency’s boundaries for the purpose of receiving irrigation water from the Forbestown Ditch. M/S/C (Onken/Moreland) (1) applications for annexation of parcels to the Agency for the

purpose of receiving Forbestown Ditch water service will no longer be accepted; (2) no surplus water agreements will be approved for Forbestown Ditch water after 2011, except for those two currently enforce, which two will not be renewed after 2012; and, (3) planning shall commence to extend domestic water service to parcels along Lost Horizon Drive so that irrigation water service may be terminated in that vicinity once the domestic system is in place.

Ayes: Edwards, Lodigiani, Moreland, Onken. Abstained: Hunter. HYDROLOGIC MONITORING SYSTEM EVALUATION In April 2009 the Board approved a consulting services agreement with Innovative Hydrology for a survey and network design for hydrologic monitoring. Until this time, and for several decades previously, Surface Water Data had operated and maintained the Agency’s gauging stations and collected and reported the stream-flow data to the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS). Part of SFWPA’s obligation under the license issued to operate its power project by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) is the installation, operation and maintenance of stream-flow gauging stations throughout the project and the reporting of the data therefrom to the USGS. The proposal to engage the services of Innovative Hydrology came after a staff analysis of how to optimize the Agency’s stream-flow data needs. It was the recommendation of staff after this analysis that the Agency develop a network design for converting the old gauging stations to real-time data loggers that report via a satellite communication system to a central computer where the data is stored and available for analysis by staff and system-modeling software. In addition to engaging Innovative Hydrology, the Board approved creation of a hydrographer position, and Eddie Paul was subsequently promoted into it. He immediately began training for the position, as well as assisting Innovative Hydrology personnel in the conversion of the old gauging stations. By the end of September, all the conversions were complete and Eddie assumed responsibility for the Agency’s hydrologic monitoring program, including reporting to USGS. The 2010-11 water year (October – September) is now complete and Mr. Paul, the gauging stations and the satellite communication system have performed very well. However, because the system is only one-year old, Mr. Glaze opined that now would be a good time to have Innovative Hydrology return to each of the sites and evaluate their condition and performance. Such an evaluation would ensure that the Agency’s hydrologic monitoring program would move forward with all systems functioning optimally. As the Agency moves into a new FERC license, controlling and ensuring correct volumes of water released for environmental purposes becomes more complex than under the current license conditions. Also, under the new power purchase agreement with PG&E, the value of water for generation purposes is significantly greater than under the old agreement, making efficient and non-wasteful releases for consumptive purposes economically imperative. Directors reviewed a proposal from Mark Heggli (Innovative Hydrology) to perform the system evaluation discussed above at a cost of $5,500.

224

M/S/C (Moreland/Hunter) accepting the proposal from Innovative Hydrology to perform

an evaluation and review of the Agency’s hydrologic information system at a cost not to exceed $5,500, and authorizing the General Manager to execute a standard consulting-services agreement with Innovative Hydrology for said work.

DISPOSITION OF SURPLUS COMMUNICATION SYSTEM EQUIPMENT Mrs. Zancanella and Mr. Martinez reported that the Agency has made significant progress towards the replacement and upgrading of the Power Division’s microwave communications system. The project is substantially complete with only minor work anticipated for next Spring. The equipment and radios that are being replaced by the microwave project are no longer of value to South Feather. Directors reviewed a schedule of this equipment. The agreement whereby PG&E committed to funding a portion of the microwave project (one of several “legacy” capital improvement projects that were being planned and designed prior to the expiration of the previous power purchase agreement) included removal and disposal by PG&E of the replaced equipment and radios. M/S/C (Hunter/Lodigiani) declaring surplus and removing from the list of Power Assets

those items on the Schedule of Replaced Communication System Equipment and Radios, dated October 20, 2011.

RECESS (3:23 p.m.) CLOSED SESSION (convened at 3:31 p.m.) Conference with Legal Counsel – Existing Litigation Government Code §54956.9a. SFWPA v. Surface Water Data. OPEN SESSION (reconvened at 4:12 p.m.) President Edwards announced that legal counsel was given direction during the closed session. No action was taken. ADJOURNMENT (4:12 p.m.) Michael C. Glaze, Secretary James L. Edwards, President


TO: Board of Directors FROM: Steve Wong, Finance Division Manager DATE: November 17, 2011 RE: Approval of Warrants Agenda Item for 11/22/11 Board of Directors Meeting October 2011 General Fund and Joint Facilities Operating Fund expenditures are summarized as follows: Warrant Numbers: 28419 to 28486 , $ 227,956.72 Misc. Checks: 28226 to 28256 , $ 182,388.69 and 28328 to 28373 Payroll Expenses: $ 422,254.75 TOTAL EXPENDITURES FOR OCTOBER, 2011: $ 832,600.16 October 2011 Power Division (“PG&E Legacy Projects”) expenditures are summarized as follows: Warrant Numbers: 66798 to 66803 , $ 103,847.22 Misc. Checks: 66793 $ 129,076.76 TOTAL POWER DIVISION EXPENDITURES FOR OCTOBER 2011: $ 232,923.98 Action to approve all expenditures:

“I move approval of the total General Fund and Joint Facilities Operating Fund expenditures for the month of October 2011 in the amount of $832,600.16; and approval for the total Power Division expenditures for the month of October 2011 in the amount of $232,923.98”

South Feather Water and Power Agency

October, 2011 Warrants

Check Vendor Name Account General Description Amount 28419 All Metals Pipe & Supply 07-63-63260 Bolts, Washers 15.67$ 28420 Allied Electronics, Inc. 07-63-63100 Electrical Supplies 118.89$ 28421 ALS Group Corp 07-62-62200 IH Monitoring-Ozone TWA at FPH 80.00$ 28422 Better Deal Exchange 07-63-63260 Bolts, Nuts, Washers, Propane Sand Paper 216.49$ 28423 City Body Repair 07-60-60395 Vehicle Repair, T-112 5,279.59$ 28424 Consolidated Electrical Distributors 07-00-11202 Steel Pipe, Copper Wire 10,712.84$ 28425 Innovative Hydrology 07-64-64100 Solar Panels 666.66$ 28426 Interstate Battery System of Sacramento 07-64-64100 Deep Cycle Batteries 1,041.99$ 28427 Jeff's Truck Service 01-61-61260 Heater Block 176.64$ 28428 K-Gas, Inc. 07-64-64250 Propane 3,704.26$ 28429 Lock-N-Stitch 01-61-61201 Repair Crack Lower Guide Bearing Spider 7,500.26$ 28430 M J B Welding Supply 01-61-61260 Welding Supplies 78.98$ 28431 Martin Crane & Rigging 07-64-64201 Voom Truck Svc, Clean Station 2 570.00$ 28432 Metal Works Supply 01-61-61260 Steel, Brush 38.71$ 28433 Neil's Contolled Blasting 07-00-11204 LGV Access Tunnel Repairs, WPH Rock Slide inspect 118,570.00$ 28434 Oroville Ford-Lincoln-Mercury 07-66-66150 Trac Bar, Front Spring Insulator 364.06$ 28435 Oroville Safe & Lock 07-63-63370 Door Knob Sets 212.36$ 28436 Pioneer Shipping 07-63-63201 UPS fees 185.37$ 28437 Ray's General Hardware 01-61-61260 Paint Remover, Paint Supplies Kerosene PVC Fittings 147.68$ 28438 Recology Butte Colusa Counties 07-66-66250 Garbage Svc, Oct 2011, HQ 240.93$ 28439 Rickly Hydrological Company 07-64-64100 Staff Gauges 270.87$ 28440 T & T Supplies 07-66-66150 Turn Signal Switch 131.17$ 28441 Tehama Tire Service, Inc. 07-66-66150 Tires T-78 841.51$ 28442 Webb Engineering Specialty Co. 01-00-11180 Rebuild Upper Guide Thrust Bearing Oil Cooler 9,376.38$ 28443 Void28444 Advanced Document Concepts 01-50-50201 Copier Maintenance 282.62$ 28445 All Metals Pipe & Supply 01-54-54104 Nuts, Plates, Shaft Collar, Round Steel 64.90$ 28446 Basic Laboratory 01-53-53204 Water Testing 206.00$ 28447 Better Deal Exchange 01-54-54104 Elbows, Adapters, Bolts, Nuts Silicone Pipe Insulation 196.40$ 28448 Bobcat of Chico 01-56-56150 Glass 282.34$ 28449 BSK Associates 01-53-53204 CPHD quarterly requirements 270.00$ 28450 Butte Auto Supply 01-56-56150 Battery, Lamp, Cleaning Supplies 527.23$ 28451 Butte Co.-Neal Road Landfill 01-53-53204 Backwash Waste 2,958.78$ 28452 C.O.M.P. 01-52-52226 Spirometry Exam , Respirator Physical 110.00$ 28453 CDW Government, Inc. 01-58-58100 Replacement Headset 136.54$ 28454 Chadbourne Office Supply 01-50-50106 Copy Paper, Printer Toner, Envelopes, Batteries 1,104.77$ 28455 Comsco Inc. 01-56-56100 Paper Products 122.82$ 28456 CSG Systems 01-55-55102 October billing statements 3,810.72$ 28457 Del-Mar Equipment Rentals 01-54-54104 Concrete, Top Soil 255.21$ 28458 Empire Safety 01-52-52102 Vests, Hearing Protection, Hard Hats 240.66$ 28459 Environmental Resource Assoc 01-53-53204 PT 2011 Renewal 275.05$ 28460 Francotyp-Postalia, Inc. 01-50-50171 Mailing Equip Rental, 1/22/11-1/21/12 138.19$ 28461 Graphic Impressions 01-58-58100 Impints, Shells, Perforated Paper 1,380.46$ 28462 Gridley Country Ford-Mercury 01-56-56150 Parts and Labor 2,764.21$ 28463 Groeniger & Co. 01-00-22300 Couplers, Nipples, Valves, Bushings, Tubes 8,696.36$ 28464 Hach Co. 01-53-53260 Test Packs, Formazin, C12 Analyzer 417.48$ 28465 Inabind 01-50-50106 Dark Blue Covers 200.87$ 28466 Industrial Power Products-Oroville 01-56-56150 Saw Repair Material 72.99$ 28467 K-Gas, Inc. 01-56-56160 Propane 39.34$ 28468 M J B Welding Supply 01-54-54104 Welding Supplies, Cut-off Wheel 28.57$ 28469 Matco Tools 01-56-56274 Leak Detector, Scan Tool 1,458.55$ 28470 McMaster Carr Supply Co. 01-54-54104 Rubber Wheels, Sockets, Compartment Box 111.37$ 28471 Minasian, Spruance, Meith 01-50-50208 September 2011 Professional Services 2,297.33$ 28472 National Meter & Automation, Inc. 01-00-22300 5/8 meter w/ ert, Turbo Meter 8,118.82$ 28473 Nor-Mac Inc. 01-00-22300 Backflow, Box and Parts 6,274.53$ 28474 North Valley Barricade, Inc. 01-56-56100 Employee Work Shirts 345.88$ 28475 Northern Calif Gloves 01-56-56100 Rain Gear, Hip Boots 1,364.33$ 28476 Pace Supply Corp. 01-00-22300 Full Circle Clamp 353.93$ 28477 Payless Building Supply 01-54-54264 Concrete, Top Soil 390.28$ 28478 Pioneer Shipping 01-50-50201 Shipping Charges 36.86$ 28479 Ramos Oil Co., Inc. 01-56-56160 Fuel 6,935.14$ 28480 Recology Butte Colusa Counties 01-56-56250 October 2011 services 565.27$ 28481 Sierra Chemical Co. 01-53-53102 Sodium Bisulfite, Chlorine 761.19$ 28482 Trimble Navigation Ltd. 01-58-58999 GPS, Trimble Handheld Unit 7,340.12$ 28483 U.S.A. Blue Book 01-53-53260 Nitric Acid, Submersible Pump 443.84$ 28484 Vista Net, Inc. 07-68-68100 Shoretel Telephones, Spam Filtering 4,086.24$ 28485 White Cap 01-54-54295 Burke Plug 706.46$ 28486 Wilbur-Ellis 01-54-54104 Herbicide 1,242.76$

TOTAL OCTOBER, 2011 WARRANTS 227,956.72$

Page 2 of 6


Miscellaneous Checks, August, 2011

Date Check # Vendor Name Account Description Amount10/04/11 28226 Cityside Management 01-00-22200 UB Refund 190.38$ 10/04/11 28227 D M Figley Co 07-64-64260 Patching Material 1,278.86$ 10/04/11 28228 Deborah King 01-00-22200 UB Refund 62.50$ 10/04/11 28229 Marjorie Edgerton 01-00-22200 UB Refund 29.09$ 10/04/11 28230 FedEX 01-56-56200 Freight for McMaster Carr PO #3073 82.63$ 10/04/11 28231 Maria Gutierrez 01-00-22200 UB Refund 15.64$ 10/04/11 28232 Home Depot 01-56-56100 Screws, Sprayer Parts, Lumber 108.56$ 10/04/11 28233 Jeffrey Kilburn 01-00-22200 UB Refund 15.00$ 10/04/11 28234 Trisha Masterson 01-00-22200 UB Refund 171.54$ 10/04/11 28235 Oroville Cable 07-63-63260 Fittings, Drill Bits, Safety Glasses 525.92$ 10/04/11 28236 Riebes Auto Parts 07-66-66150 Battery, Grease Gun, Hose 50.25$ 10/04/11 28237 Sears 07-63-63270 Wet/Dry Shop Vac 144.40$ 10/04/11 28238 Staples 07-67-67106 Mailing Envelopes, Ink Cartricdge 58.95$ 10/04/11 28239 Tractor Supply 01-53-53260 Guage 23.58$ 10/04/11 28240 Wal-Mart 07-63-63100 Shop and Office Supplies 202.52$ 10/07/11 28241 ADP 01-50-50201 PR Processing PE 9/9 & 9/23/11 964.02$ 10/07/11 28242 Access Information Mgmt 01-50-50201 Shredding Services 45.00$ 10/07/11 28243 AFLAC 01-00-22915 Empl Supplemental Disability PR 9/23 & 10/7/11 521.40$ 10/07/11 28244 AT&T 01-50-50251 September Statement 404.64$ 10/07/11 28245 AT&T Mobility 01-50-50251 Cell Phone Statement for September 446.73$ 10/07/11 28246 Backflow Distributors 01-54-54104 Valve Bonnet, Backflow Tester 103.76$ 10/07/11 28247 Better Deal Exchange 01-54-54104 Spraypaint, Level 26.77$ 10/07/11 28248 Browers Towing 01-56-56200 Tow T-140 315.00$ 10/07/11 28249 Calif Coop Snow Surveys 07-64-64408 Snow Survey Meeting 98.00$ 10/07/11 28250 CA Dept of Child Support 01-00-15224 Employee Judgement PR 10/7/11 270.83$ 10/07/11 28251 Knife River Const 01-54-54104 Sand and Gravel 2,085.78$ 10/07/11 28252 Oroville Cable 01-56-56150 Hyd Hose, Clamps 313.78$ 10/07/11 28253 SCOR 01-53-53260 Lab Water & Testing 65.14$ 10/07/11 28254 Staples Credit 07-64-64106 Binders 33.11$ 10/07/11 28255 State Street Bank 01-00-22908 Employee 457 Contributions PR 10/7/11 331.60$ 10/07/11 28256 Wal-Mart 07-66-66100 Bottled Water, Batteries 75.25$ 10/25/11 28257-28288 September Warrants10/25/11 28289-28327 September Warrants10/21/11 28328 AT&T 07-60-60251 T-1 Line for September 402.21$ 10/21/11 28329 B of A Bankcard 07-63-63201 Satellite Serv for WPH 89.99$ 10/21/11 28330 CA Board of Equalization 01-53-53250 Elec Energy Surcharge 97.72$ 10/21/11 28331 CDW Government 07-68-68100 Computer Hardware 264.11$ 10/21/11 28332 D M Figley Co 07-64-64260 Sikaflex 1,276.84$ 10/21/11 28333 DMV Renewal 07-64-64501 Boat Renewal 20.00$ 10/21/11 28334 Tom Edgar 01-00-22200 UB Refund 38.04$ 10/21/11 28335 Donald Edwards 01-00-22200 UB Refund 27.16$ 10/21/11 28336 Lila Hochstrat 01-00-22200 UB Refund 125.00$ 10/21/11 28337 McMaster Carr 07-63-63260 Brass Fittings 79.14$ 10/21/11 28338 Northern Safety 07-62-62102 Sunscreen, Insect Repellent 108.06$ 10/21/11 28339 Northern Sierra Air Quality 07-64-64201 Plumas Co Burn Permit 60.75$ 10/21/11 28340 Oroville Cable 07-63-63100 Welding and Safety Supplies 281.60$ 10/21/11 28341 PG&E - Oroville 07-66-66250 September Service Statement 3,901.41$ 10/21/11 28342 PG&E CFM/PPC Dept 07-66-66201 Move Electrical Line 4,022.06$ 10/21/11 28343 Riebes Auto Parts 07-66-66150 Air Gun, Brake Parts, Trailer Plug 395.53$ 10/21/11 28344 S. Kilgore & P. Robie 01-00-22200 UB Refund 26.35$ 10/21/11 28345 Staples 07-63-63106 Office Supplies 162.68$ 10/21/11 28346 Toby & Andrea Thompson 01-00-22200 UB Refund 32.17$ 10/21/11 28347 Vista Net 07-68-68100 Cisco WIC and Installation 1,695.41$ 10/21/11 28348 WECC 07-63-63201 WREGIS Service 193.20$ 10/21/11 28349 Zone 4344 Properites 01-00-22200 UB Refund 1.24$ 10/24/11 28350 ADP 07-60-60201 Oct 2011 Payroll Processing 797.94$ 10/24/11 28351 ACWA Health Benefits 01-50-50400 November Employee Vision & Dental 7,764.04$ 10/24/11 28352 ACWA/JPIA 01-50-50393 Workers' Comp Premium July - Sept 2011 37,089.00$ 10/24/11 28353 AT&T 01-50-50251 October Statement 743.32$ 10/24/11 28354 AT&T 01-50-50251 October Statement 262.92$ 10/24/11 28355 AT&T 01-53-53251 October Statement 1,063.29$ 10/24/11 28356 AT&T Long Distance 07-60-60251 October Statement 35.48$ 10/24/11 28357 AT&T Long Distance 01-53-53251 October Statement 220.68$ 10/24/11 28358 B of A Bankcard 07-60-60350 Business Meetings 49.10$ 10/24/11 28359 Better Deal Exchange 07-64-64260 Drill Bits, Spraypaint 52.80$ 10/24/11 28360 CA Dept of Health 01-50-50501 Water System Fees 11,285.72$ 10/24/11 28361 CA Dept of Child Support 01-00-15224 Employee Judgement PR 10/21/11 270.83$ 10/24/11 28362 Home Depot 01-53-53260 Tools, Light Bulbs, Blocks 329.63$ 10/24/11 28363 IBEW #1245 01-00-25207 November Members Dues 4,568.00$ 10/24/11 28364 PG&E - Oroville 01-54-54250 September Statement 6,759.10$ 10/24/11 28365 Reliance Standard Life 01-50-50402 October Employees Life Insurance 897.29$ 10/24/11 28366 Riebes Auto Parts 01-56-56150 Service manual 25.73$ 10/24/11 28367 Standard Insurance 01-50-50403 Empl Supplemental Disability 10-1-11 2,196.19$ 10/24/11 28368 Staples Credit 01-00-14404 Employee Computer Acquisition 589.85$


Miscellaneous Checks, August, 2011

10/24/11 28369 State Street Bank 01-00-22908 Employee 457 Contributions PR 10/21/11 866.51$ 10/24/11 28370 US Bank 01-53-53260 Campground Phone, Solar Panel Replacement 656.22$ 10/24/11 28371 Wal-Mart 01-56-56100 Shop Supplies 67.60$ 10/27/11 28372 CalPERS 01-50-50413 Employee Retirement 09/18/11-10/1/11 41,627.88$ 10/28/11 28373 CalPERS 07-60-60413 Employee Retirement 10/2/11-10/15/11 41,808.27$

TOTAL OCTOBER CHECKS 182,388.69$

SOUTH FEATHER WATER AND POWER

OCTOBER 2011

PAYROLL DEF/COMP WIRES P/E 10/1/11 5,252.17$

PAYROLL DEF/COMP WIRES P/E 10/15/11 4,986.31$

PAYROLL STATE & FED TAXES 134,953.16$

PAYROLL NET 277,063.11$

TOTAL OCTOBER, 2011 422,254.75$

PAYROLL

Page 5 of 6

POWER DIVISIONOctober, 2011 Power Division Warrants

Date Check # Vendor Name Account General Description Amount 11/22/11 66798 Consolidated Electrical Distrb 06-00-11202/2010-0822 Flex Connectors, Wiring Trough 654.55$ 11/22/11 66799 Graybar Electric Company 06-00-11202/2010-0822 Total Access 750/850/1500 Blank Plug 458.39$ 11/22/11 66800 Metal Works Supply 06-00-11202/2010-0824 Channel 237.53$ 11/22/11 66801 PG&E- Sacramento 06-00-11204/2010-0824 Line Extension Sly Cr Dam 1,663.04$ 11/22/11 66802 Peninsula Engineering Sol 06-00-11202/2010-0820 Microwave Parts, SPH Upgrade 100,650.00$ 11/22/11 66803 Recology Yuba-Sutter 06-00-11204/2010-0824 Garbage Svc, Oct 2011, Sly Cr Dam 183.71$

Total October, 2011 Power Division Warrants 103,847.22$

Name or CompanyDate Check # or Person Account Description Amount

10/24/11 66793 PG&E Special 06-00-11204/2010-0820 Microwave Path Upgarde services 129,076.76$

Total October, 2011 Power Division Miscellaneous Checks and Expenses 129,076.76$

POWER DIVISIONMiscellaneous Checks and Expenses October 2011

Page 6 of 6


TO: Board of Directors FROM: Kathy Zancanella, Power Division Manager DATE: November 15, 2011 RE: General Information (regarding matters not scheduled on agenda) 11/22/11 Board of Directors Meeting Operations Attached are the Power Generation Summary Report for October 2011, and a chart showing precipitation to date. Rainfall to date, measured at Forbestown Headquarters, is 6.29 inches, and the first storm with low snow levels occurred November 6. The National Weather Service forecasts another La Nina-influenced winter, likely resulting in weather patterns similar to last year. Sly Creek Dam Teichert and its subcontractors have been working to finish installation and testing of the new Sly Creek Dam spill gate by the end of November. The final concrete pour of the ogee and gate seat was done on November 8 -9, and blankets and heaters were used to prevent the concrete from freezing while

curing. The bridge deck sections were transported to the site on November 11 and set on Saturday, November 12. Assembly of the spill gate is underway as this report is being written. The photos on this page were taken on November 10 when I accompanied a FERC inspector to the site. The photo on the next page was taken November 14.

Sly Creek Powerhouse Annual Outage The annual outage at Sly Creek Powerhouse was finished on November 9. During inspections of the powerhouse, a 5-3/8 inch long crack was discovered on the lower guide bearing spider (cast iron support structure). Because cast iron cannot be welded, a process called “metal stitching” was recommended for the repair, and the Lock-N-Stitch company from Turlock sent a technician to perform the repair. This was the first time our staff saw this technique used, and Henry Reeson worked closely with the Lock-N-Stitch technician to learn the process. Attached are photos by John Davis that further explain this process. Microwave Upgrade By the time the Board meets this month, the conversion of all the microwave paths to digital should be about complete. The benefits of the conversion are already apparent as John Davis was able to access the network from Sly Creek Powerhouse during the outage, and could look up scanned drawings and stay abreast of email and outside calls without needing to return to the office. John provided this photo of the view from the seldom-visited Monte De Oro passive receiver site on the Kelly Ridge microwave path.

Sunset Hill Kelly Ridge PH

Forbestown Headquarters Security A security system is being installed at Forbestown Headquarters which will provide for intrusion alarms and allow staff to use a “panic” button to summon law enforcement in an emergency. Art Martinez is taking the lead on this project and spent part of the past holiday weekend laying out the wiring.

Sly Creek Powerhouse Spider Repairs – Metal Stitching Crack as found on inspection Crack after removing paint and applying dye penetrant

Installation of metal stitching pins in the center of crack

Metal pins ground down after being locked together

Peening to relieve stress and create uniformity Finished repair after buffing

Lock-N-Stitch Process Sketch – Typical Repair

POWER DIVISION MANAGER'S REPORT

2011

Release to SFFR Release to SFFR Release to Release to Maximum Elevation 5,045.50 Feet 3,524.00 Feet Below LGV Below Diversions Lost Creek Slate Creek

End of Month Conditions

Restriction from 5047.00 feet for PMF

Restriction from 3,530.00 feet for construction

January 5,016.23 Feet 3,505.38 Feet 9.90 cfs 6.50 cfs 6.30 cfs 17.0 cfs

February 5,020.80 Feet 3,504.87 Feet 11.30 cfs 6.50 cfs 6.30 cfs 17.0 cfs

March 5,030.12 Feet 3,496.91 Feet 13.20 cfs 6.60 cfs 345.00 cfs 17.3 cfs

April 5,035.35 Feet 3,515.73 Feet 365.00 cfs 1157.00 cfs 938.00 cfs 682.0 cfs

May 5,035.25 Feet 3,516.56 Feet 293.00 cfs 567.00 cfs 498.00 cfs 17.0 cfs

June 5,037.34 Feet 3,500.46 Feet 49.70 cfs 214.00 cfs 262.00 cfs 384.0 cfs

July 5,039.52 Feet 3,476.06 Feet 11.70 cfs 11.00 cfs 13.20 cfs 11.7 cfs

August 5,034.88 Feet 3,455.98 Feet 33.00 cfs 10.80 cfs 9.10 cfs 18.0 cfs

September 5,033.24 Feet 3,421.19 Feet 345.00 cfs 11.00 cfs 8.80 cfs 14.1 cfs

October 5,019.01 Feet 3,442.53 Feet 14.80 cfs 11.00 cfs 8.40 cfs 15.5 cfs

November Feet Feet cfs cfs cfs cfs

December Feet Feet cfs cfs cfs cfs

Forbestown

January 5,629.300 MWH 38,433.010 MWH 13,733.250 MWH 7,706.141 MWH $2,535,764.57February 4,191.700 MWH 29,546.320 MWH 0.000 MWH 6,874.315 MWH $1,733,777.31March 6,810.400 MWH 30,685.120 MWH 11,094.030 MWH 7,584.016 MWH $1,707,756.59April 8,234.700 MWH 25,497.950 MWH 25,590.900 MWH 7,338.599 MWH $1,924,452.36May 9,152.700 MWH 32,832.450 MWH 23,978.070 MWH 7,380.578 MWH $1,922,752.88June 8,276.100 MWH 38,750.670 MWH 26,326.170 MWH 6,904.822 MWH $2,313,650.64July 3,579.900 MWH 20,939.110 MWH 13,186.080 MWH 6,600.680 MWH $1,941,642.18August 2,622.700 MWH 20,369.370 MWH 11,325.700 MWH 6,410.803 MWH $1,906,123.77September 1,864.400 MWH 16,751.390 MWH 9,042.310 MWH 7,220.791 MWH $1,678,423.54October 1,671.900 MWH 16,701.860 MWH 9,035.830 MWH 1,448.018 MWH $1,265,226.02November MWH MWH MWH MWH

December MWH MWH MWH MWH

52,033.800 MWH 270,507.250 MWH 143,312.340 MWH 65,468.763 MWH $18,929,569.86

Powerhouse Operations

Woodleaf

SOUTH FEATHER WATER AND POWERSOUTH FEATHER POWER PROJECT

Reservoir and Stream Operations

STREAM RELEASES

Energy Revenue

Sly CreekRESERVOIR ELEVATIONS

Little Grass Valley

Sly Creek Kelly Ridge


TO: Board of Directors FROM: Matt Colwell, Water Division Manager DATE: November 17, 2011 RE: General Information (regarding matters not scheduled on agenda) 10/25/11 Board of Directors Meeting Domestic Distribution Operations Water distribution crews have been accomplishing normal water system operation and maintenance tasks, including irrigation and domestic distribution system betterments and leak repairs. This past month, the transmission and distribution (T&D) crew has been occupied with installing new services, replacing old, leaking, and substandard service connections, replacing fire hydrants, replacing concrete sidewalks, placing and compacting asphalt, installing new backflow services, and installing new irrigation pipeline. Or, appropriately stated, business as usual. Community line T&D crews are constantly upgrading old and substandard facilities associated with the Community Line irrigation system. The picture at right identifies a new service manifold and meter plumbing and the welding of the abandoned service tap. Bangor Canal T&D crews are replacing approximately 500-feet of 6-inch irrigation pipeline at the end of Grimy Gulch and Pleasant Grove roads. The pipeline is an extension of the existing and newly replaced 3,300-foot 12-inch pipeline replaced last year. The 2011 Irrigation flows are as follows: Forbestown Ditch SF 14 = 0 cfs

NYWD = 0 cfs SFWPA @ WD 6 = 0 cfs

Bangor Canal SF 25 = 8 cfs Palermo Canal = 2 cfs

-50,000

-25,000

0

25,000

50,000

75,000

100,000

125,000

150,000

175,000

200,000

-100

-50

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

Elec

tric

ity D

eman

d (K

WH

)

Wat

er D

eman

d (M

illio

n G

allo

ns)

Monthly

Miners Ranch Water Treatment PlantMonthly Water Production VS: KWH Purchased

Water Treatment Operations Staff has switched the water treatment flow path to full conventional treatment. The winter season raw-water quality is higher in turbidity (dirtier) and at a lower temperature. This makes the water slightly more difficult to treat, so beginning this time of year, operations staff has to utilize the full treatment path, including flocculation and sedimentation basins. Miners Ranch water treatment volumes for October 2011 are presented in the table at right and in the chart at the end of this report. The 2011 cumulative demand is still tracking a new record low. It is reasonable to assume that the annual maximum daily demand (MDD) has already been experienced for 2011. On July 9 and August 15, MRTP produced 9.0 million gallons per day which is significantly lower than the MDD since 1994 (current records). Solar Plant Production MRTP power demand was greater than solar generation by 30,000 KWH during the month of October. The graph below provides a historical perspective of energy demand (from PG&E) compared to water production.

Miners Ranch Production October 2011

Total (MG) 120.6 (80% of Avg)

High (MGD) 5.7 Low (MGD) 3.0 Avg. (MGD) 3.9

1,000

1,200

1,400

1,600

1,800

2,000

2,200

NS

OF

GAL

LON

S MRTP Total Annual Water Production

5 Year Avg Cummulative

1997 (max)

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011

2010 Minimum

1997 Maximum

Average

0

200

400

600

800

JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JULY AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC

MIL

LIO

N

Water Division Status Report Matt Colwell Water Division Manager


TO: Board of Directors FROM: Steve Wong, Finance Division Manager DATE: November 17, 2011 RE: General Information (regarding matters not scheduled on the agenda) 11/22/11 Board of Directors Meeting South Feather Relicensing Consulting Services No invoices have been submitted this month for relicensing consulting services. Total relicensing payments to-date to HDR, the Agency’s consultant for relicensing, amount to $5,108,868 for services rendered through June 25, 2011. The budget balance remaining under this agreement is $41,893. EAP Participation A number of Finance and IT staff participated in the Agency’s Emergency Action Plan Functional Exercise on November 9, 2011. It was helpful to see and experience interaction with the Power Division and the multitude of other agencies involved in an emergency scenario. Travel, Conference Authorization Form A new administrative policy and practice has been established for employee overnight travel situations. A form documenting the purpose, location, estimated costs and supervisory approval are all summarized prior to registration and departure. Backroom Conversion The File and Copy room in the back of the Finance Division was reconfigured and a functional work area has been added. The change evolved after observations were made, staff communicated and listened to one another, a spirit of flexibility prevailed, and collaborating on the solution along with a commitment to provide a better overall work environment was paramount. 2012 Budget Work on the 2012 Annual Budget continued throughout the Agency during the month. A 2012 Proposed Budget was distributed on November 10, 2011 and the Budget and Finance Committee (Directors Edwards and Hunter) met on November 15, 2011 with the management team.

South Feather Water & Power

General Fund Financial Report

November 22, 2011 Board Meeting

2011

2008 2009 2010 2011 2011 ACTUAL %

ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION ACTUAL ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET ESTIMATED THRU 10/31/11 RECEIVED

REVENUE:

Water Sales Rev

41100 Domestic Water 2,580,748 2,444,993 2,354,324 2,300,000 2,275,000 1,994,914 87%

41400 Irrigation Water 252,037 229,598 223,461 200,000 216,300 191,211 96%

41300 Surplus Water (PG&E) 159,694 192,914 65,019 0 0 0 0%

41502 Surplus Water (Contract) 1,650,000 1,000 0 0 0 0 0%

Sub-Total Water Sales Rev 4,642,479 2,868,505 2,642,804 2,500,000 2,491,300 2,186,125 87%

Power Revenue

41305 Sly Cr Pwr Generation 148,375 225,455 1,068,090 1,600,000 2,345,000 1,912,076 120%

41450 Woodleaf TWD 23,443 63,990 20,188 0 0 0 0%

41500 Surplus Wtr 368,000 368,000 368,000 0 150,000 129,337 0%

41600 Sly Creek MOU 77,200 77,200 77,200 0 0 0 0%

Sub-Total Power Rev 617,018 734,645 1,533,478 1,600,000 2,495,000 2,041,413 128%

Water Serv Chgs

42301 Sundry Billing (Job Orders) 152,930 17,108 3,381 5,000 15,000 45,135 903%

42303 Inspection Fees 2,580 0 0 0 7,800 7,774 0%

42341 System Cap Chg (MRTP) 237,759 28,490 0 0 0 0 0%

Other Water Serv Charges 45,290 100,248 70,323 30,000 55,000 51,787 173%

Sub-Total Water Serv Chgs 438,559 145,846 73,704 35,000 77,800 104,696 299%

Non-Oper Revenue

49202 Int-Time Certificates 46,868 18,178 9,840 10,000 0 20,902 209%

49250 Int-Misc 24,396 18,323 23,981 5,000 5,000 32,998 660%

49311 Property Taxes 529,166 517,253 513,770 475,000 520,000 253,190 53%

49312 ERAF Surcharge (4) 4 0 0 0 0 0%

49405 ACWA/JPIA RPA 1,410 0 0 0 56,761 56,761 100%

49500 Revenue, PG&E 93,959 0 0 0 236,081 236,081 100%

49625 Back Flow Installation 34,527 34,725 48,017 30,000 37,500 43,710 146%

49630 Back Flow Inspection 75,948 78,275 81,264 80,000 81,500 70,202 88%

49910 PG&E (SFPP) 10,000 7,500 5,000 0 0 0 0%

49912 04 Refinancing, Excess Funds 266,163 293,464 890,857 0 0 0 0%

49932 North Yuba Water District 12,759 33,977 (10,006) 0 0 0 0%

Other Non-Oper Rev 47,205 56,380 55,809 1,000 27,500 26,027 2603%

Transfer In From 1995 COP Res Fd 686,924 0 0 0 0 0%

Sub-Total Non-Oper Rev 1,142,397 1,745,003 1,618,532 601,000 964,342 739,871 123%

TOTAL GENERAL FUND REVENUE 6,840,453 5,493,999 5,868,518 4,736,000 6,028,442 5,072,105 107%

Page 1 of 8




2011

2008 2009 2010 2011 2011 ACTUAL %

ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION ACTUAL ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET ESTIMATED THRU 10/31/11EXPENDED

EXPENSES:

General Administration, 1-50

Salaries & Benefits 1,763,255 953,257 890,656 990,296 940,600 733,518 74%

Supplies 26,028 17,299 22,043 20,200 22,000 19,991 99%

Services 172,800 194,152 193,970 187,000 234,593 95,851 51%

Utilities 21,367 31,722 43,137 43,000 43,000 33,434 78%

Fuel, Oil, Auto 1,341 215 44 500 100 43 9%

Training/Dues 57,893 62,668 62,809 74,500 61,500 25,195 34%

Total General Admin, 1-50 2,042,684 1,259,313 1,212,659 1,315,496 1,301,793 908,032 69%

Water Source, 1-51

Source of Supply 13,757 14,113 14,113 14,500 14,113 14,113 97%

Total Water Source, 1-51 13,757 14,113 14,113 14,500 14,113 14,113 97%

Environ Health & Safety, 1-52

Salaries & Benefits 33,743 68,042 75,705 71,778 81,900 62,374 87%

Supplies 3,413 6,154 6,139 8,000 7,000 4,394 55%

Services 3,732 11,854 4,757 11,000 13,500 6,857 62%

Utilities 0 0 0 0 0 0 0%

Fuel, Oil, Auto 0 0 92 0 100 72 0%

Training/Dues 5,730 6,760 9,083 13,200 13,200 4,231 32%

Total EH&S, 1-52 46,618 92,810 95,776 103,978 115,700 77,928 75%

Water Treatment, 1-53


Supplies 64,215 75,216 58,788 85,000 82,500 64,851 76%

Services 26,048 14,288 23,934 19,000 24,500 15,509 82%

Utilities 37,465 42,342 25,762 40,000 27,500 22,211 56%

Fuel, Oil, Auto 654 23 55 500 100 15 3%

Training/Dues 366 1,064 5,592 7,500 7,500 2,188 29%

Total Water Treat, 1-53 501,632 726,386 784,673 878,168 853,200 649,273 74%

Transmission & Distribution, 1-54

Salaries & Benefits 773,635 1,483,248 1,521,604 1,595,641 1,703,580 1,303,972 82%

Supplies 142,118 201,553 199,261 187,500 103,000 59,200 32%

Services 1,408 6,170 3,643 6,300 6,500 2,890 46%

Utilities 25,201 23,821 23,544 29,500 29,500 21,634 73%

Fuel, Oil, Auto 1,143 4 37 1,000 100 15 2%

Training/Dues 0 0 1,251 1,000 1,000 888 89%

Total Trans & Dist, 1-54 943,505 1,714,796 1,749,340 1,820,941 1,843,680 1,388,599 76%

Page 2 of 8




2011

2008 2009 2010 2011 2011 ACTUAL %

ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION ACTUAL ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET ESTIMATED THRU 10/31/11EXPENDED

EXPENSES (CON'T):

Customer Accounts, 1-55


Supplies 61,767 56,999 57,453 66,000 77,500 72,184 109%

Services 0 0 0 0 500 350 100%

Utilities 0 0 0 0 0 0 0%

Fuel, Oil, Auto 0 0 0 0 0 0 0%

Training/Dues 0 230 750 1,100 1,100 0 0%

Total Cust Accts, 1-55 345,071 363,409 355,344 372,025 411,800 332,018 89%

General Plant & Shop, 1-56


Supplies 20,883 12,954 14,303 16,500 19,500 16,337 99%

Services 4,229 6,221 2,487 10,000 7,500 3,882 39%

Utilities 20,956 20,486 21,082 26,000 27,000 18,086 70%

Fuel, Oil, Auto 118,211 95,412 107,590 100,000 115,500 94,779 95%

Training/Dues 0 0 0 0 300 265 0%

Total Gen Plant & Shop, 1-56 376,177 351,320 371,725 383,522 371,500 287,642 75%

Sundry & Expense Credits, 1-57


Supplies (96,980) (113,390) (90,406) (71,750) (2,000) (13,731) 19%

Services (63,144) (60,470) 3,774 (5,000) (5,000) 0 0%

Utilities 0 0 0 0 0 0 0%

Fuel, Oil, Auto 0 0 0 0 0 0 0%

Training/Dues 0 0 0 0 0 0 0%

Total Sundry, 1-57 (118,167) (156,933) (70,213) (50,350) 23,000 52,358 -104%

Information Technology, 1-58


Supplies 16,012 17,394 17,072 35,700 26,000 23,285 65%

Services 8,605 9,482 7,598 31,000 31,000 23,791 77%

Utilities 0 100 1,790 2,500 3,000 2,354 94%

Fuel, Oil, Auto 0 0 0 0 0 0 0%

Training/Dues 25,096 20,681 22,967 31,100 31,100 22,904 74%

Total Info Tech, 1-58 94,210 144,212 221,903 297,654 295,200 229,591 77%

Sly Creek Power Plant, 1-61

Salaries & Benefits 0 0 155,971 473,770 281,025 147,700 31%

Supplies 0 0 5,922 47,250 21,800 10,874 23%

Services 0 0 30,151 77,000 43,000 40,356 52%

Utilities 0 0 186 8,000 6,650 4,882 61%

Fuel, Oil, Auto 0 0 34 0 30 34 0%

Training/Dues 0 0 0 3,250 3,700 3,693 114%

Total Sly Creek Power Plant, 1-61 0 0 192,264 609,270 356,205 207,539 34%

TOTAL OPERATING EXPENSES 4,245,487 4,509,426 4,927,584 5,745,204 5,586,191 4,147,093 72%

SUB-TOTAL, REVENUES OVER OPER EXP 2,594,966 984,573 940,934 (1,009,204) 442,251 925,012

Page 3 of 8




2011

2008 2009 2010 2011 2011 ACTUAL

ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION ACTUAL ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET ESTIMATED THRU 10/31/11

SUB-TOTAL, REVENUES OVER OPER EXP 2,594,966 984,573 940,934 (1,009,204) 442,251 925,012

Non-Operating, 1-59

Supplies & Servces (122,779) 1,546 210 11,402 1,000 210

Interest 302,220 235,042 217,187 205,228 205,245 205,245

Principal 746,536 787,113 242,718 253,370 349,106 349,106

Non-Operating, 1-59 925,977 1,023,701 460,115 470,000 555,351 554,561

Available for Capital Outlay Expenses and

Relicensing 1,668,989 (39,128) 480,819 (1,479,204) (113,100) 370,451

Other Non-Operating Expenses:

Relicensing 242,483 157,866 82,129 0 60,000 50,357

Captial Outlay:

WT-Minor Projects (2011-0053) 10,000 10,000 0

TD-Minor Projects (2011-0054) 25,000 25,000 0

GP-Vehicle Replacements (2011-0056) 160,000 165,000 164,276

GP-Minor Projects (2011-0057) 10,000 10,000 0

IT-Minor Projects (2011-0058) 15,000 15,000 13,837

WT-Modernize MRTP Telemetry Operation (2010-0094) 10,000 10,000 0

WT-Upgrade MRTP Security (2010-0095) 13,500 8,500 8,188

Springbrook v.7 (2010-0103) 30,000 27,500 25,516

System Data & Visualization Disem (2010-0104) 15,000 15,000 0

Sly-Sunset MW Path (2010-0820) 375,000 400,000 253,792

Sly/Turbine Brg Cooling Coil (2011-0833) 10,000 10,000 9,376

EHS-Capital (2011-0834) 2,500 2,500 0

Total Capital Outlay 151,068 173,883 216,891 676,000 698,500 474,985

Transfers:

SFPP Jt Facil Oper Fd-Minimum Payment 0 354,500 354,500 354,500

SFPP Jt Facil Oper Fd-Relicensing 0 560,000 0 0

SFPP Jt Facil Oper Fd-Overhead 0 550,000 420,239 420,239

MRTP System Capacity Fund (1,666,977) 0 0 0

Net Non-Operating and Transfers (393,551) (331,749) (1,666,977) 788,500 16,239 249,397

NET REVENUE OVER EXPENSES 1,275,438 (370,877) (1,485,178) (690,704) (96,861) 619,848

Beginning Balance 929,421 2,204,859 1,833,982 1,251,957 348,804 348,804

Ending Balance 2,204,859 1,833,982 348,804 561,253 251,943 968,652

SCHEDULE OF CASH AND INVESTMENTS

General Fund Cash and Savings Account 296,856

LAIF 13,854,007

WFB Money Market 1,309,988

Rabobank Money Market 2,008,614

Certificates of Deposit 1,909,856

Raymond James/TCB Fixed Income portfolio 1,986,989

TOTAL CASH & INVESTMENTS AT 10/31/2011 21,366,310

Page 4 of 8


Joint Facilities Operating Fund Financial Report


2011

2011 2011 ACTUAL

ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION BUDGET ESTIMATED THRU 10/31/11 YTD %

REVENUE:

41150 Sale of Electricity 17,500,000 21,065,000 15,622,931 89%

41502 Water Sales 130,000 150,000 86,130 66%

42305 Current Service Charges 0 3,975 5,067 100%

42331 Concession Income 5,000 16,322 16,322 326%

49250 Interest Income 10,000 20,000 0 0%

49321 State of CA, DWR 0 468,000 468,278 0%

49929 Miscellaneous Income 0 400 343 100%

Total Revenue 17,645,000 21,723,697 16,199,071 92%

EXPENSES:

JFOF Administration, 7-60

Salaries & Benefits 499,430 604,000 490,239 98%

Supplies 8,500 9,420 7,242 85%

Services 557,500 607,450 477,705 86%

Utilities 5,000 45,300 45,417 908%

Fuel, Oil, Auto 1,000 500 358 36%

Training/Dues 29,500 27,580 27,493 93%

Total JFOF Administration, 7-60 1,100,930 1,294,250 1,048,454 95%



Supplies 33,250 7,100 2,036 6%

Services 11,500 6,914 5,735 50%

Utilities 0 0 0 0%

Fuel, Oil, Auto 0 0 0 0%

Training/Dues 14,750 4,041 1,066 7%

Total Environ Health & Safety, 7-62 126,700 79,055 53,960 43%

Power Plant Operations, 7-63

Salaries & Benefits 1,395,000 1,877,500 1,504,414 108%

Supplies 192,000 118,505 88,537 46%

Services 242,000 79,100 50,553 21%

Utilities 0 12,700 5,596 0%

Fuel, Oil, Auto 0 110 74 100%

Training/Dues 5,000 400 390 8%

Total Power Plant Operations, 7-63 1,834,000 2,088,315 1,649,564 90%

Page 5 of 8




2011

2011 2011 ACTUAL

ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION BUDGET ESTIMATED THRU 10/31/11 YTD %EXPENSES (CON'T):

Water Collection, 7-64


Supplies 111,000 47,600 47,363 43%

Services 249,000 228,000 218,021 88%

Utilities 0 5,000 6,407 0%

Fuel, Oil, Auto 0 625 611 0%

Training/Dues 0 400 642 0%

Total Water Collection, 7-64 785,000 592,625 491,484 63%

Campgrounds, 7-65


Supplies 2,300 3,100 3,050 133%

Services 12,900 5,000 4,931 38%

Utilities 300 2,200 2,395 0%



Total Campgrounds, 7-65 84,140 66,325 55,594 66%

JFOF Plant & Shop, 7-66


Supplies 66,000 16,570 15,851 24%

Services 13,000 8,000 11,461 88%

Utilities 0 39,500 32,504 100%

Fuel, Oil, Auto 93,000 123,000 100,726 108%


Total JFOF Plant & Shop, 7-66 382,000 488,070 395,877 104%

Regulatory Compliance, 7-67


Supplies 10,000 500 446 4%

Services 10,000 14,500 4,755 48%

Utilities 0 100 56 0%


Training/Dues 5,000 11,200 10,901 218%

Total Regulatory Compliance, 7-67 95,000 130,500 88,981 94%

Communications & IT, 7-68


Supplies 54,000 23,300 25,232 47%

Services 40,150 12,000 11,218 0%

Utilities 0 120 13 100%


Training/Dues 5,000 1,200 0 0%

Total Comm & IT, 7-68 239,150 182,220 143,129 60%

TOTAL OPERATING EXPENSES 4,646,920 4,921,360 3,927,043 85%

SUB-TOTAL, REVENUES OVER OPER EXP 12,998,080 16,802,337 12,272,028

Page 6 of 8




2011

2011 2011 ACTUAL

ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION BUDGET ESTIMATED THRU 10/31/11

SUB-TOTAL, REVENUES OVER OPER EXP 12,998,080 16,802,337 12,272,028


North Yuba Water District (354,500) (354,500) (354,500)

Captial Outlay

SFPP Minor Projects (2011-0800) 25,000 25,000 10,102

SFPP Vehicle Replacements (2011-0815) 35,000 35,000 0

SFPP Microwave Path Upgrade (2010-0822) 900,000 550,000 433,542

KPH Trash Rake (2008-0802) 60,000 10,000 1,734

New License Compliance (2010-0825) 199,000 0 0

MRC Access Road (2010-0826) 400,000 415,000 410,662

LGV Access Tunnel Repair (2011-0829) 400,000 400,000 144,727

WPH Transformer (2011-0830) 1,450,000 1,450,347 1,450,347

Woodleaf Slide Inspection (2011-0831) 20,000 20,000 0

KPH Refurbish TSV (2011-0832) 100,000 40,000 3,287

EHS Minor Projects (2011-0834) 12,500 12,500 0

WPH Fab Needle Valves (2011-0835) 112,500 5,000 0

CT Test Equipment (2011-0836) 22,000 22,000 24,346

FPH Batteries & Chargers (2011-0837) 34,640 34,640 33,376

Manta Test Equipment (2011-0838) 70,000 70,000 68,951

MRC Wall Repairs (2011-0839) 106,000 100,000 0

PMS Server, MW Test (2011-0840) 19,000 19,000 0

Network Eq/Wtr RTU Upgrade (2011-0841) 70,000 70,000 39,735

MR Tunnel ROV Inspection (2011-0842) 30,000 30,000 3,989

Total Capital Outlay 4,065,640 3,308,487 2,624,798

Transfers:

SFPP Jt Facil Oper Fd-Minimum Payment (354,500) (354,500) (354,500)

SFPP Jt Facil Oper Fd-Relicensing (560,000) 0 0

SFPP Jt Facil Oper Fd-Overhead (550,000) (420,239) (420,239)

Net Non-Operating and Transfers (5,884,640) (4,437,726) (3,754,037)

NET REVENUE OVER EXPENSES 7,113,440 12,364,611 8,517,991

Beginning Balance 5,119,500 8,242,756 8,242,756

Loan Payable to PG&E (thru 12/31/2010) (3,647,167)

Ending Balance 12,232,940 16,960,200 16,760,747

NOTE: Per NYWD agreement, 15% working capital reserve ($800,000) and $15,000,000

contingency reserve is required. Repayment to PG&E in 2015 for loan for dam crest

modification projects estimated to be $17,000,000.

Page 7 of 8


Irrigation Water Accounting

For The Period Of 1/1/2011 - 10/31/2011

ACCT CODE DESCRIPTION REVENUE EXPENSES

2011-504 Palermo Canal 71,400$ 102,873$

2011-505 Bangor Canal 82,989$ 53,027$

2011-506 Forbestown Canal 13,512$ 108,551$

2011-507 Community Line 23,310$ 17,430$

Totals 191,211$ 281,881$


System Capacity Fund Financial Report


2011

2011 ACTUAL

ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION BUDGET THRU 10/31/11

REVENUE:

42341 System Capacity Charges 11,421 23,835

49250 Interest Income 1,000 0

Total Revenue 12,421 23,835

CAPITAL OUTLAY:

2010-0097 ID 2 Floating Liner 250,000 0

2010-0105 Filters 75,000 77,980

Total Expenses 325,000 77,980

Net Revenue over Expenses (312,579) (54,145)

Beginning Balance 1,678,398 1,678,398

Ending Balance 1,365,819 1,624,253

Page 8 of 8

Consumption Report 1 11/17/2011 11:39 AM

MINERS RANCH TREATMENT PLANT CONSUMPTION: 2002 - 2011Volume

Month 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 20111 6,173 6,313 6,429 6,474 6,573 6,669 6,725 6,769 6,618 6,591 6.775 6.122 7.271 7.554 7.448 8.090 8.207 8.889 7.916 7.573 113,477$ 133,641$ 143,027$ 145,277$ 148,137$ 153,959$ 154,692$ 159,260$ 151,996$ 150,322$ 2 6,176 6,339 6,420 6,471 6,587 6,679 6,734 6,769 6,614 6,602 6.936 6.628 6.796 6.691 5.292 8.699 7.481 6.365 5.962 6.215 115,056$ 141,679$ 140,355$ 140,867$ 135,734$ 155,627$ 152,150$ 145,022$ 141,650$ 142,642$ 3 6,185 6,352 6,418 6,491 6,599 6,683 6,734 6,611 6,600 6,588 6.334 6.774 4.730 6.973 7.711 7.152 7.257 5.880 5.253 6.421 113,010$ 139,244$ 128,788$ 143,055$ 149,585$ 148,605$ 149,953$ 141,538$ 140,719$ 143,299$ 4 6,195 6,351 6,431 6,504 6,601 6,692 6,730 6,617 6,615 6,610 8.342 7.575 14.813 8.602 4.902 13.375 12.141 9.000 7.957 7.100 123,744$ 127,524$ 186,929$ 152,140$ 134,041$ 184,144$ 178,390$ 160,660$ 153,889$ 148,039$ 5 6,193 6,350 6,425 6,521 6,617 6,696 6,732 6,618 6,623 6,596 16.710 8.391 20.148 9.999 12.634 14.079 22.608 18.122 9.442 11.917 168,473$ 149,448$ 215,567$ 161,093$ 179,334$ 187,560$ 235,151$ 210,095$ 162,323$ 175,915$ 6 6,185 6,362 6,430 6,523 6,629 6,729 6,739 6,614 6,619 6,616 24.116 23.040 26.978 20.752 23.382 31.806 26.294 21.423 17.553 13.938 203,323$ 230,840$ 250,942$ 221,634$ 239,100$ 276,121$ 254,186$ 228,845$ 207,800$ 186,242$ 7 6,212 6,372 6,447 6,523 6,622 6,704 6,723 6,613 6,626 6,620 30.445 31.117 35.443 25.326 36.390 32.093 32.619 31.394 29.635 28.752 232,671$ 277,024$ 292,074$ 246,343$ 300,406$ 284,092$ 286,867$ 279,461$ 271,282$ 266,205$ 8 6,222 6,403 6,451 6,536 6,653 6,711 6,744 6,616 6,625 6,624 35.448 37.053 31.434 34.428 34.406 32.652 34.451 33.753 31.050 26.332 251,741$ 297,688$ 273,996$ 286,438$ 295,228$ 285,480$ 296,155$ 290,613$ 277,308$ 252,930$ 9 6,251 6,396 6,463 6,536 6,652 6,715 6,742 6,618 6,625 6,630 34.240 27.494 35.193 33.775 35.822 38.006 32.202 30.758 31.253 35.886 247,204$ 251,588$ 291,115$ 288,492$ 302,033$ 310,005$ 285,155$ 275,714$ 277,684$ 299,122$

10 6,257 6,407 6,463 6,543 6,653 6,722 6,752 6,624 6,622 6,619 21.874 25.796 23.999 22.126 21.505 18.185 22.185 23.476 23.822 21.347 193,918$ 244,822$ 235,668$ 229,208$ 226,935$ 209,278$ 233,964$ 238,626$ 240,410$ 226,912$ 11 6,244 6,406 6,460 6,558 6,664 6,720 6,772 6,611 6,625 17.848 18.403 11.714 14.193 17.340 14.494 15.691 12.593 11.793 172,334$ 230,893$ 169,262$ 183,401$ 205,562$ 191,507$ 198,159$ 179,613$ 175,699$ 12 6,241 6,404 6,477 6,565 6,657 6,726 6,772 6,618 6,607 9.536 7.259 6.858 7.959 7.683 9.550 7.913 7.865 7.223 126,989$ 143,185$ 142,156$ 151,576$ 154,272$ 162,949$ 154,678$ 153,027$ 148,725$

6,211 6,371 6,443 6,520 6,742 6,704 6,742 6,642 6,618 6,610 218.603 205.651 225.378 198.380 214.517 228.180 229.048 209.518 188.859 165.480 2,061,941$ 2,367,575$ 2,469,879$ 2,349,523$ 2,470,368$ 2,549,327$ 2,579,501$ 2,462,475$ 2,349,484$ 1,991,627$

RevenueCustomers

Averages Totals

(x 1,000,000 cf)

Totals

0.000

5.000

10.000

15.000

20.000

25.000

30.000

35.000

40.000

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12

Cub

ic F

eet x

1,0

00,0

00

Month

VOLUME 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011

$-

$50,000

$100,000

$150,000

$200,000

$250,000

$300,000

$350,000

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Month

REVENUE 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011


BANGOR TREATMENT PLANT CONSUMPTION: 2002 - 2011

Month 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 20111 19 22 22 22 24 23 23 22 23 22 55.0 35.7 18.9 17.0 13.9 11.8 12.7 12.6 12.7 13.5 505$ 558$ 463$ 451$ 404$ 386$ 402$ 396$ 431$ 423$ 2 19 22 22 22 23 23 23 22 23 22 49.7 32.3 16.9 23.0 10.4 18.2 10.4 8.5 9.7 14.6 501$ 538$ 450$ 489$ 384$ 427$ 387$ 370$ 412$ 429$ 3 19 23 22 24 23 23 23 20 23 22 29.0 30.7 12.3 16.6 16.0 12.9 15.5 8.9 10.0 15.5 412$ 533$ 421$ 468$ 419$ 394$ 420$ 363$ 414$ 435$ 4 19 23 22 23 23 23 23 20 23 22 29.5 25.3 25.4 21.2 9.9 35.5 17.4 12.9 14.1 17.5 415$ 489$ 505$ 483$ 380$ 503$ 432$ 388$ 441$ 448$ 5 19 22 22 23 23 23 23 20 23 22 35.8 32.4 52.0 19.9 15.0 52.2 35.1 30.1 15.8 22.1 448$ 530$ 675$ 474$ 413$ 586$ 546$ 498$ 451$ 477$ 6 19 21 22 23 24 23 23 22 23 22 94.2 70.9 76.2 54.3 54.6 90.6 62.7 47.5 21.7 34.0 704$ 766$ 781$ 688$ 662$ 754$ 699$ 630$ 489$ 554$ 7 19 21 22 24 22 23 24 23 23 22 117.3 102.3 98.4 61.3 89.3 79.9 79.0 111.9 73.7 60.9 794$ 899$ 900$ 712$ 827$ 799$ 814$ 969$ 816$ 726$ 8 19 21 22 24 23 23 22 23 25 22 140.5 166.1 99.4 94.5 103.7 116.7 96.4 94.2 98.8 94.3 854$ 1,086$ 895$ 858$ 878$ 948$ 855$ 905$ 982$ 882$ 9 21 21 22 23 23 23 22 23 24 22 109.1 80.6 109.3 99.2 95.0 105.0 99.9 91.8 86.6 104.4 785$ 818$ 962$ 867$ 868$ 913$ 876$ 893$ 888$ 953$

10 20 22 22 23 24 23 22 23 22 22 99.4 79.7 77.6 67.2 61.8 46.0 61.2 53.2 56.3 74.9 743$ 795$ 797$ 723$ 712$ 615$ 699$ 683$ 696$ 810$ 11 22 22 22 23 23 23 23 23 22 72.2 77.9 36.2 37.0 42.8 24.8 32.2 28.5 31.0 657$ 749$ 538$ 559$ 580$ 480$ 521$ 533$ 534$ 12 21 22 22 23 23 23 22 23 22 31.8 22.9 21.5 20.7 16.3 14.2 10.7 14.4 14.6 445$ 489$ 480$ 456$ 415$ 411$ 384$ 443$ 429$

20 22 22 23 23 23 23 22 23 22 863.5 756.8 644.1 531.9 528.8 607.8 533.1 514.5 444.9 451.8 7,261$ 8,249$ 7,866$ 7,229$ 6,941$ 7,217$ 7,034$ 7,070$ 6,983$ 6,137$ Totals TotalsAverages

Customers RevenueVolume(x 1,000 cf)

0.0

20.0

40.0

60.0

80.0

100.0

120.0

140.0

160.0

180.0

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12

Cub

ic F

eet x

1,0

00

Month

VOLUME 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011

$-

$200

$400

$600

$800

$1,000

$1,200

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Month

REVENUE 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011


COMMUNITY LINE WATER CONSUMPTION: 2002 - 2011

Month 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2011 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 20111 65 63 61 60 65 65 66 66 66 66 141.7 211.6 305.8 84.9 89.8 136.5 80.9 130.0 135.7 170.6 933$ 1,417$ 1,155$ 1,142$ 1,278$ 1,207$ 1,289$ 1,295$ 1,302$ 1,331$ 2 65 59 61 59 64 63 64 65 65 68 119.0 209.2 183.8 70.9 74.9 47.5 127.8 102.3 130.6 106.3 930$ 913$ 1,141$ 1,110$ 1,165$ 1,234$ 1,225$ 1,272$ 1,209$ 1,296$ 3 65 62 59 59 64 65 66 65 65 67 105.4 125.7 89.9 65.3 68.3 67.8 82.6 100.0 91.9 104.4 844$ 1,166$ 1,100$ 1,103$ 1,190$ 1,211$ 1,258$ 1,232$ 1,176$ 1,280$ 4 65 61 60 59 64 66 65 66 65 67 186.3 150.0 85.9 238.9 179.2 67.6 189.3 193.1 126.7 105.1 868$ 1,154$ 1,296$ 1,217$ 1,190$ 1,344$ 1,336$ 1,274$ 1,267$ 1,281$ 5 66 62 64 62 67 66 67 68 64 69 236.7 399.7 125.1 908.6 189.2 86.9 308.7 1,132.6 571.1 208.9 1,138$ 1,214$ 2,056$ 1,280$ 1,262$ 1,473$ 2,308$ 1,764$ 1,280$ 1,423$ 6 67 64 65 64 68 69 68 71 67 70 3,185.5 2,045.4 1,151.2 2,372.5 515.6 2,049.0 1,664.0 1,950.8 1,361.4 603.8 2,836$ 2,306$ 3,581$ 1,651$ 3,300$ 2,921$ 3,199$ 2,609$ 1,717$ 1,834$ 7 69 65 67 64 67 68 68 71 69 73 3,395.3 4,911.0 2,729.9 3,873.0 1,652.2 2,004.9 1,917.6 2,700.7 2,980.0 1,932.3 5,815$ 3,949$ 5,162$ 2,822$ 3,238$ 3,165$ 3,972$ 4,312$ 4,545$ 3,268$ 8 69 66 67 67 70 68 68 71 70 74 3,534.6 5,507.4 3,884.0 2,738.5 3,957.9 3,750.7 2,508.1 2,852.6 2,800.1 2,224.4 6,432$ 5,156$ 3,993$ 5,239$ 5,080$ 3,773$ 4,128$ 4,127$ 4,272$ 3,574$ 9 69 66 67 67 69 69 68 71 71 72 5,401.0 5,209.8 3,874.6 3,752.9 3,300.4 3,273.6 2,988.4 2,757.6 2,403.5 2,939.1 6,125$ 5,146$ 5,038$ 4,572$ 4,579$ 4,265$ 4,030$ 3,718$ 5,273$ 4,279$

10 69 67 66 68 68 69 67 70 71 72 3,729.5 4,317.6 2,996.6 3,229.3 3,283.3 1,456.6 1,403.1 2,362.4 2,473.9 1,852.5 5,206$ 4,259$ 4,479$ 4,561$ 2,690$ 2,648$ 3,606$ 3,773$ 4,139$ 3,168$ 11 67 64 62 68 69 69 68 68 71 1,448.6 1,680.5 1,531.5 625.5 923.8 1,077.1 582.2 1,003.6 553.7 2,468$ 2,697$ 1,729$ 2,142$ 2,317$ 1,807$ 2,224$ 1,760$ 2,366$ 12 63 62 61 66 66 68 69 67 68 210.8 236.1 113.2 122.1 240.7 215.3 239.5 274.6 300.8 936$ 1,202$ 1,193$ 1,403$ 1,368$ 1,423$ 1,482$ 1,482$ 1,420$

67 63 63 64 67 67 67 68 68 70 21,694.4 25,004.0 17,071.5 18,082.4 14,475.3 14,233.5 12,092.2 15,560.3 13,929.4 10,247.3 34,532$ 30,579$ 31,923$ 28,241$ 28,657$ 26,471$ 30,058$ 28,619$ 29,967$ 22,735$

Revenue

Totals

Customers Volume(x 1,000 cf)

TotalsAverages

0.0

1,000.0

2,000.0

3,000.0

4,000.0

5,000.0

6,000.0

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12

Cub

ic F

eet x

1,0

00

Month

VOLUME 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005

2006 2007 2008 2009 2011

$-

$1,000

$2,000

$3,000

$4,000

$5,000

$6,000

$7,000

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Month

REVENUE 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011


FORBESTOWN DITCH WATER CONSUMPTION: 2002 - 2011

Month 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 20111 5 7 10 14 11 6 7 7 7 12 1.7 4.3 1.7 115.5 74.2 73.7 74.6 76.5 96.9 38.0 102$ 127$ 312$ 335$ 284$ 196$ 215$ 217$ 238$ 239$ 2 5 8 9 12 10 6 7 7 7 12 1.7 3.1 0.8 99.2 34.5 66.5 66.5 67.3 67.4 1.1 102$ 278$ 293$ 290$ 222$ 196$ 214$ 214$ 215$ 176$ 3 5 9 9 11 10 5 8 20 7 12 2.1 2.7 0.4 74.8 74.3 149.4 74.4 73.9 72.9 38.2 102$ 313$ 293$ 280$ 267$ 179$ 232$ 214$ 213$ 240$ 4 7 9 10 10 10 7 7 7 7 12 14.6 2.5 26.8 72.8 71.4 123.0 101.9 88.3 72.7 50.5 151$ 295$ 338$ 268$ 266$ 267$ 245$ 231$ 215$ 271$ 5 27 15 37 23 26 14 13 16 10 14 368.8 5.5 650.7 409.5 583.1 253.4 531.3 430.5 115.2 172.8 1,241$ 673$ 2,292$ 222$ 1,157$ 552$ 454$ 746$ 292$ 422$ 6 39 38 48 36 42 30 28 34 31 33 1,083.5 896.5 2,164.7 1,359.0 1,873.7 896.1 1,664.7 1,597.5 773.1 862.5 2,503$ 2,724$ 4,210$ 2,229$ 2,862$ 1,581$ 1,532$ 2,597$ 1,466$ 1,654$ 7 50 50 51 47 49 36 30 36 36 35 1,387.3 2,898.2 1,907.3 2,157.2 2,459.6 1,583.2 1,725.4 2,038.1 1,822.5 1,746.5 3,162$ 5,276$ 3,907$ 3,241$ 3,667$ 1,888$ 3,393$ 3,066$ 2,831$ 2,757$ 8 46 47 54 53 53 37 36 35 34 33 2,207.7 2,829.6 2,885.7 3,009.0 2,863.3 1,810.4 2,299.0 1,590.0 2,022.6 2,215.2 3,299$ 5,013$ 4,597$ 4,301$ 4,205$ 2,014$ 2,178$ 2,628$ 3,053$ 3,286$ 9 53 48 56 54 52 37 36 35 34 33 1,726.4 2,705.8 2,544.3 3,150.0 2,784.4 1,772.5 2,042.9 1,878.6 1,945.5 2,126.9 3,700$ 4,900$ 4,780$ 4,564$ 4,116$ 2,035$ 2,131$ 2,989$ 2,997$ 3,203$

10 41 29 44 43 44 20 20 22 21 20 1,688.6 1,419.9 1,370.4 1,785.5 1,480.9 726.4 918.5 1,044.6 1,133.4 859.8 3,202$ 2,374$ 3,147$ 2,817$ 2,373$ 784$ 962$ 1,702$ 1,788$ 1,433$ 11 18 14 11 18 7 14 12 16 17 259.7 203.3 90.6 270.1 154.4 168.2 222.7 242.3 128.4 737$ 634$ 1,081$ 620$ 317$ 436$ 475$ 565$ 413$ 12 10 12 22 14 8 8 8 9 13 3.7 2.1 474.9 89.5 74.6 148.3 75.4 83.0 39.4 249$ 392$ 973$ 353$ 904$ 316$ 233$ 258$ 258$

43 38 48 43 44 29 27 30 28 22 8,745.8 10,973.5 12,118.3 12,592.1 12,528.4 7,771.2 9,797.4 9,210.6 8,289.9 8,111.6 18,548$ 23,001$ 26,221$ 19,520$ 20,641$ 10,445$ 12,264$ 15,428$ 13,978$ 13,681$

RevenueVolume

Averages

Customers(x 1,000 cf)

TotalsTotals

0.0

500.0

1,000.0

1,500.0

2,000.0

2,500.0

3,000.0

3,500.0

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12

Cub

ic F

eet x

1,0

00

Month

VOLUME

2002 2003 2004 2005 2006

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011

$-

$1,000

$2,000

$3,000

$4,000

$5,000

$6,000

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Month

REVENUE 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011


BANGOR CANAL WATER CONSUMPTION: 2002 - 2011

Month 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 20111 202 153 166 183 157 159 163 173 175 173 346.08 117.70 298.02 783.28 999.46 724.20 842.00 948.91 993.91 851.48 3,026$ 2,781$ 3,888$ 3,896$ 3,866$ 3,620$ 3,806$ 4,086$ 4,158$ 3,992$ 2 168 171 164 163 155 157 158 164 168 172 293.68 266.06 154.00 663.21 844.31 669.71 631.89 818.69 671.99 755.38 2,961$ 4,122$ 3,650$ 3,729$ 3,730$ 3,556$ 3,541$ 3,835$ 3,759$ 3,915$ 3 168 169 164 163 153 160 160 164 168 166 97.02 133.18 132.34 720.10 643.28 645.28 620.43 674.56 651.87 783.17 3,018$ 3,860$ 3,682$ 3,741$ 3,441$ 3,513$ 3,525$ 3,637$ 3,698$ 3,799$ 4 174 168 178 170 152 171 173 179 171 165 431.74 187.56 522.04 708.38 605.38 1,176.41 1,402.61 909.53 814.60 804.62 3,219$ 4,034$ 4,479$ 3,904$ 3,400$ 4,332$ 4,559$ 4,102$ 3,901$ 3,817$ 5 204 184 212 187 192 198 213 215 188 190 2,480.72 288.72 5,044.56 1,915.86 1,689.26 2,877.85 5,377.98 3,817.34 1,190.88 1,544.43 5,786$ 4,464$ 9,950$ 5,274$ 5,263$ 6,556$ 9,335$ 7,720$ 4,614$ 5,009$ 6 216 212 219 212 217 223 217 229 213 215 6,959.76 4,964.58 7,615.46 4,708.74 6,759.58 13,677.09 8,852.45 6,589.73 3,287.34 3,286.44 10,641$ 9,842$ 12,741$ 8,689$ 11,012$ 18,261$ 13,123$ 10,921$ 7,278$ 7,301$ 7 223 220 241 219 218 227 230 229 232 226 11,067.80 8,588.32 12,886.23 7,522.74 12,410.45 14,958.77 10,229.44 9,009.45 10,161.09 8,363.15 14,963$ 13,871$ 18,402$ 11,780$ 16,807$ 19,641$ 16,476$ 13,476$ 14,717$ 12,739$ 8 227 220 229 226 222 227 226 239 236 238 10,774.98 11,602.54 11,088.18 9,961.04 14,843.95 18,647.25 11,273.23 9,695.74 9,718.66 9,352.24 14,707$ 16,675$ 16,533$ 14,425$ 19,431$ 23,465$ 15,758$ 14,358$ 14,331$ 13,949$ 9 226 221 226 223 225 227 235 238 234 238 10,348.92 9,755.90 10,421.12 10,981.46 11,988.86 17,226.77 10,452.92 9,406.75 10,033.50 11,001.37 14,357$ 14,926$ 15,787$ 15,496$ 16,535$ 22,473$ 15,090$ 14,060$ 14,637$ 15,684$

10 219 216 216 221 218 213 223 231 221 223 8,768.44 9,115.18 7,235.44 7,757.52 7,617.21 8,000.91 8,021.02 8,121.09 8,699.87 7,071.95 13,508$ 14,196$ 12,207$ 11,990$ 11,845$ 12,099$ 12,319$ 12,572$ 12,979$ 11,308$ 11 199 196 182 185 196 183 204 201 206 9,929.70 4,545.10 1,943.22 4,363.88 4,658.00 3,146.31 4,399.09 3,293.95 3,738.01 13,400$ 8,930$ 5,912$ 7,743$ 8,379$ 6,562$ 8,184$ 7,041$ 7,587$ 12 178 172 176 165 174 175 180 186 182 718.90 548.50 1,022.73 1,286.40 1,106.82 1,342.71 978.35 1,192.89 1,005.61 3,510$ 4,298$ 2,930$ 4,314$ 4,119$ 4,500$ 4,239$ 4,563$ 4,304$

200 192 198 193 190 193 199 204 200 201 62,217.74 50,113.34 58,363.33 51,372.61 64,166.58 83,093.25 63,081.42 54,478.63 50,967.33 43,814.23 103,095$ 102,000$ 110,160$ 94,980$ 107,827$ 128,578$ 109,955$ 100,370$ 95,962$ 81,513$

Volume(x 1,000 cf)

Customers Revenue

TotalsAverages Totals

0.00

2,000.00

4,000.00

6,000.00

8,000.00

10,000.00

12,000.00

14,000.00

16,000.00

18,000.00

20,000.00

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12

Cub

ic F

eet x

1,0

00

Month

VOLUME 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011

$-

$5,000

$10,000

$15,000

$20,000

$25,000

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Month

REVENUE 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011


PALERMO CANAL WATER CONSUMPTION: 2002 - 2011

Month 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 20111 78 56 75 71 71 80 80 80 79 77 220.22 84.60 219.66 342.90 491.02 636.15 467.73 638.54 524.34 368.52 1,491$ 1,067$ 1,945$ 1,548$ 1,811$ 2,124$ 1,898$ 2,100$ 1,964$ 1,746$ 2 76 73 72 68 69 79 76 78 77 78 230.52 148.02 208.66 519.50 426.59 586.00 466.70 474.43 518.60 347.59 1,435$ 1,746$ 1,881$ 1,828$ 1,728$ 2,095$ 1,860$ 1,932$ 1,960$ 1,768$ 3 76 74 72 68 70 79 76 70 76 77 197.06 206.80 169.64 546.35 420.94 916.98 486.41 308.81 547.86 359.14 1,412$ 1,825$ 1,839$ 1,824$ 1,714$ 2,043$ 1,866$ 1,539$ 1,936$ 1,737$ 4 86 76 72 68 69 89 150 79 77 80 417.56 275.42 444.95 549.72 422.94 973.82 4,331.96 593.43 556.76 395.44 1,766$ 1,976$ 2,126$ 1,838$ 1,689$ 2,636$ 7,122$ 1,991$ 1,975$ 1,835$ 5 175 86 185 88 125 159 174 163 107 136 5,682.40 323.98 6,617.18 941.42 2,695.41 4,445.04 6,901.03 5,598.44 1,612.15 3,316.14 8,465$ 2,336$ 10,754$ 2,606$ 5,056$ 7,460$ 10,203$ 8,682$ 3,584$ 5,845$ 6 205 196 199 175 188 202 205 204 177 173 8,406.36 8,581.26 8,260.96 6,450.06 8,099.80 9,103.04 10,264.94 8,829.84 7,006.06 6,800.98 11,617$ 12,902$ 12,650$ 9,832$ 11,800$ 13,087$ 14,335$ 12,817$ 10,443$ 10,139$ 7 204 214 198 202 200 204 219 221 210 193 9,241.96 8,396.05 8,020.61 8,669.57 9,433.97 9,592.59 9,783.62 10,598.90 11,051.13 9,356.00 11,704$ 13,069$ 12,389$ 12,637$ 13,723$ 13,612$ 14,055$ 14,945$ 15,201$ 13,159$ 8 215 219 206 209 263 201 207 215 211 212 9,912.98 11,834.39 7,764.92 10,344.43 8,680.54 9,372.64 10,238.86 10,589.77 11,664.89 10,711.85 13,375$ 15,693$ 13,173$ 14,545$ 12,901$ 13,326$ 14,322$ 14,832$ 15,884$ 14,908$ 9 212 217 196 201 190 205 219 208 207 202 9,801.94 9,473.72 9,199.26 9,462.04 8,377.17 9,218.87 9,706.46 9,540.67 10,755.00 10,716.74 13,247$ 14,330$ 13,699$ 13,495$ 12,098$ 13,235$ 13,975$ 13,634$ 14,885$ 14,754$

10 187 173 172 165 166 144 163 164 184 140 6,665.24 5,406.14 4,468.28 5,425.76 4,780.99 2,900.42 5,106.18 4,388.30 7,141.06 2,895.79 9,642$ 9,324$ 8,331$ 8,640$ 7,957$ 5,544$ 8,194$ 7,480$ 10,683$ 5,502$ 11 142 102 79 91 109 109 112 95 90 963.32 862.74 227.80 883.35 1,438.40 1,168.79 1,441.04 794.98 514.52 2,799$ 3,130$ 2,024$ 2,587$ 3,465$ 3,128$ 3,498$ 2,562$ 2,150$ 12 76 84 75 75 82 85 90 82 81 197.90 272.54 539.79 538.60 619.19 594.79 632.75 501.08 405.46 1,236$ 2,203$ 1,171$ 1,938$ 1,445$ 2,111$ 2,251$ 1,992$ 1,862$

144 131 133 123 134 136 148 138 131 137 51,937.46 45,865.66 46,141.72 44,673.70 45,886.96 49,509.13 59,827.69 52,857.20 52,297.83 45,268.17 78,188$ 79,600$ 81,984$ 73,318$ 75,386$ 80,401$ 93,579$ 84,506$ 82,528$ 71,393$ Totals

Revenue

Averages

Volume(x 1,000 cf)

Totals

Customers

0.00

2,000.00

4,000.00

6,000.00

8,000.00

10,000.00

12,000.00

14,000.00

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12

Cub

ic F

eet x

1,0

00

Month

VOLUME 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011

$-

$2,000

$4,000

$6,000

$8,000

$10,000

$12,000

$14,000

$16,000

$18,000

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Month

REVENUE 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011


TO: Board of Directors FROM: Michael Glaze, General Manager DATE: November 16, 2011 RE: General Information (regarding matters not scheduled on the agenda) 11/22/11 Board of Directors Meeting Relicensing Since the SFWPA Board’s last meeting there have been no new relicensing developments. The State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) is continuing the approval process for the 401 Water Quality Permit for the Agency’s South Feather Power Project and is continuing its review of the CEQA-compliance documents submitted by the Agency earlier this year. The permit application was filed by the Agency on May 14, 2008. Brown Act Training The Paradise Irrigation District’s board of directors decided that it needed an update on the Brown Act. Knowing that I used to provide seminars on this topic on behalf of the California Special Districts Association, I was asked to provide the training for them. I agreed and, because our two agencies are neighbors, knew that you would not want to charge them for my time. The training will be on December 6 at 10 a.m. In the event you would also like a little Brown Act refresher, the handout I’ll be giving the PID board at their training is attached. LAFCo Sphere of Influence Update State law establishing Local Agency Formation Commissions (LAFCo) in each county requires LAFCo to establish spheres of influence for each city and special district. Further, “On or before January 1, 2008, and every five years thereafter, the commission shall, as necessary, review and update each sphere of influence.” [GC 56425(g)] I have initiated a dialog with LAFCo staff regarding compliance with the sphere update requirement, cited above. At the same time, I have been talking with Alan Brown, LOAPUD’s general manager, about his proposal that SFWPA partner with LOAPUD in the preparation of CEQA documents that might be necessary. While a change in a special district’s sphere boundary would be a project under CEQA, I’m not yet convinced that the review and update required of LAFCo (different than a sphere change) triggers CEQA.

The proposed Rio D’Oro project is outside LOAPUD’s sphere of influence, but within the sphere boundary of SFWPA. Thus, LOAPUD needs to change its currently LAFCo-authorized sphere boundary to include Rio D’Oro and, thus, CEQA processing would be required. If it is determined that a LAFCo review and update of SFWPA’s sphere of influence is a project under CEQA, then partnering with LOAPUD would be a good idea in my opinion, given the relative common area of existing and potential service that the two agencies share. Authorization to move forward with such a project would first come before the Board for approval.

THE RALPH M. BROWN ACT

California’s Open Meeting Law Government Code §54950 et. seq.

“A popular government, without popular information, or the means of acquiring it, is but a prologue to a Farce or a Tragedy.” --James Madison

Prepared by Michael Glaze, MPA, for the Paradise Irrigation District Board of Directors December 6, 2011

Purpose 2

To provide the public with access to the decision-making process of local legislatures

Policy Declaration “[t]he public commissions, boards and

councils and the other public agencies in this State exist to aid in the conduct of the people’s business. It is the intent of the law that their actions be taken openly and that their deliberations be conducted openly… The people insist on remaining so informed so that they may retain control over the instruments they have created.”

(G.C. §54950)

Basics of the Brown Act 3

Public notice to every meeting subject to the Brown Act is required, and access is mandatory unless the meeting is held in closed session under a specific exception contained in the Act.

Typical problems in application: What kinds of public bodies are

subject to the Act? Has the public body given proper

notice? What constitutes a “meeting,” and

what kinds of communications are permitted outside of meetings?

Are the exceptions permitting closed sessions being properly applied?

Public Bodies Subject to the Act

4

Governing body of a local agency Applies to directors elect also

Commissions, committees, boards, or other bodies of a local agency Exceptions: Advisory committees composed solely of

members of legislative body that constitute less than a quorum and that have neither a continuing scope of business nor a schedule set by the legislative body

Others not relevant to PID State agencies are not covered by the

Brown Act, but are subject to the Bagley- Keene Open Meetings Act Similar to the Brown act

Advance Notice of Meetings Required

5

Regular meetings Agenda posted at least 72 hours before

the meeting Public may request copy of agenda and “all

documents constituting the agenda packet” be mailed to them Must be mailed when agenda posted or

when distributed to board, whichever first

Special meetings 24-hours notice to each local newspaper

of general circulation, radio or television station that has in writing requested notice

Emergency meetings May be called for specific and drastic

circumstances Work stoppage, crippling activity that

severely impairs public health, safety, or both, as determined by a majority of the board

1-hour notification of media requesting notice

Agenda Specifics 6

Brief description of each item of business Generally not to exceed 20 words Descriptions must not be misleading Assist public in determining whether to

monitor or participate in the meeting

Closed session items to be included Must protect confidentiality of subject to

be discussed Must provide public with general idea

of the topic being discussed Act provides “safe harbor” descriptions

to ensure against violations

Agenda Specifics (cont’d) 7

No action on items not on agenda, except: Brief response to public testimony Request for clarification from or

references of matters to staff Brief reports on personal activities When there is an emergency When two-thirds of directors agree

there is need to take immediate action on matter about which the board could not have been aware earlier

An item posted for a prior meeting and continued to the meeting at which action is being taken

What Is A Meeting? 8

“Congregation by a majority” of board at the same time and place to “hear, discuss, or deliberate” on any matter within the board’s jurisdiction No action necessary for a gathering to

be defined as a meeting It’s a meeting if: Merely receiving information Discussing views on an issue Directors deliberate, consider, analyze, or

debate an issue and any vote which may ultimately be taken

A meeting does not have to be formally announced, agendized, or convened to be subject to the Act

What Is A Meeting? (cont’d)

9

Serial meetings Whether in person, telephone or fax,

constitute a meeting if done to “develop a collective concurrence as to action”

Example: a majority of directors emailing each other regarding current issues

Example: individual phone calls by the

general manager to directors to poll their positions

Director

Director

Director Director

Director

Manager

Director

Director

Director Director

Director

“Intermediary”


10

Exempted from meeting definition Individual contacts or conversations Attendance of majority of directors at: Conference open to the public

Not discussing district business

Open and publicized meeting (not called by district’s board) to discuss community interest topics

Open and publicized meeting of another local agency where district business not discussed

Ceremonial or social event where district business is not discussed

Attendance of majority of board at an open and noticed standing committee of board Members of board not on committee may

attend only as observers


11

Must be held within boundaries of district’s jurisdiction, except: When necessary to comply with state or

federal law To inspect real or personal property over

which district has control To participate in multi-agency meetings Must be properly noticed by all agencies

To meet with federal or state officials Topic solely relevant with such officials

At facility closest to principal office of district if no meeting facility exists within district boundaries

To discuss pending litigation with legal counsel for the purpose of reducing fees

Public Access 12

Regular meetings must be held at time, place and location fixed by official board action Must be accessible to all members of the

public No admission fees may be charged Attendance registration or any other

condition of admission prohibited Cameras are permitted Recordings made by district are public

records Broadcast of meeting must be permitted

unless it can be demonstrated that doing so would cause a persistent disruption

Public Access (cont’d) 13

Records distributed to board at meeting are public records District prepared documents must be

available to public at meeting May have to provide them before the

meeting if they are available Documents prepared by someone else

must be available to public after meeting

Time must be provided for public comment Time limitations may be imposed Criticism may not be prohibited Protected by First Amendment Including criticism of particular public

officials and employees Privacy of rank-and-file employees may

be protected from public discussion

Closed Sessions 14

Litigation – to confer with legal counsel Existing litigation – formally initiated Agenda to state name of the case, unless it

would jeopardize process service or settlement negotiations

Threatened litigation To inform board of circumstances that suggest

significant exposure to litigation Agenda to state number of potential cases

Initiation of litigation Agenda to state number of potential cases

Real estate negotiations Meeting with negotiator prior to purchase,

sale, exchange or lease of real property Agenda to identify negotiator, address of

property, and whether instruction will concern price, payment terms, or both

Closed Sessions (cont’d) 15

Public employment To discuss:

Appointment Employment Evaluation of performance Discipline or dismissal To hear complaints brought against an employee

Employee may request a public hearing

Agenda to state position to be filled or title of employee being reviewed Need not do so in case of complaints

Note: an elected official is not an employee Collective bargaining negotiations

To meet with negotiator and instruct regarding negotiations

Agenda to state name of district’s negotiator and name of bargaining unit Identify positions if bargaining with unrepresented

employees

Public security Action not reportable Law enforcement or legal counsel present

Closed Sessions (cont’d) 16

After a closed session Publicly report action taken Approval of agreements or settlements

Real estate negotiations Settlement of pending litigation, as well

as approval to defend, appeal, or participate in litigation

Labor agreements Action taken on claims

Public entitled to copies of documents approved

Closed session records Minutes may be maintained, but not

required If taken, minutes are not public record Recordings not required unless court

ordered

Brown Act Enforcement 17

A knowing violation with intent to deprive public of information to which it is entitled is a misdemeanor No record of successful prosecution

Civil remedies - D.A. or public member may sue to:

Compel compliance with Brown Act Obtain a ruling that violation occurred Obtain a ruling that a director’s free speech

rights are being violated Void an action taken at an illegal meeting

District has 30 days to correct action Decision to take corrective action raises no

inference that the action “cured” was unlawful

Attorney’s fees may be recovered

Brown Act Enforcement (cont’d)

18

Disclosure of confidential information acquired in closed session prohibited (AB 1945, 2003) Only entire board as a body can agree

to divulge confidential closed session information

How a director voted on an action is not confidential information Brown Act requires certain final votes be

reported publicly Prescribed remedies: Injunctive relief Disciplinary action against an employee Referral of director to the Grand Jury


TO: Board of Directors FROM: Michael Glaze, General Manager DATE: November 4, 2011 RE: Change in Fees and Charges

Agenda Item for 11/22/11 Board of Directors Meeting At its April 2010 meeting, the Board adopted a Strategic Ten-Year Financial Plan for 2011-2020 including, conceptually, modifications to potable water rates in 2012, 2014 and 2017. The current rates and the proposed rates from that plan are shown below.

First After First Year 100 Units 100 Units

Current $0.64 $0.25 2012 $0.53 $0.28 2014 $0.42 $0.31 2017 $0.35 $0.35

Based on current customer usage, the proposed new rates would result in water bills being reduced for over 99% of the Agency’s treated-water customers. The table, below, analyzes the impact the new rates would have on high-volume customers. Year

Rate for First 100

Units

Rate After First 100

Units

Cost for First 100

Units

Breakeven

Volume (units)

Total Bill* for

Breakeven Volume

Customers Who

Would Pay More

Highest Average Monthly Increase

Present 64¢ 25¢ $64.00 2012 53¢ 28¢ $53.00 466.7 $170.67 43 $4.52 2014 42¢ 31¢ $42.00 466.7 $170.67 43 $9.05 2017 35¢ 35¢ $35.00 390.0 $151.50 63 $11.75 *Includes $15.00 monthly service charge, but not the Backflow Maintenance Charge paid by 18% of the treated-water customers. Most treated-water customers do not exceed 100 units (10,000 cubic feet, or 74,800 gallons) of consumption per month. The average customer uses between a low of 8 units in the winter and a high of 47 units in the summer.

The “breakeven volume” in the table, above, is the consumption volume at which the new rate would result in a customer’s bill equaling what it would under the present rate (this happens because the second tier increases as the first tier decreases so that they are equal in 2017). Only 43 customers received a bill in 2010 that exceeded $170.67 (the breakeven cost in 2012 and 2014), and 63 customers in 2010 had a bill that exceeded $151.50 (the breakeven cost in 2017). However, most of the customers who exceeded the breakeven cost did so only during dry and hot months. Their bills during cooler and wetter months were significantly less than the breakeven cost such that their total annual cost will probably be less under the new rate schedule. Notwithstanding the fact that the proposed new rates would result in a decrease for over 99% of all Agency customers, a few customers could possibly see an increase. The Board, therefore, took action at its meeting on September 27 to authorize sending a Notice of Change in Rates to the record owners of each parcel on which the fee is proposed for change, as well as to the address where the treated-water service is provided. Attached is a copy of the Notice that was sent the week following the Board’s authorization. In addition to explaining the amount of the proposed new water rates, the basis of the proposed change in rates, and the reason for the proposed change in rates, the Notice also included information about how a customer or property owner could protest the proposal, as follows:

The Agency’s Board of Directors will conduct a public hearing regarding the proposed rate changes at 2:00 p.m. on November 22, 2011, at the Agency office located at 2310 Oro Quincy Highway, Oroville, California. You have a right to protest the proposed change in rates and charges. Oral protests will be heard at the public hearing described above. Written protests will also be considered at that time. Please be advised that if the written protests received are filed prior to the close of the public hearing by more than 50% of landowners subject to the Agency’s rates and charges, then the Board will not implement the proposed change. Only written protests will be counted for this purpose, and only one protest will be counted for each parcel.

At this writing, only two written protests have been received. Public Hearing on Proposed Change in rates Before you consider approving the proposed change in rates, the public hearing must be held. The public hearing is initiated by the President "opening" the hearing and allowing interested individuals to comment on the proposed change in rates. Comments about anything not related to the change in rates is not appropriate during the hearing. This is a time for people to make comments to the Board that they feel are necessary for an objective decision about approving the change in rates. The Board's responsibility is to listen. You may also ask questions. You are not required, however, to debate the proposal with presenters since your job is to evaluate the information they provide and determine if the proposed change in rates is appropriate.

As was done at the October meeting, staff will be able to display on the board room screen account information and analysis for anyone in the audience who wants to know the impact the rate changes will have on their bill. When everyone in the audience has had an opportunity to address the Board on the issue, the President will "close" the public hearing and move on to the Board’s consideration of adopting the change in rates. Approval of Change in Rates After the public hearing is closed the Board may consider approving the change in rates. The form of action for approval is:

"I move that the ‘Rates-of-Use’ for ‘Potable Water,’ as specified in Part D of the Agency’s Rules and Regulations Governing Water Service, be changed in three stages, as follows: starting January 1, 2012, 53¢ per unit for the first 100 units, and 28¢ thereafter; starting January 1, 2014, 42¢ per unit for the first 100 units, and 31¢ thereafter; and, starting January 1, 2017, 35¢ per unit for all amounts delivered."

To lower the rates for raw (irrigation) water (all of which are presently equivalent to $45/AF), the form of action is:

"I move that the ‘Rates-of-Use’ for ‘Non-Potable Water,’ as specified in Part D of the Agency’s Rules and Regulations Governing Water Service, each be changed to the equivalent of $____ per acre foot.

SOUTH FEATHER WATER & POWER AGENCY MICHAEL C. GLAZE, GENERAL MANAGER 2310 ORO-QUINCY HIGHWAY

OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95966 530-533-2401 [email protected]

1

September 28, 2011 Re: NOTICE OF CHANGE IN RATES FOR TREATED WATER PURCHASED

FROM SOUTH FEATHER WATER AND POWER AGENCY Dear Property Owner and/or Treated-Water Customer: The Purpose of this letter is to advise you that the Board of Directors of the South Feather Water and Power Agency has authorized changes in rates subject to the protest and hearing procedure described in this letter. Based on the historical usage, customers continuing their current level of use will experience a decrease in their monthly cost of water. However, the changes in rates could result in cost increases if water usage on a parcel increases to a higher consumption level. This notice will also advise you that the Agency’s Board of Directors will conduct a public hearing on the proposed changes, on October 25, 2011, commencing at the hour of 2:00 p.m., as a part of its regularly scheduled Board of Directors meeting held at that time. The meeting will be held at the Agency’s office located at 2310 Oro-Quincy Highway, Oroville, California. 1. The amount of the proposed fee or charge proposed to be imposed. The changes in rates proposed by South Feather Water and Power Agency are described in the table, below. Essentially, a rate adjustment will be implemented in three stages over a five-year period. Basically, the Agency’s rates are applied to two blocks of water usage. Block One, for usage of up to 100 units (1 unit = 100 cubic feet = 748 gallons), and Block Two, all usage above that amount. An average household in the Agency uses between a low of 8 units per month in the winter, and a high of 47 units per month in the driest summer months. The rates for Block One will be decreased from 64¢ to 35¢, and the Block Two rates will increase from 25¢ to 35¢, both occurring in three phases over a five-year period, as described on the next page.

2

Rate Per Unit BLOCK ONE

First 100 Units BLOCK TWO

After First 100 Units Currently

Starting January 1, 2012 Starting January 1, 2014 Starting January 1, 2017

2. The basis of the proposed changes in rates. The changes in rates are made possible by increased power revenues available to the Agency. Effective July 1, 2010, the Agency assumed full responsibility for the ownership, operation, maintenance and sale of power from the South Feather Hydroelectric Project. Based on experience to date, and anticipated experience under the present Power Sales Agreement, the operations of the South Feather Power Project will provide increased revenues to the Agency. A substantial amount of these power revenues are required to finance the capital requirements of the Agency, including water treatment, storage, distribution system repairs, replacement and expense. These revenues will also be used to operate and maintain the hydroelectric facilities. However, a portion of the revenues from the South Feather Power Project can be used by the Agency to offset the cost of delivered water. From a customer’s standpoint, this means that hydroelectric revenues will, with the implementation of this change in rates, provide funds to the Agency which it can use to offset the cost of its water operations, allowing the Agency to decrease rates for approximately 99% of its customers and to reduce the cumulative bill to customers for water service by up to $500,000 per year by 2017. Block Two, as described, will be increased. Block Two water is water provided by the Agency for large users, including some agricultural users, as well as large multi-residential properties such as mobile home parks. As can be seen in the table, above, it is currently sold at a substantially lower rate than is applied to Block One. As part of a strategic financial plan adopted by the Board of Directors last year, it is the Board’s goal to apply an increase to the Block Two rate in order to better reflect the actual costs of providing the water. Over the five-year period, the Block Two rate will increase 40%, and the Block One rate will decrease 45%, so that in 2017 the two blocks will be merged and their rates will be the same. The Agency will expend $2,620,000 in 2011 to treat and deliver water to its 6,650 treated-water customers. Operational expenses are expected to increase by approximately 5% annually in succeeding years. Capital expenses forecast for the period of these rates are approximately $1.5 million annually through 2016, and approximately $2.4 million annually thereafter, which includes expansion of the Agency’s water treatment plant and construction of additional treated-water storage facilities. The present rate structure will generate $2,200,000 in revenue in 2011 – $420,000 less than projected operational expenses, and will cover no portion of the Agency’s capital expenses. As part of the Agency’s rate plan, the Board intends to allocate up to an additional $500,000 of hydroelectric revenues per year to offset the

3

cost of its water operations and facilitate the schedule of rates shown in the table above. Therefore, the proposed changes in rates, described herein, reflect a rate for water use which is substantially below the cost of producing and delivering water, which costs are being subsidized by the use of the revenue produced by the Agency’s hydroelectric facilities. The remaining balance of hydroelectric revenues must be used to finance the Agency’s capital expenses, including the costs of the hydroelectric system, and to fund required reserves. To conclude, the change in rates, while increasing the cost of Block Two water over a five-year period by 40%, will, for approximately 99% of the Agency’s current customers, result in an overall decrease in costs because Block One will be decreasing to the same rate per unit as Block Two. By 2017, every unit of water delivered by the Agency will be delivered at the same rate, and will receive an equal subsidy from power revenue. 3. Reason for the proposed change in rates. The Agency’s Board of Directors has determined that the rate per unit of water should, over time, be merged so that all users pay the same rate. Moreover, Article XIII D(6) of the California Constitution, approved by the voters as Proposition 218 in 1996, mandates that the Agency charge its customers based on the cost of the service delivered and, with the subsidy from power, each unit delivered by the Agency costs the same amount to produce. Finally, the Board believes the fairest approach is to subsidize the cost of domestic water on an equal basis with power revenues. Thus, the distinction between Block One and Block Two can no longer be justified. The Agency’s Board of Directors will conduct a public hearing regarding the proposed rate changes at 2:00 p.m. on November 22, 2011, at the Agency office located at 2310 Oro Quincy Highway, Oroville, California. You have a right to protest the proposed changes in rates and charges. Oral protests will be heard at the public hearing described above. Written protests will also be considered at that time. Please be advised that if the written protests received are filed prior to the close of the public hearing by more than 50% of landowners subject to the Agency’s rates and charges, then the Board will not implement the proposed change. Only written protests will be counted for this purpose, and only one protest will be counted for each parcel. Written protests should be directed to the Agency at the following address: South Feather Water and Power Agency 2310 Oro Quincy Hwy Oroville, CA.95966

4

Please contact the Agency office at (530) 533-2401 should you desire further information with respect to the proposed change in rates. It should be mentioned that this change in rates, which overall will reflect a reduction in the Agency’s cost that it would charge its customers for the operation of its treated water system, represents a significant return to its customers provided by the Agency’s hydroelectric system. This system, which has long provided the Agency a reliable supply of water, will now also be providing the Agency a substantial infusion of revenues to offset costs of the Agency and to permit the Agency to finance required replacements and expansions of its capital assets. On behalf of the Board of Directors, we are delighted to be able to implement this plan which we believe will be of significant benefit to our customers. I would be happy to hear and answer any questions you may have. My contact information is provided in the header on the first page of this letter. Sincerely, MICHAEL C. GLAZE General Manager


TO: Board of Directors FROM: Steve Wong, Finance Division Manager Michael Glaze, General Manager DATE: November 16, 2011 RE: 2012 Agency Budget

Agenda Item for 11/22/11 Board of Directors Meeting The proposed 2011 Budget is attached. The Board’s Finance Committee (Directors Edwards and Hunter) reviewed it in detail with Agency staff on November 15, and recommends its adoption. The format, funds and fund accounting system are all similar to the budgets presented in recent years. The budget and accounting structure segregate revenues and expenses according to the source of funds, facilitate compliance with the Agency’s agreement with North Yuba Water District, identify funds received and used for system-capacity purposes, and meets governmental accounting standards. This 2012 Proposed Budget assumes implementation of the modifications to the domestic water rates proposed to be effective January 1, 2012 (previous agenda item), resulting in decreased water bills for virtually all of SFWPA’s customers. The total SFWPA 2012 Proposed Budget anticipates a beginning balance on January 1, 2012 of $25,648,916, and an end-of-the-year balance at December 31, 2012 of $35,682,241 – an increase of over $10,000,000. By maintaining operating and capital costs at levels consistent with prior years, the increased revenues realized from the sale of electricity generated by the South Feather Power Project will result in substantial distributions to the North Yuba Water District and the SFWPA General Fund beginning in the 2013 budget year. No significant changes in operations are proposed for 2012. One position is added: an apprentice Electrical Machinist in the Power Division beginning July 1, 2012. The Operating funds have been adjusted for expected merit and cost-of-living increases for employees, increased premiums associated with the retirement and health benefit plans, and increases for supplies and services. Adequate funding for vehicles, capital projects and debt service obligations is included and was discussed in detail during the Finance Committee’s review of the proposed budget. Please let either of us know if you have questions or need additional information prior to your meeting.

The following action is recommended:

“I move approval of the 2012 Budget as recommended by the Finance Committee, including appropriation of funds for equipment acquisitions and capital improvement projects.”

South Feather Water and Power AgencyTotal 2012 Proposed Budget $54,670,616

47%

4%

43%

6%

Source of Funds

Beginning Balance $25,648,916 (47%)

Water Sales $2,505,000 (4%)

Sale of Electricity $23,410,000 (43%)

Other Revenue $3,106,700 (6%)

16%

6%

10%

1%

65%

2%

Use of Funds

Salaries & Benefits, $8,563,300 (16%)

Supplies & Services, $3,205,700 (6%)

Capital Projects, $5,533,950 (10%)

Debt Service, $439,000 (1%)

Reserve/Ending Balance, $35,672,241 (65%)

North Yuba Water District $1,256,425 (2%)

SOUTH FEATHER WATER AND POWER AGENCY 2012 ANNUAL BUDGET

Budget Comments and Assumptions

Summary of Fund Projections The Summary of Fund Projections is a one-page overview of the entire Agency’s financial expectations for 2011 and 2012. The proposed total 2012 budget is comprised of a $11,769,000 operating budget, a $5,533,950 capital budget, $439,000 in debt service expenditures, and a distribution of $1,256,425 to North Yuba Water District, for a total budget of $18,998,375. The total balance that will be remaining on December 31, 2012, is estimated to be $35,672,241. The General Fund (Fund 1) includes activity of the Water Division and the Sly Creek Powerhouse. The Power Division Fund (Fund 6) accounted for the Agency’s activities and relationship with Pacific Gas and Electric Co. (PG&E) through June 30, 2010, the conclusion of a 50-year agreement. A couple of projects were in process at June 30, 2010, and PG&E agreed to continue its financial participation with the Agency in those projects. These projects, known as “Legacy” projects, are accounted for in Fund 6 and they are identified on the Capital Budget/Project Management pages with a Fund 6 Funding Source. The SFPP Joint Facilities Operating Fund (JFOF – Fund 7) was established to account for revenues and expenditures in accordance with the 2005 agreement with North Yuba Water District. Activity related to the Woodleaf, Forbestown and Kelly Ridge Powerhouses, as well as compliance with Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) license conditions, is reflected in Fund 7. SFWPA is obligated to repay a loan to PG&E in 2015 from JFOF monies for a portion of expenses incurred (and to be incurred) in connection with dam-crest-modification projects on the Sly Creek and Lost Creek dams. A reserve is in place so that adequate funds will be available when that loan must be repaid. The MRTP System Capacity Fund (Fund 12) is a capital fund and documents activity related to increasing the capacity of Miners Ranch Treatment Plant (MRTP). The source of funds for these expenditures is development fees collected with the installation of new accounts. The Retiree Health Benefits Fund (Fund 51) accounts for SFWPA’s “Other Post-Employment Benefits” (OPEB) obligations, specifically retiree health benefits. Revenues The 2012 Proposed Budget for the General Fund assumes implementation of the modifications to the domestic water rates proposed to be effective January 1, 2012, resulting in decreased water bills for virtually all of SFWPA’s customers. Revenue from the sale of hydroelectric power to PG&E, pursuant to the Power Purchase Agreement with PG&E, is projected to be the same in 2012 as 2011. Campground revenues, JFOF account 42331, are expected to double in 2012 since the Sly Creek Dam Crest Modification project will be completed and additional campgrounds will be available for public use. System Capacity Fund revenues in 2011 include the receipt of System Capacity Charges for Phase 2 of the Hillview Ridge Apartments project.

Operating Expenses Labor costs in the Proposed Operating Budget include adequate funds for a 4% Cost-of-Living Adjustment on January 1, 2012 and 3.5% for average annual merit increases throughout the year. CalPERS retirement contributions are projected to increase 10% and the increase for health premiums is 2.4%. One additional position is proposed for 2012, an Electrical Machinist, beginning July 1, 2012 (JFOF account 07-63-63300).

Relicensing The FERC license authorizing operations of South Feather’s four power plants ended March 31, 2009. The FERC relicensing process is nearing completion. Until the relicensing process is completed, operations continue under the previous FERC license conditions. Expenditures incurred in the relicensing process now total over $5,600,000. As the license has not yet been issued, additional costs will be incurred. PG&E has paid $236,081 to South Feather for its share of relicensing costs for the period of April 1, 2009 through June 30, 2010 (General Fund Revenue account 49500 in 2011). The remaining costs incurred through December 31, 2011 will become a liability of the JFOF and repaid to the General Fund over a five year period (General Fund-JFOF Transfer). Expenditures beginning January 1, 2012 will be recorded in JFOF Department 67, Regulatory Compliance. Debt Service As of 2012, SFWPA has revenue bonds outstanding for construction of the 1980 Miners Ranch Treatment Plant and 2003 Certificates of Participation outstanding for the solar power project at MRTP. The interest rates vary from 4.75% to 5.375%. The 1980 bonds mature in 2020 and the 2003 Certificates mature in 2024. Ten-Year Projections The ten-year projections now cover through the year 2021. This 2012 Proposed Budget assumes approval of rate modifications proposed to become effective on January 1, 2012. Also incorporated into the projections are rate adjustments on January 1, 2014 and January 1, 2017. It is anticipated that over $3 million per year will be distributed to both North Yuba Water District and the SFWPA General Fund from 2013 through 2016 and between $5 million and $7 million to each agency annually from 2017 through 2021. The JFOF obligations for the relicensing repayment and the PG&E loan for the dam crest modification projects are accounted for and paid or reserved prior to the distribution of “additional JFOF” funds. For the SFWPA General Fund, existing debt service obligations are scheduled through 2024. The 2021 projected cost for debt service is decreased due to the final maturity of the 1980 bonds occurring in 2020. Potential debt service in the amount of $1,415,000 per year to finance funding for the MRTP expansion continues to be included in these projections. Also continuing in these projections are annual $1 million contributions for OPEB obligations scheduled to commence in 2016.


2012 ANNUAL BUDGET

SUMMARY OF FUND PROJECTIONS

1 6 7 7 12 51

GENERAL POWER DIV SFPP JOINT RESERVE MRTP SYS SFWPA

DESCRIPTION FUND FUND FAC OPER FD FOR PGE LOAN CAP FUND RET BENE FD TOTAL

1/1/2011 BALANCE 348,804 0 8,242,756 0 1,678,398 3,265,708 13,535,666

2011

REVENUES 6,028,442 5,655,000 21,723,697 0 146,000 7,500 33,560,639

OPER EXPENDITURES (5,586,191) 0 (4,921,360) 0 0 0 (10,507,551)

CAPITAL EXPENDITURES (758,500) (5,655,000) (3,308,487) 0 (308,000) 0 (10,029,987)

DEBT SERVICE EXPENDITURES (555,351) 0 0 0 0 0 (555,351)

NORTH YUBA WATER DIST 0 0 (354,500) 0 0 0 (354,500)

TRANSFERS 774,739 0 (774,739) 0 0 0 0

RESERVE FOR PGE LOAN 0 0 (3,647,167) 3,647,167 0 0 0

12/31/2011 BALANCE 251,943 0 16,960,200 3,647,167 1,516,398 3,273,208 25,648,916

2012

REVENUES 5,613,700 2,102,000 21,274,000 0 22,000 10,000 29,021,700

OPER EXPENDITURES (5,990,000) 0 (5,779,000) 0 0 0 (11,769,000)

CAPITAL EXPENDITURES (1,090,650) (2,102,000) (2,191,300) 0 (150,000) 0 (5,533,950)

DEBT SERVICE EXPENDITURES (439,000) 0 0 0 0 0 (439,000)

NORTH YUBA WATER DIST 0 0 (1,256,425) 0 0 0 (1,256,425)

TRANSFERS 2,893,850 0 (2,893,850) 0 0 0 0

RESERVE FOR PGE LOAN 0 0 (2,600,000) 2,600,000 0 0 0

RESERVE FOR VEHICLE REPLACE (300,000) (300,000) (600,000)

12/31/2012 BALANCE 939,843 0 23,213,625 6,247,167 1,388,398 3,283,208 35,072,241

DESIRED RESERVE 600,000 15,862,500 17,000,000 10,100,000

Page 1 of 53


General Fund Summary of Revenue and Expenses

2012 Annual Budget

2008 2009 2010 2011 2011 2012 2012 2012

ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION ACTUAL ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET ESTIMATED REQUESTED PROPOSED ADOPTED

REVENUE:

Water Sales Rev

41100 Domestic Water 2,580,748 2,444,993 2,354,324 2,300,000 2,275,000 2,150,000 2,150,000

41400 Irrigation Water 252,037 229,598 223,461 200,000 216,300 205,000 205,000

41300 Surplus Water (PG&E) 159,694 192,914 65,019 0 0 0 0

41502 Surplus Water (Contract) 1,650,000 1,000 0 0 0 0 0

Sub-Total Water Sales Rev 4,642,479 2,868,505 2,642,804 2,500,000 2,491,300 2,355,000 2,355,000

Power Revenue

41305 Sly Cr Pwr Generation 148,375 225,455 1,068,090 1,600,000 2,345,000 2,345,000 2,345,000

41450 Woodleaf TWD 23,443 63,990 20,188 0 0 0 0

41500 Surplus Wtr 368,000 368,000 368,000 0 150,000 140,000 140,000

41600 Sly Creek MOU 77,200 77,200 77,200 0 0 0 0

Sub-Total Power Rev 617,018 734,645 1,533,478 1,600,000 2,495,000 2,485,000 2,485,000

Water Serv Chgs

42301 Sundry Billing (Job Orders) 152,930 17,108 3,381 5,000 15,000 15,000 15,000

42303 Inspection Fees 2,580 0 0 0 7,800 0 0

42341 System Cap Chg (MRTP) 237,759 28,490 0 0 0 0 0

Other Water Serv Charges 45,290 100,248 70,323 30,000 55,000 55,000 55,000

Sub-Total Water Serv Chgs 438,559 145,846 73,704 35,000 77,800 70,000 70,000

Non-Oper Revenue

49202 Int-Time Certificates 46,868 18,178 9,840 10,000 0 5,000 5,000

49250 Int-Misc 24,396 18,323 23,981 5,000 5,000 1,000 1,000

49311 Property Taxes 529,166 517,253 513,770 475,000 520,000 525,200 525,200

49312 ERAF Surcharge (4) 4 0 0 0 0 0

49405 ACWA/JPIA RPA 1,410 0 0 0 56,761 50,000 50,000

49500 Revenue, PG&E 93,959 0 0 0 236,081 0 0

49625 Back Flow Installation 34,527 34,725 48,017 30,000 37,500 40,000 40,000

49630 Back Flow Inspection 75,948 78,275 81,264 80,000 81,500 81,500 81,500

49910 PG&E (SFPP) 10,000 7,500 5,000 0 0 0 0

49912 04 Refinancing, Excess Funds 266,163 293,464 890,857 0 0 0 0

49932 North Yuba Water District 12,759 33,977 (10,006) 0 0 0 0

Other Non-Oper Rev 47,205 56,380 55,809 1,000 27,500 1,000 1,000

Transfer In From 1995 COP Res Fd 686,924 0 0 0 0 0

Sub-Total Non-Oper Rev 1,142,397 1,745,003 1,618,532 601,000 964,342 703,700 703,700

TOTAL GENERAL FUND REVENUE 6,840,453 5,493,999 5,868,518 4,736,000 6,028,442 5,613,700 5,613,700

Page 2 of 53



2012 Annual Budget

2008 2009 2010 2011 2011 2012 2012 2012


EXPENSES:

General Administration, 1-50

Salaries & Benefits 1,763,255 953,257 890,656 990,296 940,600 1,014,100 1,014,100

Supplies 26,028 17,299 22,043 20,200 22,000 22,700 22,700

Services 172,800 194,152 193,970 187,000 234,593 240,000 240,000

Utilities 21,367 31,722 43,137 43,000 43,000 45,500 45,500

Fuel, Oil, Auto 1,341 215 44 500 100 100 100

Training/Dues 57,893 62,668 62,809 74,500 61,500 28,500 28,500

Total General Admin, 1-50 2,042,684 1,259,313 1,212,659 1,315,496 1,301,793 1,350,900 1,350,900

Water Source, 1-51

Source of Supply 13,757 14,113 14,113 14,500 14,113 14,500 14,500

Total Water Source, 1-51 13,757 14,113 14,113 14,500 14,113 14,500 14,500


Salaries & Benefits 33,743 68,042 75,705 71,778 81,900 88,400 88,400

Supplies 3,413 6,154 6,139 8,000 7,000 16,000 16,000

Services 3,732 11,854 4,757 11,000 13,500 16,000 16,000

Utilities 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Fuel, Oil, Auto 0 0 92 0 100 100 100

Training/Dues 5,730 6,760 9,083 13,200 13,200 9,850 9,850

Total EH&S, 1-52 46,618 92,810 95,776 103,978 115,700 130,350 130,350

Water Treatment, 1-53


Supplies 64,215 75,216 58,788 85,000 82,500 85,000 85,000

Services 26,048 14,288 23,934 19,000 24,500 26,000 26,000

Utilities 37,465 42,342 25,762 40,000 27,500 45,000 45,000

Fuel, Oil, Auto 654 23 55 500 100 400 400

Training/Dues 366 1,064 5,592 7,500 7,500 7,500 7,500

Total Water Treat, 1-53 501,632 726,386 784,673 878,168 853,200 931,000 931,000

Transmission & Distribution, 1-54

Salaries & Benefits 773,635 1,483,248 1,521,604 1,595,641 1,703,580 1,834,600 1,834,600

Supplies 142,118 201,553 199,261 187,500 103,000 104,000 104,000

Services 1,408 6,170 3,643 6,300 6,500 6,500 6,500

Utilities 25,201 23,821 23,544 29,500 29,500 29,500 29,500

Fuel, Oil, Auto 1,143 4 37 1,000 100 100 100

Training/Dues 0 0 1,251 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000

Total Trans & Dist, 1-54 943,505 1,714,796 1,749,340 1,820,941 1,843,680 1,975,700 1,975,700

Page 3 of 53



2012 Annual Budget

2008 2009 2010 2011 2011 2012 2012 2012


EXPENSES (CON'T):

Customer Accounts, 1-55


Supplies 61,767 56,999 57,453 66,000 77,500 80,000 80,000

Services 0 0 0 0 500 500 500

Utilities 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Fuel, Oil, Auto 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Training/Dues 0 230 750 1,100 1,100 1,100 1,100

Total Cust Accts, 1-55 345,071 363,409 355,344 372,025 411,800 441,200 441,200

General Plant & Shop, 1-56


Supplies 20,883 12,954 14,303 16,500 19,500 19,500 19,500

Services 4,229 6,221 2,487 10,000 7,500 7,500 7,500

Utilities 20,956 20,486 21,082 26,000 27,000 27,000 27,000

Fuel, Oil, Auto 118,211 95,412 107,590 100,000 115,500 120,000 120,000

Training/Dues 0 0 0 0 300 300 300

Total Gen Plant & Shop, 1-56 376,177 351,320 371,725 383,522 371,500 392,800 392,800

Sundry & Expense Credits, 1-57


Supplies (96,980) (113,390) (90,406) (71,750) (2,000) (2,000) (2,000)

Services (63,144) (60,470) 3,774 (5,000) (5,000) (5,000) (5,000)

Utilities 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Fuel, Oil, Auto 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Training/Dues 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Total Sundry, 1-57 (118,167) (156,933) (70,213) (50,350) 23,000 14,200 14,200

Information Technology, 1-58


Supplies 16,012 17,394 17,072 35,700 26,000 27,000 27,000

Services 8,605 9,482 7,598 31,000 31,000 25,000 25,000

Utilities 0 100 1,790 2,500 3,000 3,000 3,000

Fuel, Oil, Auto 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Training/Dues 25,096 20,681 22,967 31,100 31,100 31,100 31,100

Total Info Tech, 1-58 94,210 144,212 221,903 297,654 295,200 306,000 306,000

Sly Creek Power Plant, 1-61

Salaries & Benefits 0 0 155,971 473,770 281,025 319,000 319,000

Supplies 0 0 5,922 42,250 21,800 37,750 37,750

Services 0 0 30,151 82,000 43,000 62,500 62,500

Utilities 0 0 186 8,000 6,650 7,100 7,100

Fuel, Oil, Auto 0 0 34 0 30 0 0

Training/Dues 0 0 0 3,250 3,700 7,000 7,000

Total Sly Creek Power Plant, 1-61 0 0 192,264 609,270 356,205 433,350 433,350

TOTAL OPERATING EXPENSES 4,245,487 4,509,426 4,927,584 5,745,204 5,586,191 5,990,000 5,990,000

SUB-TOTAL, REVENUES OVER OPER EXP 2,594,966 984,573 940,934 (1,009,204) 442,251 (376,300) (376,300)

Page 4 of 53



2012 Annual Budget

2008 2009 2010 2011 2011 2012 2012 2012


SUB-TOTAL, REVENUES OVER OPER EXP 2,594,966 984,573 940,934 (1,009,204) 442,251 (376,300) (376,300)

Debt Service, 1-59

Supplies & Servces (122,779) 1,546 210 11,402 1,000 1,000 1,000

Interest 302,220 235,042 217,187 205,228 205,245 188,000 188,000

Principal 746,536 787,113 242,718 253,370 349,106 250,000 250,000

Non-Operating, 1-59 925,977 1,023,701 460,115 470,000 555,351 439,000 439,000


Relicensing 242,483 157,866 82,129 0 60,000 0 0

Capital Outlay 151,068 173,883 216,891 686,000 698,500 3,665,650 1,090,650

Total Capital Outlay and Relicensing 393,551 331,749 299,020 686,000 758,500 3,665,650 1,090,650

Transfers:

From:

SFPP JFOF-Minimum Payment 0 354,500 354,500 709,000 709,000

SFPP JFOF-Additional Payment 0 0 0 547,425 547,425

SFPP JFOF-Relicensing 0 560,000 0 1,145,000 1,145,000

SFPP JFOF-Overhead 0 550,000 420,239 492,425 492,425

To:

MRTP System Capacity Fund (1,666,977) 0 0 0 0

Net Transfers 0 0 (1,666,977) 1,464,500 774,739 2,893,850 2,893,850

NET REVENUE OVER EXPENSES 1,275,438 (370,877) (1,485,178) (700,704) (96,861) (1,587,100) 987,900

Beginning Balance 929,421 2,204,859 1,833,982 1,251,957 348,804 251,943 251,943

Reserve for Vehicle Replacement (300,000) (300,000)

Ending Balance 2,204,859 1,833,982 348,804 551,253 251,943 (1,635,157) 939,843

Page 5 of 53


Joint Facilities Operating Fund Summary of Revenue and Expenses

2012 Annual Budget

2011 2011 2012 2012 2012

ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION BUDGET ESTIMATED REQUESTED PROPOSED ADOPTED

REVENUE:

41150 Sale of Electricity 17,500,000 21,065,000 21,065,000 21,065,000

41502 Water Sales 130,000 150,000 150,000 150,000

42305 Current Service Charges 0 3,975 3,500 3,500

42331 Concession Income 5,000 16,322 30,000 30,000

49250 Interest Income 10,000 20,000 25,000 25,000

49321 State of CA, DWR 0 468,000 0 0

49929 Miscellaneous Income 0 400 500 500

Total Revenue 17,645,000 21,723,697 21,274,000 21,274,000

EXPENSES:

JFOF Administration, 7-60

Salaries & Benefits 499,430 604,000 649,800 649,800

Supplies 8,500 9,420 8,300 8,300

Services 557,500 607,450 604,500 604,500

Utilities 5,000 45,300 8,000 8,000

Fuel, Oil, Auto 1,000 500 700 700

Training/Dues 29,500 27,580 31,200 31,200

Total JFOF Administration, 7-60 1,100,930 1,294,250 1,302,500 1,302,500



Supplies 33,250 7,100 23,250 23,250

Services 11,500 6,914 21,500 21,500

Utilities 0 0 0 0

Fuel, Oil, Auto 0 0 0 0

Training/Dues 14,750 4,041 14,750 14,750

Total Environ Health & Safety, 7-62 126,700 79,055 129,500 129,500

Power Plant Operations, 7-63

Salaries & Benefits 1,395,000 1,877,500 2,010,400 2,010,400

Supplies 192,000 118,505 125,500 125,500

Services 242,000 79,100 270,900 270,900

Utilities 0 12,700 28,800 28,800

Fuel, Oil, Auto 0 110 1,400 1,400

Training/Dues 5,000 400 5,400 5,400

Total Power Plant Operations, 7-63 1,834,000 2,088,315 2,442,400 2,442,400

Page 6 of 53



2012 Annual Budget

2011 2011 2012 2012 2012

ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION BUDGET ESTIMATED REQUESTED PROPOSED ADOPTEDEXPENSES (CON'T):

Water Collection, 7-64


Supplies 111,000 47,600 49,000 49,000

Services 249,000 228,000 259,000 259,000

Utilities 0 5,000 5,000 5,000

Fuel, Oil, Auto 0 625 800 800

Training/Dues 0 400 500 500

Total Water Collection, 7-64 785,000 592,625 646,300 646,300

Campgrounds, 7-65


Supplies 2,300 3,100 29,500 29,500

Services 12,900 5,000 8,500 8,500

Utilities 300 2,200 2,500 2,500

Fuel, Oil, Auto 0 25 200 200

Training/Dues 0 0 0 0

Total Campgrounds, 7-65 84,140 66,325 127,700 127,700

JFOF Plant & Shop, 7-66


Supplies 66,000 16,570 16,500 16,500

Services 13,000 8,000 25,600 25,600

Utilities 0 39,500 46,400 46,400

Fuel, Oil, Auto 93,000 123,000 121,120 121,120

Training/Dues 0 0 1,000 1,000

Total JFOF Plant & Shop, 7-66 382,000 488,070 520,620 520,620

Regulatory Compliance, 7-67


Supplies 10,000 500 2,000 2,000

Services 10,000 14,500 250,000 250,000

Utilities 0 100 100 100


Training/Dues 5,000 11,200 22,100 22,100

Total Regulatory Compliance, 7-67 95,000 130,500 383,000 383,000

Communications & IT, 7-68


Supplies 54,000 23,300 36,400 36,400

Services 40,150 12,000 25,000 25,000

Utilities 0 120 480 480


Training/Dues 5,000 1,200 5,200 5,200

Total Comm & IT, 7-68 239,150 182,220 226,980 226,980

TOTAL OPERATING EXPENSES 4,646,920 4,921,360 5,779,000 5,779,000

SUB-TOTAL, REVENUES OVER OPER EXP 12,998,080 16,802,337 15,495,000 15,495,000

Page 7 of 53



2012 Annual Budget

2011 2011 2012 2012 2012

ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION BUDGET ESTIMATED REQUESTED PROPOSED ADOPTED

SUB-TOTAL, REVENUES OVER OPER EXP 12,998,080 16,802,337 15,495,000 15,495,000

NYWD and Capital Outlay:

North Yuba Water District-Minimum Pymt (354,500) (354,500) (709,000) (709,000)

North Yuba Water District-Add Pymt 0 0 (547,425) (547,425)

Captial Outlay (4,065,640) (3,308,487) (2,191,300) (2,191,300)

Total NYWD and Capital Outlay (4,420,140) (3,662,987) (3,447,725) (3,447,725)

Transfers:

SFPP JFOF-Minimum Payment (354,500) (354,500) (709,000) (709,000)

SFPP JFOF-Additional Payment 0 0 (547,425) (547,425)

SFPP JFOF-Relicensing (560,000) 0 (1,145,000) (1,145,000)

SFPP JFOF-Overhead (550,000) (420,239) (492,425) (492,425)

Net Transfers (1,464,500) (774,739) (2,893,850) (2,893,850)

NET REVENUE OVER EXPENSES 7,113,440 12,364,611 9,153,425 9,153,425

Beginning Balance 5,119,500 8,242,756 16,960,200 16,960,200

Loan Payable to PG&E (3,647,167) (2,600,000) (2,600,000)

Reserve for Vehicle Replacement (300,000) (300,000)

Ending Balance 12,232,940 16,960,200 23,213,625 23,213,625

NOTE: Per NYWD agreement, 15% working capital reserve ($800,000) and $15,000,000

contingency reserve is required. Repayment to PG&E in 2015 for loan for dam crest

modification projects estimated to be $17,000,000.

Page 8 of 53

South Feather Water & PowerSystem Capacity Fund Summary of Revenue and Expenses

2012 Annual Budget

2011 2011 2012 2012 2012ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION BUDGET ESTIMATED REQUESTED PROPOSED ADOPTED

REVENUE:42341 System Capacity Charges 11,421 22,842 20,000 20,00049250 Interest Income 1,000 1,000 2,000 2,000

Total Revenue 12,421 23,842 22,000 22,000

CAPITAL OUTLAY:2010-0097 ID 2 Floating Liner 250,000 230,000 0 02010-0105 Filters 75,000 78,000 0 02012-5e Filters, Air Scour 0 0 150,000 150,0002012-5f MRTP Expansion 0 0 2,500,000 0

Total Expenses 325,000 308,000 2,650,000 150,000

Net Revenue over Expenses (312,579) (284,158) (2,628,000) (128,000)

Beginning Balance 1,678,398 1,678,398 1,394,240 1,394,240

Ending Balance 1,365,819 1,394,240 (1,233,760) 1,266,240

Page 9 of 53

South Feather Water & PowerRetiree Health Benefits Trust Fund

Summary of Revenues and Expensess2012 Annual Budget

2011 2011 2012 2012 2010ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION BUDGET ESTIMATED REQUESTED PROPOSED ADOPTED

REVENUE:

51-00-41250 Interest Income 5,000 7,500 10,000 10,000

Total Revenue 5,000 7,500 10,000 10,000

EXPENSES: 0 0 0 0Total Expenses 0 0 0 0

Sub-Total, Revenues over Oper Exp 5,000 7,500 10,000 10,000

NET TRANSFERS 0 0 0 0

Beginning Balance, January 1 2,929,035 3,265,708 3,273,208 3,273,208

Ending Balance, December 31 2,934,035 3,273,208 3,283,208 3,283,208

Note: Desired Reserve - $10,100,000

Page 10 of 53

SFPP Joint Facilities Operating Fund (JFOF)

Revenue and Expense Projections

2011 - 2021

2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021

Line Description Estimated Proposed Projected(Thousands of Dollars)

1 Operating Expenses 4,921 5,779 6,155 6,555 6,981 7,434 7,918 8,432 8,980 9,564 10,186

2 Non-Operating Expenses 3,308 2,191 3,000 3,500 2,000 2,000 3,500 4,000 2,000 2,000 2,000

3 Relicensing Repayment/Overhead 420 1,637 1,645 1,645 1,645 1,645 550 550 550 550 550

4 Total Expenses 8,649 9,607 10,800 11,700 10,626 11,079 11,968 12,982 11,530 12,114 12,736

Non-Operating Expenses:5 2011 Forbestown TSV, LGV tunnel repair, MRC access road repair, WPH Transformer repayment

6 2012 Repair, Replace and Upgrade Equipment

7 2013 Recreation facility rehab, valve modifications

8 2014 Recreation facility rehab, valve modifications

9 2015 Capital equipment replacement/purchase


11 2017 Rewind Forbestown Powerhouse

12 2018 Rewind Woodleaf Powerhouse




2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 20211/1/11 Balance 8,243

16 Projected Gross Revenues 21,724 21,274 21,912 22,570 23,247 23,944 24,662 25,402 26,164 26,949 27,758

17 Projected Total Expenses 8,649 9,607 10,800 11,700 10,626 11,079 11,968 12,982 11,530 12,114 12,736

18 Net Revenues 21,318 11,667 11,113 10,870 12,621 12,865 12,695 12,420 14,634 14,835 15,022

19 Min Revenue Distribution SFWPA 355 709 709 709 709 709 709 709 709 709 709

20 Min Revenue Distribution NYWD 355 709 709 709 709 709 709 709 709 709 709

21 15% Working Capital Reserve 800 67 56 60 64 68 72 77 82 88 93

22 Contingency Reserve 15,000 0 0 0 0 750 158 159 161 162 164

23 PG&E Loan 3,647 2,600 3,600 3,600 3,600 0 0 0 0 0 0

24 OPEB Contributions 0 0 0 0 200 200 200 200 200 200

25 PERS Prior Service (50%) 251 251 251 251 251 251 251 251 251

26 Additional Rev Distribution SFWPA 673 3,791 2,894 2,770 3,644 5,089 5,298 5,157 6,261 6,358

27 Additional Rev Distribution NYWD 673 3,791 2,894 2,770 3,644 5,089 5,298 5,157 6,261 6,358

28 Notes and Assumptions: Operating expenses increase by 6.5% per year.

29 Projected Gross Revenues increased by 3.0% per year.

30 Contingency Reserve COLA of 5% in 2015 and 1% per year thereafter.

Page 11 of 53

South Feather Water & Power Agency

General Fund

Revenue and Expense Projections

2011 Through 2021

2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021

Line Description Estimated Proposed Projected(thousands of dollars)

1 Gross Revenue 6,028 5,614 5,670 5,547 5,602 5,658 5,535 5,590 5,646 5,703 5,760

2 Operating Expenses (5,586) (5,990) (6,379) (6,635) (6,900) (7,176) (7,463) (7,761) (8,072) (8,395) (8,731)

3 Relicensing/Transfers 420 1,617 1,645 1,645 1,645 1,645 550 550 550 550 550

4 Capital Outlay (759) (1,091) (2,345) (350) (350) (350) (350) (350) (350) (350) (350)

5 Sub-Total 103 150 (1,409) 207 (3) (223) (1,728) (1,971) (2,226) (2,492) (2,771)

6 SFPP Joint Fac Fund Min Distrib 355 709 709 709 709 709 709 709 709 709 709

7 SFPP Joint Fac Fund Add Distrib 0 673 3,791 2,894 2,770 3,644 5,089 5,298 5,157 6,261 6,358

8 Sub-Total 458 1,532 3,091 3,810 3,477 4,130 4,070 4,036 3,641 4,478 4,296

9 Debt Service, Existing (555) (439) (450) (450) (450) (450) (450) (450) (450) (450) (275)

10 Debt Service, Potential (1,415) (1,415) (1,415) (1,415) (1,415) (1,415) (1,415)

11 OPEB Contributions (800) (800) (800) (800) (800) (800)

12 PERS Prior Service (50%) (409) (409) (409) (409) (409) (409) (409) (409) (409)

13 NET REVENUE OVER EXPENSES (97) 1,093 2,232 2,951 1,203 1,056 996 962 567 1,404 1,397

14 January 1 Balance 349 252 1,345 3,577 6,528 7,731 8,787 9,783 10,744 11,311 12,715

15 December 31 Balance 252 1,345 3,577 6,528 7,731 8,787 9,783 10,744 11,311 12,715 14,112

Notes, Assumptions, Comments:16 1.) General Fund Revenues increase 1% per year.17 2.) No funds are anticipated from Water Transfers.

18 3.) Operating expenditures increased by 6.5% in 2013 and 4% each year thereafter.19 4.) Capital expenditures for 2013 based on 2012 unfunded requests..20 5.) Capital expenditures for 2014 on based on 4 year average of 2006 to 2009.21 6.) Potential Debt Service is $18,000,000 at 4.75% over 20 years.22 7.) Assumes water consumption remains constant with rate modifications in 2012, 2014 and 2017.

Page 12 of 53

SOUTH FEATHER WATER & POWER AGENCY2012 ANNUAL BUDGET

OPERATING BUDGET SUMMARYDepartment 50, General Administration and Engineering

2008 2009 2010 2011 2011 2012 2012 2012DESCRIPTION ACTUAL ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET ESTIMATED REQUESTED PROPOSED ADOPTED

Salaries and Benefits 2,103,853 953,257 890,656 990,296 940,600 1,014,100 1,014,100Supplies 14,268 17,299 31,407 20,200 22,000 22,700 22,700Services 180,633 194,151 184,607 187,000 234,593 240,000 240,000Utilities 21,367 31,722 43,136 43,000 43,000 45,500 45,500Fuel, Oil, Auto 1,341 215 44 500 100 100 100Training/Dues 57,894 62,668 62,808 74,500 61,500 28,500 28,500

Total Gen Adm, 1-50 2,379,356 1,259,312 1,212,658 1,315,496 1,301,793 1,350,900 1,350,900 0

Department Description and StatisticsThe General Administration department includes all of the Agency's administrative and engineering activities.Accounting, legal services, human resource activities and the Board of Director salaries are recorded here. The Agency's membership in various associations is in the General Administration Training/Dues category. Risk managaement and all liability and property insurance expenses are included in this department.

Budget Modifications: Description Requested Proposed Adopted

Page 13 of 53


OPERATING BUDGET DETAILDepartment 50, General Administration and Engineering

2008 2009 2010 2011 2011 2012 2012 2012ACCT NO. ACCT NAME ACTUAL ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET ESTIMATED REQUESTED PROPOSED ADOPTED

Salaries and Benefits01-50-50300-2 GA-Regular Earnings 429,083 489,979 442,842 488,910 450,000 484,000 484,00001-50-50302-2 GA-Overtime Earnings 0 0 0 0 100 100 10001-50-50303-2 GA-Vacation, Sick Leave 121,078 88,377 104,967 103,441 105,000 113,000 113,00001-50-50307-2 GA-Holiday Pay 0 32,449 31,995 36,091 30,000 32,500 32,50001-50-50340-2 GA-Director Fees 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 35,000 36,000 36,000

01-50-50309-0 GA-Employee Benefits01-56-56393-0 GA-Workers Comp Insurance 70,386

01-50-50400-2 GA-Health Insurance 585,320

01-50-50402-2 GA-Life Insurance 7,456

01-50-50403-2 GA-Short/Long Term Disability 14,658

01-50-50406-2 GA-SUI

Employee Benefits, Distributed 1,185,384 312,452 (835,580) 331,254 320,000 348,000 348,000

01-50-50394-0 GA-Health Fitness (Reimb) 1,640 490 600 500 500 500

01-50-50404-2 GA-Social Security 34,114

01-50-50405-2 GA-Medicare 9,275

01-50-50413-2 GA-Cal Public Empl Retire Sys 310,609

01-50-50461-2 GA-OPEB Expense 336,668 84,124

Salaries and Benefits 2,103,853 953,257 890,656 990,296 940,600 1,014,100 1,014,100

Supplies

01-50-50106-0 GA-Office Supplies 10,355 10,149 15,865 13,500 15,000 15,000 15,000

01-50-50108-2 GA-Engineering Supplies 164 1,434 200 0 200 200

01-50-50114-0 GA-Postage 3,755 5,743 6,131 6,500 6,000 6,500 6,500

01-50-50370-2 GA-Building/Ground Maint 1,687 3,616 9,411 6,000 1,000 1,000 1,000

Supplies 15,961 20,942 31,407 26,200 22,000 22,700 22,700

Services

01-50-50171-2 GA-Equipment Rental 3,791 4,042 7,024 6,000 5,000 6,000 6,000

01-50-50201-0 GA-Outside Services 35,760 33,204 31,544 35,000 30,000 35,000 35,000

01-50-50207-0 GA-Bad Debts Expense 3,771 0 0 0 0 0 0

01-50-50208-2 GA-Legal & Consulting 33,653 21,325 27,110 25,000 40,000 40,000 40,000

01-50-50211-2 GA-Election Fees 0 16,852 0 13,300 0 0

01-50-50212-0 GA-Janitorial Services 11,275 0 0 0 0 0

01-50-50216-2 GA-Accounting Services 6,275 14,138 7,000 8,000 12,000 15,000 15,000

01-50-50217-0 GA-Advertising 1,278 2,636 1,700 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000

01-50-50219-0 GA-Public Education 686 1,092 1,428 1,000 2,500 2,500 2,500

01-56-56226-0 GA-Physical Exam 797 0 0 0 0 0 0

01-50-50255-0 GA-Safety Awards 2,511 3,827 2,214 1,000 350 1,000 1,000

01-50-50256-2 GA-Employee Appreciation 0 575 506 1,000 1,600 1,500 1,500

01-50-50360-0 GA-Cash (Over/Short) (6) (27) 47 0 (157) 0 0

01-50-50390-2 GA-General Insurance 83,077 92,604 106,034 100,000 110,000 120,000 120,000

01-50-50395-2 GA-Claims (Inj/Damages) (3,928) 240 0 2,000 3,000 2,000 2,000

01-50-50501-0 GA-Federal, State & Local Fees 0 15,000 15,000 15,000

Services 178,940 190,508 184,607 181,000 234,593 240,000 240,000

Utilties

01-50-50250-2 GA-Utilities 21,177 23,804 19,983 18,000 17,000 18,000 18,000

01-50-50251-2 GA-Telephone and Communications 190 7,918 23,153 25,000 26,000 27,500 27,500

Utilities 21,367 31,722 43,136 43,000 43,000 45,500 45,500

Fuel/Oil/Auto

01-50-50140-0 GA-Auto Allowance 1,341 215 44 500 100 100 100

Fuel/Oil/Auto 1,341 215 44 500 100 100 100

Training & Dues

01-50-50224-2 GA-Dues, Fees 55,311 52,113 53,313 60,000 55,000 21,000 21,000

01-50-50225-2 GA-Subscrip/Publications 430 3,988 253 5,000 500 500 500

01-50-50350-2 GA-Business Meetings 1,507 1,365 1,980 1,500 1,000 1,000 1,000

01-50-50408-2 GA-Schools, Training 646 5,202 7,262 8,000 5,000 6,000 6,000

Training & Dues 57,894 62,668 62,808 74,500 61,500 28,500 28,500

TOTALS 2,379,356 1,259,312 1,212,658 1,315,496 1,301,793 1,350,900 1,350,900

Page 14 of 53


OPERATING BUDGET SUMMARYDepartment 51, Source of Supply


Salaries and BenefitsSupplies 13,757 14,113 14,113 14,500 14,113 14,200 14,200ServicesUtilitiesFuel, Oil, AutoTraining/Dues

Total Source of Supply, 1-51 13,757 14,113 14,113 14,500 14,113 14,200 14,200 0

Department Description and StatisticsPayments to State of California Department of Water Resources

Page 15 of 53


OPERATING BUDGET DETAILDepartment 51, Source of Supply


Salaries and Benefits 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Supplies01-51-51230-0Source, Dam Inspect(Lwr Wyn) 5,757 6,113 6,113 6,500 6,113 6,200 6,20001-51-51249-0Source, Palermo Canal 8,000 8,000 8,000 8,000 8,000 8,000 8,000

Supplies 13,757 14,113 14,113 14,500 14,113 14,200 14,200 0

Services 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Utilties 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Fuel/Oil/Auto 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Training & Dues 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

TOTALS 13,757 14,113 14,113 14,500 14,113 14,200 14,200 0

Page 16 of 53


OPERATING BUDGET SUMMARYDepartment 52, Environmental Health and Safety


Salaries and Benefits 33,743 68,042 75,705 71,778 81,900 88,400 88,400Supplies 3,414 6,153 6,139 8,000 7,000 16,000 16,000Services 3,732 5,234 4,757 11,000 13,500 16,000 16,000Utilities 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Fuel, Oil, Auto 0 0 92 0 100 100 100Training/Dues 5,730 13,381 9,083 13,200 13,200 9,850 9,850

Total EH&S, 1-52 46,619 92,810 95,776 103,978 115,700 130,350 130,350 0

Department Description and StatisticsThe Environmental Health and Safety department anticipates, identifies and evaluates hazardous conditions and practices; developshazard control designs, methods, procedures and programs; implements and administers hazard control programs; and measures, audits and evaluates the effectiveness of hazard control programs.


01-52-52370, Supplies Weld Shop Fume Scrubber, HQ Security Improvements, Replacement SCBAs for MRTP11,500$ 11,500$

Page 17 of 53


OPERATING BUDGET DETAILDepartment 52, Environmental Health and Safety


Salaries and Benefits01-52-52300-2EHS-Regular Pay 23,356 34,496 37,279 41,435 40,500 43,500 43,50001-52-52303-2EHS-Vac, S/L etc 10,387 7,659 10,176 8,984 10,200 11,000 11,00001-52-52307-2EHS-Holiday Pay 4,022 4,327 2,520 4,200 4,500 4,50001-52-52404-2 EHS-Social Security01-52-52405-2 EHS-Medicare

Employee Benefits, Distributed 21,865 23,923 18,839 27,000 29,400 29,400

Salaries and Benefits 33,743 68,042 75,705 71,778 81,900 88,400 88,400

Supplies01-52-52102-2EHS-Department Supplies 3,389 5,736 5,023 6,000 6,000 7,500 7,50001-52-52106-2EHS-Office Suppleis 25 393 1,116 1,000 500 1,000 1,00001-52-52370-0EHS-Building/Ground Maint 0 24 0 1,000 500 7,500 7,500

Supplies 3,414 6,153 6,139 8,000 7,000 16,000 16,000 0

Services01-52-52200-2EHS-Outside Services 851 2,661 2,070 8,000 8,000 10,000 10,00001-52-52226-2EHS-Physical Exams 2,881 2,573 2,687 3,000 2,500 3,000 3,00001-52-52501-2EHS-Fed, State, Local Gov Fees 0 0 0 0 3,000 3,000 3,000

Services 3,732 5,234 4,757 11,000 13,500 16,000 16,000 0

Utilties 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Fuel/Oil/Auto01-52-52140-2 EHS-Auto Allowance 0 0 92 0 100 100 10001-52-52150-2EHS-Vehicle Repair/Maintenance 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Fuel/Oil/Auto 0 0 92 0 100 100 100 0

Training & Dues01-52-52224-2EHS-Dues, Fees 3,622 6,741 5,882 5,000 5,000 4,000 4,00001-52-52225-2EHS-Subscriptions 214 239 239 600 600 750 75001-52-52350-2 EHS-Business Meetings 0 0 59 100 100 100 10001-52-52408-2EHS-Schools, Training 1,894 6,401 2,903 7,500 7,500 5,000 5,000

Training & Dues 5,730 13,381 9,083 13,200 13,200 9,850 9,850 0

TOTALS 46,619 92,810 95,776 103,978 115,700 130,350 130,350 0

Page 18 of 53


OPERATING BUDGET SUMMARYDepartment 53, Water Treatment


Salaries and Benefits 372,885 593,453 670,543 726,169 711,100 767,100 767,100Supplies 64,215 74,710 58,788 85,000 82,500 85,000 85,000Services 26,048 14,794 23,934 19,000 24,500 26,000 26,000Utilities 37,465 42,342 25,762 40,000 27,500 45,000 45,000Fuel, Oil, Auto 654 23 55 500 100 400 400Training/Dues 0 1,064 5,592 7,500 7,500 7,500 7,500

Total Water Treat, 1-53 501,267 726,386 784,674 878,169 853,200 931,000 931,000 0

Department Description and StatisticsThe Water Treatment Department accounts for the maintenance and operation of the Miners Ranch TreatmentPlant and the Bangor Treatment Plant. Five operators are assigned full-time to these operations serving over 6,700 domesticwater customers using in excess of 230 million cubic feet of water per year. Significant costs in this departmentinclude the purchase of chemicals and independent testing services.


Page 19 of 53


2012 ANNUAL BUDGET

OPERATING BUDGET DETAIL

Department 53, Water Treatment

2008 2009 2010 2011 2011 2012 2012 2012

ACCT NO. ACCT NAME ACTUAL ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET ESTIMATED REQUESTED PROPOSED ADOPTED

Salaries and Benefits

01-53-53300-0 WT-Regular Pay 303,208 321,555 374,001 456,882 410,100 441,000 441,000

01-53-53302-0 WT-Overtime Pay 7,491 8,995 7,000 7,000 7,000 7,000

01-53-53303-0 WT-Vac, S/L 69,677 54,849 54,084 45,500 46,900 50,500 50,500

01-53-53307-2 WT-Holiday Pay 18,928 21,469 22,790 21,000 22,600 22,600

Employee Benefits, Distributed 190,421 211,160 191,997 225,100 245,000 245,000

01-53-53394-2 WT-Health Fitness (Reimb) 209 834 2,000 1,000 1,000 1,000


Supplies

01-53-53100-0 WT-Supplies 3,607 8,227 9,177 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000

01-53-53102-0 WT-Treated Supplies 32,777 29,891 17,545 30,000 27,500 30,000 30,000

01-53-53260-0 WT-Maint Supplies 27,831 36,592 32,066 45,000 45,000 45,000 45,000

Supplies 64,215 74,710 58,788 85,000 82,500 85,000 85,000 0

Services

01-53-53172-0 WT-Equipment Rental 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

01-53-53204-0 WT-Outside Service 26,048 14,288 23,934 18,000 12,500 13,000 13,000

01-53-53370-0 WT-Bldg/Grounds Maint 0 506 0 1,000 500 1,000 1,000

01-53-53501-0 WT-Fed, State Local Fees 0 0 0 0 11,500 12,000 12,000

Services 26,048 14,794 23,934 19,000 24,500 26,000 26,000 0

Utilties

01-53-53250-0 WT-Utilities 37,465 36,289 16,619 30,000 15,500 30,000 30,000

01-53-53251-2 WT-Telephone & Communications 0 6,053 9,143 10,000 12,000 15,000 15,000

Utilities 37,465 42,342 25,762 40,000 27,500 45,000 45,000 0

Fuel/Oil/Auto

01-53-53140-0 WT-Auto Allowance 654 23 55 500 100 400 400

Fuel/Oil/Auto 654 23 55 500 100 400 400 0

Training & Dues

01-53-53224-0 WT-Dues and Fees 0 390 1,975 2,500 2,500 2,500 2,500

01-53-53408-2 WT-Schools, Training 0 674 3,617 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000

Training & Dues 0 1,064 5,592 7,500 7,500 7,500 7,500 0

TOTALS 501,267 726,386 784,674 878,169 853,200 931,000 931,000 0

Page 20 of 53


OPERATING BUDGET SUMMARYDepartment 54, Transmission and Distribution


Salaries and Benefits 773,636 1,483,672 1,521,603 1,595,641 1,703,580 1,834,600 1,834,600Supplies 142,119 201,554 199,259 187,500 103,000 104,000 104,000Services 1,408 5,747 3,643 6,300 6,500 6,500 6,500Utilities 25,201 23,820 23,543 29,500 29,500 29,500 29,500Fuel, Oil, Auto 1,143 4 37 1,000 100 100 100Training/Dues 0 0 1,251 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000

Total Trans & Dist, 1-54 943,507 1,714,797 1,749,336 1,820,941 1,843,680 1,975,700 1,975,700

Department Description and StatisticsMaintain system of transmission and distribution of pipelines and connections for domestic water service and ditches and canals for irrigation service.

Budget Modifications: Description Requested Proposed Adopted-$ -$

Page 21 of 53


OPERATING BUDGET DETAILDepartment 54, Transmission & Distribution


Salaries and Benefits01-54-54300-2TD-Regular Earnings 565,380 744,295 766,265 912,571 902,100 970,000 970,00001-54-54302-2TD-Overtime Pay 27,949 50,629 56,271 55,001 55,000 55,000 55,00001-54-54303-2TD-Vac/SL Pay 180,307 146,577 150,693 151,118 150,000 161,500 161,50001-54-54307-2TD-Holiday Pay 0 65,554 67,186 74,181 60,500 65,100 65,10001-54-54309-2TD-Employee Benefits01-54-54404-2TD-Social Security01-54-54405-2TD-Medicare

Employee Benefits, Distributed 476,194 480,750 402,290 535,500 582,500 582,50001-54-54394-2TD-Health Fitness (Reimb) 423 438 480 480 500 500

Salaries and Benefits 773,636 1,483,672 1,521,603 1,595,641 1,703,580 1,834,600 1,834,600

Supplies01-54-54104-0T/D-Maint Supplies 27,611 51,037 62,642 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,00001-54-54264-0T/D-Materials(Aggr Inventory) 4,361 17,020 12,934 17,500 17,000 17,000 17,00001-54-54270-0T/D-Small Tools 2,542 1,677 2,294 4,000 3,000 4,000 4,00001-54-54294-0T/D-Equipment Use 54,670 65,473 60,341 55,000 1,000 1,000 1,00001-54-54295-2T/D-Maint Supplies 18,465 34,643 30,294 31,000 31,000 31,000 31,00001-54-54296-4T/D-Equipment Use 34,470 31,704 30,754 30,000 1,000 1,000 1,000

Supplies 142,119 201,554 199,259 187,500 103,000 104,000 104,000

Services01-54-54170-0T/D-Equipment Rental 0 0 186 300 300 300 30001-54-54202-0T/D-Outside Service 1,408 5,747 3,457 6,000 6,000 6,000 6,00001-54-54501-0T/D-Fed, State, Local Fees 0 0 0 0 200 200 200

Services 1,408 5,747 3,643 6,300 6,500 6,500 6,500

Utilties01-54-54250-0T/D-Utilities 25,201 23,119 22,822 27,500 27,500 27,500 27,50001-54-54251-2T/D-Telephone & Communications 0 701 721 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000

Utilities 25,201 23,820 23,543 29,500 29,500 29,500 29,500

Fuel/Oil/Auto01-54-54140-0TD-Auto Allowance 1,143 4 37 1,000 100 100 10001-54-54150-0TD-Veh/Equip Maint & Rep 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Fuel/Oil/Auto 1,143 4 37 1,000 100 100 100

Training & Dues01-54-54408-0TD-Schools & Train 0 0 1,251 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000

Training & Dues 0 0 1,251 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000

TOTALS 943,507 1,714,797 1,749,336 1,820,941 1,843,680 1,975,700 1,975,700

Page 22 of 53


OPERATING BUDGET SUMMARYDepartment 55, Customer Accounts


Salaries and Benefits 283,302 306,179 297,140 304,925 332,700 359,600 359,600Supplies 61,768 56,999 57,453 66,000 77,500 80,000 80,000Services 0 0 0 0 500 500 500Utilities 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Fuel, Oil, Auto 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Training/Dues 0 230 750 1,100 1,100 1,100 1,100

Total Cust Accts, 1-55 345,070 363,408 355,343 372,025 411,800 441,200 441,200 0

Department Description and StatisticsThis department accounts for the activity of the meter readers, the Agency's program for backflow installation and maintenance and front counter personnel receiving payment for water service.


Page 23 of 53


OPERATING BUDGET DETAILDepartment 55, Customer Accounts


Salaries and Benefits01-55-55300-0 CA-Salaries 252,687 187,931 180,324 203,094 209,000 225,000 225,00001-55-55303-0 CA-Overtime Pay 0 133 145 1,000 500 500 50001-55-55302-0 CA-Vac, S/L Pay 30,615 12,682 16,213 16,457 13,900 15,000 15,00001-55-55307-0 CA-Holiday Pay 0 6,815 6,202 6,357 3,700 4,000 4,000

Employee Benefits, Distributed 0 98,595 94,227 77,917 105,500 115,000 115,00001-55-55394-0 CA-Fitness Club Dues (Reimb) 0 23 29 100 100 100 100


Supplies01-55-55102-0 CA-Supplies 46,041 40,277 38,961 40,000 40,000 40,000 40,00001-55-55113-0 CA-Meter Maintenance 11,140 15,243 17,357 22,000 17,500 20,000 20,00001-55-55205-0 CA-Backflow Maintenance 4,587 1,479 1,135 4,000 20,000 20,000 20,000

Supplies 61,768 56,999 57,453 66,000 77,500 80,000 80,000

Services01-55-55201-0 CA-Outside Services 0 0 0 0 500 500 50001-55-55293-0 CA-Backflow Equipment Use 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Services 0 0 0 0 500 500 500

Training & Dues01-55-55224-0 CA-Dues, Fees 0 230 0 100 100 100 10001-55-55408-0 CA-Training, Schools 0 0 750 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000

Training & Dues 0 230 750 1,100 1,100 1,100 1,100

TOTALS 345,070 363,408 355,343 372,025 411,800 441,200 441,200

Page 24 of 53


OPERATING BUDGET SUMMARYDepartment 56, General Plant


Salaries and Benefits 211,899 216,247 164,917 231,022 201,700 218,500 218,500Supplies 18,497 10,510 24,645 16,500 19,500 19,500 19,500Services 4,229 8,664 2,487 10,000 7,500 7,500 7,500Utilities 20,956 20,486 21,082 26,000 27,000 27,000 27,000Fuel, Oil, Auto 118,212 95,413 107,590 100,000 115,500 120,000 120,000Training/Dues 0 0 0 300 300 300 300

Total Gen Plant, 1-56 373,793 351,320 320,721 383,822 371,500 392,800 392,800

Department Description and StatisticsMaintains Water Division vehicles, equipment and machinery. Responsible for warehouse operations.Maintenance of building facilities and landscaping.


Page 25 of 53


OPERATING BUDGET DETAILDepartment 56, General Plant


Salaries and Benefits01-56-56300-0GP-Regular Pay 188,287 111,498 126,182 140,197 111,100 119,500 119,50001-56-56302-0GP-Overtime Pay 500 500 50001-56-56303-0 GP-Vacation, Sick Leave 23,612 26,920 21,760 23,477 19,600 21,100 21,10001-56-56307-0GP-Holiday Pay 8,441 6,771 7,443 7,800 8,400 8,400

01-56-56405-2 GP-Medicare 1,934

Employee Benefits 69,388 59,905 62,700 69,000 69,000


Supplies

01-56-56100-0GP-Supplies 16,819 9,617 13,411 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000

01-56-56102-0GP-Safety Supplies 115 0 471 500 500 500 500

01-56-56274-0GP-Small Tools (Auto) 1,563 893 420 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000

01-56-56370-0GP-Bldgs & Grds Maint (incl MRTP) 0 0 10,343 0 3,000 3,000 3,000

Supplies 18,497 10,510 24,645 16,500 19,500 19,500 19,500

Services

01-56-56170-0GP-Equipment Rental 0 2,443 0 3,000 1,000 1,000 1,000

01-56-56200-0GP-Outside Services 4,229 6,221 2,487 7,000 6,500 6,500 6,500

Services 4,229 8,664 2,487 10,000 7,500 7,500 7,500

Utilties

01-56-56251-0GP-Utilities 20,956 20,486 21,082 26,000 25,000 25,000 25,000

01-56-56251-0GP-Telephone & Communications 2,000 2,000 2,000

Utilities 20,956 20,486 21,082 26,000 27,000 27,000 27,000

Fuel/Oil/Auto

01-56-56150-0GP-Veh/Equip Rep & Maint 38,203 39,861 43,021 40,000 35,000 40,000 40,000

01-56-56160-0GP-Fuel & Oil 80,009 55,552 64,569 60,000 80,500 80,000 80,000

Fuel/Oil/Auto 118,212 95,413 107,590 100,000 115,500 120,000 120,000

Training & Dues

01-56-56408-0GP-Schools, Training 300 300 300

Training & Dues 0 0 0 0 300 300 300

TOTALS 373,793 351,320 320,721 383,522 371,500 392,800 392,800

Page 26 of 53


OPERATING BUDGET SUMMARYDepartment 57, Sundry Billings/Expense Reimbursements


Salaries and Benefits 41,957 16,927 12,039 26,400 30,000 21,200 21,200Supplies (129,507) (113,389) (129,793) (71,750) (2,000) (2,000) (2,000)Services (30,619) (60,470) 43,162 (5,000) (5,000) (5,000) (5,000)Utilities 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Fuel, Oil, Auto 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Training/Dues 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Total Sundry/Exp Reimb, 1-57 (118,169) (156,932) (74,592) (50,350) 23,000 14,200 14,200

Department Description and StatisticsThis department accounts for work specifically performed on jobs by the Water Division paid for by non-Agency sources.

Budget Modifications: Description Requested Proposed AdoptedEffective January 1, 2011, the practice of intra-fund charging for equipment use was terminated.

Page 27 of 53


2012 ANNUAL BUDGET


Department 57, Sundry Billings/Expense Reimbursements

2008 2009 2010 2011 2011 2012 2012 2012



01-57-57300-0 Sundry Rillings-Regular Earn 11,401 10,963 17,500 15,000 12,500 12,500

01-57-57302-0 Sundry Billings-Overtime Earn 95 159 100 2,000 500 500

01-57-57303-0 Sundry Billings-Vac, SL Pay 130 5,500 0 0

01-57-57521-0 Sundry Billings-Salaries 41,957 (40)

01-57-57309-0 Employee Benefits

Employee Benefits, Distributed 5,471 787 8,800 7,500 8,200 8,200

Salaries and Benefits 41,957 16,927 12,039 26,400 30,000 21,200 21,200 0

Supplies

01-57-57505-0 Exp Cr-Improvements/Equip (5,663) (850) 0

01-57-57507-0 Exp Cr-Improvements/Overhead (19,854) (9,843) (36,600)

01-57-57509-0 Exp Cr-Sundry/Equip (10,245) (2,070) (1,592) (1,500) (2,000) (2,000) (2,000)

01-57-57515-4 Exp Cr-Equip, Irrig (Palermo) (12,548) (11,393) (12,487) (6,000)

01-57-57515-5 Exp Cr-Equip, Irrig (Bangor) (10,516) (7,503) (9,534) (5,000)

01-57-57515-6 Exp Cr-Equip, Irrig (Forbestown) (7,312) (3,760) (4,028) (2,500)

01-57-57515-7 Exp Cr-Equip, Irrig (Community) (743) (664) (1,642) (500)

01-57-57515-8 Exp Cr-Equip, Upper Forbes- (3,063)

town, NYWD (1,424) (7,384) (500)

01-57-57517-0 Exp Cr-Equip (MRTP) (59,080) (68,312) (60,543) (55,000)

01-57-57518-3 Exp Cr-Equip (Bangor) (2,122) (1,610) (304) (750)

Supplies (129,507) (113,389) (129,793) (71,750) (2,000) (2,000) (2,000) 0

Services

01-57-57500-0 Sundry Billings 140,079 40,274 40,374 35,000 35,000 35,000 35,000

01-57-57312-0 Exp Cr-Misc (3,237) (342) 2,788 0

01-57-57511-0 Exp Cr-Sundry-Overhead (167,461) (100,402) (40,000) (40,000) (40,000) (40,000)

01-57-57999-0 Sundry AR, Misc 0

Services (30,619) (60,470) 43,162 (5,000) (5,000) (5,000) (5,000) 0

TOTALS (118,169) (156,932) (74,592) (50,350) 23,000 14,200 14,200 0

Page 28 of 53


OPERATING BUDGET SUMMARYDepartment 58, Information Technology


Salaries and Benefits 44,497 96,554 172,477 197,354 204,100 219,900 219,900Supplies 16,012 17,395 17,071 35,700 26,000 27,000 27,000Services 8,605 9,482 7,598 21,000 31,000 25,000 25,000Utilities 0 100 1,790 2,500 3,000 3,000 3,000Fuel, Oil, Auto 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Training/Dues 25,096 20,680 22,967 31,100 31,100 31,100 31,100

Total Information Tech, 1-58 94,210 144,211 221,903 287,654 295,200 306,000 306,000 0

Department Description and StatisticsManage, coordinate and maintain Agency information systems. Liaison between Agency staff, computer hardware vendors,software suppliers, communications equipment, handheld data recorders and SCADA systems.


Page 29 of 53


2012 ANNUAL BUDGET


Department 58, Information Technology

2008 2009 2010 2011 2011 2012 2012 2012



01-58-58300-0 IT-Regular Earnings 30,526 49,895 95,530 118,478 116,400 125,000 125,000

01-58-58302-0 IT-Overtime Pay 0 90 0 0 700 500 500

01-58-53303-0 IT-Vac, S/L Pay 13,971 10,803 17,216 11,598 14,700 15,800 15,800

01-58-58307-0 IT-Holiday Pay 4,657 6,546 7,539 6,000 6,500 6,500

Employee Benefits 31,109 53,070 59,239 65,800 71,600 71,600

01-58-58394-0 IT-Health Fitness (Reimb) 0 0 115 500 500 500 500


Supplies

01-58-58100-0 IT-Department Supplies 1,368 4,559 14,891 29,700 24,000 25,000 25,000

01-58-58106-0 IT-Office Supplies 14,644 12,836 2,180 6,000 2,000 2,000 2,000

Supplies 16,012 17,395 17,071 35,700 26,000 27,000 27,000

Services

01-58-58201-0 IT-Outside Services 8,605 9,482 7,598 21,000 31,000 25,000 25,000

Services 8,605 9,482 7,598 21,000 31,000 25,000 25,000

Utilties

01-58-58251-0 IT-Telephone & Communications 100 1,790 2,500 3,000 3,000 3,000

Utilities 0 100 1,790 2,500 3,000 3,000 3,000

Fuel/Oil/Auto 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Training & Dues

01-58-58224-0 IT-Dues, Fees 1,572 13,447 50 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000

01-58-58225-0 IT-Subscriptions 9,683 4,480 14,920 16,000 16,000 16,000 16,000

01-58-58350-0 IT-Business Meetings 0 0 20 100 100 100 100

01-58-58408-0 IT-Schools, Training 13,841 2,753 7,977 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000

Training & Dues 25,096 20,680 22,967 31,100 31,100 31,100 31,100 0

TOTALS 94,210 144,211 221,903 287,654 295,200 306,000 306,000 0

Page 30 of 53


OPERATING BUDGET SUMMARYDepartment 60, JFOF Administration and Supervision

2010 2011 2011 2011 2011 2011DESCRIPTION ACTUAL BUDGET ESTIMATED REQUESTED PROPOSED ADOPTED

Salaries and Benefits 499,430 604,000 649,800 649,800Supplies 8,500 9,420 8,300 8,300Services 557,500 607,450 604,500 604,500Utilities 5,000 45,300 8,000 8,000Fuel, Oil, Auto 1,000 500 700 700Training/Dues 29,500 27,580 31,200 31,200

Total JFOF Adm, 7-60 1,100,930 1,294,250 1,302,500 1,302,500 0

Department Description and StatisticsThe Joint Facilities Operating Fund (JFOF) Administration and Supervision department includes all of the Power Division's administrative activities.Accounting, legal and other support services for the Power Division are recorded here. Membership in various associations is in the Training/Dues category. Power Division liability and property insurance expenses are included in this department.


Page 31 of 53


OPERATING BUDGET DETAILDepartment 60, JFOF Administration and Supervision

2010 2011 2011 2012 2012 2012ACCT NO. ACCT NAME ACTUAL BUDGET ESTIMATED REQUESTED PROPOSED ADOPTED

Salaries and Benefits07-60-60300-0 JFOF Adm-Regular Earnings 340,000 333,000 358,000 358,00007-60-60302-0 JFOF Adm-Overtime Pay 0 1,300 1,500 1,50007-60-60303-0 JFOF Adm-Vac, SL Pay 12,780 35,000 35,000 35,00007-60-60307-0 JFOF Adm-Holiday Pay 10,650 14,200 15,200 15,200

Distribution of Employee Benefit Costs 136,000 220,500 240,000 240,000

07-60-60394-0 JFOF Adm-Health Fitness (Reimb) 100 100

Salaries and Benefits 499,430 604,000 649,800 649,800 0

Supplies07-60-60102-0 JFOF Adm-Department Supplies 5,000 4,500 4,000 4,0000760-60102-0 JFOF Adm-Safety Supplies 300 200 20007-60-60106-0 JFOF Adm-Office Supplies 3,000 4,000 3,500 3,50007-60-60114-0 JFOF Adm-Postage 0 170 200 20007-60-60255-0 JFOF Adm-Safety Awards 500 300 250 25007-60-60260-0 JFOF Adm-Maintenance Supplies 0 100 100 10007-60-60270 JFOF Adm - Small Tools 0 0 50 5007-60-60370-0 JFOF Adm-Bldg/Grd Maint Supp 0 50 0 0

Supplies 8,500 9,420 8,300 8,300 0

Services07-60-60171-0 JFOF Adm-Equipment Rental 1,000 0 500 50007-60-60201-0 JFOF Adm-Outside Services 6,500 9,000 8,500 8,50007-60-60208-0 JFOF Adm-Legal & Consulting 5,000 55,000 40,000 40,00007-60-60216-0 JFOF Adm-Accounting Services 5,000 10,750 12,000 12,00007-60-60219-0 JFOF Adm-Public Education 500 1,100 1,000 1,00007-60-60256-0 JFOF Adm-Employee Appreciation 1,000 3,600 1,000 1,00007-60-60390-0 JFOF Adm-General Insurance 112,000 117,000 120,000 120,00007-60-60395-0 JFOF Adm-Claims (Inj/Damages) 1,000 0 1,000 1,00007-60-60501-0 JFOF Adm-Fed, State & Local Fees 425,500 411,000 420,500 420,500

Services 557,500 607,450 604,500 604,500 0

Utilties07-60-60250-0 JFOF Adm-Utilities 3,000 26,300 0 007-60-60251-0 JFOF Adm-Telephone and Communications 2,000 19,000 8,000 8,000

Utilities 5,000 45,300 8,000 8,000

Fuel/Oil/Auto07-60-60140-0 JFOF Adm-Auto Allowance 1,000 500 700 700

Fuel/Oil/Auto 1,000 500 700 700

Training & Dues07-60-60224-0 JFOF Adm-Dues, Fees 26,000 25,350 26,500 26,50007-60-60225-0 JFOF Adm-Subscrip/Publications 500 630 700 70007-60-60350-0 JFOF Adm-Business Meetings 1,000 1,500 2,000 2,00007-60-60408-0 JFOF Adm-Schools, Training 2,000 100 2,000 2,000

Training & Dues 29,500 27,580 31,200 31,200 0

TOTALS 1,100,930 1,294,250 1,302,500 1,302,500 0

Page 32 of 53


OPERATING BUDGET SUMMARYDepartment 61, Sly Creek Powerhouse


Salaries and Benefits 473,770 281,025 319,000 319,000Supplies 47,250 21,800 37,750 37,750Services 77,000 43,000 62,500 62,500Utilities 8,000 6,650 7,100 7,100Fuel, Oil, Auto 0 30 0 0Training/Dues 3,250 3,700 7,000 7,000

Total Sly Creek PH, 1-61 0 609,270 356,205 433,350 433,350 0

Department Description and StatisticsMaintenance and operation of Sly Creek Powerhouse.


Page 33 of 53


OPERATING BUDGET DETAILDepartment 61, Sly Creek Powerhouse


Salaries and Benefits01-61-61300-0 Sly-Regular Earnings 0 297,000 175,000 200,000 200,00001-61-61302-0 Sly-Overtime Pay 10,000 32,000 32,000 32,00001-61-61303-0 Sly-Vac/SL Pay 19,620 0 0 001-61-61307-0 Sly-Holiday Pay 16,350 4,000 10,000 10,000

Employee Benefits, Distributed 130,800 70,000 77,000 77,000

01-61-61394-0 Sly-Health Fitness (Reimb) 0 25 0 0

Salaries and Benefits 0 473,770 281,025 319,000 319,000

Supplies01-61-61100 Sly-Deparment Supplies 36,000 2,500 3,000 3,00001-61-61102 Sly-Safety Supplies 0 2,000 5,250 5,25001-61-61106 Sly-Office Supplies 6,250 150 500 50001-61-61260 Sly-Maintenance Supplies 0 17,000 25,000 25,00001-61-61270 Sly-Small Tools 150 1,000 1,00001-61-61370 Sly-Building/Ground Maint 5,000 0 3,000 3,000

Supplies 0 47,250 21,800 37,750 37,750

Services01-61-61171 Sly-Equipment Rental 0 550 5,000 5,00001-61-61201-0 Sly-Outside Services 16,000 3,000 7,500 7,50001-61-61226-0 Sly-Physical Exam 1,000 0 1,000 1,00001-61-61390-0 Sly-General Insurance 18,000 10,000 10,000 10,00001-61-61501-0 Sly-Fed, State and Local Fees 42,000 30,000 39,000 39,000

Services 0 77,000 43,000 62,500 62,500

Utilties01-61-61250-0 Sly-Utilities 4,000 6,200 6,500 6,50001-61-61251-0 Sly-Telephone and Communications 4,000 450 600 600

Utilities 0 8,000 6,650 7,100 7,100

Fuel/Oil/Auto01-61-61140-0 Sly-Auto Allowance 0 30 0 0

Fuel/Oil/Auto 0 0 30 0 0

Training & Dues01-61-61224-0 Sly-Dues, Fees 500 0 500 50001-61-61225-0 Sly-Subscriptions/Publications 250 0 250 25001-61-61408-0 Sly-Schools, Training 2,500 3,700 6,250 6,250

Training & Dues 0 3,250 3,700 7,000 7,000

TOTALS 0 609,270 356,205 433,350 433,350

Page 34 of 53


2012 ANNUAL BUDGET

OPERATING BUDGET SUMMARY

Department 62, JFOF Environmental Health and Safety

2010 2011 2011 2012 2012 2012

DESCRIPTION ACTUAL BUDGET ESTIMATED REQUESTED PROPOSED ADOPTED

Salaries and Benefits 67,200 61,000 70,000 70,000

Supplies 33,250 7,100 23,250 23,250

Services 11,500 6,914 21,500 21,500

Utilities 0 0 0 0


Training/Dues 14,750 4,041 14,750 14,750

Total JFOF EH&S, 7-62 0 126,700 79,055 129,500 129,500 0

Department Description and StatisticsThe Environmental Health and Safety department anticipates, identifies and evaluates hazardous conditions and practices; develops

hazard control designs, methods, procedures and programs; implements and administers hazard control programs;

and measures, audits and evaluates the effectiveness of hazard control programs.


None

Page 35 of 53


OPERATING BUDGET DETAILDepartment 62, Environmental Health and Safety


Salaries and Benefits07-62-62300-0 JFOF EHS-Regular Pay 45,000 42,000 46,800 46,80007-62-62303-0 JFOF EHS-Vac, S/L etc 1,500 500 1,500 1,50007-62-62307-0 JFOF EHS-Holiday Pay 1,500 0 1,500 1,500



Supplies07-62-62102-0 JFOF EHS-Safety Supplies 7,500 2,100 7,500 7,50007-62-62106-0 JFOF EHS-Office Suppleis 750 0 750 75007-62-62370-0 JFOF EHS-Building/Ground Maint 25,000 5,000 15,000 15,000

Supplies 0 33,250 7,100 23,250 23,250

Services07-62-62200-0 JFOF EHS-Outside Services 7,500 2,500 12,500 12,50007-62-62226-0 JFOF EHS-Physical Exams 4,000 414 4,000 4,00007-62-62501-0 JFOF EHS-Fed, St, Local Fees 0 4,000 5,000 5,000

Services 0 11,500 6,914 21,500 21,500

Utilties 0 0 0 0 0

Fuel/Oil/Auto07-62-62150-0 JFOF EHS-Vehicle Repair/Maintenance 0 0 0 0 0


Training & Dues07-62-62224-0 JFOF EHS-Dues, Fees 4,000 2,975 4,000 4,00007-62-62225-0 JFOF EHS-Subscriptions 750 214 750 75007-62-62350-0 JFOF EHS-Business Meetings 0 0 0 007-62-62408-0 JFOF EHS-Schools, Training 10,000 852 10,000 10,000

Training & Dues 0 14,750 4,041 14,750 14,750

TOTALS 0 126,700 79,055 129,500 129,500 0

Page 36 of 53


OPERATING BUDGET SUMMARYDepartment 63, Power Plant Operations and Maintenance


Salaries and Benefits 1,395,000 1,877,500 2,010,400 2,010,400Supplies 192,000 118,505 125,500 125,500Services 242,000 79,100 270,900 270,900Utilities 0 12,700 28,800 28,800Fuel, Oil, Auto 0 110 1,400 1,400Training/Dues 5,000 400 5,400 5,400

Total Plt Oper & Maint, 7-63 1,834,000 2,088,315 2,442,400 2,442,400 0

Department Description and StatisticsDepartment 63 accounts for the operations and maintenance of the Woodleaf, Forbestown and Kelly Ridgepower plants.

Budget Modifications: Description Requested Proposed Adopted07-63-63300, Regular Pay Elec Machinist, beg 7/1/12 50,000 50,000

Page 37 of 53


OPERATING BUDGET DETAILDepartment 63, Power Plant Operations and Maintenance


Salaries and Benefits07-63-63300-0 JFOF PP-Regular Pay 825,000 860,000 975,000 975,00007-63-63302-0 JFOF PP-Overtime Pay 60,000 200,000 160,000 160,00007-63-63303-0 JFOF PP-Vac, S/L Pay 60,000 145,000 145,000 145,00007-63-63307-0 JFOF PP-Holiday Pay 50,000 72,000 77,400 77,400

Employee Benefits, Distributed 400,000 600,000 652,500 652,50007-63-63394-0 JFOF PP-Health Fitness (Reimb) 0 500 500 500

Salaries and Benefits 0 1,395,000 1,877,500 2,010,400 2,010,400 0

Supplies07-63-63100-0 JFOF PP-Department Supplies 192,000 30,000 30,000 30,00007-63-63102-0 JFOF PP-Safety Supplies 0 3,000 3,000 3,00007-63-63106-0 JFOF PP-Office Supplies 0 500 2,500 2,50007-63-63114-0 JFOF PP-Postage 0 5 0 007-63-63260-0 JFOF PP-Maintenance Supplies 0 70,000 80,000 80,00007-63-63270-0 JFOF PP-Small Tools 0 15,000 10,000 10,000

Supplies 0 192,000 118,505 125,500 125,500 0

Services07-63-63172-0 JFOF PP-Equipment Rental 0 2,100 2,000 2,00007-63-63204-0 JFOF PP-Outside Service 157,000 75,000 265,000 265,00007-63-63501-0 JFOF PP-Fed, State & Local Fees 85,000 2,000 3,900 3,900

Services 0 242,000 79,100 270,900 270,900

Utilties07-63-63250-0 JFOF PP-Utilities 0 12,000 24,000 24,00007-63-63251-0 JFOF PP-Telephone & Communications 0 700 4,800 4,800

Utilities 0 0 12,700 28,800 28,800 0

Fuel/Oil/Auto07-63-63140-0 JFOF PP-Auto Allowance 110 1,400 1,400

Fuel/Oil/Auto 0 0 110 1,400 1,400 0

Training, Dues & Fees07-63-63224-0 JFOF PP-Dues and Fees 0 0 0 007-63-63225-0 JFOF PP-Subscriptions/Public 0 400 400 40007-63-63408-0 JFOF PP-Schools, Training 5,000 0 5,000 5,000

Training & Dues 0 5,000 400 5,400 5,400 0

TOTALS 0 1,834,000 2,088,315 2,442,400 2,442,400 0

Page 38 of 53


OPERATING BUDGET SUMMARYDepartment 64, Water Collection


Salaries and Benefits 425,000 311,000 332,000 332,000Supplies 111,000 47,600 49,000 49,000Services 249,000 228,000 259,000 259,000Utilities 0 5,000 5,000 5,000Fuel, Oil, Auto 0 625 800 800Training/Dues 0 400 500 500

Total Water Collection, 7-64 0 785,000 592,625 646,300 646,300 0

Department Description and StatisticsThe Water Collection Department accounts for the Agency's hydrography activity andmaintenance of the Agency's dams and canals related to power generation.


Page 39 of 53


OPERATING BUDGET DETAILDepartment 64, Water Collection


Salaries and Benefits07-64-64300 JFOF WC-Regular Earnings 267,000 185,000 200,000 200,00007-64-64302 JFOF WC-Overtime Pay 5,000 22,000 20,000 20,00007-64-64303 JFOF WC-Vac/SL Pay 18,000 10,000 10,000 10,00007-64-64307 JFOF WC-Holiday Pay 15,000 7,000 7,000 7,000



Supplies07-64-64100 JFOF WC-Department Supplies 111,000 12,000 13,000 13,00007-64-64104 JFOF WC-Maint Supplies 0 35,000 35,000 35,00007-64-64270 JFOF WC-Small Tools 0 600 1,000 1,000

Supplies 0 111,000 47,600 49,000 49,000

Services07-64-64170 JFOF WC-Equipment Rental 0 4,000 5,000 5,00007-64-64202 JFOF WC-Outside Services 249,000 70,000 100,000 100,00007-64-64501 JFOF WC-Fed, State & Local Fees 0 154,000 154,000 154,000

Services 0 249,000 228,000 259,000 259,000

Utilties07-64-64250 JFOF WC-Utilities 0 5,000 5,000 5,00007-64-64251 JFOF WC-Telephone & Communications 0 0 0 0

Utilities 0 0 5,000 5,000 5,000

Fuel/Oil/Auto07-64-64140 JFOF WC-Auto Allowance 0 0 0 007-64-64150 JFOF WC-Veh/Equip Maint & Rep 0 625 800 800

Fuel/Oil/Auto 0 0 625 800 800

Training & Dues07-64-64408 JFOF WC-Schools & Training 0 400 500 500

Training & Dues 0 0 400 500 500 0

TOTALS 0 785,000 592,625 646,300 646,300 0

Page 40 of 53


OPERATING BUDGET SUMMARYDepartment 65, Campgrounds


Salaries and Benefits 68,640 56,000 87,000 87,000Supplies 2,300 3,100 29,500 29,500Services 12,900 5,000 8,500 8,500Utilities 300 2,200 2,500 2,500Fuel, Oil, Auto 0 25 200 200Training/Dues 0 0 0 0

Total Campgrounds, 7-65 0 84,140 66,325 127,700 127,700 0

Department Description and StatisticsDepartment 65 records expenses associated with the operations and maintenance ofthe South Fork Power Project campgrounds.

Budget Modifications: Description Requested Proposed Adopted07-65-65260, Maint SuppliesRestroom Liner 25,000 25,000

Page 41 of 53


OPERATING BUDGET DETAILDepartment 65, Campgrounds


Salaries and Benefits07-65-65300-6 CG-Regular Pay 51,700 28,000 50,000 50,00007-65-65301-6 CG-Hourly Pay 0 7,000 7,000 7,00007-65-65302-6 CG-Vac, SL Pay 3,000 1,000 3,000 3,00007-65-65307-6 CG-Holiday Pay 2,500 1,000 1,000 1,000

Employee Benefits 11,440 19,000 26,000 26,000


Supplies07-65-65100-0 CG-Department Supplies 2,300 2,700 3,000 3,00007-65-65260-0 CG-Maintenance Supplies 0 400 26,500 26,500

Supplies 0 2,300 3,100 29,500 29,500

Services07-65-65170-6 CG-Equipment Rental 0 0 0 007-65-65200-0 CG-Outside Services 12,900 5,000 8,500 8,500

Services 0 12,900 5,000 8,500 8,500

Utilties07-65-65251-6 CG-Utilities 0 2,000 2,000 2,00007-65-65251-6 CG-Telephone & Communications 300 200 500 500

Utilities 0 300 2,200 2,500 2,500

Fuel/Oil/Auto07-65-65140-0 CG-Auto Allowance 0 25 200 20007-65-65150-6 CG-Veh/Equip Rep & Maint 0 0 0 007-65-65160-6 CG-Fuel & Oil 0 0 0 0

Fuel/Oil/Auto 0 0 25 200 200

Training & Dues07-65-65408-6 CG-Schools, Training

Training & Dues 0 0 0 0 0 0

TOTALS 0 84,140 66,325 127,700 127,700 0

Page 42 of 53


OPERATING BUDGET SUMMARYDepartment 66, Joint Facilities Shop & Transportation


Salaries and Benefits 210,000 305,500 310,000 310,000Supplies 66,000 16,870 16,500 16,500Services 13,000 13,500 25,600 25,600Utilities 0 39,500 46,400 46,400Fuel, Oil, Auto 93,000 123,000 121,120 121,120Training/Dues 0 0 1,000 1,000

Total JFOF Shop & Trans, 7-66 0 382,000 498,370 520,620 520,620 0

Department Description and StatisticsDepartment 66 records expenditures associated with the general facilities and vehicles for the Joint FacilitiesOperating Fund and maintenance of Forest Service roads which are SFWPA's responsibilities.

Budget Modifications: Description Requested Proposed Adopted07-66-66170 Equipment Rental, Water Truck Rental 14,500 14,500

for two months

Page 43 of 53


OPERATING BUDGET DETAILDepartment 66, Joint Facilities Shop & Transportation


Salaries and Benefits07-66-66300-6 JFOF JS-Regular Pay 133,500 145,000 156,000 156,00007-66-66302-6 JFOF JS-Overtime Pay 0 13,000 10,000 10,00007-66-66302-6 JFOF JS-Vac, SL Pay 9,000 37,500 25,000 25,00007-66-66307-6 JFOF JS-Holiday Pay 7,500 12,500 13,000 13,000

07-66-66309-6 JFOF JS-Employee Benefits 60,000 97,500 106,000 106,000


Supplies07-66-66100-6 JFOF JS-Supplies 66,000 9,000 9,000 9,00007-66-66102-6 JFOF JS-Safety Supplies 600 400 40007-66-66106-0 JFOF JS-Office Supplies 120 0 007-66-66260-6 JFOF JS-Maintenance Supplies 2,500 2,500 2,50007-66-66270-6 JFOF JS-Small Tools 1,150 800 80007-66-66370-6 JFOF JS-Bldg/Grd Maint Supp 3,500 3,800 3,800

Supplies 0 66,000 16,870 16,500 16,500

Services07-66-66170-6 JFOF JS-Equipment Rental 0 3,500 15,600 15,60007-66-66201-6 JFOF JS-Outside Services 13,000 10,000 10,000 10,000

Services 0 13,000 13,500 25,600 25,600

Utilties07-66-66250-6 JFOF JS-Utilities 35,000 36,000 36,00007-66-66251-6 JFOF JS-Telephone & Communications 4,500 10,400 10,400

Utilities 0 0 39,500 46,400 46,400

Fuel/Oil/Auto07-66-66140-6 JFOF JS-Auto Expense 3,000 150 120 12007-66-66150-6 JFOF JS-Veh/Equip Rep & Maint 0 27,000 25,000 25,00007-66-66160-6 JFOF JS-Fuel & Oil 90,000 96,000 96,000 96,000

Fuel/Oil/Auto 0 93,000 123,000 121,120 121,120

Training & Dues07-66-66408-6 JFOF JS-Schools, Training 0 0 1,000 1,000

Training & Dues 0 0 0 1,000 1,000 0

TOTALS 0 382,000 498,370 520,620 520,620 0

Page 44 of 53


2012 ANNUAL BUDGET

OPERATING BUDGET SUMMARY

Department 67, Regulatory Compliance

2010 2011 2011 2012 2012 2011

DESCRIPTION ACTUAL BUDGET ESTIMATED REQUESTED PROPOSED ADOPTED

Salaries and Benefits 70,000 104,200 108,800 108,800

Supplies 10,000 500 2,000 2,000

Services 10,000 14,500 250,000 250,000

Utilities 0 100 100 100


Training/Dues 5,000 11,200 22,100 22,100

Total Regulatory Compliance, 7-670 95,000 130,500 383,000 383,000 0

Department Description and StatisticsActivity and administration associated with compliance with license requirements of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC).

Budget Modifications: Description Requested Proposed Adopted07-67-67201-6 Part 12D Inspections 170,000 170,00007-67-67201-6 Relicensing 50,000 50,000

Page 45 of 53


OPERATING BUDGET DETAILDepartment 67, Regulatory Compliance


Salaries and Benefits07-67-67300-6 RC-Regular Pay 44,500 65,000 70,000 70,00007-67-67303-6 RC-Vac, S/L Pay 3,000 6,700 3,200 3,20007-67-67307-6 RC-Holiday Pay 2,500 2,500 3,000 3,000

Employee Benefits, Distributed 20,000 29,500 32,100 32,10007-67-67394-6 RC-Health Fitness (Reimb) 500 500 500


Supplies07-67-67102-6 RC-Department Supplies 10,000 0 1,000 1,00007-67-67106-6 RC-Office Supplies 0 500 1,000 1,000

Supplies 0 10,000 500 2,000 2,000

Services07-67-67201-6 RC-Outside Services 10,000 14,500 250,000 250,000

Services 0 10,000 14,500 250,000 250,000

Utilties07-67-67250-0 JFOF RC-Utilities, Gas & Electric 0 0 0 007-67-67251-0 JFOR RC-Telephone & Communications 0 0 100 100 100

Utilites 0 100 100 100

Fuel/Oil/Auto07-67-67150-6 RC-Vehicle Repair/Maintenance 0 0 0 0 0


Training & Dues07-67-67224-6 RC-Dues, Fees 0 100 100 10007-67-67225-6 RC-Subscriptions 0 6,000 2,000 2,00007-67-67350-6 RC-Business Meetings 0 100 1,000 1,00007-67-67408-6 RC-Schools, Training 5,000 5,000 19,000 19,000

Training & Dues 0 5,000 11,200 22,100 22,100

TOTALS 0 95,000 130,500 383,000 383,000 0

Page 46 of 53


OPERATING BUDGET SUMMARYDepartment 68, Information Technology and Communications


Salaries and Benefits 140,000 145,600 159,900 159,900Supplies 54,000 23,300 36,400 36,400Services 40,150 12,000 35,000 35,000Utilities 0 120 480 480Fuel, Oil, Auto 0 0 0 0Training/Dues 5,000 1,200 5,200 5,200

Total IT & Communications, 7-68 0 239,150 182,220 236,980 236,980 0

Department Description and StatisticsManage, coordinate and maintain Agency information systems. Liaison between Agency staff, computer hardware vendors ,software suppliers, communications equipment, handheld data recorders and SCADA systems.

Budget Modifications: Description Requested Proposed Adopted07-68-68201, Other Services SCADA Support Costs 10,000$ 10,000$

Page 47 of 53


OPERATING BUDGET DETAILDepartment 68, Information Technology and Communications


Salaries and Benefits07-68-68300-6 JFOF CO-Regular Earnings 89,000 75,000 89,000 89,00006-68-68302-6 JFOF CO-Overtime Pay 0 13,000 10,000 10,00007-68-68303-6 JFOF CO-Vac, S/L Pay 6,000 8,500 8,500 8,50007-68-68307-6 JFOF CO-Holiday Pay 5,000 3,000 2,200 2,200

Employee Benefits 40,000 46,100 50,200 50,200

Salaries and Benefits 0 140,000 145,600 159,900 159,900 0

Supplies07-68-68100-6 JFOF CO-Department Supplies 54,000 22,000 34,700 34,70007-68-68102-0 JFOF CO-Safety Supplies 0 200 200 20007-68-68260-0 JFOF CO-Maintenance Supplies 0 100 500 50007-68-68270-0 JFOF CO-Small Tools 0 1,000 1,000 1,000

Supplies 0 54,000 23,300 36,400 36,400 0

Services07-68-68201-6 JFOF CO-Outside Services 40,150 12,000 35,000 35,000

Services 0 40,150 12,000 35,000 35,000 0

Utilties07-68-68251-6 JFOF CO-Telephone & Communications 0 120 480 480

Utilities 0 0 120 480 480 0


Training & Dues07-68-68224-6 JFOF CO-Dues, Fees 1,200 1,200 1,20007-68-68225-6 JFOF CO-Subscriptions 0 0 007-68-68350-6 JFOF CO-Business Meetings 0 2,000 2,00007-68-68408-6 JFOF CO-Schools, Training 5,000 0 2,000 2,000

Training & Dues 0 5,000 1,200 5,200 5,200 0

TOTALS 0 239,150 182,220 236,980 236,980 0

Page 48 of 53


CAPITAL BUDGET/PROJECT MANAGEMENT SUMMARY

PROJ TASK GL FDG PRIOR 2011 2011 2012 2012 2012NO. CODE DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT SRC PRIOR YEARS BUDGET ESTIMATED REQUESTED PROPOSED ADOPTED COMMENTS

FERC Relicensing 11207-2 1 1 5,583,820 0 60,000WATER DIVISION

Administration & Engineering12-5a 12-5a GIS Baseline 1 1 20,000 20,00012-5b 12-5b GPS Equipment 1 1 8,000 8,000 Replace and Upgrade12-5c 12-5c Plotter, Large format 1 2 6,500 6,500

Water Treatment11-053 2011-053 WT-Minor Projects, 2011 1 1 10,000 10,00012-053 2012-053 WT-Minor Projects, 2012 1 1 10,000 10,00012-056 2012-056 WT-Vehicle Replacements 1 1 25,000 25,000 Replace 94 Operator Pickup, Full Size Short Bed PU10-094 2010-094 Modernize TP Telemetry Operation 11170-2 1 1 10,000 10,000 18,600 18,600 BTP, MGT, MRTP radio telemetry system upgrade10-095 2010-095 Upgrade MRTP Security 11170-2 1 1 13,500 8,500 14,000 14,000 2011-Alarm System. 2012-Cameras10-096 2010-096 Engineer and Rebuild Filter #3 11167-2 12 1 179,225 0 010-105 2010-105 MRTP Expansion, Filters 11167-2 12 1 282,246 75,000 78,000 SA #1. Underdrain Systems for 1,2,4 and 2 new filters12-5e 2012-5e MRTP Expansion, Filters, Air Scour 12 1 150,000 150,000 $130k for Blowers, Power, Bldg; $20k for expansion design12-5f 2012-5f MRTP Expansion 12 2 2,500,000 0 Engineering, Design12-5g 2012-5g BTP Effluent UV 1 2 8,000 012-5h 2012-5h MRTP Streaming Current Analyzer 1 1 8,050 8,050 Replace and Upgrade12-5i 2012-5i #3 Raw Water Pump Maintenance 1 2 12,000 012-5j 2012-5j Turbidity Meter 1 2 10,000 10,000 Replace and Upgrade, 412-6c 2012-6c SCADA Computer Server Upgrade` 1 1 15,000 15,000 Replace main and backup computers12-6d 2012-6d Wonderware Historical Logger System 1 1 15,000 15,000

Transmission & Distribution11-054 2011-054 TD-Minor Projects, 2011 1 1 25,000 25,00012-054 2012-054 TD-Minor Projects, 2012 1 1 25,000 25,000

11-056 2011-056 TD-Vehicle Replacements, 2011 11183.2 1 1 160,000 165,000 Replace 2 Trucks (CARB requirement)12-056 2012-056 TD-Vehicle Replacements, 2012 1 1 235,000 235,000 87 310 JD Backhoe ($125k), 03 Meter Tech Van ($35k)

95 Maint Tech ($50k), 97 Utility Truck T-70 ($25k)12-056 2012-056 TD-Vehicle Replacements, 2012 1 2 50,000 50,000 Foreman/Ditch Tender vehicles, 212-5k 2012-5k Hydro/Vac Excavator Valve Trailer 1 1 60,000 60,000 500 gal Single Unit Hydro Excavator, Vac Truck and Trailer12-5l 2012-5l Trailer Mount Air Compressor 1 1 40,000 40,000 Replace 1967 Jack Hammer12-5u 2012-5u Mini-Excavator 1 2 50,000 50,000 Replace 1994 unit

10-097 2010-097 Replace ID 2 Floating Liner 11167-2 12 1 250,000 230,00010-098 2010-098 Rio D'Oro Supply Assessment operating 7/15/10 Deposit12-5m 2012-5m Million Gallon Tank Inspection and Recoat 1 1 12,000 12,000 Inside and Out12-5n 2012-5n Foothill, Oro-Garden Interconnector Mainline 1 1 120,000 120,000 1500' 8" looping and services12-5o 2012-5o Baldwin Ave Interconnector 1 2 120,000 0 1800 looping 6"12-5p 2012-5p Ophir, West of Lincoln 1 2 120,000 0 1500' 8" 12' deep12-5q 2012-5q Lost Horizon Pipeline 1 2 400,000 50,000 Environmental Documents and Annexation, 3500' 6-8"12-5r 2012-5r Community Line, Phase 1 1 3 1,200,000 0 Miners Ranch-Foothill mainline 12-16"12-5s 2012-5s Circle Drive 1 3 500,000 012-5t 2012-5t Railroad Ave/Palermo Rd -N. Villa 1 3 100,000 0 looping 3 dead ends12-5v 2012-5v Bangor Canal Siphon Swedes Flat 1 1 30,000 30,000 30" Galvanized CMP substandard wood shavings to stop leaking12-5w 2012-5w Community Line, Marquez 1 2 55,000 55,000 1100', 6" steel12-5x 2012-5x Community Line, Myers Orchard 1 3 25,000 0 500', 6" steel12-5y 2012-5y Solana Tanks 1 2 10,000 0 Demolish and Remove12-5z 2012-5z Water Wagon 1 1 20,000 20,000 Emergency, Fire, Event

Page 49 of 53




WATER DIVISION (CONTINUED)General Plant and Shop

11-057 2011-057 GP-Minor Projects, 2011 1 1 10,000 10,00012-057 2012-057 GP-Minor Projects, 2012 1 1 10,000 10,00012-6a 2012-6a GP-Shop HVAC 1 1 20,000 20,000 Replacement

Information Technology11-058 2011-058 IT-Minor Projects, 2011 1 1 15,000 15,00012-058 2012-058 IT-Minor Projects, 2012 1 1 25,000 25,000

10-102 2010-102 Storage Area Network 11182-2 1 1 17,187 010-103 2010-103 Springbrook v.7 11182-2 1 1 30,000 27,500 5,000 5,000 On-Line access and bill pay10-104 2010-104 Water System Data & Visualization Disem 11172-2 1 1 15,000 15,000 20,000 20,000 Server, Wonderware Historian12-5n 2012-5n Water System Data & Visualization Disem 1 2 130,000 0 Phase 2, 600 mhz field sites

11-107 2011-107 Web Page Update operating 1 1 10,000 0 01-58-5820112-6b 2012-6b ISA Server Upgrades 1 1 20,000 20,000 Adm & MRTP. Firewall security.

Water Division Sub-total 623,500 654,000 6,222,150 1,147,150 0

POWER DIVISION

09-800 2008-802 KPH Trash Rake 11140 7 477,354 60,000 10,000 70,000 70,00009-811 2009-811 FPH TSV Replacement 11150 6 805,657 616,100 705,00009-800 2009-814 SCADA Replacement 11150 7 0 20,000 20,000

10-820 2010-820 Sly/SPH-Sunset MW Path 11180 1 46,660 375,000 400,000 Switch to digital for SCADA 10-820 2010-820 Sly/SPH-Sunset MW Path 11180 6 46,660 206,500 300,000 PG&E share10-822 2010-822 SFPP/Microwave Upgrade 11150 6 51,240 867,500 450,000 30,000 30,000 PG&E share10-822 2010-822 SFPP/Microwave Upgrade 11150 7 51,240 900,000 550,000 30,000 30,000

10-824 2010-824 SFPP/Sly Creek Dam Crest Modifications 11140 6 5,376,603 2,600,000 2,600,000 60,000 60,000 Includes contingency. Cost sharing w/PG&E12-825 2012-825 SFPP/New License Compliance 11150 7 199,000 0 30,000 30,000 Monitoring and Management Plans10-826 2010-826 SFPP/Miners Ranch Canal Access Rd 11150 7 57,616 400,000 415,000 SA #4 Sta 6 Sand Trap, Potential DWR cost sharing10-827 2010-827 GF/Ponderosa Powerhouses 1 and 2 11151 1 0 Phase II Feasibility Studies10-828 2010-828 SFPP/Lost Creek Dam Crest Modifications 11140 6 727,884 1,600,000 1,600,000 2,012,000 2,012,000 Cost sharing w/PG&E. $17,500,000 for construction

11-800 2011-800 SFPP/ Minor Projects, 2011 11185 7 25,000 25,000 Air Compressor12-800 2012-800 SFPP/Minor Projects, 2012 7 25,000 25,000 Non-Routine incl. Steam Cleaner11-815 2011-815 SFPP/Vehicle Replacements, 2011 11185 7 35,000 35,000 Replace Foreman's vehicle (Underhill)12-815 2012-815 SFPP/Vehicle Replacements, 2012 7 70,000 70,000 Replace 96 Dodge, Replace 97 Ford11-829 2011-829 SFPP/LGV Access Tunnel Repair 11140 7 400,000 400,00011-830 2011-830 SFPP/WPH Transformer 11150 7 1,450,000 1,450,347 Repayment to PG&E11-831 2011-831 SFPP/Woodleaf Slide Inspection 60201 7 20,000 20,000 5 Yr. Rock Bolt Caps11-832 2011-832 SFPP/KPH Refurbish TSV 11150 7 100,000 40,000 350,000 350,000 Engr in 2011, outage in 201211-8g 2011-8g SFPP/Powerhouse RTU replacement 7 0 300,000 300,000 Remote Terminal Unit, one per year

11-833 2011-833 Sly/Turbine Brg Cooling Coil 11180 1 10,000 10,000 Rebuild11-834 2011-834 EHS/Capital 11185 1 2,500 2,50011-834 2011-834 EHS/Capital 11185 7 12,500 12,50011-835 2011-835 SFPP/WPH Fab Needle Valves & Seats 11150 7 112,500 5,000 112,500 112,500 611-836 2011-836 SFPP/CT Test Equipment 11185 7 22,000 22,00011-837 2011-837 SFPP/FPH Batteries & Chargers 11185 7 34,640 34,64011-838 2011-838 SFPP/Manta Test Equipment 11185 7 70,000 70,000

Page 50 of 53




POWER DIVISION (CONTINUED)11-8o 2011-8o SFPP/River Cat ADCP 7 0 25,300 25,300 Stream Gauging

11-839 2011-839 SFPP/MRC Wall Repairs 11140 7 106,000 100,000 105,000 105,000 Upstream Sta 4 & 6, Gunite SF 25 upstream of flume11-840 2011-840 SFPP/PMS Server, MW Test Set 11185 7 19,000 19,00011-841 2011-841 SFPP/Network Equip, Water RTU Upgrade 11150 7 70,000 70,000 200,000 200,000 for SCADA upgrade11-842 2011-842 SFPP/Miners Ranch Tunnel ROV Inspection 11140 7 30,000 30,00012-8a 2012-8a Pave KPH parking area 7 20,000 20,000 For Dust control12-8b 2012-8b Office Copier, Power Div HQ 7 7,000 7,000 End of contract on existing copier, no extensions left12-8c 2012-8c Upgraded Radios HQ-Sunset Hill 7 100,000 100,00012-8d 2012-8d Diesel Modifications 7 15,000 15,000 Air Quality regulations12-8e 2012-8e Rebuild WPH & FPH armatures 7 70,000 70,000 Keep original as spares12-8f 2012-8f Micro-ohm tester (relay contact tester) 7 75,000 75,000 Test gear no longer available from PG&E12-8g 2012-8g Welding Shop ventilation, tables & cabinets 7 50,000 50,000 Assumes welding shop finished in early 201212-8h 2012-8h Pinkard Creek & Sucker Run Creek GOES operating 7 14,500 14,500 Pre-1914 rights monitoring12-8i 2012-8i Palermo Canal GOES operating 1 6,500 6,500 Real-time monitoring12-8j 2012-8j SPH Condition Assessment, HDR 1 75,000 75,000 Electrical and control systems12-8k 2012-8k FPH Condition Assessment & WECC test 7 265,000 265,000 WECC test, electrical, mechanical and control systems12-8l 2012-8l KPH & WPH Condition Assessment, HDR 7 150,000 150,000 Electrical and control systems

12-8m 2012-8m Security Cameras, Forbes HQ 7 14,000 14,000 IT12-8n 2012-8n Security Cameras, Powerhouses 7 36,000 36,000 IT12-8o 2012-8o Security Cameras, Sly Creek 1 12,000 12,000 IT12-8p 2012-8p File Server, Power Division 7 7,000 7,000 IT12-8q 2012-8q Dam Inspections, Part 12D requirement operating 7 0 Regulatory Compliance12-8r 2012-8r Radios 7 10,000 10,000 Replacement, complete narrow-banding project12-8s 2012-8s WPH Penstock Valve Trip System 7 20,000 20,000 Radio activation

Power Division Sub-total 10,343,240 9,375,987 4,386,800 4,386,800 0

TOTAL PROJECT MANAGEMENT 10,966,740 10,029,987 10,608,950 5,533,950 0

TOTAL BY FUNDING SOURCEGeneral Fund 1 686,000 758,500 3,665,650 1,090,650PG&E-Power Division Fund 6 5,890,100 5,655,000 2,102,000 2,102,000SFPP Joint Facilities Oper Fund 7 4,065,640 3,308,487 2,191,300 2,191,300MRTP System Capacity Fund 12 325,000 308,000 2,650,000 150,000TOTAL BY FUNDING SOURCE 10,966,740 10,029,987 10,608,950 5,533,950

Page 51 of 53


DEBT SERVICE BUDGET SUMMARYDepartment 59, Debt Service

2009 2010 2011 2011 2012 2012 2012DESCRIPTION ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET ESTIMATED REQUESTED PROPOSED ADOPTED

Supplies & Services 1,546 210 2,000 1,000 1,000 1,000

Interest 235,042 217,187 205,228 205,245 188,000 188,000Principal 787,113 242,718 253,370 349,106 250,000 250,000

Total Debt Service, 1-59 1,023,701 460,115 460,598 555,351 439,000 439,000 0

Department Description and Statistics

1980 Miners Ranch domestic revenue bonds:In 1980 the Agency issued $3,500,000 in bonds with annual installments of $30,000 to $170,000 through October 1. 2020. Interest is paid semi-annually on October 1 and April 1 at 5%. The bonds were used to finance the construction of the Miners Ranch Water Treatment Plant. The principal balance outstanding at 12/31/2011 is $1,265,000.

2003 Certificates of Participation:In 2003 $2,685,000 in certificates of participation were issued with annual principal installments of $125,000 to $185,000 through October 1, 2024. Interest is payable on April 1 and October 1 with rates varying from 4.75% to 5.375%. The certificates assisted in the purchase of a solar photovoltaic electricity generation at the Miner's Ranch Water Treatment Plant and funding certain aimprovements to the Agency's administration building. The principal balance outstanding at 12/31/2011 is $2,430,000.

Economic Development Administration Loan:In 1977 a loan of $320,000 was acquired with annual principal and interest obligations of $18,805 through July, 2017. The funds were used to improve the ditch system in the Bangor area. The interest rate on the loan was 5%. The loan was paid off early on July 1, 2011.

Page 52 of 53


DEBT SERVICE BUDGET DETAILDepartment 59, Debt Service

2009 2010 2011 2011 2012 2012 2012ACCT NO. ACCT NAME ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET ESTIMATED REQUESTED PROPOSED ADOPTED

01-59-59201-0Supplies & Services 1,546 210 2,000 1,000 1,000 1,000

Interest

TCB Line of Credit 0 0 0 0 0 0

1980 Miners Ranch Bonds 79,000 74,000 68,750 68,750 63,250 63,250

1995 Certificates of Participation 9,281 0 0 0 0 0

2003 Certificates of Participation 140,069 137,100 131,044 131,044 124,750 124,750

1995 Economic Development Adm Loan 6,692 6,087 5,434 5,451 0 0

Interest 235,042 217,187 205,228 205,245 188,000 188,000

Principal

1980 Miners Ranch Bonds 100,000 105,000 110,000 110,000 115,000 115,000

1995 Certificates of Participation 675,000 0 0 0 0 0

2003 Certificates of Participation 0 125,000 130,000 130,000 135,000 135,000

1995 Economic Development Adm Loan 12,113 12,718 13,370 109,106 0 0

Principal 787,113 242,718 253,370 349,106 250,000 250,000

TOTALS 1,023,701 460,115 460,598 555,351 439,000 439,000

Page 53 of 53


TO: Board of Directors FROM: Matt Colwell, Water Division Manager DATE: November 17, 2011 RE: Agreement for Foothill Boulevard Surface Restoration Project, SFWPA Project No. 2011-0108 Agenda Item for 11/22/11 Board of Directors Meeting It has been previously reported that on Tuesday October 4, at approximately 3:30 pm, Agency crews responded to a significant water mainline break. Agency personnel found Foothill Boulevard near Edgemont flooded with water erupting from both sides of the street (picture at right). Although the crew efficiently repaired the leak, significant roadway surface and sub-grade damage occurred. The proposed repairs to the of approximately 3,500 square feet of roadway include: removal and disposal of existing roadway asphalt concrete; import and placement of 75 tons of aggregate base; and, placement of asphalt concrete. Also, a requirement during construction will be to maintain single lane traffic control during construction. On November 3, 2011, the attached Request for Bids was sent to four general contractors:

• Duke Sherwood Contracting, Oroville; • RRHorn General Contractors, Chico; • D&S Asphalt Company, Oroville; and, • Fairbanks Paving Company, Oroville.

Two bidders responded prior to the November 16, 2011 deadline. RRHorn’s bid amount was $45,715, and Fairbanks Paving Company bid $43,475 (the other two contractors were nonresponsive). Based on bid amount, experience with similar projects, work plan, and schedule, it is recommended that the project be awarded to Fairbanks Paving Company.

Since the project costs are significantly greater than the $10,000 deductable, a claim has been submitted to ACWA/JPIA. The recommended action is:

“I move approval of, and authorization for the General Manager to negotiate and execute a contract, subject to legal counsel’s approval, with Fairbanks Paving Company for the Foothill Boulevard Surface Restoration project, SFWPA Project No. 2011-0108, at a cost not to exceed $43,475.”

-1-

AGREEMENT FOR

FOOTHILL BOULEVARD SURFACE RESTORATION PROJECT

THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into this 22nd day of November, 2011, by and between South Feather Water and Power Agency (SFWPA), and Fairbanks Paving Company (CONTRACTOR). WITNESSETH:

SFWPA desires to retain the services of CONTRACTOR to repair damage to Foothill Boulevard in the vicinity of its intersection with Edgemont Drive, Oroville, California (SFWPA Project No. 2011-0108), resulting from a break in South Feather Water and Power Agency’s water main, as described in the Agency’s Request for Bids (attached hereto as Exhibit “B”) for said project dated November 3, 2011.

CONTRACTOR desires to perform the services requested by SFWPA on the terms and conditions set forth below.

NOW, THEREFORE, the parties agree as follows. 1. Contract Documents: This Contract shall include this Agreement, and Exhibits “A,” “B”

and “C”, attached hereto, which are incorporated herein.

2. Description of Work: CONTRACTOR shall perform the work described in the Contractor’s Proposal, attached as Exhibit “C” hereto.

CONTRACTOR shall provide all labor, equipment, material, supplies, and services required or necessary to properly, competently and completely perform the work under this Agreement. CONTRACTOR shall determine the method, details and means of doing the work. Except as otherwise provided in this Agreement, all materials incorporated into the work shall be new.

3. Compensation: Contract price is $43,475.00 (lump sum). 4. Term and Time for Completion: This Agreement shall become effective on the date first

above written and will continue in effect until the services provided herein have been completed. CONTRACTOR shall complete the work within thirty (30) days of the date of this Agreement.

5. Payment for Services: Upon completion of the project, as described in Exhibit “B”, CONTRACTOR shall invoice SFWPA for said work. will make progress payments, based upon percentage of completion, according to the following schedule. Payment by SFWPA will be due net 30 days from the date of invoice, less 10% retention.

-2-

Within sixty (60) days after the date of completion of the work of improvement, the retention withheld shall be released. In the event of a dispute between SFWPA and CONTRACTOR, the Agency may withhold from the final payment an amount not to exceed 150 percent of the disputed amount. For purposes of this subdivision, "completion" means any of the occurrences set forth at Public Contract Code section 7107 Subds. (c)(1)-(4). Acceptance of SFWPA’s final payment by CONTRACTOR shall constitute a complete release and waiver of all claims of CONTRACTOR except disputed claims identified in writing by CONTRACTOR prior to final payment.

The payment schedule is a negotiated item and supersedes the payment terms stated in CONTRACTOR's proposal (Exhibit “C” hereto). The making of the first payment by SFWPA shall not constitute acceptance or approval of any work prior to final completion and acceptance.

CONTRACTOR’s invoice shall be accompanied by proof that CONTRACTOR has paid for all materials billed to SFWPA, and by CONTRACTOR's certification that all labor and services related to the project, to date, have been paid.

6. Coordination; Project Meetings: It is understood and acknowledged that SFWPA's activities

will continue during the project and that SFWPA will need adequate notice from CONTRACTOR if it becomes necessary to take components of SFWPA’s domestic water distribution system off-line in connection with CONTRACTOR's work. CONTRACTOR and SFWPA agree to coordinate their schedules insofar as possible to minimize interference with one another. A project coordination meeting shall be held between CONTRACTOR and SFWPA prior to commencement of work. In addition, project meetings shall be held upon request of either SFWPA or CONTRACTOR provided that at least 24 hours’ written notice is given. The costs of project coordination and project meetings are included in the contract price.

7. General Insurance: CONTRACTOR shall, at its expense, maintain in effect at all times during the duration of this Agreement not less than the following coverage and limits of insurance.

a. Worker's Compensation. CONTRACTOR shall carry such insurance as will protect SFWPA and CONTRACTOR from claims under Worker's Compensation and Employers' Liability Acts; such insurance to be maintained as to the type and amount in strict compliance with State statutes.

b. General Liability. CONTRACTOR shall obtain and keep in full force and effect general liability insurance including provisions for contractual liability, personal injury, independent contractors and broad form property damage coverages. This insurance shall be on a Commercial General Liability form with a standard cross-liability clause or endorsement. The limit for this insurance shall be no less than Five Million Dollars ($5,000,000) per occurrence combined single limit for bodily injury and property damage. CONCTRACTOR’s insurance secured under this subparagraph shall name by endorsement SFWPA as an additional insured. The general liability insurance policy shall include a provision requiring the policy of the named insured to be applied, in full, before any insurance separately and independently maintained by SFWPA shall be invoked.

-3-

c. Automobile Liability. CONTRACTOR shall maintain automobile liability insurance with coverage for any vehicle including those owned, leased rented or borrowed. This insurance shall have a standard cross-liability clause or endorsement. The limit amount for this insurance shall be no less than Two Million Dollars ($2,000,000) per occurrence combined single limit for bodily injury and property damage. Contractor’s insurance secured under this subparagraph shall name by endorsement SFWPA as an additional insured. The general liability insurance policy shall include a provision requiring the policy of the named insured to be applied, in full, before any insurance separately and independently maintained by SFWPA shall be invoked. d. "Builder's Risk" (All Risk). Coverage for the full insurable value of CONTRACTOR's materials and improvements at the worksite.

e. Certificate of Insurance. Promptly upon execution of this Agreement and prior to commencement of any work, CONTRACTOR shall provide SFWPA with certificates of insurance evidencing that all insurance and the endorsements referred to above and required by this Agreement have been obtained and are in full force and effect. Approval of the insurance by SFWPA shall not relieve or decrease any liability of CONTRACTOR. The certificates and policies shall provide that thirty (30) days’ written notice of any material change, reduction in coverage or cancellation of the insurance policies will be provided to SFWPA. In addition, in the event any change is made in the insurance carrier, policies or nature of coverage required under this Agreement, CONTRACTOR shall notify SFWPA prior to making such changes.

8. Indemnification and Hold Harmless: CONTRACTOR shall protect, indemnify, hold harmless and defend SFWPA, its Directors, officers, employees and agents, from any and all claims, fines, demands, costs, expenses (including but not limited to attorney's fees and costs of litigation or arbitration), liability, losses, penalties, causes of action, awards, suits or judgments for damages of any nature whatsoever (hereinafter collectively referred to as “Claims”) to the extent arising out of the breach of this agreement in whole or in part by, or willful or fraudulent misconduct or negligent acts, errors or omissions by CONTRACTOR, its employees, agents or contractors, or the agent, employee or contractor of any one of them in the performance of their duties or in their operations under this Agreement, but not including the sole or active negligence or the willful misconduct of SFWPA. Neither termination of the Agreement nor completion of the acts to be performed under this Agreement shall release CONTRACTOR from its obligations to indemnify as to any Claims so long as the event upon which such Claim is predicated shall have occurred prior to the effective date of any such termination or completion and arose out of or was in any way connected with performance or operations under this Agreement by CONTRACTOR, its employees, agents or consultants, or the employee, agent or CONTRACTOR of any one of them. Submission of insurance certificates or other proof of compliance with the insurance requirements in the Agreement does not relieve CONTRACTOR from liability under this indemnification and hold harmless clause. The obligation of this indemnity article shall apply whether or not such insurance policies shall have been determined to be applicable to any of such damages or claims for damages.

-4-

9. Warranty and Repair: CONTRACTOR warrants all work performed under this Agreement to

be free from defects in materials and workmanship and for a period of one (1) year from the date of acceptance. CONTRACTOR shall, at its sole cost and expense, with its workers and equipment, repair or replace defects in material and workmanship found to exist on the project, upon demand of SFWPA or the City of Oroville. In addition, all manufacturers' warranties shall be assignable, and shall inure to SFWPA and to the City of Oroville. These warranty provisions are negotiated and supersede the provisions in CONTRACTOR's quotation attached hereto as Exhibit “C”. CONTRACTOR’S warranty to repair and replace defective materials and workmanship within one year shall not otherwise limit the period during which SFWPA may seek relief under the laws and statutes of limitations applicable to breach of a written contract.

10. Exhibits Incorporated: Exhibits “B” and “C” attached to this Agreement are incorporated by reference as though fully set forth herein.

11. Miscellaneous: This Agreement constitutes the entire agreement of the parties hereto and shall be binding on their successors and assigns. However, CONTRACTOR will not assign this Agreement without the written consent of SFWPA. No modification of this Agreement shall be binding unless in writing signed by both parties. A waiver of any term, or any breach, of this Agreement shall not be deemed a waiver of any other term or breach. If any provision of this Agreement is held to be unenforceable, the remainder shall be severable and not affected thereby. Time is of the essence of this Agreement.

12. Notices: Insofar as this Agreement requires or contemplates the giving of notices, such notices shall be deemed given when personally delivered in writing or facsimile transmission, or deposited in the United States mail, postage prepaid, as follows:

To SFWPA:

Michael C. Glaze, General Manager South Feather Water and Power Agency P.O. Box 581 Oroville, California 95966 FAX: 916-533-3968

To CONTRACTOR:

Marc Fairbanks, Vice President Fairbanks Paving Company 2590 South Fifth Avenue Oroville, California 95965 530-533-3114 FAX: 530-533-2126 [email protected]

-5-

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Agreement on the date first above written. SOUTH FEATHER WATER AND POWER AGENCY

By Michael C. Glaze, General Manager

FAIRBANKS PAVING COMPANY

By Marc Fairbanks, Vice President

CALIFORNIA CONTRACTOR’S LICENSE No. 218271 (A, B, C12, C13, C21, C42)

-6-

EXHIBIT “A” GENERAL CONDITIONS 1. Independent Contractor: CONTRACTOR's relationship to SFWPA is that of an independent

contractor. All persons hired by CONTRACTOR and performing the work shall be CONTRACTOR’s employees or agents. SFWPA shall not be obligated in any way to pay any wages or other claims by any such employees or agents or any other person by reason of this Agreement. CONTRACTOR shall be solely liable for losses, costs, damage or injuries by said employees or agents during the course of the work. CONTRACTOR shall not delegate any of the work to subcontractors without advance written approval (fax or email acceptable) of SFWPA.

2. Labor; Wages; Safety:

a. All work shall be performed by skilled trade persons qualified to perform the required work in a manner comparable with the best standards of practice.

b. CONTRACTOR, and any subcontractor, in accordance with the provisions of California Labor

Code section 1770 et. seq. shall pay not less than the general prevailing rate of wages and the general prevailing rate for holiday and overtime work in the locality in which any work deemed to be “Public Work” in accordance with the provisions of California Labor Code section 1720 is to be performed for each craft, classification, or type of worker needed to perform the public work. The prevailing rates on wages shall be as determined by the Director of the Department of Industrial Relations of the State of California. Copies of the published prevailing rates are on file at SFWPA's main office.

c. CONTRACTOR shall be subject to and shall abide by all applicable provisions of the Labor

Code, including, but not limited to, Section 1775 (forfeitures for failure to pay prevailing wages), Section 1776 (payroll records), Section 1777.5 (apprentices), and Sections 1810-1815 (working hours).

d. In accordance with generally accepted practices and in accordance with California State

Safety Orders, CONTRACTOR will be solely and completely responsible for conditions of the job site, including safety of all persons and property during performance of the work. This requirement will apply continuously and not be limited to normal working hours.

3. Drug-Free Workplace: CONTRACTOR shall ensure that its employees on the work, and the

employees of its subcontractors, if any, conform to SFWPA's policies regarding a drug-free workplace and comply with all state and federal laws and regulations governing maintenance of a drug-free workplace.

-7-

4. Laws and Regulations; Permits:

a. CONTRACTOR shall ensure compliance with all applicable federal and state laws, federal and state safety orders, local ordinances, and the rules and regulations of all authorities having jurisdiction over construction of the project, and they will be deemed to be included in the contract the same as though herein written out in full.

b. Any and all permits from local government entities shall be the responsibility of the

CONTRACTOR. 5. Underground Facilities: SFWPA is unaware of any underground facilities within the worksite, other

than its own. CONTRACTOR shall be solely responsible for locating and identifying any underground facilities before conducting any trenching or excavation, and for ensuring the protection of any such facilities during construction. Contractor shall comply with the provisions of Labor Code Section 6705 regarding trench safety.

6. Unforeseen Conditions. Contractor shall promptly, and before such conditions are disturbed, notify

SFWPA in writing of (1) any hazardous waste, (2) any subsurface or latent conditions differing from those indicated, or (3) any unknown and unusual conditions not ordinarily encountered or inherent in the work.

7. Storage of Equipment and Materials; Cleanup: CONTRACTOR shall be solely responsible for any

equipment or materials wherever they may be stored, and SFWPA will bear no responsibility, nor accountability whatsoever, for any damages or losses. CONTRACTOR shall keep the worksite in a neat and orderly condition and, upon completion, shall thoroughly clean the site and remove and dispose of all debris.

8. Extra Work:

a. Although the work is intended to be a turn-key project, SFWPA reserves the right at any time during the course of the contract to order the CONTRACTOR to perform extra work, furnish extra material or equipment, or to make changes altering, adding to, or deducting from the work, without invalidating the contract or bonds. Changes shall not be binding upon either SFWPA or the CONTRACTOR unless made in writing in accordance with this section.

b. Changes shall originate with SFWPA who will transmit to the CONTRACTOR a written request

for a proposal covering the requested change, and setting forth the work in detail. Upon receipt of such request, CONTRACTOR shall promptly submit in writing to SFWPA a proposal offering to perform such change, a request for any required extension of time caused by such change, and an itemized statement of the cost or credit for the proposed change. Failure of CONTRACTOR to include a request for extension of time in the proposal shall constitute

-8-

conclusive evidence that such extra work or revisions will entail no delay and that no extension of time will be required.

c. If CONTRACTOR's proposal is accepted and authorized by SFWPA, a written Change Order

will be issued by SFWPA stating that the extra work or change authorized, and granting any required adjustments of contract price and of time of completion.

d. SFWPA may order CONTRACTOR, by a written Change Order, to perform extra work or to

make changes on a cost-plus basis. Such Change Order shall specify the estimated amount of the payment to be made and the time extension to be allowed for such work or changes. CONTRACTOR shall perform such work and shall furnish SFWPA with itemized bills only for the actual cost of labor, materials, equipment use, transportation, tools, necessary incidentals, and insurance, plus a charge not exceeding 15 percent (15%) of the actual cost of the foregoing items to cover all other expenses and profit of CONTRACTOR and subcontractors for such work or changes.

e. The performance of extra work or changes pursuant to Change Order shall be in accordance

with this Agreement (and any bonds). No extra work shall be performed and no change shall be made unless pursuant to such written Change Order, and no claim for an addition to the contract price shall be valid unless so ordered.

f. If CONTRACTOR has any claims for extra work, delays, disruption or damages against

SFWPA, such claims shall be made in writing, with supporting data, to SFWPA within ten (10) days of the first occurrence or condition giving rise to the claim. Such claims shall be processed by SFWPA as requests for change orders under this General Condition 8. Failure of CONTRACTOR to give written notice as provided in this paragraph shall be deemed a waiver of such claim.

9. Dispute Resolution; Venue: To the extent that they are applicable, the provisions of Public Contract

Code Section 20104-20104.6 shall govern the resolution of claims under this Agreement. Said provisions, which call for written claims, responses, negotiations, mediation and arbitration, are incorporated by reference as though fully set forth herein. Venue for any arbitration or action to enforce this Agreement shall be in the County of Butte, State of California.

10. Termination: SFWPA may terminate this Agreement at any time and for any reason upon fourteen

(14) days advance written notice. In the event of such termination, CONTRACTOR is to be compensated for all work performed to the date of termination based upon Article 4 of this Agreement, including non-cancelable purchases of materials and equipment, provided that such compensation shall not exceed the contract price set forth in Article 2 hereof. Compensation under this paragraph shall not include costs related to lost profit associated with the expected completion of the work or other such payments relating to the benefit of the bargain.

-9-

11. Assignment: CONTRACTOR hereby offers and agrees to assign to SFWPA all rights, title, and interest in and to all causes of action it may have under Section 4 of the Clayton Act (15 U.S.C Sec. 15) or under the Cartwright Act (Chapter 2 [commencing with Section 1670] of Part 2 of Division 7 of the Business and Professions Code), arising from purchases of goods, services, or materials pursuant to this Agreement. This assignment shall be made and become effective at the time the SFWPA tenders final payment to CONTRACTOR, without further acknowledgement by the parties.

12. Noncollusion Affidavit: In accordance with Section 7106 of the California Public Contract Code, the

bidder declares under penalty of perjury that the bid is not made in the interest of, or on behalf of, any undisclosed person, partnership, company, association, organization, or corporation; that the bid is genuine and not collusive or sham; that the bidder has not directly or indirectly induced or solicited any other bidder to put in a false or sham bid, and has not directly or indirectly colluded, conspired, connived, or agreed with any bidder or anyone else to put in a sham bid, or that anyone shall refrain from bidding; that the bidder has not in any matter, directly or indirectly, sought by agreement, communication or conference with anyone to fix the bid price of the bidder or any other bidder, or to fix any overhead, profit, or cost element of the bid price, or of that of any other bidder, or to secure any advantage against the public body awarding the contract of anyone interested in the proposed contract; that all statements contained in the bid are true; and, further, that the bidder has not, directly or indirectly, submitted his or her bid price or any breakdown thereof, or of the contents thereof, or divulged information or data relative thereto, or paid, and will not pay, any fee to any corporation, partnership, company association, organization, bid depository, or to any member or agent thereof to effectuate a collusive or sham bid.

13. Workers' Compensation Certificate: By signing this Agreement, CONTRACTOR certifies as follows:

“I am aware of the provisions of Section 3700 of the Labor Code which require every employer to be insured against liability for workers' compensation or to undertake self-insurance in accordance with the provisions of that code, and I will comply with such provisions before commencing the performance of the work of this contract.”

SOUTH FEATHER WATER & POWER AGENCY MATT COLWELL, WATER DIVISION MANAGER 2310 ORO-QUINCY HIGHWAY OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95966 530-533-4578, EXT. 112 [email protected] November 3, 2011

REQUEST FOR BIDS

Foothill Boulevard Roadway Repairs, Project No. 2011-0108 South Feather Water and Power Agency (SFWPA) is requesting bid proposals for roadway repairs located along Foothill Boulevard east of its intersection with Edgemont Drive, City of Oroville, California. The project will include demolition and replacement of approximately 70 feet longitudinal by 50 feet width (3,500 sf) of roadway and shoulder work. The roadway is approximately 44 feet in width with an additional 6 feet of shoulder (3 feet on each side of roadway). The roadway section shall conform to City of Oroville ST-01 standards for arterial Streets (see attached). The repair section is intended to emulate the existing roadway conditions in slope and gradient prior to the damage that is the subject of this request, described below. On October 4, 2011, an 8-inch C900 water main ruptured and the water flow scoured and undermined the roadway creating voids and compromised sub-grade. As a result, the road section is currently failing and must be repaired within 30 days of contract award. Bids must be received on or prior to close of business November 16, 2011, to be given consideration. Bid submittals will consider the following work tasks which are intended to complete the project objectives. The bid submittal should not be limited to these specific tasks if the bidder is aware that additional tasks will be required to complete the project. Task:

1. Mobilization; 2. Traffic Control to assure minimum single lane passage with one-way reversing control; 3. Removal of approximately 70 feet longitudinal and 50 foot width of existing roadway and shoulder

asphalt concrete, together with off-site disposal of removed material; 4. Import and place 75 tons of ¾-inch Class II aggregate base; 5. Grade and compact sub-grade to 95% relative compaction in roadway sections; 6. Place and compact ½-inch AR 4000 asphalt concrete, or equivalent, to a depth of 6 inches (City of

Oroville standard ST-01, arterial street); and, 7. Replace roadway striping for approximately 70 lineal feet to match existing roadway and shoulder

markings, together with centerline dots.

Request For Bids SFWPA Project No. 2011-0108 Page 2 The State Director of the Department of Industrial Relations has established the general prevailing rates of wages and rates for overtime and legal holidays in the locality in which this work is to be performed. Not less than said prevailing wages shall be paid for work on this project. Copies of such prevailing wages are on the web at http://www.dir.ca.gov/DLSR/PWD/index.htm. Proposals will be evaluated based on experience with similar projects and bid price, which shall be given such weight as SFWPA, in its sole discretion, deems appropriate to determine the firm which best meets the needs of SFWPA. A copy of the proposed agreement between SFWPA and the successful bidder is attached. Bidder’s exceptions or proposed revisions to said proposed agreement shall be included and made a part of Bidder’s proposal to this Request for Bids. SFWPA will make a reasonable effort to accommodate said exceptions and/or proposed revisions. However, if SFWPA determines that it cannot accommodate Bidder’s exceptions and/or proposed revisions to the proposed agreement, or that it is not in SFWPA’s best interest to do so, Bidder’s proposal shall be rejected. For more information please contact Matt Colwell, Water Division Manager, at 530.534.2238, [email protected]. Sincerely, South Feather Water and Power Agency

Matt Colwell, Water Division Manager c: Michael C. Glaze, General Manager


TO: Board of Directors FROM: Alex C. Brown, Regulatory Compliance Manager DATE: November 16, 2011 RE: FERC Part 12D Consulting Services Agenda Item for 11/22/11 Board of Directors Meeting FERC regulations (“Part 12 D”) require licensees like SFWPA to have all high-hazard dams inspected by an independent consultant every five years. The high-hazard dams include Little Grass Valley, Sly Creek, Lost Creek and Miners Ranch. Ponderosa Dam has been included since the beginning of the Part 12 D inspection program because it diverts water to a domestic water supply at Miners Ranch Dam. The result of these inspections will be a report filed with FERC and an updating of the Supporting Technical Information Documents associated with the dams. A proposal was requested and received from Faiz Makdisi of AMEC Geomatrix and Wayne Edwards of W.D. Edwards Consulting, as co-independent consultants. Their proposal (and the Agency’s request for it) was based on the same work they performed for SFWPA in 2007. Wayne Edwards facilitated the 2007 SFWPA potential-failure-modes analysis for Little Grass Valley, Sly Creek, Lost Creek, Ponderosa, and Miners Ranch dams. I have reviewed their proposal and am of the opinion that their qualifications, experience, skills, and familiarity with the South Feather Power Project are best suited for the Agency’s Part 12D needs. Attached is a copy of the proposed Consulting Services Agreement, together with the AMEX Geomatrix proposal to undertake the 2012 Part 12D inspections and reporting, along with resumes for Wayne Edwards and Faiz Makdisi. As proposed, Mr. Edwards will work as a subconsultant to AMEC Geomatrix. The recommended form of actions is:

“I move approval of, and authorization for the General Manager to negotiate and execute a Consulting Services Agreement with Faiz Makdisi of AMEC Geomatrix for the FERC-required Part 12D safety inspection and reporting for the South Feather Power Project, subject to review by legal counsel and FERC approval of the consultants.”

November 16, 2011 Consulting Services Agreement Page1 of 5

CONSULTING SERVICES AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT is entered into effective as of November 22, 2011 by AMEC Geomatrix, Inc. (“Consultant”) and South Feather Water and Power Agency (“Agency”). ARTICLE 1 SCOPE Consultant shall perform the services (the “Services”) described generally in the Consultant’s Proposal dated October 24, 2011, attached hereto as Appendix A. This Agreement shall become effective as of the date shown above and shall remain in effect unless amended in writing or terminated pursuant to Article 8 herein. Agency may engage other consultants as Agency deems necessary to timely and efficiently carry out tasks required, and this Agreement shall not be considered an exclusive engagement by Agency of Consultant for Agency’s requirements. ARTICLE 2 COMPENSATION For performance of the Services, Agency shall pay Consultant a fixed/not to exceed price of $135,884. This compensation shall be paid to Consultant upon completion of scope of work described in said Proposal. ARTICLE 3 REPRESENTATIVES Consultant will function in cooperation with and subject always to the direction and control of Agency’s authorized officers or designated representatives. Consultant shall also designate a representative for the execution of the Services. Consultant’s and Agency’s representatives are: Consultant: Agency: AMEC Geomatrix, Inc. South Feather Water and Power Agency Faiz Makdisi Alex C. Brown, Regulatory Compliance Manager 2101 Webster Street, 12th Floor 2310 Oro-Quincy Hwy. Oakland, California, 94612-3066 Oroville, CA 95965 Telephone: (510) 663-4204 Telephone: (530) 533-4578, ext. 213 [email protected] [email protected] Additional contact information can be found under Article 15. ARTICLE 4 PERSONNEL All Consultant’s staff, and its subcontractors’ staff, assigned to these Services shall be approved by the Agency prior to their assignment to task activities. Consultant shall confirm that the technical qualifications of all personnel assigned to these tasks meet the applicable industry standards. In the event that the individuals who are initially assigned by Consultant to perform Services under this Agreement are removed, replaced or reassigned by Consultant, such removal, replacement or reassignment may result in harm and costs to Agency. Consultant agrees not to remove, replace or reassign any such individuals without the approval of Agency. Such approval shall not be unreasonably


withheld or delayed. Consultant shall make reasonable efforts to maintain continuity in its staffing and will provide Agency ample notification if any such changes are made. Notwithstanding the foregoing, it is agreed by Consultant that Agency is relying on the expertise and experience of Consultant as well as Consultant’s subcontractors, and therefore Consultant shall not terminate the services of a subcontractor employed for the benefit of Agency without the prior approval of Agency, which approval shall not be unreasonably withheld. Agency may, in its discretion, direct Consultant to replace subcontractors that Agency reasonably believes are not performing in a satisfactory manner. Consultant shall ensure that subcontracts contain express acknowledgement by subcontractors of Agency’s right to replace them and shall require the subcontractors to waive any claims or damages in connection therewith, save and except for costs and fees incurred to the date of said termination, plus reasonable costs incurred as a result of said termination. ARTICLE 5 RECORDS To the extent Agency does not otherwise specifically request delivery of records or results, Consultant agrees to retain all records and results of Services performed under this Agreement for a period of not less than two years after completion of the Services. At Agency’s request Consultant will deliver a copy of any or all original field notes, investigative notes, tests, photographs, records, calculations, details, drawings, specifications, summaries and reports produced and collected in the course of Services performed under this Agreement. ARTICLE 6 OWNERSHIP OF DOCUMENTS Agency shall own all data, reports, information, manuals, drawings, or other electronic, written, recorded, photographic or visual materials, or other deliverables produced in the performance of this Agreement for use by Agency. Consultant shall retain no ownership interest in any of the foregoing described deliverables except as may be described herein, and such deliverables, including those retained by Consultant in the normal course of Consultant’s business, may not be reused, sold, transferred or conveyed without Agency’s permission. Any reuse of Consultant prepared documents, except for the specific purpose intended hereunder, will be at Agency's sole risk and without liability or legal exposure to Consultant or its subconsultants. ARTICLE 7 CONFLICT OF INTEREST/BUSINESS ETHICS Consultant shall exercise reasonable care and diligence to prevent any actions or conditions that would result in a conflict with Agency’s interest. During the term of this Agreement, neither Consultant nor its subcontractors shall accept employment or engage in any work that creates a conflict of interest between Consultant and Agency, or in any way compromises the interest of Agency for which Contractor’s services are being retained. Consultant shall immediately notify Agency of any and all such violations of this clause, by Consultant, its agents or subcontractors, immediately upon becoming aware of such violations. Failure of such notification or lack of knowledge of a violation by Consultant or its subcontractors shall not excuse the performance hereunder. ARTICLE 8 TERMINATION Agency may suspend or terminate this Agreement by giving thirty days prior written notice to Consultant, but such termination shall not relieve Agency of its obligation to pay Consultant for


expenses incurred and Services performed up to the date of termination and all reasonable expenses that Consultant incurs by reason of such termination. Any reports, drawings or other documents prepared for Agency prior to the effective date of such termination shall be delivered to Agency by Consultant prior to Agency’s release of its final payment to Consultant. ARTICLE 9 WARRANTY Consultant warrants that its Services are performed with the degree of skill and care that is required by current, good and sound professional procedures and practices, and in conformance with generally accepted professional standards prevailing at the time the Services are performed so as to ensure that the Services performed are correct and appropriate for the purposes contemplated in this Agreement. ARTICLE 10 LIMITATION OF LIABILITY Consultant’s total cumulative liability for any claims of any kind, whether based on contract, tort (including negligence and strict liability), under any warranty or otherwise, for any loss or damage relating to this Agreement or the performance of the Services, shall not exceed the insurance coverage specified in this Agreement, and Agency hereby releases Consultant from any liability in excess of such amount. This monetary limitation shall survive the failure of any exclusive remedy. Neither Agency nor Consultant shall be liable, whether based on contract, tort (including negligence and strict liability), under any warranty or otherwise relating to the Services or this Agreement, for any consequential, indirect, special, punitive or incidental loss or damage, any damage or loss of any property or equipment, or any loss of use of property or equipment, and Agency and Consultant mutually release the other from any liability for all such losses and damages. All of the provisions of this Agreement providing for limitation or protection against liability of Consultant and Agency shall also protect their directors, officers and employees, and affiliated entities of Consultant and their directors, officers, employees and affiliates, and shall apply regardless of the fault, negligence or strict liability of Consultant, its directors, officers, employees or affiliates. ARTICLE 11 INSURANCE Consultant shall provide and continue to maintain during the performance of this Agreement insurance coverage as follows:

i. Workers’ Compensation insurance in compliance with statutory limits. ii. Employers’ Liability with the following limits:

Each Accident $1,000,000 iii. Business Automobile Liability with the following limits:

Combined Single Limit $1,000,000 iv. Commercial General Liability with the following limits:

Each Occurrence $500,000 General Aggregate $1,000,000

v. Professional Liability Insurance with the following limits: Any One Claim $500,000 Policy Aggregate $1,000,000


ARTICLE 12 SAFETY Consultant shall plan and conduct its work to safeguard persons and property from injury. Consultant shall direct performance of the work in compliance with reasonable safety and work practices and applicable federal, state and local laws, rules and regulations. Agency may designate safety precautions in addition to those in use or proposed by Consultant. Agency reserves the right to inspect the work and to halt work to ensure compliance with reasonable and safe work practices and with applicable federal, state, and local laws, rules and regulations. ARTICLE 13 DELAYS Neither party shall be considered in default in the performance of its obligations hereunder, except obligations to make payments for Services previously performed, to the extent that the performance of any such obligation is prevented or delayed by any cause that is beyond the reasonable control of the affected party. In the event either party claims that such performance of its obligations was prevented or delayed by any such cause, that party shall promptly notify the other party of that fact, and of the circumstances preventing or delaying performance. Such party claiming a cause-delayed performance shall endeavor, to the extent reasonable, to remove the obstacles which preclude performance. ARTICLE 14 DISPUTES Any dispute, controversy or claim arising out of or relating to this Agreement or the breach thereof, shall be subject to mediation under the guidelines of the American Arbitration Association in Sacramento, California, as a condition precedent to the institution of arbitration. If any dispute, controversy or claim cannot be resolved through mediation, it shall be resolved through binding arbitration under the commercial arbitration rules of the American Arbitration Association in Sacramento, California. The Arbitrator shall give full effect to Articles 8 and 9 and shall not deviate therefrom. ARTICLE 15 NOTICES Any notice related to this Agreement shall be in writing and shall be considered duly made if delivered to the other party at the following addresses: Consultant: Agency: AMEC Geomatrix, Inc. South Feather Water and Power Agency Faiz Makdisi Alex C. Brown, Regulatory Compliance Manager 2101 Webster Street, 12th Floor 2310 Oro-Quincy Hwy. Oakland, California, 94612-3066 Oroville, CA 95965 Telephone: (510) 663-4204 Telephone: (530) 533-4578, ext. 213 [email protected] [email protected] Either party may change its address or numbers for receiving notices by giving written notice of such change to the other party.


ARTICLE 16 SURVIVAL The provisions of this Agreement which by their nature should survive expiration, cancellation or termination of this Agreement, including but not limited to provisions regarding warranty and liability, shall survive such expiration, cancellation or other termination. ARTICLE 17 LAW This Agreement shall be governed by and interpreted in accordance with the laws of the State of California, excluding its conflicts of law principles. ARTICLE 18 INTEGRATION These terms and conditions are intended by Consultant and Agency to constitute the final and complete statement of their agreement, and all prior proposals, communications and understandings related to the subject matter of this Agreement are hereby superseded. No modification or amendment of this Agreement shall be effective unless the same is in writing and signed by both parties. CONSULTANT: AMEC GEOMATRIX, INC. SOUTH FEATHER WATER AND POWER AGENCY By: By: Michael C. Glaze Title: Title: General Manager Date: Date: November 22, 2011

AMEC Environment & Infrastructure 2101 Webster Street, 12th Floor Oakland, California 94612-3066 USA Tel (510) 663-4100 Fax (510) 663-4141 amec.com

October 24, 2011

Alex C. Brown, Regulatory Compliance Manager South Feather Water and Power Agency 2310 Oro-Quincy Highway Oroville, CA 95966

Subject: Proposal to Prepare Part 12 Safety Inspection Reports for Little Grass Valley, Sly Creek, Lost Creek, Miners Ranch, and Ponderosa Dams

Dear Mr. Brown:| In response to your request, enclosed is our proposal to prepare the next Part 12 safety inspection reports for South Feather Water and Power Agency’s (SFWPA) Little Grass Valley, Sly Creek, Lost Creek, Miners Ranch, and Ponderosa Dams. As discussed, we propose Faiz Makdisi of AMEC Geomatrix, Inc. (AMEC) and Wayne Edwards of W. D. Edwards Consulting, LLC (WDE) as Co-Independent Consultants. AMEC would be the prime consultant with WDE as a sub-consultant.

The proposal is based on our experience in performing FERC Part 12 safety inspection reports for over 50 dams and our knowledge of SFWPA’s dams. In 2007, Wayne Edwards facilitated the PFMA workshops for Little Grass Valley, Ponderosa, and Miners Ranch Dams. In 2008 as Co-Independent Consultants, we completed the Part 12 safety inspection report for Little Grass Valley, and prepared the Part 12 reports for Sly Creek and Lost Creek Dams. We also completed the updates to the Supporting Technical Information Documents (STIDs) for these three dams.

It is our understanding that Part 12 safety inspection reports for the dams are due to the FERC by December 1, 2012. The scope of our work will include the following tasks.

SCOPE OF WORK

Task 1 – Review STID and Project Information:

At the start of the project we will review existing data and reports on all five dams, especially information developed since the last Part 12D safety inspection reports. We anticipate that SFWPA will provide pertinent project materials in electronic format including:

• Project drawings

• Previous Part 12 safety review reports and STIDs (including existing PFMA reports)

• Surveillance and Monitoring Plans and Surveillance and Monitoring Reports

Alex C. Brown, Regulatory Compliance Manager


October 24, 2011 Page 2 of 5

• Operation and maintenance records

• Dam and reservoir operating procedures

• Geology and seismicity studies

• Stability analyses and supporting data

• Spillway radial gate inspection and analysis reports

• Probable Maximum Flood and Inflow Design Flood reports

• Dam break studies

• Emergency Action Plans

• FERC annual operations inspection reports and other dam safety-related correspondence since last Part 12 reports

• Division of Safety of Dams (DSOD) correspondence since the last Part 12 reports

We also will review the DSOD files in Sacramento, if necessary, for any additional data or references that are not available in SFWPA files and reported in the current STIDs.

Task 2 – Part 12D Field Inspections

The Independent Consultants (ICs) will conduct the Part 12D field inspections following the review of project information, the STID data, and the PFMA reports. The inspections will focus on potential concerns identified in the previous PFMA reports and the status of the recommendations in the last Part 12 reports. We will also discuss each potential failure mode (PFM) to assess the appropriate classification.

For each dam, visible and accessible portions of the dam, abutments and appurtenant structures will be inspected for evidence of leakage, concrete deterioration, settlement, and joint offsets. Attention will be paid to any improvements or maintenance done since the last safety review reports. Accessible portions of the power intake and powerhouse facilities will also be inspected. Powerhouse operators and dam operations and maintenance staff will be interviewed to develop an understanding of operating and maintenance procedures. The scope of the inspections will be limited to visible elements only and excludes covered, buried, or hidden conditions. The inspections will not include any special investigations, geotechnical investigations, or materials testing. Inspection notes, checklists, and inspection photos will be prepared at the end of the field inspection.

We estimate that the field inspections can be completed in three days, including travel time to and from the project sites. As discussed with SFWPA, we propose to perform the field inspections during the month of May 2012.

Task 3 – Prepare Draft Part 12D Reports

The ICs will evaluate the pertinent project materials and STID information reviewed in Task 1, the information obtained during the field inspection, and the results of the PFMA workshop documented in the PFMA reports, to evaluate the adequacy of current stability analyses, spillway capacity studies, and existing surveillance and monitoring programs. We will provide recommendations for modifications to the surveillance and monitoring program if warranted by the results of the field inspection.



October 24, 2011 Page 3 of 5 The Part 12D safety inspection reports will be prepared consistent with FERC requirements. The reports will contain the following items, as required in the FERC Part 12D Safety Inspection Report Outline in Appendix H of Chapter 14 - Monitoring the Performance of Dams, updated July 1, 2005:

1. Findings and Recommendations

2. Project Description

3. Discussion of Potential Failure Modes Analysis Report

4. Surveillance and Monitoring with Respect to Potential Failure Modes

5. Field Inspection

6. Operations and Maintenance Programs Relative to Potential Failure Modes

7. Assessment of Supporting Technical Information Document

8. Appendices

The draft Part 12 reports will be submitted to SFWPA by October 15, 2012. The ICs will meet with SFWPA or hold a conference call to discuss findings, conclusions, and recommendations in the draft reports, if necessary.

Task 4 – Issue Final Part 12D Reports

Based on receiving SFWPA’s comments by November 1, we will incorporate any comments and submit the final Part 12 reports by November 15, so that SFWPA can submit the final reports to the FERC by December 1, 2012. AMEC will submit six copies of each report along with a CD containing scanned versions of the final reports in PDF format.

Task 5 – Update STIDs

The Independent Consultants will review the current STIDs and assist SFWPA in updating these documents. The following sections will be updated as needed and will include summaries of any new studies or analyses:

• Section 2 – updated project description

• Section 3 – new project chronology

• Section 4 – revised operation procedures

• Section 5 – updated geology and seismicity studies

• Section 6 – updated hydrology studies

• Section 7 – updated surveillance and monitoring plans

• Section 8 – revised stability analyses

• Section 9 – updated information on the spillway gates



October 24, 2011 Page 4 of 5

• Section 10 – correspondence with the FERC and DSOD since the last Part 12 report

• Section 11 – reference to documents prepared since last Part 12 report

AMEC will provide six copies of the replacement pages for each STID along with a CD containing scanned versions of the updated STIDs in PDF format.

SCHEDULE AND BUDGET

We propose the following schedule for the Part 12 inspections and reports:

• Receive Background Information March 1, 2012

• Perform Field inspections May 2012

• Submit Draft Part 12 Reports October 15

• Receive SFWPA Comments November 1

• Submit Final Part 12 Reports November 15

• Submit STID Updates November 15

• Reports Due to FERC December 1

We are available to begin this work as soon as we receive your authorization and the required project information. Our estimated budget for performing the scope of work is $135,884. We will bill our services on a time-and-materials basis, not to exceed the estimated budget without written authorization. The estimated staff hours are provided in the attached spreadsheet.

We look forward to working with SFWPA again in the continued management of your dam safety program. Enclosed are the resumes of Faiz Makdisi and Wayne Edwards for obtaining FERC’s approval as the Independent Consultants for the next Part 12 safety inspection reports.

Please call me at (510) 663-4204 or Wayne Edwards at (415) 883-1663 if you have any questions of need more information.

Sincerely,

AMEC Geomatrix, Inc.

Faiz I. Makdisi, Ph.D., P.E.

Principal Engineer and Vice President

Enclosure: Cost Estimate Spreadsheet

cc: Wayne Edwards, W.D. Edwards Consulting C:\Projects\South Feather\Proposal for 2012 Part12 Inspections\SFWPA 2012 Part 12 Proposal_10-24-2011.doc

AMEC Environment & Infrastructure 2101 Webster Street, 12th Floor Oakland, California 94612-3066 USA Tel (510) 663-4100 Fax (510) 663-4141 amec.com

Total by Task

TASK PRINCIPAL SENIOR PROJECT STAFF CADD SUPPORT LABOR EXPENSES AMEC PRINCIPAL SUPPORT LABOR EXPENSES 5% MARK UP

Total ON SUBS

1 Review STID and Project Information 40 10 40 $17,250 $100 $17,350 40 $7,000 $30 $7,030 $352 $24,732

2 Part 12D Field Inspection 24 $6,120 $350 $6,470 24 $4,200 $350 $4,550 $228 $11,248

3 Prepare Draft Part 12D Reports (3 copies/dam) 40 15 120 16 20 $32,295 $1,500 $33,795 40 $7,000 $7,000 $350 $41,145

4 Prepare Final Part 12D Reports (6 copies/dam) 24 4 48 4 40 $17,180 $3,000 $20,180 24 $4,200 $4,200 $210 $24,590

5 Meetings and Project Management 16 8 $5,120 $200 $5,320 8 $1,400 $1,400 $70 $6,790

6 Update STIDs 24 100 20 $20,920 $20,920 16 $2,800 $2,800 $140 $23,860

Scanning Documents* 16 16 $3,520 $3,520 $0 $3,520

$102,405 $5,150 $107,555 $26,600 $380 $26,980 $1,349 $135,884

TOTAL HOURS 168 29 332 0 20 96 152 0

RATE $255 $185 $130 $105 $120 $90 $175 $68

LABOR COST $42,840 $5,365 $43,160 $0 $2,400 $8,640 $26,600 $0

PROJECT TOTAL: $135,884

* Approximate Estimate

DESCRIPTION

WDE Total

WDE - Subconsultant

SFWPA FERC PART 12D SAFETY INSPECTION REPORTSLittle Grass Valley, Sly Creek, Lost Creek, Miners Ranch, and Ponderosa Dams

COST ESTIMATE

AMEC Geomatrix

FAIZ I. MAKDISI, PHD, PE, D.GE PRINCIPAL ENGINEER AND VICE PRESIDENT

C:\Projects\FERC Part12_Documents\Resumes\FMakdisi_Dams w-pubs_10.doc AMEC Geomatrix, Inc. 7/2010

Dr. Makdisi’s 34-year career has combined applied research and professional practice in geotechnical and foundation/earthquake engineering for commercial, industrial, and critical structures. For the past 15 years, he has focused on geotechnical studies and safety evaluations of earth and rockfill dams, embankments, levees, and landfills. His work includes feasibility evaluations and preliminary design studies; field investigation design and planning; borrow area material studies; in situ and laboratory testing; and evaluation and interpretation of static and dynamic material properties of dams and their foundations. Studies also included stability evaluations of embankment slopes, seepage analyses, and static and dynamic stress analyses to evaluate stability during earthquakes.

Dr. Makdisi has performed studies to determine earthquake-induced permanent deformations in slopes and embankments and has developed and published (with the late H.B. Seed) widely-used simplified procedures for estimating the dynamic response and permanent deformations in earth and rockfill dams and embankments. He was a lead participant in earthquake ground motion studies and development of seismic design criteria for key facilities such as dams and nuclear power plants. He was Principal Investigator for the “Stability of Slopes, Embankments and Rockfalls” chapter of the Seismic Retrofit Manual for the Federal Highway Project, prepared for the National Center for Earthquake Engineering Research.

Dr. Makdisi has served on technical review boards and as an independent peer reviewer for a number of agencies, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Districts, and public utilities.

He is currently serving as a member of the Safety Review Consulting Board for Perris Dam, and has served as Board Member for Castaic Dam, and the upper Feather River dams, for the Department of Water Resources, Division of Safety of Dams. He also currently serves as member of the Board of Consultants for Conconully Dam, for the US Bureau of Reclamation. He was a member of the team of Technical Advisors to the Los Angeles District, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers that provided review on the design and construction of the 600-foot-high Seven Oaks Dam in Southern California. He has served as peer reviewer of the seismic analyses of Cougar and Blue River dams for the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Portland District; and peer reviewer of dam safety studies for Terminus, Success, and Lake Isabella dams for the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Sacramento District. He provided independent expert technical review of the White River seismic remediation project in Seattle, Washington, for the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC). Dr. Makdisi is also an independent peer reviewer involved in the Safety of Dams Programs for Pacific Gas and Electric Company and for the East Bay Municipal Utility District (EBMUD).

Dr. Makdisi currently serves as a member of a senior technical review board providing peer review of the design and construction of setback levees and levee upgrades on the Bear River, Feather River, and Yuba River north of Sacramento, California. He has also provided expert technical support to the State of California Attorney General’s Office during litigation related to the levee failure on the Feather River near Marysville, California, during the flood of 1997 and provided expert litigation support for a case related to seepage problems of the Madera Canal downstream of Friant Dam.

He has provided technical oversight and construction quality assurance

EDUCATION Ph.D., Geotechnical

Engineering, University of California, Berkeley, CA, 1976

M.S., Geotechnical Engineering, University of California, Berkeley, CA, 1971

B.Eng., Civil Engineering, American University of Beirut, Lebanon, 1970

REGISTRATION Professional Engineer, CA

No. C29432, 1978 Professional Engineer, Institute

of Civil Engineers, Lebanon, 1970

AFFILIATIONS Academy of Geo-Professionals,

Diplomate, Geotechnical Engineering

American Society of Civil Engineers

Association of California Water Agencies

Association of State Dam Safety Officials

Earthquake Engineering Research Institute

Institute of Civil Engineers (UK) International Society for Soil

Mechanics and Foundation Engineering

Seismological Society of America

U.S. Society of Dams (Member, Committee on Earthquakes)

HONORS Norman Medal Award,

American Society of Civil Engineers, 1977

Design and Environmental Honor Award for 2002, Chief of Engineers, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers

FAIZ I. MAKDISI, PHD, PE, D.GE PAGE 2


for San Luis Obispo County for the Lopez Dam seismic remediation project and provided independent technical review of the seismic stability of Calaveras Dam for the San Francisco Public Utilities Commission.

Dr. Makdisi has published more than 40 papers and major research reports. His paper (co-authored with H. Bolton Seed, Lee, and Idriss) on the analyses of the slides in the San Fernando Dams during the 1971 earthquake was awarded the 1977 Norman Medal award of the American Society of Civil Engineers.

As a member of a team of Technical Advisors to the Los Angeles District, Corps of Engineers, on the design and construction of Seven Oaks Dam in California, Dr. Makdisi was a co-recipient of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Chief of Engineers “Design and Environmental Honor Award for 2002” for the design and construction of Seven Oaks Dam in California.

He has presented lectures at ASCE seminars and workshops in San Francisco, Los Angeles, and Oakland, California, and Seattle, Washington, as well as lectures at the University of California campuses at Berkeley and Davis, Stanford University, University of Washington, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champagne, University of Puerto Rico at Mayaguez, and Jinhua University in Beijing, China. He was invited to present a keynote lecture on the seismic stability of embankments and slopes at the session on slope stability at the Geo-Denver 2000 conference of ASCE’s Geo-Institute. He also presented a lecture on seismic design criteria for dams at the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission’s Dam Safety Workshop, held in Portland, Oregon, in March 2001.

During the past several years, Dr. Makdisi has been involved in studies for more than 50 dams; 25 of these projects were under the jurisdiction of the Division of Safety of Dams or FERC. Representative project experience includes:

Crane Valley Dam, Pacific Gas and Electric Company, Madera County, CA, Principal-in-charge for geotechnical and geologic investigations, and evaluations of seismic stability of a 130-foot hydraulic fill dam, including design of remedial measures.

Lake Isabella Dams, US Army Corps of Engineers, Sacramento District, Kern County, CA, Member of a Joint Venture Team providing support for safety evaluation studies for two dams on Lake Isabella that include field investigations, geologic fault studies, seepage analyses, liquefaction assessments, seismic deformation and stability analyses of the embankments and outlet structures, potential failure modes analyses (PFMA), and evaluation of alternatives for remediation of seismic, hydraulic and seepage deficiencies.

Anderson and Guadalupe Dams, Santa Clara Valley Water District, CA, Principal-in-charge of geologic and geotechnical studies of the potential for fault rupture, ground motions estimates, and seismic stability of two embankment dams, including evaluation of the conceptual design of remedial measures.

Seven Oaks Dam, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Los Angeles District San Bernardino, CA, Principal-in-charge for evaluation of seismic stability of a 600-foot-high earth and rockfill embankment.

San Pablo Dam, East Bay Municipal Utility District, San Pablo, CA, Principal-in-charge responsible for estimates of earthquake ground motions, field investigations and laboratory testing, evaluation of seismic stability, and conceptual design of alternative remedial measures.

Lake Almanor and Butt Valley Dams, Pacific Gas and Electric Company, Plumas County, CA, Project manager responsible for evaluation of seismic stability, design of remedial measures, and support services during construction.

Thompson Creek and Eaton Wash Dams, Los Angeles County Department of Public Works, Los Angeles, CA. Principal-in-charge for evaluation of seismic stability, design of remedial measures, and support services during construction.

Painted Rock Dam, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Los Angeles District, AZ. Project manager responsible for the evaluation of the potential for seepage and finite-element analysis of the potential for hydraulic fracturing.

Hansen, Whittier Narrows, and Prado Dams, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Los Angeles District, Los Angeles, CA. Project manager responsible for performing deterministic and probabilistic estimates of earthquake ground motions and evaluation of seismic stability.

Leland and Piedmont Reservoir Embankments, East Bay Municipal Utility District, Lafayette, CA, Principal-in-charge; performed estimates of earthquake design ground motions and evaluation of seismic stability.



Rollins and Dutch Flat Afterbay Dams, Nevada Irrigation District, Yuba-Bear River, CA, Project manager responsible for evaluation of the potential for liquefaction and earthquake-induced deformation.

Lopez Dam, San Luis Obispo County Department of Public Works, Arroyo Grande, CA, Principal-in-charge of technical review and oversight for evaluation of the potential for foundation liquefaction and design of remedial measures, including stone column densification.

Halsey Forebay, Blue Lake, Pit No. 4, and Mc Cloud Dams, Pacific Gas and Electric Company, Auburn, CA, Project manager responsible for evaluation of seismic stability and review of alternatives for remedial measures.

New Exchequer Dam, HDR Engineering, Inc., Merced River, CA, Project manager responsible for assessment of seismicity, design ground motions, and evaluation of seismic stability and earthquake-induced deformations for the Merced Irrigation District.

Don Pedro Dam, HDR Engineering, Inc., Tuolumne River, CA, Project manager; performed estimates of earthquake ground motions and review of seismic stability for the Turlock Irrigation District.

Wishon and Lake Fordyce Dams, Pacific Gas and Electric Company, King River, CA, Project manager responsible for the evaluation of seepage concerns, stability of spillway gravity wall, and evaluations of seismic stability and deformation of embankment slopes.

Blue Ridge Dam, Tennessee Valley Authority, Blue Ridge, GA, Principal-in-charge responsible for evaluation of earthquake ground motions, assessment of liquefaction potential and seismic stability, and evaluation and conceptual design of alternative remedial measures.

Calaveras Dam, City and County of San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, Principal-in-charge; performed an evaluation of potential for liquefaction and earthquake-induced deformations.

Success Dam, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Sacramento County, CA. Principal-in-charge; performed seismic deformation analyses to support design of remediation.

FERC Part 12 Independent Consultant for: Lyons, Relief, and Main Strawberry dams; Drum forebay, Drum afterbay, Halsey forebay, Halsey afterbay, Rock Creek, and Wise forebay dams; Wishon, Courtright, and Philbrook dams; New Exchequer Dam; New Bullards Bar, Log Cabin, and Our Hour House dams; North Battle Creek, Macumber, and Manzanita dams; Santa Felicia Dam; Lost Creek, Sly Creek, and Little Grass Valley dams; Ralston Afterbay dam; and Lake Almanor, Butt Valley, Belden forebay, Grizzly forebay, Bucks Storage and Bucks Diversion Dams.

FERC Potential Failure Modes Analysis Facilitator for: Scott Dam; Lake Almanor, Butt Valley, and Belden Forebay dams; Don Pedro dam, Pit 1 dam, Pit 3, Pit 4, Pit 5 Open Conduit, Pit 6, and Pit 7 dams; Lake Tabeaud, Lower Bear, Upper Bear, Upper Blue Lake, and Tiger Creek Dams; Drum forebay and afterbay, Halsey forebay, Halsey afterbay, Rock Creek, and Wise forebay dams; and San Antonio dam.

PUBLICATIONS

“Seismic Deformation Analysis for Risk Assessment of Embankment Dams.” V. G. Perlea, D. C. Serafini, S. Salah-Mars, and F.I. Makdisi, Paper accepted for publication at the ASCE Geo-Frontiers 2011 conference to be held in Dallas, Texas, March 2011.

“Potential Seepage within an Earth Embankment through Defects in a HDPE Liner – Innovative Use of Three Dimensional Modeling.” T. Keuscher, Jeff Weaver, and F.I. Makdisi, Poster Presentation at the Dam Safety Conference of the Association of State Dam Safety Officials, Seattle, WA, September 19-23, 2010.

“Seismic Evaluation of the Lake Isabella Intake Towers.” S. Salah-Mars, Y. Ghanaat, F. I. Makdisi, K. Ferguson, M. Monaghan, Z. L-Wang, S. Anderson, C. Wong, and M. Ma. Dam Safety 2009, Association of State Dam Safety Officials, Hollywood, Florida, September 27-October 1, 2009.

“Evaluation of Stability of a Reservoir Embankment in a High Seismic Environment.” F.I. Makdisi, Z.L. Wang, and A. Yiadom. The 14

th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Beijing, China, October 12-17, 2008.

“Design Ground Motions Library (DGML) – Tools for selecting time history records for specific engineering applications.” R. R. Youngs, M. S. Power, G. Wang, F.I. Makdisi, and C. Chin. Proceedings of the SMIP 07 Seminar on Utilization of Strong-Motion Data, California Geological Survey, Strong Motion Instrumentation Program, September 13, 2007.



“Seismic Retrofitting Manual for Highway Structures: Part 2 – Retaining Structures, Slopes, Tunnels, Culverts and Roadways.” M. S. Power, K. Fishman, F. I. Makdisi, S. Musser, and T. L. Youd. Technical Report MCEER-06-SP11, Prepared for the Federal Highway Administration, December 1, 2006.

“Seismic Stability of San Pablo Dam.” M.J. Ryan, F.I. Makdisi, Z.L. Wang, and A. Yiadom. 100th Anniversary Earthquake Conference Commemorating the 1906 San Francisco Earthquake, San Francisco, CA. April 2006.

“Practical Applications of a Nonlinear Approach to Analysis of Earthquake-Induced Liquefaction and Deformation of Earth Structures.” Z.L. Wang, F.I. Makdisi, and J. Egan. Journal of Soil Dynamics & Earthquake Engineering, Volume 26, Issue 2-4, p231-252, 2006.

“Site Response Using Effective Stress Analysis,” Faiz I. Makdisi, Z.L. Wang, C.Y. Chang, and J. Egan. Presentation at the Transportation Research Board Annual Meeting, Washington, D.C., January 24, 2006.

“Practical Applications of a Nonlinear Approach to Analysis of Earthquake-induced Liquefaction and Deformation of Earth Structures.” Zhi-Liang Wang, Faiz I. Makdisi, and John Egan. Proceedings of the 11

th

International Conference on Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering and the Third International Conference on Earthquake Geotechnical Engineering, Berkeley, California, January 2004.

“Reanalysis and Seismic Strengthening of Thompson Creek Dam, CA.” Tim Keuscher, Faiz I. Makdisi, and Zhi-Liang Wang. 2003 Dam Safety Conference, Association of State Dam Safety Officials, Minneapolis, Minnesota, September 2003.

“State Pressure Index for Modeling Sand Behavior.” Z.L. Wang, Y.F. Dafalias, X.S. Li, and F.I. Makdisi. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, American Society of Civil Engineers, v. 128, no. 6, p. 511-519. June 2002.

“Development and Applications of a Nonlinear Approach to the Analysis of Earthquake Performance of Dams.” Z.L. Wang, F.I. Makdisi, and J.A. Egan. 3rd U.S.-Japan Workshop on Advanced Research on Earthquake Engineering for Dams, San Diego, California, June 22 and 23, 2002.

“Seismic Design criteria for Dams.” Lecture presented at the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission’s (FERC) Dam Safety Workshop, held in Portland, Oregon, in March 2001.

“Simulation of Earthquake Performance of a Waterfront Slope Using Fully Coupled Effective Stress Approach.” Z.-L. Wang, J. Egan, L. Scheibel, and F. I. Makdisi. Proceedings of conference on FLAC and Numerical Modeling in Geomechanics, Lyon, France, Billaux et al. (eds.), October 2001.

“Seismic Stability of Embankments and Slopes.” Keynote presentation at the session on slope stability at the Geo-Denver 2000 conference of ASCE’s Geo-Institute.

“Style of Faulting and Footwall/Hanging Wall Effects on Strong Ground Motions.” S.-J. Chiou, F.I. Makdisi, and R.R. Youngs. Report to USGS/NEHRP (National Earthquake Hazard Reduction Program), Award Number 1434-95-G-2614, December 2000.

“Seismic Stability of New Exchequer Dam and Gated Spillway Structure.” F.I. Makdisi, Z.–L Wang, and W. D. Edwards. Twentieth Annual USCOLD Lecture Series, Seattle, Washington, July 10-14, 2000.

“Implementing a Bounding Surface Hypoplasticity Model for Sand into the FLAC Program.” Z.-L. Wang and F.I. Makdisi. Proceedings of the FLAC Symposium on Numerical Modeling in Geomechanics, Minneapolis, Minnesota, September 1-3, 1999.

“Style of Faulting Effects on Peak Ground Acceleration.” S.-J. Chiou, F.I. Makdisi, and R.R. Youngs. Proceedings of Strong Motion Symposium in Taiwan, 1999.

“Liquefaction Assessment Using a Bounding Surface Hypoplasticity Model for Sand.” Z.-L. Wang and F.I. Makdisi. Proceedings of the Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering and Soil Dynamics Conference, Seattle, Washington, August 1998.

“Seismic Stability of Lake Almanor and Butt Valley Dams.” F.I. Makdisi, Z.-L. Wang, M.L. Traubenik, and C.S. Ahlgren. Waterpower ’97: Proceedings of the International Conference on Hydropower, v. 2, Atlanta, Georgia, August 5-8, 1997.

“Decision Analysis, Lake Almanor and Butt Valley Dams.” P.K. Regan, N.A. Abrahamson, and F.I. Makdisi. Waterpower ’97: Proceedings of the International Conference on Hydropower, v. 2, Atlanta, Georgia, August 5-8, 1997.



“Attenuation Relationships for Shallow Crustal Earthquakes Based on California Strong Motion Data.” K. Sadigh, C.-Y. Chang, J.A. Egan, F. Makdisi, and R.R. Youngs. Seismological Research Letters: Eastern Section of the Seismological Society of America, v. 68, no. 1, January/February 1997.

“Seismic Hazard and Ground Motions Estimates for a Building Site in Kobe, Japan.” F.I. Makdisi, M.S. Power, J. R. Wesling, K.L. Hansen, Z.-L. Wang, D. Rosidi, and S.J. Chiou. Proceedings, Eleventh World Conference on Earthquake Engineering (11WCEE), Acapulco, Mexico, June 1996.

“Evaluation of Seismic Stability of Seven Oaks Dam.” F.I. Makdisi, A.T. Roodsari, M. Madianos, and Z.L. Wang. Proceedings of the Association of State Dam Safety Officials Annual Conference, Atlanta, Georgia, September 15-20, 1995.

“The Case for Magnitude Dependent Dispersion in Peak Ground Acceleration.” R.R. Youngs, F.I. Makdisi, N.A. Abrahamson, and K. Sadigh. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, v. 85, no. 4, p. 1161-1176, August 1995.

“Near-field Vertical Ground Motions from the 17 January 1994 Northridge Earthquakes: Were They Unusual?” J.A. Egan, F.I. Makdisi, and D. Rosidi. Seismological Research Letters, v. 65, no. 1, 1994.

“Analysis of the Recorded Response of Lexington Dam During Various Levels of Ground Shaking.” F.I. Makdisi, C.Y. Chang, Z.L. Wang, and C.M. Mok. Proceedings of the Seminar on Seismological and Engineering Applications of Recent Strong-Motion Data, Strong Motion Instrumentation Program, California Division of Mines and Geology, Sacramento, California, May 1991.

“Development of Site-Specific Response Spectra for a Large Nearby Earthquake for Seismic Evaluation of a Nuclear Power Plant.” F.I. Makdisi, K. Sadigh, and Y.B. Tsai. Seismological Research Letters, v. 60, no. 1, Eastern Section, Seismological Society of America, 1989.

“Attenuation Relationships for Horizontal Peak Ground Acceleration and Response Spectral Acceleration For Rock Sites.” K. Sadigh, C.-Y. Chang, F.I. Makdisi, and J. Egan. Seismological Research Letters, v. 60, no. 1, Eastern Section, Seismological Society of America, January - March 1989.

“Seismic Hazard of Western Saudi Arabia and Seismic Design and Retrofitting Considerations for Highway Bridges.” I.M. Idriss, F.I. Makdisi, and H. Sultan. Proceedings of Second Symposium on Geotechnical Problems, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, November 1988.

“Seismic Response of Earth Dams in Triangular Canyons.” F.I. Makdisi, T. Kagawa, and H.B. Seed. Journal of the Geotechnical Division, ASCE, v. 108, no. GT10, October 1982.

“Performance of Earth Dams During Earthquakes.” H.B. Seed and F.I. Makdisi. Journal of Water Power and Dam Construction, v. 32, no. 8, August 1980.

“Simplified Procedure for Evaluating Embankment Response.” F.I. Makdisi and H.B. Seed. Journal of the Geotechnical Division, ASCE, v. 105, no. GT12, December 1979.

“Geologic Seismologic and Geotechnical Considerations Related to Performance of Dams During Earthquakes.” I.M. Idriss, L.S. Cluff, D. Tocher, F.I. Makdisi, and P.L. Knuepfer. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International Congress on Large Dams, New Delhi, 1979.

“Undrained Static and Cyclic Stress-Strain Behavior of Sand.” I.M. Idriss, Y. Moriwaki, F.I. Makdisi, and S. Rahman. Report prepared for Shell Development Company, Woodward-Clyde Consultants, San Francisco, California, March 1979.

“A Simplified Procedure for Estimating Earthquake-Induced Deformations in Dams and Embankments.” F.I. Makdisi and H.B. Seed. Journal of the Geotechnical Division, ASCE, v. 104, no. GT7, July 1978.

“The Performance of Earth Dams During Earthquakes.” H.B. Seed, F.I. Makdisi, and P. De Alba. Journal of the Geotechnical Division, ASCE, v. 104, no. GT7, July 1978.

“Analysis of Chabot Dam During the 1906 Earthquake.” F.I. Makdisi, H.B. Seed, and I.M. Idriss. Proceedings of the ASCE Geotechnical Division Specialty Conference, Pasadena, California, June 1978.

“Pore Pressure Response of Saturated Soil Masses Subjected to Earthquake or Ocean Wave Loading.” K. Sadigh, F.I. Makdisi, and S. Rahman. Report on research sponsored by Woodward-Clyde Consultants Professional Development Program, San Francisco, California, January 1978.



“Seismic Stability Evaluation of Embankment Dams with Chutes.” I.M. Idriss, F.I. Makdisi, and B.B. Gordon. Proceedings of the Winter Meeting of the American Society of Agricultural Engineers, Chicago, Illinois, December 1976.

“Performance and Analysis of Earth Dams During Strong Earthquakes.” F.I. Makdisi. Thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements of the degree of Doctor of Philosophy, University of California, Berkeley, November 1976.

“Earthquake Induced Deformations of Earth Dams.” N. Serff, H.B. Seed, F.I. Makdisi, and C.-Y. Chang. Report No. EERC 76-4, College of Engineering, University of California, Berkeley, September 1976.

“Representation of Irregular Stress Time Histories by Equivalent Uniform Stress Series in Liquefaction Analyses.” H.B. Seed, I.M. Idriss, F.I. Makdisi, and N. Banerjee. Report No. EERC 75-29, College of Engineering, University of California, Berkeley, October 1975.

“Dynamic Analysis of the Lower San Fernando Dam During the Earthquake of February 9, 1971.” H.B. Seed, I.M. Idriss, K.L. Lee, and F.I. Makdisi. Journal of the Geotechnical Division, ASCE, v. 101, no. GT9, September 1975.

“Properties of Soils in the San Fernando Hydraulic Fill Dams.” K.L. Lee, H.B. Seed, I.M. Idriss, and F.I. Makdisi. Journal of the Geotechnical Division, ASCE, v. 101, no. GT8, August 1975.

“Slides in the San Fernando Dams During the Earthquake of February 9, 1971.” H.B. Seed, K.L. Lee, I.M. Idriss, and F.I. Makdisi. Journal of the Geotechnical Division, ASCE, v. 101, no. GT7, July 1975.

“Analysis of the Slides in the San Fernando Dams During the Earthquake of February 9, 1971.” H.B. Seed, K.L. Lee, I.M. Idriss, and F.I. Makdisi. Report EERC 73-2, College of Engineering, University of California, Berkeley, July 1973.

“Mobility in Richmond - Recommendations for the Decade Ahead.” F.I. Makdisi. Report on a study organized and conducted by a Multidisciplinary Graduate Student Team at the University of California, Berkeley, in the academic year 1970-1971.

W a y n e D . E d w a r d s , P . E .

EXPERIENCE

Mr. Edwards is an engineering consultant with more than 30 years of experience in

the planning, design, construction, and project management of water supply and

hydroelectric engineering projects. Mr. Edwards has worked on projects involving

over 150 dams, including seismic stability analyses, spillway adequacy studies,

design and installation of monitoring systems, geotechnical investigations, design and

construction of stability improvements, and project management. Mr. Edwards also

has extensive experience in other hydro facilities ranging from the design and

construction of penstocks, tunnels, canals, and flumes to feasibility studies, licensing,

and design of new powerhouses. Selected projects:

Dam Safety and Design

Dam Safety Program, Pacific Gas & Electric, CA. Project manager with overall

responsibility for 103 dams under California Division of Safety of Dams (DSOD)

and Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) jurisdiction.

FERC Dam Safety Reviews. Independent consultant for over 50 FERC Part 12 dam

safety reviews. Facilitator for FERC Potential Failure Modes Analysis (PFMA)

workshops for 33 dams.

FERC Dam Safety Surveillance and Monitoring Plans. Prepared Surveillance and

Monitoring Plans (SMP) and Surveillance and Monitoring Reports (SMR) for 17

Southern California Edison (SCE) dams.

New Exchequer Dam Seismic Stability Analysis, Merced Irrigation District, CA. Project manager for seismic stability analysis of 492-foot-high concreted faced

rockfill dam.

Don Pedro Dam Seismic Stability Analysis, Turlock Irrigation District, CA. Project

manager for seismic stability analysis of 585-foot-high zoned earthfill dam.

New Bullard Bar Dam Seismicity Study, Yuba County Water Agency, CA. Project

manager for review of potential seismic sources and ground motions for 645-foot-

high concrete arch dam.

Pardee Reservoir Enlargement Project, East Bay Municipal Utility District. CA. Contract manager for preliminary engineering and geotechnical studies to determine

the best alternative to increase storage at Pardee Reservoir by approximately 170,000

acre-feet. Project components include replacing the main dam, relocating the

powerhouse, replacing or rebuilding the outlet tower, rebuilding Jackson Creek Dam,

replacing bridges, roads, and recreation facilities, and improving Pardee tunnel and

aqueduct facilities.

Spillway Gate Evaluations. Project manager for the inspection and structural

analysis of over 300 spillway gates at 40 dams nationwide. Managed design of

improvements to gates at Gibraltar, DeCordova Bend, and Tobesofkee Dams.

McCloud Dam, Shasta County, CA. Directed studies to identify alternatives to

modify 235-foot-high earth and rockfill dam to pass the PMF. Subsequently an

inflow design flood study determined that the spillway design flood was one-half

PMF. Reviewed feasibility of all options including enlarging existing spillway, a new

tunnel spillway, raising the dam crest and a fuse plug spillway on the dam crest. The

selected alternative was to raise the dam crest and modify the spillway chute. The

cost was $6 million as compared to $40 million to pass the full PMF.

Old Aswan Dam, Aswan, Egypt. As consultant to USAID and the Egyptian Ministry

of Irrigation, prepared the request for technical proposal on the seismic stability

evaluation of the Old Aswan Dam. Also made recommendation on the selection of

consulting firm to perform field investigations and stability analysis.

Pit 1 Dam, Shasta County, CA. Directed studies to address the seismic stability and

spillway adequacy of a 40-foot-high earth and rockfill embankment. Dynamic

EDUCATION

B.S., Civil Engineering,

University of Washington

REGISTRATION

Professional Engineer,

California 22581, Nebraska

9524

PROFESSIONAL

ENDEAVORS

W.D. Edwards Consulting,

LLC, 2003 - present

HDR Engineering, Inc., 1993 -

2003

Pacific Gas & Electric

Company - 1969-1993

PROFESSIONAL

ACTIVIT IES

American Society of Civil

Engineers (ASCE)

ASCE Task Committee on

Guidelines for Evaluation of

Spillway Gates, 1998-present

United States Society on Dams

(USSD formerly USCOLD),

1982-present

USSD Board of Directors,

2004 - 2010

USCOLD Technical Activities

Committee, 1984-1995; Vice

Chairman, 1988-1991;

Chairman, 1991-1995

USCOLD Committee on

Monitoring Dams and Their

Foundations. 1995-2000

USSD Committee on Dam

Decommissioning, 1998-2008;

Chairman, 2000-2003

ICOLD Committee on Dam

Decommissioning; Chairman,

2005-present

Program Subcommittee for

1988 ICOLD Congress

EPRI Dam Safety Advisory

Group, 1989-1991

Association of State Dam

Safety Officials (ASDSO),

1993-present

Co-chair of two FERC/USSD

Dam Safety Surveillance and

Monitoring Workshops, 2006.

2007


analysis showed that dam could withstand the shaking from the controlling fault.

Dambreak studies clearly showed that the small town immediately downstream would

be inundated if the dam failed and that the dam needed to safely pass the PMF. A

study of alternatives showed that raising the dam crest and modifying the spillway

gates was the most economic solution.

Pit 3 Dam, Shasta County, CA. Directed studies to address stability of 130-foot-high

concrete gravity dam under PMF loading. An Inflow Design Flood (IDF) analysis

confirmed that a small town would have significant incremental effects due to

hypothetical dam failure up to PMF. Conventional two-dimensional rigid base

analysis indicated that dam could safely pass only a fraction of the PMF. Performed

2-D and 3-D finite element analyses which showed that dam would withstand PMF

loading. The abutments were armored with concrete slabs to prevent erosion during

possible overtopping.

Lake Valley Dam, Placer County, CA. Project engineer responsible for field and

laboratory investigations, seismic stability analyses and design of stability

improvements to 28-foot and 75-foot-high earthfill embankments. Field

investigations included drilling and piezometer installation and geophysical survey.

Because of cobbles and boulders in the fill it was necessary to excavate a shaft in the

main dam to obtain samples and perform in place density test. Stability improvements

consisted of widening the crest, flattening the downstream slope, adding a toe drain

and buttressing the upstream slope with a rockfill berm.

Scott Dam, Lake County, CA. Project engineer responsible for final design,

procurement and construction support for modifications of spillway gates and hoists

on 134-foot-high concrete gravity dam to pass the PMF. Also included spill chute

improvements and abutment protection. Directed extensive geotechnical

investigations which included drilling, sampling and laboratory testing of the soft

foundation rock. Reduced uplift by installing more drains in the gallery and inclined

drains from the toe. Installed piezometers to monitor effect of new drains and

cleaning of existing drains. Seismic stability was a concern because of an active fault

2-km from the dam site. Performed field vibration testing in order to verify the

computer model of the dam and soft foundation.

Pit 4 Dam, Shasta County, CA. Directed studies to review structural adequacy and

overall stability of 58-foot-high slab and buttress dam due to flood overtopping. Even

though the slab could withstand the loading, investigations confirmed that the

foundation was highly erodible.

Bucks Diversion Dam, Plumas County, CA. Directed foundation investigation and

analysis of 99-foot-high concrete arch dam. Main concern was the stability of the

gravity abutment blocks.

Chill Bar Dam, El Dorado County, CA. Directed studies to evaluate the stability of

120-foot-high concrete gravity dam under flood loading. The studies included

foundation drilling and sampling, piezometer installation and 2-D finite element

analysis. Also routed floods with and without dam failure to determine incremental

effects and select the appropriate design flood. The spillway design flood has been

determined and studies are still underway on the stability of the dam under flood

loading.

Pit 6 Dam, Shasta County, CA. Responsible for design and construction support for

spillway improvements to 183-foot-high concrete gravity dam. Improved the stability

of the dissipater blocks of the St. Anthony's Falls type spillway. Also raised walls to

contain the hydraulic jump and protect the powerhouse. Directed a foundation

investigation to obtain data at the dam-foundation interface, clean drains, and install

piezometers. Work was co-funded by EPRI, as part of dam safety research program.

Lake Fordyce Dam, Nevada County, CA. Responsible for planning, permitting,

procurement, design, and construction support of dam and spillway modification to


permit 3 additional feet of storage. Modifications included a new flashboard support

structure and adding a parapet to the crest of 145-foot-high concrete faced rockfill

dam. Also repaired the concrete face slab by placing a reinforced gunite overlay.

Relief Dam, Tuolumne County, CA. Directed studies to assess effects of large floods

overtopping a 141-foot-high concrete faced rockfill dam. Dambreak routings showed

that there would be significant incremental effects to downstream areas up to the

PMF. A flow through analysis indicated that the rockfill on the downstream slope and

toe would not withstand the overtopping. The spillway was modified to pass the

PMF.

Mokelumne Project, Alpine, Amador, and Calaveras Counties, CA. Prepared

testimony on dam safety for 13 dams for relicensing hearings. Reviewed proposed

project improvements for any impacts on dam safety.

Rock Creek and Cresta Project, Plumas County, CA. Prepared testimony on dam

safety for 2 concrete gravity dams for relicensing hearings. Performed initial studies

of alternatives to remove sediments from the reservoirs and modify operations to

permit sediment bypass at the dams.

Dam Decommissioning

Van Norden Dam, Placer County, CA. Responsible for permitting, design, and

construction support of the breaching of 32-foot-high earthfill dam. Geotechnical

investigation and stability analysis showed that dam was deficient under seismic

loading including liquefaction of the embankment and foundation. Studies of

alternatives showed that breaching the dam was the most economic solution. A

trapezoidal section was excavated through the dam and lined with reinforced

concrete.

Sunol and Niles Dams, City of San Francisco, CA. Project principal for conceptual

engineering study to remove two small concrete dams on Alameda Creek. Scope of

work included researching dam removal case studies, site investigations, developing

sediment management strategies, identifying diversion and dewatering options, and

developing a demolition plan for each dam.

Elwha and Glines Canyon Dams, Elwha River, WA. Selected by the Bureau of

Reclamation to participate in a VE study for the removal of two dams on the Elwha

River. Elwha Dam, built in 1910-13, is a 105-feet high concrete gravity dam. Glines

Canyon Dam, constructed in 1927, is a 210-feet high concrete arch dam. Dam

removal is expected to improve the populations of the native anadromous fish runs.

There is an estimated 4 million cubic yards of sediment behind Elwha Dam and

approximately 14 million cubic yards of sediment behind Glines Canyon Dam. The

VE team identified over $4 million in potential savings.

Dam Decommissioning Dialogue, Aspen Institute, Washington, DC. Member of a

diverse group, that met over a two-year period, to write a book on dam

decommissioning. The book, “Dam Removal: A New Option For a New Century”

addresses issues involved in dam removal – when it should be considered as an

alternative and how to do it right if dam removal is the selected alternative. The

group reviewed numerous case studies from across the country and prepared a

section on lessons learned.

Penstocks/Pipelines

Caribou Powerhouses Nos. 1 and 2, Plumas County, CA. Project engineer

responsible for planning, analysis, design, and geotechnical investigation of facilities

damaged by a massive landslide. The ridge supporting penstock No. 1 settled,

opening riveted joints and causing a landslide which damaged the adjacent

powerhouse No. 2 and switchyard. Based on geotechnical investigations, the ridge


was excavated to provide a stable foundation for a new penstock No. 1. Also rebuilt

powerhouse No. 2 by installing a new transformer, controls, control building,

switchyard, and gantry crane. The powerhouses were back on line within 10 months.

Project was recognized by ASCE with the 1987 Outstanding Civil Engineering Achievement Award of Merit.

Penstock Stabilization Caribou 2, Plumas County, CA. Project manager responsible

for analysis, design, and construction of stability improvements to penstock on a

steep slope. Inspection and monitoring revealed that penstock was slowly moving

downhill and that one expansion joint had opened about 8 inches. Analysis of

geotechnical and monitoring data indicated the area of instability. Improved stability

of two anchor blocks with deep rock anchors and installed a sleeve to restore the

expansion joint.

Camino Hydroelectric Project Penstock Stabilization, El Dorado County, CA. Project engineer responsible for identifying and evaluating stability improvements for

a 12-foot diameter high-head penstock on steep slope. Prepared feasibility level

design, drawings, and construction cost estimates for the alternatives and

recommended a phased approach to implement the proposed improvements.

Swinging Bridge Hydroelectric Project Penstock Evaluation, NY. Project engineer

for determining the cause of settlement and buckling in a section of 10-foot diameter

steel penstock liner which passes through an earthfill dam. Participated in an

emergency inspection with FERC, reviewed dam and penstock settlement data,

identified the cause of buckling, and designed the repairs.

El Dorado Penstock Replacement, El Dorado County, CA. Responsible for design,

procurement, and construction support for new steel penstock to replace old

woodstave penstock. The new pipe sections were ring girder supported and designed

and fabricated for installation during a short outage.

Tunnels/Canals

El Dorado Canal Tunnel, El Dorado County, CA. Directed studies, design, and

construction support for a new 4,000-foot tunnel to bypass a section of canal

destroyed by a landslide.

South Canal Tunnel, Placer County, CA. Directed design, procurement and

construction support for emergency repairs to a small tunnel in soft ground. Included

low profile tunnel sets and shotcrete for support and a high density polyethylene liner

to improve hydraulics.

Pit 1 Tunnel, Shasta County, CA. Responsible for design, procurement, and

construction support for repairs to the concrete lining during annual outage.

Yolo County Flood Control and Water Conservation District, CA. Directed team of

FEMA inspectors in documenting damage to canal system from the 1995 floods.

Identified repairs required to get canal back in service before the irrigation season.

Hydroelectric Plants

Gibraltar Project, Santa Barbara, CA. Project manager for surrendering the FERC

license for an 820 kW hydroelectric project. In the first phase, HDR assembled

project documentation and conducted a site visit and interviews with project staff.

Also discussed project with FERC staff in San Francisco and Washington, DC. HDR

developed a powerhouse retirement plan that was then sent to interested parties and

agencies. The Application for Surrender of License was submitted to FERC in May

2000.


Utica and Angels Projects, Alpine, Calaveras, and Tuolumne Counties, CA. Project

manager for evaluation of two existing (4.0 MW and 1.0 MW) hydroelectric projects.

The study included an assessment of the condition of project facilities, estimation of

average energy generation, estimation of the value of the projects, and an economic

analysis.

Fish Passage Improvement Project, Potter Valley Project, Mendocino County, CA. Project manager for Fish Passage Improvement Project which included rebuilding of

an existing fish ladder to new agency criteria. Responsible for agency negotiations,

criteria development, estimating, design and construction. Directed study to replace

fish screen at intake to power tunnel. Worked closely with state and federal fisheries

agencies to identify acceptable alternatives for a new screen that would prevent loss

of downstream migrants.

Rock Creek and Cresta Dams, Plumas County, CA. Prepared layouts and cost

estimates for new fishwater units located at the dam abutments. Reviewed

alternatives to place new units within the gallery of the dams.

Pine Flat Powerhouse, Fresno County, CA. Project engineer for reconnaissance

study to investigate the costs and benefits of installing an additional unit at Pine Flat

Powerhouse. In order to meet future increases in minimum instream releases and

address concerns over water temperature control, a new low level outlet will be

required. This study addressed alternatives for tapping the existing penstocks,

powerhouse locations, and average annual generation based on possible minimum

instream release requirements.

Rock Creek and Cresta Projects, Plumas County, CA. Project manager for

procurement of new trashrakes at the intakes to Rock Creek and Cresta powerhouses.

Services included developing design and operation criteria, identifying potential

suppliers, and preparing the procurement specification.

Grizzly Powerhouse, Plumas County, CA. Directed final design and preparation of

contract documents for a 20-MW powerhouse. Performed technical review and

signoff of powerhouse and intake drawings and the construction specification.

Pit 1 Powerhouse, Shasta County, CA. Prepared feasibility studies, layouts, and cost

estimates for pumping facilities located upstream of the powerhouse. The plan was to

pump water from the Pit River to the forebay on the Fall River to increase

powerhouse output.


TO: Board of Directors FROM: Michael Glaze, General Manager DATE: November 7, 2011 RE: Annexation Processing – NorthStar Engineering / Gallaway Consulting

Agenda Item for 11/22/11 Board of Directors Meeting This item and the next are interrelated. Although there have been no requests for annexation of property to the Agency for the purpose of receiving water service in several years, it is certain that there will be annexations in the future. An annexation is required whenever the owner of a parcel not within the Agency’s boundaries desires to receive water service, regardless of whether the requested service is treated or raw (irrigation) water. Those parcels presently receiving service are either “original” parcels (those that were a part of OWID’s original formation in 1919), annexed parcels (those that have been added into the Agency subsequent to 1919), or those that have a right to raw-water service (only) by virtue of the Railroad Commission’s order in 1922. Annexations are “projects” under CEQA, typically requiring an initial study and negative declaration by the Board prior to approving the annexation. Once approved by the Board, an annexation must then be approved by the Butte Local Agency Formation Commission (LAFCo). Each county has a LAFCo as a result of State legislation passed in the early ‘60s, and they have jurisdiction over the creation of new cities and special districts, and changes in local government boundaries and authorized services. LAFCo’s annexation application requirements are rather extensive. In addition to a comprehensive initial study and negative declaration in compliance with CEQA, LAFCo’s Application for Annexation must be prepared, together with a map and written boundary description in accordance with State Board of Equalization specifications. Once all of the documentation is submitted, finalization of an annexation involves a hearing before the Commission, and most likely consultation with LAFCo staff prior to the hearing. Although annexation applicants have always been required by the Agency to hire a professional surveyor or civil engineer to prepare the required annexation map and boundary description, Agency staff have

heretofore prepared all of the other documents. This is contrary to other development processes where the Agency’s policy has always been that a developer must be responsible for all aspects of their project’s approval, and that no Agency resources are used to subsidize or assist (except to review plans and specifications, to inspect construction of water facilities, and to prepare necessary development agreements). Members of the Agency’s management team that would be likely candidates to be responsible for processing annexations (one particular manager comes to mind considering how much “information” processing is involved) all have sufficiently full plates regarding their respective assignments and responsibilities. Saddling any one of them with annexation processing would be an overburden. Also, annexation requests are always urgent from their applicant’s perspective, and never seem to come at a time when it is convenient to drop other important projects to give necessary attention and time to their processing. Therefore, it is recommended that the Agency retain a consulting firm to process annexation requests, including preparation of the CEQA documents. In 2004 the Agency entered into a consulting services agreement with Gallaway Consulting to handle minor CEQA projects. Recently, Gallaway Consulting was acquired by NorthStar Engineering of Chico. This consolidation provides the necessary resources to handle all aspects of an annexation: CEQA processing and preparation of the annexation boundary map and description (typically done by a professional land surveyor). Attached is a proposal from NorthStar Engineering / Gallaway Consulting to provide CEQA documentation services and LAFCo application processing for parcel annexations. Also attached is a standard consulting services agreement for Board consideration. The recommended action is:

"I move acceptance of the proposal from NorthStar Engineering / Gallaway Consulting for CEQA documentation services and LAFCo application processing for annexation requests received by the Agency, and authorize the General Manager to execute a standard consulting-services agreement with NorthStar Engineering / Gallaway Consulting for said work."

NORTHSTAR ENGINEERING 111 MISSION RANCH BLVD, SUITE 100

CHICO, CA 95926

Task Description

Principal Engineer / Surveyor

Senior Engineer / Surveyor

Assistant Engineer / Surveyor

Environ. Project

Manager Planner Survey Crew GIS SubTotal Total Cost per

TaskHourly Rate $155 $120 $105 $105 $75 $165 $60

Task 1 CEQA AnalysisIS/ND Preparation + Revisions 2 24 6 2,370.00$ Subtotal 2,370.00$

Tas 2 Annexation ApplicationApplication Preparation + Revisions 1 8 705.00$ Subtotal 705.00$

Task 3 Exhibits to Application (per each area)Review Existing Annexation Documentation 2 240.00$ Prepare Legal Descriptions 6 630.00$ Prepare Annexation Area Boundary Map 6 630.00$ Coordination with Client 1 4 635.00$ Coordination with LAFCO Staff 4 420.00$ Attend LAFCO Hearings 2 240.00$ Subtotal 2,795.00$

Reimbursable Expenses (copies, graphics, mailing etc.) 125.00$ 125.00$ Total all Tasks 5,995.00$

South Feather Water and Power AgencyCOST PROPOSAL - Parcel Annexation(s) CEQA Documentation and LAFCo Application

Time & Materials, Not to Exceed

11-4-11 Page 1 of 1


TO: Board of Directors FROM: Michael Glaze, General Manager DATE: November 7, 2011 RE: Rules & Regulations – Annexation Procedures and Fees

Agenda Item for 11/22/11 Board of Directors Meeting This item and the previous one are interrelated. The Agency’s Rules & Regulations Governing Water Service provides direction regarding parcel annexation procedures. It also prescribes fees to be charged to annexation applicants (both a processing fee and a per-acre fee that does not have a designated purpose). As discussed under the previous agenda item, I am proposing that a consultant be retained to provide CEQA documentation services and to prepare the necessary LAFCo application and boundary map and description. If this is approved, amendments to the Rules and Regulations would be necessary, as follows (additions are underlined and deletions are shown by strike through).

ANNEXATION PROCEDURES Property must be annexed to SFWPA prior to receiving domestic or irrigation water service. If the property qualifies for irrigation service by virtue of Railroad Commission Order No. 11334, or will receive irrigation service on a surplus basis, it may receive irrigation water without annexation, but no domestic water service will be supplied to parcels that are not annexed to the Agency. Property outside the sphere-of-influence boundary established for the Agency by the Local Agency Formation Commission (LAFCo), and/or outside the place-of-use boundary designated by the State Water Resources Control Board, may not be annexed to SFWPA unless those boundaries are modified to include the property proposing annexation. Determination of a parcel’s suitability for development and/or connection to SFWPA’s domestic or irrigation distribution system is the responsibility of the

parcel’s owner. Information regarding annexation procedures, sphere-of-influence and place-of-use boundaries, the location of existing distribution facilities, and available excess treatment and distribution system capacity will be provided by Agency staff upon request.

Annexation Application Initiating Application. A property owner may initiate the annexation application process by filing an Application for Water Service. Agency staff will use the information provided on the form to determine the specific requirements for providing domestic or irrigation water service to the subject parcel, including the costs associated with the annexation process (SFWPA, County Clerk, LAFCo, and State Board of Equalization fees). Payment of Fees. The applicant will be informed of the requirements for receiving service, including the costs associated with the annexation process. Thereafter, if the applicant wants to proceed with annexing their property, they must deposit funds equal in amount to the total of the Agency’s processing fee and the fees to be charged by the County Clerk, LAFCo, and the State Board of Equalization (SBE). These fees will be paid based on the annexation of the entire parcel to the Agency. (Payment of SFWPA’s annexation fee is not required until just prior to the initial activation of water service.) Information, Map & Legal Description. In addition to the deposit, the property owner will need to complete the Annexation Information Form that staff will supply, providing information about their property required by LAFCo. It will also be the property owner’s responsibility to provide an annexation map and legal description, prepared by a professional land surveyor in conformance with the specifications of LAFCo and SBE. Approval by Board of Directors. Once the deposit, and information form, map, and legal description have been received, staff will submit the annexation application information to a consultant that has been retained by the Agency to provide CEQA documentation services and to prepare LAFCo applications and boundary plats and descriptions. Said consultant will conduct an initial study in conformance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), prepare the annexation application documents required by LAFCo, as well as the necessary boundary plat and description in conformance with State Board of Equalization specifications. and set cConsideration of approval of the annexation shall be included on the agenda of a regular meeting of SFWPA’s Board of Directors as soon after the consultant has prepared the necessary documents as possible. LAFCo Approval. After approval by the Board of Directors, the annexation application will be submitted for LAFCo’s consideration. The Local Agency Formation Commission (LAFCo) has been established by the State Legislature to, among other duties, review and approve or disapprove proposals for annexation of

territory to special districts. Approval by LAFCo of any annexation proposal is required before the Agency can provide water service.

Agency Annexation Processing Fees Processing Fee. In addition to fees levied by the County Clerk, LAFCo, SBEState Board of Equalization, and any other applicable non-Agency fees public agency having jurisdiction over the annexation approval process, SFWPA’s shall require payment by the applicant of a Processing Fee prior to engaging its annexation-processing consultant. The Annexation Processing Fee shall be that amount estimated by the consultant to be its total cost to process a standard parcel annexation. paid prior to preparation by staff of the annexation application documents required by LAFCo and CEQA. The Processing Fee is intended to cover administrative the annexation-processing consultant’s costs incurred by SFWPA in preparing and processingto prepare the annexation application documents. The amount of the Processing Fee is based on annexation of the entire parcel and is specified herein under “ Water Rates – Fees and Charges.” When the annexation process is complete and the annexation-processing consultant’s final invoice has been received by the Agency, the applicant will be reimbursed the difference between the invoice amount and the Annexation Processing Fee they originally deposited, if said fee is greater. If the consultant’s invoice is greater than the deposited fee, the applicant will be sent a request for payment of the difference. Water service shall not be provided to applicant’s property until payment of any additional cost to process the annexation has been made by the applicant. Annexation Fee. The property owner has the option of paying the Agency Annexation Fee on a per-acre basis, or on a size-of-service basis. If the per-acre rate is paid, the entire parcel will be annexed to the Agency, and the land will be entitled to receive a prorated share of the Agency’s available water supply, subject only to the limitations in system capacity. If the property owner elects to pay the Annexation Fee on the size-of-service basis, the entire parcel will still be annexed, but the annexation will specify a limit in the parcel’s right to receive water service. A maximum service size, based on maximum meter service size or irrigation flow rate will be specified. If a larger service size is needed for the parcel in the future, an additional Agency Annexation Fee will have to be paid to the Agency prior to receipt of the larger service. The fee will be equal to the difference between the size-of-service rate paid initially, and the rate for the larger size requested, or the per-acre rate, whichever is less. Since the entire parcel was annexed initially, no further LAFCo proceedings would necessarily be required, unless ordered by LAFCo. If property that was annexed on the size-of-service basis is subsequently proposed for subdivision, an additional Agency Annexation Fee will have to be paid to the Agency prior to recordation of the parcel map or subdivision map. The fee will be

equal to the difference between the size-of-service rate paid initially, and the per-acre rate calculated on the basis of the total area of the property to be subdivided. The amount of the per-acre based and size-of-service based Annexation Fees are specified herein under “ Water Rates – Fees and Charges.”

The following annexation fees (all of them increase annually in accordance with the Engineering News Record’s National Construction Cost Index) are prescribed in the Rules and Regulations:

Annexation Fees Processing (if fully developed) ......................................................................... $ 128 Processing (if not fully developed) ................................................................... $ 257 Annexation Fee Per-Acre Basis.......................................................................... $ 401/lot or acre Size-of-Service Basis ⅝” meter ............................................................................................ $ 803 1” meter ........................................................................................... $2,007 Flat Rate (irrigation system only) .................................................... $1,075

Miners’ Inch (irrigation system only) $1,606/miners inch

I am recommending the elimination of all of these fees. The processing fees will no longer be needed if a consultant is retained to perform all annexation processing and preparation of all necessary documents. The annexation fee should be eliminated because there is no specific Agency expense that it offsets. The recommended action is:

"I move approval of the amendments to the Annexation Procedures section of the Rules and Regulations as proposed by the General Manager, and of the elimination of all annexation fees prescribed in Part D of the Rules and Regulations."


TO: Board of Directors FROM: Michael Glaze, General Manager DATE: November 8, 2011 RE: Conveyance Agreement – Hillview Ridge Apartments Phase II

Agenda Item for 11/22/11 Board of Directors Meeting Attached is a standard Conveyance Agreement that has been submitted for execution by Oroville Pacific Associates II, LP (Eagle, Idaho), developer of the Hillview Ridge Apartments Phase II project that is under construction behind the Agency’s Oroville headquarters. Part A, Section 4.A of the Agency’s Rules & Regulations specifies the following:

After completion of plans and specifications…and prior to commencement of construction, the developer shall enter into a Conveyance Agreement with the Agency, approved by the Board of Directors, describing the conditions upon which the Agency will accept the developer’s completed water system improvements.

Water Division Manager Matt Colwell has approved the construction drawings for the project, and the attached Conveyance Agreement describes the conditions upon which the Agency will accept the project’s water system into its maintained system. The developer has satisfied all conditions necessary for the Board’s consideration of the Conveyance Agreement, including payment of plan-check and inspection fees, system capacity charges, and meter/backflow installation charges. Approval of the Conveyance Agreement is recommended as follows:

“I move approval of the Conveyance Agreement with Oroville Pacific Associates II, LP, specifying the terms and conditions, together with those contained in the Agency’s Rules and Regulations Governing Water Service, whereby the Agency is willing to accept, upon completion of the water distribution facilities for the Hillview Ridge Apartments Phase II project, if it is constructed in accordance with the approved plans and specifications thereof, and in a manner meeting the Agency’s approval.”

Hillview Ridge Apartments Phase II 1 Conveyance Agreement

CONVEYANCE AGREEMENT

THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into this 22nd day of November, 2011, by and between SOUTH FEATHER WATER AND POWER AGENCY, hereinafter referred to as “Agency,” and OROVILLE PACIFIC ASSOCIATES II, LP, hereinafter referred to as “Developer.”

RECITALS

WHEREAS, Developer has prepared or caused to be prepared, at Developer’s sole cost, expense,

and responsibility, plans and specifications entitled Hillview Ridge Apartments Phase II (filed in Agency’s office as “Hillview Ridge Apartments Phase II”), as prepared by Rolls Anderson & Rolls for construction of water-system improvements consisting generally of 1,625 lineal feet of 8-inch, C900 class 200 water mainline pipe, and all appurtenances thereto, to provide treated water to that parcel designated by the Butte County Assessor as APN 013-290-049 , a copy of which is attached hereto marked Exhibit “A” and made a part of this Agreement; and,

WHEREAS, the plans and specifications contained in Exhibit “A” meet with the Agency’s engineer’s

acceptance; and, WHEREAS, the facilities and lands to be served treated water by said water-system improvements lie

within the boundaries of the Agency and are identified in Exhibit “A”; and, WHEREAS, Developer desires Agency to accept said water-system improvements into Agency’s

overall water system upon completion; and, WHEREAS, Agency, subject to the following terms and conditions, as well as those contained in the

Agency’s Rules and Regulations Governing Water Service (hereinafter referred to as “Rules and Regulations”), is willing to accept said water-system improvements upon completion, provided the water-system improvements are constructed in accordance with the plans and specifications and in a manner meeting Agency’s approval.

NOW, THEREFORE, the parties mutually agree as follows. ARTICLE 1 – RECITALS. The recitals contained herein are an integral part of this Agreement. ARTICLE 2 – PLANS. Attached hereto, marked Exhibit “A” and made a part of this Agreement is one

set of plans reduced to 11” x 17”, prepared by the Developer’s licensed civil engineer, and consisting of ten sheets, and specifications for construction of water-system improvements. The Agency’s acceptance of these plans and specifications does not constitute a warranty or guaranty by Agency of proper design nor does it relieve Developer of responsibility for the proper design and construction of the improvements thereon.

ARTICLE 3 - CONNECTION FEES: Attached hereto, marked Exhibit “B” and made a part of this

Agreement, is Part D of the Rules and Regulations, entitled “Water Rates.” Developer understands and agrees to be bound by any Agency alterations, additions, amendments, revisions or modifications to Part D or


any other Agency policies, rules, or regulations. All parties hereby agree that Agency is entitled to those connection fees (the sum of the New Service Charge, Residential Meter/Backflow Fee, and System Capacity Charge) as specified in Part D. Agency shall collect said connection fees at the time application for water service is made. It shall be incumbent upon the water service applicant to pay the then-current connection fees and all other then-applicable fees and charges.

Developer has previously paid the System Capacity Charge for, and the estimated cost to install the

two-inch and four-inch water meters that will provide water service to the project. Upon payment of the Agency’s $40 New Service Charge for each of the two meters ($80 total), water service for the applicant’s lot shall be initiated (“turned on”) by the Agency.

ARTICLE 4 - ENGINEERING, PLAN-CHECK, AND INSPECTION SERVICES PERFORMED BY

AGENCY. Agency and Developer understand and agree that Developer shall assume the cost and expense of Agency’s performance of engineering, plan-check, and inspection services, in connection with Developer’s construction of water-system improvements described in Exhibit “A” attached hereto.

Prior to, or in conjunction with, the first submittal of plans and specifications for review by Agency’s

engineer, Developer shall deposit the sum of $3887, being 3% of Developer’s engineer’s estimate of the cost to construct that portion of the water system that will be conveyed upon completion to the Agency, which sum shall be payment for engineering and plan-check services performed by Agency in connection with Developer’s construction of treated water system facilities described in Exhibit “A”, attached hereto. Agency’s acceptance of payment for engineering and plan-check services performed is not a warranty or guarantee by Agency of proper design or proper specifications of materials for construction. If construction is not commenced within 12 months after approval of the plans and specifications by Agency’s engineer, Developer may be required to make additional payments to Agency for plan-check and review services. Such additional payments may not be in excess of 3% of Developer’s engineer’s estimate.

Developer has already deposited with the Agency the sum of $3887, being 3% of Developer’s

engineer’s estimate of the cost to construct that portion of the water system that will be conveyed upon completion to the Agency, which sum is payment for construction-inspection services performed by Agency in connection with Developer’s construction of treated water system facilities described in Exhibit “A,” attached hereto. Agency’s acceptance of payment for construction-inspection services performed is not a warranty or guarantee by Agency of proper design or proper specifications of materials for construction, or that the water system was constructed without fault, failure or omission.

ARTICLE 5 - LABOR AND MATERIAL PAYMENT BONDING REQUIREMENTS. Developer shall

defend and indemnify Agency against all claims for nonpayment of labor, material, and other obligations incurred by Developer, its agents, contractors, employees and assigns. The cost of construction of the water-system improvements is estimated by Developer’s engineer to be $129,586.

At the time of offering the water-system improvements to the Agency, in addition to supplying a

written “OFFER OF DEDICATION” in the form as described in Exhibit “C”, Developer shall either submit a “RELEASE” agreement in the form of Exhibit “D”, attached hereto and made a part hereof, from each and every contractor, subcontractor, corporation, firm, person, or business entity furnishing materials for or performing labor or other services in performing the terms and provisions of this Agreement, or a Labor and Material Payment Bond to the Agency in the form prescribed by Exhibit “E”, attached hereto and made a part hereof, the principal sum of which shall be not less than the estimated construction cost as provided herein.


In addition, Developer shall maintain an accurate and current list of all contractors, subcontractors, business entities, corporations, firms, and/or persons performing the terms and provisions of this Agreement, and shall make this list available to the Agency’s engineer or General Manager upon request.

ARTICLE 6 - INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS. Prior to Developer’s commencement of construction of the

water-system improvements as otherwise set forth in the terms and provisions of this Agreement, general liability insurance naming Agency as additional named insured shall be obtained and maintained for the duration of this Conveyance Agreement by Developer or Developer’s contractor for claims for damages to property, personal injury, bodily injury, and accidental death. The types of insurance covered under the general liability policy shall include, but not be limited to, comprehensive form, premises-operations, underground hazard, products/ completed operations hazard, broad form property damage, independent contractor, and personal injury. Prior to any blasting operations for removal of rock, stumps, or other materials from the work area, the general liability policy must also contain explosion and collapse hazard coverage. It shall also include coverage for Products-Completed Operations liability losses for a period of 12 months from the date of Agency’s acceptance of the completed works. (This time period corresponds with the 12-month maintenance bond requirement.) All insurance acquired under the terms of this article must be obtained through an insurance company authorized and licensed to do business in the State of California. The general liability policy shall contain limits of liability as follows:

1. Bodily Injury: $1,000,000 for each occurrence, $2,000,000 aggregate 2. Property Damage: $1,000,000 each occurrence, $1,000,000 aggregate.

General Liability Insurance policies having combined single limits damage combined of liability shall carry limits for bodily injury and property damage combined of $1,000,000 each occurrence and $1,000,000 aggregate.

The certificate of insurance shall also have a description of operations/locations/vehicles that refers

specifically to the water-system improvements.

Proof Of Insurance. Developer shall submit or cause to be submitted a copy of the insurance policy(ies) with endorsements and exclusions, and shall submit to Agency a certified copy of the endorsement naming Agency as additional insured as proof of general liability insurance required by this Agreement. Developer shall receive Agency approval that the insurance requirements of this Agreement have been met. The Developer must receive this approval prior to the start of construction pursuant to the terms of this Agreement.

ARTICLE 7 - HOLD HARMLESS AND INDEMNIFICATION. Developer shall hold Agency and

Agency’s agents, officers, and employees harmless from any and all claims, lawsuits, acts or omissions arising out of Developer’s performance of the terms and conditions of this Agreement. Likewise, Developer shall defend and/or pay the cost of defending and indemnifying Agency together with Agency’s agents, employees and officers from all civil proceedings, claims and/or judgments including, but not limited to, payment of all attorney fees and litigation costs.

ARTICLE 8 – INSPECTION OF WORK. Developer shall give two working days’ advance notice prior to Developer’s contractor starting any work associated with the water-system improvements and shall keep Agency informed of construction schedules throughout the course of the work in order for Agency to properly schedule inspection personnel. It is suggested that Developer’s contractor provide Agency submittals on any materials proposed for the water-system improvements for approval prior to purchase.


ARTICLE 9 - BEGINNING OF WORK OR TERMINATION. This Agreement shall terminate and be of

no further force or effect at Agency’s discretion should Agency determine that Developer has failed to cause construction of the water-system improvements as shown on Exhibit “A” to commence within 12 months from the date of this Agreement.

For purposes of this Article, Developer’s commencement of construction shall not be deemed to have

occurred upon one or any combination of the following actions or events: 1. Bid advertisement 2. Execution of contracts or bonds 3. Ordering of material and supplies or the delivery and stockpiling of materials and supplies on the job

site. 4. Clearing and grubbing for, or construction of roads, including the completion of rough subgrade work.

Agency and Developer understand and agree that construction of the water-system improvements shall

be deemed to have commenced when Developer causes its properly-licensed contractor to excavate and backfill pipeline in excess of 10% of the total water system to be constructed pursuant to the terms of this Agreement. The Agency’s engineer shall make the determination as to the percentage of water system caused to be constructed and installed by Developer.

ARTICLE 10 – CONSTRUCTION. Developer shall cause the water-system improvements described

in Exhibit “A” to be constructed by a properly licensed contractor, without expense to Agency, and Agency shall not be responsible for any of the cost of said improvements. Developer is not acting as a contractor, agent, official, or representative of Agency in constructing or providing such water-system improvements, or in causing such improvements to be installed. This Agreement simply provides for the transfer and assumption of responsibility for such water-system improvements to be installed upon completion and upon performance of all terms of this Agreement to be performed by Developer. The approval of the plans and specifications as presented by Developer shall not be deemed as a warranty or guarantee by Agency of proper design or proper specifications of materials or construction. Agency specifically relies upon the design and specifications as prepared or caused to be prepared by Developer as being in keeping with the requirements of Agency, as being in accordance with the conditions of the geography, and as having specific materials and equipment of the highest practicable quality and character. The Developer will provide a licensed civil engineer to act as the project engineer during construction.

All proposed field modifications shall be identified for review by Agency’s engineer. No field

modifications shall be made prior to approval by Agency’s engineer. Developer’s contractor shall provide and keep on site an up-to-date “as-built” set of plans that show

changes from the original plans approved by Agency’s engineer prior to commencement of construction. No underground portion of the water-system improvements described in Exhibit “A” shall be backfilled

prior to approval by the Agency’s engineer, or his designated on-site construction inspector. ARTICLE 11 - NOTIFICATION OF DEVIATIONS OR FAILURES: Agency agrees to notify Developer

in writing as to any deviations or failure in construction of the water-system improvements pursuant to said plans and specifications, and the requirements of said Agency as soon as any deviation is brought to


Agency’s attention, and Developer shall immediately cause such deviation or failure to be corrected at the sole cost of Developer. Developer agrees that Agency is not, by inspection of the construction or installation of the improvements, representing Developer or providing a substitute for inspection and control of the work by Developer. Developer agrees that any inspections and observations of the work by Agency are for the sole purposes of providing notice of the stage and character of the work. Developer agrees that the failure of the Agency to note variances from the plans and specifications for the project does not excuse or exempt Developer from complying with all terms of these plans and specifications.

ARTICLE 12 - REIMBURSEMENT FOR FUNDS EXPENDED BY DEVELOPER. Should Developer

desire reimbursement for funds expended in the installation and construction of water-system improvements that benefit non-project parcels as provided in the terms and provisions of this Agreement in addition to all other funds expended for the acquisition of rights of way and employment of engineers and contractors for construction, planning, and design of the water-system improvements, then Developer shall request such reimbursement in writing and deliver such writing to the Agency’s main business office 30 days prior to conveyance of the water-system improvements to Agency as provided in Article 16 herein. Agency, upon receiving Developer’s written request for reimbursement of funds expended pursuant to the terms and provisions of this Agreement, will then determine if Developer is entitled to reimbursement pursuant to Agency policies, rules, and regulations then in effect. Should Agency determine that Developer may be entitled to reimbursement, then Agency, in its sole discretion, may enter into a reimbursement agreement with Developer that shall provide for the method and manner by which Developer would achieve reimbursement of funds expended for the construction and installation of the water-system improvements. Should Agency, in its discretion, determine to enter into a reimbursement agreement with Developer, such agreement shall be prepared and entered into prior to Developer’s conveyance of water distribution facilities to Agency, all as set forth in Article 16 herein. The reimbursement agreement shall provide for the method and manner by which Agency may assist Developer in obtaining reimbursement of a portion of funds expended by Developer for the water-system improvements constructed pursuant to the terms of this Agreement.

Developer is advised that, for facilities installed with public funds, the Labor Code requires that all

craftsmen, mechanics and laborers be paid the local prevailing wages. Agency has not ascertained if reimbursement could be construed as public funding. Developer assumes all risk as to whether reimbursement could be construed as public funding, and indemnifies Agency from all liability claims arising or alleged to arise from construction wages not conforming to local prevailing wages.

ARTICLE 13 – PREVAILING WAGES. The State’s Attorney General has opined that, in certain

circumstances, construction of facilities for provision of public utility service, with the understanding and agreement that said facilities will be turned over to the Agency for ownership, operation and maintenance at the conclusion of construction, may be subject to the prevailing wage laws of the State of California.

It is Developer’s responsibility to determine if the Attorney General’s opinion affects the wages paid by him/her to workers employed on water facilities constructed for their project. However, should it be determined that the prevailing wage laws of the State (Labor Code §1770, et seq.) apply to the work performed for the project, then Developer will be required and shall agree to defend and hold the Agency harmless from any liability, claims, damages, or costs in any way associated with said determination by the State. Further, Developer shall take all necessary and appropriate action, including payment of back wages, and any associated penalties that may be required, due to enforcement of the prevailing wage law in connection with construction of the water system.


The Agency will not represent or advise Developer in connection with this matter except to advise him/her of their potential liability. Developer should not rely upon any opinion or information of the Agency in making his/her determination in connection with the payment or nonpayment of wages.

ARTICLE 14 - COMPLETION OF WORK OR TERMINATION. This Agreement shall terminate and

be of no further force or effect at Agency’s discretion should Agency determine that Developer has failed to cause construction of the water-system improvements as shown on Exhibit “A” to be completed within one and one-half (1½) years from the date of this Agreement.

For the purposes of this Article, Developer’s completion of the construction shall occur upon Agency’s

accepting conveyance of the water-system improvements pursuant to Article 15 (“Conveyance”) of this Agreement. Developer further understands and agrees that Agency may withhold acceptance of Developer’s proposed dedication of the facilities should Agency’s engineer determine that any portion of the water-system improvements have failed to pass appropriate pressure and leakage tests or that samples of water taken from the treated water lines and tested are determined not to be safe by the Agency’s engineer. Developer understands and agrees that Agency may also withhold acceptance of the proposed dedication of the water system should Agency’s engineer determine that Developer failed to complete all other construction either over, under or adjacent to the water-system improvements including but not limited to final road grade, paving, curbs, gutters, sidewalks, all other utilities, and restoration of rights of way.

ARTICLE 15 – CONVEYANCE. Upon completion of the water-system improvements in a manner meeting Agency’s approval, Developer shall immediately convey said improvements and title thereto free and clear of all liens, encumbrances and expense to Agency by such conveyance and documents as deemed necessary by Agency, including but not limited to the following:

1. An executed “OFFER OF DEDICATION” (Exhibit “C”) offering the water-system improvements shown on

Exhibit “A” to Agency. 2. “RELEASE” statements (Exhibit “D”) from every contractor, subcontractor, corporation, firm or business

entity furnishing materials for or performing labor or other services, OR a Labor and Material Payment Bond (Exhibit “E”), all as specified in Article 5.

3. Developer shall provide Agency with proof satisfactory to Agency that Developer has acquired all local, state, and federal permits, maps or licenses and that Developer shall comply with all local, state and federal rules, ordinances and regulations relevant to the real property on, over or under which the water-system improvements are situated.

4. Payment of System Capacity Charges due Agency pursuant to then-current Agency rules and regulations and as specified in Article 3 of this Agreement.

5. Payment of any balance due for engineering, plan-check, and inspection services performed by Agency. 6. One complete set of “as-built” drawings with the notation “As-Built” entered in the revision block, dated

and initialed by Developer’s engineer. Delivery of the as-built drawings shall include BOTH electronic copies (delivered on CD media and not spanned over more than one disk containing all the digital CAD files – i.e., .dwg, .dxf – files for the entire drawing set, or as otherwise specified by the Agency’s engineer) and hard copies (24”x 36” reproducible copies on Mylar or material of suitable durability) of the improvements constructed.

7. All easements and rights of way required by Agency, including reasonable documentation of title provided at Developer’s expense to confirm authority to convey the easements and facilities.

8. The Developer-constructed water-system improvements shall be flushed (or re-flushed) and shall pass bacteriological testing no earlier than 14 calendar days prior to the date Agency’s General Manager


accepts the Offer of Dedication. Developer shall provide for proper drainage and de-chlorination equipment during flushing operations.

9. Developer shall furnish a Maintenance Bond in the form prescribed in Exhibit “F” attached hereto and made a part hereof in an amount of not less than 25 percent of cost of construction of the water-system improvements at the time of offering the water-system improvements to the Agency, protecting Agency against any failure of the work due to faulty materials, poor workmanship, or defective equipment within a period of one year following acceptance of the “OFFER OF DEDICATION” of the water-system improvements by Agency’s General Manager.

In place of a Maintenance Bond, the Developer may offer a certificate of deposit or an irrevocable letter of credit meeting the Agency’s approval as to form and financial institute utilized. Certificates of deposit used in lieu of a maintenance bond must be opened either in the Developer’s name and specifically assigned to the Agency or opened on behalf of the Agency only. The signatory for the Agency shall be the General Manager or Treasurer of the Agency.

Upon written certification by Developer and the Developer’s engineer that the water system

improvements have been completed in conformance with the Agency’s Rules and Regulations Governing Water Service, its Development Standards for Treated Water Systems and the approved project plans and specifications, and upon concurrence by Agency’s engineer and General Manager, the General Manager will accept the “OFFER OF DEDICATION” of the completed water-system improvements and include said improvements into the Agency’s overall water system and shall operate, maintain, and repair said improvements except as specified during the warranty period.

ARTICLE 16 - APPLICATION FOR WATER. No water shall be delivered to or conveyed by or

through the water-system improvements shown on Exhibit “A”, other than for testing purposes and construction purposes authorized by Agency’s General Manager, until said water system is conveyed to Agency, formally accepted by Agency, and proper applications for water service have been filed with Agency and approved.

ARTICLE 17 - OBLIGATION FOR PIPELINES AND/OR FACILITIES. Agency shall be under no

obligation to provide additional pipelines and/or facilities in order to serve water to Developer’s project. Upon acceptance of the water-system improvements by Agency, it shall become the sole property of Agency and shall be used and operated at Agency’s sole discretion.

ARTICLE 18 - RULES AND REGULATIONS. Upon acceptance of the water-system improvements

by Agency, Developer, its successors and assigns, shall be subject to and shall comply with all of the rules and regulations of Agency and shall pay the water rates, tolls and charges as may be levied and/or established by Agency’s Board of Directors from time to time.

ARTICLE 19 – ASSIGNMENT. No transfer or assignment may be made by Developer of this

Agreement or any part or interest of law unless such transfer or assignment is approved in writing by Agency, provided further that Agency shall not unreasonably withhold consent to transfer or assign. In the event of such transfer or assignment, Agency may, at its sole option and in addition to any other remedy that it may have, elect to terminate this Agreement.

ARTICLE 20 – NOTICES. The mailing addresses of Agency and Developer for purposes of giving

any notice required pursuant to this Agreement are as follows:


AGENCY DEVELOPER

SOUTH FEATHER WATER AND POWER AGENCY OROVILLE PACIFIC ASSOCIATES II, LP 2310 Oro-Quincy Highway 430 E State Street, Suite 100 Oroville, California 95966 Eagle, ID 83616

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement on the day and year first

above written. SOUTH FEATHER WATER AND POWER AGENCY

By_________________________________________ Michael C. Glaze, General Manager

DEVELOPER

By_________________________________________

By_________________________________________

Conveyance Agreement.112211 9 EXHIBIT ‘A’

EXHIBIT A

DEVELOPER’S IMPROVEMENT PLANS

Conveyance Agreement – Hillview Ridge Apartments Phase II 10 EXHIBIT 'B'

EXHIBIT B

Part D – Water Rates1

Potable Water- Service Charge (per month) .......................................................................................................... $152

Multi-Family Residential Units Service Charge .......................................................................... $7.90

3

(per occupied unit per month)

Rates-of-Use (in addition to Service Charge): First 100 Units (10,000 cubic feet) .................................................................................... $0.64/unit After First 100 Units (over 10,000 cubic feet) ................................................................... $0.25/unit Oversized Meter Charge (in addition to Service Charge; not applicable to mobile home parks,

apartment complexes, duplexes, multiple commercial units, etc.4

):

Meter Size Monthly Charge 1" ........................................................................ $6.00 1½" ..................................................................... $16.00 2" ........................................................................ $20.50 3" ........................................................................ $50.00 4" ........................................................................ $72.50 6" ........................................................................ $105.00

Oversized Meter Charges will be reduced by 50% if all watering is done between the hours of 9:00

PM and 6:00 AM (i.e., NO watering may be done during the day). Customers must come to the SFWPA office and apply for this reduction annually.

Non-Potable Water- Service Charge (per month) ..................................................................................................... $17.505

Rates-of-Use (in addition to Service Charge):

Miners Inch Accounts .......................................................................................................... $2.25/MI Metered (unit = 100 cubic feet) ................................................................................................ 10⅓¢ Flat Rate Accounts (per month) ................................................................................................ $45.006

(All non-potable rates-of-use equate to $45.00 per acre-foot.)

Fees & Charges7

New Service Charge (installation estimates, processing, etc.) .................................................. $408

Account Transfer Charge (processing, meter reading, etc.) ...................................................... $20

9

Turn-on Charge.......................................................................................................................... $15

10

(After Hours ......................................................................................................................... $98

11

1 Originally affected 2/13/90, “Part D” added 6/26/01.

)

2 Authorized 2/23/93; effective 3/1/93; multi-family residential units excluded as of 2/23/99. 3 Effective 2/23/99. 4 Effective 2/23/99. 5 Authorized 2/23/93; effective 3/1/93; multi-family residential units excluded as of 2/23/99. 6 Authorized 3/23/93; effective 4/1/93. Amended 3/26/96 to clarify that the flat rate is $45/month, and that flat rate

customers also pay the $17.50/month service charge, for a total monthly rate of $62.50. 7 Originally affected 2/13/90 8 Authorized 6/23/92; effective 7/1/92; renamed 2/27/01 9 Effective 2/27/01 10 Effective 2/23/99

11 Effective 2/23/99; amended 7/22/08. Fee to be increased annually, commencing January 1, 2009 by the same percentage as the annual cost-of-living adjustment granted to the Agency’s Water Treatment and Distribution Employees


Residential Meter/Backflow Fee .............................................................................................. $99312

Development Plan Check (of Engineer’s Estimate - potable water) ....................................... 3% ea.

Development Inspection Fee (of Engineer’s Estimate - potable water) .............................. 3% ea.13

Encroachment Permit (includes inspection) .............................................................................. $50

14

Non-Standard Service

15

Temporary Building-Construction Service (6 month max.) ........................................ $10/month

16

Bulk-Service Meter Deposit ................................................................................................ $750

17

Failure-to-report Usage Fee ................ ................ .......................................................... $20/month88

Water-Truck or –Container Backflow Inspection Fee ........................................................... $3018

Bulk-Service Meter Charge ........................................................................................ $20/month

19

Bulk-Service Volume-of-Usage Rage ......................................................................... $1.50/unit

20

Minimum Bulk-Service Meter Damage Repair Fee .............................................................. $25

21

Bulk Raw-Water Charge (2,500 gal. max.) ..................................................................... $5/load

22

Filling Station Charge (2,500 gal. max.) ......................................................................... $5/load

23

Flow Test Fee .................................................................................................................... $50/test

24

Returned Check Fee (returned by bank) ........................................................................ $20/check

25

Escrow Information Charge .................................................................................................. $5/order

Meter Tampering Fee (resetting, damaging, cutting locks, etc.) First Incident .................................................................................................. $25 + repair costs26

Second and Subsequent Incidents .............................................................. $250 + repair costs

27

Delinquent Penalty ..................................................................... 1½%/month penalty after 30 days

28

Shutoff Notice Service Fee ........................................................................................................ $29

29

Meter Lock Service Fee ............................................................................................................. $53

30

Annexation Fees

31

Processing (if fully developed) ............................................................................................. $ 128

Processing (if not fully developed) ....................................................................................... $ 257 Annexation Fee Per-Acre Basis ......................................................................................... $ 401/lot or acre32

Size-of-Service Basis

33

⅝” meter .............................................................................................................. $ 803

1” meter ............................................................................................................ $ 2,007 Flat Rate (irrigation system only) ...................................................................... $ 1,075

12 Effective 9/26/06, charged whenever water service is requested for a parcel with an existing service line and meter set. Payment in full for installation of ⅝” residential radio-read meter and ¾” backflow prevention device. Fee to be increased annually, commencing January 1, 2008 in accordance with Engineering News Record’s National Construction Cost Index, subject to suspension on a year-by-year basis by the Board of Directors. 13 Name amended 2/27/01 14 Amended 10/27/98 15 Renamed 11/27/01 16 Renamed 11/27/01 17 Added 11/27/01 18 Added 11/27/01 19 Added 11/27/01 20 Added 11/27/01 21 Added 11/27/01 22 Added 11/27/01 23 Added 11/27/01 24 Effective 8/26/97 25 Authorized 3/23/93; effective 4/1/93; amended 2/27/01 26 Effective 2/27/01 27 Effective 8/26/97 28 Effective 2/27/01

29 Authorized 10/27/98; amended 7/22/08. Fee to be increased annually, commencing January 1, 2009 by the same percentage as the annual cost-of-living adjustment granted to the Agency’s Water Treatment and Distribution Employees. 30 Authorized 3/23/93; effective 4/1/93; amended 2/27/01 and 7/22/08. Fee to be increased annually, commencing January 1, 2009 by the same percentage as the annual cost-of-living adjustment granted to the Agency’s Water Treatment and Distribution Employees.

31 Amended 3/23/99 to increase annually in accordance with the Engineering News Record’s National Construction Cost Index

32 Amended 3/23/99, 1/25/2000 33Added 8/22/00 88 Added 7/22/08. Fee assessed if customer fails to report monthly usage.


Miners’ Inch (irrigation system only) ............................................................. $1,606/MI Quitclaim Deed Processing Fee .................................................................................................. $25 Meter Check Fee: ⅝” Meter ................................................................................................................... $45 prepaid34

Meters Over ⅝” ......................................................................................... per estimate, prepaid

35

SFWPA will check accuracy of water user’s meter at user’s request. If meter is within 2% accurate, SFWPA will retain fee. If inaccuracy exceeds 2% fast, fee will be returned. Adjustments for any over-charge will be made on next billing, with adjustment not to exceed three (3) months.

System Capacity Charges36

Miners Ranch Treatment Plant: Meter Size ....... Capacity Charges ............... GPM ...................... Plant Capacity ⅝” ...................... $ 3,807 ......................... 20 .............................. 0.206% 1" ....................... $ 9,513 ......................... 50 .............................. 0.514% 1½" .................... $ 19,028 ....................... 100 ............................. 1.029% 2" ...................... $ 30,448 ....................... 160 ............................. 1.646% 3" ...................... $ 60,885 ....................... 320 ............................. 3.291% 4" ...................... $ 95,136 ....................... 500 ............................. 5.143% 6" ..................... $ 190,272 .................... 1,000 ........................... 10.286% 8" ..................... $ 456,652 .................... 2,400 ........................... 24.686% 10" .................... $723,031 ..................... 3,800 ........................... 39.086% 12" .................... $ 951,358 .................... 5,000 ........................... 51.429% Larger meters will require evaluation of peak flows needed for service. Applicant will be responsible for providing required date. Based on this information, SFWPA will determine the capacity charge.

The System Capacity Charge shall be paid prior to the physical connection of any service to the domestic water system. For meter sizes greater than 2”, payment of the System Capacity Charge may be required at the time the application for service is approved and prior to construction of the structure for which service is requested.

37

Bangor Treatment Plant: ................................................................................................................................ $ 3,807 The System Capacity Charge shall be paid prior to the physical connection of any service to the domestic water system. Connections to this system shall be limited to ⅝” residential meters only. 38

34 Authorized 6/23/92; effective 7/1/92

35 Authorized 6/23/92; effective 7/1/92 36 Effective 10/1/91, amended 3/23/99 (increases annually in accordance with Engineering News Record’s National Construction

Cost Index), and 1/25/2000 37 Paragraph added 6/26/01 38 Paragraph amended 9/23/03

Conveyance Agreement – Hillview Ridge Apartments Phase II 13 EXHIBIT 'C'

EXHIBIT C

OFFER OF DEDICATION I/We hereby extend an offer to convey, transfer, and dedicate all rights, title, and interest in and to

that certain water system and appurtenances more particularly described in Exhibit “A” attached to the Agreement by and between SOUTH FEATHER WATER AND POWER AGENCY and OROVILLE PACIFIC ASSOCIATES II, LP hereinafter referred to as DEVELOPER, dated November 22, 2011, a copy of which is on file in Agency headquarters located in Oroville, California; to SOUTH FEATHER WATER AND POWER AGENCY, assuring and warranting to said Agency that the water system for the project known as Hillview Ridge Apartments Phase II (filed in Agency’s office as “Hillview Ridge Apartments Phase II ”), is free and clear of all liens, encumbrances, and other expense.

I/We have constructed or caused the construction and installation of the water system and

improvements described in Exhibit “A” attached to said Agreement, and do hereby assure and warrant to SOUTH FEATHER WATER AND POWER AGENCY that the water system improvement facilities together with the contractors, subcontractors, employees, or agents of the Developer have been fully and completely paid and there exist no liens, encumbrances, stop notices, or claims on the water system improvement facilities or by any of the subcontractors, employees, or agents against the water system improvement facilities constructed pursuant to the terms of the above Agreement or against SOUTH FEATHER WATER AND POWER AGENCY.

The undersigned hereby certify that he/she/they are the sole owners in fee of the parcels of property

described as Hillview Ridge Apartments Phase II, that they are authorized to make this conveyance to Agency, and that they shall defend and indemnify Agency from and against any demands, claims, or damages arising from this conveyance and/or seeking to impose or enforce any lien or encumbrance on the facilities arising from their construction and conveyance.

I/We declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed this ________

day of ______________, 20___, in the City of ____________, County of _____________, State of California.

DEVELOPER

By_______________________________________

By_______________________________________

We accept this “OFFER OF DEDICATION” made by on this __________ day of _______________, 20____.

SOUTH FEATHER WATER AND POWER AGENCY By General Manger Note: All blanks must be completed properly; otherwise the South Feather Water and Power Agency will not

accept the Offer.

Conveyance Agreement – Hillview Ridge Apartments Phase II 14 EXHIBIT 'D'

EXHIBIT D RELEASE

FOR ADEQUATE CONSIDERATION, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, the undersigned, jointly, severally, and individually releases and forever discharges the Developer, OROVILLE PACIFIC ASSOCIATES II, LP, and SOUTH FEATHER WATER AND POWER AGENCY, together with all other persons, firms, business entities, irrigation agencies, and government entities whatsoever of and from any and all actions, causes of action, claims, demands, damages, stop notice actions, costs, expenses, liens, and compensation on account of or in any way growing out of the construction, installation, and work of those certain water system facilities described in the Conveyance Agreement dated November 22, 2011, by and between SOUTH FEATHER WATER AND POWER AGENCY and the Developer named above; the project being known as Hillview Ridge Apartments Phase II , (filed in Agency’s office as “Hillview Ridge Apartments Phase II ”).

INDIVIDUAL OR FIRM

(Print Name)

(Address)

(City) (State) (Zip)

By (Signature)

(Title) (Date)

Note: All blanks must be completed properly, otherwise South Feather Water and Power Agency will not accept the release.

Conveyance Agreement – Hillview Ridge Apartments Phase II 15 EXHIBIT 'E'

EXHIBIT E LABOR AND MATERIAL PAYMENT BOND

By this Agreement

of_________________________________________________________________, hereinafter referred to as “Principal”, and _________________________________________________________________________ of (a corporation certified as a corporation admitted to do business in the State of California as a surety insurer), hereinafter referred to as “Surety” are held and firmly bound to SOUTH FEATHER WATER AND POWER AGENCY, hereinafter referred to as “Agency”, and to any and all persons who perform labor upon, or furnish material to be used in, or furnish appliances, trucks, or power contributing to the work to be performed under an agreement (filed in Agency’s office as “Hillview Ridge Apartments Phase II”), hereinafter specifically described in the amounts of ____________________________________ ($___________), for the payment of which Principal and Surety hereby bind themselves, their heirs, legal representatives, successors, and assigns, jointly and severally.

On the date of November 22, 2011, Principal entered into an agreement with Agency for the principal purposes of constructing or providing for the construction of certain water-system improvements, together with appurtenances thereto, to which agreement references are made for further particulars. A copy of the Agreement is attached hereto labeled Exhibit “A” and made a part hereof.

The condition of this obligation is that if the Principal shall promptly and faithfully make payment to all

persons, firms, subcontractors, and corporations furnishing material for or performing labor thereof including all amounts due for materials, lubricants, labor, in the prosecution of the work provided for in the Agreement attached hereto as Exhibit “A” and any authorized extension or modification thereof including all amounts due for materials, lubricants, oil, gasoline, power, repairs on machinery, equipment, and tools consumed or used in connection with the construction of such work, and all insurance premiums on said work, and for all other labor, performed in such work whether by subcontractor or otherwise, then this obligation shall be void; otherwise this obligation shall remain in full force and effect.

FOR VALUE RECEIVED, the Surety hereby agrees that no change, extension of time, alteration, or

addition to the terms of the Agreement attached hereto as Exhibit “A” or to the work to be performed thereunder or the specifications accompanying the same shall in any way affect the Surety’s obligation on this Bond, and said Surety does hereby waive notice of any such change, extension of time, alteration, or addition or modification to the terms of the Agreement or to the work to be performed or to the specifications.

The lien claimants to whom the provisions of this Bond inure shall have a right of action to recover

hereon in any suit brought to foreclose liens as provided by the Mechanics Lien Laws and Public Work Lien Laws of the State of California, or in a separate suit brought hereon. No final settlement or compromise between the Agency and the Developer shall abridge the right of any beneficiary hereunder to pursue such remedies as may be provided such beneficiary by California Law.

Conveyance Agreement – Hillview Ridge Apartments Phase II 16 EXHIBIT 'E'

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Labor and Material Payment Bond is executed on the ____ day of ________________, 20____ in the City of _______________________, County of __________________, State of California.

__________________________________ [Seal]

__________________________________ “PRINCIPAL”

__________________________________ [Seal]

__________________________________ “SURETY”

State of California }

} ss County of }

Subscribed and sworn to before me this ____ day of ________________, 20____, at

_____________________, California.

_________________________________ Notary Public

1) No____________________

Conveyance Agreement – Hillview Ridge Apartments Phase II 17 EXHIBIT 'F'

EXHIBIT F

MAINTENANCE BOND

KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: That we, (2) _______________ hereinafter called “Principal”, and (3) __________________________of __________________, hereinafter called “Surety”, are held and firmly bound unto the South Feather Water and Power Agency, 2310 Oro-Quincy Highway, Oroville, California 95966, hereinafter called “Obligee”, in the sum of (5) _________________________________________________ Dollars, (6)($___________) for the payment of which, well and truly to be made, the said Principal and Surety bind themselves, jointly, severally, and firmly by these presents together with their heirs, executors, administrators, successors, and assigns.

The condition of this obligation is such that whereas, the said Principal has entered into a certain

Agreement with the Obligee (filed in Agency’s office as “Hillview Ridge Apartments Phase II ”) dated (7)_____________, this Maintenance Bond being Exhibit “F” of that Agreement, for the construction and the installation of water-system improvements and all appurtenances thereto, the conditions of said Agreement being made a part hereof, wherein Principal agrees to repair, maintain, and remedy the water-system improvements and all appurtenances for a period of one year following the date of Obligee’s acceptance of the conveyance of the water-system improvements and appurtenances.

NOW, THEREFORE, if the Principal shall maintain and remedy said work free from defects in

materials and workmanship for a period of one year following the date on which the Board of Directors of the Obligee formally accepts conveyance of work described herein, then this obligation shall be void; otherwise, it shall remain in full force and effect.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Maintenance Bond is executed on the ____ day of ____________,

20___, in the City of _______________, County of ________________, State of California. (Seal) (8) ___________________________________ (If Applicable)

(9) By________________________________ “PRINCIPAL”

(Seal) (10) __________________________________

(11) By_______________________________ “SURETY”

(12) Address _______________________________

______________________________________

______________________________________

Conveyance Agreement – Hillview Ridge Apartments Phase II 18 EXHIBIT 'F'

State of California } } ss

County of } Subscribed and sworn to before me this ____ day of __________, 20____, at ________________, California. _________________________

Notary Public (1) Surety’s Bond number for reference. (2) Same as “Developer” in Conveyance Agreement. (3) Full name of Surety Company. (4) State in which it was duly organized. (5) Amount as agreed to by Agency Engineer - spell out. (6) Numerical dollar amount. (7) Date of Agreement with the Agency. (8) Type or print Principals (correct) Corporate, Partnership, or individual’s name, as the case may be. (9) Signature and seal, if applicable, must be witnessed and notarized. (10) Type or print Surety’s corporate name. (11) Signature and seal must be witnessed and notarized. If signator for Surety is Attorney-in-fact,

attach the proper Power of Attorney. (12) Enter mailing address of Surety for purposes of giving any notice pursuant to this Maintenance

Bond.

Conveyance Agreement – Hillview Ridge Apartments Phase II 19 EXHIBIT 'G'

EXHIBIT G

PERFORMANCE BOND KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: That we (1) ________________________________________ _______________________a (2) _________________________________________________________ hereinafter called "Principal" and (3 ________________________________________________________ of ______________________________ State of______________________ hereinafter called the "Surety", are held and firmly bound unto South Feather Water and Power Agency, hereinafter called "Owner", in the penal sum of ________________________________ Dollars ($_____________) in lawful money of the United States, for the payment of which sum well and truly to be made, we bind ourselves, our heirs, executors, administrators and successors, jointly and severally, firmly by these presents. THE CONDITION OF THIS OBLIGATION IS such that WHEREAS, the Principal entered into a certain agreement with the Owner, dated November 22, 2011, a copy of which is hereto attached and made a part hereof for the construction of the water system improvements for the Hillview Ridge Apartments Phase II, including all appurtenances thereto, all as set forth in the attached agreement. NOW, THEREFORE, if the Principal shall well, truly and faithfully perform its duties, all the undertakings, covenants, terms, conditions and agreements of said agreement during the original term thereof, and any extensions thereof which may be granted by the Owner, with or without notice to the Surety, and if he shall satisfy all claims and demands incurred under such agreement, and shall fully indemnify and save harmless the Owner from all costs and damages which it may suffer by reason of failure to do so, and shall reimburse and repay the Owner all outlay and expense which the Owner may incur in making good any default, then this obligation shall be void; otherwise to remain in full force and effect. PROVIDED, FURTHER, that the said Surety, for value received hereby stipulates and agrees that no change, extension of time, alteration or addition to the terms of the agreement or to the work to be performed thereunder or the specifications accompanying the same shall in any way affect its obligation on this bond, and it does hereby waive notice of any such change, extension of time, alteration or addition to the terms of the agreement or to the work or to the specifications. PROVIDED, FURTHER, that no final settlement between the Owner and the developer shall abridge the right of any beneficiary hereunder whose claim may be unsatisfied. Performance Bond OROVILLE PACIFIC ASSOCIATES II, LP IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this instrument is executed in two (2) counterparts, each one of which shall be deemed an original, this the ____ day of __________________, 20___.

Conveyance Agreement – Hillview Ridge Apartments Phase II 20 EXHIBIT 'G'

ATTEST: ________________________________________

______________________________________

(Principal) Secretary Principal (Seal) _______________________________________ (Witness as to Principal) _______________________________________ (Address) ATTEST: _______________________________________ (Surety) Secretary (Seal) _______________________________________ (Witness as to Surety) _______________________________________ (Address)

By __________________________________ ______________________________________ ______________________________________ (Address) ______________________________________ Surety By ___________________________________ Attorney-in-Fact ______________________________________ (Address)

NOTE: Date of Bond must not be prior to date of Agreement. 1) Correct name of Developer. 2) A Corporation, A Partnership, or an Individual, as case may be. 3) Correct name of Surety. 4) If Principal is a Partnership, all partners must execute bond.


TO: Board of Directors FROM: Kathy Zancanella, Power Division Manager DATE: November 15, 2011 RE: HDR Engineering – Task Order No. 4, Forbestown Powerhouse Condition Assessment 11/22/11 Board of Directors Meeting At the Board’s April 2011 meeting, a Master Services Agreement with HDR Engineering was approved for engineering and design services. Approval of a fourth Task Order under the Masters Services Agreement is being requested for a condition assessment of Forbestown Powerhouse to be conducted in early 2012. Forbestown Powerhouse has electrical and mechanical issues that affect its operational reliability. The carbon brushes that used to last a year now have to be replaced every four to six weeks. A voltage spike of unknown origin occurs when the unit trips. The facing plates for the wickets leak to the point where it is difficult to attain the pressure needed for the new turbine shutoff valve to operate properly. The existing greaseless (Thordon) bushings swell when wet and cause drag on the wickets, which have required overcompensation in order to close correctly when the unit is shutdown. The ten-year financial plan (included with the proposed 2012 Agency budget – previous item) includes rewinding the generator in 2017, based on a 20-year life expectancy of the winding installed in 1997. However, with some of the other problems the unit has been having, it may be prudent to plan that work sooner, and to look at whether other components may be nearing the end of their life, so that a single outage can accommodate multiple tasks. Determining the condition of the equipment now can also aid in developing the specifications for ordering replacement equipment, as most replacement components require a long lead time for ordering. Most of the inspection related work proposed by HDR Engineering will be done during the outage scheduled January 30 through February 24, 2012. The proposed task order and schedule are attached. In addition to investigating the problems with the powerhouse, one of the requirements under the NERC rules is that each unit with a capacity of 20 MW or greater undergo generator testing and mathematical model validation. This was done by PG&E for Woodleaf Powerhouse in 2008, but testing for the Forbestown unit was not schedule before the old contract ended. This testing will be part of the work performed by HDR Engineering, and is scheduled for the week following the outage.

The recommended form of action is:

“I move approval of, and authorize the General Manager to execute, Task Order No. 4 with HDR Engineering to conduct the proposed condition assessment of the Forbestown powerhouse and switchyard, at an estimated cost of $263,096.”

SFWPA-HDR MCSA Task Order No. 004

Forbestown Condition Assessment

November 22, 2011 Master Consulting Services Agreement – Task Order No. 4 Page 1 of 7

TASK ORDER This Task Order pertains to an Agreement by and between South Feather Water and Power Agency, (“Agency”), and HDR Engineering, Inc. (“Consultant”), dated April 28, 2011, (“the Agreement”). Consultant shall perform services on the project described below as provided herein and in the Agreement. This Task Order shall not be binding until it has been properly signed by both parties. Upon execution, this Task Order shall supplement the Agreement as it pertains to the project described below. TASK ORDER NUMBER: 004 PROJECT NAME: Forbestown Powerhouse & Switchyard Condition Assessment PART 1.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION

The Forbestown Powerhouse is located in Butte County near the town of Forbestown. The Forbestown Powerhouse is located 5.2 miles downstream from the Woodleaf Powerhouse and water is released directly from the Woodleaf Powerhouse to the Forbestown Diversion Dam. Water flows from the diversion dam through a power tunnel intake, power tunnel and penstock to the powerhouse which was placed in service in 1961. It is normally base loaded with some peaking capacity (in tandem with Woodleaf Powerhouse). The powerhouse contains one Allis Chalmers vertical reaction (Francis) shaft turbine with a runner that was replaced in 1989 by American Hydro. The nameplate output of the unit is 54,500 HP (40,875 kW normal operating capacity) and a speed of 450 rpm. The generator was rewound in 1996 by Westinghouse and has a nameplate output of 40,500 kVA with a capability of 36,450 kW at 0.9 power factor. The governor is a cabinet type and manufactured by Woodward.

SFWPA’s current goal is to have a site assessment of the electrical/mechanical systems in the Forbestown Powerhouse. HDR’s scope is to provide consulting support and recommendations in the following areas:

1. Controls inspection, data collection and assessment. 2. Electrical inspection, data collection and assessment. 3. Generator inspection, data collection and assessment. 4. Turbine & valve inspection, data collection and assessment. 5. Turbine-Generator signature testing and data analysis. 6. WECC generator testing & model validation and analysis. 7. Review of O & M practices. 8. Turbine and generator NDE Procedures (Optional).




PART 2.0 SCOPE OF SERVICES TO BE PERFORMED BY CONSULTANT

2.1 Project Tasks

Task 1.0 Preliminary Engineering

1.1 Kickoff Meeting & Document Collection: The initial kickoff meeting is to be held and SFWPA supplied drawing and documentation collected. The project scope and schedule will be reviewed and coordination of tasks discussed. Safety requirements will be discussed.

1.2 Document Review: The existing drawings and documentation provided by SFWPA will be reviewed.

1.3 Prepare Site Assessment Checklists: HDR will plan a site assessment and prepare checklists of items to be inspected based on the information received from SFWPA and previous experience.

1.4 Prepare Test Plans: HDR will provide the necessary test plans and the procedures required.

Task 2.0 Site Inspection/Data Collection

2.1 Controls Inspection/Data Collection: Controls of the equipment including control boards, unit controls, annunciation, SCADA, protection relays, instrumentation, governor will be inspected and data will be collected.

2.2 Electrical Inspection / Data Collection: Electrical inspection will include the powerhouse and switchyard electrical systems / equipment; transformers, switches, switchgear / breakers and motor control centers, electrical control devices (CT, PT, etc.) metering, grounding, motors; AC and DC distribution system; battery. Data will be collected from this inspection.

2.3 Generator Inspection / Data Collection: During the outage, with the unit at a standstill and the penstock drained, the visual / boroscope inspection will cover the following areas:

1. The stator and rotor spider, to inspect the rotor poles, stator core and stator winding upper end. Field leads, rim, spider and the shaft will be inspected. Cover plates or other components may have to be removed.

2. Under the rotor spider, the same inspection will be made on the lower end of poles, core and stator winding. The top of the bearing housing and the shaft will be inspected. Cover plates or other components may have to be removed.

3. Inside the generator housing, the stator frame, sole plates. Cover plates/barriers or other components may have to be removed.

4. The back surface of the stator core, support studs and connections. 5. The area above the generator including the exciter, collector rings, etc. No permanent cover

plates will be removed. 6. The area above and below the upper guide bearing. 7. In the area under the thrust bearing bridge, the bearing housing, shaft and shaft coupling.

Assuming the oil will be drained from the thrust bearing, coolers should be removed permitting a thorough inspection.




2.4 Turbine & Valve Inspection / Data Collection:

a. Visual inspection of the internals of the turbine – a visual inspection of the water passageways of the turbine including:

1. Integrity of the coatings, with attention to obvious blistering, corrosion, pitting and deterioration of base metal and evidence of pinholes. Welded joints will be visually inspected.

2. Evidence of cavitation, corrosion and/or erosion on the surface of the turbine runner, wicket gates, stay vanes, spiral case, draft tube liner and facing plates.

3. Condition of the wicket gate vertical sealing surfaces. 4. Condition of the wicket gate end seals. 5. Condition and clearance readings of the upper and lower runner seals. 6. Confirmation of cooling water to the runner seals.

b. General Inspection of the Turbine – inspections of the following components of the turbine:

1. Guide bearing clearances and visual inspection of babbitt, if accessible. 2. Condition of guide bearing cooling system. 3. Condition of guide bearing oil (compare with previous analyses). 4. Review of shear pin failure occurrences. 5. Review of wicket gate stem seal design. 6. Assessment of wicket gate and operating mechanism bushing clearances, where

accessible. 7. Inspection of the auto greasing system for the gate and operating mechanism bushings. 8. Inspection of shaft seals. 9. Condition of shaft. 10. Inspection of the governor actuator and hydraulic system. 11. Review of the unit sump system (pumps, oil/water separator, etc.). 12. Inspect tailwater depression system.

c. Internal Inspections of the Thrust Bearing (if accessible) – inspection of the thrust bearing

will include the following: 1. Cleanliness of the following:

• High Pressure Lube system • Lube Oil • Oil to Water Heat Exchangers • Oil Pot.

2. Dimensional (actual to drawing): • Shoes • Rotating ring • Oil Pot base ring • Shoe radial restraint • Shoe tangential restraint.




3. Areas of the turbine that can affect the hydraulic thrust loading will also be inspected and include: • Runner top and bottom seal clearance measurements • Runner band to discharge ring clearance measurements.

d. Visual inspection of the Turbine Shutoff Valve.

2.5 Turbine-Generator Signature Testing: Baseline vibration testing, index testing (determine turbine performance characteristics), load rejection testing (determine performance characteristics and pressure rise)

2.6 Generator & Transformer Heat Run/Ventilation: not in Forbestown scope. Not budgeted.

2.7 WECC Generator Testing & Model Validation: WECC region has developed requirements for all generating entities to perform model validation of generators 10 MW or larger, or of units in facilities with an aggregate generating capacity of 20 MW or larger. WECC requires these generating units to be mathematically modeled and the model parameters validated every five years or sooner. The following are planned, as applicable:

• Generator Testing and Model Validation • Over Excitation Limit/Protection Verification • Power System Stabilizer Tuning and Verification • Unit Frequency Response Testing

2.8 O & M Practice Review Data Collection: Discuss SFWPA Operations & Maintenance goals / observe O & M practices with staff; compare practices to industry standards. This task will focus on specific topics based on SFWPA needs as discussed during the Kickoff Meeting.

2.9 Turbine and Generator NDE Procedures (OPTIONAL): HDR to develop procedures for non-destructive examination of critical high stress areas in the turbine and generator as appropriate based on inspection findings. Actual non-destructive examination for cracks is to be performed by SFWPA.

2.10 Turbine and Generator NDE Testing (OPTIONAL): performed by SFWPA using procedures developed in sub-task 2.9.

Task 3.0 Condition Assessment

3.1 Controls Condition Assessment: Review and analyze data. Develop write up of inspection findings, conclusions and recommendations including controls upgrades.

3.2 Electrical Condition Assessment: Review and analyze data. Include basic EasyPower electrical model. Develop write up of inspection findings, conclusions and recommendations.

3.3 Generator Condition Assessment: Review and analyze data. Develop write up of inspection findings, conclusions and recommendations.

3.4 Turbine & Valve Condition Assessment: Review and analyze data. Develop write up of inspection findings, conclusions and recommendations.

3.5 Turbine – Generator signature Testing Data Analysis: Review and analyze vibration and index test data. Perform hydraulic transient analysis. Develop write up of findings, conclusions and recommendations.




3.6 Generator and Transformer Heat Run / Ventilation Analysis: not in Forbestown scope. Not budgeted.

3.7 WECC Generator Analysis and Model Validation: Review and analyze test data. Validate model. Develop write up of findings, conclusions and recommendations.

3.8 O & M Practices Review: Determine changes needed to achieve O & M goals. Develop write up of findings, conclusions and recommendations.

Task 4.0 Condition Assessment Report 4.1 Prepare Draft Report: Prepare consolidated condition assessment report. Discuss results with

SFWPA. 4.2 Report Review (by SFWPA): SFWPA review and comment on report. 4.3 Finalize Report: Resolve review comments and finalize report; final results presentation. Task 5.0 – 7.0 Not Used Task 8.0 Project Closeout

8.1 Administrative Closeout: HDR will compile and turn over all final project deliverables and close out the work.

Task 9.0 Project Management

The following project management activities will be performed on an on-going basis throughout the project: 9.1 Project setup: Project management and project control activities associated with project setup. 9.2 Work plan: Manage and coordinate the execution of the work plan. 9.3 Invoicing: Project management and project control activities associated with invoicing 9.4 QA/QC: Quality assurance and quality control activities to ensure deliverables meet

requirements. 9.5 Change control: Project management to deal with the scope, schedule, and cost aspects of any

requested or required changes. 9.6 Staffing, budget, and schedule control: Coordinate resource staffing. Project controls activities

to track and control cost and schedule. 9.7 Information Distribution & Status Reporting: Distribute information between various team

members. Prepare status reports documenting work that has occurred, planned work, and project issues.

9.8 Project Meetings: Project meetings not included in the tasks above. 9.9 Project Management and Coordination: Contract and project management / coordination.

2.2 Assumptions

1. All drawings and other technical data in SFWPA’s files relevant to the scope of work described herein will be made available to HDR in a timely manner.




2. SFWPA is responsible for unit operation during testing and will support hookup/disconnection of HDR test equipment.

3. Inspections/data collection will be based upon accessible/observable parts of the equipment. SFWPA will be responsible for removal of access plates, opening of panels, etc. as needed.

4. Confined space entry will be done under the SFWPA safety program.

2.3 Deliverables

The following deliverables are included under this task order:

Task Qty Description Format Comments

1 1 Site Assessment Checklists/Test Plans/Procedures

MS Office

2.9 1 set NDE Procedures (OPTIONAL) MS Office

4.1 1 Draft Assessment Report with Inspection and Test Results / Assessments

MS Office

4.3 1 Final Assessment Report MS Office

9 1 / month Status summary MS Office

PART 3.0 AGENCY’S RESPONSIBILITIES:

1. Provide documentation to HDR.

2. Provide access to Forbestown powerhouse and switchyard for data collection and testing. Schedule and operate the powerhouse to support the various test plans at the required power levels including shutdown and tripping of the unit. The plant will need to operate at various power levels for a length of time sufficient to stabilize temperatures/other plant parameters to support required data collection.

3. Perform plant shutdown and clearance to setup for inspections/data collection.




PART 4.0 PERIODS OF SERVICE

The expected schedule for completion of the work included in this Task Order is attached. The planned schedule will be adjusted based on input from SFWPA and mutual agreement between SFWPA and HDR as to changes.

PART 5.0 PAYMENTS TO CONSULTANT

The fee budget and rates for this task order are provided in the enclosed confidential rate sheet and total $263,096.00, The budget is a "good faith" estimate with worked to be performed on a time and expense basis with charges based on the project description, scope of services, assumptions, and schedule provided above. HDR will not exceed the authorized total budget without written approval from SFWPA. Compensation shall be per the terms of the Agreement.

PART 6.0 OTHER (n/a)

HDR Engineering, Inc. South Feather Water and Power Agency By: __________________________________ By: _______________________________ Michael C. Glaze Title: _________________________________ Title: General Manager Date: _________________________________ Date: _____________________________

ID TASKNO

Task Name Duration Start Finish Predecessors Successors

0 Forbestown Condition Assessment 162 days 11/14/11 6/29/121 Submit Task Order for Approval 0 days 11/14/11 11/14/11

2 SFWPA Board Meeting 0 days 11/22/11 11/22/11

3 Complete Task Order Signing 0 days 12/15/11 12/15/11

4 1.0 Preliminary Engineering 20 days 1/3/12 1/30/12

5 Start Work 0 days 1/3/12 1/3/12 36,6

6 1.1 Kickoff Meeting & Document Collection 5 days 1/3/12 1/9/12 5 7,8,9

7 1.2 Document Review 10 days 1/10/12 1/23/12 6 11,12

8 1.3 Prepare Site Assessment Checklist 10 days 1/10/12 1/23/12 6 14,15

9 1.4 Prepare Test Plans 15 days 1/10/12 1/30/12 6 18,17

10 2.0 Site Inspection/Data Collection 25 days 1/30/12 3/2/12

11 2.1 Controls Inspection/Data Collection 5 days 2/24/12 3/1/12 7,16 23

12 2.2 Electrical Inspection/Data Collection 5 days 2/24/12 3/1/12 7,16 24

13 Start Outage - Forbestown 0 days 1/30/12 1/30/12 14FS+5 days,15,19

14 2.3 Generator Inspection/Data Collection 5 days 2/6/12 2/10/12 13FS+5 days,8 25

15 2.4 Turbine & Valve Inspection/Data Collection 5 days 1/30/12 2/3/12 8,13 26,20

16 Outage Complete - Forbestown 0 days 2/24/12 2/24/12 11,12,17,18

17 2.6 Turbine-Generator Signature Testing 5 days 2/24/12 3/1/12 9,16 27

18 2.7 WECC Generator Testing & Model Validation 5 days 2/24/12 3/1/12 9,16 28

19 2.8 O&M Practice Review 25 days 1/30/12 3/2/12 13 29

20 2.9 Turbine and Generator NDE Procedures (Optional) 5 days 2/6/12 2/10/12 15 21

21 2.10 Turbine and Generator NDE Testing (Optional - by SFWPA) 5 days 2/13/12 2/17/12 20 31

22 3.0 Condition Assessment 49 days 2/6/12 4/12/12

23 3.1 Controls Condition Assessment 30 days 3/2/12 4/12/12 11 31

24 3.2 Electrical Condition Assessment 25 days 3/2/12 4/5/12 12 31

25 3.3 Generator Condition assessment 20 days 2/13/12 3/9/12 14 31

26 3.4 Turbine & Valve Condition Assessment 20 days 2/6/12 3/2/12 15 31

27 3.5 Turbine-Gen Signature Testing Data Analysis 30 days 3/2/12 4/12/12 17 31

28 3.7 WECC Generator Analysis & Model Validation 30 days 3/2/12 4/12/12 18 31

29 3.8 O&M Practices Review 25 days 3/5/12 4/6/12 19 31

30 4.0 Condition Assessment Report 40 days 4/13/12 6/8/12

31 4.1 Prepare Draft Report 15 days 4/13/12 5/3/12 23,24,25,26,27,28,29,21 32

32 4.2 Report Review by SFWPA 10 days 5/4/12 5/17/12 31 33

33 4.3 Finalize Report 15 days 5/18/12 6/8/12 32 35

34 8.0 Project Closeout 10 days 6/11/12 6/22/12

35 8.1 Administration Closout 10 days 6/11/12 6/22/12 33 37

36 9.0 Project Management 128 days 1/3/12 6/29/12 5 37

37 Project Complete 0 days 6/29/12 6/29/12 36,35

11/14

11/22

12/15

1/3

1/30

2/24

6/29

30 6 13 20 27 4 11 18 25 1 8 15 22 29 5 12 19 26 4 11 18 25 1 8 15 22 29 6 13 20 27 3 10 17 24 1 8Nov '11 Dec '11 Jan '12 Feb '12 Mar '12 Apr '12 May '12 Jun '12 Jul '12

Task

Split

Progress

Milestone

Summary

Project Summary

External Tasks

External Milestone

Deadline


Page 1

Project: Forbestown Condition AssessmentData Date: 11/10/11


TO: Public Recipients of Agenda Information FROM: Michael Glaze, General Manager DATE: November 17, 2011 RE: Closed Session Agenda Item for 11/22/11 Board of Directors Meeting The information provided to Directors for this agenda item is not available to the public. The purpose for this item is to give the Board an opportunity to confer with its designated real estate negotiator. The Board is permitted by law (Brown Act) to confidentially discuss with its negotiator(s) the purchase, sale or exchange of real property. Attendance during this closed-session item will be limited to Directors and the board’s designated representatives in real estate negotiations.

Date post:	22-Mar-2020
Category:	Documents
Upload:	others
View:	0 times
Download:	0 times