Dr. Kohei Komamura
Professor of Economics, Director of the Research Center
for Financial Gerontology, Keio University
Special Speech
Prospects of Japan’s social security system
and role of public and private pensions
Keywords of the Lecture
• 2017 new population estimates. Continued decline in population/increase in longevity
• The outlook for the social security system reform
• The issues facing the public pension system and verification of the 2019 pension finance
• The roles of public and private pension programs
• Financial gerontology, financial literacy and behavioral economics
2
Frequent Social Security System Reforms and System Revisions • 1: A period of intensive reform toward 2025. Public funds to be concentrated on low-income earners and
healthcare/Long-term care
• 2: Pension continues to be reformed every five years, healthcare, every two years and Long-term care, every three years through meticulous system and fee revisions (healthcare and Long-term care to be revised every six years simultaneously)
• Pension: 2019 and 2024 (ensuring of the pension replacement rate under fixed premium and enhancement of private pension programs and measures against the low-income elderly)
• Healthcare: 2018, 2020, 2022 and 2024, Long-term care (disabled people): 2018, 2021 and 2024: (leading the behavior of business operators and medical institutions by means of rewards, taking measures against Long-term care worker shortage and those against lifestyle-related diseases/Long-term care prevention and dementia)
• Plus joint reform of social security and taxation, social security reform program legislation and additional reform (political conditions, economic/financial conditions, demographics, etc.)
• 3: “When the nation has policy, the people find a way around” --> Does the policy have the public reaction in view?
• --> The government does not eye the whole household economy in a cross-sectoral manner (individual impacts are invisible).
• --> A lack of a future vision and lifelong asset building behavior.
• --> A lack of the elderly’ s perspective (how they feel toward, understand and react to, system reforms or changes in use of systems) (gerontology (psychology) or financial gerontology makes a contribution).
• --> Economic agent, household economy and the elderly’s reaction (savings, consumption, asset building and inheritance).
3
65
70
75
80
85
90
95
Trends in, and Estimates for, Median Longevity
Male Female4
Complied based on Projection: Population & Household by the National Institute of Population and Social Security Research (each year)
New Population Estimates: Continued Extension of Longevity
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
Survival Rates to the Specified Age (%, Actual Results and Estimates)
Aged 65 (M17) Aged 75 (M17)
Aged 65 (F17) Aged 75 (F17)
Estimates for the Number of Future Deaths (unit: 1,000 people)
1000
1100
1200
1300
1400
1500
1600
1700
1800
2016
2018
2020
2022
2024
2026
2028
2030
2032
2034
2036
2038
2040
2042
2044
2046
2048
2050
2052
2054
2056
2058
2060
2062
2064
Estimates for the Number of Deaths (1,000 people)
5
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
Actual Number of, and Estimates for, Births (1,000 people)
1975 19801987 19921997 Estimates for 2002Estimates for 2006 Estimates for 2012Actual + Estimates for 2017
Trends in, and Estimates for, the Number of Births (unit: 1,000 people)
Complied based on Projection: Population & Household 2017 by the National Institute of Population and Social Security Research
Around 2040: Society where 1.7 Million People Die and 700 Thousand People are Born
Estimates for the Number of the Elderly Increased Percentages of Those Aged 75 or Older and Women
6
Complied based on Projection: Population & Household 2017 by the National Institute of Population and Social Security Research
45.0%
50.0%
55.0%
60.0%
65.0%
70.0%
0
5000
10000
15000
20000
25000
30000
35000
40000
45000
2015 2020 2025 2030 2035 2040 2045 2050 2055 2060 2065
Estimates for Population of those Aged 65 or Older and Aged 75 or Older (unit: 1,000 people) and Percentages of those Aged 75 or Older (%) and Women (%)
Population of those aged 65-74 Population of those aged 75 or older Percentage of women aged 75 or older
Percentage of those aged 75 or older Percentage of women aged 65 or older
The Issues Facing the Pension System and Verification of the 2019 Pension Finance
• 1: Reform implemented in 2016 based on the 2014 pension finance verification
• Resources for the so-called macroeconomic slide formula is on hold in the deflationary phase to be addressed by carry-over
• Expansion in application of employees’ pension to non-regular workers
• 2: Issues identified as a result of the 2014 pension finance verification
• The macroeconomic slide formula to be applied to the basic pension for a period of about 30 years
• --> Sharp reduction in the basic pension benefit levels. An increase in the elderly with low pension payments
• --> Sustainability confirmed in The Financial Report on the Public Pension System Fiscal 2015 by the Pension Actuarial Subcommittee, Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare
• 3: Discussions in the 2014 pension finance verification
• “Estimated rate of profit --> Estimated real rate of interest” --> Target earnings of reserve --> Government Pension Investment Fund (GPIF)’s base portfolio
• 4: Policy for cooperation between public and private pension programs and diffusion of private pension programs (corporate or personal pension plans)
• Decline in employees’ pension funds
• Enhancement of private pension programs and promotion of enrollment
• Support for low-income earners needed in order to offset the effect of the macroeconomic slide formula on the basic pension
7
Rates of Change of Public Pension from the Current Level and Options
8
down 30%
Source: Compiled based on Data by the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare (2015)
Rates of Change for the Basic Pension and Proportional Part
(Case E)
2015
2030
2042 (E
nro
lled f
or
40 y
ears
, A
ged 6
5)
2042 (
Enro
lled f
or
45 y
ears
, A
ged 6
5)
2042(E
nro
lled f
or
47 y
ears
, A
ged 6
7)
2042(E
nro
lled f
or
49 y
ears
, A
ged 6
9)
Rates of Change for the Basic Pension and Proportional Part
(Case H)
down 43%
Rates of change for proportional part Rates of change for basic pension Rates of change for proportional part Rates of change for basic pension
2015
2030
2042 (E
nro
lled f
or
40 y
ears
, A
ged 6
5)
2042 (
Enro
lled f
or
45 y
ears
, A
ged 6
5)
2042(E
nro
lled f
or
47 y
ears
, A
ged 6
7)
2042(E
nro
lled f
or
49 y
ears
, A
ged 6
9)
Simulation for the Effect of Pensionable Age/Period of Enrollment and Private Pension Plans
9 Source: Compiled based on Data by the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare (2015)
Estimated Pension Replacement Rates (%) and Supplemental Measures (Case E)
20
15
20
30
20
42
(E
nro
lled
fo
r 4
0 y
ea
rs, A
ge
d 6
5)
20
42
(E
nro
lled
fo
r 4
5 y
ea
rs, A
ge
d 6
5)
20
42
(E
nro
lled
fo
r 4
7 y
ea
rs, A
ge
d 6
7)
20
42
(E
nro
lled
fo
r 4
9 y
ea
rs, A
ge
d 6
9)
20
42
(P
riva
te P
en
sio
n P
lan
s)
Increment (proportional part) Basic Pension Proportional Part Increment (basic pension) Private Pension Plans
10
Excerpts from the Financial Literacy Survey by the Central Council for Financial Services Information, Bank of Japan (2016)
Aside from Benefit Levels, to What Extent Do People Understand the Public
Pension Program in which They are Enrolled?
The amount of money I can receive
The category of insured person
The necessary period of enrollment for pension eligibility
Pensionable age
The type of my public pension program
(Fig. 25) Understanding of One’s Own Pension <Q 27>
I know I don't know
Longevity and Asset Building/Management
11
1) The impact of extension of longevity (extension of longevity): saving behavior, asset selection, retirement age
2) Income/asset risk (factors of asset depletion/variation): fluctuations in consumer prices/asset prices, review
of the social security system (public pension, healthcare/Long-term care expenses), prolongation of asset
management, burden on asset management ability
3) Risk of deterioration in cognitive function (prolongation of a period of low cognitive function)
80s
Amount of Assets
Extension of Longevity
Factor of Asset Depletion
Period of
Deterioration in
Cognitive Ability
Aged 60 Late 60s
Age
90s
Financial Assets that Grow with Advancing Age and Percentage of Risk Assets
0.0%
2.0%
4.0%
6.0%
8.0%
10.0%
12.0%
14.0%
16.0%
18.0%
20.0%
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
~34 35-44 45-54 55-64 65-74 75+
Advancing Age and Total Financial Assets (10,000 yen: left), Percentage of Risk Assets (stocks/bonds, trusts, etc.) (%: right)
リスク性資産の割合 合計金融資産 Total Financial Assets Percentage of Risk
Assets
12 Source: Estimates by Komamura’s Laboratory
Aging of “Financial Assets”
4% 4% 3% 3% 3%
10% 8% 7% 7% 6%
15% 16% 16% 14% 13%
24% 21% 23% 26% 26%
26% 25% 21% 20% 22%
22% 25% 29% 30% 30%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
2014年 2020年 2025年 2030年 2035年
Estimates of the Percentage of Financial Assets Owned by Age Increase in the Percentage of the Elderly in Financial Assets
~34 35-44 45-54 55-64 65-74 75+
13
Data: Estimates by Prof. Komamura based on Household Projection for Japan
by the National Institute of Population and Social Research (national projection) (January 2013)
2014 2020 2025 2030 2035
Issues Associated with Lifelong Asset Building
• 1) Time dispersion --> “Do the elderly reduce the weight of risk assets more?”
• 2) Wealth effect --> “With advancing age, financial assets (inheritance, retirement benefit) increase while the weight of risk assets is increased”
• 3) The issue associated with changes in financial literacy (inverted U-shape) with advancing age
• 4) The issue associated with deterioration in cognitive ability with advancing age --> ”Aging behavioral economics”
• 5) Increased uncertainty over public pension (lifetime, indexation) and the social security system
• 6) Lifecycle changes of risks other than financial assets
• Uncertainty over labor income (wage structure, changes in employment patterns, unemployment risks)
• Uncertainty over home mortgage, educational spending and expenses
• --> Will “target year funds” be accepted by the young generation? Issues associated with lifelong personal assets building (those associated with financial literacy and behavioral economics “Policy for cooperation between public and private pension programs”)
14
Financial Literacy Forms an Inverted U-Shape with Age (Peaks in the 60s, and Higher among Men. Young Men are Over-confident)
-15
-10
-5
0
5
10
18-29 30s 40s 50s 60s 70s
Objective Assessment - Self-Assessment (%)
Male Female
15
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
18-29歳 30-39歳 40-49歳 50-59歳 60-69歳 70-79歳
Financial Literacy by Gender and Age
男性 女性
Compiled based on the Financial Literacy Survey by the Central Council for Financial Services Information, Bank of Japan (2016)
18-29 30-39 40-49 50-59 60-69 70-79
Male
Female
Financial Literacy by Financial Conditions (Percentage of Questions Answered Correctly by Income Bracket/Financial
Asset Level (%))
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
Financial Literacy by Financial Asset Level
16
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
Financial Literacy by Income Bracket
No in
com
e
Less than 2
.5 m
il. y
en
2.5
mil.
~ le
ss than 5
mil.
yen
5 m
il.~
less than 7
.5 m
il. y
en
7.5
mil.
~ le
ss than 1
0 m
il. y
en
10 m
il. ~
le
ss than 1
5 m
il. y
en
1.5
mil.
yen o
r m
ore
Don’t k
now
/Don’t w
ant
to a
nsw
er
To
tal
No a
ssets
Less than 2
.5 m
il. y
en
2.5
mil.
~ le
ss than 5
mil.
yen
5 m
il.~
less than 7
.5 m
il. y
en
7.5
mil.
~ le
ss than 1
0 m
il. y
en
10 m
il. ~
le
ss than 2
0 m
il. y
en
20 m
il. y
en o
r m
ore
Don’t k
now
/Don’t w
ant
to a
nsw
er
To
tal
Compiled based on the Financial Literacy Survey by the Central Council for Financial
Services Information, Bank of Japan (2016)
16
Financial Literacy by Educational Background/Occupation (High Percentage of Questions Answered Correctly among Those with High Educational
Background and Public Servants (%))
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
Financial Literacy by Educational Background
17
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
Financial Literacy by Occupation
Compiled based on the Financial Literacy Survey by the Central
Council for Financial Services Information, Bank of Japan (2016)
Cognitive Function Deteriorates with Age
18 Source: Midori Takayama (Changes and adaptations in intellectual functions; gerontology core subject 1: Changes and adaptations in mental and physical functions/life with advancing age)
Calculation span
Reading span
Backward digit recall span
Execution Performance of Tasks Related to Cognitive Function
Processing speed
Numeric symbol task
Pattern comparison
Letter comparison
Z score
Working memory
Z score
Cognitive Ability and Asset Management Performance
Kim, E., S. Hanna, S. Chatterjee, and S. Lindamood (2012), “Who among the Elderly Owns Stocks? The
Role of Cognitive Ability and Bequest Motive,” Journal of Family Economic Issues, Vol.33, pp. 338-352.
Cognitive Ability and Percentage of Those
Owning Stock Investments
Source: Total Small Medium Large
(<$10,000) ($10,000~50,000) (>$50,000)
Source:
Fig. 1-10 Cognitive Ability (estimate) and Asset
Management Performance
Low score
High score
Difference between two scores
An
nu
al risk (
ad
justm
en
t p
erf
orm
ance)
Size of portfolio
19
Behavioral Economics and Aging (hypothesis) Consider the Impact of Deterioration in Cognitive Function with Advancing Age on Asset Selection
• 1) Due to the deterioration in cognitive function with advancing age, the elderly make a decision to save their cognitive function more; they thus are more prone to causing a framing effect (decision is influenced by how things are expressed).
• 2) With advancing age it becomes difficult for the elderly to respond to many options and they tend to prefer easy-to-follow information and simple options.
• --> The elderly prefer less options (about half) than young adults.
• 3) The elderly are prone to putting off decision-making and will not regret not having made a choice.
• --> The ownership effect (people don’t want to let go of something they once possessed) becomes stronger.
20
• 4) The elderly tend to remember positive emotional events or information and forget negative information.
• --> Influenced more by positive frames than by negative ones.
• --> Issues associated with decision-making and information sharing (Long-term care and inheritance issues) among family members (between parent and child)
• 5) In terms of the temporal axis, they have a perspective of not looking toward the future but looking back on the past.
• --> Delay in decision-making timing (assets/business succession, asset management or vacant house issues)
• 6) Aging and differences between men and women
21
Behavioral Economics and Aging (hypothesis 2)
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
18-29 30s 40s 50s 60s 70s
Behavioral Bias by Age and Gender (%)
損失回避 損失回避 近視眼的
近視眼的 横並び 横並び
22
• Loss aversion tendency and horizontally egalitarian behavior are more conspicuous among women in all age brackets.
• Near-sighted behavior is more noticeable among men in nearly all age brackets.
• Whereas loss aversion tendency and horizontally egalitarian behavior slightly decline among both men and women in older age, near-sighted behavior rises (refer to Reference Material 3).
Approach from Behavioral Economics
Compiled based on the Financial Literacy Survey by the Central Council for Financial Services Information, Bank of Japan (2016)
Horizontally
egalitarian, Male
Loss aversion,
Female
Near-sighted,
Female
Horizontally
egalitarian, Female
Loss aversion,
Male Near-sighted, Male
Implications of Asset Management and the Social Security System in Older Age
• 1) A “decline” in cognitive function in an aging society represents a “rise in transaction costs” and a “decline in market function”
• Modern social and economic activities are designed on the premise of the presence of a certain level of information processing capacity
• 2) How financial services should be in an aging society
• Response to the elderly’s mental and physical changes (psychological fluctuations (instability (including a will)), decline in understanding/memory (financial products and procedures), postponement of decision, decline in transaction capability, etc., and psychological characteristics (at variance with family members in understanding)
• Cooperation between finance and healthcare/Long-term care/welfare
• --> Adult guardianship (issues associated with the use situation, property management and physical custody), regional comprehensive care and citizen guardians
• Issues over inheritance (conflicts of interest between parent and child or among family members, including changes in cognitive function and psychology)
23
Trends in Longevity and Changes in Social and Economic Systems
• 1) From the average life span of 80 years to that of 90 years and to that of 100 years
• 2) In terms of the impact of the progress of longevity, attention needs to be paid not only to a numeric increase in the number of the elderly but to a qualitative impact on social and economic systems as well.
• 3) Establishment of the social and economic system that fits into longevity
• 1) Review of various social and economic systems established in the industrial revolution/welfare state era (the age category of schooling, employment and retirement under the 20th century model)
• 2) Establishment of the social and economic system that incorporates changes in intellectual/cognitive function and psychology with age: Policy formulation based on cognitive science, gerontology and social neuroscience
• Revision toward a lifecycle perspective
• Needs for revising an “autonomous individual persona (decision-making, ability to judge)”
• Needs for putting in place new social economic rules, public roles and services (including the social security system) by leveraging the fruit of aging behavioral economics
24
Reference Material 1: Percentages of Correct Answers by Area in the Financial Literacy 2016
25
Compiled based on the Financial Literacy Survey by the Central Council for Financial Services Information, Bank of Japan (2016)
Attribute-based characteristics are as described below: 1) The percentage of correct answers is the lowest in the age bracket
from 18 to 29. With advancing age, it tends to rise (slightly falls in those in their 70s).
2) The percentage of correct answers is relatively low among students and part-timers.
3) With advancing annual incomes and financial assets, it tends to rise. 4) The higher frequency of reading financial/economic information, the
higher the percentage of correct answers. 5) Those who have gained experience in financial transactions tend to
show higher percentages of correct answers.
In a comparison of the same true or false questions as those used in Japan, the percentage of correct answers was 10% lower in Japan than in the U.S. The percentage of correct answers was below that of the U.S. in any of the categories, such as by question, gender, age bracket and annual income. In terms of behavioral characteristics compared with the U.S., the number of those who feel they are over-indebted was smaller and that of those who have a contingency reserve was larger in Japan. *In comparison with other countries overseas, you should allow for the fact that circumstances differ in terms of financial products and services, the taxation or educational system when looking at the results.
金融リテラシー・マップの分野 正答率
家計管理 51.0
生活設計 50.4
金融知識:金融取引の基本 72.9
金融知識:金融・経済の基礎 48.8
金融知識:保険 52.5
金融知識:ローン・クレジット 53.3
金融知識:資産形成 54.3
外部の知見活用 65.3
合計 55.6
Areas of the Financial Literacy Map Percentage of
Correct Answers
Family finances management 51.0
Life design 50.4
Financial knowledge: The basics of financial transactions 72.9
Financial knowledge: The basics of finance and economy 48.8
Financial knowledge: Insurance 52.5
Financial knowledge: Loans and credits 53.3
Financial knowledge: Asset building 54.3
Use of outside knowledge 65.3
Total 55.6
Reference Material 2: International Comparison of Financial Literacy
26
0
20
40
60
80
100
General (1) Interest (2) Compound interest (3) Risk and return (4) Definition of inflation (5) Dispersion
International Comparison of True or False Questions Answered Correctly
Japan OECD Average Germany United Kingdom Norway United States
Compiled based on the Financial Literacy Survey by the Central Council for Financial Services Information, Bank of Japan (2016)
Reference Material 3: Approach from Behavioral Economics
27
Excerpts from the Financial Literacy Survey by the Central Council for Financial Services Information, Bank of Japan (2016)
Regarding an investment with an expected rate of return of 5% (refer to Fig. 61), 80% of respondents said “Won’t invest,” showing a strong tendency toward avoiding loss overall. There were many of those who refrain from investing in stocks, investment trusts or foreign currency deposits among those who show a strong tendency toward loss aversion. This tendency was stronger among women than among men. Near-sighted behavioral bias proved strong among the elderly and men. Horizontally egalitarian behavioral bias proved slightly stronger among young adults and women and the percentage of correct answers among those who had a strong bias for this was low. Among those who had a strong bias for this, many financial troubles occurred and the number of those who feel over-indebted was large.
(Fig. 61) Loss Aversion Tendency <Q6>
When you invest 100 thousand yen, either a
profit on gain in price of 20 thousand yen or a
loss on decline in price of 10 thousand yen
will be generated. What would you do?
Will invest
Won’t invest
(Note) For further details of the three behavioral biases described on this page, refer to the “Importance of Applying Behavioral Economics to Financial Education” (Central Council for Financial Services Information, Bank of Japan).
28
Excerpts from the Financial Literacy Survey by the Central Council for Financial Services Information, Bank of Japan (2016)
(Table 62) Near-sighted Behavior and Horizontally Egalitarian Behavior <Q1-3 1-10> (%)
Behavioral
Bias Question
1 2 3 4 5
Applicable ← No opinion → Not
applicable
Near-sighted
Behavior
On the precondition that you will invariably receive either (1)
100 thousand yen now or (2) 110 thousand yen in a year, you
will opt for (1).
30.8 16.3 17.8 12.9 22.2
Horizontally
Egalitarian
Behavior
If there are more than one similar products, more often than
not you buy one that is recommended as the best-selling
product rather than the one that you think best.
3.7 11.3 43.4 22.9 18.7
(Table 64) Characteristics of Those who Have a Strong Behavioral Bias <Q1-3, 1-10, 6, etc.> (%)
Percentage
of Correct
Answers
Percentage
of Those who
Have
Invested in
Stock
Percentage of
Those who Have
Experienced
Financial Trouble
Percentage of
Those who Have
Borrowed from
Consumer Loan
Companies
Percentage
of Those
who Feel
Over-
indebted
Total Number of Respondents 55.6 31.6 5.9 3.9 11.4
Those who Have a Strong Loss Aversion Tendency 52.8 24.0 5.3 3.5 10.7
Those who Have a Strong Near-sighted Behavioral Bias 56.7 33.3 7.0 5.8 15.6
Those who Have a Strong Horizontally Egalitarian Behavioral
Bias 48.6 34.6 7.0 4.3 18.2
Reference Material 4: Examples of Financial Literacy Questions
29
Excerpts from the Financial Literacy Survey by the Central Council for Financial Services Information, Bank of Japan (2016)
Q21 Answer if the following sentence is correct (one each) [Compulsory Input]
1 2 3
Correct Wrong Don’t Know
1. In the high inflation phase, the prices of daily necessities and services rise rapidly 60.8 7.6 31.6
2. If you take out a home mortgage, when comparing the payment period of 15 years with
that of 30 years, the amount of monthly payment will be normally larger but the total amount
of interest to be paid will be smaller for 15 years.
68.4 5.8 25.8
3. Investment whose return is higher than the average entails a higher risk than the average. 74.8 2.7 22.5
4. Buying a stock in a company is a safer investment than buying a stock investment trust (*)
*A financial product that invests in stocks in several companies 5.2 45.8 49.0
Materials/Reference Literature
• Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare (2015) Report on the Results of the FY2014 Financial Verification – The Actual Financial Situation and Outlook for the National Pension and Employees’ Pension Programs
• The Financial Report on the Public Pension System for FY 2015 by the Pension Actuarial Subcommittee, Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare (2017)
• The Financial Literacy Survey by the Central Council for Financial Services Information, Bank of Japan (2016)
30