Date post: | 06-Apr-2018 |
Category: |
Documents |
Upload: | kenan-farrell |
View: | 215 times |
Download: | 0 times |
of 22
8/3/2019 Sportsgrants v. Crossfit
1/22
Michael A. Cohen, OSB # 965776Email [email protected] R. Wilmot, OSB #061936Email [email protected], WILLIAMSON & WYATT, P.C.
FILED :-=; Ft=''R ,.' :) " ' , .1 ~ ' .__- . ~ ~ .11- L:"lbIJ:;Dr-(f.:p
1211 SW 5th Ave., Suite 1900Portland, OR 97204Telephone (503) 222-9981Fax (503) 796-2900
Timothy J. Gorry, to be admitt ed Pro Hac ViceEmail [email protected] M. Joseph, to be admitted Pro Hac ViceEmail [email protected], KAHAN & GORRY, PC9601 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 700Beverly Hills, CA 90210Telephone (310) 855-3200Fax (310) 855-3201
Of Attorneys for Plaintiff, Sportsgrants, Inc.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF OREGON
PORTLAND DIVISION
SPORTSGRANTS, INC., an Oregoncorporation,
Plaintiff,
vs.
CROSSFIT, INC., a Delawarecorporation; and DOES 1 through 10,inclusive,
Defendants.
Page 1 - COMPLAINT
Civil No.CV'12 - 019 6 - ~ SI
VERIFIED COMPLAINT FOR:1. TRADEMARK INFRINGEMENT2. COMMON LAW TRADEMARK
INFRINGEMENT3. VIOLATION OF LANHAM ACT
(15 U.S.C. 1 051, et seq.)4. VIOLATION OF LANHAM ACT
(15 U.S.C. 43(c))5. ACCOUNTING
JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
SCHWABE . WIlliAMSON & WYAn. PC .Atlorneys al LawPacwest Center
1211 SW 51h Ave .. Suile 1900 Portland . OR 97204
Telephone 503 .222 .9981 Fa x 503 .796 .2900
PDXl1198021J638011MAC /8887676.1
1FL/5ZbI
Case 3:12-cv-00196-SI Document 1 Filed 02/03/12 Page 1 of 22 Page ID#: 1
8/3/2019 Sportsgrants v. Crossfit
2/22
Plaintiff Sportsgrants, Inc. ("Sportsgrants") alleges the following against
Defendant CrossFit, Inc., and Does 1 through 1 0 (collectively, "Defendants"):
JURISDICTION AND VENUE
1. This is an action for injunctive relief and damages arising under (i) the
federal trademark laws and (ii) for false designation of origin under 15 U.S.C.
1051, et seq. (the Lanham Act).
2. This Court has original subject matter jurisdiction over the subject
matter pursuant to Section 39 of the Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. 1121, and under 28
U.S.C. 1331 and 28 U.S.C. 1338, because the action arises, in part, under 15U.S.C. 1114 and 1125. This Court has supplemental jurisdiction over the non
federal question claims pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1367.
3. Venue is proper in the United States District Court for the District of
Oregon pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1391(b), because a substantial part of the events
giving rise to Sportsgrants' claims arose in Oregon and Plaintiff's principal place
of business is located in Oregon.
4. This Court has personal jurisdiction over the Defendants because, on
information and belief, Defendants have engaged in acts or omissions within and
outside the State of Oregon causing injury within the State of Oregon and has
otherwise made or established contacts within the State of Oregon sufficient to
permit the exercise of personal jurisdiction, including establishing and supporting
numerous CrossFit "Affiliates" within the State of Oregon, as further alleged in
Paragraph 10 below.
SCHWABE, WILLIAMSON & W YA n , PC Attorneys at Law Pacwest Center
1211 SW 5th Ave ., Suite 1900 Portland , OR 97204
Telephone 503 .222.9981 Fax 503 .796 .2900
Page 2 - COMPLAINT
PDXJI19802l163801IMAC/8887676 .1
Case 3:12-cv-00196-SI Document 1 Filed 02/03/12 Page 2 of 22 Page ID#: 2
8/3/2019 Sportsgrants v. Crossfit
3/22
PARTIES
5. Plaintiff Sportsgrants, Inc. ("Sportsgrants") is an Oregon not-for
profit corporation, with its principal place of business in Hood River, Oregon.
6. Sportsgrants is informed and believes and thereon alleges that
Defendant CrossFit, Inc. ("CrossFit") is, and at all times mentioned herein was, a
Delaware corporation, with its principal place of business in Washington DC.
7. The true names and capacities of defendant DOES 1 through 1 0,
whether individual, corporate, associate, or otherwise, are presently unknown to
Sportsgrants who therefore sues said defendants by such fictitious names.
Sportsgrants will seek leave of this Court to amend this complaint to show the truenames and capacities of said defendants when the same have been ascertained, or
according to proof presented at trial.
8. Sportsgrants is informed and believes and on that basis alleges that at
all times mentioned herein, each of the defendants, including those sued as DOES
1 through 10 (collectively, "Defendants"), was the agent of each of the remaining
defendants, and in doing the things hereinafter alleged, was acting within the
course and scope of such agency and with the permission, consent of and
ratification by their co-defendants.
GENERAL ALLEGATIONS
9. CrossFit is in the business of offering fitness training services through
its website, and also through gym facilities located throughout the United States,
including in Oregon, and abroad.
10. Sportsgrants is informed and believes and on that basis alleges that
these gym facilities are independently owned and operated by what CrossFit refers
SCHWABE, WILLIAMSON & WYAn, PCAttorneys al LawPage 3 - COMPLAINTPacwest Center
1211 SW 51h Ave., Suile 1900 Portland, OR 97204
Telephone 503.222.9981 Fax 503 .796 .2900
PDXl1198021l638011MAC/8887676.1
Case 3:12-cv-00196-SI Document 1 Filed 02/03/12 Page 3 of 22 Page ID#: 3
8/3/2019 Sportsgrants v. Crossfit
4/22
to as "Affiliates." The gym facilities that are owned and operated by Affiliates are
referred to herein as an "Affiliate Gym" or "Affiliate Gyms."
11. Scott Zagarino ("Mr. Zagarino") is the founder and Chief Executive
Officer of Sportsgrants. All acts alleged herein to have been done by Mr. Zagarino
were done in his capacity as Chief Executive Officer of Sportsgrants.
12. Mr. Zagarino is a former professional athlete who, in 1988, was
profoundly touched by his experience visiting a critical care unit for young adults.
The effect of that experience changed the course of Mr. Zagarino's life.
13. Since that time, Mr. Zagarino has been involved with various
fundraising endeavors, and has worked tirelessly to create programs that haveraised millions of dollars to make a difference in the lives of those in need.
14. In 2006, Mr. Zagarino was working on a more efficient and effective
way to raise money for worthy causes .
15. In or around the spring of2006, Mr. Zagarino and a friend completed
a newly introduced workout called "Figh t Gone Bad" at an Affiliate Gym in Los
Angeles. I t was during this workout in 2006 that Mr. Zagarino came up with the
idea to create a fundraising event whereby athletes could collectively dedicate one
day of the year to fundraising for charity by collecting donations online. The
simplicity of the idea was especially appealing to Mr. Zagarino because the
fundraising event would require little overhead or administrative costs, thereby
leaving the vast majority of the donations to charity.
16. In or around the spring of 2006, Mr. Zagarino came up with the idea
to name the charity event "Fight Gone Bad," which was a phrase he first heard
used by mixed martial arts champion B.J. Penn to describe a particularly tough and
challenging workout designed for him.
SCHWABE, WILLIAMSON & W YA n , P .C . Allomeys at Law Pacwesl Center
1211 SW 51h Ave ., Suite 1900 Port land, OR 97204
Telephone 503 .222 .9981 Fax 503 .796 .2900
Page 4 - COMPLAINT
PDXl119802/1638011MAC/8887676 . 1
Case 3:12-cv-00196-SI Document 1 Filed 02/03/12 Page 4 of 22 Page ID#: 4
8/3/2019 Sportsgrants v. Crossfit
5/22
17. In September, 2006, Mr. Zagarino sponsored and promoted the first
"Fight Gone Bad" for charity. Mr. Zagarino produced the entire event himself by,
among other things, tirelessly calling local Affiliate Gyms to ask i f they would
participate.
18. Participants collectively dedicated this one day o f the year to
soliciting and collecting online donations. Participation in and donations for the
event were not contingent upon completing a workout; the participants needed only
to attempt to complete a workout.
19. The first Fight Gone Bad for charity included approximately 324
participants at approximately 30 Affiliate Gyms. The event raised approximatelyOne Hundred Seventeen Thousand Three Hundred Eleven Dollars ($117,311), one
hundred percent of which was donated to charity.
20. Neither Greg Glassman (who is a principal of CrossFit), nor anyone
else employed by CrossFit, had any communications with Mr. Zagarino regarding
the 2006 Fight Gone Bad charity event. Likewise, neither Greg Glassman, nor
anyone else employed by CrossFit, contributed in any way to the production,
promotion, or advertising of the 2006 Fight Gone Bad charity event.
21. The success of the first Fight Gone Bad event caused Mr. Zagarino to
endeavor to tu m Fight Gone Bad into an annual fundraising event, as described in
Paragraph 18, above.
22. In furtherance of this objective, in 2007 Mr. Zagarino formed
Sportsgrants and, at that time, assigned all his intellectual property rights to the
Fight Gone Bad charity event to Sportsgrants.
23. Fight Gone Bad 2 for charity took place in September 2007 and was
exclusively produced by Sportsgrants, through the tireless work of Mr. Zagarino,
acting as the Executive Director. Approximately 900 people at approximately 60
SCHWABE , WILLIAMSON & WYATT , PC Allorneys at Law Pacwesl Cenler
1211 SW 51h Ave ., Suite 1900 Portland, OR 97204
Te lephone 503.222.9981 Fa x 503.7962900
Page 5 - COMPLAINT
PDXJl198021163801fMAC /8887676.1
Case 3:12-cv-00196-SI Document 1 Filed 02/03/12 Page 5 of 22 Page ID#: 5
8/3/2019 Sportsgrants v. Crossfit
6/22
Affiliate Gyms participated in the event, which raised over Two Hundred Eighty
Three Thousand Seven Hundred Dollars ($283,700) for the benefit of charity by
collecting donations online on a website designed and owned by Sportsgrants.
24. Neither Greg Glassman, nor anyone else employed by CrossFit, had
any communications with Mr. Zagarino regarding the 2007 Fight Gone Ba d charity
event. Likewise, neither Greg Glassman, nor anyone else employed by CrossFit,
contributed in any way to the production, promotion, or advertising of the 2007
Fight Gone Ba d charity event.
25. Prior to the third annual Fight Gone Bad for charity, Mr. Zagarino
contacted executives at CrossFit to ask i f CrossFit would support the event.CrossFit declined.
26. Thereafter, the Fight Gone Bad 3 for charity took place in September
2008 and was exclusively produced by Sports grants, again, through the tireless
work o f Mr. Zagarino. Approximately 2,400 people at approximately 200 Affiliate
Gyms and elsewhere participated in the event, including, Affiliate Gyms in
Canada. As a result o f the efforts of Sports grants and Mr. Zagarino, the third
annual Fight Gone Bad event raised a total o f approximately Six Hundred Twenty
Seven Thousand Dollars ($627,000) for charity.
27. Neither Greg Glassman, nor anyone else employed by CrossFit, had
any communications with Mr. Zagarino regarding the 2008 Fight Gone Bad charity
event. Likewise, neither Greg Glassman, nor anyone else employed by CrossFit,
contributed in any way to the production, promotion, or advertising o f the 2008
Fight Gone Bad charity event.
28. In or around 2009, CrossFit contacted Mr. Zagarino to seek his
assistance with forming CrossFi t's own charitable foundation ("CrossFit
Foundation"). Mr. Zagarino obliged.
SCHWABE , WILLIAMSON & WYATI, P.C . Attomeys at Law Pacwest Center
1211 SW 5th Ave ., Suite 1900 Portland, OR 97204
Telephone 503 .222 .9981 Fax 503.796.2900
Page 6 - COMPLAINT
PDXlI198021l63801IMAC/8887676.1
Case 3:12-cv-00196-SI Document 1 Filed 02/03/12 Page 6 of 22 Page ID#: 6
8/3/2019 Sportsgrants v. Crossfit
7/22
29. Fight Gone Bad 4 for charity took place in September 2009 and was
exclusively produced by Sportsgrants, again, through the tireless work o f
Mr. Zagarino. Approximately 5,200 people at approximately 365 Affiliate Gyms
and elsewhere participated in the event, including Affiliate Gyms and other
facilities located internationally. As a result o f the efforts o f Sportsgrants and Mr.
Zagarino, the fourth annual Fight Gone Bad event raised a total o f approximately
One Million One Hundred Thousand Dollars ($1,100,000).
30. For the first time, CrossFit agreed to include and did include a few
notices about Fight Gone Bad 4 on its website and Facebook page. Sportsgrants is
informed and believes and on that basis alleges that CrossFit's cooperation wasdirectly related to the fact that Mr. Zagarino voluntarily assisted with efforts to
create the CrossFit Foundation, as alleged in Paragraph 28, above.
31. In early 2010, during a conference call for the CrossFit Foundation in
which Mr. Glassman and Mr. Zagarino were both participants, Mr. Glassman
indicated that he would like for CrossFit to have more control over the annual
Fight Gone Bad charity event. After discussion with others on the call, including
other principals of CrossFit, Mr. Glassman retracted his statement, and conceded
that it was proper for the event to be produced by Sportsgrants.
32. Shortly thereafter, Mr. Zagarino entered into discussions with
principals at CrossFit regarding a potential assignment and license deal whereby
Sports grants would assign its Fight Gone Bad common law trademark rights to
CrossFit in exchange for a long term renewable license o f the trademark back to
Sportsgrants. Those discussions did not culminate in an agreement between the
parties.
33. In or around August, 2010, Sportsgrants filed an application for
registration of the Fight Gone Bad mark with the United States Patent and
SCHWABE, WILLIAMSON & WYATT , P.C. Attorneys at Law Pacwest Center
1211 SW 5th Ave " Suite 1900 Portland, OR 97204
Te lephone 5 03 .222.9981 Fa x 503.796 .2900
Page 7 - COMPLAINT
PDXll19802 / 163801lMAC /8887 676 1
Case 3:12-cv-00196-SI Document 1 Filed 02/03/12 Page 7 of 22 Page ID#: 7
8/3/2019 Sportsgrants v. Crossfit
8/22
Trademark Office ("USPTO"), in International Classes 35 and 36, specifically for
"charitable services, namely, organizing and conducting charitable athletic events
that promote public awareness of the importance o f fundraising for charities," and
"charitable fundraising services, namely, organizing and conducting athleticfundraising events for charities."
34. Sportsgrants is informed and believes and on that basis alleges that
CrossFit, specifically, those on the board of directors of the CrossFit Foundation,
were aware that Sportsgrants filed an application to register the Fight Gone Bad
trademark.
35. Prior to the fifth annual Fight GoneBad
for charity, Mr. Zagarinocontacted executives at CrossFit to again request that CrossFit support the event.
CrossFit again declined to provide the specific support requested by Mr. Zagarino
on behalf o f Sportsgrants.
36. In or about September 2010, the fifth annual Fight Gone Bad charity
event took place with over 6,750 participants from over 600 Affiliate Gyms and
other facilities. Fight Gone Bad 5 helped raise nearly One Million Five Hundred
Thousand Dollars ($1,500,000) for charity, including Two Hundred Thousand
($200,000) donated directly to the CrossFit Foundation.
37. Other than to include a few posts on CrossFit's blog and Facebook
page about Fight Gone Ba d 5, neither Greg Glassman nor anyone else employed
by CrossFit contributed to the production, promotion, or advertising of the 2010
Fight Gone Bad charity event.
38. In or around August, 2011, S ports grants trademark was registered
with the USPTO on the Principal Register under the Act of 1946 (U.S. Registration
No. 4,017,046), covering the use o f the mark in International Class 35 for
"charitable services, namely, organizing and conducting charitable athletic events
SCHWABE , WILLIAMSON & WYAn, PC Attorneys at Law Pacwest Center
1211 SW 51h Ave. , Su ite 1900 Portland, OR 97204
Telephone 503.222 .9981 Fa x 503 .796.2900
Page 8 - COMPLAINT
PDXll198021J 6380) IMACl8887676.1
Case 3:12-cv-00196-SI Document 1 Filed 02/03/12 Page 8 of 22 Page ID#: 8
8/3/2019 Sportsgrants v. Crossfit
9/22
that promote public awareness o f the importance of fundraising for charities" and
in Class 36 for "charitable fundraising services, namely, organizing and conducting
athletic fundraising events for charities." True and correct copies of the USPTO's
TESS and T AR R records of that registration are attached hereto as Exhibit A. This
trademark registration is valid and subsisting.
39. In or about March, 2011, Mr. Zagarino was elected as the executive
director of the board of directors for the CrossFit Foundation. During weekly
conference calls, Mr. Zagarino made requests for support and assistance from
CrossFit for Sportsgrants' Fight Gone Bad charity event. With only a few
exceptions, CrossFit either rejected or ignored those requests.40. In or about September 2011, the sixth annual Fight Gone Bad
charity event took place with over 16,438 participants at approximately 1,080
Affiliate Gyms and other facilities in 16 countries around the world. Fight Gone
Bad 6 raised approximately Two Million Three Hundred Thousand Dollars
($2,300,000) for charity, including Six Hundred Thousand Dollars ($600,000)
donated directly to the CrossFit Foundation.
41. After the conclusion of the sixth annual Fight Gone Bad event,
Sportsgrants announced that the next Fight Gone Bad charity event would take
place on September 22,2012.
42. Shortly thereafter, Sportsgrants was made aware of a series of
charitable events purportedly called "Fight Gone Bad." One such event was
scheduled to take place in the city of London, Ontario Canada, and the other was
scheduled to take place in the city of Atlantic Beach, Florida. Sportsgrants is
informed and believes and on that basis alleges that these events were modeled
after the Fight Gone Bad charity event created and produced by Sportsgrants.
Sportsgrants is further informed and believes and on that basis alleges that these
SCHWABE, WILLIAMSON & WYATT , P CAllomeys al La wPage 9 - COMPLAINTPacwe s t Cente r
12 11 SW 5 th Ave ., Su ite 1900 Portland , OR 97204
Telephon e 503 .222 .9981 Fa x 503 .796 .2900
PDXl119802 / 1638011MAC/8887676 ,I
Case 3:12-cv-00196-SI Document 1 Filed 02/03/12 Page 9 of 22 Page ID#: 9
8/3/2019 Sportsgrants v. Crossfit
10/22
events are similar, i f not identical, to those created and produced by Sportsgrants,
except that they are produced by different persons and/or entities, and having no
affiliation with Sportsgrants.
43. At no time did Sportsgrants give any other person or entity permission
to utilize its trademark. Accordingly, Sportsgrants immediately notified the
infringing parties of its trademark and requested that they immediately cease and
desist from further use of the name Fight Gone Bad in connection with any charity
event.
44. Sportsgrants is infonned and believes and on that basis alleges that in
January, 2012, CrossFit began to advertise and promote in emails and elsewherethat, "This year's Fight Gone Bad will be held in June this year and will fund
childhood illness."
45. Sportsgrants is also infonned and believes and on that basis alleges
that in January, 2012, persons on behalf of Cross Fit began placing telephone calls
and sending emails to Affiliate Gyms to advertise and promote a "new Fight Gone
Bad" that will be produced by CrossFit, which has "taken out the middle man"
by removing Sportsgrants.
46. At all times relevant hereto, CrossFit was entirely aware o f
Sportsgrants' use of the name Fight Gone Bad for charity events, and was fully
aware that Sportsgrants owns the federally protected trademark Fight Gone Bad
in International Class 35 and 36.
47. CrossFit's use of the Fight Gone Bad trademark in connection with
charitable events is without the consent of Sportsgrants. Moreover, Sportsgrants is
informed and believes and on that basis alleges that, as of the date of this
Complaint, CrossFit continues to use Sportsgrants' trademark without the
permission or consent of Sportsgrants.
SCHWABE, WILLIAMSON & WYATT , PC Atto m eys at Law Pacwest Center
1211 SWSthAve ., Suite 1900 Portland, OR 97204
Te lephone 5 03.222.9981 Fax 5 0 3.796 .2900
Page 10 - COMPLAINT
PD Xf l1980 2 / 163801lMAC / 8887676.J
Case 3:12-cv-00196-SI Document 1 Filed 02/03/12 Page 10 of 22 Page ID#: 10
8/3/2019 Sportsgrants v. Crossfit
11/22
FIRST CLAIM FO R RELIEF
(For Trademark Infringement Against All Defendants, 15 U.S.C. 1114)
48. Sports grants incorporates herein by this reference the allegations in
paragraphs 1 through 47, inclusive, as though set forth in full.
49. Sportsgrants adopted the Fight Gone Bad mark and used it in
interstate commerce as a means to identify its charity events.
50. Since on or about September 2006, and continually since that time,
Sportsgrants has used the mark Fight Gone Bad to identify its charity events and
to distinguish it from those charity events held by others by, among other things,prominently displaying the Fight Gone Bad mark on Sportsgrants' website and
on promotional items such as t-shirts and hoodies, which participants "earn" by
raising certain amounts o f dollars for charity. In addition, Sportsgrants has used
the Fight Gone Bad mark in company literature and advertising. These goods
and advertising using the Fight Gone Bad mark have been distributed throughout
the United States and beyond.
51. The Fight Gone Bad mark is widely recognized all over the world.
Among other things, participants in the charity event proudly wear the t-shirts and
hoodies earned as a result of successful fundraising efforts and, therefore, the mark
has come to be a symbol of Sportsgrants' global fundraising efforts.
52. Defendants have infringed on Sportsgrants' Fight Gone Bad mark in
interstate commerce by engaging in the acts descr ibed in this Complaint. The use
of the Fight Gone Bad mark by Defendants is without permission or authority o f
Sportsgrants, and such use by Defendants is likely to cause confusion, to cause
mistake and to deceive.
SCHWABE , WILLIAMSON & W YA n , PC Attomeys al Law Pacwest Center
1211 SW 51h Ave., Suile 1900 Portland, OR 97204
Telephone 503.22 2. 9981 Fax 503 .796 ,2900
Page 11 - COMPLAINT
PDXlI 19802/16380 IIMAC /8887676 ,I
Case 3:12-cv-00196-SI Document 1 Filed 02/03/12 Page 11 of 22 Page ID#: 11
8/3/2019 Sportsgrants v. Crossfit
12/22
53. Defendants' alleged acts of trademark infringement have been
committed with the intent to cause confusion, to cause mistake and to deceive.
54. Sportsgrants has requested that Defendants cease and desist from their
acts of trademark infringement and has given Defendants actual notice of
Sportsgrants' trademark registrations, but Defendants have refused to cease such
acts.
55. Unless enjoined and restrained, Defendants will continue to actively
infringe Sportsgrants' trademark rights.
56. By reason o f Defendants' infringement and threatened infringement,
Sports grants has sustained and will continue to sustain substantial injury, loss anddamage to the ownership rights in its trademarks.
57. Further irreparable harm to Sportsgrants is imminent as a result of
Defendants' conduct, and Sportsgrants is without an adequate remedy at law.
Sportsgrants is entitled to an injunction restraining Defendants, their officers,
directors, agents, employees, representatives and all persons acting in concert with
them from engaging in further such acts o f trademark infringement.
58. Sportsgrants is further entitled to recover from Defendants the
damages sustained by Sportsgrants as a result o f Defendants , acts of trademark
infringement. Sportsgrants is at present unable to ascertain the full extent o f the
monetary damage Sportsgrants has suffered by reason o f Defendants' acts of
trademark infringement. Sportsgrants will seek leave o f this Court to amend this
Complaint to allege the true and correct amount of its damages, including interest,
when they become known and/or Sportsgrants will prove such damages at trial.
59. Sportsgrants is further entitled to recover from Defendants the gains,
profits and advantages they have obtained as a result o f their acts o f trademark
infringement. Sportsgrants is at present unable to ascertain the full extent of the
SCHWABE , WILLIAMSON & W YA n , P .C. Attorneys at Law Pacwest Center
1211 SW 5th Ave ., Su ite 1900 Port land , OR 97204
Telephone 503 .222 .9981 Fax 503.796 .2900
Page 12 - COMPLAINT
PDXll19802 / 1638011MAC/8887676 . 1
Case 3:12-cv-00196-SI Document 1 Filed 02/03/12 Page 12 of 22 Page ID#: 12
8/3/2019 Sportsgrants v. Crossfit
13/22
gains, profits and advantages Defendants have obtained by reason of their acts of
trademark infringement. Sportsgrants will seek leave of this Court to amend this
Complaint to allege the true and correct amount of its damages, including interest,
when they become known and/or Sportsgrants will prove such damages at trial.
SECOND CLAIM FOR RELIEF
(For Common Law Trademark Infringement Against All Defendants)
60. Sportsgrants incorporates herein by this reference the allegations in
paragraphs 1 through 59, inclusive, as though set forth in full.
61. Defendants' acts alleged above constitute infringement,misappropriation, dilution, and misuse of Sportsgrants Fight Gone Bad
trademark, conversion of Sports grants , intellectual property and unjust enrichment
of Defendants, all in violation of Sportsgrants' rights under the common law of
Oregon.
62. Defendants' alleged acts of trademark infringement and unfair
competition are likely to cause confusion, to cause mistake and to deceive as to
affiliation, connection or association with Sportsgrants, or as to origin, sponsorship
or approval of others ' services by Sports grants and are likely to dilute the quality
of Sportsgrants' trademark.
63. Defendants' activities have been willful. Defendants' activities have
caused great and irreparable harm to Sportsgrants. Defendants' activities will not
cease unless enjoined by this Court. Sportsgrants has no adequate remedy at law.
SCHWABE, WILLIAMSON & WYATI, P .C Allomeys at Law Pacwest Center
1211 SW 5th Ave . Suite 1900 Portland, OR 97204
Telephone 503 .222 .9981 Fax 503.796.2900
Page 13 - COMPLAINT
PDXll198021l63 80 l1MAC / 8887676.1
Case 3:12-cv-00196-SI Document 1 Filed 02/03/12 Page 13 of 22 Page ID#: 13
8/3/2019 Sportsgrants v. Crossfit
14/22
THIRD CLAIM FOR RELIEF
(For Violation of The Lanham Act By Use Of False
Designation Against All Defendants, 15 U.S.C. 1125(a))
64. Sportsgrants incorporates herein by this reference the allegations in
paragraphs 1 through 63, inclusive, as though set forth in full.
65. Defendants threaten to profit from the interstate exploitation o f "Fight
Gone Bad." Such use o f Fight Gone Bad is a false designation o f origin which is
likely to cause confusion, to cause mistake and to deceive as to the affiliation,
connection or association of Defendants with Sportsgrants, and as to the origin,
sponsorship or approval o f such name by Sportsgrants. These acts are in violationof 15 U.S.C. 1125(a), in that Defendants have used in connection with goods and
services a false designation o f origin, a false or misleading description and
representation o f fact which is likely to cause confusion, and to cause mistake, and
to deceive as to the affiliation, connection, or association of defendants with
Sportsgrants and as to the origin, sponsorship and approval o f Defendants' goods,
services and commercial activities by Sportsgrants.
66. By reason o f Defendants , acts alleged herein, Sportsgrants has and
will suffer damage to its business, reputation and good will and the loss o f sales
and profits Sportsgrants would have made but for Defendants' acts. Sportsgrants is
entitled to recover damages for Defendants' actions.
67. Defendants threaten to continue to do the acts complained of herein,
and unless restrained and enjoined, will continue to do so, all to Sportsgrants'
irreparable damage. It would be difficult to ascertain the amount o f compensation
which could afford Sportsgrants adequate relief for such continuing acts, and a
multiplicity o f judicial proceedings would be required. Sportsgrants' remedy at
law is not adequate to compensate it for injuries threatened.
SCHWABE, WILLIAMSON & WYATT, P .C.Attomeys at Lawage 14 - COMPLAINTPacwest Center
1211 SW5thAve ., Suite 1900 Portland, OR 97204
Telephone 503 .222.9981 Fax 503 .796 .2900
PDXJ 119802116380 IIMAC/8887676.1
Case 3:12-cv-00196-SI Document 1 Filed 02/03/12 Page 14 of 22 Page ID#: 14
8/3/2019 Sportsgrants v. Crossfit
15/22
FOURTH CLAIM FOR RELIEF
(For Violation o f The Lanham Act By Dilution
In Violation Of Federal Anti-Dilution Statute Against All Defendants,
15 U.S.C. 1125(c))
68. Sportsgrants incorporates herein by this reference the allegations in
paragraphs 1 through 67, inclusive, as though set forth in full.
69. Defendants have made commercial use o f a mark owned by
Sportsgrants in connection with charitable events which Defendants have used and
transported in United States interstate commerce. Defendants' acts are in violation
o f Lanham Act 43(c) in that they have caused dilution o f the distinctive quality ofSportsgrants' famous mark Fight Gone Bad, all to the irreparable injury to, and
damage of, Sportsgrants.
70. Defendants' acts have lessened the capacity o f Sports grants' famous
mark to identify and distinguish the charitable events produced and sponsored by
Sportsgrants. Defendants' acts have blurred the unique association which has
heretofore existed between Sportsgrants' Fight Gone Bad mark and the charitable
events promoted and produced by Sportsgrants.
71. Sportsgrants' Fight Gone Bad mark is distinctive and famous. The
Fight Gone Bad mark is inherently strong and distinctive, has long been used in
connection with the events in association with which it appears, has long been the
subject o f substantial advertising and promotion, has been used and advertised
throughout the United States and elsewhere, is widely recognized by consumers
and those in the trade, is in substantially exclusive use, and is federally registered,
as alleged above. The acts o f Defendants alleged in this Complaint were
commenced and committed from a time after Sportsgrants' marks became famous.
SCHWABE , WILLIAMSON & W YA n , P.C. Attomeys at Law Pacwest Center
1211 SW 5th A ve ., Suite 1900 Portland, OR 97204
Telephone 503 .222 .9981 Fax 503 .796 .2900
Page 15 - COMPLAINT
PDXlI1 9802 / 163801IMAC /8887676.]
Case 3:12-cv-00196-SI Document 1 Filed 02/03/12 Page 15 of 22 Page ID#: 15
8/3/2019 Sportsgrants v. Crossfit
16/22
72. Defendants committed these acts willfully and with the intent to trade
on the reputation o f Sportsgrants and to cause dilution o f Sportsgrants' famous
mark.
73. By reason of Defendants' acts alleged herein, Sportsgrants has and
will suffer damage to its business, reputation and good will and the loss o f
charitable donations and profits made by Sports grants. Sportsgrants is entitled to
recover damages for Defendants' actions.
74. Defendants threaten to continue to do the acts complained of herein,
and unless restrained and enjoined, will continue to do so, all to Sportsgrants'
irreparable damage. I t would be difficult to ascertain the amount o f compensationwhich could afford Sportsgrants adequate relief for such continuing acts, and a
multiplicity o f judicial proceedings would be required. Sportsgrants' remedy at
law is not adequate to compensate it for injuries threatened.
FIFTH CLAIM FO R RELIEF
(F or An Accounting Against All Defendants)
75. Sportsgrants incorporates herein by this reference the allegations in
paragraphs 1 through 74, inclusive, as though set forth in full.
76. Sportsgrants is informed and believes and on that basis alleges that,
based upon the actions o f Defendants alleged herein, Defendants have received
money which is due and payable to Sportsgrants.
77. The total amount o f money due from Defendants is unknown to
Sportsgrants and cannot be ascertained without an independent accounting of all
proceeds received by Defendants with respect to the transactions herein alleged.
78. Sportsgrants has demanded an independent accounting from
Defendants regarding the aforementioned acts, but Defendants have failed and
SCHWABE, WILLIAMSON & WYATT, PCAllomeys at Lawage 16 - COMPLAINTPacwest Center
1211 SW 5th Ave., Suite 1900 Portland, OR 97204
Telephon e 503.222.9981 Fax 503 .796.2900
PDXJI198021l63801IMAC/8887676.1
Case 3:12-cv-00196-SI Document 1 Filed 02/03/12 Page 16 of 22 Page ID#: 16
8/3/2019 Sportsgrants v. Crossfit
17/22
refused, and continue to fail and refuse, to render an independent accounting and
pay such sum.
WHEREFORE, Plaintiff prays for relief as follows:
FIRST CLAIM FOR RELIEF
(For Trademark Infringement Against All Defendants)
1. That Defendants and their agents, servants, employees, licensees and
all persons acting in concert or participation with them, and each of them, be
enjoined preliminarily and during the pendency of this action, and permanently
thereafter; from:a. Infringing Sportsgrants' trademark; and
b. Producing, manufacturing, adapting, marketing, advertising,
selling, distributing, promoting, licensing, exhibiting or
displaying or using in any manner Sportsgrants' trademark in
connection with any charity event.
2. That Defendants be required to account for and pay over to
Sportsgrants all gains, profits and advantages which they have derived from their
infringement of Sportsgrants' trademark; alternatively, and at Plaintiff's election,
for statutory damages pursuant to 15 U.S.C. 1117( c) up to $2 million per
counterfeit mark per type of goods or services sold, offered for sale, or distributed
by Defendants.
3. That Defendants be required to pay such relief to Sportsgrants as this
Court deems just and proper.
SCHWABE , WILLIAMSON &W YA n , P .C. Attorneys at Law Pacwest Cen ter
1211 SW 5th Ave ., Suite 1 90 0 Portland , OR 9 7 2 0 4
Telephone 503.222 .9961 Fax 503 .796 .2900
Page 17 - COMPLAINT
PDXl11980211638011MAC / 8887676.J
Case 3:12-cv-00196-SI Document 1 Filed 02/03/12 Page 17 of 22 Page ID#: 17
8/3/2019 Sportsgrants v. Crossfit
18/22
SECOND CLAIM FO R RELIEF
(For Common Law Trademark Infringement Against All Defendants)
4. That Defendants and their agents, servants, employees, licensees and
all persons acting in concert or participation with them, and each of them, be
enjoined preliminarily and during the pendency of this action, and permanently
thereafter; from:
a. Infringing Sportsgrants' trademark; and
b. Producing, manufacturing, adapting, marketing, advertising,
selling, distributing, promoting, licensing, exhibiting or
displaying or using in any manner Sportsgrants' trademark inconnection with any charity event.
5. That Defendants be required to account for and pay over to
Sportsgrants all gains, profits and advantages which they have derived from their
infringement of Sportsgrants' trademark.
6. That Defendants be required to pay such relief to Sportsgrants as this
Court deems just and proper.
THIRD CLAIM FOR RELIEF
(For Violation of The Lanham Act For False Designation
Against All Defendants)
7. That Defendants and their agents, servants, employees, licensees and
all persons acting in concert or participation with them, and each of them, be
enjoined preliminarily and during the pendency of this action, and permanently
thereafter, from:
a. Infringing Sports grants trademark;
SCHWABE. WILLIAMSON & WYAn. PC Attorneys at Law Pacwest Center
1211 SW 5th Ave . Suite 1900 Portland , OR 97204
Telephone 503.222 .9981 Fax 503 .796 .2900
Page 18 - COMPLAINT
PDXllI9802 / 163801IMAC /8887676.1
Case 3:12-cv-00196-SI Document 1 Filed 02/03/12 Page 18 of 22 Page ID#: 18
8/3/2019 Sportsgrants v. Crossfit
19/22
b. Producing, manufacturing, adapting, marketing, advertising,
selling, distributing, promoting, licensing, exhibiting or
displaying or using in any manner Sportsgrants' trademark in
connection with charity events;
c. Competing unfairly with Plaintiff in any manner.
8. That Defendants be required to account for all gains, profits and
advantages which they have derived from their infringement o f Sports grants ,
trademarks.
9. That Plaintiff be awarded Defendants' profits, treble Plaintiffs
damages, together with prejudgment and post-judgment interest, and reasonableattorney's fees and costs o f suit.
10. That Defendants be required to pay such relief to Sportsgrants as this
Court deems just and proper.
FOURTH CLAIM FO R RELIEF
(F or Violation of The Lanham Act By Dilution
Against All Defendants)
11. That Defendants and their agents, servants, employees, licensees and
all persons acting in concert or participation with them, and each of them, be
enjoined preliminarily and during the pendency o f this action, and permanently
thereafter, from using the name "Fight Gone Bad", or any other mark, word, or
name similar to Plaintiffs mark which are likely to cause confusion, mistake or to
deceive.
12. That Defendants be required to account to Plaintiff for any and all
profits derived by Defendants from the sale of their goods and for all damages
SCHWABE , WILLIAMSON & WYATT, PC Attorneys at Law Pacwest Center
t211 SW 5th Ave., Suit e 1900 Portland , OR 97204
Telephone 503.222 .9981 Fax 503 .796 .2900
Page 19 - COMPLAINT
PDXll19802/163801 / MAC / 8887676 1
Case 3:12-cv-00196-SI Document 1 Filed 02/03/12 Page 19 of 22 Page ID#: 19
8/3/2019 Sportsgrants v. Crossfit
20/22
sustained by Plaintiff by reason of said acts of infringement and unfair competition
complained of herein.
13. That Plaintiff be awarded Defendants' profits, treble Plaintiffs
damages, together with prejudgment and post-judgment interest, and reasonable
attorney's fees and costs of suit.
14. That Defendants be required to pay such other relief to Plaint iff as this
Court deems just and proper.
FIFTH CLAIM FOR RELIEF
(For Accounting Against All Defendants) 15. F or a complete accounting of all gains, profits and advantages derived
by Defendants from their wrongful acts.
ON ALL CLAIMS
(Against All Defendants)
16. F or attorneys' fees incurred herein pursuant to the Lanham Act.
17. For costs of suit and disbursements.
18. For such other relief as this Court deems just and proper.
SCHWABE , WILLIAMSON & WYAn, PCAtlomeys at Lawage 20 - COMPLAINTPacwest Center
1211 SW5thAve., Suite 1900 Portland, OR 97204
Telephone 503 .22 2.9981 Fax 503 .796 .2900
PDXll19802 / 163801fMAC/8887676I
Case 3:12-cv-00196-SI Document 1 Filed 02/03/12 Page 20 of 22 Page ID#: 20
8/3/2019 Sportsgrants v. Crossfit
21/22
Plaint iff requests trial by jury on all i ssues so triable.
Dated this 3rd day o f February, 2012.
Respectfully submitted,
SCHWABE, WILLIAMSON & WYATT,P.C.
By: ILL/J ~ JMichael A. Cohen, OSB # 965776Matthew R. Wilmot, OS B #061936Telephone 503.222.9981
Of Attorneys for Plaintiff, Sports grants, Inc.
SCHWABE, WILLIAMSON & W YA n , PCAttomeys at Lawage 21 - COMPLAINTPacwest Center
1211 SW 5th Ave ., Su ite 1900 Portland, OR 97204
Telephone 503 .222 ,9981 Fax 503.796 .2900
PDXl119802/1638011MAC /8887676.1
Case 3:12-cv-00196-SI Document 1 Filed 02/03/12 Page 21 of 22 Page ID#: 21
8/3/2019 Sportsgrants v. Crossfit
22/22
VERIFICATION OF COMPLAINT
I, Scott Zagarino, am the Chief Executive Officer of Sportsgrants, Inc., and am
authorized to execute this Verification in that capacity. I have read the foregoing
Complaint, and verify that the factual allegations therein are true and correct, and as
to those allegations alleged on information and belief, I believe them to be true and
correct.
I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States and the
State of Oregon that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed this Z day of
February, 2012, at Portland, Oregon.
t bhief Executive Officer,
Sportsgrants, Inc.
Case 3:12-cv-00196-SI Document 1 Filed 02/03/12 Page 22 of 22 Page ID#: 22