+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Spreadsheet Tools for Quantifying the Costs and … Tools for Quantifying the Costs and Benefits of...

Spreadsheet Tools for Quantifying the Costs and … Tools for Quantifying the Costs and Benefits of...

Date post: 24-Apr-2018
Category:
Upload: phunghanh
View: 218 times
Download: 2 times
Share this document with a friend
40
Spreadsheet Tools for Quantifying the Costs and Benefits of Two-Stage Channels J. Witter, A. Ward, D. Mecklenburg, J. D’Ambrosio, S. Roley, and J. Tank AWRA – Agricultural Hydrology and Water Quality II St. Louis, MO March 25, 2013
Transcript

Spreadsheet Tools for Quantifying the Costs and Benefits of Two-Stage Channels

J. Witter, A. Ward, D. Mecklenburg, J. D’Ambrosio, S. Roley, and J. Tank

AWRA – Agricultural Hydrology and Water Quality II St. Louis, MO

March 25, 2013

Decision Aids and Design Tools

• Assessment – Reference Reach Spreadsheet

• Benefits – Instream Nitrogen Tool

• Costs – Two-Stage Ditch Cost Estimator – Two-Stage Ditch Economic Analysis

• Design – Two-Stage Cross Sections – Bank Stability and Toe Erosion Model

http://www.dnr.state.oh.us/tabid/24137/Default.aspx

Powell, G.E., A.D. Ward, D.E. Mecklenburg, and A.D. Jayakaran. 2007. Two-stage channel systems: Part 1, a practical approach for sizing agricultural ditches. JSWC 62(4): 277-286.

Assessment: Reference Reach Spreadsheet

Pattern

Profile

Materials

Dimension

Assessment: Reference Reach Spreadsheet

Profile Sheet: Longitudinal Slope Profile

Assessment: Reference Reach Spreadsheet

Meander Pattern - Channel Plan Form More Info

This Worksheet

1) This sheet will graph the distance and azmuth entered in the profile worksheet.2) Fill in the values below using the graphed pattern, arialphotos, topo maps, etc.3) Before printing the graph, its width or height may needadjusting. "Square" the graph by clicking and dragging.

Meander Length min maxmeander length (ft) 280 280 490

Meander Widthbelt width (ft) 135 130 150

amplitude (ft)

Bendsradius (ft) 70 40 80

arc angle (degrees) 70 30 170

Sinuositystream length (ft) 388.4

valley length (ft) 285.9

Graph FormatZ scale: 10 Dimensions (ft) Ratios

Bankfull Width: 31.0 Sinuosity: 1.4show banks Meander Length: 280 (280 - 490 ) Meander Length Ratio: 9 (9 - 15.8 )

Belt Width: 135 (130 - 150 ) Meander Width Ratio: 4.4 (4.2 - 4.8 )show centerline Radius of Curvature: 70 (40 - 80 ) Radius / BkF Width: 2.3 (1.3 - 2.6 )

Reference ReachStream: Dogskin Run

Watershed: Little MuskingumLocation:

Latitude: 39.6346Longitude: 81.0278

County: MunroeDate:

Observers:

Channel Type: C4Drainage Area (sq.mi): 2.94Pattern

typical min maxbankfull width (ft) 31.00

meander length (ft) 280.0 280.0 490.0belt width (ft) 135.0 130.0 150.0amplitude (ft) --- --- ---

radius (ft) 70.0 40.0 80.0arc angle (degrees) 70.0 30.0 170.0

stream length (ft) 388.4valley length (ft) 285.9

Sinuosity 1.4Meander Length Ratio 9.0 9.0 15.8Meander Width Ratio 4.4 4.2 4.8

Radius Ratio 2.3 1.3 2.6

Dan Mecklenburg, Dawn Farver, Andy Ward, Pam Stackler, MichelleJune 24, 2002

Marietta Unit WNF

Dogskin Run Little Muskingum Marietta Unit WNF

-100

-50

0

50

100

150

200

250-300 -250 -200 -150 -100 -50 0 50

East West Distance

North

Sou

th D

istan

ce

Pattern Sheet: Meander Plan Form

Assessment: Reference Reach Spreadsheet

Two Individual

Pebble Counts

Weighted Pebble Count

Sieve Analysis for Two

Bulk Samples

Materials Sheet

Assessment: Reference Reach Spreadsheet

Dimension Sheet: Cross sectional dimension

X-section 1 X-section 2 X-section 8

Assessment: Reference Reach Spreadsheet

Distance

Foresight (Rod Reading)

Assessment: Reference Reach Spreadsheet

Cross Section 3

Bankfull Dimensions Flood Dimensions Materials83.0 x-section area (ft.sq.) 126.7 W flood prone area (ft) 39 threshold grain size (mm):49.6 width (ft) 2.6 entrenchment ratio 43 D50 Riffle (mm)1.7 mean depth (ft) --- low bank height (ft) 72 D84 Riffle (mm)2.8 max depth (ft) --- low bank height ratio51.3 wetted parimeter (ft)1.6 hyd radi (ft)29.6 width-depth ratio

Bankfull Flow Flow Resistance Forces & Power5.2 velocity (ft/s) 0.035 Manning's roughness 0.78 channel slope (%)

429.3 discharge rate (cfs) 0.12 D'Arcy-Weisbach fric. 0.79 shear stress (lb/sq.ft.)0.72 Froude number 8.1 resistance factor u/u* 0.64 shear velocity (ft/s)

7.1 relative roughness 4.2 unit strm power (lb/ft/s)

2 + 35.9 Dogskin Run, Riffle

92

94

96

98

100

102

-40 -20 0 20 40 60 80 100 120

Width (ft)

Elev

atio

n (ft

)Assessment: Reference Reach Spreadsheet

Comment Boxes explain equations, links or

instructions

Assessment: Reference Reach Spreadsheet

Benefits: Instream Nitrogen Tool Existing System

20.0 30.0 2.9

20.0 30.0 2.9

Benefits: Instream Nitrogen Tool Proposed Two-Stage System

Benefits: Instream Nitrogen Tool Denitrification Rates

Benefits: Instream Nitrogen Tool Hydrology

Benefits: Instream Nitrogen Tool Watershed Characteristics and Management

Benefits: Instream Nitrogen Tool Results

0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%

100%

Nitr

ogen

Dis

trib

utio

n

Trapezoidal Two-Stage

Total Export (lbs)Bed (lbs)Bench - Saturated (lbs)Bench - Unsaturated (lbs)Side Slopes (lbs)Buffer (lbs)Land Conversion (lbs)

0

200

400

600

800

1000

1200

1400

1600

N R

emov

ed (l

bs)

Trapezoidal Two-Stage

Bed (lbs)Bench - Saturated (lbs)Bench - Unsaturated (lbs)Side Slopes (lbs)

Buffer (lbs)Land Conversion (lbs)

Costs: Two-Stage Ditch Cost Estimator 1. Ditch Geometry

Costs: Two-Stage Ditch Cost Estimator 2. Earthwork

Costs: Two-Stage Ditch Cost Estimator 3. Tiles Outlets and Erosion Control Measures

• Outlet Protection • Drop Structures • Sloped Outlets • Rock Chutes • Berming • Rip Rap • Instream

Structures

Costs: Two-Stage Ditch Cost Estimator 4. Seed and Seeding Costs

Costs: Two-Stage Ditch Cost Estimator 5. Land Value & Profitability

• Mowing • Spraying • Clean Out

Costs - Two-Stage Ditch Cost Estimator 6. Maintenance Costs

Costs: Two-Stage Ditch Economic Analysis

Regional Geometry

Cross Sections

Profile

New Channel Dimensions

Design: Two-Stage Cross Section Plots

Distance

Rod Reading

Existing

Proposed

Design: Two-Stage Cross Section Plots

Cross Section 3 Earthwork Balance: cut 382 sq.ft. Bench Elevation: 704.4 ft

700702704706708710712714716

-100 -50 0 50 100 150Width (ft)

Elev

atio

n (ft

)

Design: Two-Stage Cross Section Plots

Design: Bank Stability and Toe Erosion Model 1. Channel Form

Design: Bank Stability and Toe Erosion Model 2. Vegetation and Bank/Toe Protection

Design: Bank Stability and Toe Erosion Model 3. Soil Physical Properties and Erodibility

Design: Bank Stability and Toe Erosion Model 4. Bank Stability

Design: Bank Stability and Toe Erosion Model 5. Hydraulic Erosion

Presenter
Presentation Notes
Export and reevaluate bank stability

Contact Information

• Jon Witter – [email protected] – (614)292-6538

• Andy Ward – [email protected] – (614)292-9354

• Jessica D’Ambrosio – [email protected] – (614)247-7876


Recommended