National review and accountability mechanisms
Sowmya Kadandale Department for Health Systems Policies amp Workforce
Review mechanisms
bull Opportunity to assess
ndash progress achieved on agreed goals specific
objectives milestones and recommendations from
earlier reviews
ndash performance against the indicators that are part of
the monitoring or results framework
bull Centre of accountability - bring together
beneficiaries MoH partners civil society and all
relevant stakeholders
ndash Ensures mutual accountability between all groups
Review mechanisms
bull Build on sub-sectoralnational reviews get the global
picture
bull Reviews can take several forms
bull RMNCH can ensure their goals are included by providing
coherent inputs across the national policy and
performance review processes
Review mechanisms ndash CAF tool
This section of the tool seeks to understand where the country stands on some key aspects of national policy process like - engagement of a broad range of stakeholders - reviews synthesis amp analysis of information on health
system and population health including RMNCH - prioritising amp planning using review findings to
prioritise and to plan - mutual accountability agreements (compacts) to
back one national plan and process
How does it link together
Epidemiological surveillance
National health information system
Monitoring and evaluation framework
National health sector strategic plan
Health sector reviews
ACCOUNTABILITY
Sectoral reforms and actions
CO
IA is a to
ol th
at reinfo
rces the d
ifferent asp
ect of th
e info
rmatio
n ch
ain
Maternal deaths
Civil registration vital statistics
Compacts
Primary health care
National health accounts
Review mechanisms ndash CAF tool
Four sections in the tool
bull Reviews andor other mechanisms
bull Synthesis of information
bull From review to planning
bull Compactsother formal agreements
Reviews andor other mechanisms
Regular review mechanisms
bull What are the types of reviews in the country ndash
sectoral national sub-national programmatic
independent
bull How often are the reviews held ndash annual mid-
term review final
Relevant stakeholders
bull Who are the relevant stakeholders in the review
o Citizens professional associations different sectors active in health
(water and sanitation education transport agriculture women
finance) civil society private sector parliamentarians research
institutes non-governmental organizations decentralized and local
governments bilateral and multilateral agencies
bull Is there a mapping of the different stakeholders at the start of
the review process
bull Are the relevant stakeholders involved in all the phases of the
review process (preparation review development of an action
plan implementation of recommendations MampE of the
recommendations)
Civil society organization are important
to the review progress and performance
bull Which categories of civil society organizations
participate in the review
bull What role do they play
Synthesis of information
Reviews are based on a synthesis of
quality data
bull Is there a national annual assessment of the
quality of the data
bull Sub-national level - are there annual reviews at
regionsprovinces districts amp community levels
bull Is there a mechanism for obtaining retro-active
information
Programme-specific review are aligned with the
annual sector review and the results decisions
are incorporated
bull What is the frequency of reviews of specific
programmes
bull Is the timing of programme review harmonized
to the timing of the annual sector
bull Are the results of reviews of specific
programmes discussed and used to review the
health sector
From review to planning
The results of the review meetings are
widely used in the planning process
bull What types of reports are produced by the review
bull Is there a mechanism for synthesis of dataresults from
the reviews
bull What national mechanisms are in place to use the
results of the reviews for health planning
bull What types of plans are developed based on review
reports
bull Is there a mechanism for allocating resources based on
the results of the review
The results of the review meetings are
widely used in the planning process
Results achieved
bull How was the money spent
bull Have policies changed
bull Were recommendations implemented as intended
bull Has access to services improved
bull Has the quality of services improved
bull Has service utilization improved
bull Has coverage of interventions improved
bull Risk behaviors are they rare
bull Have health outcomes and equity improved
bull Do the services meet the needs of the population
bull Is the population protected from financial risks
Compactsother formal agreements
Country compactsformal arrangements
bull Codify government and development partner
commitments on ways of working to improve
health outcomes
ndash improve partner alignment with country systems
ndash bring new partners into health sector coordination efforts
ndash address the fragmentation and volatility of health aid
ndash reduce transaction costs
ndash increase mutual accountability
Key elements of a country compact
bull Commitments by different players ndash government development agencies implementing partners
bull Aid management modalities
bull Monitoring arrangements and indicators for tracking progress
Some useful links
bull httpwwwinternationalhealthpartnershipnet
bull httpwwwhealthintelligenceportalorg
bull httpwwwhlsporgHomeResourcesSectormonitoringfr
ameworksaspx
bull httpwwwetc-
crystalorgindexphpid=631ampL=120and20char28
124292Buser25202Bchar28124293D0
Thank you
Monitor
Action
Review
Review mechanisms
bull Opportunity to assess
ndash progress achieved on agreed goals specific
objectives milestones and recommendations from
earlier reviews
ndash performance against the indicators that are part of
the monitoring or results framework
bull Centre of accountability - bring together
beneficiaries MoH partners civil society and all
relevant stakeholders
ndash Ensures mutual accountability between all groups
Review mechanisms
bull Build on sub-sectoralnational reviews get the global
picture
bull Reviews can take several forms
bull RMNCH can ensure their goals are included by providing
coherent inputs across the national policy and
performance review processes
Review mechanisms ndash CAF tool
This section of the tool seeks to understand where the country stands on some key aspects of national policy process like - engagement of a broad range of stakeholders - reviews synthesis amp analysis of information on health
system and population health including RMNCH - prioritising amp planning using review findings to
prioritise and to plan - mutual accountability agreements (compacts) to
back one national plan and process
How does it link together
Epidemiological surveillance
National health information system
Monitoring and evaluation framework
National health sector strategic plan
Health sector reviews
ACCOUNTABILITY
Sectoral reforms and actions
CO
IA is a to
ol th
at reinfo
rces the d
ifferent asp
ect of th
e info
rmatio
n ch
ain
Maternal deaths
Civil registration vital statistics
Compacts
Primary health care
National health accounts
Review mechanisms ndash CAF tool
Four sections in the tool
bull Reviews andor other mechanisms
bull Synthesis of information
bull From review to planning
bull Compactsother formal agreements
Reviews andor other mechanisms
Regular review mechanisms
bull What are the types of reviews in the country ndash
sectoral national sub-national programmatic
independent
bull How often are the reviews held ndash annual mid-
term review final
Relevant stakeholders
bull Who are the relevant stakeholders in the review
o Citizens professional associations different sectors active in health
(water and sanitation education transport agriculture women
finance) civil society private sector parliamentarians research
institutes non-governmental organizations decentralized and local
governments bilateral and multilateral agencies
bull Is there a mapping of the different stakeholders at the start of
the review process
bull Are the relevant stakeholders involved in all the phases of the
review process (preparation review development of an action
plan implementation of recommendations MampE of the
recommendations)
Civil society organization are important
to the review progress and performance
bull Which categories of civil society organizations
participate in the review
bull What role do they play
Synthesis of information
Reviews are based on a synthesis of
quality data
bull Is there a national annual assessment of the
quality of the data
bull Sub-national level - are there annual reviews at
regionsprovinces districts amp community levels
bull Is there a mechanism for obtaining retro-active
information
Programme-specific review are aligned with the
annual sector review and the results decisions
are incorporated
bull What is the frequency of reviews of specific
programmes
bull Is the timing of programme review harmonized
to the timing of the annual sector
bull Are the results of reviews of specific
programmes discussed and used to review the
health sector
From review to planning
The results of the review meetings are
widely used in the planning process
bull What types of reports are produced by the review
bull Is there a mechanism for synthesis of dataresults from
the reviews
bull What national mechanisms are in place to use the
results of the reviews for health planning
bull What types of plans are developed based on review
reports
bull Is there a mechanism for allocating resources based on
the results of the review
The results of the review meetings are
widely used in the planning process
Results achieved
bull How was the money spent
bull Have policies changed
bull Were recommendations implemented as intended
bull Has access to services improved
bull Has the quality of services improved
bull Has service utilization improved
bull Has coverage of interventions improved
bull Risk behaviors are they rare
bull Have health outcomes and equity improved
bull Do the services meet the needs of the population
bull Is the population protected from financial risks
Compactsother formal agreements
Country compactsformal arrangements
bull Codify government and development partner
commitments on ways of working to improve
health outcomes
ndash improve partner alignment with country systems
ndash bring new partners into health sector coordination efforts
ndash address the fragmentation and volatility of health aid
ndash reduce transaction costs
ndash increase mutual accountability
Key elements of a country compact
bull Commitments by different players ndash government development agencies implementing partners
bull Aid management modalities
bull Monitoring arrangements and indicators for tracking progress
Some useful links
bull httpwwwinternationalhealthpartnershipnet
bull httpwwwhealthintelligenceportalorg
bull httpwwwhlsporgHomeResourcesSectormonitoringfr
ameworksaspx
bull httpwwwetc-
crystalorgindexphpid=631ampL=120and20char28
124292Buser25202Bchar28124293D0
Thank you
Monitor
Action
Review
Review mechanisms
bull Build on sub-sectoralnational reviews get the global
picture
bull Reviews can take several forms
bull RMNCH can ensure their goals are included by providing
coherent inputs across the national policy and
performance review processes
Review mechanisms ndash CAF tool
This section of the tool seeks to understand where the country stands on some key aspects of national policy process like - engagement of a broad range of stakeholders - reviews synthesis amp analysis of information on health
system and population health including RMNCH - prioritising amp planning using review findings to
prioritise and to plan - mutual accountability agreements (compacts) to
back one national plan and process
How does it link together
Epidemiological surveillance
National health information system
Monitoring and evaluation framework
National health sector strategic plan
Health sector reviews
ACCOUNTABILITY
Sectoral reforms and actions
CO
IA is a to
ol th
at reinfo
rces the d
ifferent asp
ect of th
e info
rmatio
n ch
ain
Maternal deaths
Civil registration vital statistics
Compacts
Primary health care
National health accounts
Review mechanisms ndash CAF tool
Four sections in the tool
bull Reviews andor other mechanisms
bull Synthesis of information
bull From review to planning
bull Compactsother formal agreements
Reviews andor other mechanisms
Regular review mechanisms
bull What are the types of reviews in the country ndash
sectoral national sub-national programmatic
independent
bull How often are the reviews held ndash annual mid-
term review final
Relevant stakeholders
bull Who are the relevant stakeholders in the review
o Citizens professional associations different sectors active in health
(water and sanitation education transport agriculture women
finance) civil society private sector parliamentarians research
institutes non-governmental organizations decentralized and local
governments bilateral and multilateral agencies
bull Is there a mapping of the different stakeholders at the start of
the review process
bull Are the relevant stakeholders involved in all the phases of the
review process (preparation review development of an action
plan implementation of recommendations MampE of the
recommendations)
Civil society organization are important
to the review progress and performance
bull Which categories of civil society organizations
participate in the review
bull What role do they play
Synthesis of information
Reviews are based on a synthesis of
quality data
bull Is there a national annual assessment of the
quality of the data
bull Sub-national level - are there annual reviews at
regionsprovinces districts amp community levels
bull Is there a mechanism for obtaining retro-active
information
Programme-specific review are aligned with the
annual sector review and the results decisions
are incorporated
bull What is the frequency of reviews of specific
programmes
bull Is the timing of programme review harmonized
to the timing of the annual sector
bull Are the results of reviews of specific
programmes discussed and used to review the
health sector
From review to planning
The results of the review meetings are
widely used in the planning process
bull What types of reports are produced by the review
bull Is there a mechanism for synthesis of dataresults from
the reviews
bull What national mechanisms are in place to use the
results of the reviews for health planning
bull What types of plans are developed based on review
reports
bull Is there a mechanism for allocating resources based on
the results of the review
The results of the review meetings are
widely used in the planning process
Results achieved
bull How was the money spent
bull Have policies changed
bull Were recommendations implemented as intended
bull Has access to services improved
bull Has the quality of services improved
bull Has service utilization improved
bull Has coverage of interventions improved
bull Risk behaviors are they rare
bull Have health outcomes and equity improved
bull Do the services meet the needs of the population
bull Is the population protected from financial risks
Compactsother formal agreements
Country compactsformal arrangements
bull Codify government and development partner
commitments on ways of working to improve
health outcomes
ndash improve partner alignment with country systems
ndash bring new partners into health sector coordination efforts
ndash address the fragmentation and volatility of health aid
ndash reduce transaction costs
ndash increase mutual accountability
Key elements of a country compact
bull Commitments by different players ndash government development agencies implementing partners
bull Aid management modalities
bull Monitoring arrangements and indicators for tracking progress
Some useful links
bull httpwwwinternationalhealthpartnershipnet
bull httpwwwhealthintelligenceportalorg
bull httpwwwhlsporgHomeResourcesSectormonitoringfr
ameworksaspx
bull httpwwwetc-
crystalorgindexphpid=631ampL=120and20char28
124292Buser25202Bchar28124293D0
Thank you
Monitor
Action
Review
Review mechanisms ndash CAF tool
This section of the tool seeks to understand where the country stands on some key aspects of national policy process like - engagement of a broad range of stakeholders - reviews synthesis amp analysis of information on health
system and population health including RMNCH - prioritising amp planning using review findings to
prioritise and to plan - mutual accountability agreements (compacts) to
back one national plan and process
How does it link together
Epidemiological surveillance
National health information system
Monitoring and evaluation framework
National health sector strategic plan
Health sector reviews
ACCOUNTABILITY
Sectoral reforms and actions
CO
IA is a to
ol th
at reinfo
rces the d
ifferent asp
ect of th
e info
rmatio
n ch
ain
Maternal deaths
Civil registration vital statistics
Compacts
Primary health care
National health accounts
Review mechanisms ndash CAF tool
Four sections in the tool
bull Reviews andor other mechanisms
bull Synthesis of information
bull From review to planning
bull Compactsother formal agreements
Reviews andor other mechanisms
Regular review mechanisms
bull What are the types of reviews in the country ndash
sectoral national sub-national programmatic
independent
bull How often are the reviews held ndash annual mid-
term review final
Relevant stakeholders
bull Who are the relevant stakeholders in the review
o Citizens professional associations different sectors active in health
(water and sanitation education transport agriculture women
finance) civil society private sector parliamentarians research
institutes non-governmental organizations decentralized and local
governments bilateral and multilateral agencies
bull Is there a mapping of the different stakeholders at the start of
the review process
bull Are the relevant stakeholders involved in all the phases of the
review process (preparation review development of an action
plan implementation of recommendations MampE of the
recommendations)
Civil society organization are important
to the review progress and performance
bull Which categories of civil society organizations
participate in the review
bull What role do they play
Synthesis of information
Reviews are based on a synthesis of
quality data
bull Is there a national annual assessment of the
quality of the data
bull Sub-national level - are there annual reviews at
regionsprovinces districts amp community levels
bull Is there a mechanism for obtaining retro-active
information
Programme-specific review are aligned with the
annual sector review and the results decisions
are incorporated
bull What is the frequency of reviews of specific
programmes
bull Is the timing of programme review harmonized
to the timing of the annual sector
bull Are the results of reviews of specific
programmes discussed and used to review the
health sector
From review to planning
The results of the review meetings are
widely used in the planning process
bull What types of reports are produced by the review
bull Is there a mechanism for synthesis of dataresults from
the reviews
bull What national mechanisms are in place to use the
results of the reviews for health planning
bull What types of plans are developed based on review
reports
bull Is there a mechanism for allocating resources based on
the results of the review
The results of the review meetings are
widely used in the planning process
Results achieved
bull How was the money spent
bull Have policies changed
bull Were recommendations implemented as intended
bull Has access to services improved
bull Has the quality of services improved
bull Has service utilization improved
bull Has coverage of interventions improved
bull Risk behaviors are they rare
bull Have health outcomes and equity improved
bull Do the services meet the needs of the population
bull Is the population protected from financial risks
Compactsother formal agreements
Country compactsformal arrangements
bull Codify government and development partner
commitments on ways of working to improve
health outcomes
ndash improve partner alignment with country systems
ndash bring new partners into health sector coordination efforts
ndash address the fragmentation and volatility of health aid
ndash reduce transaction costs
ndash increase mutual accountability
Key elements of a country compact
bull Commitments by different players ndash government development agencies implementing partners
bull Aid management modalities
bull Monitoring arrangements and indicators for tracking progress
Some useful links
bull httpwwwinternationalhealthpartnershipnet
bull httpwwwhealthintelligenceportalorg
bull httpwwwhlsporgHomeResourcesSectormonitoringfr
ameworksaspx
bull httpwwwetc-
crystalorgindexphpid=631ampL=120and20char28
124292Buser25202Bchar28124293D0
Thank you
Monitor
Action
Review
How does it link together
Epidemiological surveillance
National health information system
Monitoring and evaluation framework
National health sector strategic plan
Health sector reviews
ACCOUNTABILITY
Sectoral reforms and actions
CO
IA is a to
ol th
at reinfo
rces the d
ifferent asp
ect of th
e info
rmatio
n ch
ain
Maternal deaths
Civil registration vital statistics
Compacts
Primary health care
National health accounts
Review mechanisms ndash CAF tool
Four sections in the tool
bull Reviews andor other mechanisms
bull Synthesis of information
bull From review to planning
bull Compactsother formal agreements
Reviews andor other mechanisms
Regular review mechanisms
bull What are the types of reviews in the country ndash
sectoral national sub-national programmatic
independent
bull How often are the reviews held ndash annual mid-
term review final
Relevant stakeholders
bull Who are the relevant stakeholders in the review
o Citizens professional associations different sectors active in health
(water and sanitation education transport agriculture women
finance) civil society private sector parliamentarians research
institutes non-governmental organizations decentralized and local
governments bilateral and multilateral agencies
bull Is there a mapping of the different stakeholders at the start of
the review process
bull Are the relevant stakeholders involved in all the phases of the
review process (preparation review development of an action
plan implementation of recommendations MampE of the
recommendations)
Civil society organization are important
to the review progress and performance
bull Which categories of civil society organizations
participate in the review
bull What role do they play
Synthesis of information
Reviews are based on a synthesis of
quality data
bull Is there a national annual assessment of the
quality of the data
bull Sub-national level - are there annual reviews at
regionsprovinces districts amp community levels
bull Is there a mechanism for obtaining retro-active
information
Programme-specific review are aligned with the
annual sector review and the results decisions
are incorporated
bull What is the frequency of reviews of specific
programmes
bull Is the timing of programme review harmonized
to the timing of the annual sector
bull Are the results of reviews of specific
programmes discussed and used to review the
health sector
From review to planning
The results of the review meetings are
widely used in the planning process
bull What types of reports are produced by the review
bull Is there a mechanism for synthesis of dataresults from
the reviews
bull What national mechanisms are in place to use the
results of the reviews for health planning
bull What types of plans are developed based on review
reports
bull Is there a mechanism for allocating resources based on
the results of the review
The results of the review meetings are
widely used in the planning process
Results achieved
bull How was the money spent
bull Have policies changed
bull Were recommendations implemented as intended
bull Has access to services improved
bull Has the quality of services improved
bull Has service utilization improved
bull Has coverage of interventions improved
bull Risk behaviors are they rare
bull Have health outcomes and equity improved
bull Do the services meet the needs of the population
bull Is the population protected from financial risks
Compactsother formal agreements
Country compactsformal arrangements
bull Codify government and development partner
commitments on ways of working to improve
health outcomes
ndash improve partner alignment with country systems
ndash bring new partners into health sector coordination efforts
ndash address the fragmentation and volatility of health aid
ndash reduce transaction costs
ndash increase mutual accountability
Key elements of a country compact
bull Commitments by different players ndash government development agencies implementing partners
bull Aid management modalities
bull Monitoring arrangements and indicators for tracking progress
Some useful links
bull httpwwwinternationalhealthpartnershipnet
bull httpwwwhealthintelligenceportalorg
bull httpwwwhlsporgHomeResourcesSectormonitoringfr
ameworksaspx
bull httpwwwetc-
crystalorgindexphpid=631ampL=120and20char28
124292Buser25202Bchar28124293D0
Thank you
Monitor
Action
Review
Review mechanisms ndash CAF tool
Four sections in the tool
bull Reviews andor other mechanisms
bull Synthesis of information
bull From review to planning
bull Compactsother formal agreements
Reviews andor other mechanisms
Regular review mechanisms
bull What are the types of reviews in the country ndash
sectoral national sub-national programmatic
independent
bull How often are the reviews held ndash annual mid-
term review final
Relevant stakeholders
bull Who are the relevant stakeholders in the review
o Citizens professional associations different sectors active in health
(water and sanitation education transport agriculture women
finance) civil society private sector parliamentarians research
institutes non-governmental organizations decentralized and local
governments bilateral and multilateral agencies
bull Is there a mapping of the different stakeholders at the start of
the review process
bull Are the relevant stakeholders involved in all the phases of the
review process (preparation review development of an action
plan implementation of recommendations MampE of the
recommendations)
Civil society organization are important
to the review progress and performance
bull Which categories of civil society organizations
participate in the review
bull What role do they play
Synthesis of information
Reviews are based on a synthesis of
quality data
bull Is there a national annual assessment of the
quality of the data
bull Sub-national level - are there annual reviews at
regionsprovinces districts amp community levels
bull Is there a mechanism for obtaining retro-active
information
Programme-specific review are aligned with the
annual sector review and the results decisions
are incorporated
bull What is the frequency of reviews of specific
programmes
bull Is the timing of programme review harmonized
to the timing of the annual sector
bull Are the results of reviews of specific
programmes discussed and used to review the
health sector
From review to planning
The results of the review meetings are
widely used in the planning process
bull What types of reports are produced by the review
bull Is there a mechanism for synthesis of dataresults from
the reviews
bull What national mechanisms are in place to use the
results of the reviews for health planning
bull What types of plans are developed based on review
reports
bull Is there a mechanism for allocating resources based on
the results of the review
The results of the review meetings are
widely used in the planning process
Results achieved
bull How was the money spent
bull Have policies changed
bull Were recommendations implemented as intended
bull Has access to services improved
bull Has the quality of services improved
bull Has service utilization improved
bull Has coverage of interventions improved
bull Risk behaviors are they rare
bull Have health outcomes and equity improved
bull Do the services meet the needs of the population
bull Is the population protected from financial risks
Compactsother formal agreements
Country compactsformal arrangements
bull Codify government and development partner
commitments on ways of working to improve
health outcomes
ndash improve partner alignment with country systems
ndash bring new partners into health sector coordination efforts
ndash address the fragmentation and volatility of health aid
ndash reduce transaction costs
ndash increase mutual accountability
Key elements of a country compact
bull Commitments by different players ndash government development agencies implementing partners
bull Aid management modalities
bull Monitoring arrangements and indicators for tracking progress
Some useful links
bull httpwwwinternationalhealthpartnershipnet
bull httpwwwhealthintelligenceportalorg
bull httpwwwhlsporgHomeResourcesSectormonitoringfr
ameworksaspx
bull httpwwwetc-
crystalorgindexphpid=631ampL=120and20char28
124292Buser25202Bchar28124293D0
Thank you
Monitor
Action
Review
Reviews andor other mechanisms
Regular review mechanisms
bull What are the types of reviews in the country ndash
sectoral national sub-national programmatic
independent
bull How often are the reviews held ndash annual mid-
term review final
Relevant stakeholders
bull Who are the relevant stakeholders in the review
o Citizens professional associations different sectors active in health
(water and sanitation education transport agriculture women
finance) civil society private sector parliamentarians research
institutes non-governmental organizations decentralized and local
governments bilateral and multilateral agencies
bull Is there a mapping of the different stakeholders at the start of
the review process
bull Are the relevant stakeholders involved in all the phases of the
review process (preparation review development of an action
plan implementation of recommendations MampE of the
recommendations)
Civil society organization are important
to the review progress and performance
bull Which categories of civil society organizations
participate in the review
bull What role do they play
Synthesis of information
Reviews are based on a synthesis of
quality data
bull Is there a national annual assessment of the
quality of the data
bull Sub-national level - are there annual reviews at
regionsprovinces districts amp community levels
bull Is there a mechanism for obtaining retro-active
information
Programme-specific review are aligned with the
annual sector review and the results decisions
are incorporated
bull What is the frequency of reviews of specific
programmes
bull Is the timing of programme review harmonized
to the timing of the annual sector
bull Are the results of reviews of specific
programmes discussed and used to review the
health sector
From review to planning
The results of the review meetings are
widely used in the planning process
bull What types of reports are produced by the review
bull Is there a mechanism for synthesis of dataresults from
the reviews
bull What national mechanisms are in place to use the
results of the reviews for health planning
bull What types of plans are developed based on review
reports
bull Is there a mechanism for allocating resources based on
the results of the review
The results of the review meetings are
widely used in the planning process
Results achieved
bull How was the money spent
bull Have policies changed
bull Were recommendations implemented as intended
bull Has access to services improved
bull Has the quality of services improved
bull Has service utilization improved
bull Has coverage of interventions improved
bull Risk behaviors are they rare
bull Have health outcomes and equity improved
bull Do the services meet the needs of the population
bull Is the population protected from financial risks
Compactsother formal agreements
Country compactsformal arrangements
bull Codify government and development partner
commitments on ways of working to improve
health outcomes
ndash improve partner alignment with country systems
ndash bring new partners into health sector coordination efforts
ndash address the fragmentation and volatility of health aid
ndash reduce transaction costs
ndash increase mutual accountability
Key elements of a country compact
bull Commitments by different players ndash government development agencies implementing partners
bull Aid management modalities
bull Monitoring arrangements and indicators for tracking progress
Some useful links
bull httpwwwinternationalhealthpartnershipnet
bull httpwwwhealthintelligenceportalorg
bull httpwwwhlsporgHomeResourcesSectormonitoringfr
ameworksaspx
bull httpwwwetc-
crystalorgindexphpid=631ampL=120and20char28
124292Buser25202Bchar28124293D0
Thank you
Monitor
Action
Review
Regular review mechanisms
bull What are the types of reviews in the country ndash
sectoral national sub-national programmatic
independent
bull How often are the reviews held ndash annual mid-
term review final
Relevant stakeholders
bull Who are the relevant stakeholders in the review
o Citizens professional associations different sectors active in health
(water and sanitation education transport agriculture women
finance) civil society private sector parliamentarians research
institutes non-governmental organizations decentralized and local
governments bilateral and multilateral agencies
bull Is there a mapping of the different stakeholders at the start of
the review process
bull Are the relevant stakeholders involved in all the phases of the
review process (preparation review development of an action
plan implementation of recommendations MampE of the
recommendations)
Civil society organization are important
to the review progress and performance
bull Which categories of civil society organizations
participate in the review
bull What role do they play
Synthesis of information
Reviews are based on a synthesis of
quality data
bull Is there a national annual assessment of the
quality of the data
bull Sub-national level - are there annual reviews at
regionsprovinces districts amp community levels
bull Is there a mechanism for obtaining retro-active
information
Programme-specific review are aligned with the
annual sector review and the results decisions
are incorporated
bull What is the frequency of reviews of specific
programmes
bull Is the timing of programme review harmonized
to the timing of the annual sector
bull Are the results of reviews of specific
programmes discussed and used to review the
health sector
From review to planning
The results of the review meetings are
widely used in the planning process
bull What types of reports are produced by the review
bull Is there a mechanism for synthesis of dataresults from
the reviews
bull What national mechanisms are in place to use the
results of the reviews for health planning
bull What types of plans are developed based on review
reports
bull Is there a mechanism for allocating resources based on
the results of the review
The results of the review meetings are
widely used in the planning process
Results achieved
bull How was the money spent
bull Have policies changed
bull Were recommendations implemented as intended
bull Has access to services improved
bull Has the quality of services improved
bull Has service utilization improved
bull Has coverage of interventions improved
bull Risk behaviors are they rare
bull Have health outcomes and equity improved
bull Do the services meet the needs of the population
bull Is the population protected from financial risks
Compactsother formal agreements
Country compactsformal arrangements
bull Codify government and development partner
commitments on ways of working to improve
health outcomes
ndash improve partner alignment with country systems
ndash bring new partners into health sector coordination efforts
ndash address the fragmentation and volatility of health aid
ndash reduce transaction costs
ndash increase mutual accountability
Key elements of a country compact
bull Commitments by different players ndash government development agencies implementing partners
bull Aid management modalities
bull Monitoring arrangements and indicators for tracking progress
Some useful links
bull httpwwwinternationalhealthpartnershipnet
bull httpwwwhealthintelligenceportalorg
bull httpwwwhlsporgHomeResourcesSectormonitoringfr
ameworksaspx
bull httpwwwetc-
crystalorgindexphpid=631ampL=120and20char28
124292Buser25202Bchar28124293D0
Thank you
Monitor
Action
Review
Relevant stakeholders
bull Who are the relevant stakeholders in the review
o Citizens professional associations different sectors active in health
(water and sanitation education transport agriculture women
finance) civil society private sector parliamentarians research
institutes non-governmental organizations decentralized and local
governments bilateral and multilateral agencies
bull Is there a mapping of the different stakeholders at the start of
the review process
bull Are the relevant stakeholders involved in all the phases of the
review process (preparation review development of an action
plan implementation of recommendations MampE of the
recommendations)
Civil society organization are important
to the review progress and performance
bull Which categories of civil society organizations
participate in the review
bull What role do they play
Synthesis of information
Reviews are based on a synthesis of
quality data
bull Is there a national annual assessment of the
quality of the data
bull Sub-national level - are there annual reviews at
regionsprovinces districts amp community levels
bull Is there a mechanism for obtaining retro-active
information
Programme-specific review are aligned with the
annual sector review and the results decisions
are incorporated
bull What is the frequency of reviews of specific
programmes
bull Is the timing of programme review harmonized
to the timing of the annual sector
bull Are the results of reviews of specific
programmes discussed and used to review the
health sector
From review to planning
The results of the review meetings are
widely used in the planning process
bull What types of reports are produced by the review
bull Is there a mechanism for synthesis of dataresults from
the reviews
bull What national mechanisms are in place to use the
results of the reviews for health planning
bull What types of plans are developed based on review
reports
bull Is there a mechanism for allocating resources based on
the results of the review
The results of the review meetings are
widely used in the planning process
Results achieved
bull How was the money spent
bull Have policies changed
bull Were recommendations implemented as intended
bull Has access to services improved
bull Has the quality of services improved
bull Has service utilization improved
bull Has coverage of interventions improved
bull Risk behaviors are they rare
bull Have health outcomes and equity improved
bull Do the services meet the needs of the population
bull Is the population protected from financial risks
Compactsother formal agreements
Country compactsformal arrangements
bull Codify government and development partner
commitments on ways of working to improve
health outcomes
ndash improve partner alignment with country systems
ndash bring new partners into health sector coordination efforts
ndash address the fragmentation and volatility of health aid
ndash reduce transaction costs
ndash increase mutual accountability
Key elements of a country compact
bull Commitments by different players ndash government development agencies implementing partners
bull Aid management modalities
bull Monitoring arrangements and indicators for tracking progress
Some useful links
bull httpwwwinternationalhealthpartnershipnet
bull httpwwwhealthintelligenceportalorg
bull httpwwwhlsporgHomeResourcesSectormonitoringfr
ameworksaspx
bull httpwwwetc-
crystalorgindexphpid=631ampL=120and20char28
124292Buser25202Bchar28124293D0
Thank you
Monitor
Action
Review
Civil society organization are important
to the review progress and performance
bull Which categories of civil society organizations
participate in the review
bull What role do they play
Synthesis of information
Reviews are based on a synthesis of
quality data
bull Is there a national annual assessment of the
quality of the data
bull Sub-national level - are there annual reviews at
regionsprovinces districts amp community levels
bull Is there a mechanism for obtaining retro-active
information
Programme-specific review are aligned with the
annual sector review and the results decisions
are incorporated
bull What is the frequency of reviews of specific
programmes
bull Is the timing of programme review harmonized
to the timing of the annual sector
bull Are the results of reviews of specific
programmes discussed and used to review the
health sector
From review to planning
The results of the review meetings are
widely used in the planning process
bull What types of reports are produced by the review
bull Is there a mechanism for synthesis of dataresults from
the reviews
bull What national mechanisms are in place to use the
results of the reviews for health planning
bull What types of plans are developed based on review
reports
bull Is there a mechanism for allocating resources based on
the results of the review
The results of the review meetings are
widely used in the planning process
Results achieved
bull How was the money spent
bull Have policies changed
bull Were recommendations implemented as intended
bull Has access to services improved
bull Has the quality of services improved
bull Has service utilization improved
bull Has coverage of interventions improved
bull Risk behaviors are they rare
bull Have health outcomes and equity improved
bull Do the services meet the needs of the population
bull Is the population protected from financial risks
Compactsother formal agreements
Country compactsformal arrangements
bull Codify government and development partner
commitments on ways of working to improve
health outcomes
ndash improve partner alignment with country systems
ndash bring new partners into health sector coordination efforts
ndash address the fragmentation and volatility of health aid
ndash reduce transaction costs
ndash increase mutual accountability
Key elements of a country compact
bull Commitments by different players ndash government development agencies implementing partners
bull Aid management modalities
bull Monitoring arrangements and indicators for tracking progress
Some useful links
bull httpwwwinternationalhealthpartnershipnet
bull httpwwwhealthintelligenceportalorg
bull httpwwwhlsporgHomeResourcesSectormonitoringfr
ameworksaspx
bull httpwwwetc-
crystalorgindexphpid=631ampL=120and20char28
124292Buser25202Bchar28124293D0
Thank you
Monitor
Action
Review
Synthesis of information
Reviews are based on a synthesis of
quality data
bull Is there a national annual assessment of the
quality of the data
bull Sub-national level - are there annual reviews at
regionsprovinces districts amp community levels
bull Is there a mechanism for obtaining retro-active
information
Programme-specific review are aligned with the
annual sector review and the results decisions
are incorporated
bull What is the frequency of reviews of specific
programmes
bull Is the timing of programme review harmonized
to the timing of the annual sector
bull Are the results of reviews of specific
programmes discussed and used to review the
health sector
From review to planning
The results of the review meetings are
widely used in the planning process
bull What types of reports are produced by the review
bull Is there a mechanism for synthesis of dataresults from
the reviews
bull What national mechanisms are in place to use the
results of the reviews for health planning
bull What types of plans are developed based on review
reports
bull Is there a mechanism for allocating resources based on
the results of the review
The results of the review meetings are
widely used in the planning process
Results achieved
bull How was the money spent
bull Have policies changed
bull Were recommendations implemented as intended
bull Has access to services improved
bull Has the quality of services improved
bull Has service utilization improved
bull Has coverage of interventions improved
bull Risk behaviors are they rare
bull Have health outcomes and equity improved
bull Do the services meet the needs of the population
bull Is the population protected from financial risks
Compactsother formal agreements
Country compactsformal arrangements
bull Codify government and development partner
commitments on ways of working to improve
health outcomes
ndash improve partner alignment with country systems
ndash bring new partners into health sector coordination efforts
ndash address the fragmentation and volatility of health aid
ndash reduce transaction costs
ndash increase mutual accountability
Key elements of a country compact
bull Commitments by different players ndash government development agencies implementing partners
bull Aid management modalities
bull Monitoring arrangements and indicators for tracking progress
Some useful links
bull httpwwwinternationalhealthpartnershipnet
bull httpwwwhealthintelligenceportalorg
bull httpwwwhlsporgHomeResourcesSectormonitoringfr
ameworksaspx
bull httpwwwetc-
crystalorgindexphpid=631ampL=120and20char28
124292Buser25202Bchar28124293D0
Thank you
Monitor
Action
Review
Reviews are based on a synthesis of
quality data
bull Is there a national annual assessment of the
quality of the data
bull Sub-national level - are there annual reviews at
regionsprovinces districts amp community levels
bull Is there a mechanism for obtaining retro-active
information
Programme-specific review are aligned with the
annual sector review and the results decisions
are incorporated
bull What is the frequency of reviews of specific
programmes
bull Is the timing of programme review harmonized
to the timing of the annual sector
bull Are the results of reviews of specific
programmes discussed and used to review the
health sector
From review to planning
The results of the review meetings are
widely used in the planning process
bull What types of reports are produced by the review
bull Is there a mechanism for synthesis of dataresults from
the reviews
bull What national mechanisms are in place to use the
results of the reviews for health planning
bull What types of plans are developed based on review
reports
bull Is there a mechanism for allocating resources based on
the results of the review
The results of the review meetings are
widely used in the planning process
Results achieved
bull How was the money spent
bull Have policies changed
bull Were recommendations implemented as intended
bull Has access to services improved
bull Has the quality of services improved
bull Has service utilization improved
bull Has coverage of interventions improved
bull Risk behaviors are they rare
bull Have health outcomes and equity improved
bull Do the services meet the needs of the population
bull Is the population protected from financial risks
Compactsother formal agreements
Country compactsformal arrangements
bull Codify government and development partner
commitments on ways of working to improve
health outcomes
ndash improve partner alignment with country systems
ndash bring new partners into health sector coordination efforts
ndash address the fragmentation and volatility of health aid
ndash reduce transaction costs
ndash increase mutual accountability
Key elements of a country compact
bull Commitments by different players ndash government development agencies implementing partners
bull Aid management modalities
bull Monitoring arrangements and indicators for tracking progress
Some useful links
bull httpwwwinternationalhealthpartnershipnet
bull httpwwwhealthintelligenceportalorg
bull httpwwwhlsporgHomeResourcesSectormonitoringfr
ameworksaspx
bull httpwwwetc-
crystalorgindexphpid=631ampL=120and20char28
124292Buser25202Bchar28124293D0
Thank you
Monitor
Action
Review
Programme-specific review are aligned with the
annual sector review and the results decisions
are incorporated
bull What is the frequency of reviews of specific
programmes
bull Is the timing of programme review harmonized
to the timing of the annual sector
bull Are the results of reviews of specific
programmes discussed and used to review the
health sector
From review to planning
The results of the review meetings are
widely used in the planning process
bull What types of reports are produced by the review
bull Is there a mechanism for synthesis of dataresults from
the reviews
bull What national mechanisms are in place to use the
results of the reviews for health planning
bull What types of plans are developed based on review
reports
bull Is there a mechanism for allocating resources based on
the results of the review
The results of the review meetings are
widely used in the planning process
Results achieved
bull How was the money spent
bull Have policies changed
bull Were recommendations implemented as intended
bull Has access to services improved
bull Has the quality of services improved
bull Has service utilization improved
bull Has coverage of interventions improved
bull Risk behaviors are they rare
bull Have health outcomes and equity improved
bull Do the services meet the needs of the population
bull Is the population protected from financial risks
Compactsother formal agreements
Country compactsformal arrangements
bull Codify government and development partner
commitments on ways of working to improve
health outcomes
ndash improve partner alignment with country systems
ndash bring new partners into health sector coordination efforts
ndash address the fragmentation and volatility of health aid
ndash reduce transaction costs
ndash increase mutual accountability
Key elements of a country compact
bull Commitments by different players ndash government development agencies implementing partners
bull Aid management modalities
bull Monitoring arrangements and indicators for tracking progress
Some useful links
bull httpwwwinternationalhealthpartnershipnet
bull httpwwwhealthintelligenceportalorg
bull httpwwwhlsporgHomeResourcesSectormonitoringfr
ameworksaspx
bull httpwwwetc-
crystalorgindexphpid=631ampL=120and20char28
124292Buser25202Bchar28124293D0
Thank you
Monitor
Action
Review
From review to planning
The results of the review meetings are
widely used in the planning process
bull What types of reports are produced by the review
bull Is there a mechanism for synthesis of dataresults from
the reviews
bull What national mechanisms are in place to use the
results of the reviews for health planning
bull What types of plans are developed based on review
reports
bull Is there a mechanism for allocating resources based on
the results of the review
The results of the review meetings are
widely used in the planning process
Results achieved
bull How was the money spent
bull Have policies changed
bull Were recommendations implemented as intended
bull Has access to services improved
bull Has the quality of services improved
bull Has service utilization improved
bull Has coverage of interventions improved
bull Risk behaviors are they rare
bull Have health outcomes and equity improved
bull Do the services meet the needs of the population
bull Is the population protected from financial risks
Compactsother formal agreements
Country compactsformal arrangements
bull Codify government and development partner
commitments on ways of working to improve
health outcomes
ndash improve partner alignment with country systems
ndash bring new partners into health sector coordination efforts
ndash address the fragmentation and volatility of health aid
ndash reduce transaction costs
ndash increase mutual accountability
Key elements of a country compact
bull Commitments by different players ndash government development agencies implementing partners
bull Aid management modalities
bull Monitoring arrangements and indicators for tracking progress
Some useful links
bull httpwwwinternationalhealthpartnershipnet
bull httpwwwhealthintelligenceportalorg
bull httpwwwhlsporgHomeResourcesSectormonitoringfr
ameworksaspx
bull httpwwwetc-
crystalorgindexphpid=631ampL=120and20char28
124292Buser25202Bchar28124293D0
Thank you
Monitor
Action
Review
The results of the review meetings are
widely used in the planning process
bull What types of reports are produced by the review
bull Is there a mechanism for synthesis of dataresults from
the reviews
bull What national mechanisms are in place to use the
results of the reviews for health planning
bull What types of plans are developed based on review
reports
bull Is there a mechanism for allocating resources based on
the results of the review
The results of the review meetings are
widely used in the planning process
Results achieved
bull How was the money spent
bull Have policies changed
bull Were recommendations implemented as intended
bull Has access to services improved
bull Has the quality of services improved
bull Has service utilization improved
bull Has coverage of interventions improved
bull Risk behaviors are they rare
bull Have health outcomes and equity improved
bull Do the services meet the needs of the population
bull Is the population protected from financial risks
Compactsother formal agreements
Country compactsformal arrangements
bull Codify government and development partner
commitments on ways of working to improve
health outcomes
ndash improve partner alignment with country systems
ndash bring new partners into health sector coordination efforts
ndash address the fragmentation and volatility of health aid
ndash reduce transaction costs
ndash increase mutual accountability
Key elements of a country compact
bull Commitments by different players ndash government development agencies implementing partners
bull Aid management modalities
bull Monitoring arrangements and indicators for tracking progress
Some useful links
bull httpwwwinternationalhealthpartnershipnet
bull httpwwwhealthintelligenceportalorg
bull httpwwwhlsporgHomeResourcesSectormonitoringfr
ameworksaspx
bull httpwwwetc-
crystalorgindexphpid=631ampL=120and20char28
124292Buser25202Bchar28124293D0
Thank you
Monitor
Action
Review
The results of the review meetings are
widely used in the planning process
Results achieved
bull How was the money spent
bull Have policies changed
bull Were recommendations implemented as intended
bull Has access to services improved
bull Has the quality of services improved
bull Has service utilization improved
bull Has coverage of interventions improved
bull Risk behaviors are they rare
bull Have health outcomes and equity improved
bull Do the services meet the needs of the population
bull Is the population protected from financial risks
Compactsother formal agreements
Country compactsformal arrangements
bull Codify government and development partner
commitments on ways of working to improve
health outcomes
ndash improve partner alignment with country systems
ndash bring new partners into health sector coordination efforts
ndash address the fragmentation and volatility of health aid
ndash reduce transaction costs
ndash increase mutual accountability
Key elements of a country compact
bull Commitments by different players ndash government development agencies implementing partners
bull Aid management modalities
bull Monitoring arrangements and indicators for tracking progress
Some useful links
bull httpwwwinternationalhealthpartnershipnet
bull httpwwwhealthintelligenceportalorg
bull httpwwwhlsporgHomeResourcesSectormonitoringfr
ameworksaspx
bull httpwwwetc-
crystalorgindexphpid=631ampL=120and20char28
124292Buser25202Bchar28124293D0
Thank you
Monitor
Action
Review
Compactsother formal agreements
Country compactsformal arrangements
bull Codify government and development partner
commitments on ways of working to improve
health outcomes
ndash improve partner alignment with country systems
ndash bring new partners into health sector coordination efforts
ndash address the fragmentation and volatility of health aid
ndash reduce transaction costs
ndash increase mutual accountability
Key elements of a country compact
bull Commitments by different players ndash government development agencies implementing partners
bull Aid management modalities
bull Monitoring arrangements and indicators for tracking progress
Some useful links
bull httpwwwinternationalhealthpartnershipnet
bull httpwwwhealthintelligenceportalorg
bull httpwwwhlsporgHomeResourcesSectormonitoringfr
ameworksaspx
bull httpwwwetc-
crystalorgindexphpid=631ampL=120and20char28
124292Buser25202Bchar28124293D0
Thank you
Monitor
Action
Review
Country compactsformal arrangements
bull Codify government and development partner
commitments on ways of working to improve
health outcomes
ndash improve partner alignment with country systems
ndash bring new partners into health sector coordination efforts
ndash address the fragmentation and volatility of health aid
ndash reduce transaction costs
ndash increase mutual accountability
Key elements of a country compact
bull Commitments by different players ndash government development agencies implementing partners
bull Aid management modalities
bull Monitoring arrangements and indicators for tracking progress
Some useful links
bull httpwwwinternationalhealthpartnershipnet
bull httpwwwhealthintelligenceportalorg
bull httpwwwhlsporgHomeResourcesSectormonitoringfr
ameworksaspx
bull httpwwwetc-
crystalorgindexphpid=631ampL=120and20char28
124292Buser25202Bchar28124293D0
Thank you
Monitor
Action
Review
Key elements of a country compact
bull Commitments by different players ndash government development agencies implementing partners
bull Aid management modalities
bull Monitoring arrangements and indicators for tracking progress
Some useful links
bull httpwwwinternationalhealthpartnershipnet
bull httpwwwhealthintelligenceportalorg
bull httpwwwhlsporgHomeResourcesSectormonitoringfr
ameworksaspx
bull httpwwwetc-
crystalorgindexphpid=631ampL=120and20char28
124292Buser25202Bchar28124293D0
Thank you
Monitor
Action
Review
Some useful links
bull httpwwwinternationalhealthpartnershipnet
bull httpwwwhealthintelligenceportalorg
bull httpwwwhlsporgHomeResourcesSectormonitoringfr
ameworksaspx
bull httpwwwetc-
crystalorgindexphpid=631ampL=120and20char28
124292Buser25202Bchar28124293D0
Thank you
Monitor
Action
Review