+ All Categories
Home > Documents > SP36 Brazilian version of the Shriners Hospital Upper ......Investigation performed at 1 Instituto...

SP36 Brazilian version of the Shriners Hospital Upper ......Investigation performed at 1 Instituto...

Date post: 27-Apr-2021
Category:
Upload: others
View: 0 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
1
Brazilian version of the Shriners Hospital Upper Extremity Evaluation (SHUEE): Cultural Adaptation and Evaluation of Psychometric Properties Renata D'Agos-ni NicoliniPanisson, PT, PhD 1,2,3 Ana Paula Tedesco, MD, MSc 1 Jon Davids, MD 4 Rita MaAello, PT, PhD 3 Márcio V.F. Donadio, PT, PhD 3 Investigation performed at 1 Instituto de Neuro-Ortopedia, Caxias do Sul, Brazil, 2 Faculdade da Serra Gaúcha, Caxias do Sul, Brazil, 3 Centro Infant, Institute of Biomedical Research, PUCRS, Porto Alegre, Brazil, 4 Shriners Hospitals for Children, Northern California, USA To validate the upper extremity (UE) assessment tool, Shriners Hospital Upper Extremity Evaluation (SHUEE), for individuals with hemiplegic cerebral palsy (HCP), in the Brazilian population. Validation study 21 patients with HCP mean age 8.73±3.98 (3-16) years old GMFCS I = 15 (71.4%) II = 6 (28.6%) MACS I = 6 (28.6%) II = 8 (38.1%) III = 7 (33.3%) On the translation stage there were small disagreements between translators on grammar and vocabulary, with no effect on the semantic equivalence of the content. They were discussed and harmonized. Since SHUEE is a practical content of UE evaluation there were no problems with idiomatic and cultural equivalence (colloquialisms). Therefore, no cultural adaptations were necessary. The SHUEE showed good psychometric properties with good and excellent α-C (Table 1). The convergent validity (Table 2) indicated significant correlation of the SFA and the DPA with MACS, PMAL and PEDI. The sensitivity to change showed significant difference between the pre and post-treatment on the score of DPA (Table 3). SHUEE showed excellent intra and interobserver reliability with ICC greater than 0.9 (Table 4) . Our results showed that the Brazilian Portuguese version of SHUEE demonstrated a good reliability and convergent validity, suggesting that it is a reliable tool for the upper extremity evaluation of Brazilian children and adolescents, 3 to 18 years old, with HCP. Renata D’Agostini Nicolini-Panisson, [email protected], Telephone:+55 54 8132 2793 SP 36 Table 1 Psychometric characteristics of the SHUEE in children and adolescents with hemiplegic cerebral palsy Shriners Hospital Upper Extremity Evaluation Spontaneous Functional Analysis Dynamic Positional Analysis Grasp and Release Analysis Number of activities, n 9 16 6 Original score 1 (n=11), mean±SD 23.8±11.3 47.5±11.7 4.73±2.14 Actual score (n=21), mean±SD 27,86±13,43 49,57±14,45 4.43±2.29 Floor effect, n (%) 0 (0) 0 (0) 3 (14.29) Ceiling effect, n (%) 4 (19.05) 1 (4.76) 13 (61.90) α-C, mean (CI 95%) α-C total = 0.842 (0.79-0.88) 0.988 (0.972- 0.997) 0.777 (0.415- 0.942) 0.933 (0.831- 0.983) n=21. α-C= Cronbach’s Alpha Coefficient. SHUEE= Shriners Hospital Upper Extremity Evaluation. 1 Data from the original article of SHUEE (Davids et al. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006;88(2):326-333). Table 2 – Convergent validity of SHUEE Shriners Hospital Upper Extremity Evaluation Spontaneous Functional Analysis Dynamic Positional Analysis MACS -0.68 (0.00) -0.54 (0.01) PMAL (How often scale) 0.86 (0.00) 0.83 (0.00) PMAL (How well scale) 0.86 (0.00) 0.83 (0.00) PMAL (Spontaneous use) 0.80 (0.00) 0.76 (0.00) PEDI (Functional skill: Self-care) 0.68 (0.00) 0.62 (0.00) PEDI (Caregiver assistance: Self-care) 0.75 (0.00) 0.63 (0.00) Data expressed by Spearman Correlation Coefficient: r (p value). MACS=Manual Ability Classification System; PMAL=Pediatric Motor Activity Log; PEDI=Pediatric Evaluation of Disability Inventory. Table 3 – Sensitivity to change of SHUEE after treatment with botulinum toxin and physical therapy Measures Before* After* Difference* P value Spontaneous Functional Analysis 19.20±8.17 (10,31) 21.00±10.05 (12,36) 1.80±2.77 (-2,5) 0.22 Dynamic Positional Analysis 42.4±11.17 (25,53) 53.6±7.16 (45,63) 11.2±6.30 (3,20) 0.01 Grasp and Release Analysis 4.2±1.79 (2,6) 4.40±1.67 (2,6) 0.2±0.45 (0,1) 0.37 *Data expressed as mean±standard-desviation, with the minimum and maximum values in parentheses. n=5. Table 4 – Intraobserver and interobserver reliability Measures ICC Intraobserver (First x Second Assessment) ICC Interobserver (5 Physical Therapist) Spontaneous Functional Analysis 0.996-0.998 0,990-1,00 Dynamic Positional Analysis 0.979-0.998 0,979-0,993 Thumb 0.944-0.986 0,976-1,00 Fingers 0.984-1.00 0,984-1,00 Wrist 0.922-0.989 0,887-0,959 Forearm 0.993-0.999 0,977-1,00 Elbow 0.889-1.00 1,00-1,00 Grasp and Release Analysis 1.00-1.00 1,00-1,00 *Values expressed as mean ICC: minimum-maximum. ICC= Intraclass Correlation Coefficient. The translation and cultural adaptation was performed following the stages proposed by the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. The evaluated psychometric properties were reliability and convergent validity. Reliability was determined by internal consistency (Cronbach’s Alpha Coefficient, α-C), ceiling and floor effect, sensitivity to change (Student’s Paired t test), intraobserver and interobserver reliability (Intraclass Correlation Coefficient, ICC). Sensitivity to change was evaluated measuring changes that occurred after treatment suggested in the first evaluation, in 5 individuals, treated with botulinum toxin and physical therapy. Tests were done 2 – 4 months after treatment. Inter and intraobserver reliability were tested with 5 physical therapists previously trained in SHUEE. They blindly examined videos from 10 randomized patients, in two different occasions, two weeks apart. Convergent validity was performed using Spearman's Correlation Coefficient examining correlations between the items of SHUEE: Spontaneous Functional Analysis (SFA) and Dynamic Positional Analysis (DPA) with Pediatric Motor Activity Log (PMAL), Pediatric Evaluation of Disability Inventory (PEDI) and Manual Ability Classification System (MACS). OBJECTIVE DESIGN PARTICIPANTS AND SETTING METHODS RESULTS CONCLUSIONS
Transcript
Page 1: SP36 Brazilian version of the Shriners Hospital Upper ......Investigation performed at 1 Instituto de Neuro-Ortopedia, Caxias do Sul, Brazil, 2 Faculdade da Serra Gaúcha, Caxias do

Brazilian version of the Shriners Hospital Upper Extremity Evaluation (SHUEE): Cultural Adaptation and Evaluation of Psychometric Properties

Renata  D'Agos-ni  Nicolini-­‐Panisson,  PT,  PhD1,2,3    Ana  Paula  Tedesco,  MD,  MSc1        Jon  Davids,  MD4      Rita  MaAello,  PT,  PhD3          Márcio  V.F.  Donadio,  PT,  PhD3  Investigation performed at 1 Instituto de Neuro-Ortopedia, Caxias do Sul, Brazil, 2 Faculdade da Serra Gaúcha, Caxias do Sul, Brazil,

3 Centro Infant, Institute of Biomedical Research, PUCRS, Porto Alegre, Brazil, 4 Shriners Hospitals for Children, Northern California, USA

To validate the upper extremity (UE) assessment tool, Shriners Hospital Upper Extremity Evaluation (SHUEE), for individuals with hemiplegic cerebral palsy (HCP), in the Brazilian population.

Validation study

•  21 patients with HCP •  mean age 8.73±3.98 (3-16) years

old •  GMFCS I = 15 (71.4%) II = 6 (28.6%) •  MACS I = 6 (28.6%) II = 8 (38.1%) III = 7 (33.3%)

On the translation stage there were small disagreements between translators on grammar and vocabulary, with no effect on the semantic equivalence of the content. They were discussed and harmonized. Since SHUEE is a practical content of UE evaluation there were no problems with idiomatic and cultural equivalence (colloquialisms). Therefore, no cultural adaptations were necessary.

The SHUEE showed good psychometric properties with good and excellent α-C (Table 1). The convergent validity (Table 2) indicated significant correlation of the SFA and the DPA with MACS, PMAL and PEDI. The sensitivity to change showed significant difference between the pre and post-treatment on the score of DPA (Table 3). SHUEE showed excellent intra and interobserver reliability with ICC greater than 0.9 (Table 4) .

Our results showed that the Brazilian Portuguese version of SHUEE demonstrated a good reliability and convergent validity, suggesting that it is a reliable tool for the upper extremity evaluation of Brazilian children and adolescents, 3 to 18 years old, with HCP.

Renata D’Agostini Nicolini-Panisson, [email protected], Telephone:+55 54 8132 2793

   SP  36    

Table 1 – Psychometric characteristics of the SHUEE in children and adolescents with hemiplegic cerebral palsy

Shriners Hospital Upper Extremity Evaluation Spontaneous

Functional Analysis

Dynamic Positional Analysis

Grasp and Release Analysis

Number of activities, n 9 16 6

Original score1 (n=11), mean±SD 23.8±11.3 47.5±11.7 4.73±2.14

Actual score (n=21), mean±SD 27,86±13,43 49,57±14,45 4.43±2.29

Floor effect, n (%) 0 (0) 0 (0) 3 (14.29)

Ceiling effect, n (%) 4 (19.05) 1 (4.76) 13 (61.90)

α-C, mean (CI 95%)

α-C total = 0.842 (0.79-0.88) 0.988 (0.972-

0.997) 0.777 (0.415-

0.942) 0.933 (0.831-

0.983)

n=21. α-C= Cronbach’s Alpha Coefficient. SHUEE= Shriners Hospital Upper Extremity Evaluation. 1 Data from the original article of SHUEE (Davids et al. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006;88(2):326-333).

Table 2 – Convergent validity of SHUEE Shriners Hospital Upper Extremity Evaluation

Spontaneous

Functional Analysis

Dynamic Positional

Analysis

MACS -0.68 (0.00) -0.54 (0.01)

PMAL (How often scale) 0.86 (0.00) 0.83 (0.00)

PMAL (How well scale) 0.86 (0.00) 0.83 (0.00)

PMAL (Spontaneous use) 0.80 (0.00) 0.76 (0.00)

PEDI (Functional skill: Self-care) 0.68 (0.00) 0.62 (0.00)

PEDI (Caregiver assistance: Self-care) 0.75 (0.00) 0.63 (0.00)

Data expressed by Spearman Correlation Coefficient: r (p value). MACS=Manual Ability Classification System; PMAL=Pediatric Motor Activity Log; PEDI=Pediatric Evaluation of Disability Inventory.

Table 3 – Sensitivity to change of SHUEE after treatment with botulinum toxin and physical therapy

Measures Before* After* Difference* P value

Spontaneous Functional

Analysis

19.20±8.17

(10,31)

21.00±10.05

(12,36)

1.80±2.77

(-2,5) 0.22

Dynamic Positional Analysis 42.4±11.17

(25,53)

53.6±7.16

(45,63)

11.2±6.30

(3,20) 0.01

Grasp and Release Analysis 4.2±1.79

(2,6)

4.40±1.67

(2,6)

0.2±0.45

(0,1) 0.37

*Data expressed as mean±standard-desviation, with the minimum and maximum values in parentheses. n=5.

Table 4 – Intraobserver and interobserver reliability

Measures ICC Intraobserver

(First x Second Assessment)

ICC Interobserver

(5 Physical Therapist)

Spontaneous Functional Analysis 0.996-0.998 0,990-1,00

Dynamic Positional Analysis 0.979-0.998 0,979-0,993

Thumb 0.944-0.986 0,976-1,00

Fingers 0.984-1.00 0,984-1,00

Wrist 0.922-0.989 0,887-0,959

Forearm 0.993-0.999 0,977-1,00

Elbow 0.889-1.00 1,00-1,00

Grasp and Release Analysis 1.00-1.00 1,00-1,00

*Values expressed as mean ICC: minimum-maximum. ICC= Intraclass Correlation Coefficient.

The translation and cultural adaptation was performed following the stages proposed by the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons.

The evaluated psychometric properties were reliability and convergent validity. Reliability was determined by internal consistency (Cronbach’s Alpha Coefficient, α-C), ceiling and floor effect, sensitivity to change (Student’s Paired t test), intraobserver and interobserver reliability (Intraclass Correlation Coefficient, ICC).

Sensitivity to change was evaluated measuring changes that occurred after treatment suggested in the first evaluation, in 5 individuals, treated with botulinum toxin and physical therapy. Tests were done 2 – 4 months after treatment.

Inter and intraobserver reliability were tested with 5 physical therapists previously trained in SHUEE. They blindly examined videos from 10 randomized patients, in two different occasions, two weeks apart.

Convergent validity was performed using Spearman's Correlation Coefficient examining correlations between the items of SHUEE: Spontaneous Functional Analysis (SFA) and Dynamic Positional Analysis (DPA) with Pediatric Motor Activity Log (PMAL), Pediatric Evaluation of Disability Inventory (PEDI) and Manual Ability Classification System (MACS).

OBJECTIVE  

DESIGN  

PARTICIPANTS AND SETTING

METHODS   RESULTS  

CONCLUSIONS  

Recommended